Apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in renal failure: the relation to mode of dialysis

Association of Ratio of Apolipoprotein B to Apolipoprotein A1 With Survival in Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

Although the ratio of apolipoprotein B (apo B) to apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1) (apo B/apo A1) seems to be associated with mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients, the association of apo B/apo A1 ratio with death remains not clear in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Aims

The study targets to examine the relationship of apo B/apo A1 ratio with survival in patients receiving PD treatment.

Methods

In this single-center prospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 1,616 patients receiving PD treatment with a median follow-up time of 47.6 months. We used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship between apo B/apo A1 ratio and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality. The association of apo B/apo A1 ratio with atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic CV mortality was further evaluated by competing risk regression models.

Results

During the follow-up, 508 (31.4%) patients died, 249 (49.0%) died from CV events, of which 149 (59.8%) were atherosclerotic CV mortality. In multivariable models, for 1-SD increase in apo B/apo A1 ratio level, the adjusted hazard ratios for CV and all-cause mortality were 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–1.47; P = 0.005] and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.07–1.35; P = 0.003), respectively. The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios for atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic CV mortality were 1.43 (95% CI, 1.19–1.73; P < 0.001) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.64–1.13; P = 0.256), respectively. For quartile analysis, patients in quartile 4 had higher CV, all-cause, and atherosclerotic CV mortality compared with those in quartile 1. Moreover, apo B/apo A1 ratio had a diabetes-related difference in CV, all-cause, and atherosclerotic CV mortality.

Conclusion

Elevated apo B/apo A1 ratio level was significantly associated with CV, all-cause, and atherosclerotic CV mortality in patients undergoing PD. Moreover, the association was especially statistically significant in patients with diabetes.

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality among peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and mortality in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of non-HDL-C with cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality in PD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study. A total of 1,616 incident PD patients from a single PD center in South China were followed for a median of 47.6 months. The independent association of non-HDL-C with CV and all-cause mortality was evaluated by a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 508 (31.4%) patients died, of which 249 (49.0%) were due to CV events. Atherosclerotic CV mortality accounted for 59.8% of CV mortality. In multivariable models, for 1-SD increase in non-HDL-C level, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CV and all-cause mortality were 1.52  [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-1.75; P < 0.001)] and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.12-1.39; P < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, non-HDL-C was positively associated with atherosclerotic CV mortality (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.52; P = 0.004) but not associated with nonatherosclerotic CV mortality (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.59-1.05; P = 0.108). The quartile analyses showed a similar pattern to the continuous variable analyses of non-HDL-C levels for CV and all-cause mortality but did not demonstrate statistical significance for atherosclerotic or nonatherosclerotic CV mortality.

CONCLUSION

An elevated non-HDL-C level was independently associated with an increased risk of CV mortality, especially atherosclerotic CV mortality, and all-cause mortality in incident PD patients.

Alterations in Lipoprotein Composition in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

♦ Objective

Dyslipidemia is common among patients with end-stage renal disease, whether treated by hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). To better understand the specific lipoprotein abnormalities in PD patients, we measured the lipid and apolipoprotein (Apo) composition of the four major classes of plasma lipoproteins in PD patients, HD patients, and healthy control subjects: very low density (VLDL), intermediate density (IDL), low density (LDL), and high density lipoproteins (HDL).

♦ Design

Fasting plasma samples were obtained from 15 nondiabetic PD patients, 15 nondiabetic HD patients, and 16 healthy control subjects, all from a cross section of patients and subjects in the region of Göteborg, Sweden. Lipoproteins were isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation, and lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured by gas chromatography and electroimmunoassay, respectively.

♦ Results

Alterations in lipoprotein composition were apparent in all four lipoprotein density classes from PD and HD patients. VLDL contained a significantly higher concentration of ApoCIII in both HD and PD patients, and an elevation of free cholesterol, triglyceride, ApoB, ApoCII, and ApoE in PD patients. IDL from both PD and HD patients contained an excess of free and esterified cholesterol and triglyceride and significantly elevated levels of ApoB, ApoCII, ApoCIII, and ApoE. LDL had a higher concentration of ApoB in PD patients and elevated triglyceride and ApoCIII in both PD and HD patients. HDL isolated from PD patients had lower free cholesterol and ApoAI levels compared to control subjects, but these were not significantly different from HD patients.

♦ Conclusions

An increase in lipid and apolipoprotein mass in IDL, and an enrichment of ApoCIII in VLDL, IDL, and LDL were observed in both HD and PD patients. The predominant alteration in lipoprotein composition distinguishing PD patients from HD patients was an elevation of ApoB in LDL. Further study of these alterations in lipoprotein composition in PD patients will be helpful in understanding the underlying causes of dyslipidemia and, ultimately, to the selection of hypolipidemic drugs or other treatments to reduce the cardiovascular risks associated with dyslipidemia in these patients.

Dyslipidemia in Peritoneal Dialysis — Relation to Dialytic Variables

Objective

To investigate whether the specific lipoprotein (LP) abnormalities of peritoneal dialysis (PD) are associated with functional variables of this mode of dialysis.

Design

A survey of the LP profile in relation to peritoneal dialysis capacity (PDC) variables. The LP profile was compared to that of a group of age- and sex-matched controls.

Setting

The Peritoneal Dialysis Unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Patients

Twenty-two nondiabetic PD patients (5 women, 17 men) who had been on PD for at least 6 months.

Main Outcome Measures

The LP profile included plasma lipids, apolipoproteins (Apo), and individual ApoA- and ApoB-containing LP. The PDC measurement determined peritoneal glucose uptake, protein losses, effective peritoneal surface area, and total weekly creatinine clearance.

Results

The patients had been on PD for 6 to 48 months (mean 15.3 months) and had a total weekly creatinine clearance of 69.7 ± 13.3 L/1.73m2body surface area, an average peritoneal glucose uptake corresponding to 446 ± 162 kcal/24 hour, and a protein loss of 8.1 ± 2.5 g/24 hr. The patients had significantly higher total cholesterol (7.1 mmol/L), VLDL-cholesterol (1.0 mmol/L), LDL-cholesterol (4.7 mmol/L), and triglyceride levels (2.5 mmol/L); whereas the HDL-cholesterol level (1.2 mmol/L) was significantly lower than in controls. The PD patients had increased levels of ApoB-containing LPs, both of the cholesterol-rich LP-B and of the triglyceride-rich LP-B complex, reflected in higher plasma concentrations of ApoB, ApoC-III, and ApoE. Furthermore, they had significantly lower levels of LP-A-I:A-II, as well as of ApoA-I and ApoA-II. The LP-A-I:A-II and ApoA-II levels correlated inversely with the duration of PD treatment ( r = 0.54, p < 0.01 and r = 0.52, p < 0.05, respectively). The ApoA-II level was inversely correlated with the peritoneal surface area ( r = 0.53, p < 0.05). There were no other correlations between LP variables and PDC variables, nor did any of the LP variables correlate with peritoneal glucose uptake or protein losses.

Conclusion

The proatherogenic lipoprotein profile of patients on PD is characterized by increased concentrations of cholesterol-rich and triglyceride-rich ApoB-containing LPs. While the duration of treatment appears to have some influence on the development of this type of dyslipidemia, the pathophysiological links to the dialysis mode must be further explored.

Statins for Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Dyslipidemia is a potent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in the general population. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or low high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) are well-established CV risk factors, but more precise determinants of risk include increased apoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], intermediate and very low-density lipoprotein (IDL-C, VLDL-C; “remnant particles”), and small dense LDL particles. Lipoprotein metabolism is altered in association with declining glomerular filtration rate such that patients with non dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) have lower levels of HDL-C, higher triglyceride, ApoB, remnant IDL-C, remnant VLDL-C, and Lp(a), and a greater proportion of oxidized LDL-C. Similar abnormalities are prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients, who often manifest proatherogenic changes in LDL-C in the absence of increased levels. Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) have a similar but more severe dyslipidemia compared to HD patients due to stimulation of hepatic lipoprotein synthesis by glucose absorption from dialysate, increased insulin levels, and selective protein loss in the dialysate analogous to the nephrotic syndrome. In the dialysis-dependent CKD population, total cholesterol is directly associated with increased mortality after controlling for the presence of malnutrition–inflammation.

Treatment with statins reduces CV mortality in the general population by approximately one third, irrespective of baseline LDL-C or prior CV events. Statins have similar, if not greater, efficacy in altering the lipid profile in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (HD and PD) compared to those with normal renal function, and are well tolerated in CKD patients at moderate doses (≤ 20 mg/day atorvastatin or simvastatin). Statins reduce C-reactive protein as well as lipid moieties such as ApoB, remnants IDL and VLDL-C, and oxidized and small dense LDL-C fraction. Large observational studies demonstrate that statin treatment is independently associated with a 30% – 50% mortality reduction in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD (similar between HD- and PD-treated patients). One recent randomized controlled trial evaluated the ability of statin treatment to reduce mortality in type II diabetics treated with HD (“4D”); the primary end point of death from cardiac cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke was not significantly reduced. However, results of this trial may not apply to other end-stage renal disease populations. Two ongoing randomized controlled trials (SHARP and AURORA) are underway evaluating the effect of statins on CV events and death in patients with CKD (including patients treated with HD and PD). Recruitment to future trials should be given a high priority by nephrologists and, until more data are available, consideration should be given to following published guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemia in CKD. Additional consideration could be given to treating all dialysis patients felt to be at risk of CV disease (irrespective of cholesterol level), given the safety and potential efficacy of statins. This is especially relevant in patients treated with PD, given their more atherogenic lipid profile and the lack of randomized controlled trials in this population.

Cholesterol Disturbances and the Role of Proper Nutrition in CKD Patients

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a widespread disease with increasing prevalence in the modern society. Lipid disturbances are common in this group of patients. In most patients with CKD atherogenic dyslipidemia is observed. Dyslipidemia in patients with renal diseases increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases and it accelerates the progression of chronic kidney disease to its end stage. The amelioration of dyslipidemia and the lowering of oxidative stress, inflammatory processes, insulin sensitivity and remnant lipoproteins levels may lead to the reduction in cardiovascular burden. Nutritional interventions can strengthen the beneficial effect of treatment and they play an important role in the preservation of overall well-being of the patients with CKD since the aim of appropriate diet is to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, prevent malnutrition, and hamper the progression of kidney disease. The management of dyslipidemia, regardless of the presence of chronic kidney disease, should be initiated by the introduction of therapeutic lifestyle changes. The introduction of diet change was shown to exert beneficial effect on the lipid level lowering that reaches beyond pharmacological therapy. Currently available evidence give the impression that data on dietary interventions in CKD patients is not sufficient to make any clinical practice guidelines and is of low quality.

Clinical Studies of Interventions to Mitigate Cardiovascular Risk in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) population, affecting up to 60% of cohorts. CVD is the primary cause of death in up to 40% of PD patients in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Cardiovascular mortality rates are reported to be approximately 14 per 100 patient-years, which are 10- to 20-fold greater than those of age- and sex-matched controls. The excess risk of CVD is related to a combination of traditional risk factors (such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and insulin resistance), nontraditional (kidney disease-related) risk factors (such as anemia, chronic volume overload, inflammation, malnutrition, hyperuricemia, and mineral and bone disorder), and PD-specific risk factors (such as dialysis solutions, glycation end products, hypokalemia, residual kidney function, and ultrafiltration failure). Interventions targeting these factors may mitigate cardiovascular risk, although high-level clinical evidence is lacking. This review summarizes the evidence relating to cardiovascular interventions targeting modifiable CVD risk factors in PD patients, as well as highlighting the key recommendations of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines.

Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Dyslipidemia is a common feature of various renal diseases. This perturbed lipid metabolism results in accelerated atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Treatment of dyslipidemia, in addition to normalization of blood pressure and reduction of proteinuria, could provide additional means to retard the progression of chronic renal insufficiency. Possible therapeutic approaches include mainly dietary and life-style modifications, selective use of some technical components of dialysis systems, and the judicious prescriptions of lipid-lowering drugs. Even with relatively normal lipid and lipoprotein profiles statin therapy seems to prevent atherogenesis acceleration. A wide range of therapeutic interventions, targeting the lipid abnormalities that may develop in chronic renal patients and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are currently available, though still without convincing evidence based on long-term prospective studies which clearly demonstrate a significant reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of ESRD patients. However, extensive investigations, concerning the best long-term therapeutic strategy for this high-risk population of patients, are still missing.

The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis

Technical innovations in peritoneal dialysis (PD), now used widely for the long-term treatment of ESRD, have significantly reduced therapy-related complications, allowing patients to be maintained on PD for longer periods. Indeed, the survival rate for patients treated with PD is now equivalent to that with in-center hemodialysis. In parallel, changes in public policy have spurred an unprecedented expansion in the use of PD in many parts of the world. Meanwhile, our improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in solute and water transport across the peritoneum and of the pathobiology of structural and functional changes in the peritoneum with long-term PD has provided new targets for improving efficiency and for intervention. As with hemodialysis, almost half of all deaths on PD occur because of cardiovascular events, and there is great interest in identifying modality-specific factors contributing to these events. Notably, tremendous progress has been made in developing interventions that substantially reduce the risk of PD-related peritonitis. Yet the gains have been unequal among individual centers, primarily because of unequal clinical application of knowledge gained from research. The work to date has further highlighted the areas in need of innovation as we continue to strive to improve the health and outcomes of patients treated with PD.

Clinical implications of statin therapy in patients undergoing hemodialysis

PURPOSE

The clinical implications regarding the use of statins in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are explored.

SUMMARY

The majority of the evidence reviewed from randomized controlled trials and recent meta-analyses suggest that there is minimal to no benefit of statin therapy for reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), including cardiovascular events and mortality, for statin-naive patients undergoing hemodialysis. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) 2003 dyslipidemia guidelines recommended that patients with ESRD receive a statin to reach a goal low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration of <100 mg/dL; however, there was no distinction between nondialysis and dialysis patients, and newer evidence has since been published. Although KDOQI released 2012 guidelines that recommended against the initiation of statins in dialysis patients due to the lack of evidence to support benefit, the guidelines were specific for diabetic dialysis patients. Clinicians should use their clinical judgment and weigh the risks and benefits from the available evidence when deciding whether to initiate statins in hemodialysis patients. A statin may be warranted for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events or in younger hemodialysis patients who have a longer life expectancy.

CONCLUSION

The available literature does not support the initiation of statins in hemodialysis patients who were not receiving statin therapy before requiring hemodialysis. At this time, there are no conclusive data to support discontinuation of statins in ESRD patients on hemodialysis receiving statins for either primary or secondary prevention of CHD.

Association of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism with end-stage renal disease and hyperlipidemia in patients on long-term hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death of patients with chronic renal failure. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) plays an important role in the homeostasis of cholesterol and triglycerides.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the possible link(s) between apoE gene polymorphism, inflammation and lipoproteins in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We studied 109 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and 97 controls. The serum lipids, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and total homocysteine (t-Hcy) levels and paraoxonase (PON) activity were determined in our patients. We also analyzed apoE gene polymorphism in the patients and controls.

RESULTS

The analysis of the apoE gene demonstrated a predominance of the e3 allele in both the patients and controls, followed by the e4 and then the e2 alleles. The analysis of the apoE genotype and allele frequencies showed significantly higher e4 allele and E3E4 genotype frequencies and decreased e3 allele and E3E3 genotype frequencies in the patients compared with the controls. The e2, e4 and E3E4 carriers within the ESRD patient population presented an atherogenic lipid profile. However, there were no significant variations in the serum PON activity and the hs-CRP and t-Hcy levels between individuals with different apoE polymorphisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest an association between the e4 allele, E3E4 genotype and ESRD. The apoE polymorphism affects the serum lipoprotein levels, and the ESRD patients who are e4 and e2 allele carriers are more likely to present an atherogenic lipoprotein profile that may be a major factor associated with increased risk of CVD.

Assessment of dyslipidemia in pre-dialysis patients in south-west Nigeria

Background:

Majority of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are more likely to die of cardiovascular complications before reaching end stage renal disease. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) recommends that all CKD patients should be evaluated for dyslipidemia and for treatment to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

Patients and Methods:

A cross-sectional case control study to determine the frequency of occurrence of lipid abnormalities in patients with CKD and compare these abnormalities with that of normal controls. A total of 100 patients and 100 controls were recruited for the study. Demographic and clinical data were obtained using structured questionnaire. Weight, height and waist circumference, body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure were also obtained. Subjects had their fasting lipid profile and fasting plasma glucose assayed after overnight fast of 8-14 hours. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was obtained using Friedwald formula.

Result:

The study revealed that total cholesterol (TC) was elevated above normal levels in 44% of cases compared with 6% in controls (P < 0.001), with the mean (SD) value of 5.82 ± 3.28 mmol/l for cases compared with 3.9 ± 1.0 mmol/l (P < 0.001) in controls. Low density lipoprotein was elevated in 48% of cases compared with 14% in controls (P < 0.001), with the mean (SD) values of 4.15 ± 2.74 mmol/l and 2.57 ± 0.95 mmol/l for cases and controls, respectively, (P < 0.001). Triglyceride (TG) was elevated above normal level in 26% of cases compared with none in the controls (P < 0.001), with the mean (SD) values of 1.41 ± 1.10 mmol/l and 0.64 ± 0.24 mmol/l for cases and controls, respectively (P < 0.001). All Lipid fractions except HDL also correlated significantly with levels of proteinuria TC (r = 0.345, P = 0.001), TG (r = 0.268, P = 0.011) LDL (r = 0.366, P = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Dyslipidemia is common among patients with CKD. Regular evaluation of all CKD patients for dyslipidemia and treatment need be instituted.

The lipid story in chronic kidney disease: a long story with a happy end?

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality increase with the severity of kidney disease, reaching 30 times higher mortality rates in dialysis patients compared with the general population. Although dyslipidemia is a well-established CV risk factor in the general population, the relationship between lipid disorders and CV risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less clear. Despite the clear evidence that statins reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events and death from cardiac causes in individuals without CKD, the use of statins in patients with kidney disease is significantly less frequent. For a long time, one of the explanations was the lack of a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed specifically to CKD patients. After recent publication of the data from Study of Heart and Renal Protection trial, given the safety and potential efficacy of statins, this lipid-lowering treatment should be administered more frequently to individuals with CKD stage 1–4, as well as those undergoing dialysis.

Signaling pathways of apoE and its role of gene expression in glomerulus diseases

The roles of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in regulating plasma lipids and lipoproteins levels have been investigated for over several decades. However, in different tissues/cells, the role of apoE was different, such as that it was a risk factor for cancer, but some reports stated that apoE was a protective factor for renal diseases. At the moment, most of the studies find that apoE not only acts as a ligand for metabolism of lipids, but also plays as a factor to regulate lots of signaling pathways. There was rare review to sum up the signaling pathways for apoE, and there was also rare review to widely review the gene expression of apoE in glomerulus diseases. This review was performed to provide a relatively complete signaling pathways flowchart for apoE to the investigators who were interested in the roles of apoE in the pathogenesis of glomerulus diseases. In the past decades, some studies were also performed to explore the association of apoE gene expression with the risk of glomerulus diseases. However, the role of apoE in the pathogenesis of glomerulus diseases was controversial. Here, the signal transduction pathways of apoE and its role of gene expression in the pathogenesis of glomerulus diseases were reviewed.

Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) plasma levels and oxLDL to LDL ratio - are they real oxidative stress markers in dialyzed patients?

AIMS

Dyslipidemia and oxidative stress are commonly present in patients during maintenance dialysis treatment. However, the significance of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) as a marker of oxidative stress in uremia is still unresolved. The aim of this study was to establish the role of oxLDL and oxLDL/LDL ratio as markers of lipoprotein abnormalities and oxidative stress in the dialyzed patients.

MAIN METHODS

Plasma oxLDL level was measured by ELISA, and oxLDL/LDL ratio was calculated in 106 dialyzed patients and 20 controls. The linkages between oxLDL, oxLDL/LDL ratio and lipid profile and oxidative stress markers malondialdehyde (MDA) and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn SOD) levels were also analyzed.

KEY FINDINGS

OxLDL levels and oxLDL/LDL ratio were similar in hemodialyzed patients and controls, whereas these parameters were lower in peritoneally dialyzed patients when compared to healthy individuals. In contrast, both MDA and Cu/Zn SOD levels were significantly higher in uremics than in controls. oxLDL and oxLDL/LDL ratio positively correlated with lipid profile (except of HDL), whereas there were no positive associations between these parameters and both MDA and Cu/Zn SOD. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that increased oxLDL/HDL and TC/HDL ratios and total cholesterol levels are the parameters which independently predicted oxLDL in dialyzed patients. In the case of oxLDL/LDL ratio, the independent variables were oxLDL/HDL ratio, total cholesterol and HDL levels.

SIGNIFICANCE

oxLDL levels and oxLDL/LDL ratio seem to be the markers of lipoprotein abnormalities rather than the markers of oxidative stress in the population of dialyzed patients.

Effects of adding ezetimibe to fluvastatin on kidney function in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized control trial

AIMS

Statins not only reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, but also prevent the progression of kidney dysfunction. Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, also lowers LDL cholesterol levels when added to statins; however, the effect of add-on ezetimibe on kidney function has had conflicting results.

METHODS

We conducted an open-labeled, randomized, 12-month trial, comparing the effects of daily therapy with 20 mg fluvastatin either with or without 10 mg ezetimibe in 54 patients with dyslipidemia. The prespecified primary outcome was the percent change from baseline in kidney function, which was defined by the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The secondary outcomes were the changes in surrogate atherosclerotic markers. All analyses were by intention to treat.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, the percent change from baseline (±SE) of the estimated glomerular filtration rate, was -5.5±1.9% in the fluvastatin-only group and 6.6±1.9% in the fluvastatin-plus-ezetimibe (combined-therapy) group (p=0.0002). Secondary outcomes, consisting of the cardioankle vascular index, augmentation index, ankle-brachial index, and maximum intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries, did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol was 122±23 mg per deciliter in the fluvastatin group and 111±29 mg per deciliter in the combined-therapy group (a between-group difference of 9.2%, p= 0.036). Side-effect and safety profiles were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Combined therapy with fluvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily resulted in a significant improvement in changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Physical activity and blood lipids and lipoproteins in dialysis patients

The relationship between physical activity and blood lipids and lipoproteins in dialysis patients is reviewed in the context of the potentially confounding factors such as nutritional intake, cigarette smoking, obesity, alcohol intake, and physical activity levels in the general population and additional confounding factors such as mode of dialysis and diabetes in dialysis patients. The known associations in the general population of physical activity with high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions and apolipoprotein A-I are more pronounced in hemodialysis patients than in peritoneal dialysis patients even after adjusting for these confounding factors. Examining studies on the effects of physical activity on blood lipids and lipoproteins, the most consistent observation is the noted decrease in triglycerides and increase in high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin sensitivity in hemodialysis patients. The changes in lipids and lipoproteins in hemodialysis patients could be caused by changes in activity levels of lipoprotein lipase, insulin sensitivity, and/or glucose metabolism. Future research investigating the relationship between physical activity and blood lipids and lipoproteins in dialysis patients should direct research towards the underlying mechanisms for changes in blood lipids and lipoproteins.

Dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney disease

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with impaired renal function. Dyslipidemia has been established as a well-known traditional risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population and it is well known that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibit significant alterations in lipoprotein metabolism. In this review, the pathogenesis and treatment of CKD-induced dyslipidemia are discussed. Studies on lipid abnormalities in predialysis, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients are analyzed. In addition, the results of the studies that tested the effects of the hypolipidemic drugs on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD are reported.

Effect of Dialysis Type on Serum Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and Lipoproteins

AIM

Dyslipidemia is common among patients with end-stage renal disease, whether treated by hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, there are not enough data about the effect of dialysis type on serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein (a) [Apo(a)], apolipoprotein (b) [Apo(b)], and lipid levels. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of dialysis type on serum lipid levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 40 HD patients (20 men and 20 women, aged 48.1 +/- 17.6 years) and 69 PD patients (35 men and 34 women, aged 45.2 +/- 16.3 years). Serum lipid profile including total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), Apo(a), Apo(b), and Lp(a) were determined in HD and PD patients. Patients who have used statins within the last six months were not included in the study.

RESULTS

No significant differences in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, Apo(a), Apo(b), or Lp(a) serum levels were found between HD and PD patients. Serum TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, Apo(a), Apo(b), and Lp(a) in HD and PD patients were 172.2 +/- 42.7 (mg/dL) vs. 181.0 +/- 53.0 (mg/dL), 97.2 +/- 36.2 (mg/dL) vs. 101.4 +/- 33.6 (mg/dL), 45.3 +/- 11.9 (mg/dL) vs. 41.4 +/- 11.1 (mg/dL), 144.7 +/- 71.8 (mg/dL) vs. 173.0 +/- 76.8 (mg/dL), 1.2 +/- 0.5 (g/L) vs. 1.0 +/- 0.2 (g/L), 0.9 +/- 0.3 (g/L) vs. 1.2 +/- 0.3 (g/L), and 43.1 +/- 40.6 (mg/dL) vs. 46.0 +/- 42.7 (mg/dL), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that the maintenance CAPD treatment is associated with more pronounced alterations of the lipoproteins and lipid metabolism than those observed during HD treatment.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and renoprotection: the weight of the evidence

Dyslipidemia and the contributions of oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL) are independent cardiovascular risk factors. There is growing evidence that dyslipidemia contributes not only to cardiovascular disease but also to the progressive decline of renal function in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease. Ox-LDL, by generating inflammation and oxidative stress, contributes to a pro-atherogenic mileu and leads to endothelial dysfunction, subsequent glomerular filtration barrier damage, and progressive renal injury. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), in turn, induces deleterious effects on lipid metabolism. Therefore, by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and reducing ox-LDL, HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are attractive therapeutic options to preserve renal function. Current evidence demonstrates a reduction in cardiovascular risk and improved renal outcomes especially in patients with mild to moderate impairment of renal function. Evidence supports a beneficial role of statins thought to extend beyond their lipid-lowering effect, referred to as pleiotropic actions. These actions include modulatory effects on inflammation, oxidative stress and thrombosis, derived from their ability to prevent the formation of isoprenoid intermediates involved in cellular signaling, posttranslational modification of proteins and cellular function. This translates to potential reductions in the rate of decline in GFR in CKD and adverse effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the kidney. This review examines the role of statins for reno-protection as well as cardiovascular benefit in patients with CKD.

Cardiovascular disease in patients with renal disease: the role of statins

OBJECTIVES

Atherosclerosis is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a major cause of death. The National Kidney Foundation guidelines favour the use of statin therapy for treatment of dyslipidaemia in patients with CKD. Much evidence supports statin therapy for reducing CVD and improving outcomes in the general population, but there is less evidence in patients with CKD. Consequently, prevention of CVD in CKD is based primarily on extrapolation from non-CKD trials. Significantly, in trials specifically designed to investigate patients with CKD, evidence is emerging for improved cardiovascular outcomes with statin therapy. This review describes available data relating to cardiovascular outcomes and the role of statins in patients with CKD, including pre-dialysis, dialysis, and renal transplant patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The PubMed database was searched (1998-present) to ensure comprehensive identification of publications (including randomised clinical trials) relevant to CKD patients, patterns of cardiovascular outcome in such patients and their relationship to lipid profile, and the role of statins for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications.

RESULTS

There are conflicting data on the relationship between dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular outcomes, with one major study of statin therapy (4D--Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie) providing equivocal results. Further studies, including AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events; NCT00240331) in patients receiving haemodialysis, and SHARP (Study of Heart And Renal Protection; NCT00125593) in patients with CKD including those on dialysis, should help to clarify the role of statin therapy in these populations.

CONCLUSIONS

More studies are needed to elucidate the role of statins in improving cardiovascular outcomes for CKD patients. It is anticipated that ongoing clinical trials geared towards the optimal prevention and treatment of CVD in patients with CKD will help guide clinicians in the management of CKD.

Chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state and considerations for the use of statins

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) creates one of the highest risk atherosclerotic states that can occur in human beings. The use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme reductase inhibitors (statins) has gained widespread acceptance in the general population for the purposes of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and reducing the future risks of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac death. In patients with CKD, the balance of benefits and risks of statins appears to be different than that in the general population. Reductions in LDL-C with statins may be associated with a reduced progression of CKD. Importantly, recent studies suggest statins are associated with a reduction in rates of acute kidney injury, mediated by ischemic insults and oxidative stress, after cardiac surgery and exposure to iodinated contrast. A reduction in cardiovascular events with LDL-C reduction in CKD and dialysis patients is yet to be proven. In addition, studies suggest that there are higher adverse drug effects with statins in CKD. This work will address the benefits and risks of this important treatment option for the growing population of patients with CKD, who have not undergone renal transplantation, and are at very high risk of cardiovascular events.

Dyslipidaemia and cardiorenal disease: mechanisms, therapeutic opportunities and clinical trials

Dyslipidaemia is an important risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). CKD generates an atherogenic lipid profile, characterised by high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and accumulation of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, comparable to that in the metabolic syndrome. These changes are due specifically to the effects of CKD on key enzymes, transfer proteins and receptors involved in lipid metabolism. Dyslipidaemia is further compounded by dialysis, immunosuppressive drugs, and concomitant diseases such as diabetes mellitus. Post hoc analyses from large intervention trials suggest the benefit of statins in patients with early CKD, but prospective clinical trials in haemodialysis (HD) and renal transplant recipients have not conclusively shown improvements in hard cardiovascular end-points. The lack of efficacy of statins in late-stage CKD could be a consequence of other disease processes, such as calcific arteriopathy and insulin resistance, which are not modified by lipid-lowering agents. Despite uncertainty and pending the results of ongoing statin trials such as Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) and AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events), major international guidelines continue to support statin therapy in CKD and renal transplant patients to reduce cardiovascular risk burden. Because of increased risk of toxicity, particularly myopathy, statins and other lipid-regulating agents should be used cautiously in CKD and renal transplant recipients.

Lipoprotein metabolism in chronic renal insufficiency

Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is associated with a characteristic dyslipidemia. Findings in children with CRI largely parallel those in adults. Moderate hypertriglyceridemia, increased triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) and reduced high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are the most usual findings, whereas total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remain normal or modestly increased. Qualitative abnormalities in lipoproteins are common, including small dense LDL, oxidized LDL, and cholesterol-enriched TRL. Measures of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activity are reduced, and concentrations of apolipoprotein C-III are markedly elevated. Still an active area of research, major pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the dyslipidemia of CRI include insulin resistance and nonnephrotic proteinuria. Sources of variability in the severity of this dyslipidemia include the degree of renal impairment and the modality of dialysis. The benefits of maintaining normal body weight and physical activity extend to those with CRI. In addition to multiple hypolipidemic pharmaceuticals, fish oils are also effective as a triglyceride-lowering agent, and the phosphorous binding agent sevelamer also lowers LDL-C. Emerging classes of hypolipidemic agents and drugs affecting sensitivity to insulin may impact future treatment. Unfortunately, cardiovascular benefit has not been convincingly demonstrated by any trial designed to study adults or children with renal disease. Therefore, it is not possible at this time to endorse general recommendations for the use of any agent to treat dyslipidemia in children with chronic kidney disease.

Dyslipidemia, inflammation and dialysis outcomes: what we know now

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The limited prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease starts when renal function begins to decline.

RECENT FINDINGS

Available interventions did not prove their efficacy. Treatment of dyslipidemia and inflammation by statins was shown to be effective in post-hoc subgroup analyses of large-scale randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 2 and 3. So far, randomized controlled trials in dialysis patients (HEMO, ADEMEX, 4D study) and after kidney transplantation (ALERT study) have produced so-called 'negative results'. It is most likely that these trials had limited power to prove the primary hypothesis. It is also probable that cardiac disease in renal patients changes its character from a vascular atherosclerotic to a more complex structural heart disease in combination with stiff arteries (arteriosclerosis). Clinically, this leads to a high proportion of sudden cardiac deaths: of 270 cardiac deaths in the 4D trial, 160 were of sudden cardiac origin. A complex pathogenetic process and a number of new emerging cardiovascular disease risk factors in the setting of high-grade inflammation/infection are proposed as being responsible.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on outcome variables in diabetic hemodialysis patients with special focus on risk factors such as inflammation and dyslipidemia.

Statins for improving renal outcomes: a meta-analysis

Statins frequently are used to prevent cardiovascular events. Several recent studies suggest that statins also may have renal benefits, although this is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the effect of statins on change in kidney function and urinary protein excretion. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, and the authors' personal files were searched. Published or unpublished randomized, controlled trials or crossover trials of statins that reported assessment of kidney function or proteinuria were included, and studies of individuals with ESRD were excluded. Data were extracted for study design, subject characteristics, type of statin and dose, baseline/change in cholesterol levels, and outcomes (change in measured or estimated GFR [eGFR] and/or urinary protein excretion). Weighted mean differences were calculated for the change in GFR between statin and control groups using a random-effects model. A random-effects model also was used to calculate the standardized mean difference for the change in urinary protein excretion between groups. Twenty-seven eligible studies with 39,704 participants (21 with data for eGFR and 20 for proteinuria or albuminuria) were identified. Overall, the change in the weighted mean differences for eGFR was statistically significant (1.22 ml/min per yr slower in statin recipients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 2.00). In subgroup analysis, the benefit of statin therapy was statistically significant in studies of participants with cardiovascular disease (0.93 ml/min per yr slower than control subjects; 95% CI 0.10 to 1.76) but was NS for studies of participants with diabetic or hypertensive kidney disease or glomerulonephritis. The standardized mean difference for the reduction in albuminuria or proteinuria as a result of statin therapy was statistically significant (0.58 units of SD greater in statin recipients; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.98). Statin therapy seems to reduce proteinuria modestly and results in a small reduction in the rate of kidney function loss, especially in populations with cardiovascular disease.

Effect of fluvastatin on apolipoprotein-defined lipoprotein subclasses in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

According to the concept of apolipoprotein (apo)-defined lipoproteins, apoA-I-containing lipoproteins consist of two subclasses referred to as lipoprotein A-I (LpA-I) and lipoprotein A-I:A-II (LpA-I:A-II), and apoB-containing lipoproteins of five subclasses, namely lipoprotein B (LpB), lipoprotein B:C (LpB:C), lipoprotein B:E (LpB:E), lipoprotein B:C:E (LpB:C:E), and lipoprotein A-II:B:C:D:E (LpA-II:B:C:D:E). The purpose of this study was to determine the levels of apoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses before and after fluvastatin treatment of patients with chronic renal insufficiency. ApoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses were measured in 15 patients with chronic renal failure and 15 asymptomatic subjects. The effect of fluvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses was determined in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, treatment period crossover study. Patients were administered fluvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo during 8 weeks in a randomized order. Patients were characterized by significantly higher levels of LpB (P < 0.001), LpB:C (P < 0.001), and LpB:E (P < 0.05), and slightly higher levels of LpB:C:E and LpA-II:B:C:D:E than controls. The levels of LpA-I:A-II were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in patients than controls. Fluvastatin treatment reduced all apoB-containing subclasses, but only the reduced level of LpB subclass was statistically significant (P < 0.02). The levels of LpA-I and LpA-I:A-II were not affected. Fluvastatin treatment reduced and normalized LpB and LpB:E subclasses. Although slightly reduced, the levels of markedly atherogenic LpB:C subclass were not normalized. The potential role of LpB:C on the progression of coronary artery disease in chronic renal insufficiency remains to be determined in future studies.

Disturbed lipoprotein composition in non-dialyzed, hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and post-transplant patients with chronic renal failure

Studies were carried out in 183 non-dialyzed, 123 hemodialysis, 81 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and 35 post-transplant patients and in 103 healthy subjects as a reference group. Lipids and apolipoprotein (apo)AI and apoB were determined using Roche kits. An anti-apoB antibody was used to separate apoB-containing apoCIII and apoE-triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) in the non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) fraction from apoCIIInonB and apoEnonB in the HDL fraction in four groups of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and healthy subjects. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between triglyceride (TG) or HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations and lipoproteins. Dyslipidemia varied according to the degree of renal insufficiency, the type of dialysis and therapy regime in CRF patients. Lipoprotein disturbances were manifested by increased TG, non-HDL-C and TRL concentrations, and decreased HDL-C and apoAI concentrations, whereas post-renal transplant patients showed normalization of lipid and lipoprotein profiles, except for TG levels and total apoCIII and apoCIIInonB. The present study indicates that CRF patients have disturbed lipoprotein composition, and that hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C concentrations in these patients are multifactorial, being secondary to disturbed lipoproteins. The method using anti-apoB antibodies to separate apoB-containing lipoproteins in the non-HDL fraction from non-apoB-containing lipoproteins in HDL can be used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with progression of renal failure or atherosclerosis. The variability of TG and HDL-C concentrations depends on the variability of TRL and cholesterol-rich lipoprotein concentrations, but the decreases in TG and increases in HDL-C concentrations are caused by apoAI concentration variability. These relationships, however, need to be confirmed in further studies.

Variable effects of soy protein on plasma lipids in hyperlipidemic and normolipidemic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemic factors contribute to the high cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis patients. Soy protein has decreased some atherogenic lipid concentrations in subjects with normal renal function. This study evaluates the effect of soy protein on serum lipid profiles in hyperlipidemic and normolipidemic hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Nineteen hyperlipidemic and 18 normolipidemic hemodialysis patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. After a 4-week run-in phase, subjects in each category were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Thirty grams of isolated soy protein or milk protein was consumed daily as a beverage at breakfast or postdialysis for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In hyperlipidemic subjects, soy protein intake significantly decreased total cholesterol levels by 18.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], -11.4 to -25.8; P = 0.04), triglyceride levels by 43.1% (95% CI, -34.0 to -52.2; P = 0.02), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 23.6% (95% CI, -14.7 to -32.5; P < 0.01), apolipoprotein B levels by 15.4% (95% CI, -5.4 to -25.4; P = 0.01), and insulin levels by 49.8% (95% CI, -23.3 to -66.1; P < 0.01). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was decreased significantly (-25.8%; 95% CI, -8.3 to -42.7; P = 0.01), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was increased significantly (17%; 95% CI, 2 to 32.0; P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference compared with the milk protein group (-5.5% +/- 16.9% and 7.0% +/- 11.8%, respectively). There were no significant changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in normolipidemic subjects.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate soy protein substitution has lipid-lowering effects in hyperlipidemic hemodialysis patients. However, soy protein intake had little effect on plasma lipid levels in normolipidemic hemodialysis patients.

Kidney disease and cardiovascular disease: implications of dyslipidemia

Cardiovascular complications are common inpatients with kidney disease. Regulating the lipid levels in these patients is important so that the risks of kidney and cardiovascular complications can be minimized. Lipid regulation decreases the incidence of coronary vascular events and other vascular complications in patients with kidney disease; however, whether lipid regulation slows progression of kidney disease is not yet known. Additional studies of the implications of dyslipidemia in patients with kidney disease are needed.

The effect of the initiation of renal replacement therapy on lipid profile and oxidative stress during the first 6 months of treatment

BACKGROUND

Disturbed lipoproteins and increased oxidative stress are two of the "non-traditional" cardiovascular risk factors in chronic renal failure. There are very few prospective data of the influence of dialysis on these two factors. In the present study we investigated the effects of the initiation of both hemo- and peritoneal dialysis therapy on lipoproteins and parameters of LDL oxidation.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we assessed lipoproteins, plasma lipid peroxides and in vitro copper-induced LDL oxidation in 46 patients with end-stage renal disease prior to the start of dialysis and after 6 months of treatment with either hemodialysis (n=33) or peritoneal dialysis (n=13).

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment with hemodialysis there was an increase in total cholesterol (4.6+/-1.1 vs. 5.0+/-1.3 mmol/l; p<0.05) and triglycerides (2.0+/-0.9 vs. 2.8+/-1.6 mmol/l; p<0.03). In the peritoneal dialysis group the lipoproteins did not change. Regarding lipid peroxides and in vitro copper-induced LDL oxidation, also no changes were observed after 6 months of treatment in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Dyslipidemia aggravates after 6 months of hemodialysis but not after 6 months of peritoneal dialysis. During this period, no net effects on oxidative stress were demonstrated.

LDL susceptibility to oxidation and HDL antioxidant capacity in patients with renal failure

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the susceptibility to oxidation and the ability to stimulate reactive oxygen species of LDL from hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. It was also designed to evaluate the antioxidant activity of HDL from uremic patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Lipoprotein properties were determined in 28 HD patients, 30 CAPD patients and 30 control subjects by spectrophotometric, chemiluminescence and electrophoresis methods.

RESULTS

CAPD LDL were more resistant to oxidation than control LDL. HD and control LDL, in contrast to CAPD LDL, stimulated reactive oxygen species generation in granulocytes. The HDL ability to protect LDL against oxidation was impaired in renal patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of atherosclerosis development in patients with renal failure does not appear to be related to less resistance of LDL to oxidation, but rather to the decreased HDL antioxidant capacity.

Traditional and non-traditional risk factors as contributors to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although traditional risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia and advanced age, are prevalent in ESRD patients they may not be sufficient by themselves to account for the high prevalence of CVD in patients with this condition. Thus, the search for other, non-traditional, risk factors that may be involved in the pathogenesis of uremic CVD has been an area of intense study. Data suggest that the accelerated atherosclerotic process of ESRD may involve several interrelated processes, such as oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction and vascular calcification, in a milieu of constant low-grade inflammation. The cause(s) of inflammation in ESRD are multifactorial and, while it may reflect underlying CVD, an acute-phase reaction may also be a direct cause of vascular injury via several pathogenetic mechanisms. Available data suggest that pro-inflammatory cytokines play a central role in the genesis of both malnutrition and CVD in ESRD. Thus, it could be speculated that suppression of the vicious cycle of malnutrition, inflammation and atherosclerosis (MIA syndrome) would improve survival in dialysis patients. Recent evidence has demonstrated strong associations between inflammation and both increased oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in ESRD patients. As there is not yet any recognized, or even proposed, treatment for ESRD patients with chronic inflammation it would be of obvious interest to study the long-term effect of various anti-inflammatory treatment strategies on the nutritional and cardiovascular status as well as outcome of these patients.

The influence of serum apolipoprotein E concentration and polymorphism on serum lipid parameters in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism has been shown to influence serum lipid parameters and ApoE levels in both healthy subjects and hemodialysis (HD) patients. Conversely, ApoE concentration significantly affects serum lipid levels in the general population, independently of ApoE polymorphism, by modulating lipoprotein production, lipolytic conversion, and receptor-mediated clearance. Therefore, studying the effect of ApoE polymorphism on serum lipid levels without taking into account ApoE levels could lead to confounding results. However, such a combined study has not been performed in HD patients to date.

METHODS

Three hundred one patients without diabetes on long-term maintenance HD therapy and 200 matched healthy subjects were studied. Determination of levels of fasting serum ApoE and other lipid parameters, as well as common ApoE genotypes, was performed in all subjects.

RESULTS

HD patients had a significantly lower prevalence of the epsilon4 allele and greater levels of ApoE compared with the control population. ApoE2 allele carriers had significantly lower levels of ApoB and serum total, low-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as well as increased ApoE levels. When ApoE levels were included in analysis, ApoE levels themselves were proven to be important determinants of serum lipid levels, whereas the effect of ApoE polymorphism became more pronounced. The combination of these 2 factors explains a much greater percentage of the variation in the studied parameters than each factor alone.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, our study provides data to support that ApoE concentration in combination with the ApoE polymorphism significantly influences serum lipid parameters in HD patients.

A broad-based metabolic approach to study VLDL apoB100 metabolism in patients with ESRD and patients treated with peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is often observed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is associated with cardiovascular diseases. Peritoneal dialysis treatment may further deteriorate the lipoprotein abnormalities, suggesting that peritoneal dialysis alters lipid metabolism.

METHODS

To study the mechanisms involved in these abnormalities in peritoneal dialysis, we measured insulin sensitivity, free fatty acids release, de novo lipogenesis (DNL), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apoB100 kinetics and cholesterol synthesis in vivo in ESRD (N= 6), peritoneal dialysis patients (N= 5), and controls (N= 7) using stable isotopes.

RESULTS

Insulin sensitivity, as assessed by an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, tended to be lower in ESRD and peritoneal dialysis compared to controls [P= 0.08 by analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Free fatty acid release during the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp tended to be higher in ESRD and peritoneal dialysis compared to controls (P= 0.08 by ANOVA), while DNL and fractional cholesterol synthesis were normal. VLDL-1 apoB100 (P < 0.05) and VLDL-2 apoB100 pool sizes (P < 0.05) were significantly higher in peritoneal dialysis patients compared to controls. The increased VLDL-1 apoB100 pool size was explained by increased VLDL-1 apoB100 synthesis (P < 0.05) in combination with reduced VLDL-1 apoB100 catabolism (P < 0.01), while the increased VLDL-2 apoB100 pool was explained by reduced catabolism (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Both VLDL-1 apoB100 and VLDL-2 apoB100 pool sizes are increased in peritoneal dialysis patients, due to disturbances both in synthesis and catabolism. VLDL-1 apoB100 production is, at least partially, explained by increased free fatty acid availability secondary to peripheral insulin resistance, thus identifying insulin resistance as potential therapeutic target in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Hypertriglyceridemia in patients with chronic renal failure: possible mechanisms

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) caused by numerous factors defined as traditional and uremia-related risk factors. One of these risk factors, dyslipidemia, is often observed in patients with CRF, resulting in abnormal concentrations and composition of plasma lipoproteins. The prominent features of uremic dyslipidemia are an increase in plasma triglycerides and cholesterol in nearly all lipoproteins, and a reduction in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Because of its direct contact with the circulating blood, the endothelium is preferentially subjected to the modulatory effects of these altered lipoproteins. Little is known about the mechanisms for hypertriglyceridemia in CRF. This review highlights several studies over the past years that have contributed to knowledge of hypertriglyceridemia, especially in combination with renal diseases and their dialysis treatment. The underlying mechanisms behind hypertriglyceridemia have not been fully clarified and may indeed be multifactorial. Hypertriglyceridemia may contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis. Therefore, it is essential to study the putative mechanisms for uremic dyslipidemia, since optimal treatment is essential for the prevention or delay of cardiovascular complications in patients with CRF.

Dialysis modalities and dyslipidemia

Progressive renal failure is accompanied by dyslipidemia, which is reflected in an abnormal apolipoprotein profile. It is characterized by increased concentrations of intact and partially metabolized triglyceride-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins. They occur preferentially in very-low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) as a result of impaired metabolism and clearance. Hemodialysis can moderately attenuate the renal dyslipidemia. In contrast, peritoneal dialysis is associated with further aggravation, including an increase of cholesterol-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins.

Triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins trigger the phosphorylation of extracellular-signal regulated kinases in vascular cells

Postprandial triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins (TRL) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, but the intracellular processes by which TRL could affect vascular function are still unknown. Incubation of TRL obtained at 2 h postprandial period with vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) produced a tyrosine phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1 and ERK2) that belong to the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. The activation of ERK1 and ERK2 had a maximum at 15 min, returned to baseline by 60 min, and was partially depleted after incubation of cells with a MAPKK inhibitor (PD 098059). In addition, postprandial TRL did competent VSMC for DNA replication through a MAPK pathway. These effects were dependent of the lipid composition of TRL. Our observations suggest that postprandial TRL can trigger activation of the MAPK pathway and induce a mitogenic response in VSMC in a lipid-dependent fashion.

ApoA- and apoB-containing lipoproteins and Lp(a) concentration in non-dialyzed patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

End-Stage renal disease is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The serum levels of lipids and apolipoproteins and Lp(a) were determined in 51 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) with various advancement, without interference of factors which might disturb Lp(a) metabolism and with proteinuria less than 0.5 g/24 h. The patients studied were divided into two groups: patients with moderate renal failure (CRF-M) and creatinine levels of 2-6mg/dL n = 27; and predialysis patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) and creatinine levels higher than 8.5 mg/dL n=24.

RESULTS

In both studied groups serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total apoCIII, apoCIIInonB, apoB:CIII were statistically increased, (except total cholestrol (TC) and LDL-cholestrol (LDL-C), apoB, total apoE, apoEnonB, apoB:E), while the levels of HDL-cholestrol (HDL-C) and apoAl significantly decreased. Lipid and lipoprotein ratios as risk factors of atherosclerosis were similar in both groups. The TC/HDL-C ratio increased, while that of HDL-C/ apoAI and apoAI/apoCIII decreased. Serum Lp(a) concentrations were significantly increased in both studied groups. The medians and ranges of Lp(a) concentration were similar in both groups. Serum Lp(a) levels correlated with total cholesterol (r=0.295; p < 0.05), LDL-C (r = 0.312; p < 0.05) and apoB (r = 0.215; p < 0.05). In addition, no correlation was found between Lp(a) levels and albumin concentrations (r = 0.126; p = 0.421).

CONCLUSION

Our results may indicate that the reduced levels of apoA-containing lipoproteins and increased TG-rich apoB-containing lipoproteins and Lp(a) indicated a clear atherogenic pattern in early renal disease. Increased Lp(a) concentration may result in nonspecific synthesis or catabolism disturbances. Measurement and monitoring of lipoprotein family profiles offers a new means for selecting appropriate therapies targeted for normalizing dyslipidemia in non-dialyzed patients.