1
|
Lavik E, Minasian L. Bioconjugates for Cancer Prevention: Opportunities for Impact. Bioconjug Chem 2024; 35:1148-1153. [PMID: 39116257 DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Cancer prevention encompasses both screening strategies to find cancers early when they are likely to be most treatable and prevention and interception strategies to reduce the risk of developing cancers. Bioconjugates, here defined broadly as materials and molecules that have synthetic and biological components, have roles to play across the cancer-prevention spectrum. In particular, bioconjugates may be developed as affordable, accessible, and effective screening strategies or as novel vaccines and drugs to reduce one's risk of developing cancers. Developmental programs are available for taking novel technologies and evaluating them for clinical use in cancer screening and prevention. While a variety of different challenges exist in implementing cancer-prevention interventions, a thoughtful approach to bioconjugates could improve the delivery and acceptability of the interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Lavik
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
| | - Lori Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Dr, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stroot IAS, Bart J, Hollema H, Jalving M, Wagner MM, Yigit R, van Doorn HC, de Hullu JA, Gaarenstroom KN, van Beurden M, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Slangen BFM, Zweemer RP, Gómez García EB, Ausems MGEM, Boere IA, van Hest LP, Duijkers FAM, van Asperen CJ, Schmidt MK, Wevers MR, Ruijs MWG, Devilee P, Collée JM, Hebon Investigators, de Bock GH, Mourits MJE. Long-term outcome of high-grade serous carcinoma established in risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens in asymptomatic BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variant carriers. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:198-203. [PMID: 38795508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe the long-term outcome of asymptomatic BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variant (GPV) carriers with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) in their risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) specimen. METHODS In a previously described cohort of asymptomatic BRCA1/2 GPV carriers derived from the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian cancer in the Netherlands (HEBON) study, women with HGSC at RRSO were identified. Main outcome was ten-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were time to recurrence, ten-year disease-specific survival (DSS), ten-year overall survival (OS). Patient, disease and treatment characteristics associated with recurrence were described. RESULTS The 28 included women with HGSC at RRSO were diagnosed at a median age of 55.3 years (range: 33.5-74.3). After staging, eighteen women had (FIGO) stage I, three stage II and five had stage III disease. Two women did not undergo surgical staging and were classified as unknown stage. After a median follow-up of 13.5 years (range: 9.1-24.7), six women with stage I (33%), one woman with stage II (33%), two women with stage III (40%) and none of the women with unknown stage developed a recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 6.9 years (range: 0.8-9.2 years). Ten-year DFS was 68%, ten-year DSS was 88% and ten-year OS was 82%. CONCLUSION Most asymptomatic BRCA1/2 GPV carriers with HGSC at RRSO were diagnosed at an early stage. Nevertheless, after a median follow-up of 13.5 years, nine of the 28 women with HGSC at RRSO developed a recurrence after a median of 6.9 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris A S Stroot
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost Bart
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry Hollema
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marise M Wagner
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Refika Yigit
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Katja N Gaarenstroom
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marc van Beurden
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Amsterdam University Medical Center-Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte F M Slangen
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gómez García
- University Medical Center Maastricht, Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Boere
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liselotte P van Hest
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Floor A M Duijkers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics & Department of Pathology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics & Department of Pathology, Leiden, the Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Epidemiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Molecular Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke R Wevers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle W G Ruijs
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics & Department of Pathology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hebon Investigators
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center: Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koutras A, Perros P, Prokopakis I, Ntounis T, Fasoulakis Z, Pittokopitou S, Samara AA, Valsamaki A, Douligeris A, Mortaki A, Sapantzoglou I, Katrachouras A, Pagkalos A, Symeonidis P, Palios VC, Psarris A, Theodora M, Antsaklis P, Makrydimas G, Chionis A, Daskalakis G, Kontomanolis EN. Advantages and Limitations of Ultrasound as a Screening Test for Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2078. [PMID: 37370973 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the seventh most common malignancy diagnosed among women, the eighth leading cause of cancer mortality globally, and the most common cause of death among all gynecological cancers. Even though recent advances in technology have allowed for more accurate radiological and laboratory diagnostic tests, approximately 60% of OC cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Given the high mortality rate of advanced stages of OC, early diagnosis remains the main prognostic factor. Our aim is to focus on the sonographic challenges in ovarian cancer screening and to highlight the importance of sonographic evaluation, the crucial role of the operator΄s experience, possible limitations in visibility, emphasizing the importance and the necessity of quality assurance protocols that health workers have to follow and finally increasing the positive predictive value. We also analyzed how ultrasound can be combined with biomarkers (ex. CA-125) so as to increase the sensitivity of early-stage OC detection or, in addition to the gold standard examination, the CT (Computed tomography) scan in OC follow-up. Improvements in the performance and consistency of ultrasound screening could reduce the need for repeated examinations and, mainly, ensure diagnostic accuracy. Finally, we refer to new very promising techniques such as liquid biopsies. Future attempts in order to improve screening should focus on the identification of features that are unique to OC and that are present in early-stage tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Koutras
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevas Perros
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Prokopakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Ntounis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Zacharias Fasoulakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Savia Pittokopitou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Athina A Samara
- Department of Embryology, University of Thessaly, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Asimina Valsamaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Larisa, Tsakalof 1, 41221 Larisa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Douligeris
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Mortaki
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioakeim Sapantzoglou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Katrachouras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital of Ioannina, University of Ioannina, Stavros Niarchos Str., 45500 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Athanasios Pagkalos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Xanthi, Neapoli, 67100 Xanthi, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Symeonidis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, 6th km Alexandroupolis-Makris, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | | | - Alexandros Psarris
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Theodora
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Panos Antsaklis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - George Makrydimas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Athanasios Chionis
- Department of Gynecology, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens 'ALEXANDRA', National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanuel N Kontomanolis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, 6th km Alexandroupolis-Makris, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun J, Yan C, Xu D, Zhang Z, Li K, Li X, Zhou M, Hao D. Immuno-genomic characterisation of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveals immune evasion mechanisms and identifies an immunological subtype with a favourable prognosis and improved therapeutic efficacy. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1570-1580. [PMID: 35017656 PMCID: PMC9130248 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01692-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy has revolutionised the field of cancer therapy and immunology, but has demonstrated limited therapeutic efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS Multi-omics data of 495 TCGA HGSOC tumours and RNA-seq data of 1708 HGSOC tumours were analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and meta-analyses were used to identify prognostic genes. The immune microenvironment was characterised using the ssGSEA methods for 28 immune cell types. Immunohistochemistry staining of tumour tissues of 14 patients was used to validate the key findings further. RESULTS A total of 1142 genes were identified as favourable prognostic genes, which are prevailing in immune-related pathways and the infiltration of most immune subpopulations was observed to be associated with a favourable prognosis suggesting that tumour immunogenicity was the most prominent factor associated with improved clinical outcomes and response to chemotherapy of HGSOC. We identified multiple genomic and transcriptomic determinants of immunogenicity, including the copy loss of chromosome 4q and deficiencies of the homologous recombination pathway. Finally, an immunological subtype characterised by increased infiltration of activated CD8 T cells and decreased Tregs was associated with favourable prognosis and improved therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Our study characterised the immunogenomic landscape and refined the immunological classifications of HGSOC. This may improve the selection of patients with HGSOC who are suitable candidates for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Sun
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 Wenzhou, P. R. China
| | - Congcong Yan
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 Wenzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dandan Xu
- grid.155956.b0000 0000 8793 5925Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Zicheng Zhang
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 Wenzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ke Li
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 Wenzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiaobo Li
- grid.410736.70000 0001 2204 9268Department of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, P. R. China
| | - Meng Zhou
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, 325027 Wenzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dapeng Hao
- grid.410736.70000 0001 2204 9268Department of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Revised Markov Model Evaluating Oophorectomy at the Time of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: Age 65 Years Revisited. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 139:735-744. [PMID: 35576331 PMCID: PMC9015029 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform an updated Markov modeling to assess the optimal age for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication. METHODS We performed a literature review that assessed hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality by disease, age, hysterectomy with or without BSO, and estrogen therapy use. Base mortality rates were derived from national vital statistics data. A Markov model from reported HRs predicted the proportion of the population staying alive to age 80 years by 1-year and 5-year age groups at time of surgery, from age 45 to 55 years. Those younger than age 50 years were modeled as either taking postoperative estrogen or not; those 50 and older were modeled as not receiving estrogen. Computations were performed with R 3.5.1, using Bayesian integration for HR uncertainty. RESULTS Performing salpingo-oophorectomy before age 50 years for those not taking estrogen yields a lower survival proportion to age 80 years than hysterectomy alone before age 50 years (52.8% [Bayesian CI 40.7-59.7] vs 63.5% [Bayesian CI 62.2-64.9]). At or after age 50 years, there were similar proportions of those living to age 80 years with hysterectomy alone (66.4%, Bayesian CI 65.0-67.6) compared with concurrent salpingo-oophorectomy (66.9%, Bayesian CI 64.4-69.0). Importantly, those taking estrogen when salpingo-oophorectomy was performed before age 50 years had similar proportions of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and people living to age 80 years as those undergoing hysterectomy alone or those undergoing hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy at age 50 years and older. CONCLUSION This updated Markov model argues for the consideration of concurrent salpingo-oophorectomy for patients who are undergoing hysterectomy at age 50 and older and suggests that initiating estrogen in those who need salpingo-oophorectomy before age 50 years mitigates increased mortality risk.
Collapse
|
6
|
Long Non-Coding RNA-Based Functional Prediction Reveals Novel Targets in Notch-Upregulated Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061557. [PMID: 35326706 PMCID: PMC8946805 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Notch signaling is a druggable target in high-grade serous ovarian cancers; however, its complexity is not clearly understood. Recent revelations of the biological roles of lncRNAs have led to an increased interest in the oncogenic action of lncRNAs in various cancers. In this study, we performed in silico analyses using The Cancer Genome Atlas data to discover novel Notch-related lncRNAs and validated our transcriptome data via NOTCH1/3 silencing in serous ovarian cancer cells. The expression of novel Notch-related lncRNAs was down-regulated by a Notch inhibitor and was upregulated in high-grade serous ovarian cancers, compared to benign or borderline ovarian tumors. Functionally, Notch-related lncRNAs were tightly linked to Notch-related changes in diverse gene expressions. Notably, genes related to DNA repair and spermatogenesis showed specific correlations with Notch-related lncRNAs. Master transcription factors, including EGR1, CTCF, GABPα, and E2F4 might orchestrate the upregulation of Notch-related lncRNAs, along with the associated genes. The discovery of Notch-related lncRNAs significantly contributes to our understanding of the complex crosstalk of Notch signaling with other oncogenic pathways at the transcriptional level.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fatty Acid Metabolism in Ovarian Cancer: Therapeutic Implications. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23042170. [PMID: 35216285 PMCID: PMC8874779 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most malignant gynecological tumor. Previous studies have reported that metabolic alterations resulting from deregulated lipid metabolism promote ovarian cancer aggressiveness. Lipid metabolism involves the oxidation of fatty acids, which leads to energy generation or new lipid metabolite synthesis. The upregulation of fatty acid synthesis and related signaling promote tumor cell proliferation and migration, and, consequently, lead to poor prognosis. Fatty acid-mediated lipid metabolism in the tumor microenvironment (TME) modulates tumor cell immunity by regulating immune cells, including T cells, B cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells, which play essential roles in ovarian cancer cell survival. Here, the types and sources of fatty acids and their interactions with the TME of ovarian cancer have been reviewed. Additionally, this review focuses on the role of fatty acid metabolism in tumor immunity and suggests that fatty acid and related lipid metabolic pathways are potential therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
8
|
Integration of Genomic Profiling and Organoid Development in Precision Oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 23:ijms23010216. [PMID: 35008642 PMCID: PMC8745679 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology involves an innovative personalized treatment strategy for each cancer patient that provides strategies and options for cancer treatment. Currently, personalized cancer medicine is primarily based on molecular matching. Next-generation sequencing and related technologies, such as single-cell whole-transcriptome sequencing, enable the accurate elucidation of the genetic landscape in individual cancer patients and consequently provide clinical benefits. Furthermore, advances in cancer organoid models that represent genetic variations and mutations in individual cancer patients have direct and important clinical implications in precision oncology. This review aimed to discuss recent advances, clinical potential, and limitations of genomic profiling and the use of organoids in breast and ovarian cancer. We also discuss the integration of genomic profiling and organoid models for applications in cancer precision medicine.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jacobson MR, Walker M, Ene GEV, Firestone C, Bernardini MQ, Allen L, Huszti E, Sobel M. Factors affecting surgical decision-making in carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants undergoing risk-reducing surgery at a dedicated hereditary ovarian cancer clinic. Menopause 2021; 29:151-155. [PMID: 34873108 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants have a significantly elevated lifetime risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is associated with a 90% reduction in the development of tubal and ovarian cancer. At our tertiary hospital, we have a dedicated clinic where women predisposed to hereditary ovarian/tubal cancer receive counseling on reproduction, risk reduction, surgical prophylaxis, and menopausal aftercare. The objective of this study was to evaluate the choices that Canadian women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants make regarding ovarian cancer risk reduction within this highly specialized multidisciplinary clinic. METHODS This retrospective chart review included all women with confirmed BRCA1/2 mutations referred to the Familial Ovarian Cancer Clinic at Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada over a 45-month time period. Patient demographics, preoperative consultation notes and investigations, intraoperative findings, and pathology were recorded. RESULTS A total of 191 women were included in our cohort; 140 (73.3%) underwent risk-reducing surgery and 51 (26.7%) deferred or declined surgery. In women who underwent surgical prevention (median age 45 [30-72] y), 123 (87.9%) underwent RRSO and 17 (12.1%) chose a risk-reducing bilateral salpingectomy with deferred oophorectomy. Of the women undergoing RRSO, 11 (8.9%) women chose concurrent hysterectomy. Prevalent themes affecting decision-making included fears around premature surgical menopause, family planning, and concerns around development of endometrial cancer related to tamoxifen. CONCLUSION Women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants face challenging decisions regarding risk reduction and care providers must be knowledgeable and supportive in helping women make informed and individualized choices about their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Jacobson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melissa Walker
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gabrielle E V Ene
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Courtney Firestone
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Allen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ella Huszti
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mara Sobel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gokulnath P, Soriano AA, de Cristofaro T, Di Palma T, Zannini M. PAX8, an Emerging Player in Ovarian Cancer. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1330:95-112. [PMID: 34339032 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73359-9_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian Cancer is one of the most lethal and widespread gynecological malignancies. It is the seventh leading cause of all cancer deaths worldwide. High-Grade Serous Cancer (HGSC), the most commonly occurring subtype, alone contributes to 70% of all ovarian cancer deaths. This is mainly attributed to the complete lack of symptoms during the early stages of the disease and absence of an early diagnostic marker.PAX8 is emerging as an important histological marker for most of the epithelial ovarian cancers, as it is expressed in about 90% of malignant ovarian cancers, specifically in HGSC. PAX8 is a member of the Paired-Box gene family (PAX1-9) of transcription factors whose expression is tightly controlled temporally and spatially. The PAX genes are well known for their role in embryonic development and their expression continues to persist in some adult tissues. PAX8 is required for the normal development of Müllerian duct that includes Fallopian tube, uterus, cervix, and upper part of vagina. In adults, it is expressed in the Fallopian tube and uterine epithelium and not in the ovarian epithelium. Considering the recent studies that predict the events preceding the tumorigenesis of HGSC from the Fallopian tube, PAX8 appears to have an important role in the development of ovarian cancer.In this chapter, we review some of the published findings to highlight the significance of PAX8 as an important marker and an emerging player in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. We also discuss regarding the future perspectives of PAX8 wherein it could contribute to the betterment of ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Gokulnath
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology 'G. Salvatore' (IEOS) - CNR, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Amata Amy Soriano
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology 'G. Salvatore' (IEOS) - CNR, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Tiziana de Cristofaro
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology 'G. Salvatore' (IEOS) - CNR, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Tina Di Palma
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology 'G. Salvatore' (IEOS) - CNR, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariastella Zannini
- Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology 'G. Salvatore' (IEOS) - CNR, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rassy E, Assi T, Boussios S, Kattan J, Smith-Gagen J, Pavlidis N. Narrative review on serous primary peritoneal carcinoma of unknown primary site: four questions to be answered. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1709. [PMID: 33490221 PMCID: PMC7812188 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Serous peritoneal papillary carcinoma (SPPC) represents a particular cancer of unknown primary (CUP) entity that arises in the peritoneal surface lining the abdomen and pelvis without a discriminative primary tumor site. In this review, we discuss the validity of SPPC as a distinct entity. Clinically, patients with SPPC are older, have higher parity and later menarche, are more often obese and probably have poorer survival compared to those with primary ovarian cancer. Pathologically, SPPC is more anaplastic and multifocal, unlike primary ovarian cancer which is commonly unifocal. Biologically, it presents a higher expression of proliferative signals and similar cell cycle and DNA repair protein expression. These differences hint towards SPPC and primary ovarian cancer being as a spectrum of disease. Patients with SPPC are traditionally managed similarly to stage III–IV ovarian cancer. The recommended approach integrates aggressive cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy to remove the macroscopic tumor, eradicate the microscopic residual disease, and control the microscopic metastasis. However, the available evidence lacks proper randomized or prospective studies on SPPC and is limited to retrospective series. The diligent identification of SPPC is warranted to design specific clinical trials that eventually evaluate the impact of the new therapeutics on this distinct entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Rassy
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Institut, Villejuif, France.,Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tarek Assi
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Stergios Boussios
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, Kent, UK.,AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Joseph Kattan
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Julie Smith-Gagen
- School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Feeney L, Harley IJG, McCluggage WG, Mullan PB, Beirne JP. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: Catching the silent killer before it strikes. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:868-889. [PMID: 33312883 PMCID: PMC7701910 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i11.868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the western world. The majority of women presenting with the disease are asymptomatic and it has been dubbed the "silent killer". To date there is no effective minimally invasive method of stratifying those with the disease or screening for the disease in the general population. Recent molecular and pathological discoveries, along with the advancement of scientific technology, means there is a real possibility of having disease-specific liquid biopsies available within the clinical environment in the near future. In this review we discuss these discoveries, particularly in relation to the most common and aggressive form of EOC, and their role in making this possibility a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Feeney
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Ian JG Harley
- Northern Ireland Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BL, United Kingdom
| | - Paul B Mullan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - James P Beirne
- Trinity St James Cancer Institute, St. James’ Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of the literature to estimate the prevalence and outcomes of occult tubal carcinoma in BRCA mutation carriers and high-risk patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. DATA SOURCE A search was done using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov between 1946 and March 2019 with keywords and MeSH terms selected by an expert medical librarian and coauthors. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two independent reviewers performed study selection with an initial screen on abstracts and a second on full articles. Articles were rejected if they were irrelevant to the study question, pertained to a different population or did not report occult tubal neoplasia. Quality was assessed using methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Data were extracted and recorded in an Excel database. Forest plots for the prevalence of occult carcinoma were done using STATA. Among 2,402 studies assessed, 27 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. A total of 6,283 patients underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2002 and 2019: 2,894 cases were BRCA1, 1,579 BRCA2, and 1,810 high-risk based on family history. Among these, 75 patients were diagnosed with occult tubal carcinoma at the time of surgery. The pooled prevalence was 1.2% (I=7.1%, P=.363) occurring at a median age of 53.2 years (range 42.4-67). In a subanalysis of 18 studies reporting follow-up data, 10 recurrences (18.7%, 95% CI 7.5-53%) and 24 cases of post-risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy peritoneal cancer (0.54%, 95% CI 0.4-1.9%) were reported after a median follow-up of 52.5 months. BRCA1, older age, and previous breast cancer were more often associated with occult malignancy. CONCLUSION Occult tubal carcinomas found at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients and BRCA mutation carriers have significant potential for recurrence despite the frequent administration of postoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rush SK, Swisher EM, Garcia RL, Pennington KP, Agnew KJ, Kilgore MR, Norquist BM. Pathologic findings and clinical outcomes in women undergoing risk-reducing surgery to prevent ovarian and fallopian tube carcinoma: A large prospective single institution experience. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:514-520. [PMID: 32199636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for women at increased risk of ovarian, fallopian tube (FT), and peritoneal carcinoma (collectively OC). We describe rates of occult neoplasia in the largest single-institution prospective cohort of women undergoing RRSO, including those with mutations in non-BRCA homologous repair (HRR) genes. METHODS Participants undergoing RRSO enrolled in a prospective tissue bank between 1999 and 2017. Ovaries and FTs were serially sectioned in all cases. Participants had OC susceptibility gene mutations or a family history suggesting OC risk. Analyses were completed in Stata IC 15.1. RESULTS Of 644 women, 194 (30.1%) had mutations in BRCA1, 177 (27.5%) BRCA2, 27 (4.2%) other HRR genes, and 15 (2.3%) Lynch Syndrome-associated genes. Seventeen (2.6%) had occult neoplasms at RRSO, 15/17 (88.2%) in the FT. Of BRCA1 carriers, 14/194 (7.2%) had occult neoplasia, 8/194 (4.1%) invasive. One PALB2 and two BRCA2 carriers had intraepithelial FT neoplasms. Occult neoplasm occurred more frequently in BRCA1/2 carriers ≥45 years of age (6.5% vs 2.2%, chi square, p = .04), and 211/371 (56.9%) BRCA1/2 carriers had surgery after guideline-recommended ages. Four in 8 (50%) invasive and 2/9 (22%) intraepithelial neoplasms had positive pelvic washings. None with intraepithelial neoplasms developed recurrence or peritoneal carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS BRCA1 carriers have the highest risk of occult neoplasia at RRSO, and the frequency increased with age. Women with BRCA1/2 mutations often have RRSO beyond recommended ages. One PALB2 carrier had FT intraepithelial neoplasia, a novel finding. Serial sectioning is critical to identifying occult neoplasia and should be performed for all risk-reducing surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon K Rush
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Rochelle L Garcia
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Kathryn P Pennington
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Kathy J Agnew
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Mark R Kilgore
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Barbara M Norquist
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ma YN, Bu HL, Jin CJ, Wang X, Zhang YZ, Zhang H. Peritoneal cancer after bilateral mastectomy, hysterectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a poor prognosis: A case report and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:3872-3880. [PMID: 31799317 PMCID: PMC6887594 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i22.3872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) patients with BRCA mutations have a good prognosis; however, for patients with BRCA mutations who are diagnosed with PPC after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO), the prognosis is poor, and survival information is scarce.
CASE SUMMARY We treated a 56-year-old woman with PPC after bilateral mastectomy, hysterectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This patient had primary drug resistance and died 12 mo after the diagnosis of PPC. The genetic test performed on this patient indicated the presence of a germline BRCA1 mutation. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and extracted studies of patients with BRCA mutations who developed PPC after PSO. After a detailed literature search, we found 30 cases, 7 of which had a history of breast cancer, 14 of which had no history of breast cancer, and 9 of which had an unknown history. The average age of PSO patients was 48.86 years old (range, 31-64 years). The average time interval between the diagnosis of PPC and preventive surgery was 61.03 mo (range, 12-292 mo). The 2-year survival rate for this patient population was 78.26% (18/23), the 3-year survival rate was 50.00% (9/18), and the 5-year survival rate was 6.25% (1/16).
CONCLUSION Patients with BRCA mutations who are diagnosed with PPC after preventative surgery have a poor prognosis. Prevention measures and treatments for these patients need more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Na Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hua-Lei Bu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - Cheng-Juan Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201620, China
| | - Xia Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - You-Zhong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cheng A, Li L, Wu M, Lang J. Pathological findings following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:139-147. [PMID: 31521389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the benefit of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by estimating the pathological positive rate of occult lesions, including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and occult cancers (OCCs). METHODS BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO in a Chinese study center between 2014 and 2018 were included. A literature review was performed, followed by a meta-analysis of the literature to further validate the findings. RESULTS Twenty-four BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO were identified; one patient (4.2%) had STIC, and one patient (4.2%) had occult fallopian tube cancer complicated by STIC. Thirty-four articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Of the reported cases of OCC, 61.3% occurred in the fallopian tubes and 32.3% in the ovaries, and 81.5% were in the early stages. The estimated rate of overall pathological positive events was 5%. The estimated rates of overall STIC events and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively. The rates of STIC and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively, for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 1% and 1%, respectively, for BRCA2 mutation carriers. No significant difference was observed between the results of a routine examination of pathological sections and those of the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriae (SEE-FIM) protocol. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first report of RRSO results in China. In this systematic review, the positive rates of STIC or OCC after RRSO were no more than 3%, which are 200-fold higher than the risk of the general population. The use of a strict SEE-FIM protocol would likely increase positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoshuang Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Jinghe Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Salvador S, Scott S, Francis JA, Agrawal A, Giede C. No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2019; 39:480-493. [PMID: 28527613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This guideline reviews the potential benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy to prevent the development of high grade serous cancers (HGSC) of the ovary/fallopian tube/peritoneum based on current evidence supporting the fallopian tube origin of disease. INTENDED USERS Gynaecologists, obstetricians, family doctors, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, residents, and health care providers. TARGET POPULATION Adult women (18 and older): OPTIONS: Women considering hysterectomy who wish to retain their ovaries in situ have traditionally also retained their fallopian tubes. In addition, women undergoing permanent surgical sterilization have usually undergone tubal ligation using various methods rather than undergoing surgical removal of the entire fallopian tube. EVIDENCE For the sections "Evidence Supporting the Hypothesis That HGSC Originates in the Fallopian Tube" and "Current Literature on the Effects and Safety of Opportunistic Salpingectomy," relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews using the following terms, either alone or in combination, with the search limited to English language materials: "high grade serous cancers ovary," "fallopian tube," "peritoneum," "opportunistic salpingectomy," "epithelial ovarian cancers," "origin," "tubal carcinoma in situ," "BRCA mutation," "prophylactic salpingectomy," "inflammation," "clear cell," and "endometrioid." The initial search was performed in March 2015 with a final literature search in March 2016. Relevant evidence was selected for inclusion in the following order: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, observational studies, non-systematic reviews, case series, and reports. The total number of studies identified was 458, and 56 studies were included in this review. For the section "Other Factors Influencing the Risk of Developing "Ovarian" Cancers" a general Medline search was carried out using the terms "ovarian neoplasm" and "prevention." The search included papers published from December 2005 to March 2016. Meta-analyses were preferentially selected except where no such review was found. Additional searches for each subheading were also conducted (e.g., "ovarian neoplasm" and "tubal ligation.") Additional significant articles were identified through cross-referencing the identified reviews. For the search for "ovarian neoplasm" and "prevention," 10 meta-analyses were identified. For the search for "ovarian neoplasm" and "tubal ligation," an additional 4 meta-analyses were identified. VALIDATION METHODS The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed on by the principal authors. The Executive and Board of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration, and the Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology framework (Table 1). The interpretation of strong and weak recommendations is described in Table 2. The summary of findings is available on request. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS The addition of opportunistic salpingectomy to a planned hysterectomy or permanent sterilization did not increase rates of hospital readmission (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.10 and OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.21, respectively) or blood transfusions (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.10 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.73, respectively) but did increase the overall operating time (by 16 minutes and 10 minutes, respectively) in a retrospective review of 43 931 women. The risk of repeat surgery for tubal pathology among women with retained fallopian tubes after hysterectomy was at least doubled (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.42 in a population-based study of 170 000 women). If general gynaecologists were to consider removal of fallopian tubes at the time of every hysterectomy and sterilization procedure with referral of all patients with HGSC for hereditary cancer counselling and genetic testing, experts project a potential reduction in the rate of HGSC by 40% over the next 20 years. GUIDELINE UPDATE Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations. SPONSORS This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada and SOGC. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
18
|
Krishnamachari B, Rehman M, Cohn JE, Chan V, Modi N, Leitner O, Tangney K, O'Connor A, Blazey W, Koehler S, Tegay D. Video Education on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) for Physicians: an Interventional Study. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1213-1221. [PMID: 28573517 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1233-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines are the gold standard in hereditary cancer risk assessment, screening, and treatment. A minority of physicians follow NCCN guidelines for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This study assesses the impact of an interventional educational program on HBOC in terms of knowledge. Physicians were sent an invite to join either an intervention survey (web-training offered prior to the knowledge survey) or control survey (web-training offered after the knowledge survey). Sixty-nine physicians in the intervention arm and 67 physicians in the control arm completed the survey. The interventional group regularly answered items correctly at a higher frequency than the control group. For example, 64.71% (n = 44) of physicians in the intervention group knew that multi-gene testing does not have to include only highly penetrant genes compared to 32.84% (n = 22) of the control group (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen with other specific survey items. The current study is important in that it shows web-based education to be a feasible and effective modality for training on hereditary breast cancer. This type of education may be incorporated into CME programs and can be used as a foundation for further studies as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhuma Krishnamachari
- Department of Clinical Specialties, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, 20 Riland PO Box 8000, Northern Boulevard, Old Westbury, NY, 11568, USA.
| | - Mahin Rehman
- Academic Medicine Scholars Program, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA
| | - Jason E Cohn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vivian Chan
- Academic Medicine Scholars Program, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA
| | - Neil Modi
- Division of Research, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - William Blazey
- Department of Family Medicine, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA
| | - Sharon Koehler
- Department of Clinical Specialties, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, 20 Riland PO Box 8000, Northern Boulevard, Old Westbury, NY, 11568, USA
| | - David Tegay
- Department of Clinical Specialties, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, 20 Riland PO Box 8000, Northern Boulevard, Old Westbury, NY, 11568, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, Ikechebelu JI, Ugwu EO, Okonkwo OO. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8:CD012464. [PMID: 30141832 PMCID: PMC6513554 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012464.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of deleterious mutations in breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) or breast cancer 2 gene (BRCA2) significantly increases the risk of developing some cancers, such as breast and high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) of ovarian, tubal and peritoneal origin. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is usually recommended to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers after completion of childbearing. Despite prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the role of RRSO in reducing the mortality and incidence of breast, HGSC and other cancers, RRSO is still an area of debate and it is unclear whether RRSO differs in effectiveness by type of mutation carried. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of RRSO in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 7) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid and trial registries, with no language restrictions up to July 2017. We handsearched abstracts of scientific meetings and other relevant publications. SELECTION CRITERIA We included non-randomised trials (NRS), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series that used statistical adjustment for baseline case mix using multivariable analyses comparing RRSO versus no RRSO in women without a previous or coexisting breast, ovarian or fallopian tube malignancy, in women with or without hysterectomy, and in women with a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) before, with or after RRSO. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To assess bias in the studies, we used the ROBINS-I 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. We quantified inconsistency between studies by estimating the I2 statistic. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled effect estimates. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 cohort studies, comprising 8087 participants (2936 (36%) surgical participants and 5151 (64%) control participants who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. All the studies compared RRSO with or without RRM versus no RRSO (surveillance). The certainty of evidence by GRADE assessment was very low due to serious risk of bias. Nine studies, including 7927 women, were included in the meta-analyses. The median follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 27.4 years. MAIN OUTCOMES overall survival was longer with RRSO compared with no RRSO (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.54; P < 0.001; 3 studies, 2548 women; very low-certainty evidence). HGSC cancer mortality (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.17; I² = 69%; P < 0.0001; 3 studies, 2534 women; very low-certainty evidence) and breast cancer mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.88; I² = 65%; P = 0.009; 7 studies, 7198 women; very low-certainty evidence) were lower with RRSO compared with no RRSO. None of the studies reported bone fracture incidence. There was a difference in favour of RRSO compared with no RRSO in terms of ovarian cancer risk perception quality of life (MD 15.40, 95% CI 8.76 to 22.04; P < 0.00001; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported adverse events.Subgroup analyses for main outcomes: meta-analysis showed an increase in overall survival among women who had RRSO versus women without RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52; P < 0001; I² = 23%; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; P = 0.01; I² = 0%; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). The meta-analysis showed a decrease in HGSC cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.41; I² = 54%; P = 0.001; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but uncertain for BRCA2 mutation carriers due to low frequency of HGSC cancer deaths in BRCA2 mutation carriers. There was a decrease in breast cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but not for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). One study showed a difference in favour of RRSO versus no RRSO in improving quality of life for ovarian cancer risk perception in women who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (MD 10.70, 95% CI 2.45 to 18.95; P = 0.01; 98 women; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (MD 13.00, 95% CI 3.59 to 22.41; P = 0.007; very low-certainty evidence). Data from one study showed a difference in favour of RRSO and RRM versus no RRSO in increasing overall survival (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.98; P = 0.0001; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence), but no difference for breast cancer mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.19; P = 0.25; very low-certainty evidence). The risk estimates for breast cancer mortality according to age at RRSO (50 years of age or less versus more than 50 years) was not protective and did not differ for BRCA1 (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.11; I² = 16%; P = 0.23; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low-certainty evidence that RRSO may increase overall survival and lower HGSC and breast cancer mortality for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that RRSO reduces the risk of death from HGSC and breast cancer in women with BRCA1 mutations. Evidence for the effect of RRSO on HGSC and breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers was very uncertain due to low numbers. These results should be interpreted with caution due to questionable study designs, risk of bias profiles, and very low-certainty evidence. We cannot draw any conclusions regarding bone fracture incidence, quality of life, or severe adverse events for RRSO, or for effects of RRSO based on type and age at risk-reducing surgery. Further research on these outcomes is warranted to explore differential effects for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George U Eleje
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi CampusEffective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyPMB 5001, NnewiNigeria
| | - Ahizechukwu C Eke
- Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics600 N Wolfe StreetPhipps 228BaltimoreUSA21287‐1228
| | - Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu
- Faculty of Clinical medicine, College of Medicine, Anambra State University AmakuDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyAwkaNigeria
| | - Joseph I Ikechebelu
- Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching HospitalDepartment of Obstetrics/GynaecologyNnewiNigeria
| | - Emmanuel O Ugwu
- University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituko‐OzallaObstetrics and GynaecologyEnuguNigeria400001
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cox DM. Response to "A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations". J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1312-1313. [PMID: 30032367 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Devin M Cox
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, 2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway MS 5012, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mathieu KB, Bedi DG, Thrower SL, Qayyum A, Bast RC. Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2018; 51. [PMID: 28639753 PMCID: PMC5788737 DOI: 10.1002/uog.17557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) recently reported a reduction in the average overall mortality among ovarian cancer patients screened with an annual sequential, multimodal strategy that tracked biomarker CA125 over time, where increasing serum CA125 levels prompted ultrasound. However, multiple cases were documented wherein serum CA125 levels were rising, but ultrasound screens were normal, thus delaying surgical intervention. A significant factor which could contribute to false negatives is that many aggressive ovarian cancers are believed to arise from epithelial cells on the fimbriae of the fallopian tubes, which are not readily imaged. Moreover, because only a fraction of metastatic tumors may reach a sonographically-detectable size before they metastasize, annual screening with ultrasound may fail to detect a large fraction of early-stage ovarian cancers. The ability to detect ovarian carcinomas before they metastasize is critical and future efforts towards improving screening should focus on identifying unique features specific to aggressive, early-stage tumors, as well as improving imaging sensitivity to allow for detection of tubal lesions. Implementation of a three-stage multimodal screening strategy in which a third modality is employed in cases where the first-line blood-based assay is positive and the second-line ultrasound exam is negative may also prove fruitful in detecting early-stage cases missed by ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Mathieu
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Road, Unit 1902, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - D G Bedi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S L Thrower
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Road, Unit 1902, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - A Qayyum
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bhatt A, Seshadri RA. Rare Indications for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. MANAGEMENT OF PERITONEAL METASTASES- CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY, HIPEC AND BEYOND 2018:369-432. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7053-2_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
|
23
|
Peritoneal cancer arising after total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for cervical cancer in a patient with right breast cancer and germline mutation of BRCA1 gene: a case report and literature review. Breast Cancer 2017; 25:243-249. [PMID: 29094253 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-017-0813-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Primary peritoneal carcinoma is usually advanced at diagnosis and curability is low unless the patient has a small tumor burden. Peritoneal carcinoma can occur in association with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, which is thought to account for 5-6% of all breast cancer. Mutations of two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are responsible for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Women with BRCA1/2 mutations often undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to prevent both ovarian and breast cancer. However, peritoneal carcinoma has been reported to develop after RRSO in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. We experienced a patient with peritoneal carcinoma and inguinal lymph node metastasis after surgical resection of breast cancer and subsequent RRSO. This report describes the first case of peritoneal carcinoma arising after RRSO in a Japanese patient with BRCA1 mutation, including a review of the literature on peritoneal carcinoma associated with BRCA1/2 mutation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Allain DC, Sweet K, Agnese DM. Management Options after Prophylactic Surgeries in Women with BRCA Mutations: A Review. Cancer Control 2017; 14:330-7. [PMID: 17914333 DOI: 10.1177/107327480701400403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although breast cancer is relatively common, only about 5% of cases are due to inheritance of highly penetrant cancer susceptibility genes. The majority of these are caused by mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are also associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Increased surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgeries are standard options for the effective medical management of mutation carriers. However, optimal management of female carriers who choose to undergo prophylactic surgeries is still poorly understood. Methods The authors provide an overview of the current literature regarding medical management options for women carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and the implications for those individuals who have chosen to undergo prophylactic surgeries. Results BRCA mutation carriers who opt for prophylactic surgeries are still at risk for development of malignancy, and appropriate monitoring is warranted. Conclusions There are limited data on the appropriate medical management for BRCA mutation carriers after prophylactic surgeries. However, a management plan can be extrapolated from the general management recommendations for surveillance and other risk-reducing strategies in BRCA-positive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn C Allain
- Clinical Cancer and Human Cancer Genetics Programs and Department of Internal Medicine, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Madore WJ, De Montigny E, Deschênes A, Benboujja F, Leduc M, Mes-Masson AM, Provencher DM, Rahimi K, Boudoux C, Godbout N. Morphologic three-dimensional scanning of fallopian tubes to assist ovarian cancer diagnosis. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2017; 22:76012. [PMID: 28727868 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.7.076012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The majority of high-grade serous ovarian cancers is now believed to originate in the fallopian tubes. Therefore, current practices include the pathological examination of excised fallopian tubes. Detection of tumors in the fallopian tubes using current clinical approaches remains difficult but is of critical importance to achieve accurate staging and diagnosis. Here, we present an intraoperative imaging system for the detection of human fallopian tube lesions. The system is based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) to access subepithelial tissue architecture. To demonstrate that OCT could identify lesions, we analyzed 180 OCT volumes taken from five different ovarian lesions and from healthy fallopian tubes, and compared them to standard pathological review. We demonstrated that qualitative features could be matched to pathological conditions. We then determined the feasibility of intraluminal imaging of intact human fallopian tubes by building a dedicated endoscopic single-fiber OCT probe to access the mucosal layer inside freshly excised specimens from five patients undergoing prophylactic surgeries. The probe insertion into the lumen acquired images over the entire length of the tubes without damaging the mucosa, providing the first OCT images of intact human fallopian tubes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy-Julie Madore
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, CanadabCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université (CRCHUM), Cancer and Imaging and Engineering Departments, Montreal, CanadacInstitut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Etienne De Montigny
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, CanadabCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université (CRCHUM), Cancer and Imaging and Engineering Departments, Montreal, Canada
| | - Andréanne Deschênes
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, Canada
| | - Fouzi Benboujja
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mikaël Leduc
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université (CRCHUM), Cancer and Imaging and Engineering Departments, Montreal, CanadacInstitut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, CanadadUniversité de Montréal, Department of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université (CRCHUM), Cancer and Imaging and Engineering Departments, Montreal, CanadacInstitut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, CanadaeUniversité de Montréal, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kurosh Rahimi
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université (CRCHUM), Cancer and Imaging and Engineering Departments, Montreal, CanadacInstitut du cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Caroline Boudoux
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, Canada
| | - Nicolas Godbout
- École Polytechnique Montréal, Centre d'Optique, Photonique et Lasers (COPL), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Salvador S, Scott S, Francis JA, Agrawal A, Giede C. N o 344-Salpingectomie opportuniste et autres méthodes pour réduire le risque de cancer de l'ovaire, de la trompe de Fallope et du péritoine dans la population générale. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 39:494-508. [PMID: 28527614 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.03.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIF La présente directive clinique examine les avantages potentiels de la salpingectomie opportuniste pour prévenir le développement du cancer séreux de grade élevé de l'ovaire, de la trompe de Fallope et du péritoine à la lumière de données probantes actuelles selon lesquelles ce type de cancer prendrait naissance dans la trompe de Fallope. UTILISATEURS CIBLES Gynécologues, obstétriciens, médecins de famille, infirmières autorisées, infirmières praticiennes, résidents et fournisseurs de soins de santé. POPULATION CIBLE Femmes adultes (18 ans et plus) : OPTIONS: Les femmes envisageant une hystérectomie et souhaitant conserver leurs ovaires conservent généralement aussi leurs trompes de Fallope. De plus, celles qui subissent une chirurgie de stérilisation permanente subissent habituellement aussi une ligature des trompes selon des méthodes variées plutôt qu'un retrait chirurgical complet des trompes. RéSULTATS: Les sections « Données probantes appuyant l'hypothèse selon laquelle les CSGE prendraient naissance dans la trompe de Fallope » et « Articles récents sur les répercussions et la sûreté de la salpingectomie opportuniste » reposent sur des études pertinentes rédigées en anglais, qui ont été repérées dans PubMed, Medline et la Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews à l'aide des termes suivants, seuls ou combinés : high grade serous cancers ovary, fallopian tube, peritoneum, opportunistic salpingectomy, epithelial ovarian cancers, origin, tubal carcinoma in situ, BRCA mutation, prophylactic salpingectomy, inflammation, clear cell et endometrioid. La recherche initiale a été menée en mars 2015, et une dernière recherche a été effectuée en mars 2016. Dans l'ordre, les données probantes pertinentes ont été tirées de méta-analyses, de revues de la littérature, de directives, d'essais cliniques randomisés, d'études de cohorte prospectives, d'études d'observation, de revues non systématiques, d'études de série de cas ainsi que de rapports. Au total, 458 études ont été repérées, et 56 ont été retenues pour la présente directive. Pour la section « Autres facteurs influant sur le risque de développer un cancer de ″l'ovaire″ », une recherche générale a été effectuée dans Medline à partir des termes ovarian neoplasm et prevention. Ont été inclus dans cette recherche des articles rédigés entre décembre 2005 et mars 2016. Les méta-analyses ont été privilégiées lorsque possible. Des recherches supplémentaires ont également été menées pour chaque sous-descripteurs (p. ex., ovarian neoplasm et tubal ligation). D'autres articles pertinents ont été ciblés au moyen d'une vérification des références des revues de la littérature retenues. Les termes ovarian neoplasm et prevention ont permis de repérer 10 méta-analyses; les termes ovarian neoplasm et tubal ligation, 4 méta-analyses. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Le contenu et les recommandations ont été rédigés et acceptés par les auteurs principaux. La direction et le conseil de la Société de gynéco-oncologie du Canada ont examiné le contenu et soumis des commentaires, puis le Conseil d'administration de la SOGC a approuvé la version finale avant publication. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée à partir des critères de l'approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (tableau 1). L'interprétation des recommandations solides et conditionnelles est décrite dans le tableau 2. Le résumé des conclusions peut être fourni sur demande. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS ET COûTS: L'ajout d'une salpingectomie opportuniste à une hystérectomie ou à une procédure de stérilisation permanente prévue n'a pas entraîné une augmentation des taux de réadmission à l'hôpital (RC : 0,91; IC à 95 % : 0,75-1, 10 et RC : 0,8; IC à 95 % : 0,56-1,21, respectivement) ou de transfusion sanguine (RC : 0,86; IC à 95 % : 0,67-1,10 et RC : 0,75; IC à 95 % : 0,32-1,73, respectivement), mais il a entraîné une hausse de la durée des opérations (de 16 minutes et de 10 minutes, respectivement) selon une étude rétrospective portant sur 43 931 femmes. Le risque de subir des interventions répétées pour une pathologie tubaire chez les femmes ayant conservé leurs trompes de Fallope après une hystérectomie était au moins deux fois plus élevé (RC : 2,13; IC à 95 % : 1,88-2,42, selon une étude fondée sur une population de 170 000 femmes). Selon des experts, si les gynécologues généralistes envisageaient systématiquement de retirer les trompes de Fallope lors d'une hystérectomie ou d'une procédure de stérilisation et d'aiguiller toutes les patientes aux prises avec un CSGE vers une consultation en oncologie génétique et un dépistage génétique, le taux de CSGE pourrait diminuer de 40 % au cours des 20 prochaines années. MISE à JOUR DE DIRECTIVES CLINIQUES: Une revue des données probantes sera menée cinq ans après la publication de la présente directive clinique afin de déterminer si une mise à jour complète ou partielle s'impose. Cependant, si de nouvelles données probantes importantes sont publiées avant la fin du cycle de cinq ans, le processus pourrait être accéléré afin que certaines recommandations soient mises à jour rapidement. PARRAINS La présente directive clinique a été élaborée à l'aide de ressources financées par la Société de gynéco-oncologie du Canada et la SOGC. DéCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.
Collapse
|
27
|
Shimizu H, Ishikawa T, Iitsuka C, Homma M, Takimoto M, Sekizawa A. Early-onset primary peritoneal carcinoma from atypical cells after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA2 mutation carrier: a case report. Int Cancer Conf J 2017; 6:104-108. [PMID: 31149481 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-017-0287-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA mutation carriers is performed to reduce carcinogenesis. It decreases the ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer risk to 3.5-4.3% and breast cancer risk to 30-40%. According to a previous study, despite RRSO, 3.4% of patients develop breast cancer and 0.8% develop peritoneal cancer. However, the long-term risk of recurrence and appropriate treatment for patients with unsuspected neoplasia after RRSO are unclear. Case: A 61-year-old woman who had a BRCA2 mutation underwent RRSO. Her pelvic washing cytology showed atypical cells, and similar atypical cells were identified on her fimbria. She underwent strict surveillance. Elevated CA125 levels and increased ascites in the pelvic cavity were detected by routine surveillance at 18 months after RRSO. She underwent staging laparotomy and was diagnosed with primary peritoneal carcinoma stage IIIC. It is helpful to perform surveillance by transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 analyses in cases that require strict management. The appropriate intervention should be considered for cases in which atypical cells or non-invasive carcinoma are detected after RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanako Shimizu
- 1Department of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045 Japan.,2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ishikawa
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Iitsuka
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayumi Homma
- 3Department of Pathology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Takimoto
- 3Department of Pathology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Sekizawa
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
HE4 Serum Levels in Patients with BRCA1 Gene Mutation Undergoing Prophylactic Surgery as well as in Other Benign and Malignant Gynecological Diseases. DISEASE MARKERS 2017; 2017:9792756. [PMID: 28182133 PMCID: PMC5274692 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9792756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective. We assess the behavior of serum concentrations of HE4 marker in female carriers of BRCA1 and assess the diagnostic usefulness of HE4 in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Methods. A total of 619 women with BRCA1 gene mutation, ovarian, endometrial, metastatic, other gynecological cancers, or benign gynecological diseases were included. Intergroup comparative analyses were carried out, the BRCA1 gene carriers subgroup was subjected to detailed analysis, and ROC curves were determined for the assessment of diagnostic usefulness of HE4 in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Results. Statistically lower serum HE4 and CA 125 levels were observed in BRCA1 gene mutation premenopausal carriers. Occult ovarian/fallopian tube cancer was found 3.6%. Each of those patients was characterized by slightly elevated levels of either CA 125 (63.9 and 39.4 U/mL) or HE4 (79 pmol/L). The ROC-AUC curves were 0.892 and 0.894 for diagnostic usefulness of ovarian cancer and 0.865 for differentiation of endometrial cancer from endometrial polyps. Conclusions. Patients with BRCA1 gene mutations have relatively low serum HE4 levels. Even the slightest elevation in HE4 or CA 125 levels in female BRCA1 carriers undergoing prophylactic surgery should significantly increase oncological alertness. The HE4 marker is valuable in ovarian and uterine cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, Ikechebelu JI, Ugwu EO, Okonkwo OO. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- George U Eleje
- Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus; Effective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; PMB 5001, Nnewi Anambra State Nigeria
| | - Ahizechukwu C Eke
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 600 N Wolfe Street Phipps 228 Baltimore, MD Maryland USA 21287-1228
| | - Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu
- Faculty of Clinical medicine, College of Medicine, Anambra State University Amaku; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Awka Nigeria
| | - Joseph I Ikechebelu
- Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital; Department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology; Nnewi Nigeria
| | - Emmanuel O Ugwu
- University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituko-Ozalla; Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Enugu Nigeria 400001
| | - Onyinye O Okonkwo
- Tabitha Medical Centre; Department of Pathology; Abuja Nigeria 400001
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chudecka-Głaz A, Cymbaluk-Płoska A, Luterek-Puszyńska K, Menkiszak J. Diagnostic usefulness of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for HE4 and the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay for CA125. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:3101-3114. [PMID: 27899969 PMCID: PMC5103905 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in the preoperative stratification of patients with ovarian tumors using a novel combination of laboratory tests. The study group (n=619) consisted of 354 premenopausal and 265 postmenopausal patients. The levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) were determined, and ROMA calculations were performed for each pre- and postmenopausal patient. HE4 levels were determined using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, while CA125 levels were determined by a chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay. A contingency table was applied to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Receiver operating characteristic curves were also constructed, and areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared between the marker determinations and ROMA algorithms. In terms of distinguishing between ovarian cancer and benign disease, the sensitivity of ROMA was 88.3%, specificity was 88.2%, PPV was 75.3% and NPV was 94.9% among all patients. The respective parameters were 71.1, 90.1, 48.2 and 91.1% in premenopausal patients and 93.6, 82.9, 86.6 and 91.6% in postmenopausal patients. The AUC value for the ROMA algorithm was 0.926 for the ovarian cancer vs. benign groups in all patients, 0.813 in premenopausal patients and 0.939 in postmenopausal patients. The respective AUC values were 0.911, 0.879 and 0.934 for CA125; and 0.879, 0.783 and 0.889 for HE4. In this combination, the ROMA algorithm is characterized by an extremely high sensitivity of prediction of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic masses, and may constitute a precise tool with which to support the qualification of patients to appropriate surgical procedures. The ROMA may be useful in diagnosing ovarian endometrial changes in young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Luterek-Puszyńska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
George SHL, Garcia R, Slomovitz BM. Ovarian Cancer: The Fallopian Tube as the Site of Origin and Opportunities for Prevention. Front Oncol 2016; 6:108. [PMID: 27200296 PMCID: PMC4852190 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and aggressive histotype of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and it is the predominant histotype associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for most of the known causes of HBOC, while mutations in mismatch repair genes and several genes of moderate penetrance are responsible for the remaining known hereditary risk. Women with a history of familial ovarian cancer or with known germline mutations in highly penetrant genes are offered the option of risk-reducing surgery that involves the removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes (salpingo-oophorectomy). Growing evidence now supports the fallopian tube epithelia as an etiological site for the development of HGSC and consequently, salpingectomy alone is emerging as a prophylactic option. This review discusses the site of origin of EOC, the rationale for risk-reducing salpingectomy in the high-risk population, and opportunities for salpingectomy in the low-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H L George
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ruslan Garcia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, FL , USA
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Menkiszak J, Chudecka-Głaz A, Gronwald J, Cymbaluk-Płoska A, Celewicz A, Świniarska M, Wężowska M, Bedner R, Zielińska D, Tarnowska P, Jakubowicz J, Kojs Z. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers and postoperative incidence of peritoneal and breast cancers. J Ovarian Res 2016; 9:11. [PMID: 26928677 PMCID: PMC4772302 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0220-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are no effective methods of diagnosis of early-stage ovarian cancer. Conservative care over patients at high risk of ovarian and breast cancers is ineffective. Prophylactic surgery is considered the best prophylaxis among BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers. Methods One hundred ninety-five patients, carriers of one of three most common mutations of the BRCA1 gene (Am J Hum Genet: 66: (6)1963-1968, 2000) in the Polish population (5382insC, 4153delA and C61G), who undergone prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. The study group consisted of consecutive mutation carriers living in Poland, in the West Pomeranian province. Histopathological examination of the surgical material failed to reveal presence of malignancy. Results During follow-up we diagnosed two peritoneal cancers and 14 breast cancers. Diagnosis of breast cancer before prophylactic surgery increased the risk of peritoneal cancer almost three times. Time from diagnosis of breast cancer to prophylactic surgery increased the risk of peritoneal cancer after prophylactic surgery. This was strongly expressed (HR = 5.0; p = 0.030) in cases of over five-year-long delay in prophylactic surgery. Diagnosis of breast cancer before prophylactic surgery correlated with the risk of death (p = 0.00010). Presence of 5382insC mutation decreased and C61G mutation increased the risk of peritoneal cancer (p = 0.049 vs. p = 0.013). Conclusions Occurrence of primary peritoneal cancer after prophylactic surgery is similar to that reported in international literature. Primary breast cancer occurred less often than in international literature. We suspect that the risk of development of breast cancer among BRCA1 carriers undergoing prophylactic surgery can differ in a population. The next goal should be to study the molecular basis for the risk of development of malignancies in any population. Carriers of BRCA1 gene diagnosed with breast cancer should undergo prophylactic surgery within five years from the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology; International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Aleksander Celewicz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Maria Świniarska
- Department of the Clinical Oncology the West Pomeranian Centre of the Oncology in Szczecin, ul. Strzałowska 22, 71-730, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Małgorzata Wężowska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Ryszard Bedner
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Dorota Zielińska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Paulina Tarnowska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, SPSK-2, 70-111 Szczecin Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, Szczecin, Poland.
| | - Jerzy Jakubowicz
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute Cracow Branch, Garncarska 11, 31-115, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Zbigniew Kojs
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow Branch, Garncarska 11, 31-115, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prophylactic salpingectomy and prophylactic salpingoophorectomy for adnexal high-grade serous epithelial carcinoma: A reappraisal. Surg Oncol 2015; 24:335-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 09/27/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
Outcomes and Cost Analysis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction and Gynecologic Procedures. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75:534-8. [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
35
|
Krishnan V, Clark R, Chekmareva M, Johnson A, George S, Shaw P, Seewaldt V, Rinker-Schaeffer C. In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose. J Vis Exp 2015:e52721. [PMID: 26555178 DOI: 10.3791/52721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), the cause of widespread peritoneal metastases, continues to have an extremely poor prognosis; fewer than 30% of women are alive 5 years after diagnosis. The omentum is a preferred site of HGSC metastasis formation. Despite the clinical importance of this microenvironment, the contribution of omental adipose tissue to ovarian cancer progression remains understudied. Omental adipose is unusual in that it contains structures known as milky spots, which are comprised of B, T, and NK cells, macrophages, and progenitor cells surrounding dense nests of vasculature. Milky spots play a key role in the physiologic functions of the omentum, which are required for peritoneal homeostasis. We have shown that milky spots also promote ovarian cancer metastatic colonization of peritoneal adipose, a key step in the development of peritoneal metastases. Here we describe the approaches we developed to evaluate and quantify milky spots in peritoneal adipose and study their functional contribution to ovarian cancer cell metastatic colonization of omental tissues both in vivo and ex vivo. These approaches are generalizable to additional mouse models and cell lines, thus enabling the study of ovarian cancer metastasis formation from initial localization of cells to milky spot structures to the development of widespread peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert Clark
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago
| | | | - Amy Johnson
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago
| | - Sophia George
- Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network
| | - Patricia Shaw
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, University Health Network
| | - Victoria Seewaldt
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, University Health Network; Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and early invasive serous carcinoma in the nonprophylactic setting: analysis of a case series. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39:442-53. [PMID: 25517955 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A precursor for invasive ovarian/pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma, termed serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), has been identified and characterized through careful analysis of the fallopian tubes in both prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy specimens obtained from women with either a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer or germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in cases of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma. Data on incidental STICs and clinically occult microscopic invasive high-grade serous carcinomas are limited. We analyzed the clinicopathologic features of 22 cases, including 15 pure STICs and 7 STICs associated with microscopic invasive high-grade serous carcinomas, identified incidentally in fallopian tubes removed for nonprophylactic indications. Patient age ranged from 39 to 79 years (mean: 62.7; median: 61), with only 1 patient under the age of 50. No patients were known to carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Of the 12 pure STICs for which the location in the fallopian tube could be established, 9 were in the fimbriated portion, 1 was at the junction of the fimbria and infundibulum, and 2 were in the nonfimbriated tube. Of the 7 STICs with associated invasive high-grade serous carcinoma, 3 were located in the fimbriated portion, 2 were at the junction of the fimbria and infundibulum, and 2 were in the nonfimbriated tube. The invasive components were in the fallopian tube in 6 cases, 4 in subepithelial stroma of tubal mucosa, and 2 as an intramucosal (exophytic) luminal lesion without invasion of underlying subepithelial stroma (size range: 1 to 4 mm). The remaining case had a microscopic focus of high-grade serous carcinoma within the ipsilateral ovary (1.3 mm cortical focus) identified only on deeper sections, without an associated invasive component in the fallopian tube. The preferential finding of atypical epithelium with the cytologic features of high-grade serous carcinoma, namely STIC, in the fallopian tubes rather than the ovaries as an incidental (clinically occult) microscopic lesion in the absence of widespread pelvic carcinoma provides further evidence that STIC is the earliest form of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma and that the fallopian tube is the site of origin. This study demonstrates the potential for complete examination of the fallopian tubes and ovaries to identify STICs and early invasive serous carcinomas that might be more amenable to the earliest intervention and potential cure.
Collapse
|
37
|
Sherman ME, Piedmonte M, Mai PL, Ioffe OB, Ronnett BM, Van Le L, Ivanov I, Bell MC, Blank SV, DiSilvestro P, Hamilton CA, Tewari KS, Wakeley K, Kauff ND, Yamada SD, Rodriguez G, Skates SJ, Alberts DS, Walker JL, Minasian L, Lu K, Greene MH. Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3275-83. [PMID: 25199754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.1987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) lowers mortality from ovarian/tubal and breast cancers among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Uncertainties persist regarding potential benefits of RRSO among high-risk noncarriers, optimal surgical age, and anatomic origin of clinically occult cancers detected at surgery. To address these topics, we analyzed surgical treatment arm results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol-0199 (GOG-0199), the National Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS This analysis included asymptomatic high-risk women age ≥ 30 years who elected RRSO at enrollment. Women provided risk factor data and underwent preoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) serum testing and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU). RRSO specimens were processed according to a standardized tissue processing protocol and underwent central pathology panel review. Research-based BRCA1/2 mutation testing was performed when a participant's mutation status was unknown at enrollment. Relationships between participant characteristics and diagnostic findings were assessed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Invasive or intraepithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal neoplasms were detected in 25 (2.6%) of 966 RRSOs (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 4.6%; BRCA2 carriers, 3.5%; and noncarriers, 0.5%; P < .001). In multivariable models, positive BRCA1/2 mutation status (P = .0056), postmenopausal status (P = .0023), and abnormal CA-125 levels and/or TVU examinations (P < .001) were associated with detection of clinically occult neoplasms at RRSO. For 387 women with negative BRCA1/2 mutation testing and normal CA-125 levels, findings at RRSO were benign. CONCLUSION Clinically occult cancer was detected among 2.6% of high-risk women undergoing RRSO. BRCA1/2 mutation, postmenopausal status, and abnormal preoperative CA-125 and/or TVU were associated with cancer detection at RRSO. These data can inform management decisions among women at high risk of ovarian/tubal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olga B Ioffe
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda Van Le
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Iouri Ivanov
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria C Bell
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul DiSilvestro
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katie Wakeley
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Noah D Kauff
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Diane Yamada
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo Rodriguez
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Skates
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S Alberts
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joan L Walker
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lori Minasian
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Lu
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mark H Greene
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
BRCA-associated ovarian cancer: from molecular genetics to risk management. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:787143. [PMID: 25136623 PMCID: PMC4129974 DOI: 10.1155/2014/787143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) mostly arises sporadically, but a fraction of cases are associated with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The presence of a BRCA mutation in OC patients has been suggested as a prognostic and predictive factor. In addition, the identification of asymptomatic carriers of such mutations offers an unprecedented opportunity for OC prevention.
This review is aimed at exploring the current knowledge on epidemiological and molecular aspects of BRCA-associated OC predisposition, on pathology and clinical behavior of OC occurring in BRCA mutation carriers, and on the available options for managing asymptomatic carriers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen Y, Bancroft E, Ashley S, Arden-Jones A, Thomas S, Shanley S, Saya S, Wakeling E, Eeles R. Baseline and post prophylactic tubal-ovarian surgery CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2014; 13:197-203. [PMID: 24389956 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9697-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have different baseline CA125 levels compared with non-carriers, and whether a significant difference in pre- and post-operative CA125 levels exists in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). The study also considered whether CA125 measurements should continue in unaffected BRCA mutation carriers after RRBSO. 383 Eligible women were identified through retrospective review of the BRCA Carrier Clinic at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. These women all had CA125 levels measured as they were either a carrier or at risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Of these, 76 went on to have a negative predictive test for their familial mutation and so are classed as 'non-carriers'. 133 BRCA1 and 87 BRCA2 carriers had RRBSO, with a further 26 BRCA1 carriers, 28 BRCA2 carriers and one non-carrier developing ovarian cancer. The remaining 21 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 carriers did not have RRBSO or develop ovarian cancer in the time of study follow-up. CA125 levels were measured as surveillance or as part of pre-RRBSO care. CA125 measurement post-RRBSO was continued in 48 BRCA1 and 40 BRCA2 carriers. In 154 BRCA1 mutation carriers, the median baseline (i.e. before RRBSO and with no clinical signs of ovarian cancer) CA125 level was 9.0 U/ml (range 2-78) and was 10.0 U/ml (range 1-43) in 115 BRCA2 mutation carriers. When compared with the 75 non-carriers (median baseline CA125 10.0 U/ml; range 2-52), there was no significant difference between the BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-carrier groups. There was a significant reduction in CA125 from pre- to post-RRBSO in 48 BRCA1 carriers (p = 0.04) but no significant difference in 40 BRCA2 mutation carriers (p = 0.5). Out of a total of 220 mutation carriers who underwent RRBSO, two had an incidental ovarian cancer found on histopathology and another developed primary peritoneal cancer during the follow-up period. Our study is the first to compare initial serum CA125 levels in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with those of non-carriers. Our study found no significant difference between the three groups. A drop in CA125 levels after RRBSO in BRCA1 carriers supports the finding of earlier studies, but differed in that the fall was not seen in BRCA2 carriers. The finding of only one case of post-operative peritoneal cancer in 220 carriers undergoing RRBSO supports the discontinuation of post-RRBSO serum CA125 monitoring in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- North-West Thames Regional Genetics Service (Kennedy-Galton Centre), Level 8V, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Rd, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dubeau L, Drapkin R. Coming into focus: the nonovarian origins of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 24 Suppl 8:viii28-viii35. [PMID: 24131966 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional view of epithelial ovarian cancer asserts that all tumor subtypes share a common origin in the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) DESIGN: A literature review was carried out to summarize the emerging understanding of extraovarian sources of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. RESULTS Historically, there were no diagnostic criteria for documenting the origin of ovarian epithelial carcinomas. Moreover, there are no normal epithelial tissues in the ovary with morphologic similarities to these tumors. In fact, no precursor lesions have ever been reproducibly identified in the ovary. However, there is a strong correlation between extrauterine Müllerian tissue and the development of ovarian carcinomas, tumors of low malignant potential, and cystadenomas. The most recent support for this hypothesis comes from the careful analysis of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy specimens from BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. These studies showed that a significant majority of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, the most common subtype, arise from the fallopian tube fimbriae rather than the OSE. CONCLUSIONS Mounting evidence indicates that the vast majority of epithelial ovarian carcinomas are not ovarian in origin. Extrauterine Müllerian epithelium from various sites in the reproductive tract likely accounts for the diverse morphology and behavior of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dubeau
- Department of Pathology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gadducci A, Sergiampietri C, Tana R. Alternatives to risk-reducing surgery for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 24 Suppl 8:viii47-viii53. [PMID: 24131970 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have an 18%-60% and 11%-27% lifetime risk of developing ovarian carcinoma, respectively. Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces the risk of this malignancy by up to 96%. Gynecological screening programs with periodical trans-vaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 assay have been widely used in women at hereditary high risk of ovarian carcinoma, but clinical results have been conflicting. These surveillance protocols have often fallen short of expectations because of the advanced stage of ovarian carcinoma in the identified screened women. Several investigations have been addressed to the detection of additional tumor markers able to generate more reliable screening tools. The combined serum assay of leptin, prolactin, osteopontin, CA125, macrophage inhibiting factor and insulin-like growth factor-II appears to have a significant better diagnostic reliability compared with serum CA125 alone in discriminating healthy individuals from ovarian carcinoma patients, and therefore, it could have a role in the screening of women at high risk for this malignancy. As far as chemoprevention is concerned, oral contraceptives significantly reduce the ovarian carcinoma risk also in BRCA mutation carriers, whereas the efficacy of fenretinide is still under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gadducci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Genomic aberrations of BRCA1-mutated fallopian tube carcinomas. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2014; 184:1871-6. [PMID: 24726640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Intraepithelial carcinomas of the fallopian tube are putative precursors to high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary and peritoneum. Molecular characterization of these early precursors is limited but could be the key to identifying tumor biomarkers for early detection. This study presents a genome-wide copy number analysis of occult fallopian tube carcinomas identified through risk-reducing prophylactic oophorectomy from three women with germline BRCA1 mutations, demonstrating that extensive genomic aberrations are already established at this early stage. We found no indication of a difference in the level of genomic aberration observed in fallopian tube carcinomas compared with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. These findings suggest that spread to the peritoneal cavity may require no or very little further tumor evolution, which raises the question of what is the real window of opportunity to detect high-grade serous peritoneal carcinoma arising from the fallopian tube before it spreads. Nonetheless, the similarity of the genomic aberrations to those observed in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas suggests that genetic biomarkers identified in late-stage disease may be relevant for early detection.
Collapse
|
43
|
Finch APM, Lubinski J, Møller P, Singer CF, Karlan B, Senter L, Rosen B, Maehle L, Ghadirian P, Cybulski C, Huzarski T, Eisen A, Foulkes WD, Kim-Sing C, Ainsworth P, Tung N, Lynch HT, Neuhausen S, Metcalfe KA, Thompson I, Murphy J, Sun P, Narod SA. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1547-53. [PMID: 24567435 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.2820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 491] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to estimate the reduction in risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation after oophorectomy, by age of oophorectomy; to estimate the impact of prophylactic oophorectomy on all-cause mortality; and to estimate 5-year survival associated with clinically detected ovarian, occult, and peritoneal cancers diagnosed in the cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were identified from an international registry; 5,783 women completed a baseline questionnaire and ≥ one follow-up questionnaires. Women were observed until either diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, death, or date of most recent follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer incidence and all-cause mortality associated with oophorectomy were evaluated using time-dependent survival analyses. RESULTS After an average follow-up period of 5.6 years, 186 women developed either ovarian (n = 132), fallopian (n = 22), or peritoneal (n = 32) cancer, of whom 68 have died. HR for ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer associated with bilateral oophorectomy was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.30; P < .001). Among women who had no history of cancer at baseline, HR for all-cause mortality to age 70 years associated with an oophorectomy was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.39; P < .001). CONCLUSION Preventive oophorectomy was associated with an 80% reduction in the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers and a 77% reduction in all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P M Finch
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Pål Møller
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Christian F Singer
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Beth Karlan
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Leigha Senter
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Barry Rosen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Parviz Ghadirian
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - William D Foulkes
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Charmaine Kim-Sing
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Peter Ainsworth
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Nadine Tung
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Henry T Lynch
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Susan Neuhausen
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Kelly A Metcalfe
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Islay Thompson
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Joan Murphy
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Ping Sun
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Steven A Narod
- Amy P.M. Finch, Barry Rosen, Andrea Eisen, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Islay Thompson, Joan Murphy, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, University of Toronto; Barry Rosen and Joan Murphy, Princess Margaret Hospital; Amy P.M. Finch, Islay Thompson, Ping Sun, and Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute; Andrea Eisen, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto; Peter Ainsworth, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario; Parviz Ghadirian, University of Montreal Hospital Centre; William D. Foulkes, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Charmaine Kim-Sing, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Jan Lubinski, Cezary Cybulski, and Tomasz Huzarski, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland; Pål Møller and Lovise Maehle, Norwegian Radium Hospital and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Beth Karlan, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills; Susan Neuhausen, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Leigha Senter, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Nadine Tung, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Henry T. Lynch, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Powell CB. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA mutation carriers: Twenty years later. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 132:261-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
45
|
George SHL, Shaw P. BRCA and Early Events in the Development of Serous Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2014; 4:5. [PMID: 24478985 PMCID: PMC3901362 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 01/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Women who have an inherited mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have a substantial increased lifetime risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and epidemiological factors related to parity, ovulation, and hormone regulation have a dramatic effect on the risk in both BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers. The most common and most aggressive histotype of EOC, high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is also the histotype associated with germline BRCA mutations. In recent years, evidence has emerged indicating that the likely tissue of origin of HGSC is the fallopian tube. We have reviewed, what is known about the fallopian tube in BRCA mutation carriers at both the transcriptional and translational aspect of their biology. We propose that changes of the transcriptome in BRCA heterozygotes reflect an altered response to the ovulatory stresses from the microenvironment, which may include the post-ovulation inflammatory response and altered reproductive hormone physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H. L. George
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Shaw
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
The molecular fingerprint of high grade serous ovarian cancer reflects its fallopian tube origin. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:6571-96. [PMID: 23528888 PMCID: PMC3645655 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14046571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 03/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/19/2013] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), the most lethal and frequent type of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), has poor long term prognosis due to a combination of factors: late detection, great metastatic potential and the capacity to develop resistance to available therapeutic drugs. Furthermore, there has been considerable controversy concerning the etiology of this malignancy. New studies, both clinical and molecular, strongly suggest that HGSC originates not from the surface of the ovary, but from the epithelial layer of the neighboring fallopian tube fimbriae. In this paper we summarize data supporting the central role of fallopian tube epithelium in the development of HGSC. Specifically, we address cellular pathways and regulatory mechanisms which are modulated in the process of transformation, but also genetic changes which accumulate during disease progression. Similarities between fallopian tube mucosa and the malignant tissue of HGSC warrant a closer analysis of homeostatic mechanisms in healthy epithelium in order to elucidate key steps in disease development. Finally, we highlight the importance of the cancer stem cell (CSC) identification and understanding of its niche regulation for improvement of therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
|
47
|
Long term follow up of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with unsuspected neoplasia identified at risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 129:364-71. [PMID: 23391663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2012] [Revised: 01/11/2013] [Accepted: 01/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The reported incidence of neoplasia identified at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers ranges from 4 to 12% but long-term outcomes have not been described. We evaluated recurrence and survival outcomes of mutation carriers with neoplastic lesions identified at RRSO. METHODS We identified BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with neoplasia at RRSO at three institutions. Data was collected on clinical variables, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. RESULTS We identified 32 mutation carriers with invasive carcinomas (n=15) or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n=17) that were not suspected prior to surgery. 26 occurred in BRCA1 and 6 in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Median and mean age for carcinomas were 50 years and 49.3 respectively, significantly younger than for intraepithelial neoplasm, median 53 years, and mean 55 years (p=0.04). For the 15 invasive carcinomas, median follow up was 88 months (range 45-172 months), 7 recurred (47%), median time to recurrence was 32.5 months and 3 have died of disease; 1 additional patient died of breast cancer. Overall survival was 73%, disease specific overall survival was 80% and disease free survival was 66%. For the 17 high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms, median follow up was 80 months (range 40-150), 4 were treated with chemotherapy. One recurred at 43 months and is currently not on therapy with a normal CA125, 16 months later. All patients with noninvasive neoplasia are alive. CONCLUSIONS BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with unsuspected invasive carcinoma at RRSO have a relatively high rate of recurrence despite predominantly early stage, small volume disease. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasms rarely recur as carcinoma and may not require adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
48
|
Mingels MJ, Roelofsen T, van der Laak JA, de Hullu JA, van Ham MA, Massuger LF, Bulten J, Bol M. Tubal epithelial lesions in salpingo-oophorectomy specimens of BRCA-mutation carriers and controls. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127:88-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2012] [Revised: 06/04/2012] [Accepted: 06/08/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
49
|
Li J, Fadare O, Xiang L, Kong B, Zheng W. Ovarian serous carcinoma: recent concepts on its origin and carcinogenesis. J Hematol Oncol 2012; 5:8. [PMID: 22405464 PMCID: PMC3328281 DOI: 10.1186/1756-8722-5-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2012] [Accepted: 03/09/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent morphologic and molecular genetic studies have led to a paradigm shift in our conceptualization of the carcinogenesis and histogenesis of pelvic (non-uterine) serous carcinomas. It appears that both low-grade and high-grade pelvic serous carcinomas that have traditionally been classified as ovarian in origin, actually originate, at least in a significant subset, from the distal fallopian tube. Clonal expansions of the tubal secretory cell probably give rise to serous carcinomas, and the degree of ciliated conversion is a function of the degree to which the genetic hits deregulate normal differentiation. In this article, the authors review the evidentiary basis for aforementioned paradigm shift, as well as its potential clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China 250012
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kiely BE, Friedlander ML, Milne RL, Stanhope L, Russell P, Jenkins MA, Weideman P, McLachlan SA, Grant P, Hopper JL, Phillips KA. Adequacy of risk-reducing gynaecologic surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and other women at high risk of pelvic serous cancer. Fam Cancer 2012; 10:505-14. [PMID: 21424757 PMCID: PMC3175342 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the type of risk-reducing gynaecologic surgery (RRGS) and the extent of pathological evaluation being undertaken for Australasian women at high familial risk of pelvic serous cancer. Surgical and pathology reports were reviewed for women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, or a family history of breast and ovarian cancer, who underwent RRGS between 1998 and 2008. "Adequate" surgery was defined as complete removal of all ovarian and extra-uterine fallopian tube tissue. "Adequate" pathology was defined as paraffin embedding of all removed ovarian and tubal tissue. Predictors of adequacy were assessed using logistic regression. There were 201 women, including 173 mutation carriers, who underwent RRGS. Of these, 91% had adequate surgery and 23% had adequate pathology. Independent predictors of adequate surgery were surgeon type (OR = 20; 95% CI 2-167; P = 0.005 for gynaecologic oncologists versus general gynaecologists), more recent surgery (OR = 1.33/year; 95% CI 1.07-1.67; P = 0.012) and younger patient age (OR = 0.93/year of age; 95% CI 0.87-0.99; P = 0.028). Independent predictors of adequate pathology were more recent surgery (OR = 1.26/year; 95% CI 1.06-1.49; P = 0.008) and surgeon type (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.4-6.7; P = 0.004 for gynaecologic oncologists versus general gynaecologists). Four serous ovarian cancers and one endometrioid endometrial cancer were detected during surgery or pathological examination. In conclusion Australasian women attending a specialist gynaecologic oncologist for RRGS are most likely to have adequate surgery and pathological examination. Additional education of clinicians and consumers is needed to ensure optimal surgery and pathology in these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B E Kiely
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|