1
|
Yuan Y, Liu J, Wu Z, Zhou G, Sommer W, Yue Z. Does Eye Gaze Uniquely Trigger Spatial Orienting to Socially Relevant Information? A Behavioral and ERP Study. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12091133. [PMID: 36138869 PMCID: PMC9497197 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Using behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures, the present study examined whether eye gaze triggers a unique form of attentional orienting toward threat-relevant targets. A threatening or neutral target was presented after a non-predictive gaze or an arrow cue. In Experiment 1, reaction times indicated that eye gaze and arrow cues triggered different attention orienting towards threatening targets, which was confirmed by target-elicited P3b latency in Experiment 2. Specifically, for targets preceded by arrow and gaze cues, P3b peak latency was shorter for neutral targets than threatening targets. However, the latency differences were significantly smaller for gaze cues than for arrow cues. Moreover, target-elicited N2 amplitude indicated a significantly stronger cue validity effect of eye gaze than that of arrows. These findings suggest that eye gaze uniquely triggers spatial attention orienting to socially threatening information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yichen Yuan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Jinqun Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Zehua Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Guomei Zhou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Werner Sommer
- Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
- Correspondence: (W.S.); (Z.Y.)
| | - Zhenzhu Yue
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
- Correspondence: (W.S.); (Z.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan KM, Daitch AL, Pinheiro-Chagas P, Fox KCR, Parvizi J, Lieberman MD. Electrocorticographic evidence of a common neurocognitive sequence for mentalizing about the self and others. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1919. [PMID: 35395826 PMCID: PMC8993891 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29510-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies of mentalizing (i.e., theory of mind) consistently implicate the default mode network (DMN). Nevertheless, the social cognitive functions of individual DMN regions remain unclear, perhaps due to limited spatiotemporal resolution in neuroimaging. Here we use electrocorticography (ECoG) to directly record neuronal population activity while 16 human participants judge the psychological traits of themselves and others. Self- and other-mentalizing recruit near-identical cortical sites in a common spatiotemporal sequence. Activations begin in the visual cortex, followed by temporoparietal DMN regions, then finally in medial prefrontal regions. Moreover, regions with later activations exhibit stronger functional specificity for mentalizing, stronger associations with behavioral responses, and stronger self/other differentiation. Specifically, other-mentalizing evokes slower and longer activations than self-mentalizing across successive DMN regions, implying lengthier processing at higher levels of representation. Our results suggest a common neurocognitive pathway for self- and other-mentalizing that follows a complex spatiotemporal gradient of functional specialization across DMN and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Tan
- Social Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Amy L Daitch
- Laboratory of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas
- Laboratory of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kieran C R Fox
- Laboratory of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Josef Parvizi
- Laboratory of Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Matthew D Lieberman
- Social Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Does gaze direction of fearful faces facilitate the processing of threat? An ERP study of spatial precuing effects. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 21:837-851. [PMID: 33846951 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00890-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Eye gaze is very important for attentional orienting in social life. By adopting the event-related potential (ERP) technique, we explored whether attentional orienting of eye gaze is modulated by emotional congruency between facial expressions and the targets in a spatial cuing task. Faces with different emotional expressions (fearful/angry/happy/neutral) directing their eye gaze to the left or right were used as cues, indicating the possible location of subsequent targets. Targets were line drawings of animals, which could be either threatening or neutral. Participants indicated by choice responses whether the animal would fit inside a shoebox in real life or not. Reaction times to targets were faster after valid compared with invalid cues, showing the typical eye gaze cuing effect. Analyses of the late positive potential (LPP) elicited by targets revealed a significant modulation of the gaze cuing effect by emotional congruency. Threatening targets elicited larger LPPs when validly cued by gaze in faces with negative (fearful and angry) expressions. Similarly, neutral targets showed larger LPPs when validly cued by faces with neutral expressions. Such effects were not present after happy face cues. Source localization in the LPP time window revealed that for threatening targets, the activity of right medial frontal gyrus could be related to a larger gaze-orienting effect for the fearful than the angry condition. Our findings provide electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of gaze cuing effects by emotional congruency.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cross ES, Ramsey R. Mind Meets Machine: Towards a Cognitive Science of Human-Machine Interactions. Trends Cogn Sci 2020; 25:200-212. [PMID: 33384213 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
As robots advance from the pages and screens of science fiction into our homes, hospitals, and schools, they are poised to take on increasingly social roles. Consequently, the need to understand the mechanisms supporting human-machine interactions is becoming increasingly pressing. We introduce a framework for studying the cognitive and brain mechanisms that support human-machine interactions, leveraging advances made in cognitive neuroscience to link different levels of description with relevant theory and methods. We highlight unique features that make this endeavour particularly challenging (and rewarding) for brain and behavioural scientists. Overall, the framework offers a way to study the cognitive science of human-machine interactions that respects the diversity of social machines, individuals' expectations and experiences, and the structure and function of multiple cognitive and brain systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S Cross
- Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
| | - Richard Ramsey
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Renton AI, Painter DR, Mattingley JB. Differential Deployment of Visual Attention During Interactive Approach and Avoidance Behavior. Cereb Cortex 2020; 29:2366-2383. [PMID: 29750259 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The ability to coordinate approach and avoidance actions in dynamic environments represents the boundary between extinction and the continued survival of many animal species. It is therefore crucial that sensory systems allocate limited attentional resources to the most relevant information to facilitate planning and execution of appropriate actions. Prominent theories of how attention regulates visual processing focus on the distinction between behaviorally relevant and irrelevant visual inputs. To date, however, no study has directly compared the deployment of attention to visual inputs relevant for approach and avoidance behaviors, which naturally occur in dynamic, interactive environments. In two experiments, we combined electroencephalography, frequency tagging, and eye gaze measures to investigate whether the deployment of visual selective attention differs for items relevant for approach and avoidance actions. Participants maneuvered a cursor to approach and avoid contact with moving items in a continuous interactive task. The results indicated that while the approach and avoidance tasks recruited equivalent attentional resources overall, attentional biases were directed toward task-relevant items during approach, and away from task-relevant items during avoidance. We conclude that the deployment of visual attention is guided not only by relevance to a behavioral goal, but also by the nature of that goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela I Renton
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.,Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - David R Painter
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Jason B Mattingley
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.,Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weygandt M, Behrens J, Brasanac J, Söder E, Meyer-Arndt L, Wakonig K, Ritter K, Brandt AU, Bellmann-Strobl J, Gold SM, Haynes JD, Paul F. Neural mechanisms of perceptual decision-making and their link to neuropsychiatric symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 33:139-145. [PMID: 31195338 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-making (DM) capabilities are impaired in multiple sclerosis (MS). A variety of researchers hypothesized that this impairment is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL) and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Studies explicitly testing this hypothesis, however, are rare, provided inconclusive results, or evaluated only a limited selection of DM domains. Consequently, we conducted the first MS study on perceptual DM (e.g. deciding whether a car will fit into a parking lot based on a visual percept) to test this assumption. METHODS Specifically, we used an fMRI task that measured brain activity in 30 MS patients and 19 healthy controls (HCs) while the participants repeatedly decided whether objects referenced indirectly via their written object names would fit into a shoebox to investigate neural mechanisms of perceptual DM. The objects varied in size and thus decision difficulty. From these data, we determined voxel-wise brain activity parameters reflecting (i) decision difficulty and (ii) decision speed and related them to behavioral DM performance, QoL, mild to moderate depressive symptoms, and fatigue. RESULTS Patients showed reduced DM performance. Activity reflecting decision difficulty in the middle temporal gyrus was negatively related to DM performance across MS patients and HCs; activity reflecting decision speed in MS patients was associated with depressive symptoms and fatigue in areas of the dorsal visual stream. CONCLUSION The study shows that the perceptual DM capacity is reduced in MS. Moreover, the link between neural mechanisms of perceptual DM and neuropsychiatric symptoms suggests that an impairment in this domain is clinically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Weygandt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Department of Neurology, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin 10117, Germany.
| | - Janina Behrens
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Jelena Brasanac
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin 12203, Germany
| | - Eveline Söder
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lil Meyer-Arndt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Katharina Wakonig
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Kerstin Ritter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Department of Neurology, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Alexander U Brandt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 13125, Germany
| | - Stefan M Gold
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin 12203, Germany; Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), Center for Molecular Neurobiology, University Medical Center, Hamburg 20251, Germany
| | - John-Dylan Haynes
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Department of Neurology, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Excellence Cluster NeuroCure, Berlin 10117, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Clinical and Experimental Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Department of Neurology, Berlin 10117, Germany; Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 13125, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roberts ID, Hutcherson CA. Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models. Trends Cogn Sci 2019; 23:602-614. [PMID: 31104816 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In recent years interest in integrating the affective and decision sciences has skyrocketed. Immense progress has been made, but the complexities of each field, which can multiply when combined, present a significant obstacle. A carefully defined framework for integration is needed. The shift towards computational modeling in decision science provides a powerful basis and a path forward, but one whose synergistic potential will only be fully realized by drawing on the theoretical richness of the affective sciences. Reviewing research using a popular computational model of choice (the drift diffusion model), we discuss how mapping concepts to parameters reduces conceptual ambiguity and reveals novel hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D Roberts
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Cendri A Hutcherson
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Marketing, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boshyan J, Feldman Barrett L, Betz N, Adams RB, Kveraga K. Line-Drawn Scenes Provide Sufficient Information for Discrimination of Threat and Mere Negativity. Iperception 2018; 9:2041669518755806. [PMID: 29774139 PMCID: PMC5950935 DOI: 10.1177/2041669518755806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous work using color photographic scenes has shown that human observers are keenly sensitive to different types of threatening and negative stimuli and reliably classify them by the presence, and spatial and temporal directions of threat. To test whether such distinctions can be extracted from impoverished visual information, we used 500 line drawings made by hand-tracing the original set of photographic scenes. Sixty participants rated the scenes on spatial and temporal dimensions of threat. Based on these ratings, trend analysis revealed five scene categories that were comparable to those identified for the matching color photographic scenes. Another 61 participants were randomly assigned to rate the valence or arousal evoked by the line drawings. The line drawings perceived to be the most negative were also perceived to be the most arousing, replicating the finding for color photographic scenes. We demonstrate here that humans are very sensitive to the spatial and temporal directions of threat even when they must extract this information from simple line drawings, and rate the line drawings very similarly to matched color photographs. The set of 500 hand-traced line-drawing scenes has been made freely available to the research community: http://www.kveragalab.org/threat.html.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Boshyan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa Feldman Barrett
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Betz
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Reginald B Adams
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Kestutis Kveraga
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Callaghan C, Kveraga K, Shine JM, Adams RB, Bar M. Predictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder. Conscious Cogn 2017; 47:63-74. [PMID: 27222169 PMCID: PMC5764074 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
It is argued that during ongoing visual perception, the brain is generating top-down predictions to facilitate, guide and constrain the processing of incoming sensory input. Here we demonstrate that these predictions are drawn from a diverse range of cognitive processes, in order to generate the richest and most informative prediction signals. This is consistent with a central role for cognitive penetrability in visual perception. We review behavioural and mechanistic evidence that indicate a wide spectrum of domains-including object recognition, contextual associations, cognitive biases and affective state-that can directly influence visual perception. We combine these insights from the healthy brain with novel observations from neuropsychiatric disorders involving visual hallucinations, which highlight the consequences of imbalance between top-down signals and incoming sensory information. Together, these lines of evidence converge to indicate that predictive penetration, be it cognitive, social or emotional, should be considered a fundamental framework that supports visual perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire O'Callaghan
- Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kestutis Kveraga
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M Shine
- School of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Reginald B Adams
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Moshe Bar
- Gonda Center for Brain Research, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|