The efficacy of methotrexate for maintaining remission in inflammatory bowel disease

Methotrexate showed efficacy both in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, predictors of surgery were identified in patients initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate methotrexate efficacy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and identify predictors of surgery for patients who were initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy.

Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of 34,860 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the IBD Bioresource (United Kingdom) prior to 9 November 2021. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with methotrexate efficacy. The data were randomly stratified into training and testing sets (7:3). Nomograms were developed based on Cox regression analysis outcomes. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were determined using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.

Results: Overall, 1,042 patients (CD: 791, UC: 251) were included. Independent factors associated with effective methotrexate monotherapy were younger age at diagnosis, latest therapy period, exclusive upper gastrointestinal tract disease (for CD), and longer duration between diagnosis and methotrexate initiation (for UC). For CD, predictors in the nomogram were gender, treatment era, tolerance, lesion site, perianal involvement, disease behaviour, and biologics requirements (C-index: 0.711 and 0.732 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). For UC, the factors were age at diagnosis and sex (C-index: 0.784 and 0.690 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predictions and actual observations.

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy.

RESULTS

The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase.

DISCUSSION

Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX.

CONCLUSION

MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

Favourable Tolerability and Drug Survival of Tioguanine Versus Methotrexate After Failure of Conventional Thiopurines in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Both methotrexate and tioguanine can be considered as treatment options in patients with Crohn's disease after failure of conventional thiopurines. This study aimed to compare tolerability and drug survival of methotrexate and tioguanine therapy after failure of conventional thiopurines in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study, including patients with Crohn's disease initiating monotherapy methotrexate or tioguanine after failure [all causes] of conventional thiopurines. Follow-up duration was 104 weeks or until treatment discontinuation. The primary outcome was cumulative therapy discontinuation incidence due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included total number of [serious] adverse events, and ongoing monotherapy.

RESULTS

In total, 219 patients starting either methotrexate [n = 105] or tioguanine [n = 114] were included. In all 65 [29.7%] patients (methotrexate 43.8% [46/105 people], tioguanine 16.7% [19/114 people], p <0.001) discontinued their treatment due to adverse events during follow-up. Median time until discontinuation due to adverse events was 16 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 7-38, p = 0.812). Serious adverse events were not significantly different. Patients treated with methotrexate experienced adverse events more often [methotrexate 83%, tioguanine 46%, p <0.001]. Total monotherapy drug survival after 104 weeks was 22% for methotrexate and 46% for tioguanine [p <0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a higher cumulative discontinuation incidence due to adverse events for methotrexate [44%] compared with tioguanine [17%] in Crohn's disease patients after failure of conventional thiopurines. The total adverse events incidence during methotrexate use was higher, whereas serious adverse events incidence was similar. These favourable results for tioguanine treatment may guide the selection of immunosuppressive therapy after failure of conventional thiopurines.

Indeterminate Colitis - Update on Treatment Options

Indeterminate colitis (IC) is described in approximately 5-15% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It usually reflects a difficulty or lack of clarity in distinguishing between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) on biopsy or colectomy specimens. The diagnostic difficulty may explain the variability in the reported prevalence and incidence of IC. Clinically, most IC patients tend to evolve over time to a definite diagnosis of either UC or CD. IC has also been interchangeably described as inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU). This review offers an overview of the available limited literature on the conventional medical and surgical treatments for IC. In contrast to the numerous studies on the medical management of UC and CD, there are very few data from dedicated controlled trials on the treatment of IC. The natural evolution of IC more closely mimics UC. Regarding medical options for treatment, most patients diagnosed with IC are treated similarly to UC, and treatment choices are based on disease severity. Others are managed similarly to CD if there are features suggestive of CD, including fissures, skin tags, or rectal sparing. In medically refractory IC, surgical treatment options are limited and include total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), with its associated risk factors and complications. Post-surgical complications and pouch failure rates were historically thought to be more common in IC patients, but recent meta-analyses reveal similar rates between UC and IC patients. Future therapies in IBD are focused on known mechanisms in the disease pathways of UC and CD. Owing to the lack of IC-specific studies, clinicians have traditionally and historically extrapolated the data to IC patients based on their symptomatology, clinical course, and endoscopic findings.

A User's Guide to De-escalating Immunomodulator and Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

De-escalation of immunomodulators and biologic agents in inflammatory bowel disease is frequently discussed with patients and must weigh the risk of continued medical therapy with the risk of disease recurrence. Risk factors for disease flare after withdrawal of inflammatory bowel disease medications such as disease activity at de-escalation, disease prognostic features, and prior course of disease have been identified predominately in retrospective studies, allowing for risk stratification of patients. This review evaluates the published literature regarding therapeutic de-escalation and provides a framework for physicians to apply this to clinical practice. Prospective trials are underway and planned, which should provide further insight into this treatment paradigm and better inform patient selection for this strategy.

Is there room for immunomodulators in ulcerative colitis?

Introduction: The management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has evolved over the past few decades. While aminosalicylates remain the mainstay of induction and maintenance therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate UC, the advent of biologic agents and novel oral small molecules has substantively changed the treatment landscape for patients with moderate-to-severe disease and confounded the role of traditional immunomodulators (IMMs) such as thiopurines and methotrexate in the UC management algorithm.Areas covered: We summarize the mechanism of action of thiopurines and methotrexate, identify clinical parameters for their use, and appraise the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of IMMs in UC as both monotherapy and in combination with other therapies, emphasizing on prospective, controlled data.Expert opinion: With the advent of several classes of highly effective treatments for UC, emergence of data demonstrating no benefit of IMMs over placebo, and concerns about the relative safety profile of long-term IMM exposure, we propose that the role of thiopurines or methotrexate be restricted to patients with milder disease failing to maintain corticosteroid-free remission on aminosalicylates alone or in combination therapy with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Aminosalicylates, thiopurines and methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: Is it possible to discontinue the treatment?

The current goals of treatment in inflammatory bowel disease, both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are to achieve clinical, endoscopic and ideally histological remission and improve the quality of life of these patients. Current therapies are effective in achieving remission in most cases, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on their optimal duration. This review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the withdrawal of therapy with 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines and methotrexate. We also aim to identify which specific group of patients, while in remission and in the absence of risk factors, may be able to discontinue therapy without a significant risk of relapse.

A single-center experience with methotrexate in the treatment of Chinese Crohn's disease patients

OBJECTIVE

Methotrexate (MTX) can be used as an alternative for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who are intolerant of thiopurine. This retrospective study aimed to provide some clues about MTX treatment in Chinese patients with CD.

METHODS

Medical records of 27 adult patients with CD who were treated with MTX between 2012 and 2017 at Renji Hospital were reviewed. MTX was administered at 15 mg or 20 mg intramuscularly once per week. The remission and response rates and adverse reactions of MTX were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen (48.1%) of the patients achieved remission for more than 12 months, whereas four (14.8%) responded clinically. Eight (29.6%) patients discontinued MTX due to adverse events. The mean age of those who maintained remission was significantly younger than that of those who did not ([35.62 ± 10.99] years vs. [45.43 ± 11.93] years, P < 0.05). The pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) level was higher in the group who maintained remission than that in those who did not ([17.20 ± 17.26] mg/L vs. [6.98 ± 5.66] mg/L, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MTX is effective and relatively safe for patients at doses of 15 mg/week or 20 mg/week and may be an alternative therapy for patients who are intolerant of thiopurine. Elderly patients with CD and patients with normal pretreatment CRP level may have a reduced response to MTX.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults

Crohn's disease is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology with genetic, immunologic, and environmental influences. The incidence of Crohn's disease has steadily increased over the past several decades. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved since the last practice guideline was published. These guidelines represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology and were developed under the auspices of the Practice Parameters Committee for the management of adult patients with Crohn's disease. These guidelines are established for clinical practice with the intent of suggesting preferable approaches to particular medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When exercising clinical judgment, health-care providers should incorporate this guideline along with patient's needs, desires, and their values in order to fully and appropriately care for patients with Crohn's disease. This guideline is intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. To evaluate the level of evidence and strength of recommendations, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments at a later time.

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation Topical Review on Treatment Withdrawal ['Exit Strategies'] in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Clinically effective therapies now exist for remission maintenance in both ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]. For each major class of IBD medications [5-aminosalicyclates, immunomodulators, and biologic agents], used alone or in combination, there is a risk of relapse following reduction or cessation of treatment. A consensus expert panel convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] reviewed the published literature and agreed a series of consensus practice points. The objective of the expert consensus is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice so that physicians can make informed decisions in partnership with their patients. The likelihood of relapse with stopping each class of IBD medication is reviewed. Factors associated with an altered risk of relapse with withdrawal are evaluated, and strategies to monitor and allow early identification of relapse are considered. In general, patients in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission are more likely to remain well when treatments are stopped. Reintroduction of the same treatment is usually, but not always, successful. The decision to stop a treatment needs to be individualized, and shared decision making with the patient should take place.

Hepatic Issues and Complications Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Clinical Report From the NASPGHAN Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Hepatology Committees

Hepatobiliary disorders are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and persistent abnormal liver function tests are found in approximately 20% to 30% of individuals with IBD. In most cases, the cause of these elevations will fall into 1 of 3 main categories. They can be as a result of extraintestinal manifestations of the disease process, related to medication toxicity, or the result of an underlying primary hepatic disorder unrelated to IBD. This latter possibility is beyond the scope of this review article, but does need to be considered in anyone with elevated liver function tests. This review is provided as a clinical summary of some of the major hepatic issues that may occur in patients with IBD.

Use of Methotrexate in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy is a well-recognized therapy for many inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis. More than 20 years ago, the clinical efficacy of MTX was also established for steroid dependent Crohn's disease, but it was never broadly adapted as a treatment modality. More recently, MTX is being increasingly used in the pediatric population with Crohn's disease, both as a single agent as well as a concomitant therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment. This review outlines important pharmacological aspects for the therapeutic application of MTX and the current status of MTX as mono- or combination-therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease including new results of MTX monotherapy in steroid dependent ulcerative colitis.

Systematic Review of Effects of Withdrawal of Immunomodulators or Biologic Agents From Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Little is known about the optimal duration of therapy with an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent and/or an immunomodulator for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify studies reporting after de-escalation (drug cessation or dose reduction) of anti-TNF agents and/or immunomodulators in patients in remission from IBD. Studies were reviewed according to the type of IBD and drug. Rates of relapse, factors associated with relapse, and response to re-treatment were determined. Our search yielded 6315 unique citations; we analyzed findings from 69 studies (18 on de-escalation [drug cessation or dose reduction] of immunomodulator monotherapy, 8 on immunomodulator de-escalation from combination therapy, and 43 on de-escalation of anti-TNF agents, including 3 during pregnancy) comprising 4672 patients. Stopping immunomodulator monotherapy after a period of remission was associated with high rates of relapse in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (approximately 75% of patients experienced a relapse within 5 years after therapy was stopped). Most studies of patients with Crohn's disease who discontinued an immunomodulator after combination therapy found that rates of relapse did not differ from those of patients who continued taking the drug (55%-60% had disease relapse 24 months after they stopped taking the immunomodulator). The only study in patients with ulcerative colitis supported continued immunomodulator use. Approximately 50% of patients who discontinued anti-TNF agents after combination therapy maintained remission 24 months later, but the proportion in remission decreased with time. Markers of disease activity, poor prognostic factors, and complicated or relapsing disease course were associated with future relapse. In conclusion, based on a systematic review, 50% or more of patients with IBD who cease therapy have a disease relapse. Further studies are required to accurately identify subgroups of patients who are good candidates for discontinuation of treatment. The decision to withdraw a drug should be made for each individual based on patient preference, disease markers, consequences of relapse, safety, and cost.

[A Case of Crohn's Disease Showing Favorable Response to Induction and Maintenance Therapy with Methotrexate after Failure of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy]

Thanks to the introduction of immumomodulators and biologics, therapeutic approaches in Crohn's disease have changed significantly during the past decade. Although new biologic therapy has dramatically improved the treatment of Crohn's disease, a substantial number of patients are refractory to these therapies or lose their initial response. Methotrexate (MTX) is a structural analogue of folic acid that can competitively inhibit the binding of dihydrofolic acid to the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase and has been widely used as immunomodulator in rheumatology area for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Although MTX has also been shown to be an effective agent for remission induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease, the use of MTX in Crohn's disease has not yet been reported in Korea. Herein, we report a case of Crohn's disease patient who was successfully treated with MTX after treatment failure with thiopurine and anti-tumor necrosis factor.

Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate, a folate antagonist, is an immunosuppressant drug that is effective for treating several inflammatory disorders including Crohn's disease. Ulcerative colitis, a related chronic inflammatory bowel disease, can be challenging to treat. T his updated systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the use of methotrexate for induction maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to assess the efficacy and safety of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD/FBD group specialized trials register from inception to June 26, 2014. Study references and review papers were also searched for additional trials. Abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings were searched to identify research published in abstract form only.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in which methotrexate was compared to placebo or an active comparator in patients with quiescent ulcerative were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinical or endoscopic relapse as defined by the primary studies. Secondary outcomes included frequency and nature of adverse events, change of disease activity score and steroid-sparing effect. We calculated the risk ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval for dichotomous outcomes. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials (165 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One study compared oral methotrexate (12.5 mg/week) to placebo, another compared oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP, 1.5 mg/kg/day) or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, 3 g/day) and the other compared methotrexate (15 mg/week) in combination sulfasalazine (3 g/day) to sulfasalazine. The placebo-controlled study was rated as low risk of bias. The study comparing methotrexate to 6-MP and 5-ASA was rated as high risk of bias and the study assessing methotrexate and sulfasalazine was rated as unclear risk of bias for sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding. The placebo-controlled study found no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients who maintained remission. At nine months, 36% (5/14) of methotrexate patients maintained remission compared to 54% (10/18) of placebo patients (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.45). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was low due to very sparse data (15 events). The study comparing combination therapy to sulfasalazine found no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who maintained remission. At 12 months, 100% (14/14) of patients in the combination group maintained remission compared to 75% (9/12) of sulfasalazine patients (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.86), A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unknown risk of bias and very sparse data (23 events). There were no statistically significant differences in maintenance of remission rates between methotrexate and 6-MP or between methotrexate and 5-ASA. At 76 weeks, 14% (1/7) of methotrexate patients maintained remission compared to 64% (7/11) of 6-MP patients (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.45) and 0% (0/2) of 5-ASA patients (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.06 to 20.71). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence from this study was very low due to high risk of bias and very sparse data. Adverse events reported in these studies included transient leucopenia, migraine, nausea and dyspepsia, mild alopecia, mild increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels, peritoneal abscess, hypoalbuminemia, severe rash and atypical pneumonia

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results for efficacy and safety outcomes between methotrexate and placebo, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate and 5-aminosalicylic acid were uncertain. Whether a higher dose or parenteral administration of methotrexate would be effective in quiescent ulcerative colitis is unknown. At present there is no evidence supporting the use of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of methotrexate maintenance therapy in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Large scale methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed. These studies should investigate higher doses of methotrexate (e.g. 15 to 25 mg/week) and parenteral administration.

Optimal Endpoint of Therapy in IBD: An Update on Factors Determining a Successful Drug Withdrawal

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are chronic inflammatory disorders, which require long term treatment to achieve remission and to prevent relapses and cancer. While current therapies are effective in most cases, they can have rare but serious side effects and are often associated with high costs. On the other hand, early discontinuation of an effective treatment may lead to a quick relapse and to complications at the restart of therapy. Therefore it is essential to determine the optimal duration of maintenance therapy, but clear guidelines are missing. The most important questions when deciding whether to continue or withdraw therapy in quiescent UC and CD patients are the efficacy of the continuous treatment to maintain remission in the long term, the frequency and severity of side effects, and the chance of relapse after discontinuation of therapy. This review summarizes the current knowledge on these topics with respect to 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines, methotrexate, and biological therapies and collects information regarding when and in which specific patient groups, in the absence of risk factors, can withdrawal of therapy be considered without a high risk of relapse. Additionally, the particular aspect of colorectal cancer prevention by current therapies will also be discussed.

Consensus guidelines of ECCO/ESPGHAN on the medical management of pediatric Crohn's disease

Children and adolescents with Crohn's disease (CD) present often with a more complicated disease course compared to adult patients. In addition, the potential impact of CD on growth, pubertal and emotional development of patients underlines the need for a specific management strategy of pediatric-onset CD. To develop the first evidenced based and consensus driven guidelines for pediatric-onset CD an expert panel of 33 IBD specialists was formed after an open call within the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation and the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterolog, Hepatology and Nutrition. The aim was to base on a thorough review of existing evidence a state of the art guidance on the medical treatment and long term management of children and adolescents with CD, with individualized treatment algorithms based on a benefit-risk analysis according to different clinical scenarios. In children and adolescents who did not have finished their growth, exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is the induction therapy of first choice due to its excellent safety profile, preferable over corticosteroids, which are equipotential to induce remission. The majority of patients with pediatric-onset CD require immunomodulator based maintenance therapy. The experts discuss several factors potentially predictive for poor disease outcome (such as severe perianal fistulizing disease, severe stricturing/penetrating disease, severe growth retardation, panenteric disease, persistent severe disease despite adequate induction therapy), which may incite to an anti-TNF-based top down approach. These guidelines are intended to give practical (whenever possible evidence-based) answers to (pediatric) gastroenterologists who take care of children and adolescents with CD; they are not meant to be a rule or legal standard, since many different clinical scenario exist requiring treatment strategies not covered by or different from these guidelines.

The liver in pediatric gastrointestinal disease

Hepatic involvement is often encountered in gastrointestinal (GI) diseases, in part because of the close anatomic and physiologic relations between the liver and GI tract. Drainage of the mesenteric blood supply to the portal vein permits absorbed and/or translocated nutrients, toxins, bacterial elements, cytokines, and immunocytes to gain hepatic access. Liver problems in digestive disorders may range from nonspecific hepatocellular enzyme elevations to significant pathologic processes that may progress to end-stage liver disease. Hepatobiliary manifestations of primary GI diseases in childhood and adolescence are not uncommon and include several well-described associations, such as sclerosing cholangitis with inflammatory bowel disease. Liver damage may also result from the effects of drugs used to treat GI diseases, for example, the hepatotoxicity of immunomodulatory therapies. This review highlights the important features of the hepatic and biliary abnormalities associated with 3 common pediatric GI conditions: inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and cystic fibrosis.

Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylates are the most commonly used therapies. However, many patients require immunosuppressive therapy for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent disease. Methotrexate is a medication that is effective for treating a variety of inflammatory diseases, including Crohn's disease. This review was performed to determine the effectiveness of methotrexate treatment in UC patients. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of methotrexate for induction of remission in patients with UC.

SEARCH METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane IBD/FBD group specialized trials register were searched from from inception to June 26, 2014. Study references and review papers were also searched for additional trials. Abstracts from major gastroenterological meetings were searched to identify research published in abstract form only.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing methotrexate with placebo or an active comparator in patients with active ulcerative colitis were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission and withdrawal from steroids as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the total number of patients randomized (intention-to-treat analysis). We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcome was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies (n = 101 patients) were included in the review. One study (n = 67) compared oral methotrexate 12.5 mg/week) to placebo. The other study (n = 34) compared oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) to 6-mercaptopurine (1.5 mg/kg/day) and 5-aminosalicylic acid (3 g/day). The placebo-controlled study was judged to be at low risk of bias. The other study was judged to be at high risk of bias due to an open-label design. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical remission rates between methotrexate and placebo patients. Forty-seven per cent (14/30) of methotrexate patients achieved clinical remission and complete withdrawal from steroids during the study period compared to 49% (18/37) of placebo patients (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.59. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (32 events). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission and withdrawal from steroids in the study comparing oral methotrexate to 6-mercaptopurine and 5-aminosalicylic acid. At 30 weeks, 58% (7/12) of methotrexate patients achieved clinical remission and withdrawal from steroids compared to 79% (11/14) of 6-mercaptopurine patients (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.29) and 25% of 5-aminosalicylic acid patients (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.64 to 8.49). GRADE analyses indicated that the overall quality of the evidence was very low due to very sparse data (18 and 9 events respectively) and and high risk of bias. In the placebo-controlled trial two patients (7%) were withdrawn from the methotrexate group due to adverse events (leucopenia, migraine) compared to one patient (3%) who had a rash in the placebo group (RR 2.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 25.91). Adverse events experienced by methotrexate patients in the active comparator study included nausea and dyspepsia, mild alopecia, mild increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels, peritoneal abscess, hypoalbuminemia, severe rash and atypical pneumonia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although methotrexate was well-tolerated, the studies showed no benefit for methotrexate over placebo or active comparators. The results for efficacy outcomes between methotrexate and placebo, methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate and 5-aminosalicylic acid were uncertain. Whether a higher dose or parenteral administration would be effective for induction therapy is unknown. At present there is no evidence supporting the use of methotrexate for induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis. A trial in which larger numbers of patients receive a higher dose of oral methotrexate should be considered. Currently there are two large ongoing placebo-controlled trials (METEOR and MERIT-UC) assessing the efficacy and safety of intramuscular or subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with active UC which may help resolve the evidence supporting the use of methotrexate as therapy for active of ulcerative colitis.

Use of methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease in 2014: A User’s Guide

Methotrexate has been used an immunomodulator in many autoimmune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. However, many physicians are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with its use in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. We summarize the data for use of methotrexate in common clinical scenarios: (1) steroid dependant Crohn’s disease (CD); (2) maintenance of remission in steroid free CD; (3) azathioprine failures in CD; (4) in combination therapy with Anti-TNF agents in CD; (5) decreasing antibody formation to Anti-TNF therapy in CD; (6) management of fistulizing disease in CD; and (7) as well as induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. An easy to use algorithm is provided for the busy clinician to access and safely prescribe methotrexate for their inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Effect of azathioprine intolerance on outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine is well established for the maintenance of remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant proportion of patients are intolerant to azathioprine. It is not clear if intolerance of azathioprine is a marker of poor prognosis for patients who will have a more aggressive disease or be more likely to require surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if intolerance to azathioprine is a marker of poor prognosis, indicating patients who have a more aggressive disease course, and to analyse the risk factors and causes of intolerance.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using the Milton Keynes Hospital IBD database was performed to compare azathioprine-intolerant and azathioprine-tolerant patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria comprising 141 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 98 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Overall, 28.0% of patients were intolerant to azathioprine. Risk factors for intolerance were female sex and age 50-70 years. Common reasons for intolerance were nausea and vomiting (34.3%), deranged liver function tests (28.4%) and headaches (11.9%). In patients with UC, there was no statistical difference in the disease activity scores between those who were azathioprine intolerant versus tolerant. In patients with CD, azathioprine intolerance was associated with significantly worse disease activity; 25% fewer patients were in clinical remission and 20% more had moderate/severe disease. Rates of surgery were similar between the groups for both UC/CD.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that azathioprine intolerance acts as a surrogate marker for patients with CD who in future have poorer symptom control. Azathioprine intolerance marks out a group of patients with CD in whom increased vigilance of symptom control and early escalation of treatment is required.

Oral tacrolimus as maintenance therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis--an analysis of outcomes in two London tertiary centres

BACKGROUND

The medical management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) remains a significant challenge. Two randomised controlled studies have demonstrated tacrolimus therapy is effective for the induction of remission of moderate to severe UC. However, the long term outcomes of UC patients treated with tacrolimus as maintenance therapy are not certain.

AIMS

This study aims to assess the efficacy of tacrolimus maintenance therapy for refractory UC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with UC treated with tacrolimus at two London tertiary centres was performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed at six months, at the end of tacrolimus treatment, or at the last follow-up for patients continuing tacrolimus treatment. Modified Truelove-Witts score (mTW) and Mayo endoscopy subscores were calculated.

RESULTS

25 patients with UC, treated with oral tacrolimus between 2005 and 2011, were identified. The median duration of tacrolimus treatment was 9 months (IQR 3.7-18.2 months). The median duration of follow-up was 27 months (range 3-66 months). At six months thirteen (52%) patients had achieved and maintained clinical response and eleven (44%) were in clinical remission. The mean mTW score decreased from 10+/-0.5 before therapy, to 5.8+/-0.8 (p≤0.001 95% CI 2.7-5.8) at cessation of treatment or last follow-up. Mayo endoscopy subscore decreased from 2.6+/-0.1 to 1.2+/-0.2 (p≤0.001 mean reduction 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-1.9). Eight patients (32%) subsequently underwent a colectomy within a mean time of 17 months (range 2-45 months).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is effective for the maintenance of refractory UC and can deliver sustained improvement in mucosal inflammation.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of vidofludimus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the ENTRANCE study

BACKGROUND

Vidofludimus (SC12267) is a novel oral immunomodulator inhibiting dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines including interleukin-17 (IL17A and IL17F) and interferon-gamma. The objective of the study was to explore the efficacy, safety and tolerability of vidofludimus in steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

The open label uncontrolled ENTRANCE study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00820365) has been conducted at 13 study centers in Germany, Bulgaria and Romania. Thirty-four steroid-dependent patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were treated with a once daily 35mg oral dose of vidofludimus over 12weeks. Steroids were tapered during the first 8weeks followed by a steroid-free treatment period of 4weeks. Complete response was defined as steroid-free clinical remission at week 12; partial response was defined as being in remission at steroid dose equal or lower than the individual patient's threshold dose for relapse.

RESULTS

Of the thirty-four patients enrolled in this trial 26 were evaluable for primary efficacy assessment. After completion of the 12weeks treatment phase 8 out of 14 (57.1%) patients with CD and 6 out of 12 (50.0%) patients with UC were in steroid-free remission (complete responders). Another 4 (28.6%) patients in CD and 5 (41.7%) patients in UC were partial responders. Vidofludimus was well tolerated, no drug-related serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides first evidence of clinical efficacy of vidofludimus in IBD. Although the safety and tolerability profile seems favorable, long-term controlled studies are needed to further investigate its potential as novel IBD therapy.

Methotrexate in ulcerative colitis: a nationwide retrospective cohort from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

BACKGROUND

There are paucity of data regarding the utility of methotrexate (MTX) in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy of MTX in achieving steroid-free remission.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the nationwide Veterans Affairs database to identify steroid-dependent patients with UC using MTX for the period 2001 to 2011. Patients were followed up for 15 months after MTX initiation by tracking their prednisone, MTX, thiopurines, and infliximab dispense. Endpoints were: (1) successful remission, defined as cessation of prednisone filling activity while continuing MTX; (2) failure with continuance, failure to be weaned off steroids while continuing MTX; (3) failure with discontinuance, cessation of MTX while continuing steroids.

RESULTS

We included 91 patients with UC with mean age 59 years. The average weekly dose for oral and parenteral MTX was 14 and 25 mg/week, respectively. The average daily dose for prednisone within the oral MTX and parenteral MTX groups was 12 and 25 mg/day, respectively. By the 12th month of follow-up, 37% and 30% of patients on oral and parenteral MTX, respectively, were able to discontinue steroid. There was a nonsignificant trend toward dose reduction of steroids in those who were concomitantly taking oral MTX and steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study represents the largest cohort of patients with MTX and UC reported to date and suggests that approximately one-third of patients were successfully weaned off steroids with MTX therapy. MTX should be considered in the long-term management of patients with UC on steroids.

Sustained clinical benefit and tolerability of methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Methotrexate is an immunosuppressant that is used to treat patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, there are few data on the long-term effects of methotrexate maintenance therapy for these patients. We assessed the sustained clinical benefits and tolerability of methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy in patients with CD.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 3 hospitals on 174 consecutive patients with CD (age, 35 ± 12 y) who received methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy (23% also did not respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy) from 2000 to 2010. We assessed patient characteristics and the tolerability and sustained clinical benefits of the treatment. Sustained clinical benefit was defined as ongoing use of methotrexate or intentional discontinuation of successful therapy before the end-of-study point.

RESULTS

The number of patients with sustained clinical benefits from methotrexate monotherapy were 98 (86%), 50 (63%), 27 (47%), and 3 (20%), at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively. Forty-five patients (26%) discontinued methotrexate because of intolerance, particularly within 6 months after therapy began. Adverse responses generally were mild; only 1 patient required admission to the hospital for infection with cytomegalovirus, and no drug-related deaths were reported. Intolerance of the preceding thiopurine therapy was associated with adverse events during methotrexate therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort study of patients who received methotrexate monotherapy after thiopurine therapy for CD, 47% continued to receive the therapy or intentionally discontinued successful therapy within 2 years, and 20% did so within 5 years. Long-term use of methotrexate was well tolerated and relatively safe.

Methotrexate: underused and ignored?

For more than a decade, methotrexate has been known to be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of steroid-dependent active Crohn's disease. However, international data on medication utilization suggest that this drug is rarely used in clinical practice for an indication of Crohn's disease. This review investigates the potential reasons for the underuse of methotrexate in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter retrospective study focused on long-term efficacy and safety. The Madrid experience

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate is useful in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its role is secondary because of its limited experience and a supposedly unfavorable safety profile.

AIM

To describe the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in a long-term real clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospectively reviewed records of IBD patients treated with methotrexate in eight hospitals of Madrid (Spain).

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were included (80% Crohn's disease); 94% received methotrexate because of steroid dependency. Overall, 82% of the patients initially responded (28% remission). Eighty-eight percent of the patients followed maintenance treatment for a mean of 17 (range: 1-108) months. Forty percent of the patients lost response at a mean of 57 weeks after starting methotrexate. No statistically significant differences were found in the response rates in terms of the disease type, route of administration, or the Montreal Classification category. The mean methotrexate cumulative dose was 1108 mg (range: 25-6480). The main adverse events included 10 cases of gastrointestinal symptoms, four of myelotoxicity, and 10 of abnormal liver function tests, and led to methotrexate withdrawal in four (5%) patients. Transient elastography, performed in 46 patients, detected six additional cases with significant fibrosis and normal liver function tests.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate is useful in inducing a response in IBD, although its efficacy decreases frequently through the follow-up. Although methotrexate seems safe in the long term, in addition to biochemical controls, a more accurate method to detect liver damage should be considered.

[Guidelines for the management of Crohn's disease]

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with uncertain etiopathogenesis. CD can involve any site of gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to anus and is associated with serious complications such as bowel strictures, perforations, and fistula formation. The incidence and prevalence rates of CD in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Although there are no definitive curative modalities for CD, various medical and surgical therapies are currently applied for diverse clinical situations of CD. However, a lot of decisions on the management of CD are made depending on the personal experiences and choices of physicians. To suggest preferable approaches to diverse problems of CD and to minimize the variations according to physicians, guidelines for the management of CD are needed. Therefore, IBD Study Group of the Korean Association for the Study of the Intestinal Diseases has set out to develop the guidelines for the management of CD in Korea. These guidelines were developed using the adaptation methods and encompass the treatment of inflammatory disease, stricturing disease, and penetrating disease. The guidelines also cover the indication of surgery, prevention of recurrence after surgery, and CD in pregnancy and lactation. These are the first Korean guidelines for the management of CD and the update with further scientific data and evidences is needed.

[Guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The quality of life can decreases significantly during exacerbations of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist and sometimes these lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) Study Group of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) set out the Korean guidelines for the management of UC. These guidelines are made by the adaptation using several foreign guidelines and encompass treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission and indication for surgery in UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence. These are the first Korean treatment guidelines for UC and will be revised with new evidences on treatment of UC.

Efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate therapy for refractory Crohn's disease: a large single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials demonstrate that methotrexate is effective in inducing remission and preventing relapse of Crohn's disease (CD) as a first-line immunosuppressant, but efficacy data after failure with, or intolerance to, thiopurines are limited.

AIMS

To report efficacy of methotrexate in a cohort of refractory CD patients, most of whom had not responded to, or were intolerant of, thiopurines.

METHODS

Data were collected for patients receiving methotrexate for active CD. Response to methotrexate induction therapy at 4 months, and sustained clinical benefit at last point of follow-up with maintenance therapy, were assessed via physician's global assessment. Demographic and disease factors predicting response, or sustained clinical benefit, were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-six [38 (54%) female patients, mean age at diagnosis 29.4 years] patients received methotrexate between 2001 and 2010, 61 (92%) of whom received the drug parenterally. Sixty patients had failed, or were intolerant of, thiopurines. Response to therapy at 4 months occurred in 54 (82%) patients. However, sustained clinical benefit occurred in only 19 (29%) patients at last point of follow-up, including six patients who discontinued the drug for family planning reasons. No predictors of response or sustained clinical benefit were identified. Adverse events occurred in 20 (30%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that methotrexate is effective in terms of initial response in Crohn's disease patients who have failed, or are intolerant of, thiopurines. However, efficacy is not sustained in the long term.

Optimization of conventional therapy in patients with IBD

The majority of patients with IBD use conventional therapy (namely, aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents) for prolonged periods of time, to both induce and maintain remission. Treatment paradigms in IBD have evolved towards a rapid escalation of therapy to achieve stringent goals, including mucosal healing and a reduction in the need for hospital admission and surgery. In this context, the failure to optimize conventional therapy can lead to a potentially effective treatment being abandoned too early, which is undesirable when only a limited number of drugs are effective in the management of IBD, and could also lead to patients being unnecessarily exposed to potentially toxic and/or expensive biologic drugs. This Review provides an overview of the many ways in which conventional therapy can be optimized, and describes strategies to improve adherence to drug regimens, such as simplifying the dosing regimen, optimizing drug delivery and dose, and tailoring medication on the basis of metabolite levels.

Methotrexate in ulcerative colitis: a Spanish multicentric study on clinical use and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MTX in UC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

UC patients who had been treated with MTX were identified from the databases of 8 Spanish IBD referral hospitals. Patients were included in the study if they received MTX for steroid dependency or steroid refractoriness. Therapeutic success was defined as the absence of UC-related symptoms, complete steroid withdrawal and no requirement of rescue therapies within the first 6 months after starting MTX.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included, 70% treated for steroid dependency and 27% for steroid refractoriness. Thiopurines had been previously attempted in 87.5% of patients. The median dose of MTX used for induction was 25mg (IIQ 17.5-25) weekly given parenterally in 82.5% of cases. Eighty-five percent of patients were on steroids when MTX was started. Forty-five percent of patients met criteria for therapeutic success. Initial treatment failures were mainly due to inefficacy (50%) or intolerance (36%). After a median follow-up of 28 months (IQR 22-47), 38% of patients with initial therapeutic success required new steroid courses, 22% started biological therapy, and only 1 patient required colectomy. The cumulative probability of maintaining steroid-free clinical remission was 60%, 48%, and 35% at 6, 12, and 24 months after starting MTX, respectively. Eleven patients (27.5%) experienced adverse events, leading to MTX discontinuation in only 8 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

MTX appears to be effective to maintain clinical remission in UC, at least in the short-term, with an acceptable safety profile.

Tocotrienols have potent antifibrogenic effects in human intestinal fibroblasts

BACKGROUND

Excessive fibroblast expansion and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition are key events for the development of bowel stenosis in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Tocotrienols are vitamin E compounds with proven in vitro antifibrogenic effects on rat pancreatic fibroblasts. We aimed at investigating the effects of tocotrienols on human intestinal fibroblast (HIF) proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and synthesis of ECM.

METHODS

HIF isolated from CD, ulcerative colitis (UC), and normal intestine were treated with tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF) from palm oil. HIF proliferation was quantified by (3) H-thymidine incorporation, apoptosis was studied by DNA fragmentation, propidium iodide staining, caspase activation, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, autophagy was analyzed by quantification of LC3 protein and identification of autophagic vesicles by immunofluorescence and production of ECM components was measured by Western blot.

RESULTS

TRF significantly reduced HIF proliferation and prevented basic fibroblast growth factor-induced proliferation in CD and UC, but not control HIF. TRF enhanced HIF death by promoting apoptosis and autophagy. HIF apoptosis, but not autophagy, was prevented by the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk, whereas both types of cell death were prevented when the mitochondrial permeability transition pore was blocked by cyclosporin A, demonstrating a key role of the mitochondria in these processes. TRF diminished procollagen type I and laminin γ-1 production by HIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocotrienols exert multiple effects on HIF, reducing cell proliferation, enhancing programmed cell death through apoptosis and autophagy, and decreasing ECM production. Considering their in vitro antifibrogenic properties, tocotrienols could be useful to treat or prevent bowel fibrosis in CD patients.

Efficacy of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis: failure or promise

BACKGROUND

Low-dose methotrexate is a widely used and efficacious therapy in chronic inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. Prospective randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of parenteral methotrexate in Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a systematic review of the efficacy of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis (UC) and discuss the results in the context of the known pharmacokinetics and adverse events of methotrexate therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases and other inflammatory conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. All publications describing patients with UC treated with methotrexate were included.

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies or retrospective case series and 5 meeting abstracts that met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 study reported a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial using methotrexate at a dose of 12.5 mg orally with no significant clinical benefit. However, the majority of uncontrolled retrospective analyses suggest a clinical response to methotrexate therapy in a range of 30%-80% when the drug is applied by parenteral route in doses between 20-25 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

The only randomized controlled trial of methotrexate in UC employed oral dosing and doses lower than those shown to be effective in CD and did not demonstrate efficacy, whereas uncontrolled, retrospective studies using doses and routes of administration similar to those employed in CD suggest benefit. Well-designed, prospective, placebo-controlled trials of methotrexate in UC are needed.

Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in chronic active Crohn's disease: long-term single-center experience and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines methotrexate (MTX) should be considered as a second-line immunomodulator in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease (CD) if purine analogs are not tolerated or there is a lack of efficacy. However, its therapeutic role remains controversial to the present day.

METHODS

Medical records of all eligible patients treated in the outpatient clinic of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Hospital between December 2000 and January 2009 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were identified. The mean duration of treatment was 100 weeks (range, 2-364 weeks) with a mean cumulative dose of MTX of 2130 mg (range, 40-9005 mg). In 50 (79%) patients started on MTX clinical remission could be achieved within 3 months of treatment. The cumulative probability of these patients to maintain remission was 95.3%, 89.5%, 70.6%, and 62.8% at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years of treatment, respectively. The respective figures of the meta-analysis were 94%, 86%, 75%, 53%, and 43. Drug-related side effects were reported in 50 patients (79%), leading to withdrawal of MTX in 21 cases (33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Along with previous observations our data demonstrate the efficacy of MTX as a second-line immunomodulator in chronic active CD. However, its use is limited due to intolerable side effects in a large proportion of patients. The results should encourage further research in order to establish the definite significance of MTX in chronic active CD.

Changes in liver biochemistry during methotrexate use for inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the spectrum of liver enzyme test (LET) abnormalities that occur while using methotrexate for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of subjects using methotrexate for IBD at a single center. The clinical and epidemiological parameters, and hepatotoxicity risk factors, were recorded. Subjects were excluded if cumulative methotrexate doses could not be ascertained, if they had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, or if baseline and follow-up LETs were not available. Also noted were the cumulative methotrexate dose during the peak LET increase, severity of LET increase, and whether normalization occurred.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven subjects were included (Crohn's disease, n=67; UC, n=17; indeterminate colitis n=3). The mean therapy duration was 81 weeks (3- to 364-week range), and the cumulative average dose was 1,813 mg (25-8,255-mg range). Thirty-seven (43%) subjects received a cumulative dose >1,500 mg. Sixty-seven (77%) had normal LETs, and in 51 (76%) LETs remained normal throughout methotrexate therapy. In the 16 (24%) who developed LET abnormalities, seven (44%) had underlying risk factor(s) for liver disease. Normalization (without dose reduction) occurred in 14 (88%) while continuing methotrexate. Of 20 subjects with abnormal LETs at baseline, nine (45%) subsequently normalized while continuing methotrexate, whereas nine (45%) worsened. Seventeen liver biopsies were performed in 11 and were classified as Roenigk's grade I in 15 (88%) subjects. Roenigk IIIb or IV was not seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate is commonly associated with LET abnormalities, but these frequently normalize while still on therapy, and in only 5% will drug discontinuation be necessary. Liver biopsies rarely have substantive abnormalities.

What is the optimal therapy for Crohn's disease: step-up or top-down?

Crohn's disease (CD) is an idiopathic chronic inflammatory disorder of the digestive tract, which is incurable. Present therapeutic guidelines follow a sequential step-up approach that focuses on treating acute disease or 'inducing clinical remission' and subsequently aims to 'maintain clinical response'. In view of the chronic relapsing-remitting disabling disease course, new treatment approaches have been sought with the ultimate end point of disease course modification and mucosal healing. A recent preliminary study from D'Haens et al. has provided evidence suggesting that reversing the treatment paradigm from a 'step-up' to a 'top-down' approach may positively alter the natural course of this illness. Their findings indicate that early use of biologic therapy, in combination with immunomodulators, resulted in remission occuring more rapidly than the conventional 'step-up' treatment, with a longer time period to relapse, a decreased need for treatment with corticosteroids, a faster reduction in clinical symptoms, rapid decline in biochemical inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein) and improved endoscopic mucosal healing. These results, supported by previous studies on infliximab use, may hold a promising outcome of fewer stricturing complications, hospitalizations and surgeries for patients with CD. However, we need to better define the timing and candidates for the 'top-down' approach as we are still uncertain about the safety data and the long-term benefits if biologic agents are given as routine maintenance treatment, since most of the trials in CD have been short term, and approximately 30% of patients might have been overtreated. Future clinical trials will be crucial in answering these questions.

The Asia-Pacific consensus on ulcerative colitis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in many parts of the Asia-Pacific region. There is a need to improve the awareness of IBD and develop diagnostic and management recommendations relevant to the region. This evidence-based consensus focuses on the definition, epidemiology and management of ulcerative colitis (UC) in Asia. A multi-disciplinary group developed the consensus statements, reviewed the relevant literature, and voted on them anonymously using the Delphi method. The finalized statements were reviewed to determine the level of consensus, evidence quality and strength of recommendation. Infectious colitis must be excluded prior to diagnosing UC. Typical histology and macroscopic extent of the disease seen in the West is found in the Asia-Pacific region. Ulcerative colitis is increasing in many parts of Asia with gender distribution and age of diagnosis similar to the West. Extra-intestinal manifestations including primary sclerosing cholangitis are rarer than in the West. Clinical stratification of disease severity guides management. In Japan, leukocytapheresis is a treatment option. Access to biologic agents remains limited due to high cost and concern over opportunistic infections. The high endemic rates of hepatitis B virus infection require stringent screening before initiating immune-suppressive agents. Vaccination and prophylactic therapies should be initiated on a case-by-case basis and in accordance with local practice. Colorectal cancer complicates chronic colitis. A recent increase in UC is reported in the Asia-Pacific region. These consensus statements aim to improve the recognition of UC and assist clinicians in its management with particular relevance to the region.

The potential for disease modification in Crohn's disease

The natural history of Crohn's disease is characterized by progression to complicated and disabling disease, often necessitating surgical interventions. There is either circumstantial or direct evidence to support the disease-modifying potential of several therapeutic agents. Healing of endoscopic lesions is an emerging surrogate marker of disease modification, as mucosal lesions are considered to reflect ongoing inflammation and tissue damage that lead to the formation of fistulas and fibrotic strictures, which are the main indications for surgery. In contrast to systemic steroids, both azathioprine and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have demonstrated the potential of mucosal healing. Prevention of hospitalization and surgery in the short and medium term has been demonstrated for the anti-TNF agents infliximab and adalimumab. The evidence supporting a role for medical therapy in the prevention of fibrotic wall thickening and in the obliteration of fistula tracks is limited and should be the focus of further prospective studies. These studies should validate predictors of complicated disease and randomized studies should be performed in high-risk groups to investigate whether early introduction of immunosuppressive agents or biologic therapies slows down disease progression and alters the natural history of the disease.

Efficacy of methotrexate in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients unresponsive or intolerant to azathioprine /mercaptopurine

BACKGROUND

Despite the wide use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine (AZA/MP) therapy in the management of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), approximately 20% of patients cannot tolerate the drugs and 30% do not respond.

AIM

To examine the efficacy and safety profile of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CD or UC who are either intolerant or non-responsive to AZA/MP.

METHODS

A total of 131 patients with IBD treated with MTX were identified. Retrospective data were obtained by case note review. Clinical response (defined as steroid withdrawal, normalization of previously raised CRP or physician's clinical assessment of improvement) was assessed at 6 months.

RESULTS

Clinical response in Crohn's disease occurred in 18 of 29 patients (62%) refractory to AZA/MP and 42 of 70 patients (60%) intolerant to AZA/MP, with no difference between the groups (P = 1.0). In UC, clinical response was seen in 7 of 9 (78%) patients refractory to AZA/MP and 15 of 23 (65%) intolerant to thiopurines. MTX was well tolerated in a majority of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate appears effective in both CD and UC patients who fail to respond to or are intolerant to AZA/MP therapy.

Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate, a folate antagonist, is an immunosuppressant drug that is effective for treating several inflammatory disorders including Crohn's disease. Ulcerative colitis, a related chronic inflammatory bowel disease, can be challenging to treat. This review was performed to examine the efficacy of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and safety of methotrexate for maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane IBD/FBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register, MEDLINE (PUBMED), EMBASE (1984 to November 2008), Web of Science, Scopus, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), and Clinical trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched. In addition, references from selected papers and abstracts from Digestive Disease Week were also examined.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate for maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis compared to placebo or any other intervention were considered for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by each author. The odds ratio of relapse, 95% confidence interval and P-value were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. An intention to treat analysis was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial fulfilled the inclusion criteria. This trial randomized 30 patients to methotrexate and 37 to placebo. Methotrexate was given orally in a dose of 12.5 mg/week. Fourteen patients in the methotrexate group and 18 patients in the placebo group who entered remission were followed for 9 months or to the time of first relapse. Sixty-four per cent of methotrexate patients relapsed compared to 44% of placebo patients (OR 2.25; 95% CI 0.54 to 9.45; P = 0.27).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is not sufficient to recommend the use of methotrexate to maintain remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. A large scale methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trial is needed. Such a study should investigate higher doses of methotrexate and parenteral administration.

Use of methotrexate in refractory Crohn's disease: the Edinburgh experience

BACKGROUND

In the two benchmark controlled trials in Crohn's disease (CD) supporting its use, methotrexate (MTX) was used as the immunosuppressant of choice in immunomodulatory-naive patients. However, in daily clinical practice MTX is used generally after thiopurine analogs have failed.

METHODS

The data are reported using intramuscular (IM) MTX (25 mg/week) in the induction of remission and oral MTX (15 mg/week) in 39 CD patients with a median age of 32 years, assessed retrospectively. In all, 97% patients had failed azathioprine and/or mercaptopurine therapy due to lack of efficacy in 14 (36%) and side effects in 24 (61%) patients; 21 patients (53%) were steroid-dependent with a median dose of 27.5 mg prednisolone/day for over a year.

RESULTS

In all, 72% of patients tolerated an induction regimen of 25 mg/week of IM MTX; 10% managed a reduced dose and 18% were intolerant. Remission was achieved in 71% of patients at 16 weeks. In the patients taking corticosteroids, withdrawal was achieved in 26% of patients and reduction in 47% at 16 weeks. Oral MTX therapy was continued in 22 patients after induction. In this group the probability of relapse was 78% at 50 weeks of oral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral MTX therapy is efficacious in inducing remission in steroid-dependent CD patients, although its use is limited by side effects in approximately 30% of patients. Low-dose oral therapy does not maintain long-term remission and is not a suitable alternative.