Peptic ulcer and bleeding events associated with rofecoxib in a 3-year colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial

Hydroxytriazenes incorporating sulphonamide derivatives: evaluation of antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory activities, and computational study

The existent investigation deals with synthesis, characterization, computational analysis, and biological activities of some hydroxytriazene derivatives containing sulphonamide moiety. The compounds were screened for antidiabetic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities. The antidiabetic activity was assessed using α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition assays with IC₅₀ values ranging from 32.0 to 759.13 μg/mL and 157.77 to 340.47 μg/mL while standard drug acarbose showed IC₅₀ values 12.21 and 69.74 μg/mL, respectively. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays with IC₅₀ value ranging from 54.01 to 912.66 μg/mL and 33.22 to 128.11 μg/mL, and standard drug ascorbic acid showed IC₅₀ values 29.12 μg/mL and 69.13 μg/mL, respectively. Anti-inflammatory activity was investigated using the carrageenan-induced paw edema method, where percentage inhibition was up to 93.0 and 98.57 for 2 h and 4 h, respectively, and all the compounds were found to exhibit excellent anti-inflammatory activity. Moreover, prediction of activity spectra for substance and molecular docking were also performed. The PASS prediction hypothesized the potential of the compounds for anti-inflammatory activity, and docking results suggested the best binding pose for compounds 1b and 2b with the least energy value from which compounds can be considered as potent COX-2 inhibitors. Furthermore, possible interactions between hydroxytriazene analogues and the targets of antioxidant NADPH oxidase and antidiabetic human maltase-glucoamylase enzyme have been identified. The HOMO and LUMO analysis revealed charge transfer within the compounds. These findings suggested that the synthesized compounds can be potential agents for the treatment of diabetes and inflammation.

Angiogenin regulates PKD activation and COX-2 expression induced by TNF-α and bradykinin in the colonic myofibroblast

INTRODUCTION

The myofibroblast is a gastrointestinal stromal cell that is a target of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), a pro-inflammatory cytokine strongly implicated in colitis-associated cancer. Crosstalk between TNF-α and other pro-inflammatory mediators amplify inflammatory signaling but the mechanism is unknown. Angiogenin (ANG) is a 14-kDa angiogenesis protein that is regulated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the role of ANG on inflammatory mediator crosstalk in the myofibroblast is unknown.

METHODS

The human colonic myofibroblast cell line 18Co, as well as primary mouse and human colonic myofibroblasts, were exposed to TNF-α (10 ng/ml) and bradykinin (BK, 100 nM). ANG was quantified by ELISA. The expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and phosphorylation of PKD was assessed by Western Blot.

RESULTS

Primary mouse and human colonic myofibroblasts exposed to TNF-α/BK led to enhanced PKD phosphorylation and synergistic COX-2 expression. 18Co cells secrete high levels of ANG (24h, 265 ± 5 pg/ml). The monoclonal antibody 26-2F, which neutralizes ANG, inhibited TNF-α/BK-mediated PKD phosphorylation and synergistic COX-2 expression in primary human myofibroblasts. Likewise, in primary mouse myofibroblasts that do not express ANG (ANG-KO), TNF-α/BK failed to enhance PKD phosphorylation and COX-2 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF-α/BK enhance PKD phosphorylation and COX-2 expression in primary mouse and human colonic myofibroblasts. Angiogenin is produced by the myofibroblast, and inhibition of ANG signaling, either by its absence (ANG-KO) or by pharmacologic inhibition, blocks enhanced PKD phosphorylation and synergistic COX-2 expression induced by TNF-α/BK. ANG mediates crosstalk signaling between TNF-α/BK in the regulation of stroma-derived COX-2 and may be a novel therapeutic target for the management of colitis-associated cancer.

Effects and possible mechanisms of Alpinia officinarum ethanol extract on indomethacin-induced gastric injury in rats

CONTEXT

Alpinia officinarum Hance (Zingiberoside) has a long history in treating gastrointestinal diseases, but its mechanisms of action are not yet known.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of the ethanol extract of A. officinarum rhizomes in an indomethacin-induced gastric injury rat model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Indomethacin (0.3 g/kg) was orally administered to Sprague-Dawley rats to induce gastric damage; after 7 h, the rats were treated with 0.03, 0.09, or 0.18 g/kg of the plant extract, galangin (0.2 g/kg), or bismuth potassium citrate (0.08 g/kg), once a day for 6 days. Rats in the control group received an equivalent volume of vehicle solution for 6 days. Gastric damage was evaluated by gross ulcer and histological indexes. Cyclooxygenase and non-cyclooxygenase pathway proteins were quantified by western blotting and ELISA.

RESULTS

Alpinia officinarum extract ameliorated gastric injury in a dose-dependent manner, and 0.18 g/kg dose exhibited the best performance by reducing the gross ulcer (from 20.23 ± 1.38 to 1.66 ± 0.37) and histological (from 4.67 ± 1.03 to 0.33 ± 0.51) indexes, decreasing serum TNF-α level (14.17%), increasing serum VEGF level (1.58 times), increasing cyclooxygenase-1 level (1.25 times, p <  0.001) in the gastric mucosa, and reversing indomethacin-induced changes in the expression of non-cyclooxygenase pathway proteins (p <  0.05). Galangin was less effective as an antiulcer agent than the whole extract, indicating that other components also contributed to the protective effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Alpinia officinarum extract and galangin exert antiulcer effects through cyclooxygenase and non-cyclooxygenase pathways validating use of galangin as a treatment for gastric damage.

Impact of the World Health Organization Pain Treatment Guidelines and the European Medicines Agency Safety Recommendations on Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use in Lithuania: An Observational Study

Background and objective: Irrational use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the main cause of adverse effects-associated hospitalizations among all medication groups leading to extremely increased costs for health care. Pharmacoepidemiological studies can partly reveal such issues and encourage further decisions. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the utilization of non-opioid analgesics (ATC classification N02B and M01A) in Lithuania, and to compare it with that of other Baltic and Scandinavian countries in terms of compliance to the WHO pain treatment guidelines and the EMA safety recommendations on NSAID use. Materials and methods: The dispensing data were obtained from the sales analysis software provider in the Baltic countries (SoftDent, Ltd., Kaunas, Lithuania); State Medicine Control Agencies of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia; Norwegian Prescription Database; Swedish Database for Medicines; and Danish Prescription Database. Data included the utilization of both prescription and over-the-counter drugs. Utilization was expressed in defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 inhabitants/day. Results: During the 11-year period, the utilization of drugs belonging to the N02B and M01A groups increased by 22.8%, from 58.37 in 2005 to 71.68 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in 2016 in Lithuania. Contrary to the WHO guidelines on pain management, all Baltic countries were more likely to use NSAIDs than other analgesics and antipyretics: in 2015, the drugs of the M01A group were used 6.04, 5.79, and 6.11 times more than those of N02B in Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia, respectively, whereas the Scandinavian countries preferred the N02B to the M01A group: in Denmark and Sweden, the utilization of other analgesics and antipyretics was 2.33 and 1.24, respectively, times higher than that of NSAIDs. In Norway, the use of both groups was similar. In the Scandinavian countries, paracetamol was the analgesic of first choice, whereas, in Lithuania, it took only the third place. The most popular drug in Lithuania was diclofenac, and its utilization accounted for 30.04% of all non-opioid analgesics in 2016. Although the European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted the use of certain NSAIDs, i.e., cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, nimesulide, and diclofenac, their use consistently increased by 15.91, 2.83, and 1.41 times, respectively, showing incompliance with the international guidelines. Conclusions: Neither the EMA safety policy on NSAID use nor the WHO pain treatment guidelines had a sufficient impact on the rational use of NSAIDs in Lithuania. The use of NSAIDs restricted by the EMA (diclofenac, COX-2 inhibitors, nimesulide, and piroxicam) remains high or even increases, while the utilization of safer alternatives (paracetamol and naproxen) remains relatively low as compared with the Scandinavian countries. Incompliance with international guidelines may result in increased morbidity, mortality and higher costs for health care.

Cyclooxygenase 2: protein-protein interactions and posttranslational modifications

Numerous studies implicate the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) enzyme and COX2-derived prostanoids in various human diseases, and thus, much effort has been made to uncover the regulatory mechanisms of this enzyme. COX2 has been shown to be regulated at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels, leading to the development of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX2 inhibitors (COXIBs), which inhibit the COX2 enzyme through direct targeting. Recently, evidence of posttranslational regulation of COX2 enzymatic activity by s-nitrosylation, glycosylation, and phosphorylation has also been presented. Additionally, posttranslational regulators that actively downregulate COX2 expression by facilitating increased proteasome degradation of this enzyme have also been reported. Moreover, recent data identified proteins, located in close proximity to COX2 enzyme, that serve as posttranslational modulators of COX2 function, upregulating its enzymatic activity. While the precise mechanisms of the protein-protein interaction between COX2 and these regulatory proteins still need to be addressed, it is likely these interactions could regulate COX2 activity either as a result of conformational changes of the enzyme or by impacting subcellular localization of COX2 and thus affecting its interactions with regulatory proteins, which further modulate its activity. It is possible that posttranslational regulation of COX2 enzyme by such proteins could contribute to manifestation of different diseases. The uncovering of posttranslational regulation of COX2 enzyme will promote the development of more efficient therapeutic strategies of indirectly targeting the COX2 enzyme, as well as provide the basis for the generation of novel diagnostic tools as biomarkers of disease.

Investigational drugs targeting the prostaglandin E2 signaling pathway for the treatment of inflammatory pain

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of pain, inflammation and fever. Although they are effective for a huge number of users, their analgesic properties are not sufficient for several patients and the occurrence of side effects still constitutes a big challenge during long term therapy. Areas covered: This review gives an overview about the first and second generations of NSAIDs (COX1/2 non-selective, COX-2 selective), and their main side effects which gave still an urgent need for safer drugs and for the establishment of novel treatment strategies (improved safety, tolerability, patient convenience). The current developments of a possible third generation NSAID class comprise changes in the formulation of already approved drugs, combination therapies, dual cyclooxygenase-lipoxygenase inhibitors, NO- and H₂S-releasing NSAIDs, prostaglandin synthase inhibitors and EP receptor modulators, respectively. Literature search has been done with PubMed NCBI. Expert opinion: Currently, there is no newly developed drug that is superior to the already approved selective and non-selective NSAIDs. Several novel approaches show promising analgesic efficacy but side effects are still an important problem. Solutions might be constituted by combination therapies allowing administration of lower drug doses or by individualized therapies targeting molecules apart from COX, respectively.

Effects of Lornoxicam on Anastomotic Healing: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Control Experimental Study

Introduction and Aim. With the implementation of multimodal analgesia regimens, Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are often administered for optimal pain control and reduction of opioid use. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of lornoxicam, a NSAID, on anastomotic healing employing an animal model. Materials and Methods. A total of 28 Wistar rats were randomly assigned in two groups. All animals underwent ascending colonic transection followed by an end-to-end hand sewn anastomosis. Group 1 received intraperitoneally lornoxicam before and daily after surgery. Group 2 received intraperitoneally an equal volume of placebo. Half of the animals in each group were euthanized on the 3rd pod and the remaining on the 7th pod. Macro- and microscopic indicators of anastomotic healing were compared using a two-tailed Fisher exact test. Results. The lornoxicam group significantly decreased fibroblast in growth and reepithelization of the mucosa at the anastomotic site on the 3rd pod and significantly increased occurrence of deep reaching defects, necrosis, and microabscess on the 7th pod. Conclusion. Lornoxicam administration during the perioperative period adversely affects histologic parameters of intestinal anastomotic healing. These effects of lornoxicam administration were not found to induce significant increase of anastomotic dehiscence in the rat model.

Postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of anastomotic leak: meta-analysis of clinical and experimental studies

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery programs following colorectal resection recommend the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as part of multimodal analgesia. The present study aimed to assess whether postoperative NSAID use increased the risk of anastomotic leak.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature was performed for studies comparing anastomotic leak following NSAID administration versus control. Meta-analysis was conducted for studies in human patients and experimental animal models. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 8 studies in humans and 12 experimental animal studies. Use of NSAIDs was significantly associated with anastomotic leak in humans (8 studies, 4,464 patients, odds ratio [OR] 2.14; p < 0.001). This effect was seen with nonselective NSAIDs (6 studies, 3,074 patients, OR 2.37; p < 0.001), but not with selective NSAIDs (4 studies, 1,223 patients, OR 2.32; p = 0.170). There was strong evidence of selection bias from all clinical studies, with additional inconsistent definitions and outcomes assessment. From experimental animal models, anastomotic leak was more likely with NSAID use (ten studies, 575 animals, OR 9.51; p < 0.001). Bursting pressures at day 7 were significantly lower in NSAID versus controls (7 studies, 168 animals, weighted mean difference -35.7 mmHg; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emerging data strongly suggest that postoperative NSAIDs are linked to anastomotic leak, although most studies are flawed and may be describing pre-existing selection bias. However, when combined with experimental data, these increasing concerns suggest caution is needed when prescribing NSAIDs to patients with pre-existing risk factors for leak, until more definitive evidence emerges.

Marketed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antihypertensives, and human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors: as-yet-unused weapons of the oncologists' arsenal

Experimental data indicate that several pharmacological agents that have long been used for the management of various diseases unrelated to cancer exhibit profound in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. This is of major clinical importance, since it would possibly aid in reassessing the therapeutic use of currently used agents for which clinicians already have experience. Further, this would obviate the time-consuming process required for the development and the approval of novel antineoplastic drugs. Herein, both pre-clinical and clinical data concerning the antineoplastic function of distinct commercially available pharmacological agents that are not currently used in the field of oncology, ie, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensive agents, and anti-human immunodeficiency virus agents inhibiting viral protease, are reviewed. The aim is to provide integrated information regarding not only the molecular basis of the antitumor function of these agents but also the applicability of the reevaluation of their therapeutic range in the clinical setting.

Time-perspective in cardiovascular risk of NSAID use after first-time myocardial infarction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the fact that NSAIDs are not recommended among patients with established cardiovascular disease, many patients receive NSAID treatment for a short period of time. However, up until recently, data on the relationship between treatment duration and associated cardiovascular risk were sparse and have not been summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

A series of recent studies of patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) demonstrated that short-term treatment with most NSAIDs is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk relative to no NSAID treatment. These studies furthermore demonstrated that NSAID use among patients with first-time MI was associated with persistently increased risk of all-cause mortality and of a composite of coronary death or nonfatal recurrent MI for at least 5 years thereafter.

SUMMARY

The present review indicates that there is no apparent well-tolerated therapeutic window for associated cardiovascular risk and NSAID use in patients with prior MI. Further randomized studies are warranted to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs, but, at this point, the overall evidence suggests advising caution in using NSAIDs at all times after MI. Legislation bodies need to address this issue of public health proportions, as studies have shown that utilization rates of NSAID keep increasing.

Gastroprotection studies of Schiff base zinc (II) derivative complex against acute superficial hemorrhagic mucosal lesions in rats

Background

The study was carried out to assess the gastroprotective effect of the zinc (II) complex against ethanol-induced acute hemorrhagic lesions in rats.

Methodology/Principal Finding

The animals received their respective pre-treatments dissolved in tween 20 (5% v/v), orally. Ethanol (95% v/v) was orally administrated to induce superficial hemorrhagic mucosal lesions. Omeprazole (5.790×10⁻⁵ M/kg) was used as a reference medicine. The pre-treatment with the zinc (II) complex (2.181×10⁻⁵ and 4.362×10⁻⁵ M/kg) protected the gastric mucosa similar to the reference control. They significantly increased the activity levels of nitric oxide, catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione and prostaglandin E2, and decreased the level of malondialdehyde. The histology assessments confirmed the protection through remarkable reduction of mucosal lesions and increased the production of gastric mucosa. Immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis indicated that the complex might induced Hsp70 up-regulation and Bax down-regulation. The complex moderately increased the gastroprotectiveness in fine fettle. The acute toxicity approved the non-toxic characteristic of the complex (<87.241×10⁻⁵ M/kg).

Conclusion/Significance

The gastroprotective effect of the zinc (II) complex was mainly through its antioxidant activity, enzymatic stimulation of prostaglandins E2, and up-regulation of Hsp70. The gastric wall mucus was also a remarkable protective mechanism.

Prevention of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: current controversies and clinical guidance

Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common medical emergency and associated with significant morbidly and mortality. The risk of bleeding from peptic ulceration and oesophagogastric varices can be reduced by appropriate primary and secondary preventative strategies. Helicobacter pylori eradication and risk stratification with appropriate gastroprotection strategies when used with antiplatelet drugs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in preventing peptic ulcer bleeding, whilst endoscopic screening and either nonselective beta blockade or endoscopic variceal ligation are effective at reducing the risk of variceal haemorrhage. For secondary prevention of variceal haemorrhage, the combination of beta blockade and endoscopic variceal ligation is more effective. Recent data on the possible interactions of aspirin and NSAIDs, clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and the increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with all nonaspirin cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors have increased the complexity of choices for preventing peptic ulcer bleeding. Such choices should consider both the GI and cardiovascular risk profiles. In patients with a moderately increased risk of GI bleeding, a NSAID plus a PPI or a COX-2 selective agent alone appear equivalent but for those at highest risk of bleeding (especially those with previous ulcer or haemorrhage) the COX-2 inhibitor plus PPI combination is superior. However naproxen seems the safest NSAID for those at increased cardiovascular risk. Clopidogrel is associated with a significant risk of GI haemorrhage and the most recent data concerning the potential clinical interaction of clopidogrel and PPIs are reassuring. In clopidogrel-treated patients at highest risk of GI bleeding, some form of GI prevention is indicated.

Association between adherence to concomitant proton pump inhibitor therapy in current NSAID users and upper gastrointestinal complications

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a well-documented role as a gastroprotective agent among NSAID users at an increased risk of peptic ulcer and bleeding. Observational studies have, however, suggested that the clinical efficacy of PPI therapy may be reduced because of poor adherence.

AIM

To study the association between adherence to concomitant PPI in current NSAID users and the risk of peptic ulcer and bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case-control study linking nationwide data from the Swedish Patient Registry with the Swedish Drug Prescription Database. The study population included patients admitted for a first-time peptic ulcer or bleeding and who were incident users of NSAID. Each case was matched on age, sex, NSAID duration, and calendar month with five controls. PPI adherence was calculated as the proportion of NSAID days being covered by PPI therapy. Matched and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 3649 cases were identified. Patients with poor adherence (<20% PPI coverage) had a significantly increased risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.22-2.88) compared with fully adherent patients (≥80% PPI coverage). As a continuous variable, the risk of an event increased with 6% points for every 10% decrease in PPI adherence (OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10).

CONCLUSION

The gastroprotective effect of PPI in NSAID users is highly dependent on adherence, with about twice the risk in patients with poor adherence. Efforts to increase adherence should be an integrated part of clinical practice.

NSAID gastropathy and enteropathy: distinct pathogenesis likely necessitates distinct prevention strategies

The mechanisms underlying the ability of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to cause ulceration in the stomach and proximal duodenum are well understood, and this injury can largely be prevented through suppression of gastric acid secretion (mainly with proton pump inhibitors). In contrast, the pathogenesis of small intestinal injury induced by NSAIDs is less well understood, involving more complex mechanisms than those in the stomach and proximal duodenum. There is clear evidence for important contributions to NSAID enteropathy of enteric bacteria, bile and enterohepatic recirculation of the NSAID. There is no evidence that suppression of gastric acid secretion will reduce the incidence or severity of NSAID enteropathy. Indeed, clinical data suggest little, if any, benefit. Animal studies suggest a significant exacerbation of NSAID enteropathy when proton pump inhibitors are co-administered with the NSAID. This worsening of damage appears to be linked to changes in the number and types of bacteria in the small intestine during proton pump inhibitor therapy. The distinct mechanisms of NSAID-induced injury in the stomach/proximal duodenum versus the more distal small intestine likely dictate distinct strategies for prevention.

Rofecoxib and clinically significant upper and lower gastrointestinal events revisited based on documents from recent litigation

INTRODUCTION

On the basis of published data, it is widely believed and cited that rofecoxib use is associated with approximately a 50% reduction in significant gastrointestinal (GI) complications such as bleeding.

METHODS

Data made available as part of litigation, including the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research trial and an Alzheimer's study, allow a reassessment of the reported benefits of rofecoxib in terms of a significant reduction in complicated GI events and in lower GI bleeding.

RESULTS

During the review process of the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research study, it was suggested that rofecoxib might have little benefit, with regard to GI toxicity, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis not treated with corticosteroids. Reanalysis of the original Merck data set showed 9 complicated confirmed events in the rofecoxib group compared with 10 in the naproxen group among corticosteroid nonusers and 7 versus 27 among corticosteroid users so that the difference between rofecoxib and naproxen in the occurrence of confirmed complicated perforations, ulcers or bleeds seemed to be entirely because of the effects within corticosteroid users. The claim that serious lower GI events were 54% lower with the use of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib was stated to be based on an assessment blinded to treatment allocation. In fact, the choice did not represent the original blinded analysis that showed a nonsignificant difference, but rather was based on an assessment after treatment allocation was disclosed.

CONCLUSION

Examination and reanalysis of unpublished data regarding rofecoxib has failed to confirm a safety advantage of rofecoxib over traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in terms of complicated upper or lower GI events.

Epidemiology and demographics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: prevalence, incidence, and mortality

Despite major advances in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding still is a serious problem in clinical practice. Current evidence indicates that most peptic ulcer bleeding-linked deaths are not a direct sequela of the bleeding ulcer itself. Instead, mortality derives from multiorgan failure, cardiopulmonary conditions, or terminal malignancy, suggesting that improving further current treatments for the bleeding ulcer may have a limited impact on mortality unless supportive therapies are developed for the global management of these patients.

Consensus document: antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting. A North-American perspective

The optimal regimen of the anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation who have had a coronary stent is unclear. It is well recognised that "triple therapy" with aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. National guidelines have not made specific recommendations given the lack of adequate data. In choosing the best antithrombotic options for a patient, consideration needs to be given to the risks of stroke, stent thrombosis and major bleeding. This document describes these risks, provides specific recommendations concerning vascular access, stent choice, concomitant use of proton-pump inhibitors and the use and duration of triple therapy following stent placement based upon the risk assessment.

Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among healthy individuals

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Studies have raised concern on the cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs. We studied safety of NSAID therapy in a nationwide cohort of healthy individuals.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This is a review of the literature regarding cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs with special focus on the few studies investigating healthy individuals.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Due to a high frequency of gastrointestinal complications related to NSAID treatment a new generation of NSAID, called the selective COX-2 inhibitors, were developed in order to use the beneficial pain-relieving effect of NSAIDs without the COX-1 related risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib was withdrawn from the market in 2004 after studies had documented an increased risk of myocardial infarction related to this drug. Focus also turned to the traditional NSAIDs and found similar results for some of the older drugs, especially diclofenac and high-dose ibuprofen. Most interventional studies have not been designed specifically to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs and no studies have previously investigated the relationship between NSAID treatment and cardiovascular risk in healthy individuals. Overall, evidence regarding the selective COX-2 inhibitors' cardiovascular risk profile (mostly thrombo-embolic events) is derived from the clinical trials whereas results on the traditional NSAIDs are based on observational studies and meta-analyses. Importantly, some of the randomized trials comparing COX-2 inhibitors with traditional NSAIDs did not show a difference in cardiovascular risk and it cannot be denied that the traditional NSAIDs are characterized by a different cardiovascular risk-profile than the COX-2 inhibitors. A recent cohort study among one million healthy people showed that the selective COX-2 inhibitors as well as diclofenac are associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction. This was further underlined by a dose-response relationship.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Individual NSAIDs have different cardiovascular safety that needs to be considered when choosing appropriate treatment. In particular, rofecoxib and diclofenac were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and should be used with caution in most individuals. This notion is also valid for healthy individuals and underlines the importance of critical use of NSAID therapy in the general population and also that over-the-counter retail of NSAIDs should be reassessed.

NSAID-induced gastrointestinal and cardiovascular injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent publications related to NSAID-induced adverse effects on the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

This paper explores novel mechanisms of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal injury, highlights new composite endpoints evaluating adverse events of NSAIDs in the entire gastrointestinal tract, and combines published data to establish evidence-based guidance on the best use of NSAIDs to achieve optimal clinical outcomes whilst minimizing cardiovascular and gastrointestinal injuries.

SUMMARY

NSAIDs can induce peptic ulcers via epithelial cell membrane disruption and the renin angiotensin system, independent of the cyclooxygenase (COX) pathways, whereas mast cells and bile acid sensors may have a protective effect on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage. Patients with arthritis treated with a COX-2 inhibitor are less likely to develop upper and lower gastrointestinal complications than those who are treated with diclofenac plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). PPI therapy is recommended in patients receiving dual antiplatelet treatment but observational studies show that clopidogrel users taking PPIs have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Until further reliable controlled data are available, this potential, but currently unproven, clinical interaction can be minimized by widely separating the dosing of clopidogrel and PPI. Histamine-2 antagonists may be an alternative to PPI for the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients taking low-dose aspirin.

New pharmacologic therapies in gastrointestinal disease

Many gastrointestinal diseases remain poorly responsive to therapies, and even in the cases of conditions for which there are many effective drugs, there is still considerable room for improvement. This article is focused on drugs for digestive disorders that have entered the marketplace recently, or are expected to reach the marketplace within the next 1 to 2 years. Although advances have been made in understanding gastrointestinal motility, visceral pain, mucosal inflammation, and tissue repair, the major gastrointestinal diseases remain as significant therapeutic challenges.

Gastric acid is the key modulator in the pathogenesis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulceration in rats

1. In the present study, we investigated the role of gastric acid (GA) secretion on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulcerogenesis in vivo. Rats were administered single oral doses of selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1 (SC-560; 2.5 mg/kg), COX-2 (DFU; 25 mg/kg) or non-selective COX (indomethacin; 25 mg/kg) inhibitors. Three groups (basal, histamine-stimulated and histamine with lansoprazole) were pylorus ligated 2 h after inhibitor administration and killed 2 h later. Another group without pylorus ligation received only inhibitors and was killed after 18 h. 2. At 4 h, indomethacin increased the ulcer index (UI) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in basal and histamine-stimulated states, whereas SC-560 only increased MPO activity. Histamine-stimulated, but not basal, GA was further enhanced by indomethacin and SC-560 via increased proton pump expression. Lansoprazole (10 mg/kg) reduced the UI, MPO activity and GA to basal levels with SC-560 and DFU and to near basal with indomethacin. Indomethacin and SC-560 significantly inhibited prostaglandin (PG) E(2), without significantly affecting COX-1 and COX-2 expression. Although DFU inhibited PGE(2) by one-third, it did not affect COX expression. 3. At 18 h, indomethacin significantly increased the UI and MPO activity, whereas PGE(2) synthesis was less inhibited, indicating a return to control levels. In contrast, PGE(2) synthesis was higher than control with SC-560. Furthermore, COX-2 expression was significantly elevated with indomethacin and SC-560, explaining the source of augmented PGE(2) synthesis. Proton pump expression remained elevated, comparable with 4 h levels, with indomethacin and SC-560. However, DFU had no significant effect on the aforementioned parameters. 4. The data suggest that NSAID-induced ulcerogenesis is dependent on the amount of GA secretion derived from increased proton pump expression and requires inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2.

Prevention of NSAID-related upper gastrointestinal toxicity: a meta-analysis of traditional NSAIDs with gastroprotection and COX-2 inhibitors

Background:

Traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors (COX-2s) are important agents for the treatment of a variety or arthritic conditions. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of misoprostol, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the prevention of tNSAID related upper gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and to review the upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety of COX-2s.

Methods:

An extensive literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prophylactic agents used for the prevention of upper GI toxicity, and RCTs that assessed the GI safety of the newer COX-2s. Meta-analysis was performed in accordance with accepted techniques.

Results:

39 gastroprotection and 69 COX-2 RCTs met inclusion criteria. Misoprostol, PPIs, and double doses of H2RAs are effective at reducing the risk of both endoscopic gastric and duodenal tNSAID-induced ulcers. Standard doses of H2RAs are not effective at reducing the risk of tNSAID-induced gastric ulcers, but reduce the risk of duodenal ulcers. Misoprostol is associated with greater adverse effects than the other agents, particularly at higher doses. COX-2s are associated with fewer endoscopic ulcers and clinically important ulcer complications, and have fewer treatment withdrawals due to GI symptoms than tNSAIDS. Acetylsalicylic acid appears to diminish the benefit of COX-2s over tNSAIDs. In high risk GI patients, tNSAID with a PPI or a COX-2 alone appear to offer similar GI safety, but a strategy of a COX-2 with a PPI appears to offer the greatest GI safety.

Conclusion:

Several strategies are available to reduce the risk of upper GI toxicity with tNSAIDs. The choice between these strategies needs to consider patients’ underlying GI and cardiovascular risk.

Peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease had a tremendous effect on morbidity and mortality until the last decades of the 20th century, when epidemiological trends started to point to an impressive fall in its incidence. Two important developments are associated with the decrease in rates of peptic ulcer disease: the discovery of effective and potent acid suppressants, and of Helicobacter pylori. With the discovery of H pylori infection, the causes, pathogenesis, and treatment of peptic ulcer disease have been rewritten. We focus on this revolution of understanding and management of peptic ulcer disease over the past 25 years. Despite substantial advances, this disease remains an important clinical problem, largely because of the increasingly widespread use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin. We discuss the role of these agents in the causes of ulcer disease and therapeutic and preventive strategies for drug-induced ulcers. The rare but increasingly problematic H pylori-negative NSAID-negative ulcer is also examined.

Time trends and impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Changing patterns in medical practice may contribute to temporal changes in the incidence of upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) complications. There are limited data on the incidence of lower GI complications in clinical practice and most studies that have been done have serious methodological limitations to inferring the actual burden of this problem. The aims of this study were to analyze time trends of hospitalizations resulting from GI complications originating both from the upper and lower GI tract in the general population, and to determine the risk factors, severity, and clinical impact of these GI events.

METHODS

This was a population-based study of patients hospitalized because of GI complications in 10 general hospitals between 1996 and 2005 in Spain. We report the age- and gender-specific rates, estimate the regression coefficients of the upper and lower GI event trends, and evaluate the severity and associated risk factors. GI hospitalization charts were validated by an independent review of large random samples of unspecific and specific codes distributed among all hospitals and study years.

RESULTS

Upper GI complications fell from 87/100,000 persons in 1996 to 47/100,000 persons in 2005, whereas lower GI complications increased from 20/100,000 to 33/100,000. Overall, mortality rates decreased, but the case fatality remained constant over time. Lower GI events had a higher mortality rate (8.8 vs. 5.5%), a longer hospitalization (11.6+/-13.9 vs. 7.9+/-8.8 days), and higher resource utilization than did upper GI events. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) without concomitant proton pump inhibitor was more frequently recorded among upper GI complications than among lower GI complications. When comparing upper GI events with lower GI events, we found that male gender (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-2.21), and recorded NSAID use (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.60-2.30) were associated to a greater extent with upper GI events, whereas older age (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77-0.89), number of comorbidities (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86-0.96), and having a diagnosis in recent years (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90-0.94) were all associated to a greater extent with lower GI events than with upper GI events after adjusting for age, sex, hospitalization, and discharge year.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past decade, there has been a progressive change in the overall picture of GI events leading to hospitalization, with a clear decreasing trend in upper GI events and a significant increase in lower GI events, causing the rates of these two GI complications to converge. Overall, mortality has also decreased, but the in-hospital case fatality of upper or lower GI complication events has remained constant. It will be a challenge to improve future care in this area unless we develop new strategies to reduce the number of events originating in the lower GI tract, as well as reducing their associated mortality.

Recent advances in peptic ulcer bleeding

Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a common cause of hospital admission, morbidity and mortality. Data published since 2006 illustrate that assessment, endoscopic and pharmacological management, and follow-up strategies can be refined to improve the overall prognosis of peptic ulcer bleeding.

Canadian consensus guidelines on long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and the need for gastroprotection: benefits versus risks

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used, but are not without risks.

AIM

To provide evidence-based management recommendations to help clinicians determine optimal long-term NSAID therapy and the need for gastroprotective strategies based on an assessment of both gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risks.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 21 voting participants revised and voted on the statements and the strength of evidence (assessed according to GRADE) at a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

An algorithmic approach was developed to help manage patients who require long-term NSAID therapy. The use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in patients with high CV risk was assumed. For patients at low GI and CV risk, a traditional NSAID alone may be acceptable. For patients with low GI risk and high CV risk, full-dose naproxen may have a lower potential for CV risk than other NSAIDs. In patients with high GI and low CV risk, a COX-2 inhibitor plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may offer the best GI safety profile. When both GI and CV risks are high and NSAID therapy is absolutely necessary, risk should be prioritized. If the primary concern is GI risk, a COX-2 inhibitor plus a PPI is recommended; if CV risk, naproxen 500 mg b.d. plus a PPI would be preferred. NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration.

CONCLUSION

More large, long-term trials that examine clinical outcomes of complicated and symptomatic upper and lower GI ulcers are needed.

Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications

Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to indicate preferred approaches to medical problems as established by scientifically valid research. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are preferable, but compassionate use reports and expert review articles are used in a thorough review of the literature conducted through Medline with the National Library of Medicine. Only when data that will not withstand objective scrutiny are available is a recommendation identified as a consensus of experts. Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the subject, without regard to specialty training or interests, and are intended to indicate the preferable, but not necessarily the only, acceptable approach to a specific problem. Guidelines are intended to be flexible and must be distinguished from standards of care, which are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of specifics in any health-care problem, the physician must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology by a committee of experts in the field, reviewed by its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. The recommendations of these guidelines are therefore considered valid at the time of production based on the data available. New developments in medical research and practice pertinent to each guideline will be reviewed at an established time and indicated at publication to assure continued validity. Owing to the volume of new data on the subject of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract, i.e., the advent of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, new data on interactions between these agents, as well as traditional NSAIDs, with aspirin and H. pylori, it was elected by the Committee to confine these guidelines to upper gastrointestinal (GI) injury and to leave post-duodenal injury as the subject of a separate guideline.

[Adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the lower gastrointestinal tract]

Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) are among the most commonly used drugs worldwide. Together with the beneficial effects, several adverse effects have become evident in the past decades. NSAIDs may damage any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The adverse effect in the lower GI tract was thought to be less important, but more and more data confirm that NSAIDs can cause equally severe lesions in the lower GI tract as well, only the diagnostic procedures are limited. NSAIDs may damage the intact mucosa, and they also may cause flare-up of a preexisting disease. Adverse events in the lower GI tract are caused mainly by the dual (COX-1 and COX-2) inhibitors. Besides the inhibiting of the cyclooxygenase enzymes, an important step is the local effect of the drug that initiates the chain reaction with the damage of the epithelial cells (increase of mucosal permeability, influx of luminal factors, produce of inflammatory mediators etc.). The spectrum of adverse effects of NSAIDs on the lower GI are reviewed according to the latest literature and the available prevention and therapeutic strategies.

Colorectal polyps: the scope and management of the problem

Colorectal cancer affects over 150,000 individuals yearly, and accounts for over 50,000 deaths. Much of the benefit of colorectal cancer screening has been attributed to detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, highlighting the importance of colorectal polyps as targets for intervention and as biomarkers for colorectal cancer risk. This review details the epidemiology of sporadic colorectal polyps, rationale behind use of polyps as an important surrogate for colorectal cancer risk, the benefits and limitations of secondary prevention of colorectal polyps through chemopreventive and dietary interventions, as well as colon surveillance.

Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn't the stomach digest itself?

Except in rare cases, the stomach can withstand exposure to highly concentrated hydrochloric acid, refluxed bile salts, alcohol, and foodstuffs with a wide range of temperatures and osmolarity. This is attributed to a number of physiological responses by the mucosal lining to potentially harmful luminal agents, and to an ability to rapidly repair damage when it does occur. Since the discovery in 1971 that prostaglandin synthesis could be blocked by aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there has been great interest in the contribution of prostaglandins to gastric mucosal defense. Prostaglandins modulate virtually every aspect of mucosal defense, and the importance of this contribution is evident by the increased susceptibility of the stomach to injury following ingestion of an NSAID. With chronic ingestion of these drugs, the development of ulcers in the stomach is a significant clinical concern. Research over the past two decades has helped to identify some of the key events triggered by NSAIDs that contribute to ulcer formation and/or impair ulcer healing. Recent research has also highlighted the fact that the protective functions of prostaglandins in the stomach can be carried out by other mediators, in particular the gaseous mediators nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide. Better understanding of the mechanisms through which the stomach is able to resist injury in the presence of luminal irritants is helping to drive the development of safer anti-inflammatory drugs, and therapies to accelerate and improve the quality of ulcer healing.

Role of cyclooxygenase isoforms in prostacyclin biosynthesis and murine prehepatic portal hypertension

Portal hypertension (PHT) is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. Abrogation of PHT using NSAIDs has demonstrated that prostacyclin (PGI(2)), a direct downstream metabolic product of cyclooxygenase (COX) activity, is an important mediator in the development of experimental and clinical PHT. However, the role of COX isoforms in PGI(2) biosynthesis and PHT is not fully understood. Prehepatic PHT was induced by portal vein ligation (PVL) in wild-type, COX-1(-/-), and COX-2(-/-) mice treated with and without COX-2 (NS398) or COX-1 (SC560) inhibitors. Hemodynamic measurements and PGI(2) biosynthesis were determined 1-7 days after PVL or sham surgery. Gene deletion or pharmacological inhibition of COX-1 or COX-2 attenuated but did not ameliorate PGI(2) biosynthesis after PVL or prevent PHT. In contrast, treatment of COX-1(-/-) mice with NS398 or COX-2(-/-) mice with SC560 restricted PGI(2) biosynthesis and abrogated the development of PHT following PVL. In conclusion, either COX-1 or COX-2 can mediate elevated PGI(2) biosynthesis and the development of experimental prehepatic PHT. Consequently, PGI(2) rather then COX-selective drugs are indicated in the treatment of PHT. Identification of additional target sites downstream of COX may benefit the >27,000 patients whom die annually from cirrhosis in the United States alone.

The pattern of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from 1997 to 2005: a nationwide study on 4.6 million people

PURPOSE

To describe the nationwide pattern of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the Danish population.

METHODS

All Danish citizens aged 10 or above 1 January 1997 were included in the study. The national prescription registry was used to identify all claimed prescriptions for NSAIDs by the cohort until 2005. By individual-level-linkage of nationwide registries, information was acquired concerning hospitalizations, comorbidity, concomitant pharmacotherapy and socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

The population consisted of 4,614,807 individuals, of which 2,663,706 (57.8%) claimed at least one prescription for NSAID from 1997 to 2005. Ibuprofen and diclofenac were the most frequently used non-selective NSAIDs, whereas rofecoxib and celecoxib were the most frequently used selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. The usage was similar across all age groups. Female sex and increasing age was associated with increased use of NSAID. Factors predicting extensive NSAID use were: rheumatic disease (odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-1.90), gout agents (allopurinol) (OR = 2.54, CI: 2.44-2.64) and other pain medication (OR = 3.27, CI: 3.23-3.31). NSAIDs were most often prescribed for use for one distinct treatment interval and for a short period (overall inter-quartile range [IQR]: 9-66 days). High doses were used in a relatively large proportion of the population (8.9% for etodolac to 19.5% for celecoxib) and 54,373 (2.0%) claimed prescriptions for more than one NSAID at the same time.

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs were commonly used in the Danish population. Since NSAIDs have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk, further research on the overall risk associated with these drugs on a national scale is needed.

[The safety of COX-2 inhibitors]

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, but they can cause serious gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. NSAIDs are capable of damaging the whole gastrointestinal tract. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs) have been developed with the aim of maintaining the anti-inflammatory benefits but reducing gastrotoxicity. There is a good evidence that these drugs effectively prevent gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications. Little is known about the side effects of these agents in the small and large intestine. There is an increasing evidence that COX-2 is constitutively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and is important for the maintenance of bowel integrity. There have also been growing concerns about the potential for coxibs to increase the frequency of adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent knowledge about the safety profile of selective COX-2 inhibitors.

Improving on our goal to reduce NSAID-induced GI complications: a challenging task?

A large number of at-risk patients treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) do not receive prophylaxis for gastrointestinal (GI) complications. The combination of a 10-min physician educational intervention and a computer alert has been proved to increase the rate of prescribing gastroprotective therapy for high-risk patients who receive ulcerogenic drugs at hospital discharge from 45% to 67%. This improvement is remarkable; still, more than 30% of these high-risk patients did not receive appropriate therapy. Considering that most patients who receive NSAIDs are outpatients treated by generalists, and considering that adherence may be poor and self-medication with NSAIDs is common among patients with GI risk factors, closing the gap between patients treated with NSAIDs who do and do not receive adequate GI prophylaxis is a challenging endeavor. In order to more effectively pursue this goal, we will need to develop new and more complex approaches.

Future expectations in the prophylaxis of intestinal bleeding

Prophylaxis of gastrointestinal bleeding is attempted in widely varying situations. In NSAID-induced peptic ulcer, the advantage of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors with regard to gastrointestinal damage has yet to be translated into an advantage in overall morbidity. Strategies for primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding have been established. Therapy tailored to hepatic venous pressure gradient has the potential to achieve clinical relevance. Several methods have been developed to prevent postpolypectomy bleeding, but their optimal risk-tailored application has yet to be demonstrated. Although octreotide treatment seems to be beneficial in reducing the blood loss from angiodysplasias, controlled studies to determine its optimal use are awaited. Stress-ulcer prophylaxis is commonly applied in critically ill patients. Although data indicate that H2-receptor antagonists and omeprazole are effective in preventing clinically significant bleeding, evidence for an advantage with respect to length of hospital or intensive-care-unit stay, as well as mortality, is still lacking. Since there is misuse of acid-suppressing drugs on regular wards, in-house guidelines may offer the potential for saving costs and reducing inappropriate prescription.

Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is an important emergency situation. Population-based epidemiology data are important to get insight in the actual healthcare problem. There are only few recent epidemiological surveys regarding acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Several surveys focusing on peptic ulcer disease showed a significant decrease in admission and mortality of peptic ulcer disease. Several more recent epidemiological surveys show a decrease in incidence of all cause upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding remained stable. Peptic ulcer bleeding is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, responsible for about 50% of all cases, followed by oesophagitis and erosive disease. Variceal bleeding is the cause of bleeding in cirrhotic patients in 50-60%. Rebleeding in upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in 7-16%, despite endoscopic therapy. Rebleeding is especially high in variceal bleeding and peptic ulcer bleeding. Mortality ranges between 3 and 14% and did not change in the past 10 years. Mortality is increasing with increasing age and is significantly higher in patients who are already admitted in hospital for co-morbidity. Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding are NSAIDs use and H. pylori infection. In patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and using NSAIDs, a protective drug was only used in 10%. COX-2 selective inhibitors do cause less gastroduodenal ulcers compared to non-selective NSAIDs, however, more cardiovascular adverse events are reported. H. pylori infection is found in about 50% of peptic ulcer bleeding patients. H. pylori should be tested for in all ulcer patients and eradication should be given.

COX-2 selective inhibitors in the treatment of osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs) in osteoarthritis (OA) and their gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renovascular, and hepatic side effects compared with traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen.

METHODS

Bibliographic database searches for randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and literature reviews.

RESULTS

Coxibs are comparable to traditional NSAIDs, providing moderate benefit for OA patients in pain and function versus placebo. NSAIDs, including coxibs, are superior to acetaminophen for OA, particularly in patients with moderate to severe pain. Coxibs decrease gastroduodenal ulcers (74% relative risk reduction) and ulcer complications (61% reduction) versus traditional NSAIDs. Meta-analysis of randomized trials indicates that coxibs increase the risk of myocardial infarctions approximately twofold versus placebo and versus naproxen, but do not increase the risk versus nonnaproxen NSAIDs. NSAIDs, including coxibs, commonly cause fluid retention and increase blood pressure and uncommonly induce congestive heart failure or significant renal dysfunction; risk factors include advanced age, hypertension, and heart or kidney disease. NSAIDs are a rare cause of clinical hepatotoxicity (<1 liver-related death per 100,000 NSAID users in clinical studies). Increased rates of aminotransferase elevations occur with rofecoxib (2%) and high-dose lumiracoxib (3%), and postmarketing cases of clinical liver injury with lumiracoxib have been reported recently.

CONCLUSIONS

Coxibs are as effective as traditional NSAIDs and superior to acetaminophen for the treatment of OA. Coxibs cause fewer gastrointestinal complications than traditional NSAIDs. Coxibs increase cardiovascular risk versus placebo and naproxen-but probably not versus nonnaproxen NSAIDs. Blood pressure commonly increases after initiation of selective or nonselective NSAIDs, especially in hypertensive patients.

Are COX-2 inhibitors preferable to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with risk of cardiovascular events taking low-dose aspirin?

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with increased risk of acute cardiovascular events. Only aspirin offers primary and secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis, but trials have not answered directly whether low-dose aspirin is cardioprotective with COX-2 inhibitors. A large inception cohort study showed that concomitant use of aspirin reduced risk of cardiovascular events when given with rofecoxib, celecoxib, sulindac, meloxicam, and indometacin but not when given with ibuprofen. In large trials assessing gastrointestinal safety, there were fewer gastrointestinal events in patients using both COX-2 inhibitors and aspirin than in those using non-selective NSAIDs and aspirin; significantly fewer uncomplicated upper gastrointestinal events took place in the MEDAL trial. Analysis of VIGOR and two capsule endoscopy studies showed significantly less distal gastrointestinal blood loss with COX-2 inhibitors than with non-selective NSAIDs. Endoscopy trials showed that low-dose aspirin does not diminish the gastrointestinal benefits of COX-2 inibitors over non-selective NSAIDs. In an elderly epidemiological cohort receiving aspirin, both celecoxib and rofecoxib reduced risk of admission for gastrointestinal events. Comparison of the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks is difficult: likelihood and severity of cardiovascular events differ between individuals, agents, and exposure. Mortality associated with gastrointestinal events is less frequent than with cardiovascular events, but asymptomatic ulcers can result in severe complications. Data support the conclusion that COX-2 inhibitors are preferable to non-selective NSAIDs in patients with chronic pain and cardiovascular risk needing low-dose aspirin, but relative risks and benefits should be assessed individually for each patient.

Hospitalization for gastrointestinal adverse events attributable to the use of low-dose aspirin among patients 50 years or older also using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Use of aspirin with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases the risk of gastrointestinal ulcers; however, it is not clear if this risk varies with the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used.

AIM

To assess the risk of gastrointestinal hospitalizations attributable to aspirin in patients 50 years or older also using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

METHODS

Administrative data of patients 50 years or older who received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or acetaminophen prescription between 1998 and 2004 were used.

RESULTS

Study patients received 7,412,992 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions and 5,614,044 acetaminophen prescriptions among which 23% and 32%, respectively, were dispensed to aspirin users. Time-dependent Cox regression models revealed that, compared to patients using acetaminophen (without aspirin), the adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) among non-users of aspirin were: rofecoxib 1.3 (1.2, 1.5), celecoxib 0.7 (0.6, 0.8), diclofenac 1.5 (1.2, 1.7), ibuprofen 0.9 (0.6, 1.4), naproxen 2.5 (2.1, 3.0) and piroxicam 1.5 (0.8, 2.8); among users of aspirin: rofecoxib 3.2 (2.8, 3.7), celecoxib 1.8 (1.5, 2.1), diclofenac 2.8 (2.2, 3.5), ibuprofen 1.4 (0.8, 2.7), naproxen 2.2 (1.6, 3.0) and piroxicam 2.0 (0.8, 5.4). The risk attributable to aspirin varied from none with naproxen to 61% (53%, 68%) with celecoxib.

CONCLUSION

The increase in gastrointestinal hospitalization attributable to aspirin differed with the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used, and seemed higher with cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors than with non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Gastroduodenal defense

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The gastroduodenum resists mucosal injury despite continuous exposure to concentrated gastric acid. The mucosal barrier consists of a preepithelial mucus HCO3- layer, intercellular tight junctions connecting the epithelial cells, and submucosal acid sensors, prostaglandins, cytokines, enteric nerves and blood flow. In the past year, study of these defensive mechanisms has revealed new insight into the observed sex differences in ulcer prevalence, the protective role of transforming growth factor, the role of serotonin in regulating HCO3- secretion, the role of mechanisms in ulcer healing, the interaction of trefoil factors with the mucus gel, the interaction of glucocorticoids with cyclooxygenase and the characterization of novel, mucosal sparing antiinflammatory agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transforming growth factor, melatonin, serotonin, trefoil factors and H2S all enhance mucosal barrier function or accelerate ulcer healing. Newer coxibs may have safety and advantages over existing compounds. Existing nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be safer than originally thought.

SUMMARY

The continued elucidation of basic defense mechanisms has led to the development of several new compounds designed to enhance barrier function and repair mechanisms.