Bone mineral density loci specific to the skull portray potential pleiotropic effects on craniosynostosis

Bone health index in the assessment of bone health: The Generation R Study

Bone Health Index (BHI) has been proposed as a useful instrument for assessing bone health in children. However, its relationship with fracture risk remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether BHI is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalent fracture odds in children from the Generation R Study. We also implemented genome-wide association study (GWAS) and polygenic score (PGS) approaches to improve our understanding of BHI and its potential. In total, 4150 children (49.4 % boys; aged 9.8 years) with genotyped data and bone assessments were included in this study. BMD was measured across the total body (less head following ISCD guidelines) using a GE-Lunar iDXA densitometer; and BHI was determined from the hand DXA scans using BoneXpert®. Fractures were self-reported collected with home questionnaires. The association of BHI with BMD and fractures was evaluated using linear models corrected for age, sex, ethnicity, height, and weight. We observed a positive correlation between BHI and BMD (ρ = 0.32, p-value<0.0001). Further, every SD decrease in BHI was associated with an 11 % increased risk of prevalent fractures (OR:1.11, 95 % CI 1.00-1.24, p-value = 0.05). Our BHI GWAS identified variants (lead SNP rs1404264-A, p-value = 2.61 × 10-14) mapping to the ING3/CPED1/WNT16 locus. Children in the extreme tails of the BMD PGS presented a difference in BHI values of -0.10 standard deviations (95% CI -0.14 to -0.07; p-value<0.0001). On top of the demonstrated epidemiological association of BHI with both BMD and fracture risk, our results reveal a partially shared biological background between BHI and BMD. These findings highlight the potential value of using BHI to screen children at risk of fracture.

The Rotterdam Study. Design update and major findings between 2020 and 2024

The Rotterdam Study is a population-based cohort study, started in 1990 in the district of Ommoord in the city of Rotterdam, the Netherlands, with the aim to describe the prevalence and incidence, unravel the etiology, and identify targets for prediction, prevention or intervention of multifactorial diseases in mid-life and elderly. The study currently includes 17,931 participants (overall response rate 65%), aged 40 years and over, who are examined in-person every 3 to 5 years in a dedicated research facility, and who are followed-up continuously through automated linkage with health care providers, both regionally and nationally. Research within the Rotterdam Study is carried out along two axes. First, research lines are oriented around diseases and clinical conditions, which are reflective of medical specializations. Second, cross-cutting research lines transverse these clinical demarcations allowing for inter- and multidisciplinary research. These research lines generally reflect subdomains within epidemiology. This paper describes recent methodological updates and main findings from each of these research lines. Also, future perspective for coming years highlighted.

Zebrafish as a Model for Osteoporosis: Functional Validations of Genome-Wide Association Studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

GWAS, as a largely correlational analysis, requires in vitro or in vivo validation. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have many advantages for studying the genetics of human diseases. Since gene editing in zebrafish has been highly valuable for studying embryonic skeletal developmental processes that are prenatally or perinatally lethal in mammalian models, we are reviewing pros and cons of this model.

RECENT FINDINGS

The true power for the use of zebrafish is the ease by which the genome can be edited, especially using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Gene editing, followed by phenotyping, for complex traits such as BMD, is beneficial, but the major physiological differences between the fish and mammals must be considered. Like mammals, zebrafish do have main bone cells; thus, both in vivo stem cell analyses and in vivo imaging are doable. Yet, the "long" bones of fish are peculiar, and their bone cavities do not contain bone marrow. Partial duplication of the zebrafish genome should be taken into account. Overall, small fish toolkit can provide unmatched opportunities for genetic modifications and morphological investigation as a follow-up to human-first discovery.