1
|
Leclercq AL, Waelkens V, Roelant E, Allegaert M, Verhaegen I, Claes K, Dauvister E, Snijders S, Eggers K, Moyse A, Van Eerdenbrugh S. Treatment for preschool age children who stutter: Protocol of a randomised, non-inferiority parallel group pragmatic trial with Mini-KIDS, social cognitive behaviour treatment and the Lidcombe Program-TreatPaCS. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304212. [PMID: 38990808 PMCID: PMC11239023 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Stuttering is a speech disorder in which the flow of speech is disrupted by involuntary repetitions of sounds, syllables, words or phrases, stretched sounds or silent pauses in which the person is unable to produce sounds and sound transitions. Treatment success is the highest if stuttering is treated before the age of 6 years, before it develops into "persistent" stuttering. Stuttering treatment programs that focus directly on the speech of the child, like the Lidcombe Program, have shown to be effective in this age group. Mini-KIDS is also a treatment that focuses directly on the speech of the child. It is possible that capturing the increased brain plasticity at this age in combination with creating optimal conditions for recovery underlie these treatments' success rate. A treatment focusing on the cognitions, emotions and behaviour of the child, the social cognitive behaviour treatment (SCBT), is also frequently delivered in Belgium. In this study we want to compare, and collect data on the effectiveness, of these three treatment programs: Mini-KIDS, SCBT and the Lidcombe Program (protocol registered under number NCT05185726). 249 children will be allocated to one of three treatment groups. Stuttering specialists will treat the child (and guide the parents) with Mini-KIDS, the SCBT or the Lidcombe Program. They will be trained to deliver the programs meticulously. At 18 months after randomisation, the speech fluency of the child and the attitude of the child and parent(s) towards speech will be measured. It is expected that the three programs will achieve the same (near) zero levels of stuttering in nearly all children and a positive attitude towards speech at 18 months after the start of treatment. The amount of treatment hours to reach the (near) zero levels of stuttering will be compared between the different programmes. For families as well as for the health system this could generate important information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Lise Leclercq
- Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Veerle Waelkens
- Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ella Roelant
- Clinical Trials Center, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mathias Allegaert
- Clinical Trials Center, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Iris Verhaegen
- Clinical Trials Center, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kim Claes
- Clinical Trials Center, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Estelle Dauvister
- Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Steffi Snijders
- Center of Expertise Care and Wellbeing, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kurt Eggers
- Center of Expertise Care and Wellbeing, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Astrid Moyse
- Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Sabine Van Eerdenbrugh
- Center of Expertise Care and Wellbeing, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feltner C, Wallace IF, Nowell SW, Orr CJ, Raffa B, Middleton JC, Vaughan J, Baker C, Chou R, Kahwati L. Screening for Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children 5 Years or Younger: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2024; 331:335-351. [PMID: 38261038 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.24647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Importance Children with speech and language difficulties are at risk for learning and behavioral problems. Objective To review the evidence on screening for speech and language delay or disorders in children 5 years or younger to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, ERIC, Linguistic and Language Behavior Abstracts (ProQuest), and trial registries through January 17, 2023; surveillance through November 24, 2023. Study Selection English-language studies of screening test accuracy, trials or cohort studies comparing screening vs no screening; randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions. Data Extraction and Synthesis Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, study quality, and data extraction; results were narratively summarized. Main Outcomes and Measures Screening test accuracy, speech and language outcomes, school performance, function, quality of life, and harms. Results Thirty-eight studies in 41 articles were included (N = 9006). No study evaluated the direct benefits of screening vs no screening. Twenty-one studies (n = 7489) assessed the accuracy of 23 different screening tools that varied with regard to whether they were designed to be completed by parents vs trained examiners, and to screen for global (any) language problems vs specific skills (eg, expressive language). Three studies assessing parent-reported tools for expressive language skills found consistently high sensitivity (range, 88%-93%) and specificity (range, 88%-85%). The accuracy of other screening tools varied widely. Seventeen RCTs (n = 1517) evaluated interventions for speech and language delay or disorders, although none enrolled children identified by routine screening in primary care. Two RCTs evaluating relatively intensive parental group training interventions (11 sessions) found benefit for different measures of expressive language skills, and 1 evaluating a less intensive intervention (6 sessions) found no difference between groups for any outcome. Two RCTs (n = 76) evaluating the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention delivered by speech-language pathologists featuring parent training found a 2.3% to 3.0% lower proportion of syllables stuttered at 9 months compared with the control group when delivered in clinic and via telehealth, respectively. Evidence on other interventions was limited. No RCTs reported on the harms of interventions. Conclusions and Relevance No studies directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening. Some parent-reported screening tools for expressive language skills had reasonable accuracy for detecting expressive language delay. Group parent training programs for speech delay that provided at least 11 parental training sessions improved expressive language skills, and a stuttering intervention delivered by speech-language pathologists reduced stuttering frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Feltner
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Ina F Wallace
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Sallie W Nowell
- Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Colin J Orr
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Brittany Raffa
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jennifer Cook Middleton
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jessica Vaughan
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Claire Baker
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Roger Chou
- The Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University
- School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Leila Kahwati
- RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montalbaron MB, Achlatis E, Johnson AM, Ma Y, Young VN, Rosen CA, Amin MR, Kwak PE. Presumptive Diagnosis in Tele-Health Laryngology: A Multi-Center Observational Study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1511-1519. [PMID: 37070580 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231165811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, outpatient visits were adapted for the virtual setting, forcing laryngologists to presume certain diagnoses without the aid of laryngoscopy, solely based on history and the limited physical exam available via video visit. This study aims to examine the accuracy of presumptive diagnoses made via telemedicine, compared to subsequent in-person follow up, where endoscopic examination could confirm or refute suspected diagnoses. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of 38 patients evaluated for voice-related issues at NYU Langone Health and the University of California-San Francisco. Presumptive diagnoses at the initial telemedicine encounter were noted, along with diagnostic cues used for clinical reasoning and recommended treatment plans. These presumptive diagnoses were compared to diagnoses and plans established following laryngoscopy at follow-up in-person visits. RESULTS After laryngoscopy at the first in-person visit, 38% of presumptive diagnoses changed, as did 37% of treatment plans. The accuracy varied among conditions. Muscle tension dysphonia and Reinke's edema were accurately diagnosed without laryngoscopy, but other conditions, including vocal fold paralysis and subglottic stenosis, were not initially suspected, relying on laryngoscopy for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS While some laryngologic conditions may be reasonably identified without in-person examination, laryngoscopy remains central to definitive diagnosis and treatment. Telemedicine can increase access to care, but it may provide more utility as a screening tool, triaging which patients should present more urgently for in-person laryngoscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Montalbaron
- NYU Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Efstratios Achlatis
- NYU Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron M Johnson
- NYU Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yue Ma
- UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - VyVy N Young
- UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clark A Rosen
- UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Milan R Amin
- NYU Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul E Kwak
- NYU Voice Center, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hokstad S, Næss KAB. Stuttering in individuals with Down syndrome: a systematic review of earlier research. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1176743. [PMID: 38094702 PMCID: PMC10716236 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The main objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence on the occurrence and characteristics of stuttering in individuals with Down syndrome and thus contribute knowledge about stuttering in this population. Group studies reporting outcome measures of stuttering were included. Studies with participants who were preselected based on their fluency status were excluded. We searched the Eric, PsychInfo, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases on 3rd January 2022 and conducted supplementary searches of the reference lists of previous reviews and the studies included in the current review, as well as relevant speech and language journals. The included studies were coded in terms of information concerning sample characteristics, measurement approaches, and stuttering-related outcomes. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS) was used to evaluate study quality. We identified 14 eligible studies, with a total of 1,833 participants (mean = 131.29, standard deviation = 227.85, median = 45.5) between 3 and 58 years of age. The estimated occurrence of stuttering ranged from 2.38 to 56%, which is substantially higher than the estimated prevalence (1%) of stuttering in the general population. The results also showed that stuttering severity most often was judged to be mild-to-moderate and that individuals with Down syndrome displayed secondary behaviors when these were measured. However, little attention has been paid to investigating the potential adverse effects of stuttering for individuals with Down syndrome. We judged the quality of the evidence to be moderate-to-low. The negative evaluation was mostly due to sampling limitations that decreased the representability and generalizability of the results. Based on the high occurrence of stuttering and the potential negative effects of this condition, individuals with Down syndrome who show signs of stuttering should be referred to a speech and language pathologist for an evaluation of their need for stuttering treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Hokstad
- Department of Education, Lillehammer, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari-Anne B. Næss
- Department of Education, Lillehammer, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirmess M, Guttormsen LS, Hofslundsengen H, Næss KAB, Kefalianos E. Norwegian speech-language pathologists treatment practices for preschool children who stutter: An explorative study. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2023; 77:105999. [PMID: 37562079 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the treatment practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) with preschool children who stutter to explore variations in service delivery and, consequently to better inform and support evidence-based practice. METHOD 121 Norwegian SLPs completed an online survey about stuttering treatment for preschool children aged up to six years. They reported on treatment training, choices, setting, dosage, and outcomes. Data was analysed descriptively. Correlation analyses between years of clinical experience and clinician perceived outcomes were conducted. RESULT Sixty-eight percent of SLPs were trained in one or more stuttering treatment programs. The majority of SLPs (83 %) provided treatment in person in preschool centers; 59 % reported providing treatment once a week. Thirty-four percent of SLPs reported that they often or always delivered the whole treatment program. Treatment practice addressed various elements, including advising parents about language and communication strategies, supporting the child's self-image, and perceived outcomes. The SLPs reported their clinician perceived outcomes as 'always' or 'often' reduction of audible stuttering (70 %), reduced cognitive and emotional reactions (55 %), and improved communication skills (58 %). Factors influencing treatment choices were identified at the systemic level (e.g., work place regulations) and individual level (e.g., SLPs competency, child's best). CONCLUSION Stuttering treatment services in Norway differ from those reported in existing literature as treatment is given in preschool settings, only 34 % of SLPs deliver programs as intended whilst the majority use treatment elements only, and still experience positive changes. Provision is variable, and seems influenced by SLP training and competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,.
| | - Linn Stokke Guttormsen
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway,; Department of Early Childhood Education, Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Hofslundsengen
- Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway
| | | | - Elaina Kefalianos
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Taeye R, Van Lierde K, Alighieri C. Telepractice in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric speech-language disorders: The opinions and experiences of speech-language pathologists. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 169:111560. [PMID: 37116275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the opinions and experiences with telepractice (TP) of Dutch-speaking speech-language pathologists (SLPs) living in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium (Flanders). This study will help to optimize care for children with speech-language disorders as we will gain more insight into the experienced barriers and facilitators while using TP for assessing and treating these disorders. METHOD Twenty-nine Dutch-speaking speech-language pathologists living in Flanders (age category 20-30 years: n = 16/29, 55.2%, 31-40 years: n = 10/29, 34.2%, 41-50 years: n = 2/29, 6.9%, 51-60 years: n = 1/29, 3.4%) were recruited through the social media. An online questionnaire was developed based on the available literature and administered to the SLPs. To compare the opinions and experiences of SLPs with TP, χ2 tests or Fisher's exact tests were used. RESULTS The study showed a statistically significant association between years of clinical experience of SLPs and their opinion that TP does not provide more options in a clinical setting compared to face-to-face contact. SLPs who had expertise in multiple domains experienced significantly more added value of TP during the corona pandemic than SLPs who had expertise in only one specific domain. Additionally, SLPs who worked in a private practice indicated significantly more difficulties in developing a therapeutic relationship due to a lack of personal contact than SLPs who worked in other settings. 51.7% (15/29) of the SLPs experienced technical barriers using TP. CONCLUSION Expertise in multiple domains of pediatric speech-language therapy resulted in experiencing more added value of TP during the corona pandemic, possibly because of the experience of multiple different and simultaneous advantages of TP in several domains. Additionally, SLPs in a private practice experienced more difficulties in developing a therapeutic relationship due to a lack of personal contact with their clients. This is in contrast to hospitals where children are often seen for a shorter period. Hence, there may be less chance of a negative perception of relationships with clients. Another conclusion is that treatment drop-out was not larger using TP compared to face-to-face therapy. However, SLPs experienced that the use of TP was not promoted/encouraged by their employer possibly because of technical barriers. It is hoped that the findings of this study will help SLPs and policymakers overthrow existing barriers and make telepractice a substantial, effective, and efficient service delivery model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Taeye
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 2P1, 9000, Gent, Belgium
| | - Kristiane Van Lierde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 2P1, 9000, Gent, Belgium
| | - Cassandra Alighieri
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 2P1, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bowers L, Young HD, Glade R. Training School Professionals in a Global Pandemic: Insights From Elementary Education and Speech-Language Pathology. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2022; 53:1129-1148. [PMID: 36194652 DOI: 10.1044/2022_lshss-21-00176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this research was to explore the preparation of practitioners from two disciplines-speech-language pathology and elementary education-who often work together in a school setting to identify ways to best support future professionals in their educational practicum settings. The primary research questions guiding this investigation were as follows: Did the student teaching and supervision experiences of preservice K-6 teachers (PSTs) and their mentors and speech-language pathology graduate student clinicians and their supervisors differ during the COVID-19 pandemic, and if so, in what ways? METHOD A total of 54 participants from one university participated in this study from four groups: 15 graduate student clinicians in a speech-language pathology program, 14 speech-language pathology supervisors, 14 PSTs, and 11 teacher mentors. Survey questions were designed to capture the perceptions of students and supervisors in the fields of speech-language pathology and elementary education who were in the school setting during the fall 2020 semester. Quantitative and qualitative questions were included to obtain information related to the following areas: planning, environment, supervision preferences, team experiences, professional development, and telepractice. RESULTS Speech-language pathologists and teacher mentors reported being able to successfully mentor and supervise students in the school setting despite significant challenges presented by the global pandemic. Findings also identified several significant differences in the experiences of PSTs and speech-language pathology graduate student clinicians who were in the schools for field experiences. CONCLUSIONS Overall, speech-language pathology graduate student clinicians and their supervisors as well as PSTs and their teacher mentors reported adequately navigating their field experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implications for how these findings can inform professional preparation programs to optimize future educational and therapy outcomes for students are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Bowers
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
| | - Heather D Young
- Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
| | - Rachel Glade
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bergþórsdóttir ÍÖ, Crowe K, Einarsdóttir JT. Implementation fidelity in parent-implemented interventions for stuttering. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2022; 36:904-927. [PMID: 34553655 DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1965659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge of the fidelity with which interventions are delivered in research studies is crucial to meaningful examination of intervention impact. This paper presents a review of fidelity implementation (FOI) measurements in interventions jointly delivered by speech-language pathologists (SLP) and parents in research for preschool-aged children who stutter (CWS). Four key FOI components were examined: dosage, adherence, quality, responsiveness. Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. Articles were published between 1990 and 2020 described nine different interventions and examined CWS aged 2-6 years. No study reported all FOI components in both the clinical and the home setting and five did not report on any FOI component in either setting. The number of FOI components reported ranged from 0 to 4 in both clinical (M = 1.5) and home (M = 1.0) settings. Across studies, dosage was most often reported (n = 27, 75.0%) and responsiveness was least often reported (n = 16, 44.4%). The number of FOI components reported in articles did not increase over time, although a trend towards greater reporting in recent years was observed. Poor reporting of FOI in intervention research presents a serious methodological concern that impacts the ability of clinicians and researchers to interpret the findings of these studies. Rigorous measurement and reporting of FOI in future intervention studies is required in order to better inform evidence-based practices for interventions with CWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathryn Crowe
- School of Health Science, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- School of Teacher Education, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laiho A, Elovaara H, Kaisamatti K, Luhtalampi K, Talaskivi L, Pohja S, Routamo-Jaatela K, Vuorio E. Stuttering interventions for children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review as a part of clinical guidelines. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 99:106242. [PMID: 35751980 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stuttering may have a holistic effect on the quality of life of a person who stutters by limiting participation in social situations, resulting in feelings of isolation and frustration, leading to difficulties in education and employment and increasing the likelihood of mental health problems. Even young children who stutter may have negative experiences of speaking. Therefore, it is important to treat stuttering behavior effectively in both children and adults. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review group and case studies about the effectiveness of behavioral stuttering interventions to provide evidence-based guidelines for clinicians. METHODS Systematic data retrieval was conducted in four electronic databases (PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane). The assessment of search results was conducted according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent judges. The methodological quality of each paper was assessed using strict criteria to include only high-quality research. RESULTS The search revealed 2293 results, and 38 papers (systematic reviews N=3, group design studies N=21 and case studies N=14) with acceptable methodological quality were included. The data show that there is most evidence about the treatment of early childhood stuttering, very little evidence about school-aged children and some evidence about adults. The most convincing evidence is about the Lidcombe Program in the treatment of young children who stutter, but also other methods have promising evidence. Our data imply that in the treatment of adults who stutter, holistic treatments may influence speech fluency and overall experience of stuttering behavior. Speech restructuring treatments may have a positive effect on overt characteristics of stuttering, but not on covert stuttering behavior. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review agree with earlier reviews about the treatment of young children. However, due to different inclusion criteria, this review also shows the benefits of holistic treatment approaches with adults and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Auli Laiho
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Voimavarakeskus Tempo Oy, Tempo - Stuttering Resource Center.
| | - Heli Elovaara
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Salon kaupunki, City of Salo.
| | - Kirsi Kaisamatti
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Coronaria Terapeija Oy.
| | - Katri Luhtalampi
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Logopedica.
| | - Liisa Talaskivi
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Kommunikointikeskus Kipinä Oy.
| | - Salla Pohja
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Voimavarakeskus Tempo Oy, Tempo - Stuttering Resource Center.
| | | | - Elsa Vuorio
- Finnish Association of Speech and Language Therapists; Private Practice.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aldukair L, Ward D. Telepractice application for the overt stuttering assessment of children aged 6-15 years old. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 57:1050-1070. [PMID: 35703426 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the importance of delivering speech and language therapy services to children who stutter (CWS), there are barriers to accessing speech and language therapy. One way to improve access for those who may otherwise be deprived of speech and language therapy services, including CWS, is through telepractice (TP). However, there is currently no evidence as to the viability of TP stuttering assessments for CWS. AIM To investigate the validity and reliability, and acceptability of using a TP application to assess overt stuttering behaviour children aged 6-15 years. METHODS & PROCEDURE A total of 30 CWS, aged between 6 and 15 years, were recruited from a speech therapy clinic in King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Children were divided into two testing conditions, either face-to-face (f2f)-led or TP-led testing, and the Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-IV) was administered, percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) was calculated, and severity ratings (SR) assigned, either via f2f or via TP using two laptops with webcams, video conference software and a broadband internet connection. Agreement and reliability of scoring in the two testing conditions were reported in addition to findings from questionnaires exploring children's and their caregivers' perceptions both before and immediately after the TP assessment was carried out. OUTCOME & RESULTS A total of 30 sessions were successfully carried out, with results revealing unsatisfactory levels of agreement when applying the Bland and Altman method. However, when discrepancies were found, these were comparable with those from traditional f2f studies. Generally, parents and children exhibited high levels of satisfaction and held a positive view regarding TP pre- and post-assessment. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The results of the study suggest that conducting an overt stuttering assessment via TP for 6-15-year-olds CWS is reliable and valid. Although the TP model posed some (mainly technical) challenges for executing the assessment, high levels of satisfaction were recorded by parents and children alike. The TP system and equipment chosen in this study has provided a basis for the delivery of TP overt stuttering assessment in a clinical setting, thus addressing the barriers to access that are present for CWS. These results are preliminary, but they can be seen as a building block for future research in TP assessment studies for CWS. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Stuttering treatment via TP has been proven to be feasible and successful across a variety of treatment programs (e.g., Lidcombe, Camperdown). However, the viability of assessing stuttering via videoconferencing has never been explored in children. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Preliminary support for the assessment of overt stuttering in CWS aged 6-15 years via video conferencing. The results justify larger scale studies of this service delivery method. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The TP system and equipment chosen in this study has provided a basis for the delivery of TP overt stuttering assessment in a clinical setting, thus addressing the barriers to access that are present for CWS aged 6-15 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamya Aldukair
- Health Rehabilitation Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - David Ward
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iimura D, Kakuta K, Oe T, Kobayashi H, Sakai N, Miyamoto S. Treatment for School-Age Children Who Stutter: A Systematic Review of Japanese Literature. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2022; 53:561-583. [PMID: 35157506 DOI: 10.1044/2021_lshss-21-00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review identified and synthesized published research articles, written in Japanese, on the clinical effectiveness of a broad range of nonpharmacological interventions for school-age children who stutter. METHOD A systematic review of Japanese literature published between January 1, 1980, and July 7, 2020, reporting interventions for school-age children who stutter, was carried out through a search of two databases (CiNii Article database and Japan Medical Abstract Society database) using the key words "stuttering" and "school-age" or "child" or "primary school students" or "children" or "school child" in Japanese. To be included in the review, the articles must report studies where data were subjectively reported by clinicians, where school-age participants were treated for developmental stuttering, where participants received interventions conducted by clinicians, and where quantitative outcomes (pre- and/or posttreatment) were measured; and they must be published in Japanese. RESULTS Forty articles met all the inclusion criteria. Most articles adopted a case series or single-case study design. A total of 179 intervention programs were identified from all the articles and broadly classified into speech therapy, psychological therapy, interventions for modifying the child's environment, and others. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review provided a broad overview of the treatments used for school-age children who stutter in Japan. Future research should focus on gathering more reliable, systematic, and rigorous evidence to establish the effectiveness of stuttering treatments for school-age children and thereby develop evidence-based practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Iimura
- Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Okayama, Japan.,Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences,University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kohei Kakuta
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hospital, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takuya Oe
- Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences,University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- School of Teacher Education, College of Human and Social Science, Kanazawa University, Japan.,United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Suita, Japan
| | - Naomi Sakai
- Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Saitama, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lung Function Tests, Quality of Life and Telemedicine: Three Windows on the Multifaceted World of Asthma in Adolescents. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9040476. [PMID: 35455520 PMCID: PMC9026868 DOI: 10.3390/children9040476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation and recognized as the most prevalent chronic illness among children. Despite this, the knowledge as to how asthma affects adolescents is still scarce. One of the main management problems of asthmatic adolescents is the poor adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. The assessment of respiratory function and the impact on quality of life are still two crucial challenges in the management of asthmatic adolescents. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted physicians to explore complementary management strategies including telemedicine technologies. This review aims to provide an update on the contribution of respiratory functional tests, how asthma affects quality of life of adolescents and, finally, how telemedicine contributes to the management of adolescent asthmatics during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hofslundsengen H, Kirmess M, Guttormsen LS, Næss KAB, Kefalianos E. Systematic review of implementation quality of non-pharmacological stuttering intervention trials for children and adolescents. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2022; 71:105884. [PMID: 34798495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This narrative systematic review in line with PRISMA guidelines aims to investigate the implementation quality of previously published group comparison clinical trials of stuttering interventions for children and adolescents (under age 18 years). METHODS We searched for publications in the databases Eric, PsychInfo, PubMed and Web of Science using the search terms 'stutt*' or 'stamm*'and 'intervention', 'trial' or 'treatment'. We reviewed the implementation elements reported in studies and how these elements were used to report intervention outcomes. RESULTS 3,017 references published between 1974-2019 were identified. All references were screened for eligibility using predefined selection criteria resulting in 21 included studies. The implementation quality details reported varied between studies. Existing studies most commonly lacked details about the support system provided to SLPs administering the interventions and monitoring of treatment fidelity both in the clinical setting and in the home environment. Support systems for participant's parents and treatment dosage were generally well reported. Dosage was the most common implementation quality element considered in analyses of treatment effect and within discussions of findings. CONCLUSION Findings highlight the need for future clinical trials of stuttering interventions to closely adhere to systematic guidelines for reporting implementation quality to ensure reliability of trial outcomes. A checklist for reporting clinical trials of non-pharmacological stuttering interventions is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Hofslundsengen
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, box 131, 6856 Sogndal, Norway.
| | - Melanie Kirmess
- University of Oslo, Department of Special Needs Education, Mail Box 1140 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway; Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1453 Bjørnemyr, Norway.
| | - Linn Stokke Guttormsen
- University of Oslo, Department of Special Needs Education, Mail Box 1140 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Kari-Anne Bottegaard Næss
- University of Oslo, Department of Special Needs Education, Mail Box 1140 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Elaina Kefalianos
- University of Melbourne, Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Level 2, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Santayana G, Carey B, Shenker RC. No other choice: Speech-Language Pathologists' attitudes toward using telepractice to administer the Lidcombe Program during a pandemic. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2021; 70:105879. [PMID: 34624789 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telepractice has been shown to be a viable modality for the delivery of stuttering treatment. Since the advent of COVID-19, speech-language pathologists must adapt in-clinic treatments for online presentation. This research aimed to gather information from speech-language pathologists on their experiences of telepractice to deliver the Lidcombe Program to treat stuttering in young children. METHODS This paper presents the findings of an online survey that polled the clinical experiences of 106 speech-language pathologists who were delivering the Lidcombe Program via telepractice during COVID-19. RESULTS The majority of respondents were experienced clinicians from the United States and Canada who had attended a Lidcombe Program workshop. Prior to COVID-19, 80 % had provided some clinical services online (up to 10 % of the time), and at the start of COVID-19 public lockdown orders, 77 % viewed telepractice as both a necessity and an opportunity. Three months after the public lockdown orders, the large majority, 94 %, said that they would continue to use both telepractice and in-clinic treatment in the future. Technology issues, concerns about establishing the clinical relationship, and identification of mild stuttering featured as challenges of telepractice service delivery, while benefits included time efficiency, flexibility of scheduling, and improved clinical processes. CONCLUSION Respondents reported that the Lidcombe Program was easily translatable to telepractice and the majority intend to continue telepractice in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brenda Carey
- Brenda Carey Speech Pathology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brignell A, Krahe M, Downes M, Kefalianos E, Reilly S, Morgan A. Interventions for children and adolescents who stutter: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2021; 70:105843. [PMID: 33743406 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review critically appraises and maps the evidence for stuttering interventions in childhood and adolescence. We examine the effectiveness of speech-focused treatments, the efficacy of alternative treatment delivery methods and identify gaps in the research evidence. METHODS Nine electronic databases and three clinical trial registries were searched for systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and studies that applied an intervention with children (2-18 years) who stutter. Pharmacological interventions were excluded. Primary outcomes were a measure of stuttering severity and quality assessments were conducted on all included studies. RESULTS Eight RCTs met inclusion criteria and were analysed. Intervention approaches included direct (i.e. Lidcombe Program; LP) and indirect treatments (e.g. Demands and Capacities Model; DCM). All studies had moderate risk of bias. Treatment delivery methods included individual face-to-face, telehealth and group-based therapy. Both LP and DCM approaches were effective in reducing stuttering in preschool aged children. LP had the highest level of evidence (pooled effect size=-3.8, CI -7.3 to -0.3 for LP). There was no high-level evidence for interventions with school-aged children or adolescents. Alternative methods of delivery were as effective as individual face-to-face intervention. CONCLUSION The findings of this systematic review and evidence mapping are useful for clinicians, researchers and service providers seeking to understand the existing research to support the advancement of interventions for children and adolescence who stutter. Findings could be used to inform further research and support clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Brignell
- Speech and Language Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Michelle Krahe
- Health Group, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia
| | - Martin Downes
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia
| | - Elaina Kefalianos
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Sheena Reilly
- Health Group, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia
| | - Angela Morgan
- Speech and Language Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Erickson S, Bridgman K, Furlong L, Stark H. Speech-Language Pathologist Perspectives of the Implementation of Telepractice-Delivered Stuttering Treatment for School-Age Children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2021; 53:30-43. [PMID: 34752153 DOI: 10.1044/2021_lshss-20-00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The impact of stuttering can be significant, and effective treatment is critical. Despite evidence supporting direct treatment approaches for school-age children who stutter, a complex set of barriers can prevent access at school. One potential solution is telepractice. To date, however, there is no published evidence regarding the use of telepractice to deliver the Lidcombe Program within a school setting. METHOD In this pilot study, a telepractice service was established and the perspectives of the five treating speech-language pathologists (SLPs) were evaluated before, during, and after the trial through focus groups and recorded telesupervision sessions. RESULTS An inductive and reflexive thematic analysis identified four main themes: (a) Understanding and managing technology is critical; (b) logistical considerations can be time-consuming and challenging; (c) preparation and support are essential; and (d) family engagement, acceptance, and independence with telepractice services can be facilitated by external support and coaching. Initially, the SLPs shared feelings of uncertainty, fear, and apprehension. Yet, despite this concern, the SLPs ultimately reported that telepractice can play an important role in their service. CONCLUSIONS In order to maximize the potential value of telepractice, SLPs require training and support to (a) manage the technology and troubleshoot problems that invariably arise, (b) have the opportunity to watch demonstrations of the technology, and (c) clearly explain the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of the parent engaging in treatment. These findings have particular relevance now, as schools and support services navigate a COVID-safe delivery model for the indefinite future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Erickson
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Bridgman
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Furlong
- School of Education, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Commerce, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hannah Stark
- Catholic Education Services, Learning Diversity, Catholic Education Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mansuri B, Tohidast SA, Choubineh M, Bagheri R, Azimi H. Development and psychometric evaluation of a scale to measure telepractice among speech and language pathologists during COVID-19 pandemic. LOGOP PHONIATR VOCO 2021; 47:292-298. [PMID: 34637673 DOI: 10.1080/14015439.2021.1988144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the outbreak of the COVID-19 and the need for physical distancing, the provision of Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) services via telepractice has been essential. One of the first steps in this field is the need to study telepractice among Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs). However, there is currently no specific instrument to measure telepractice in SLP to achieve this aim. The present study was conducted to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire to investigate telepractice among SLPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study comprised of two stages: (1) development of the questionnaire according to an in-depth literature review and (2) evaluation of the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The content validity of the instrument was determined by 10 experts in the field of SLP. To check the face validity of the questionnaire, 10 SLPs were interviewed and their opinions were incorporated in the questionnaire. A total of 221 SLPs completed the questionnaire to determine the construct validity and the internal consistency. To evaluate the test-retest reliability, 30 SLPs completed the questionnaire twice with two weeks of interval. RESULTS The final version of the questionnaire comprised of three sections and 31 items. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for different sections of the questionnaire ranged between 0.902 and 0.92 and the Intra-class Correlation coefficients of the sections were found to be between 0.9 and 0.96 in the test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS The questionnaire developed in the study is a valid and reliable scale to measure telepractice among SLPs for educational or research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banafshe Mansuri
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Seyed Abolfazl Tohidast
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Mehran Choubineh
- Student Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Rasool Bagheri
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Hadi Azimi
- English Language Teaching Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wood E, Bhalloo I, McCaig B, Feraru C, Molnar M. Towards development of guidelines for virtual administration of paediatric standardized language and literacy assessments: Considerations for clinicians and researchers. SAGE Open Med 2021; 9:20503121211050510. [PMID: 34646565 PMCID: PMC8504279 DOI: 10.1177/20503121211050510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous virtual care literature within the field of speech-language pathology has primarily focused on validating the virtual use of intervention programmes. There are fewer articles addressing the validity of conducting virtual assessments, particularly standardized assessment of oral language and literacy abilities in children. In addition, there is a lack of practical, useful recommendations available to support clinicians and researchers on how to conduct these assessment measures virtually. Given the recent rapid rise in virtual care and research as a result of the Coronavirus-19 pandemic, clinicians and researchers require guidance on best practices for virtual administration of these tools imminently. This article seeks to fill this gap in the literature by providing such recommendations. METHODS We (a) completed a narrative review of the extant literature, and (b) conducted semi-structured interviews with a group of 12 clinicians, students and researchers who had administered standardized language and literacy assessments with a variety of monolingual and multilingual school-aged children, with and without speech and language difficulties, in clinical and research settings. Six themes: candidacy for virtual assessment, communication and collaboration with caregivers, technology and equipment, virtual administration, ethics, consent and confidentiality, and considerations for bilingual populations were identified as a result of these two processes and were used to develop a set of recommendations to guide the use of standardized assessments in a virtual setting. In line with the Guidelines International Network, these recommendations were rated by group members, and reviewed by external stakeholders. A quasi-Delphi consensus procedure was used to reach agreement on ratings for recommendations. RESULTS We have developed and outlined several recommendations for clinicians and researchers to guide their use of standardized language and literacy assessments in virtual care, across six key themes. CONCLUSIONS This article is one of the first to share practical recommendations for virtual assessment in the domain of oral language and literacy assessment for clinicians and researchers. We hope the current recommendations will facilitate future clinical research in this area, and as the body of research in this field grows, this article will act as a basis for the development of formal Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Wood
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Insiya Bhalloo
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brittany McCaig
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cristina Feraru
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Monika Molnar
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Almubark BM, Majrashi N, Alghusun N, Alhammad M, Alhthifi F, Alyahya RSW. Telehealth Clinical Practice Guide for Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Speech and Language Pathology: A Saudi and Middle Eastern Guide. Telemed J E Health 2021; 28:636-642. [PMID: 34529497 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Telehealth refers to the application of telecommunications technology to deliver clinical services at a distance by linking clinician to patient, caregiver, or any person(s) involved in client care for assessment, intervention, consultation, and supervision. Telehealth for occupational therapy (OT), physical therapy (PT), and speech and language pathology (SLP) have produced service delivery venues that are of great benefit during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The concept of telehealth for rehabilitation services is relatively new in the Middle East, and no specialty-specific clinical practice standards or guidelines are published to guide the rehabilitation practitioners. Therefore, a specialty-specific telehealth practice guide for rehabilitation practitioners has been developed by an expert panel in the field of rehabilitation. This guide is documented in this article. Such a guide will be beneficial when providing tele-evaluation, teleintervention/telerehabilitation, teleconsultation, and telemonitoring through communication technologies. The purpose of this guide is to enable understanding of core telehealth clinical principles and aid the provision of OT, PT, and SLP telehealth services in Saudi Arabia. Also, the guide can potentially be implemented in other Middle Eastern countries. The guide is based on key telehealth guidelines involving the American Occupational Therapy Association telehealth resources, American Physical Therapy Association, American Speech and Hearing Association, telemedicine policies in Saudi Arabia by the national health information center at the Saudi Health Council, and a blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines that are based on the American Telemedicine Association's Core Standards for Telemedicine Operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bazah M Almubark
- Occupational Therapy Unit, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Norah Alghusun
- Department of Communication and Swallowing Disorders, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Faisal Alhthifi
- Rehabilitation Services, Al Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem S W Alyahya
- Department of Communication and Swallowing Disorders, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Faculty of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sjøstrand Å, Kefalianos E, Hofslundsengen H, Guttormsen LS, Kirmess M, Lervåg A, Hulme C, Bottegaard Næss KA. Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children six years and younger. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013489. [PMID: 34499348 PMCID: PMC8428330 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013489.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stuttering, or stammering as it is referred to in some countries, affects a child's ability to speak fluently. It is a common communication disorder, affecting 11% of children by four years of age. Stuttering can be characterized by sound, part word or whole word repetitions, sound prolongations, or blocking of sounds or airflow. Moments of stuttering can also be accompanied by non-verbal behaviours, including visible tension in the speaker's face, eye blinks or head nods. Stuttering can also negatively affect behavioural, social and emotional functioning. OBJECTIVES Primary objective To assess the immediate and long-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering on speech outcomes, communication attitudes, quality of life and potential adverse effects in children aged six years and younger. Secondary objective To describe the relationship between intervention effects and participant characteristics (i.e. child age, IQ, severity, sex and time since stuttering onset) at pretest. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, nine other databases and two trial registers on 16 September 2020, and Open Grey on 20 October 2020. There were no limits in regards to language, year of publication or type of publication. We also searched the reference lists of included studies and requested data on unpublished trials from authors of published studies. We handsearched conference proceedings and programmes from relevant conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that assessed non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in young children aged six years and younger. Eligible comparators were no intervention, wait list or management as usual. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We identified four eligible RCTs, all of which compared the Lidcombe Program to a wait-list control group. In total, 151 children aged between two and six years participated in the four included studies. In the Lidcombe Program, the parent and their child visit a speech and language therapist (SLT) in a clinic. One study conducted clinic visits by telephone. In each clinic visit, parents were taught how to conduct treatment at home. Two studies took place in Australia, one in New Zealand and one in Germany. Two studies were conducted for nine months, one for 16 weeks and one for 12 weeks. The frequency of clinic visits and practice sessions at home varied within the programme. One study was partially funded by the Rotary Club, Wiesbaden, Germany; and one was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. One study did not report funding sources and another reported that they did not receive any funding for the trial. All four studies reported the outcome of stuttering frequency. One study also reported on speech efficiency, defined as articulation rate. No studies reported the other predetermined outcomes of this review, namely stuttering severity; communication attitudes; emotional, cognitive or psychosocial domains; or adverse effects. The Lidcombe Program resulted in a lower stuttering frequency percentage syllables stuttered (% SS) than a wait-list control group at post-test, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and nine months postrandomization (mean difference (MD) -2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.48 to -0.84, 4 studies, 151 participants; P = 0.001; very low-certainty evidence). However, as the Lidcombe Program is designed to take one to two years to complete, none of the participants in these studies had finished the complete intervention programme at any of the data collection points. We assessed stuttering frequency to have a high risk of overall bias due to high risk of bias in at least one domain within three of four included studies, and to have some concern of overall bias in the fourth, due to some concern in at least one domain. We found moderate-certainty evidence from one study showing that the Lidcombe Program may increase speech efficiency in young children. Only one study reported outcomes at long-term follow-up. The long-term effect of intervention could not be summarized, as the results for most of the children in the control group were missing. However, a within-group comparison was performed between the mean % SS at randomization and the mean % SS at the time of extended follow-up, and showed a significant reduction in frequency of stuttering. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicates that the Lidcombe Program may result in lower stuttering frequency and higher speech efficiency than a wait-list control group in children aged up to six years at post-test. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very low and moderate certainty of the evidence and the high risk of bias identified in the included studies. Thus, there is a need for further studies from independent researchers, to evaluate the immediate and long-term effects of other non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering compared to no intervention or a wait-list control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åse Sjøstrand
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elaina Kefalianos
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Hilde Hofslundsengen
- Department of Language, Literature, Mathematics and Interpreting, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway
| | - Linn S Guttormsen
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Melanie Kirmess
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne Lervåg
- Department of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Charles Hulme
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Subasi M, Van Borsel J, Van Eerdenbrugh S. The Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering in Non-English-Speaking Countries: A Systematic Review. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2021; 74:89-102. [PMID: 34289470 DOI: 10.1159/000517650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Lidcombe Program is a stuttering treatment approach for children between the ages of 3 and 6 years. Most papers about the Lidcombe Program, however, are based on studies conducted in native English-speaking countries. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the delivery and implementation of the Lidcombe Program in non-native English-speaking countries. SUMMARY A resource search was conducted between October and November 2019. Scopus, PubMed, ASHA, Cochrane Library, ERIC, Google Scholar, and SpeechBITE databases and reference lists of relevant papers were searched for the identification process. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for the appraisal of the studies. The search yielded 8 studies conducted in non-native English-speaking countries. The Lidcombe Program is efficacious in non-native English-speaking countries when delivered to both preschool and young school age children who stutter. It is reported to be delivered with minor changes and challenges. The number of weekly clinic visits and the total time needed to reach zero or near-zero stuttering levels with the Lidcombe Program can be up to 3 times greater in non-native English-speaking countries than in native English-speaking countries, mostly due to the increased time needed to introduce the parental verbal contingencies. Key Messages: Speech and language therapists practicing in non-native English-speaking countries are encouraged to use the Lidcombe Program for both preschool and young school age children who stutter, although this can take more time than that reported in native English-speaking countries. Further investigation to explore the therapy process with children and parents in non-native English-speaking countries is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Subasi
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - John Van Borsel
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sabine Van Eerdenbrugh
- Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Thomas More College of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Winters KL, Byrd CT. Predictors of communication attitude in preschool-age children who stutter. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 91:106100. [PMID: 33862497 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although preschool-age children who stutter report more negative attitudes toward communication than their typically fluent peers, few investigations have explored factors that may contribute to the differences observed in communication attitude. The purpose of the present study was to explore whether behavioral characteristics of stuttering severity (frequency, duration, physical concomitants) and time since onset of stuttering predict communication attitude in preschool-age children. METHOD Fifty-nine preschool-aged children who stutter completed two speaking samples and the KiddyCAT, a self-report assessment of communication attitude. Speech samples were analyzed for stuttering frequency (measured by percentage of stuttered syllables), duration, and presence of physical concomitants. Linear regression models were used to assess if these behavioral measures of stuttering and time since onset of stuttering predicted self-reported communication attitude. RESULTS Results indicate stuttering behavioral measures and time since onset do not predict KiddyCAT scores of preschool-age children who stutter. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary data suggest children who have presented with stuttering for a longer period of time are no more likely to report a negative communication attitude than children who have a shorter time since onset. Additionally, in contrast to school-age children who stutter, but similar to adults and adolescents who stutter, communication attitude is not linearly related to stuttering severity in preschool-age children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L Winters
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2405A Whitis Ave, Stop A1100, Austin, TX, 78712, United States.
| | - Courtney T Byrd
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2405A Whitis Ave, Stop A1100, Austin, TX, 78712, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zahir MZ, Miles A, Hand L, Ward EC. Information and Communication Technology in Schools: Its Contribution to Equitable Speech-Language Therapy Services in an Underserved Small Island Developing State. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2021; 52:644-660. [DOI: 10.1044/2020_lshss-20-00100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose
Access to speech-language therapy services for children with communication difficulties is limited in vulnerable countries within the Majority world, such as Small Island Developing States. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) has been identified as a possible solution to provide equitable access to services in Minority world countries. This study explored ICT-related conditions in remote schools of the Maldives, a Small Island Developing State, in order to identify potential service delivery approaches.
Method
A mixed methods approach was used, involving (a) an online survey of 107 teachers, (b) observational data from four schools, (c) interviews with 31 teachers and the four principals of participating schools, and (d) 13 relevant online documents. Content analysis was used to analyze and integrate data from all sources.
Results
Teachers' access to ICT devices and fixed broadband Internet varied across schools. The government had limited funds to provide adequate fixed broadband Internet for them. However, favorable prospects were also discovered, including high access to 4G mobile broadband Internet in islands, high levels of confidence among teachers to use ICT, a variety of ICT uses currently employed by teachers, and the presence of financial aid for students with special education needs.
Conclusions
The findings of the study support the potential for using mobile broadband Internet, available ICT devices, and teachers as agents of service delivery in remote schools to enhance speech-language therapy service delivery in the Maldives. The creation of relevant digital educational content for teachers could further support children with communication difficulties in the country.
Supplemental Material
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14143910
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Elizabeth C. Ward
- The University of Queensland School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nonis D, Unicomb R, Hewat S. Parental perceptions of stuttering in children: a systematic review of the literature. SPEECH, LANGUAGE AND HEARING 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/2050571x.2021.1913299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dinusha Nonis
- Speech Pathology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Department of Disability Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Rachael Unicomb
- Speech Pathology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Sally Hewat
- Speech Pathology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Almudhi A. Evolution in technology and changes in the perspective of stuttering therapy: A review study. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021; 28:623-627. [PMID: 33424348 PMCID: PMC7783783 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Technology has been revolutionizing health care. The current article is split into three parts, the first portion discusses the usage of technological devices in stuttering treatment, the scan of technical devices may be used specifically in treatment or can be used to offer guidance and thereby improve the pace of expression. They will even help to create physiological improvements. The second section of the article refers to telehealth as a means of providing services to people with stuttering. This approach has become a simple benevolence of technology and has managed to enter the unreached. Teletherapy can also be utilized for individuals who are robbed of treatment owing to isolation from financial restrictions. The third part of the analysis is regarding the apps. Apps may be used as an adjunct to speech language training or can be used during the repair process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz Almudhi
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Euler HA, Merkel A, Hente K, Neef N, Wolff von Gudenberg A, Neumann K. Speech restructuring group treatment for 6-to-9-year-old children who stutter: A therapeutic trial. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 89:106073. [PMID: 33444874 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
For children who stutter (CWS), there is good evidence of the benefits of treatment for pre-school age, but an evidence gap for elementary school age. Here we report on the effectiveness of a fluency shaping treatment for 6- to 9-year-old children. The main treatment component is the reinforcement of soft voice onsets. An intensive in-patient group treatment phase lasts 6 days, followed by a 6-month maintenance phase with 3 in-patient weekend group refresher courses. Child and a parent participate together in various treatment activities. In this controlled intervention study (waitlist control, intention-to-treat design) assessments were performed before treatment (T1), 4 weeks after the intensive phase (T2), at the end of the maintenance phase (T3), and 1 year later (T4). Participants were 119 children (108 boys, 11 girls, age 5.5‑10.4 years). Control conditions included a subgroup with delayed treatment (N=25) as well as the assessment of complexity of utterances, inter-rater reliability, and speech naturalness. From before treatment to 1-year follow-up, percent stuttered syllables and OASES-S (Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience with Stuttering - School-age) scores decreased with large effect size. Speech naturalness improved during this period but did not reach the level of non-stuttering children. Complexity of utterances increased during the intensive phase, but only temporarily. Twenty children (16.8 %, including dropouts) showed no demonstrable treatment benefit. Fluency shaping treatment can be effectively applied to young school children. It is assumed that parental support, group therapy, intensive treatment, and regular exercises at home are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald A Euler
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital Münster, Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster, Kardinal-von Galen-Ring 10, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| | - Anna Merkel
- Institute of the Kassel Stuttering Therapy, Feriendorfstr. 1, 34208, Bad Emstal, Germany.
| | - Katja Hente
- Institute of the Kassel Stuttering Therapy, Feriendorfstr. 1, 34208, Bad Emstal, Germany.
| | - Nicole Neef
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | - Katrin Neumann
- Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital Münster, Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster, Kardinal-von Galen-Ring 10, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bayati B, Ayatollahi H. Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing the Use of Telepractice in Stuttering Treatment. Healthc Inform Res 2021; 27:57-66. [PMID: 33611877 PMCID: PMC7921573 DOI: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.1.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stuttering is a speech disorder characterized by the repetition of sounds, syllables, or words; prolongation of sounds; and interruptions in speech. Telepractice allows speech services to be delivered to patients regardless of their location. This review investigated factors influencing the use of telepractice in stuttering treatment. METHODS Articles related to the application of telepractice in stuttering were searched using the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and ProQuest databases without consideration of any time limit. Initially, 79 articles were found and after application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were selected for the review study. Data were analyzed by using the content analysis method and synthesized narratively. RESULTS Factors influencing the use of telepractice in stuttering treatment were categorized into individual, technical, clinical, and economic factors. Providing access to healthcare services, maintaining personal privacy, and allowing flexibility in arranging appointments were among individual factors. In terms of the technical factors, technical problems and Internet speed were addressed. Clinical factors were divided into positive and negative outcomes, and economic factors were mainly related to time and cost savings. CONCLUSIONS Although patients may benefit from using telepractice, the widespread adoption of this technology can be hindered by some technical and non-technical factors. Because telepractice can be employed as a complementary method to treat stuttering, more attention should be paid to the required infrastructure and factors that may negatively impact the use of this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baran Bayati
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran
| | - Haleh Ayatollahi
- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park V, Onslow M, Lowe R, Jones M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Menzies R, Block S, Wilson L, Harrison E, Hewat S. Predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment dropout and outcome for early stuttering. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 56:102-115. [PMID: 33251679 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information is available about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment time, but nothing is known about what predicts treatment prognosis. AIMS To investigate the predictors of treatment dropout and treatment outcome for children who were treated for early stuttering with the Lidcombe Program (N = 277). METHODS & PROCEDURES A total of 32 variables were used as predictors in regression analyses of short- and medium-term Lidcombe Program outcome, and of treatment dropout. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Regression analyses associated children who have better language skills and easy temperament with better treatment outcome, although only a small portion of the variance of treatment outcome was accounted for by these variables. There was an association between treatment dropout and parental scores on a personality screening tool relating to their impulsivity. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Variables identified as predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment outcome were statistically significant, but not clinically significant. They did not account for a clinically substantive portion of treatment outcomes. Findings about parental impulsivity and their relationship with intervention drop-out require replication with prospective methods and comprehensive assessment of parent psychological status. This is particularly important because parents are involved in conducting all early interventions. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Information is available about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment time, but nothing is known about what predicts Lidcombe Program treatment outcome. What this paper adds to existing knowledge There are predictors of Lidcombe Program treatment outcome that are statistically significant, but none are clinically significant. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Clinicians can tell parents that nothing has been found that can assist with making prognostic indications about treatment outcome for their children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Park
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Onslow
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Lowe
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Jones
- School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sue O'Brian
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Ann Packman
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Ross Menzies
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan Block
- School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda Wilson
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury/Wadonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Harrison
- Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Sally Hewat
- School of Humanities and Social Science, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Donaghy M, O'Brian S, Onslow M, Lowe R, Jones M, Menzies RG. Verbal Contingencies in the Lidcombe Program: A Noninferiority Trial. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:3419-3431. [PMID: 32956008 DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The Lidcombe Program is an efficacious and effective intervention for early stuttering. The treatment is based on parent verbal response contingent stimulation procedures, which are assumed to be responsible for treatment effect. The present trial tested this assumption. Method The design was a parallel, open plan, noninferiority randomized controlled trial. In the experimental arm, the five Lidcombe Program verbal contingencies were removed from parent instruction. The primary outcome was beyond-clinic percentage syllables stuttered at 18-month follow-up. Seventy-four children and their parents were randomized to one of the two treatment arms. Results Findings of noninferiority were inconclusive for the primary outcome of stuttering severity, based on a margin of 1.0 percentage syllables stuttered. Conclusions The inconclusive finding of noninferiority means it is possible that verbal contingencies make some contribution to the Lidcombe Program treatment effect. However, considering all primary and secondary outcomes, an overriding impression from the trial is a similarity of outcomes between the control and experimental arms. The clinical applications of the trial are discussed, along with further research that is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Donaghy
- Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sue O'Brian
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Onslow
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Lowe
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Jones
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Ross G Menzies
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kohnen S, Banales E, McArthur G. Videoconferencing Interventions for Children with Reading and Spelling Difficulties: A Pilot Study. Telemed J E Health 2020; 27:537-543. [PMID: 32936055 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Many children in rural and remote areas do not have access to professionals providing literacy interventions. However, delivery of services through videoconferencing would increase access and choice for end users. Introduction: This pilot study investigated the efficacy of videoconferencing literacy interventions. As videoconferencing platforms become easier and cheaper to use, this form of telehealth delivery is increasing in popularity. However, there is currently no strong evidence base to support this practice. Materials and Methods: We studied 18 children, aged 7-12 years, with poor reading and/or spelling, and whose literacy interventions were videoconferenced into their homes and/or schools. Children were tested on three reading measures: (1) reading words, (2) reading nonwords, and (3) letter-sound knowledge, twice before their interventions commenced and once after their intervention concluded. Results: Children's raw and standardized scores on 2 of 3 outcome measures increased significantly more during the intervention than in the no-intervention period before their training commenced. Discussion and Conclusions: This study demonstrates that videoconferencing is a promising delivery mode for literacy interventions, and the results justify running a larger, randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Kohnen
- Department of Cognitive Science and Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Banales
- Department of Cognitive Science and Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Genevieve McArthur
- Department of Cognitive Science and Macquarie University Centre for Reading, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fong R, Tsai CF, Yiu OY. The Implementation of Telepractice in Speech Language Pathology in Hong Kong During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2020; 27:30-38. [PMID: 32667859 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the accelerated emergence of telepractice in speech language pathology during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Hong Kong-a small city with limited accessibility concern that telepractice has not been widely implemented. Method: An online survey of speech therapists in Hong Kong was conducted between February and March in 2020. The survey comprised up to 15 questions to assess participants' demographics, existing service delivery in telepractice, perception, and their training and knowledge on telepractice. Results: One hundred thirty-five speech (n = 135) speech language pathologists responded to the survey. About one-third (34.8%; n = 47) of participants reported having provided services through telepractice, whereas 72.3% of them started in <3 months and half of them considered it was less effective than face-to-face service. Among the other participants (n = 88), 83% of them indicated that unsuitable patient type and age as the main reason for not providing telepractice. The majority of participants had no prior training for delivering telepractice, and focused on technology when asked about their desired training. Knowledge of participants on telepractice was found only to align fairly with international guidelines. Discussions: The survey findings suggested that telepractice provision in Hong Kong was different from that of other countries where telepractice has been well established, due to the accelerated emergence by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: The study showed how the development of telepractice would be like in a short time frame, and findings on perception and desired training could be a reference for a better establishment of this model of service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Fong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Oi Yan Yiu
- Speech Therapy Department, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Koushik S, Hewat S, Onslow M, Shenker R, Jones M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Menzies R, Harrison E, Wilson L. Three Lidcombe program clinic visit options: a phase II trial. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 82:105919. [PMID: 31351345 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Weekly clinic visits are recommended in the Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide (Packman et al., 2015). That specification is based on traditional speech-language pathology practices rather than empirical research, and two studies have suggested that such a format does not always occur in clinical communities. This research was conducted to determine the relative efficacy of different Lidcombe Program models of clinic visits. METHOD Thirty-one children were randomized to three different service delivery models: twice-weekly, weekly and fortnightly (once every two weeks) clinic visits. All children were treated with the Lidcombe Program following manualised procedures. Measures of percentage syllables stuttered were obtained from beyond clinic audio recordings pre- and post-randomization. RESULTS Results showed that the twice-weekly and fortnightly treatment formats were not suitable for all families. However, the fortnightly outcomes at 9 months post-randomization were comparable with those attained during weekly clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS These results justify further, large-scale clinical trialling to compare weekly Lidcombe Program clinic visits with schedules involving less frequent clinic visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sally Hewat
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Trajkovski N, O'Brian S, Onslow M, Packman A, Lowe R, Menzies R, Jones M, Reilly S. A three-arm randomized controlled trial of Lidcombe Program and Westmead Program early stuttering interventions. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2019; 61:105708. [PMID: 31121476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare two experimental Westmead Program treatments with a control Lidcombe Program treatment for early stuttering. METHOD The design was a three-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessments 9 months post-randomization. Participants were 91 pre-school children. RESULTS There was no evidence of difference in percentage syllables stuttered at 9 months among groups. Dropout rates were substantive and may have been connected with novel aspects of the trial design: the use of community clinicians, no exclusion criteria, and randomization of children younger than 3 years of age. CONCLUSION The substantive dropout rate for all three arms in this trial means that any conclusions about the 9-month stuttering outcomes must be regarded as tentative. However, continued development of the Westmead Program is warranted, and we are currently constructing an internet version.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Trajkovski
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Sue O'Brian
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Mark Onslow
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ann Packman
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Robyn Lowe
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Ross Menzies
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Mark Jones
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
| | - Sheena Reilly
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, QLD, Australia; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ferdinands B, Bridgman K. An investigation into the relationship between parent satisfaction and child fluency in the Lidcombe Program: Clinic versus telehealth delivery. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2019; 21:347-354. [PMID: 29621894 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1445779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Parents have a vital role in the delivery of the Lidcombe Program when treating stuttering in young children. Research into parent experiences and perceptions throughout the Lidcombe Program is currently limited. Qualitative literature indicates that parent experiences and child progress are closely linked with program duration. This preliminary quantitative study examined parent satisfaction with child fluency at three time points. Data from clinic and telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program were used to further explore between-group non-inferiority. Method: The data were drawn from a parallel, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Forty-nine children were randomised to the clinic or telehealth group. Parent satisfaction ratings with child fluency, the percentage of syllables stuttered and parent reported severity ratings were measured pre-treatment, 9 months and 18 months post-commencement of treatment. Result: An increase in parent satisfaction paralleled a decrease in stuttering severity across the three time points universally, however, the relationship between parent satisfaction and stuttering severity was not found at every time point. Conclusion: Though a general increase in parent satisfaction was seen as severity decreased, a global assumption on satisfaction cannot be made based on stuttering severity when measured using an ordinal scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgitta Ferdinands
- Audiology and Speech Pathology Department, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia and
| | - Kate Bridgman
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University , Bundoora , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Onslow M, Lowe R. After the RESTART trial: six guidelines for clinical trials of early stuttering intervention. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2019; 54:517-528. [PMID: 30773736 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Rotterdam Evaluation Study of Stuttering Therapy randomized trial (RESTART) was seminal, comparing the Lidcombe Program with RESTART Demands and Capacities Model-based treatment (RESTART-DCM) for pre-school age children who stutter. AIMS To critique the methods of the RESTART trial to develop guidelines for its systematic replication and extension. Beyond that, to contribute to the refinement of existing methodological guidelines for early stuttering intervention. METHOD The discussion is organized around methodological issues of primary outcomes, treatment completion, clinician allegiance, treatment fidelity, age exclusions and no-treatment control reasoning. MAIN CONTRIBUTION We recommend six methodological guidelines to guide future clinical trials comparing the Lidcombe Program with RESTART-DCM, which can be applied to clinical trials of other early stuttering intervention methods: (1) incorporate a continuous measure of primary outcome; (2) ensure that all children in clinical trials have completed treatment; (3) eliminate potential bias due to clinician allegiance; (4) establish treatment fidelity within and beyond the clinic; (5) include children younger than 3 years in clinical trials; and (6) establish an estimate of treatment effect size at some stage of treatment development. CONCLUSION In addition to guiding future clinical research comparing RESTART-DCM and Lidcombe Program treatment, these recommendations may extend to influence positively other treatment developments for early stuttering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Onslow
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Lowe
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bernstein Ratner N. Selecting Treatments and Monitoring Outcomes: The Circle of Evidence-Based Practice and Client-Centered Care in Treating a Preschool Child Who Stutters. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018; 49:13-22. [PMID: 29322185 DOI: 10.1044/2017_lshss-17-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the present clinical forum is to compare how 2 clinicians might select among therapy options for a preschool-aged child who presents with stuttering close to onset. Method I discuss approaches to full evaluation of the child's profile, advisement of evidence-based practice options open to the family, the need for monitoring of the child's response, and selection of other approaches, if the child appears nonresponsive to the 1st-line approach. Results Although some researchers and clinicians appear to favor endorsement of a single recommended treatment for early stuttering, I do not find this approach helpful or consistent with newer mandates for patient-centered care. I am also most comfortable recommending RESTART demands and capacities model as the 1st treatment approach, with parent consent, because its mechanism of action appears transparent and well-documented. Conclusions There are numerous well-supported intervention options for treating preschool children who stutter. No single therapy can possibly work for all clients. I discuss available options that I feel have sufficient evidence-based support for use with young children who stutter. I emphasize the need to consider more, not fewer, acceptable therapy options for children who do not respond positively to a selected treatment approach within a reasonable time frame.
Collapse
|
37
|
Shafiei B, Faramarzi S, Abedi A, Dehqan A, Scherer R. Effects of the Lidcombe Program and Parent-Child Interaction Therapy on Stuttering Reduction in Preschool Children. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2018; 71:29-41. [DOI: 10.1159/000493915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
38
|
Furlong L, Serry T, Erickson S, Morris ME. Processes and challenges in clinical decision-making for children with speech-sound disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2018; 53:1124-1138. [PMID: 30216607 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with speech-sound disorders (SSD) constitute a significant proportion of speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) caseloads. Previous research has investigated the clinical practice of SLPs intervening with children with SSD; however, little is known about the clinical decision-making underpinning their practice. AIMS The clinical decision-making of SLPs working with children with SSD was explored to understand how their clinical decisions were influenced by: (1) beliefs about what works in therapy; (2) prior clinical experience; and (3) client and service-related variables. METHODS & PROCEDURES Semi-structured, individual, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 SLPs. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and explore key ideas and themes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Four themes emerged: (1) clinical decision-making procedures were highly individualized; (2) parental involvement was viewed as central to the success and progression of therapy; (3) therapy procedures were influenced by practice-setting constraints; and (4) engaging in evidence-based practice within clinical settings was perceived as challenging. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS In clinical settings, a range of factors influence decision-making and therapy provided by SLPs to children with SSD. These SLPs had a high regard for clients' values and preferences. Prior clinical experiences also shaped clinical practice. Clinical decision-making was influenced by practice-setting constraints. SLPs are under pressure in their workplaces and are struggling to manage the competing demands on their time. Large clinical caseloads, heavy workloads, current service-delivery models and changing family structures are all impacting on the provision of therapy to children with SSD and therapy outcomes. As a profession, there is a need to consider these barriers and identify ways to overcome them in order to assist SLPs to routinely adopt the highest standards of clinical practice for children with SSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Furlong
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tanya Serry
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shane Erickson
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Meg E Morris
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Keilmann A, Neumann K, Zöller D, Freude C. Clinical trial of the D.E.L.P.H.I.N. speech treatment for children and adolescents who stutter. LOGOP PHONIATR VOCO 2018; 43:155-168. [DOI: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1498917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Annerose Keilmann
- Division of Communication Disorders, The University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Voice Care Center Bad Rappenau, Bad Rappenau, Germany
| | - Kirsten Neumann
- Division of Communication Disorders, The University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christina Freude
- Division of Communication Disorders, The University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sutherland R, Trembath D, Roberts J. Telehealth and autism: A systematic search and review of the literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2018; 20:324-336. [PMID: 29709201 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1465123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Research interest in telehealth and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has grown. There is a need to review the literature to allow speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and other service providers to consider applicability to their settings. The aim of this review was to examine the nature and outcomes of studies examining telehealth assessment and/or intervention in ASD. METHOD A systematic search of the literature was undertaken, with 14 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The authors extracted information from each included article, including participant characteristics, technology used, measures and reported outcomes. Quality review of articles was undertaken. RESULT The 284 participants with ASD across the 14 included studies ranged in age from 19 months to adulthood. The quality of the studies varied. A range of services were provided via telehealth, including diagnostic assessments, early intervention and language therapy. Results suggested that services delivered via telehealth were equivalent to services delivered face to face, and superior to comparison groups without telehealth sessions. CONCLUSION The findings suggest there may be a range of benefits in using telehealth with individuals with ASD, their families, and teachers. Further research, however, is required particularly regarding the use of telehealth directly with children with ASD for assessment and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Sutherland
- a Griffith University Arts Education and Law - Autism Centre of Excellence, Griffith University , Mount Gravatt , Australia and
| | - David Trembath
- b Menzies Health Institute Queensland , Gold Coast , Australia
| | - Jacqueline Roberts
- a Griffith University Arts Education and Law - Autism Centre of Excellence, Griffith University , Mount Gravatt , Australia and
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Onslow M, Jones M, O'Brian S, Packman A, Menzies R, Lowe R, Arnott S, Bridgman K, de Sonneville C, Franken MC. Comparison of Percentage of Syllables Stuttered With Parent-Reported Severity Ratings as a Primary Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials of Early Stuttering Treatment. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2018; 61:811-819. [PMID: 29554191 DOI: 10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-16-0448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This report investigates whether parent-reported stuttering severity ratings (SRs) provide similar estimates of effect size as percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) for randomized trials of early stuttering treatment with preschool children. METHOD Data sets from 3 randomized controlled trials of an early stuttering intervention were selected for analyses. Analyses included median changes and 95% confidence intervals per treatment group, Bland-Altman plots, analysis of covariance, and Spearman rho correlations. RESULTS Both SRs and %SS showed large effect sizes from pretreatment to follow-up, although correlations between the 2 measures were moderate at best. Absolute agreement between the 2 measures improved as percentage reduction of stuttering frequency and severity increased, probably due to innate measurement limitations for participants with low baseline severity. Analysis of covariance for the 3 trials showed consistent results. CONCLUSION There is no statistical reason to favor %SS over parent-reported stuttering SRs as primary outcomes for clinical trials of early stuttering treatment. However, there are logistical reasons to favor parent-reported stuttering SRs. We conclude that parent-reported rating of the child's typical stuttering severity for the week or month prior to each assessment is a justifiable alternative to %SS as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials of early stuttering treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Onslow
- The University of Sydney, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Lidcombe, New South Wales
| | - Mark Jones
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sue O'Brian
- The University of Sydney, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Lidcombe, New South Wales
| | - Ann Packman
- The University of Sydney, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Lidcombe, New South Wales
| | - Ross Menzies
- The University of Sydney, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Lidcombe, New South Wales
| | - Robyn Lowe
- The University of Sydney, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Lidcombe, New South Wales
| | - Simone Arnott
- Australian Catholic University, School of Allied and Public Health, Melbourne
| | - Kate Bridgman
- La Trobe University, Department of Human Communication Science, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nippold MA. Stuttering in Preschool Children: Direct Versus Indirect Treatment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2018; 49:4-12. [DOI: 10.1044/2017_lshss-17-0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this article is to discuss the controversial topic of stuttering in preschool children and how to evaluate the options for treatment, emphasizing the role of external research evidence.
Method
A hypothetical but realistic case study of a 3-year-old boy who stutters is described. Two contrasting approaches to treatment are presented, the Lidcombe Program (LP) and the demands and capacities model (DCM). Studies published in peer-reviewed research journals that have examined the effectiveness of each approach are summarized and critiqued.
Results
The review indicates that the LP is the preferred treatment approach for stuttering in preschool children and that it offers the best opportunity for rapid success.
Conclusion
The LP should be carried out by knowledgeable, experienced, and flexible speech-language pathologists who are able to accommodate the individual needs and differences of every child and family.
Collapse
|
43
|
Al-Khaledi M, Lincoln M, McCabe P, Alshatti T. The Lidcombe Program: a series of case studies with Kuwaiti preschool children who stutter. SPEECH, LANGUAGE AND HEARING 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/2050571x.2017.1370523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maram Al-Khaledi
- Department of Communication Disorders Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | | | - Patricia McCabe
- Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tariq Alshatti
- Department of Communication Disorders Sciences, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Durisko C, McCue M, Doyle PJ, Dickey MW, Fiez JA. A Flexible and Integrated System for the Remote Acquisition of Neuropsychological Data in Stroke Research. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22:1032-1040. [PMID: 27214198 PMCID: PMC5165659 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropsychological testing is a central aspect of stroke research because it provides critical information about the cognitive-behavioral status of stroke survivors, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of stroke-related disorders. Standard neuropsychological methods rely upon face-to-face interactions between a patient and researcher, which creates geographic and logistical barriers that impede research progress and treatment advances. INTRODUCTION To overcome these barriers, we created a flexible and integrated system for the remote acquisition of neuropsychological data (RAND). The system we developed has a secure architecture that permits collaborative videoconferencing. The system supports shared audiovisual feeds that can provide continuous virtual interaction between a participant and researcher throughout a testing session. Shared presentation and computing controls can be used to deliver auditory and visual test items adapted from standard face-to-face materials or execute computer-based assessments. Spoken and manual responses can be acquired, and the components of the session can be recorded for offline data analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS To evaluate its feasibility, our RAND system was used to administer a speech-language test battery to 16 stroke survivors with a variety of communication, sensory, and motor impairments. The sessions were initiated virtually without prior face-to-face instruction in the RAND technology or test battery. RESULTS Neuropsychological data were successfully acquired from all participants, including those with limited technology experience, and those with a communication, sensory, or motor impairment. Furthermore, participants indicated a high level of satisfaction with the RAND system and the remote assessment that it permits. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate the feasibility of using the RAND system for virtual home-based neuropsychological assessment without prior face-to-face contact between a participant and researcher. Because our RAND system architecture uses off-the-shelf technology and software, it can be duplicated without specialized expertise or equipment. In sum, our RAND system offers a readily available and promising alternative to face-to-face neuropsychological assessment in stroke research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrine Durisko
- Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael McCue
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick J. Doyle
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Walsh Dickey
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Julie A. Fiez
- Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Iacono T, Stagg K, Pearce N, Hulme Chambers A. A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:543. [PMID: 27716325 PMCID: PMC5050606 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim of the study was to conduct a scoping review of studies into the application of or attitudes towards ehealth amongst allied health professionals conducted in Australia. Methods Studies meeting inclusion criteria published from January 2004 to June 2015 were reviewed. Professions included were audiology, dietetics, exercise physiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, social work, and speech pathology. Terms for these professions and forms of ehealth were combined in databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (1806 – Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and AMED (Ovid). Results Forty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria were summarised. They were either trials of aspects of ehealth service delivery, or clinician and/or client use of and attitudes towards ehealth. Trials of ehealth were largely from two research groups located at the Universities of Sydney and Queensland; most involved speech pathology and physiotherapy. Assessments through ehealth and intervention outcomes through ehealth were comparable with face-to-face delivery. Clinicians used ICT mostly for managing their work and for professional development, but were reticent about its use in service delivery, which contrasted with the more positive attitudes and experiences of clients. Conclusion The potential of ehealth to address allied health needs of Australians living in rural and remote Australia appears unrealised. Clinicians may need to embrace ehealth as a means to radicalise practice, rather than replicate existing practices through a different mode of delivery. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Iacono
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3550, Australia.
| | - Kellie Stagg
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3550, Australia
| | - Natalie Pearce
- La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3550, Australia
| | - Alana Hulme Chambers
- Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Docker Street, Wangaratta, VIC, 3677, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bridgman K, Onslow M, O'Brian S, Jones M, Block S. Lidcombe Program Webcam Treatment for Early Stuttering: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2016; 59:932-939. [PMID: 27617680 DOI: 10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-15-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Webcam treatment is potentially useful for health care in cases of early stuttering in which clients are isolated from specialized treatment services for geographic and other reasons. The purpose of the present trial was to compare outcomes of clinic and webcam deliveries of the Lidcombe Program treatment (Packman et al., 2015) for early stuttering. METHOD The design was a parallel, open plan, noninferiority randomized controlled trial of the standard Lidcombe Program treatment and the experimental webcam Lidcombe Program treatment. Participants were 49 children aged 3 years 0 months to 5 years 11 months at the start of treatment. Primary outcomes were the percentage of syllables stuttered at 9 months postrandomization and the number of consultations to complete Stage 1 of the Lidcombe Program. RESULTS There was insufficient evidence of a posttreatment difference of the percentage of syllables stuttered between the standard and webcam Lidcombe Program treatments. There was insufficient evidence of a difference between the groups for typical stuttering severity measured by parents or the reported clinical relationship with the treating speech-language pathologist. CONCLUSIONS This trial confirmed the viability of the webcam Lidcombe Program intervention. It appears to be as efficacious and economically viable as the standard, clinic Lidcombe Program treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Bridgman
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, New South WalesSchool of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Onslow
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales
| | - Susan O'Brian
- Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales
| | - Mark Jones
- School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan Block
- School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Vong E, Wilson L, Lincoln M. The Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention for Malaysian families: Four case studies. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS 2016; 49:29-39. [PMID: 27638190 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the outcomes of implementing the Lidcombe Program, an evidence-based early intervention for stuttering, with four preschool children in Malaysia. Early stuttering intervention is currently underdeveloped in Malaysia, where stuttering treatment is often more assertion-based than evidence-based. Therefore, introducing an evidence-based early stuttering intervention is an important milestone for Malaysian preschoolers who stutter. METHOD The participants ranged from 3 years 3 months to 4 years 9 months at the start of the study. Beyond-clinic speech samples were obtained at 1 month and 1 week pretreatment and immediately post-Stage 1, and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-Stage 1. RESULTS Two participants, who were bilingual, achieved near-zero levels of stuttering at 12 months posttreatment. Near zero levels of stuttering were also present in their untreated languages. One participant withdrew due to reasons not connected with the research or treatment. The remaining participant, who presented with severe stuttering, completed Stage 1 but had some relapse in Stage 2 and demonstrated mild stuttering 12 months post-Stage 1. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes were achieved without the need to significantly adapt Lidcombe Program procedures to Malaysian culture. Further research to continue evaluation of the Lidcombe Program with Malaysian families and to estimate proportion of those who will respond is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etain Vong
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 789, Albury, New South Wales, 2640, Australia.
| | - Linda Wilson
- School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 789, Albury, New South Wales, 2640, Australia.
| | - Michelle Lincoln
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 1825, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Baxter S, Johnson M, Blank L, Cantrell A, Brumfitt S, Enderby P, Goyder E. Non-pharmacological treatments for stuttering in children and adults: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical effectiveness, and exploration of barriers to successful outcomes. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20:1-302, v-vi. [PMID: 26767317 DOI: 10.3310/hta20020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite many years of research, there is no certainty regarding the cause of stuttering. Although numerous interventions have been developed, a broad-based systematic review across all forms of intervention for adults and children was needed including views and perceptions of people who stutter. OBJECTIVE The aims of the study were to report the clinical effectiveness of interventions for people who stutter (or clutter), to examine evidence regarding the views of people who stutter and the views of professionals regarding interventions. DATA SOURCES A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative literature was carried out between August 2013 and April 2014. The following electronic databases were searched: (1) MEDLINE, (2) EMBASE, (3) The Cochrane Library (including The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment Database and NHS Economic Evaluations Database), (4) PsycINFO, (5) Science Citation Index, (6) Social Science Citation Index, (7) Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, (8) ASSIA, (9) Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts, (10) Sociological Abstracts and (11) the EPPI Centre. Reference lists of included papers and other reviews were screened and also key journals in the subject area were hand-searched. REVIEW METHODS The searches aimed to identify (1) evidence of clinical effectiveness in populations of pre-school children, school-aged children, adolescents and adults, and (2) data relating to perceptions of barriers and facilitators to intervention clinical effectiveness among staff and people who stutter. A metasynthesis of the two linked elements via development of a conceptual model was also carried out to provide further interpretation of the review findings. RESULTS A systematic search of the literature identified a large number of potentially relevant studies. Of these, 111 studies examining the clinical effectiveness of interventions, 25 qualitative papers and one mixed-methods paper met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Review of the effectiveness literature indicated evidence of positive outcomes across all types of interventions. Virtually all evidence we identified reported at least some positive effect for some participants. However, there was evidence of considerable individual variation in outcome for study participants. The qualitative literature highlighted the need for programmes to be tailored to individual need with variation at the levels of the intervention, the individual and interpersonal/social elements. Metasynthesis of the data highlighted the complexity of elements that need to be considered in evaluation of long-term impacts following stuttering interventions. LIMITATIONS Around two-thirds of the studies were considered to be at higher risk of bias. The heterogeneous nature and variability in outcomes meant that we were unable to complete a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS Although much of the evidence we identified was from studies at risk of bias, it is suggested that most available interventions for stuttering may be of benefit to at least some people who stutter. There is a requirement for greater clarity regarding what the core outcomes following stuttering intervention should be and also enhanced understanding of the process whereby interventions effect change. Further analysis of those for whom interventions have not produced a significant benefit may provide additional insights into the complex intervention-outcomes pathway. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013004861.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Maxine Johnson
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lindsay Blank
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Cantrell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shelagh Brumfitt
- Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pamela Enderby
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goyder
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sutherland R, Trembath D, Hodge A, Drevensek S, Lee S, Silove N, Roberts J. Telehealth language assessments using consumer grade equipment in rural and urban settings: Feasible, reliable and well tolerated. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 23:106-115. [DOI: 10.1177/1357633x15623921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Telehealth can be an effective way to provide speech pathology intervention to children with speech and language impairments. However, the provision of reliable and feasible standardised language assessments via telehealth to establish children’s needs for intervention and to monitor progress has not yet been well established. Further, there is limited information about children’s reactions to telehealth. This study aimed to examine the reliability and feasibility of conducting standardised language assessment with school-aged children with known or suspected language impairment via a telehealth application using consumer grade computer equipment within a public school setting. Method Twenty-three children (aged 8–12 years) participated. Each child was assessed using a standardised language assessment comprising six subtests. Two subtests were administered by a speech pathologist face-to-face (local clinician) and four subtests were administered via telehealth. All subtests were completed within a single visit to the clinic service, with a break between the face to face and telehealth sessions. The face-to-face clinician completed behaviour observation checklists in the telehealth and face to face conditions and provided feedback on the audio and video quality of the application from the child’s point of view. Parent feedback about their child’s experience was elicited via survey. Results There was strong inter-rater reliability in the telehealth and face-to-face conditions (correlation coefficients ranged from r = 0.96–1.0 across the subtests) and good agreement on all measures. Similar levels of attention, distractibility and anxiety were observed in the two conditions. Clinicians rated only one session of 23 as having poor audio quality and no sessions were rated as having poor visual quality. Parent and child reactions to the use of telehealth were largely positive and supportive of using telehealth to assess rural children. Discussion The findings support the use of telehealth in the language assessment of school-aged children using a web application and commercially available computer equipment. This reliable and innovative service delivery model has the potential to be used by speech pathologists to provide assessments to children in remote communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Sutherland
- Autism Centre of Excellence, Griffith University, Australia
- NSW Centre for Effective Reading & Child Development Unit, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | | | - Antoinette Hodge
- NSW Centre for Effective Reading & Child Development Unit, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Suzi Drevensek
- NSW Centre for Effective Reading & Child Development Unit, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Sabrena Lee
- NSW Centre for Effective Reading & Child Development Unit, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Natalie Silove
- NSW Centre for Effective Reading & Child Development Unit, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Donaghy MA, Smith KA. Management options for pediatric patients who stutter: current challenges and future directions. PEDIATRIC HEALTH MEDICINE AND THERAPEUTICS 2016; 7:71-77. [PMID: 29388582 PMCID: PMC5683286 DOI: 10.2147/phmt.s77568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Stuttering is a speech disorder, with onset often occurring in the preschool years. The prevalence of stuttering in young children is much higher than that in the general population, suggesting a high rate of recovery. However, we are unable to predict which children will recover without treatment, and it is widely acknowledged that stuttering therapy during childhood provides the best safeguard against chronic stuttering. This review reports on current evidence-based stuttering treatment options for preschoolers through to adolescents. We discuss the clinical challenges associated with treating pediatric clients who stutter at different stages of development and explore potential areas of treatment research that might serve to advance current clinical practice in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A Donaghy
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW
| | - Kylie A Smith
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|