Polyomavirus nephropathy: a current perspective and clinical considerations

Hemorrhagic cystitis induced by JC polyomavirus infection following COVID-19: a case report

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is a human polyomavirus that can establish lifelong persistent infection in the majority of adults. It is typically asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals. However, there is a risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. Though JCPyV commonly resides in the kidney-urinary tract, its involvement in urinary system diseases is extremely rare. Here, we reported a case of a 60-year-old male patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection who developed hemorrhagic cystitis after receiving treatment with nirmatrelvir 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg quaque die (QD). Subsequent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) confirmed the infection to be caused by JCPyV type 2. Then, human immunoglobulin (PH4) for intravenous injection at a dose of 25 g QD was administered to the patient. Three days later, the hematuria resolved. This case illustrates that in the setting of compromised host immune function, JCPyV is not limited to causing central nervous system diseases but can also exhibit pathogenicity in the urinary system. Moreover, mNGS technology facilitates rapid diagnosis of infectious etiology by clinical practitioners, contributing to precise treatment for patients.

Protocolized polyoma BK viral load monitoring and high-dose immunoglobulin treatment in children after kidney transplant

Background

BKPyV virus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is diagnosed in 5%-16% of pediatric renal transplant recipients (PRTR) and preceded by BKPyV-viruria and DNAemia. Despite the risk of irreversible transplant damage associated with BKPyVAN, evidence-based consensus guidelines for BKPyVAN prevention are still lacking. In this retrospective study, we examined the safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (HD-IVIG) therapy for prevention of BKPyVAN in PRTR with significant BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia.

Methods

Between January 2013 and December 2022, all PRTR under our care underwent routine urine and blood testing for BKPyV viral load, using specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). BKPyV DNAemia, with <103 copies/mL, with BKPyV viruria <107 copies/mL, with no evidence of BKPyVAN, were managed with 50% dose reduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients showing no decline in BKPyV viral load within two months of MMF dose reduction were managed with HD-IVIG (2 g/kg).

Results

Seventy patients were recruited during a ten-year period and 31/70 patients (44%) demonstrated significant post-transplantation BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia, while 13/31 (42%) patients were unresponsive to MMF dose reduction, and were administered HD-IVIG. Of these, 12/13 (92%) patients achieved BKPyV viral clearance within six months from completion of HD-IVIG therapy and 1/13 patient (8%) was unresponsive to HD-IVIG therapy, showing increased BKPyV viral load. There were no major adverse events associated with HD-IVIG, and none of our patients developed BKPyVAN during the study period.

Conclusions

Prophylactic HD-IVIG therapy in PRTR with significant BKPyV-viruria/DNAemia unresponsive to MMF dose reduction is safe and might be effective in preventing BKPyVAN. Our findings remain to be established by large-scale prospective studies.

Clinical and immunological characteristics for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) can cause a significant risk of allograft impairment after kidney transplantation (KT). Intact BKPyV-specific immunity is associated with viral containment. This study investigated BKPyV-specific immunological factors among KT recipients.

METHODS

This prospective study in a single transplant center from January 2019 to August 2019 assessed associations between clinical and immunological characteristics, with a focus on BKPyV-cell-specific immunity and BKPyVAN, among KT recipients aged ≥15 years. The numbers of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-producing CD4+  T, CD8+  T, natural killer (NK), and natural killer T (NKT) cells were measured after stimulation with large T antigen and viral capsid protein 1 (VP1).

RESULTS

In total, 100 KT recipients were included (mean age ± SD, 42 ± 11 years); 35% of the recipients were female patients, and 70% had received induction immunosuppressive therapy. The 1-year cumulative incidence of high-level BKPyV DNAuria (possible BKPyVAN) and (presumptive BKPyVAN) was 18%. Among 40 patients with immunological factor data, pre-KT %NK cells (hazard ratio [HR], 1.258; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.077-1.469; p = .004) and %VP1-specific NK cells (HR, 1.209; 95% CI, 1.055-1.386; p = .006) were factors independently associated with possible and presumptive BKPyVAN. KT recipients with possible and presumptive BKPyVAN were more likely to exhibit significant mean coefficients of %NK, %VP1-specific NK, and %NKT cells at 1 month after KT than before KT (all p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Individuals with nonspecific and VP1-specific NK cells before KT and increasing numbers of these cells after KT may be at risk for high-level BKPyV DNAuria and presumptive BKPyVAN. Further studies are needed to determine the utility of BKPyV-specific innate immune surveillance in predicting the occurrence of BKPyVAN.

Infection, Rejection, and the Connection

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for people with end-stage organ disease. Immune-mediated transplant rejection is a common complication that decreases allograft survival. Although immunosuppression is required to prevent rejection, it also increases the risk of infection. Some infections, such as cytomegalovirus and BK virus, can promote inflammatory gene expression that can further tip the balance toward rejection. BK virus and other infections can induce damage that resembles the clinical pathology of rejection, and this complicates accurate diagnosis. Moreover, T cells specific for viral infection can lead to rejection through heterologous immunity to donor antigen directly mediated by antiviral cells. Thus, viral infections and allograft rejection interact in multiple ways that are important to maintain immunologic homeostasis in solid organ transplant recipients. Better insight into this dynamic interplay will help promote long-term transplant survival.

Biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplant patients: risk factors, prevalence and treatment approach

Purpose: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a latent infection and it is closely associated with immunsuppressive therapy. We aimed in this study to evaluate biopsy-proven BKVN and investigate frequency, risk factors and treatment management. Materials and Methods: In this study, 422 kidney transplant recipients were analysed retrospectively between April 2014 and April 2020 for biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy. Group I included 16 kidney transplant patients with biopsy-proven BK nephropathy and group II included 36 kidney transplant patients with negative BK virus nephropathy. We aimed demographic, clinical features of kidney transplant recipients with BKVN (group I, n: 16 ) and non-BKVN (group II, n:36) were compared and the factors affecting of BKVN. Results: The mean age of grup I and group II were were 41±14.8 years and 39±15.2 respectively. The patients mean follow-up period of 43±11.2 months. Serum creatinine and proteinuria degree were significantly higher in the group with BKVN. In order to reduce the dose of immunosuppression in patients with BKVN, tacrolimus treatment was discontinued in 8 patients, and they were switched to everolimus + MMF + prednisone treatment, leflunamide + MMF + prednisone treatment in 4 patients, and sirolimus + MMF + prednisone treatment in 4 patients. The mean serum creatinine level of the patients who were followed up were observed as 1.78±0.98 mg/dl in group I. Conclusion: In our center, the prevalance of BKVN was found 3.92% during the study period. Reduction of dose immunosuppressive therapy is the most effective treatment. It is thought that there was no differences between Leflunamide and other approaches for treatment. Early diagnosis and screening (frequently intervals) seems to be most effective way for BKVN.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

High-Frequency US for BK Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy after Kidney Transplant

Background BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is an important cause of chronic renal allograft dysfunction. However, US features indicative of BKPyVAN have not been fully evaluated. Purpose To assess the value of high-frequency US for the diagnosis of BKPyVAN in kidney transplant recipients. Materials and Methods In this prospective cohort study, participants who tested positive for BK viruria after kidney transplant from September 2019 to January 2021 were evaluated with high-frequency US 1 day before biopsy. Clinical characteristics and US features were compared between participants with and without BKPyVAN. Significant predictors associated with BKPyVAN were determined using logistic regression analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Results A total of 105 participants who underwent kidney transplant (mean age, 38 years ± 11 [SD]; 63 men) were evaluated; 45 participants were diagnosed with BKPyVAN. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that eccentric hydronephrosis and subcapsular hypoechoic areas were independent factors for BKPyVAN. The AUC for predicting BKPyVAN according to subcapsular hypoechoic areas was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.77), with a specificity of 92% (55 of 60 participants). The AUC of combined US (eccentric hydronephrosis plus subcapsular hypoechoic area) and clinical (urine BKPyV DNA load [BKPyV-DNA] plus BK viremia) features was 0.90, with a specificity of 92% (55 of 60 participants). Parenchymal hyperechoic and subcapsular hypoechoic areas were independent factors for differentiating BKPyVAN from transplant rejection. The pooled specificity of subcapsular hypoechoic areas was 96% (21 of 22 participants), with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.80). For the combination of US (parenchymal echogenicity plus subcapsular hypoechoic area) and clinical (urine BKPyV-DNA plus time since transplant) features, the AUC reached 0.92 and specificity was 82% (18 of 22 participants). Conclusion High-frequency US characteristics are valuable for diagnosing BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and distinguishing BKPyVAN from rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

BK virus-associated nephropathy in a lung transplant patient: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is a relatively common cause of renal dysfunction in the first six months after renal transplantation. It arises from reactivation of the latent and usually harmless BK virus (BK virus) due to immunosuppression and other factors including some that are unique to renal transplantation such as allograft injury. BKVAN is much rarer in non-renal solid organ transplantation, where data regarding diagnosis and management are extremely limited.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 58-year-old man found to have worsening renal dysfunction nine months after bilateral sequential lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). He had required methylprednisolone for acute allograft rejection but achieved good graft function. Urine microscopy and culture and renal ultrasound were normal. BK virus PCR was positive at high levels in urine and blood. Renal biopsy subsequently confirmed BKVAN. The patient progressed to end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis despite reduction in immunosuppression, including switching mycophenolate for everolimus, and the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

CONCLUSIONS

This very rare case highlights the challenges presented by BK virus in the non-renal solid organ transplant population. Diagnosis can be difficult, especially given the heterogeneity with which BKV disease has been reported to present in such patients, and the optimal approach to management is unknown. Balancing reduction in immunosuppression against prevention of allograft rejection is delicate. Improved therapeutic options are clearly required.

Polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus infections are risk factors for grafts loss in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Published literature on predictors of polyomavirus (BKV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant and their impact on allograft outcomes remain sparse. We hypothesize that BKV and CMV viremia infections decrease allograft survival in SPK. Identifying modifiable predictors of BKV and CMV may help tailor immunosuppression and improve allograft survival.

METHODS

All SPK recipients at our institution between January 2000 and April 2016 were included (n = 757). Thirty-nine recipients had BKV only and 25 had CMV only, and infection occurred at median follow-up times of 217 and 163 days, respectively. Event density sampling was used to match recipients with BKV or CMV to up to 10 recipients without infection by age, sex, and HLA mismatch status, and these were followed for a median of 4.3 years after infection.

RESULTS

Older age (HR 1.49 for each decade; 95% CI: 0.95, 2.35; P = .083) and tacrolimus use (HR 20.6; 95% CI: 2.37, 179.53; P = .006) were associated with increased incidence of BKV, but not CMV, infection. Both BKV and CMV infections were associated with increased risk of allograft failure for both pancreas (BKV [HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.47, 3.208; P = .000], CMV [HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.077, 2.687; P = .023]) and kidney (BKV [HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.765, 3.984; P = .000], CMV [HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.295, 3.308; P = .002]).

CONCLUSION

Older age at time of transplant and tacrolimus may help predict BKV infection in SPK recipients.

Decoy Cells versus Plasma Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Polyomaviruses in Renal Transplant Patients: A Single Institutional Experience

Background and Aims:

Microscopic detection of decoy cells is routinely performed in urine samples from renal transplant patients for the evaluation of polyomaviruses. However, they are scanty papers evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of decoy cells in urine samples. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of decoy cells in urine samples and compare with plasma real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a gold standard method. In addition, to compare the findings of this study with other similar studies.

Methods:

A retrospective study over a period of four years from January 2014 to December 2017 was performed. A total of 89 urine samples from renal transplant patients were assessed for the presence of polyomaviruses and compared with plasma RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured.

Results:

There were 29 males and 18 females. The mean patient age was 40.3 years. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were 86.6%, 67.5%, 70.7%, 35.1% and 96.1%, respectively. Other similar studies reported a sensitivity of 41.9-84.6%, specificity of 65.8-100% and accuracy of 69.9-82%.

Conclusion:

The findings of this study show that the detection of decoy cells in urine samples is a sensitive screening method for polyomaviruses. The findings of this study are compatible with other similar studies.

BK Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy managed by screening policy in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is an important complication after kidney transplantation. Prevalence ranges from 1% to 10%, and graft loss occurs in approximately 50% of the cases. There is no effective treatment, so early viral detection with immunosuppression tapering is the current strategy to prevent PyVAN.

AIMS

To verify the frequency of PyVAN in a single center and evaluate the response to immunosuppressive adjustments through graft survival analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven PyVAN, compared with no-PyVAN patients regarding clinical aspects, immunosuppression, and graft survival over at least 2 years.

RESULTS

There were 1404 kidney transplants analyzed in the study period, 58 with biopsy-proven PyVAN. Cumulative incidence was 4.1%. Median time from transplantation to PyVAN diagnosis was 6 (1-41) months. PyVAN was associated with recipient male gender (P = .041) and deceased donation (P = .005). Graft survival was inferior for PyVAN compared to no-PyVAN patients, 81.8% vs 75.2%, P = .019. Thirteen (22.4%) PyVAN patients lost their grafts, nine (15.5%) losses attributed to BKPyV infection. Three patients with BKPyV-associated graft losses were submitted to a successful second kidney transplant, with no evidence of viral replication during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PyVAN still is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Even though implementing active vigilance and immunosuppressive adjustment, this real-life single-center study demonstrated inferior graft survival in PyVAN patients compared to non-PyVAN.

BK viremia and nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients

The renal survival rate of pediatric renal transplant recipients (pRTR) has improved with the use of modern immunosuppressive agents; however, the incidence of post-transplantation viral infection has increased. This study investigated the incidence of BK viremia and BK viral-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in pRTR. One-hundred-and-thirty-four pRTR were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 20, 14.9%) comprised those who were prospectively followed with longitudinal analyses after renal transplantation in the time period from May 2007 to June 2008, while group 2 (n = 114, 85.1%) cross-sectional study of those who were transplanted from January 1994 to April 2007. The mean ages at transplantation in groups 1 and 2 were 10.6 ± 4.7 years and 7.8 ± 4.5 years, respectively. BK viremia was detected in four (20.0%) patients in group 1, and seven (6.1%) in group 2 (P = 0.04), with increased incidence associated with induction therapy. The median time to detection of BK viremia after transplantation was 44 days in group 1 and 142 days in group 2. BKVAN was diagnosed in three patients (two in group 1 and one in group 2). All three patients diagnosed with BKVAN were receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids as maintenance immunosuppression. Reducing immunosuppression resulted in reduced BK viremia. Monitoring for BK viremia and BKVAN is important in pRTR being treated with the current immunosuppressive regimen. The first line of treatment for BK viremia remains careful reduction of immunosuppression and close monitoring of renal allograft function.

Screening for BK Viremia/Viruria and the Impact of Management of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of BK-induced nephritis in renal transplant recipients is estimated to be 1% to 10%; the rate of graft loss within 1 year is 30% to 65%. We conducted this study to evaluate screening of BK virus in blood and/or urine among renal transplant recipients and to assess the effects of different therapeutic modalities in renal transplant recipients with BK nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients were screened at the time of transplant and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Fiftynine patients were diagnosed with BK virus viremia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment: group 1 (n = 29) received an active treatment and group 2 (n = 30) received minimized immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Most patients required graft biopsies to confirm diagnosis (86.2% in group 1 vs 50% in group 2; P = .03). Both groups were comparable regarding demographic data. Initial posttransplant graft function was significantly better in group 1 (P = .017); ultimately, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding graft survival (P= .51). Fifty percent of patients had biopsy-proven acute T-cell-mediated rejection before BK virus-associated nephropathy diagnosis (significantly higher in group 1). Serum creatinine levels were significantly better in group 2 at 3, 4, and 5 years after BK nephropathy (P = .001, .017, and .003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of BK nephropathy in our renal transplant recipients was 5.9% with a rate of graft loss ranging from 43% to 51%. Regular screening, less intensive immunosuppressive therapy, and early intervention by reduction of immunosuppressive medications are advisable to obtain early diagnosis and to have better outcomes of BK virus-associated nephropathy with antiviral agents.

BK viremia is not associated with adverse outcomes in the absence of BK nephropathy

There are limited data regarding the association of different levels of BK viremia and BK nephropathy (BKN), and graft outcomes. We studied the BK plasma PCR levels of all kidney transplant recipients (KTR) transplanted at our institution between 01/01/2006 and 06/30/2014. Patients were divided into groups based on their highest BK plasma PCR level within the first year following transplantation: undetectable, low (<1000 copies/mL), moderate (1000-10 000 copies/mL), high (>10 000-100 000 copies/mL), very high (>100 000 copies/mL), and those that had biopsy-proven BKN. There were a total of 1146 KTR during the study period: 813 with undetectable BK levels and 333 with any detectable BK level (87 with low, 79 with moderate, 88 with high, 34 with very high level BK, and 45 that had BKN). Compared to KTR with an undetectable BK level, incidence of mortality, graft failure, rejections,and infections were not significantly different for those with low, moderate, high, or very high BK level. Patients with BKN had a higher rate of infection and higher rates of total graft failure or death-censored graft failure compared to those with undetectable BK levels. BK viremia in the absence of BKN does not significantly increase the risk of rejection, infections, or graft failure compared to an undetectable BK level.

Which is more nephrotoxic for kidney transplants: BK nephropathy or rejection?

Little data exist comparing outcomes following BK nephropathy (BKN) vs acute rejection. We reviewed outcomes among recipients who had a primary diagnosis of biopsy-proven BKN or rejection between 1 and 18 months post-transplant. There were 96 cases of BKN and 256 cases of rejections. We compared outcomes of BKN with all rejection combined and also with cellular rejection. Seven of 256 (2.7%) patients developed BKN after treatment of rejection. Conversely, 8 of 96 (8.3%) developed rejection after BKN. The eGFR at time of diagnosis in the BKN group (33.7 ± 12.6) was lower than the rejection group (44.8 ± 23.3, P < .001). The eGFR at 6 months after diagnosis of BKN was 32.7 ± 14.9 and for rejection was 48.8 ± 20.7 (P ≤ .001). The mean eGFR at 3 years postdiagnosis was 41.6 ± 18.5 in BKN and 53 ± 21.3 for rejection (P = .001). The graft failure incidence rates were similar between 2 groups. A similar pattern was observed comparing BKN with cellular rejection. While the difference in rate of graft loss between BKN and rejection did not reach statistical significance, kidney function up to 3 years after diagnosis was worse for BKN than for rejection, suggesting that BKN is at least as damaging to kidneys as rejection.

BK virus as a mediator of graft dysfunction following kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK virus is a significant risk factor for kidney allograft dysfunction and loss among renal transplant recipients. Currently, there is no proven effective treatment except for the reduction of immunosuppression. In this review, we discuss diagnostic challenges and current treatment options for BK in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiviral and antibiotic therapies have been employed for BK viraemia with variable efficacy. In addition, novel therapeutic regimens such as adoptive transfer of targeted T cells have been described as possible treatment options for recipients with BK nephropathy. BK can also be seen in the native kidneys of pancreas, heart, lung and liver transplant recipients, suggesting that BK screening measures should be employed to other solid organ transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Early screening for BK combined with reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of treatment for BK viraemia. New therapeutic advances demonstrate promise in vitro; however, the in-vivo efficacy will be demonstrated by future studies.

Fluoroquinolones and BK Virus Nephropathy: A Myth or a Reality

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is a challenging problem for the transplant nephrologist. Various strategies have been used to prevent or treat BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). These include reduction in immunosuppression, intravenous immune globulin, cidofovir, leflunomide, and the fluoroquinolone antibiotics. All these agents have their own toxicities. Great interest was shown to use fluoroquinolones to prevent BKVN after its useful experience was reported in bone marrow transplant. Fluoroquinolones being cheap and easily available, attracted nephrologists to use it, for prevention of BKVN. These agents have been shown in vitro studies to be effective. However, there are mixed results about their effectiveness in prevention of BKVN in clinical setting. This review will focus the evidence available for using fluoroquinolones in prevention of BKVN and its usefulness. Furthermore, a way forward to use these agents or not for prevention of BKVN will also be discussed.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

CMV and BKPyV Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving an mTOR Inhibitor-Based Regimen Versus a CNI-Based Regimen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the incidences of cytomegalovirus and BK polyoma virus infections in renal transplant recipients receiving a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR)-based regimen compared with a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted a comprehensive search for randomized, controlled trials up to January of 2016 addressing our objective. Other outcomes included acute rejection, graft loss, serious adverse events, proteinuria, wound-healing complications, and eGFR. Two review authors selected eligible studies, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We assessed quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

RESULTS

We included 28 randomized, controlled trials with 6211 participants classified into comparison 1: mTOR inhibitor versus calcineurin inhibitor and comparison 2: mTOR inhibitor plus reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor versus regular dose of calcineurin inhibitor. Results showed decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparison 1 (risk ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.72), with high quality of evidence, and comparison 2 (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.80), with moderate quality of evidence. The available evidence neither confirmed nor ruled out a reduction of BK polyoma virus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparisons. Secondary outcomes revealed more serious adverse events and acute rejections in mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 and no difference in comparison 2. There was no difference in graft loss in both comparisons. eGFR was higher in the mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 (mean difference =4.07 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 6.80) and similar to the calcineurin inhibitor-based group in comparison 2. More proteinuria and wound-healing complications occurred in the mTOR inhibitor-based groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate- to high-quality evidence of reduced risk of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients in the mTOR inhibitor-based compared with the calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. Our review also suggested that a combination of a mTOR inhibitor and a reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor may be associated with similar eGFR and rates of acute rejections and serious adverse events compared with a standard calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen at the expense of higher incidence of proteinuria and wound-healing complications.

Genitourinary Tract Infections

Similarly to the general population, genitourinary tract infections are common conditions in theimmunocompromised host. They can be furthermore divided into infections of the urinary tract and genital tract infections. Transplant recipients are more likely to have infections of the urinary tract infections while persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at higher risk for the second group of infections, especially sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Manifestations of these diseases can be associated with more complications and can be more severe. We provide an overview of manifestations, diagnosis, and management of these disorders.

Tacrolimus Blood Level Fluctuation Predisposes to Coexisting BK Virus Nephropathy and Acute Allograft Rejection

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two distinct disease entities which occur at opposite ends of the immune spectrum. However, they coexist in renal transplant recipients. Predisposing factors for this coexistence remain elusive. We identified nine biopsy-proven BKVN patients with coexisting acute rejection, and 21 patients with BKVN alone. We retrospectively analyzed the dosage and blood concentrations of immunosuppressants during the 3-month period prior to the renal biopsy between the two patient groups. Compared to the BKVN alone group, renal function was noticeably worse in the coexistence group (p = 0.030). Regarding the dose and average drug level of immunosuppressants, there was no difference between the two groups. Interestingly, the coefficient of variance of tacrolimus trough blood level was noticeably higher during the 3-month period prior to the renal biopsy in the coexistence group (p = 0.010). Our novel findings suggest that a higher variability of tacrolimus trough level may be associated with the coexistence of BKVN and acute rejection. Since the prognosis is poor and the treatment is challenging in patients with coexisting BKVN and acute rejection, transplant clinicians should strive to avoid fluctuations in immunosuppressant drug levels in patients with either one of these two disease entities.

Alloimmunity But Not Viral Immunity Promotes Allograft Loss in a Mouse Model of Polyomavirus-Associated Allograft Injury

Background

The interplay between viral infection and alloimmunity is known to influence the fate of transplanted organs. Clarifying how local virus-associated inflammation/injury and antiviral immunity can alter host alloimmune responses in transplantation remains a critical question.

Methods

We used a mouse model of polyomavirus (PyV) infection and kidney transplantation to investigate the roles of direct viral pathology, the antiviral immune response, and alloimmunity in the pathogenesis of PyV-associated allograft injury. We have previously shown that an effective primary T cell response is required in PyV-associated graft injury.

Results

Here we show that the transfer of primed antidonor, but not antiviral, T cells results in PyV-associated allograft injury. In further studies, we use a surrogate minor antigen model (ovalbumin) and show that only antidonor specific T cells and not antiviral specific T cells are sufficient to mediate injury. Lastly, we demonstrate that local but not systemic virus-mediated inflammation and injury within the graft itself are required.

Conclusions

These data suggest that in this mouse model, the predominant mechanism of allograft injury in PyV-associated injury is due to an augmented alloimmune T cell response driven by virus-induced inflammation/injury within the graft. These studies highlight the important interplay between viral infection and alloimmunity in a model system.

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Native Kidneys of an Immunocompetent Individual

BACKGROUND Polyomavirus nephropathy has emerged as an important cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. Polyomavirus rarely affects the native kidneys of an immunocompetent individual. Until now, polyomavirus nephropathy in native kidneys of an immunocompetent individual has not been reported, as far as we know. CASE REPORT A 34-year-old man was transferred from a local clinic to be evaluated for the cause of azotemia. Serum creatinine was 2.85 mg/dL. We performed renal biopsy to identify the cause of azotemia. The result of kidney biopsy was consisted to polyomavirus nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS We report the first case of polyomavirus nephropathy in native kidneys of an immunocompetent individual.

[Clinical and morphological signs of viral damage to a kidney transplant]

AIM

Тo compare morphological changes and results of immunohistochemical (IHC) identification of viruses (polyomaviruses, adenoviruses, and herpesviruses) in the biopsy specimens with their clinical manifestations in recipients of renal transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Morphological and IHC studies were conducted using 71 needle renal transplant biopsy specimens from patients in the study group and 10 renal biopsy specimens from those in the control group. A number of clinical indicators were estimated.

RESULTS

IHC examination revealed the expression of adenoviral antigens more commonly in patients with posttransplant nephritis than in recipients without nephritis or in control individuals (p<0.05). The association of patient age and time after kidney transplantation with the severity of viral damage was confirmed: graft loss in children occurred within the first months of surgery (p<0.05). Polyomavirus was detected by PCR in patients with the morphological patterns of polyomavirus nephropathy. Determination of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in the biopsy specimens showed no significant associations with morphological changes.

CONCLUSION

By taking into account a variety of factors that influence the development of viral nephritis, morphological and IHC examinations should be combined with evaluation of clinical findings.

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.

The association between killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) and KIR ligand genotypes and the likelihood of BK virus replication after kidney transplantation

BK virus is a common opportunistic post-transplantation viral infection. Although some risk factors have been studied in this context, the contribution of NK cells has not been assessed in detail. In a group of kidney transplant recipients, we studied the association between (i) the likelihood of BK virus replication during the two-year period after kidney transplantation and (ii) the genotypes of the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) repertoire and their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligands. Other clinical factors (such as defective organ recovery and immunosuppressive treatment) were also assessed. BK virus replication was observed in 43 of the 103 recipients (41%). Patients with BK virus replication in the plasma were more likely to display defective organ recovery in the first seven days post-transplantation. BK virus replication was not associated with Missing KIR ligands. However, BK virus replication was more frequent in patients with responsive NK cells (i.e. when a ligand for activating KIRs was not homozygous in the recipient and present in the donor). Our results suggest that defective organ recovery and the recipient's activating KIR repertoire may be related (depending on HLA ligands present in the couple recipient / donor) to the reactivation of BK virus replication after kidney transplantation.

Nephropathy Evolving Within the First Two Posttransplant Months With No Typical Cytopathic Lesions: Two Cases Presentation

BACKGROUND

We report 2 cases of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) emerging within the initial 8 posttransplant weeks. These cases were characterized by intraepithelial BK virus replication without typical nuclear inclusions in epithelial cells.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 70-year-old male recipient of a cadaveric kidney transplant had experienced unsatisfying graft function since the time of transplantation (Tx). One month after Tx, results of a graft biopsy revealed mild tubulointerstitial inflammation. No intraepithelial nuclear inclusions suggestive of viral infection were present at that time. The patient received intravenous methylprednisolone, and the dosage of tacrolimus was increased. Due to a further drop in the glomerular filtration rate, a subsequent kidney biopsy was performed during posttransplant week 10, which revealed lesions typical of PyVAN. Retrospectively performed SV40 staining revealed that intragraft polyomavirus replication was already present on posttransplant day 30. Basic immunosuppression reduction and ciprofloxacin administration were followed by BK viremia elimination, stabilization of graft function, and resolution of PyVAN. In another patient, a 62-year-old male recipient of a cadaveric renal graft, BK viremia was monitored from the time of Tx. Two months after Tx, the patient was found to have a BK viral load of 6 × 4 log(10)/mL. Results of the graft biopsy revealed fully preserved tubular epithelium, but SV40 staining was positive in some of these cells. After basic immunosuppression reduction and introduction of ciprofloxacin, the BK viral load dropped to 1 × log(10)/mL with graft function stabilization.

CONCLUSIONS

PyVAN may emerge as early as 4 weeks after Tx, with near-normal or acute rejection-like graft morphology. The early monitoring of plasma BK viral load, as well as SV40 staining, avoids misdiagnosis of this severe posttransplant complication.

Risk Factors for the Development of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

The BK polyoma virus has, in recent years, become a significant cause of renal allograft dysfunction and failure. Among 260 adult kidney transplant recipients, those with biopsy-proven BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) were compared with those without BKVN with regard to gender, age, race, rejection episodes, time on dialysis, number of organs transplanted, HLA match, live donor versus deceased donor, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of donor and recipient, induction therapy, and maintenance immunosuppression. Episodes of rejection (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 8.5% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), transplantation of >1 organ (35.7% of patients with BKVN vs 9.0% of patients without BKVN; P = .01), positive CMV serology in both donor and recipient (71.4% of patients with BKVN vs 41.1% of patients without BKVN; P = .03), and a greater cumulative dose of daclizumab use at the time of induction (2.24 ± 0.05 mg/kg in patients with BKVN vs 2.03 ± 0.14 mg/kg in patients without BKVN; P = .04) were statistically significant risk factors for the development of BKVN. Those who developed BKVN received a higher mean cumulative dose of rabbit antithymoglobulin for induction therapy, but that difference failed to achieve statistical significance (P = .07).

Risk factors in the progression of BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. It has an unfavorable clinical course, and no definite treatment guidelines have yet been established. Here, we report our center's experience with biopsy-proven BKVAN and investigate factors associated with its progression.

METHODS

From January 2004 to April 2013, 25 patients with BKVAN were diagnosed by biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of the 25 patients, 10 were deceased-donor transplant recipients and 15 were living-donor transplant recipients. Three of the patients underwent retransplantation. The primary immunosuppressant used was tacrolimus in 17 patients and cyclosporine in eight patients.

RESULTS

BKVAN was observed at a mean duration of 22.8 ± 29.1 months after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine level at biopsy was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/dL. BKVAN occurred with acute rejection in eight patients (28%). Immunosuppression modification was performed in 21 patients (84%). Additionally, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered to 13 patients (52%) and two (8%), respectively. Allograft loss occurred in five patients (27.8%) during the follow- up period at 0.7, 17.1, 21.8, 39.8, and 41.5 months after the BKVAN diagnosis. Advanced stages of BKVAN, increased creatinine levels, and accompanying acute rejection at the time of BKVAN diagnosis increased the risk of allograft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven BKVAN were unfavorable in the present study, especially in patients with advanced-stage BKVAN, poor renal function, and acute allograft rejection.

Late-Onset BK Viruria in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Most cases of BK virus (BKV) infections emerge within the 1st years of kidney transplantation. We aimed to determine the prevalence of late-onset BKV infection and whether there are any differences between risk factors in early and late BKV infections.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed 300 kidney transplant recipients that were under regular follow-up and selected recipients with BKV infection and recorded associated risk factors, connection with immunosuppression, and responses to modification of treatment.

RESULTS

BKV was detected within the 1st 5 years after transplantation in 20 patients (6.6%, group 1) and after 5 years in 15 patients (5.0%, group 2). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, sex mismatches, donor type, BKV elimination time, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at the times of BKV detection and last follow-up visit. In group 1, 2 recipients had biopsy-proven BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), 3 recipients had BK viruria and viremia without BKVAN (biopsy proven), and 15 recipients (75%) had only BK viruria. In group 2, all of the patients had only BK viruria. In this group, on detection of BK viruria and immediate modification of immunosuppressive regimens prevented BK viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine screening of renal transplant recipients for BKV was indicated not only during the 1st 5 years, but also for the full follow-up period after transplantation.

Impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the incidence of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients with human BK polyomavirus viremia

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of renal transplant recipients (RTR) will develop human BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viremia. BKPyV viremia is a pre-requisite of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN). Risk of BKPyV infections increases with immunosuppression. Currently, the only effective therapy against PyVAN is reductions in immunosuppression, but this may increase the risk of rejection. In vitro data have shown that pravastatin dramatically decreased caveolin-1 expression in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (HRPTEC) and suppressed BKPyV infection in these cells. Based on these data, we postulated that statin therapy may prevent the progression of BKPyV viremia to PyVAN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in adult RTR transplanted between July 2005 and March 2012. All patients with documented BKPyV viremia (viral load >500 copies/mL on 2 consecutive tests) were included. Group I consisted of patients taking a statin before the BKPyV viremia diagnosis (n = 32), and Group II had no statin exposure before or after the BKPyV viremia diagnosis (n = 36). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PyVAN.

RESULTS

Demographic data, transplant characteristics, and the degree of immunosuppression (i.e., induction/maintenance therapies, rejection treatment) were similar between the groups, with the exception of more diabetics in Group I. The incidence of PyVAN was comparable between the 2 groups (Group I = 28.1% vs. Group II = 41.7%; P = 0.312).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the proven in vitro effectiveness of pravastatin preventing BKPyV infection in HRPTEC, statins at doses maximized for cholesterol lowering, in RTR with BKPyV viremia, did not prevent progression to PyVAN.

Conversion to a sirolimus-based regimen is associated with lower incidence of BK viremia in low-risk kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK viral nephropathy is an increasingly recognized cause of early allograft loss in kidney transplantation. This study aimed to determine whether a sirolimus (Sir)-based calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen is associated with a lower incidence of BK viremia.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients were either on tacrolimus (Tac)-based or on Sir-based immunosuppression. Conversion from Tac to Sir occurred at or after 3 months if patients were <62 years of age, had calculated panel reactive antibodies of <20%, and did not have acute early rejection.

RESULTS

Incidence of clinically significant BK viremia was 17.9% in the Tac group and 4.3% in the Sir group. Cox regression multivariate analysis showed that male gender (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.87) and switch to Sir (HR = 0.333) impacted the incidence of BK viremia. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher BK-free survival in the Sir group. A trend was seen toward shorter time to resolution of BK viremia and lower peak viremia in the Sir group. Patients on Sir had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at each time point; 34% of patients discontinued Sir because of side effects.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to Sir-based maintenance immunosuppression at or about 3 months after kidney transplantation correlates with a lower incidence of BK viremia.

Acute interstitial nephritis - a reappraisal and update

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an under recognized and under diagnosed cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is estimated to account for 15 - 20% of cases of AKI; it is the reported diagnosis in 2.8% of all kidney biopsies, and 13.5% of biopsies done specifically for acute renal failure. Considerable evidence implicates antigen initiated cell-mediated injury in the pathogenesis of AIN. Drugs account for 70% of all cases, with over 150 different agents incriminated. The remaining cases are due to infections, autoimmune diseases, and rarely idiopathic. The central component of renal injury in AIN is altered tubular function, which usually precedes decrements in filtration rate. The key to early diagnosis is vigilance for the presence of tubular dysfunction in non-oliguric individuals, especially in patients with modest but gradual increments in creatinine level. The utility of urinary biomarkers to diagnose AIN in its early nascent and potentially reversible stage remains to be determined. Prompt recognition, elimination of the offending source of antigen, and use of a limited course of steroid therapy where indicated, will result in complete resolution in ~ 65% of cases, partial resolution in up to 20%, and irreversible damage in the rest.

Polyomavirus BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab

BACKGROUND

Desensitization with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab improves transplantation rates. It is unclear if desensitization increases the risk of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia. Here, BKV viremia in HLA-sensitized patients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab was analyzed.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in the desensitized group (N=187) and the non-desensitized group (N=284). Surveillance for BKV viremia was done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

BKV viremia was observed in 20% of the desensitized and 10% of the non-desensitized (P<0.001) groups by 2 years posttransplant. The desensitized group had more lymphocyte depleting induction and more rejection. They also had a greater degree of viremia with more patients having a peak viral load greater than 10,000 copies per milliliter (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BKV-associated nephropathy or graft loss in the two groups. There was an association of BKV viremia with desensitization and lymphocyte induction. Only desensitization remained a significant predictor in the multivariable model with an adjusted HR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.21-3.77, P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab is associated with a higher incidence of BKV viremia with high viral copies and was the major predictor of BKV viremia in the multivariable model. More frequent surveillance for BKV viremia and an early, aggressive treatment strategy are essential for preventing high BKV viral loads in this patient population.

BK virus infection: an update on diagnosis and treatment

BK virus, first isolated in 1971, is a significant risk factor for renal transplant dysfunction and allograft loss. Unfortunately, treatment options for BK virus infection are limited, and there is no effective prophylaxis. Although overimmunosuppression remains the primary risk factor for BK infection after transplantation, male gender, older recipient age, prior rejection episodes, degree of human leukocyte antigen mismatching, prolonged cold ischemia time, BK serostatus and ureteral stent placement have all been implicated as risk factors. Routine screening for BK has been shown to be effective in preventing allograft loss in patients with BK viruria or viremia. Reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of BK nephropathy treatment and is the best studied intervention. Laboratory-based methods such as ELISPOT assays have provided new insights into the immune response to BK and may help guide therapy in the future. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology of BK virus infection, screening strategies, treatment options and future research directions.

Renal relevant radiology: imaging in kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation can be associated with various complications that vary from vascular complications to urologic disorders to immunologic adverse effects. In evaluating the recipient with graft dysfunction, clinicians can choose among several imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, nuclear medicine studies, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. This review discusses the evaluation of the kidney transplant recipient using these imaging procedures, emphasizing the clinical diagnostic utility and role of each modality. A kidney biopsy is often required as a gold standard for diagnostic purposes. However, because of the inherent risks of a kidney biopsy, noninvasive imaging in diagnosing causes of graft dysfunction is a highly desired tool used and needed by the transplant community. Because the diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the time course and nature of the transplant-related complication, this review also addresses the advantages and limitations of each modality. The recent advances in kidney transplant imaging techniques and their clinical implications are also discussed.

Possible antiviral effect of ciprofloxacin treatment on polyomavirus BK replication and analysis of non-coding control region sequences

Acute renal dysfunction (ARD) is a common complication in renal transplant recipients. Multiple factors contribute to ARD development, including acute rejection and microbial infections. Many viral infections after kidney transplantation result from reactivation of “latent” viruses in the host or from the graft, such as the human Polyomavirus BK (BKV). We report the case of a 39 year-old recipient of a 2^nd kidney graft who experienced BKV reactivation after a second episode of acute humoral rejection. A 10-day treatment with the quinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin was administered with an increase of immunosuppressive therapy despite the active BKV replication. Real Time PCR analysis performed after treatment with ciprofloxacin, unexpectedly showed clearance of BK viremia and regression of BK viruria. During the follow-up, BK viremia persisted undetectable while viruria decreased further and disappeared after 3 months.

BKV non-coding control region sequence analysis from all positive samples always showed the presence of archetypal sequences, with two single-nucleotide substitutions and one nucleotide deletion that, interestingly, were all representative of the subtype/subgroup I/b-1 we identified by the viral protein 1 sequencing analysis.

We report the potential effect of the quinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin in the decrease of the BKV load in both blood and urine.

An in-house assay for BK polyomavirus quantification using the Abbott m2000 RealTime system

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) quantification is useful for monitoring renal transplant patient response to therapy. The Abbott m2000 RealTime System employed by some clinical laboratories to perform US Food and Drug Administration-approved assays can also be used to develop in-house assays such as the one presented here. This study aimed to validate an in-house quantitative real-time PCR assay targeting the BKPyV major capsid VP1 gene for assessment of viral load using the Abbott m2000 RealTime System. BKPyV load was measured in 95 urine and plasma samples previously tested for BKPyV by one of three laboratories (46 BKPyV-positive samples consisting of 35 plasma and 11 urine samples; 49 samples negative for BKPyV consisting of 47 plasma and two urine samples). Two additional plasma specimens from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey were also analysed. Precision studies were performed by diluting a high-viral-titre patient sample into BKPyV-negative pooled plasma to create high-positive (6.16 log10 copies ml(-1)) and low-positive (3.16 log10 copies ml(-1)) samples. For precision studies of inter-assay variability, a high-positive (7.0 log10 copies ml(-1)) and a low-positive (3.0 log10 copies ml(-1)) sample were measured in 20 separate runs. The assay's limit of quantification and limit of detection were 2.70 and 2.25 log10 copies ml(-1), respectively. The assay was linear from 2.70 to 9.26 log10 copies ml(-1). Of the 48 known positives, 43 were detected as positive, with three reported by the reference laboratory as values lower than the limit of detection. Two known positives at 3.27 and 3.80 log10 copies ml(-1) tested negative by the m2000 BKPyV assay. Of the 49 known negative samples, 48 were negative by the m2000 BKPyV load assay, with one sample confirmed positive by a reference laboratory. Qualitative analysis prior to discrepancy testing demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.58 % and a specificity of 97.96 %. Precision studies demonstrated inter-assay coefficients of variation of 0.63 % (high positive) and 4.38 % (low positive). Genotyping was performed on 22 patient samples, of which 21 (95.45 %) were type I and one (4.55 %) was type II. In conclusion, the m2000 BKPyV viral load assay sensitivity, specificity, linear range, precision and cost effectiveness make it an attractive methodology for clinical laboratories using the Abbott m2000 RealTime System.

Evaluating the impact of pre-transplant desensitization utilizing a plasmapheresis and low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin protocol on BK viremia in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A correlation exists between polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and the degree of immunosuppression. However, the impact of pre-transplant desensitization on the incidence of BKV viremia is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated living-donor RTR between January 2004 and December 2008 receiving routine BKV viral load monitoring. Patients were divided into those who underwent pre-transplant desensitization (n = 20) and those who did not (n = 71). The primary endpoint was the incidence of BKV viremia at 1 year post transplant.

RESULTS

All demographic data were similar, except for more female patients (65% vs. 36.6%; P = 0.0392) in the desensitized group. More desensitized patients had a previous transplant (75% vs. 12.7%; P < 0.0001) and were more likely to be induced with basiliximab (75% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.0021). Following transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rates were highest in the desensitized group (55% vs. 1.4%; P < 0.0001). The incidence of BKV viremia at 1 year post transplant was significantly higher in desensitized patients (45% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.0385). Desensitization was also associated with a higher prevalence of BKV viremia at any time post transplant (50% vs. 22.5%; P = 0.0245), polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (20% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.0198) and BKV-related allograft loss (10% vs. 0%; P = 0.0464). Also of note, in a subgroup analysis of only our desensitized patients, it did not appear that development of AMR significantly impacted the incidence of BKV viremia in these individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis reveals that pre-transplant desensitization significantly increases the risk for BKV viremia and nephropathy.

Human polyomavirus reactivation: disease pathogenesis and treatment approaches

JC and BK polyomaviruses were discovered over 40 years ago and have become increasingly prevalent causes of morbidity and mortality in a variety of distinct, immunocompromised patient cohorts. The recent discoveries of eight new members of the Polyomaviridae family that are capable of infecting humans suggest that there are more to be discovered and raise the possibility that they may play a more significant role in human disease than previously understood. In spite of this, there remains a dearth of specific therapeutic options for human polyomavirus infections and an incomplete understanding of the relationship between the virus and the host immune system. This review summarises the human polyomaviruses with particular emphasis on pathogenesis in those directly implicated in disease aetiology and the therapeutic options available for treatment in the immunocompromised host.