Homotypic and heterotypic immune responses to Omicron variant in immunocompromised patients in diverse clinical settings

Kinetics of humoral and cellular immune responses 5 months post-COVID-19 booster dose by immune response groups at the peak immunity phase: An observational historical cohort study using the Fukushima vaccination community survey

Background

Understanding the waning of immunity after booster vaccinations is important to identify which immune-low populations should be prioritized.

Methods

We investigated longitudinal cellular and humoral immunity after the third vaccine dose in both high- and low-cellular and humoral immunity groups at the peak immunity phase after the booster vaccination in a large community-based cohort. Blood samples were collected from 1045 participants at peak (T1: median 54 days post-third dose) and decay (T2: median 145 days post-third dose) phases to assess IgG(S), neutralizing activity, and ELISpot responses. Participants were categorized into high/low ELISpot/IgG(S) groups at T1. Cellular and humoral responses were tracked for approximately five months after the third vaccination.

Results

In total, 983 participants were included in the cohort. IgG(S) geometric mean fold change between timepoints revealed greater waning in the >79 years age group (T2/T1 fold change: 0.27) and higher IgG(S) fold change in the low-ELISpot group at T1 (T2/T1 fold change: 0.32-0.33) than in the other groups, although ELISpot geometric mean remained stable.

Conclusions

Antibody level of those who did not respond well to third dose vaccination waned rapidly than those who responded well. Evidence-based vaccine strategies are essential in preventing potential health issues caused by vaccines, including side-effects.

Bringing optimised COVID-19 vaccine schedules to immunocompromised populations (BOOST-IC): study protocol for an adaptive randomised controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Immunocompromised hosts (ICH) experience more breakthrough infections and worse clinical outcomes following infection with COVID-19 than immunocompetent people. Prophylactic monoclonal antibody therapies can be challenging to access, and escape variants emerge rapidly. Immunity conferred through vaccination remains a central prevention strategy for COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines do not elicit optimal immunity in ICH but boosting, through additional doses of vaccine improves humoral and cellular immune responses. This trial aims to assess the immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 vaccine booster strategies against SARS-CoV-2 for ICH in Australia.

METHODS

Bringing optimised COVID-19 vaccine schedules to immunocompromised populations (BOOST-IC) is an adaptive randomised trial of one or two additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines 3 months apart in people living with HIV, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, or those who have haematological malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma). Key eligibility criteria include having received 3 to 7 doses of Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)-approved COVID-19 vaccines at least 3 months earlier, and having not received SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies in the 3 months prior to receiving the study vaccine. The primary outcome is the geometric mean concentration of anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) 28 days after the final dose of the study vaccine. Key secondary outcomes include anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG titres and the proportion of people seroconverting 6 and 12 months after study vaccines, local and systemic reactions in the 7 days after vaccination, adverse events of special interest, COVID-19 infection, mortality and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

This study will enhance the understanding of COVID-19 vaccine responses in ICH, and enable the development of safe, and optimised vaccine schedules in people with HIV, SOT, or haematological malignancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05556720. Registered on 23rd August 2022.

Comparison of COVID-19 Hospitalization and Death Between Solid Organ Transplant Recipients and the General Population in Canada, 2020-2022

Background

Solid organ transplant recipients have a high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A comprehensive understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple waves in the solid organ transplant population and how this compares to the general population is limited. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to answer this question.

Methods

We included 15 306 solid organ transplant recipients and 12 160 904 individuals from the general population. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 100 person-years) of severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization or death with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test) occurring between January 25, 2020, and November 30, 2022.

Results

Compared with the general population, solid organ transplant recipients had almost a 6 times higher rate of severe COVID-19 (20.39 versus 3.44 per 100 person-years), with almost 5.5 times as high a rate of death alone (4.19 versus 0.77 per 100 person-years). Transplant recipients with severe COVID-19 were substantially younger (60.1 versus 66.5 y) and had more comorbidities. The rate of severe COVID-19 declined over time in the solid organ transplant population, with an incidence rate of 41.25 per 100 person-years in the first wave (January 25, 2020, to August 31, 2020) and 18.41 in the seventh wave (June 19, 2022, to November 30, 2022, Omicron era).

Conclusions

Solid organ transplant recipients remain at high risk of severe outcomes when they are infected with SARS-CoV-2. Resources and strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 exposure are needed in this vulnerable patient population.

Clinical and prognostic implications of hyaluronic acid in patients with COVID-19 reinfection and first infection

Objective

Previous research has shown that human identical sequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) promote coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression by upregulating hyaluronic acid (HA). However, the association of HA with mortality and long COVID in SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and first infection is unclear.

Methods

Patients with COVID-19 at Beijing Ditan Hospital from September 2023 to November 2023 were consecutively enrolled. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections were matched 1:2 with first infections using a nearest neighbor propensity score matching algorithm. We compared the hospital outcomes between patients with COVID-19 reinfection and first infection. The association between HA levels and mortality and long COVID in the matched cohort was analyzed.

Results

The reinfection rate among COVID-19 hospitalized patients was 25.4% (62 cases). After propensity score matching, we found that reinfection was associated with a better clinical course and prognosis, including lower levels of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fewer cases of bilateral lung infiltration and respiratory failure, and shorter viral clearance time and duration of symptoms (p < 0.05). HA levels were significantly higher in patients with primary infection [128.0 (90.5, 185.0) vs. 94.5 (62.0, 167.3), p = 0.008], those with prolonged viral clearance time [90.5 (61.5, 130.8) vs. 130.0 (95.0, 188.0), p < 0.001], and deceased patients [105.5 (76.8, 164.5) vs. 188.0 (118.0, 208.0), p = 0.002]. Further analysis showed that HA was an independent predictor of death (AUC: 0.789), and the risk of death increased by 4.435 times (OR = 5.435, 95% CI = 1.205-24.510, p = 0.028) in patients with high HA levels. We found that patients with HA levels above 116 ng/mL had an increased risk of death. However, the incidence of long COVID was similar in the different HA level groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Serum HA may serve as a novel biomarker for predicting COVID-19 mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and first infection. However, HA levels may not be associated with long COVID.

Live virus neutralizing antibodies against pre and post Omicron strains in food and retail workers in Québec, Canada

Background

Measuring the ability of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to neutralize live viruses remains an effective approach to quantify the level of protection of individuals. We assessed the neutralization activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2, Delta, Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 strains, in 280 vaccinated restaurant/bar, grocery and hardware store workers in Québec, Canada.

Methods

Participants were recruited during the emergence of Omicron BA.1 variant. The neutralizing activity of participant sera was assessed by microneutralization assay.

Results

Serum neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titers of all participants against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain were comparable with those against Delta variant (ranges of titers 10-2032 and 10-2560, respectively), however, their response was significantly reduced against Omicron BA.1, BA2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 (10-1016, 10-1016, 10-320, 10-80 and 10-254, respectively). Individuals who received 2 doses of vaccine had significantly reduced NtAb titers against all SARS-CoV-2 strains compared to those infected and then vaccinated (≥1 dose), vaccinated (≥2 doses) and then infected, or those who received 3 doses of vaccine. Participants vaccinated with 2 or 3 doses of vaccine and then infected had the highest NtAb titers against all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested.

Conclusion

We assessed for the first time the NtAb response in food and retail workers. We found that vaccination prior to the emergence of Omicron BA.1 was associated with higher neutralizing activity against pre-Omicron variants, suggesting the importance of updating vaccines to increase antibody response against new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Vaccination followed by infection was associated with higher neutralizing activity against all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested.

COVID-19 Reinfection Has Better Outcomes Than the First Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients face an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and are vulnerable to repeat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. In nonimmunocompromised individuals, SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are milder likely because of cross-protective immunity. We sought to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 reinfection exhibits milder manifestations than primary infection in transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using a large, prospective cohort of adult transplant patients with COVID-19, we identified patients with SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. We performed a 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching to control potential confounders, including the COVID-19 variant. We compared outcomes including oxygen requirement, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admission within 30 d after diagnosis between patients with reinfection and those with the first episode of COVID-19.

RESULTS

Between 2020 and 2023, 103 reinfections were identified in a cohort of 1869 transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (incidence of 2.7% per year). These included 50 kidney (48.5%), 27 lung (26.2%), 7 heart (6.8%), 6 liver (5.8%), and 13 multiorgan (12.6%) transplants. The median age was 54.5 y (interquartile range [IQR], 40.5-65.5) and the median time from transplant to first infection was 6.6 y (IQR, 2.8-11.2). The time between the primary COVID-19 and reinfection was 326 d (IQR, 226-434). Three doses or more of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are received by 87.4% of patients. After propensity score matching, reinfections were associated with significantly lower hospitalization (5.8% versus 19.4%; risk ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.12-0.71) and oxygen requirement (3.9% versus 13.6%; risk ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.84). In a within-patient analysis only in the reinfection group, the second infection was milder than the first (3.9% required oxygen versus 19.4%, P  < 0.0001), and severe first COVID-19 was the only predictor of severe reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant recipients with COVID-19 reinfection present better outcomes than those with the first infection, providing clinical evidence for the development of cross-protective immunity.

COVID-19 Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a German Transplant Center

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show higher morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 than the general population and have an impaired response to vaccination. We analyzed COVID-19 incidence and clinical outcomes in a single-center cohort of approximately 2500 KTRs. Between 1 February 2020 and 1 July 2022, 578 KTRs were infected with SARS-CoV-2, with 25 (4%) recurrent infections. In total, 208 KTRs (36%) were hospitalized, and 39 (7%) died. Among vaccinated patients, infection with the Omicron variant had a mortality of 2%. Unvaccinated patients infected with the Omicron variant showed mortality (9% vs. 11%) and morbidity (hospitalization 52% vs. 54%, ICU admission 12% vs. 18%) comparable to the pre-Omicron era. Multivariable analysis revealed that being unvaccinated (OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.38, 3.35]), infection in the pre-Omicron era (OR = 3.06, 95% CI [1.92, 4.87]), and higher patient age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.03, 1.06]) are independent risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization, whereas a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen was found to reduce the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33, 0.79]). This suggests that both virological changes in the Omicron variant and vaccination reduce the risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in KTRs. Our data extend the knowledge from the general population to KTRs and provide important insights into outcomes during the Omicron era.

Delayed and Attenuated Antibody Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination With Poor Cross-Variant Neutralization in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients-A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Background

Therapeutically immunosuppressed transplant recipients exhibit attenuated responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines. To elucidate the kinetics and variant cross-protection of vaccine-induced antibodies in this population, we conducted a prospective longitudinal study in heart and lung transplant recipients receiving the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) 3-dose vaccination series.

Methods

We measured longitudinal serum antibody and neutralization responses against the ancestral and major variants of SARS-CoV-2 in SARS-CoV-2-uninfected lung (n = 18) and heart (n = 17) transplant recipients, non-lung-transplanted patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 7), and healthy controls (n = 12) before, during, and after the primary mRNA vaccination series.

Results

Among healthy controls, strong anti-spike responses arose immediately following vaccination and displayed cross-neutralization against all variants. In contrast, among transplant recipients, after the first 2 vaccine doses, increases in antibody concentrations occurred gradually, and cross-neutralization was completely absent against the Omicron B.1.1.529 variant. However, most (73%) of the transplant recipients had a significant response to the third vaccine dose, reaching levels comparable to those of healthy controls, with improved but attenuated neutralization of immune evasive variants, particularly Beta, Gamma, and Omicron. Responses in non-lung-transplanted patients with cystic fibrosis paralleled those in healthy controls.

Conclusions

In this prospective, longitudinal analysis of variant-specific antibody responses, lung and heart transplant recipients display delayed and defective responses to the first 2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses but significantly augmented responses to a third dose. Gaps in antibody-mediated immunity among transplant recipients are compounded by decreased neutralization against Omicron variants, leaving many patients with substantially weakened immunity against currently circulating variants.

Additive effects of booster mRNA vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection on T cell immunity across immunocompromised states

Suboptimal immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination has frequently been observed in individuals with various immunodeficiencies. Given the increased antibody evasion properties of emerging SARS-CoV-2 subvariants, it is necessary to assess whether other components of adaptive immunity generate resilient and protective responses against infection. We assessed T cell responses in 279 individuals, covering five different immunodeficiencies and healthy controls, before and after booster mRNA vaccination, as well as after Omicron infection in a subset of patients. We observed robust and persistent Omicron-reactive T cell responses that increased markedly upon booster vaccination and correlated directly with antibody titers across all patient groups. Poor vaccination responsiveness in immunocompromised or elderly individuals was effectively counteracted by the administration of additional vaccine doses. Functionally, Omicron-reactive T cell responses exhibited a pronounced cytotoxic profile and signs of longevity, characterized by CD45RA+ effector memory subpopulations with stem cell-like properties and increased proliferative capacity. Regardless of underlying immunodeficiency, booster-vaccinated and Omicron-infected individuals appeared protected against severe disease and exhibited enhanced and diversified T cell responses against conserved and Omicron-specific epitopes. Our findings indicate that T cells retain the ability to generate highly functional responses against newly emerging variants, even after repeated antigen exposure and a robust immunological imprint from ancestral SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.

Differential cellular and humoral immune responses in immunocompromised individuals following multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations

Introduction

The heterogeneity of the immunocompromised population means some individuals may exhibit variable, weak or reduced vaccine-induced immune responses, leaving them poorly protected from COVID-19 disease despite receiving multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. There is conflicting data on the immunogenicity elicited by multiple vaccinations in immunocompromised groups. The aim of this study was to measure both humoral and cellular vaccine-induced immunity in several immunocompromised cohorts and to compare them to immunocompetent controls.

Methods

Cytokine release in peptide-stimulated whole blood, and neutralising antibody and baseline SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG levels in plasma were measured in rheumatology patients (n=29), renal transplant recipients (n=46), people living with HIV (PLWH) (n=27) and immunocompetent participants (n=64) post third or fourth vaccination from just one blood sample. Cytokines were measured by ELISA and multiplex array. Neutralising antibody levels in plasma were determined by a 50% neutralising antibody titre assay and SARS-CoV-2 spike specific IgG levels were quantified by ELISA.

Results

In infection negative donors, IFN-γ, IL-2 and neutralising antibody levels were significantly reduced in rheumatology patients (p=0.0014, p=0.0415, p=0.0319, respectively) and renal transplant recipients (p<0.0001, p=0.0005, p<0.0001, respectively) compared to immunocompetent controls, with IgG antibody responses similarly affected. Conversely, cellular and humoral immune responses were not impaired in PLWH, or between individuals from all groups with previous SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Discussion

These results suggest that specific subgroups within immunocompromised cohorts could benefit from distinct, personalised immunisation or treatment strategies. Identification of vaccine non-responders could be critical to protect those most at risk.

Precision Vaccinology Approaches for the Development of Adjuvanted Vaccines Targeted to Distinct Vulnerable Populations

Infection persists as one of the leading global causes of morbidity and mortality, with particular burden at the extremes of age and in populations who are immunocompromised or suffer chronic co-morbid diseases. By focusing discovery and innovation efforts to better understand the phenotypic and mechanistic differences in the immune systems of diverse vulnerable populations, emerging research in precision vaccine discovery and development has explored how to optimize immunizations across the lifespan. Here, we focus on two key elements of precision vaccinology, as applied to epidemic/pandemic response and preparedness, including (a) selecting robust combinations of adjuvants and antigens, and (b) coupling these platforms with appropriate formulation systems. In this context, several considerations exist, including the intended goals of immunization (e.g., achieving immunogenicity versus lessening transmission), reducing the likelihood of adverse reactogenicity, and optimizing the route of administration. Each of these considerations is accompanied by several key challenges. On-going innovation in precision vaccinology will expand and target the arsenal of vaccine components for protection of vulnerable populations.

Persistent SARS-CoV-2-specific immune defects in kidney transplant recipients following third mRNA vaccine dose

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show poorer response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, yet response patterns and mechanistic drivers following third doses are ill-defined. We administered third monovalent mRNA vaccines to n = 81 KTRs with negative or low-titer anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody (n = 39 anti-RBDNEG; n = 42 anti-RBDLO), compared with healthy controls (HCs, n = 19), measuring anti-RBD, Omicron neutralization, spike-specific CD8+%, and SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires. By day 30, 44% anti-RBDNEG remained seronegative; 5% KTRs developed BA.5 neutralization (vs 68% HCs, P < .001). Day 30 spike-specific CD8+% was negative in 91% KTRs (vs 20% HCs; P = .07), without correlation to anti-RBD (rs = 0.17). Day 30 SARS-CoV-2-reactive TCR repertoires were detected in 52% KTRs vs 74% HCs (P = .11). Spike-specific CD4+ TCR expansion was similar between KTRs and HCs, yet KTR CD8+ TCR depth was 7.6-fold lower (P = .001). Global negative response was seen in 7% KTRs, associated with high-dose MMF (P = .037); 44% showed global positive response. Of the KTRs, 16% experienced breakthrough infections, with 2 hospitalizations; prebreakthrough variant neutralization was poor. Absent neutralizing and CD8+ responses in KTRs indicate vulnerability to COVID-19 despite 3-dose mRNA vaccination. Lack of neutralization despite CD4+ expansion suggests B cell dysfunction and/or ineffective T cell help. Development of more effective KTR vaccine strategies is critical. (NCT04969263).

Impact of Omicron BA.1 infection on BA.4/5 immunity in transplant recipients

Mutations in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 have allowed Omicron subvariants to escape neutralizing antibodies. The degree to which this occurs in transplant recipients is poorly understood. We measured BA.4/5 cross-neutralizing responses in 75 mostly vaccinated transplant recipients who recovered from BA.1 infection. Sera were collected at 1 and 6 months post-BA.1 infection, and a lentivirus pseudovirus neutralization assay was performed using spike constructs corresponding to BA.1 and BA.4/5. Uninfected immunized transplant recipients and health care worker controls were used for comparison. Following BA.1 infection, the proportion of transplant recipients with neutralizing antibody responses was 88.0% (66/75) against BA.1 and 69.3% (52/75) against BA.4/5 (P = .005). The neutralization level against BA.4/5 was approximately 17-fold lower than that against BA.1 (IQR 10.6- to 45.1-fold lower, P < .0001). BA.4/5 responses declined over time and by ≥0.5 log₁₀ (approximately 3-fold) in almost half of the patients by 6 months. BA.4/5-neutralizing antibody titers in transplant recipients with breakthrough BA.1 infection were similar to those in immunized health care workers but significantly lower than those in uninfected triple-vaccinated transplant recipients. These results provide evidence that transplant recipients are at ongoing risk for BA.4/5 infection despite vaccination and prior Omicron strain infection, and additional mitigation strategies may be required to prevent severe disease in this cohort.

Inefficient Recovery of Repeatedly Stimulated Memory CD8 T Cells after Polymicrobial Sepsis Induction Leads to Changes in Memory CD8 T Cell Pool Composition

Long-lasting sepsis-induced immunoparalysis has been principally studied in primary (1°) memory CD8 T cells; however, the impact of sepsis on memory CD8 T cells with a history of repeated cognate Ag encounters is largely unknown but important in understanding the role of sepsis in shaping the pre-existing memory CD8 T cell compartment. Higher-order memory CD8 T cells are crucial in providing immunity against common pathogens that reinfect the host or are generated by repeated vaccination. In this study, we analyzed peripheral blood from septic patients and show that memory CD8 T cells with defined Ag specificity for recurring CMV infection proliferate less than bulk populations of central memory CD8 T cells. Using TCR-transgenic T cells to generate 1° and higher-order (quaternary [4°]) memory T cells within the same host, we demonstrate that the susceptibility and loss of both memory subsets are similar after sepsis induction, and sepsis diminished Ag-dependent and -independent (bystander) functions of these memory subsets equally. Both the 1° and 4° memory T cell populations proliferated in a sepsis-induced lymphopenic environment; however, due to the intrinsic differences in baseline proliferative capacity, expression of receptors (e.g., CD127/CD122), and responsiveness to homeostatic cytokines, 1° memory T cells become overrepresented over time in sepsis survivors. Finally, IL-7/anti-IL-7 mAb complex treatment early after sepsis induction preferentially rescued the proliferation and accumulation of 1° memory T cells, whereas recovery of 4° memory T cells was less pronounced. Thus, inefficient recovery of repeatedly stimulated memory cells after polymicrobial sepsis induction leads to changes in memory T cell pool composition, a notion with important implications in devising strategies to recover the number and function of pre-existing memory CD8 T cells in sepsis survivors.

Utilization of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant Assay To Identify High-Titer Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Plasma against Wild-Type and Variant SARS-CoV-2 Viruses

There is evidence that COVID-19 convalescent plasma may improve outcomes of patients with impaired immune systems; however, more clinical trials are required. Although we have previously used a 50% plaque reduction/neutralization titer (PRNT₅₀) assay to qualify convalescent plasma for clinical trials and virus-like particle (VLP) assays to validate PRNT₅₀ methodologies, these approaches are time-consuming and expensive. Here, we characterized the ability of the Abbott severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG II Quant assay to identify high- and low-titer plasma for wild-type and variant (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta) SARS-CoV-2 characterized by both VLP assays and PRNT₅₀. Plasma specimens previously tested in wild-type, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta VLP neutralization assays were selected based on availability. Selected specimens were evaluated by the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay [Abbott anti-Spike (S); Abbott, Chicago, IL], and values in units per milliliter were converted to binding antibody units (BAU) per milliliter. Sixty-three specimens were available for analysis. Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay values in BAU per milliliter were significantly different between high- and low-titer specimens for wild-type (Mann-Whitney U = 42, P < 0.0001), Alpha (Mann-Whitney U = 38, P < 0.0001), Beta (Mann-Whitney U = 29, P < 0.0001), Gamma (Mann-Whitney U = 0, P < 0.0001), and Delta (Mann-Whitney U = 42, P < 0.0001). A conservative approach using the highest 95% confidence interval (CI) values from wild-type and variant of concern (VOC) SARS-CoV-2 experiments would identify a potential Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay cutoff of ≥7.1 × 10³ BAU/mL. IMPORTANCE The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to treat hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in August 2020. However, by 4 February 2021, the FDA had revised the convalescent plasma EUA. This revision limited the authorization for high-titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma and restricted patient groups to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 early in their disease course or hospitalized patients with impaired humoral immunity. Traditionally our group utilized 50% plaque reduction/neutralization titer (PRNT₅₀) assays to qualify CCP in Canada. Since that time, the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (Abbott, Chicago IL) was developed for the qualitative and quantitative determination of IgG against the SARS-CoV-2. Here, we characterized the ability of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay to identify high- and low-titer plasma for wild-type and variant (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta) SARS-CoV-2.