Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Nociception level index-directed superficial parasternal intercostal plane block vs erector spinae plane block in open-heart surgery: a propensity matched non-inferiority clinical trial

This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.

To Study the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Midline Sternotomy in Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of acute poststernotomy pain after cardiac surgery is 80%1. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) adjacent to the sternum anesthetizes the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and may provide effective analgesia after sternotomy.

METHODOLOGY

A randomized controlled, double-blinded, prospective comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care center on patients of midline sternotomy between 18 and 65 years and NYHA Class 2 and 3 for open cardiac surgery with the primary aim to evaluate analgesia on deep breathing after 3 hours of PIFB block bilaterally. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups. PIFB was administered bilaterally before extubation, with 15 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plain (Group B), and bupivacaine+ clonidine 0.25 mcg/kg (Group B+C). Group C did not receive any intervention. All patients received acetaminophen 1 gram three times a day and injectable tramadol 1 mg/kg as a rescue analgesic.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar among all the groups. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain was statistically lower (P < 0.05) in Groups B and B+C compared to Group C at rest, deep breathing, and coughing at 3, 6, and 12 hours after extubation. NRS on deep breathing in Groups B, B+C, and C was {(2.3, 1.5, 4.4) at 3 hours, (2.3, 1.6, 4.3) at 6 hours, (2.8, 2.1, 3.9) at 12 hrs, and {(4.3, 3.5, 3.6)} at 24 hours after extubation. The peak expiratory flow rate was the highest in Group B. Rescue analgesia was not required in Group B.

CONCLUSION

PIFB reduces sternotomy pain compared to the control group on deep breathing at 3 hours after block, with delayed requirement of rescue analgesia and improved respiratory mechanics in terms of peak expiratory flow rate at all time points. There is no benefit from adding clonidine.

Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes.

SUMMARY

This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.

Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Traditional multimodal analgesic strategies have several contraindications in cardiac surgery patients, forcing clinicians to use alternative options. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks, anesthetizing the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, are being explored as a straightforward method to treat pain after sternotomy. We sought to evaluate the literature on the effects of superficial parasternal blocks on pain control after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for RCTs evaluating superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy published from inception to 11 March 2022. The prespecified primary outcome was opioid consumption at 12 hr. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations. Outcomes were analyzed with a random-effects model. All subgroups were prespecified.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,275 citations. Eleven RCTs, comprising 756 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one study reported the prespecified primary outcome, precluding the possibility of meta-analysis. This study reported a reduction in opioid consumption (-11.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -14.1) There was a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hr (-7.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% CI,  -5.6 to -8.7; five trials; 436 participants; moderate certainty evidence). All five studies measuring complications reported that none were detected, which included a sample of 196 blocks.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests a potential benefit of using superficial parasternal blocks to improve acute postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Future studies specifying dosing regimens and adjuncts are required.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); first submitted 22 March 2022.

Comparison of the Effects of Full Median Sternotomy vs. Mini-Incision on Postoperative Pain in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is not yet clear whether cardiac surgery by mini-incision (minimally invasive cardiac surgery [MICS]) is overall less painful than the conventional approach by full sternotomy (FS). A meta-analysis is necessary to investigate polled results on this topic.

METHODS

PubMed®/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO) were searched for all clinical trials, reported until 2022, comparing FS with MICS in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve surgery (MVS), and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and postoperative pain outcome was analyzed. Main summary measures were the method of standardized mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-values (considered statistically significant when < 0.05).

RESULTS

In AVR, the general estimate of postoperative pain effect favored MICS (SMD 0.87 [95% CI 0.04 to 1.71], P=0.04). However, in the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference between the groups (SMD 0.70 [95% CI -0.69 to 2.09], P=0.32). For MVS, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis with the included studies, because they had different methodologies. In CABG, the general estimate of the effect of postoperative pain did not favor any of the approaches (SMD -0.40 [95% CI -1.07 to 0.26], P=0.23), which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis (SMD -0.02 [95% CI -0.71 to 0.67], P=0.95).

CONCLUSION

MICS was not globally less painful than the FS approach. It seems that postoperative pain is more related to the degree of tissue retraction than to the size of the incision.

Continuous Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Catheters for Poststernotomy Pain Control: A Case Series

This case series describes the safety and effectiveness of superficial parasternal intercostal plane catheters for poststernotomy pain control in 4 patients who underwent multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients had reduced sternal pain and opioid consumption while the catheters ran continuously for 72 hours without complications. Our experience suggests the effectiveness of parasternal blocks can be safely prolonged with catheters, and they can be a useful addition to pain management strategies for this patient population.

Superficial versus deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks: cadaveric evaluation of injectate spread

BACKGROUND

Deep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks provide anterior chest wall analgesia for both breast and cardiac surgery. Our primary objective of this cadaveric study was to describe the parasternal spread of deep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks. Our secondary objectives were to describe needle proximity to the internal mammary artery when performing deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks, and compare lateral injectate spread and extension into the rectus sheath.

METHODS

We performed ultrasound-guided deep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks 2 cm from the sternum at the T3-4 interspace in four fresh frozen cadavers as described in clinical studies.

RESULTS

Parasternal spread of injectate was greater with the deep parasternal intercostal plane injection than with the superficial parasternal intercostal plane injection. The internal mammary artery was ∼3 mm away from the needle trajectory in cadaver #1 and ∼5 mm from the internal mammary artery in cadaver #2. Lateral spread extended to the midclavicular line for all deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks and beyond the midclavicular line for all superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks. Neither block extended to the rectus sheath.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater number of parasternal interspaces were covered with the deep parasternal intercostal plane block than with the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block when one injection was performed at the T3-4 interspace. However, considering proximity to the internal mammary artery, and potential devastating consequences of an arterial injury, we propose that the deep parasternal intercostal plane block be classified as an advanced block and that future studies focus on optimising superficial parasternal intercostal plane parasternal spread.

Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block: A Novel Technique for Analgesia in Patients with Sternal Dehiscence

ABSTRACT

Sternal wound complications following sternotomy need a multidisciplinary approach in high-risk postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Poorly controlled pain during surgical management of such wounds increases cardiovascular stress and respiratory complications. Multimodal analgesia including intravenous opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia techniques, like central neuraxial blocks and fascial plane blocks, have been described. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB), a novel technique, has been effectively used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Under ultrasound (US) guidance PIFB is performed with the aim of depositing local anesthetic between two superficial muscles, namely the pectoralis major muscle and the external intercostal muscle. The authors report a series of five cases where US-guided bilateral PIFB was used in patients undergoing sternal wound debridement. Patients had excellent analgesia intraoperatively as well as postoperatively for 24 hours with minimal requirement of supplemental analgesia. None of the patients experienced complications due to PIFB administration. The authors concluded that bilateral PIFB can be effectively used as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia with general anesthesia and as a sole anesthesia technique in selected cases of sternal wound debridement.

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pectointercostal Facial Plane Block for Enhanced Recovery After Sternotomy in Adult Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of the pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on enhancing the recovery of patients who undergo cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.

SETTING

The operating rooms and intensive care units of university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred patients who were American Society of Anesthesiologists class II to III aged 18-to-70 years scheduled for elective cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound-guided bilateral PIFPB or ESPB.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients shared comparable baseline characteristics. Time to extubation, the primary outcome, did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the groups, with median (95% confidence interval) values of 115 (90-120) minutes and 110 (100-120) minutes, respectively (p = 0.875). The ESPB group had a statistically significant reduced pain score postoperatively. The median (IQR) values of postoperative fentanyl consumption were statistically significantly lower in the ESPB group than in the PIFPB group (p < 0.001): 4 (4-5) versus 9 (9-11) µg/kg, respectively. In the ESPB group, the first analgesia request was given 4 hours later than in the PIFPB group (p < 0.001). Additionally, 12 (24%) patients in the PIFPB group reported nonsternal wound chest pain, compared with none in the ESPB group. The median intensive care unit length of stay for both groups was 3 days (p = 0.428).

CONCLUSIONS

Erector spinae plane block and PIFPB were found to equally affect recovery after cardiac surgery, with comparable extubation times and intensive care unit length of stay.

Update of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium in adult patients

Postoperative delirium (POD) remains a common, dangerous and resource-consuming adverse event but is often preventable. The whole peri-operative team can play a key role in its management. This update to the 2017 ESAIC Guideline on the prevention of POD is evidence-based and consensus-based and considers the literature between 01 April 2015, and 28 February 2022. The search terms of the broad literature search were identical to those used in the first version of the guideline published in 2017. POD was defined in accordance with the DSM-5 criteria. POD had to be measured with a validated POD screening tool, at least once per day for at least 3 days starting in the recovery room or postanaesthesia care unit on the day of surgery or, at latest, on postoperative day 1. Recent literature confirmed the pathogenic role of surgery-induced inflammation, and this concept reinforces the positive role of multicomponent strategies aimed to reduce the surgical stress response. Although some putative precipitating risk factors are not modifiable (length of surgery, surgical site), others (such as depth of anaesthesia, appropriate analgesia and haemodynamic stability) are under the control of the anaesthesiologists. Multicomponent preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative preventive measures showed potential to reduce the incidence and duration of POD, confirming the pivotal role of a comprehensive and team-based approach to improve patients' clinical and functional status.

Peripheral Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events after peripheral regional anesthesia (PRA) compared to no regional anesthesia (RA), placebo, or neuraxial anesthesia in children and adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis with an assessment of the risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 1) and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

SETTING

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults and children undergoing heart surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Any kind of PRA compared to no RA or placebo or neuraxial anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In total, 33 RCTs (2,044 patients) were included-24 of these had a high risk of bias, and 28 were performed in adults. Compared to no RA, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery (mean difference [MD] -0.81 points, 95% CI -1.51 to -0.10; I2 = 92%; very low certainty evidence). Peripheral regional anesthesia, compared to placebo, may reduce pain intensity at rest (MD -1.36 points, 95% CI -1.59 to -1.13; I2 = 54%; very low certainty evidence) and during movement (MD -1.00 points, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.67; I² = 72%; very low certainty evidence) 24 hours after surgery. No data after pediatric cardiac surgery could be meta-analyzed due to the low number of included trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to no RA or placebo, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest and during movement. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously because the certainty of evidence is only very low.

Influence of Regional Nerve Block in Addition to General Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium, Pain, and In-hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate whether venous injection of sedative agent or regional nerve block in alliance with major anesthesia could decrease the risk of postoperative delirium occurrence in patients receiving cardiothoracic surgery. Electronic academic databases were retrieved for related publications, and statistical software was used for data pooling and analysis. Forest plot was used to show the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio. Combined receiver operating characteristic curve was used to show the area under the curve of complex data. Seven studies were included for analysis. The risk of occurrence of delirium still showed no difference (risk rate = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.85-1.03) between the intervention group and placebo group. Postoperative pain feeling was more alleviated in patients with prophylactic application of regional nerve block. In addition, prophylactic application of regional nerve block could decrease the risk of postoperative in-hospital stay (risk rate = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.02-0.54). Our study demonstrated that, in elderly patients or pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery, prophylactic application of regional nerve block failed to decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium. However, the option of regional nerve block could decrease the duration of in-hospitalization stay and alleviate the acute pain during the postoperative period after open-heart surgery.

Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.

METHODS

We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.

RESULTS

Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.

Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A white paper part 1: Thoracic transplantation surgery

Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focuses on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations.

Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters for cardiac surgery: a retrospective, propensity weighted, cohort study

Aim: Anesthesia for cardiac surgery has evolved toward fast-track recovery strategies incorporating non opioid analgesics and regional anesthesia. Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study compared opioid consumption, pain scores and length of stay in patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy and did or did not receive preoperative parasternal intercostal plane block catheters with postoperative ropivacaine infusions. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores did not differ. Blocks were associated with decreased intraoperative opioids and reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Conclusion: Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters were not associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption or pain scores, but were associated with reduced intraoperative opioids and length of stay.

Practice Advisory for Preoperative and Intraoperative Pain Management of Cardiac Surgical Patients: Part 2

Pain after cardiac surgery is of moderate to severe intensity, which increases postoperative distress and health care costs, and affects functional recovery. Opioids have been central agents in treating pain after cardiac surgery for decades. The use of multimodal analgesic strategies can promote effective postoperative pain control and help mitigate opioid exposure. This Practice Advisory is part of a series developed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) Quality, Safety, and Leadership (QSL) Committee's Opioid Working Group. It is a systematic review of existing literature for various interventions related to the preoperative and intraoperative pain management of cardiac surgical patients. This Practice Advisory provides recommendations for providers caring for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This entails developing customized pain management strategies for patients, including preoperative patient evaluation, pain management, and opioid use-focused education as well as perioperative use of multimodal analgesics and regional techniques for various cardiac surgical procedures. The literature related to this field is emerging, and future studies will provide additional guidance on ways to improve clinically meaningful patient outcomes.

Comparison of regional anesthetic techniques for postoperative analgesia after adult cardiac surgery: bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Patients usually suffer acute pain after cardiac surgery. Numerous regional anesthetic techniques have been used for those patients under general anesthesia. The most effective regional anesthetic technique was still unclear.

Methods

Five databases were searched, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. The efficiency outcomes were pain scores, cumulative morphine consumption, and the need for rescue analgesia in this Bayesian analysis. Postoperative nausea, vomiting and pruritus were safety outcomes. Functional outcomes included the time to tracheal extubation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality.

Results

This meta-analysis included 65 randomized controlled trials involving 5,013 patients. Eight regional anesthetic techniques were involved, including thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), erector spinae plane block, and transversus thoracic muscle plane block. Compared to controls (who have not received regional anesthetic techniques), TEA reduced the pain scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h both at rest and cough, decreased the rate of need for rescue analgesia (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.016-0.55), shortened the time to tracheal extubation (MD = -181.55, 95% CI: -243.05 to -121.33) and the duration of hospital stay (MD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.24). Erector spinae plane block reduced the pain score 6 h at rest and the risk of pruritus, shortened the duration of ICU stay compared to controls. Transversus thoracic muscle plane block reduced the pain scores 6 and 12 h at rest compared to controls. The cumulative morphine consumption of each technique was similar at 24, 48 h. Other outcomes were also similar among these regional anesthetic techniques.

Conclusions

TEA seems the most effective regional postoperative anesthesia for patients after cardiac surgery by reducing the pain scores and decreasing the rate of need for rescue analgesia.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, ID: CRD42021276645.

Comparison of transversus thoracis muscle plane block and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block for enhanced recovery after pediatric open-heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Effective analgesia after cardiac surgery contributes to enhanced recovery.

AIM

To compare the perioperative analgesic effectiveness of Transversus Thoracis Muscle Plane Block (TTPB) and Pecto-Intercostal-Fascial Plane Block (PIFB) for controlling post-sternotomy pain in the pediatric population for ultrafast track cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Double-blind randomized study of 60 children, 2-12 years old, undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy in whom a bilateral ultrasound-guided TTPB or TIBP block was performed preemptively.

RESULTS

Epidemiologic data of both groups were comparable. TTPB group had a lower median Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS) all over the time postoperatively. Fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in TTBP group compared with PIFB group, only 4/30 received supplemental fentanyl during surgery in the TTPB group vs. 11/30 in the PIFB group (p = 0.033). The median [interquartile] values of postoperative fentanyl consumption were significantly lower in the TTBP compared with PIFB group: 12.0 [10.0-12.0] vs. 15.0 [15.0-16.0] µg/kg (p < 0.001), respectively. First rescue analgesia was later in the TTPB group compared to the PIFB group with median times of 7.25 and 5.0 hours, respectively (p < 0.001). Both groups had a comparable ICU length of stay (p = 0.919), with a median of 3 days. Furthermore, in the PIFB group, the incidence of non-sternal wound chest pain (53.3%) was significantly higher than in the TTPB group (3.3%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TTPB and PIFB are safe regional blocks that could enhance recovery after pediatric cardiac surgery. In our series, TTPB provided better and longer-lasting postoperative analgesia with less incidence of non-sternal wound pain than PIFB.

Retrospective Evaluation of Fascial Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery With Median Sternotomy in a Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cardiac surgery typically causes moderate to severe postoperative pain and discomfort. Inadequate pain management in the early postoperative period leads to pulmonary complications. The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the hospital is typically prolonged. As a component of multimodal analgesia regimens, fascial plane blocks have become more popular. In our clinic, serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB), pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I-II), and pectointercostal nerve fascial plane blocks (PIFB) are performed by ultrasonography. We wished to evaluate the postoperative visual pain scale, initial additional analgesic agent requirement time, extubation time, morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent open heart surgery with fascial plane blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients over 18 years who underwent open heart surgery with sternotomy between 01 September 2021 and 15 June 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with chest wall blocks placed at the end of surgery were included in the study. In Group 1, the PECS II block was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery in the operating room. In Group 2, SAPB was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery. Data regarding patient demographics, anesthesia method applied, amount of opioid used intraoperatively, cardiopulmonary bypass time, anesthesia and surgery time, postoperative extubation time, mechanical ventilation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of patients at rest and movement at 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th hours post-extubation, time to and type of first postoperative analgesic, postoperative complications, length of cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) stay and hospital length of stay were recorded from hospital records.

RESULTS

 The data of a total of 46 patients (Group 1: PECS II block + PIFB, n=20; Group 2: SAPB+ PIFB, n=26) were analyzed retrospectively. There was no difference in demographic variables between the groups. Intraoperative opioid usage, operation time, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, extubation time, ICU discharge time, and length of hospital stay were not statistically different between the groups. The first rescue analgesic requirement time was longer in group 2 than in group 1 but not statistically significant (18.76±15.36 h vs 12.62±10.61 h, p=0.162). The post-extubation VAS scores at rest and movement at the 6th hour were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.73±1.28 vs 3.15±2.10, respectively, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the VAS scores at the 6th hour were lower in SAPB + PIFB group than in PECS II + PIFB group. As these blocks can be easy to apply, we thought these combinations could be an alternative for pain relief in cardiac surgery. Prospective randomized studies are needed with a large number of patients.

An Expert Review of Chest Wall Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery

The recent integration of regional anesthesia techniques into the cardiac surgical patient population has become a component of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery pathways. Fascial planes of the chest wall enable single-injection or catheter-based infusions to spread local anesthetic over multiple levels of innervation. Although median sternotomy remains a common approach to cardiac surgery, minimally invasive techniques have integrated additional methods of performing cardiac surgery. Understanding the surgical approach and chest wall innervation is crucial to success in choosing the appropriate chest wall block. Parasternal intercostal plane techniques (previously termed "pectointercostal fascial plane" and "transversus thoracic muscle plane") provide anterior chest and ipsilateral sternal coverage. Anterolateral chest wall coverage is feasible with the interpectoral plane and pectoserratus plane blocks (previously termed "pectoralis") and superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block provides extensive coverage of the ipsilateral chest wall. Any of these techniques has the potential to provide bilateral chest wall analgesia. The relative novelty of these techniques requires ongoing research to be strategic, thoughtful, and focused on clinically meaningful outcomes to enable widespread evidence-based implementation. This review article discusses the key perspectives for performing and assessing chest wall blocks in a cardiac surgical population.

Effect of pecto-intercostal fascial block on extubation time in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives

Epidural and paravertebral block reduce the extubation time in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia but are relatively contraindicated in heparinized patients due to the potential risk of hematoma. The Pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) is an alternative in such patients.

Methods

This is a single-center randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for elective open cardiac surgery were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive PIFB (30 ml 0.3% ropivacaine plus 2.5 mg dexamethasone on each side) or saline (30 ml normal saline on each side) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome was extubation time after surgery. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption during surgery, postoperative pain scores, adverse events related to opioids, and length of stay in the hospital.

Results

A total of 50 patients (mean age: 61.8 years; 34 men) were randomized (25 in each group). The surgeries included sole coronary artery bypass grafting in 38 patients, sole valve surgery in three patients, and both procedures in the remaining nine patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 20 (40%) patients. The time to extubation was 9.4 ± 4.1 h in the PIFB group vs. 12.1 ± 4.6 h in the control group (p = 0.031). Opioid (sufentanil) consumption during surgery was 153.2 ± 48.3 and 199.4 ± 51.7 μg, respectively (p = 0.002). In comparison to the control group, the PIFB group had a lower pain score while coughing (1.45 ± 1.43 vs. 3.00 ± 1.71, p = 0.021) and a similar pain score at rest at 12 h after surgery. The two groups did not differ in the rate of adverse events.

Conclusions

PIFB decreased the time to extubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Trial Registration

This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052743) on November 4, 2021.

Sternotomy Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Poor pain control after cardiac surgery can be associated with postoperative complications, longer recovery, and development of chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to plain bupivacaine (PB) will provide better and long-lasting analgesia when used for wound infiltration in median sternotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial.

SETTING

Single institution, tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery through median sternotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

A single surgeon performed wound infiltration of LB plus PB or PB into the sternotomy wound, chest, and mediastinal tube sites.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 72 hours for pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Sixty patients completed the study for analysis (LB group [n = 29], PB group [n = 31]). Patient characteristics, procedural variables, and pain scores measured at specific intervals from 4 hours until 72 hours postoperatively did not reveal any significant differences between the groups. Mixed-model regression showed that the trend of mean pain scores at movement in the LB group was significantly (p = 0.01) lower compared with the PB group. Opioid consumption over 72 hours was not significantly different between the 2 groups (oral morphine equivalents; median [interquartile range], 139 [73, 212] mg in LB v 105 [54, 188] mg in PB, p = 0.29). Recovery characteristics and adverse events were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LB added to PB for sternotomy wound infiltration during elective cardiac surgery did not significantly improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

Effects of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare the effects of single-shot ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis involved cardiac surgical patients (age > 18 y) requiring median sternotomy. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science. The effects of the single-shot ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique were compared with those of placebo and no intervention. We conducted a risk assessment of bias for eligible studies and assessed the overall quality of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain after extubation at 12 and 24 h, postoperative nausea and vomiting, extubation time, intensive care unit discharge time, and length of hospital stay. Fifteen studies with 849 patients were included. The regional anesthesia techniques included pecto-intercostal fascial block, transversus thoracis muscle plane block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and pectoralis nerve block I. All the regional anesthesia techniques included significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h, expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The ESP block was the most effective treatment (-22.93 MME [-34.29;-11.56]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we concluded that fascial plane blocks were better than placebo when evaluating 24 h MMEs. However, it is still challenging to determine which is better, given the paucity of studies available in the literature. More randomized controlled trials are required to determine which regional anesthesia technique is better.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; CRD42022315497.

Erector spinae plane block as perioperative analgesia for midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inadequate analgesia following cardiac surgery increases postoperative complications. Opioid-based analgesia is associated with side effects that may compromise postoperative recovery. Regional anesthetic techniques provide an alternative thereby reducing opioid requirements and potentially enhancing postoperative recovery. The erector spinae plane block has been used in multiple surgical procedures including sternotomy for cardiac surgery. We, therefore, aimed to characterize the impact of this block on post-sternotomy pain and recovery in cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search for studies reporting on the use of the erector spinae plane block in adult cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included postoperative pain, time-to-extubation, and intensive care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

In total, 498 citations were identified and five were included in the meta-analysis. The erector spinae plane block did not significantly reduce self-reported postoperative pain scores at 4 h (-2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.15 to 4.07; p = .29) or 12 h (-0.27; 95% CI -2.48 to 1.94; p = .65) postextubation, intraoperative opioid requirements (-3.07; 95% CI -6.25 to 0.11; p = .05], time-to-extubation (-1.17; 95% CI -2.81 to 0.46; p = .12), or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (-4.51; 95% CI -14.23 to 5.22; p = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

Erector spinae plane block was not associated with significant reduction in postoperative pain, intraoperative opioid requirements, time-to-extubation, and ICU length of stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The paucity of large randomized controlled trials and the high heterogeneity among studies suggest that further studies are required to assess its effectiveness in cardiac surgery patients.

Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Evidence Update and Technical Considerations

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery era, parasternal intercostal nerve block has been proposed to improve pain control and reduce opioid use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However current literature has reported conflicting evidence about the effect of this multimodal pain management, as procedural variations might pose a significant bias on outcomes evaluation. In this setting, the infiltration of the parasternal plane into 2 intercostal spaces, second and fifth, with a local anesthetic spread under or above the costal plane with ultrasound guidance, seem to be standardized in theory, but significant differences might be observed in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes and defines the optimal techniques for parasternal plane blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, considering both pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracic plane block. A total of 10 randomized trials have been published, in adjunct to observational studies, which are heterogeneous in terms of techniques, methods, and outcomes. Parasternal block has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and provide a more favorable analgesic profile, with reduced postoperative opioid-related side effects. A trend toward reduced intensive care unit stay or duration of mechanical ventilation should be confirmed by adequately powered randomized trials or registry studies. Differences in operative technique might impact outcomes and, therefore, standardization of the procedure plays a pivotal role before reporting specific outcomes. Parasternal plane blocks might significantly improve outcomes of cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, and should be introduced comprehensively in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.

Regional analgesia for cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Regional anesthesia is gaining attention as a valuable component of multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia in cardiac surgery, where improving the patient's quality of recovery while minimizing the harms of opioid administration are key points of emphasis in perioperative care. This review serves as an outline of recent advancements in a variety of applications of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Growing interest in regional analgesia, particularly the use of newer "chest wall blocks", has led to accumulating evidence for the efficacy of multiple regional techniques in cardiac surgery. These include a variety of technical approaches, with results consistently demonstrating optimized pain control and reduced opioid requirements. Regional and pain management experts have worked to derive consensus around nerve block nomenclature, which will be foundational to establish best practice, design and report future research consistently, improve medical education, and generally advance our knowledge in this vital area of perioperative patient care.

SUMMARY

The field of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery has matured over the last several years. A variety of regional techniques have been described and shown to be efficacious as part of the multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to pain management in the cardiac surgical setting.

Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84-21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08-16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022.

Comment on: “Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery”

This article (Correspondence) is in response to the recently published article on the role of Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for cardiac procedures by Zhang et al. in “BMC Anesthesiology”. I greatly appreciate the authors for publishing this study in which Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block, a novel technique for providing pain relief in open cardiac surgical procedures was evaluated. I wish to present my reflections on this article as well as to add a few more points on this topic.

Shared pathophysiology: Understanding stroke and Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease and stroke share several known vascular risk factors. The pathophysiology and whether one predisposes to the other is a topic of ongoing investigation. In this critical review, we highlight what is known about each pathway and the shared potential mechanisms. We offer insight into topics that warrant further investigation. We address topics of both neurodegeneration and secondary cascades. Furthermore, the concept of targeting secondary mechanisms early might be a viable treatment option for ongoing preventative measures. The review is intended to serve as a catalyst for further scientific inquiry into this important topic.

Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block for cardiac surgery: case series

Multimodal analgesia in cardiac surgery sternotomy includes bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block (BC-ESPB). However, the effectiveness of the local anesthetic regimens is still uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess pain control achieved with a multimodal analgesia regimen including BC-ESPB at the level of T5 with PCA with a 0.125 % bupivacaine infusion and rescue boluses. This is a descriptive case series study which recruited 11 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery through sternotomy in whom multimodal analgesia including BC-ESPB was used, between February and April 2021, at a fourth level institution. All patients reported pain according to the numeric rating scale (NRS)  ≤ 3 both at rest and in motion, at extubation and then 4 and 12 hours after surgery. After 24 hours the pain was NRS ≤ 3 in 100 % of the patients at rest and in 63.6 % in motion. At 48 h 81 % of the patients reported pain NRS ≤ 3 at rest and in motion. At 72h all patients reported pain NRS ≤ 3 at rest and 82 % in motion. The average intraoperative use of fentanyl was 2.35 µg/kg and postoperative hydromorphone was 5.3, 4.1 and 3.3 mg at 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively. Hence, bilateral ESP block in continuous infusion plus rescue boluses allows for proper control of acute intra and post-operative pain.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided parasternal block in adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Pain after cardiac surgery is a common and severe postoperative complication. As a new regional nerve block method, ultrasound-guided parasternal block (PSB) has been increasingly used to supplement the analgesic effects of opioids in order to eliminate opioid-related adverse drug events, but its efficacy still remains controversial. In the present meta-analysis, we aim to screen all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and give a comprehensive summary of the clinical value of PSB after adult cardiac surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched all RCTs about PSB after cardiac surgery in the database of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI and Wanfang with no limitation of language from inception to September 2021. Two reviewers were independently involved in the process of data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager software. The quality of included RCTs were assessed by using Cochrane's risk of bias assessment tool, and funnel plots were drawn to assess publication bias.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 12 RCTs with 366 patients in PSB group and 364 patients in control group were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that intraoperative and postoperative consumption of sufentanil were significantly decreased with the addition of PSB (P<0.05). Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in PSB group were found to be significantly lower than that of control group at extubation, postoperative 4h and 8h (P<0.05) instead of postoperative 24h or longer. PSB could reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (P<0.05). In addition, we demonstrated that PSB was significantly related to decreased mechanical ventilation time, total length of ICU stay and hospital days (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Through decreasing the consumption of opioids, ultrasound-guided PSB could relieve pain and limit opioid-related complications. Clinical outcomes, such as mechanical ventilation time, total length of ICU stay and hospital days, will also be improved. Our findings prove that ultrasound-guided PSB is an effective regional analgesic method after adult cardiac surgery.

Evaluation of ultrasound-guided pecto-intercostal block in canine cadavers

OBJECTIVE

To describe the technique for performing an ultrasound-guided pecto-intercostal fascial (PIF) block and compare two volumes of injectate in canine cadavers.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental cadaveric study.

ANIMALS

A total of 11 canine cadavers (11.8 ± 1.9 kg).

METHODS

Parasternal ultrasound-guided injections were performed within the PIF plane, between the deep pectoral and external intercostal muscles, at the intercostal space between ribs four and five. Each hemithorax was injected with 0.25 mL kg-1 (treatment low volume, LV) or 0.5 mL kg-1 (treatment high volume, HV) of 1% methylene blue dye. Treatments were randomly assigned to either right or left hemithorax, with each cadaver injected with both treatments, for a total of 22 injections. Anatomical dissections were performed to determine staining of ventral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves, surrounding nerves and musculature and spread of injectate. The presence or absence of intrathoracic puncture was also noted.

RESULTS

The PIF plane was identified and injected in each hemithorax. No significant differences between treatments LV and HV were found for number of ventral cutaneous nerve branches stained or any other analyzed variable. The ventral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves (T3-T8) were variably stained, and the most commonly stained nerves were T5 (6 and 10), T6 (8 and 9) and T7 (2 and 7) in treatments LV and HV, respectively. Staining outside the immediate parasternal region was noted in both treatments, with greater spread away from the parasternal region in treatment HV. No intrathoracic staining was found.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Ultrasound-guided PIF injections resulted in staining of ventral cutaneous branches and parasternal musculature; however, the spread observed was inadequate to provide effective analgesia to the sternum. In vivo studies are warranted to investigate this regional anesthetic technique in veterinary patients.

Regional anesthesia techniques and postoperative delirium: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative delirium is a frequent occurrence in the elderly surgical population. As a comprehensive list of predictive factors remains unknown, an opioid-sparing approach incorporating regional anesthesia techniques has been suggested to decrease its incidence. Due to the lack of conclusive evidence on the topic, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the potential impact of regional anesthesia and analgesia on postoperative delirium.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for randomized trials comparing regional anesthesia or analgesia to systemic treatments in patients having any type of surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We pooled the results separately for each of these two applications by random effects modelling. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence and strength of conclusions.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eighteen trials (3361 subjects) were included. Using regional techniques for surgical anesthesia failed to reduce the risk of postoperative delirium, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI: 0.79 to 1.85); P=0.3800. In contrast, regional analgesia reduced the relative risk of perioperative delirium by a RR of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.42 to 0.68; P<0.0001), when compared to systemic analgesia. Post-hoc subgroup analysis for hip fracture surgery yielded similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that postoperative delirium may be decreased when regional techniques are used in the postoperative period as an analgesic strategy. Intraoperative regional anesthesia alone may not decrease postoperative delirium since there are other factors that may influence this outcome.

The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Pectointercostal Fascial Plane Block on Sternal Wound Pain After Open Heart Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral pectointercostal fascial plane block after open heart surgeries.

METHODS

Seventy patients aged above 18 years and scheduled for on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement or both through median sternotomy were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 35 (block group or control group). The block group had the block performed through 20 ml of a solution of 0.25% bupivacaine plus epinephrine (5 mcg/mL), and the control group received dry needling. The primary outcome was the 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes were time to the first analgesic request, pain score, quality of oxygenation, intensive care unit stays, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

The cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours was significantly lower in the block group, with a mean difference of -3.54 (95% confidence interval=-6.55 to -0.53; P=0.015). In addition, the median estimate time to the first analgesic request was significantly longer in the block group than in the control group. Finally, during the postoperative period (4 to 24 h), mean sternal wound objective pain scores were, on average, 0.58 units higher in the block group.

CONCLUSION

pectointercostal fascial block is an effective technique in reducing morphine consumption and controlling poststernotomy pain after cardiac surgeries. Also, it may have a role in better postoperative respiratory outcomes.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pectointercostal Fascial Block and Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block for Acute Poststernotomy Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate morphine consumption and pain scores 24 hours postoperatively to compare the effects of a bilateral pectointercostal fascial block (PIFB) with those of a transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) on acute poststernotomy pain in cardiac surgery patients who have undergone median sternotomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded.

SETTING

The operating room, intensive care unit, and patient ward at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-nine American Society of Anesthesiologists II-to-III patients aged 18- to-80 years, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomly were allocated to groups scheduled to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided PIFB or TTMPB.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was postoperative morphine use within the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during coughing, time of first analgesic demand from the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, and rescue analgesia use. The nausea/vomiting scores, time to extubation, length of stays in intensive care and the hospital, patient satisfaction scores, and complications were also recorded. The first 24-hour morphine use did not significantly differ between the PIFB and TTMPB groups (mean ± standard deviation [95% CI], 13.89 ± 6.80 [10.83-16.95] mg/24 h and 15.08 ± 7.42 [11.83-18.33] mg/24 h, respectively, p = 0.608). No significant difference between the two groups in the NRS scores at rest and during coughing was observed; the groups had similar requirements for rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours (n [%], three [15.8] and seven [35], p = 0.273, respectively). The time from PCA to the first analgesia request was longer in the PIFB than in the TTMPB group (median [interquartile range], 660 [540-900] minutes, and 240 [161-525] minutes, respectively, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

PIFB and TTMPB showed similar effectiveness for morphine consumption within 24 hours postoperatively and in pain scores in cardiac surgery patients.

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia-Current Strategies for Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery

With the advent of fast-track pathways after cardiac surgery, there has been a renewed interest in regional anesthesia due to its opioid-sparing effect. This paradigm shift, looking to improve resource allocation efficiency and hasten postoperative extubation and mobilization, has been pursued by nearly every specialty area in surgery. Safety concerns regarding the use of classical neuraxial techniques in anticoagulated patients have tempered the application of regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery. Recently described ultrasound-guided thoracic wall blocks have emerged as valuable alternatives to epidurals and landmark-driven paravertebral and intercostal blocks. These novel procedures enable safe, effective, opioid-free pain control. Although experience within this field is still at an early stage, available evidence indicates that their use is poised to grow and may become integral to enhanced recovery pathways for cardiac surgery patients.

A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac surgical pain is of moderate-to-severe intensity. Ineffective pain control may lead to increased cardiopulmonary complications and poor surgical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in providing analgesia in adult cardiac surgeries.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.

SETTINGS

Single-center, tertiary care hospital with university affiliation.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty patients of either sex, aged 18-to-60 years, body mass index 19-to-30 kg/m², undergoing elective on-pump single-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting or valve replacement under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly categorized into two groups of 15 patients each to receive bilateral erector spinae plane block with 20 mL per side of 0.25% levobupivacaine (group E) or sham block with 20 mL of normal saline (group C).

MAIN RESULTS

Mean analgesic requirement in terms of fentanyl equivalents (µg) in the first 24 hours postoperatively was 225 ± 112 in group E and 635 ± 145 in group C (95% confidence interval, 313.10-506.90; p < 0.05). Mean time to first rescue analgesia was 356.9 ± 34.5 in group E and 123.9 ± 13.1 minutes in group C (p < 0.05). Cox proportional hazard ratio for rescue analgesic requirement in group E-to-group C was 5.0. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 88.4 ± 17 and 103.5 ± 18 minutes in groups E and C, respectively (p < 0.05). Ramsay sedation score at six hours postextubation was 1.45 ± 0.53 in group E and 3.19 ± 0.62 in group C (p < 0.05). Mean numerical rating score was 3.67 ± 1.41 in group E and 4.50 ± 1.00 in group C (p = 0.17). No significant differences were observed in the incidences of postoperative nausea vomiting, pruritus, and erector spinae plane block-related infection and pneumothorax.

CONCLUSION

Single-shot erector spinae plane block provides superior analgesia as compared with sham block. It decreased the first 24-hour postoperative analgesic consumption by 64.5% and risk of pain by five times in the authors' population. It also reduced the sedation and duration of mechanical ventilation in postcardiac surgery patients.