Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR

Clinical performance of the TrueMark™ MSI assay for microsatellite instability detection in a Chinese colorectal cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair (MMR) detection is valuable in assessing prognosis and treatment options. However, the conventional detection methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) are limited by not fully consistent results as well as a long turnaround time. TrueMark™ MSI Assay is a novel solution for MSI analysis, but lack of research support in the Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 dMMR and 60 pMMR CRC samples identified by IHC were collected and their MSI status were detected using TrueMark™ MSI assay with an expanded panel of 13 markers. The overall performance and diagnostic concordance between TrueMark™ MSI test and MMR IHC analysis were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

According to the TrueMark™ test, 55 out of the 120 (45.8 %) CRCs were identified as MSI-high (MSI-H) with an instability at ≥ 4/13 markers. Compared with the MMR IHC analysis, an overall percent agreement of 94.2 % and a Kappa of 0.883 were achieved. For the seven inconsistent samples, tumor mutation burden analysis was performed and the results supported the diagnosis by TrueMark™ test. To confirm the robustness of the above findings, a validation was performed in an independent cohort comprising 51 consecutive CRCs. Furthermore, an optimized panel composed of NR-21, NR-24, NR-27, ABI-16, ABI-17 and ABI-20B was developed by multivariate logistic regression model, and showed 100 % agreement with the 13-marker panel for MSI detection in both the derivation and validation sets.

CONCLUSION

TrueMark™ MSI provides a fast, reliable and highly automated solution to MSI detection in Chinese CRC patients, and the new 6-marker panel we established shows promise deserving further evaluation.

Head-to-head comparative study: evaluating three panels for MSI-PCR testing in patients with colorectal and gastric cancer

AIMS

Due to the lack of large clinical cohorts in the Chinese populations with colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC), there is no consensus among the preferred panel for microsatellite instability (MSI)-PCR testing. This study aims to evaluate a more appropriate panel.

METHODS

We tested the MSI status of 2572 patients with CRC and GC using the NCI panel and 2 mononucleotide panels (5 and 6 mononucleotide panels). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was employed to perform mismatch repair protein testing in 1976 samples.

RESULTS

We collected 2572 patients with CRC and GC. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) panel failed to detect 13 cases. Of the 2559 cases that received results from all three panels, 2544 showed consistent results. In the remaining 15 cases, 9 showed discrepancies between MSI-H and MSI-L, and 6 showed discrepancies between MSI-L and microsatellite stability (MSS). The misdiagnosis rate of MSI-L was significantly lower in two mononucleotide panels than in the NCI panel (12.5% vs 87.5%, p=0.010) in CRC. In patients with GC, only the NCI panel detected three MSI-L cases, while the results of the two mononucleotide panels were one MSI-H and two MSS. Based on their IHC results, the MSI-L misdiagnosis rate of the NCI panel was 33.3%. Furthermore, compared with two mononucleotide panels, the NCI panel had a much lower rate of all loci instability in CRC (90.8% and 90.3% vs 25.2%) and GC (89.5% and 89.5% vs 12.0%).

CONCLUSION

In Chinese patients with CRC and GC, the five and six mononucleotide panels have advantages for detecting MSI over the NCI panel.

Characterization of discordance between mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability testing may prevent inappropriate treatment with immunotherapy

In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients with cancer are treated based on their tumor molecular profile with approved targeted and immunotherapies outside the labeled indication. Importantly, patients undergo a tumor biopsy for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) which allows for a WGS-based evaluation of routine diagnostics. Notably, we observed that not all biopsies of patients with dMMR/MSI-positive tumors as determined by routine diagnostics were classified as microsatellite-unstable by subsequent WGS. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the discordance rate between routine dMMR/MSI diagnostics and WGS and to further characterize discordant cases. We assessed patients enrolled in DRUP with dMMR/MSI-positive tumors identified by routine diagnostics, who were treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and for whom WGS data were available. Patient and tumor characteristics, study treatment outcomes, and material from routine care were retrieved from the patient medical records and via Palga (the Dutch Pathology Registry), and were compared with WGS results. Initially, discordance between routine dMMR/MSI diagnostics and WGS was observed in 13 patients (13/121; 11%). The majority of these patients did not benefit from ICB (11/13; 85%). After further characterization, we found that in six patients (5%) discordance was caused by dMMR tumors that did not harbor an MSI molecular phenotype by WGS. In six patients (5%), discordance was false due to the presence of multiple primary tumors (n = 3, 2%) and misdiagnosis of dMMR status by immunohistochemistry (n = 3, 2%). In one patient (1%), the exact underlying cause of discordance could not be identified. Thus, in this group of patients limited to those initially diagnosed with dMMR/MSI tumors by current routine diagnostics, the true assay-based discordance rate between routine dMMR/MSI-positive diagnostics and WGS was 5%. To prevent inappropriate ICB treatment, clinicians and pathologists should be aware of the risk of multiple primary tumors and the limitations of different tests. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Molecular profiling of pediatric and young adult colorectal cancer reveals a distinct genomic landscapes and potential therapeutic avenues

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health concern, and the incidence of early onset (EO) CRC, has an upward trend. This study delves into the genomic landscape of EO-CRC, specifically focusing on pediatric (PED) and young adult (YA) patients, comparing them with adult (AD) CRC. In this retrospective monocentric investigation, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing to compare the mutational profile of 38 EO-CRCs patients (eight PED and 30 YA) to those of a 'control group' consisting of 56 AD-CRCs. Our findings reveal distinct molecular profiles in EO-CRC, notably in the WNT and PI3K-AKT pathways. In pediatrics, we observed a significantly higher frequency of RNF43 mutations, whereas APC mutations were more prevalent in adult cases. These observations suggest age-related differences in the activation of the WNT pathway. Pathway and copy number variation analysis reveal that AD-CRC and YA-CRC have more similarities than the pediatric patients. PED shows a peculiar profile with CDK6 amplification and the enrichment of lysine degradation pathway. These findings may open doors for personalized therapies, such as PI3K-AKT pathway inhibitors or CDK6 inhibitors for pediatric patients. Additionally, the distinct molecular signatures of EO-CRC underscore the need for age-specific treatment strategies and precision medicine. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive molecular investigations in EO-CRCs, which can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy, prognosis, and therapeutic decisions for these patients. Collaboration between the pediatric and adult oncology community is fundamental to improve oncological outcomes for this rare and challenging pediatric tumor.

Detection of (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions in Lynch syndrome patients by microsatellite instability liquid biopsy

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited condition characterized by an increased risk of developing cancer, in particular colorectal cancer (CRC). Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the main feature of (pre)cancerous lesions occurring in LS patients. Close endoscopic surveillance is the only option available to reduce CRC morbidity and mortality. However, it may fail to intercept interval cancers and patients' compliance to such an invasive procedure may decrease over the years. The development of a minimally invasive test able to detect (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions, could thus help tailor surveillance programs in LS patients. Taking advantage of an endoscopic surveillance program, we retrospectively assessed the instability of five microsatellites (BAT26, BAT25, NR24, NR21, and Mono27) in liquid biopsies collected at baseline and possibly at two further endoscopic rounds. For this purpose, we tested a new multiplex drop-off digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) assay, reaching mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) as low as 0.01%. Overall, 78 plasma samples at the three time-points from 18 patients with baseline (pre)cancerous lesions and 18 controls were available for molecular analysis. At baseline, the MAFs of BAT26, BAT25 and NR24 were significantly higher in samples of patients with lesions but did not differ with respect to the grade of dysplasia or any other clinico-pathological characteristics. When all markers were combined to determine MSI in blood, this test was able to discriminate lesion-bearing patients with an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.66; 0.94).

Mutations in Mismatch Repair Genes and Microsatellite Instability Status in Pancreatic Cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) showing mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency may benefit from immunotherapy. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Here, we estimated the prevalence of MSI in PC, investigated germline and somatic mutations in the three MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6), and assessed the relationship between MMR genes mutations and MSI status in PC. Clinical specimens from PC patients were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing, including paired normal and tumor specimens from 155 patients, tumor-only specimens from 86 patients, and normal-only specimens from 379 patients. The MSI status of 235 PCs was assessed via PCR. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in the MMR genes were identified in 1.1% of patients, while somatic variants were found in 2.6% of patients. No MSI-H tumors were detected. One patient carried two variants (P (VAF = 0.57) and LP (VAF = 0.25)) simultaneously; however, their germline/somatic status remains unknown due to the investigation focusing solely on the tumor and MSI analysis was not performed for this patient. MSI is rare in PC, even in tumors with MMR genes mutations. Our findings underscore the importance of assessing tumor MMR-D status in PC patients with confirmed Lynch syndrome when deciding whether to prescribe immunotherapy.

Microsatellite Instability Testing and Prognostic Implications in Colorectal Cancer

Given the crucial predictive implications of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC), MSI screening is commonly performed in those with and at risk for CRC. Here, we compared results from immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) MSI assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 48 patients who underwent surgery for colon and rectal cancer by calculating Cohen's kappa measurement (k), revealing high agreement between the methods (k = 0.915). We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate and multivariate Cox regression to assess the prognostic significance of ddPCR-based MSI and to identify clinicopathological features associated with CRC outcome. Patients with MSI-high had better overall survival (OS; p = 0.038) and disease-free survival (DFS; p = 0.049) than those with microsatellite stability (MSS). When stratified by primary tumor location, right-sided CRC patients with MSI-high showed improved DFS, relative to those with MSS (p < 0.001), but left-sided CRC patients did not. In multivariate analyses, MSI-high was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.221, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.026-0.870, p = 0.042), whereas the loss of DNA mismatch repair protein MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) expression was associated with worse OS (HR = 0.133, 95% CI: 0.001-1.152, p = 0.049). Our results suggest ddPCR is a promising tool for MSI detection. Given the opposing effects of MSI-high and MLH1 loss on OS, both ddPCR and IHC may be complementary for the prognostic assessment of CRC.

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency mimicking Lynch syndrome is associated with hypomorphic mismatch repair gene variants

Lynch syndrome (LS) and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) are distinct cancer syndromes caused, respectively, by mono- and bi-allelic germline mismatch repair (MMR) variants. LS predisposes to mainly gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers in adulthood. CMMRD predisposes to brain, haematological, and LS-spectrum cancers from childhood. Two suspected LS patients with first cancer diagnosis aged 27 or 38 years were found to be homozygous for an MMR (likely) pathogenic variant, MSH6 c.3226C>T (p.(Arg1076Cys)), or variant of uncertain significance (VUS), MLH1 c.306G>A (p.(Glu102=)). MLH1 c.306G>A was shown to cause leaky exon 3 skipping. The apparent genotype-phenotype conflict was resolved by detection of constitutional microsatellite instability in both patients, a hallmark feature of CMMRD. A hypomorphic effect of these and other variants found in additional late onset CMMRD cases, identified by literature review, likely explains a LS-like phenotype. CMMRD testing in carriers of compound heterozygous or homozygous MMR VUS may find similar cases and novel hypomorphic variants. Individualised management of mono- and bi-allelic carriers of hypomorphic MMR variants is needed until we better characterise the associated phenotypes.

One-instrument, objective microsatellite instability analysis using high-resolution melt

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have proved immense clinical progression in the treatment of certain cancers. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is correlated with mismatch repair system deficiency and is exceptionally administered based exclusively on this biological mechanism independent of the cancer type. The promising effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors has left an increasing demand for analytical tools evaluating the mismatch repair status. The analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), reflecting an indirect but objective manner the inactivation of the mismatch repair system, plays several roles in clinical practice and, therefore, its evaluation is of high relevance. Analysis of MSI by PCR followed by fragment analysis on capillary electrophoresis remains the gold standard method for detection of a deficient mismatch repair system and thereby treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Novel technologies have been applied and concepts such as tumor mutation burden have been introduced. However, to date, most of these technologies require high costs or the need of matched non-tumor tissue as internal comparator. In this study, we present a novel, one-instrument, fast, and objective method for the detection of MSI (MicroSight® MSI 1-step HRM Analysis), which does not depend on the use of matched non-tumor tissue. The assay analyzes five well-described mononucleotide microsatellite sequences by real-time PCR followed by high-resolution melt and evaluates microsatellite length variations via PCR product melting profiles. The assay was evaluated using two different patient cohorts and evaluation included several DNA extraction methodologies, two different PCR platforms, and an inter-laboratory ring study. The MicroSight® MSI assay showed a high repeatability regardless of DNA extraction method and PCR platform, and a 100% agreement of the MSI status with PCR fragment analysis methods applied as clinical comparator.

An Innovative and Accurate Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Microsatellite Instability Detection Method for Colorectal and Endometrial Tumors

The detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has become mandatory for most tumors in recent years, owing to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors as a highly effective therapy for MMR deficiency/MSI tumors. The timely and efficient detection of MSI is valuable, and new methods are increasingly being developed. To date, MMR assessment has been performed using immunohistochemistry of the 4 MMR proteins and/or microsatellite stability/MSI using PCR, mostly using the pentaplex panel. The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for MSI analysis would improve the effectiveness at a lower cost and in less time. This study describes the development of 8 new microsatellites combined with a classification algorithm, termed "Octaplex CaBio-MSID" (for Cancérologie Biologique MSI Detection tool), to assess MSI using NGS. A series of 303 colorectal cancer and 88 endometrial cancer samples were assessed via MSI testing using NGS using the Octaplex CaBio-MSID algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of Octaplex CaBio-MSID were 98.4% and 98.4% for colorectal cancers, and 89.3% and 100% for endometrial cancers, respectively. This new NGS-based MSI detection method outperforms previously published methods (ie, Idylla [Biocartis], OncoMate MSI Dx [Promega], and Foundation One CDx [Roche Foundation Medicine]). Although highly efficient, Octaplex CaBio-MSID requires validation in a larger independent series of different tumor types.

Rare germline mutation and MSH2-&MSH6 + expression in a double primary carcinoma of colorectal carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary malignancies are rare in cancer patients, and risk factors may include genetics, viral infection, smoking, radiation, and other environmental factors. Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most prevalent form of hereditary predisposition to double primary colorectal and endometrial cancer in females. LS, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is a common autosomal dominant condition. Pathogenic germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, namely MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, and less frequently, deletions in the 3' end of EPCAM cause LS. It manifested itself as loss of MMR nuclear tumor staining (MMR protein deficient, dMMR).

CASE PRESENTATION

This case study describes a double primary carcinoma in a 49-year-old female. In June 2022, the patient was diagnosed with highly to moderately differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The patient's mother died of esophageal cancer at age 50, and the father died of undefined reasons at age 70. Immunohistochemical stainings found ER (++), PR (++), P53 (+), MSH2 (-), MSH6 (+), MLH1 (+), and PMS2 (+). MMR gene sequencing was performed on endometrial tumor and peripheral blood samples from this patient. The patient carried two pathogenic somatic mutations in the endometrial tumor, MSH6 c.3261dupC (p.Phe1088LeufsTer5) and MSH2 c.445_448dup (p.Val150fs), in addition to a rare germline mutation MSH6 c.133G > C (p.Gly45Arg). Two years ago, the patient was diagnosed with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the left-half colon. Immunohistochemical stainings found MSH2(-), MSH6(+), MLH1(+), and PMS2(+) (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of a patient with double primary EC and CRC, a careful evaluation of the IHC and the genetic data was presented. The patient carried rare compound heterozygous variants, a germline missense mutation, and a somatic frameshift mutation of MSH6, combined with a novel somatic null variant of MSH2. Our study broadened the variant spectrum of double primary cancer and provided insight into the molecular basis for abnormal MSH2 protein loss and double primary carcinoma.

Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications

Advances in molecular genetics have revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis, progression, and therapeutic options for treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular landscape of GI cancers, focusing on key genetic alterations implicated in tumorigenesis across various anatomical sites including GIST, colon and rectum, and pancreas. Emphasis is placed on critical oncogenic pathways, such as mutations in tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic modifications. The role of molecular biomarkers in predicting prognosis, guiding treatment decisions, and monitoring therapeutic response is discussed, highlighting the integration of genomic profiling into clinical practice. Finally, we address the evolving landscape of precision oncology in GI cancers, considering targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Development of Tumor Markers for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Although breast cancer treatment has been developed remarkably in recent years, it remains the primary cause of death among women. Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has significantly altered the way breast cancer is treated, although not all patients benefit from the changes. At present, the most effective mechanism of immune checkpoint blockade application in malignant tumors is not clear and efficacy may be influenced by many factors, including host, tumor, and tumor microenvironment dynamics. Therefore, there is a pressing need for tumor immunomarkers that can be used to screen patients and help determine which of them would benefit from breast cancer immunotherapy. At present, no single tumor marker can predict treatment efficacy with sufficient accuracy. Multiple markers may be combined to more accurately pinpoint patients who will respond favorably to immune checkpoint blockade medication. In this review, we have examined the breast cancer treatments, developments in research on the role of tumor markers in maximizing the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, prospects for the identification of novel therapeutic targets, and the creation of individualized treatment plans. We also discuss how tumor markers can provide guidance for clinical practice.

Immunotherapy-related biomarkers: Confirmations and uncertainties

Immunotherapy profoundly changed oncology treatment, becoming one of the main therapeutical strategies. Remarkable improvement has been achieved in survival outcomes, but the percentage of patients who benefit from immunotherapy is still limited. Only one-third of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve long-term response. Several patients are not responsive to treatment or relapse after an initial response. To date, programmed death-ligand 1, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden are the three biomarkers validated to predict the ICIs response, but a single variable seems still insufficient in the patient's selection. Considering the substantial and increasing use of these drugs, the identification of new predictive biomarkers of ICI response is of paramount importance. We summarize the state of the art and the clinical use of immune biomarkers in oncology, highlighting the strength and weaknesses of currently approved biomarkers, describing the emerging tissues and circulating biomarkers, and outlining future perspectives.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

Spatial profiling of cancer-associated fibroblasts of sporadic early onset colon cancer microenvironment

The incidence of sporadic early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) has increased worldwide. The molecular mechanisms in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) in EOCC are not fully understood. The aim of this study is to unravel unique spatial transcriptomic and proteomic profiles in tumor epithelial cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Here, we divide the sporadic colon cancer tissue samples with transcriptomic data into patients diagnosed with EOCC (<50 yrs) and late-onset colon cancer (LOCC, ≥50 yrs) and then, analyze the data using CIBERSORTx deconvolution software. EOCC tumors are more enriched in CAFs with fibroblast associated protein positive expression (FAP(+)) than LOCC tumors. EOCC patients with higher FAP mRNA levels in CAFs have shorter OS (Log-rank test, p < 0.029). Spatial transcriptomic analysis of 112 areas of interest, using NanoString GeoMx digital spatial profiling, demonstrate that FAP(+) CAFs at the EOCC tumor invasive margin show a significant upregulation of WNT signaling and higher mRNA/protein levels of fibroblast growth factor 20 (FGF20). Tumor epithelial cells at tumor invasive margin of EOCC tumors neighboring FAP(+) CAFs show significantly higher mRNA/protein levels of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) and PI3K/Akt signaling activation. NichNET analysis show a potential interaction between FGF20 and FGFFR2. The role of FGF20 in activating FGFR2/pFGFR2 and AKT/pAKT was validated in-vitro. In conclusion, we identify a unique FAP(+) CAF population that showed WNT signaling upregulation and increased FGF20 levels; while neighbor tumor cells show the upregulation/activation of FGFR2-PI3K/Akt signaling at the tumor invasive margin of EOCC tumors.

Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers

BACKGROUND

Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers for detection of MSI.

METHODS

The eight marker-panel was comprised of five conventional markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27) and three LMR markers (BAT-52, BAT-59 and BAT-62). MSI testing was performed against 300 specimens of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers through PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis length analysis.

RESULTS

The MSI testing with eight marker-panel showed 99.3% (295/297) concordance with IHC analysis excluding 3 MMR-focal deficient cases. The sensitivity of BAT-59 and BAT-62 was higher than or comparable to that of conventional markers in gastric and endometrial cancer. The mean shift size was larger in LMR markers compared to conventional markers for gastric and endometrial cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSI testing with eight maker-panel showed comparable performance with IHC analysis. The LMR markers, especially BAT-59 and BAT-62, showed high sensitivity and large shifts which can contribute to increased confidence in MSI classification, especially in gastric and endometrial cancers. Further study is needed with large number of samples for the validation of these LMR markers.

MLH1 Promoter Methylation Could Be the Second Hit in Lynch Syndrome Carcinogenesis

(1) Background: MLH1 hypermethylation is an epigenetic alteration in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC), causing gene silencing, and, as a consequence, microsatellite instability. Commonly, MLH1 hypermethylation is considered a somatic and sporadic event in cancer, and its detection is recognized as a useful tool to distinguish sporadic from inherited conditions (such as, Lynch syndrome (LS)). However, MLH1 hypermethylation has been described in rare cases of CRC and EC in LS patients. (2) Methods: A total of 61 cancers (31 CRCs, 27 ECs, 2 ovarian cancers, and 1 stomach cancer) from 56 patients referred to cancer genetic counselling were selected for loss of MLH1 protein expression and microsatellite instability. All cases were investigated for MLH1 promoter methylation and MLH1/PMS2 germline variants. (3) Results: Somatic MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was identified in 16.7% of CRC and in 40% of EC carriers of MLH1 germline pathogenic variants. In two families, primary and secondary MLH1 epimutations were demonstrated. (4) Conclusions: MLH1 hypermethylation should not be exclusively considered as a sporadic cancer mechanism, as a non-negligible number of LS-related cancers are MLH1 hypermethylated. Current flow charts for universal LS screening, which include MLH1 methylation, should be applied, paying attention to a patient's family and personal history.

Deep sequencing reveals recurrent somatic mutations and distinct molecular subgroups in gastric cancer in Mizo population, North East India

In India, Mizoram has the highest incidence of gastric cancer (GC) which might be associated with environmental factors such as diet, Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections, and somatic genomic alterations. We performed PCR cum sequencing and fragment analysis for detection of H. pylori/EBV infection and microsatellite Instability (MSI) in GC patients (N = 68). Somatic mutations were identified by targeted and exome sequencing. We found 87% of GC patients infected with H. pylori and or EBV. Pathogenic infections were mostly mutually exclusive with only 16% of coinfection. TP53, MUC6, and ARID1A were significantly mutated. Two molecular subgroups with distinctive mutational profiles were identified: (1) patients harboring mutations in TP53 and (2) patients harboring mutations in RTK/RAS/PI3-K signaling pathway and chromatin-remodeling genes. Therefore, EBV and H. pylori infections and somatic mutations in the genes involved in RTK/RAS/PI3K signaling pathway, chromatin-remodeling, and TP53 might drive GC development and progression in Mizo patients.

A Highly Sensitive Pan-Cancer Test for Microsatellite Instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an evolving biomarker for cancer detection and treatment. MSI was first used to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC), but has recently become indispensable in predicting patient response to immunotherapy. To address the need for pan-cancer MSI detection, a new multiplex assay was developed that uses novel long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers to improve sensitivity. A total of 469 tumor samples from 20 different cancer types, including 319 from patients with Lynch syndrome, were tested for MSI using the new LMR MSI Analysis System. Results were validated by using deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) status according to immunohistochemistry as the reference standard and compared versus the Promega pentaplex MSI panel. The sensitivity of the LMR panel for detection of dMMR status by immunohistochemistry was 99% for CRC and 96% for non-CRC. The overall percent agreement between the LMR and Promega pentaplex panels was 99% for CRC and 89% for non-CRC tumors. An increased number of unstable markers and the larger size shifts observed in dMMR tumors using the LMR panel increased confidence in MSI determinations. The LMR MSI Analysis System expands the spectrum of cancer types in which MSI can be accurately detected.

Microsatellite instability in non-endometrioid ovarian epithelial tumors: a study of 400 cases comparing immunohistochemistry, PCR, and NGS based testing with mutation status of MMR genes

Testing of microsatellite instability is not only used as a triage for possible Lynch syndrome, but also to predict immunotherapy treatment response. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability (MSI) in 400 cases of non-endometrioid ovarian tumors (high-grade serous, low-grade serous, mucinous and clear cell), to compare different methodological approaches of testing, and to assess the optimal approach for next generation sequencing (NGS) MSI testing. For all tumors, we evaluated immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of MMR proteins and assessed microsatellite markers by PCR-based method. Except for high-grade serous carcinoma, we correlated the findings of IHC and PCR with NGS-based MSI testing. We compared the results with somatic and germline mutation in MMR genes. Among the whole cohort, seven MMR-D cases, all clear cell carcinomas (CCC), were found. On PCR analysis, 6 cases were MSI-high and one was MSS. In all cases, mutation of an MMR gene was found; in 2 cases, the mutation was germline (Lynch syndrome). An additional 5 cases with a mutation in MMR gene(s) with MSS status and without MMR-D were identified. We further utilized sequence capture NGS for MSI testing. Employing 53 microsatellite loci provided high sensitivity and specificity. Our study shows that MSI occurs in 7% of CCC while it is rare or absent in other nonendometrioid ovarian neoplasms. Lynch syndrome was present in 2% of patients with CCC. However, some cases with MSH6 mutation can evade all testing methods, including IHC, PCR, and NGS-MSI.

ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1-3 Gene Fusions in Colorectal and Non-Colorectal Microsatellite-Unstable Cancers

This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of actionable gene rearrangements in tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI). The detection of translocations involved tests for 5'/3'-end expression imbalance, variant-specific PCR and RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Gene fusions were detected in 58/471 (12.3%) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), 4/69 (5.8%) gastric cancers (GCs) and 3/65 (4.6%) endometrial cancers (ECs) (ALK: 8; RET: 12; NTRK1: 24; NTRK2: 2; NTRK3: 19), while none of these alterations were observed in five cervical carcinomas (CCs), four pancreatic cancers (PanCs), three cholangiocarcinomas (ChCs) and two ovarian cancers (OCs). The highest frequency of gene rearrangements was seen in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal carcinomas (53/204 (26%)). Surprisingly, as many as 5/267 (1.9%) KRAS/NRAS/BRAF-mutated CRCs also carried tyrosine kinase fusions. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analysis of the fraction of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated gene copies in kinase-rearranged tumors indicated that there was simultaneous co-occurrence of two activating events in cancer cells, but not genetic mosaicism. CRC patients aged above 50 years had a strikingly higher frequency of translocations as compared to younger subjects (56/365 (15.3%) vs. 2/106 (1.9%), p = 0.002), and this difference was particularly pronounced for tumors with normal KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status (52/150 (34.7%) vs. 1/54 (1.9%), p = 0.001). There were no instances of MSI in 56 non-colorectal tumors carrying ALK, ROS1, RET or NTRK1 rearrangements. An analysis of tyrosine kinase gene translocations is particularly feasible in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type microsatellite-unstable CRCs, although other categories of tumors with MSI also demonstrate moderate occurrence of these events.

Immune checkpoint therapy for solid tumours: clinical dilemmas and future trends

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs), in addition to targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, novel targeting LAG-3 drugs have also been approved in clinical application. With the widespread use of the drug, we must deeply analyze the dilemma of the agents and seek a breakthrough in the treatment prospect. Over the past decades, these agents have demonstrated dramatic efficacy, especially in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, in the field of a broad concept of solid tumours, non-specific indications, inseparable immune response and side effects, unconfirmed progressive disease, and complex regulatory networks of immune resistance are four barriers that limit its widespread application. Fortunately, the successful clinical trials of novel ICB agents and combination therapies, the advent of the era of oncolytic virus gene editing, and the breakthrough of the technical barriers of mRNA vaccines and nano-delivery systems have made remarkable breakthroughs currently. In this review, we enumerate the mechanisms of each immune checkpoint targets, associations between ICB with tumour mutation burden, key immune regulatory or resistance signalling pathways, the specific clinical evidence of the efficacy of classical targets and new targets among different tumour types and put forward dialectical thoughts on drug safety. Finally, we discuss the importance of accurate triage of ICB based on recent advances in predictive biomarkers and diagnostic testing techniques.

Assessment of the reliability of MSI status and dMMR proteins deficiency screening on endoscopic biopsy material in esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a negative predictive factor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable oesogastric adenocarcinoma and a crucial determinant for immunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate reliability of dMMR/MSI status screening performed on preoperative endoscopic biopsies.

METHODS

Paired pathological samples from biopsies and surgical specimen of oesogastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected between 2009 and 2019. We compared dMMR status obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI status by PCR. dMMR/MSI status on surgical specimen was considered as reference.

RESULTS

PCR and IHC were conclusive on biopsies respectively for 53 (96.4%) and 47 (85.5%) of the 55 patients enrolled. IHC was not contributive for 1 surgical specimen. A third reading of IHC was carried out for 3 biopsies. MSI status was observed in 7 (12.5%) surgical specimens. When analyses were contributive, sensitivity and specificity of biopsies for dMMR/MSI were respectively 85% and 98% for PCR vs. 86% and 98% for IHC. Concordance rate between biopsies and surgical specimen was 96.2% for PCR and 97.8% for IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biopsies are a suitable source of tissue for dMMR/MSI status determination in oesogastric adenocarcinoma which should be routinely performed at diagnosis to better adapt neoadjuvant treatment.

MINIABSTRACT

By comparison of dMMR phenotype obtained by immunohistochemistry and MSI status by PCR between match-paired samples of oesogastric cancer's endoscopic biopsies and surgical specimen, we observed that biopsies are a suitable source of tissue for dMMR/MSI status determination.

Concordance in detection of microsatellite instability by PCR and NGS in routinely processed tumor specimens of several cancer types

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in several cancer types and is commonly used for prognosis and as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed n = 263 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens (127 colorectal cancer (CRC), 55 endometrial cancer (EC), 33 stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), and 48 solid tumor specimens of other tumor types) with a capillary electrophoresis based multiplex monomorphic marker MSI-PCR panel and an amplicon-based NGS assay for microsatellite instability (MSI+). In total, n = 103 (39.2%) cases with a known defect of the DNA mismatch repair system (dMMR), determined by a loss in protein expression of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 48, 46.6%) or MLH1/PMS2 (n = 55, 53.4%), were selected. Cases with an isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 were excluded.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity of the NGS assay in comparison with the MSI-PCR were 92.2% and 98.8%. With CRC cases a nearly optimal concordance was reached (sensitivity 98.1% and specificity 100.0%). Whereas EC cases only show a sensitivity of 88.6% and a specificity of 95.2%, caused by several cases with instability in less than five monomorphic markers, which could be difficult to analyze by NGS (subtle MSI+ phenotype).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI analysis of FFPE DNA by NGS is feasible and the results show a high concordance in comparison with the monomorphic marker MSI-PCR. However, cases with a subtle MSI+ phenotype, most frequently manifest in EC, have a risk of a false-negative result by NGS and should be preferentially analyzed by capillary electrophoresis.

Mathematical modeling the order of driver gene mutations in colorectal cancer

Tumor heterogeneity is a large obstacle for cancer study and treatment. Different cancer patients may involve different combinations of gene mutations or the distinct regulatory pathways for inducing the progression of tumor. Investigating the pathways of gene mutations which can cause the formation of tumor can provide a basis for the personalized treatment of cancer. Studies suggested that KRAS, APC and TP53 are the most significant driver genes for colorectal cancer. However, it is still an open issue regarding the detailed mutation order of these genes in the development of colorectal cancer. For this purpose, we analyze the mathematical model considering all orders of mutations in oncogene, KRAS and tumor suppressor genes, APC and TP53, and fit it on data describing the incidence rates of colorectal cancer at different age from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry in the United States for the year 1973-2013. The specific orders that can induce the development of colorectal cancer are identified by the model fitting. The fitting results indicate that the mutation order with KRAS → APC → TP53, APC → TP53 → KRAS and APC → KRAS → TP53 explain the age-specific risk of colorectal cancer with very well. Furthermore, eleven pathways of gene mutations can be accepted for the mutation order of genes with KRAS → APC → TP53, APC → TP53 → KRAS and APC → KRAS → TP53, and the alternation of APC acts as the initiating or promoting event in the colorectal cancer. The estimated mutation rates of cells in the different pathways demonstrate that genetic instability must exist in colorectal cancer with alterations of genes, KRAS, APC and TP53.

Performance of Immunohistochemical and Molecular Methods in Detecting Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important prognostic molecular biomarker for gastric cancer (GC). MSI status may be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Idylla™ MSI assay has not been validated for GC but may prove to be a valid alternative.

METHODS

In a series of 140 GC cases, MSI status was evaluated by IHC for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6; gold-standard pentaplex PCR panel (PPP) (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27); and Idylla. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0.

RESULTS

PPP identified 102 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases and 38 MSI-high cases. Only 3 cases showed discordant results. Compared with PPP, the sensitivity was 100% for IHC and 94.7% for Idylla. Specificity was 99% for IHC and 100% for Idylla. MLH1 IHC alone showed sensitivity and specificity of 97.4% and 98.0%, respectively. IHC identified three indeterminate cases; all were MSS according to PPP and Idylla.

CONCLUSION

IHC for MMR proteins represents an optimal screening tool for MSI status in GC. If resources are limited, isolated MLH1 evaluation may constitute a valuable option for preliminary screening. Idylla may help detect rare MSS cases with MMR-loss and define MSI status in indeterminate cases.

Noninvasive detection of microsatellite instability in patients with endometrial cancer

The analysis of mismatch repair proteins in solid tissue is the standard of care (SoC) for the microsatellite instability (MSI) characterization in endometrial cancer (EC). Uterine aspirates (UAs) or circulating-DNA (cfDNA) samples capture the intratumor heterogeneity and provide a more comprehensive and dynamic molecular diagnosis. Thus, MSI analysis by droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR) in UAs and cfDNA can provide a reliable tool to characterize and follow-up the disease. The UAs, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE) and longitudinal plasma samples from a cohort of 90 EC patients were analyzed using ddPCR panel and compared to the SoC. A high concordance (96.67%) was obtained between the analysis of MSI markers in UAs and the SoC. Three discordant cases were validated as unstable by ddPCR on FFPE samples. Besides, a good overall concordance (70.27%) was obtained when comparing the performance of the ddPCR assay on UAs and cfDNA in high-risk tumors. Importantly, our results also evidenced the value of MSI analysis to monitor the disease evolution. MSI evaluation in minimally invasive samples shows great accuracy and sensitivity and provides a valuable tool for the molecular characterization and follow-up of endometrial tumors, opening new opportunities for personalized management of EC.

A robust microsatellite instability detection model for unpaired colorectal cancer tissue samples

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a key biomarker for cancer immunotherapy and prognosis. Integration of MSI testing into a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) panel could save tissue sample, reduce turn-around time and cost, and provide MSI status and comprehensive genomic profiling in single test. We aimed to develop an MSI calling model to detect MSI status along with the NGS panel-based profiling test using tumor-only samples.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 174 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were enrolled, including 31 MSI-high (MSI-H) and 143 microsatellite stability (MSS) cases. Among them, 56 paired tumor and normal samples (10 MSI-H and 46 MSS) were used for modeling, and another 118 tumor-only samples were used for validation. MSI polymerase chain reaction (MSI-PCR) was performed as the gold standard. A baseline was built for the selected microsatellite loci using the NGS data of 56 normal blood samples. An MSI detection model was constructed by analyzing the NGS data of tissue samples. The performance of the model was compared with the results of MSI-PCR.

RESULTS

We first intersected the target genomic regions of the NGS panels used in this study to select common microsatellite loci. A total of 42 loci including 23 mononucleotide repeat sites and 19 longer repeat sites were candidates for modeling. As mononucleotide repeat sites are more sensitive and specific for detecting MSI status than sites with longer length motif and the mononucleotide repeat sites performed even better than the total sites, a model containing 23 mononucleotide repeat sites was constructed and named Colorectal Cancer Microsatellite Instability test (CRC-MSI). The model achieved 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when compared with MSI-PCR in both training and validation sets. Furthermore, the CRC-MSI model was robust with the tumor content as low as 6%. In addition, 8 out of 10 MSI-H samples showed alternations in the four mismatch repair genes ( MLH1 , MSH2 , MSH6 , and PMS2 ).

CONCLUSION

MSI status can be accurately determined along the targeted NGS panels using only tumor samples. The performance of mononucleotide repeat sites surpasses loci with longer repeat motif in MSI calling.

Mismatch repair deficiency testing in Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial tumors

Introduction

Lynch syndrome-associated cancer develops due to germline pathogenic variants in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2. Somatic second hits in tumors cause MMR deficiency, testing for which is used to screen for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer and to guide selection for immunotherapy. Both MMR protein immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis can be used. However, concordance between methods can vary for different tumor types. Therefore, we aimed to compare methods of MMR deficiency testing in Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial cancers.

Methods

Ninety-seven urothelial (61 upper tract and 28 bladder) tumors diagnosed from 1980 to 2017 in carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated pathogenic MMR variants and their first-degree relatives (FDR) were analyzed by MMR protein immunohistochemistry, the MSI Analysis System v1.2 (Promega), and an amplicon sequencing-based MSI assay. Two sets of MSI markers were used in sequencing-based MSI analysis: a panel of 24 and 54 markers developed for colorectal cancer and blood MSI analysis, respectively.

Results

Among the 97 urothelial tumors, 86 (88.7%) showed immunohistochemical MMR loss and 68 were successfully analyzed by the Promega MSI assay, of which 48 (70.6%) were MSI-high and 20 (29.4%) were MSI-low/microsatellite stable. Seventy-two samples had sufficient DNA for the sequencing-based MSI assay, of which 55 (76.4%) and 61 (84.7%) scored as MSI-high using the 24-marker and 54-marker panels, respectively. The concordance between the MSI assays and immunohistochemistry was 70.6% (p = 0.003), 87.5% (p = 0.039), and 90.3% (p = 1.00) for the Promega assay, the 24-marker assay, and the 54-marker assay, respectively. Of the 11 tumors with retained MMR protein expression, four were MSI-low/MSI-high or MSI-high by the Promega assay or one of the sequencing-based assays.

Conclusion

Our results show that Lynch syndrome-associated urothelial cancers frequently had loss of MMR protein expression. The Promega MSI assay was significantly less sensitive, but the 54-marker sequencing-based MSI analysis showed no significant difference compared to immunohistochemistry. Data from this study alongside previous studies, suggest that universal MMR deficiency testing of newly diagnosed urothelial cancers, using immunohistochemistry and/or sequencing-based MSI analysis of sensitive markers, offer a potentially useful approach to identification of Lynch syndrome cases.

Diagnostic Performance of Immunohistochemistry Compared to Molecular Techniques for Microsatellite Instability and p53 Mutation Detection in Endometrial Cancer

Molecular algorithms may estimate the risk of recurrence and death for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and may impact treatment decisions. To detect microsatellite instabilities (MSI) and p53 mutations, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular techniques are used. To select the most appropriate method, and to have an accurate interpretation of their results, knowledge of the performance characteristics of these respective methods is essential. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of IHC versus molecular techniques (gold standard). One hundred and thirty-two unselected EC patients were enrolled in this study. Agreement between the two diagnostic methods was assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the IHC were calculated. For MSI status, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 89.3%, 87.3%, 78.1% and 94.1%, respectively. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.74. For p53 status, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 92.3%, 77.1%, 60.0% and 96.4%, respectively. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.59. For MSI status, IHC presented a substantial agreement with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach. For the p53 status, the moderate agreement observed between IHC and next generation sequencing (NGS) methods implies that they cannot be used interchangeably.

A comparison of performance of 6-mononucleotide site panel and NCI panel for microsatellite instability detection in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) represents as a molecular hallmark of deficient MMR system at the genomic level. Increasing clinical significance of MSI status highlights the necessity of simple, accurate markers for detection. Although 2B3D NCI panel is the most widely applied, it has been questioned whether the performance of NCI panel is second to none in MSI detection.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy of the NCI panel versus a 6-mononucleotide site panel (BAT25, BAT26, NR21, NR24, NR27, and MONO-27) in assessing MSI status of 468 Chinese patients with CRC, and compared MSI test results with the results by immunohistochemistry of four MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) in the present study. Clinicopathological variables were also collected, and their associations with MSI or MMR proteins status were analyzed using either the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

MSI-H/dMMR was significantly associated with right colon involvement, poor differentiation, early stage, mucinous adenocarcinoma, negative lymph node, less neural invasion, and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type. As to the efficiency of detecting deficient MMR system, both panels had good concordance with MMR proteins expression by IHC, and 6-mononucleotide site panel outperformed NCI panel in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value numerically despite the lack of statistical significance. The advantage was more obvious in the sensitivity and specificity analyses of each single microsatellite markers from 6-mononucleotide site panel in comparison with NCI panel. Additionally, the rate of MSI-L detected by 6-mononucleotide site panel was much lower than that detected by the NCI panel (0.64% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.0326).

CONCLUSION

6-mononucleotide site panel had a greater ability to help resolve cases of MSI-L into either MSI-H or MSS. We propose that 6-mononucleotide site panel may be potentially more suitable than NCI panel for Chinese CRC population. Large-scale studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Predictive Biomarkers for Response to Immunotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Promises and Challenges

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis and a paucity of therapeutic options. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with TNBC. However, this therapeutic evolution is paralleled by a growing need for biomarkers which allow for a better selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from this immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimen. These biomarkers will not only facilitate a better optimization of treatment strategies, but they will also avoid unnecessary side effects in non-responders, and limit the increasing financial toxicity linked to the use of these agents. Huge efforts have been deployed to identify predictive biomarkers for the ICI, but until now, the fruits of this labor remained largely unsatisfactory. Among clinically validated biomarkers, only programmed death-ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) expression has been prospectively assessed in TNBC trials. In addition to this, microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden are approved as tumor agnostic biomarkers, but only a small percentage of TNBC fits this category. Furthermore, TNBC should no longer be approached as a single biological entity, but rather as a complex disease with different molecular, clinicopathological, and tumor microenvironment subgroups. This review provides an overview of the validated and evolving predictive biomarkers for a response to ICI in TNBC.

Prognostic Implications of Endoscopic Obstruction in Patients with Pathological Stage II Colon Cancers: a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic effect of endoscopic obstruction (eOB) on the survival of stage II colon cancer patients and the role of eOB in guiding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of stage II colon cancer are little known.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients who had undergone curative surgery and preoperative colonoscope for stage II colon carcinoma were included. The eOB was defined as severe luminal colon obstruction that prevented the standard colonoscope from passing beyond the tumor. The association between eOB and stage II colon cancer survival and the predictive role of eOB for adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1102 included patients, 616 (55.9%) had eOB and 486 (44.1%) had no eOB. The median follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range, 38-68 months). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with eOB had poor 5-year overall survival (OS; 85.3% vs. 95.3%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without eOB. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS; 78.5% vs. 87.6%, p = 0.004) was also poor in these patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated eOB was a significant prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.531, p < 0.001), but not for DFS (p = 0.081). Even when patients with clinical colonic obstruction were excluded from the population with eOB, the worse OS (HR = 2.262, p = 0.001) was observed. The OS and DFS of eOB patients improved slightly after adjuvant chemotherapy, but there was no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage II colon cancer patients with eOB have a poor prognosis. However, whether eOB can guide adjuvant chemotherapy still needs further study.

Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ malignancies has become widespread in the last decade. Accumulating evidence shows broad survival benefit as compared to traditional chemotherapies. At the same time, a need has emerged to stratify these drugs in various patient populations and histologies. Consequently, various immune biomarkers have been proposed to help in selecting patients for these therapies. Here, we review the evidence pertaining to biomarkers including programmed death-ligand 1, defective mismatch repair, tumor mutational burden, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, gene expression profiles, circulating blood cells, circulating DNA and the gut microbiome. The value of PD-L1 testing in certain malignancies, such as lung and urothelial cancer is highlighted as well as emerging data from trials such as GARNET and CheckMate142.

Prognosis and chemosensitivity of non-colorectal alimentary tract cancers with microsatellite instability

BACKGROUND

Data on outcomes of microsatellite instable and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR/MSI) digestive non-colorectal tumors are limited.

AIMS

To evaluate overall survival (OS) of patients with dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumor.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with a dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumor were included in this French retrospective multicenter study.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients were included with a mean age of 63.6 years and 32.6% with a Lynch syndrome. Most tumors were oesophago-gastric (54.3%) or small bowel (32.8%) adenocarcinomas and at a localized stage at diagnosis (86.7%). In patients with localized tumors and R0 resection, median OS was 134.0 ± 64.2 months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 100.3 ± 65.7 months. Considering oesophago-gastric tumors, median DFS was improved when chemotherapy was added to surgery (not reached versus 22.8 ± 10.0 months, p = 0.03). In patients with advanced tumors treated by chemotherapy, median OS was 14.2 ± 1.9 months and median progression-free survival was 7.4 ± 1.6 months.

CONCLUSION

dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumors are mostly diagnosed at a non-metastatic stage with a good prognosis. Advanced dMMR/MSI digestive non-colorectal tumors have a poor prognosis with standard chemotherapy.

EBV and MSI Status in Gastric Cancer: Does It Matter?

We investigated the impactof microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status in gastric cancer (GC), regarding response to perioperative chemotherapy (POPChT), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We included 137 cases of operated GC, 51 of which were submitted to POPChT. MSI status was determined by multiplex PCR and EBV status by EBV-encoded RNA in situ hybridization. Thirty-seven (27%) cases presented as MSI-high, and seven (5.1%) were EBV+. Concerning tumor regression after POPChT, no differences were observed between the molecular subtypes, but females were more likely to respond (p = 0.062). No significant differences were found in OS or PFS between different subtypes. In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.02, IC 95% 1.002-1.056, p = 0.033) and positive lymph nodes (HR 1.82, IC 95% 1.034-3.211, p = 0.038) were the only prognostic factors for OS. However, females with MSI-high tumors treated with POPChT demonstrated a significantly increased OS compared to females with MSS tumors (p = 0.031). In conclusion, we found a high proportion of MSI-high cases. MSI and EBV status did not influence OS or PFS either in patients submitted to POPChT or surgery alone. However, superior survival of females with MSI-high tumors suggests that sex disparities and molecular classification may influence treatment options in GC.

Predictive biomarkers of colon cancer immunotherapy: Present and future

Immunotherapy has revolutionized colon cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefits for colon cancer patients, especially those with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ICI pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment for metastatic MSI-H colon cancer patients. Additionally, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has presented efficacy in treating early-stage colon cancer patients. Although MSI has been thought of as an effective predictive biomarker for colon cancer immunotherapy, only a small proportion of colon cancer patients were MSI-H, and certain colon cancer patients with MSI-H presented intrinsic or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Thus, further search for predictive biomarkers to stratify patients is meaningful in colon cancer immunotherapy. Except for MSI, other biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression level, tumor mutation burden (TMB), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), certain gut microbiota, ctDNA, and circulating immune cells were also proposed to be correlated with patient survival and ICI efficacy in some colon cancer clinical studies. Moreover, developing new diagnostic techniques helps identify accurate predictive biomarkers for colon cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we outline the reported predictive biomarkers in colon cancer immunotherapy and further discuss the prospects of technological changes for biomarker development in colon cancer immunotherapy.

MSI colorectal cancer, all you need to know

Colorectal cancer management has been dramatically impacted by molecular profiling these last years. Among these molecular subgroups, patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) are of particular interest, owing to the prognostic and predictive value of this tumor biomarker. This review article explains the molecular abnormalities underlying MSI phenotype and the consequences of such molecular abnormalities on carcinogenesis, genetic instability and immune infiltration. It details the diagnostic methods for identifying MSI colorectal cancer patients and describes how the prognostic and theranostic values of this marker are impacting treatment decision-making for these patients in 2022.

Left-sided colorectal cancer distinct in indigenous African patients compared to other ethnic groups in South Africa

Introduction

A large proportion of indigenous African (IA) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in South Africa are young (< 50 years), with no unique histopathological or molecular characteristics. Anatomical site as well as microsatellite instability (MSI) status have shown to be associated with different clinicopathological and molecular features. This study aimed to ascertain key histopathological features in microsatellite stable (MSS) and low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) patients, to provide insight into the mechanism of the disease.

Methods

A retrospective cohort (2011–2015) of MSS/MSI-L CRC patient samples diagnosed at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital was analyzed. Samples were categorized by site [right colon cancer (RCC) versus left (LCC)], ethnicity [IA versus other ethnic groups (OEG)] and MSI status (MSI-L vs MSS). T-test, Fischer’s exact and Chi-square tests were conducted.

Results

IA patients with LCC demonstrated an increased prevalence in males, sigmoid colon, signet-ring-cell morphology, MSI-L with BAT25/26 marker instability and advanced disease association.

Conclusion

This study revealed distinct histopathological features for LCC, and suggests BAT25 and BAT26 as negative prognostic markers in African CRC patients. Larger confirmatory studies are recommended.

Correlation of Immunological and Histopathological Features with Gene Expression-Based Classifiers in Colon Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between four distinct histopathological features: (1) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, (2) mucinous differentiation, (3) tumor-stroma ratio, plus (4) tumor budding and two gene expression-based classifiers—(1) consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) plus (2) colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes (CRIS). All four histopathological features were retrospectively scored on hematoxylin and eosin sections of the most invasive part of the primary tumor in 218 stage II and III colon cancer patients from two independent cohorts (AMC-AJCC-90 and AC-ICAM). RNA-based CMS and CRIS assignments were independently obtained for all patients. Contingency tables were constructed and a χ2 test was used to test for statistical significance. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and a mucinous phenotype (>50% mucinous surface area) were strongly correlated with CMS1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008) and CRIS-A (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001). The presence of mucus (≥ 10%) was associated with CMS3: mucus was present in 64.1% of all CMS3 tumors (p < 0.001). Although a clear association between tumor-stroma ratio and CMS4 was established in this study (p = 0.006), still 32 out of 61 (52.5%) CMS4 tumors were scored as stroma-low, indicating that CMS4 tumors cannot be identified solely based on stromal content. Higher budding counts were seen in CMS4 and CRIS-B tumors (p = 0.045 and p = 0.046). No other associations of the measured parameters were seen for any of the other CRIS subtypes. Our analysis revealed clear associations between histopathologic features and CMS or CRIS subtypes. However, identification of distinct molecular subtypes solely based on histopathology proved to be infeasible. Combining both molecular and morphologic features could potentially improve patient stratification.

Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer: Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment

Microsatellite unstable (MSI) colorectal cancers (CRCs) are due to DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and occurs in15% of non-metastatic diseases and 5% in the metastatic setting. Nearly 30% of MSI CRCs occur in a context of constitutional mutation of the MMR system (Lynch syndrome). Others are sporadic cancers linked to a hypermethylation of the MLH-1 promoter. The pathogenic alterations of MMR genes lead to the accumulation of frequent somatic mutational events and these tumours arbour a high antigen burden and are highly infiltrated with cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes. Microsatellite instability/DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MSI/dMMR) status has prognostic and predictive implications in non-metastatic and metastatic CRCs. The prognostic value of MSI status in non-metastatic CRCs has been studied extensively, yet the data are more limited for its predictive value in terms of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy. In both cases (metastatic and non-metastatic settings) treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a remarkable effectiveness in the context of MSI/dMMR status. Indeed, recent data from prospective cohorts and randomised trials have shown a dramatical improvement of survival with immunotherapy (programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1]   cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA-4] blockage) in metastatic or non-metastatic MSI/dMMR CRC. In this review we report and discuss how and for whom to test for the MSI/dMMR phenotype, as well as the prognostic value of this phenotype and the new treatment recommendations options for this unique CRC population. Despite their efficacy, primary and secondary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are observed in more than 50% MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients and in the future how to identify these patients and to overcome resistance will be an important challenge.

Systematic pan-cancer analysis identifies RBM39 as an immunological and prognostic biomarker

RNA‐binding Motif Protein39 (RBM39) is identified as a splicing factor and transcription coactivator. Despite mounting evidence that RBM39 plays a critical role in the development of specific malignancies, no systematic pan‐cancer investigation of RBM39 has been conducted. As a result, we set out to investigate RBM39’s prognostic significance and putative immunological activities in 33 different cancers. Based on TCGA and CCLE, GTEx, cBioportal and HPA, we used a series of bioinformatics approaches to explore the potential oncogenic role of RBM39, including analysis of the expression of the pan‐cancer species RBM39, the prognostic relationship between RBM39 expression and overall survival (OS), disease‐specific survival (DSS) and progression‐free interval (PFI), the relationship between RBM39 expression and clinical phenotype, analysis of the relationship between RBM39 expression and tumour mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA methylation and immune cell infiltration. Our results showed that RBM39 is overexpressed in most cancers. RBM39 was positively or negatively correlated with the prognosis of different tumours. RBM39 expression was associated with TMB and MSI in 9 and 12 cancer types. In addition, RBM39 expression was associated with DNA methylation in almost all tumours. There are eight tumours were screened for further study, including BRCA, COAD, HNSC, LIHC, LUSC, SKCM, STAD, UCEC. In the screed tumours, RBM39 was found to be negatively correlated with the infiltration of most immune cells. In addition, the correlation with RBM39 expression varied by immune cell subtype. Based on RBM39’s role in tumorigenesis and tumour immunity, we suggest it can serve as a surrogate prognostic marker.

Microsatellite Instability: From the Implementation of the Detection to a Prognostic and Predictive Role in Cancers

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been identified in several tumors arising from either germline or somatic aberration. The presence of MSI in cancer predicts the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. To date, the predictive role of MSI is currently used in the selection of colorectal cancer patients for immunotherapy; moreover, the expansion of clinical trials into other cancer types may elucidate the predictive value of MSI for non-colorectal tumors. In clinical practice, several assays are used for MSI testing, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this review, we provide an overview of MSI in various cancer types, highlighting its potential predictive/prognostic role and the clinical trials performed. Finally, we focus on the comparison data between the different assays used to detect MSI in clinical practice.

Computational Analysis of Pathological Image Enables Interpretable Prediction for Microsatellite Instability

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with several tumor types and has become increasingly vital in guiding patient treatment decisions; however, reasonably distinguishing MSI from its counterpart is challenging in clinical practice.

Methods

In this study, interpretable pathological image analysis strategies are established to help medical experts to identify MSI. The strategies only require ubiquitous hematoxylin and eosin–stained whole-slide images and perform well in the three cohorts collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Equipped with machine learning and image processing technique, intelligent models are established to diagnose MSI based on pathological images, providing the rationale of the decision in both image level and pathological feature level.

Findings

The strategies achieve two levels of interpretability. First, the image-level interpretability is achieved by generating localization heat maps of important regions based on deep learning. Second, the feature-level interpretability is attained through feature importance and pathological feature interaction analysis. Interestingly, from both the image-level and feature-level interpretability, color and texture characteristics, as well as their interaction, are shown to be mostly contributed to the MSI prediction.

Interpretation

The developed transparent machine learning pipeline is able to detect MSI efficiently and provide comprehensive clinical insights to pathologists. The comprehensible heat maps and features in the intelligent pipeline reflect extra- and intra-cellular acid–base balance shift in MSI tumor.

Fusobacterium nucleatum impairs DNA mismatch repair and stability in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Dysbiosis of the laryngeal microbiota has been demonstrated to the development of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the association of Fusobacterium and Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) has not been investigated.

METHODS

The abundance of Fusobacterium and F. nucleatum, the status of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI, and MMR-related gene expression were analyzed in 171 HNSCC tissues, 61 paired para-tumor tissues, and 60 vocal cord polyp tissues. The molecular mechanism of F. nucleatum and MMR-related gene expression were investigated in two human HNSCC cell lines (Tu 686 and FD-LSC-1).

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that a high Fusobacterium abundance was detected in the HNSCC tissues and was exaggerated in the recurrent patients. We further found that a high Fusobacterium abundance was detected in the HNSCC tissues with dMMR and MSI. The Fusobacterium abundance was negatively correlated with the expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in the HNSCC tissues. The Fusobacterium abundance was closely associated with the F. nucleatum abundance in the HNSCC tissues. F. nucleatum increased miR-205-5p expression to suppress MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 expression via the TLR4- and MYD88-dependent innate immune signaling pathway, resulting in dMMR, DNA damage, and cell proliferation in HNSCC.

CONCLUSIONS

F. nucleatum impacts HNSCC epigenetic changes in tissues with dMMR to promote DNA damage and cell proliferation by suppressing MMR-related gene expression via the TLR4/MYD88/miR-205-5p signaling pathway, which is valuable in the development of efficient strategies for HNSCC prevention and treatment.

LAY SUMMARY

This study clearly indicates that Fusobacterium induced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) aggressiveness to affect poor prognosis in HNSCC patients by epigenetic alteration of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability. Moreover, the research has shown that Fusobacterium nucleatum ( F. nucleatum ) impacts HNSCC epigenetic changes in tissues with deficient MMR to promote DNA damage and cell proliferation by suppressing MMRrelated gene expression via the TLR4/MYD88/miR-205-5p signaling pathway.

Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma (MGC) is a rare but distinctive histologic subtype of gastric cancer (GC). The clinico-pathologic and genomic characteristics of MGC have not been well evaluated.

METHODS

We collected individual data from five cohorts targeting the microsatellite instability (MSI) of GC (n = 5089) to evaluate the clinico-pathologic characteristics of MGC. In addition, public genomic databases were used for genomic analysis. The characteristics of MGC were compared with those of non-mucinous GC (NMGC).

RESULTS

MGC (n = 158, 3.1%) showed distinctive characteristics in terms of age, sex, and TNM stage compared to NMGC (n = 4931). MGC was frequently associated with MSI-high (OR: 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.40, p < 0.001), while mutually exclusive to the Epstein-Barr virus type. The prognosis of MGC was better than that of NMGC (adj.HR: 0.731, 95% CI 0.556-0.962, p = 0.025). There was no clear benefit from postoperative chemotherapy in MGC. TP53 was the main driver mutation in the MGC without recurrent variants. MGC was related to high expression of GPR120 and B3GNT6 and moderate regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-up signature with a high EMT-down signature, and those characteristics was related to favorable prognosis of GC (log-rank p = 0.044, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). MSI-H of MGC was associated with low cancer-associate fibroblasts but high CD274 (PD-L1) expression compared to microsatellite stable MGC, suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors may be useful for the MSI-H of MGC.

CONCLUSION

MGC could be a surrogate for performing MSI but not the EBV test in GC. Further, its genetic characteristics lead to a favorable prognosis for MGC.