1
|
Lambinon C, le Roux T, Eikelboom RH, Bennett RJ. Impact of adult cochlear implantation on the partner relationship: a conceptual framework informed by cochlear implant recipient and partner perceptions. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-15. [PMID: 39225085 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2396061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE (1) To understand the impact of adult cochlear implantation on the partner relationship, as perceived by adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients and their intimate partners. (2) To generate a conceptual framework for guiding future research and clinical adult cochlear implantation interventions. METHOD Concept mapping, a participatory, mixed-method approach, was used for data collection, analysis and interpretation. Participants attended sessions to generate, sort and rate statements describing the changes in their relationship due to cochlear implantation. Participants included 15 CI recipients (mean age: 51.6 years; SD: 8.2) and 12 partners (mean age: 50.9 years; SD: 8.2). RESULTS Five concepts emerged from the data, describing changes in the partner relationship following cochlear implantation: (1) Social Interactions, (2) Partner Involvement, (3) Communication, (4) Emotional Adjustment, and (5) Relationship Intimacy. The concept Relationship Intimacy was rated the highest in positivity and importance. Findings also underscored improved social interactions, communication dynamics, and emotional adjustment. CONCLUSIONS The Relationship Intimacy cluster emerged as pivotal, highlighting its essential role in improving post-implantation relationships. CI recipients experienced enhanced autonomy, while partners' roles evolved regarding assistance and support. The diverse effects of implantation on partner relationships highlight the importance of adopting a patient- and family-centered approach to audiological intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ché Lambinon
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Talita le Roux
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Ear Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Ear Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
- National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Timmer BHB, Bennett RJ, Montano J, Hickson L, Weinstein B, Wild J, Ferguson M, Holman JA, LeBeau V, Dyre L. Social-emotional well-being and adult hearing loss: clinical recommendations. Int J Audiol 2024; 63:381-392. [PMID: 36960799 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2190864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Aim: Best-practice in audiological rehabilitation takes a holistic client- and family-centred approach and considers hearing care in the context of personal well-being. Hearing loss not only impairs the ability to hear, but can also compromise the ability to communicate, thus negatively impacting both social and emotional well-being. Hearing care professionals play a key role in fostering their client's well-being. This paper aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to ensure inclusion of social-emotional well-being in audiologic rehabilitation clinical practice.Methods: A review of current research and expert opinion.Results: This guide proposes a 5-step plan which includes: identifying the client's social-emotional well-being; including family members in audiological rehabilitation; incorporating social-emotional needs and goals in an individualized management plan; relating identified hearing needs and goals to rehabilitation recommendations; and using counselling skills and techniques to explore and monitor social-emotional well-being. Each component of the 5-step plan is discussed and clinical considerations are presented.Conclusion: These comprehensive recommendations provide guidance to hearing care professionals looking to ensure clients' social-emotional well-being are considered throughout the rehabilitation journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbra H B Timmer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
- Sonova AG, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca J Bennett
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- The Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Joseph Montano
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louise Hickson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | | | - Jane Wild
- Audiology Service, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wales, UK
| | - Melanie Ferguson
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Jack A Holman
- Hearing Sciences (Scottish Section), Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Valeri LeBeau
- Audiology Service, Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Narayanan SK, Houmller SS, Wolff A, Hougaard DD, Gaihede M, Schmidt JH, Hammershi D. Adapting to New Hearing Aids and Hearing Aid Adjustments in Adult Danish Users. Am J Audiol 2023; 32:526-542. [PMID: 37450946 DOI: 10.1044/2023_aja-23-00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was aimed at understanding the effect of time taken to adapt to the new hearing aids (HAs) and the timeline of HA adjustments performed over more than a year of rehabilitation on self-reported HA outcomes. METHOD A self-report of the time it took to get accustomed to the new HAs and adjustment of the HAs during a year of rehabilitation collected from 690 HA users using a nonstandardized questionnaire were analyzed. The abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing questionnaire and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids were used as the self-reported HA outcome. RESULT Out of 690 participants, 442 (64%) got accustomed to HAs within 2 months. Ninety-one participants (13%) did not get accustomed to the HAs at all, out of which 74 (81%) were first-time HA users. Eighty-four participants (12%) did not receive any HA adjustments after their initial fitting, and 49 (7%) had their HAs adjusted four or more times during the 1 year of rehabilitation. Three hundred ninety (57%) participants got their HA adjusted only at the 2-month follow-up visit, showing the intent to adjust given an opportunity. The stepwise multiple linear regression results showed the significant impact of getting accustomed to the HA and having HA adjusted at multiple instances on the self-reported HA outcomes. CONCLUSION This study showed the importance of getting accustomed to the HA and having a minimal number of adjustments to have a better long-term self-reported HA outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreeram K Narayanan
- Section for AI and Sound, Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Sabina S Houmller
- Research Unit for ORL - Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital & University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
- OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Anne Wolff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Dan D Hougaard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Michael Gaihede
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Jesper H Schmidt
- Research Unit for ORL - Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital & University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
- OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Dorte Hammershi
- Section for AI and Sound, Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nicoras R, Gotowiec S, Hadley LV, Smeds K, Naylor G. Conversation success in one-to-one and group conversation: a group concept mapping study of adults with normal and impaired hearing. Int J Audiol 2023; 62:868-876. [PMID: 35875851 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2095538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The concept of conversation success is undefined, although prior work has variously related it to accurate exchange of information, alignment between interlocutors, and good management of misunderstandings. This study aimed (1) to identify factors of conversation success and (2) to explore the importance of these factors in one-to-one versus group conversations. DESIGN Group concept mapping method was applied. Participants responded to two brainstorming prompts ("What does 'successful conversation' look like?" and "Think about a successful conversation you have taken part in. What aspects of that conversation contributed to its success?"). The resulting statements were sorted into related clusters and rated in importance for one-to-one and group conversation. STUDY SAMPLE Thirty-five adults with normal and impaired hearing. RESULTS Seven clusters were identified: (1) Being able to listen easily; (2) Being spoken to in a helpful way; (3) Being engaged and accepted; (4) Sharing information as desired; (5) Perceiving flowing and balanced interaction; (6) Feeling positive emotions; (7) Not having to engage coping mechanisms. Three clusters (1, 2, and 4) were more important in group than in one-to-one conversation. There were no differences by hearing group. CONCLUSIONS These findings emphasise that conversation success is a multifaceted concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raluca Nicoras
- Hearing Sciences - Scottish Section, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Lauren V Hadley
- Hearing Sciences - Scottish Section, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Karolina Smeds
- Hearing Sciences - Scottish Section, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- ORCA Europe, WS Audiology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Graham Naylor
- Hearing Sciences - Scottish Section, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frisby C, Eikelboom RH, Mahomed-Asmail F, Kuper H, Moore DR, de Kock T, Manchaiah V, Swanepoel DW. Mobile Health Hearing Aid Acclimatization and Support Program in Low-Income Communities: Feasibility Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e46043. [PMID: 37610802 PMCID: PMC10483300 DOI: 10.2196/46043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common management option for hearing loss is hearing aids. In addition to devices, patients require information and support, including maintenance and troubleshooting. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies can support hearing aid management, acclimatization, and use. This study developed an mHealth acclimatization and support program for first-time hearing aid users and subsequently implemented and pilot-tested the feasibility of the program. The program was facilitated by community health workers (CHWs) in low-income communities in South Africa. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an mHealth acclimatization and support program supported by CHWs in low-income communities. METHODS An application-based acclimatization and support was adapted and translated for use in low- and middle-income countries. This program was delivered in the form of 20 different voice notes accompanied by graphical illustrations via WhatsApp or 20 different SMS text messages. The program was provided to first-time hearing aid users immediately after a community-based hearing aid fitting in March 2021 in 2 low-income communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. The 20 messages were sent over a period of 45 days. Participants were contacted telephonically on days 8, 20, and 43 of the program and via open-ended paper-based questionnaires translated to isiXhosa 45 days and 6 months after the program started to obtain information on their experiences, perceptions, and accessibility of the program. Their responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 participants fitted with hearing aids received the mHealth acclimatization and support program. Most participants (15/19, 79%) received the program via WhatsApp, with 21% (4/19) of them receiving it via SMS text message. Participants described the program as helpful, supportive, informative, sufficient, and clear at both follow-ups. A total of 14 participants reported that they were still using their hearing aids at the 6-month follow-up. Three participants indicated that not all their questions about hearing aids were answered, and 5 others had minor hearing aid issues. This included feedback (n=1), battery performance (n=1), physical fit (n=2), and issues with hearing aid accessories (n=1). However, CHWs successfully addressed all these issues. There were no notable differences in responses between the participants who received the program via WhatsApp compared with those who received it through SMS text message. Most participants receiving WhatsApp messages reported that the voice notes were easier to understand, but the graphical illustrations supplemented the voice notes well. CONCLUSIONS An mHealth acclimatization and support program is feasible and potentially assists hearing aid acclimatization and use for first-time users in low-income communities. Scalable mHealth support options can facilitate increased access and improve outcomes of hearing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Frisby
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado and the University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| | - Faheema Mahomed-Asmail
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado and the University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Hannah Kuper
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - David R Moore
- Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado and the University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, United States
- Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, India
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado and the University of Pretoria, Aurora, CO, United States
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lund K, Ordoñez R, Nielsen JB, Christiansen S, Houmøller SS, Schmidt JH, Gaihede M, Hammershøi D. Value Propositions of Public Adult Hearing Rehabilitation in Denmark. Audiol Res 2023; 13:254-270. [PMID: 37102773 PMCID: PMC10135904 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13020023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To obtain and evaluate detailed descriptions of potential value propositions as seen by adults undergoing hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids. Design: Semi-structured interviews with patients and audiologists, a literature search, and the inclusion of domain knowledge from experts and scientists were used to derive value propositions. A two-alternative forced-choice paradigm and probabilistic choice models were used to investigate hearing aid users' preferences for the value propositions through an online platform. Study sample: Twelve hearing aid users (mean age 70, range 59-70) and eleven clinicians were interviewed. A total of 173 experienced hearing aid users evaluated the value propositions. Results: Twenty-nine value propositions as described by patients, clinicians, and hearing care experts where identified, from which twenty-one value propositions were evaluated. Results of the pair-wise evaluation method show that the value propositions judged to be the most important for the hearing aid users were: "13. To solve the hearing problem you have", "09. Thorough diagnosis of the hearing", and "16. The hearing aid solution is adapted to individual needs", which are related to finding the correct hearing solution and to be considered in the process. The value propositions judged to be least important were: "04 Next of kin and others involved in the process", "26. To be in the same room as the practitioner", and "29. The practitioner's human characteristics", related to the involvement of others in the process and the proximity and personal manner of the practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Lund
- Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg Universitety Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Rodrigo Ordoñez
- Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jens Bo Nielsen
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jesper Hvass Schmidt
- Research Unit for ORL-Head & Neck Surgery, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- OPEN-Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Gaihede
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg Universitety Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Dorte Hammershøi
- Department of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oosthuizen I, Manchaiah V, Launer S, Swanepoel DW. Hearing aid Experiences of Adult Hearing aid Owners During and After Fitting: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Trends Hear 2022; 26:23312165221130584. [PMID: 36300258 PMCID: PMC9618746 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221130584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing number of qualitative studies exploring the experiences and perceptions of adult hearing aid owners throughout their hearing aid journey. As these studies and reported experiences vary greatly, a systematic review was conducted to identify and synthesize the key concepts in adult hearing aid owners' experiences during and after fitting. A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted, yielding 443 results. Articles were evaluated for inclusion based on pre-determined eligibility criteria, including conventional, smartphone-connected, and direct-to-consumer hearing devices. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Rating of Qualitative Research scale. Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) were followed. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and studies were grouped into three main domains, namely experiences of owners related to a) hearing aid adoption and fitting (n = 3), b) hearing aid use (n = 20), and c) hearing aid sub-optimal use (n = 25). Hearing aid owners mainly reported on how their attitude towards hearing aids affected experiences during the fitting stage. Improved psychosocial functioning was the most prevalent perceived benefit of hearing aid use. Owners described sub-optimal use in terms of hearing device-related and non-device-related concepts. The COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior) model is used to discuss specific service-delivery, hearing-device, and hearing-aid-owner related concepts and clinical implications, including behavior change techniques to enhance understanding of the concepts that hearing aid owners perceive as essential to improve hearing aid experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilze Oosthuizen
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Ilze Oosthuizen, Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA,UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA,Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Stefan Launer
- Department of Audiology and Health Innovation, Sonova AG, Staefa, Switzerland,School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bennett RJ, Donaldson S, Kelsall-Foreman I, Meyer C, Pachana NA, Saulsman L, Eikelboom RH, Bucks RS. Addressing Emotional and Psychological Problems Associated With Hearing Loss: Perspective of Consumer and Community Representatives. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:1130-1138. [PMID: 34670097 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-21-00093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing loss causes emotional distress and can contribute to the development of psychological difficulties, yet emotional and psychological issues are not addressed within current audiology services. The purpose of this study was to use focus groups with consumer and community representatives to explore how we might improve the provision of support for clients experiencing emotional and psychological issues in relation to their hearing loss. PARTICIPANTS Adults with hearing loss (n = 19) and their significant others (n = 9), as well as 10 hearing health care professionals (n = 4 hearing health care clinicians, n = 4 reception staff, and n = 2 clinical managers), participated in consumer and community engagement focus groups. METHOD Consumer and community representatives were tasked with (a) identifying the stakeholders involved in supporting adults experiencing emotional or psychological difficulties on account of their hearing loss, (b) describing the behaviors undertaken by each stakeholder group, and (c) selecting target behavior(s) that could optimally form the basis of an intervention program to improve the quality and frequency of support provided to people experiencing emotional and psychological problems in the audiology setting. RESULTS Participants identified 12 stakeholder groups involved in supporting adults with hearing loss experiencing emotional and psychological problems. The three behaviors voted by participants to be the most promising for a behavioral intervention included the clinician (a) asking about, (b) providing information on, and (c) delivering therapeutic intervention for emotional and psychological well-being within audiological service provision. CONCLUSION Consumer and community stakeholder representatives indicate a general desire for hearing health care clinicians to deliver support for the emotional and psychological issues that arise relating to hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J. Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sara Donaldson
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - India Kelsall-Foreman
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Carly Meyer
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Nancy A. Pachana
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia
| | - Lisa Saulsman
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Robert H. Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Romola S. Bucks
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- The Raine Study, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Van Eeckhoutte M, Scollie S. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:1003-1017. [PMID: 34883040 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the difference in outcome measures and drivers of user preference between premium and entry-level hearing aids using group concept mapping. DESIGN A single-blind crossover trial was conducted. Aided behavioural outcomes measured were loudness rating, speech/consonant recognition, and speech quality. Preference between hearing aids was measured with a 7-point Likert scale. Group concept mapping was utilised to investigate preference results. Participants generated statements based on what influenced their preferences. These were sorted into categories with underlying themes. Participants rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of importance. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-three adult participants (mean: 62.4 years; range: 24-78) with mild to moderately severe bilateral SNHL (PTA500-4000 Hz > 20 dB HL). RESULTS A total of 83 unique statements and nine distinct clusters, with underlying themes driving preference, were generated. Clusters that differed significantly in importance between entry-level and premium hearing aid choosers were: Having access to smartphone application-based user-controlled settings, the ability to stream calls and music, and convenience features such as accessory compatibility. CONCLUSION This study has identified non-signal-processing factors which significantly influenced preference for a premium hearing aid over an entry-level hearing aid, indicating the importance of these features as drivers of user preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan K Saleh
- Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Folkeard
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maaike Van Eeckhoutte
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Hearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens, Lyngby.,Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) & Audiology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Susan Scollie
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alicea CCM, Doherty KA. Targeted Re-Instruction for Hearing Aid Use and Care Skills. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:590-601. [PMID: 34185574 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-20-00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine if re-instructing a hearing aid (HA) user on the specific skill(s) they could not successfully perform on the Practical Hearing Aid Skills Test-Revised (PHAST-R) resulted in better HA use and care skills than a traditional fitting method. This is referred to as "targeted re-instruction." Also, factors that might affect HA use and care skills, including memory function, hearing handicap, and hearing aid-related attitudes, were assessed. Method This study was a randomized control trial. Twenty-six new HA users (13 experimental; 13 control) were fit with HAs and provided a standard HA orientation. HA use and care skills were measured immediately following the HA fitting and then again at 4 weeks post-HA fitting. The experimental group was administered the PHAST-R twice during the trial period to identify the HA use and care skills that participants needed re-instruction on. Results Participants in the experimental group maintained their HA use and care skills over the 4-week HA trial period, whereas participants in the control group showed a significant decline. Working memory, hearing handicap, and HA-related attitudes were not found to be correlated with HA use and care skills. Conclusions Participants who did not receive targeted re-instruction showed a decline in their HA use and care skills after only 4 weeks of HA use, whereas targeted re-instruction prevented a decline in HA use and care skills. It took an average of less than 10 min to administer the PHAST-R and provide targeted re-instruction, indicating that it would be appropriate to use in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly C. M. Alicea
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Syracuse University, New York
| | - Karen A. Doherty
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Syracuse University, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meyer C, Waite M, Atkins J, Ekberg K, Scarinci N, Barr C, Cowan R, Hickson L. How Can eHealth Meet the Hearing and Communication Needs of Adults With Hearing Impairment and their Significant Others? A Group Concept Mapping Study. Ear Hear 2021; 43:335-346. [PMID: 34320524 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To seek the perspectives of key stakeholders regarding: (1) how eHealth could help meet the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing impairment and their significant others; and (2) how helpful each aspect of eHealth would be to key stakeholders personally. DESIGN Group concept mapping, a mixed-methods participatory research method, was used to seek the perspectives of key stakeholders: adults with hearing impairment (n = 39), significant others (n = 28), and hearing care professionals (n = 56). All participants completed a short online survey before completing one or more of the following activities: brainstorming, sorting, and rating. Brainstorming required participants to generate ideas in response to the focus prompt, "One way I would like to use information and communication technologies to address the hearing and communication needs of adults with hearing loss and their family and friends is to…." The sorting task required participants to sort all statements into groups that made sense to them. Finally, the rating task required participants to rate each of the statements according to "How helpful would this idea be to you?" using a 5-point Likert scale. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to the "sorting" data to develop a cluster map using the Concept Systems software. The "rating" data were subsequently analyzed at a cluster level and an individual-item level using descriptive statistics. Differences in cluster ratings between stakeholder groups were examined using Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS Overall, 123 statements were generated by participants in response to the focus prompt and were included in subsequent analyses. Based on the "sorting" data and hierarchical cluster analysis, a seven-cluster map was deemed to be the best representation of the data. Three key themes emerged from the data, including using eHealth to (1) Educate and Involve Others; (2) Support Aural Rehabilitation; and (3) Educate About and Demonstrate the Impacts of Hearing Impairment and Benefits of Hearing Rehabilitation. Overall median rating scores for each cluster ranged from 3.97 (educate and involve significant others) to 3.44 (empower adults with hearing impairment to manage their hearing impairment from home). CONCLUSIONS These research findings demonstrate the broad range of clinical applications of eHealth that have the capacity to support the implementation of patient- and family-centered hearing care, with self-directed educational tools and resources typically being rated as most helpful. Therefore, eHealth appears to be a viable option for enabling a more biopsychosocial approach to hearing healthcare and educating and involving significant others in the hearing rehabilitation process without adding more pressure on clinical time. More research is needed to inform the subsequent development of eHealth interventions, and it is recommended that health behavior change theory be adhered to for such interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Meyer
- HEARing CRC, Melbourne, VIC, Australia School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bennett RJ, Swanepoel DW, Ratinaud P, Bailey A, Pennebaker JW, Manchaiah V. Hearing aid acquisition and ownership: what can we learn from online consumer reviews? Int J Audiol 2021; 60:917-926. [PMID: 34120557 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1931487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the publicised opinions of consumers actively participating in online hearing aid reviews. DESIGN A retrospective design examining data generated from an online consumer review website (www.HearingTracker.com). Qualitative data (open text responses) were analysed using the open source automated topic modelling software IRaMuTeQ (http://www.iramuteq.org/) to identify themes. Outputs were compared with quantitative data from the consumer reviews (short response questions exploring hearing aid performance and benefit, and some meta-data such as hearing aid brand and years of hearing aid ownership). STUDY SAMPLE 1378 online consumer hearing aid reviews. RESULTS Six clusters within two domains were identified. The domain Device Acquisition included three clusters: Finding the right provider, device and price-point; Selecting a hearing aid to suit the hearing loss; Attaining physical fit and device management skills. The domain Device Use included three clusters: Smartphone streaming to hearing aids; Hearing aid adjustment using smartphone; and Hearing in noise. CONCLUSIONS Although online hearing aid consumers indicate positive performance on multiple-choice questions relating to hearing aid performance and benefit, their online reviews describe a number of barriers limiting their success. Hearing healthcare clinicians must employ a personalised approach to audiological rehabilitation to ensure individual clients' needs are met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.,Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
| | | | | | - James W Pennebaker
- Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA.,Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferguson MA, Maidment DW, Gomez R, Coulson N, Wharrad H. The feasibility of an m-health educational programme (m2Hear) to improve outcomes in first-time hearing aid users. Int J Audiol 2021; 60:S30-S41. [PMID: 33135503 PMCID: PMC8300526 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1825839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To (i) assess the delivery, accessibility, usability, acceptability, and adherence, and (ii) identify suitable outcome measures, for a mobile-enhanced multimedia educational programme (m2Hear) in first-time hearing aid users. DESIGN A prospective, single-centre feasibility study. STUDY SAMPLE First-time hearing aid users (n = 59), recruited at their initial hearing assessment. Evaluations were made at 1-week and at 10-12 weeks post-hearing aid fitting. RESULTS m2Hear was most commonly accessed via tablets (42.3%). Usability was high for the System Usability Scale (88.5%), and the uMARS, particularly for the Information (M = 4.7), Functionality (M = 4.5) and Aesthetics (M = 4.2) subscales (maximum score = 5). Participant feedback was positive, with a high percent agreeing that m2Hear aided understanding of hearing aids (98%), held their interest (86%), improved confidence to use hearing aids and communicate (84%), and provided additional information to audiologist's advice (82%). Learnings about practical hearing aid handling/maintenance skills and how to communicate with others were reportedly used equally in participant's everyday lives. m2Hear was convenient to use, clear, concise and comprehensive. Outcome measures of social participation resulted in large effect sizes (Cohen's d > 1.6). CONCLUSIONS A theoretically-driven, personalised and co-designed educational m-health intervention is feasible and beneficial for use in the self-management of hearing loss and hearing aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. Ferguson
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Hearing Sciences Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - David W. Maidment
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Hearing Sciences Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Rachel Gomez
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Neil Coulson
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heather Wharrad
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meijerink JF, Pronk M, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Jansen V, Kramer SE. Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17927. [PMID: 32960175 PMCID: PMC7539169 DOI: 10.2196/17927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing aid (HA) use is known to improve health outcomes for people with hearing loss. Despite that, HA use is suboptimal, and communication issues and hearing-related activity limitations and participation restrictions often remain. Web-based self-management communication programs may support people with hearing loss to effectively self-manage the impact of hearing loss in their daily lives. OBJECTIVE The goal of the research is to examine the short- and long-term effects of a web-based self-management SUpport PRogram (SUPR) on communication strategy use (primary outcome) and a range of secondary outcomes for HA users aged 50 years and older. METHODS Clients of 36 HA dispensing practices were randomized to SUPR (SUPR recipients; n=180 HA users) and 34 to care as usual (controls; n=163 HA users). SUPR recipients received a practical support booklet and online materials delivered via email over the course of their 6-month HA rehabilitation trajectory. They were encouraged to appoint a communication partner and were offered optional email contact with the HA dispensing practice. The online materials included 3 instruction videos on HA handling, 5 videos on communication strategies, and 3 testimonial videos. Care as usual included a HA fitting rehabilitation trajectory only. Measurements were carried out at baseline, immediately postintervention, 6 months postintervention, and 12 months postintervention. The primary outcome measure was self-reported use of communication strategies (3 subscales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired [CPHI]). Secondary outcome measures included self-reported personal adjustment to hearing loss (CPHI); use, satisfaction and benefit of HAs and SUPR (use questionnaire; International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids [IOI-HA], Alternative Interventions [IOI-AI]); recommendation of HA dispensing services; self-efficacy for HA handling (Measure of Audiologic Rehabilitation Self-Efficacy for Hearing Aids [MARS-HA]); readiness to act on hearing loss (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment adapted for hearing loss [URICA-HL]); and hearing disability (Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap [AIADH]). RESULTS Linear mixed model analyses (intention to treat) showed no significant differences between the SUPR and control group in the course of communication strategy use (CPHI). Immediately postintervention, SUPR recipients showed significantly higher self-efficacy for advanced HA handling than the controls, which was sustained at 12 months (MARS-HA; mean difference immediately postintervention: 5.3, 95% CI 0.3 to 10.4; P=.04). Also, SUPR recipients showed significantly greater HA satisfaction than controls immediately postintervention (IOI-HA; 0.3, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.5; P=.006), which was sustained at 12 months, and significantly greater HA use than the controls immediately postintervention (IOI-HA; 0.3, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.5; P=.03), which was not sustained at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS This study provides ground to recommend adding SUPR to standard HA dispensing care, as long-term, modest improvements in HA outcomes were observed. Further research is needed to evaluate what adjustments to SUPR are needed to establish long-term effectiveness on outcomes in the psychosocial domain. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN77340339; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN77340339. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Fj Meijerink
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pronk
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Vera Jansen
- Schoonenberg HoorSupport, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sophia E Kramer
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bennett RJ, Barr C, Montano J, Eikelboom RH, Saunders GH, Pronk M, Preminger JE, Ferguson M, Weinstein B, Heffernan E, van Leeuwen L, Hickson L, Timmer BHB, Singh G, Gerace D, Cortis A, Bellekom SR. Identifying the approaches used by audiologists to address the psychosocial needs of their adult clients. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:104-114. [PMID: 32940093 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1817995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the approaches taken by audiologists to address their adult clients' psychosocial needs related to hearing loss. DESIGN A participatory mixed methods design. Participants generated statements describing the ways in which the psychosocial needs of their adult clients with hearing loss are addressed, and then grouped the statements into themes. Data were obtained using face-to-face and online structured questions. Concept mapping techniques were used to identify key concepts and to map each of the concepts relative to each other. STUDY SAMPLE An international sample of 65 audiologists. RESULTS Ninety-three statements were generated and grouped into seven conceptual clusters: Client Empowerment; Use of Strategies and Training to Personalise the Rehabilitation Program; Facilitating Peer and Other Professional Support; Providing Emotional Support; Improving Social Engagement with Technology; Including Communication Partners; and Promoting Client Responsibility. CONCLUSIONS Audiologists employ a wide range of approaches in their attempt to address the psychosocial needs associated with hearing loss experienced by their adult clients. The approaches described were mostly informal and provided in a non-standardised way. The majority of approaches described were not evidence-based, despite the availability of several options that are evidence-based, thus highlighting the implementation gap between research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.,School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Caitlin Barr
- Soundfair, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Australia
| | | | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.,Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Gabrielle H Saunders
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marieke Pronk
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jill E Preminger
- Program in Audiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | | | - Eithne Heffernan
- Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lisette van Leeuwen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise Hickson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Barbra H B Timmer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.,Sonova AG, Staefa, Switzerland
| | - Gurjit Singh
- Sonova AG, Staefa, Switzerland.,Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel Gerace
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Alex Cortis
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Sandra R Bellekom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Glista D, O'Hagan R, Moodie S, Scollie S. An examination of clinical uptake factors for remote hearing aid support: a concept mapping study with audiologists. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:S13-S22. [PMID: 32749182 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1795281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a conceptual framework around the factors that influence audiologists in the clinical uptake of remote follow-up hearing aid support services. DESIGN A purposive sample of 42 audiologists, stratified according to client-focus of either paediatric or adult, were recruited from professional associations in Ontario, Canada, as members of the six-step, participatory-based concept mapping process. Analyses included multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis. RESULTS Six main themes emerged from this research according to overall level of importance: (1) technology and infrastructure; (2) audiologist-centred considerations; (3) hearing healthcare regulations; (4) client-centred considerations; (5) clinical implementation considerations; and (6) financial considerations. Subthemes were identified at the group-level and by subgroup. These highlight the importance of TECH factors (accessible Technology, Easy to use, robust Connection, and Help available), as well as the multi-faceted nature of the perceived attitudes/aptitudes across stakeholders. CONCLUSION Findings can be utilised in tailored planning and development efforts to support future research, knowledge dissemination, best-practice protocol/guideline development, and related training to assist in the clinical uptake of remote follow-up hearing aid support services, across variable practice contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Glista
- The School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,The National Centre for Audiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Robin O'Hagan
- The National Centre for Audiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Sheila Moodie
- The School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,The National Centre for Audiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Susan Scollie
- The School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.,The National Centre for Audiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maidment DW, Coulson NS, Wharrad H, Taylor M, Ferguson MA. The development of an mHealth educational intervention for first-time hearing aid users: combining theoretical and ecologically valid approaches. Int J Audiol 2020; 59:492-500. [DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1755063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David W. Maidment
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Hearing Sciences Section, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Neil S. Coulson
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Heather Wharrad
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Melanie A. Ferguson
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bennett RJ, Kosovich EM, Stegeman I, Ebrahimi-Madiseh A, Tegg-Quinn S, Eikelboom RH. Investigating the prevalence and impact of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2020; 59:615-623. [PMID: 32105163 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1731615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the prevalence of device-related problems associated with hearing aid use, participants' help-seeking behaviours for these problems, and factors associated with hearing aid problems.Design: A prospective convenience cohort design surveying 413 adult hearing aid users (34-97 years of age) recruited from seven clinics across Australia.Results: Almost all participants (98%) indicated that they were experiencing at least one of the hearing aid problems included on the survey. The number of hearing aid related problems reported by participants ranged from 0 to 25 (of a possible 26), with a mean of 10 problems (SD = 5). The three most reported problems were related to difficulty hearing in noisy environments, hearing in windy environments, and understanding certain voices. Participants had reported less than half (46.33%) of the total problems identified to their clinic (range = 0-100%, mean = 43.40, SD = 13.92). Participants who reported experiencing a greater number of hearing aid problems also reported lower levels of hearing aid benefit, and satisfaction with their hearing aids.Conclusions: The majority of hearing aid owners experience problems with their hearing aids. Addressing these problems would likely contribute to improved hearing aid outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Erin M Kosovich
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Azadeh Ebrahimi-Madiseh
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Susan Tegg-Quinn
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.,Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Ototoxicity refers to the damage to structures and function of the auditory-vestibular system caused by exogenous agents such as pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and ionizing radiation. There are many potentially ototoxic substances. For example, depending on how ototoxicity is defined, there are 200 to 600 medications that can cause damage to hearing and/or balance. Ototoxicity encompasses cochleotoxicity, vestibulotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. A variety of professional disciplines are involved in determining causation, prevention, and management of ototoxic effects. Research to identify and develop otoprotectants and otorescue agents is emerging and will translate basic scientific discovery into applications for use in hearing conservation programs, safety operations, and clinical care. Original concept maps are presented here to visually represent knowledge pathways, domains, and relationships essential to the understanding of ototoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly L. Watts
- US Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence, San Antonio, Texas
- Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (NSMRL), Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Bennett RJ, Meyer CJ, Eikelboom RH, Atlas JD, Atlas MD. Factors Associated With Self-Reported Hearing Aid Management Skills and Knowledge. Am J Audiol 2018; 27:604-613. [PMID: 30286248 DOI: 10.1044/2018_aja-18-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing aid management describes the skills and knowledge required for the handling, use, care, and maintenance of the hearing aid. The importance of hearing aid management skills and knowledge is evidenced by their association with hearing aid outcomes. However, the nature of this association and the influence of participant factors on this association are unknown. Accordingly, the aims of the current study were to (a) investigate participant factors that influence hearing aid management skills and knowledge and (b) investigate the impact of hearing aid management skills and knowledge on hearing aid outcomes. METHOD Factors associated with hearing aid management skills and knowledge were investigated through an e-mail- and paper-based self-report survey, including the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Inventory (Bennett, Meyer, Eikelboom, & Atlas, 2018b) and the International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids (Cox & Alexander, 2002). The study sample included 518 adult hearing aid owners, ranging in age from 18 to 97 years (M = 71 years, SD = 14 years), 61% male and 39% female, recruited from seven hearing clinics across Australia. RESULTS Participant factors found to be associated with hearing aid skills and knowledge included participants' age, gender, style of hearing aid, age of current hearing aid, and total years of hearing aid ownership. Higher levels of hearing aid management skills and knowledge were found to be associated with better hearing aid outcomes, specifically higher self-reported satisfaction with hearing aids, perceived benefit from hearing aids, and overall outcome of the hearing aid fitting as evaluated by the International Outcomes Inventory for Hearing Aids. CONCLUSIONS Hearing aid management difficulties were greatest for older people, women, and owners of behind-the-ear style of hearing aids, suggesting that clinicians need to be cognizant of the additional needs for these three groups. The positive association between hearing aid outcomes and hearing aid skills and knowledge emphasizes the importance of education and training on hearing aid management for successful aural rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J. Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Carly J. Meyer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert H. Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
- Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Julian D. Atlas
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Marcus D. Atlas
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bennett RJ, Meyer CJ, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD. Evaluating Hearing Aid Management: Development of the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Inventory (HASKI). Am J Audiol 2018; 27:333-348. [PMID: 30208414 DOI: 10.1044/2018_aja-18-0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although hearing health care clinicians provide training on hearing aid handling and management as part of the rehabilitation program, clinical studies suggest that the level of management skill demonstrated by hearing aid owners is low. In the absence of a comprehensive clinical survey to identify these shortfalls in clinical training, the objective of this study was to develop and report the psychometric properties of the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Inventory (HASKI: a self-administered version and a clinician-administered version). The HASKI evaluates the knowledge and skills required for hearing aid management. A secondary aim was to report the prevalence of hearing aid management difficulties in an Australian population. METHOD The development of the HASKI and the investigation of its psychometric properties in a prospective convenience cohort of 518 adult hearing aid owners, ranging in age from 18 to 97 years (M = 71 years, SD = 14), 60% male, 38% female, and 2% undisclosed, recruited from 7 hearing clinics across Australia, were used. RESULTS The HASKI (both the self-administered and clinician administered) demonstrated high internal consistency, interdimensional relationships, construct validity, test-retest reliability, interobserver reliability, and criterion validity. A range of aptitudes were observed from low to full competency, with 99% of participants indicating difficulty with at least 1 item on the survey. CONCLUSIONS The Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Inventories are valid and reliable measures of hearing aid handling and management skills with good potential for use in clinical settings. Hearing aid management is an area of difficulty for the majority of hearing aid owners, indicating the need for clinicians to improve the efficacy of hearing aid management training delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J. Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands
| | - Carly J. Meyer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert H. Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Marcus D. Atlas
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco
- Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands
| |
Collapse
|