Pilot Study of the Effects of High-Protein Meals During Hemodialysis on Intradialytic Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Correlation between geriatric nutritional risk index and intradialytic hypotension in elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

There is a correlation between nutritional status and treatment outcomes and long-term survival in MHD patients but there is limited research on the relationship between GNRI and IDH. This case-control study aimed to investigate the correlation between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

METHODS

This study was carried out on 129 cases of MHD patients with IDH and 258 non-IDH-controls in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, China, between June 2020 and May 2022. Professional researchers collected patients' general information on gender, primary disease, dialysis-related indicators, anthropometric measures, laboratory biochemicals, and GNRI. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between GNRI and IDH.

RESULTS

A total of 385 elderly MHD patients were included. Compared with GNRI Q4 group, the odds ratios for the risk of IDH in GNRI Q3 group, GNRI Q2 group, and GNRI Q1 group of elderly MHD patients were 1.227, 2.196, and 8.350, respectively, showing a significant downward trend (P-trend < 0.05). The area under the curve of GNRI for predicting IDH was 0.839 (95% CI: 0.799-0.879). Between different genders, a decrease in GNRI was closely related to an increase in IDH risk (P for trend < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This research shows a significant association between GNRI and the incidence of IDH among elderly MHD patients and has an important warning effect. Encouraging the incorporation of GNRI assessment into the clinical assessment protocols of older patients with MHD may help to improve the nutritional status of those suffering from it and reduce the risk of IDH.

Does intradialytic oral nutrition impact hemodialysis patients' quality of Life, appetite, and safety? A pilot study of a crossover clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

due to the catabolic characteristics of hemodialysis (HD), patients should consume foods or supplements during this treatment to meet their energy requirements and maintain a neutral nitrogen balance; however, there are some outcomes in which the effect of intradialytic oral nutrition (ION) is scarcely known.

OBJECTIVES

this study aims to evaluate the effect of two types of ION (liquid and solid) on QoL, appetite, and safety in HD patients.

METHODS

a pilot randomized, crossover clinical trial was performed in 18 patients on chronic HD. One group received ION for 18 HD sessions, after the crossover continued for 18 more sessions in the control group, and vice versa. We recorded QoL, appetite, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and intradialytic hypotension (IH) events.

RESULTS

clinical improvement was observed for most QoL components. Regardless of the consistency of supplementation, SBP increased to 4.10 mmHg. Both study groups reported a "very good-to-good" appetite.

CONCLUSION

favorable clinical changes were observed in QoL scores during the study. Five of six IH events were reported for patients in the ION group, and SBP increased within the safe range (≤ 10 mmHg); appetite remained stable in both groups. Therefore, we concluded that this strategy, regardless of implementation consistency, is safe to be used in stable patients.

Adaptive Nutrition Intervention Stabilizes Serum Phosphorus Levels in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Decentralized Clinical Trial Using Real-World Data

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effect of an adaptive nutritional and educational intervention for patients on hemodialysis (HD) in a routine care setting, using real-world data from electronic health records.

METHODS

Decentralized clinical trial of seven HD facilities recruited patients who have been on HD for over 3 months (N = 153) for an 8-week adaptive intervention protocol. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) control (2) education intervention (3) meal intervention (4) education and meal interventions. Educational contents were digitally delivered via mobile phones and premade meals tailored on laboratory findings were home-delivered. Changes in serum electrolytes and malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Meal intervention statistically significantly stabilized serum phosphorus level (β = -0.81 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval = [-1.40, -0.22]) at week 8, with increased likelihood of being within target serum value range (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = [1.04, 1.40]). Meal group showed better nutritional status (MIS = 3.65) than the education group (MIS = 5.10) at week 8 (adjusted p < .05). No significant changes were observed in serum potassium level, depression, and self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

It was demonstrated that an adaptive meal intervention in a real-world care setting may benefit serum phosphorus control and nutritional status of patients on HD, without negative effect on depression levels or self-efficacy. More work is needed to develop an effective educational intervention.

Barriers to and Strategies for Dietary Adherence: A Qualitative Study Among Hemodialysis/Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Health Care Providers

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were: (1) investigate hemodialysis (HD)/peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients' barriers to dietary adherence, (2) identify strategies to overcome these barriers, and (3) examine dialysis providers' perceptions toward patients' barriers to dietary adherence and strategies to overcome these barriers.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was conducted from February-May 2022. A total of 21 HD/PD participants and 11 health care providers participated in individual interviews. HD/PD participants also responded to a 57-item food frequency questionnaire. Six months of serum laboratory values were obtained from the medical charts. Content analysis methodology was used to identify themes. Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to examine diet quality and laboratory values of the HD and PD participants using SPSS v.27 with statistical significance of P < .05.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) diet quality score for HD/PD patients was 36 (26-43) with no differences observed between the patient populations. Mann-Whitney U tests showed no differences between serum laboratory values between the patient populations. Barriers identified by the HD/PD patients were communication/patient education and dietary habits. Barriers identified by the health care providers were communication/patient education and socioeconomic status. Strategies to overcome these barriers were enhancing communication between all parties involved in the care and tailoring educational information to the patient's background.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication and patient education were themes identified among both health care providers and patients. Therefore, open communication among the patients and providers and enhancement of the nutrition education handouts may improve dietary adherence.

Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension in Hemodialysis Patients: Current Challenges and Future Prospects

Intradialytic hypotension, defined as rapid decrease in systolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg or in mean arterial pressure of greater than or equal to 10 mmHg that results in end-organ ischemia and requires countermeasures such as ultrafiltration reduction or saline infusion to increase blood pressure to improve patient's symptoms, is a known complication of hemodialysis and is associated with several potential adverse outcomes. Its pathogenesis is complex and involves both patient-related factors such as age and comorbidities, as well as factors related to the dialysis prescription itself. Key factors include the need for volume removal during hemodialysis and a suboptimal vascular response which compromises the ability to compensate for acute intravascular volume loss. Inadequate vascular refill, incorrect assessment or unaccounted changes of target weight, acute illnesses and medication interference are further potential contributors. Intradialytic hypotension can lead to compromised tissue perfusion and end-organ damage, both acutely and over time, resulting in repetitive injuries. To address these problems, a careful assessment of subjective symptoms, minimizing interdialytic weight gains, individualizing dialysis prescription and adjusting the dialysis procedure based on patients' risk factors can mitigate negative outcomes.

The effect of food intake during hemodialysis on blood pressure: A nonrandomized experimental trial

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is one of the most important intradialytic complications and is thought to be associated with intradialytic food intake. Allowing intradialytic feeding is still unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between IDH and intradialytic food intake.

METHODS

A nonrandomized experimental study was conducted to determine the effect of intradialytic food intake on blood pressure (BP) in hemodialysis patients. Each patient was assessed twice using an ambulatory BP monitor with and without intradialytic food intake.

RESULTS

The study was completed with 54 patients. Intradialytic hypotension developed in 40 patients (74.1%) during the food intake session, while intradialytic hypotension developed in 22 participants (40%) in the no-food session. Repeated BP readings showed that eating 2 h or more after the start of hemodialysis significantly reduced BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradialytic food intake affects the development of IDH. Patients who ate during hemodialysis had a trend of higher of IDH than those who ate nothing during hemodialysis. Eating during dialysis is not recommended.

Feeding during Dialysis Increases Intradialytic Blood Pressure Variability and Reduces Dialysis Adequacy

Whether hemodialysis patients should be allowed or even encouraged to eat during dialysis remains a controversial topic. This cross-over study aimed to evaluate the impact of feeding during dialysis on intradialytic blood pressure (BP) profile and dialysis adequacy in 26 patients receiving thrice-weekly, in-center hemodialysis. Over three consecutive mid-week dialysis sessions, intradialytic BP was monitored using the Mobil-O-Graph device (IEM, Stolberg, Germany). Blood samples were also obtained for the determination of the urea reduction ratio (URR). At baseline, patients underwent dialysis without the provision of a meal. In phases A and B, a meal with either high-protein (1.5 gr/kg of body weight) or low-protein (0.7 gr/kg of body weight) content was administered 1 h after the initiation of dialysis. The sequence of meals (high-protein and low-protein or vice versa) was randomized. Average intradialytic systolic BP (SBP) was similar on all three occasions. However, compared with baseline, the standard deviation (SD) (11.7 ± 4.1 vs. 15.6 ± 7.6 mmHg, p < 0.01), coefficient of variation (CV) (9.5 ± 3.7% vs. 12.4 ± 6.0%, p < 0.01) and average real variability (ARV) (9.4 ± 3.9 vs. 12.1 ± 5.2 mmHg, p < 0.01) of intradialytic SBP were higher in phase A. Similarly, compared with the baseline evaluation, all three indices of intradialytic SBP variability were higher in phase B (SD: 11.7 ± 4.1 vs. 14.1 ± 4.5 mmHg, p < 0.05; CV: 9.5 ± 3.7% vs. 11.1 ± 3.8%, p < 0.05; ARV: 9.4 ± 3.9 vs. 10.9 ± 3.9 mmHg, p < 0.05). Compared with dialysis without a meal, the consumption of a high-protein or low-protein meal resulted in a lower URR (73.4 ± 4.3% vs. 65.7 ± 10.7%, p < 0.001 in phase A and 73.4 ± 4.3% vs. 67.6 ± 4.3%, p < 0.001 in phase B, respectively). In conclusion, in the present study, feeding during dialysis was associated with higher intradialytic SBP variability and reduced adequacy of the delivered dialysis.

Protein and energy intake: Comparison of two food services in patients during hemodialysis treatment

OBJECTIVES

Radboud University Medical Center introduced a new food service (NFS) to the hemodialysis (HD) department, which contains several small protein-rich foods and adheres to the Dutch dietary HD guidelines. The objectives were to investigate whether the NFS improves protein and energy intake compared with the old food service (OFS), the number of symptomatic hypotensive events (SHEs), and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort (pilot) study of 25 adult patients with HD at the Radboud University Medical Center between August 2018 and February 2019. Differences in protein and energy intake over time by repeated measurements of the OFS and NFS were evaluated by linear mixed models with adjustments for confounders. SHEs, defined as a systolic drop >20 mmHg between two blood pressure measurements and 1) temporary or permanent stop ultrafiltration, 2) nausea, or 3) dizziness were collected. Patient satisfaction was determined by means of a self-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Protein and energy intake for the OFS and NFS differed significantly. Mean ± standard deviation for protein intake was 26 ± 11 g and 31 ± 13 g, respectively, and for energy intake 603 ± 218 kcal and 724 ± 244 kcal, respectively. No increase in SHEs occurred between the food services (2 SHEs at OFS vs 1 SHE at NFS). OFS patient satisfaction was graded 6.7 ± 2.3 and NFS was graded 7.3 ± 1.7.

CONCLUSIONS

NFS resulted in increased protein and energy intake and patient satisfaction, but no increase in SHEs was observed.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Nutrition Support

Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those undergoing maintenance dialysis, are prone to protein-energy wasting (PEW), the latter of which can be ameliorated with different methods of nutrition support. Dietary counseling guided by dietitians is the key for preventing and managing PEW in CKD. If dietary counseling per se fails to meet the recommended energy and protein requirements, the addition of oral nutrition supplements (ONSs) would be necessary. When these initial measures cannot attain the recommended energy and protein requirements, nutrition support, including enteral tube feeding or parenteral nutrition (PN), should be considered as a viable option to improve nutrition status. Partial PN, comprising intraperitoneal PN (IPPN) and intradialytic PN (IDPN) therapies, may be attempted as supplemental nutrition support in patients with PEW requiring peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, respectively. Despite the debatable effectiveness of IPPN for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, it remains a feasible means in these patients. The indications for IPPN in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis include inadequate dietary intake of energy and protein, and barriers of oral intake and other forms of enteral supplementation such as issues with suitability, tolerance, and compliance. Nonetheless, in the case of spontaneous dietary consumption of energy and protein meeting the difference between the IDPN provision and the nutrition targets, the use of IDPN is rational. In patients with PEW and malfunctioning gastrointestinal tract, as well as those whose enteral intake (with or without partial PN) is below the recommended nutrient requirements, total PN becomes a relevant nutrition intervention.

Relationship of a food intake during hemodialysis and symptomatic intradialytic hypotension

INTRODUCTION

Intradialytic hypotension is the most common complication during hemodialysis and is associated with increased cardiovascular disease, mortality, and overall hospital admissions. We analyzed the influence of food intake during hemodialysis on intradialytic hypotension.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients treated with chronic hemodialysis were observed for 8 weeks-4 weeks with a meal during hemodialysis and 4 weeks without a meal.

FINDINGS

A statistically significant decrease of hypotensive events (p < 0.001) and cramping episodes (p = 0.035) was observed during a 4-week period without a meal. Patients who were particularly susceptible to intradialytic hypotension were those who were diabetic, had low urinary excretion, and were treated with hemodialysis for a long time. On a follow up, there was a significant increase in serum albumin after 3 months (p = 0.01) and 6 months (p = 0.036) despite meal withdrawal during hemodialysis.

DISCUSSION

Fasting during hemodialysis may cause a significantly lower frequency of intradialytic hypotension and cramping episodes without affecting the nutritional status.

Frequency of Intradialytic Hypotension Events Do Not Increase with Oral Nutritional Supplementation during Hemodialysis Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of the use of a renal-specific oral nutritional supplement (RS-ONS) during hemodialysis sessions and the use of RS-ONS at home on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.

METHODS

A single-center, 12-week, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. The intervention was a RN-ONS divided into two portions: 100 and 137 mL. The first portion was given after 1 hour of hemodialysis (HD) treatment, while the second portion was given 45 minutes before the end of HD. The research staff registered the baseline and final nutritional parameters and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) from the screen of the HD device during 36 HD sessions. Hypotension symptoms were also recorded every hour during each HD session. The nutritional and functional status was also assessed.

RESULTS

We registered a total of 16 hypotensive events during 1082 HD sessions: 9 were in patients supplemented at home (551 HD sessions) and 7 occurred in patients supplemented during HD P = .668. Incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IH) during 1082 HD sessions was 1.4%. The total malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) decreased in both groups (P < .01), and the percentage of cachexia improved in the supplemented-during-HD group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized controlled trial, intradialytic hypotension events did not increase with the RS-ONS during HD treatment. This strategy appears to be a safe anabolic nutritional strategy for the prevention of PEW, selecting stable patients and administering a fractioned volume of the supplement after the first hour of HD treatment. More studies with larger samples size are required to confirm these findings.

Predialytic versus Intradialytic Nutrition: A Study to Assess Effects on Intradialytic Blood Pressure, Dialysis Adequacy, and Urea Removal

BACKGROUND

Provision of oral protein in hemodialysis (HD) is desirable due to improved compliance to protein requirements and better nutritional status, but the risks of hypotension and underdialysis need to be considered. This study compared 2 different timings for administering oral nutritional supplements (ONS), predialysis and mid-dialysis, with respect to hemodynamics, dialysis adequacy, urea removal, and tolerability.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective crossover study analyzed 72 stable patients with ESRD on twice a week maintenance HD with a mean age of 38.7 (±11.2) years and a dialysis vintage of 28.2 (±13.1) months. In the first week, all the patients received ONS (450 kcal energy, 20 g protein) 1 h prior to start of dialysis (group 1) and in the next week, the supplement was administered after 2 h of start of dialysis (group 2), with a predialysis fasting period of at least 3 h in both groups. Blood pressures, serum, and spent dialysate samples were collected and nausea occurrence was noted by severity.

RESULTS

Predialytic intake (group 1) was associated with higher predialysis and 1st hour blood urea, dialysis adequacy, and urea removal than group 2. Both groups achieved mean Kt/V > 1.2, and the occurrence of symptomatic hypotensive episodes and nausea was not significantly different between the groups. On repeated measures ANOVA, changes in blood urea over time showed significant group effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Predialytic supplementation was associated with better dialysis adequacy and urea removal than intradialytic supplementation. However, both timings were equally tolerated and not associated with underdialysis.

Dietary protein interventions to improve nutritional status in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poor nutritional status is prevalent among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. Chronic hemodialysis patients show an accelerated decline in skeletal muscle mass and strength, which is associated with higher mortality rates and a reduced quality of life. The current review aims to summarize recent advances regarding underlying causes of muscle loss and interventions that support muscle mass maintenance in patients with chronic hemodialysis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Muscle maintenance in chronic hemodialysis patients is compromised by low dietary protein intake levels, anabolic resistance of skeletal muscle tissue, sedentary behavior, and amino acid removal during hemodialysis. Studies assessing the effect of increased protein intake on nutritional status generally show beneficial results, especially in hypoalbuminemic chronic hemodialysis patients. The muscle protein synthetic response following protein ingestion in chronic hemodialysis patients may be enhanced through incorporation of structured physical activity and/or concurrent ketoacid ingestion.

SUMMARY

A coordinated program that combines nutritional and physical activity interventions is likely required to attenuate the decline in muscle mass and strength of chronic hemodialysis patients. Nephrologists, dieticians, and exercise specialists should collaborate closely to establish guidelines regarding the appropriate quantity and timing of protein ingestion. In addition, they should provide tailored nutritional and physical activity interventions for chronic hemodialysis patients (see video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, Video abstract, http://links.lww.com/COCN/A14).

Development of muffins as dialysis snacks for patients undergoing hemodialysis: results of chemical composition and sensory analysis

Objective

This study aimed to develop two non-industrial food products as financially accessible options to prevent and treat malnutrition in hemodialysis (HD) patients. These food products were developed and intended for use as dialysis snacks.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional and multi-step study. First, 183 adult HD patients (55 ± 14 years; 50.8% males), replied to a questionnaire with their food preferences regarding taste (salty, sweet, bitter, sour) and consistency (liquid, solid, pasty) for a dialysis snack. Most patients preferred a food product with a solid consistency (90%) and a salty flavor (81.4%). Second, three muffin formulations of fine herbs were developed; one enriched with whey protein concentrate (WPC), a second with textured soy protein (TSP) and a third standard formulation without protein for comparison with the protein-enriched muffins, for which the chemical and nutritional compositions were analyzed. In the third step, 60 patients on HD (61 ± 15 years; 53% males) were enrolled in a sensory analysis by applying a 9-point structured hedonic scale, ranging from “extremely liked” (score 9) to “extremely disliked” (score 1).

Results

When compared with the standard formulation, the formulations enriched with WPC and TSP protein had a significantly higher amount of protein/serving (Standard: 5.9 ± 0.3 g vs WPC: 14.5 ± 0.9 g and TSP 10.8 ± 0.7 g; P < 0.05) but a lower amount of carbohydrate (Standard: 13.1 ± 2.2 g vs WPC: 5.6 ± 0.8 g and TSP 6.0 ± 1.2 g vs; P < 0.05). The mineral content/serving of the protein-enriched muffins was low in phosphorus (50 mg) and sodium (180 mg). The potassium content/serving was moderate for the WPC muffin (225.2 mg) and low for the TSP muffin (107.9 mg). The acceptability index (AI) for the enriched protein muffins was higher than 70% and similar to the standard formulation.

Conclusion

The muffins with fine herbs and enriched with protein were well-accepted by all patients and appropriate to serve as dialysis snacks for HD patients.

Hemodialysis Affects Wanting and Spontaneous Intake of Protein-Rich Foods in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

OBJECTIVES

Protein-energy wasting is a risk factor for mortality and morbidity in hemodialysis patients (HD patients). Food intake could be modified by HD-related changes in the food reward system (i.e., liking and wanting of specific macronutrients). In HD patients on days with and without dialysis, we evaluated (1) the reward system for protein-, fat-, and carbohydrate-rich foods, plasma hormones, and metabolite changes; and (2) the spontaneous ad libitum intake of macronutrients.

(DESIGN AND) METHODS

Twenty-four HD patients evaluated their liking and wanting of macronutrients at 7:30 AM and 11:30 AM on a day with and a day without dialysis. Concentrations of hormones and plasma amino acids were determined. An additional 18 HD patients ate what they wanted from a buffet lunch comprising 8 dishes on a day with and a day without dialysis. Healthy subjects, age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched, served as controls.

RESULTS

At 11:30 AM, wanting for protein-rich foods was higher on the day with than on the day without dialysis (P < .01), bringing wanting levels close to those of healthy subjects. This increase correlated with changes in the concentrations of plasma amino acids (P < .01). HD patients ate more protein from the buffet on the day with than on the day without dialysis (P < .01) and more than healthy subjects (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In HD patients, wanting and spontaneous intake of protein-rich foods increase immediately after dialysis. This increase correlated with decreased concentrations of plasma amino acids. Thus, in clinical practice, protein-rich foods should be recommended during and after dialysis in patients with protein-energy wasting.

Short-Term Effects of Very-Low-Phosphate and Low-Phosphate Diets on Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The short-term effects of low-phosphate diets on fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) level and the optimal amount of dietary phosphate restriction in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unknown.

DESIGN SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This was a randomized, active-controlled trial with a crossover design that included 35 adults with ESKD undergoing thrice-weekly hemodialysis and with a serum phosphate level >5.5 mg/dl or between 3.5 and 5.5 mg/dl with regular phosphate binder use at a hemodialysis unit of tertiary teaching hospital in Taiwan. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a very-low-phosphate diet, with a phosphate-to-protein ratio of 8 mg/g, or a low-phosphate diet, with a phosphate-to-protein ratio of 10 mg/g for 2 days, each with a 5-day washout during which subjects adhered to their usual diet. The primary outcome measure was mean difference in change-from-baseline intact FGF23 level between intervention groups. Secondary outcomes included difference in change-from-baseline serum phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), and C-terminal FGF23 level between intervention groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean change-from-baseline in intact FGF23 levels between the two study diets. The very-low-phosphate diet significantly lowered serum phosphate (mean difference, 0.6 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.2 to 1.0; P=0.002). There were no significant differences in change-from-baseline intact PTH and C-terminal FGF23 levels between the two study diets.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the 2-day period, the FGF23-lowering effect of the very-low-phosphate diet is similar to that of the low-phosphate diet. The very-low-phosphate diet has an additional phosphate-lowering effect compared with the low-phosphate diet.