Blood pressure, frailty status, and all-cause mortality in elderly hypertensives; The Nambu Cohort Study

The bidirectional association between frailty index and cardiovascular disease: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Observational studies have suggested a relationship between frailty and cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the causality is still uncertain. We used bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) design to investigate the potential causal associations between frailty and four main CVDs, including hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms for frailty index (FI) and CVDs (hypertension, MI, HF, and AF) were selected as genetic instruments based on European-descent genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Summary-level data for outcomes on FI (n = 175,226), hypertension (n = 463,010), MI (n = 171,875), HF (n = 977323), and AF (n = 1,030,836) was derived from five large-scale GWASs of European ancestry. We used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method to examine the bidirectional associations between FI and CVDs in the main analyses. In the IVW MR analyses, genetically determined high FI was significantly associated with increased risks of hypertension (odds ratio [OR] per 1-SD increase: 1.07 [95 % confidence interval, 1.05-1.08]), MI (OR per 1-SD increase: 1.74 [1.21-2.51]), HF (OR per 1-SD increase: 1.28 [1.10-1.48]), and AF (OR per 1-SD increase: 1.20 [1.08-1.33]). In addition, genetically determined hypertension (beta: 1.406 [1.225-1.587]), MI (beta: 0.045 [0.023-0.067]), HF (beta: 0.105 [0.066-0.143]) and AF (beta: 0.021 [0.012-0.031]) were significantly associated with high FI. These findings were robustly supported by a series of sensitivity analyses with different MR models.

CONCLUSIONS

We found potential bidirectional causal associations between elevated FI and increased risks of CVD, suggesting mutual risk factors between frailty and CVD.

Prevalence and correlates of frailty in older hypertensive outpatients according to different tools: the HYPER-FRAIL pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To date, few studies have investigated frailty in hypertensive individuals. This study aimed at identifying the prevalence of frailty in a sample of hypertensive older outpatients using six different identification tools. Clinical correlates of frailty and agreement between different frailty definitions were also investigated.

METHODS

The HYPER-FRAIL pilot study recruited hypertensive patients aged at least 75 years from two geriatric outpatient clinics of Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy. Four frailty scales [Fried Frailty Phenotype, Frailty Index, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Frailty Postal Score] and two physical performance tests [Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and usual gait speed] were applied. The Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to assess agreement between measures. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify clinical features independently associated with frailty.

RESULTS

Among 121 participants (mean age 81, 60% women), frailty prevalence varied between 33 and 50% according to the tool used. Moderate agreement was observed between Fried Frailty Phenotype, Frailty Index and SPPB, and between Frailty Index and CFS. Agreement was minimal or weak between the remaining measures (K < 0.60). Use of walking aids and depressive symptoms were independently associated with frailty, regardless of the definition used. Frailty correlates also included dementia, disability and comorbidity burden, but not office and 24-h blood pressure values.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is highly prevalent among older hypertensive outpatients, but agreement between different frailty tools was moderate-to-weak. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the prognostic role of different frailty tools and their clinical utility in the choice of antihypertensive treatment.

Associations of blood pressure with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in over 2 million older persons with or without diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The impact of blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality outcomes in older people with diabetes mellitus (DM) is not well quantified. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies, we aimed to compare the associations of blood pressure levels with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in older people aged ≥ 65 years with or without DM.

METHODS

Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and search of bibliographies to July 2022. Study-specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

Forty-five unique observational cohort studies (n = 2305,189 participants) assessing the associations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels with adverse cardiovascular outcomes were included. In the general population, the pooled RRs (95% CIs) of SBP ≥ 140 vs < 140 mmHg and per 10 mmHg increase for composite CVD/MACE were 1.26 (0.96-1.64) and 1.15 (1.08-1.23), respectively. The respective estimates were 1.56 (1.04-2.34) and 1.10 (1.04-1.18) for patients with DM. SBP ≥ 130 vs < 130 mmHg was not associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both populations. SBP < 120 vs ≥ 120 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of all cause-mortality in the general population (n = 10 studies). DBP ≥ 90 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of some adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both populations. Interaction analyses suggested similar risk of outcomes in both populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational evidence suggests SBP and DBP confer similar cardiovascular and mortality risk in older adults in the general population and those with DM. A blood pressure target range of > 130/80 to < 140/90 mmHg may be optimal for patients ≥ 65 years with DM, but specific targets may need to be individualised based on patients' unique circumstances. Furthermore, findings do not support stringent blood pressure control in this population group. Definitive RCTs are needed to support these observational findings.

Current issues in frailty and hypertension management

The significance of hypertension management in older individuals is greatly influenced by factors other than chronological age, as they have diverse physical, mental, and social backgrounds. Differences in physical functions, between independence, frailty and dependence, have a great impact on antihypertensive therapy in the older population. While recent clinical trials support the significance of intensive antihypertensive therapy regardless of age, there is little evidence to positively support the significance of antihypertensive therapy for older patients with physical function requiring nursing care, and observational studies suggest that antihypertensive treatment may instead be harmful in these older patients. Therefore, frailty, the transitional state between independence and dependence with the need for nursing care, is conceivable to be the tipping point at which the balance of risks and benefits of antihypertensive treatment is converted. The increased risk of acute adverse outcome is another issue that complicates management in the practice of hypertension treatment in frail patients. Particularly, increased blood pressure variability manifested by orthostatic hypotension in frail patients can induce fall and fracture leading to disability shortly after initiation or modification of antihypertensive treatment. Future challenges to optimize the management of frail hypertensive patients include developing techniques to estimate treatment efficacy, identifying safe antihypertensive regimens that reduce the risk of falls, and establishing strategies to restore frail patients to robust health.

Elevated pulse pressure and cardiovascular risk associated in Spanish population attended in primary care: IBERICAN study

Introduction

Elevated pulse pressure (ePP) is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk (CVR) in people older than 60, and a functional marker of subclinical target organ damage (sTOD) which can predict cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension (HTN), regardless of sTOD.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of ePP in adult population seen in primary care and its association with other vascular risk factors, sTOD and with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Materials and methods

Observational multicentre study conducted in Spain (8,066 patients, 54.5% women) from the prospective cohort study IBERICAN recruited in Primary Care. Pulse pressure (PP) was defined as the difference between the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥60 mmHg. Adjusted (for age and sex) ePP prevalence were determined. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the possible variables associated with ePP were carried out.

Results

The mean of PP was 52.35 mmHg, and was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with HTN (56.58 vs. 48.45 mmHg) The prevalence of ePP adjusted for age and sex was 23.54% (25.40% men vs. 21.75% women; p < 0.0001). The ePP prevalence rates increased linearly with age (R2 = 0.979) and were significantly more frequent in population aged ≥65 than in population aged <65 (45.47% vs. 20.98%; p < 0.001). HTN, left ventricular hypertrophy, low estimated glomerular filtration rate, alcohol consumption, abdominal obesity, and CVD were independently associated with ePP. 66.27% of patients with ePP had a high or very high CVR, as compared with 36.57% of patients without ePP (OR: 3.41 [95% CI 3.08-3.77]).

Conclusions

The ePP was present in a quarter of our sample, and it was increased with the age. Also, the ePP was more frequent in men, patients with HTN, other TOD (as left ventricular hypertrophy or low estimated glomerular filtration rate) and CVD; because of this, the ePP was associated a higher cardiovascular risk. In our opinion, the ePP is an importer risk marker and its early identification lets to improve better diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Current topics of frailty in association with hypertension and other medical conditions

Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to stress resulting from physiological decline associated with aging. Topics of hypertension management and its association with frailty and cognitive function, recent studies of coronavirus disease 2019 infection (COVID-19) in elderly is discussed in this narrative review. While various guidelines for hypertension recommend that frailty is taken into account in treatment decisions, specific assessment tools and clinical decision criteria have not been explicitly established. Hypertension is prevalent in frail individuals, although a direct association has not been reported. Therefore, optimal blood pressure (BP) control is critical for managing cardiovascular risk reduction and preserving quality of life in frail hypertensive patients. BP typically decreases in later life or situations in which patients are dependent on nursing care. Mortality is reported to be high among frail patients with lower BP, raising questions about appropriate BP targets for frail patients. Cognitive decline is one of the domains of frailty, and is associated with a loss of autonomy, lack of self-management, and compromised quality of life. It remains to be clarified whether antihypertensive treatment is beneficial for cognitive function especially in older individuals. Increased severity and mortality of COVID-19 infection has been reported in older people. Clinical manifestations and biomarkers particular to older patients, and lifestyle changes including social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic is reported. From the knowledge from recent literatures, future perspectives for holistic approach and management of frail older people is addressed.

Insufficient blood pressure control is independently associated with increased arterial stiffness

Hypertension is a risk factor for atherosclerosis. Achieving the therapeutic target value of blood pressure (BP) prevents the onset of cardiovascular events; however, it is not clear how antihypertensive drug use and BP control status relate to arterial stiffness. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between BP control status with or without antihypertensive drugs and arterial stiffness. Nine hundred eighty individuals (mean age: 68 ± 11 years) who participated in a community-based cohort study were enrolled. Arterial stiffness was evaluated using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Higher BP was defined as a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg. Participants were divided into four groups: normal, non higher BP without antihypertensive drugs (n = 421); untreated, higher BP without antihypertensive drugs (n = 174); good control, non higher BP with antihypertensive drugs (n = 209); and poor control, higher BP with antihypertensive drugs (n = 176). In multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age, sex, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus medication use, obesity, smoking, alcohol drinking, and heart rate at the CAVI measurement for a high CAVI-using a borderline cutoff value of 8.0-the other three groups were significantly associated with a high CAVI when compared with the normal group. By contrast, multivariable logistic analysis of a high CAVI using an abnormal cutoff value of 9.0 demonstrated that the poor control and untreated groups were significantly associated with a high CAVI, whereas the good control group was not. In conclusion, even with antihypertensive drugs, poor BP control is independently associated with a high CAVI.

Update on Hypertension Research in 2021

In 2021, 217 excellent manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research. Editorial teams greatly appreciate the authors' contribution to hypertension research progress. Here, our editorial members have summarized twelve topics from published work and discussed current topics in depth. We hope you enjoy our special feature, "Update on Hypertension Research in 2021".

Systolic Blood Pressure and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Role of Frailty

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether frailty modifies the association of systolic blood pressure (SBP) with cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older adults.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A population-based study of nationally representative older Chinese adults in a community setting.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included participants aged 65 years or older from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey 2002-2014 and followed up to 2018.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were divided into two groups according to a frailty index based on the accumulation of a 44-items deficits model. The association between SBP and mortality was analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 18,503 participants included, the mean age was 87.2 years and the overall median follow-up time was 42.7 months. We identified 7808 (42.2%) frail participants (mean frailty index=0.33), in which 7533 (96.5%) died during the follow-up. Effect modification by frailty was detected (P for interaction=0.032). Among frail participants, a U-shaped association was found with hazard ratios of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.02-1.32) for SBP < 100 mmHg, and 1.11 (95% CI, 1.00-1.24) for SBP ≥ 150 mmHg compared with SBP 120-130 mmHg. For non-frail older adults, a tendency toward higher risk among those with SBP ≥ 130 mmHg was observed. The analyses towards cardiovascular mortality showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest the presence of effect modification by frailty indicating a possible negative effect for elevated SBP in non-frail older adults and a U-shaped relationship of SBP in frail older adults with respect to mortality even after adjusting for diastolic blood pressure.