1
|
Reed TT, Kendal AH, Wozniak KJ, Simmons LA. DNA replication initiation timing is important for maintaining genome integrity. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.18.599555. [PMID: 38948856 PMCID: PMC11212987 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.18.599555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication is regulated by factors that promote or inhibit initiation. In Bacillus subtilis, YabA is a negative regulator of DNA replication initiation while the newly identified kinase CcrZ is a positive regulator. The consequences of under-initiation or over-initiation of DNA replication to genome stability remain unclear. In this work, we measure origin to terminus ratios as a proxy for replication initiation activity. We show that ΔccrZ and several ccrZ alleles under-initiate DNA replication while ablation of yabA or overproduction of CcrZ leads to over-initiation. We find that cells under-initiating DNA replication have few incidents of replication fork stress as determined by low formation of RecA-GFP foci compared with wild type. In contrast, cells over-initiating DNA replication show levels of RecA-GFP foci formation analogous to cells directly challenged with DNA damaging agents. We show that cells under-initiating and over-initiating DNA replication were both sensitive to mitomycin C and that changes in replication initiation frequency cause increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. With these results, we propose that cells under-initiating DNA replication are sensitive to DNA damage due to a shortage of DNA for repair through homologous recombination. For cells over-initiating DNA replication, we propose that an increase in the number of replication forks leads to replication fork stress which is further exacerbated by chromosomal DNA damage. Together, our study shows that DNA replication initiation frequency must be tightly controlled as changes in initiation influence replication fork fate and the capacity of cells to efficiently repair damage to their genetic material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan T. Reed
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Abigail H. Kendal
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Katherine J Wozniak
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
- Present address: Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Lyle A. Simmons
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duardo RC, Marinello J, Russo M, Morelli S, Pepe S, Guerra F, Gómez-González B, Aguilera A, Capranico G. Human DNA topoisomerase I poisoning causes R loop-mediated genome instability attenuated by transcription factor IIS. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadm8196. [PMID: 38787953 PMCID: PMC11122683 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adm8196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
DNA topoisomerase I can contribute to cancer genome instability. During catalytic activity, topoisomerase I forms a transient intermediate, topoisomerase I-DNA cleavage complex (Top1cc) to allow strand rotation and duplex relaxation, which can lead to elevated levels of DNA-RNA hybrids and micronuclei. To comprehend the underlying mechanisms, we have integrated genomic data of Top1cc-triggered hybrids and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) shortly after Top1cc induction, revealing that Top1ccs increase hybrid levels with different mechanisms. DSBs are at highly transcribed genes in early replicating initiation zones and overlap with hybrids downstream of accumulated RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) at gene 5'-ends. A transcription factor IIS mutant impairing transcription elongation further increased RNAPII accumulation likely due to backtracking. Moreover, Top1ccs can trigger micronuclei when occurring during late G1 or early/mid S, but not during late S. As micronuclei and transcription-replication conflicts are attenuated by transcription factor IIS, our results support a role of RNAPII arrest in Top1cc-induced transcription-replication conflicts leading to DSBs and micronuclei.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée C. Duardo
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jessica Marinello
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Russo
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Morelli
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Pepe
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Guerra
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| | - Belén Gómez-González
- Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa—CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla–CSIC, Calle Américo Vespucio 24, 41092 Seville, Spain
- Departamento de Genetica, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Seville, Spain
| | - Andrés Aguilera
- Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa—CABIMER, Universidad de Sevilla–CSIC, Calle Américo Vespucio 24, 41092 Seville, Spain
- Departamento de Genetica, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Seville, Spain
| | - Giovanni Capranico
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Corazzi L, Ionasz VS, Andrejev S, Wang LC, Vouzas A, Giaisi M, Di Muzio G, Ding B, Marx AJM, Henkenjohann J, Allers MM, Gilbert DM, Wei PC. Linear interaction between replication and transcription shapes DNA break dynamics at recurrent DNA break Clusters. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3594. [PMID: 38678011 PMCID: PMC11055891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47934-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) are replication-transcription collision hotspots; many are unique to neural progenitor cells. Through high-resolution replication sequencing and a capture-ligation assay in mouse neural progenitor cells experiencing replication stress, we unravel the replication features dictating RDC location and orientation. Most RDCs occur at the replication forks traversing timing transition regions (TTRs), where sparse replication origins connect unidirectional forks. Leftward-moving forks generate telomere-connected DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while rightward-moving forks lead to centromere-connected DSBs. Strand-specific mapping for DNA-bound RNA reveals co-transcriptional dual-strand DNA:RNA hybrids present at a higher density in RDC than in other actively transcribed long genes. In addition, mapping RNA polymerase activity uncovers that head-to-head interactions between replication and transcription machinery result in 60% DSB contribution to the head-on compared to 40% for co-directional. Taken together we reveal TTR as a fragile class and show how the linear interaction between transcription and replication impacts genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Corazzi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivien S Ionasz
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Li-Chin Wang
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Athanasios Vouzas
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Marco Giaisi
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giulia Di Muzio
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Boyu Ding
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna J M Marx
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Henkenjohann
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael M Allers
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David M Gilbert
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Pei-Chi Wei
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Faculty of Bioscience, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Ruprecht-Karl-University of Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Zhangding Z, Liu X, Gan T, Ai C, Wu J, Liang H, Chen M, Guo Y, Lu R, Jiang Y, Ji X, Gao N, Kong D, Li Q, Hu J. Fork coupling directs DNA replication elongation and termination. Science 2024; 383:1215-1222. [PMID: 38484065 DOI: 10.1126/science.adj7606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication is initiated at multiple loci to ensure timely duplication of eukaryotic genomes. Sister replication forks progress bidirectionally, and replication terminates when two convergent forks encounter one another. To investigate the coordination of replication forks, we developed a replication-associated in situ HiC method to capture chromatin interactions involving nascent DNA. We identify more than 2000 fountain-like structures of chromatin contacts in human and mouse genomes, indicative of coupling of DNA replication forks. Replication fork interaction not only occurs between sister forks but also involves forks from two distinct origins to predetermine replication termination. Termination-associated chromatin fountains are sensitive to replication stress and lead to coupled forks-associated genomic deletions in cancers. These findings reveal the spatial organization of DNA replication forks within the chromatin context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Zhengrong Zhangding
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xuhao Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tingting Gan
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Peking University ChengDu Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Biotechnologies, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China
| | - Chen Ai
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jinchun Wu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Haoxin Liang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Mohan Chen
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yuefeng Guo
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
| | - Rusen Lu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Yongpeng Jiang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xiong Ji
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Ning Gao
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Daochun Kong
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Qing Li
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jiazhi Hu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University; Beijing 100871, China
- PKU-THU Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Peking University ChengDu Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Biotechnologies, Chengdu, Sichuan 610213, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yadav AK, Polasek-Sedlackova H. Quantity and quality of minichromosome maintenance protein complexes couple replication licensing to genome integrity. Commun Biol 2024; 7:167. [PMID: 38336851 PMCID: PMC10858283 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05855-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate and complete replication of genetic information is a fundamental process of every cell division. The replication licensing is the first essential step that lays the foundation for error-free genome duplication. During licensing, minichromosome maintenance protein complexes, the molecular motors of DNA replication, are loaded to genomic sites called replication origins. The correct quantity and functioning of licensed origins are necessary to prevent genome instability associated with severe diseases, including cancer. Here, we delve into recent discoveries that shed light on the novel functions of licensed origins, the pathways necessary for their proper maintenance, and their implications for cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anoop Kumar Yadav
- Department of Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Polasek-Sedlackova
- Department of Cell Biology and Epigenetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bournaka S, Badra-Fajardo N, Arbi M, Taraviras S, Lygerou Z. The cell cycle revisited: DNA replication past S phase preserves genome integrity. Semin Cancer Biol 2024; 99:45-55. [PMID: 38346544 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Accurate and complete DNA duplication is critical for maintaining genome integrity. Multiple mechanisms regulate when and where DNA replication takes place, to ensure that the entire genome is duplicated once and only once per cell cycle. Although the bulk of the genome is copied during the S phase of the cell cycle, increasing evidence suggests that parts of the genome are replicated in G2 or mitosis, in a last attempt to secure that daughter cells inherit an accurate copy of parental DNA. Remaining unreplicated gaps may be passed down to progeny and replicated in the next G1 or S phase. These findings challenge the long-established view that genome duplication occurs strictly during the S phase, bridging DNA replication to DNA repair and providing novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridoula Bournaka
- Department of General Biology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Nibal Badra-Fajardo
- Department of General Biology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Marina Arbi
- Department of General Biology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Stavros Taraviras
- Department of Physiology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Zoi Lygerou
- Department of General Biology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gulhan DC, Viswanadham V, Muyas F, Jin H, Foote MB, Lee JJK, Barras D, Jung YL, Ljungstrom V, Rousseau B, Galor A, Diplas BH, Maron SB, Cleary JM, Cortés-Ciriano I, Park PJ. Predicting response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy among mismatch repair-deficient patients using mutational signatures. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.01.19.24301236. [PMID: 38293061 PMCID: PMC10827269 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.19.24301236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Despite the overall efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) for mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) across tumor types, a sizable fraction of patients with MMRD still do not respond to ICB. We performed mutational signature analysis of panel sequencing data (n = 95) from MMRD cases treated with ICB. We discover that T>C-rich single base substitution (SBS) signatures-SBS26 and SBS54 from the COSMIC Mutational Signatures catalog-identify MMRD patients with significantly shorter overall survival. Tumors with a high burden of SBS26 show over-expression and enriched mutations of genes involved in double-strand break repair and other DNA repair pathways. They also display chromosomal instability (CIN), likely related to replication fork instability, leading to copy number losses that trigger immune evasion. SBS54 is associated with transcriptional activity and not with CIN, defining a distinct subtype. Consistently, cancer cell lines with a high burden of SBS26 and SBS54 are sensitive to treatments targeting pathways related to their proposed etiology. Together, our analysis offers an explanation for the heterogeneous responses to ICB among MMRD patients and supports an SBS signature-based predictor as a prognostic biomarker for differential ICB response.
Collapse
|
8
|
Khamidullina AI, Abramenko YE, Bruter AV, Tatarskiy VV. Key Proteins of Replication Stress Response and Cell Cycle Control as Cancer Therapy Targets. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1263. [PMID: 38279263 PMCID: PMC10816012 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Replication stress (RS) is a characteristic state of cancer cells as they tend to exchange precision of replication for fast proliferation and increased genomic instability. To overcome the consequences of improper replication control, malignant cells frequently inactivate parts of their DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway), while relying on other pathways which help to maintain replication fork stability (ATR-CHK1). This creates a dependency on the remaining DDR pathways, vulnerability to further destabilization of replication and synthetic lethality of DDR inhibitors with common oncogenic alterations such as mutations of TP53, RB1, ATM, amplifications of MYC, CCNE1 and others. The response to RS is normally limited by coordination of cell cycle, transcription and replication. Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases, which prevent unscheduled mitosis entry, leads to fragility of under-replicated sites. Recent evidence also shows that inhibition of Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), such as CDK4/6, CDK2, CDK8/19 and CDK12/13 can contribute to RS through disruption of DNA repair and replication control. Here, we review the main causes of RS in cancers as well as main therapeutic targets-ATR, CHK1, PARP and their inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvina I. Khamidullina
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncobiology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia; (A.I.K.); (Y.E.A.)
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia
| | - Yaroslav E. Abramenko
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncobiology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia; (A.I.K.); (Y.E.A.)
| | - Alexandra V. Bruter
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor V. Tatarskiy
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncobiology, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia; (A.I.K.); (Y.E.A.)
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilov Street, 119334 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spegg V, Altmeyer M. Genome maintenance meets mechanobiology. Chromosoma 2024; 133:15-36. [PMID: 37581649 PMCID: PMC10904543 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-023-00807-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Genome stability is key for healthy cells in healthy organisms, and deregulated maintenance of genome integrity is a hallmark of aging and of age-associated diseases including cancer and neurodegeneration. To maintain a stable genome, genome surveillance and repair pathways are closely intertwined with cell cycle regulation and with DNA transactions that occur during transcription and DNA replication. Coordination of these processes across different time and length scales involves dynamic changes of chromatin topology, clustering of fragile genomic regions and repair factors into nuclear repair centers, mobilization of the nuclear cytoskeleton, and activation of cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we provide a general overview of cell cycle regulation and of the processes involved in genome duplication in human cells, followed by an introduction to replication stress and to the cellular responses elicited by perturbed DNA synthesis. We discuss fragile genomic regions that experience high levels of replication stress, with a particular focus on telomere fragility caused by replication stress at the ends of linear chromosomes. Using alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) in cancer cells and ALT-associated PML bodies (APBs) as examples of replication stress-associated clustered DNA damage, we discuss compartmentalization of DNA repair reactions and the role of protein properties implicated in phase separation. Finally, we highlight emerging connections between DNA repair and mechanobiology and discuss how biomolecular condensates, components of the nuclear cytoskeleton, and interfaces between membrane-bound organelles and membraneless macromolecular condensates may cooperate to coordinate genome maintenance in space and time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Spegg
- Department of Molecular Mechanisms of Disease, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Altmeyer
- Department of Molecular Mechanisms of Disease, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Irony-Tur Sinai M, Kerem B. Insights into common fragile site instability: DNA replication challenges at DNA repeat sequences. Emerg Top Life Sci 2023; 7:277-287. [PMID: 37876349 PMCID: PMC10754330 DOI: 10.1042/etls20230023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFS) are specific genomic regions prone to chromosomal instability under conditions of DNA replication stress. CFSs manifest as breaks, gaps, and constrictions on metaphase chromosomes under mild replication stress. These replication-sensitive CFS regions are preferentially unstable during cancer development, as reflected by their association with copy number variants (CNVs) frequently arise in most tumor types. Over the years, it became clear that a combination of different characteristics underlies the enhanced sensitivity of CFSs to replication stress. As of today, there is a strong evidence that the core fragility regions along CFSs overlap with actively transcribed large genes with delayed replication timing upon replication stress. Recently, the mechanistic basis for CFS instability was further extended to regions which span topologically associated domain (TAD) boundaries, generating a fragility signature composed of replication, transcription and genome organization. The presence of difficult-to-replicate AT-rich repeats was one of the early features suggested to characterize a subgroup of CFSs. These long stretches of AT-dinucleotide have the potential to fold into stable secondary structures which may impede replication fork progression, leaving the region under-replicated. Here, we focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying repeat instability at CFSs and on the proteins involved in the resolution of secondary structure impediments arising along repetitive sequence elements which are essential for the maintenance of genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Irony-Tur Sinai
- Department of Genetics, The Life Sciences Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Batsheva Kerem
- Department of Genetics, The Life Sciences Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Malzl D, Peycheva M, Rahjouei A, Gnan S, Klein KN, Nazarova M, Schoeberl UE, Gilbert DM, Buonomo SCB, Di Virgilio M, Neumann T, Pavri R. RIF1 regulates early replication timing in murine B cells. Nat Commun 2023; 14:8049. [PMID: 38081811 PMCID: PMC10713614 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43778-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The mammalian DNA replication timing (RT) program is crucial for the proper functioning and integrity of the genome. The best-known mechanism for controlling RT is the suppression of late origins of replication in heterochromatin by RIF1. Here, we report that in antigen-activated, hypermutating murine B lymphocytes, RIF1 binds predominantly to early-replicating active chromatin and promotes early replication, but plays a minor role in regulating replication origin activity, gene expression and genome organization in B cells. Furthermore, we find that RIF1 functions in a complementary and non-epistatic manner with minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins to establish early RT signatures genome-wide and, specifically, to ensure the early replication of highly transcribed genes. These findings reveal additional layers of regulation within the B cell RT program, driven by the coordinated activity of RIF1 and MCM proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Malzl
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090, Lazarettgasse 14, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mihaela Peycheva
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria
- CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090, Lazarettgasse 14, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ali Rahjouei
- Max-Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Gnan
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UK
| | - Kyle N Klein
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Mariia Nazarova
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula E Schoeberl
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - David M Gilbert
- San Diego Biomedical Research Institute, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Sara C B Buonomo
- School of Biological Sciences, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UK
| | - Michela Di Virgilio
- Max-Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Neumann
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
- Quantro Therapeutics, Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Rushad Pavri
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Transcription and replication both require large macromolecular complexes to act on a DNA template, yet these machineries cannot simultaneously act on the same DNA sequence. Conflicts between the replication and transcription machineries (transcription-replication conflicts, or TRCs) are widespread in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and have the capacity to both cause DNA damage and compromise complete, faithful replication of the genome. This review will highlight recent studies investigating the genomic locations of TRCs and the mechanisms by which they may be prevented, mitigated, or resolved. We address work from both model organisms and mammalian systems but predominantly focus on multicellular eukaryotes owing to the additional complexities inherent in the coordination of replication and transcription in the context of cell type-specific gene expression and higher-order chromatin organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana Goehring
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA;
| | - Tony T Huang
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA;
| | - Duncan J Smith
- Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang N, Xu S, Egli D. Replication stress in mammalian embryo development, differentiation, and reprogramming. Trends Cell Biol 2023; 33:872-886. [PMID: 37202286 PMCID: PMC11214770 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Duplicating a genome of 3 billion nucleotides is challenged by a variety of obstacles that can cause replication stress and affect the integrity of the genome. Recent studies show that replication fork slowing and stalling is prevalent in early mammalian development, resulting in genome instability and aneuploidy, and constituting a barrier to development in human reproduction. Genome instability resulting from DNA replication stress is a barrier to the cloning of animals and to the reprogramming of differentiated cells to induced pluripotent stem cells, as well as a barrier to cell transformation. Remarkably, the regions most impacted by replication stress are shared in these different cellular contexts, affecting long genes and flanking intergenic areas. In this review we integrate our knowledge of DNA replication stress in mammalian embryos, in programming, and in reprogramming, and we discuss a potential role for fragile sites in sensing replication stress and restricting cell cycle progression in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Wang
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Shuangyi Xu
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Dieter Egli
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kislova AV, Zheglo D, Pozhitnova VO, Sviridov PS, Gadzhieva EP, Voronina ES. Replication stress causes delayed mitotic entry and chromosome 12 fragility at the ANKS1B large neuronal gene in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Chromosome Res 2023; 31:23. [PMID: 37597021 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-023-09729-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
Substantial background level of replication stress is a feature of embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can predispose to numerical and structural chromosomal instability, including recurrent aberrations of chromosome 12. In differentiated cells, replication stress-sensitive genomic regions, including common fragile sites, are widely mapped through mitotic chromosome break induction by mild aphidicolin treatment, an inhibitor of replicative polymerases. IPSCs exhibit lower apoptotic threshold and higher repair capacity hindering fragile site mapping. Caffeine potentiates genotoxic effects and abrogates G2/M checkpoint delay induced by chemical and physical mutagens. Using 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) for replication labeling, we characterized the mitotic entry dynamics of asynchronous iPSCs exposed to aphidicolin and/or caffeine. Under the adjusted timing of replication stress exposure accounting revealed cell cycle delay, higher metaphase chromosome breakage rate was observed in iPSCs compared to primary lymphocytes. Using differential chromosome staining and subsequent locus-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization, we mapped the FRA12L fragile site spanning the large neuronal ANKS1B gene at 12q23.1, which may contribute to recurrent chromosome 12 missegregation and rearrangements in iPSCs. Publicly available data on the ANKS1B genetic alterations and their possible functional impact are reviewed. Our study provides the first evidence of common fragile site induction in iPSCs and reveals potential somatic instability of a clinically relevant gene during early human development and in vitro cell expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana Zheglo
- Laboratory of Mutagenesis, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.
| | | | - Philipp S Sviridov
- Laboratory of Mutagenesis, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elmira P Gadzhieva
- Laboratory of Mutagenesis, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu J, Liu Y, Zhangding Z, Liu X, Ai C, Gan T, Liang H, Guo Y, Chen M, Liu Y, Yin J, Zhang W, Hu J. Cohesin maintains replication timing to suppress DNA damage on cancer genes. Nat Genet 2023; 55:1347-1358. [PMID: 37500731 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01458-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Cohesin loss-of-function mutations are frequently observed in tumors, but the mechanism underlying its role in tumorigenesis is unclear. Here, we found that depletion of RAD21, a core subunit of cohesin, leads to massive genome-wide DNA breaks and 147 translocation hotspot genes, co-mutated with cohesin in multiple cancers. Increased DNA damages are independent of RAD21-loss-induced transcription alteration and loop anchor disruption. However, damage-induced chromosomal translocations coincide with the asymmetrically distributed Okazaki fragments of DNA replication, suggesting that RAD21 depletion causes replication stresses evidenced by the slower replication speed and increased stalled forks. Mechanistically, approximately 30% of the human genome exhibits an earlier replication timing after RAD21 depletion, caused by the early initiation of >900 extra dormant origins. Correspondingly, most translocation hotspot genes lie in timing-altered regions. Therefore, we conclude that cohesin dysfunction causes replication stresses induced by excessive DNA replication initiation, resulting in gross DNA damages that may promote tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinchun Wu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengrong Zhangding
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuhao Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Ai
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Gan
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Haoxin Liang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuefeng Guo
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Mohan Chen
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yiyang Liu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianhang Yin
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Weiwei Zhang
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiazhi Hu
- The MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laufer VA, Glover TW, Wilson TE. Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation. MUTATION RESEARCH. REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2023; 792:108475. [PMID: 37931775 PMCID: PMC10792551 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomal structural variation (SV) encompasses a heterogenous class of genetic variants that exerts strong influences on human health and disease. Despite their importance, many structural variants (SVs) have remained poorly characterized at even a basic level, a discrepancy predicated upon the technical limitations of prior genomic assays. However, recent advances in genomic technology can identify and localize SVs accurately, opening new questions regarding SV risk factors and their impacts in humans. Here, we first define and classify human SVs and their generative mechanisms, highlighting characteristics leveraged by various SV assays. We next examine the first-ever gapless assembly of the human genome and the technical process of assembling it, which required third-generation sequencing technologies to resolve structurally complex loci. The new portions of that "telomere-to-telomere" and subsequent pangenome assemblies highlight aspects of SV biology likely to develop in the near-term. We consider the strengths and limitations of the most promising new SV technologies and when they or longstanding approaches are best suited to meeting salient goals in the study of human SV in population-scale genomics research, clinical, and public health contexts. It is a watershed time in our understanding of human SV when new approaches are expected to fundamentally change genomic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent A Laufer
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Thomas W Glover
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Thomas E Wilson
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brison O, Gnan S, Azar D, Koundrioukoff S, Melendez-Garcia R, Kim SJ, Schmidt M, El-Hilali S, Jaszczyszyn Y, Lachages AM, Thermes C, Chen CL, Debatisse M. Mistimed origin licensing and activation stabilize common fragile sites under tight DNA-replication checkpoint activation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2023; 30:539-550. [PMID: 37024657 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-00949-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Genome integrity requires replication to be completed before chromosome segregation. The DNA-replication checkpoint (DRC) contributes to this coordination by inhibiting CDK1, which delays mitotic onset. Under-replication of common fragile sites (CFSs), however, escapes surveillance, resulting in mitotic chromosome breaks. Here we asked whether loose DRC activation induced by modest stresses commonly used to destabilize CFSs could explain this leakage. We found that tightening DRC activation or CDK1 inhibition stabilizes CFSs in human cells. Repli-Seq and molecular combing analyses showed a burst of replication initiations implemented in mid S-phase across a subset of late-replicating sequences, including CFSs, while the bulk genome was unaffected. CFS rescue and extra-initiations required CDC6 and CDT1 availability in S-phase, implying that CDK1 inhibition permits mistimed origin licensing and firing. In addition to delaying mitotic onset, tight DRC activation therefore supports replication completion of late origin-poor domains at risk of under-replication, two complementary roles preserving genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Brison
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Stefano Gnan
- Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 3244, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Dana Azar
- Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 3244, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Laboratoire Biodiversité et Génomique Fonctionnelle, Faculté des Sciences, Université Saint-Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Stéphane Koundrioukoff
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Rodrigo Melendez-Garcia
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Su-Jung Kim
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Mélanie Schmidt
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Sami El-Hilali
- Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 3244, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Villefranche sur mer Developmental Biology Laboratory, CNRS UMR7009, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
| | - Yan Jaszczyszyn
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), UMR 9198CNRS, CEA, Paris-Sud University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Anne-Marie Lachages
- Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 3244, Paris, France
- UTCBS, CNRS UMR 8258/ INSERM U 1267, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Claude Thermes
- Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), UMR 9198CNRS, CEA, Paris-Sud University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Chun-Long Chen
- Curie Institute, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 3244, Paris, France
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Michelle Debatisse
- CNRS UMR 9019, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang G, Vasquez KM. Dynamic alternative DNA structures in biology and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2023; 24:211-234. [PMID: 36316397 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00539-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Repetitive elements in the human genome, once considered 'junk DNA', are now known to adopt more than a dozen alternative (that is, non-B) DNA structures, such as self-annealed hairpins, left-handed Z-DNA, three-stranded triplexes (H-DNA) or four-stranded guanine quadruplex structures (G4 DNA). These dynamic conformations can act as functional genomic elements involved in DNA replication and transcription, chromatin organization and genome stability. In addition, recent studies have revealed a role for these alternative structures in triggering error-generating DNA repair processes, thereby actively enabling genome plasticity. As a driving force for genetic variation, non-B DNA structures thus contribute to both disease aetiology and evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guliang Wang
- Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Paediatric Research Institute, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Karen M Vasquez
- Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Paediatric Research Institute, Austin, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu Y, Wu X, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Thermes C, Chen CL. OKseqHMM: a genome-wide replication fork directionality analysis toolkit. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:e22. [PMID: 36629249 PMCID: PMC9976876 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac1239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
During each cell division, tens of thousands of DNA replication origins are co-ordinately activated to ensure the complete duplication of the human genome. However, replication fork progression can be challenged by many factors, including co-directional and head-on transcription-replication conflicts (TRC). Head-on TRCs are more dangerous for genome integrity. To study the direction of replication fork movement and TRCs, we developed a bioinformatics toolkit called OKseqHMM (https://github.com/CL-CHEN-Lab/OK-Seq, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428883). Then, we used OKseqHMM to analyse a large number of datasets obtained by Okazaki fragment sequencing to directly measure the genome-wide replication fork directionality (RFD) and to accurately predict replication initiation and termination at a fine resolution in organisms including yeast, mouse and human. We also successfully applied our analysis to other genome-wide sequencing techniques that also contain RFD information (e.g. eSPAN, TrAEL-seq). Our toolkit can be used to predict replication initiation and fork progression direction genome-wide in a wide range of cell models and growth conditions. Comparing the replication and transcription directions allows identifying loci at risk of TRCs, particularly head-on TRCs, and investigating their role in genome instability by checking DNA damage data, which is of prime importance for human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqun Liu
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR3244, Dynamics of Genetic Information, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Xia Wu
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR3244, Dynamics of Genetic Information, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Claude Thermes
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Chun-Long Chen
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR3244, Dynamics of Genetic Information, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Benitez A, Sebald M, Kanagaraj R, Rodrigo-Brenni MC, Chan YW, Liang CC, West SC. GEN1 promotes common fragile site expression. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112062. [PMID: 36729836 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Our genomes harbor conserved DNA sequences, known as common fragile sites (CFSs), that are difficult to replicate and correspond to regions of genome instability. Following replication stress, CFS loci give rise to breaks or gaps (termed CFS expression) where under-replicated DNA subsequently undergoes mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS). We show that loss of the structure-selective endonuclease GEN1 reduces CFS expression, leading to defects in MiDAS, ultrafine anaphase bridge formation, and DNA damage in the ensuing cell cycle due to aberrant chromosome segregation. GEN1 knockout cells also exhibit an elevated frequency of bichromatid constrictions consistent with the presence of unresolved regions of under-replicated DNA. Previously, the role of GEN1 was thought to be restricted to the nucleolytic resolution of recombination intermediates. However, its ability to cleave under-replicated DNA at CFS loci indicates that GEN1 plays a dual role resolving both DNA replication and recombination intermediates before chromosome segregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaid Benitez
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Marie Sebald
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Radhakrishnan Kanagaraj
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Monica C Rodrigo-Brenni
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Ying Wai Chan
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Chih-Chao Liang
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Stephen C West
- The Francis Crick Institute, DNA Recombination and Repair Laboratory, 1 Midland Road, London NW1 1AT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hu Y, Stillman B. Origins of DNA replication in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 2023; 83:352-372. [PMID: 36640769 PMCID: PMC9898300 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Errors occurring during DNA replication can result in inaccurate replication, incomplete replication, or re-replication, resulting in genome instability that can lead to diseases such as cancer or disorders such as autism. A great deal of progress has been made toward understanding the entire process of DNA replication in eukaryotes, including the mechanism of initiation and its control. This review focuses on the current understanding of how the origin recognition complex (ORC) contributes to determining the location of replication initiation in the multiple chromosomes within eukaryotic cells, as well as methods for mapping the location and temporal patterning of DNA replication. Origin specification and configuration vary substantially between eukaryotic species and in some cases co-evolved with gene-silencing mechanisms. We discuss the possibility that centromeres and origins of DNA replication were originally derived from a common element and later separated during evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixin Hu
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA; Program in Molecular and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Bruce Stillman
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Genome-wide measurement of DNA replication fork directionality and quantification of DNA replication initiation and termination with Okazaki fragment sequencing. Nat Protoc 2023; 18:1260-1295. [PMID: 36653528 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00793-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Studying the dynamics of genome replication in mammalian cells has been historically challenging. To reveal the location of replication initiation and termination in the human genome, we developed Okazaki fragment sequencing (OK-seq), a quantitative approach based on the isolation and strand-specific sequencing of Okazaki fragments, the lagging strand replication intermediates. OK-seq quantitates the proportion of leftward- and rightward-oriented forks at every genomic locus and reveals the location and efficiency of replication initiation and termination events. Here we provide the detailed experimental procedures for performing OK-seq in unperturbed cultured human cells and budding yeast and the bioinformatics pipelines for data processing and computation of replication fork directionality. Furthermore, we present the analytical approach based on a hidden Markov model, which allows automated detection of ascending, descending and flat replication fork directionality segments revealing the zones of replication initiation, termination and unidirectional fork movement across the entire genome. These tools are essential for the accurate interpretation of human and yeast replication programs. The experiments and the data processing can be accomplished within six days. Besides revealing the genome replication program in fine detail, OK-seq has been instrumental in numerous studies unravelling mechanisms of genome stability, epigenome maintenance and genome evolution.
Collapse
|
23
|
Said M, Barra V, Balzano E, Talhaoui I, Pelliccia F, Giunta S, Naim V. FANCD2 promotes mitotic rescue from transcription-mediated replication stress in SETX-deficient cancer cells. Commun Biol 2022; 5:1395. [PMID: 36543851 PMCID: PMC9772326 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04360-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication stress (RS) is a leading cause of genome instability and cancer development. A substantial source of endogenous RS originates from the encounter between the transcription and replication machineries operating on the same DNA template. This occurs predominantly under specific contexts, such as oncogene activation, metabolic stress, or a deficiency in proteins that specifically act to prevent or resolve those transcription-replication conflicts (TRCs). One such protein is Senataxin (SETX), an RNA:DNA helicase involved in resolution of TRCs and R-loops. Here we identify a synthetic lethal interaction between SETX and proteins of the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway. Depletion of SETX induces spontaneous under-replication and chromosome fragility due to active transcription and R-loops that persist in mitosis. These fragile loci are targeted by the Fanconi anemia protein, FANCD2, to facilitate the resolution of under-replicated DNA, thus preventing chromosome mis-segregation and allowing cells to proliferate. Mechanistically, we show that FANCD2 promotes mitotic DNA synthesis that is dependent on XPF and MUS81 endonucleases. Importantly, co-depleting FANCD2 together with SETX impairs cancer cell proliferation, without significantly affecting non-cancerous cells. Therefore, we uncovered a synthetic lethality between SETX and FA proteins for tolerance of transcription-mediated RS that may be exploited for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Said
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388CNRS UMR9019, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Viviana Barra
- grid.10776.370000 0004 1762 5517Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Elisa Balzano
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Biology & Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Ibtissam Talhaoui
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388CNRS UMR9019, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Franca Pelliccia
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Biology & Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Simona Giunta
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Biology & Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Valeria Naim
- grid.14925.3b0000 0001 2284 9388CNRS UMR9019, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rhind N. DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance. Bioessays 2022; 44:e2200097. [PMID: 36125226 PMCID: PMC9783711 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202200097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The regulation of DNA replication is a fascinating biological problem both from a mechanistic angle-How is replication timing regulated?-and from an evolutionary one-Why is replication timing regulated? Recent work has provided significant insight into the first question. Detailed biochemical understanding of the mechanism and regulation of replication initiation has made possible robust hypotheses for how replication timing is regulated. Moreover, technical progress, including high-throughput, single-molecule mapping of replication initiation and single-cell assays of replication timing, has allowed for direct testing of these hypotheses in mammalian cells. This work has consolidated the conclusion that differential replication timing is a consequence of the varying probability of replication origin initiation. The second question is more difficult to directly address experimentally. Nonetheless, plausible hypotheses can be made and one-that replication timing contributes to the regulation of chromatin structure-has received new experimental support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Rhind
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shaikh N, Mazzagatti A, De Angelis S, Johnson SC, Bakker B, Spierings DCJ, Wardenaar R, Maniati E, Wang J, Boemo MA, Foijer F, McClelland SE. Replication stress generates distinctive landscapes of DNA copy number alterations and chromosome scale losses. Genome Biol 2022; 23:223. [PMID: 36266663 PMCID: PMC9583511 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02781-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A major driver of cancer chromosomal instability is replication stress, the slowing or stalling of DNA replication. How replication stress and genomic instability are connected is not known. Aphidicolin-induced replication stress induces breakages at common fragile sites, but the exact causes of fragility are debated, and acute genomic consequences of replication stress are not fully explored. RESULTS We characterize DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) in single, diploid non-transformed cells, caused by one cell cycle in the presence of either aphidicolin or hydroxyurea. Multiple types of CNAs are generated, associated with different genomic regions and features, and observed copy number landscapes are distinct between aphidicolin and hydroxyurea-induced replication stress. Coupling cell type-specific analysis of CNAs to gene expression and single-cell replication timing analyses pinpointed the causative large genes of the most recurrent chromosome-scale CNAs in aphidicolin. These are clustered on chromosome 7 in RPE1 epithelial cells but chromosome 1 in BJ fibroblasts. Chromosome arm level CNAs also generate acentric lagging chromatin and micronuclei containing these chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS Chromosomal instability driven by replication stress occurs via focal CNAs and chromosome arm scale changes, with the latter confined to a very small subset of chromosome regions, potentially heavily skewing cancer genome evolution. Different inducers of replication stress lead to distinctive CNA landscapes providing the opportunity to derive copy number signatures of specific replication stress mechanisms. Single-cell CNA analysis thus reveals the impact of replication stress on the genome, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms which fuel chromosomal instability in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem Shaikh
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Alice Mazzagatti
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Simone De Angelis
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Sarah C Johnson
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Bjorn Bakker
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713, AV, the Netherlands
- Current address: The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Diana C J Spierings
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713, AV, the Netherlands
| | - René Wardenaar
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713, AV, the Netherlands
| | - Eleni Maniati
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Jun Wang
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Michael A Boemo
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK
| | - Floris Foijer
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713, AV, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah E McClelland
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Processing DNA lesions during mitosis to prevent genomic instability. Biochem Soc Trans 2022; 50:1105-1118. [PMID: 36040211 PMCID: PMC9444068 DOI: 10.1042/bst20220049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Failure of cells to process toxic double-strand breaks (DSBs) constitutes a major intrinsic source of genome instability, a hallmark of cancer. In contrast with interphase of the cell cycle, canonical repair pathways in response to DSBs are inactivated in mitosis. Although cell cycle checkpoints prevent transmission of DNA lesions into mitosis under physiological condition, cancer cells frequently display mitotic DNA lesions. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of how mitotic cells process lesions that escape checkpoint surveillance. We outline mechanisms that regulate the mitotic DNA damage response and the different types of lesions that are carried over to mitosis, with a focus on joint DNA molecules arising from under-replication and persistent recombination intermediates, as well as DNA catenanes. Additionally, we discuss the processing pathways that resolve each of these lesions in mitosis. Finally, we address the acute and long-term consequences of unresolved mitotic lesions on cellular fate and genome stability.
Collapse
|
27
|
Bhowmick R, Lerdrup M, Gadi SA, Rossetti GG, Singh MI, Liu Y, Halazonetis TD, Hickson ID. RAD51 protects human cells from transcription-replication conflicts. Mol Cell 2022; 82:3366-3381.e9. [PMID: 36002000 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Oncogene activation during tumorigenesis promotes DNA replication stress (RS), which subsequently drives the formation of cancer-associated chromosomal rearrangements. Many episodes of physiological RS likely arise due to conflicts between the DNA replication and transcription machineries operating simultaneously at the same loci. One role of the RAD51 recombinase in human cells is to protect replication forks undergoing RS. Here, we have identified a key role for RAD51 in preventing transcription-replication conflicts (TRCs) from triggering replication fork breakage. The genomic regions most affected by RAD51 deficiency are characterized by being replicated and transcribed in early S-phase and show significant overlap with loci prone to cancer-associated amplification. Consistent with a role for RAD51 in protecting against transcription-replication conflicts, many of the adverse effects of RAD51 depletion are ameliorated by inhibiting early S-phase transcription. We propose a model whereby RAD51 suppresses fork breakage and subsequent inadvertent amplification of genomic loci prone to experiencing TRCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Bhowmick
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Mads Lerdrup
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Sampath Amitash Gadi
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Giacomo G Rossetti
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, 30, quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Manika I Singh
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Ying Liu
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Thanos D Halazonetis
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, 30, quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ian D Hickson
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Palmerola KL, Amrane S, De Los Angeles A, Xu S, Wang N, de Pinho J, Zuccaro MV, Taglialatela A, Massey DJ, Turocy J, Robles A, Subbiah A, Prosser B, Lobo R, Ciccia A, Koren A, Baslan T, Egli D. Replication stress impairs chromosome segregation and preimplantation development in human embryos. Cell 2022; 185:2988-3007.e20. [PMID: 35858625 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Human cleavage-stage embryos frequently acquire chromosomal aneuploidies during mitosis due to unknown mechanisms. Here, we show that S phase at the 1-cell stage shows replication fork stalling, low fork speed, and DNA synthesis extending into G2 phase. DNA damage foci consistent with collapsed replication forks, DSBs, and incomplete replication form in G2 in an ATR- and MRE11-dependent manner, followed by spontaneous chromosome breakage and segmental aneuploidies. Entry into mitosis with incomplete replication results in chromosome breakage, whole and segmental chromosome errors, micronucleation, chromosome fragmentation, and poor embryo quality. Sites of spontaneous chromosome breakage are concordant with sites of DNA synthesis in G2 phase, locating to gene-poor regions with long neural genes, which are transcriptionally silent at this stage of development. Thus, DNA replication stress in mammalian preimplantation embryos predisposes gene-poor regions to fragility, and in particular in the human embryo, to the formation of aneuploidies, impairing developmental potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L Palmerola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Selma Amrane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Alejandro De Los Angeles
- Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Shuangyi Xu
- Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Masters of Biotechnology Program, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Joao de Pinho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael V Zuccaro
- Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Angelo Taglialatela
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Dashiell J Massey
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Jenna Turocy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Alex Robles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Anisa Subbiah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Bob Prosser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Rogerio Lobo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Alberto Ciccia
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Amnon Koren
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Timour Baslan
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Dieter Egli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Pediatrics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aska EM, Zagidullin B, Pitkänen E, Kauppi L. Single-Cell Mononucleotide Microsatellite Analysis Reveals Differential Insertion-Deletion Dynamics in Mouse T Cells. Front Genet 2022; 13:913163. [PMID: 35873465 PMCID: PMC9304711 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.913163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite sequences are particularly prone to slippage during DNA replication, forming insertion-deletion loops that, if left unrepaired, result in de novo mutations (expansions or contractions of the repeat array). Mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical DNA repair mechanism that corrects these insertion-deletion loops, thereby maintaining microsatellite stability. MMR deficiency gives rise to the molecular phenotype known as microsatellite instability (MSI). By sequencing MMR-proficient and -deficient (Mlh1+/+ and Mlh1−/−) single-cell exomes from mouse T cells, we reveal here several previously unrecognized features of in vivo MSI. Specifically, mutational dynamics of insertions and deletions were different on multiple levels. Factors that associated with propensity of mononucleotide microsatellites to insertions versus deletions were: microsatellite length, nucleotide composition of the mononucleotide tract, gene length and transcriptional status, as well replication timing. Here, we show on a single-cell level that deletions — the predominant MSI type in MMR-deficient cells — are preferentially associated with longer A/T tracts, long or transcribed genes and later-replicating genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elli-Mari Aska
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bulat Zagidullin
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Esa Pitkänen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liisa Kauppi
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- *Correspondence: Liisa Kauppi,
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saxena S, Zou L. Hallmarks of DNA replication stress. Mol Cell 2022; 82:2298-2314. [PMID: 35714587 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Faithful DNA replication is critical for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Although DNA replication machinery is highly accurate, the process of DNA replication is constantly challenged by DNA damage and other intrinsic and extrinsic stresses throughout the genome. A variety of cellular stresses interfering with DNA replication, which are collectively termed replication stress, pose a threat to genomic stability in both normal and cancer cells. To cope with replication stress and maintain genomic stability, cells have evolved a complex network of cellular responses to alleviate and tolerate replication problems. This review will focus on the major sources of replication stress, the impacts of replication stress in cells, and the assays to detect replication stress, offering an overview of the hallmarks of DNA replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Saxena
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Lee Zou
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ji F, Zhu X, Liao H, Ouyang L, Huang Y, Syeda MZ, Ying S. New Era of Mapping and Understanding Common Fragile Sites: An Updated Review on Origin of Chromosome Fragility. Front Genet 2022; 13:906957. [PMID: 35669181 PMCID: PMC9164283 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.906957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are specific genomic loci prone to forming gaps or breakages upon replication perturbation, which correlate well with chromosomal rearrangement and copy number variation. CFSs have been actively studied due to their important pathophysiological relevance in different diseases such as cancer and neurological disorders. The genetic locations and sequences of CFSs are crucial to understanding the origin of such unstable sites, which require reliable mapping and characterizing approaches. In this review, we will inspect the evolving techniques for CFSs mapping, especially genome-wide mapping and sequencing of CFSs based on current knowledge of CFSs. We will also revisit the well-established hypotheses on the origin of CFSs fragility, incorporating novel findings from the comprehensive analysis of finely mapped CFSs regarding their locations, sequences, and replication/transcription, etc. This review will present the most up-to-date picture of CFSs and, potentially, a new framework for future research of CFSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Ji
- International Institutes of Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.,Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinli Zhu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hongwei Liao
- International Institutes of Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.,Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liujian Ouyang
- Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingfei Huang
- Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Madiha Zahra Syeda
- Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Songmin Ying
- International Institutes of Medicine, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.,Department of Pharmacology and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Biswas B, Chaaban R, Chakraborty S, Devaux A, Dian AL, Minello A, Singh JK, Vagner S, Uguen P, Lambert S, Dutertre M, Carreira A. At the crossroads of RNA biology, genome integrity and cancer. Bull Cancer 2022; 109:728-735. [PMID: 35597618 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
This article is the synthesis of the scientific presentations that took place during two international courses at Institute Curie, one on post-transcriptional gene regulation and the other on genome instability and human disease, that were joined together in their 2021 edition. This joined course brought together the knowledge on RNA metabolism and the maintenance of genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswendu Biswas
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Rady Chaaban
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Shrena Chakraborty
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Alexandre Devaux
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Ana Luisa Dian
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Anna Minello
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Jenny Kaur Singh
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Stephan Vagner
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Patricia Uguen
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France.
| | - Sarah Lambert
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Martin Dutertre
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Aura Carreira
- CNRS UMR 3348 Genome integrity, RNA and Cancer, Institut Curie, University Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Saayman X, Esashi F. Breaking the paradigm: early insights from mammalian DNA breakomes. FEBS J 2022; 289:2409-2428. [PMID: 33792193 PMCID: PMC9451923 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can result from both exogenous and endogenous sources and are potentially toxic lesions to the human genome. If improperly repaired, DSBs can threaten genome integrity and contribute to premature ageing, neurodegenerative disorders and carcinogenesis. Through decades of work on genome stability, it has become evident that certain regions of the genome are inherently more prone to breakage than others, known as genome instability hotspots. Recent advancements in sequencing-based technologies now enable the profiling of genome-wide distributions of DSBs, also known as breakomes, to systematically map these instability hotspots. Here, we review the application of these technologies and their implications for our current understanding of the genomic regions most likely to drive genome instability. These breakomes ultimately highlight both new and established breakage hotspots including actively transcribed regions, loop boundaries and early-replicating regions of the genome. Further, these breakomes challenge the paradigm that DNA breakage primarily occurs in hard-to-replicate regions. With these advancements, we begin to gain insights into the biological mechanisms both invoking and protecting against genome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xanita Saayman
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Fumiko Esashi
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Balzano E, Di Tommaso E, Antoccia A, Pelliccia F, Giunta S. Characterization of Chromosomal Instability in Glioblastoma. Front Genet 2022; 12:810793. [PMID: 35154254 PMCID: PMC8831864 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.810793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a malignant tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). The poor prognosis of GBM due to resistance to therapy has been associated with high chromosomal instability (CIN). Replication stress is a major cause of CIN that manifests as chromosome rearrangements, fragility, and breaks, including those cytologically expressed within specific chromosome regions named common fragile sites (CFSs). In this work, we characterized the expression of human CFSs in the glioblastoma U-251 MG cell line upon treatment with the inhibitor of DNA polymerase alpha aphidicolin (APH). We observed 52 gaps/breaks located within previously characterized CFSs. We found 17 to be CFSs in GBM cells upon treatment with APH, showing a frequency equal to at least 1% of the total gaps/breaks. We report that two CFSs localized to regions FRA2E (2p13/p12) and FRA2F (2q22) were only found in U-251 MG cells, but not lymphocytes or fibroblasts, after APH treatment. Notably, these glioblastoma-specific CFSs had a relatively high expression compared to the other CFSs with breakage frequency between ∼7 and 9%. Presence of long genes, incomplete replication, and delayed DNA synthesis during mitosis (MiDAS) after APH treatment suggest that an impaired replication process may contribute to this loci-specific fragility in U-251 MG cells. Altogether, our work offers a characterization of common fragile site expression in glioblastoma U-251 MG cells that may be further exploited for cytogenetic and clinical studies to advance our understanding of this incurable cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Balzano
- Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Laboratory of Genome Evolution, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Elena Di Tommaso
- Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
- Laboratory of Genome Evolution, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Antoccia
- Laboratory of Genetics and Cytogenetics, Dipartimento di Scienze, Università Degli Studi Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
| | - Franca Pelliccia
- Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
- *Correspondence: Franca Pelliccia, ; Simona Giunta,
| | - Simona Giunta
- Laboratory of Genome Evolution, Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
- *Correspondence: Franca Pelliccia, ; Simona Giunta,
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mei L, Kedziora KM, Song EA, Purvis JE, Cook J. The consequences of differential origin licensing dynamics in distinct chromatin environments. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:9601-9620. [PMID: 35079814 PMCID: PMC9508807 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic chromosomes contain regions of varying accessibility, yet DNA replication factors must access all regions. The first replication step is loading MCM complexes to license replication origins during the G1 cell cycle phase. It is not yet known how mammalian MCM complexes are adequately distributed to both accessible euchromatin regions and less accessible heterochromatin regions. To address this question, we combined time-lapse live-cell imaging with immunofluorescence imaging of single human cells to quantify the relative rates of MCM loading in euchromatin and heterochromatin throughout G1. We report here that MCM loading in euchromatin is faster than that in heterochromatin in early G1, but surprisingly, heterochromatin loading accelerates relative to euchromatin loading in middle and late G1. This differential acceleration allows both chromatin types to begin S phase with similar concentrations of loaded MCM. The different loading dynamics require ORCA-dependent differences in origin recognition complex distribution. A consequence of heterochromatin licensing dynamics is that cells experiencing a truncated G1 phase from premature cyclin E expression enter S phase with underlicensed heterochromatin, and DNA damage accumulates preferentially in heterochromatin in the subsequent S/G2 phase. Thus, G1 length is critical for sufficient MCM loading, particularly in heterochromatin, to ensure complete genome duplication and to maintain genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Mei
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Katarzyna M Kedziora
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Bioinformatics and Analytics Research Collaborative (BARC), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Eun-Ah Song
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeremy E Purvis
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeanette Gowen Cook
- Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Whale AJ, King M, Hull RM, Krueger F, Houseley J. Stimulation of adaptive gene amplification by origin firing under replication fork constraint. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:915-936. [PMID: 35018465 PMCID: PMC8789084 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Adaptive mutations can cause drug resistance in cancers and pathogens, and increase the tolerance of agricultural pests and diseases to chemical treatment. When and how adaptive mutations form is often hard to discern, but we have shown that adaptive copy number amplification of the copper resistance gene CUP1 occurs in response to environmental copper due to CUP1 transcriptional activation. Here we dissect the mechanism by which CUP1 transcription in budding yeast stimulates copy number variation (CNV). We show that transcriptionally stimulated CNV requires TREX-2 and Mediator, such that cells lacking TREX-2 or Mediator respond normally to copper but cannot acquire increased resistance. Mediator and TREX-2 can cause replication stress by tethering transcribed loci to nuclear pores, a process known as gene gating, and transcription at the CUP1 locus causes a TREX-2-dependent accumulation of replication forks indicative of replication fork stalling. TREX-2-dependent CUP1 gene amplification occurs by a Rad52 and Rad51-mediated homologous recombination mechanism that is enhanced by histone H3K56 acetylation and repressed by Pol32 and Pif1. CUP1 amplification is also critically dependent on late-firing replication origins present in the CUP1 repeats, and mutations that remove or inactivate these origins strongly suppress the acquisition of copper resistance. We propose that replicative stress imposed by nuclear pore association causes replication bubbles from these origins to collapse soon after activation, leaving a tract of H3K56-acetylated chromatin that promotes secondary recombination events during elongation after replication fork re-start events. The capacity for inefficient replication origins to promote copy number variation renders certain genomic regions more fragile than others, and therefore more likely to undergo adaptive evolution through de novo gene amplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J Whale
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle King
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ryan M Hull
- Epigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Felix Krueger
- Babraham Bioinformatics, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Saponaro M. Transcription-Replication Coordination. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:108. [PMID: 35054503 PMCID: PMC8781949 DOI: 10.3390/life12010108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription and replication are the two most essential processes that a cell does with its DNA: they allow cells to express the genomic content that is required for their functions and to create a perfect copy of this genomic information to pass on to the daughter cells. Nevertheless, these two processes are in a constant ambivalent relationship. When transcription and replication occupy the same regions, there is the possibility of conflicts between transcription and replication as transcription can impair DNA replication progression leading to increased DNA damage. Nevertheless, DNA replication origins are preferentially located in open chromatin next to actively transcribed regions, meaning that the possibility of conflicts is potentially an accepted incident for cells. Data in the literature point both towards the existence or not of coordination between these two processes to avoid the danger of collisions. Several reviews have been published on transcription-replication conflicts, but we focus here on the most recent findings that relate to how these two processes are coordinated in eukaryotes, considering advantages and disadvantages from coordination, how likely conflicts are at any given time, and which are their potential hotspots in the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Saponaro
- Transcription Associated Genome Instability Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kodali S, Meyer-Nava S, Landry S, Chakraborty A, Rivera-Mulia JC, Feng W. Epigenomic signatures associated with spontaneous and replication stress-induced DNA double strand breaks. Front Genet 2022; 13:907547. [PMID: 36506300 PMCID: PMC9730818 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.907547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are specific regions of all individuals' genome that are predisposed to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and undergo subsequent rearrangements. CFS formation can be induced in vitro by mild level of DNA replication stress, such as DNA polymerase inhibition or nucleotide pool disturbance. The mechanisms of CFS formation have been linked to DNA replication timing control, transcription activities, as well as chromatin organization. However, it is unclear what specific cis- or trans-factors regulate the interplay between replication and transcription that determine CFS formation. We recently reported genome-wide mapping of DNA DSBs under replication stress induced by aphidicolin in human lymphoblastoids for the first time. Here, we systematically compared these DSBs with regards to nearby epigenomic features mapped in the same cell line from published studies. We demonstrate that aphidicolin-induced DSBs are strongly correlated with histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation, a marker for active transcription. We further demonstrate that this DSB signature is a composite effect by the dual treatment of aphidicolin and its solvent, dimethylsulfoxide, the latter of which potently induces transcription on its own. We also present complementing evidence for the association between DSBs and 3D chromosome architectural domains with high density gene cluster and active transcription. Additionally, we show that while DSBs were detected at all but one of the fourteen finely mapped CFSs, they were not enriched in the CFS core sequences and rather demarcated the CFS core region. Related to this point, DSB density was not higher in large genes of greater than 300 kb, contrary to reported enrichment of CFS sites at these large genes. Finally, replication timing analyses demonstrate that the CFS core region contain initiation events, suggesting that altered replication dynamics are responsible for CFS formation in relatively higher level of replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravan Kodali
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Silvia Meyer-Nava
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Stephen Landry
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Arijita Chakraborty
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Wenyi Feng
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Wenyi Feng,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
St Germain C, Zhao H, Sinha V, Sanz LA, Chédin F, Barlow J. OUP accepted manuscript. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:2051-2073. [PMID: 35100392 PMCID: PMC8887484 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Conflicts between transcription and replication machinery are a potent source of replication stress and genome instability; however, no technique currently exists to identify endogenous genomic locations prone to transcription–replication interactions. Here, we report a novel method to identify genomic loci prone to transcription–replication interactions termed transcription–replication immunoprecipitation on nascent DNA sequencing, TRIPn-Seq. TRIPn-Seq employs the sequential immunoprecipitation of RNA polymerase 2 phosphorylated at serine 5 (RNAP2s5) followed by enrichment of nascent DNA previously labeled with bromodeoxyuridine. Using TRIPn-Seq, we mapped 1009 unique transcription–replication interactions (TRIs) in mouse primary B cells characterized by a bimodal pattern of RNAP2s5, bidirectional transcription, an enrichment of RNA:DNA hybrids, and a high probability of forming G-quadruplexes. TRIs are highly enriched at transcription start sites and map to early replicating regions. TRIs exhibit enhanced Replication Protein A association and TRI-associated genes exhibit higher replication fork termination than control transcription start sites, two marks of replication stress. TRIs colocalize with double-strand DNA breaks, are enriched for deletions, and accumulate mutations in tumors. We propose that replication stress at TRIs induces mutations potentially contributing to age-related disease, as well as tumor formation and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Commodore P St Germain
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
- School of Mathematics and Science, Solano Community College, 4000 Suisun Valley Road, Fairfield, CA 94534, USA
| | - Hongchang Zhao
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Vrishti Sinha
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Lionel A Sanz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Frédéric Chédin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Jacqueline H Barlow
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 530 752 9529; Fax: +1 530 752 9014;
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Translesion polymerase eta both facilitates DNA replication and promotes increased human genetic variation at common fragile sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2106477118. [PMID: 34815340 PMCID: PMC8640788 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106477118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are difficult-to-replicate genomic regions that form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes under replication stress. They are hotspots for chromosomal instability in cancer. Repetitive sequences located at CFS loci are inefficiently copied by replicative DNA polymerase (Pol) delta. However, translesion synthesis Pol eta has been shown to efficiently polymerize CFS-associated repetitive sequences in vitro and facilitate CFS stability by a mechanism that is not fully understood. Here, by locus-specific, single-molecule replication analysis, we identified a crucial role for Pol eta (encoded by the gene POLH) in the in vivo replication of CFSs, even without exogenous stress. We find that Pol eta deficiency induces replication pausing, increases initiation events, and alters the direction of replication-fork progression at CFS-FRA16D in both lymphoblasts and fibroblasts. Furthermore, certain replication pause sites at CFS-FRA16D were associated with the presence of non-B DNA-forming motifs, implying that non-B DNA structures could increase replication hindrance in the absence of Pol eta. Further, in Pol eta-deficient fibroblasts, there was an increase in fork pausing at fibroblast-specific CFSs. Importantly, while not all pause sites were associated with non-B DNA structures, they were embedded within regions of increased genetic variation in the healthy human population, with mutational spectra consistent with Pol eta activity. From these findings, we propose that Pol eta replicating through CFSs may result in genetic variations found in the human population at these sites.
Collapse
|
41
|
Warburton A, Markowitz TE, Katz JP, Pipas JM, McBride AA. Recurrent integration of human papillomavirus genomes at transcriptional regulatory hubs. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:101. [PMID: 34848725 PMCID: PMC8632991 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00264-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) genomes are often integrated into host chromosomes in HPV-associated cancers. HPV genomes are integrated either as a single copy or as tandem repeats of viral DNA interspersed with, or without, host DNA. Integration occurs frequently in common fragile sites susceptible to tandem repeat formation and the flanking or interspersed host DNA often contains transcriptional enhancer elements. When co-amplified with the viral genome, these enhancers can form super-enhancer-like elements that drive high viral oncogene expression. Here we compiled highly curated datasets of HPV integration sites in cervical (CESC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cancers, and assessed the number of breakpoints, viral transcriptional activity, and host genome copy number at each insertion site. Tumors frequently contained multiple distinct HPV integration sites but often only one “driver” site that expressed viral RNA. As common fragile sites and active enhancer elements are cell-type-specific, we mapped these regions in cervical cell lines using FANCD2 and Brd4/H3K27ac ChIP-seq, respectively. Large enhancer clusters, or super-enhancers, were also defined using the Brd4/H3K27ac ChIP-seq dataset. HPV integration breakpoints were enriched at both FANCD2-associated fragile sites and enhancer-rich regions, and frequently showed adjacent focal DNA amplification in CESC samples. We identified recurrent integration “hotspots” that were enriched for super-enhancers, some of which function as regulatory hubs for cell-identity genes. We propose that during persistent infection, extrachromosomal HPV minichromosomes associate with these transcriptional epicenters and accidental integration could promote viral oncogene expression and carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Warburton
- Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 33 North Drive, MSC3209, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Tovah E Markowitz
- NIAID Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource (NCBR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Advanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Joshua P Katz
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James M Pipas
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alison A McBride
- Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 33 North Drive, MSC3209, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lokanga RA, Kumari D, Usdin K. Common Threads: Aphidicolin-Inducible and Folate-Sensitive Fragile Sites in the Human Genome. Front Genet 2021; 12:708860. [PMID: 34567068 PMCID: PMC8456018 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.708860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The human genome has many chromosomal regions that are fragile, demonstrating chromatin breaks, gaps, or constrictions on exposure to replication stress. Common fragile sites (CFSs) are found widely distributed in the population, with the largest subset of these sites being induced by aphidicolin (APH). Other fragile sites are only found in a subset of the population. One group of these so-called rare fragile sites (RFSs) is induced by folate stress. APH-inducible CFSs are generally located in large transcriptionally active genes that are A + T rich and often enriched for tracts of AT-dinucleotide repeats. In contrast, all the folate-sensitive sites mapped to date consist of transcriptionally silenced CGG microsatellites. Thus, all the folate-sensitive fragile sites may have a very similar molecular basis that differs in key ways from that of the APH CFSs. The folate-sensitive FSs include FRAXA that is associated with Fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common heritable form of intellectual disability. Both CFSs and RFSs can cause chromosomal abnormalities. Recent work suggests that both APH-inducible fragile sites and FRAXA undergo Mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS) when exposed to APH or folate stress, respectively. Interestingly, blocking MiDAS in both cases prevents chromosome fragility but increases the risk of chromosome mis-segregation. MiDAS of both APH-inducible and FRAXA involves conservative DNA replication and POLD3, an accessory subunit of the replicative polymerase Pol δ that is essential for break-induced replication (BIR). Thus, MiDAS is thought to proceed via some form of BIR-like process. This review will discuss the recent work that highlights the similarities and differences between these two groups of fragile sites and the growing evidence for the presence of many more novel fragile sites in the human genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daman Kumari
- Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Karen Usdin
- Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
St Germain C, Zhao H, Barlow JH. Transcription-Replication Collisions-A Series of Unfortunate Events. Biomolecules 2021; 11:1249. [PMID: 34439915 PMCID: PMC8391903 DOI: 10.3390/biom11081249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive replication or transcription and pose an even more potent threat to genome integrity when these processes co-occur. It is critical to maintaining high fidelity and processivity of transcription and replication while navigating through a complex chromatin environment, highlighting the importance of defining cellular pathways regulating transcription-replication interaction formation, evasion, and resolution. Here we discuss how transcription influences replication fork stability, and the safeguards that have evolved to navigate transcription-replication interactions and maintain genome integrity in mammalian cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Commodore St Germain
- School of Mathematics and Science, Solano Community College, 4000 Suisun Valley Road, Fairfield, CA 94534, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| | - Hongchang Zhao
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| | - Jacqueline H. Barlow
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Park SH, Bennett-Baker P, Ahmed S, Arlt MF, Ljungman M, Glover TW, Wilson TE. Locus-specific transcription silencing at the FHIT gene suppresses replication stress-induced copy number variant formation and associated replication delay. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:7507-7524. [PMID: 34181717 PMCID: PMC8287918 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Impaired replication progression leads to de novo copy number variant (CNV) formation at common fragile sites (CFSs). We previously showed that these hotspots for genome instability reside in late-replicating domains associated with large transcribed genes and provided indirect evidence that transcription is a factor in their instability. Here, we compared aphidicolin (APH)-induced CNV and CFS frequency between wild-type and isogenic cells in which FHIT gene transcription was ablated by promoter deletion. Two promoter-deletion cell lines showed reduced or absent CNV formation and CFS expression at FHIT despite continued instability at the NLGN1 control locus. APH treatment led to critical replication delays that remained unresolved in G2/M in the body of many, but not all, large transcribed genes, an effect that was reversed at FHIT by the promoter deletion. Altering RNase H1 expression did not change CNV induction frequency and DRIP-seq showed a paucity of R-loop formation in the central regions of large genes, suggesting that R-loops are not the primary mediator of the transcription effect. These results demonstrate that large gene transcription is a determining factor in replication stress-induced genomic instability and support models that CNV hotspots mainly result from the transcription-dependent passage of unreplicated DNA into mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Hae Park
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | | | - Samreen Ahmed
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Martin F Arlt
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Mats Ljungman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Thomas W Glover
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Thomas E Wilson
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kemiha S, Poli J, Lin YL, Lengronne A, Pasero P. Toxic R-loops: Cause or consequence of replication stress? DNA Repair (Amst) 2021; 107:103199. [PMID: 34399314 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Transcription-replication conflicts (TRCs) represent a potential source of endogenous replication stress (RS) and genomic instability in eukaryotic cells but the mechanisms that underlie this instability remain poorly understood. Part of the problem could come from non-B DNA structures called R-loops, which are formed of a RNA:DNA hybrid and a displaced ssDNA loop. In this review, we discuss different scenarios in which R-loops directly or indirectly interfere with DNA replication. We also present other types of TRCs that may not depend on R-loops to impede fork progression. Finally, we discuss alternative models in which toxic RNA:DNA hybrids form at stalled forks as a consequence - but not a cause - of replication stress and interfere with replication resumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Kemiha
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS et Université de Montpellier, Equipe labélisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Jérôme Poli
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS et Université de Montpellier, Equipe labélisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Yea-Lih Lin
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS et Université de Montpellier, Equipe labélisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Armelle Lengronne
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS et Université de Montpellier, Equipe labélisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Pasero
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS et Université de Montpellier, Equipe labélisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lalonde M, Trauner M, Werner M, Hamperl S. Consequences and Resolution of Transcription-Replication Conflicts. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11070637. [PMID: 34209204 PMCID: PMC8303131 DOI: 10.3390/life11070637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it is now clear that conflicts can arise due to aberrant transcription regulation and premature proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress and genomic instability. As both are considered hallmarks of aging and human diseases such as cancer, understanding the cellular consequences of conflicts is of paramount importance. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge on where and when collisions occur and how these encounters affect the genome and chromatin landscape of cells. Finally, we conclude with the different cellular pathways and multiple mechanisms that cells have put in place at conflict sites to ensure the resolution of conflicts and accurate genome duplication.
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Unlike bacteria, mammalian cells need to complete DNA replication before segregating their chromosomes for the maintenance of genome integrity. Thus, cells have evolved efficient pathways to restore stalled and/or collapsed replication forks during S-phase, and when necessary, also to delay cell cycle progression to ensure replication completion. However, strong evidence shows that cells can proceed to mitosis with incompletely replicated DNA when under mild replication stress (RS) conditions. Consequently, the incompletely replicated genomic gaps form, predominantly at common fragile site regions, where the converging fork-like DNA structures accumulate. These branched structures pose a severe threat to the faithful disjunction of chromosomes as they physically interlink the partially duplicated sister chromatids. In this review, we provide an overview discussing how cells respond and deal with the under-replicated DNA structures that escape from the S/G2 surveillance system. We also focus on recent research of a mitotic break-induced replication pathway (also known as mitotic DNA repair synthesis), which has been proposed to operate during prophase in an attempt to finish DNA synthesis at the under-replicated genomic regions. Finally, we discuss recent data on how mild RS may cause chromosome instability and mutations that accelerate cancer genome evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camelia Mocanu
- Chromosome Dynamics and Stability Group, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 7BG, UK
| | - Kok-Lung Chan
- Chromosome Dynamics and Stability Group, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 7BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Replication initiation: Implications in genome integrity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2021; 103:103131. [PMID: 33992866 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In every cell cycle, billions of nucleotides need to be duplicated within hours, with extraordinary precision and accuracy. The molecular mechanism by which cells regulate the replication event is very complicated, and the entire process begins way before the onset of S phase. During the G1 phase of the cell cycle, cells prepare by assembling essential replication factors to establish the pre-replicative complex at origins, sites that dictate where replication would initiate during S phase. During S phase, the replication process is tightly coupled with the DNA repair system to ensure the fidelity of replication. Defects in replication and any error must be recognized by DNA damage response and checkpoint signaling pathways in order to halt the cell cycle before cells are allowed to divide. The coordination of these processes throughout the cell cycle is therefore critical to achieve genomic integrity and prevent diseases. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of how the replication initiation events are regulated to achieve genome stability.
Collapse
|
49
|
Youssefian L, Saeidian AH, Palizban F, Bagherieh A, Abdollahimajd F, Sotoudeh S, Mozafari N, Farahani RA, Mahmoudi H, Babashah S, Zabihi M, Zeinali S, Fortina P, Salas-Alanis JC, South AP, Vahidnezhad H, Uitto J. Whole-Transcriptome Analysis by RNA Sequencing for Genetic Diagnosis of Mendelian Skin Disorders in the Context of Consanguinity. Clin Chem 2021; 67:876-888. [PMID: 33969388 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among the approximately 8000 Mendelian disorders, >1000 have cutaneous manifestations. In many of these conditions, the underlying mutated genes have been identified by DNA-based techniques which, however, can overlook certain types of mutations, such as exonic-synonymous and deep-intronic sequence variants. Whole-transcriptome sequencing by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can identify such mutations and provide information about their consequences. METHODS We analyzed the whole transcriptome of 40 families with different types of Mendelian skin disorders with extensive genetic heterogeneity. The RNA-seq data were examined for variant detection and prioritization, pathogenicity confirmation, RNA expression profiling, and genome-wide homozygosity mapping in the case of consanguineous families. Among the families examined, RNA-seq was able to provide information complementary to DNA-based analyses for exonic and intronic sequence variants with aberrant splicing. In addition, we tested the possibility of using RNA-seq as the first-tier strategy for unbiased genome-wide mutation screening without information from DNA analysis. RESULTS We found pathogenic mutations in 35 families (88%) with RNA-seq in combination with other next-generation sequencing methods, and we successfully prioritized variants and found the culprit genes. In addition, as a novel concept, we propose a pipeline that increases the yield of variant calling from RNA-seq by concurrent use of genome and transcriptome references in parallel. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that "clinical RNA-seq" could serve as a primary approach for mutation detection in inherited diseases, particularly in consanguineous families, provided that tissues and cells expressing the relevant genes are available for analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Youssefian
- Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Biology PhD Program, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amir Hossein Saeidian
- Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Biology PhD Program, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fahimeh Palizban
- Laboratory of Complex Biological Systems and Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Atefeh Bagherieh
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Soheila Sotoudeh
- Department of Dermatology, Children's Medical Center, Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nikoo Mozafari
- Skin Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rahele A Farahani
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Hamidreza Mahmoudi
- Department of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sadegh Babashah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Paolo Fortina
- Cancer Genomics and Bioinformatics, Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Translation and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrew P South
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hassan Vahidnezhad
- Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jouni Uitto
- Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Courtot L, Bournique E, Maric C, Guitton-Sert L, Madrid-Mencía M, Pancaldi V, Cadoret JC, Hoffmann JS, Bergoglio V. Low Replicative Stress Triggers Cell-Type Specific Inheritable Advanced Replication Timing. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22094959. [PMID: 34066960 PMCID: PMC8125030 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication timing (RT), reflecting the temporal order of origin activation, is known as a robust and conserved cell-type specific process. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces well-documented RT delays associated to genetic instability, but it can also generate RT advances that are still uncharacterized. In order to characterize these advanced initiation events, we monitored the whole genome RT from six independent human cell lines treated with low doses of aphidicolin. We report that RT advances are cell-type-specific and involve large heterochromatin domains. Importantly, we found that some major late to early RT advances can be inherited by the unstressed next-cellular generation, which is a unique process that correlates with enhanced chromatin accessibility, as well as modified replication origin landscape and gene expression in daughter cells. Collectively, this work highlights how low replication stress may impact cellular identity by RT advances events at a subset of chromosomal domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilas Courtot
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Elodie Bournique
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Chrystelle Maric
- Université de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, DNA Replication Pathologies Team, F-75006 Paris, France;
| | - Laure Guitton-Sert
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Miguel Madrid-Mencía
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
| | - Vera Pancaldi
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Charles Cadoret
- Université de Paris, CNRS, Institut Jacques Monod, DNA Replication Pathologies Team, F-75006 Paris, France;
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| | - Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
- Laboratoire de pathologie, Laboratoire d’excellence Toulouse Cancer, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, CEDEX, 31059 Toulouse, France
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| | - Valérie Bergoglio
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), UMR1037 Inserm, University Paul Sabatier III, ERL5294 CNRS, 2 Avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; (L.C.); (E.B.); (L.G.-S.); (M.M.-M.); (V.P.)
- Correspondence: (J.-C.C.); (J.-S.H.); (V.B.)
| |
Collapse
|