1
|
Vrijsen JN, Grafton B, Koster EHW, Lau J, Wittekind CE, Bar-Haim Y, Becker ES, Brotman MA, Joormann J, Lazarov A, MacLeod C, Manning V, Pettit JW, Rinck M, Salemink E, Woud ML, Hallion LS, Wiers RW. Towards implementation of cognitive bias modification in mental health care: State of the science, best practices, and ways forward. Behav Res Ther 2024; 179:104557. [PMID: 38797055 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Cognitive bias modification (CBM) has evolved from an experimental method testing cognitive mechanisms of psychopathology to a promising tool for accessible digital mental health care. While we are still discovering the conditions under which clinically relevant effects occur, the dire need for accessible, effective, and low-cost mental health tools underscores the need for implementation where such tools are available. Providing our expert opinion as Association for Cognitive Bias Modification members, we first discuss the readiness of different CBM approaches for clinical implementation, then discuss key considerations with regard to implementation. Evidence is robust for approach bias modification as an adjunctive intervention for alcohol use disorders and interpretation bias modification as a stand-alone intervention for anxiety disorders. Theoretical predictions regarding the mechanisms by which bias and symptom change occur await further testing. We propose that CBM interventions with demonstrated efficacy should be provided to the targeted populations. To facilitate this, we set a research agenda based on implementation frameworks, which includes feasibility and acceptability testing, co-creation with end-users, and collaboration with industry partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna N Vrijsen
- Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Depression Expertise Center, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Ben Grafton
- Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - Ernst H W Koster
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Jennifer Lau
- Youth Resilience Unit, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Charlotte E Wittekind
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Yair Bar-Haim
- School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel; School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Eni S Becker
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa A Brotman
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jutta Joormann
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Conneticut, USA
| | - Amit Lazarov
- School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Colin MacLeod
- Centre for the Advancement of Research on Emotion, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - Victoria Manning
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Turning Point, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy W Pettit
- Department of Psychology and Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mike Rinck
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elske Salemink
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Marcella L Woud
- Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Georg-Elias-Mueller-Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Reinout W Wiers
- Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Lab, Department of Psychology, and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yi KH, Lim YA, Lee J, Lee SY. Types of Client Perceptions Regarding Counselling Experiences at Psychological Counselling Centres: Utilising Q Methodology. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:586. [PMID: 39062409 PMCID: PMC11274072 DOI: 10.3390/bs14070586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This study used Q methodology to explore the various types and characteristics of clients' subjective perceptions concerning their experiences at psychological counselling centres. We selected 33 Q samples from a Q population of 135; of the Q sample, 31 P samples underwent Q sorting. Subsequently, we analysed the data using the Quanl Program. The study categorised perception into four distinct types. Type 1 values therapeutic counselling relationships, Type 2 prioritises counselling services, Type 3 values counsellor assignment, and Type 4 prioritises the counselling structure. This study provides valuable basic data to clients, counsellors, and counselling institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoung Hwa Yi
- Coaching and Counselling, Graduate Schools, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30, Pildong-ro 1 gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea; (K.H.Y.); (Y.a.L.); (J.L.)
| | - Yeon ah Lim
- Coaching and Counselling, Graduate Schools, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30, Pildong-ro 1 gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea; (K.H.Y.); (Y.a.L.); (J.L.)
| | - Jeeyoung Lee
- Coaching and Counselling, Graduate Schools, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30, Pildong-ro 1 gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea; (K.H.Y.); (Y.a.L.); (J.L.)
| | - Song Yi Lee
- Dharma College, Dongguk University-Seoul, 30, Pildong-ro 1 gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zandieh S, Abdollahzadeh SM, Sadeghirad B, Wang L, McCabe RE, Yao L, Inness BE, Pathak A, Couban RJ, Crandon H, Torabiardakani K, Bieling P, Busse JW. Therapist-guided remote versus in-person cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 2024; 196:E327-E340. [PMID: 38499303 PMCID: PMC10948182 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective for several psychiatric and somatic conditions; however, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have administered treatment in person and whether remote delivery is similarly effective remains uncertain. We sought to compare the effectiveness of therapist-guided remote CBT and in-person CBT. METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 4, 2023, for RCTs that enrolled adults (aged ≥ 18 yr) presenting with any clinical condition and that randomized participants to either therapist-guided remote CBT (e.g., teleconference, videoconference) or in-person CBT. Paired reviewers assessed risk of bias and extracted data independently and in duplicate. We performed random-effects model meta-analyses to pool patient-important primary outcomes across eligible RCTs as standardized mean differences (SMDs). We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance to assess the certainty of evidence and used the Instrument to Assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) to rate the credibility of subgroup effects. RESULTS We included 54 RCTs that enrolled a total of 5463 patients. Seventeen studies focused on treatment of anxiety and related disorders, 14 on depressive symptoms, 7 on insomnia, 6 on chronic pain or fatigue syndromes, 5 on body image or eating disorders, 3 on tinnitus, 1 on alcohol use disorder, and 1 on mood and anxiety disorders. Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of therapist-guided remote and in-person CBT on primary outcomes (SMD -0.02, 95% confidence interval -0.12 to 0.07). INTERPRETATION Moderate-certainty evidence showed little to no difference in the effectiveness of in-person and therapist-guided remote CBT across a range of mental health and somatic disorders, suggesting potential for the use of therapist-guided remote CBT to facilitate greater access to evidence-based care. Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/7asrc).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Zandieh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Seyedeh Maryam Abdollahzadeh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Behnam Sadeghirad
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Randi E McCabe
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Liam Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Briar E Inness
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Ananya Pathak
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Rachel J Couban
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Holly Crandon
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Kian Torabiardakani
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Peter Bieling
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont
| | - Jason W Busse
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Zandieh, Sadeghirad, Wang, Yao, Pathak, Busse), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (Zandieh), Toronto, Ont.; Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Abdollahzadeh), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Department of Anesthesia (Sadeghirad, Wang, Busse), McMaster University; The Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre (Wang, Torabiardakani, Busse), McMaster University; St. Joseph's Healthcare (McCabe, Bieling); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences (McCabe, Inness, Bieling), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Institute for Management and Innovation (Crandon), University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fuhr DC, Wolf-Ostermann K, Hoel V, Zeeb H. [Digital technologies to improve mental health]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2024; 67:332-338. [PMID: 38294700 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-024-03842-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
The burden of mental diseases is enormous and constantly growing worldwide. The resulting increase in demand for psychosocial help is also having a negative impact on waiting times for psychotherapy in Germany. Digital interventions for mental health, such as interventions delivered through or with the help of a website (e.g. "telehealth"), smartphone, or tablet app-based interventions and interventions that use text messages or virtual reality, can help. This article begins with an overview of the functions and range of applications of digital technologies for mental health. The evidence for individual digital forms of interventions is addressed. Overall, it is shown that digital interventions for mental health are likely to be cost-effective compared to no therapy or a non-therapeutic control group. Newer approaches such as "digital phenotyping" are explained in the article. Finally, individual papers from the "Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health" are presented, and limitations and challenges of technologies for mental health are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C Fuhr
- Abteilung für Evaluation und Prävention, Leibniz Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Deutschland.
- Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland.
| | - Karin Wolf-Ostermann
- Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland
| | - Viktoria Hoel
- Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland
| | - Hajo Zeeb
- Abteilung für Evaluation und Prävention, Leibniz Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie, Achterstr. 30, 28359, Bremen, Deutschland
- Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kählke F, Hasking P, Küchler AM, Baumeister H. Mental health services for German university students: acceptance of intervention targets and preference for delivery modes. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1284661. [PMID: 38426046 PMCID: PMC10903098 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1284661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Most university students with mental disorders remain untreated. Evaluating the acceptance of intervention targets in mental health treatment, promotion, and prevention, as well as mental health service delivery modes is crucial for reducing potential barriers, increasing healthcare utilization, and efficiently allocating resources in healthcare services. Aim The study aimed to evaluate the acceptance of various intervention targets and delivery modes of mental health care services in German first-year university students. Methods In total, 1,376 first-year students from two German universities from the 2017-2018 multi-center cross-sectional cohort of the StudiCare project, the German arm of the World Mental Health International College Student Survey initiative, completed a web-based survey assessing their mental health. Mental disorder status was based on self-reported data fulfilling the DSM-IV criteria. We report frequencies of accepted delivery modes [categories: group or in-person therapy with on or off campus services, self-help internet- or mobile-based intervention (IMI) with or without coaching, or a combination of a in-person and IMI (blended)]. In a multinomial logistic regression, we estimate correlates of the preference for in-person vs. IMI vs. a combination of both modes (blended) modalities. Additionally, we report frequencies of intervention targets (disorder specific: e.g., social phobia, depressive mood; study-related: test anxiety, procrastination; general well-being: sleep quality, resilience) their association with mental disorders and sex, and optimal combinations of treatment targets for each mental illness. Results German university students' acceptance is high for in-person (71%-76%), moderate for internet- and mobile-based (45%-55%), and low for group delivery modes (31%-36%). In-person treatment (72%) was preferred over IMI (19%) and blended modalities (9%). Having a mental disorder [odds ratio (OR): 1.56], believing that digital treatments are effective (OR: 3.2), and showing no intention to use services (OR: 2.8) were associated with a preference for IMI compared to in-person modes. Students with prior treatment experience preferred in-person modes (OR: 0.46). In general, treatment targets acceptance was higher among female students and students with mental disorders. However, this was not true for targets with the highest (i.e., procrastination) and the lowest (i.e., substance-use disorder) acceptance. If only two intervention targets were offered, a combination of study-related targets (i.e., procrastination, stress, time management) would reach 85%-88% of the students. Conclusion In-person services are preferred, yet half of the students consider using IMI, preferably aiming for a combination of at least two study-related intervention targets. Student mental health care services should offer a combination of accepted targets in different delivery modes to maximize service utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Kählke
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Professorship Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Penelope Hasking
- Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Ann-Marie Küchler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moreira H, Skvarc D, Gomes-Pereira B, Albuquerque A, Góis AC, Fonseca A, Pereira AM, Caiado B, Paulino B, Santos C, Ehrenreich-May J, Canavarro MC, Saraiva M, Vicente VN, Pereira AI. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of Emotion Detectives In-Out: a blended version of the unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in Portuguese children. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:63. [PMID: 38326847 PMCID: PMC10851582 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01532-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood emotional disorders (EDs; i.e., anxiety and depressive disorders) are currently a public health concern. Their high prevalence, long-term effects, and profound influence on the lives of children and families highlight the need to identify and treat these disorders as early and effectively as possible. This clinical trial will examine the efficacy of a blended version (i.e., combining face-to-face and online sessions into one treatment protocol) of the Unified Protocol for Children (the "Emotion Detectives In-Out" program). This program is a manualized cognitive-behavioral therapy for the transdiagnostic treatment of EDs in children aged 7 to 12 years that aims to reduce the intensity and frequency of strong and aversive emotional experiences by helping children learn how to confront those emotions and respond to them in more adaptive ways. METHODS This study is designed as a multicenter equivalence randomized controlled parallel-group two-arm trial comparing the Emotion Detectives In-Out program with an evidenced-based group intervention for children with anxiety disorders (the Coping Cat program). Participants will be children aged between 7 and 12 years with an anxiety disorder or with clinically significant anxiety symptoms as well as one of their parents or a legal representative. A minimum sample size of 138 children (69 per group) is needed to test whether the efficacy of the proposed intervention is equivalent to that of the well-established Coping Cat intervention. DISCUSSION We expect Emotion Detectives In-Out to be a feasible and efficacious alternative intervention for treating children's EDs by allowing for a greater increase in children's access to care. A blended format is expected to overcome common barriers to treatment (e.g., parents´ lack of time to attend regular sessions) and make the intervention more accessible to families. TRIAL REGISTRATION The clinical trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05747131, date assigned February 28, 2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Moreira
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Dave Skvarc
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Bárbara Gomes-Pereira
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Carolina Góis
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Fonseca
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Maria Pereira
- CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Brígida Caiado
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
- Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal
| | - Bruna Paulino
- CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Santos
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Cristina Canavarro
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mariana Saraiva
- CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vitória Nunes Vicente
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Isabel Pereira
- CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burrell TD, Sheu YS, Kim S, Mohadikar K, Ortiz N, Jonas C, Horberg MA. COVID-19 and Adolescent Outpatient Mental Health Service Utilization. Acad Pediatr 2024; 24:68-77. [PMID: 37302698 PMCID: PMC10250250 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic created challenges in accessing mental health (MH) services when adolescent well-being declined. Still, little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic affected outpatient MH service utilization for adolescents. METHODS Retrospective data were collected from electronic medical records of adolescents aged 12-17 years at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, an integrated health care system from January 2019 to December 2021. MH diagnoses included anxiety, mood disorder/depression, anxiety and mood disorder/depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or psychosis. We used interrupted time series analysis to compare MH visits and psychopharmaceutical prescribing before and after the COVID-19 onset. Analyses were stratified by demographics and visit modality. RESULTS The study population of 8121 adolescents with MH visits resulted in a total of 61,971 (28.1%) of the 220,271 outpatient visits associated with an MH diagnosis. During 15,771 (7.2%) adolescent outpatient visits psychotropic medications were prescribed. The increasing rate of MH visits prior to COVID-19 was unaffected by COVID-19 onset; however, in-person visits declined by 230.5 visits per week (P < .001) from 274.5 visits per week coupled with a rise in virtual modalities. Rates of MH visits during the COVID-19 pandemic differed by sex, mental health diagnosis, and racial and ethnic identity. Psychopharmaceutical prescribing during MH visits declined beyond expected values by a mean of 32.8 visits per week (P < .001) at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS A sustained switch to virtual visits highlights a new paradigm in care modalities for adolescents. Psychopharmaceutical prescribing declined requiring further qualitative assessments to improve the quality of access for adolescent MH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tierra D Burrell
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md.
| | - Yi-Shin Sheu
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| | - Seohyun Kim
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| | - Karishma Mohadikar
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| | - Nancy Ortiz
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| | - Cabell Jonas
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| | - Michael A Horberg
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group (TD Burrell, YS Sheu, S Kim, K Mohadikar, N Ortiz, C Jonas, and MA Horberg), Rockville, Md
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reid HE, Pratt D, Edge D, Wittkowski A. Psychological intervention priorities according to perinatal women who experienced suicidal thoughts and perinatal mental health professionals: a Q-methodology study. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1286500. [PMID: 38179249 PMCID: PMC10764428 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1286500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Suicide is the leading direct cause of maternal death in the year following birth and the second leading cause during pregnancy, in the UK and Ireland. Currently no evidence-based psychological interventions exist specifically designed to reduce mothers' suicidal experiences during the perinatal period. Reducing suicidal ideation and behaviour in mothers is a priority to prevent deaths and lessen the distress felt by mothers and their families. As Q-methodology measures the consensus and disagreement between individuals on a given topic, the current study used Q-methodology to elicit the priorities for a future psychological intervention aimed at reducing suicidal ideation and behaviour during the perinatal period, from the collective perspectives of both mothers and professionals. Method As part of this Q-methodology study, we developed a Q-set of 75 statements pertaining to possible elements of a psychological intervention that might help reduce a mother's suicidal ideation and behaviour during the perinatal period. Mothers and professionals were recruited via perinatal mental health services and social media advertisements. Results Twenty-one mothers and 11 perinatal mental health professionals ranked each Q-set statement depending on its perceived importance in developing a new intervention. A centroid factor analysis was conducted and two factors, which accounted for 42% of the overall variance, were identified: Factor 1 "supporting the mother to create distance between herself and the appeal of suicide" and Factor 2 "establishing positive connections with the therapist, the baby and motherhood." All participants believed that developing plans to keep the mother safe from suicide was the most important aspect for inclusion in a future intervention. Participants who loaded onto Factor 1 also prioritised supporting mothers to learn more about triggers for their suicidal ideation and behaviour. Ensuring a robust therapeutic alliance was more important for those who loaded onto Factor 2. Conclusion This is the first study using Q-methodology to explore the psychological intervention priorities of mothers and professionals. Findings indicate clear priorities in terms of planning and coping during a crisis, endorsed by all participants, and provide an initial step in the development of a new perinatal suicide prevention intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly E. Reid
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Pratt
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Edge
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anja Wittkowski
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
ALFANO LINDA, MALCOTTI IVANO, CILIBERTI ROSAGEMMA. Psychotherapy, artificial intelligence and adolescents: ethical aspects. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2023; 64:E438-E442. [PMID: 38379752 PMCID: PMC10876024 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.3135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced in various domains, including its application in psychotherapy. AI-powered psychotherapy tools present promising solutions for increasing accessibility to mental health care. However, the integration of AI in psychotherapy raises significant ethical concerns that require thorough consideration and regulation to ensure ethical practice, patient safety, and data privacy. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the utilization of AI in psychotherapy, emphasizing the need for responsible implementation, patient privacy, and the human-AI interaction. The challenge raised by the use of artificial intelligence requires a comprehensive approach. Schools, in particular, are crucial in providing both knowledge and ethical guidance, helping young individuals decipher the complexities of online content. Additionally, parental support is essential, requiring the provision of time, fostering relationships, encouraging dialogue, and creating a safe environment to share experiences amidst the intricacies of adolescence. Reimagining social and healthcare services tailored for adolescents is equally crucial, taking into account recent societal changes. The integration of AI in psychotherapy has vast potential to transform mental healthcare. However, ensuring its accuracy and effectiveness demands a proactive approach to address associated ethical considerations. By adopting responsible practices, preserving patient autonomy, and continually refining AI systems, the field can leverage the benefits of AI in psychotherapy while maintaining high ethical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LINDA ALFANO
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moreira H, Góis AC, Pereira AM, Pereira B, Caiado B, Nepomuceno MI, Pereira AI. Parents' acceptability of blended psychological interventions for children with emotional disorders. Internet Interv 2023; 34:100687. [PMID: 38023966 PMCID: PMC10654020 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to (1) describe parents' knowledge and use of online resources to address children's mental health issues and the family's general internet and technology usage patterns; (2) examine parents' acceptance of blended interventions for children with emotional disorders (ED); and (3) analyse the predictors of parents' intention to use a blended intervention if their children experienced an ED. Method The sample included 164 Portuguese parents (95.7 % mothers) of children between the ages of 6 and 13 years who completed an online survey. The study was disseminated through social networks, personal contacts of the researchers, and among parents participating in a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a psychological intervention for children with ED. Results Only 4.3 % of parents knew about online psychological interventions for children, and only 1.2 % had used them before. Most parents (73.2 %) reported that they would choose face-to-face individual therapy as their first option if their child had any ED, followed by blended therapy (14.8 %). Regression analyses showed that higher levels of parents' intention to use a blended intervention were predicted by their perceptions of the utility or efficacy of this type of delivery format. Discussion/conclusion These results suggest that although most parents show unfamiliarity with blended psychological interventions for children, they consider it a treatment modality to which they would resort if their children had emotional difficulties. Their intention to use such an intervention seems to be more likely if they perceive it as useful and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Moreira
- University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Portugal
| | - Ana Carolina Góis
- University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Portugal
| | - Ana Maria Pereira
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Portugal
| | - Bárbara Pereira
- University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Portugal
| | - Brígida Caiado
- University of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Portugal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
McVay MA, Jake-Schoffman DE, Leong MC, Lou X. Privacy Concerns in Group Format Lifestyle Interventions for Obesity. Int J Behav Med 2023; 30:693-704. [PMID: 36261768 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-022-10134-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Group format weight loss interventions have benefits over individual format, but privacy concerns may limit their uptake. METHOD In this study, adults with obesity and interest in losing weight were recruited nationally online and randomly assigned to view one of eight videos describing a hypothetical, group behavioral weight loss intervention. Based on three fully crossed factors, the videos varied on privacy features of intervention (present or not); matching participants to group based on weight loss barriers (matched or not); and intervention format (online or in-person). Participants rated their willingness to join, privacy concerns, and perceived effectiveness of these interventions. They further reported preference for individual or group format interventions and reason for preferences. RESULTS Description of privacy features, matching of participants, and format did not affect willingness to join, privacy concerns, or perceived effectiveness of the intervention. Privacy concerns were associated with lower willingness to join and lower perceived intervention effectiveness, and greater social anxiety and weight stigma. More participants preferred individual over group format (40.1% vs 33.9%; 26% selected neither) and preference for individual format was associated with greater privacy concerns. CONCLUSION Strategies to address privacy concerns in group-based interventions warrant further attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A McVay
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118210, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
| | - Danielle E Jake-Schoffman
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, P.O. Box 118210, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Man Chong Leong
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| | - XiangYang Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kornfield R, Lattie EG, Nicholas J, Knapp AA, Mohr DC, Reddy M. "Our Job is to be so Temporary": Designing Digital Tools that Meet the Needs of Care Managers and their Patients with Mental Health Concerns. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION 2023; 7:302. [PMID: 38094872 PMCID: PMC10718568 DOI: 10.1145/3610093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Digital tools have potential to support collaborative management of mental health conditions, but we need to better understand how to integrate them in routine healthcare, particularly for patients with both physical and mental health needs. We therefore conducted interviews and design workshops with 1) a group of care managers who support patients with complex health needs, and 2) their patients whose health needs include mental health concerns. We investigate both groups' views of potential applications of digital tools within care management. Findings suggest that care managers felt underprepared to play an ongoing role in addressing mental health issues and had concerns about the burden and ambiguity of providing support through new digital channels. In contrast, patients envisioned benefiting from ongoing mental health support from care managers, including support in using digital tools. Patients' and care managers' needs may diverge such that meeting both through the same tools presents a significant challenge. We discuss how successful design and integration of digital tools into care management would require reconceptualizing these professionals' roles in mental health support.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sousa J, Smith A, Richard J, Rabinowitz M, Raja P, Mehrotra A, Busch AB, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L. Choosing Or Losing In Behavioral Health: A Study Of Patients' Experiences Selecting Telehealth Versus In-Person Care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:1275-1282. [PMID: 37669481 PMCID: PMC10762624 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
It is not known how the growth of telehealth has affected patients' choice of visit modalities (telehealth versus in person). In 2023 we conducted a mixed-methods study that paired a nationally representative survey of 2,071 adults (including 571 who used behavioral health services) and semistructured interviews with twenty-six people with depression or bipolar disorder. We explored patients' experiences with visit modality selection and their agency in the decision. Approximately one-third of patients receiving therapy or medication visits reported that their clinicians did not offer both modalities. Thirty-two percent reported that they did not typically receive their preferred modality, and 45 percent did not believe that their clinician considered their modality preferences. Qualitative findings revealed that some clinicians did not elicit patients' modality preferences. Perceived lack of choice affected satisfaction and rapport with clinicians and encouraged some people to seek care elsewhere. These findings highlight trade-offs in policies to preserve patient choice and approaches that clinicians can take to identify and accommodate patients' preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Sousa
- Jessica Sousa , RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Smith
- Andrew Smith, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Pushpa Raja
- Pushpa Raja, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ateev Mehrotra
- Ateev Mehrotra, Harvard University and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alisa B Busch
- Alisa B. Busch, Harvard University and McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Forbes A, Keleher MR, Venditto M, DiBiasi F. Assessing Patient Adherence to and Engagement With Digital Interventions for Depression in Clinical Trials: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e43727. [PMID: 37566447 PMCID: PMC10457707 DOI: 10.2196/43727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New approaches to the treatment of depression are necessary for patients who do not respond to current treatments or lack access to them because of barriers such as cost, stigma, and provider shortage. Digital interventions for depression are promising; however, low patient engagement could limit their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed how participant adherence to and engagement with digital interventions for depression have been measured in the published literature, what levels of adherence and engagement have been reported, and whether higher adherence and increased engagement are linked to increased efficacy. METHODS We focused on a participant population of adults (aged ≥18 years) with depression or major depressive disorder as the primary diagnosis and included clinical trials, feasibility studies, and pilot studies of digital interventions for treating depression, such as digital therapeutics. We screened 756 unique records from Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane published between January 1, 2000, and April 15, 2022; extracted data from and appraised the 94 studies meeting the inclusion criteria; and performed a primarily descriptive analysis. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc (Princeton, New Jersey, United States) funded this study. RESULTS This SLR encompassed results from 20,111 participants in studies using 47 unique web-based interventions (an additional 10 web-based interventions were not described by name), 15 mobile app interventions, 5 app-based interventions that are also accessible via the web, and 1 CD-ROM. Adherence was most often measured as the percentage of participants who completed all available modules. Less than half (44.2%) of the participants completed all the modules; however, the average dose received was 60.7% of the available modules. Although engagement with digital interventions was measured differently in different studies, it was most commonly measured as the number of modules completed, the mean of which was 6.4 (means ranged from 1.0 to 19.7) modules. The mean amount of time participants engaged with the interventions was 3.9 (means ranged from 0.7 to 8.4) hours. Most studies of web-based (34/45, 76%) and app-based (8/9, 89%) interventions found that the intervention group had substantially greater improvement for at least 1 outcome than the control group (eg, care as usual, waitlist, or active control). Of the 14 studies that investigated the relationship between engagement and efficacy, 9 (64%) found that increased engagement with digital interventions was significantly associated with improved participant outcomes. The limitations of this SLR include publication bias, which may overstate engagement and efficacy, and low participant diversity, which reduces the generalizability. CONCLUSIONS Patient adherence to and engagement with digital interventions for depression have been reported in the literature using various metrics. Arriving at more standardized ways of reporting adherence and engagement would enable more effective comparisons across different digital interventions, studies, and populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainslie Forbes
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | | | | | - Faith DiBiasi
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Best MW, Romanowska S, Zhou Y, Wang L, Leibovitz T, Onno KA, Jagtap S, Bowie CR. Efficacy of Remotely Delivered Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Series of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Schizophr Bull 2023; 49:973-986. [PMID: 37066769 PMCID: PMC10318881 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is among the most persistent and debilitating mental health conditions worldwide. The American Psychological Association (APA) has identified 10 psychosocial treatments with evidence for treating schizophrenia and these treatments are typically provided in person. However, in-person services can be challenging to access for people living in remote geographic locations. Remote treatment delivery is an important option to increase access to services; however, it is unclear whether evidence-based treatments for schizophrenia are similarly effective when delivered remotely. STUDY DESIGN The current study consists of a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining the evidence-base for remote-delivery of each of the 10 APA evidence-based treatments for schizophrenia. RESULTS Of the 10 treatments examined, only cognitive remediation (CR), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and family psychoeducation had more than 2 studies examining their efficacy for remote delivery. Remote delivery of CBT produced moderate effects on symptoms (g = 0.43) and small effects on functioning (g = 0.26). Remote delivery of CR produced small-moderate effects on neurocognition (g = 0.35) and small effects on functioning (g = 0.21). There were insufficient studies of family psychoeducation with equivalent outcome measures to assess quantitatively, however, studies of remotely delivered family psychoeducation suggested that it is feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the evidence-base for remotely delivered treatment for schizophrenia is limited. Studies to date suggest that remote adaptations may be effective; however, more rigorous trials are needed to assess efficacy and methods of remote delivery that are most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Best
- Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, CA, USA
- Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, CA, USA
| | - Sylvia Romanowska
- Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, CA, USA
| | - Ying Zhou
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, CA, USA
| | - Linbo Wang
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, CA, USA
| | - Talia Leibovitz
- Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, CA, USA
| | - Karin A Onno
- Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, CA, USA
| | - Shreya Jagtap
- Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mak WWS, Ng SM, Leung FHT. A Web-Based Stratified Stepped Care Platform for Mental Well-being (TourHeart+): User-Centered Research and Design. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e38504. [PMID: 36947112 PMCID: PMC10131708 DOI: 10.2196/38504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internet-based mental health interventions have been demonstrated to be effective in alleviating psychological distress and promoting mental well-being. However, real-world uptake and engagement of such interventions have been low. Rather than being stand-alone interventions, situating internet-based interventions under a stratified stepped care system can support users to continue with mental health practice and monitor their mental health status for timely services that are commensurate with their needs. A user-centered approach should be used in the development of such web-based platforms to understand the facilitators and barriers in user engagement to enhance platform uptake, usability, and adherence so it can support the users' continued adoption and practice of self-care for their mental health. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the design process taken to develop a web-based stratified stepped care mental health platform, TourHeart+, using a user-centered approach that gathers target users' perceptions on mental self-care and feedback on the platform design and incorporates them into the design. METHODS The process involved a design workshop with the interdisciplinary development team, user interviews, and 2 usability testing sessions on the flow of registration and mental health assessment and the web-based self-help interventions of the platform. The data collected were summarized as descriptive statistics if appropriate and insights are extracted inductively. Qualitative data were extracted using a thematic coding approach. RESULTS In the design workshop, the team generated empathy maps and point-of-view statements related to the possible mental health needs of target users. Four user personas and related processes in the mental health self-care journey were developed based on user interviews. Design considerations were derived based on the insights drawn from the personas and mental health self-care journey. Survey results from 104 users during usability testing showed that the overall experience during registration and mental health assessment was friendly, and they felt cared for, although no statistically significant differences on preference ratings were found between using a web-based questionnaire tool and through an interactive chatbot, except that chatbot format was deemed more interesting. Facilitators of and barriers to registering the platform and completing the mental health assessment were identified through user feedback during simulation with mock-ups. In the usability testing for guided self-help interventions, users expressed pain points in course adherence, and corresponding amendments were made in the flow and design of the web-based courses. CONCLUSIONS The design process and findings presented in the study are important in developing a user-centric platform to optimize users' acceptance and usability of a web-based stratified stepped care platform with guided self-help interventions for mental well-being. Accounting for users' perceptions and needs toward mental health self-care and their experiences in the design process can enhance the usability of an evidence-based mental health platform on the web.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie W S Mak
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Sin Man Ng
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Florence H T Leung
- Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ryan AT, Brenner LA, Ulmer CS, Mackintosh MA, Greene CJ. The Use of Evaluation Panels During the Development of a Digital Intervention for Veterans Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: Qualitative Evaluation Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e40104. [PMID: 36877553 PMCID: PMC10028512 DOI: 10.2196/40104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals enrolling in the Veterans Health Administration frequently report symptoms consistent with insomnia disorder. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a gold standard treatment for insomnia disorder. While the Veterans Health Administration has successfully implemented a large dissemination effort to train providers in CBT-I, the limited number of trained CBT-I providers continues to restrict the number of individuals who can receive CBT-I. Digital mental health intervention adaptations of CBT-I have been found to have similar efficacy as traditional CBT-I. To help address the unmet need for insomnia disorder treatment, the VA commissioned the creation of a freely available, internet-delivered digital mental health intervention adaptation of CBT-I known as Path to Better Sleep (PTBS). OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the use of evaluation panels composed of veterans and spouses of veterans during the development of PTBS. Specifically, we report on the methods used to conduct the panels, the feedback they provided on elements of the course relevant to user engagement, and how their feedback influenced the design and content of PTBS. METHODS A communications firm was contracted to recruit 3 veteran (n=27) and 2 spouse of veteran (n=18) panels and convene them for three 1-hour meetings. Members of the VA team identified key questions for the panels, and the communications firm prepared facilitator guides to elicit feedback on these key questions. The guides provided a script for facilitators to follow while convening the panels. The panels were telephonically conducted, with visual content displayed via remote presentation software. The communications firm prepared reports summarizing the panelists' feedback during each panel meeting. The qualitative feedback described in these reports served as the raw material for this study. RESULTS The panel members provided markedly consistent feedback on several elements of PTBS, including recommendations to emphasize the efficacy of CBT-I techniques; clarify and simplify written content as much as possible; and ensure that content is consistent with the lived experiences of veterans. Their feedback was congruent with previous studies on the factors influencing user engagement with digital mental health interventions. Panelist feedback influenced multiple course design decisions, including reducing the effort required to use the course's sleep diary function, making written content more concise, and selecting veteran testimonial videos that emphasized the benefits of treating chronic insomnia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The veteran and spouse evaluation panels provided useful feedback during the design of PTBS. This feedback was used to make concrete revisions and design decisions consistent with existing research on improving user engagement with digital mental health interventions. We believe that many of the key feedback messages provided by these evaluation panels could prove useful to other digital mental health intervention designers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Thomas Ryan
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Lisa Anne Brenner
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Aurora, CO, United States
- Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry, and Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christi S Ulmer
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Margaret-Anne Mackintosh
- National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Dissemination and Training Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Carolyn J Greene
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Translational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kohl F, Angerer P, Weber J. Employees' preferences on organisational aspects of psychotherapeutic consultation at work by occupational area, company size, requirement levels and supervisor function - a cross-sectional study in Germany. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:347. [PMID: 36797723 PMCID: PMC9932407 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15255-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common mental disorders affect a significant proportion of the population worldwide at any given time. Psychotherapeutic consultation at work offers employees with mental distress short-term and low-threshold access to psychotherapeutic treatment. However, this offer is only accepted by one to two percent of the employees to whom it is offered. Taking into account employees ' preferences regarding organisational aspects might increase the use of psychotherapeutic consultation at work. This study therefore aimed to identify preferences on organisational aspects of psychotherapeutic consultation at work among employees of diverse occupational areas, company sizes, supervisor functions and job requirement levels. METHODS A total of 755 employees were recruited via advertisements on social media (Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn). Participants rated on a 5-point Likert scale their agreement to different implementation options of psychotherapeutic consultation at work: type (in-person/video/telephone), location (on/outside company premises), time (within/outside working hours), scope (diagnostic/diagnostic + treatment) and purpose (private/occupational). Additionally, the maximum accepted distance to the location of consultation was assessed. Various analyses of variances (ANOVA) were conducted to determine differences in agreement to implementation options within each organisational aspect and to analyse differences between occupational areas, company sizes, requirement levels and between employees with and without supervisor function. RESULTS Participants indicated a preference for in-person psychotherapeutic consultation that takes places outside company premises and outside working hours. Furthermore, they preferred offers including diagnostic and treatment sessions compared to offers including diagnostic sessions only. Even though participants agreed that consultation should be offered for all purposes, agreement for occupational issues was stronger than for private issues. For some implementation options, the level of agreement varied according to occupational field, company size, supervisor function and level of requirement. However, these differences did not affect the key findings mentioned above. CONCLUSION Those findings give practical indications on the organisational design of psychotherapeutic consultation at work. The results suggest that in-person consultation outside company premises and working hours combining diagnostic and treatment sessions will be accepted by employees regardless of their occupational area, company size, supervisor function and requirement level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Kohl
- grid.411327.20000 0001 2176 9917Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Angerer
- grid.411327.20000 0001 2176 9917Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jeannette Weber
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alavi N, Moghimi E, Stephenson C, Gutierrez G, Jagayat J, Kumar A, Shao Y, Miller S, Yee CS, Stefatos A, Gholamzadehmir M, Abbaspour Z, Shirazi A, Gizzarelli T, Khan F, Patel C, Patel A, Yang M, Omrani M. Comparison of online and in-person cognitive behavioral therapy in individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder: a non-randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1113956. [PMID: 37187863 PMCID: PMC10175610 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1113956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The increased prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) amid the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantial growth in online mental health care delivery. Compared to its in-person counterpart, online cognitive behavioral therapy (e-CBT) is a time-flexible and cost-effective method of improving MDD symptoms. However, how its efficacy compares to in-person CBT is yet to be explored. Therefore, the current study compared the efficacy of a therapist-supported, electronically delivered e-CBT program to in-person therapy in individuals diagnosed with MDD. Methods Participants (n = 108) diagnosed with MDD selected either a 12 week in-person CBT or an asynchronous therapist-supported e-CBT program. E-CBT participants (n = 55) completed weekly interactive online modules delivered through a secure cloud-based online platform (Online Psychotherapy Tool; OPTT). These modules were followed by homework in which participants received personalized feedback from a trained therapist. Participants in the in-person CBT group (n = 53) discussed sessions and homework with their therapists during one-hour weekly meetings. Program efficacy was evaluated using clinically validated symptomatology and quality of life questionnaires. Results Both treatments yielded significant improvements in depressive symptoms and quality of life from baseline to post-treatment. Participants who opted for in-person therapy presented significantly higher baseline symptomatology scores than the e-CBT group. However, both treatments demonstrated comparable significant improvements in depressive symptoms and quality of life from baseline to post-treatment. e-CBT seems to afford higher participant compliance as dropouts in the e-CBT group completed more sessions on average than those in the in-person CBT group. Conclusion The findings support e-CBT with therapist guidance as a suitable option to treat MDD. Future studies should investigate how treatment accessibility is related to program completion rates in the e-CBT vs. in-person group. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov Protocol Registration and Results System (NCT04478058); clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazanin Alavi
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- OPTT Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
- *Correspondence: Nazanin Alavi,
| | - Elnaz Moghimi
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Gilmar Gutierrez
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jasleen Jagayat
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anchan Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Yijia Shao
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shadé Miller
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Caitlin S. Yee
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anthi Stefatos
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Zara Abbaspour
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tessa Gizzarelli
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ferwa Khan
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Charmy Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Archana Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mohsen Omrani
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- OPTT Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Exploring experiences and needs of perinatal women in digital healthcare: A meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence. Int J Med Inform 2023; 169:104929. [PMID: 36435014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the experiences and needs of perinatal women by using digital technologies in healthcare. METHODS This review was consolidated following the eMERGe meta-ethnography reporting guidance. We conducted a comprehensive search in eight databases from inception to 12 October 2021. Published and unpublished qualitative and mixed-method studies published in English were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the critical appraisal skill program checklist. A meta-ethnographic synthesis was used according to Noblit and Hare's seven-step iterative process. RESULTS A total of 3,843 articles were retrieved, and 27 qualitative studies pertaining to 3,775 perinatal women from 13 countries across different ethnicities were included. Four overarching themes emerged for the aspect of experiences: (1) normalization of experience, (2) attainment of valuable knowledge, (3) empowerment and self-confidence boosting, and (4) beneficial features of digital platforms. For the aspect of needs, the derived themes included the following: (1) necessity of credible resources, (2) importance of personalization, (3) concern about cybersecurity, and (4) urging additional support. Our line-of-argument for interpreting the perinatal women's experiences can offer a much greater engagement in digital healthcare, while the findings on the perinatal women's needs can add value for improving the design of digital healthcare in the future. CONCLUSION This review offers a deeper understanding of the perinatal women's experiences and needs when using digital technologies in healthcare. Our findings provide meaningful recommendations for clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tatarko A, Jurcik T, Boehnke K. Social capital and the COVID-19 pandemic threat: The Russian experience. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2022; 7:957215. [PMID: 36589789 PMCID: PMC9795210 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.957215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Social capital is an important resource for the wellbeing of both the individual and society. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have been conducted to explore the role of social capital in coping with the negative consequences of the pandemic. However, how the pandemic itself can affect the social capital of people has yet to be studied. Try to fill this gap, we aimed at testing the association between the individually perceived coronavirus threat and such indicators of social capital as general social trust, institutional trust, and the quality of various types of people's social relationships (with family, friends, colleagues, neighbors, residents of a locality, residents of a country). Data were collected in different regions of the Russian Federation for a convenience sample of 500 respondents. The study found that the individually perceived coronavirus threat was positively associated with institutional trust, but not with general social trust. Moreover, this covariation was moderated by age: an institutional trust-threat relation emerged only in older respondents with an average age of around 60, but not in younger participants. Furthermore, the study found that perceived coronavirus threat was associated with closer relationships in the family, but simultaneously with an increased distance in relations with neighbors and residents of the respondents' locality. In summary, the study indicated that "strong" ties (i.e., with family, colleagues, and friends) either remained unchanged or were intensified in the face of the pandemic threat, whereas "weak" ties (i.e., with neighbors, residents of the same locality, and fellow citizens) tended to weaken even more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tatarko
- National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tomas Jurcik
- National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
A systematic review of digital and face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression. NPJ Digit Med 2022; 5:144. [PMID: 36109583 PMCID: PMC9476400 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00677-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) represents one of the major treatment options for depressive disorders besides pharmacological interventions. While newly developed digital CBT approaches hold important advantages due to higher accessibility, their relative effectiveness compared to traditional CBT remains unclear. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify all studies that conducted a CBT-based intervention (face-to-face or digital) in patients with major depression. Random-effects meta-analytic models of the standardized mean change using raw score standardization (SMCR) were computed. In 106 studies including n = 11854 patients face-to-face CBT shows superior clinical effectiveness compared to digital CBT when investigating depressive symptoms (p < 0.001, face-to-face CBT: SMCR = 1.97, 95%-CI: 1.74–2.13, digital CBT: SMCR = 1.20, 95%-CI: 1.08–1.32) and adherence (p = 0.014, face-to-face CBT: 82.4%, digital CBT: 72.9%). However, after accounting for differences between face-to-face and digital CBT studies, both approaches indicate similar effectiveness. Important variables with significant moderation effects include duration of the intervention, baseline severity, adherence and the level of human guidance in digital CBT interventions. After accounting for potential confounders our analysis indicates comparable effectiveness of face-to-face and digital CBT approaches. These findings underline the importance of moderators of clinical effects and provide a basis for the future personalization of CBT treatment in depression.
Collapse
|
23
|
Savill M, Nguyen T, Shim RS, Loewy RL. Online Psychosis Screening: Characterizing an Underexamined Population to Improve Access and Equity. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:1005-1012. [PMID: 35172594 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Online resources represent an important avenue to identify and support individuals who may be experiencing symptoms of psychosis but have yet to engage in care. Understanding the experiences and needs of this group is critical to inform outreach for early psychosis and improve outcomes by addressing barriers to early treatment. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, explorative, cross-sectional analysis by using data collected by Mental Health America as part of their online psychosis screening and support program. Data included scores from the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief, basic demographic information, and respondents' plans for next steps. RESULTS Of 120,937 respondents, most (82.1%) reported distressing psychosis-like experiences at levels sufficient to merit a referral to specialty care for additional evaluation. However, only 17.1% planned to seek treatment as a next step, with most (53.6%) wanting instead more information. Higher distress was only weakly associated with the plan to seek treatment. In the multivariable analysis, respondents who were younger; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer; or Native American or who had lower income reported the greatest symptom-related distress. Younger and higher-income respondents were less likely to plan to seek treatment next. Across race-ethnicity, African Americans were most likely to plan to seek treatment. CONCLUSIONS Most respondents reported that psychosis-like experiences caused significant distress, but they did not plan to seek treatment next. Addressing this treatment gap requires careful consideration regarding what services individuals want, how services should be presented, and what barriers may limit help seeking. These steps are critical to improve access to early intervention for individuals with psychosis spectrum disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Savill
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis (Savill, Shim); Mental Health America, Alexandria, Virginia (Nguyen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (Loewy)
| | - Theresa Nguyen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis (Savill, Shim); Mental Health America, Alexandria, Virginia (Nguyen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (Loewy)
| | - Ruth S Shim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis (Savill, Shim); Mental Health America, Alexandria, Virginia (Nguyen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (Loewy)
| | - Rachel L Loewy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis (Savill, Shim); Mental Health America, Alexandria, Virginia (Nguyen); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (Loewy)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lekagul A, Piancharoen P, Chattong A, Suradom C, Tangcharoensathien V. Living through the psychological consequences of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of effective mitigating interventions. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060804. [PMID: 35882462 PMCID: PMC9329730 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review assesses interventions and their effectiveness in mitigating psychological consequences from pandemic. METHOD Published English literatures were searched from four databases (Medline, PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO) from January 2020 and September 2021. A total of 27 papers with 29 studies (one paper reported three studies) met inclusion criteria. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool is applied to assess the quality of all randomised controlled trials (RCT). RESULTS All studies were recently conducted in 2020. Publications were from high-income (13, 44.8%), upper middle-income (12, 41.4%) and lower middle-income countries (3, 10.3%) and global (1, 3.5%). Half of the studies conducted for general population (51.7%). One-third of studies (8, 27.6%) provided interventions to patients with COVID-19 and 20.7% to healthcare workers. Of the 29 studies, 14 (48.3%) were RCT. All RCTs were assessed for risk of biases; five studies (15, 35.7%) had low risk as measured against all six dimensions reflecting high-quality study.Of these 29 studies, 26 diagnostic or screening measures were applied; 8 (30.9%) for anxiety, 7 (26.9%) for depression, 5 (19.2%) for stress, 5 (19.2%) for insomnia and 1 (3.8%) for suicide. Measures used to assess the baseline and outcomes of interventions were standardised and widely applied by other studies with high level of reliability and validity. Of 11 RCT studies, 10 (90.9%) showed that anxiety interventions significantly lowered anxiety in intervention groups. Five of the six RCT studies (83.3%) had significantly reduced the level of depression. Most interventions for anxiety and stress were mindfulness and meditation based. CONCLUSIONS Results from RCT studies (11%, 78.6%) were effective in mitigating psychological consequences from COVID-19 pandemic when applied to healthcare workers, patients with COVID-19 and general population. These effective interventions can be applied and scaled up in other country settings through adaptation of modes of delivery suitable to country resources, pandemic and health system context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angkana Lekagul
- International Health Policy Program, Amphur Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Anamika Chattong
- International Health Policy Program, Amphur Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Chawisa Suradom
- Psychiatry, Chiang Mai University Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Digital tools for the assessment of pharmacological treatment for depressive disorder: State of the art. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2022; 60:100-116. [PMID: 35671641 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Depression is an invalidating disorder, marked by phenotypic heterogeneity. Clinical assessments for treatment adjustments and data-collection for pharmacological research often rely on subjective representations of functioning. Better phenotyping through digital applications may add unseen information and facilitate disentangling the clinical characteristics and impact of depression and its pharmacological treatment in everyday life. Researchers, physicians, and patients benefit from well-understood digital phenotyping approaches to assess the treatment efficacy and side-effects. This review discusses the current possibilities and pitfalls of wearables and technology for the assessment of the pharmacological treatment of depression. Their applications in the whole spectrum of treatment for depression, including diagnosis, treatment of an episode, and monitoring of relapse risk and prevention are discussed. Multiple aspects are to be considered, including concerns that come with collecting sensitive data and health recordings. Also, privacy and trust are addressed. Available applications range from questionnaire-like apps to objective assessment of behavioural patterns and promises in handling suicidality. Nonetheless, interpretation and integration of this high-resolution information with other phenotyping levels, remains challenging. This review provides a state-of-the-art description of wearables and technology in digital phenotyping for monitoring pharmacological treatment in depression, focusing on the challenges and opportunities of its application in clinical trials and research.
Collapse
|
26
|
Atif N, Nazir H, Sultan ZH, Rauf R, Waqas A, Malik A, Sikander S, Rahman A. Technology-assisted peer therapy: a new way of delivering evidence-based psychological interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:842. [PMID: 35773677 PMCID: PMC9245257 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In low-income settings, ninety percent of individuals with clinical depression have no access to evidence-based psychological interventions. Reasons include lack of funds for specialist services, scarcity of trained mental health professionals, and the stigma attached to mental illness. In recent years there have been many studies demonstrating effective delivery of psychological interventions through a variety of non-specialists. While these interventions are cost-effective and less stigmatising, efforts to scale-up are hampered by issues of quality-control, and what has been described by implementation scientists as ‘voltage-drop’ and ‘programme-drift.’ Using principles of Human Centred Design in a rural setting in Pakistan, we worked with potential users to co-design a Tablet or Smartphone-based App that can assist a lay-person deliver the Thinking Healthy Programme, a World Health Organization-endorsed evidence-based intervention for perinatal depression. The active ingredients of this cognitive-therapy based intervention are delivered by a virtual ‘avatar’ therapist incorporated into the App which is operated by a ‘peer’ (a woman from the neighbourhood with no prior experience of healthcare delivery). Using automated cues from the App, the peer reinforces key therapeutic messages, helps with problem-solving and provides the non-specific but essential therapeutic elements of empathy and support. The peer and App therefore act as co-therapists in delivery of the intervention. The peer can deliver the intervention with good fidelity after brief automated in-built training. This approach has the potential to be applied to other areas of mental health and help bridge the treatment gap, especially in resource-poor settings. This paper describes the process of co-development with end-users and key features of the App.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najia Atif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Huma Nazir
- Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | | | - Rabia Rauf
- Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Ahmed Waqas
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Abid Malik
- Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.,Health Services Academy, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Siham Sikander
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-E-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Darnell D, Pullmann MD, Hull TD, Chen S, Areán P. Predictors of Disengagement and Symptom Improvement Among Adults With Depression Enrolled in Talkspace, a Technology-Mediated Psychotherapy Platform: Naturalistic Observational Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e36521. [PMID: 35731563 PMCID: PMC9260528 DOI: 10.2196/36521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is a common psychiatric condition with an estimated lifetime prevalence for major depression of 16.6% in the US adult population and is effectively treated through psychotherapy. The widespread availability of the internet and personal devices such as smartphones are changing the landscape of delivery of psychotherapy; however, little is known about whether and for whom this type of therapy is beneficial, and whether having synchronous video-based sessions provides additional benefits to clients above and beyond messaging-based therapy. OBJECTIVE This study examined the outcomes associated with the use of a digital platform (Talkspace) for technology-mediated psychotherapy. We examined the duration of client engagement in therapy and client depression score trajectories over 16 weeks. We explored the association of client characteristics, therapist characteristics, and service plan type with time-to-disengagement and trajectories of change in depression scores. METHODS This naturalistic observational study assessed data collected routinely by the platform between January 2016 and January 2018 and examined psychotherapy outcomes among a large representative sample of adult clients with clinically significant depression. Treatment disengagement was defined as a lack of client-initiated communication for more than 4 weeks. Clients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 item (PHQ-8) at intake and every 3 weeks via an in-app survey. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the time until and predictors of disengagement. Changes in depression scores and predictors of change over time were examined using mixed-effects regression. RESULTS The study included 5890 clients and 1271 therapists. Client scores on the PHQ-8 declined over time, with the average client improving from a score of 15 to below the clinical cutoff of 10 by week 6. At the same time point, 37% of clients had disengaged from the therapy. When combined into a final Cox regression model, those who were more likely to disengage were clients aged 18 to 25 years versus those aged ≥50 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.9; P<.001), had higher education (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22; P<.001), had been in therapy before (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17; P=.01), and were living with a partner but unmarried versus single (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27; P=.02). Having a therapist with >10 years of experience was related to lower odds of disengagement (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.94; P=.01). When combined into a final regression model predicting improvement in depression scores over time, clients showing more improvement were those with an associate's degree or higher (linear estimate=-0.07, P=.002) and higher intake PHQ-8 scores (estimate=3.73, P<.001). There were no differences based on the plan type. CONCLUSIONS Our findings add to the growing literature showing the benefits of technology-mediated psychotherapy over a relatively brief period (16 weeks).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doyanne Darnell
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael D Pullmann
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Shiyu Chen
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Patricia Areán
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Topooco N, Fowler LA, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, DePietro B, Vázquez MM, Firebaugh ML, Ceglarek P, Monterubio G, Newman MG, Eisenberg D, Wilfley DE, Taylor CB. Digital interventions to address mental health needs in colleges: Perspectives of student stakeholders. Internet Interv 2022; 28:100528. [PMID: 35378846 PMCID: PMC8976123 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The need for clinical services in U.S. colleges exceeds the supply. Digital Mental health Interventions (DMHIs) are a potential solution, but successful implementation depends on stakeholder acceptance. This study investigated the relevance of DMHIs from students' perspectives. Methods In 2020-2021, an online cross-sectional survey using mixed methods was conducted with 479 students at 23 colleges and universities. Respondents reported views and use of standard mental health services and DMHIs and rated the priority of various DMHIs to be offered through campus services. Qualitative data included open-ended responses. Findings Among respondents, 91% reported having experienced mental health problems, of which 91% reported barriers to receiving mental health services. Students highlighted therapy and counseling as desired and saw flexible access to services as important. With respect to DMHIs, respondents had the most experience with physical health apps (46%), mental health questionnaires (41%), and mental well-being apps (39%). Most were unaware of or had not used apps or self-help programs for mental health problems. Students were most likely to report the following DMHIs as high priorities: a crisis text line (76%), telehealth (66%), websites for connecting to services (62%), and text/messaging with counselors (62%). They considered a self-help program with coach support to be convenient but some also perceived such services to be possibly less effective than in-person therapy. Conclusions Students welcome DMHIs on campus and indicate preference for mental health services that include human support. The findings, with particular focus on characteristics of the DMHIs prioritized, and students' awareness and perceptions of scalable DMHIs emphasized by policymakers, should inform schools looking to implement DMHIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naira Topooco
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden
- Center for mHealth, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Lauren A. Fowler
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Bianca DePietro
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melissa M. Vázquez
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Marie-Laure Firebaugh
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Peter Ceglarek
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Grace Monterubio
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michelle G. Newman
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Eisenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Denise E. Wilfley
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - C. Barr Taylor
- Center for mHealth, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shanley I, Jones C, Reddi N. Medical Psychotherapy Training and the
COVID
‐19 Pandemic. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY 2022; 38:338-352. [PMID: 35601048 PMCID: PMC9111680 DOI: 10.1111/bjp.12719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
30
|
Phillips EA, Himmler S, Schreyögg J. Preferences of psychotherapists for blended care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:112. [PMID: 35151294 PMCID: PMC8841060 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03765-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Digital treatment formats are emerging within mental health care. Evidence suggests that mental health care providers and recipients prefer a combination of digital and traditional elements within psychotherapy treatment formats, also called blended care (BC), over standalone digital formats. We examined the attitudes and preferences of licensed psychotherapists in Germany regarding such BC applications. METHODS We fielded a survey among psychotherapists, including questions about attitudes, previous experiences, and expectations regarding BC, as well as a discrete choice experiment. Attributes for the experiment were developed using a stepwise qualitative approach. A Bayesian D-efficient design was used to generate the choice tasks. The choice data were analyzed by applying mixed logit models. RESULTS The survey was completed by 200 psychotherapists. Attitudes towards BC were mainly positive, with strong reported intentions to use BC formats. In the choice experiment, recommendation from a professional society for a BC online component was the most important characteristic. Greater effectiveness and a larger share of face-to-face vs. online time were also desired features, while a financial incentive to use BC was less relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena A. Phillips
- grid.9026.d0000 0001 2287 2617Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Himmler
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management Health Economics, Burg. Oudlaan 50, 3062 Rotterdam, PA Netherlands
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- grid.9026.d0000 0001 2287 2617Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Esplanade 36, 20354 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Woerner M, Sams N, Rivera Nales C, Gorstein T, Johnson M, Mosser BA, Areán PA. Generational Perspectives on Technology's Role in Mental Health Care: A Survey of Adults With Lived Mental Health Experience. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:840169. [PMID: 35224537 PMCID: PMC8868823 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.840169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Personal technology (e.g., smartphones, wearable health devices) has been leveraged extensively for mental health purposes, with upwards of 20,000 mobile applications on the market today and has been considered an important implementation strategy to overcome barriers many people face in accessing mental health care. The main question yet to be addressed is the role consumers feel technology should play in their care. One underserved demographic often ignored in this discussion are people over the age of 60. The population of adults 60 and older is predicted to double by 2,050 signaling a need to address how older adults view technology for their mental health care. Objective The objective of this study is to better understand why digital mental health tools are not as broadly adopted as predicted, what role people with lived mental health experience feel technology should play in their care and how those results compare across age groups. Method In a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed results from a one-time cross-sectional survey that included 998 adults aged 18–83 with lived experience of mental health concerns recruited from Prolific, an online research platform. We surveyed participant's use of technology including their perspectives on using technology in conjunction with their mental health care. We asked participants about their previous use of digital mental health tools, their treatment preferences for mental health care, and the role technology should play in their mental health care. Results Across all age groups, respondents had favorable views of using digital mental health for managing mental health care. However, older adults rated their acceptability of digital mental health tools lower than middle-aged and younger adults. When asked what role technology should play in mental health care in an open-ended response, most participants responded that technology should play a complementary role in mental health care (723/954, 75.8%). Conclusion Digital mental health is seen as a valuable care management tool across all age groups, but preferences for its role in care remain largely administrative and supportive. Future development of digital mental health should reflect these preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Woerner
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Nichole Sams
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults With Mental Illness (ALACRITY Center), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Cristian Rivera Nales
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Adolescent Adversity and Depression Intervention (AADI) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Tara Gorstein
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults With Mental Illness (ALACRITY Center), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Brittany A. Mosser
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults With Mental Illness (ALACRITY Center), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Patricia A. Areán
- Conducting Research to Enhance Assessment and Treatment Through Innovation in Mental Health (CREATIV) Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults With Mental Illness (ALACRITY Center), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- *Correspondence: Patricia A. Areán
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Whelan BM, Theodoros D, Cahill L, Vaezipour A, Vogel AP, Finch E, Farrell A, Cardell E. Feasibility of a Telerehabilitation Adaptation of the Be Clear Speech Treatment Program for Non-Progressive Dysarthria. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12020197. [PMID: 35203960 PMCID: PMC8870717 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of a telerehabilitation adaptation of the Be Clear speech treatment program for adults with non-progressive dysarthria to determine clinical delivery viability and future research directions. Treatment effects on speech clarity, intelligibility, communication effectiveness, and participation, as well as psychosocial outcomes in 15 participants with non-progressive dysarthria, were explored. Intervention involved daily 1-h online sessions (4 days per week for 4 weeks, totalling 16 sessions) and daily home practice. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline (PRE), post-treatment (POST), and 12 weeks following treatment (FUP). Feasibility measures targeting participant satisfaction, treatment adherence and fidelity, and technical viability were also employed. The programme was feasible concerning technical viability and implementation, treatment adherence and fidelity. High levels of participant satisfaction were reported. Increases in overall ratings of communication participation and effectiveness were identified at POST and FUP. Reductions in speech rate were identified at FUP. Improvements in aspects of lingual and laryngeal function were also noted after treatment. Over time, improvements relating to the negative impact of dysarthria were identified. Naïve listeners perceived negligible changes in speech clarity following treatment. Online delivery of the Be Clear speech treatment program was feasible, and some positive speech benefits were observed. Due to the small sample size included in this research, statistically significant findings related to speech outcomes must be interpreted with caution. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial of Be Clear online is warranted to evaluate treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke-Mai Whelan
- Recover Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (D.T.); (L.C.); (A.V.)
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia;
- Correspondence:
| | - Deborah Theodoros
- Recover Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (D.T.); (L.C.); (A.V.)
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia;
| | - Louise Cahill
- Recover Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (D.T.); (L.C.); (A.V.)
| | - Atiyeh Vaezipour
- Recover Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (D.T.); (L.C.); (A.V.)
| | - Adam P. Vogel
- Centre for the Neuroscience of Speech, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
- Redenlab Inc., Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Emma Finch
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia;
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane 4102, Australia
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane 4102, Australia;
| | - Anna Farrell
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane 4102, Australia;
- The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health, Brisbane 4029, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Cardell
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gonzalez C, Ramirez M, Mata-Greve F, Diaz A, Duran MC, Johnson M, Grote N, Areán PA. Acceptability of virtual therapy for postpartum women during COVID-19: A national mixed methods study. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:893073. [PMID: 36159918 PMCID: PMC9500288 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.893073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpartum depression (PPD) affects one in eight women in the U.S., with rates increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the unique circumstances of COVID-19, virtual therapy might be a unique way to overcome barriers to mental health services. The study sought to explore the acceptability of virtual therapy among women in the postpartum period. METHODS Using an online recruitment mixed methods approach, we collected data from a U.S. national cross-sectional sample of women (N = 479) who gave birth in the last 12 months. FINDINGS Results show that 66% of women endorsed items consistent with possible depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Only 27% accessed therapy services during the postpartum period. While 88% were open to engaging in virtual therapy services, 12% identified several major concerns with virtual therapy, namely: (1) preference for in-person therapy (2) no perceived need for therapy (3) uncomfortable with virtual therapy, and (4) lack of privacy. Of note, 36% more Latinas reported dissatisfaction with quality of care received during virtual therapy compared to non-Latina participants. Despite a major shift to virtual care with COVID-19, future work is needed to make virtual mental health services more accessible for women with PPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Gonzalez
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Magaly Ramirez
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Felicia Mata-Greve
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Autumn Diaz
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Miriana C Duran
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Nancy Grote
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Patricia A Areán
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Moran O, Doyle J, Smith S, Giggins O, Dinsmore J. Investigating the needs and concerns of older adults with multimorbidity and their healthcare professionals for conceivable digital psychotherapeutic interventions. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221089097. [PMID: 35646383 PMCID: PMC9131374 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221089097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimorbidity, defined as the concurrent experience of more than one chronic health condition in an individual, affects ∼65% of people over 65 and 85% of those over 85 years old with 30% of those also experiencing mental health concerns. This can lead to reduced quality of life and functioning as well as poorer outcomes in terms of condition management, adherence to treatment, and ultimately disease prognosis and progression. Digital health interventions offer a viable means of condition self-management, as well as psychological support, particularly for those who may have difficulty accessing in-person services. To best meet the needs of older adults with multimorbidity, deeper insights are needed into their specific concerns and issues around condition management, particularly with regard to distress in relation to managing one's condition. The present study aimed to explore this using one-to-one qualitative interviews and focus groups with people with chronic health conditions and healthcare professionals. Participants were 11 older adults with multimorbidity (4 males; mean age: M = 72.7 years) and 14 healthcare professionals including five clinical nurse specialists, four pharmacists, two general practitioners, one occupational therapist, one speech and language therapist and one dietician. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes, which included: patient feelings of anxiety or worry leading to an unwillingness to access essential information; the various mental health challenges faced by those with multimorbidity; the importance of personal values in providing motivation; and the importance of social support. Findings are discussed in relation to the potential development of transdiagnostically applicable digital interventions for the management of distress in those with multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla Moran
- NetwellCASALA, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - Julie Doyle
- NetwellCASALA, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - Suzanne Smith
- NetwellCASALA, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - Oonagh Giggins
- NetwellCASALA, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - John Dinsmore
- Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, Trinity College Dublin, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Barriers and Facilitators to Resuming In-Person Psychotherapy with Perinatal Patients amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multistakeholder Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182212234. [PMID: 34831992 PMCID: PMC8619135 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient psychotherapy transitioned to telemedicine. This study aimed to examine barriers and facilitators to resuming in-person psychotherapy with perinatal patients as the pandemic abates. We conducted focus group and individual interviews with a sample of perinatal participants (n = 23), psychotherapy providers (n = 28), and stakeholders (n = 18) from Canada and the U.S. involved in the SUMMIT trial, which is aimed at improving access to mental healthcare for perinatal patients with depression and anxiety. Content analysis was used to examine perceived barriers and facilitators. Reported barriers included concerns about virus exposure in a hospital setting (77.8% stakeholders, 73.9% perinatal participants, 71.4% providers) or on public transportation (50.0% stakeholders, 26.1% perinatal participants, 25.0% providers), wearing a mask during sessions (50.0% stakeholders, 25.0% providers, 13.0% participants), lack of childcare (66.7% stakeholders, 46.4% providers, 43.5% perinatal participants), general transportation barriers (50.0% stakeholders, 47.8% perinatal participants, 25.0% providers), and the burden of planning and making time for in-person sessions (35.7% providers, 34.8% perinatal participants, 27.8% stakeholders). Reported facilitators included implementing and communicating safety protocols (72.2% stakeholders, 47.8% perinatal participants, 39.3% providers), conducting sessions at alternative or larger locations (44.4% stakeholders, 32.1% providers, 17.4% perinatal participants), providing incentives (34.8% perinatal participants, 21.4% providers, 11.1% stakeholders), and childcare and flexible scheduling options (31.1% perinatal participants, 16.7% stakeholders). This study identified a number of potential barriers and illustrated that COVID-19 has fostered and amplified barriers. Future interventions to facilitate resuming in-person sessions should focus on patient-centered strategies based on empathy regarding ongoing risk-aversion among perinatal patients despite existing safety protocols, and holistic thinking to make access to in-person psychotherapy easier and more accessible for perinatal patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Ould Brahim L, Lambert SD, Feeley N, Coumoundouros C, Schaffler J, McCusker J, Moodie EEM, Kayser J, Kolne K, Belzile E, Genest C. The effects of self-management interventions on depressive symptoms in adults with chronic physical disease(s) experiencing depressive symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:584. [PMID: 34800995 PMCID: PMC8605588 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03504-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. It is estimated that 20% of adults with chronic physical diseases experience concomitant depression, increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality. Low intensity psychosocial interventions, such as self-management, are part of recommended treatment; however, no systematic review has evaluated the effects of depression self-management interventions for this population. The primary objective was to examine the effect of self-management interventions on reducing depressive symptomatology in adults with chronic disease(s) and co-occurring depressive symptoms. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of these interventions on improving other psychosocial and physiological outcomes (e.g., anxiety, glycemic control) and to assess potential differential effect based on key participant and intervention characteristics (e.g., chronic disease, provider). METHODS Studies comparing depression self-management interventions to a control group were identified through a) systematic searches of databases to June 2018 [MEDLINE (1946 -), EMBASE (1996 -), PsycINFO (1967 -), CINAHL (1984 -)] and b) secondary 'snowball' search strategies. The methodological quality of included studies was critically reviewed. Screening of all titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility was assessed independently by two authors. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. RESULTS Fifteen studies were retained: 12 for meta-analysis and three for descriptive review. In total, these trials included 2064 participants and most commonly evaluated interventions for people with cancer (n = 7) or diabetes (n = 4). From baseline to < 6-months (T1), the pooled mean effect size was - 0.47 [95% CI -0.73, - 0.21] as compared to control groups for the primary outcome of depression and - 0.53 [95% CI -0.91, - 0.15] at ≥ 6-months (T2). Results were also significant for anxiety (T1) and glycemic control (T2). Self-management skills of decision-making and taking action were significant moderators of depression at T1. CONCLUSION Self-management interventions show promise in improving depression and anxiety in those with concomitant chronic physical disease. The findings may contribute to the development of future Self-management interventions and delivering evidence-based care to this population. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to identify sources of heterogeneity and investigate key intervention components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sylvie D. Lambert
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada ,St. Mary’s Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nancy Feeley
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada ,Centre for Nursing Research, Montreal, Canada
| | - Chelsea Coumoundouros
- grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Jane McCusker
- St. Mary’s Research Centre, Montreal, Canada ,grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Erica E. M. Moodie
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - John Kayser
- grid.459278.50000 0004 4910 4652CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréa, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kendall Kolne
- Trillium Lakelands District School Board, Lindsay, Canada
| | | | - Christine Genest
- grid.14848.310000 0001 2292 3357Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
King EL, Spencer CM, Meeks CA. How the COVID-19 Pandemic Can and Must Expand Social Worker e-Interventions for Mental Health, Family Wellness, and Beyond. SOCIAL WORK 2021; 67:swab043. [PMID: 34694398 PMCID: PMC8574323 DOI: 10.1093/sw/swab043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Both media and academic reports have highlighted COVID-19's negative impacts on mental health and safety in the United States, yet care and service gaps persist. Evidence suggests that a default to in-person service delivery did not meet clients' needs before the pandemic, and that unmet needs have ballooned since COVID-19 spread throughout the United States due to a combination of increased stress, social isolation, and fewer available services during lockdowns. This article reviews literature on online interventions' utility and effectiveness in preventing and treating problems likely exacerbated under pandemic conditions, including mental health conditions, anger, couple dynamics, parenting, and alcohol misuse. The article also describes barriers to evidence-based e-interventions' wider and more consistent use, highlights some vulnerable populations' unique service needs, outlines service gaps that online programs might effectively mitigate, and offers a path by which social workers can lead an interdisciplinary charge in researching, developing, and implementing e-interventions during the current pandemic and beyond.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mata-Greve F, Johnson M, Pullmann MD, Friedman EC, Griffith Fillipo I, Comtois KA, Arean P. Mental Health and the Perceived Usability of Digital Mental Health Tools Among Essential Workers and People Unemployed Due to COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8:e28360. [PMID: 34081592 PMCID: PMC8354319 DOI: 10.2196/28360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 has created serious mental health consequences for essential workers or people who have become unemployed as a result of the pandemic. Digital mental health tools have the potential to address this problem in a timely and efficient manner. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to document the extent of digital mental health tool (DMHT) use by essential workers and those unemployed due to COVID-19, including asking participants to rate the usability and user burden of the DMHT they used most to cope. We also explored which aspects and features of DMHTs were seen as necessary for managing stress during a pandemic by having participants design their own ideal DMHT. METHODS A total of 2000 people were recruited from an online research community (Prolific) to complete a one-time survey about mental health symptoms, DMHT use, and preferred digital mental health features. RESULTS The final sample included 1987 US residents that identified as either an essential worker or someone who was unemployed due to COVID-19. Almost three-quarters of the sample (1479/1987, 74.8%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Only 14.2% (277/1957) of the sample used a DMHT to cope with stress associated with COVID-19. Of those who used DMHTs to cope with COVID-19, meditation apps were the most common (119/261, 45.6%). Usability was broadly in the acceptable range, although participants unemployed due to COVID-19 were less likely to report user burden with DMHTs than essential workers (t198.1=-3.89, P<.001). Individuals with emotional distress reported higher financial burden for their DMHT than nondistressed individuals (t69.0=-3.21, P=.01). When the sample was provided the option to build their own DMHT, the most desired features were a combination of mindfulness/meditation (1271/1987, 64.0%), information or education (1254/1987, 63.1%), distraction tools (1170/1987, 58.9%), symptom tracking for mood and sleep (1160/1987, 58.4%), link to mental health resources (1140/1987, 57.4%), and positive psychology (1131/1986, 56.9%). Subgroups by employment, distress, and previous DMHT use status had varied preferences. Of those who did not use a DMHT to cope with COVID-19, most indicated that they did not consider looking for such a tool to help with coping (1179/1710, 68.9%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the potential need for DMHTs, this study found that the use of such tools remains similar to prepandemic levels. This study also found that regardless of the level of distress or even past experience using an app to cope with COVID-19, it is possible to develop a COVID-19 coping app that would appeal to a majority of essential workers and unemployed persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Mata-Greve
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael D Pullmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults with Mental Illness (ALACRITY) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Emily C Friedman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults with Mental Illness (ALACRITY) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Isabell Griffith Fillipo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Creating Technological Innovations (CREATIV) Lab, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Katherine A Comtois
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Center for Suicide Prevention and Recovery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Patricia Arean
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults with Mental Illness (ALACRITY) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Creating Technological Innovations (CREATIV) Lab, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kozlov E, McDarby M, Prescott M, Altman M. Assessing the Care Modality Preferences and Predictors for Digital Mental Health Treatment Seekers in a Technology-enabled Stepped Care Delivery System: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e30162. [PMID: 34343965 PMCID: PMC8482163 DOI: 10.2196/30162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to mental health services continues to be a systemic problem in the United States and around the world owing to a variety of barriers including the limited availability of skilled providers and lack of mental health literacy among patients. Individuals seeking mental health treatment may not be aware of the multiple modalities of digital mental health care available to address their problems (eg, self-guided and group modalities, or one-to-one care with a provider). In fact, one-to-one, in-person treatment is the dominant care model with a masters- or doctoral-level trained mental health provider, and it may or may not be the appropriate or preferred level of care for an individual. Technology-enabled mental health platforms may be one way to improve access to mental health care by offering stepped care, but more research is needed to understand the care modality preferences of digital mental health care seekers because additional modalities become increasingly validated as effective treatment options. Objective The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the predictors of care modality preferences among individuals enrolled in a technology-enabled stepped mental health care platform. Methods This exploratory, cross-sectional study used employee data from the 2021 Modern Health database, an employer-sponsored mental health benefit that uses a technology-enabled platform to optimize digital mental health care delivery. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to evaluate associations among the categorical and continuous factors of interest and the preferred care modality. Bivariate logistic regression models were constructed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of preferring a one-on-one versus self-guided group, or no preference for digital mental health care modalities. Results Data were analyzed for 3661 employees. The most common modality preference was one-on-one care (1613/3661, 44.06%). Approximately one-fourth of the digital mental health care seekers (881/3661, 24.06%) expressed a preference for pursuing self-guided care, and others (294/3661, 8.03%) expressed a preference for group care. The ORs indicated that individuals aged 45 years and above were significantly more likely to express a preference for self-guided care compared to individuals aged between 18 and 24 years (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.70-3.59; P<.001). Individuals screening positive for anxiety (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86; P<.001) or depression (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95; P=.02) were more likely to prefer one-on-one care. Conclusions Our findings elucidated that care modality preferences vary and are related to clinical severity factors and demographic variables among individuals seeking digital mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa Kozlov
- Institute for Health, Health Policy and Aging Research, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, US
| | - Meghan McDarby
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, US
| | - Maximo Prescott
- Modern Life, Inc., 450 Sansome St, 12th Floor, San Francisco, US
| | - Myra Altman
- Modern Life, Inc., 450 Sansome St, 12th Floor, San Francisco, US.,Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, US
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Whiting DL, Chuah SL, Simpson GK, Deane FP, Reynolds J. Video-consulting to address mental health needs after traumatic brain injury: evaluation of a training workshop to build capacity among psychologists. Brain Inj 2021; 35:1065-1074. [PMID: 34334058 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1953594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to significant psychological distress, but few psychologists in Australia are trained in working with this complex clinical group. Despite government funding to provide video-consulting (VC) services in Australia, uptake before COVID-19 was limited. OBJECTIVE This mixed methods study evaluated whether training in eHealth and evidence based TBI psychological therapies increased provider uptake of VC in clinical practice, and delivery of mental health services to individuals with TBI. METHODS Mental health professionals completed a range of self-report measures before (n = 50), after (n = 48), and four months following (n = 30) a one-day workshop. Participants' TBI knowledge, client-base and levels of access, confidence, motivation and attitudes toward VC were assessed. Knowledge did not increase after training but participants had significant increases in their confidence and motivation to using VC at follow up. Significant reductions in pragmatic barriers to using VC were reported post training and at follow up, all barrier categories indicated significant reductions. There was no significant change in clinical practice of the participants. CONCLUSIONS Training to increase TBI knowledge requires specific assessment tools and although training appears to reduce barriers to using VC, uptake in clinical practice may require additional supervision and warrants further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane L Whiting
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Sarah L Chuah
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Grahame K Simpson
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.,John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney School of Medicine, the University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Frank P Deane
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Julia Reynolds
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Baumeister H, Bauereiss N, Zarski AC, Braun L, Buntrock C, Hoherz C, Idrees AR, Kraft R, Meyer P, Nguyen TBD, Pryss R, Reichert M, Sextl T, Steinhoff M, Stenzel L, Steubl L, Terhorst Y, Titzler I, Ebert DD. Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of PSYCHOnlineTHERAPY: Study Protocol of a Multicenter Blended Outpatient Psychotherapy Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for Patients With Depressive and Anxiety Disorders. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:660534. [PMID: 34054617 PMCID: PMC8160118 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.660534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) and their integration into routine psychotherapy (i.e., blended therapy) can offer a means of complementing psychotherapy in a flexible and resource optimized way. Objective: The present study will evaluate the non-inferiority, cost-effectiveness, and safety of two versions of integrated blended psychotherapy for depression and anxiety compared to standard cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Methods: A three-armed multicenter cluster-randomized controlled non-inferiority trial will be conducted comparing two implementations of blended psychotherapy (PSYCHOnlineTHERAPYfix/flex) compared to CBT. Seventy-five outpatient psychotherapists with a CBT-license will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. Each of them is asked to include 12 patients on average with depressive or anxiety disorders resulting in a total sample size of N = 900. All patients receive up to a maximum of 16 psychotherapy sessions, either as routine CBT or alternating with Online self-help sessions (fix: 8/8; flex: 0-16). Assessments will be conducted at patient study inclusion (pre-treatment) and 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks and 12 months post-inclusion. The primary outcome is depression and anxiety severity at 18 weeks post-inclusion (post-treatment) using the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes are depression and anxiety remission, treatment response, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, working alliance, psychotherapy adherence, and patient safety. Additionally, several potential moderators and mediators including patient characteristics and attitudes toward the interventions will be examined, complemented by ecological day-to-day digital behavior variables via passive smartphone sensing as part of an integrated smart-sensing sub-study. Data-analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis with additional per-protocol analyses. In addition, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will be conducted from a societal and a public health care perspective. Additionally, qualitative interviews on acceptance, feasibility, and optimization potential will be conducted and analyzed. Discussion: PSYCHOnlineTHERAPY will provide evidence on blended psychotherapy in one of the largest ever conducted psychotherapy trials. If shown to be non-inferior and cost-effective, PSYCHOnlineTHERAPY has the potential to innovate psychotherapy in the near future by extending the ways of conducting psychotherapy. The rigorous health care services approach will facilitate a timely implementation of blended psychotherapy into standard care. Trial Registration: The trial is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023973; date of registration: December 28th 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Natalie Bauereiss
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anna-Carlotta Zarski
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lina Braun
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Claudia Buntrock
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Hoherz
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abdul Rahman Idrees
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Institute of Databases and Information Systems (DBIS), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Robin Kraft
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Institute of Databases and Information Systems (DBIS), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Pauline Meyer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tran Bao Dat Nguyen
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Pryss
- Medical Informatics, Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Reichert
- Institute of Databases and Information Systems (DBIS), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Theresa Sextl
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maria Steinhoff
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lena Stenzel
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lena Steubl
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ingrid Titzler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David Daniel Ebert
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Sport & Health Sciences, Chair for Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Michaelis M, Burgess S, Junne F, Rothermund E, Gündel H, Zipfel S, Wolf M, Rieger MA. Mental Health Applications for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Common Mental Disorders: Attitudes of German Employees. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:508622. [PMID: 34017269 PMCID: PMC8130826 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.508622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Web-based and mobile mental health applications for the prevention and treatment of common mental disorders (CMDs) are on the rise. Under certain circumstances they have proved to be effective for a range of conditions (e.g., depression). Objective: There is not sufficient evidence regarding the benefits and barriers especially for mobile phone apps and for programs in the field of primary prevention. Studies on the acceptance of potential users of mental health apps yielded mixed outcomes. In a large survey we investigated the attitudes of employees toward mental health apps and various traditional mental health services. Our main research question in this contribution focuses on the acceptance of apps compared to other measures and the moderating influence of individual characteristics. Methods: The standardized survey was completed by members of an online access panel with different job types. A set of 33 self-developed items, including three questions on e-health, captured the perceived relevance of prevention at the (A) occupational, (B) individual, and (C) societal level. On the basis of an exploratory factor analysis, mean scores for mapping seven (sub-)dimensions were constructed and compared using the Wilcoxon test. The influence of potential predictors was analyzed in linear regression models. Results: The data of 610 respondents were analyzed (response rate 75%). Support from mental health applications was rated significantly less important compared to all other dimensions at the levels (A) to (C). Respondents were more likely to use mental health apps if they felt literate with electronic devices, perceived a high relevance of work-related demands as causal factors for CMDs, stated they would be ashamed of having a CMD, and would be willing to begin psychotherapy if recommended. Discussion and Conclusions: The results confirm the critical attitudes of potential mental health app users found in other studies. Since users with a negative attitude toward e-health might have a higher risk for dropout and non-adherence as well as lower intervention effects, well-designed educational strategies should be carried out beforehand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Michaelis
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Burgess
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Junne
- Department of Internal Medicine VI, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Eva Rothermund
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center/Leadership Personality Centre, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Harald Gündel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center/Leadership Personality Centre, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephan Zipfel
- Department of Internal Medicine VI, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Wolf
- Center for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Monika A. Rieger
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Laine A, Anttila M, Hirvonen H, Välimäki M. Feasibility of a Web-Based Psychoeducation Course and Experiences of Caregivers Living With a Person With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25480. [PMID: 33890862 PMCID: PMC8105764 DOI: 10.2196/25480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that burdens both patients and caregivers. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of a web-based psychoeducation course targeted at caregivers of persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) and to describe their experiences of living with a person with SSD based on the material caregivers produced during the web-based course. METHODS A convergent, parallel, mixed methods study design was used. First, caregivers' engagement in the course was evaluated quantitatively. Second, the overview of the course feedback was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methods. Third, the experiences of being a caregiver to a person with SSD were analyzed qualitatively with the thematic analysis of the writings caregivers produced during the web-based course. RESULTS A total of 30 caregivers participated in the study and a web-based psychoeducation course. Less than two-thirds (18/30, 60%) completed the course. Content was most often logged for the first module, Orientation (3465 log-ins), and the lowest number of log-ins was recorded for the Daily life module (1061 log-ins). Feedback on the course varied; over half (10/17, 59%) of the caregivers considered the content to be very good or good, about half (9/17, 53%) considered the website layout to be good, only 6% (1/17) felt that the usability of the website was poor, and no one felt that it was very poor. From the reported experiences of being a caregiver to a person with SSD, 3 themes were formed: the caregiver's own well-being, relationship with the person with SSD, and experience of health care services. CONCLUSIONS The web-based psychoeducation course for caregivers living with a person with SSD seems to be especially suitable for those who have little experience as a caregiver. In the future, more planning and the consideration of aspects related to the needs of specific target groups, course content, practical arrangements, and scheduling should be taken into account. In addition, although caregivers can improve their own well-being in different ways, they need regular support and cooperation from health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Laine
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Minna Anttila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heli Hirvonen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lau Y, Cheng JY, Wong SH, Yen KY, Cheng LJ. Effectiveness of digital psychotherapeutic intervention among perinatal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Psychiatry 2021; 11:133-152. [PMID: 33889538 PMCID: PMC8040152 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i4.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perinatal period is a challenging time of substantial emotional, physiological, social, and relational changes. Depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms are common, and co-exist in the perinatal period. Digital technology continues to grow at an unprecedented pace with wide application, including psychotherapeutic intervention. A growing number of meta-analyses supported the application of digital psychotherapeutic intervention across different populations, but relatively few meta- and meta-regression analyses have concentrated on perinatal women. AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of digital psychotherapeutic intervention on improving psychological outcomes among perinatal women and identify its essential features. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from eight databases, including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses from inception up until November 24, 2020. Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 software was used to conduct meta- and meta-regression analyses. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of the Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system were adopted to assess the individual and overall qualities of the evidence, respectively. RESULTS A total of 25 RCTs that included 3239 women were identified. Meta-analyses revealed that intervention significantly improved depression (Hedges's g = 0.49), anxiety (g = 0.25), and stress (g = 0.47) symptoms compared to the control. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that a website platform with ≥ eight therapist-guided sessions using the theoretical principle of cognitive behavioral therapy was more effective than other treatments in improving depression symptoms in postnatal women. Meta-regression analyses observed that the age of perinatal women and the type of psychotherapy also had statistically significant effects on depression symptoms. Egger's regression asymmetry tests suggested that no publication biases occurred, but the overall quality of the evidence was very low. CONCLUSION This review suggests that digital psychotherapeutic intervention may be a potential solution to reduce psychological problems in perinatal women. Further high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Lau
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Jing-Ying Cheng
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Sai-Ho Wong
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Kai-Yoong Yen
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Ling-Jie Cheng
- Nursing Research Unit, Department of Nursing, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun Health Campus, National Healthcare Group, Singapore 768828, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
E-mental health applications for depression: an evidence-based ethical analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2021; 271:549-555. [PMID: 31894391 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-019-01093-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
E-mental health applications (apps) are an increasingly important factor for the treatment of depression. To assess the risks and benefits for patients, an in-depth ethical analysis is necessary. The objective of this paper is to determine the ethical implications of app-based treatment for depression. An evidence-based ethical analysis was conducted. The material was meta-reviews and randomized control studies (RCTs) on app-based treatment. Based on the empirical data, an ethical analysis was conducted using the 3-ACES-approach by Thornicroft and Tansella. Apps may empower autonomy, offer an uninterrupted series of contacts over a period of time, show evidence-based benefits for patients with subclinical and mild-to-moderate-symptoms, are easily accessible, may be used for coordinating information and services within an episode of care, and are on the whole cost-effective. Their risks are that they are not suitable for the whole range of severity of mental illnesses and patient characteristics, show severe deficits in the data privacy policy, and a big variability in quality standards. The use of apps in depression treatment can be beneficial for patients as long as (1) the usefulness of an app-based treatment is assessed for each individual patient, (2) apps are chosen according to symptom severity as well as characteristics like the patient's level of self-reliance, their e-literacy, and their openness vis-à-vis apps, (3) manufacturers improve their privacy policies and the quality of apps.
Collapse
|
46
|
Phillips EA, Himmler SF, Schreyögg J. Preferences for e-Mental Health Interventions in Germany: A Discrete Choice Experiment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:421-430. [PMID: 33641777 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent evidence suggests that e-mental health interventions can be effective at improving mental health but that there is still a notable hesitation among patients to use them. Previous research has revealed that they are perceived by patients as being less helpful than face-to-face psychotherapy. The reasons for this unfavorable perception are, however, not yet well understood. The aim of our study was to address this question by eliciting preferences for individual components of e-mental health interventions in a discrete choice experiment. METHODS Using a stepwise qualitative approach, we developed the following 5 attributes of eMHIs: introductory training, human contact, peer support, proven effectiveness, content delivery, and price. Additionally, we asked questions about respondents' demographics, attitudes, and previous experience of traditional psychotherapy, as well as their distress level. RESULTS A total of 1984 respondents completed the survey. Using mixed logit models, we found that personal contact with a psychotherapist in blended care, proven effectiveness, and low price were highly valued by participants. Participants were indifferent toward the mode of content delivery but showed a slight preference for introductory training via phone, as well as for peer support via online forum alongside coach-led group meetings on site. DISCUSSION Our results suggest a clear preference for blended care that includes face-to-face contact with a psychotherapist. This preference remained stable irrespective of sociodemographics, previous experience of psychotherapy, distress level, and the 2 context scenarios used in our discrete choice experiment. Further investigations looking at the potential benefits and risks of blended care are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena A Phillips
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian F Himmler
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management Health Economics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Renn BN, Schurr M, Zaslavsky O, Pratap A. Artificial Intelligence: An Interprofessional Perspective on Implications for Geriatric Mental Health Research and Care. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:734909. [PMID: 34867524 PMCID: PMC8634654 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.734909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare aims to learn patterns in large multimodal datasets within and across individuals. These patterns may either improve understanding of current clinical status or predict a future outcome. AI holds the potential to revolutionize geriatric mental health care and research by supporting diagnosis, treatment, and clinical decision-making. However, much of this momentum is driven by data and computer scientists and engineers and runs the risk of being disconnected from pragmatic issues in clinical practice. This interprofessional perspective bridges the experiences of clinical scientists and data science. We provide a brief overview of AI with the main focus on possible applications and challenges of using AI-based approaches for research and clinical care in geriatric mental health. We suggest future AI applications in geriatric mental health consider pragmatic considerations of clinical practice, methodological differences between data and clinical science, and address issues of ethics, privacy, and trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna N Renn
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Matthew Schurr
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Oleg Zaslavsky
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Abhishek Pratap
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Expanding Virtual Postpartum Mental Health Care for Latina Women: A Participatory Research and Policy Agenda. Womens Health Issues 2020; 31:96-99. [PMID: 33250342 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
49
|
Bernecker SL, Williams JJ, Caporale-Berkowitz NA, Wasil AR, Constantino MJ. Nonprofessional Peer Support to Improve Mental Health: Randomized Trial of a Scalable Web-Based Peer Counseling Course. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17164. [PMID: 32955451 PMCID: PMC7536598 DOI: 10.2196/17164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Millions of people worldwide are underserved by the mental health care system. Indeed, most mental health problems go untreated, often because of resource constraints (eg, limited provider availability and cost) or lack of interest or faith in professional help. Furthermore, subclinical symptoms and chronic stress in the absence of a mental illness diagnosis often go unaddressed, despite their substantial health impact. Innovative and scalable treatment delivery methods are needed to supplement traditional therapies to fill these gaps in the mental health care system. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether a self-guided web-based course can teach pairs of nonprofessional peers to deliver psychological support to each other. METHODS In this experimental study, a community sample of 30 dyads (60 participants, mostly friends), many of whom presented with mild to moderate psychological distress, were recruited to complete a web-based counseling skills course. Dyads were randomized to either immediate or delayed access to training. Before and after training, dyads were recorded taking turns discussing stressors. Participants' skills in the helper role were assessed before and after taking the course: the first author and a team of trained research assistants coded recordings for the presence of specific counseling behaviors. When in the client role, participants rated the session on helpfulness in resolving their stressors and supportiveness of their peers. We hypothesized that participants would increase the use of skills taught by the course and decrease the use of skills discouraged by the course, would increase their overall adherence to the guidelines taught in the course, and would perceive posttraining counseling sessions as more helpful and their peers as more supportive. RESULTS The course had large effects on most helper-role speech behaviors: helpers decreased total speaking time, used more restatements, made fewer efforts to influence the speaker, and decreased self-focused and off-topic utterances (ds=0.8-1.6). When rating the portion of the session in which they served as clients, participants indicated that they made more progress in addressing their stressors during posttraining counseling sessions compared with pretraining sessions (d=1.1), but they did not report substantive changes in feelings of closeness and supportiveness of their peers (d=0.3). CONCLUSIONS The results provide proof of concept that nonprofessionals can learn basic counseling skills from a scalable web-based course. The course serves as a promising model for the development of web-based counseling skills training, which could provide accessible mental health support to some of those underserved by traditional psychotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Bernecker
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Akash R Wasil
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael J Constantino
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Payne L, Flannery H, Kambakara Gedara C, Daniilidi X, Hitchcock M, Lambert D, Taylor C, Christie D. Business as usual? Psychological support at a distance. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020; 25:672-686. [PMID: 32594756 PMCID: PMC7370649 DOI: 10.1177/1359104520937378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The impact of COVID-19 has challenged the long accepted 'norm' in delivery of psychological therapy. Public policies designed to reduce transmission have made it extremely difficult to meet with service-users safely in the traditional face-to-face context. E-therapies have existed in theory and practice since technological progress has made them possible. They can offer a host of advantages over face-to-face equivalents, including improved access, greater flexibility for service-users and professionals, and cost savings. However, despite the emerging evidence and anticipated positive value, implementation has been slower than anticipated. Concerns have been raised by service-users, clinicians, and public health organisations, identifying significant barriers to the wide spread use of e-therapies. In the current climate, many clinicians are offering e-therapies for the first time, without prior arrangement or training, as the only viable option to continue to support their clients. This paper offers a clinically relevant review of the e-therapies literature, including effectiveness and acceptability dilemmas and challenges that need to be addressed to support the safe use and growth of e-therapies in psychology services. Further research is needed to better understand what might be lost and what gained in comparison to face-to-face therapy, and for which client groups and settings it might be most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Payne
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Halina Flannery
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Xeni Daniilidi
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Megan Hitchcock
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Danielle Lambert
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Taylor
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Deborah Christie
- Child and Adolescent Psychology Service, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|