Effects of second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonists on the active avoidance response in rats

[Histamine signaling restores retrieval of forgotten memories]

Histamine is a biological amine that functions as a neurotransmitter in the brain to regulate arousal, appetite, and cognitive functions. Many pharmacological studies using histamine receptor agonists and antagonists have found that histamine promotes memory consolidation and retrieval. More recently, we have revealed that the activation of the brain histaminergic system by H₃R antagonists/inverse agonists restores retrieval of forgotten long-term memory in mice and humans. The recovery of memory retrieval may involve histamine-induced excitatory effects. Histamine may increase neuronal excitability throughout the neural circuit, including both neurons that are and are not recruited into the memory trace, similar to noise added to the neural circuits for memory retrieval. Stochastic resonance can explain how adding noise to the circuit enhances memory retrieval. Memory is processed not only by consolidation and retrieval, but also by various processes such as maintenance, reconsolidation, extinction, and reinstatement. Further studies that separately analyze the memory processes are needed to elucidate the whole picture of the effects of histamine on learning and memory. Regarding the human histaminergic system, alterations in histamine signaling have been reported in several neuropsychiatric disorders, and these changes have been suggested to be involved in cognitive dysfunction in patients with the neuropsychiatric disorders. Therefore, the drugs that modulate histamine signaling, including H₃R antagonists/inverse agonists, may be effective in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction, including Alzheimer's disease.

Histamine: A Key Neuromodulator of Memory Consolidation and Retrieval

In pharmacological studies conducted on animals over the last four decades, histamine was determined to be a strong modulator of learning and memory. Activation of histamine signaling enhances memory consolidation and retrieval. Even long after learning and forgetting, it can still restore the retrieval of forgotten memories. These findings based on animal studies led to human clinical trials with histamine H₃ receptor antagonists/inverse agonists, which revealed their positive effects on learning and memory. Therefore, histamine signaling is a promising therapeutic target for improving cognitive impairments in patients with various neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. While the memory-modulatory effects of histamine receptor agonists and antagonists have been confirmed by several research groups, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This review summarizes how the activation and inhibition of histamine signaling influence memory processes, introduces the cellular and circuit mechanisms, and discusses the relationship between the human histaminergic system and learning and memory.

Impaired spatial learning and reduced adult hippocampal neurogenesis in histamine H1-receptor knockout mice

The histamine H1-receptor (H1R) is expressed in wide parts of the brain including the hippocampus, which is involved in spatial learning and memory. Previous studies in H1R knockout (H1R-KO) mice revealed deficits in a variety of learning and memory tasks. It was also proposed that H1R activation is crucial for neuronal differentiation of neural progenitors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate negatively reinforced spatial learning in the water-maze and to assess survival and neuronal differentiation of newborn cells in the adult hippocampus of H1R-KO mice. H1R-KO and wild-type (WT) mice were subjected to the following sequence of tests: (a) cued version, (b) place learning, (c) spatial probe, (d) long-term retention and (e) reversal learning. Furthermore hippocampal neurogenesis in terms of survival and differentiation was assessed in H1R-KO and WT mice. H1R-KO mice showed normal cued learning, but impaired place and reversal learning as well as impaired long-term retention performance. In addition, a marked reduction of newborn neurons in the hippocampus but no changes in differentiation of neural progenitors into neuronal and glial lineage was found in H1R-KO mice. Our data suggest that H1R deficiency in mice is associated with pronounced deficits in hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory. Furthermore, we herein provide first evidence that H1R deficiency in the mouse leads to a reduced neurogenesis. However, the exact mechanisms for the reduced number of cells in H1R-KO mice remain elusive and might be due to a reduced survival of newborn hippocampal neurons and/or a reduction in cell proliferation.

Histamine produces opposing effects to serotonin in the knee joint of rats

Formalin injected in the knee joint of rats produces concentration-dependent nociception, edema, and plasma leakage (PL). Herein, we investigated the effect of histamine H1 receptor (H1R) antagonists in this model. Articular nociception was inferred from the paw elevation time (PET; seconds) during 1-minute periods of stimulated walking, determined every 5 minutes, throughout a 60-minute experimental session. Edema was evaluated by the increase in articular diameter (AD; mm), and PL was measured by the amount of Evans blue dye in the synovial fluid (PL; μg/mL). Loratadine and cetirizine, given systemically, both increased the PET. None of the treatments changed the AD and PL. Loratadine given locally with formalin increased the PET but was without effect when given in the contralateral knee. Systemic loratadine was also without effect when formalin was coinjected with sodium cromoglycate. Histamine and the selective H1R agonist 2-pyridylethylamine decreased the PET and potentiated morphine spinal analgesia, but did not affect the AD and PL. Cetirizine prevented the antinociceptive effect of the H1R agonist. The N-methyl-D-aspartate/histamine-site agonist tele-methylhistamine coinjected with formalin only increased PET. Serotonin alone had no effect on the PET and increased the AD, and the highest dose increased the PL. When coinjected with formalin, serotonin only caused hypernociception, and the highest dose also increased AD. NAN 190, cyproheptadine, and ondansetron (respectively, 5-HT1, 5-HT2, and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists) decreased the PET without changing the AD or PL. Collectively, these results suggest that in rats, the H1R plays an antinociceptive role within the knee joint, while serotonin receptors play a pronociceptive role.

PERSPECTIVE

The present study revealed an antinociceptive mechanism that has previously not been detected by traditional nociceptive tests. Our observations may help to improve the development of new pharmacological strategies for the treatment of clinically relevant pains that generally originate in deep structures.

Circadian Time‐Dependent Differences in Murine Tolerance to the Antihistaminic Agent Loratadine

Loratadine is a second-generation histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist used in the treatment of allergic diseases. The aim of the study was to assess whether lethal toxicity and motor incoordination (neurotoxicity) of loratadine is circadian rhythm-dependent. A total of 210 male Swiss mice, aged 10 wk, were synchronized for 3 wk to 12 h light (rest span)/12 h dark (activity span). The drug was administered per os. The choice of the sublethal (TD(50) = 82 mg/kg body weight) and the lethal (LD(50) = 4 g/kg body weight) dosage was based on preliminary studies. Each of these two doses was administered to comparable groups of animals at six different circadian time points (1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 Hours After Light Onset [HALO]). The survival duration was dosing time-dependent (chi(2) = 16.96; p < 0.001). Drug dosing at 17 HALO resulted in best (67%) survival rate; whereas, dosing at 9 HALO resulted in poorest (21%) survival rate. Cosinor analyses (with a trial period tau = 24 h) validated a statistically significant circadian rhythm in survival rate (p < 0.04) with an acrophase (peak time Ø of best tolerance to loratadine) being at 17.5 HALO +/- 4.65 h. Troughs of motor incoordination were located at the administration times of 5 and 17 HALO (60% and 32% of animals affected, respectively), whereas peaks were located at 9 and 21 HALO (87% and 68% of animals affected, respectively). The 24 h mean of the motor incoordination was 61%, the mean proportion of animals affected by the treatment for the six different circadian times studies. The extent of this neurotoxic effect varied as a function of loratadine dosing time (p < 0.001). A statistically significant ultradian component rhythm (p < 0.01) with a trial period tau = 12 h was also validated. The obtained results show that the dosing time of loratadine at the mid-activity (dark) span seems to be optimal, since it corresponds to the longest (21 vs. 12 days) survival span and to least neurotoxicity.

Brain histamine H receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines measured by positron emission tomography with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design in healthy subjects: a comparison of olopatadine and ketotifen

AIMS

The strength of sedation due to antihistamines can be evaluated by using positron emission tomography (PET). The purpose of the present study is to measure histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) occupancy due to olopatadine, a new second-generation antihistamine and to compare it with that of ketotifen.

METHODS

Eight healthy males (mean age 23.5 years-old) were studied following single oral administration of olopatadine 5 mg or ketotifen 1 mg using PET with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design. Binding potential ratio and H(1)R occupancy were calculated and were compared between olopatadine and ketotifen in the medial prefrontal (MPFC), dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), anterior cingulate (ACC), insular (IC), temporal (TC), parietal (PC), occipital cortices (OC). Plasma drug concentration was measured, and correlation of AUC to H(1)R occupancy was examined.

RESULTS

H(1)R occupancy after olopatadine treatment was significantly lower than that after ketotifen treatment in the all cortical regions (P < 0.001). Mean H(1)R occupancies for olopatadine and ketotifen were, respectively: MPFC, 16.7 vs. 77.7; DLPFC, 14.1 vs. 85.9; ACC, 14.7 vs. 76.1; IC, 12.8 vs. 69.7; TC, 12.5 vs. 66.5; PC, 13.9 vs. 65.8; and OC, 19.5 vs. 60.6. Overall cortical mean H(1)R occupancy of olopatadine and ketotifen were 15% and 72%, respectively. H(1)R occupancy of both drugs correlated well with their respective drug plasma concentrations (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that 5 mg oral olopatadine, with its low H(1)R occupancy and thus minimal sedation, could safely be used an antiallergic treatment for various allergic disorders. Abbreviations histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R), histamine H(1) receptor occupancy (H(1)RO), dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R), positron emission tomography (PET), blood-brain barrier (BBB), binding potential ratio (BPR), distribution volume (DV).

Ketotifen induced inhibition of histamine release in a non-IgE model of middle ear effusion

The inhibitory effects of ketotifen, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist and mast cell stabilizer, were examined on a non-IgE experimental model of middle ear effusion. Thirty rats were divided into three groups. Group A (n = 9) was subjected to mechanical stimulation of the external auditory canal (EAC); group B (n = 11) was pre-treated with intraperitoneal administration of 0.2 mg ketotifen, 90 min before mechanical stimulation of the EAC; and group C (n = 10), the control group, was neither exposed to mechanical stimulation nor given ketotifen. Thirty minutes after completion of the experiment, the eardrums were inspected, histamine levels were determined by a fluorometric assay, and the pars flaccida underwent histological assessment. An attic effusion was observed in group A; a similar phenomenon but to a lesser extent was also seen in group B. Statistical analysis confirmed that the mean histamine concentration of the rinsing fluid obtained from group A was significantly higher than that of group C (p = 0.004) or group B (p = 0.008). No significant difference was found between the mean histamine concentration of groups C and group B (p = 0.311). Histological assessment revealed that the thickness of the pars flaccida of group A was considerably greater than that of groups C and B and was characterized by marked edema. Furthermore, the pars flaccida mast cell population was significantly depleted compared with groups C and B. The data indicate that mechanical stimulation of the EAC triggered the pars flaccida mast cells to degranulate in a non-mediated IgE fashion and that histamine is implicated in most of these histological changes. It is concluded that administration of ketotifen before mechanical stimulation of the EAC had a stabilizing effect and abolished mast cell degranulation, therefore, may be considered as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of middle ear disease in the pediatric population.

[Circadian rhythms in the toxic effects of the histamine antagonist cetirizine in mice]

Cetirizine is a second generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonist used to provide symptomatic relief of allergic signs caused by histamine release. The aim of the study was to learn whether the survival and the motor incoordination (ataxia) side effect of cetirizine administration is dosing time-dependent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 240 male Swiss mice, 10 weeks of age were synchronized for 3 weeks by 12 h light (rest span)/12 h dark (activity span). Different doses of cetirizine were administered orally at fixed times during the day to determine both the sublethal (TD(50)) and lethal (LD(50)) doses, which were, respectively, 55 +/- 0.35 and 750 +/- 0.40 mg/kg. In the chronotoxicologic study a single dose of cetirizine (DL(50)) was administered to comparable groups of animals at six different circadian stages [1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21 h after light onset (HALO)].

RESULTS

The survival was statistically significant dosing time-dependent (chi(2) = 16.73; P < 0.001). Drug dosing at 17 HALO resulted in 83.3% survival rate whereas drug dosing at 5 HALO was only 23.25%. Cosinor analysis revealed a statistically significant circadian (period approximately 24 h) rhythmic component in survival. Lowest (20%) and highest (88%) ataxia occurred when cetirizine was administered, respectively, at 17 and 5 HALO. Cosinor analysis revealed a statistically significant circadian (period approximately 24 h) rhythmic component in ataxia.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal that the best safety is shown when cetirizine is administered in the middle of the dark (activity) span of the mice, since it produces some side effects: ataxia and hyperthermia. Taking into account of the hour administration of cetirizine, improves treatment efficacy and permit the best control of allergic diseases.

Roles of histamine and its receptors in allergic and inflammatory bowel diseases

Mast cell has a long history of being recognized as an important mediator-secreting cell in allergic diseases, and has been discovered to be involved in IBD in last two decades. Histamine is a major mediator in allergic diseases, and has multiple effects that are mediated by specific surface receptors on target cells. Four types of histamine receptors have now been recognized pharmacologically and the first three are located in the gut. The ability of histamine receptor antagonists to inhibit mast cell degranulation suggests that they might be developed as a group of mast cell stabilizers. Recently, a series of experiments with dispersed colon mast cells suggested that there should be at least two pathways in man for mast cells to amplify their own activation-degranulation signals in an autocrine or paracrine manner. In a word, histamine is an important mediator in allergic diseases and IBD, its antagonists may be developed as a group of mast cell stabilizers to treat these diseases.

Effects of second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonists on the sleep–wakefulness cycle in rats

The present study was performed to examine the sedative effects of second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonist using power spectrum analysis in the rat. Similar to ketotifen, olopatadine caused a decrease in sleep latency at a dose of 50 mg/kg, while epinastine and cetirizine showed no significant effect even at a dose of 50 mg/kg. On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in the total times of wakefulness, non-rapid eye movement sleep and rapid eye movement sleep by any drugs used in the experiments. The number of sleep phases and interval between sleep phases were also unchanged by these drugs. Ketotifen and olopatadine inhibited [(3)H]mepyramine binding to rat brain homogenates in parallel with a decrease in sleep latency. No significant effect was observed with epinastine and cetirizine on [(3)H]mepyramine binding. These findings suggest that the differences in the central nervous system (CNS) depressant effect observed in second generation H(1) receptor antagonists may be due to their liability to penetrate into the CNS.