Neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 randomized NEOSTAR trial

Advances in clinical trials on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review

The reduction in lung cancer mortality rates over the past decade can be partially ascribed to advancements in immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the therapeutic landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have recently been evaluated in multiple clinical trials to confirm their safety and efficacy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative settings for patients with resectable NSCLC. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted approval for adjuvant atezolizumab following platinum-doublet chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy, adjuvant pembrolizumab after platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab for resectable NSCLC, with potential forthcoming approvals for additional agents or indications. Novel data, approvals, and emerging research findings are dramatically shifting the accepted standards of care over just a few years. Despite these advances, the optimal application of these treatments is not entirely straightforward. This article summarizes the biological rationale for immunotherapy and the important clinical trials regarding perioperative ICIs. We also further outline the controversies and future directions to better guide the individualized treatment of NSCLC patients.

CASTOR1 phosphorylation predicts poor survival in male patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer, a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitates enhanced prognostic markers for improved treatment outcomes. We have previously shown a tumor suppressive role of cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 (CASTOR1), which is targeted for degradation upon phosphorylation at S14 (pCASTOR1) in multiple types of cancer. This study focuses on the predictive value of pCASTOR1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients with KRAS mutations.

RESULTS

Employing a newly developed pCASTOR1 specific antibody, we found that tumor cells exhibited significantly elevated pCASTOR1 scores compared to non-tumor cells (P < 0.05). Higher pCASTOR1 scores predicted poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0008) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 3.0, P = 0.0035) in male patients with KRAS mutations. pCASTOR1 remained an independent predictor for OS (HR = 4.1, P = 0.0047) and RFS (HR = 3.5, P = 0.0342) after controlling for other factors. Notably, in early-stage LUAD, elevated pCASTOR1 scores were associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0176) and RFS (HR = 3.1, P = 0.0277) in male patients with KRAS mutations, akin to late-stage patients.

CONCLUSION

Elevated pCASTOR1 scores serve as biomarkers predicting poorer OS and RFS in male LUAD patients with KRAS mutations, offering potential clinical utility in optimizing treatment strategies for this subgroup.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Early Stage Resectable NSCLC: Consensus Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Advances in the multidisciplinary care of early stage resectable NSCLC (rNSCLC) are emerging at an unprecedented pace. Numerous phase 3 trials produced results that have transformed patient outcomes for the better, yet these findings also require important modifications to the patient treatment journey trajectory and reorganization of care pathways. Perhaps, most notably, the need for multispecialty collaboration for this patient population has never been greater. These rapid advances have inevitably left us with important gaps in knowledge for which definitive answers will only become available in several years. To this end, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer commissioned a diverse multidisciplinary international expert panel to evaluate the current landscape and provide diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic recommendations for patients with rNSCLC, with particular emphasis on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control TNM eighth edition stages II and III disease. Using a team-based approach, we generated 19 recommendations, of which all but one achieved greater than 85% consensus among panel members. A public voting process was initiated, which successfully validated and provided qualitative nuance to our recommendations. Highlights include the following: (1) the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation of patients with rNSCLC driven by shared clinical decision-making of a multispecialty team of expert providers; (2) biomarker testing for rNSCLC; (3) a preference for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III rNSCLC; (4) equipoise regarding the optimal management of patients with stage II between upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant or perioperative strategies; and (5) the robust preference for adjuvant targeted therapy for patients with rNSCLC and sensitizing EGFR and ALK tumor alterations. Our primary goals were to provide practical recommendations sensitive to the global differences in biology and resources for patients with rNSCLC and to provide expert consensus guidance tailored to the individualized patient needs, goals, and preferences in their cancer care journey as these are areas where physicians must make daily clinical decisions in the absence of definitive data. These recommendations will continue to evolve as the treatment landscape for rNSCLC expands and more knowledge is acquired on the best therapeutic approach in specific patient and disease subgroups.

Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery

PURPOSE

Advances in primary lung cancer drug therapy have extended patients' survival, including patients with stage IV disease. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of salvage surgery following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in primary lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 2050 primary lung cancer surgeries performed at our institution between 2012 and 2022. The study included patients who underwent salvage surgery for unresectable lesions that became resectable or localized residual lesions after treatment. We investigated patients' clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic responses, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified eight cases of salvage surgery after TKI treatment and eight cases after ICI treatment. Five patients experienced early recurrence after surgery; however, the long-term outcome in the post-TKI group was favorable, with a median overall survival (OS) of 66 (range: 28-80) months. Postoperative recurrence was confined to local lymph node recurrence in one patient in the post-ICI group. Despite the relatively short observation period, the long-term prognosis remained promising, with a median OS of 18.7 (range: 9.7-55.8) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery after TKI or ICI treatment can be safely performed, and the OS may be favorable.

A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has ushered in a new era for surgical treatment for patients with NSCLC. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference meeting abstracts. The endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), complete pathological response (pCR), surgical resection rate, R0 resection, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), surgical complications, treatment discontinuation, surgical delay, and treatment-related death. Stata 18 software was used for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty-two studies including a total of 1108 patients were eligible for this study.

RESULTS

Among the patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, the pooled MPR rate was 51% (95% CI [0.44-0.58]), and pCR rate was 34% (95% CI [0.28-0.40]). The pooled surgical resection rate was 85% (95% CI [0.81-0.89]), and the pooled R0 rate was 94% (95% CI [0.91-0.96]). The pooled rate of pathological tumor downstaging was 84% (95% CI [0.79-0.88]), and the pooled rate of pathological nodal downstaging was 38% (95% CI [0.23-0.57]). During the treatment of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgery, the pooled rate of TRAEs (any grade) was 84% (95% CI [0.73-0.91]), and the pooled rate of SAEs was 29% (95% CI [0.21-0.38]). Surgical complications pooled rate was 25% (95% CI [0.14-0.41]). The pooled rate of treatment discontinuation (11%, 95% CI [0.09-0.13]), surgical delay (3%, 95% CI [0.02-0.05]), and treatment-related death (2%, 95% CI [0.02-0.03]) were conducted.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy provides a high pathological response, surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, and pathological downstage rate and has a low risk of increasing the incidence of SAEs, surgical complications, treatment discontinuation, surgical delay, and treatment-related death. The validation of prospective and large sample studies is needed to confirm this conclusion.

Single-arm trial of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab with chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable lung cancer: the INCREASE study

BACKGROUND

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) yields pathological complete response (pCR) rates of approximately 30%. We investigated using ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) with neoadjuvant CRT in resectable, and borderline resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

This single-arm, phase-II trial enrolled operable T3-4N0-2 patients with NSCLC without oncogenic drivers. Primary study endpoints were safety, major pathological response (MPR) and pCR. Treatment encompassed platinum-doublet concurrent CRT, IPI 1 mg/kg intravenous and NIVO 360 mg intravenous on day-1, followed by chemotherapy plus NIVO 360 mg 3 weeks later. Thoracic radiotherapy was 50 or 60 Gy, in once-daily doses of 2 Gy. Resections were 6 weeks post-radiotherapy.

RESULTS

In a total of 30 patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 70%, one TRAE grade 5 late-onset pneumonitis on day 96 post-surgery (1/30, 3.3%) occurred, and one non-TRAE COVID-19 death (1/30, 3.3%). pCR and MPR were achieved in 50% (15/30) and 63% (19/30) of the ITT; and in 58% (15/26) and 73% (19/26) of the 26 patients who underwent surgery, respectively. Postoperative melanoma was seen in one non-pCR patient. The R0 rate was 100% (26/26), and no patient failed surgery due to TRAEs. In peripheral blood, proliferative CD8+ T cells were increased, while proliferative regulatory T cells (Tregs) were not. On-treatment, pCR-positives had higher CD8+CD39+ T cells and lower HLA-DR+ Tregs.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant IPI-NIVO-CRT in T3-4N0-2 NSCLC showed acceptable safety with pCR and MPR in 58% and 73% of operated patients, respectively. No patient failed surgery due to TRAEs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04245514.

Gastric cancer liver metastasis will reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors augment the antitumor activity of T cells by inhibiting the negative regulatory pathway of T cells, leading to notable efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and other malignancies through immunotherapy utilization. However, secondary malignant liver tumors not only lower the liver's sensitivity to immunotherapy but also trigger systemic immune suppression, resulting in reduced overall effectiveness of immune therapy. Patients receiving immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma experience reduced response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival when secondary malignant tumors develop in the liver. Through Liu's retrospective analysis, valuable insights are provided for the future clinical management of these patients. Therefore, in patients with gastric cancer (GC), the occurrence of liver metastasis might be indicative of reduced efficacy of immunotherapy. Overcoming liver immune tolerance mechanisms and their negative impacts allows for the potential benefits of immunotherapy in patients with GC and liver metastasis.

Neo-adjuvant radiation and intratumoral immunotherapy followed by surgery-NARIS trial for extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is a rare malignant nonepithelial disease, calling for combined modality treatments with surgery to further improve local control rates and long-term survival, especially in patients with multiple local recurrences with or without risk of amputation. In this double-arm, open-label, Phase II clinical trial, we will enroll 30 patients with pathologically confirmed ESTS without nodal involvement or distant metastases. Patients are randomly assigned to the combination treatment group or the radiation monotherapy group. Additionally, tumor and biological samples will be obtained directly before and after neoadjuvant therapy, allowing for studies of immune response and primary drug resistance mechanisms.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200060659 (http://www.chictr.org.cn) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting the pathological response and prognosis to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC, and the ability to screen patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty one resectable NSCLC (stage IA-IIIB) patients were analyzed, who received two-three cycles neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.18F-FDG PET/CT was carried out at baseline(scan-1) and prior to radical resection(scan-2). SULmax, SULpeak, MTV, TLG, T/N ratio, ΔSULmax%,ΔSULpeak%, ΔMTV%, ΔTLG%,ΔT/N ratio% were calculated. 18F-FDG PET/CT responses were classified using PERCIST. We then compared the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria for response assessment.With surgical pathology of primary lesions as the gold standard, the correlation between metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT and major pathologic response (MPR) was analyzed. All metabolic parameters were compared to treatment response and correlated to PFS and OS.

RESULTS

In total of fifty one patients, MPR was achieved in 25(49%, 25/51) patients after neoadjuvant therapy. The metabolic parameters of Scan-1 were not correlated with MPR.The degree of pathological regression was negatively correlated with SULmax, SULpeak, MTV, TLG, T/N ratio of scan-2, and the percentage changes of the ΔSULmax%, ΔSULpeak%, ΔMTV%,ΔTLG%,ΔT/N ratio% after neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.05). According to PERCIST, 36 patients (70.6%, 36/51) showed PMR, 12 patients(23.5%, 12/51) had stable metabolic disease(SMD), and 3 patients(5.9%, 3/51) had progressive metabolic disease (PMD). ROC indicated that all of scan-2 metabolic parameters and the percentage changes of metabolic parameters had ability to predict MPR and non-MPR, SULmax and T/N ratio of scan-2 had the best differentiation ability.The accuracy of RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria were no statistical significance(p = 0.91). On univariate analysis, ΔMTV% has the highest correlation with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic response by 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict MPR to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable NSCLC. ΔMTV% was significantly correlated with PFS.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.

Lung-intestinal axis, Shuangshen granules attenuate lung metastasis by regulating the intestinal microbiota and related metabolites

BACKGROUND

Based on the proposed lung-intestinal axis, there is a significant correlation between the microbiota and lung metastasis. Targeting the microbial composition is valuable in modulating the host response to cancer therapeutics. As a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, Shuangshen granules (SSG) are clinically useful in delaying lung metastasis, but its underlying mechanisms remain unknown.

METHODS

The C57BL/6N mice were chosen to establish the Lewis lung cancer models. The broad-spectrum antibiotics (ABX) group was set up to estimate the effect of microbiota composition on metastasis. The therapeutic effects of different doses of SSG in treating lung metastasis were investigated through histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis methods. Additionally, the phenotype of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the lung and blood was evaluated by flow cytometry. The fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and negative control (ABX plus high dose SSG group) experiments were also designed to assess intestinal microbiota's role in SSG intervention's outcome in lung metastasis. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and Untargeted metabolomic analysis were used to analyze intestinal microbiota and metabolite changes mediated by SSG in tumor-bearing mice with lung metastasis.

RESULT

ABX could observably lead to intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and enhance metastasis. SSG showed a significant chemopreventive effect in lung metastasis, reduced metastatic nodules and the expression levels of pre-metastatic niche biomarkers, and enriched the ratio of CD86+F4/80+CD11b+ cells, while FMT delayed metastasis similarly. The analysis of microbiota and metabolites revealed that SSG significantly enriched probiotics in feces, including Akkermansia muciniphila, Lachnoclostridium sp YL32, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and potential anti-cancer serum metabolites, including Ginsenoside Rb1, Isoquinoline, Betulin and so on. We also investigated the mechanism of SSG protection against lung metastasis and showed that SSG regulated microbiota, improved TAMs polarization, and inhibited the expression of the NF-κB pathway.

CONCLUSION

The results presented in our article demonstrated that SSG improved TAMs polarization and inhibited the NF-κB pathway by alleviating intestinal microbiota imbalance and metabolic disorders in tumor-bearing mice, resulting in delayed lung metastasis.

Pathology of Surgically Resected Lung Cancers Following Neoadjuvant Therapy

In around 30% of patients, non-small cell lung cancer is diagnosed at an advanced but resectable stage. Adding systemic therapy has shown clear benefit over surgery alone in locally advanced disease, and currently, chemo-immunotherapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is the new standard for patients without targetable mutations. One major advantage of the neoadjuvant approach is the possibility of an immediate evaluation of the treatment effect, highlighting the role of pathology as an important contributor at the forefront of clinical decision-making and research. This review provides a summary and an update on current guidelines for histological evaluation of treatment effect after neoadjuvant therapy, also known as regression grading, and discusses newer data focusing on areas of evolving questions and controversies, such as the gross examination of the tumor and tumor bed, weighted versus unweighted evaluation approaches, discussion of histologic tumor type-specific cut-offs for major pathologic response, assessment of lymph nodes and regression grading after immunotherapy and targeted therapy. As no data or recommendations exist on regression grading of multiple tumor nodules, a practical approach is recommended. Lastly, we will touch on additional tissue biomarkers and summarize recent advances in the ardently discussed field of using circulating tumor DNA for the evaluation of treatment response.

Molecular Markers, Immune Therapy, and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-State-of-the-Art Review for Surgeons

Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. An increasing understanding of relevant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biomarkers has led to the recent development of molecular-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors that have revolutionized treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic disease. The purpose of this review is to provide surgeons with a state-of-the-art understanding of the current medical and surgical treatment trends and their implications in the future of management of NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and March 2024 focusing on molecular markers, tumor targeting, and immunotherapy in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Results: There is now increasing data to suggest that molecular-targeted therapies and immune therapies have a role in the neoadjuvant setting. Advances in intraoperative imaging allow surgeons to perform increasingly parenchymal-sparing lung resections without compromising tumor margins. Liquid biopsies can noninvasively detect targetable mutations in cancer cells and DNA from a blood draw, potentially allowing for earlier diagnosis, personalized therapy, and long-term monitoring for disease recurrence. Conclusions: The management of NSCLC has advanced dramatically in recent years fueled by a growing understanding of the cancer biology of NSCLC. Advances in medical therapies, surgical techniques, and diagnostic and surveillance modalities continue to evolve but have already impacted current treatment strategies for NSCLC, which are encompassed in this review.

Clinical status and future prospects of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized mismatch repair-deficient cancers: a review

Frameshift mutations accumulate in cancers related to mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), which has the potential to produce various neoantigens, representing a distinct subset of cancers that respond considerably to immunotherapy. In recent years, robust evidence has supported the first-line application of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic dMMR cancers, which provoked extensive investigations of the feasibility and efficacy of immunotherapy in up-front settings, including neoadjuvant therapy. Several completed trials with small sample sizes suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy can achieve an impressively high complete response rate, for the first time offering the potential of systemic therapy to cure cancer without the need for surgical resection. However, a difficult dilemma emerges: clinicians are now facing a selection between the standard of care with good evidence for proficient MMR but suboptimal for dMMR cancers and the emerging immunotherapy with promising results but only based on a limited number of patients with shorter duration of follow-up. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the biological rationale and clinical status of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with dMMR cancers. Furthermore, I elaborate on particular issues that must be taken into consideration for further advancement in the field.

Effective induction immunotherapy minimizes surgical invasiveness for locally advanced lung cancer

Background

Immunotherapy has been recommended for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its effect on surgical resection has not yet been examined. This study aimed to examine the effect of induction immunotherapy on surgical resection in terms of the surgical approach, resection extent, and perioperative recovery.

Methods

We performed a real-world study comprising consecutive patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB NSCLC who received surgical resection after induction immunotherapy from January 2019 to September 2021. The perioperative outcomes were compared in terms of the surgical approach and resection extent.

Results

Among 68 patients, 37 (54.4%) achieved a clinical objective response. Standard resection was performed in 37 patients (54.4%), while extended resection was necessary in the other 31 patients (45.6%). Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was attempted in 37 cases (54.4%), with only 1 (2.7%) conversion. MIS was significantly more commonly accomplished in patients with a clinical objective response than those without (67.6% vs. 35.5%, P=0.008). Patients with a clinical objective response were more likely to have their tumors removed via MIS and/or standard resection (75.7% vs. 51.6%, P=0.04), while those without a clinical objective response more often required extended resection using an open approach. Patients receiving standard resection or MIS had significantly better perioperative outcomes than those who underwent extended resection or thoracotomy (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The results of this large single-center retrospective cohort indicate that in terms of a better clinical response, effective induction immunotherapy could help reduce the resection extent and/or provide more opportunities to perform MIS, resulting in better recovery.

Synergizing Immunotherapy and Antibody-Drug Conjugates: New Horizons in Breast Cancer Therapy

The advent of immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized breast cancer treatment, offering new hope to patients. However, challenges, such as resistance and limited efficacy in certain cases, remain. Recently, the combination of these therapies has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges. ADCs play a crucial role by delivering cytotoxic agents directly to breast cancer cells, minimizing damage to healthy tissue and enhancing the tumor-killing effect. Concurrently, immunotherapies harness the body's immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This integration offers potential to overcome resistance mechanisms and significantly improve therapeutic outcomes. This review explores the rationale behind combining immunotherapies with ADCs, recent advances in this field, and the potential implications for breast cancer treatment.

Less is more: Exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a de-escalation strategy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) constitutes a significant global cancer burden, given its high prevalence and associated mortality. Despite substantial progress in survival rates due to the enhanced multidisciplinary approach to treatment, these methods often lead to severe tissue damage, compromised function, and potential toxicity. Thus, there is an imperative need for novel, effective, and minimally damaging treatment modalities. Neoadjuvant treatment, an emerging therapeutic strategy, is designed to reduce tumor size and curtail distant metastasis prior to definitive intervention. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has optimized the treatment approach for a subset of HNSCC patients, yet it has not produced a noticeable enhancement in overall survival (OS). In the contemporary cancer therapeutics landscape, immunotherapy is gaining traction at an accelerated pace. Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT) has shown promising radiological and pathological responses, coupled with encouraging efficacy in several clinical trials. This potentially paves the way for a myriad of possibilities in treatment de-escalation of HNSCC, which warrants further exploration. This paper reviews the existing strategies and efficacies of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), along with potential de-escalation strategies. Furthermore, the challenges encountered in the context of the de-escalation strategies of NAIT are explored. The aim is to inform future research directions that strive to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients battling HNSCC.

Comprehensive Analysis of Immune Responses to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about which patients are likely to benefit most from neoadjuvant immunotherapy. In this study, we performed a multiplatform analysis on samples from resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy to explore molecular characteristics related to immune responses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients with resectable stage IB-IIIA NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy were included. A multiplex cytokine assay, bulk TCR sequencing in peripheral blood, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry were performed.

RESULTS

Low levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1alpha at baseline were associated with unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with major pathologic response (MPR) showed a decrease in HGF after one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. An increase in IDO and IP-10 was observed in patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There were no correlations between irAEs and MPR or DFS. The MPR group presented a significant decrease in white blood cells and neutrophil count after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The high peripheral baseline TCR convergence was correlated with MPR and favorable DFS in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy led to a significant increase in CD4+, CD8+, and CD8+CD39+ T-cell infiltration in tumor areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the potential roles of cytokines and TCR convergence for predicting ICIs response in resectable NSCLC and LUSC. CD8+CD39+T cells and CD4+ T cells could be involved in the action of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Updated review of perioperative treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer in the new era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: past, present, and future

The perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should control both local and microscopic systemic disease, because the survival of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection alone has been dismal except in stage IA patients. One way to improve surgical outcome is the administration of chemotherapy before or after the surgical procedure. During the last two decades, many clinical studies have focused on developing optimal adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens that can be combined with surgical treatment and/or radiotherapy. Based on the results of those clinical studies, multimodality therapy has been considered to be an appropriate treatment approach for locally advanced NSCLC patients. When nodal involvement is discovered postoperatively, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has conferred an overall survival benefit. More recently, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant use of immunotherapy adding to the cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been revealed to improve survival of the patients with locally advanced NSCLC in many large-scale clinical trials; although, optimal treatment strategies are still evolving.

The Genetic Analysis and Clinical Therapy in Lung Cancer: Current Advances and Future Directions

Lung cancer, including both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, representing 18% of the total cancer deaths in 2020. Many patients are identified already at an advanced stage with metastatic disease and have a worsening prognosis. Recent advances in the genetic understanding of lung cancer have opened new avenues for personalized treatments and targeted therapies. This review examines the latest discoveries in the genetics of lung cancer, discusses key biomarkers, and analyzes current clinical therapies based on this genetic information. It will conclude with a discussion of future prospects and potential research directions.

Prognostic model based on B cell marker genes for NSCLC patients under neoadjuvant immunotherapy by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has evolved as an effective option to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). B cells play essential roles in the immune system as well as cancer progression. However, the repertoire of B cells and its association with clinical outcomes remains unclear in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing data for LUAD samples were accessed from the TCGA and GEO databases. LUAD-related B cell marker genes were confirmed based on comprehensive analysis of scRNA-seq data. We then constructed the B cell marker gene signature (BCMGS) and validated it. In addition, we evaluated the association of BCGMS with tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) characteristics. Furthermore, we validated the efficacy of BCGMS in a cohort of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

RESULTS

A BCMGS was constructed based on the TCGA cohort and further validated in three independent GSE cohorts. In addition, the BCMGS was proven to be significantly associated with TIME characteristics. Moreover, a relatively higher risk score indicated poor clinical outcomes and a worse immune response among NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed an 18-gene prognostic signature derived from B cell marker genes based on scRNA-seq data, which had the potential to predict the prognosis and immune response of NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

[Perioperative Immunotherapy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and New Standard of Care]

Immunotherapy has drastically changed the treatment of lung cancer not only in systemic disease but also in the perioperative setting in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In particular, the neoadjuvant and perioperative therapy regimes of the CheckMate 816 and KEYNOTE-671 studies as well as the adjuvant therapy according to the IMPower010 and the PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 protocols have already been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of selected cases. Other therapy protocols and combination therapies with varying drug classes and therapy modalities are currently being examined for their effectiveness and tolerance. The new treatment landscape creates new opportunities but also challenges for the treating disciplines. This article will focus on the current evidence for perioperative immunotherapy for resectable lung cancer and the resulting therapy standards, especially with regard to patient selection for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as current research efforts.

[Anatomical Lung Resection Following Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: Technical Aspects and Case Reports]

Since the approval of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in Europe, treatment options for resectable stage II-III NSCLC have also significantly improved in clinical routine. Surgical excision of the tumour by anatomic lung resection still remains the most essential component of multimodal therapy. However, with the increasing use of the new treatment concepts in clinical routine, questions also arise regarding safety, adverse events and technical resectability following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. This review summarises the current data on perioperative safety following neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and discusses aspects of surgical technique, the extent of resection and intraoperative challenges illustrated by clinical case reports.

Integrative Approaches in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: The Role of Radiotherapy

Treatment guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vary by several factors including pathological stage, patient candidacy, and goal of treatment. With many therapeutics and even more combinations available in the NSCLC clinician's toolkit, a multitude of questions remain unanswered vis-a-vis treatment optimization. While some studies have begun exploring the interplay among the many pillars of NSCLC treatment-surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy-the vast number of combinations and permutations of different therapy modalities in addition to the modulation of each constituent therapy leaves much to be desired in a field that is otherwise rapidly evolving. Given NSCLC's high incidence and lethality, the experimentation of synergistic benefits that combinatorial treatment may confer presents a ripe target for advancement and increased understanding without the cost and burden of novel drug development. This review introduces, synthesizes, and compares prominent NSCLC therapies, placing emphasis on the interplay among types of therapies and the synergistic benefits some combinatorial therapies have demonstrated over the past several years.

Tissue-resident memory T cells in immunotherapy and immune-related adverse events by immune checkpoint inhibitor

Tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM) are a specialized subset of T cells that reside in tissues and provide long-term protective immunity against pathogens that enter the body through that specific tissue. TRM cells have specific phenotype and reside preferentially in barrier tissues. Recent studies have revealed that TRM cells are the main target of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy since their role in cancer immunosurveillance. Furthermore, TRM cells also play a crucial part in pathogenesis of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we provide a concise review of biological characteristics of TRM cells, and the major advances and recent findings regarding their involvement in immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and the corresponding irAEs.

A prospective analysis of the management practices for patients with Stage-III-N2Non-Small-Cell lung cancer (OBSERVE IIIA-B GFPC 04-2020Study)

BACKGROUND

Management of stage-III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on a multimodal strategy (surgery or radiotherapycombined with systemic drugs) remains controversial. Patients are treated with a curative intent, and available data suggestprolonged survival after complete resection. However, no consensual definition of "tumor resectability" exists. This study aimed to analyze the concordanceamong French tumor board meeting (TBM)-emittedtherapeutic decisions forstage-III-N2 NSCLC.

METHODS

Six patients with stage-III-N2 NSCLC discussed at Saint-Etienne University Hospital'sthoracic TBMs were selected, anonymouslyreported, and submitted to the participating TBMs. The primary goal of this multicenter, prospective, observational study was to assess the consistency of TBMpanel decisions for each case. The secondary endpointwas identifying the demographic or technical factors that potentiallyaffected decision-making.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven TBMs from university hospitals, a cancer center, general hospitals, and a private hospitalparticipated in this study. None of their decisions for the six cases were unanimous.The decisions were homogenous for three cases (78%, 85%, and 88% TBMs opted for medical treatment, respectively),andmore ambivalent for the other three (medical versus surgical strategies were favored by 44%/56%, 46%/54%, and 58%/42% TBMs, respectively). Interestingly, decisions regarding chemoradiationand perioperative chemotherapyinthe medical and surgical strategies, respectively, were also discordant. Hospital type, specialist participation in TBMs, and activity volumes were not significantly associated with therapeutic decisions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study highlight substantial disparities amongFrench TBMs regarding therapeutic management of stage-III-N2 NSCLC. The decisions were not associated with local conditions.

Therapeutic effect of induction therapy including nab-paclitaxel followed by surgical resection for the patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is associated with a high mortality rate worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major subtype of lung cancer. Carboplatin (CBDCA) plus nab-paclitaxel (PTX) has become a standard treatment for advanced unresectable NSCLC. However, treatment with nab-PTX has not been established as a standard therapy for resectable locally advanced (LA)-NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive study involving consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC who underwent induction therapy including nab-PTX followed by surgical resection. Fifteen patients with locally advanced NSCLC underwent induction therapy including nab-PTX followed by surgical resection. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consisted of weekly administration of nab-PTX (50 mg/m2) plus CBDCA (area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) 2) and thoracic radiotherapy (50 Gy/25 fractions).

RESULTS

The clinical stages were as follows: IIB (n =1), IIIA (n =12), and IIIC (n =2). Downstaging was observed in 73% (11/15) of patients on comparison with the clinical stage before concurrent CRT. Adverse drug reactions were observed in seven patients. Complete resection was performed in all patients. The re-evaluated pathological stage after pretreatment was diagnosed as stage 0 in three patients, stage IA1 in six, stage IA2 in one, and stage IIIA in five. The pathological effects of previous therapy were as follows: Ef3 (n =3), Ef2 (n =9), and Ef1a (n =3).

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of induction therapy including nab-PTX was promising. Induction CRT, including nab-PTX, followed by resection, may be a viable alternative treatment option for locally advanced NSCLC.

Exploiting temporal aspects of cancer immunotherapy

Many mechanisms underlying an effective immunotherapy-induced antitumour response are transient and critically time dependent. This is equally true for several immunological events in the tumour microenvironment induced by other cancer treatments. Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has proven to be very effective in the treatment of some cancers, but unfortunately, with many cancer types, most patients do not experience a benefit. To improve outcomes, a multitude of clinical trials are testing combinations of ICT with various other treatment modalities. Ideally, those combination treatments should take time-dependent immunological events into account. Recent studies have started to map the dynamic cellular and molecular changes that occur during treatment with ICT, in the tumour and systemically. Here, we overlay the dynamic ICT response with the therapeutic response following surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapies. We propose that by combining treatments in a time-conscious manner, we may optimally exploit the interactions between the individual therapies.

Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team.

OBJECTIVE

Development of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP.

METHODS

Between March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes.

RESULTS

New and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice.

The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite surgical resection, long-term survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC, provides a marginal 5.4% benefit in survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a significant survival benefit in some patients with advanced NSCLC and are being evaluated for perioperative use in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using the PubMed online database to identify clinical trials of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC and studies analyzing biomarkers and immune priming strategies.

RESULTS

Building on previous phase I and II trials, randomized phase III trials have shown efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab, perioperative pembrolizumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant pembrolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC with improvement of event-free/disease-free survival of 24% to 42%, leading to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of these drugs in the treatment of resectable NSCLC. Three additional phase III trials have also recently reported the use of immunotherapy both before and after surgery, with pathologic complete response rates of 17% to 25%, significantly better than chemotherapy alone. Perioperative ICI therapy has comparable perioperative morbidity to chemotherapy alone and does not impair surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, is safe and improves outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC. Questions regarding patient selection, the need for adjuvant ICI therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the duration of perioperative immunotherapy remain to be answered by future trials.

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy for potentially resectable oncogene-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment may benefit locally advanced oncogene-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. This retrospective study was designed to observe the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with resectable oncogene-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with potential resectable NSCLC harbouring oncogene alterations who had received neoadjuvant treatment were retrospectively recruited, and an oncogene-negative cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment was reviewed for comparison during the same period. The primary aim was to observe the treatment efficacy and event-free survival (EFS) of these agents. Safety profile, molecular target, and immunologic factor data, including PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden (TMB), were also obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were recruited. Thirty-one of them harboured oncogene alterations, including EGFR, KRAS, ERBB2, ROS1, MET, RET, ALK, and FGFR3 alterations. Among the oncogene-positive patients, 18 patients received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (oncogene-positive IO group), 13 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or corresponding TKIs or TKIs alone (oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group), and the other 15 patients were oncogene negative and received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy (oncogene-negative IO group). The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) rates were 22.2% (4 of 18) and 44.4% (8 of 18) in the oncogene-positive IO group, 0% (P = 0.120) and 23.1% (3 of 13) (P = 0.276) in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group, and 46.7% (7 of 15) (P = 0.163) and 80.0% (12 of 15) (P = 0.072) in the oncogene-negative IO group, respectively. By the last follow-up, the median EFS time had not reached in the oncogene-positive IO group, and was 29.5 months in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group and 38.4 months in the oncogene-negative IO group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy/TKIs treatment, neoadjuvant treatment with PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with higher pCR/MPR rates in patients with partially resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC, while the pCR/MPR rates were lower than their oncogene-negative counterparts treated with PD-(L)1 blockade-based treatment. Specifically, oncogene alteration types and other predictors of response to immunotherapy should be taken into account in clinical practice.

A Review of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a dramatic increase in the survival of patients with lung cancer across all stages. Over the past decade, the field has experienced rapid maturation; however, several challenges continue to complicate patient management. This review aims to highlight the data that led to this dramatic shift in practice as well as to focus on key challenges. These include determining the optimal therapy duration, managing frail patients or those with brain metastases, addressing the challenges posed by immune-related adverse events, and defining the various patterns of clinical and radiological responses to immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of different cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is no standard consensus on the optimal number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with different treatment cycles in order to provide valuable information for clinical decision-making.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched before May 2023. The included studies were categorized based on different treatment cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to assess their respective efficacy and safety in patients with resectable NSCLC.

Results

Incorporating data from 29 studies with 1331 patients, we found major pathological response rates of 43 % (95%CI, 34-52 %) with two cycles and 33 % (95%CI, 22-45 %) with three cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Radiological response rates were 39 % (95%CI, 28-50 %) and 56 % (95%CI, 44-68 %) for two and three cycles, respectively, with higher incidence rates of severe adverse events (SAEs) in the three-cycle group (32 %; 95%CI, 21-50 %). Despite similar rates of R0 resection between two and three cycles, the latter showed a slightly higher surgical delay rate (1 % vs. 7 %). Neoadjuvant treatment modes significantly affected outcomes, with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy demonstrating superiority in improving pathological and radiological response rates, while the incidence of SAEs in patients receiving combination therapy remained within an acceptable range (23 %; 95%CI, 15-35 %). However, regardless of the treatment mode administered, an increase in the number of treatment cycles did not result in substantial improvement in pathological response rates.

Conclusion

There are clear advantages of combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant settings. Increasing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from two to three primarily may not substantially improve the overall efficacy, while increasing the risk of adverse events. Further analysis of the outcomes of four cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy is necessary.

A current comprehensive role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and evidence for current use and potential future uses of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was carried out through PubMed to identify completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use, efficacy, and safety of ICIs in the management of resectable NSCLC.

DATA SUMMARY

To date, four phase 3 trials have emerged that have changed our treatment practice concerning the utilization of ICIs during the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials examined the application of adjuvant atezolizumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, following surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. In the CheckMate 816 trial, the combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy received approval for patients with resectable NSCLC. Also, for patients with resectable NSCLC, the use of a pembrolizumab and chemotherapy combination as a perioperative therapy received approval based on the results of the KEYNOTE-671 trial. Apart from these trials, there are numerous phase 2 and phase 3 trials, some of which have been published while others are still in progress.

CONCLUSION

Despite the promising outcomes from these trials there remain several unanswered questions. In this review, we will assess clinical trials involving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative ICIs, aiming to address the unresolved questions related to these therapeutic approaches.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors can be found in 10 to 15% of patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. In these patients, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. The use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising results, but data from studies of this approach are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 study in which patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced, previously untreated dMMR colon cancer were treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The two primary end points were safety, defined by timely surgery (i.e., ≤2-week delay of planned surgery owing to treatment-related toxic events), and 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary end points included pathological response and results of genomic analyses.

RESULTS

Of 115 enrolled patients, 113 (98%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 93 to 100) underwent timely surgery; 2 patients had surgery delayed by more than 2 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5 patients (4%), and none of the patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Among the 111 patients included in the efficacy analysis, a pathological response was observed in 109 (98%; 95% CI, 94 to 100), including 105 (95%) with a major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor) and 75 (68%) with a pathological complete response (0% residual viable tumor). With a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 9 to 65), no patients have had recurrence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced dMMR colon cancer, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an acceptable safety profile and led to a pathological response in a high proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; NICHE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03026140.).

Endocrine adverse events in patients with cancer receiving perioperative immune checkpoint blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Perioperative use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) improves survival in patients with early-stage cancer. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs), frequently involve the endocrine system which may increase perioperative complications and affect quality of life.

Objective

We conducted a meta-analysis to elucidate the impact of adding ICB to conventional neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy on the incidence of endocrine AEs.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomize-controlled trials (RCTs).

Data sources and methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library was performed for RCTs comparing groups with and without the addition of ICB to conventional perioperative therapy in patients with cancer. Outcomes included all-grade and grade 3-5 thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and hyperglycemia. The odds ratios (ORs) of all-grade and grade 3-5 endocrine were pooled using the random-effect model meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-four RCTs comprising 12,199 patients were identified for meta-analysis. The addition of ICB was associated with higher incidence of thyroiditis [all grade: OR = 3.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.88-6.64)], hyperthyroidism [all-grade: 7.18 (4.30-12.01); grade 3-5: 3.93 (1.21-12.82)], hypothyroidism [all-grade: 5.39 (3.68-7.90); grade 3-5: 3.63 (1.18-11.11)], adrenal insufficiency [all-grade: 3.82 (1.88-7.79); grade 3-5: 5.91 (2.36-14.82)], hypophysitis [all-grade: 10.29 (4.97-21.3); grade 3-5: 5.80 (1.99-16.92)], and type 1 diabetes mellitus [all-grade: 2.24 (1.06-4.74); grade 3-5: 3.49 (1.21-10.08)]. The cumulative incidence of each grade 3-5 endocrine AE was low (<1.3%). No grade 5 AEs leading to death were observed.

Conclusion

The addition of neoadjuvant/adjuvant ICB to conventional therapy was associated with an increased incidence of several endocrine AEs. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of endocrinopathy from the perioperative ICB use to facilitate risk-benefit discussion with patients with early-stage cancer.

Trial registration

The protocol of this research was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022332624).

Predictive model based on multiple immunofluorescence quantitative analysis for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

This study aims to establish a prediction model for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in lung squamous cell carcinoma to guide clinical treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study included 50 patients diagnosed with lung squamous cell carcinoma who received NICT. The patients were divided into the pathological complete response (PCR) group and the non-PCR group. HE staining and multiple immunofluorescence (mIF) techniques were utilized to analyze the differences in the immune microenvironment between these groups. LASSO regression and optimal subset regression were employed to identify the most significant variables and construct a prediction model.

Results

The PCR group showed higher densities of lymphocyte nuclei and karyorrhexis based on HE staining. Furthermore, based on mIF analysis, the PCR group showed higher cell densities of CD8+, PD-L1+, and CD8+PD-L1+ in the tumor region, while showing lower cell densities of CD3+Foxp3+, Foxp3+, and CD163+. Logistic univariate analysis revealed CD8+PD-L1+, PD-L1+, CD8+, CD4+LAG-3+, lymphocyte nuclei, and karyorrhexis as significant factors influencing PCR. By using diverse screening methods, the three most relevant variables (CD8+, PD-L1+, and CD8+PD-L1+ in the tumor region) were selected to establish the prediction model. The model exhibited excellent performance in both the training set (AUC=0.965) and the validation set (AUC=0.786). In the validation set, In comparison to the conventional TPS scoring criteria, the model attained superior accuracy (0.85), specificity(0.67), and sensitivity (0.92).

Conclusion

NICT treatment might induce anti-tumor effects by enriching immune cells and reactivating exhausted T cells. CD8+, PD-L1+, and CD8+PD-L1+ cell abundances within the tumor region have been closely associated with therapeutic efficacy. Incorporating these three variables into a predictive model allows accurate forecasting of treatment outcomes and provides a reliable basis for selecting NICT treatment strategies.

Cardiovascular toxicity with CTLA-4 inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Background

With the emergence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, the outcomes of patients with malignant tumors have improved significantly. However, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events has also increased, which can affect tumor treatment. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and severity of adverse cardiovascular events caused by CTLA-4 inhibitors by analyzing reported trials that involved CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials published in English from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2022, were searched using the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. All included trials examined all grade and grades 3-5 cardiac and vascular adverse events. These involved comparisons of CTLA-4 inhibitors to placebo, CTLA-4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone, CTLA-4 inhibitors combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone, and CTLA-4 inhibitors plus target agent to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus target agent. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results

Overall, 20 trials were included. CTLA-4 inhibitors significantly increased the incidence of all-grade cardiovascular toxicity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.75, p = 0.05). The incidence of all-grade cardiovascular toxicity increased in malignant tumor patients who received single-agent CTLA-4 inhibitors (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.13-2.65, p = 0.01), as well as the incidence rate of grades 3-5 cardiovascular adverse events (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.70, p = 0.03). Compared with the non-CTLA-4 inhibitor group, CTLA-4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, or target agent did not significantly affect the incidence of cardiac and vascular toxicity. The incidence of grades 3-5 cardiac failure, hypertension, pericardial effusion, myocarditis, and atrial fibrillation were much higher among patients exposed to CTLA-4 inhibitor, but the data were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the incidence rate of all cardiovascular toxicity and severe cardiovascular toxicity increased in patients who were administered CTLA-4 inhibitors. In addition, the risk of serious cardiovascular toxic events was independent of the type of adverse event. From these results, physicians should assess the benefits and risks of CTLA-4 inhibitors when treating malignancies.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab with or without relatlimab in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial

Antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4, administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are the standard of care in most patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers. When given before curative surgery, tumor responses and improved event-free survival are achieved. New antibody combinations may be more efficacious and tolerable. In an ongoing, open-label phase 2 study, 60 biomarker-unselected, treatment-naive patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive two preoperative doses of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) with or without relatlimab (anti-LAG-3) antibody therapy. The primary study endpoint was the feasibility of surgery within 43 days, which was met by all patients. Curative resection was achieved in 95% of patients. Secondary endpoints included pathological and radiographic response rates, pathologically complete resection rates, disease-free and overall survival rates, and safety. Major pathological (≤10% viable tumor cells) and objective radiographic responses were achieved in 27% and 10% (nivolumab) and in 30% and 27% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, respectively. In 100% (nivolumab) and 90% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, tumors and lymph nodes were pathologically completely resected. With 12 months median duration of follow-up, disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 12 months were 89% and 93% (nivolumab), and 93% and 100% (nivolumab and relatlimab). Both treatments were safe with grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in 10% and 13% of patients per study arm. Exploratory analyses provided insights into biological processes triggered by preoperative immunotherapy. This study establishes the feasibility and safety of dual targeting of PD-1 and LAG-3 before lung cancer surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Indentifier: NCT04205552 .

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on PD-1/L1 inhibitors for gastrointestinal tumors: a review of the rationale and clinical advances

The landscape of current tumor treatment has been revolutionized by the advent of immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Leveraging its capacity to mobilize systemic antitumor immunity, which is primarily mediated by T cells, there is growing exploration and expansion of its potential value in various stages of clinical tumor treatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy induces a robust immune response against tumors prior to surgery, effectively facilitating tumor volume reduction, early eradication or suppression of tumor cell activity, and control of potential metastatic spread, to improve curative surgical resection rates, and prevent tumor recurrence. This review delineates the theoretical basis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy from preclinical research evidence, discusses specific challenges in clinical application, and provides a comprehensive overview of clinical research progress in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors. These findings suggest that neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the potential to ameliorate immunosuppressive states and enhance cytotoxic T cell function while preserving lymphatic drainage in the preoperative period. However, further investigations are needed on specific treatment regimens, suitable patient populations, and measurable endpoints. Despite numerous studies demonstrating the promising efficacy and manageable adverse events of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in gastrointestinal tumors, the availability of high-quality randomized controlled trials is limited, which highlights the necessity for further research.

Recurrence/prognosis estimation using a molecularly positive surgical margin-based model calls for alternative curative strategies in pIIIA/N2 NSCLC

Stage pIIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is primarily treated by complete surgical resection combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies. However, up to 40% of patients experience tumor recurrence. Here, we studied 119 stage pIIIA/N2 NSCLC patients who received complete surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The paired tumor and resection margin samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Although all patients were classified as negative resection margins by histologic methods, NGS revealed that 47.1% of them had molecularly positive surgical margins. Patients who tested positive for NGS-detected residual tumors had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.002). Additionally, metastatic lymph node ratio, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) mutations, and SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4 (SMARCA4) mutations were also independently associated with DFS. We used these four features to construct a COX model that could effectively estimate recurrence risk and prognosis. Notably, mutational profiling through broad-panel NGS could more sensitively detect residual tumors than the conventional histologic methods. Adjuvant CT and adjuvant CRT exhibited no significant difference in eliminating locoregional recurrence risk for stage pIIIA/N2 NSCLC patients with molecularly positive surgical margins.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of pulmonary resection for synchronous oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Evidence for surgery in advanced disease

OBJECTIVES

Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a survival advantage with the use of local consolidative therapy in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer; however, the indications for and outcomes after pulmonary resection as a component of local consolidative therapy remain ill defined. We sought to characterize the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes among patients with resected oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients presenting to a single center (2000-2017) with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (≤3 synchronous metastases, intrathoracic nodal disease counted as a single site) who underwent resection of the primary tumor were retrospectively identified. Charts were reviewed, and demographic, clinical, pathologic, oncologic, and survival outcomes were recorded. Survival outcomes were analyzed from the date of surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients met inclusion criteria, among whom most (38, 73.1%) were ever smokers, had nonsquamous tumors (48, 92.3%), had no intrathoracic nodal disease (33, 63.5%), and had 1 to 2 sites of metastases (49, 94.2%). The majority (41, 78.9%) received systemic therapy, predominantly in the neoadjuvant setting (24/41, 58.5%). After resection, there were no 30- or 90-day deaths. After a median follow-up of 94.6 months (95% CI, 69.0-139.1), 37 patients (71.2%) progressed and 38 patients (73.1%) died. Median postoperative progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.4 (5.5-11.6) months and 51.7 (22.3-65.3) months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary resection as a means of maximum locoregional control in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer is feasible and safe, and may be associated with durable long-term survival benefits. The frequency of systemic postoperative progression highlights an urgent need to characterize perioperative and oncologic outcomes after pulmonary resection in the current era of novel systemic therapies.

Pathologic Response Evaluation in Neoadjuvant-Treated Lung Cancer

Major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) are increasingly being used in non-small cell lung carcinoma neoadjuvant clinical trials as an early endpoint of survival. MPR for all histologic types of lung cancer is ≤ 10% of viable tumor, while pCR requires no viable tumor. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer multidisciplinary recommendation for the assessment of response in surgically resected lung carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy was the first attempt to standardize grossing processing and microscopic evaluation.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Acting as Tormentors of Advanced Tumors by Unleashing Immune Cells and Associated Collateral Damage

Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), holds substantial promise in revolutionizing cancer treatment. This review explores the transformative impact of these combinations, emphasizing their potential for enhancing therapeutic outcomes across various cancers. Immune checkpoint proteins, such as PD1 and CTLA4, play a pivotal role in modulating immune responses. Blocking these checkpoints unleashes anticancer activity, and the synergy observed when combining multiple checkpoint inhibitors underscores their potential for enhanced efficacy. Nivolumab and ipilimumab harness the host's immune system to target cancer cells, presenting a powerful approach to prevent tumor development. Despite their efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors are accompanied by a distinct set of adverse effects, particularly immune-related adverse effects affecting various organs. Understanding these challenges is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and ensuring patient well-being. Ongoing clinical trials are actively exploring the combination of checkpoint inhibitory therapies, aiming to decipher their synergistic effects and efficacy against diverse cancer types. This review discusses the mechanisms, adverse effects, and various clinical trials involving nivolumab and ipilimumab across different cancers, emphasizing their transformative impact on cancer treatment.

JAML promotes the antitumor role of tumor-resident CD8+ T cells by facilitating their innate-like function in human lung cancer

Tissue-resident memory CD8+T cells (CD8+TRMs) are thought to play a crucial role in cancer immunosurveillance. However, the characteristics of CD8+TRMs in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. Here, we report that CD8+TRMs accumulate explicitly and exhibit a unique gene expression profile in the TME of NSCLC. Interestingly, these tumor-associated CD8+TRMs uniquely exhibit an innate-like phenotype. Importantly, we found that junction adhesion molecule-like (JAML) provides an alternative costimulatory signal to activate tumor-associated CD8+TRMs via combination with cancer cell-derived CXADR (CXADR Ig-like cell adhesion molecule). Furthermore, we demonstrated that activating JAML could promote the expression of TLR1/2 on CD8+TRMs, inhibit tumor progression and prolong the survival of tumor-bearing mice. Finally, we found that higher CD8+TRMs and JAML expression in the TME could predict favorable clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients. Our study reveals an intrinsic bias of CD8+TRMs for receiving the tumor-derived costimulatory signal in the TME, which sustains their innate-like function and antitumor role. These findings will shed more light on the biology of CD8+TRMs and aid in the development of potential targeted treatment strategies for NSCLC.

A Phase II Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial of Preoperative Durvalumab or Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Clinical implications of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced but resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain largely unexplored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable HNSCC were randomized to receive a single dose of preoperative durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) before resection, followed by postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy based on multidisciplinary discretion and 1-year D treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered spatial distribution analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and high-dimensional profiling of circulating immune cells tracked dynamic intratumoral and systemic immune responses.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients enrolled (D, 24 patients; D+T, 24 patients), 45 underwent surgical resection per protocol (D, 21 patients; D+T, 24 patients). D±T had a favorable safety profile and did not delay surgery. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was significantly better in patients treated with D+T than in those treated with D monotherapy. AI-powered whole-slide image analysis demonstrated that D+T significantly reshaped the tumor microenvironment toward immune-inflamed phenotypes, in contrast with the D monotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy. High-dimensional profiling of circulating immune cells revealed a significant expansion of T-cell subsets characterized by proliferation and activation in response to D+T therapy, which was rare following D monotherapy. Importantly, expansion of specific clusters in CD8+ T cells and non-regulatory CD4+ T cells with activation and exhaustion programs was associated with prolonged DRFS in patients treated with D+T.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative D±T is feasible and may benefit patients with resectable HNSCC. Distinct changes in the tumor microenvironment and circulating immune cells were induced by each treatment regimen, warranting further investigation.

Revolutionizing Localized Lung Cancer Treatment: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Immunotherapy for All?

Lung cancer poses a significant public health challenge, with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing 20 to 25% of all NSCLC cases, staged between I and IIIA. Despite surgical interventions, patient survival remains unsatisfactory, with approximately 50% mortality within 5 years across early stages. While perioperative chemotherapy offers some benefit, outcomes vary. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are imperative to improve patient survival. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy emerges as a promising avenue. In this review, we explore studies demonstrating the benefits of this combination therapy, its impact on surgical procedures, and patient quality of life. However, challenges persist, particularly for patients failing to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR), those with stage II lung cancer, and individuals with specific genetic mutations. Additionally, identifying predictive biomarkers remains challenging. Nevertheless, the integration of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the preoperative setting presents a new paradigm in managing resectable lung cancer, heralding more effective and personalized treatments for patients.

High-Grade Pleomorphic Sarcomas Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs) are amongst the most common subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas. Few real-world data on the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in UPS patients and other high-grade pleomorphic STS patients are available.

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study is to describe the efficacy and toxicity of ICB in patients with advanced UPSs and other high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas treated at our institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of all patients with metastatic high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas treated with FDA-approved ICB at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2023. Patients included in trials for which results are not yet published were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with advanced/metastatic pleomorphic sarcomas were included. The median age was 52 years. A total of 26 patients (72%) had UPSs and 10 patients (28%) had other high-grade pleomorphic sarcomas. The median follow-up time was 8.8 months. The median PFS was 2.9 months. The 3-month PFS and 6-month PFS were 46% and 32%, respectively. The median OS was 12.9 months. The 12-month OS and 24-month OS were 53% and 29%, respectively. The best response, previous RT, and type of ICB treatment were significantly and independently associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.0012, p = 0.0019 and p = 0.036, respectively). No new safety signal was identified, and the toxicity was overall manageable with no toxic deaths and only four patients (11%) stopping treatment due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world retrospective data are consistent with the published literature, with a promising 6-month PFS of 32%. Partial or stable responders to ICB treatment have significantly improved PFS compared to progressors.