1
|
Krsek A, Jagodic A, Baticic L. Nanomedicine in Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration, and Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation: A Narrative Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1384. [PMID: 39336425 PMCID: PMC11433843 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60091384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024]
Abstract
Nanomedicine is a newer, promising approach to promote neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, and modulation of the blood-brain barrier. This review includes the integration of various nanomaterials in neurological disorders. In addition, gelatin-based hydrogels, which have huge potential due to biocompatibility, maintenance of porosity, and enhanced neural process outgrowth, are reviewed. Chemical modification of these hydrogels, especially with guanidine moieties, has shown improved neuron viability and underscores tailored biomaterial design in neural applications. This review further discusses strategies to modulate the blood-brain barrier-a factor critically associated with the effective delivery of drugs to the central nervous system. These advances bring supportive solutions to the solving of neurological conditions and innovative therapies for their treatment. Nanomedicine, as applied to neuroscience, presents a significant leap forward in new therapeutic strategies that might help raise the treatment and management of neurological disorders to much better levels. Our aim was to summarize the current state-of-knowledge in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antea Krsek
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| | - Ana Jagodic
- Department of Family Medicine, Community Health Center Krapina, 49000 Krapina, Croatia;
| | - Lara Baticic
- Department of Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ryan MV, Satzer D, Ojemann SG, Kramer DR, Thompson JA. Neurophysiologic Characteristics of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2024; 102:293-307. [PMID: 39008968 DOI: 10.1159/000539398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly promising treatment option for refractory epilepsy. Optimal therapeutic benefit has been associated with stimulation at the junction of ANT and the mammillothalamic tract (mtt), but electrophysiologic markers of this target are lacking. The present study examined microelectrode recordings (MER) during DBS to identify unique electrophysiologic characteristics of ANT and the ANT-mtt junction. METHODS Ten patients with medically refractory epilepsy underwent MER during ANT-DBS implantation under general anesthesia. MER locations were determined based on coregistration of preoperative MRI, postoperative CT, and a stereotactic atlas of the thalamus (Morel atlas). Several neurophysiological parameters including single unit spiking rate, bursting properties, theta and alpha power and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-normalized root mean square (NRMS) of multiunit activity were characterized at recording depths and compared to anatomic boundaries. RESULTS From sixteen hemispheres, 485 recordings locations were collected from a mean of 30.3 (15.64 ± 5.0 mm) recording spans. Three-hundred and ninety-four of these recording locations were utilized further for analysis of spiking and bursting rates, after excluding recordings that were more than 8 mm above the putative ventral ANT border. The ANT region exhibited discernible features including: (1) mean spiking rate (7.52 Hz ± 6.9 Hz; one-way analysis of variance test, p = 0.014 when compared to mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus [MD], mtt, and CSF), (2) the presence of bursting activity with 40% of ANT locations (N = 59) exhibited bursting versus 24% the mtt (χ2; p < 0.001), and 32% in the MD (p = 0.38), (3) CSF-NRMS, a proxy for neuronal density, exhibited well demarcated changes near the entry and exit of ANT (linear regression, R = -0.33, p < 0.001). Finally, in the ANT, both theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha band power (9-12 Hz) were negatively correlated with distance to the ventral ANT border (linear regression, p < 0.001 for both). The proportion of recordings with spiking and bursting activity was consistently highest 0-2 mm above the ventral ANT border with the mtt. CONCLUSION We observed several electrophysiological markers demarcating the ANT superior and inferior borders including multiple single cell and local field potential features. A local maximum in neural activity just above the ANT-mtt junction was consistent with the previously described optimal target for seizure reduction. These features may be useful for successful targeting of ANT-DBS for epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan V Ryan
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA
| | - David Satzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven G Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Daniel R Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tian Y, Murphy MJH, Steiner LA, Kalia SK, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Hutchison WD, Popovic MR, Milosevic L, Lankarany M. Modeling Instantaneous Firing Rate of Deep Brain Stimulation Target Neuronal Ensembles in the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:464-475. [PMID: 37140523 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders, including Parkinson disease and essential tremor. However, the underlying mechanisms of DBS remain elusive. Despite the capability of existing models in interpreting experimental data qualitatively, there are very few unified computational models that quantitatively capture the dynamics of the neuronal activity of varying stimulated nuclei-including subthalamic nucleus (STN), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), and ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)-across different DBS frequencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Both synthetic and experimental data were used in the model fitting; the synthetic data were generated by an established spiking neuron model that was reported in our previous work, and the experimental data were provided using single-unit microelectrode recordings (MERs) during DBS (microelectrode stimulation). Based on these data, we developed a novel mathematical model to represent the firing rate of neurons receiving DBS, including neurons in STN, SNr, and Vim-across different DBS frequencies. In our model, the DBS pulses were filtered through a synapse model and a nonlinear transfer function to formulate the firing rate variability. For each DBS-targeted nucleus, we fitted a single set of optimal model parameters consistent across varying DBS frequencies. RESULTS Our model accurately reproduced the firing rates observed and calculated from both synthetic and experimental data. The optimal model parameters were consistent across different DBS frequencies. CONCLUSIONS The result of our model fitting was in agreement with experimental single-unit MER data during DBS. Reproducing neuronal firing rates of different nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus during DBS can be helpful to further understand the mechanisms of DBS and to potentially optimize stimulation parameters based on their actual effects on neuronal activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Tian
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Leon A Steiner
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mojgan Hodaie
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William D Hutchison
- CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milos R Popovic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milad Lankarany
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Hacker ML, Waters AC, Wang J, Provenza NR, de Hemptinne C, Johnson KA, Morrison MA, Cernera S. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. J Neurosci 2023; 43:7575-7586. [PMID: 37940596 PMCID: PMC10634582 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1427-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, involving chronic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions for electrical stimulation delivery. Despite its safety and efficacy, DBS remains an underutilized therapy. Advances in the field of DBS, including in technology, mechanistic understanding, and applications have the potential to expand access and use of DBS, while also improving clinical outcomes. Developments in DBS technology, such as MRI compatibility and bidirectional DBS systems capable of sensing neural activity while providing therapeutic stimulation, have enabled advances in our understanding of DBS mechanisms and its application. In this review, we summarize recent work exploring DBS modulation of target networks. We also cover current work focusing on improved programming and the development of novel stimulation paradigms that go beyond current standards of DBS, many of which are enabled by sensing-enabled DBS systems and have the potential to expand access to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garwood IC, Major AJ, Antonini MJ, Correa J, Lee Y, Sahasrabudhe A, Mahnke MK, Miller EK, Brown EN, Anikeeva P. Multifunctional fibers enable modulation of cortical and deep brain activity during cognitive behavior in macaques. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadh0974. [PMID: 37801492 PMCID: PMC10558126 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh0974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
Recording and modulating neural activity in vivo enables investigations of the neurophysiology underlying behavior and disease. However, there is a dearth of translational tools for simultaneous recording and localized receptor-specific modulation. We address this limitation by translating multifunctional fiber neurotechnology previously only available for rodent studies to enable cortical and subcortical neural recording and modulation in macaques. We record single-neuron and broader oscillatory activity during intracranial GABA infusions in the premotor cortex and putamen. By applying state-space models to characterize changes in electrophysiology, we uncover that neural activity evoked by a working memory task is reshaped by even a modest local inhibition. The recordings provide detailed insight into the electrophysiological effect of neurotransmitter receptor modulation in both cortical and subcortical structures in an awake macaque. Our results demonstrate a first-time application of multifunctional fibers for causal studies of neuronal activity in behaving nonhuman primates and pave the way for clinical translation of fiber-based neurotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indie C. Garwood
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Alex J. Major
- The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Marc-Joseph Antonini
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Josefina Correa
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Youngbin Lee
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Atharva Sahasrabudhe
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Meredith K. Mahnke
- The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Earl K. Miller
- The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Emery N. Brown
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Polina Anikeeva
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sil T, Hanafi I, Eldebakey H, Palmisano C, Volkmann J, Muthuraman M, Reich MM, Peach R. Wavelet-Based Bracketing, Time-Frequency Beta Burst Detection: New Insights in Parkinson's Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2023; 20:1767-1778. [PMID: 37819489 PMCID: PMC10684463 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01447-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have shown that beta band activity is not tonically elevated but comprises exaggerated phasic bursts of varying durations and magnitudes, for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Current methods for detecting beta bursts target a single frequency peak in beta band, potentially ignoring bursts in the wider beta band. In this study, we propose a new robust framework for beta burst identification across wide frequency ranges. Chronic local field potential at-rest recordings were obtained from seven PD patients implanted with Medtronic SenSight™ deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. The proposed method uses wavelet decomposition to compute the time-frequency spectrum and identifies bursts spanning multiple frequency bins by thresholding, offering an additional burst measure, ∆f, that captures the width of a burst in the frequency domain. Analysis included calculating burst duration, magnitude, and ∆f and evaluating the distribution and likelihood of bursts between the low beta (13-20 Hz) and high beta (21-35 Hz). Finally, the results of the analysis were correlated to motor impairment (MDS-UPDRS III) med off scores. We found that low beta bursts with longer durations and larger width in the frequency domain (∆f) were positively correlated, while high beta bursts with longer durations and larger ∆f were negatively correlated with motor impairment. The proposed method, finding clear differences between bursting behavior in high and low beta bands, has clearly demonstrated the importance of considering wide frequency bands for beta burst behavior with implications for closed-loop DBS paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanmoy Sil
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ibrahem Hanafi
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hazem Eldebakey
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Chiara Palmisano
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Martin M Reich
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Robert Peach
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hazra D, Chandy GM, Ghosh A. Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Boon or Bane - A Single Centre Retrospective Observational Study from India. Asian J Neurosurg 2023; 18:539-547. [PMID: 38152526 PMCID: PMC10749851 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) is more of a modality of treatment that is empirical, for which a physiological explanation is being sought. This study was done to determine the outcome and complications of patients undergoing STN-DBS for PD. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in an advanced neuromedicine facility in eastern India for 9 years (August 2013-August 2022), which included all patients undergoing STN-DBS. Results A total of 53 patients were operated on during the study period. The mean age group of the study population was 60.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 8.2) years with a male (33 [62.3%]) predominance. The most common presenting complaints included rigidity and hypokinesia (27), severe dyskinesia (21), and tremors (17). During the postoperative period, rigidity and hypokinesia (21), severe dyskinesia (16), and tremors (12) improved significantly in a subset of the patients. The majority (45 [84.9%]) of these cases received bilateral monopolar simulation, whereas three patients (5.7%) had bilateral bipolar stimulation. Unilateral bipolar stimulation was used in five (9.4%) patients. In the immediate postoperative period, they were initiated on limb, speech, and swallowing therapy as indicated. Surgery-related complications were seen in five (9.4%) cases. At 6 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in the Unified PD rating scale component (mainly motor examination and complication of PD therapy) was noted in the majority (36 [67.9%]) of patients. One patient developed neuroleptic malignant syndrome and succumbed to his illness on the fourth postoperative day. Conclusion Given these findings, STN-DBS appears to be a good, safe, and effective treatment for a subset of medically refractory PD with an overall improvement in two-thirds of the study cohort and less than 10% risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darpanarayan Hazra
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience Kolkata, India
| | - Gina Maryann Chandy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India
| | - Amit Ghosh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neuroscience Kolkata, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rasiah NP, Maheshwary R, Kwon CS, Bloomstein JD, Girgis F. Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease and Relationship between Micro-electrode tracks and hemorrhage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 171:e8-e23. [PMID: 36244666 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation is a common treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite strong efficacy in well-selected patients, complications can occur. Intraoperative micro-electrode recording (MER) can enhance efficacy by improving lead accuracy. However, there is controversy as to whether MER increases risk of hemorrhage. OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis reporting complication rates from deep brain stimulation in PD. We also interrogate the association between hemorrhage and MER. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were implemented while querying the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. All included studies were randomized controlled trials and prospective case series with 5 or more patients. Primary outcomes included rates of overall revision, infection, lead malposition, surgical site and wound complications, hardware-related complications, and seizure. The secondary outcome was the relationship between number of MER tracks and hemorrhage rate. RESULTS 262 articles with 21,261 patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 25.8 months (range 0-133). Complication rates were: revision 4.9%, infection 4.2%, lead malposition 3.3%, surgical site complications 2.8%, hemorrhage 2.4%, hardware-related complications 2.4%, and seizure 1.9%. While hemorrhage rate did not increase with single-track MER (odds ratio, 3.49; P = 0.29), there was a significant non-linear increase with each additional track. CONCLUSION Infection and lead malposition were the most common complications. Hemorrhage risk increases with more than one MER track. These results highlight the challenge of balancing surgical accuracy and perioperative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neilen P Rasiah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, USA
| | - Romir Maheshwary
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Churl-Su Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua D Bloomstein
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Fady Girgis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rao AT, Chou KL, Patil PG. Localization of deep brain stimulation trajectories via automatic mapping of microelectrode recordings to MRI. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36763997 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acbb2b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Suboptimal electrode placement during subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) surgery may arise from several sources, including frame-based targeting errors and intraoperative brain shift. We present a computer algorithm that can accurately localize intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) tracks on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in real-time, thereby predicting deviation between the surgical plan and the MER trajectories.Approach. Random forest (RF) modeling was used to derive a statistical relationship between electrophysiological features on intraoperative MER and voxel intensity on preoperative T2-weighted MR imaging. This model was integrated into a larger algorithm that can automatically localize intraoperative MER recording tracks on preoperative MRI in real-time. To verify accuracy, targeting error of both the planned intraoperative trajectory ('planned') and the algorithm-derived trajectory ('calculated') was estimated by measuring deviation from the final DBS lead location on postoperative high-resolution computed tomography ('actual').Main results. MR imaging and MERs were obtained from 24 STN DBS implant trajectories. The cross-validated RF model could accurately distinguish between gray and white matter regions along MER trajectories (AUC 0.84). When applying this model within the localization algorithm, thecalculatedMER trajectory estimate was found to be significantly closer to theactualDBS lead when compared to theplannedtrajectory recorded during surgery (1.04 mm vs 1.52 mm deviation,p< 0.002), with improvement shown in 19/24 cases (79%). When applying the algorithm to simulated DBS trajectory plans with randomized targeting error, up to 4 mm of error could be resolved to <2 mm on average (p< 0.0001).Significance. This work presents an automated system for intraoperative localization of electrodes during STN DBS surgery. This neuroengineering solution may enhance the accuracy of electrode position estimation, particularly in cases where high-resolution intraoperative imaging is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay T Rao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Kelvin L Chou
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Parag G Patil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.,Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baker S, Tekriwal A, Felsen G, Christensen E, Hirt L, Ojemann SG, Kramer DR, Kern DS, Thompson JA. Automatic extraction of upper-limb kinematic activity using deep learning-based markerless tracking during deep brain stimulation implantation for Parkinson's disease: A proof of concept study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0275490. [PMID: 36264986 PMCID: PMC9584454 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimal placement of deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for treating movement disorders routinely relies on intraoperative motor testing for target determination. However, in current practice, motor testing relies on subjective interpretation and correlation of motor and neural information. Recent advances in computer vision could improve assessment accuracy. We describe our application of deep learning-based computer vision to conduct markerless tracking for measuring motor behaviors of patients undergoing DBS surgery for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Video recordings were acquired during intraoperative kinematic testing (N = 5 patients), as part of standard of care for accurate implantation of the DBS electrode. Kinematic data were extracted from videos post-hoc using the Python-based computer vision suite DeepLabCut. Both manual and automated (80.00% accuracy) approaches were used to extract kinematic episodes from threshold derived kinematic fluctuations. Active motor epochs were compressed by modeling upper limb deflections with a parabolic fit. A semi-supervised classification model, support vector machine (SVM), trained on the parameters defined by the parabolic fit reliably predicted movement type. Across all cases, tracking was well calibrated (i.e., reprojection pixel errors 0.016-0.041; accuracies >95%). SVM predicted classification demonstrated high accuracy (85.70%) including for two common upper limb movements, arm chain pulls (92.30%) and hand clenches (76.20%), with accuracy validated using a leave-one-out process for each patient. These results demonstrate successful capture and categorization of motor behaviors critical for assessing the optimal brain target for DBS surgery. Conventional motor testing procedures have proven informative and contributory to targeting but have largely remained subjective and inaccessible to non-Western and rural DBS centers with limited resources. This approach could automate the process and improve accuracy for neuro-motor mapping, to improve surgical targeting, optimize DBS therapy, provide accessible avenues for neuro-motor mapping and DBS implantation, and advance our understanding of the function of different brain areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunderland Baker
- Department of Human Biology and Kinesiology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Anand Tekriwal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Gidon Felsen
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Elijah Christensen
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Lisa Hirt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Steven G. Ojemann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Daniel R. Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Drew S. Kern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - John A. Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saudargiene A, Radziunas A, Dainauskas JJ, Kucinskas V, Vaitkiene P, Pranckeviciene A, Laucius O, Tamasauskas A, Deltuva V. Radiomic features of amygdala nuclei and hippocampus subfields help to predict subthalamic deep brain stimulation motor outcomes for Parkinson‘s disease patients. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1028996. [PMID: 36312034 PMCID: PMC9606748 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1028996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purposeThe aim of the study is to predict the subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) outcomes for Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients using the radiomic features extracted from pre-operative magnetic resonance images (MRI).MethodsThe study included 34 PD patients who underwent DBS implantation in the STN. Five patients (15%) showed poor DBS motor outcome. All together 9 amygdalar nuclei and 12 hippocampus subfields were segmented using Freesurfer 7.0 pipeline from pre-operative MRI images. Furthermore, PyRadiomics platform was used to extract 120 radiomic features for each nuclei and subfield resulting in 5,040 features. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection method was employed to reduce the number of features to 20, and 8 machine learning methods (regularized binary logistic regression (LR), decision tree classifier (DT), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), naive Bayes classifier (NB), kernel support vector machine (SVM), deep feed-forward neural network (DNN), one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM), feed-forward neural network-based autoencoder for anomaly detection (DNN-A)) were applied to build the models for poor vs. good and very good STN-DBS motor outcome prediction.ResultsThe highest mean prediction accuracy was obtained using regularized LR (96.65 ± 7.24%, AUC 0.98 ± 0.06) and DNN (87.25 ± 14.80%, AUC 0.87 ± 0.18).ConclusionThe results show the potential power of the radiomic features extracted from hippocampus and amygdala MRI in the prediction of STN-DBS motor outcomes for PD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausra Saudargiene
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- *Correspondence: Ausra Saudargiene,
| | - Andrius Radziunas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Justinas J. Dainauskas
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Vytautas Kucinskas
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Paulina Vaitkiene
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Aiste Pranckeviciene
- Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Department of Neurology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ovidijus Laucius
- Department of Neurology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Arimantas Tamasauskas
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Vytenis Deltuva
- Neuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hanuscheck N, Thalman C, Domingues M, Schmaul S, Muthuraman M, Hetsch F, Ecker M, Endle H, Oshaghi M, Martino G, Kuhlmann T, Bozek K, van Beers T, Bittner S, von Engelhardt J, Vogt J, Vogelaar CF, Zipp F. Interleukin-4 receptor signaling modulates neuronal network activity. J Exp Med 2022; 219:213227. [PMID: 35587822 PMCID: PMC9123307 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20211887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence is emerging that immune responses not only play a part in the central nervous system (CNS) in diseases but may also be relevant for healthy conditions. We discovered a major role for the interleukin-4 (IL-4)/IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα) signaling pathway in synaptic processes, as indicated by transcriptome analysis in IL-4Rα–deficient mice and human neurons with/without IL-4 treatment. Moreover, IL-4Rα is expressed presynaptically, and locally available IL-4 regulates synaptic transmission. We found reduced synaptic vesicle pools, altered postsynaptic currents, and a higher excitatory drive in cortical networks of IL-4Rα–deficient neurons. Acute effects of IL-4 treatment on postsynaptic currents in wild-type neurons were mediated via PKCγ signaling release and led to increased inhibitory activity supporting the findings in IL-4Rα–deficient neurons. In fact, the deficiency of IL-4Rα resulted in increased network activity in vivo, accompanied by altered exploration and anxiety-related learning behavior; general learning and memory was unchanged. In conclusion, neuronal IL-4Rα and its presynaptic prevalence appear relevant for maintaining homeostasis of CNS synaptic function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hanuscheck
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carine Thalman
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Micaela Domingues
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Samantha Schmaul
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Florian Hetsch
- Institute for Pathophysiology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Manuela Ecker
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Endle
- Department of Molecular and Translational Neuroscience, Cluster of Excellence-Cellular Stress Response in Aging-Associated Diseases and Center of Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mohammadsaleh Oshaghi
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gianvito Martino
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Tanja Kuhlmann
- Institute for Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Bozek
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne; University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tim van Beers
- Molecular Cell Biology, Institute I of Anatomy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Bittner
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jakob von Engelhardt
- Institute for Pathophysiology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johannes Vogt
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Molecular and Translational Neuroscience, Cluster of Excellence-Cellular Stress Response in Aging-Associated Diseases and Center of Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Francisca Vogelaar
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and Immunotherapy, Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oxenford S, Roediger J, Neudorfer C, Milosevic L, Güttler C, Spindler P, Vajkoczy P, Neumann WJ, Kühn A, Horn A. Lead-OR: A multimodal platform for deep brain stimulation surgery. eLife 2022; 11:e72929. [PMID: 35594135 PMCID: PMC9177150 DOI: 10.7554/elife.72929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implant trajectories are stereotactically defined using preoperative neuroimaging. To validate the correct trajectory, microelectrode recordings (MERs) or local field potential recordings can be used to extend neuroanatomical information (defined by MRI) with neurophysiological activity patterns recorded from micro- and macroelectrodes probing the surgical target site. Currently, these two sources of information (imaging vs. electrophysiology) are analyzed separately, while means to fuse both data streams have not been introduced. Methods Here, we present a tool that integrates resources from stereotactic planning, neuroimaging, MER, and high-resolution atlas data to create a real-time visualization of the implant trajectory. We validate the tool based on a retrospective cohort of DBS patients (N = 52) offline and present single-use cases of the real-time platform. Results We establish an open-source software tool for multimodal data visualization and analysis during DBS surgery. We show a general correspondence between features derived from neuroimaging and electrophysiological recordings and present examples that demonstrate the functionality of the tool. Conclusions This novel software platform for multimodal data visualization and analysis bears translational potential to improve accuracy of DBS surgery. The toolbox is made openly available and is extendable to integrate with additional software packages. Funding Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (410169619, 424778381), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DynaSti), National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simón Oxenford
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Christopher Güttler
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Philipp Spindler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andrea Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bitar L, Uphaus T, Thalman C, Muthuraman M, Gyr L, Ji H, Domingues M, Endle H, Groppa S, Steffen F, Koirala N, Fan W, Ibanez L, Heitsch L, Cruchaga C, Lee JM, Kloss F, Bittner S, Nitsch R, Zipp F, Vogt J. Inhibition of the enzyme autotaxin reduces cortical excitability and ameliorates the outcome in stroke. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabk0135. [PMID: 35442704 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abk0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Stroke penumbra injury caused by excess glutamate is an important factor in determining stroke outcome; however, several therapeutic approaches aiming to rescue the penumbra have failed, likely due to unspecific targeting and persistent excitotoxicity, which continued far beyond the primary stroke event. Synaptic lipid signaling can modulate glutamatergic transmission via presynaptic lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) 2 receptors modulated by the LPA-synthesizing molecule autotaxin (ATX) present in astrocytic perisynaptic processes. Here, we detected long-lasting increases in brain ATX concentrations after experimental stroke. In humans, cerebrospinal fluid ATX concentration was increased up to 14 days after stroke. Using astrocyte-specific deletion and pharmacological inhibition of ATX at different time points after experimental stroke, we showed that inhibition of LPA-related cortical excitability improved stroke outcome. In transgenic mice and in individuals expressing a single-nucleotide polymorphism that increased LPA-related glutamatergic transmission, we found dysregulated synaptic LPA signaling and subsequent negative stroke outcome. Moreover, ATX inhibition in the animal model ameliorated stroke outcome, suggesting that this approach might have translational potential for improving the outcome after stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Bitar
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Timo Uphaus
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Carine Thalman
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Luzia Gyr
- Transfer Group Anti-Infectives, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Haichao Ji
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Molecular and Translational Neuroscience, Cologne Excellence Cluster for Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Micaela Domingues
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Heiko Endle
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Molecular and Translational Neuroscience, Cologne Excellence Cluster for Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Falk Steffen
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Nabin Koirala
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Wei Fan
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, NeuroGenomics and Informatics Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Laura Heitsch
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Carlos Cruchaga
- Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, NeuroGenomics and Informatics Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jin-Moo Lee
- Department of Neurology, Radiology, and Biomedical Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Florian Kloss
- Transfer Group Anti-Infectives, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knoell Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Bittner
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Robert Nitsch
- Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Johannes Vogt
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Molecular and Translational Neuroscience, Cologne Excellence Cluster for Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zheng Z, Zhu Z, Ying Y, Jiang H, Wu H, Tian J, Luo W, Zhu J. The Accuracy of Imaging Guided Targeting with Microelectrode Recoding in Subthalamic Nucleus for Parkinson's Disease: A Single-Center Experience. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 12:897-903. [PMID: 35124576 PMCID: PMC9108556 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-213095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Accurate electrode targeting was essential for the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS). There is ongoing debate about the necessary of microelectrode recording (MER) in subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS surgery for accurate targeting. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of imaging-guided awake DBS with MER in STN for Parkinson’s disease in a single center. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 161 Parkinson’s disease patients undergoing STN-DBS at our center from March 2013 to June 2021. The implantation was performed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based direct targeting with intraoperative MER and macrostimulation testing. 285 electrode tracks with preoperative and postoperative coordinates were included to calculate the placement error in STN targeting. Results: 85.9% of electrodes guided by preoperative MRI were implanted without intraoperative adjustment. 31 (10.2%) and 12 (3.9%) electrodes underwent intraoperative adjustment due to MER and intraoperative testing, respectively. We found 86.2% (245/285) of electrodes with trajectory error ≤2 mm. The MER physiological signals length < 4 mm and ≥4 mm group showed trajectory error > 2 mm in 38.0% and 8.8% of electrodes, respectively. Compared to non-adjustment electrodes, the final positioning of MER-adjusted electrodes deviated from the center of STN. Conclusion: The preoperative MRI guided STN targeting results in approximately 14% cases that require electrode repositioning. MER physiological signals length < 4 mm at first penetration implied deviation off planned target. MER combined with intraoperative awake testing served to rescue such deviation based on MRI alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhoule Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yuqi Ying
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hongjie Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hemmings Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jun Tian
- Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei Luo
- Department of Neurology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Junming Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rao AT, Lu CW, Askari A, Malaga KA, Chou KL, Patil PG. Clinically-derived oscillatory biomarker predicts optimal subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson's disease. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35272281 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac5c8c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Choosing the optimal electrode trajectory, stimulation location, and stimulation amplitude in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) remains a time-consuming empirical effort. In this retrospective study, we derive a data-driven electrophysiological biomarker that predicts clinical DBS location and parameters, and we consolidate this information into a quantitative score that may facilitate an objective approach to STN DBS surgery and programming. APPROACH Random-forest feature selection was applied to a dataset of 1046 microelectrode recordings sites across 20 DBS implant trajectories to identify features of oscillatory activity that predict clinically programmed volumes of tissue activation (VTA). A cross-validated classifier was used to retrospectively predict VTA regions from these features. Spatial convolution of probabilistic classifier outputs along MER trajectories produced a biomarker score that reflects the probability of localization within a clinically optimized VTA. MAIN RESULTS Biomarker scores peaked within the VTA region and were significantly correlated with percent improvement in postoperative motor symptoms (MDS-UPRDS Part III, R = 0.61, p = 0.004). Notably, the length of STN, a common criterion for trajectory selection, did not show similar correlation (R = -0.31, p = 0.18). These findings suggest that biomarker-based trajectory selection and programming may improve motor outcomes by 9 ± 3 percentage points (p = 0.047) in this dataset. SIGNIFICANCE A clinically defined electrophysiological biomarker not only predicts VTA size and location but also correlates well with motor outcomes. Use of this biomarker for trajectory selection and initial stimulation may potentially simplify STN DBS surgery and programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay T Rao
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Dr., SPC 5338, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5338, UNITED STATES
| | - Charles W Lu
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5338, UNITED STATES
| | - Asra Askari
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5338, Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5338, UNITED STATES
| | - Karlo A Malaga
- Biomedical Engineering, Bucknell University, 316 Academic East Building, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, 17837, UNITED STATES
| | - Kelvin L Chou
- Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5338, UNITED STATES
| | - Parag G Patil
- Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5338, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frey J, Cagle J, Johnson KA, Wong JK, Hilliard JD, Butson CR, Okun MS, de Hemptinne C. Past, Present, and Future of Deep Brain Stimulation: Hardware, Software, Imaging, Physiology and Novel Approaches. Front Neurol 2022; 13:825178. [PMID: 35356461 PMCID: PMC8959612 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.825178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has advanced treatment options for a variety of neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. As the technology for DBS continues to progress, treatment efficacy will continue to improve and disease indications will expand. Hardware advances such as longer-lasting batteries will reduce the frequency of battery replacement and segmented leads will facilitate improvements in the effectiveness of stimulation and have the potential to minimize stimulation side effects. Targeting advances such as specialized imaging sequences and "connectomics" will facilitate improved accuracy for lead positioning and trajectory planning. Software advances such as closed-loop stimulation and remote programming will enable DBS to be a more personalized and accessible technology. The future of DBS continues to be promising and holds the potential to further improve quality of life. In this review we will address the past, present and future of DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Frey
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jackson Cagle
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kara A. Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Justin D. Hilliard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Christopher R. Butson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wong JK, Deuschl G, Wolke R, Bergman H, Muthuraman M, Groppa S, Sheth SA, Bronte-Stewart HM, Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Lambert E, Kehnemouyi Y, Starr PA, Little S, Anso J, Gilron R, Poree L, Kalamangalam GP, Worrell GA, Miller KJ, Schiff ND, Butson CR, Henderson JM, Judy JW, Ramirez-Zamora A, Foote KD, Silburn PA, Li L, Oyama G, Kamo H, Sekimoto S, Hattori N, Giordano JJ, DiEuliis D, Shook JR, Doughtery DD, Widge AS, Mayberg HS, Cha J, Choi K, Heisig S, Obatusin M, Opri E, Kaufman SB, Shirvalkar P, Rozell CJ, Alagapan S, Raike RS, Bokil H, Green D, Okun MS. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Cutting Edge Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, Neuromodulation, Neuroethics, Pain, Interventional Psychiatry, Epilepsy, and Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:813387. [PMID: 35308605 PMCID: PMC8931265 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.813387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
DBS Think Tank IX was held on August 25-27, 2021 in Orlando FL with US based participants largely in person and overseas participants joining by video conferencing technology. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging deep brain stimulation (DBS) technologies as well as the logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The consensus among the DBS Think Tank IX speakers was that DBS expanded in its scope and has been applied to multiple brain disorders in an effort to modulate neural circuitry. After collectively sharing our experiences, it was estimated that globally more than 230,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. As such, this year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: neuromodulation in Europe, Asia and Australia; cutting-edge technologies, neuroethics, interventional psychiatry, adaptive DBS, neuromodulation for pain, network neuromodulation for epilepsy and neuromodulation for traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Robin Wolke
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Hagai Bergman
- Department of Medical Neurobiology (Physiology), Institute of Medical Research Israel-Canada, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Biomedical Statistics and Multimodal Signal Processing Unit, Section of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kevin B. Wilkins
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Matthew N. Petrucci
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Emilia Lambert
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yasmine Kehnemouyi
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ro’ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lawrence Poree
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Giridhar P. Kalamangalam
- Department of Neurology, Wilder Center for Epilepsy Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | | | - Kai J. Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Nicholas D. Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Christopher R. Butson
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jaimie M. Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jack W. Judy
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D. Foote
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Peter A. Silburn
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland and Saint Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Luming Li
- National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Genko Oyama
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hikaru Kamo
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoko Sekimoto
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Hattori
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James J. Giordano
- Neuroethics Studies Program, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Diane DiEuliis
- US Department of Defense Fort Lesley J. McNair, National Defense University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - John R. Shook
- Department of Philosophy and Science Education, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Darin D. Doughtery
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alik S. Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jungho Cha
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kisueng Choi
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Stephen Heisig
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mosadolu Obatusin
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Scott B. Kaufman
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Prasad Shirvalkar
- The Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology (Pain Management) and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert S. Raike
- Restorative Therapies Group Implantables, Research and Core Technology, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Hemant Bokil
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States
| | - David Green
- NeuroPace, Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|