Viscosity is an important factor of resistance to alcohol-based disinfectants by pathogens present in mucus

Disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2: A Review

The pandemic due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a serious global public health issue. Besides the high transmission rate from individual to individual, indirect transmission from inanimate objects or surfaces poses a more significant threat. Since the start of the outbreak, the importance of respiratory protection, social distancing, and chemical disinfection to prevent the spread of the virus has been the prime focus for infection control. Health regulatory organizations have produced guidelines for the formulation and application of chemical disinfectants to manufacturing industries and the public. On the other hand, extensive literature on the virucidal efficacy testing of microbicides for SARS-CoV-2 has been published over the past year and a half. This review summarizes the studies on the most common chemical disinfectants and their virucidal efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, including the type and concentration of the chemical disinfectant, the formulation, the presence of excipients, the exposure time, and other critical factors that determine the effectiveness of chemical disinfectants. In this review, we also critically appraise these disinfectants and conduct a discussion on the role they can play in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lectin-Functionalized Chitosan Nanoparticle-Based Biosensor for Point-of-Care Detection of Bacterial Infections

The WHO estimates an average of 10 million deaths per year due to the increasing number of infections and the predominance of drug resistance. To improve clinical outcomes and contain the spread of infections, the development of newer diagnostic tools is imperative to reduce the time and cost involved to reach the farthest population. The current study focuses on the development of a point-of-care technology that uses crystal violet entrapped, lectin functionalized chitosan nanoparticles to detect the presence of clinically relevant bacterial infections. Spherical nanoparticles of <200 nm in diameter make up the biosensing nanomaterial, showed specific clumping in the presence of bacteria to form visible aggregates as compared to a nonbacterial sample. Visible agglutination confirmed the presence of bacteria in the samples. The devices require just 100 μL of sample and were tested with various bacteria-spiked saline, simulated urine, artificial sputum, and simulated respiratory and wound swabs. The developed device did not require any sample preparation or sophisticated instruments while enabling rapid differentiation between bacterial and nonbacterial infections within 10 min. The in vitro results with bacteria-spiked simulated samples reveal 100% sensitivity and specificity with a limit of detection of 10⁵ cfu/mL. The nanomaterial developed was found to be stable for more than 90 days at accelerated conditions. The developed device can be a screening tool for home-based or clinical assessment and follow the treatment accordingly, reducing exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics in the case of nonbacterial infections.

Survival of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Influenza Virus on Human Skin: Importance of Hand Hygiene in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

BACKGROUND

The stability of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on human skin remains unknown, considering the hazards of viral exposure to humans. We generated a model that allows the safe reproduction of clinical studies on the application of pathogens to human skin and elucidated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 on human skin.

METHODS

We evaluated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus (IAV), mixed with culture medium or upper respiratory mucus, on human skin surfaces and the dermal disinfection effectiveness of 80% (weight/weight) ethanol against SARS-CoV-2 and IAV.

RESULTS

SARS-CoV-2 and IAV were inactivated more rapidly on skin surfaces than on other surfaces (stainless steel/glass/plastic); the survival time was significantly longer for SARS-CoV-2 than for IAV (9.04 hours [95% confidence interval, 7.96- 10.2 hours] vs 1.82 hours [1.65-2.00 hours]). IAV on other surfaces was inactivated faster in mucus versus medium conditions, while SARS-CoV-2 showed similar stability in the mucus and medium; the survival time was significantly longer for SARS-CoV-2 than for IAV (11.09 hours [10.22-12.00 hours] vs 1.69 hours [1.57-1.81 hours]). Moreover, both SARS-CoV-2 and IAV in the mucus/medium on human skin were completely inactivated within 15 seconds by ethanol treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The 9-hour survival of SARS-CoV-2 on human skin may increase the risk of contact transmission in comparison with IAV, thus accelerating the pandemic. Proper hand hygiene is important to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Outdoor disinfectant sprays for the prevention of COVID-19: Are they safe for the environment?

Due to the wide range of viability on inanimate surfaces and fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2, hydrogen peroxide (0.5%, HP) and hypochlorite-based (0.1%, HC) disinfectants (common biocides) are proposed by World Health Organization to mitigate the spread of this virus in healthcare settings. They can be adopted and applied to outdoor environments. However, many studies have shown that these two disinfectants are toxic to fishes and aquatic non-target organisms (primary producers and macroinvertebrates). The global market of these disinfectants will increase in coming years due to COVID-19. Therefore, it is urgent to highlight the toxicities of these disinfectants. The main findings of this article allow the community to develop a new strategy to protect the environment against the hazardous effects of disinfectants. Therefore, we use the "toxicity calculated ratio (TC ratio)" that refers to the fold increase or decrease in the toxicities reported in the literature (NOEC, LOEC, LC50 and EC50) relative to the WHO-recommended dose of HP and HC. The calculated TC ratios are valuable for policy makers to formulate the regulations to prevent disinfectant exposure in the environment. Our results were collected via PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines and showed that the TC ratios are from the single digits to several thousand-fold lower than the HP and HC recommended dose, which means these disinfectants are potentially dangerous to non-target organisms. The results also showed that HP and HC are toxic to the growth and reproduction of non-target organisms. Therefore, we recommend policymakers formulate protocols for critical assessment and monitoring of the environment-especially on non-target organisms in water bodies located in and around disinfectant-exposed areas to safeguard the environment in the future.

An innovative next-generation endoscopic submucosal injection material with a 2-step injection system (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Next-generation submucosal injection materials (SIMs) with higher performance and flexibility than the current SIMs (eg, 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution [HA]) are expected to improve the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) but are difficult to develop. We developed a next-generation SIM by devising a 2-solution-type SIM comprising 2.0% calcium chloride solution (Ca) and 0.4% sodium alginate solution (SA) and evaluated its performance.

METHODS

Viscoelasticity, submucosal elevation height, and injection pressure of HA, SA, and the next-generation SIM were measured. Outcomes of ESDs on pseudo-lesions in ex vivo porcine stomach/colon models were compared.

RESULTS

The dramatic increase in SA viscoelasticity with the addition of Ca facilitated the formation of highly viscous submucosal cushions that can be controlled by endoscopists. The submucosal elevation height of the next-generation SIM was significantly higher than that of HA or SA with the same injection pressure. The ESD procedure time using the next-generation SIM was significantly shorter than that using HA or SA (14.2 ± 6.1 vs 29.2 ± 9.1 minutes, P = .0004, or 14.2 ± 6.1 vs 29.1 ± 5.9 minutes, P <.0001). Furthermore, the total injection volume for the next-generation SIM was considerably lower than that for HA or SA (7.0 ± 0.9 vs 17.2 ± 3.4 mL, P <.0001, or 7.0 ± 0.9 vs 16.2 ± 2.9 mL, P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an ideal next-generation SIM that achieved high performance and high flexibility in ex vivo models. Our findings warrant further investigations in a patient population.

Historical Discoveries on Viruses in the Environment and Their Impact on Public Health

BACKGROUND

Transmission of many viruses occurs by direct transmission during a close contact between two hosts, or by an indirect transmission through the environment. Several and often interconnected factors, both abiotic and biotic, determine the persistence of these viruses released in the environment, which can last from a few seconds to several years. Moreover, viruses in the environment are able to travel short to very long distances, especially in the air or in water.

SUMMARY

Although well described now, the role of these environments as intermediaries or as reservoirs in virus transmission has been extensively studied and debated in the last century. The majority of these discoveries, such as the pioneer work on bacteria transmission, the progressive discoveries of viruses, as well as the persistence of the influenza virus in the air varying along with droplet sizes, or the role of water in the transmission of poliovirus, have contributed to the improvement of public health. Recent outbreaks of human coronavirus, influenza virus, and Ebola virus have also demonstrated the contemporaneity of these research studies and the need to study virus persistence in the environment. Key Messages: In this review, we discuss historical discoveries that contributed to describe biotic and abiotic factors determining viral persistence in the environment.

Situations Leading to Reduced Effectiveness of Current Hand Hygiene against Infectious Mucus from Influenza Virus-Infected Patients

Both antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) using ethanol-based disinfectants (EBDs) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important means of infection control to prevent seasonal influenza A virus (IAV) outbreaks. However, previous reports suggest a reduced efficacy of ethanol disinfection against pathogens in mucus. We aimed to elucidate the situations and mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of EBDs against IAV in infectious mucus. We evaluated IAV inactivation and ethanol concentration change using IAV-infected patients' mucus (sputum). Additionally, AHR and AHW effectiveness against infectious mucus adhering to the hands and fingers was evaluated in 10 volunteers. Our clinical study showed that EBD effectiveness against IAV in mucus was extremely reduced compared to IAV in saline. IAV in mucus remained active despite 120 s of AHR; however, IAV in saline was completely inactivated within 30 s. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the time required for the ethanol concentration to reach an IAV inactivation level and thus for EBDs to completely inactivate IAV was approximately eight times longer in mucus than in saline. On the other hand, AHR inactivated IAV in mucus within 30 s when the mucus dried completely because the hydrogel characteristics were lost. Additionally, AHW rapidly inactivated IAV. Until infectious mucus has completely dried, infectious IAV can remain on the hands and fingers, even after appropriate AHR using EBD, thereby increasing the risk of IAV transmission. We clarified the ineffectiveness of EBD use against IAV in infectious mucus.IMPORTANCE Antiseptic hand rubbing (AHR) and antiseptic hand washing (AHW) are important to prevent the spread of influenza A virus (IAV). This study elucidated the situations/mechanisms underlying the reduced efficacy of AHR against infectious mucus derived from IAV-infected individuals and indicated the weaknesses of the current hand hygiene regimens. Due to the low rate of diffusion/convection because of the physical properties of mucus as a hydrogel, the efficacy of AHR using ethanol-based disinfectant against mucus is greatly reduced until infectious mucus adhering to the hands/fingers has completely dried. If there is insufficient time before treating the next patient (i.e., if the infectious mucus is not completely dry), medical staff should be aware that effectiveness of AHR is reduced. Since AHW is effective against both dry and nondry infectious mucus, AHW should be adopted to compensate for these weaknesses of AHR.

Self-disinfecting surfaces and infection control

According to World Health Organization, every year in the European Union, 4 million patients acquire a healthcare associated infection. Even though some microorganisms represent no threat to healthy people, hospitals harbor different levels of immunocompetent individuals, namely patients receiving immunosuppressors, with previous infections, or those with extremes of age (young children and elderly), requiring the implementation of effective control measures. Public spaces have also been found an important source of infectious disease outbreaks due to poor or none infection control measures applied. In both places, surfaces play a major role on microorganisms' propagation, yet they are very often neglected, with very few guidelines about efficient cleaning measures and microbiological assessment available. To overcome surface contamination problems, new strategies are being designed to limit the microorganisms' ability to survive over surfaces and materials. Surface modification and/or functionalization to prevent contamination is a hot-topic of research and several different approaches have been developed lately. Surfaces with anti-adhesive properties, with incorporated antimicrobial substances or modified with biological active metals are some of the strategies recently proposed. This review intends to summarize the problems associated with contaminated surfaces and their importance on infection spreading, and to present some of the strategies developed to prevent this public health problem, namely some already being commercialized.

Identification of the critical viscoelastic factor in the performance of submucosal injection materials

High-performance submucosal injection materials (SIMs) contribute to the success of endoscopic therapy for early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. This study aimed to identify the most important factor (viscoelastic parameter) that determines SIM performance and the ease of injection. To determine the ideal viscoelastic parameters of SIMs, submucosal elevation heights (SEHs) and the ease of submucosal injection [characterized by injection pressures (IPs)] were evaluated using a newly developed ex vivo model, in which a constant tension was applied to the studied specimen. The strongest positive correlation was observed between the loss modulus determined at an oscillation frequency of 0.1 rad/s and SEH (correlation coefficient > 0.9) and between the loss modulus at 10 rad/s and IP (correlation coefficient > 0.9). SIMs with high loss moduli (0.1 rad/s) also contributed to maintenance of the submucosal elevation. Moreover, the SEHs of pseudoplastic fluid SIMs (whose loss moduli increased slightly with increasing angular frequency) were greater than those of Newtonian fluid SIMs (whose loss modulus increased drastically with increasing angular frequency). In this study, the ideal viscoelastic SIM parameters were clarified. The loss modulus (0.1 rad/s) was the most important viscoelastic factor affecting SIM performance. Additionally, the development of pseudoplastic fluid SIMs may lead to the creation of next-generation SIMs, with a performance superior to that of sodium hyaluronate, which is currently used widely in endoscopic treatments.