Principles and practice of HIV-protease inhibitor pharmacoenhancement

Evaluation of cardiotoxicity and other adverse effects associated with concomitant administration of artemether/lumefantrine and atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral regimen in patients living with HIV

The interplay of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and atazanavir-ritonavir (ATVr) with Cytochrome P (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme and QTc-interval may spawn clinically significant drug interactions when administered concomitantly. Cardiotoxicity and other adverse effects associated with interaction between AL and ATVr were evaluated in patients with HIV infection and malaria comorbidity. In a two-arm parallel study design, six doses of AL 80/480 mg were administered to 20 participants [control-arm (n = 10) and ATVr-arm (n = 10)], having uncomplicated Falciparum malaria, at intervals of 0, 8, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h respectively. Participants in the control arm took only AL while those in ATVr-arm took both AL and ATVr-based ART regimen. Electrocardiography, adverse events monitoring and blood tests were carried out for each of them at pre and post doses of AL. Data obtained were analyzed. QTc-interval was significantly increased in the ATVr-arm (0.4079 ± 0.008 to 0.4215 ± 0.007 s, p = 0.008) but not in the control-arm (0.4016 ± 0.018 to 0.4024 ± 0.014 s, p = 0.962). All values were, however, within normal range [0.36 – 0.44 / 0.46 s (male/female)]. General body weakness and chest pain were new adverse events reported, at post-dose of AL, in the ATVr-arm but not in the control-arm. There was no significant change (p > 0.05) in the plasma levels of creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and hemoglobin at post-dose compared to pre-dose of AL in both arms of study. Concomitant administration of artemether-lumefantrine with atazanavir-ritonavir-based regimen is potentially cardiotoxic but not associated with clinically significant renal, blood nor liver toxicities. They must be used with caution.

Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions

Oral anticancer drugs suffer from significant variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics partially due to limited bioavailability. The limited bioavailability of anticancer drugs is due to both pharmaceutical limitations and physiological barriers. Pharmacokinetic boosting is a strategy to enhance the oral bioavailability of a therapeutic drug by inhibiting physiological barriers through an intentional drug-drug interaction (DDI). This type of strategy has proven effective across several therapeutic indications including anticancer treatment. Pharmacokinetic boosting could improve anticancer drugs lacking or with otherwise unacceptable oral formulations through logistic, economic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic benefits. Despite these benefits, pharmacokinetic boosting strategies could result in unintended DDIs and are only likely to benefit a limited number of targets. Highlighting this concern, pharmacokinetic boosting has mixed results depending on the boosted drug. While pharmacokinetic boosting did not significantly improve certain drugs, it has resulted in the commercial approval of boosted oral formulations for other drugs. Pharmacokinetic boosting to improve oral anticancer therapy is an expanding area of research that is likely to improve treatment options for cancer patients.

The role of pharmacogenetics in Efficacy and safety of protease inhibitor based therapy in human immunodeficiency virus type (HIV) infection

Antiretroviral therapy has markedly reduced morbidity and mortality for persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV can now be classified as a chronic disease; until a cure is found, patients are likely to require life-long therapy. However, despite these undoubted advances, there are many issues that need to be resolved, including the problems associated with long-term efficacy and toxicity. Moreover, pharmacotherapy of patients infected with HIV is challenging because a great number of comorbidities increase polypharmacy and the risk for drug-drug interactions. There is considerable interindividual variability in patient outcomes in terms of drug disposition, drug efficacy and adverse events. The basis of these differences is multifactorial, but host genetics are believed to play a significant part. HIV-infected population consists of ethnically diverse individuals on complex and potentially toxic antiretroviral regimens on a long-term basis. These individuals would benefit greatly from predictive tests that identify the most durable regimens. Pharmacogenetics holds that promise. Thus, detailed understanding of the metabolism and transport of antiretrovirals and the influence of genetics on these pathways is important. To this end, this review provides an up-to-date overview of the metabolism of antiHIV therapeutics of the protease inhibitors Lopinavir and Ritonavir and the impact of genetic variation in drug metabolism and transport on the treatment of HIV.

Pharmacogenomics of Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism and Transport

Antiretroviral therapy has markedly reduced morbidity and mortality for persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Individual tailoring of antiretroviral regimens has the potential to further improve the long-term management of HIV through the mitigation of treatment failure and drug-induced toxicities. While the mechanisms underlying anti-HIV drug adverse outcomes are multifactorial, the application of drug-specific pharmacogenomic knowledge is required in order to move toward the personalization of HIV therapy. Thus, detailed understanding of the metabolism and transport of antiretrovirals and the influence of genetics on these pathways is important. To this end, this review provides an up-to-date overview of the metabolism of anti-HIV therapeutics and the impact of genetic variation in drug metabolism and transport on the treatment of HIV. Future perspectives on and current challenges in pursuing personalized HIV treatment are also discussed.

Design and biological evaluation of novel HIV-1 protease inhibitors with isopropanol as P1' ligand to enhance binding with S1' subsite

Newly designed HIV-1 protease inhibitors that maximize interactions with the protein backbone, especially in the form of hydrogen bonds, may enhance the antiviral potency of these compounds and minimize acquisition of drug-resistant mutations. Herein, we described a series of new HIV-1 PIs containing phenols as the P2 ligands and chiral isopropanol as the P1' ligands, in combination with 4-trifluoromethylphenylsulfonamide or 4-nitrophenylsulfonamide as the P2' ligands. And most of these compounds exhibited nanomolar inhibitory potency. In particular, inhibitors 13c and 13e with 4-trifluoromethylphenylsulfonamide as the P2' ligand and (R) - isopropanol as the P1' ligand, exhibited antiviral IC₅₀ values of 1.64 nM and 2.33 nM, respectively. Furthermore, they also showed remarkable activity against wild-type and DRV-resistant HIV-1 variants that raised the prospect of designing more effective PIs further.

Potential Antiviral Drugs for SARS-Cov-2 Treatment: Preclinical Findings and Ongoing Clinical Research

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2), initially termed 2019-new CoV (2019-nCoV), is a novel coronavirus responsible for the severe respiratory illness currently ongoing worldwide from the beginning of December 2019. This beta gene virus, very close to bat coronaviruses (bat-CoV-RaTG13) and bat-SL-CoVZC45, causes a severe disease, similar to those caused by Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV and SARS-CoV viruses, featured by low to moderate mortality rate. Unfortunately, the antiviral drugs commonly used in clinical practice to treat viral infections, are not applicable to SARS-Cov-2 and no vaccine is available. Thus, it is extremely necessary to identify new drugs suitable for the treatment of the 2019-nCoV outbreak. Different preclinical studies conducted on other coronaviruses suggested that promising clinical outcomes for 2019-nCoV should be obtained by using alpha-interferon, chloroquine phosphate, arabinol, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and anti-inflammatory drugs. Moreover, clinical trials with these suitable drugs should be performed on patients affected by SARS-Cov-2 to prove their efficacy and safety. Finally, a very promising therapeutic drug, tocilizumab, is discussed; it is currently used to treat patients presenting COVID-19 pneumonia. Herein, we recapitulate these experimental studies to highlight the use of antiviral drugs for the treatment of SARS-Cov-2 disease.

Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are anti‐cancer drugs that target tyrosine kinases, enzymes that are involved in multiple cellular processes. Currently, multiple oral TKIs have been introduced in the treatment of solid tumours, all administered in a fixed dose, although large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is described. For imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib exposure‐treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) relationships have been established and therapeutic windows have been defined, therefore dose optimization based on the measured blood concentration, called therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can be valuable in increasing efficacy and reducing the toxicity of these drugs.

In this review, an overview of the current knowledge on TDM guided individualized dosing of imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of solid tumours is presented. We summarize preclinical and clinical data that have defined thresholds for efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, PK models and factors that influence the PK of these drugs which partly explain the interpatient PK variability are summarized. Finally, pharmacological interventions that have been performed to optimize plasma concentrations are described. Based on current literature, we advise which methods should be used to optimize exposure to imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

A First-in-Human Trial of GLS4, a Novel Inhibitor of Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly, following Single- and Multiple-Ascending-Oral-Dose Studies with or without Ritonavir in Healthy Adult Volunteers

GLS4 is a novel inhibitor of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid assembly with inhibitory activities against nucleot(s)ide-resistant HBV strains. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of GLS4 and the effects of food and ritonavir in healthy adults. GLS4 was administered in a single-ascending-dose study over 1 to 240 mg and multiple-ascending-dose study that ranged from 30 mg once daily to 180 mg three times daily. The drug interaction study included sequential design (day 1 for 120 mg GLS4 alone, day 5 for 100 mg ritonavir alone, followed by 9 days of both drugs) and a placebo control (9 days of both 240 mg GLS4 and 100 mg ritonavir). The results showed that the steady-state trough concentration of multiple dosing of GLS4 alone was significantly lower than the 90% effective concentration of 55.7 ng/ml, even with increasing dosing frequency and dosage. An initial dose of 100 mg ritonavir significantly boosted plasma concentration at 24 h of 120 mg GLS4 from 2.40 to 49.8 ng/ml (geometric mean ratio, 20.7; 90% confidence interval, 17.0 to 25.3), while a milder effect was observed on the area under the curve from 0 to 24 h, with a 7.42-fold increase, and on the maximum concentration, with a 4.82-fold increase. The pharmacokinetics change in GLS4 persisted after 9 days of chronic dosing, with a trough concentration of 182 ng/ml. Both single and multiple doses of GLS4 up to 240 mg with or without ritonavir were well tolerated. These results support the investigation of a novel HBV treatment regimen containing GLS4 with 100 mg ritonavir added solely to enhance GLS4 concentrations in plasma. (This study was registered at the China Platform for Registry and Publicity of Drug Clinical Trials [http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn] under numbers CTR20132137 and CTR20150230.).

Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of HIV/AIDS: Recent Advances and Future Challenges

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a chronic disease characterized by multiple life-threatening illnesses caused by a retro-virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). HIV infection slowly destroys the immune system and increases the risk of various other infections and diseases. Although, there is no immediate cure for HIV infection/AIDS, several drugs targeting various cruxes of HIV infection are used to slow down the progress of the disease and to boost the immune system. One of the key therapeutic strategies is Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) or ' AIDS cocktail' in a general sense, which is a customized combination of anti-retroviral drugs designed to combat the HIV infection. Since HAART's inception in 1995, this treatment was found to be effective in improving the life expectancy of HIV patients over two decades. Among various classes of HAART treatment regimen, Protease Inhibitors (PIs) are known to be widely used as a major component and found to be effective in treating HIV infection/AIDS. For the past several years, a variety of protease inhibitors have been reported. This review outlines the drug design strategies of PIs, chemical and pharmacological characteristics of some mechanism-based inhibitors, summarizes the recent developments in small molecule based drug discovery with HIV protease as a drug target. Further discussed are the pharmacology, PI drug resistance on HIV PR, adverse effects of HIV PIs and challenges/impediments in the successful application of HIV PIs as an important class of drugs in HAART regimen for the effective treatment of AIDS.

Development and Palatability Assessment of Norvir® (Ritonavir) 100 mg Powder for Pediatric Population

Norvir^® (ritonavir) is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System Class IV compound with poor solubility in water (~5 µg/mL) and limited oral bioavailability. Early stage development efforts were focused on an oral solution (OS) which provided reasonable bioavailability but exhibited taste-masking challenges and required the use of solvents with potential pediatric toxicity. Norvir^® oral powder, 100 mg (NOP) was developed to replace OS. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the development of NOP and palatability assessment strategy. Palatability of NOP was assessed using the flavor profile method: (1) As an aqueous suspension dose/response and (2) evaluation with foods. The dose/response sensory analysis indicated that NOP has strong intensity bitterness and burnt aromatics (3 on the 0–3 flavor profile scale) at the clinical dose (100 mg/10 mL) and the recognition threshold was determined to be 0.3 mg/10 mL. To improve palatability, 100 mg/10 mL NOP aqueous suspension was evaluated with foods. Consuming foods high in fat and/or sugar content after NOP administration successfully reduced bitterness to a 1.5 intensity. In summary, NOP provides dose flexibility, enhanced stability, eliminated solvents, and maintains consistent bioavailability, with reduced bitterness and improved palatability via administration with common food products.

The dawn of precision medicine in HIV: state of the art of pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces viral load to under the limit of detection, successfully decreasing HIV-related morbidity and mortality. Due to viral mutations, complex drug combinations and different patient response, there is an increasing demand for individualized treatment options for patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review first summarizes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of clinical first-line drugs, which serves as guidance for antiretroviral precision medicine. Factors which have influential effects on drug efficacy and thus precision medicine are discussed: patients' pharmacogenetic information, virus mutations, comorbidities, and immune recovery. Furthermore, strategies to improve the application of precision medicine are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Precision medicine for ART requires comprehensive information on the drug, virus, and clinical data from the patients. The clinically available genetic tests are a good starting point. To better apply precision medicine, deeper knowledge of drug concentrations, HIV reservoirs, and efficacy associated genes, such as polymorphisms of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes, are required. With advanced computer-based prediction systems which integrate more comprehensive information on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenomics, and the clinically relevant information of the patients, precision medicine will lead to better treatment choices and improved disease outcomes.

Adrenal insufficiency due to ritonavir-triamcinolone drug-drug interaction without preceding Cushing's syndrome

We present the case of a 58-year-old HIV-infected patient with adrenal insufficiency after local injection of triamcinolone, most likely due to drug-drug interaction with his ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral therapy (ART). This is the first case of adrenal insufficiency occurring without prior symptoms of Cushing's syndrome in a patient on a booster-containing ART. We want to draw attention to this seemingly rare, but potentially life-threatening medical condition that can occur even in short-term use of glucocorticoids in low doses in patients on booster-containing ART and summarize some considerations for management.

Once-daily atazanavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat exposure over 72 h post-dose in plasma, urine and saliva: contribution to drug pharmacokinetic knowledge

Background

We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of atazanavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat once daily over 72 h following drug intake cessation in plasma, saliva and urine.

Methods

Healthy volunteers received a fixed-dose combination of 300/150 mg of atazanavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days, followed by a 10 day washout period and then a fixed-dose combination of 800/150 mg of darunavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days. Full PK profiles were assessed for each phase for 72 h following day 10 and parameters determined to the last measurable concentration in plasma, saliva and urine by non-compartmental methods.

Results

Sixteen subjects completed the study. Geometric mean (GM) terminal elimination half-life values to 72 h of atazanavir and darunavir were 6.77 and 6.35 h, respectively. All subjects had atazanavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 150 ng/mL 24 h post-dose and 14/16 subjects had concentrations higher than this target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 759 and 407 ng/mL, respectively). Thirteen out of 16 subjects had darunavir concentrations higher than the target of 550 ng/mL at 24 h post-dose and 5/16 subjects had concentrations higher than the target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 1033 and 382 ng/mL, respectively). Cobicistat half-life to 72 h was 4.21 h with atazanavir and 3.62 h with darunavir. GM values 24 h after the observed dose ( C 24 ) for atazanavir and darunavir were 141 and 43 ng/mL, respectively, in saliva and 24857 and 11878 ng/mL, respectively, in urine. Concentration decay in saliva/urine mirrored plasma concentrations for both drugs.

Conclusions

Different concentration decay patterns were seen for atazanavir and darunavir, which may be partially explained by cobicistat half-life (longer with atazanavir than darunavir). For the first time, we also measured drug PK forgiveness in saliva and urine, which represent easier markers of adherence.

Critical Review: What Dose of Rifabutin Is Recommended With Antiretroviral Therapy?

Since the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy to successfully treat HIV infection, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have become a significant problem as many antiretrovirals (ARVs) are metabolized in the liver. Antituberculous therapy traditionally includes rifamycins, particularly rifampicin. Rifabutin (RBT) has shown similar efficacy as rifampicin but induces CYP3A4 to a lesser degree and is less likely to have DDIs with ARVs. We identified 14 DDI pharmacokinetic studies on HIV monoinfected and HIV-tuberculosis coinfected individuals, and the remaining studies were healthy volunteer studies. Although RBT may be coadministered with most nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, identifying the optimal dose with ritonavir-boosted or cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors is challenging because of concern about adverse effects with increased RBT exposure. Limited healthy volunteer studies on other ARV drug classes and RBT suggest that dose modification may be unnecessary. The paucity of data assessing clinical tuberculosis endpoints concurrently with RBT and ARV pharmacokinetics limits evidence-based recommendations on the optimal dose of RBT within available ARV drug classes.

How to win the HIV-1 drug resistance hurdle race: running faster or jumping higher?

Infections by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the causative agent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), are still totaling an appalling 36.7 millions worldwide, with 1.1 million AIDS deaths/year and a similar number of yearly new infections. All this, in spite of the discovery of HIV-1 as the AIDS etiological agent more than 30 years ago and the introduction of an effective combinatorial antiretroviral therapy (cART), able to control disease progression, more than 20 years ago. Although very effective, current cART is plagued by the emergence of drug-resistant viral variants and most of the efforts in the development of novel direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) against HIV-1 have been devoted toward the fighting of resistance. In this review, rather than providing a detailed listing of all the drugs and the corresponding resistance mutations, we aim, through relevant examples, at presenting to the general reader the conceptual shift in the approaches that are being taken to overcome the viral resistance hurdle. From the classic 'running faster' strategy, based on the development of novel DAAs active against the mutant viruses selected by the previous drugs and/or presenting to the virus a high genetic barrier toward the development of resilience, to a 'jumping higher' approach, which looks at the cell, rather than the virus, as a source of valuable drug targets, in order to make the cellular environment non-permissive toward the replication of both wild-type and mutated viruses.

Drug Monitoring and Viral Response to Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Saquinavir/Ritonavir Containing Regimens in Individuals Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type1

The aim of this study was to correlate results of therapeutic drug monitoring, genotypic resistance and viral response to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r) containing antiretroviral regimens. The retrospective short-term study included 20 patients with LPV/r and 20 patients with SQV/r containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). At baseline 7 LPV/r patients and 10 SQV/r patients had CD4+T cell counts above 410 cells/μl. After 6 months CD4+T cells had doubled in 5 LPV/r and 2 SQV/r patients. In LPV/r patients the mean serum concentration of lopinavir (LPV) was 2.6 ppm and 67% of all LPV/r samples had 50 or fewer viral copies/ml. In SQV/r patients the mean serum concentration of saquinavir (SQV) was 2.1 ppm. 79% of all SQV/r samples had 50 or fewer viruses/ml. Pharmacoenhanced regimens efficiently suppress human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and the risk of developing resistance mutations is therefore reduced. The implementation of drug monitoring is an additional tool to determine optimal treatment conditions.

Altered Oligodendrocyte Maturation and Myelin Maintenance: The Role of Antiretrovirals in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders

Despite effective viral suppression through combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), approximately half of HIV-positive individuals have HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Studies of antiretroviral-treated patients have revealed persistent white matter abnormalities including diffuse myelin pallor, diminished white matter tracts, and decreased myelin protein mRNAs. Loss of myelin can contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction because the myelin membrane generated by oligodendrocytes is essential for rapid signal transduction and axonal maintenance. We hypothesized that myelin changes in HAND are partly due to effects of antiretroviral drugs on oligodendrocyte survival and/or maturation. We showed that primary mouse oligodendrocyte precursor cell cultures treated with therapeutic concentrations of HIV protease inhibitors ritonavir or lopinavir displayed dose-dependent decreases in oligodendrocyte maturation; however, this effect was rapidly reversed after drug removal. Conversely, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor zidovudine had no effect. Furthermore, in vivo ritonavir administration to adult mice reduced frontal cortex myelin protein levels. Finally, prefrontal cortex tissue from HIV-positive individuals with HAND on cART showed a significant decrease in myelin basic protein compared with untreated HIV-positive individuals with HAND or HIV-negative controls. These findings demonstrate that antiretrovirals can impact myelin integrity and have implications for myelination in juvenile HIV patients and myelin maintenance in adults on lifelong therapy.

Design of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors with Amino-bis-tetrahydrofuran Derivatives as P2-Ligands to Enhance Backbone-Binding Interactions: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and Protein-Ligand X-ray Studies

Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a series of very potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors are described. In an effort to improve backbone ligand-binding site interactions, we have incorporated basic-amines at the C4 position of the bis-tetrahydrofuran (bis-THF) ring. We speculated that these substituents would make hydrogen bonding interactions in the flap region of HIV-1 protease. Synthesis of these inhibitors was performed diastereoselectively. A number of inhibitors displayed very potent enzyme inhibitory and antiviral activity. Inhibitors 25f, 25i, and 25j were evaluated against a number of highly-PI-resistant HIV-1 strains, and they exhibited improved antiviral activity over darunavir. Two high resolution X-ray structures of 25f- and 25g-bound HIV-1 protease revealed unique hydrogen bonding interactions with the backbone carbonyl group of Gly48 as well as with the backbone NH of Gly48 in the flap region of the enzyme active site. These ligand-binding site interactions are possibly responsible for their potent activity.

Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor based therapy: a new strategy in chronic hepatitis C therapy

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a worldwide health issue. All oral therapies are quickly replacing peg-interferon-based treatment regimens. Developing effective, well tolerated, treatments accessible for difficult to treat populations remains an unmet need. Ritonavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, has pharmacokinetic properties that enhance the activity of concomitantly administered direct acting antivirals against HCV. Ritonavir inhibits Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4, diminishing first pass effect and hepatic metabolism, changing the pharmacokinetic parameters of Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 substrates. When combined with the HCV protease inhibitor paritaprevir, ritonavir increases mean area under the curve, allowing once daily dosing. While Phase II and III clinical trials with ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir demonstrated high efficacy in those with HCV infection, drug-drug interactions warrant cautious use of ritonavir in specific patient populations. Consideration of the patients' full medication list is imperative due to the ubiquitous nature of the Cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4 system.

Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Different Dose Combinations of Coadministered Tipranavir and Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers

PURPOSE

To characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetic combination of the nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir (TPV) with ritonavir (RTV) in 95 healthy adult volunteers, a phase 1, single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial was conducted.

METHOD

Participants received 250-mg self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) capsules of TPV at doses between 250 mg and 1250 mg twice daily for 11 days, then received one or two RTV 100-mg SEDDS capsules, in addition to the TPV capsules, for the next 21 days.

RESULTS

Coadministration of TPV and RTV (TPV/r) resulted in a greater than 20-fold increase in steady-state TPV trough concentrations (Cssmin) as compared with TPV at steady state alone. Mean TPV Cssmin was above a preliminary target threshold of 20 microM with all but one of the RTV-boosted doses; without boosting, none of the TPV-alone doses exceeded the threshold. The average steady-state Cssmin for TPV 500 mg and 750 mg with RTV 100 mg or 200 mg were 20 to 57 times the protein-adjusted TPV IC90R49\CCR418569) for protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1. An erythromycin breath test, a surrogate marker for cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 activity, indicated that all TPV/r combinations given provided net inhibition of this isoenzyme. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were mild gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This phase 1 study demonstrated that RTV-boosted TPV achieves concentrations that are expected to be effective in treating drug-experienced patients.

Salvage Therapy with Ritonavir-Boosted Amprenavir/Fosamprenavir: Virological and Immunological Response in Two Years Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of salvage regimens containing ritonavir-boosted amprenavir (APV/r) or fosamprenavir (FPV/r) in heavily pretreated protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced HIV-1 patients.

METHOD

Evaluation of APV/r- or FPV/r-containing antiretroviral regimens in PI-experienced HIV-1 patients with 2 or more antiretroviral failures. Follow-up continued to 96 weeks with prospective collection of data.

RESULTS

54 episodes (48 on APV/r and 6 on FPV/r) were considered in 45 patients who had received a median of 5 prior antiretroviral regimens (range, 2-13) including a median of 3 PIs (range, 2-4). Median time of treatment at analysis was 72 weeks (range, 12-210). At baseline, plasma viral load (pVL) and CD4 cell count was 67,000 copies/mL and 167 cell/mm(3), respectively. At week 96, the median pVL was < 50 copies/mL and CD4 cell count was 519 cells/mm(3). Proportion of patients with pVL below detection was 62% at week 48 and 61% at week 96. Fifteen patients stopped treatment because of virologic failure; one presented a full resistance profile to APV/r, based on the ANRS 2003 resistance algorithm. Median trough APV plasma concentration 4 weeks after treatment initiation was 1406 ng/mL (range, 452-4321); dose adaptation was required in only 7 patients.

CONCLUSION

This study provides long-term follow-up of APV/r and FPV/r in the setting of salvage therapy, showing a high and sustained rate of virologic and immunologic response.

In vitro and in vivo antiviral activity and resistance profile of the hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitor ABT-450

The development of direct-acting antiviral agents is a promising therapeutic advance in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, rapid emergence of drug resistance can limit efficacy and lead to cross-resistance among members of the same drug class. ABT-450 is an efficacious inhibitor of HCV NS3/4A protease, with 50% effective concentration values of 1.0, 0.21, 5.3, 19, 0.09, and 0.69 nM against stable HCV replicons with NS3 protease from genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, and 6a, respectively. In vitro, the most common amino acid variants selected by ABT-450 in genotype 1 were located in NS3 at positions 155, 156, and 168, with the D168Y variant conferring the highest level of resistance to ABT-450 in both genotype 1a and 1b replicons (219- and 337-fold, respectively). In a 3-day monotherapy study with HCV genotype 1-infected patients, ABT-450 was coadministered with ritonavir, a cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor shown previously to markedly increase peak, trough, and overall drug exposures of ABT-450. A mean maximum HCV RNA decline of 4.02 log10 was observed at the end of the 3-day dosing period across all doses. The most common variants selected in these patients were R155K and D168V in genotype 1a and D168V in genotype 1b. However, selection of resistant variants was significantly reduced at the highest ABT-450 dose compared to lower doses. These findings were informative for the subsequent evaluation of ABT-450 in combination with additional drug classes in clinical trials in HCV-infected patients. (Study M11-602 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01074008.).

Characterization of ritonavir-mediated inactivation of cytochrome P450 3A4

Ritonavir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor and an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, the major human hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme. Given the potent inhibition of CYP3A4 by ritonavir, subtherapeutic doses of ritonavir are used to increase plasma concentrations of other HIV drugs oxidized by CYP3A4, thereby extending their clinical efficacy. However, the mechanism of inhibition of CYP3A4 by ritonavir remains unclear. To date, data suggests multiple types of inhibition by ritonavir, including mechanism-based inactivation by metabolic-intermediate complex formation, competitive inhibition, irreversible type II coordination to the heme iron, and more recently heme destruction. The results presented here demonstrate that inhibition of CYP3A4 by ritonavir occurs by CYP3A4-mediated activation and subsequent formation of a covalent bond to the apoprotein. Incubations of [(3)H]ritonavir with reconstituted CYP3A4 and human liver microsomes resulted in a covalent binding stoichiometry equal to 0.93 ± 0.04 moles of ritonavir bound per mole of inactivated CYP3A4. The metabolism of [(3)H]ritonavir by CYP3A4 leads to the formation of a covalent adduct specifically to CYP3A4, confirmed by radiometric liquid chromatography-trace and whole-protein mass spectrometry. Tryptic digestion of the CYP3A4-[(3)H]ritonavir incubations exhibited an adducted peptide (255-RM K: ESRLEDTQKHR-268) associated with a radiochromatic peak and a mass consistent with ritonavir plus 16 Da, in agreement with the whole-protein mass spectrometry. Additionally, nucleophilic trapping agents and scavengers of free oxygen species did not prevent inactivation of CYP3A4 by ritonavir. In conclusion, ritonavir exhibited potent time-dependent inactivation of CYP3A, with the mechanism of inactivation occurring though a covalent bond to Lys257 of the CYP3A4 apoprotein.

Recent patents and emerging therapeutics for HIV infections: a focus on protease inhibitors

The inclusion of protease inhibitors (PIs) in highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved clinical outcomes in HIV-1-infected patients. To date, PIs are considered to be the most important therapeutic agents for the treatment of HIV infections. Despite high anti-HIV-1 potency, poor oral bioavailability of PIs has been a major concern. For achieving therapeutic concentrations, large doses of PIs are administered, which results in unacceptable systemic toxicities. Such severe and long-term toxicities necessitate the development of safer and potentially promising PIs. Recently, considerable attention has been paid to the development of newer compounds capable of inhibiting wild-type and resistant HIV-1 protease. Some of these PIs have displayed potent HIV-1 protease inhibitory activity. In this review, we have made an attempt to provide an overview on clinically approved and newly developing PIs, and related recent patents in the development of novel PIs.

Early lipid changes with atazanavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir

OBJECTIVES

Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir and darunavir are protease inhibitors that are recommended for initial treatment of HIV infection because each has shown better lipid effects and overall tolerability than ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. The extent to which lipid effects and overall tolerability differ between treatments with atazanavir and darunavir and whether atazanavir-induced hyperbilirubinaemia may result in more favourable metabolic effects are issues that remain to be resolved.

METHODS

A 96-week randomized clinical trial was carried out. The primary endpoint was change in total cholesterol at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were changes in lipids other than total cholesterol, insulin sensitivity, total bilirubin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and CD4 and CD8 cell counts, and the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and study drug discontinuation because of adverse effects at 24 weeks. Analyses were intent-to-treat.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-eight patients received once-daily treatment with either atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 90) or darunavir/ritonavir (n = 88) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine. At 24 weeks, mean total cholesterol had increased by 7.26 and 11.47 mg/dL in the atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir arms, respectively [estimated difference -4.21 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.11 to +3.69 mg/dL; P = 0.75]. However, the ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol tended to show a greater decrease with atazanavir/ritonavir compared with darunavir/ritonavir (estimated difference -1.02; 95% CI -2.35 to +0.13; P = 0.07). Total bilirubin significantly increased with atazanavir/ritonavir (estimated difference +1.87 mg/dL; 95% CI +1.58 to +2.16 mg/dL; P < 0.01), but bilirubin changes were not associated with lipid changes. Secondary endpoints other than total bilirubin were not significantly different between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine did not show significant differences in total cholesterol change or overall tolerability at 24 weeks. However, there was a trend towards a lower total to HDL cholesterol ratio with atazanavir/ritonavir and this effect was unrelated to bilirubin.

Structure-activity relationships of diamine inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A as novel pharmacoenhancers. Part II: P2/P3 region and discovery of cobicistat (GS-9350)

The HIV protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir (RTV) has been widely used as a pharmacoenhancer for other PIs, which are substrates of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). However the potent anti-HIV activity of ritonavir may limit its use as a pharmacoenhancer with other classes of anti-HIV agents. Ritonavir is also associated with limitations such as poor physicochemical properties. To address these issues a series of compounds with replacements at the P2 and/or P3 region was designed and evaluated as novel CYP3A inhibitors. Through these efforts, a potent and selective inhibitor of CYP3A, GS-9350 (cobicistat) with improved physiochemical properties was discovered.

Structure-activity relationships of diamine inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A as novel pharmacoenhancers, part I: core region

Ritonavir (RTV), an HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI), is also a potent mechanism-based inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and has been widely prescribed as a pharmacoenhancer. As a boosting agent for marketed PIs, it reduces pill burden, and improves compliance. Removal of the hydroxyl group from RTV reduces, but does not eliminate HIV PI activity and does not affect CYP3A inhibition. Herein we report the discovery of a novel series of CYP3A inhibitors that are devoid of antiviral activity. The synthesis and evaluation of analogs with extensive modifications of the 1,4-diamine core along with the structure activity relationships with respect to anti-HIV activity, CYP3A inhibitory activity, selectivity against other CYP enzymes and the human pregnane X receptor (PXR) will be discussed.

Pharmacological management of cardiovascular conditions and diabetes in older adults with HIV infection

This review looks at the evidence for potential and theoretical risks of combining antiretroviral treatment with drugs prescribed for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These conditions are common in the HIV-infected population as a result of ageing and the increased risk associated with both HIV infection and antiretroviral intake.

Abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine in virologically suppressed patients switching from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to raltegravir

There are few clinical data on the combination abacavir/lamivudine plus raltegravir. We compared the outcomes of patients from the SPIRAL trial receiving either abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine at baseline who had taken at least one dose of either raltegravir or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. For the purpose of this analysis, treatment failure was defined as virological failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/ml) or discontinuation of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine because of adverse events, consent withdrawal, or lost to follow-up. There were 143 (72.59%) patients with tenofovir/emtricitabine and 54 (27.41%) with abacavir/lamivudine. In the raltegravir group, there were three (11.11%) treatment failures with abacavir/lamivudine and eight (10.96%) with tenofovir/emtricitabine (estimated difference 0.15%; 95% CI -17.90 to 11.6). In the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor group, there were four (14.81%) treatment failures with abacavir/lamivudine and 12 (17.14%) with tenofovir/emtricitabine (estimated difference -2.33%; 95% CI -16.10 to 16.70). Triglycerides decreased and HDL cholesterol increased through the study more pronouncedly with abacavir/lamivudine than with tenofovir/emtricitabine and differences in the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio between both combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tended to be higher in the raltegravir group, although differences at 48 weeks were not significant. While no patient discontinued abacavir/lamivudine due to adverse events, four (2.80%) patients (all in the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor group) discontinued tenofovir/emtricitabine because of adverse events (p=0.2744). The results of this analysis do not suggest that outcomes of abacavir/lamivudine are worse than those of tenofovir/emtricitabine when combined with raltegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults.

Impact of low-dose ritonavir on danoprevir pharmacokinetics: results of computer-based simulations and a clinical drug-drug interaction study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Danoprevir, a potent, selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Clinical studies in HCV patients have shown a potential need for a high danoprevir daily dose and/or dosing frequency. Ritonavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) and potent CYP3A inhibitor, is used as a pharmacokinetic enhancer at subtherapeutic doses in combination with other HIV PIs. Coadministering danoprevir with ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer could allow reduced danoprevir doses and/or dosing frequency. Here we evaluate the impact of ritonavir on danoprevir pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

The effects of low-dose ritonavir on danoprevir pharmacokinetics were simulated using Simcyp, a population-based simulator. Following results from this drug-drug interaction (DDI) model, a crossover study was performed in healthy volunteers to investigate the effects of acute and repeat dosing of low-dose ritonavir on danoprevir single-dose pharmacokinetics. Volunteers received a single oral dose of danoprevir 100 mg in a fixed sequence as follows: alone, and on the first day and the last day of 10-day dosing with ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours.

RESULTS

The initial DDI model predicted that following multiple dosing of ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 10 days, the danoprevir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours and maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) would increase by about 3.9- and 3.2-fold, respectively. The clinical results at day 10 of ritonavir dosing showed that the plasma drug concentration at 12 hours postdose, AUC from time zero to infinity and C(max) of danoprevir increased by approximately 42-fold, 5.5-fold and 3.2-fold, respectively, compared with danoprevir alone. The DDI model was refined with the clinical data and sensitivity analyses were performed to better understand factors impacting the ritonavir-danoprevir interaction.

CONCLUSION

DDI model simulations predicted that danoprevir exposures could be successfully enhanced with ritonavir coadministration, and that a clinical study confirming this result was warranted. The clinical results demonstrate that low-dose ritonavir enhances the pharmacokinetic profile of low-dose danoprevir such that overall danoprevir exposures can be reduced while sustaining danoprevir trough concentrations.

Characterization of HIV-1 from patients with virological failure to a boosted protease inhibitor regimen

The use of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) regimens with unboosted protease inhibitors (PIs) has resulted in a high level of virological failure primarily due to the development of resistant virus. Current boosted PI regimens combine successfully low-dose ritonavir (r) with a second PI. The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of patients, in a population based setting, who develop virological failure on a PI/r regimen. Through The Danish HIV Cohort Study 1,007 patients who received PI/r based treatment between 1995 and 2008 were identified. Twenty-three (2.3%) experienced virological failure, of whom 19 (83%) started PI/r treatment before 2001. Patients from Copenhagen (n=19) were selected to study the development of protease (PR) and gag cleavage site (CS) mutations during PI/r treatment and PI plasma levels at the time of virological failure. Three patients (16%) developed major PI resistance mutations. Mutations in the p7/p1 and p1/p6 gag CS only developed in patients with major or minor mutations in PR. Drug concentrations were low or undetectable in 10 out of the 19 patients. In total PR resistance mutations and low drug levels could account for 12 (63%) of the failure cases. In conclusion, virological failure to PI/r is a low and decreasing problem primarily caused by low plasma drug levels and to a lesser extent major PR mutations. Gag CS mutations did not contribute significantly to resistance development and virological failure.

[Evidence-based therapeutic drug monitoring of lopinavir]

The HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir presents a wide inter-individual variability related to liver and intestinal metabolism involving CYP3A. Published studies were analyzed to establish whether there is evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring of lopinavir could improve patient care. In naïve or pretreated HIV-infected patients, no relationship could be evidenced between virological efficacy and trough lopinavir concentration, most likely because concentrations are above inhibitory concentrations. Although data are limited, patients with elevated triglycerides and cholesterol had trough lopinavir concentrations >8 000 ng/mL. These data suggest that the level of evidence of interest of lopinavir therapeutic drug monitoring is may be recommended in some situations such as children, pregnant women, pretreated patients if the number of mutations is <5, when coadministration with drug with metabolizing enzyme inducing properties is warranted and toxicity.

Steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions of darunavir/ritonavir with lipid-lowering agent rosuvastatin

HIV-1 protease inhibitors often cause dyslipidemia, necessitating the use of lipid-lowering agents such as rosuvastatin. However, when given concomitantly, these therapeutic agents often exhibit adverse drug interactions. In this study (phase I open-label trial, n = 12 HIV-1 seronegative participants), the authors assessed the drug interactions between darunavir/ritonavir given in combination with rosuvastatin. Participants were randomized to receive rosuvastatin (10 mg/day) or darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg twice daily) alone for 7 days in a crossover design followed by combination therapy for 7 days with intervening 7-day washout periods. Intensive blood sampling for pharmacokinetics and fasting lipids was performed on days 7, 21, and 35. The geometric mean AUC(0-24 h) of rosuvastatin increased from 109 to 161 ng·h/mL (P < .005) and C(max) increased 6.7 to 16.3 ng/mL (P < .001) when coadministered with darunavir/ritonavir. In the presence of darunavir/ritonavir and rosuvastatin, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased by 10% (P = .007) and 56% (P = .011), whereas the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased by 13% (P = .006) relative to rosuvastatin administration alone. There were no significant adverse events attributable to the coadministration of these drugs. Rosuvastatin levels increase in the presence of darunavir/ritonavir coadministration, whereas the lipid-lowering benefits are blunted. The clinical significance of these changes requires further investigation.

Pharmacokinetics of once-daily darunavir-ritonavir and atazanavir-ritonavir over 72 hours following drug cessation

The object of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir-ritonavir and atazanavir-ritonavir once-daily dosing over 72 h (h) following drug intake cessation. Volunteers received darunavir-ritonavir at 800 and 100 mg, respectively, once daily for 10 days, followed by a 7-day washout period, and atazanavir-ritonavir at 300 and 100 mg, respectively, once daily for 10 days. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed for each phase for the 72 h following day 10. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined over 24 h and to the last measurable concentration by noncompartmental methods. Seventeen subjects completed the study. The geometric mean (GM) terminal elimination half-life to 72 h of darunavir was 6.48 h, which was lower than the 0- to 24-h half-life (10.70 h). The terminal elimination half-life of atazanavir was 6.74 h, which was lower than the 0- to 24-h half-life (13.72 h). All subjects but one had darunavir concentrations higher than the target of 550 ng/ml for protease-resistant HIV isolates (equivalent to 10 times the protein-binding-corrected 50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)] for wild-type virus) at 24 h postdose, and 14 out of 17 had concentrations higher than the target at 30 h postdose (GM of 1,088 and 851 ng/ml). All subjects had atazanavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 150 ng/ml (equivalent to 10 times the protein-binding-corrected IC(50) for wild-type virus) at 24 and 30 h postdose (GM of 693 and 392 ng/ml). Two of 17 and 5 of 17 subjects were above target at 48 h postdose while on darunavir-ritonavir and atazanavir-ritonavir. Ritonavir half-life to 72 h was 6.84 h with darunavir and 6.07 with atazanavir. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic forgiveness of two boosted protease inhibitors. Although the rates of decline of darunavir and atazanavir slightly increased as ritonavir concentrations declined, most individuals had concentrations 6 h after the end of the ideal dosing interval of 24 h which were above the cutoff used to define therapeutic concentrations.

Influence of drug transport proteins on the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of HIV protease inhibitors

Protease inhibitors, a class of antiretroviral agents frequently used in the treatment of HIV infection, interact with numerous transport proteins resulting in clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This review focuses on the proteins that transport protease inhibitors and directly influence the pharmacokinetics of these drugs, as well as the transport proteins that are inhibited or induced by protease inhibitors. Clinically relevant DDIs involving drug transporters and protease inhibitors, either as "victim" drugs or as "perpetrator" drugs, and the pharmacokinetic consequences of such interactions are highlighted. A summary of transporter-mediated processes underlying the toxicity of protease inhibitors is provided. Finally, the effect of HIV infection or co-infection on drug transport proteins, and the implications for protease inhibitor pharmacokinetics is discussed. Transport proteins significantly influence the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity profiles of this important class of drugs.

Drug-drug interactions in the treatment of HIV infection: focus on pharmacokinetic enhancement through CYP3A inhibition

The aim of this review is to discuss the effect of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the antiretroviral treatment of HIV infection. In particular, but not exclusively, DDIs due to the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor ritonavir, which is used to increase antiretroviral drug exposure - a technique known as pharmacokinetic enhancement or 'ritonavir boosting'- will be reviewed. The emphasis here will be on the treatment of important co-morbidities common in patients with HIV, including dyslipidaemia, hypertension, tuberculosis and opiate dependence, as well as on the potentially life-threatening interaction between ritonavir and inhalational steroids, and on the effect of acid-reducing agents on some antiretroviral drugs. Finally, further developments with regard to the use of CYP3A-blocking agents to augment the efficacy of antiviral therapy will be discussed.

Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: the SPIRAL study

BACKGROUND

Switching to raltegravir in selected patients treated with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may result in similar efficacy and lower plasma lipids.

METHODS

SPIRAL is a 48-week multicentre, open-label trial in which HIV-infected adults with less than 50 copies/ml of plasma HIV RNA for at least the previous 6 months on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy were randomized (1: 1) to switch from the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir or to continue on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of treatment failure (noncompleter = failure) at 48 weeks. SPIRAL study was powered to show noninferior efficacy of raltegravir-based therapy with a margin of -12.5%.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-three patients assigned to switch to raltegravir (n = 139) or to continue ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (n = 134) were included in the efficacy analysis. At 48 weeks, 89.2% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 86.6% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of treatment failure [difference 2.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.2 to 10.6]. A total of 96.9% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 95.1% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of virological failure (difference 1.8%; 95% CI -3.5 to 7.5). Switching to raltegravir was associated with significant decreases in plasma lipids and total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio relative to continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. Severe adverse events and study drug discontinuations due to any adverse event occurred in 4 and 2% of the patients in each group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with sustained virological suppression on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy, switching from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir demonstrated noninferior efficacy and resulted in a better lipid profile at 48 weeks than continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.

Regulatory issues in developing new HIV protease inhibitors: risks and benefits

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a regulatory perspective on developing new HIV protease inhibitors. The present review highlights the risks and benefits of certain design aspects for studies in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, including timing of studies, study design options, choice of control arms, and duration of treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present review highlights published studies to illustrate the need for new therapies and highlights potential historical data to help design future HIV clinical trials better.

SUMMARY

New antiretroviral agents for patients with multidrug resistance, including safer, more convenient therapies without significant drug-drug interactions, are still needed for all patients. The goals of therapy have evolved and the expectation for treatment regimens is that the majority of patients, including treatment-experienced patients, will achieve undetectable HIV RNA. New study designs, particularly for treatment-experienced patients, are needed to help identify potential risks and benefits of new treatments.

Current and Novel Inhibitors of HIV Protease

The design, development and clinical success of HIV protease inhibitors represent one of the most remarkable achievements of molecular medicine. This review describes all nine currently available FDA-approved protease inhibitors, discusses their pharmacokinetic properties, off-target activities, side-effects, and resistance profiles. The compounds in the various stages of clinical development are also introduced, as well as alternative approaches, aiming at other functional domains of HIV PR. The potential of these novel compounds to open new way to the rational drug design of human viruses is critically assessed.