Recovery of phospho-ERK activity allows melanoma cells to escape from BRAF inhibitor therapy

Multi-omics analysis delineates resistance mechanisms associated with BRAF inhibition in melanoma cells

Mutant BRAF is a critical oncogenic driver in melanoma, making it an attractive therapeutic target. However, the success of targeted therapy using BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib has been limited due to development of resistance, restricting their clinical efficacy. A prior knowledge of resistance mechanisms to BRAFi or any cancer drug can lead to development of drugs that overcome resistance thus improving clinical outcomes. In vitro cellular models are powerful systems that can be utilized to mimic and study resistance mechanisms. In this study, we employed a multi-omics approach to characterize a panel of BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines to develop and systematically characterize BRAFi persister and resistant cells using exome sequencing, proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Our datasets revealed frequently observed intrinsic and acquired, genetic and non-genetic mechanisms of BRAFi resistance that have been studied in patients who developed resistance. In addition, we identified proteins that can be potentially targeted to overcome BRAFi resistance. Overall, we demonstrate that in vitro systems can be utilized not only to predict resistance mechanisms but also to identify putative therapeutic targets.

Design and synthesis of new 1,2,4-oxadiazole/quinazoline-4-one hybrids with antiproliferative activity as multitargeted inhibitors

Introduction

The combination of BRAF and tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors has been demonstrated to be highly effective in inhibiting tumor development and is an approach for overcoming resistance in clinical trials. Accordingly, a novel series of 1,2,4-oxadiazole/quinazoline-4-one hybrids was developed as antiproliferative multitargeted inhibitors.

Methods

The structures of the newly synthesized compounds 9a-o were validated using IR, NMR, MS, and elemental techniques. 9a-o were tested as antiproliferative agents.

Results and Discussion

The results showed that the majority of the tested compounds showed significant antiproliferative action with 9b, 9c, 9h, 9k, and 9l being the most potent. Compounds 9b, 9c, 9h, 9k, and 9l were tested as EGFR and BRAFV600E inhibitors. These in vitro tests revealed that compounds 9b, 9c, and 9h are strong antiproliferative agents that may act as dual EGFR/BRAFV600E inhibitors. 9b, 9c, and 9h were further investigated for their inhibitory effect on mutant EGFR (EGFRT790M), and the results showed that the tested compounds had considerable inhibitory action. Cell cycle study and apoptosis detection demonstrated that compound 9b exhibits cell cycle arrest at the G2/M transition. Molecular docking simulations reveal the binding mechanism of the most active antiproliferative agents.

Targeting BRAF pathway in low-grade serous ovarian cancer

Mutations in genes encoding for proteins along the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway have been detected in a variety of tumor entities including ovarian carcinomas. In the recent years, several inhibitors of this pathway have been developed, whose antitumor potential is currently being assessed in different clinical trials. Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma, is a rare gynecological tumor which shows favorable overall survival, compared to the general ovarian cancer population, but worrying resistance to conventional chemotherapies. The clinical behavior of low grade serous ovarian carcinoma reflects the different gene profile compared to high-grade serous carcinoma: KRAS/BRAF mutations. BRAF inhibitors as single agents were approved for the treatment of BRAF mutated tumors. Nevertheless, many patients face progressive disease. The understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to BRAF inhibitors therapy and preclinical studies showing that BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors combined therapy delays the onset of resistance compared to BRAF inhibitor single agent, led to the clinical investigation of combined therapy. The aim of this paper is to review the efficacy and safety of the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors on ovarian carcinomas, in particularly focusing on low grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Defining melanoma combination therapies that provide senolytic sensitivity in human melanoma cells

Malignant Melanoma that resists immunotherapy remains the deadliest form of skin cancer owing to poor clinically lasting responses. Alternative like genotoxic or targeted chemotherapy trigger various cancer cell fates after treatment including cell death and senescence. Senescent cells can be eliminated using senolytic drugs and we hypothesize that the targeted elimination of therapy-induced senescent melanoma cells could complement both conventional and immunotherapies. We utilized a panel of cells representing diverse mutational background relevant to melanoma and found that they developed distinct senescent phenotypes in response to treatment. A genotoxic combination therapy of carboplatin-paclitaxel or irradiation triggered a mixed response of cell death and senescence, irrespective of BRAF mutation profiles. DNA damage-induced senescent melanoma cells exhibited morphological changes, residual DNA damage, and increased senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). In contrast, dual targeted inhibition of Braf and Mek triggered a different mixed cell fate response including senescent-like and persister cells. While persister cells could reproliferate, senescent-like cells were stably arrested, but without detectable DNA damage and senescence-associated secretory phenotype. To assess the sensitivity to senolytics we employed a novel real-time imaging-based death assay and observed that Bcl2/Bcl-XL inhibitors and piperlongumine were effective in promoting death of carboplatin-paclitaxel and irradiation-induced senescent melanoma cells, while the mixed persister cells and senescent-like cells resulting from Braf-Mek inhibition remained unresponsive. Interestingly, a direct synergy between Bcl2/Bcl-XL inhibitors and Braf-Mek inhibitors was observed when used out of the context of senescence. Overall, we highlight diverse hallmarks of melanoma senescent states and provide evidence of context-dependent senotherapeutics that could reduce treatment resistance while also discussing the limitations of this strategy in human melanoma cells.

Convenient synthesis and X-ray determination of 2-amino-6H-1,3,4-thiadiazin-3-ium bromides endowed with antiproliferative activity

A new series of 1,3,4-thiadiazin-3-ium bromide derivatives 9a-g were prepared as a six-member ring by interactions between 4-substituted thiosemicarbazides 8a-e and α-halo ketones 2a,b. The reaction was conducted using hydrazine-NH2 and yielded a hexagonal shape. The structures of all obtained compounds have been verified using IR, NMR spectra, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, and X-ray crystallography. The X-ray crystallographic analysis of compounds 9a and 9b has revealed that the salt is formed with the nitrogen atom N3 when the aromatic substituents 9a and 9d are present, but in the case of compounds 9b, 9c, 9e, 9f, and 9g with the aliphatic substituent, the salt is formed outside the ring. Compounds 9a-g were evaluated for antiproliferative activity as multitargeted inhibitors. Results revealed that targets 9a-g displayed good antiproliferative activity, with GI50 ranging from 38 nM to 66 nM against a panel of four cancer cell lines compared to the reference Erlotinib (GI50 = 33 nM). Compounds 9a, 9c, and 9d were the most potent antiproliferative derivatives, with GI50 values of 43, 38, and 47 nM, respectively. Compounds 9a, 9c, and 9d were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against EGFR, BRAFV600E, and VEGFR-2. The in vitro experiments demonstrated that the compounds being examined exhibit potent antiproliferative properties and have the potential to function as multitargeted inhibitors. In addition, the western blotting investigation demonstrated the inhibitory effects of 9c on EGFR, BRAFV600E, and VEGFR-2.

What Is the Timing and Role of Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma?

ABSTRACT

Melanoma is the most lethal cutaneous malignancy worldwide. The last 15 years have ushered in several regulatory approvals that have dramatically altered the landscape of treatment options for patients with melanoma. Many patients with melanoma harbor activating mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene, a key component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) intracellular signaling pathway. Therapies targeting BRAF have led to remarkable improvements in both response rates and survival in patients with metastatic disease. In parallel with these developments in MAPK-targeted therapy has been the clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which also have improved response rates and survival in patients with metastatic disease including randomized trials compared with MAPK-targeted therapy in patients with advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the preferred first-line standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic disease in patients irrespective of BRAF mutational status. Given these developments, it is now less clear how to optimize the use of MAPK-targeted therapy regarding treatment setting and in sequence with immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Cross-Species Comparison of the Pan-RAF Inhibitor LY3009120's Anti-Tumor Effects in Equine, Canine, and Human Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines

Malignant melanomas (MMs) are the abnormal proliferation of melanocytes and are one of the lethal skin cancers in humans, equines, and canines. Accordingly, MMs in companion animals can serve as naturally occurring animal models, completing conventional cancer models. The common constitutive activation of the MAPK and PI3K pathways in MMs has been described in all three species. Targeting the related pathways is considered a potential option in comparative oncologic approaches. Herein, we present a cross-species comparative analysis exposing a set of ten melanoma cell lines (one human, three equine, and six canine) derived from primary tumors or metastasis to a pan-RAF and RAF dimer inhibitor (LY3009120). Cellular response (proliferation, biomass, metabolism, early and late apoptosis/necrosis, and morphology) and the presence of pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within the mutational hotspot genes BRAF exon 11 and 15, NRAS exon 2 and 3, KRAS exon 2, and KIT exon 11 were analyzed. This study showed that equine malignant melanoma (EMM) cells (MelDuWi) harbor the KRAS p.Q61H mutation, while canine malignant melanoma (CMM) cells (cRGO1 and cRGO1.2) carry NRAS p.G13R. Except for EMM metastasis cells eRGO6 (wild type of the above-mentioned hotspot genes), all melanoma cell lines exhibited a decrease in dose dependence after 48 and 72 h of exposure to LY3009120, independent of the mutation hotspot landscape. Furthermore, LY3009120 caused significant early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis in all melanoma cell lines except for eRGO6. The anti-tumor effects of LY3009120 were observed in nine melanoma cell lines, indicating the potential feasibility of experimental trials with LY3009120. The present study reveals that the irradiation-resistant canine metastasis cells (cRGO1.2) harboring the NRAS p.G13R mutation are significantly LY3009120-sensitive, while the equine metastases-derived eRGO6 cells show significant resistance to LY3009120, which make them both valuable tools for studying resistance mechanisms in comparative oncology.

Targeting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway for cancer therapy: from mechanism to clinical studies

Metastatic dissemination of solid tumors, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, underscores the urgent need for enhanced insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying metastasis, chemoresistance, and the mechanistic backgrounds of individuals whose cancers are prone to migration. The most prevalent signaling cascade governed by multi-kinase inhibitors is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, encompassing the RAS-RAF-MAPK kinase (MEK)-extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) pathway. RAF kinase is a primary mediator of the MAPK pathway, responsible for the sequential activation of downstream targets, such as MEK and the transcription factor ERK, which control numerous cellular and physiological processes, including organism development, cell cycle control, cell proliferation and differentiation, cell survival, and death. Defects in this signaling cascade are associated with diseases such as cancer. RAF inhibitors (RAFi) combined with MEK blockers represent an FDA-approved therapeutic strategy for numerous RAF-mutant cancers, including melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and thyroid cancer. However, the development of therapy resistance by cancer cells remains an important barrier. Autophagy, an intracellular lysosome-dependent catabolic recycling process, plays a critical role in the development of RAFi resistance in cancer. Thus, targeting RAF and autophagy could be novel treatment strategies for RAF-mutant cancers. In this review, we delve deeper into the mechanistic insights surrounding RAF kinase signaling in tumorigenesis and RAFi-resistance. Furthermore, we explore and discuss the ongoing development of next-generation RAF inhibitors with enhanced therapeutic profiles. Additionally, this review sheds light on the functional interplay between RAF-targeted therapies and autophagy in cancer.

Case Report: Successful Use of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in Aggressive BRAF-mutant Craniopharyngioma

BACKGROUND

Although a benign intracranial tumor, craniopharyngioma treatment has always been considered a challenging clinical problem. Recently, BRAF V600E mutation in the pathogenesis of papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP) has been further revealed. Thus, BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) serve as an applicable treatment for patients with PCP.

METHODS

Two patients with recurrent PCP were treated with combined BRAFi dabrafenib (150 mg, orally twice daily) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) trametinib (2 mg, orally twice daily). A follow-up exceeding 2 years was conducted. We meticulously scrutinized the treatment's safety and efficacy profiles by delving into existing literature.

RESULTS

One patient harboring a solid tumor achieved a complete tumor response devoid of any adverse events and encountered no recurrence over 2 years subsequent to discontinuation. Moreover, within a mere month of commencing targeted therapy, the tumor demonstrated observable shrinkage. This finding substantiates the considerable potential inherent in targeted therapy for PCP cases marked by the somatic BRAF V600E mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Under specific conditions, individuals diagnosed with PCP can attain a complete tumor response following combined treatment with BRAFi/MEKi.

Tumor Cell Resistance to the Inhibition of BRAF and MEK1/2

BRAF is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes, with an overall frequency of about 50%. Targeting BRAF and its effector mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) is now a key therapeutic strategy for BRAF-mutant tumors, and therapies based on dual BRAF/MEK inhibition showed significant efficacy in a broad spectrum of BRAF tumors. Nonetheless, BRAF/MEK inhibition therapy is not always effective for BRAF tumor suppression, and significant challenges remain to improve its clinical outcomes. First, certain BRAF tumors have an intrinsic ability to rapidly adapt to the presence of BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors by bypassing drug effects via rewired signaling, metabolic, and regulatory networks. Second, almost all tumors initially responsive to BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors eventually acquire therapy resistance via an additional genetic or epigenetic alteration(s). Overcoming these challenges requires identifying the molecular mechanism underlying tumor cell resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and analyzing their specificity in different BRAF tumors. This review aims to update this information.

Fibronectin Contributes to a BRAF Inhibitor-driven Invasive Phenotype in Thyroid Cancer through EGR1, Which Can Be Blocked by Inhibition of ERK1/2

Mutations in BRAF are common in advanced papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancer (PTC and ATC). However, patients with BRAF-mutant PTC currently lack therapies targeting this pathway. Despite the approved combination of BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibition for patients with BRAF-mutant ATC, these patients often progress. Thus, we screened a panel of BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cell lines to identify new therapeutic strategies. We showed that thyroid cancer cells resistant to BRAF inhibition (BRAFi) exhibit an increase in invasion and a proinvasive secretome in response to BRAFi. Using reverse-phase protein array (RPPA), we identified a nearly 2-fold increase in expression of the extracellular matrix protein, fibronectin, in response to BRAFi treatment, and a corresponding 1.8- to 3.0-fold increase in fibronectin secretion. Accordingly, the addition of exogenous fibronectin phenocopied the BRAFi-induced increase in invasion while depletion of fibronectin in resistant cells resulted in loss of increased invasion. We further showed that BRAFi-induced invasion can be blocked by inhibition of ERK1/2. In a BRAFi-resistant patient-derived xenograft model, we found that dual inhibition of BRAF and ERK1/2 slowed tumor growth and decreased circulating fibronectin. Using RNA sequencing, we identified EGR1 as a top downregulated gene in response to combined BRAF/ERK1/2 inhibition, and we further showed that EGR1 is necessary for a BRAFi-induced increase in invasion and for induction of fibronectin in response to BRAFi.

IMPLICATIONS

Together, these data show that increased invasion represents a new mechanism of resistance to BRAF inhibition in thyroid cancer that can be targeted with an ERK1/2 inhibitor.

Combined CDK4/6 and ERK1/2 Inhibition Enhances Antitumor Activity in NF1-Associated Plexiform Neurofibroma

PURPOSE

Plexiform neurofibromas (PNF) are peripheral nerve sheath tumors that cause significant morbidity in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), yet treatment options remain limited. To identify novel therapeutic targets for PNF, we applied an integrated multi-omic approach to quantitatively profile kinome enrichment in a mouse model that has predicted therapeutic responses in clinical trials for NF1-associated PNF with high fidelity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Utilizing RNA sequencing combined with chemical proteomic profiling of the functionally enriched kinome using multiplexed inhibitor beads coupled with mass spectrometry, we identified molecular signatures predictive of response to CDK4/6 and RAS/MAPK pathway inhibition in PNF. Informed by these results, we evaluated the efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, and the ERK1/2 inhibitor, LY3214996, alone and in combination in reducing PNF tumor burden in Nf1flox/flox;PostnCre mice.

RESULTS

Converging signatures of CDK4/6 and RAS/MAPK pathway activation were identified within the transcriptome and kinome that were conserved in both murine and human PNF. We observed robust additivity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, in combination with the ERK1/2 inhibitor, LY3214996, in murine and human NF1(Nf1) mutant Schwann cells. Consistent with these findings, the combination of abemaciclib (CDK4/6i) and LY3214996 (ERK1/2i) synergized to suppress molecular signatures of MAPK activation and exhibited enhanced antitumor activity in Nf1flox/flox;PostnCre mice in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide rationale for the clinical translation of CDK4/6 inhibitors alone and in combination with therapies targeting the RAS/MAPK pathway for the treatment of PNF and other peripheral nerve sheath tumors in persons with NF1.

Pharmacological ascorbate induces sustained mitochondrial dysfunction

Pharmacological ascorbate (P-AscH-; high dose given intravenously) generates H2O2 that is selectively cytotoxic to cancer compared to normal cells. The RAS-RAF-ERK1/2 is a major signaling pathway in cancers carrying RAS mutations and is known to be activated by H2O2. Activated ERK1/2 also phosphorylates the GTPase dynamin-related protein (Drp1), which then stimulates mitochondrial fission. Although early generation of H2O2 leads to cytotoxicity of cancer cells, we hypothesized that sustained increases in H2O2 activate ERK-Drp1 signaling, leading to an adaptive response; inhibition of this pathway would enhance the toxicity of P-AscH-. Increases in phosphorylated ERK and Drp1 induced by P-AscH- were reversed with genetic and pharmacological inhibitors of ERK and Drp1, as well as in cells lacking functional mitochondria. P-AscH- increased Drp1 colocalization to mitochondria, decreased mitochondrial volume, increased disconnected components, and decreased mitochondrial length, suggesting an increase in mitochondrial fission 48 h after treatment with P-AscH-. P-AscH- decreased clonogenic survival; this was enhanced by genetic and pharmacological inhibition of both ERK and Drp1. In murine tumor xenografts, the combination of P-AscH- and pharmacological inhibition of Drp1 increased overall survival. These results suggest that P-AscH- induces sustained changes in mitochondria, through activation of the ERK/Drp1 signaling pathway, an adaptive response. Inhibition of this pathway enhanced the toxicity P-AscH- to cancer cells.

Initial Evidence for the Efficacy of Naporafenib in Combination With Trametinib in NRAS-Mutant Melanoma: Results From the Expansion Arm of a Phase Ib, Open-Label Study

PURPOSE

No approved targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS)-mutant melanoma is currently available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase Ib escalation/expansion study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02974725), the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of naporafenib (LXH254), a BRAF/CRAF protein kinases inhibitor, were explored in combination with trametinib in patients with advanced/metastatic KRAS- or BRAF-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (escalation arm) or NRAS-mutant melanoma (escalation and expansion arms).

RESULTS

Thirty-six and 30 patients were enrolled in escalation and expansion, respectively. During escalation, six patients reported grade ≥3 dose-limiting toxicities, including dermatitis acneiform (n = 2), maculopapular rash (n = 2), increased lipase (n = 1), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n = 1). The recommended doses for expansion were naporafenib 200 mg twice a day plus trametinib 1 mg once daily and naporafenib 400 mg twice a day plus trametinib 0.5 mg once daily. During expansion, all 30 patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event, the most common being rash (80%, n = 24), blood creatine phosphokinase increased, diarrhea, and nausea (30%, n = 9 each). In expansion, the objective response rate, median duration of response, and median progression-free survival were 46.7% (95% CI, 21.3 to 73.4; 7 of 15 patients), 3.75 (95% CI, 1.97 to not estimable [NE]) months, and 5.52 months, respectively, in patients treated with naporafenib 200 mg twice a day plus trametinib 1 mg once daily, and 13.3% (95% CI, 1.7 to 40.5; 2 of 15 patients), 3.75 (95% CI, 2.04 to NE) months, and 4.21 months, respectively, in patients treated with naporafenib 400 mg twice a day plus trametinib 0.5 mg once daily.

CONCLUSION

Naporafenib plus trametinib showed promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. Prophylactic strategies aimed to lower the incidence of skin-related events are under investigation.

Palbociclib (PD 0332991) Interaction with Kinases. Theoretical and Comparative Molecular Docking Study

The optimized geometry of palbociclib, (PD 0332991) (8-cyclopentyl-6-ethanoyl-5-methyl-2-(5-(piperazin-1-yl)pyridin-2-ylamino)pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-7(8H)-one), electrostatic potential map, molecular orbitals were calculated using the density functional theory. The geometry was used in a molecular docking study of palbociclib-kinase complexes, results could be explained by the charge of the nitrogen and oxygen atoms within the palbociclib. Energy gap of HOMO-LUMO surfaces, could help to explain the reactivity of the ligand and the hydrogen bonding with three different kinases, two of CDK6 and one of CDK4 type. Docking results are similar and complementary with literature reports using molecular dynamics, were hydrogen bonding was obtained and analyzed. The promiscuity of three kinases with palbociclib was detected by the docking results, thus, palbociclib could be used in other types of cancer besides myeloid leukemia. Some similarities are found with CDK4/CDK6 kinases which allow us to determine that palbociclib could be used to control other resistant inhibitor types of cancer.

Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy

BRAF activation occurs as part of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cellular signaling pathway which leads to increased cellular proliferation and survival. Mutations in BRAF can result in unbridled activation of downstream kinases with subsequent uncontrolled cellular growth that formulate the basis for oncogenesis in multiple tumor types. Targeting BRAF by selective inhibitors has been one of the early successes in precision oncology. Agents have been explored either as monotherapy or in combination with MEK inhibition in BRAF V600-mutant pan-cancers and with EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer. Spectrum of BRAF inhibition has evolved from being melanoma-specific to being a pan-cancer target. In this article, we review BRAF and MEK inhibitor drug development journey from tissue-specific melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer to tissue-agnostic approvals.

Molecular Testing for Diagnostics, Prognostication, and Treatment Stratification in Cancers

ABSTRACT

Precision cancer care, for essentially all cancer types, now requires molecular diagnostics to assess mutations, chromosomal alterations, and gene expression to personalize treatments for individual patients. Advances in the diagnostics and treatment options have moved the field forward from fundamental discoveries beginning in the 1960s to the development of many targeted therapies that can be as specific as targeting a single-base-pair mutation. Herein is a brief historical perspective on cancer precision medicine with current diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment stratification guidance for early- and late-stage cancers.

New targeted and epigenetic therapeutic strategies for the treatment of uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare, genetically bland ocular malignancy with excellent local treatment options, but no disease-specific therapies are approved for use in the metastatic setting by the Food and Drug Administration. Metastatic UM (mUM) confers a prognosis of ~15 months. Unlike cutaneous melanoma, UM is poorly responsive to checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy highlighting the importance of clarifying vulnerable disease-specific mechanisms, such as cell cycle or metabolic pathways necessary for tumor growth and survival. The elucidation of signaling pathways downstream of the frequently mutated GNA GTPase such as PKC/MAPK/ERK/MEK, PI3K/AKT, and YAP-Hippo have offered potential targets. Potentially druggable epigenetic targets due to BAP1-mutated UM have also been identified, including proteins involved with histone deacetylation and DNA splicing. This review describes the preclinical rationale for the development of targeted therapies and current strategies currently being studied in clinical trials or will be in the near future.

Molecular Pathways and Mechanisms of BRAF in Cancer Therapy

With the identification of activating mutations in BRAF across a wide variety of malignancies, substantial effort was placed in designing safe and effective therapeutic strategies to target BRAF. These efforts have led to the development and regulatory approval of three BRAF inhibitors as well as five combinations of a BRAF inhibitor plus an additional agent(s) to manage cancer such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic thyroid cancer, and colorectal cancer. To date, each regimen is effective only in patients with tumors harboring BRAFV600 mutations and the duration of benefit is often short-lived. Further limitations preventing optimal management of BRAF-mutant malignancies are that treatments of non-V600 BRAF mutations have been less profound and combination therapy is likely necessary to overcome resistance mechanisms, but multi-drug regimens are often too toxic. With the emergence of a deeper understanding of how BRAF mutations signal through the RAS/MAPK pathway, newer RAF inhibitors are being developed that may be more effective and potentially safer and more rational combination therapies are being tested in the clinic. In this review, we identify the mechanics of RAF signaling through the RAS/MAPK pathway, present existing data on single-agent and combination RAF targeting efforts, describe emerging combinations, summarize the toxicity of the various agents in clinical testing, and speculate as to where the field may be headed.

Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma with a Combination of Immunotherapies and Molecularly Targeted Therapies

Simple Summary

Immunotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies have drastically changed the therapeutic approach for unresectable advanced or metastatic melanoma. The majority of melanoma patients have benefitted from these therapies; however, some patients acquire resistance to them. Novel combinations of immunotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies may be more efficient in treating these patients. In this review, we discuss various combination therapies under pre-clinical and clinical development which can reduce toxicity, enhance efficacy, and prevent recurrences in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Abstract

Melanoma possesses invasive metastatic growth patterns and is one of the most aggressive types of skin cancer. In 2021, it is estimated that 7180 deaths were attributed to melanoma in the United States alone. Once melanoma metastasizes, traditional therapies are no longer effective. Instead, immunotherapies, such as ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab, are the treatment options for malignant melanoma. Several biomarkers involved in tumorigenesis have been identified as potential targets for molecularly targeted melanoma therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unfortunately, melanoma quickly acquires resistance to these molecularly targeted therapies. To bypass resistance, combination treatment with immunotherapies and single or multiple TKIs have been employed and have been shown to improve the prognosis of melanoma patients compared to monotherapy. This review discusses several combination therapies that target melanoma biomarkers, such as BRAF, MEK, RAS, c-KIT, VEGFR, c-MET and PI3K. Several of these regimens are already FDA-approved for treating metastatic melanoma, while others are still in clinical trials. Continued research into the causes of resistance and factors influencing the efficacy of these combination treatments, such as specific mutations in oncogenic proteins, may further improve the effectiveness of combination therapies, providing a better prognosis for melanoma patients.

Cross-Resistance Among Sequential Cancer Therapeutics: An Emerging Issue

Over the past two decades, cancer treatment has benefited from having a significant increase in the number of targeted drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. With the introduction of targeted therapy, a great shift towards a new era has taken place that is characterized by reduced cytotoxicity and improved clinical outcomes compared to traditional chemotherapeutic drugs. At present, targeted therapies and other systemic anti-cancer therapies available (immunotherapy, cytotoxic, endocrine therapies and others) are used alone or in combination in different settings (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic). As a result, it is not uncommon for patients affected by an advanced malignancy to receive subsequent anti-cancer therapies. In this challenging complexity of cancer treatment, the clinical pathways of real-life patients are often not as direct as predicted by standard guidelines and clinical trials, and cross-resistance among sequential anti-cancer therapies represents an emerging issue. In this review, we summarize the main cross-resistance events described in the diverse tumor types and provide insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in this process. We also discuss the current challenges and provide perspectives for the research and development of strategies to overcome cross-resistance and proceed towards a personalized approach.

Phase I pharmacokinetic study of single agent trametinib in patients with advanced cancer and hepatic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Trametinib is an oral MEK 1/2 inhibitor, with a single agent recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 2 mg daily (QD). This study was designed to evaluate RP2D, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trametinib in patients with advanced solid tumors who had various degrees of hepatic dysfunction (HD).

METHODS

Advanced cancer patients were stratified into 4 HD groups based on Organ Dysfunction Working Group hepatic function stratification criteria: normal (Norm), mild (Mild), moderate (Mod), severe (Sev). Dose escalation was based on "3 + 3" design within each HD group. PK samples were collected at cycle 1 days 15-16.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were enrolled with 44 evaluable for safety [Norm=17, Mild=7, Mod (1.5 mg)=4, Mod (2 mg)=5, Sev (1 mg)=9, Sev (1.5 mg)=2] and 22 for PK analysis. Treatment related adverse events were consistent with prior trametinib studies. No treatment related deaths occurred. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluable in 15 patients (Mild=6, Mod (1.5 mg)=3, Mod (2 mg)=2, Sev (1 mg)=3 and Sev (1.5 mg)=1). One DLT (grade 3 acneiform rash) was observed in a Sev patient (1.5 mg). Dose interruptions or reductions due to treatment related adverse events occurred in 15 patients (34%) [Norm=9, 53%; Mild=2, 29%; Mod (1.5 mg)=1, 33%; Mod (2 mg)=2, 33%; Sev (1 mg)=1, 11%; Sev (1.5 mg)=1; 50%]. There were no significant differences across HD groups for all PK parameters when trametinib was normalized to 2 mg. However, only limited PK data were available for the Mod (n = 3) and Sev (n = 3) groups compared to Norm (n = 10) and Mild (n = 6) groups. Trametinib is heavily protein bound, with no correlation between serum albumin level and unbound trametinib fraction (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

RP2D for trametinib in Mild HD patients is 2 mg QD. There are insufficient number of evaluable patients due to difficulty of patient accrual to declare RP2D and MTD for Mod and Sev HD groups. DLTs were not observed in the highest dose cohorts that reached three evaluable patients - 1.5 mg QD in Mod group, and 1 mg QD in Sev group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website ( NCT02070549 ) on February 25, 2014. .

Proteomic Changes in the Monolayer and Spheroid Melanoma Cell Models of Acquired Resistance to BRAF and MEK1/2 Inhibitors

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway inhibitors are important therapies for treating many cancers. However, acquired resistance to most protein kinase inhibitors limits their ability to provide durable responses. Approximately 50% of malignant melanomas contain activating mutations in BRAF, which promotes cancer cell survival through the direct phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase MAPK/ERK 1/2 (MEK1/2) and the activation of ERK1/2. Although the combination treatment with BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors is a recommended approach to treat melanoma, the development of drug resistance remains a barrier to achieving long-term patient benefits. Few studies have compared the global proteomic changes in BRAF/MEK1/2 inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells under different growth conditions. The current study uses high-resolution label-free mass spectrometry to compare relative protein changes in BRAF/MEK1/2 inhibitor-resistant A375 melanoma cells grown as monolayers or spheroids. While approximately 66% of proteins identified were common in the monolayer and spheroid cultures, only 6.2 or 3.6% of proteins that significantly increased or decreased, respectively, were common between the drug-resistant monolayer and spheroid cells. Drug-resistant monolayers showed upregulation of ERK-independent signaling pathways, whereas drug-resistant spheroids showed primarily elevated catabolic metabolism to support oxidative phosphorylation. These studies highlight the similarities and differences between monolayer and spheroid cell models in identifying actionable targets to overcome drug resistance.

Conquering oncogenic KRAS and its bypass mechanisms

Aberrant activation of KRAS signaling is common in cancer, which has catalyzed heroic drug development efforts to target KRAS directly or its downstream signaling effectors. Recent works have yielded novel small molecule drugs with promising preclinical and clinical activities. Yet, no matter how a cancer is addicted to a specific target - cancer's genetic and biological plasticity fashions a variety of resistance mechanisms as a fait accompli, limiting clinical benefit of targeted interventions. Knowledge of these mechanisms may inform combination strategies to attack both oncogenic KRAS and subsequent bypass mechanisms.

Oxidative Stress-Related Mechanisms in Melanoma and in the Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapies

Melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer with the poorest prognosis, representing the deadliest form of skin cancer. Activating mutations in BRAF are the most frequent genetic alterations, present in approximately 50% of all melanoma cases. The use of specific inhibitors towards mutant BRAF variants and MEK, a downstream signaling target of BRAF in the MAPK pathway, has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced melanoma patients carrying BRAF mutations. Nevertheless, despite these improvements, resistance still develops within the first year of therapy in around 50% of patients, which is a significant problem in managing BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. Understanding these mechanisms is one of the mainstreams of the research on BRAFi/MEKi acquired resistance. Both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms have been described. Moreover, in recent years, oxidative stress has emerged as another major force involved in all the phases of melanoma development, from initiation to progression until the onsets of the metastatic phenotype and chemoresistance, and has thus become a target for therapy. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge on oxidative stress and its signaling in melanoma, as well as the oxidative stress-related mechanisms in the acquired resistance to targeted therapies.

Melanoma Targeted Therapies beyond BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: Potential Druggable Mutations and Novel Treatment Approaches

Melanomas exhibit the highest rate of somatic mutations among all different types of cancers (with the exception of BCC and SCC). The accumulation of a multimode of mutations in the driver oncogenes are responsible for the proliferative, invasive, and aggressive nature of melanomas. High-resolution and high-throughput technology has led to the identification of distinct mutational signatures and their downstream alterations in several key pathways that contribute to melanomagenesis. This has enabled the development of individualized treatments by targeting specific molecular alterations that are vital for cancer cell survival, which has resulted in improved outcomes in several cancers, including melanomas. To date, BRAF and MEK inhibitors remain the only approved targeted therapy with a high level of evidence in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanomas. The lack of approved precision drugs in melanomas, relative to other cancers, despite harboring one of the highest rates of somatic mutations, advocates for further research to unveil effective therapeutics. In this review, we will discuss potential druggable mutations and the ongoing research of novel individualized treatment approaches targeting non-BRAF mutations in melanomas.

Dermatologic adverse events associated with targeted therapies for melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The development of new targeted therapies has considerably changed the therapeutic paradigm of melanoma, significantly increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, skin-related adverse sequelae might occur and impact on patients' quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

In this article we will cover the most important dermatological toxicities related to BRAF and MEK-inhibitors, along with updated management strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

BRAF inhibitors have represented a revolution in the treatment of melanoma. They have improved the outcome of the disease and therefore represent an important option in the management and care of patients with advanced melanoma. Skin toxicity (especially the onset of squamous skin carcinomas) has been considered a major cutaneous side effect and, although the addition of MEK inhibitors in combination has significantly reduced the incidence of skin sequelae, serious skin adverse events might develop anyway and impact significantly on patients'quality of life and on national health system budget. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors as a new effective adjuvant treatment option for stage III and ulcerated melanoma has proved a significant impact on the risk of recurrence, and may have interesting developments in the near future as a further therapeutic tool.

Precision Medicine for Colorectal Cancer with Liquid Biopsy and Immunotherapy

Simple Summary

There are some challenges to improve the clinical outcome of colorectal cancers (CRCs) by implementing new technologies, such as early detection of recurrence/relapse and selection of appropriate drugs based on the genomic profiles of tumors. For example, the genomic characteristics of tumors can be analyzed by blood-based tests, namely ‘liquid biopsies’, which are minimally-invasive and can be performed repeatedly during the treatment course. Hence, liquid biopsies are considered to hold great promise to fill these gaps in clinical routines. In this review, we addressed clinical usefulness of liquid biopsies in the clinical management of CRC patients, including cancer screening, detection of minimal residual disease, selection of appropriate molecular-targeted drugs, monitoring of the treatment responsiveness, and very early detection of recurrence/relapse of the disease. Furthermore, we discussed the possibility of adoptive T cell therapies and a future personalized immunotherapy based on tumor genome information.

Abstract

In the field of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, diagnostic modalities and chemotherapy regimens have progressed remarkably in the last two decades. However, it is still difficult to identify minimal residual disease (MRD) necessary for early detection of recurrence/relapse of tumors and to select and provide appropriate drugs timely before a tumor becomes multi-drug-resistant and more aggressive. We consider the leveraging of in-depth genomic profiles of tumors as a significant breakthrough to further improve the overall prognosis of CRC patients. With the recent technological advances in methodologies and bioinformatics, the genomic profiles can be analyzed profoundly without delay by blood-based tests—‘liquid biopsies’. From a clinical point of view, a minimally-invasive liquid biopsy is thought to be a promising method and can be implemented in routine clinical settings in order to meet unmet clinical needs. In this review, we highlighted clinical usefulness of liquid biopsies in the clinical management of CRC patients, including cancer screening, detection of MRD, selection of appropriate molecular-targeted drugs, monitoring of the treatment responsiveness, and very early detection of recurrence/relapse of the disease. In addition, we addressed a possibility of adoptive T cell therapies and a future personalized immunotherapy based on tumor genome information.

Autophagy Inhibition in BRAF-Driven Cancers

Simple Summary

BRAF is a protein kinase that is frequently mutationally activated in cancer. Mutant BRAF can be pharmacologically inhibited, which in combination with blockade of its direct effector, MEK1/2, is an FDA-approved therapeutic strategy for several BRAF-mutated cancer patients, such as melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and thyroid cancer. However, therapy resistance is a major clinical challenge, highlighting the need for comprehensive investigations on the biological causes of such resistance, as well as to develop novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient survival. Autophagy is a cellular recycling process, which has been shown to allow cancer cells to escape from BRAF inhibition. Combined blockade of autophagy and BRAF signaling is a novel therapeutic strategy that is currently being tested in clinical trials. This review describes the relationship between BRAF-targeted therapy and autophagy regulation and discusses possible future treatment strategies.

Abstract

Several BRAF-driven cancers, including advanced BRAF^V600E/K-driven melanoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and thyroid cancer, are currently treated using first-line inhibitor combinations of BRAF^V600E plus MEK1/2. However, despite the success of this vertical inhibition strategy, the durability of patient response is often limited by the phenomenon of primary or acquired drug resistance. It has recently been shown that autophagy, a conserved cellular recycling process, is increased in BRAF-driven melanoma upon inhibition of BRAF^V600E signaling. Autophagy is believed to promote tumor progression of established tumors and also to protect cancer cells from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. To this end, BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi)-resistant cells often display increased autophagy compared to responsive lines. Several mechanisms have been proposed for BRAFi-induced autophagy, such as activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress gatekeeper GRP78, AMP-activated protein kinase, and transcriptional regulation of the autophagy regulating transcription factors TFEB and TFE3 via ERK1/2 or mTOR inhibition. This review describes the relationship between BRAF-targeted therapy and autophagy regulation, and discusses possible future treatment strategies of combined inhibition of oncogenic signaling plus autophagy for BRAF-driven cancers.

Systematic review of combinations of targeted or immunotherapy in advanced solid tumors

With rapid advances in our understanding of cancer, there is an expanding number of potential novel combination therapies, including novel-novel combinations. Identifying which combinations are appropriate and in which subpopulations are among the most difficult questions in medical research. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review of trials of novel-novel combination therapies involving immunotherapies or molecular targeted therapies in advanced solid tumors. A MEDLINE search was conducted using a modified Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for published clinical trials between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, in the top-ranked medical and oncology journals. Trials were evaluated according to a criterion adapted from previously published Food and Drug Administration guidance and other key considerations in designing trials of combinations. This included the presence of a strong biological rationale, the use of a new established or emerging predictive biomarker prospectively incorporated into the clinical trial design, appropriate comparator arms of monotherapy or supportive external data sources and a primary endpoint demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit. Of 32 identified trials, there were 11 (34%) trials of the novel-novel combination of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) therapy, and 10 (31%) trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combination therapy. 20 (62.5%) trials were phase II trials, while 12 (37.5%) were phase III trials. Most (72%) trials lacked significant preclinical evidence supporting the development of the combination in the given indication. A majority of trials (69%) were conducted in biomarker unselected populations or used pre-existing biomarkers within the given indication for patient selection. Most studies (66%) were considered to have appropriate comparator arms or had supportive external data sources such as prior studies of monotherapy. All studies were evaluated as selecting a clinically meaningful primary endpoint. In conclusion, designing trials to evaluate novel-novel combination therapies presents numerous challenges to demonstrate efficacy in a comprehensive manner. A greater understanding of biological rationale for combinations and incorporating predictive biomarkers may improve effective evaluation of combination therapies. Innovative statistical methods and increasing use of external data to support combination approaches are potential strategies that may improve the efficiency of trial design. Designing trials to evaluate novel-novel combination therapies presents numerous challenges to demonstrate efficacy in a comprehensive manner. A greater understanding of biological rationale for combinations and incorporating predictive biomarkers may improve effective evaluation of combination therapies. Innovative statistical methods and increasing use of external data to support combination approaches are potential strategies that may improve the efficiency of trial design.

Targeting the mercapturic acid pathway for the treatment of melanoma

The treatment of metastatic melanoma is greatly hampered by the simultaneous dysregulation of several major signaling pathways that suppress apoptosis and promote its growth and invasion. The global resistance of melanomas to therapeutics is also supported by a highly active mercapturic acid pathway (MAP), which is responsible for the metabolism and excretion of numerous chemotherapy agents. The relative importance of the MAP in melanoma survival was not recognized until demonstrated that B16 melanoma undergoes dramatic apoptosis and regression upon the depletion or inhibition of the MAP transporter protein RLIP. RLIP is a multi-functional protein that couples ATP hydrolysis with the movement of substances. As the rate-limiting step of the MAP, the primary function of RLIP in the plasma membrane is to catalyze the ATP-dependent efflux of unmetabolized drugs and toxins, including glutathione (GSH) conjugates of electrophilic toxins (GS-Es), which are the precursors of mercapturic acids. Clathrin-dependent endocytosis (CDE) is an essential mechanism for internalizing ligand-receptor complexes that promote tumor cell proliferation through autocrine stimulation (Wnt5a, PDGF, βFGF, TNFα) or paracrine stimulation by hormones produced by fibroblasts (IGF1, HGF) or inflammatory cells (IL8). Aberrant functioning of these pathways appears critical for melanoma cell invasion, metastasis, and evasion of apoptosis. This review focuses on the selective depletion or inhibition of RLIP as a highly effective targeted therapy for melanoma that could cause the simultaneous disruption of the MAP and critical peptide hormone signaling that relies on CDE.

Metalloproteinases Suppression Driven by the Curcumin Analog DM-1 Modulates Invasion in BRAF-Resistant Melanomas

BACKGROUND

Melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer, and BRAF (V600E) is the most frequent mutation that led to the development of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi). However, patients treated with BRAFi usually present recidivism after 6-9 months. Curcumin is a turmeric substance, and it has been deeply investigated due to its anti-inflammatory and antitumoral effects. Still, the low bioavailability and biodisponibility encouraged the investigation of different analogs. DM-1 is a curcumin analog and has shown an antitumoral impact in previous studies.

METHODS

Evaluated DM-1 stability and cytotoxic effects for BRAFi-sensitive and resistant melanomas, as well as the role in the metalloproteinases modulation.

RESULTS

DM-1 showed growth inhibitory potential for melanoma cells, demonstrated by reduction of colony formation, migration and endothelial tube formation, and cell cycle arrest. Subtoxic doses were able to downregulate important Metalloproteinases (MMPs) related to invasiveness, such as MMP-1, -2 and -9. Negative modulations of TIMP-2 and MMP-14 reduced MMP-2 and -9 activity; however, the reverse effect is seen when increased TIMP-2 and MMP-14 resulted in raised MMP-2.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide essential details into the functional role of DM-1 in melanomas, encouraging further studies in the development of combinatorial treatments for melanomas.

BRAF Inhibitors Induce Feedback Activation of RAS Pathway in Thyroid Cancer Cells

BRAF^V600E is the most frequent oncogenic mutation identified in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). In PTC patients who do not respond to standard treatment, BRAF inhibitors are currently tested as alternative strategies. However, as observed for other targeted therapies, patients eventually develop drug resistance. The mechanisms of BRAF inhibitors response are still poorly understood in a thyroid cancer (TC) context. In this study, we investigated in BRAF^V600E mutated TC cell lines the effects of Vemurafenib and Dabrafenib, two BRAF inhibitors currently used in a clinical setting. We assessed cell proliferation, and the expression and activity of the thyroid function related transporter NIS following the treatment with BRAF inhibitors. In addition, we investigated the global gene expression by microarray, the relevant modulated biological processes by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and TC specific gene signatures related to MAPK pathway activation, thyroid differentiation, and transcriptional profile associated with BRAF^V600E or RAS mutation. We found that both inhibitors induce antiproliferative and redifferentiative effects on TC cells, as well as a rewiring of the MAPK pathway related to RAS signaling. Our results suggest a possible mechanism of drug response to the BRAF inhibitors Vemurafenib or Dabrafenib, supporting very recent findings in TC patients treated with targeted therapies.

The Role of Senescent Cells in Acquired Drug Resistance and Secondary Cancer in BRAFi-Treated Melanoma

BRAF is the most common gene mutated in malignant melanoma, and predominately it is a missense mutation of codon 600 in the kinase domain. This oncogenic BRAF missense mutation results in constitutive activation of the mitogen-activate protein kinase (MAPK) pro-survival pathway. Several BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) have been developed to specifically inhibit BRAFV600 mutations that improve melanoma survival, but resistance and secondary cancer often occur. Causal mechanisms of BRAFi-induced secondary cancer and resistance have been identified through upregulation of MAPK and alternate pro-survival pathways. In addition, overriding of cellular senescence is observed throughout the progression of disease from benign nevi to malignant melanoma. In this review, we discuss melanoma BRAF mutations, the genetic mechanism of BRAFi resistance, and the evidence supporting the role of senescent cells in melanoma disease progression, drug resistance and secondary cancer. We further highlight the potential benefit of targeting senescent cells with senotherapeutics as adjuvant therapy in combating melanoma.

ERK1/2: An Integrator of Signals That Alters Cardiac Homeostasis and Growth

Integration of cellular responses to extracellular cues is essential for cell survival and adaptation to stress. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and 2 serve an evolutionarily conserved role for intracellular signal transduction that proved critical for cardiomyocyte homeostasis and cardiac stress responses. Considering the importance of ERK1/2 in the heart, understanding how these kinases operate in both normal and disease states is critical. Here, we review the complexity of upstream and downstream signals that govern ERK1/2-dependent regulation of cardiac structure and function. Particular emphasis is given to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy as an outcome of ERK1/2 activation regulation in the heart.

BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future

As widely acknowledged, 40-50% of all melanoma patients harbour an activating BRAF mutation (mostly BRAF V600E). The identification of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAP kinase) signalling pathway and its targeting has represented a valuable milestone for the advanced and, more recently, for the completely resected stage III and IV melanoma therapy management. However, despite progress in BRAF-mutant melanoma treatment, the two different approaches approved so far for metastatic disease, immunotherapy and BRAF+MEK inhibitors, allow a 5-year survival of no more than 60%, and most patients relapse during treatment due to acquired mechanisms of resistance. Deep insight into BRAF gene biology is fundamental to describe the acquired resistance mechanisms (primary and secondary) and to understand the molecular pathways that are now being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies with the aim of improving outcomes in BRAF-mutant patients.

Immune signature as predictive marker for response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and overall survival in melanoma

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma is an immunogenic skin cancer with an increasing global incidence. Advanced stages of melanoma have poor prognoses. Currently, there are no reliable parameters to predict a patient's response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

METHODS

This study highlights the relevance of a distinct immune signature in the blood for response to ICI therapy and overall survival (OS). Therefore, the immune cell composition in the peripheral blood of 45 melanoma patients prior to ICI therapy was analyzed by flow cytometry and complete blood count.

RESULTS

Responders to ICI therapy displayed an abundance of proliferating CD4+ T cells, an increased lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, a low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, low levels of CTLA-4+ Treg, and (arginase 1+ ) polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC). Nevertheless, non-responders with similar immune cell compositions also benefited from therapy displaying increased long-term OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the observed immune signature in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients prior to treatment could identify responders as well as non-responders that benefit from ICI immunotherapies.

Advanced Melanoma: Resistance Mechanisms to Current Therapies

Novel therapeutic agents introduced over the past decade, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, have revolutionized the management of metastatic melanoma and significantly improved patient outcomes. Although robust and durable responses have been noted in some cases, treatment is often limited by innate or acquired resistance to these agents. This article provides an overview of known and suspected mechanisms involved with acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors as well as developing insights into innate and acquired resistance to checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma.

Comparative efficacy of dabrafenib + trametinib versus treatment options for metastatic melanoma in first-line settings

Aim: The objective was to systematically review the literature and assess the relative efficacy of agents approved in first-line settings via network meta-analysis. Materials & methods: A literature review was conducted via searching different medical databases. The eligibility criteria included Phase II or III randomized controlled trials that had enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. Results: The network meta-analysis results suggested that dabrafenib + trametinib significantly prolongs the survival outcomes compared with the monotherapies and had comparable efficacy profile compared with encorafenib + binimetinib and cobimetinib + vemurafenib. In comparison with immunotherapies, the results varied for progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Long-term survival data of dabrafenib + trametinib establishes the combination as one of the preferred treatment options for previously untreated melanoma patients.

Juniperus indica Bertol. extract synergized with cisplatin against melanoma cells via the suppression of AKT/mTOR and MAPK signaling and induction of cell apoptosis

Juniperus indica Bertol. is an herbal plant that belongs to the genus Juniperus, which is commonly used in traditional medicine to refresh the mind and for diuretic use. However, few studies have reported the function of J. indica Bertol. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the anti-tumor and synergistic potential of J. indica Bertol. extract (JIB extract) for melanoma cells. Our results indicated the anti-melanoma activity of JIB extract. JIB extract induced cell cycle arrest at the G₀/G₁ phase and decreased cyclin and cdk protein expressions. In addition, AKT/mTOR signaling and MAPK signaling were inhibited by JIB extract to suppress melanoma cell growth and proliferation. Additionally, JIB extract induced B16/F10 cell apoptosis via the caspase cascade. According to the JIB extract's anti-melanoma capacity, to assess the synergistic effects of cisplatin and JIB extract. The results demonstrated that JIB extract combined with cisplatin enhanced the inhibition of cell growth, proliferation, and survival through the obstruction of cell cycle progression and AKT/mTOR and MAPK signaling as well as the induction of cell apoptosis. Collectively, our results indicate that JIB extract showed anti-tumor effects and synergized with cisplatin against B16/F10 cells, indicating the possibility of JIB extract to be developed as adjuvant therapy for melanoma.

Emerging strategies to treat rare and intractable subtypes of melanoma

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, possessing a diverse landscape of subtypes with distinct molecular signatures and levels of aggressiveness. Although immense progress has been achieved therapeutically for patients with the most common forms of this disease, little is known of how to effectively treat patients with rarer subtypes of melanoma. These subtypes include acral lentiginous (the rarest form of cutaneous melanoma; AL), uveal, and mucosal melanomas, which display variations in distribution across (a) the world, (b) patient age-groups, and (c) anatomic sites. Unfortunately, patients with these relatively rare subtypes of melanoma typically respond worse to therapies approved for the more common, non-AL cutaneous melanoma and do not have effective alternatives, and thus consequently have worse overall survival rates. Achieving durable therapeutic responses in these high-risk melanoma subtypes represents one of the greatest challenges of the field. This review aims to collate and highlight effective preclinical and/or clinical strategies against these rare forms of melanoma.

The Emerging Role of Ras Pathway Signaling in Pediatric Cancer

As genomic sequencing has become more widely available, the high prevalence of Ras pathway mutations in pediatric diseases has begun to emerge. Germline Ras-activating mutations have been known to contribute to cancer predisposition in a group of disorders known as the RASopathies, and now large pediatric sequencing studies have identified frequent somatic Ras pathway alterations across a diverse group of pediatric malignancies. These include glial brain tumors, relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and their prognostic impact is becoming increasingly better understood. Clinically, there has been success in targeting the Ras pathway in pediatric diseases, including the use of MEK inhibitors in plexiform neurofibromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 and the use of Ras pathway inhibitors in low-grade gliomas. Given the importance of this pathway in pediatric cancer, it is imperative that future studies strive to better understand the functional significance of these mutations, including their role in tumor growth and treatment resistance and how they can be better targeted to improve outcomes.

CDK4/6 and MAPK-Crosstalk as Opportunity for Cancer Treatment

Despite the development of targeted therapies and novel inhibitors, cancer remains an undefeated disease. Resistance mechanisms arise quickly and alternative treatment options are urgently required, which may be partially met by drug combinations. Protein kinases as signaling switchboards are frequently deregulated in cancer and signify vulnerable nodes and potential therapeutic targets. We here focus on the cell cycle kinase CDK6 and on the MAPK pathway and on their interplay. We also provide an overview on clinical studies examining the effects of combinational treatments currently explored for several cancer types.

OCULAR ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH MEK INHIBITORS

PURPOSE

Mitogen-activates protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors, particularly MEK inhibitors, have shifted the treatment paradigm for metastatic BRAF-mutant cutaneous melanoma; however, oncologists, ophthalmologists, and patients have noticed different toxicities of variable importance. This review aims to provide an update of the ocular adverse events (OAEs), especially retinal toxicity, associated with the use of MEK inhibitors.

METHODS

We conducted a scientific literature search using the PubMed database up to July 2018 with the terms "MEK inhibitors" with a "review" filter and "MEK inhibitors" with a "clinical trials" filter. Phase I-III experimental studies and reviews were selected. Current principles and techniques for diagnosing and managing MEK inhibitor retinopathy and other OAEs are discussed.

RESULTS

In patients treated with MEK inhibitors, including asymptomatic patients, OAEs occur with an incidence of up to 90%. Mild to severe ophthalmic toxicities are described, including visual disturbances, a 2-line decrease in Snellen visual acuity, dry eye symptoms, ocular adnexal abnormalities, visual field defects, panuveitis, and retinal toxicities, such as different degrees of MEK-associated retinopathy, vascular injury, and retinal vein occlusion.

CONCLUSION

MEK inhibitors can lead to different degrees of retinal, uveal, and adnexal OAE, causing visual disturbances or discomfort. One of the most relevant OAE of MEK therapy is MEK inhibitor-associated retinopathy (MEKAR), which is usually mild, self-limited, and may subside after continuous use of the drug for weeks or months, or discontinuation, thereby restoring the normal visual function of the retina, with some exceptions. Ocular adverse events are often associated with other systemic adverse effects that can modify the dosage of treatment, so the communication with the oncologist is fundamental.

Dabrafenib and trametinib induced pancreatitis: a case report and review of the literature

Approximately 50% of melanomas are characterized by BRAF mutation (V600E in 90% of cases), that predicts more aggressive behaviour. This mutation is the target of dabrafenib, an anti-BRAF tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), that together with trametinib, anti-MEK TKI, is approved for first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma due to significant benefit in overall and progression-free survival. Most common treatment-related adverse events are pyrexia, chills, fatigue, rash, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. This case report aims to present another less common adverse event of combined anti-BRAF and anti-MEK treatment. Our patient, after 4 months on target-therapy, experienced sudden deep abdominal pain. At the initial work-out at the emergency department, increase in serum lipase was detected and radiological findings were consistent with acute pancreatitis. Admitted to the hospital, other causes were ruled out and target-therapy was discontinued with symptoms improvement. Radiological and clinical follow-up was performed and a diagnosis of drug-induced pancreatitis was made. After few days of medical support with analgesia and antibiotic, the patient felt better and was discharged; target-therapy was permanently interrupted. Searching the literature, not so many cases of iatrogenic pancreatitis are described with this TKI combination, therefore, we have reported it as a rare but life-threatening adverse event that should be investigated whenever conceivable.

Mechanisms of Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma: A Systematic Review

This systematic review investigated the literature on acquired v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma. We searched MEDLINE for articles on BRAF inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma published since January 2010 in the following areas: (1) genetic basis of resistance; (2) epigenetic and transcriptomic mechanisms; (3) influence of the immune system on resistance development; and (4) combination therapy to overcome resistance. Common resistance mutations in melanoma are BRAF splice variants, BRAF amplification, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) mutations. Genetic and epigenetic changes reactivate previously blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, activate alternative signaling pathways, and cause epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Once BRAF inhibitor resistance develops, the tumor microenvironment reverts to a low immunogenic state secondary to the induction of programmed cell death ligand-1. Combining a BRAF inhibitor with a MEK inhibitor delays resistance development and increases duration of response. Multiple other combinations based on known mechanisms of resistance are being investigated. BRAF inhibitor-resistant cells develop a range of 'escape routes', so multiple different treatment targets will probably be required to overcome resistance. In the future, it may be possible to personalize combination therapy towards the specific resistance pathway in individual patients.

The MAP kinase signal transduction pathway: promising therapeutic targets used in the treatment of melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway inhibition through the use of agents binding to signal cascade kinases BRAF and MEK has become a key treatment strategy of patients with BRAF-mutant, unresectable melanoma.

AREAS COVERED

Detailed analysis is undertaken of the current data, presenting the efficacy and safety of recently developed therapies targeting BRAF and MEK inhibition in the setting of unresectable melanoma. MAPK signal transduction, translational findings, current phase I, II and III clinical trials, and ongoing studies are explored, including use of MAPK pathway inhibition in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings as well as in combination with immunotherapy and other therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Inhibition of the MAPK pathway significantly improves response, progression-free survival, disease specific survival, and overall survival for patients with BRAF-mutant, unresectable melanoma. The concurrent administration of BRAF and MEK inhibiting agents improves response rate and outcomes and reduces serious adverse effects, including development of new cutaneous malignancies. Triplet therapy with BRAK/MEK combination and immunotherapy has shown in early results to increase duration of response and may be best used sequentially as opposed to concurrently to avoid treatment limiting toxicities. Current clinical trials will further define these therapies and their impact on treatment of melanoma.

From the Broad Phase II Trial to Precision Oncology: A Perspective on the Origins of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trial Designs in Cancer Drug Development

Oncologic phase II trials that evaluate the activity of new therapeutic agents have evolved dramatically over the past 50 years. The standard approach beginning in the late 1960s focused on individual studies that evaluated new anticancer agents against a wide range of both solid and hematopoietic malignancies often in a single "broad phase II trial" that included hundreds of patients; such studies efficiently established the landscape for subsequent development of a specific drug with respect to likely disease focus, toxicity, dose, and schedule. In the 1980s and 1990s, emphasis on histological context drove an explosion in the number of individual phase II trials conducted; despite this increase in trial activity, investigations based on histology per se failed to improve the success rate of new agents brought to the clinic. Over the past 20 years, evolution toward a molecular drug development paradigm has demonstrably improved our ability to select patients more likely to benefit from systemic treatment; simultaneously, technological advances have permitted initial attempts at the rapid assignment of therapy based on predefined molecular characteristics of tumor or germline in broad-based master protocols that are inclusive of many diseases and molecularly characterized disease subsets, akin to but much more sophisticated scientifically than the broad phase II platforms of the past.