1
|
Thariat J, Little MP, Zablotska LB, Samson P, O’Banion MK, Leuraud K, Bergom C, Girault G, Azimzadeh O, Bouffler S, Hamada N. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks. Int J Radiat Biol 2024; 100:505-526. [PMID: 38180039 PMCID: PMC11039429 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2295966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The discovery of X-rays was followed by a variety of attempts to treat infectious diseases and various other non-cancer diseases with ionizing radiation, in addition to cancer. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the use of such radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases. Non-cancer diseases for which use of radiotherapy has currently been proposed include refractory ventricular tachycardia, neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and dementia), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, all with ongoing clinical studies that deliver radiation doses of 0.5-25 Gy in a single fraction or in multiple daily fractions. In addition to such non-cancer effects, historical indications predominantly used in some countries (e.g. Germany) include osteoarthritis and degenerative diseases of the bones and joints. This narrative review gives an overview of the biological rationale and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies for radiotherapy proposed for various non-cancer diseases, discusses the plausibility of the proposed biological rationale, and considers the long-term radiation risks of cancer and non-cancer diseases. CONCLUSIONS A growing body of evidence has suggested that radiation represents a double-edged sword, not only for cancer, but also for non-cancer diseases. At present, clinical evidence has shown some beneficial effects of radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but there is little or no such evidence of radiotherapy for other newly proposed non-cancer diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, COVID-19 pneumonia). Patients with ventricular tachycardia and COVID-19 pneumonia have thus far been treated with radiotherapy when they are an urgent life threat with no efficient alternative treatment, but some survivors may encounter a paradoxical situation where patients were rescued by radiotherapy but then get harmed by radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to justify the clinical use of radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases, and optimize dose to diseased tissue while minimizing dose to healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3, ENSICAEN/CNRS UMR 6534, Normandie Université, Caen, France
| | - Mark P. Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Lydia B. Zablotska
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Pamela Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - M. Kerry O’Banion
- Department of Neuroscience, Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Klervi Leuraud
- Research Department on Biological and Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation (SESANE), Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Cardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gilles Girault
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre François Baclesse, Medical Library, Caen, France
| | - Omid Azimzadeh
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Section Radiation Biology, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Simon Bouffler
- Radiation Protection Sciences Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Chilton, Didcot, UK
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Abiko, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Dong XX, Hou XW, Pan CW. Risk Factors for Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 45 Studies. Optom Vis Sci 2023; 100:606-613. [PMID: 37747945 DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000002050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE This study summarized primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG)-related factors across different dimensions. OBJECTIVES This review aimed at systematically summarizing the associated factors of PACG in published literatures. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching the electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from their inception to November 2021. The pooled risk estimates of continuous and categorical variables were calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]), respectively. RESULTS We included 45 studies in this review. In the meta-analysis, intraocular pressure (WMD, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.37 to 3.89), anterior chamber depth (WMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.34), axial length (WMD, -0.77; 95% CI, -1.26 to -0.28), retinal nerve fiber layer (WMD, -21.23; 95% CI, -30.21 to -12.25), and spherical equivalent (WMD, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.38) were the most common ophthalmic anatomic factors, and lower body weight (WMD, -3.65; 95% CI, -6.48 to -0.82) was the most significant general morphological indicators. The presence of cataract (OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.46 to 4.11) and hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20) were significantly associated with PACG. Increased level of triglyceride (WMD, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.27) was associated with PACG. In addition, an association between short-term antidepressant exposure (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.70) and acute angle-closure glaucoma was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS This review identified a few consistent factors related to PACG, providing important information for primary care physicians, general ophthalmologists, and public health professionals to counsel their patients on PACG risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xing-Xuan Dong
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Wen Hou
- School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamada N. Noncancer Effects of Ionizing Radiation Exposure on the Eye, the Circulatory System and beyond: Developments made since the 2011 ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions. Radiat Res 2023; 200:188-216. [PMID: 37410098 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00030.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
For radiation protection purposes, noncancer effects with a threshold-type dose-response relationship have been classified as tissue reactions (formerly called nonstochastic or deterministic effects), and equivalent dose limits aim to prevent occurrence of such tissue reactions. Accumulating evidence demonstrates increased risks for several late occurring noncancer effects at doses and dose rates much lower than previously considered. In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued a statement on tissue reactions to recommend a threshold of 0.5 Gy to the lens of the eye for cataracts and to the heart and brain for diseases of the circulatory system (DCS), independent of dose rate. Literature published thereafter continues to provide updated knowledge. Increased risks for cataracts below 0.5 Gy have been reported in several cohorts (e.g., including in those receiving protracted or chronic exposures). A dose threshold for cataracts is less evident with longer follow-up, with limited evidence available for risk of cataract removal surgery. There is emerging evidence for risk of normal-tension glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, but the long-held tenet that the lens represents among the most radiosensitive tissues in the eye and in the body seems to remain unchanged. For DCS, increased risks have been reported in various cohorts, but the existence or otherwise of a dose threshold is unclear. The level of risk is less uncertain at lower dose and lower dose rate, with the possibility that risk per unit dose is greater at lower doses and dose rates. Target organs and tissues for DCS are also unknown, but may include heart, large blood vessels and kidneys. Identification of potential factors (e.g., sex, age, lifestyle factors, coexposures, comorbidities, genetics and epigenetics) that may modify radiation risk of cataracts and DCS would be important. Other noncancer effects on the radar include neurological effects (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and dementia) of which elevated risk has increasingly been reported. These late occurring noncancer effects tend to deviate from the definition of tissue reactions, necessitating more scientific developments to reconsider the radiation effect classification system and risk management. This paper gives an overview of historical developments made in ICRP prior to the 2011 statement and an update on relevant developments made since the 2011 ICRP statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Hamada
- Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Cataract (opacification of the ocular lens) is a typical tissue reaction (deterministic effect) following ionizing radiation exposure, for which prevention dose limits have been recommended in the radiation protection system. Manifestations of radiation cataracts can vary among individuals, but such potential individual responses remain uncharacterized. Here we review relevant literature and discuss implications for radiation protection. This review assesses evidence for significant modification of radiation-induced cataractogenesis by age at exposure, sex and genetic factors based on current scientific literature. CONCLUSIONS In addition to obvious physical factors (e.g. dose, dose rate, radiation quality, irradiation volume), potential factors modifying individual responses for radiation cataracts include sex, age and genetics, with comorbidity and coexposures also having important roles. There are indications and preliminary data identifying such potential modifiers of radiation cataract incidence or risk, although no firm conclusions can yet be drawn. Further studies and a consensus on the evidence are needed to gain deeper insights into factors determining individual responses regarding radiation cataracts and the implications for radiation protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G R Barnard
- UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division (RCEHD), Didcot, UK
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yokoyama S, Hamada N, Tsujimura N, Kunugita N, Nishida K, Ezaki I, Kato M, Okubo H. Regulatory implementation of the occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye and underlying relevant efforts in Japan. Int J Radiat Biol 2023; 99:604-619. [PMID: 35980737 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2115160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
In April 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended reducing the occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens. Such a new occupational lens dose limit has thus far been implemented in many countries, and there are extensive discussions toward its regulatory implementation in other countries. In Japan, discussions in the Japan Health Physics Society (JHPS) began in April 2013 and in Radiation Council in July 2017, and the new occupational lens dose limit was implemented into regulation in April 2021. To share our experience, we have published a series of papers summarizing situations in Japan: the first paper based on information available by early 2017, and the second paper by early 2019. This paper (our third paper of this series) aims to review updated information available by mid-2022, such as regarding regulatory implementation of the new occupational lens dose limit, recent discussions by relevant ministries based on the opinion from the council, establishment process of safety and health management systems, the JHPS guidelines on lens dose monitoring and radiation safety, voluntary countermeasures of the licensees, development of lens dose calibration method, and recent studies on exposure of the lens in nuclear workers and biological effect on the lens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumi Yokoyama
- Research Promotion Headquarters, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norio Tsujimura
- Radiation Protection Department, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Naoki Kunugita
- School of Health Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Nishida
- Radiological Management Group, Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc, Fukui, Japan
| | - Iwao Ezaki
- Technical Group, Nuclear Power Plant Business Headquarters, Chiyoda Technol Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kato
- Ionizing Radiation Standards Group, National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hideki Okubo
- Radiological Health and Safety Center Nuclear Safe Management Department, Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dalvin LA, Deufel CL, Corbin KS, Petersen IA, Olsen TW, Roddy GW. Postradiation Optic Atrophy Is Associated With Intraocular Pressure and May Manifest With Neuroretinal Rim Thinning. J Neuroophthalmol 2022; 42:e159-e172. [PMID: 34812759 PMCID: PMC9358970 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine risk factors for postradiation optic atrophy (PROA) after plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. METHODS A single center, retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma involving choroid and/or ciliary body treated with plaque between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. Outcomes included development of PROA with pallor alone or with concomitant neuroretinal rim thinning (NRT). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PROA. RESULTS Of 78 plaque-irradiated patients, PROA developed in 41 (53%), with concomitant NRT in 15 (19%). Risk factors for PROA of any type included presentation with worse visual acuity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 5.6 [2.3-14.1], P < 0.001), higher baseline intraocular pressure (IOP; 14 vs 16 mm Hg) (1.1 [1.0-1.2], P = 0.03), shorter tumor distance to optic disc (1.3 [1.2-1.5], P < 0.001) and foveola (1.2 [1.1-1.3], P < 0.001), subfoveal subretinal fluid (3.8 [2.0-7.1], P < 0.001), greater radiation prescription depth (1.3 [1.1-1.6], P = 0.002), dose to fovea (point dose) (1.01 [1.01-1.02], P < 0.001), and mean (1.02 [1.02-1.03], P < 0.001) and maximum dose to optic disc per 1 Gy increase (1.02 [1.01-1.03], P < 0.001). On multivariate modeling, dose to disc, baseline IOP, and subfoveal fluid remained significant. Subanalysis revealed risk factors for pallor with NRT of greater mean radiation dose to disc (1.03 [1.01-1.05], P = 0.003), higher maximum IOP (17 vs 20 mm Hg) (1.4 [1.2-1.7], P < 0.001), and subfoveal fluid (12 [2-63], P = 0.004). CONCLUSION PROA may result in NRT in addition to optic disc pallor. Risk factors for PROA included higher radiation dose to optic disc, higher baseline IOP, and subfoveal fluid. Higher maximum IOP contributed to concomitant NRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Dalvin
- Departments of Ophthalmology (LAD, TWO, GWR) and Medical Physics (CLD), and Radiation Oncology (KSC, IAP), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Azizova TV, Bragin EV, Bannikova MV, Hamada N, Grigoryeva ES. The Incidence Risk for Primary Glaucoma and Its Subtypes following Chronic Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in the Russian Cohort of Mayak Nuclear Workers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030602. [PMID: 35158870 PMCID: PMC8833586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and also represents one of the normal tissue complications following radiation therapy involving ocular radiation exposure. It has widely been considered that such secondary glaucoma occurs at fractionated high dose (several tens of Gy). In contrast, this study is the first to report that normal-tension glaucoma (a subtype of primary open-angle glaucoma) occurs in radiation workers at a chronic dose of >1 Gy. Such elevated risk of radiogenic normal-tension glaucoma, if confirmed in other cohorts, has significant implications for normal tissue complications in radiotherapy patients receiving ocular radiation exposure, and for ocular radiation protection in radiation workers. Abstract Secondary glaucoma is a typical normal tissue complication following radiation therapy involving ocular radiation exposure at high fractionated dose (several tens of Gy). In contrast, recent studies in acutely exposed Japanese atomic bomb survivors showed a significantly increased risk for normal-tension glaucoma (NTG, a subtype of primary open-angle glaucoma) at much lower dose, but such information is not available in any other cohorts. We therefore set out to evaluate the incidence of risk for primary glaucoma and its subtypes in a Russian cohort of Mayak Production Association nuclear workers who received chronic radiation exposure over many years. Of these, we found a significantly increased relative risk (RR) of NTG incidence (RR = 1.88 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.01, 3.51; p = 0.047) in workers exposed to gamma rays at cumulative brain absorbed dose above >1 Gy. We observed the linear relationship between NTG incidence and brain absorbed gamma dose with an excess relative risk per unit brain absorbed dose of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.01, 1.68; p < 0.05), but not for any other subtypes nor for total primary glaucoma. Such elevated risk of radiogenic NTG incidence, if confirmed in other cohorts, has significant implications for normal tissue complications in radiotherapy patients receiving ocular radiation exposure, and for ocular radiation protection in radiation workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara V. Azizova
- Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), 456780 Ozyorsk, Russia; (E.V.B.); (M.V.B.); (E.S.G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Evgeny V. Bragin
- Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), 456780 Ozyorsk, Russia; (E.V.B.); (M.V.B.); (E.S.G.)
| | - Maria V. Bannikova
- Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), 456780 Ozyorsk, Russia; (E.V.B.); (M.V.B.); (E.S.G.)
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Unit, Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo 201-8511, Japan;
| | - Evgeniya S. Grigoryeva
- Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), 456780 Ozyorsk, Russia; (E.V.B.); (M.V.B.); (E.S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Involvement of METTL3/m 6Adenosine and TGFβ/Smad3 signaling on Tenon's fibroblasts and in a rabbit model of glaucoma surgery. J Mol Histol 2021; 52:1129-1144. [PMID: 34727293 DOI: 10.1007/s10735-021-10028-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) is a classic operation for the treatment of glaucoma, which is the second leading cause of blindness, and scar formation caused by excessive human Tenon's capsule fibroblasts (HTFs) activation is responsible for surgery failure. However, the mechanism underlying excessive HTFs activation is largely unknown. Studies have revealed that N6-methyladenosine (m6A), which is one of the most common posttranscriptional modifications, plays an important role in multiple types of cellular processes. First, we isolated and identified primary HTFs and found that transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) enhanced cell viability and promoted cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition in HTFs. We subsequently found that TGF-β1 elevated the quantity of m6A and promoted the expression of m6A "writers", in the process from DNA to RNA, adenylate was methylated at the sixth N position by methylases methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3). Furthermore, we demonstrated that METTL3 repression inhibited the promotion of cell viability, proliferation and ECM deposition in HTFs treated with TGF-β1. We then illustrated that increased METTL3 played a role by promoting Smad3 in TGF-β1-induced HTFs. We subsequently demonstrated that the METTL3/Smad3 regulatory axis was aberrantly expressed in the rabbit model of GFS. Thus, our study reveals that METTL3 indeed plays a role in modulating Smad3 in TGF-β1-induced HTFs and further provides novel theoretical strategies based on METTL3 for the inhibition of scar formation after GFS.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sugihara K, Takai Y, Kawasaki R, Nitta K, Katai M, Kitaoka Y, Yokoyama Y, Omodaka K, Naito T, Yamashita T, Mizoue S, Iwase A, Nakazawa T, Tanito M. Comparisons between retinal vessel calibers and various optic disc morphologic parameters with different optic disc appearances: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250245. [PMID: 34324508 PMCID: PMC8320981 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study (GSAS) is a multicenter collaborative study of the characteristics of glaucomatous optic disc morphology using a stereo fundus camera. This study evaluated the retinal vessel calibers and correlations using GSAS fundus photographs between retinal vessels and 38 optic nerve head (ONH) morphologic parameters comprehensively. In all 240 eyes, the mean central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE) were 138.4 and 216.5 μm, respectively; the CRAE correlated with age, visual field scores and 19 ONH parameters and CRVE correlated with age, intraocular pressure, visual field scores and 11 ONH parameters. Among the different optic disc appearances including focal ischemia (FI) (n = 53, 22%), generalized enlargement (GE) (n = 53, 22%), myopic glaucoma (MY) (n = 112, 47%), and senile sclerosis (SS) (n = 22, 9%), the CRAE did not differ significantly; CRVE was significantly narrower in SS than in FI and MY. In FI, GE, MY, and SS disc types, CRAE correlated with 3, 14, 9, and 2 ONH parameters, respectively, and CRVE corelated with 9, 0, 12, and 6 ONH parameters, respectively. We confirmed previous observations on the effect of retinal vessel narrowing on glaucomatous changes in the ONH and visual field. The associations between retinal vessel caliber and ONH morphologic parameters vary among different optic disc appearances, suggesting different effects of vascular changes in each disc type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunobu Sugihara
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Takai
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Ryo Kawasaki
- Department of Vision Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Japan
| | - Koji Nitta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Maki Katai
- Department of Ophthalmology, NTT Medical Center Sapporo, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kitaoka
- Department of Ophthalmology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yu Yokoyama
- Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuko Omodaka
- Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | | | - Takehiro Yamashita
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Shiro Mizoue
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | | | - Toru Nakazawa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masaki Tanito
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ainsbury EA, Dalke C, Hamada N, Benadjaoud MA, Chumak V, Ginjaume M, Kok JL, Mancuso M, Sabatier L, Struelens L, Thariat J, Jourdain JR. Radiation-induced lens opacities: Epidemiological, clinical and experimental evidence, methodological issues, research gaps and strategy. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 146:106213. [PMID: 33276315 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In 2011, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended reducing the occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens of the eye from 150 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year, averaged over five years, with no single year exceeding 50 mSv. With this recommendation, several important assumptions were made, such as lack of dose rate effect, classification of cataracts as a tissue reaction with a dose threshold at 0.5 Gy, and progression of minor opacities into vision-impairing cataracts. However, although new dose thresholds and occupational dose limits have been set for radiation-induced cataract, ICRP clearly states that the recommendations are chiefly based on epidemiological evidence because there are a very small number of studies that provide explicit biological and mechanistic evidence at doses under 2 Gy. Since the release of the 2011 ICRP statement, the Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative (MELODI) supported in April 2019 a scientific workshop that aimed to review epidemiological, clinical and biological evidence for radiation-induced cataracts. The purpose of this article is to present and discuss recent related epidemiological and clinical studies, ophthalmic examination techniques, biological and mechanistic knowledge, and to identify research gaps, towards the implementation of a research strategy for future studies on radiation-induced lens opacities. The authors recommend particularly to study the effect of ionizing radiation on the lens in the context of the wider, systemic effects, including in the retina, brain and other organs, and as such cataract is recommended to be studied as part of larger scale programs focused on multiple radiation health effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Public Health England (PHE) Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Oxon, United Kingdom.
| | - Claudia Dalke
- Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Germany.
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), BP 17, 31 avenue de la division Leclerc, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| | - Vadim Chumak
- National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine, Ukraine.
| | | | - Judith L Kok
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Mariateresa Mancuso
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, (ENEA), Rome, Italy.
| | - Laure Sabatier
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Saclay, France.
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN -UMR6534 - Unicaen - Normandie University, France
| | - Jean-René Jourdain
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), BP 17, 31 avenue de la division Leclerc, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Loganovsky KN, Masiuk SV, Buzunov VA, Marazziti D, Voychulene YS. Radiation Risk Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Ukrainian Chornobyl Catastrophe Liquidators. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:553420. [PMID: 33312134 PMCID: PMC7704427 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.553420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Goal: To explore the possible impact of ionizing radiation in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders amongst clean-up workers of the Chornobyl catastrophe (liquidators). Design, object, and methods: Retrospective-prospective study (1987-2015) of liquidators from the State Register of Ukraine (SRU) with radiation doses records and Clinical-Epidemiological Register (CER) of the State Institution ≪National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine≫ (NRCRM). Moreover, cohort and cross-sectional studies of the randomized sample of liquidators from the CER (exposed group, 198 subjects) were examined. Internal control group included the liquidators irradiated in doses <50.0 mSv (42 persons). All subjects were assessed by a detailed clinical examination and a battery of standardized neuropsychiatric scales, psychometric, and neuropsychological tests. Descriptive and variation statistics, non-parametric criteria, regression-correlation analysis, survival analysis by Kaplan & Meier, and risk analysis were used. Results: Exposed group vs. control group showed cognitive disorders in 99 (50.0%) vs. 20 (18.1%), (P = 0.04); affective disorders in 96 (48.3%) vs. 36 (32.7%) (P = 0.007), and stress-related disorders in 115 (58.4%) vs. 8 (7.3%) (P < 0.001). In the main group exposed to ≥50 mSv vs. internal control group (exposed to <50 mSv), affective disorders were present, respectively, in 89 (56.4%) vs. 7 (19.1%) (P < 0.001), and stress-related disorders in 98 (62.8%) vs. 17 (40.4%) (P = 0.009). Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidential intervals (95%CI) of Incidence of some neuropsychiatric disorders in liquidators of 1986-1987 related to internal control (doses <50 mSv) were as follows: organic psychosis (RR = 3.15; 95% CI: 2.6; 3.7); non-psychotic organic brain damage (RR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.6; 2.5); acute (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.3; 1.5), and chronic cerebrovascular disorders (RR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.0;1.5). Neuropsychiatric diseases show a strong, increasing, and approximately quadratic statistically significant (Pv < 0.001) relationship with individual dose, yielding an estimated excess relative risk ERR = 2.76 Sv-2 (95% CI 1.06-7.15). Conclusions: Liquidators have an excess of cognitive, affective, and stress-related disorders. The risk of diseases rises with radiation dose. Radiation risks are revealed for organic psychoses, non-psychotic organic brain damage, acute and chronic cerebrovascular pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantyn N. Loganovsky
- State Institution “National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Sergii V. Masiuk
- State Institution “National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Vladimir A. Buzunov
- State Institution “National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Donatella Marazziti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yuliya S. Voychulene
- State Institution “National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamada N, Azizova TV, Little MP. An update on effects of ionizing radiation exposure on the eye. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190829. [PMID: 31670577 PMCID: PMC8519632 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has considered for over 60 years that the lens of the eye is among the most radiosensitive tissues, and has recommended dose limits for the lens to prevent occurrence of vision impairing cataracts (VICs). Epidemiological evidence that doses much lower than previously thought produce cataracts led ICRP to recommend reducing dose threshold for VICs and reducing an occupational equivalent dose limit for the lens in 2011, when only a single threshold of 0.5 Gy was recommended. On the basis of epidemiological evidence, ICRP assumed progression of minor opacities into VICs and no dose rate effect. This contrasts with previously recommended separate thresholds for minor opacities and VICs, and for different exposure scenarios. Progression was assumed based on similar risks of cataracts and cataract surgery in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The absence of dose rate effect derived from the observed similar thresholds for protracted exposures in Chernobyl cleanup workers and in atomic bomb survivors. Since 2011, there has been an increasing body of epidemiological evidence relating to cataracts and other ocular diseases (i.e. glaucoma and macular degeneration), particularly at low doses and low dose rates. This review paper gives an overview of the scientific basis of the 2011 ICRP recommendation, discusses the plausibility of these two assumptions in the light of emerging scientific evidence, and considers the radiosensitivity of the lens among ocular structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2-11-1 Iwado-kita, Komae, Tokyo 201-8511, Japan
| | - Tamara V. Azizova
- Clinical Department, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorskoe Shosse 19, Ozyorsk Chelyabinsk Region, 456780, Ozersk, Russia
| | - Mark P. Little
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9778, Bethesda, MD 20892-9778, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Loganovsky KN, Marazziti D, Fedirko PA, Kuts KV, Antypchuk KY, Perchuk IV, Babenko TF, Loganovska TK, Kolosynska OO, Kreinis GY, Gresko MV, Masiuk SV, Mucci F, Zdorenko LL, Della Vecchia A, Zdanevich NA, Garkava NA, Dorichevska RY, Vasilenko ZL, Kravchenko VI, Drosdova NV. Radiation-Induced Cerebro-Ophthalmic Effects in Humans. Life (Basel) 2020; 10:E41. [PMID: 32316206 PMCID: PMC7235763 DOI: 10.3390/life10040041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) could affect the human brain and eyes leading to both cognitive and visual impairments. The aim of this paper was to review and analyze the current literature, and to comment on the ensuing findings in the light of our personal contributions in this field. The review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO and Google Scholar English papers published from January 2000 to January 2020. The results showed that prenatally or childhood-exposed individuals are a particular target group with a higher risk for possible radiation effects and neurodegenerative diseases. In adulthood and medical/interventional radiologists, the most frequent IR-induced ophthalmic effects include cataracts, glaucoma, optic neuropathy, retinopathy and angiopathy, sometimes associated with specific neurocognitive deficits. According to available information that eye alterations may induce or may be associated with brain dysfunctions and vice versa, we propose to label this relationship "eye-brain axis", as well as to deepen the diagnosis of eye pathologies as early and easily obtainable markers of possible low dose IR-induced brain damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin N. Loganovsky
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Donatella Marazziti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, I 56100 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.V.)
| | - Pavlo A. Fedirko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Kostiantyn V. Kuts
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Katerina Y. Antypchuk
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Iryna V. Perchuk
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Tetyana F. Babenko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Tetyana K. Loganovska
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Olena O. Kolosynska
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - George Y. Kreinis
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Marina V. Gresko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Sergii V. Masiuk
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Federico Mucci
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, I 56100 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.V.)
- Dipartimento di Biochimica Biologia Molecolare, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Leonid L. Zdorenko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Alessandra Della Vecchia
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, I 56100 Pisa, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.V.)
| | - Natalia A. Zdanevich
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Natalia A. Garkava
- Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 9 Vernadsky Street, 49044 Dnipro, Ukraine;
| | - Raisa Y. Dorichevska
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Zlata L. Vasilenko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Victor I. Kravchenko
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| | - Nataliya V. Drosdova
- National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 53 Illyenko Street, 04050 Kyiv, Ukraine; (K.N.L.); (P.A.F.); (K.V.K.); (K.Y.A.); (I.V.P.); (T.F.B.); (T.K.L.); (O.O.K.); (G.Y.K.); (M.V.G.); (S.V.M.); (L.L.Z.); (N.A.Z.); (R.Y.D.); (Z.L.V.); (V.I.K.); (N.V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Loganovsky KN, Fedirko PA, Kuts KV, Marazziti D, Antypchuk KY, Perchuk IV, Babenko TF, Loganovska TK, Kolosynska OO, Kreinis GY, Gresko MV, Masiuk SV, Zdorenko LL, Zdanevich NA, Garkava NA, Dorichevska RY, Vasilenko ZL, Kravchenko VI, Drosdova NV, Yefimova YV. BRAIN AND EYE AS POTENTIAL TARGETS FOR IONIZING RADIATION IMPACT. Part І. THE CONSEQUENCES OF IRRADIATION OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE LIQUIDATION OF THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT. PROBLEMY RADIAT︠S︡IĬNOÏ MEDYT︠S︡YNY TA RADIOBIOLOHIÏ 2020; 25:90-129. [PMID: 33361831 DOI: 10.33145/2304-8336-2020-25-90-129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to ionizing radiation could affect the brain and eyes leading to cognitive and vision impairment, behavior disorders and performance decrement during professional irradiation at medical radiology, includinginterventional radiological procedures, long-term space flights, and radiation accidents. OBJECTIVE The objective was to analyze the current experimental, epidemiological, and clinical data on the radiation cerebro-ophthalmic effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS In our analytical review peer-reviewed publications via the bibliographic and scientometric bases PubMed / MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and selected papers from the library catalog of NRCRM - theleading institution in the field of studying the medical effects of ionizing radiation - were used. RESULTS The probable radiation-induced cerebro-ophthalmic effects in human adults comprise radiation cataracts,radiation glaucoma, radiation-induced optic neuropathy, retinopathies, angiopathies as well as specific neurocognitive deficit in the various neuropsychiatric pathology including cerebrovascular pathology and neurodegenerativediseases. Specific attention is paid to the likely stochastic nature of many of those effects. Those prenatally and inchildhood exposed are a particular target group with a higher risk for possible radiation effects and neurodegenerative diseases. CONCLUSIONS The experimental, clinical, epidemiological, anatomical and pathophysiological rationale for visualsystem and central nervous system (CNS) radiosensitivity is given. The necessity for further international studieswith adequate dosimetric support and the follow-up medical and biophysical monitoring of high radiation riskcohorts is justified. The first part of the study currently being published presents the results of the study of theeffects of irradiation in the participants of emergency works at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K N Loganovsky
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - P A Fedirko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - K V Kuts
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - D Marazziti
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, I 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - K Yu Antypchuk
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - I V Perchuk
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - T F Babenko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - T K Loganovska
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - O O Kolosynska
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - G Yu Kreinis
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - M V Gresko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - S V Masiuk
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - L L Zdorenko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - N A Zdanevich
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - N A Garkava
- State Institution «Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», 9 Vernadsky Street, Dnipro, 49044, Ukraine
| | - R Yu Dorichevska
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - Z L Vasilenko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - V I Kravchenko
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - N V Drosdova
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| | - Yu V Yefimova
- State Institution «National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine», 53 Illyenko Street, Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Glaucoma incidence risk in a cohort of Mayak PA workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. Sci Rep 2019; 9:12469. [PMID: 31462740 PMCID: PMC6713741 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48915-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Glaucoma is a major cause of visual impairment, and secondary glaucoma manifested as neovascular glaucoma has long been known to occur following high-dose fractionated radiation therapy. In contrast, little is known as to whether ionizing radiation exposure causes primary glaucoma, except that a single study in Japanese atomic bomb survivors has reported a significantly increase risk. Therefore, the effect of lower dose and lower dose rate remains unclear. Here we report that in Russian Mayak Production Association workers occupationally exposed to chronic radiation for prolonged periods, incidence of total primary glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma is significantly associated with various non-radiation factors (sex, attained age, and cataract diagnosed prior to glaucoma), but neither with cumulative dose from external γ-rays nor with cumulative neutron dose nor with the unweighted sum of cumulative γ and neutron doses. The present results suggest for the first time that chronic radiation exposure does not cause primary glaucoma, although the analyses need to be made in other cohorts exposed at various dose and dose rate.
Collapse
|