Hep Par 1 and selected antibodies in the immunohistological distinction of hepatocellular carcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma, combined tumours and metastatic carcinoma

Pathology of Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma: An Update

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver cancer that is composed of both hepatocellular and cholangiocellular differentiated cells. It is slightly more common in men and among Asian and Pacific islanders. Overall, risk factors are similar to classic risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The classification has significantly evolved over time. The last WHO classification (2019) mainly emphasized diagnosis on morphological basis with routine stainings, discarded previously recognized classifications with carcinomas with stem cell features, introduced intermediate cell carcinoma as a specific subtype and considered cholangiolocarcinoma as a subtype of cholangiocellular carcinoma. Immunohistochemical markers may be applied for further specification but have limited value for diagnosis. Recent discoveries in molecular pathway regulation may pioneer new therapeutic approaches for this poor prognostic and challenging diagnosis.

Hepatocellular carcinomas in captive prosimians

We performed a retrospective examination of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (primary and metastatic tumors) in 14 captive prosimians brought to the Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory in North Carolina State University over a period of 11 years (2003 to 2014) to characterize the tumors. These animals are endangered primates; a better understanding of the main fatal neoplasms is crucial. In addition to the histologic evaluation, an immunohistochemical study was also performed, using a hepatocyte marker (hepatocyte paraffin 1 [HepPar-1]) and 2 cholangiocyte markers (keratin 7 [K7] and keratin 19 [K19]), in an attempt to identify a specific profile for HCCs with metastatic behavior. Six of the 14 HCCs had pulmonary metastases. The most frequent histopathological findings were a trabecular pattern (14/14, 100%), presence of multinucleated cells (12/14, 85.7%), and foci of extramedullary hematopoiesis (9/14, 64.3%). The mitotic count was significantly higher in the metastatic HCCs (P < .05). HepPar-1 was detected in all primary and metastatic HCCs, with a strong intensity of staining. Labeling for K7 and K19 was positive in 12 HCCs (85.7%) and 1 HCC (7.1%), respectively. Contrary to the less aggressive HCCs, most of the metastatic HCCs (5/6) expressed K7 in more than 15% of cells. The percentage of K7-positive neoplastic hepatocytes was significantly higher in metastatic HCCs. This study suggests that K7 might be a prognostically relevant marker in HCCs of captive prosimians.

Application of Immunohistochemistry in the Pathological Diagnosis of Liver Tumors

Although radiological diagnostics have been progressing, pathological diagnosis remains the most reliable method for diagnosing liver tumors. In some cases, definite pathological diagnosis cannot be obtained by histological evaluation alone, especially when the sample is a small biopsy; in such cases, immunohistochemical staining is very useful. Immunohistochemistry is the most frequently used technique for molecular pathological diagnosis due to its broad application, ease of performance and evaluation, and reasonable cost. The results occasionally reflect specific genetic mutations. The immunohistochemical markers of hepatocellular carcinoma include those of hepatocellular differentiation—such as hepatocyte paraffin 1 and arginase-1—and those of malignant hepatocytes—such as glypican-3, heat shock protein 70, and glutamine synthetase (GS). To classify the subtypes of hepatocellular adenoma, examination of several immunohistochemical markers, such as liver fatty acid-binding protein, GS, and serum amyloid A, is indispensable. Immunohistochemical staining for GS is also important for the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia. The representative immunohistochemical markers of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma include cytokeratin (CK) 7 and CK19. In this article, we provide an overview of the application of immunohistochemistry in the pathological diagnosis of liver tumors referring to the association with genetic alterations. Furthermore, we aimed to explain the practical points in the differential diagnosis of liver tumors by immunohistochemical staining.

Expression profiling of CPS1 in Correa's cascade and its association with gastric cancer prognosis

Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1), which is the antigen for the hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody, exhibits focal immunoreactivity in adenocarcinoma from the gastrointestinal tract, but its expression profiles and roles in gastric cancer (GC) remain largely unknown. The present study aimed to determine the expression pattern and prognostic value of CPS1 in Correa's cascade using tissues from 32 patients with chronic atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia (IM), 62 patients with low- or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) and 401 patients with GC. The expression of CPS1 was diffuse and strongly positive in 32 cases (100%) of IM of the glandular epithelium, and gradually downregulated in Correa's cascade, with a strongly positive ratio of 21 (70%) in low-grade IN and 4 (12.5%) in high-grade IN. The levels of CPS1 expression were significantly higher in diffuse-type GC, with 37 (26%) cases strongly positive for CPS1, compared with 14 (8%) in intestinal-type and 11 (13%) cases in mixed-type GC. In intestinal-type GC, CPS1 expression was completely lost in 107 (62%) of cases, which was associated with an advanced Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage (P=0.031) and depth of invasion (P=0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that low CPS1 expression levels were independently associated with a short overall survival (OS) time in the three types of GC (P<0.001 in intestinal-type, P=0.003 in diffuse-type and P=0.018 in mixed-type GC). Furthermore, low levels of CPS1 mRNA and high methylation levels in the CPS1 promoter were associated with a short OS time in patients with GC. These results suggested that the expression of CPS1 was progressively downregulated in Correa's cascade, and that CPS1 may serve as a prognostic marker for patients with GC, regardless of tumor type.

Progress and prospects of biomarkers in primary liver cancer (Review)

Tumor biomarkers are important in the early screening, diagnosis, therapeutic evaluation, recurrence and prognosis prediction of tumors. Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors; it has high incidence and mortality rates and seriously endangers human health. The main pathological types of primary liver cancer include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined HCC‑cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‑CC). In the present review, a systematic outline of the current biomarkers of primary liver cancer is presented, from conventional blood biomarkers, histochemical biomarkers and potential biomarkers to resistance‑associated biomarkers. The important relationships are deeply elucidated between biomarkers and diagnosis, prognosis, clinicopathological features and resistance, as well as their clinical significance, in patients with the three main types of primary liver cancer. Moreover, a summary of several important biomarker signaling pathways is provided, which is helpful for studying the biological mechanism of liver cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide help for clinical or medical researchers in the early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HCC.

Well differentiated arginase-1 negative hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on the histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy and resection specimens. The distinction of HCC from metastatic neoplasms is pertinent for treatment and prognostic purposes. Arginase-1 (Arg-1), a marker of hepatocellular differentiation, has shown superior sensitivity and specificity when compared to other immunohistochemical markers of detection of HCC such as hepatocyte paraffin antigen (HepPar-1). Studies have shown that poorly differentiated HCC can lose arginase expression, however well differentiated HCC are rarely ever arginase negative.

Methods

In this study Arg-1 expression was detected using immunohistochemical staining on tissue specimens from 40 confirmed cases of well differentiated HCC specimens using a highly specific monoclonal antibody for Arg-1. Specificity of the Arg-1 antibody was evaluated by immunostaining of 24 non-HCC tumors in the liver and 200 non-liver neoplasms using paraffin block and tissue micro-array (TMA) based immunohistochemistry.

Results

Four well differentiated HCC cases were found to be completely negative for Arg-1 and similarly all 224 non-HCC tumors did not express Arg-1. The arginase negative well differentiated tumors were positive for other hepatocellular markers such as HepPar-1 and polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA). Of the four tumors, only one recurred at 28 months. All patients are currently stable with a mean survival of 43 months.

Conclusions

Arg-1 negative well differentiated HCC can be a clinical dilemma which can lead to misdiagnosis. Confirmation with other hepatocellular markers such as HepPar1 and pCEA is essential in making the correct diagnosis. The clinicopathologic outcomes of arginase negative well differentiated HCC has been poorly characterized, thus our findings are of utmost importance in understanding the clinical behavior of these tumors. This may have a potential role in understanding the mechanism of the use of targeted therapy in HCC tumors.

Detection of Albumin Expression by RNA In Situ Hybridization Is a Sensitive and Specific Method for Identification of Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas

OBJECTIVES

Inconsistent data on detection of albumin expression by ribonucleic acid (RNA) in situ hybridization have been reported. We investigated the utility of RNAscope (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Hayward, CA) in detection of albumin in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs), and carcinomas from various organs using manual and automated staining.

METHODS

RNAscope for albumin detection was performed on 482 cases on tissue microarray sections and on 22 cases of ICC, including 14 surgical resection and eight core biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

Thirty-six of 37 (97%) HCCs had detectable mRNA, whereas all non-HCC and non-ICC cases, except one lung adenocarcinoma, were negative for albumin. Fourteen of 22 ICCs (64%) were positive for albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

RNAscope for albumin is highly sensitive and specific for identifying HCCs and is highly specific and moderately sensitive for detection of ICCs; however, rare carcinomas (non-HCC, non-ICC, and those with no hepatoid histomorphology) can also have aberrant expression of albumin.

Evaluating clinical and prognostic implications of Glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most deadly cancers worldwide. In patients with HCC, histopathogical differentiation is an important indicator of prognosis; however, because determination of HCC differentiation is difficult, the recently described immunohistochemical (IHC) marker glypican3 (GPC3) might assist in HCC prognostication.The goal of our study was to investigate GPC3's IHC staining pattern and define the relationship between its expression and patients' clinicopathologic features and overall survival. We retrieved clinical parameters from 101 pathologically diagnosed HCC patients' medical records and classified these patients into 4 clinical score categories (0–3) based on increasing GPC3 staining intensity and the percentage of stained tumor cells in their resection and biopsy specimens. Histopathological samples were well, moderately, and poorly differentiated in 33, 22, and 12 patients, respectively, and the GPC3 expression rate was 63%, 86%, and 92%,respectively. The median overall survival was 49.9 months (confidence interval (CI): 35.3–64.6 months) for clinical scores 0–1 and 30.7 months (CI: 19.4–41.9 months) for clinical scores 2–3. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .06) but showed a strong trend. In conclusion, a greater GPC3 expression is associated with a worse HCC prognosis and may be a promising prognostic marker.

Pediatric Mesenchymal Hamartomas of the Liver can Show Both Foregut and Hindgut Phenotype

Cystic epithelium in mesenchymal hamartoma (MH) is typically biliary type. Mucinous differentiation of the epithelium and increased hepatocellular component may pose a diagnostic challenge. We studied MH in 7 children (6 M, 1 F; age 4 months to 8 years, median 1 year). Resected tumors varied from 3.0 to 17.0 cm. All tumors showed biliary epithelium in the cystic component with strong and diffuse reactivity for CK7 and CK19. Expression of CK20 and CDX2 was additionally seen in 2 tumors, rare/focal in 1, and diffuse with mucinous differentiation in the other. Strong and continuous nuclear reactivity for Sox9 was seen in the cyst epithelium in all 7 tumors including focal staining in mucinous areas. It was also positive in the hepatocellular component. CD56 and vimentin were variably positive in the cystic epithelium of all cases. Alpha-fetoprotein showed patchy weak staining in the hepatocellular component and was negative in the cystic epithelium. Hepar-1 showed focal staining in the cystic epithelium in 4/7 cases and diffuse in the hepatocellular component. Both patients showing CK20 and CDX2 expression had abnormal chromosomal analysis: one with balanced translocation between chromosomes 2 and 19 and other with loss of chromosome Y. Among others, one showed 46,XY,inv(9)(p11q12), one did not grow cells, and the remaining 3 had normal karyotype. Six patients underwent resection and one had liver transplantation. All were alive and well with a median follow-up of 1.5 years. In conclusion, mucinous epithelium can be seen in MH. Expression of Sox9 in the cyst epithelium and hepatocytes suggests a common origin for these components. Expression of vimentin indicates an overlapping epithelial-mesenchymal phenotype. Hepatic MH can show divergent epithelial differentiation including both foregut and hindgut phenotype, which may provide insights into the pathogenesis of this rare neoplasm but does not seem to affect the outcome in this limited series.

Hepatocellular carcinoma with intracranial metastasis in a Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata)

BACKGROUND

A 23-year-old male Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) showed left ptosis, which progressed to exophthalmos.

METHODS

The macaque underwent a clinical examination, CT and MRI, and was euthanized. Necropsy and histopathological examination were performed after euthanasia.

RESULTS

The CT revealed and MRI confirmed an intracranial mass at the skull base with orbital extension. At necropsy, there were a large hepatic mass and an intracranial mass compressing the left temporal lobe of the brain. Histopathological and immunohistological examinations revealed that the masses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a metastatic lesion. In both the primary and metastatic lesions, neoplastic hepatocytes were arranged mainly in a trabecular pattern. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3 and CAM5.2) and hepatocyte paraffin 1 and negative for cytokeratin 7 and 20 and vimentin.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case report of HCC with intracranial metastasis in a macaque.

The expression of cytokeratin 19 in lymph nodes was a poor prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

The expression of CK19 in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor outcome. However, few studies have investigated the expression profile of CK19 in regional lymph nodes (LNs) of HCC after hepatic resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of CK19 in primary liver tumor and regional LNs of HCC with and without lymph node metastasis (LNM).

METHODS

The expression of CK19 in patients with (n = 16) and without LNM (n = 26) was examined using immunohistochemical staining. Both the primary tumor and LN specimen were studied for their CK19 expression. Clinico-pathological variables and prognostic significance were analyzed.

RESULTS

Immunopositivity of CK19 in primary liver tumor was significantly correlated with LNM (P = 0.005) and tumor non-encapsulation (P <0.005). Univariate analysis showed that CK19 expression in primary liver tumor, CK19 expression in regional LN, vascular invasion, daughter nodules, positive resection margin and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage significantly decreased overall survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that daughter nodules (P = 0.001) and CK19 expression in regional LN (P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that CK19 expression in regional LN of HCC was associated with LNM and an extremely poor outcome after operation. It is of clinical significance to identify these patients at risk for more aggressive HCC, and multi-modality treatment could be helpful to improve their dismal outcome.

Cytoplasmic staining of TTF-1 in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is a widely used biomarker in surgical pathology. Its nuclear staining is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of primary pulmonary and thyroid adenocarcinoma as well as small cell carcinomas arising in many organs. The cytoplasmic staining of TTF-1 is also observed, particularly in the benign and malignant hepatic cells. It has been controversial whether TTF-1 cytoplasmic staining is reliable enough to have diagnostic value. This review focuses on this issue and explores the potential application of TTF-1 cytoplasmic staining in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma from other primary and metastatic malignancies in the liver. The mechanism of TTF-1 cytoplasmic staining is also discussed.

Therapeutic effect of coenzyme Q10 against experimentally-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rats

The therapeutic potential of coenzyme Q10 was investigated in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma induced by trichloroacetic acid (0.5g/kg/day, p.o., for five days). Coenzyme Q10 treatment (0.4mg/kg/day, i.p.) was applied for four weeks following trichloroacetic acid administration. Coenzyme Q10 significantly suppressed lipid peroxidation, prevented the depletion of reduced glutathione and superoxide dismutase activity, and decreased the elevations of tumor necrosis factor-α and nitric oxide in liver tissue of rats with hepatocellular carcinoma. Also, the histopathological dysplastic changes induced by trichloroacetic acid in liver tissue were ameliorated by coenzyme Q10. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that coenzyme Q10 significantly decreased the expression of hepPar-1, alpha-fetoprotein, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2 and nuclear factor-κB in liver tissue of rats with hepatocellular carcinoma. It was concluded that coenzyme Q10 may represent a potential therapeutic option for liver carcinogenesis.

The diagnostic value of arginase-1 immunostaining in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma as compared to HepPar-1

Background

The ability to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic carcinoma (MC) involving the liver and cholangiocarcinoma (CC) by immunohistochemistry has been limited by the lack of a reliable positive marker for hepatocellular differentiation. Arginase-1 is a marker for HCC recently described in some literature.

Aim

To examine the immunohistochemical staining of arginase-1 in cases of HCC, MC involving the liver and CC as compared to hepatocyte paraffin antigen -1 (HepPar-1) in an attempt to further define the diagnostic utility of arginase-1 in differentiating these tumors.

Materials and methods

A comparative immunohistochemical study of arginase-1 and HepPar-1expression was performed in 50 HCC cases, 38 cases of MC to the liver from varying sites, 12 cases of CC and 10 specimens of normal liver tissues. The predictive capacity of arginase-1 and HepPar-1 staining was determined using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value calculations.

Results

All normal liver tissues (no=10), non- neoplastic cirrhotic liver tissues adjacent to HCC (no=42) as well as those adjacent to MC (no= 9) showed diffuse and strong immunostaining for both arginase-1 and HepPar-1. Arginase-1 demonstrated positive immunoreactivity in 42 of 50 (84%) cases of HCC compared with 35 of 50 (70%) for HepPar-1. Only one of 38 (2.6%) cases of MC and one of 12 (8.3%) cases of CC showed positive immunoreactivity for arginase-1. In contrast, HepPar-1 immunoreactivity was detected in 6 of 38 (15.8%) cases of MC and in 2 of 12 (16.7%) cases of CC. Arginase -1 showed a significantly higher sensitivity for HCC diagnosis (84%) compared to HepPar -1(70%) (p=0.016). The specificity of arginase-1 for HCC diagnosis was higher (96%) than that of HepPar -1 (84%); nevertheless, this was not statistically significant (p=0.109). Howerver, the combination of both immunomarkers for the diagnosis of HCC, raised the specificity to 100%.

Conclusion

Arginase-1 immunostaining has a higher sensitivity and specificity than HepPar-1 for HCC diagnosis. Furthermore, the combined use of arginase-1 and HepPar-1 can provide a potentially promising tool to improve the accuracy in distinguishing HCC from metastatic carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Virtual slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/9991436558072434.

Arginase-1, HepPar-1, and Glypican-3 are the most effective panel of markers in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic tumor on fine-needle aspiration specimens

Distinction of liver metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may present a diagnostic challenge. Arginase-1 (Arg-1) is a marker for HCC recently described in some literature. Immunohistochemical evaluation of Arg-1, hepatocyte paraffin-1 (HepPar-1), and glypican-3 expression was performed on 1,240 surgical specimens and 62 liver fine-needle aspiration specimens (29 HCCs, 28 metastatic tumors, and 5 benign liver cases). The staining results on tissue microarray sections showed that 2.7% and 3.1% of nonhepatic tumor cases were positive for HepPar-1 and glypican-3, respectively; none was positive for Arg-1. For fine-needle aspiration specimens, 19 HCCs were positive for all 3 markers; 9 were positive for 1 or 2 markers; and only 1 case was negative for all 3 markers. These data demonstrate that Arg-1 is the most specific marker in differentiating a non-HCC from HCC. It is recommended to use 3 markers as a panel in distinguishing HCC from metastatic carcinoma.

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is a reliable immunohistochemical marker to differentiate malignant and benign hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND

The immunohistochemical demonstration of Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) proved to be a useful marker in several tumor types. It has been described to distinguish reliably hepatocellular carcinomas from liver adenomas and other benign hepatocellular lesions. However, no other types of malignant liver tumors were studied so far.

METHODS

To evaluate the diagnostic value of this protein in hepatic tumors we have investigated the presence of EZH2 by immunohistochemistry in hepatocellular carcinomas and other common hepatic tumors.EZH2 expression was examined in 44 hepatocellular carcinomas, 23 cholangiocarcinomas, 31 hepatoblastomas, 16 other childhood tumor types (rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor and rhabdoid tumor), 17 metastatic liver tumors 24 hepatocellular adenomas, 15 high grade dysplastic nodules, 3 biliary cystadenomas, 3 biliary hamartomas and 3 Caroli's diseases.

RESULTS

Most of the malignant liver tumors were positive for EZH2, but neither of the adenomas, cirrhotic/dysplastic nodules, reactive and hamartomatous biliary ductules stained positively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our immunostainings confirm that EZH2 is a sensitive marker of hepatocellular carcinoma, but its specificity is very low, since almost all the investigated malignant liver tumors were positive regardless of their histogenesis. Based on these results EZH2 is a sensitive marker of malignancy in hepatic tumors. In routine surgical pathology EZH2 could be most helpful to diagnose cholangiocarcinomas, because as far as we know this is the first marker to distinguish transformed and reactive biliary structures. Although hepatoblastomas also express EZH2, the diagnostic significance of this observation seems to be quite limited whereas, the structurally similar, other blastic childhood tumors are also positive.

VIRTUAL SLIDES

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1173195902735693.

Hepatoid pancoast tumor. A case report and review of the literature

A 48-year-old male patient presented with a Pancoast tumor of the right lung and a serum alpha-fetoprotein (αFP) at 39,000 ng/ml. Alpha-fetoprotein is a tumor marker found elevated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), germ cell or stromal tumors of the ovary and nonseminomatous testicular cancer. Occasionally, this tumor marker may rise in non-neoplastic conditions such as cirrhosis and hepatitis and only exceptionally in rare cancers with hepatoid differentiation. We present our case report and review the English literature for αFP-producing lung carcinomas. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report in the literature of an αFP producing Pancoast tumor.

Cytokeratin 20-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

The differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCA) may be difficult when only based on morphology. For this purpose immunohistochemical analyses are often required, utilizing antibodies directed against CK8-18, Hep-Par1, glypican 3, CK7, CK19, CK20. Here we report a case of a 65-year-old man who presented with a clinical picture of decompensated cirrhosis. Ultrasonography revealed two nodular areas in the right liver lobe. Liver needle biopsy revealed micro-macronodular cirrhosis associated with HCC with trabecular and pseudoglandular patterns. Immunohistochemically, tumour cells were diffusely positive for CK8-18 and also diffusely immunostained by glypican 3 and Hep-Par1. Interestingly, a diffuse and strong staining for CK20 was detected in the vast majority of tumor cells, particularly in the areas showing a pseudo-glandular pattern. No immunostaining for CK7 and CK19 was found in the tumor cells. The tumor behaved aggressively, with a rapid diffusion to the whole liver. The patient died from the disease few months after presentation. These findings underline that the interpretation of the expression of CK20 alone in the differential diagnosis among HCC, CC and MCA should be done with caution because a diffuse immunoreactivity for CK20 alone may not rule out the diagnosis of HCC.

An expansile mandibular mass as the initial manifestation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequently encountered malignancies. Distant metastasis is a common sequela, occurring in approximately 50% of cases. Metastasis to the oral cavity is very rare. Careful immunohistochemical evaluation is critical in differentiating HCC from other metastatic malignancies. An understanding of the possibility that HCC may initially present as a mandibular metastasis is crucial to guide management. We describe the case of a 76-year-old man with a 3- to 4-month history of a painless, slowly enlarging, left-sided jaw mass. Biopsy findings were consistent with HCC. While the patient was a known hepatitis C carrier, the presence of HCC had been previously unknown. Additional workup revealed a large hepatic lesion. In view of his poor health, the patient elected to forgo chemotherapy, and he entered a hospice facility. This case provides an illustration that an isolated mandibular mass may represent the initial presentation of HCC. Subsequent identification of the primary tumor via radiographic and pathologic evaluations is important for the guidance of further management.

Expression of CDX2 and hepatocyte antigen in benign and malignant lesions of gallbladder and its correlation with histopathologic type and clinical outcome

Recent studies have shown that both CDX2 and Hepatocyte antigen (Hep) are detected in different types of cancer and associated with clinical prognosis. However, fever studies have examined gallbladder cancer specimens, and little is known about the clinicopathological significance of both CDX2 and Hep expression in gallbladder adenocarcinomas. In present study, we examined the expression frequencies of CDX2 and Hepatocyte antigen (Hep), and explored their clinicopathologic significances in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect and compare the frequencies of CDX2 and Hep expression in 108 samples of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, 46 peri-tumor tissues and 35 chronic cholecystitis. The expression frequencies for CDX2 and Hep were 49/108 (45.4%) and 45/108 (41.7%) in gallbladder carcinoma; 13/46 (28.3%) and 11/46 (23.9) in peri-tumor tissues; 5/35 (14.3%) and 2/35 (5.7%) in chronic cholecystitis. The positive staining of CDX2 or Hep in gallbladder adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that in peritumoral tissues (both, P < 0.05), and chronic cholecystits (both, P < 0.01). The expression of CDX2 or Hep was negatively correlated to grade of differentiation, tumor size and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). Elevated expression frequency of CDX2 or Hep was associated with increased overall survival (P = 0.003 or P = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CDX2 (P = 0.014) or Hep (P = 0.026) expression was an independent prognostic predictor in gallbladder adenocarcinoma. CDX2 and Hep might function as important biological markers in the development and prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma.

The use of immunohistochemistry in liver tumors

A variety of benign and malignant neoplasms can be encountered in the liver. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections alone may not yield sufficient information to definitively diagnose liver tumors; therefore, ancillary studies with immunohistochemical markers can play a crucial role in differentiating the different hepatic neoplasms. The recent development of oncofetoprotein glypican-3 has added to the value of immunohistochemistry in diagnosing liver cancer. This review discusses the immunohistochemical markers used most often in the diagnosis of hepatic tumors.

Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver exhibits immunohistochemical evidence of both hepatocyte and bile duct differentiation

Fibrolamellar carcinoma is a rare malignant primary liver neoplasm with characteristic histological features that typically arises in young patients without viral hepatitis or cirrhosis. Previous studies on this entity have been limited by small numbers of patients. In contrast to classical hepatocellular carcinoma, individual cases of fibrolamellar carcinoma have been reported to express cytokeratin 7. In addition, ultrastructural and serological studies have suggested that fibrolamellar carcinoma may show neuroendocrine differentiation. The cellular differentiation of fibrolamellar carcinoma has not been studied and little is reported about its immunohistochemical profile. We studied 26 cases of fibrolamellar carcinoma and 62 cases of classical hepatocellular carcinoma by immunohistochemistry for HepPar1, glypican-3, pCEA, CD10, alpha-fetoprotein, cytokeratin 20, neuroendocrine markers, and surrogate markers for biliary differentiation (cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 19, epithelial membrane antigen, EpCAM, mCEA, B72.3, and CA19.9). In situ hybridization for albumin mRNA was also performed. Tumor cells of fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma showed positive signals for albumin mRNA by in situ hybridization in all cases. Both tumor types stained uniformly positively with HepPar1 and most showed a canalicular staining pattern for pCEA, confirming their hepatocellular differentiation. In addition, 39% of hepatocellular carcinoma cases and 59% of fibrolamellar carcinoma cases were positive for glypican-3. All 22 fibrolamellar carcinoma cases tested showed positive staining for cytokeratin 7 and epithelial membrane antigen, whereas less than one-third of hepatocellular carcinoma cases were positive for these markers (P<0.0001). Further, 36% of fibrolamellar carcinoma cases showed staining for B72.3, cytokeratin 19, EpCAM, or mCEA. Minimal evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation in either tumor was found with any of the usual immunohistochemical markers used for this purpose. Therefore, cytokeratin 7 and epithelial membrane antigen may be useful to differentiate between fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. On the basis of immunohistochemistry, fibrolamellar carcinoma seems to show both hepatocellular and bile duct differentiation.

Arginase-1: a new immunohistochemical marker of hepatocytes and hepatocellular neoplasms

The distinction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic tumor in the liver often presents a diagnostic challenge that carries significant impact on prognostication and therapy. The number of diagnostically useful immunohistochemical markers of hepatocytes is limited to hepatocyte paraffin antigen (HepPar-1), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen, and CD10, with alpha-fetoprotein and glypican-3 labeling HCCs. Arginase-1 (Arg-1) is a binuclear manganese metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of arginine to ornithine and urea. We used immunohistochemistry to compare the sensitivity of Arg-1 to that of HepPar-1 in 151 HCCs. We found that the overall sensitivities of Arg-1 and HepPar-1 are 96.0% and 84.1%, respectively. The sensitivities of Arg-1 in well, moderately, and poorly differentiated HCCs are 100%, 96.2%, and 85.7%, respectively, whereas, in comparison, HepPar-1 demonstrated sensitivities of 100%, 83.0%, and 46.4% for well, moderately, and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively. There were no HCCs in our study that were reactive for HepPar-1 but nonreactive for Arg-1. We also examined Arg-1 expression in nonhepatocellular tumors, including many that are potential mimics of HCC (renal cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, melanomas, gastric adenocarcinomas, and adrenocortical carcinomas) and found that only 2 non-HCC tumors were reactive for Arg-1. Arg-1 represents a sensitive and specific marker of benign and malignant hepatocytes that may ultimately prove to be a useful diagnostic tool in routine surgical pathology practice.

The best immunohistochemical panel for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic adenocarcinoma

It can be difficult to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic adenocarcinoma (MA). An appropriate immunohistochemical panel is required for the differential diagnosis. This study aimed at finding the best panel, including hepatocyte-specific antigen (Hepatocyte), pCEA, CD10, Villin, CD34, TTF-1, MOC-31, CK7, and CK20 antibodies. Sixty-eight cases of HCC and 107 cases of MA were investigated. Hepatocyte positivity was seen in 95.6% of HCCs and in 1.9% of MAs. pCEA was expressed in 47.8% of HCCs and in 86.8% of MAs. CD10 stained 73.13% of HCCs and 36.9% of MAs. Villin was positive in 23.5% of HCCs and in 81.0% of MAs. Canalicular staining with pCEA, CD10, and Villin was seen only in HCCs. Sinusoidal CD34 staining was seen only in 42.6% of HCCs. A small subset of HCCs demonstrated cytoplasmic TTF-1 and MOC-31. CK7 was expressed in 29.4% of HCCs and in 29.9% of MAs, whereas CK20 stained 14.7% of HCCs and 62.6% of MAs. In conclusion, Hepatocyte should be combined with pCEA, MOC-31, CD10, and CD34. Canalicular staining with pCEA, CD10, and Villin is specific for HCC. CK7 and CK20 expression may be seen in some HCCs. We suggest that the best panel for discriminating HCC from MA should contain Hepatocyte, MOC-31, pCEA, CD10, and CD34.

Surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis

Early identification of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is more frequent because of surveillance programs for HCC worldwide. The optimal strategy of surveillance in cirrhosis is a current topical issue. In terms of diagnosis, recent advances in non-invasive imaging technology, including various techniques of harmonic ultrasound, new ultrasound contrast agents, multi-slice helical computed tomography and rapid high quality magnetic resonance, have all improved the accuracy of diagnosis. Consequently the role of liver biopsy in diagnosis of HCC has declined. The imaging diagnosis relies on the hallmark of arterial hypervascularity with portal venous washout. However, with recent advances in genomics and proteomics a great number of potential serum and tissue markers have been identified and are being developed as new candidate markers for both diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, and may increase the need for liver biopsy.

Significance of hepatocyte paraffin-1, cluster of differentiation 34 and cytokeratin expression in the diagnosis of alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the significance of hepatocyte paraffin-1 (Hep Par-1), cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) and cytokeratin (CK) expression in the diagnosis of alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (AFP(-)HCC) and in the differential diagnosis among AFP(-) HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) and metastatic adenocarcinoma (MAC).

METHODS: Paraffin-embedded surgical specimens were collected from 70 AFP(-)HCC patients, 6 ICC patients and 24 MAC patients at Nantong Tumor Hospital from 1989 to 2007. All specimens were stained immunohistochemically for Hep Par 1, CD34 and CK.

RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the positive expression rates of Hep Par 1 and CD34 in AFP(-)HCC, ICC and MAC (Hep Par 1: χ² = 50.7937, 9.5745 and 37.4532, respectively; CD34: χ² = 67.0330, 9.9836 and 49.3927, respectively; all P < 0.01). Significant differences were also noted in the positive expression rates of Hep Par 1, CD34, CK20 and CK19 between poorly and well differentiated AFP(-)HCC (all P < 0.01 or 0.05). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of combined immunohistochemical detection of Hep Par 1, CD34 and CK in the differential diagnosis among AFP(-) HCC, ICC and MAC were 90.7%, 89.8% and 93.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Combined detection of Hep Par 1, CD34 and CK can improve the accuracy of diagnosis of AFP(-)HCC and of differential diagnosis among AFP(-)HCC, ICC and MAC.

Hepatocyte Paraffin 1 Immunoreactivity in Early Colon Carcinogenesis

Background

This study was aimed at evaluating the correlation between Hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep par 1) and colorectal cancer.

Methods

To this end, 50 intestinal biopsies were analyzed including 10 colorectal polyps with low grade dysplasia, 10 with high grade dysplasia, 10 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 10 specimens of normal ileum and 10 of normal colon mucosa. Tissue sections were immunostained for Hep par 1 utilizing a commercial antibody. Normal colonic mucosa did not express Hep par 1.

Results

Immunoreactivity for Hep par 1 was detected in 20% of polyps with low grade dysplasia, 50% of polyps with high grade dysplasia and 60% of colorectal carcinomas. Hep par 1 was frequently detected in the deepest areas of adenocarcinomas mainly in infiltrating tumour cells.

Conclusions

Our data show that Hep par 1 immunoreactivity in human colon carcinogenesis is correlated with progression from low grade to high grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. In clinical practice, our data show that caution should be taken in utilizing Hep par 1 as the sole tool in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from a liver metastasis of colon adenocarcinoma. Our data encourage further investigations into the potential role played by Hep par 1 in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis.

Expression of hepatocyte antigen in small intestinal epithelium and adenocarcinoma

Hepatocyte antigen is recognized by antibody Hep Par 1, a widely used diagnostic immunomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma and tumors with hepatoid differentiation. Hepatocyte antigen expression has also been detected in nonneoplastic small intestinal epithelium, but expression in small intestinal adenocarcinoma has not been well investigated. We immunohistochemically examined 39 nonampullary small intestinal adenocarcinomas for hepatocyte antigen expression; 34 cases contained normal-appearing nonneoplastic small intestinal mucosa on the same tissue sections. In 30 cases (88%), the nonneoplastic mucosa exhibited granular cytoplasmic Hep Par 1 staining exclusively in the epithelium. Only 9 small intestinal adenocarcinomas (23%) showed focal positive cytoplasmic staining. Nonneoplastic colonic epithelium was negative for Hep Par 1. In 31 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 3 (10%) showed positive staining for Hep Par 1 (1 diffuse, 2 focal), a frequency not different from that for small intestinal adenocarcinomas (P = .2467). Tumors expressing hepatocyte antigen did not exhibit evidence of hepatoid differentiation and were histologically indistinguishable from hepatocyte antigen-negative tumors. Hepatocyte antigen immunoreactivity is selectively expressed in nonneoplastic small intestinal enterocytes but not in colonocytes, suggesting a potential physiologic role in intestinal biology. Whether the loss of antigen expression in a large number of small intestinal adenocarcinomas serves a role in small intestinal tumorigenesis remains to be investigated.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in multiple bile duct hamartomas: report of two cases and review of the literature

Multiple bile duct hamartomas (BDHs)/von Meyenburg complexes, are tumor-like lesions of the liver. Malignant transformation in BDHs has been previously reported in very rare instances, and the most common tumor arising in this clinical setting is cholangiocarcinoma. Herein, we report on clinicopathological findings in two cases of cholangiocarcinoma occurring in liver with multiple BDHs. Histopathologically, multiple BDHs showed morphologic transition from clearly benign to dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, then to invasive carcinoma sequence of the biliary epithelium. The neoplastic epithelium showed positivity for cytokeratin 19, CA 19-9, and epithelial membrane antigen. Staining for Hep Par 1, alpha-fetoprotein, cytokeratin 20, and alpha1-antitrypsin was negative. All sections from the non-neoplastic liver in each specimen showed multiple BDHs. Any other clinically detectable primary tumor was not found. These two neoplasms were interpreted as a cholangiocarcinoma arising in BDHs. This suggested BDHs might be a risk factor of development of cholangiocarcinoma.

N-cadherin serves as diagnostic biomarker in intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas

As a definite immunoprofile of this tumor is missing, the histopathologic diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is difficult. The aim of this study was to explore E- and N-cadherin expressions in intrahepatic bile duct tumors, and to determine their potential interest in differential diagnosis. Normal liver tissue, 5 cirrhosis with ductular reaction, 5 focal nodular hyperplasia, 5 bile duct hamartomas, 5 bile duct adenomas, and 45 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas from Caucasian patients were studied. Tissue-microarrays including 20 esophageal, 86 gastric, 8 small bowel, 64 colonic, 18 pancreatic, 6 gallbladder, and 7 extrahepatic biliary tract adenocarcinomas, 22 hepatocellular carcinomas, and normal tissues were constructed. Immunohistochemistry was performed using E-cadherin, N-cadherin, NCAM, Hep Par1, and cytokeratins 7, 19 and 20. Immunoblot analysis of frozen liver tissues was performed to control the specificity of E- and N-cadherin antibodies used. In normal liver, epithelial cells of intrahepatic bile ducts, whatever their caliber, as well as hepatocytes, coexpressed E- and N-cadherins at their plasma membranes. In cirrhosis, ductular reactions completely expressed E- and N-cadherins. All the benign lesions and 30 of the 45 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (23/29 peripheral and 7/16 hilar) also expressed N-cadherin. E-cadherin was detected in all the lesions. The expression of N-cadherin at the plasma membrane of tumor cells was significantly more frequent in peripheral than in hilar intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (P=0.003). Among noncholangiocarcinomas, only 1% gastric and 66% gallbladder adenocarcinomas and all the hepatocellular carcinomas expressed N-cadherin at the membrane of tumor cells. Finally, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, the specificity value of membranous expression of N-cadherin was 88%, whereas that of the combination cytokeratin 7/membranous N-cadherin was 98%. In the gastrointestinal and liver tract, membranous N-cadherin is restricted to the hepatocytes and intrahepatic biliary cells. In combination with cytokeratin 7 and Hep Par1, N-cadherin is a reliable tool for the histopathological diagnosis of primary hepatic tumors.

Leptin enhances cholangiocarcinoma cell growth

Cholangiocarcinoma is a strongly aggressive malignancy with a very poor prognosis. Effective therapeutic strategies are lacking because molecular mechanisms regulating cholangiocarcinoma cell growth are unknown. Furthermore, experimental in vivo animal models useful to study the pathophysiologic mechanisms of malignant cholangiocytes are lacking. Leptin, the hormone regulating caloric homeostasis, which is increased in obese patients, stimulates the growth of several cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to define if leptin stimulates cholangiocarcinoma growth. We determined the expression of leptin receptors in normal and malignant human cholangiocytes. Effects on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HuH-28) cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of the in vitro exposure to leptin, together with the intracellular pathways, were then studied. Moreover, cholangiocarcinoma was experimentally induced in obese fa/fa Zucker rats, a genetically established animal species with faulty leptin receptors, and in their littermates by chronic feeding with thioacetamide, a potent carcinogen. After 24 weeks, the effect of leptin on cholangiocarcinoma development and growth was assessed. Normal and malignant human cholangiocytes express leptin receptors. Leptin increased the proliferation and the metastatic potential of cholangiocarcinoma cells in vitro through a signal transducers and activators of transcription 3-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2. Leptin increased the growth and migration, and was antiapoptotic for cholangiocarcinoma cells. Moreover, the loss of leptin function reduced the development and the growth of cholangiocarcinoma. The experimental carcinogenesis model induced by thioacetamide administration is a valid and reproducible method to study cholangiocarcinoma pathobiology. Modulation of the leptin-mediated signal could be considered a valid tool for the prevention and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

Glycine N-methyltransferase is a favorable prognostic marker for human cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT) is a susceptibility gene for human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We previously reported that GNMT expression is diminished in HCC. Here we report our examination of GNMT expression patterns in cholangiocarcinoma and the relationship between its expression and prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed GNMT expression in tumor tissues from 33 cholangiocarcinoma patients (19 male) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) procedures with a GNMT monoclonal antibody (mAb 4-17). GNMT expression intensity and percentages were scored on a scale of 0 to 6. The association between GNMT expression and survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated with a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

High GNMT expression was found in epithelial cells of normal bile ducts. Six of 33 (18.2%) cholangiocarcinoma tissues had no GNMT expression. A statistically significant difference was noted in GNMT expression between male and female patients (68.4% vs 100%, P < 0.05). Compared to patients with GNMT expression scores > 3, the death hazard ratio for patients with GNMT scores <or= 3 was 3.68 (95% confidence interval = 1.17-11.59, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

GNMT expression is a favorable prognosis predictor for cholangiocarcinoma.

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma originating from hepatic progenitor cells: immunohistochemical and double-fluorescence immunostaining evidence

AIMS

Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare form of primary liver cancer, showing a mixture of hepatocellular and biliary features. Data suggest that most CHC arise from hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs). The aim was to investigate the origin of CHC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve cases of CHC were studied by immunohistochemistry for hepatocytic (hepPar1, alpha-fetoprotein), cholangiocytic cytokeratin [(CK) 7, CK19], hepatic progenitor cell (OV-6), haematopoietic stem cell (c-kit, CD34), as well as CD45 and chromogranin-A markers. The combination of double-fluorescence immunostaining consisted of HepPar1 with CK19, and c-kit with OV-6. All 12 cases demonstrated more or less transitional areas, with strands/trabeculae of small, uniform, oval-shaped cells including scant cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei embedded within a thick, desmoplastic stroma; however, two cases were found to consist entirely of such transitional areas. Simultaneous co-expression of hepPar1 and CK7, or CK19, was demonstrated in 10/12 (83.3%) cases of CHC. c-kit expression was noted in 10/12 (83.3%) cases, of which 7/10 (70%) showed co-expression of OV-6.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that CHC are of HPC origin, supporting the concept that human hepatocarcinogenesis may originate from the transformation of HPCs.

Cerebral metastasis from hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach

We first report a rare case of metastasis from gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) to cerebral parenchyma, in a 50-year-old Chinese patient. He complained of a one-month history of a paroxysm of headache in the left temple and pars parietalis accompanied with binocular caligation caligo, insensible feeling of limbs and transient anepia. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging revealed a spherical occupying lesion in the left posterior-temple lobe which was clinically diagnosed as a metastatic tumor. Three years ago, the patient accepted total gastrectomy as he was pathologically diagnosed at gastroscopy having an adenocarcinoma. Eight months after gastrectomy, the occupying lesion in liver was detected by ultrasound and CT, and he accepted transcatheter arterial embolization. Before operation of the brain metastasis, no obvious abnormality was found in liver by ultrasound. Histopathological characteristics of the brain tumor were identical to those of stomach tumor. The growth pattern of both tumors showed solid cell nests. The tumor cells were polygonal, and had abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round nuclei with obvious nucleoli. Sinusoid-like blood spaces were located between nodular tumor cells. Immunohistochemistry-stained tumor cells were positive for AFP and negative for Hep-Par-1. According to these histopathological findings, both tumors were diagnosed as HAC and metastatic HAC. The patient remained alive 16 mo after tumorectomy of the cerebral metastasis. The differential diagnosis of brain metastasis from metastatic tumors should use a panel of antibodies to avoid confusing with the brain metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This paper describes this rare case of metastasis from gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma to cerebral parenchyma, and provides a review of the literature concerning its histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics.

Differentiation of metastatic follicular thyroid cancer from hepatocellular carcinoma using Hep Par 1

Hepatocellular carcinoma usually arises in a cirrhotic liver. Multiple hepatic nodules in a non-cirrhotic liver are more likely to be metastatic. The primary focus commonly arises from the gastrointestinal tract, breast or lung, but in the absence of these a primary liver pathology must be considered. The case is reported of a middle-aged woman presenting with multiple nodules on computed tomography with no clinically apparent primary for whom results of initial diagnostic investigations were potentially misleading.

Clinicopathological implications of immunohistochemically demonstrated mucin core protein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma

METHODS

We examined the expression of mucin core protein 1 (MUC1) immunohistochemically in 186 surgical specimens of histopathologically nonmucinous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared the clinicopathological features in patients with MUC1-positive HCC (MUC1-positive group) with those in patients with MUC1-negative HCC (MUC1-negative group).

RESULTS

MUC1 immunoreactively was present in 85 of the 186 HCCs. Of the clinicopathological variables examined, the serum concentration of alpha-fetoprotein, tumor differentiation, bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, and cytokeratin 19 expression exhibited significant associations with MUC1 expression. Although cumulative and tumor-free survival rates were not different between the two groups, the percentage of patients with first recurrence of HCC in distant organs (distant metastasis) within 2 years after surgery was significantly higher in the MUC1-positive group than in the MUC1-negative group (P = 0.0104). The risk ratio of MUC1 positivity for this type of distant metastasis was 3.156 (95% confidence interval, 1.064-9.358).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MUC1-positive HCC, careful follow-up is necessary, not only for intrahepatic recurrence but also for distant metastasis, after the resection of primary HCC.