1
|
Rødvik AK, Torkildsen JVK, Wie OB, Tvete O, Skaug I, Silvola JT. Consonant and vowel confusions in well-performing adult cochlear implant users, measured with a nonsense syllable repetition test. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:260-268. [PMID: 36853200 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2177893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study's objective was to identify consonant and vowel confusions in cochlear implant (CI) users, using a nonsense syllable repetition test. DESIGN In this cross-sectional study, participants repeated recorded mono- and bisyllabic nonsense words and real-word monosyllables in an open-set design. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-eight Norwegian-speaking, well-performing adult CI users (13 unilateral and 15 bilateral), using implants from Cochlear, Med-El and Advanced Bionics, and a reference group of 20 listeners with normal hearing participated. RESULTS For the CI users, consonants were confused more often than vowels (58% versus 71% correct). Voiced consonants were confused more often than unvoiced (54% versus 64% correct). Voiced stops were often repeated as unvoiced, whereas unvoiced stops were never repeated as voiced. The nasals were repeated correctly in one third of the cases and confused with other nasals in one third of the cases. The real-word monosyllable score was significantly higher than the nonsense syllable score (76% versus 63% correct). CONCLUSIONS The study revealed a general devoicing bias for the stops and a high confusion rate of nasals with other nasals, which suggests that the low-frequency coding in CIs is insufficient. Furthermore, the nonsense syllable test exposed more perception errors than the real word test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne K Rødvik
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ona B Wie
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Tvete
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Juha T Silvola
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nourski KV, Steinschneider M, Rhone AE, Berger JI, Dappen ER, Kawasaki H, Howard III MA. Intracranial electrophysiology of spectrally degraded speech in the human cortex. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 17:1334742. [PMID: 38318272 PMCID: PMC10839784 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1334742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cochlear implants (CIs) are the treatment of choice for severe to profound hearing loss. Variability in CI outcomes remains despite advances in technology and is attributed in part to differences in cortical processing. Studying these differences in CI users is technically challenging. Spectrally degraded stimuli presented to normal-hearing individuals approximate input to the central auditory system in CI users. This study used intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) to investigate cortical processing of spectrally degraded speech. Methods Participants were adult neurosurgical epilepsy patients. Stimuli were utterances /aba/ and /ada/, spectrally degraded using a noise vocoder (1-4 bands) or presented without vocoding. The stimuli were presented in a two-alternative forced choice task. Cortical activity was recorded using depth and subdural iEEG electrodes. Electrode coverage included auditory core in posteromedial Heschl's gyrus (HGPM), superior temporal gyrus (STG), ventral and dorsal auditory-related areas, and prefrontal and sensorimotor cortex. Analysis focused on high gamma (70-150 Hz) power augmentation and alpha (8-14 Hz) suppression. Results Chance task performance occurred with 1-2 spectral bands and was near-ceiling for clear stimuli. Performance was variable with 3-4 bands, permitting identification of good and poor performers. There was no relationship between task performance and participants demographic, audiometric, neuropsychological, or clinical profiles. Several response patterns were identified based on magnitude and differences between stimulus conditions. HGPM responded strongly to all stimuli. A preference for clear speech emerged within non-core auditory cortex. Good performers typically had strong responses to all stimuli along the dorsal stream, including posterior STG, supramarginal, and precentral gyrus; a minority of sites in STG and supramarginal gyrus had a preference for vocoded stimuli. In poor performers, responses were typically restricted to clear speech. Alpha suppression was more pronounced in good performers. In contrast, poor performers exhibited a greater involvement of posterior middle temporal gyrus when listening to clear speech. Discussion Responses to noise-vocoded speech provide insights into potential factors underlying CI outcome variability. The results emphasize differences in the balance of neural processing along the dorsal and ventral stream between good and poor performers, identify specific cortical regions that may have diagnostic and prognostic utility, and suggest potential targets for neuromodulation-based CI rehabilitation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirill V. Nourski
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Mitchell Steinschneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Ariane E. Rhone
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Joel I. Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Emily R. Dappen
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Hiroto Kawasaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Matthew A. Howard III
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- Pappajohn Biomedical Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eshaghi M, Darouie A, Teymouri R. The Auditory Perception of Consonant Contrasts in Cochlear Implant Children. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74:455-459. [PMID: 36032915 PMCID: PMC9411492 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02250-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and ObjectivesA major part of speech perception is based on understanding and distinguishing between vocal cues in the speaker's speech. Consonants and vowels are vocal cues that can be affected by hearing impairment and their perception may thus be reduced or distorted. The present study aims to investigate the auditory perception of consonant contrasts in cochlear implant children. Materials and Methods The present cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 24 cochlear implant children aged 9-13 selected through convenience sampling from schools and cochlear implant centers. A test of non-word pairs based on a study conducted by Khavar-Ghazlani was carried out to measure contrast in consonants, place of and manner of articulation and voicing. Results The results of the test showed that cochlear implant children scored lower in the perception of voicing compared to the other two features. No significant differences were observed between their perceptions of place of articulation and manner of articulation. Conclusion Cochlear implant children appear to have a poorer perception of voicing contrast compared to the other features, which may be due to the greater reliance of this feature on auditory signs.
Collapse
|
4
|
van Wieringen A, Magits S, Francart T, Wouters J. Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:773427. [PMID: 34916902 PMCID: PMC8669965 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.773427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Speech-perception testing is essential for monitoring outcomes with a hearing aid or cochlear implant (CI). However, clinical care is time-consuming and often challenging with an increasing number of clients. A potential approach to alleviating some clinical care and possibly making room for other outcome measures is to employ technologies that assess performance in the home environment. In this study, we investigate 3 different speech perception indices in the same 40 CI users: phoneme identification (vowels and consonants), digits in noise (DiN) and sentence recognition in noise (SiN). The first two tasks were implemented on a tablet and performed multiple times by each client in their home environment, while the sentence task was administered at the clinic. Speech perception outcomes in the same forty CI users showed that DiN assessed at home can serve as an alternative to SiN assessed at the clinic. DiN scores are in line with the SiN ones by 3–4 dB improvement and are useful to monitor performance at regular intervals and to detect changes in auditory performance. Phoneme identification in quiet also explains a significant part of speech perception in noise, and provides additional information on the detectability and discriminability of speech cues. The added benefit of the phoneme identification task, which also proved to be easy to administer at home, is the information transmission analysis in addition to the summary score. Performance changes for the different indices can be interpreted by comparing against measurement error and help to target personalized rehabilitation. Altogether, home-based speech testing is reliable and proves powerful to complement care in the clinic for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Magits
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Francart
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vos TG, Dillon MT, Buss E, Rooth MA, Bucker AL, Dillon S, Pearson A, Quinones K, Richter ME, Roth N, Young A, Dedmon MM. Influence of Protective Face Coverings on the Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Patients. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2038-E2043. [PMID: 33590898 PMCID: PMC8014501 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The objectives were to characterize the effects of wearing face coverings on: 1) acoustic speech cues, and 2) speech recognition of patients with hearing loss who listen with a cochlear implant. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral center between July and September 2020. A female talker recorded sentences in three conditions: no face covering, N95 mask, and N95 mask plus a face shield. Spectral differences were analyzed between speech produced in each condition. The speech recognition in each condition for twenty‐three adult patients with at least 6 months of cochlear implant use was assessed. Results Spectral analysis demonstrated preferential attenuation of high‐frequency speech information with the N95 mask plus face shield condition compared to the other conditions. Speech recognition did not differ significantly between the uncovered (median 90% [IQR 89%–94%]) and N95 mask conditions (91% [IQR 86%–94%]; P = .253); however, speech recognition was significantly worse in the N95 mask plus face shield condition (64% [IQR 48%–75%]) compared to the uncovered (P < .001) or N95 mask (P < .001) conditions. Conclusions The type and combination of protective face coverings used have differential effects on attenuation of speech information, influencing speech recognition of patients with hearing loss. In the face of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there is a need to protect patients and clinicians from spread of disease while maximizing patient speech recognition. The disruptive effect of wearing a face shield in conjunction with a mask may prompt clinicians to consider alternative eye protection, such as goggles, in appropriate clinical situations. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2038–E2043, 2021
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa G Vos
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Emily Buss
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Andrea L Bucker
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Sarah Dillon
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Adrienne Pearson
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kristen Quinones
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Margaret E Richter
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.,Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Noelle Roth
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Allison Young
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Matthew M Dedmon
- Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rødvik AK, Tvete O, Torkildsen JVK, Wie OB, Skaug I, Silvola JT. Consonant and Vowel Confusions in Well-Performing Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants, Measured by a Nonsense Syllable Repetition Test. Front Psychol 2019; 10:1813. [PMID: 31474900 PMCID: PMC6702790 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the majority of early implanted, profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants (CIs), will develop correct pronunciation if they receive adequate oral language stimulation, many of them have difficulties with perceiving minute details of speech. The main aim of this study is to measure the confusion of consonants and vowels in well-performing children and adolescents with CIs. The study also aims to investigate how age at onset of severe to profound deafness influences perception. The participants are 36 children and adolescents with CIs (18 girls), with a mean (SD) age of 11.6 (3.0) years (range: 5.9-16.0 years). Twenty-nine of them are prelingually deaf and seven are postlingually deaf. Two reference groups of normal-hearing (NH) 6- and 13-year-olds are included. Consonant and vowel perception is measured by repetition of 16 bisyllabic vowel-consonant-vowel nonsense words and nine monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant nonsense words in an open-set design. For the participants with CIs, consonants were mostly confused with consonants with the same voicing and manner, and the mean (SD) voiced consonant repetition score, 63.9 (10.6)%, was considerably lower than the mean (SD) unvoiced consonant score, 76.9 (9.3)%. There was a devoicing bias for the stops; unvoiced stops were confused with other unvoiced stops and not with voiced stops, and voiced stops were confused with both unvoiced stops and other voiced stops. The mean (SD) vowel repetition score was 85.2 (10.6)% and there was a bias in the confusions of [i:] and [y:]; [y:] was perceived as [i:] twice as often as [y:] was repeated correctly. Subgroup analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the consonant scores for pre- and postlingually deaf participants. For the NH participants, the consonant repetition scores were substantially higher and the difference between voiced and unvoiced consonant repetition scores considerably lower than for the participants with CIs. The participants with CIs obtained scores close to ceiling on vowels and real-word monosyllables, but their perception was substantially lower for voiced consonants. This may partly be related to limitations in the CI technology for the transmission of low-frequency sounds, such as insertion depth of the electrode and ability to convey temporal information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Kirkhorn Rødvik
- Department of Special Needs Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Cochlear Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Tvete
- Cochlear Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Janne von Koss Torkildsen
- Department of Special Needs Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ona Bø Wie
- Department of Special Needs Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Cochlear Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Juha Tapio Silvola
- Department of Special Needs Education, Institute of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Cochlear Implant Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Surgery and Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Division of Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rødvik AK, von Koss Torkildsen J, Wie OB, Storaker MA, Silvola JT. Consonant and Vowel Identification in Cochlear Implant Users Measured by Nonsense Words: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2018; 61:1023-1050. [PMID: 29623340 DOI: 10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-16-0463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish a baseline of the vowel and consonant identification scores in prelingually and postlingually deaf users of multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) tested with consonant-vowel-consonant and vowel-consonant-vowel nonsense syllables. METHOD Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles reporting consonant and vowel identification scores in CI users measured by nonsense words. Relevant studies were independently assessed and screened by 2 reviewers. Consonant and vowel identification scores were presented in forest plots and compared between studies in a meta-analysis. RESULTS Forty-seven articles with 50 studies, including 647 participants, thereof 581 postlingually deaf and 66 prelingually deaf, met the inclusion criteria of this study. The mean performance on vowel identification tasks for the postlingually deaf CI users was 76.8% (N = 5), which was higher than the mean performance for the prelingually deaf CI users (67.7%; N = 1). The mean performance on consonant identification tasks for the postlingually deaf CI users was higher (58.4%; N = 44) than for the prelingually deaf CI users (46.7%; N = 6). The most common consonant confusions were found between those with same manner of articulation (/k/ as /t/, /m/ as /n/, and /p/ as /t/). CONCLUSIONS The mean performance on consonant identification tasks for the prelingually and postlingually deaf CI users was found. There were no statistically significant differences between the scores for prelingually and postlingually deaf CI users. The consonants that were incorrectly identified were typically confused with other consonants with the same acoustic properties, namely, voicing, duration, nasality, and silent gaps. A univariate metaregression model, although not statistically significant, indicated that duration of implant use in postlingually deaf adults predict a substantial portion of their consonant identification ability. As there is no ceiling effect, a nonsense syllable identification test may be a useful addition to the standard test battery in audiology clinics when assessing the speech perception of CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Kirkhorn Rødvik
- Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ona Bø Wie
- Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway
- Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Marit Aarvaag Storaker
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
- Lillehammer Hospital, Norway
| | - Juha Tapio Silvola
- Oslo University Hospital, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
- Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jaekel BN, Newman RS, Goupell MJ. Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2017; 60:1398-1416. [PMID: 28395319 PMCID: PMC5580678 DOI: 10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-15-0427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Normal-hearing (NH) listeners rate normalize, temporarily remapping phonemic category boundaries to account for a talker's speech rate. It is unknown if adults who use auditory prostheses called cochlear implants (CI) can rate normalize, as CIs transmit degraded speech signals to the auditory nerve. Ineffective adjustment to rate information could explain some of the variability in this population's speech perception outcomes. METHOD Phonemes with manipulated voice-onset-time (VOT) durations were embedded in sentences with different speech rates. Twenty-three CI and 29 NH participants performed a phoneme identification task. NH participants heard the same unprocessed stimuli as the CI participants or stimuli degraded by a sine vocoder, simulating aspects of CI processing. RESULTS CI participants showed larger rate normalization effects (6.6 ms) than the NH participants (3.7 ms) and had shallower (less reliable) category boundary slopes. NH participants showed similarly shallow slopes when presented acoustically degraded vocoded signals, but an equal or smaller rate effect in response to reductions in available spectral and temporal information. CONCLUSION CI participants can rate normalize, despite their degraded speech input, and show a larger rate effect compared to NH participants. CI participants may particularly rely on rate normalization to better maintain perceptual constancy of the speech signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany N. Jaekel
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Rochelle S. Newman
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Matthew J. Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang J, Tyler R, Ji H, Dunn C, Wang N, Hansen M, Gantz B. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants. Am J Audiol 2015; 24:384-97. [PMID: 25934950 DOI: 10.1044/2015_aja-14-0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 04/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the changes over time of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ; Tyler, Perreau, & Ji, 2009) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ; Gatehouse & Noble, 2004) in adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants by collecting data for 2 years after implantation. METHOD Nineteen postlingual subjects participated in this study. Average age at implant was 63 years. The subjects' data were included in this retrospective analysis only if they completed both questionnaires. We compared subjects' SSQ and SHQ scores to word recognition and sound localization performances. RESULTS The study showed SHQ and SSQ scores continuously improved up to 1 year postimplantation, with the most improvement occurring within the first 6 months of implantation. After 1 year, the scores reached a plateau. This is consistent with laboratory tests from the same 19 subjects, and they showed high correlations (p < .05). The present study also showed a high degree of correlation between SHQ and SSQ scores. CONCLUSIONS Both the SSQ and SHQ scores improved up to 12 months postimplantation, with the most improvement during the first 6 months of implantation. Both were consistent with laboratory tests. There was a high degree of correlation between SHQ and SSQ scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Zhang
- Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
- University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | | | | | | | - Ningyu Wang
- Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2012; 13:527-42. [PMID: 22549175 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0328-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 03/26/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants provide good speech discrimination ability despite highly limited amount of information they transmit compared with normal cochlea. Noise vocoded speech, simulating cochlear implants in normal hearing listeners, have demonstrated that spectrally and temporally degraded speech contains sufficient cues to provide accurate speech discrimination. We hypothesized that neural activity patterns generated in the primary auditory cortex by spectrally and temporally degraded speech sounds will account for the robust behavioral discrimination of speech. We examined the behavioral discrimination of noise vocoded consonants and vowels by rats and recorded neural activity patterns from rat primary auditory cortex (A1) for the same sounds. We report the first evidence of behavioral discrimination of degraded speech sounds by an animal model. Our results show that rats are able to accurately discriminate both consonant and vowel sounds even after significant spectral and temporal degradation. The degree of degradation that rats can tolerate is comparable to human listeners. We observed that neural discrimination based on spatiotemporal patterns (spike timing) of A1 neurons is highly correlated with behavioral discrimination of consonants and that neural discrimination based on spatial activity patterns (spike count) of A1 neurons is highly correlated with behavioral discrimination of vowels. The results of the current study indicate that speech discrimination is resistant to degradation as long as the degraded sounds generate distinct patterns of neural activity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Välimaa TT, Sorri MJ, Laitakari J, Sivonen V, Muhli A. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2011; 25:121-144. [PMID: 21070135 DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2010.514692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated adult cochlear implant users' (n = 39) vowel recognition and confusions by an open-set syllable test during 4 years of implant use, in a prospective repeated-measures design. Subjects' responses were coded for phoneme errors and estimated by the generalized mixed model. Improvement in overall vowel recognition was highest during the first 6 months, showing statistically significant change until 4 years, especially for the mediocre performers. The best performers improved statistically significantly until 18 months. The poorest performers improved until 12 months and exhibited more vowel confusions. No differences were found in overall vowel recognition between Nucleus24M/24R and Med-ElC40+ device users (matched comparison), but certain vowels showed statistically significant differences. Vowel confusions between adjacent vowels were evident, probably due to the implant users' inability to discriminate formant frequencies. Vowel confusions were also dominated by vowels whose average F1 and/or F2 frequencies were higher than the target vowel, indicating a basalward shift in the confusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taina T Välimaa
- Faculty of Humanities, Logopedics, and Department of Otorhinolaryngology. Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mildner V, Liker M. Fricatives, affricates, and vowels in Croatian children with cochlear implants. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2008; 22:845-856. [PMID: 18608242 DOI: 10.1080/02699200802130557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the research was to analyse the speech of children with cochlear implants over approximately a 46-month period, and compare it with the speech of hearing controls. It focused on three categories of sounds in Croatian: vowels (F1 and F2 of /i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ and /u/), fricatives /s/ and /integral/ (spectral differences expressed in terms of center of gravity), and affricates /ts/ and /t integral/ (accuracy, total duration, and pattern of stop-fricative components). One group of subjects were 10 implanted children who had been profoundly deaf before implantation. There were four recordings per child. Group two children were hearing controls matched for age and sex. The results show that the implanted children are closest to unimpaired children in terms of their formant-defined vowel space. Their fricatives exhibit poor distinction in terms of the noise spectrum, and the affricates are the most difficult to produce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vesna Mildner
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Phonetics, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Välimaa TT, Sorri MJ, Löppönen HJ. Speech perception and auditory performance in finnish adult cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2008; 6:49-66. [PMID: 18792319 DOI: 10.1179/cim.2005.6.2.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed at investigating the association between speech perception and categories of auditory performance (mCAP) in everyday life for adult cochlear implant users. DESIGN A prospective repeated measures design over a two-year follow-up period was used. METHODS The speech perception and auditory performance of 19 Finnish-speaking adults were assessed before implantation and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after switching on the implant. Spearman's rank order correlation coefficients (r(s)) were calculated between mCAP and sentence, word, syllable, vowel and consonant recognition. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients (r) were calculated among the speech perception results. RESULTS The correlation between mCAP and the speech perception results was high and statistically significant (r(s) = 0.81-0.85, p 0.0001), as well as the correlation among the speech perception tests (r = 0.79-0.92, p 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The speech perception tests used may be considered as good describers of everyday performance of the subjects of this investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taina T Välimaa
- Department of Finnish, Information Studies and Logopedics, PO Box 1000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects. Brain Res 2008; 1188:87-99. [PMID: 18062941 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2007] [Revised: 08/28/2007] [Accepted: 10/10/2007] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
15
|
Liker M, Mildner V, Sindija B. Acoustic analysis of the speech of children with cochlear implants: a longitudinal study. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2007; 21:1-11. [PMID: 17364613 DOI: 10.1080/02699200400026991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyse the speech of the children with cochlear implants, and compare it with the speech of hearing controls. We focused on three categories of Croatian sounds: vowels (F1 and F2 frequencies), fricatives (noise frequencies of /s/ and /S/ ), and affricates (total duration and the pattern of stop-fricative components in /ts/ and /tS/ ). Eighteen implanted children, aged between 9;5 and 15;2 years participated in the study. All had been profoundly hearing impaired before implantation. Three recordings per child were made over a 20-month period. The hearing controls were matched for age and sex. Implanted children had a smaller and fronted vowel space, their /s/ and /S/ noise frequencies overlapped, affricates were longer, with a high proportion of incorrect productions and substitutions. With time, there was a small but steady overall improvement in all categories. Early intervention (rehabilitation and implantation) are crucial for good speech acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Liker
- Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Phonetics, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Speech Recognition for Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Modes in the Presence of Uncorrelated Noise Sources. Ear Hear 2006; 27:763-73. [PMID: 17086085 DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240814.27151.b9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the current investigation was to compare speech recognition in noise for bilateral and unilateral modes within postlingually deafened, adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients. In addition, it was of interest to evaluate the time course of the bilateral speech-recognition advantage and the effect of changing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the magnitude of the bilateral advantage. DESIGN In the first experiment, 16 postlingually deafened adults who were bilaterally implanted with the MED-EL C40+ cochlear device were evaluated in unilateral left, unilateral right, and bilateral conditions 4 to 7 mo after activation. Speech recognition in the presence of five spatially separated, uncorrelated noise sources was evaluated using both a single fixed SNR of +10 dB and an adaptive-SNR method. In a follow-up study, a subset of 10 participants was re-evaluated using an identical fixed-SNR method 12 to 17 mo after activation to examine the time course of speech-recognition performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes at a single SNR. A third study was performed with a subset of six participants to examine performance over a range of SNRs. In this study, speech recognition was measured 12 to 17 mo after activation in quiet and at +5, +10, +15, and +20 dB SNRs using the same five uncorrelated noise sources. RESULTS The speech-recognition data revealed a significant bilateral advantage of 3.3 dB using the adaptive-SNR method. A significant bilateral advantage of 9% was also measured using a fixed +10 dB SNR. Results from the second study revealed that experience resulted in a significant (11 to 20%) increase in speech-recognition-in-noise performance for both unilateral and bilateral modes; however, the magnitude of the bilateral advantage was not affected by experience. Results from the third study revealed the largest bilateral advantage at the poorest SNR evaluated. In addition, performance in quiet was significantly better than that measured in the presence of noise, even at the +20 dB SNR. CONCLUSIONS The results of these experiments support a small but significant bilateral speech-recognition-in-noise advantage for cochlear implant recipients in an environment with multiple noise sources. This advantage is presumed to be attributable to the combined effects of binaural squelch and diotic summation. Although experience generally improved speech-recognition-in-noise performance in both unilateral and bilateral modes, a consistent bilateral advantage (approximately 10%) was measured at 4 to 7 mo and at 12 to 17 mo postactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd A Ricketts
- Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Faulkner A, Rosen S, Norman C. The right information may matter more than frequency-place alignment: simulations of frequency-aligned and upward shifting cochlear implant processors for a shallow electrode array insertion. Ear Hear 2006; 27:139-52. [PMID: 16518142 DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202357.40662.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It has been claimed that speech recognition with a cochlear implant is dependent on the correct frequency alignment of analysis bands in the speech processor with characteristic frequencies (CFs) at electrode locations. However, the use of filters aligned in frequency to a relatively basal electrode array position leads to significant loss of lower frequency speech information. This study uses an acoustic simulation to compare two approaches to the matching of speech processor filters to an electrode array having a relatively shallow depth within the typical range, such that the most apical element is at a CF of 1851 Hz. Two noise-excited vocoder speech processors are compared, one with CF-matched filters, and one with filters matched to CFs at basilar membrane locations 6 mm more apical than electrode locations. DESIGN An extended crossover training design examined pre- and post-training performance in the identification of vowels and words in sentences for both processors. Subjects received about 3 hours of training with each processor in turn. RESULTS Training improved performance with both processors, but training effects were greater for the shifted processor. For a male talker, the shifted processor led to higher post-training scores than the frequency-aligned processor with both vowels and sentences. For a female talker, post-training vowel scores did not differ significantly between processors, whereas sentence scores were higher with the frequency-aligned processor. CONCLUSIONS Even for a shallow electrode insertion, we conclude that a speech processor should represent information from important frequency regions below 1 kHz and that the possible cost of frequency misalignment can be significantly reduced with listening experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Faulkner
- Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London, Wolfson House, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mildner V, Sindija B, Zrinski KV. Speech perception of children with cochlear implants and children with traditional hearing aids. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2006; 20:219-29. [PMID: 16428240 DOI: 10.1080/02699200400027031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyse speech perception of children with cochlear implants (N = 29) and children fitted with traditional hearing aids (N = 20). One- and two-syllable words were presented auditorily in a forced choice minimal-pair discrimination task. The children repeated the word and pointed to the appropriate picture presented on computer screen. The words were minimal pairs with respect to voicing or place of articulation in stops and fricatives; among affricates the minimal pairs included the most frequently substituted fricatives and stops in addition to voicing and place of articulation. Vowel discrimination was tested in minimal pairs and in nonsense words differing only in the vowel. Unaided, all children were profoundly hearing impaired and were included in auditory-oral therapy (Verbotonal method). The smallest differences between the groups were found for stops and vowels, and the largest for fricatives and affricates. The implanted children were significantly more successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vesna Mildner
- Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Phonetics, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Owren MJ, Cardillo GC. The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006; 119:1727-39. [PMID: 16583915 DOI: 10.1121/1.2161431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Three experiments tested the hypothesis that vowels play a disproportionate role in hearing talker identity, while consonants are more important in perceiving word meaning. In each study, listeners heard 128 stimuli consisting of two different words. Stimuli were balanced for same/different meaning, same/different talker, and male/female talker. The first word in each was intact, while the second was either intact (Experiment 1), or had vowels ("Consonants-Only") or consonants wels-Only") replaced by silence (Experiments 2, 3). Different listeners performed a same/ different judgment of either talker identity (Talker) or word meaning (Meaning). Baseline testing in Experiment 1 showed above-chance performance in both, with greater accuracy for Meaning. In Experiment 2, Talker identity was more accurately judged from Vowels-Only stimuli, with modestly better overall Meaning performance with Consonants-Only stimuli. However, performance with vowel-initial Vowels-Only stimuli in particular was most accurate of all. Editing Vowels-Only stimuli further in Experiment 3 had no effect on Talker discrimination, while dramatically reducing accuracy in the Meaning condition, including both vowel-initial and consonant-initial Vowels-Only stimuli. Overall, results confirmed a priori predictions, but are largely inconsistent with recent tests of vowels and consonants in sentence comprehension. These discrepancies and possible implications for the evolutionary origins of speech are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Owren
- Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to measure the performance of persons with cochlear implants on a test of environmental-sound reception. DESIGN The reception of environmental sounds was studied using a test employing closed sets of 10 sounds in each of four different settings (General Home, Kitchen, Office, and Outside). The participants in the study were 11 subjects with cochlear implants. Identification testing was conducted under each of the four closed sets of stimuli using a one-interval, 10-alternative, forced-choice procedure. The data were summarized in terms of overall percent correct identification scores and information transfer (IT) in bits. Confusion patterns were described using a hierarchical-clustering analysis. In addition, individual performance on the environmental-sound task was related to the ability to recognize isolated words through the cochlear implant alone. RESULTS Levels of performance were similar across the four stimulus sets. Mean scores across subjects ranged from 45.3% correct (and IT of 1.5 bits) to 93.8% correct (and IT of 3.1 bits). Performance on the environmental-sound identification test was roughly related to NU-6 word recognition ability. Specifically, those subjects with word scores greater than 34% correct performed at levels of 80 to 94% on environmental-sound recognition, whereas subjects with word scores less than 34% had greater difficulty on the task. Results of the hierarchical clustering analysis, conducted on two groups of subjects (a high-performing [HP] group and a low-performing [LP] group), indicated that confusions were confined to three or four specific stimuli for the HP subjects and that larger clusters of confused stimuli were observed in the data of the LP group. Signals with distinct temporal-envelope characteristics were easily perceived by all subjects, and confused items tended to share similar overall durations and temporal envelopes. CONCLUSIONS Temporal-envelope cues appear to play a large role in the identification of environmental sounds through cochlear implants. The finer distinctions made by the HP group compared with the LP group may be related to a better ability both to resolve temporal differences and to use gross spectral cues. These findings are qualitatively consistent with patterns of confusions observed in the reception of speech segments through cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte M Reed
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|