History and future perspectives of treating asthma as a systemic and small airways disease

Distinguishing Childhood Asthma Exacerbations from Stable Asthma: The Utility of Inflammatory White Blood Cell Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by episodes of acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs), in addition to chronic airway inflammation, which has a huge impact on both the affected patients and their parents. The main objective of this study was to explore the utility of available white-blood-cell-derived inflammatory markers in diagnosing AAEs and identifying children at risk for severe exacerbations requiring admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study. The medical records of 128 children diagnosed with asthma exacerbation and 131 children with stable asthma between the ages of 2 and 12 years were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 259 participants were enrolled. Children with AAE demonstrated significantly higher white blood cell counts (WBC: 10.0 ± 4.2 × 103/μL vs. 7.1 ± 2.2 × 103/μL, p < 0.001), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC: 7398.5 ± 4600 cells/μL vs. 2634.8 ± 1448 cells/μL, p < 0.001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR: 7.0 ± 6.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) but significantly lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC: 1794.1 ± 1536 × 103/μL vs. 3552.9 ± 1509 × 103/μL, p < 0.001). Interestingly, blood eosinophil count displayed an opposite trend: children with stable asthma had significantly more eosinophils compared to those experiencing an exacerbation (370.1 ± 342.7 cells/mm3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.9 cells/mm3, p < 0.001). Two criteria that are indicative of AAE were identified: NLR values greater than 1.2, with good discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.94; sensitivity 82.5%; specificity 79.5%), and ANC values exceeding 3866, with moderate discriminative ability (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 82.3%). Moreover, a comparative analysis of these markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) in patients with AAE did not demonstrate significant differences between those requiring PICU admission and those who did not require it.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes two major findings. The first is that NLR, ANC, WBC, and PLR are significantly higher in AAE patients compared to those with stable asthma. The second is that children with stable asthma have higher AEC and ALC levels compared to those with AAE. Furthermore, this study has revealed that the studied markers (NLR, ANC, PLR, WBC, AEC, and ALC) did not differentiate between AAE patients requiring PICU admission and those managed in the general ward, suggesting a need for alternative predictive factors.

Pathogenesis of allergic diseases and implications for therapeutic interventions

Allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis (AR), allergic asthma (AAS), atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), and eczema are systemic diseases caused by an impaired immune system. Accompanied by high recurrence rates, the steadily rising incidence rates of these diseases are attracting increasing attention. The pathogenesis of allergic diseases is complex and involves many factors, including maternal-fetal environment, living environment, genetics, epigenetics, and the body's immune status. The pathogenesis of allergic diseases exhibits a marked heterogeneity, with phenotype and endotype defining visible features and associated molecular mechanisms, respectively. With the rapid development of immunology, molecular biology, and biotechnology, many new biological drugs have been designed for the treatment of allergic diseases, including anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE), anti-interleukin (IL)-5, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP)/IL-4, to control symptoms. For doctors and scientists, it is becoming more and more important to understand the influencing factors, pathogenesis, and treatment progress of allergic diseases. This review aimed to assess the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic interventions of allergic diseases, including AR, AAS, AD, and FA. We hope to help doctors and scientists understand allergic diseases systematically.

The Relationship Between Indicators of Nasal Respiratory Function and Spirometric Parameters in Children With Bronchial Asthma

Introduction: The relationship between objective indicators of nasal obstruction and airflow limitation in children with bronchial asthma (BA) and allergic rhinitis (AR) has not yet been studied. Objective: To study the relationship between objective parameters of nasal obstruction and airflow limitation, determined using the methods of anterior active rhinomanometry (AARM) and spirometry in children with BA and AR. Materials and Methods: Eighty eight children and adolescents with BA and AR, boys-65.9% (58/88), were examined. The median age was 11.09 [10.42; 11.76] years. To determine airflow limitation, the following spirometric parameters were evaluated: forced vital capacity of the lungs (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the ratio of FEV1/FVC, and maximum expiratory flow at the point 25% of the flow-volume loop (MEF25). Data were recorded both in absolute values and in relative units (% pred). Nasal respiratory function was determined by AARM based on the total nasal airflow (TNAF) in absolute (Pa/cm3/s) and relative units (RTNAF, % pred). Results: In the general cohort and in boys but not in girls, a statistically significant direct correlation was found between TNAF (Pa/cm3/s) and absolute spirometry parameters of bronchial patency-all had p < 0.01. Also, RTNAF and relative MEF25 values (% pred) in the general cohort were R = 0.22, p = 0.04, and in boys, R = 0.28, p = 0.03. In girls, there was no statistically significant correlation between nasal respiratory function and spirometric parameters, all p > 0.05. Additional analysis of literature was conducted to ascertain that the identified gender differences were not occasional. Conclusion: The significant positive correlation of absolute values of AARM and spirometric parameters in children with BA and AR was established, which apparently reflects the physical development of children. Of all the relative indicators of spirometry, only MEF25 (% pred), which indirectly reflects the patency of small bronchi, had a distinct direct correlation with RTNAF. These patterns are clearly expressed in boys with BA. In girls with this disease, however, the relationship between nasal respiratory function and spirometric indicators seems to be more complex and requires further study.

The Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow as Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Adults with Chronic Cough

BACKGROUND

Bronchial provocation tests are standard for diagnosing the etiology of chronic cough, but they are time consuming and can induce severe bronchospasm. A safer and faster clinical examination to predict bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is needed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether small-airway function tests can predict BHR in adult patients with chronic cough.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study of diagnoses made using spirometry and bronchial provocation test results was performed in 290 patients with chronic nonproductive cough. BHR-predictive values were analyzed via the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Optimal cutoff values were determined by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Patients with chronic cough with BHR showed lower forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF_25%-75%), higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), and a higher percentage of eosinophils in blood than patients without BHR (P < .0001 for all). The AUCs of FENO and FEF_25%-75% for a BHR diagnosis were 0.788 (95% CI, 0.725-0.851) and 0.702 (95% CI, 0.641-0.763), respectively. Optimal cutoff values were 43 ppb for FENO and 78.5% for FEF_25%-75%, with negative predictive values of 85.38% and 81.34%, respectively. The combined use of FENO and FEF_25%-75% increased the AUC to 0.843 (95% CI, 0.794-0.892), significantly higher than either FENO (P = .012) or FEF_25%-75% (P < .0001) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-airway dysfunction is present in patients with chronic cough and BHR. FEF_25%-75% has value as a negative predictive parameter for BHR, especially when combined with FENO. FENO > 43 ppb and FEF_25%-75% < 78.5% strongly predicted a positive bronchial provocation test.

SKI3301, a purified herbal extract from Sophora tonkinensis, inhibited airway inflammation and bronchospasm in allergic asthma animal models in vivo

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Sophora tonkinensis (Leguminosae, ST) is a traditional herbal plant in Korea and China. Its roots and rhizomes have been used to dissipate heat, to clear toxic material and to treat acute pharyngolaryngeal infections and sore throats.

AIM OF STUDY

In this study, we tried to investigate the anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects of a purified extract (SKI3301) from Sophora tonkinensis using in vitro enzyme assay models and ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma animal models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of SKI3301 on pro-inflammatory enzymes such as 5-lipoxygenase, phosphodiesterase 3 & 4, and thromboxane synthase was assayed in vitro. BALB/c mice were sensitized with OVA/Alum ip injection and nebulized with OVA to induce airway inflammation. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was collected and analyzed for leukocytes infiltration and IL-5 production along with lung histopathology. Guinea pigs passively sensitized with anti-OVA antiserum were used to investigate the effect of SKI3301 on bronchospasm in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

SKI3301 potently inhibited the activities of 5-lipoxygenase, phosphodiesterase 3 & 4, and thromboxane synthase. Orally administered SKI3301 attenuated the total leukocytes and eosinophil infiltration and IL-5 level in BAL fluids. Histopathological changes associated with lung inflammation were also reduced by SKI3301. SKI3301 inhibited OVA-induced contraction of isolated trachea from sensitized guinea pigs. SKI3301 also protected OVA-induced bronchoconstriction in the sensitized guinea pigs. Maackiain, one of 3 major components of SKI3301, was effective in inhibiting 5-lipoxygenase and OVA-induced airway inflammation.

CONCLUSION

In this study, SKI3301 potently inhibited pro-inflammatory enzymes and attenuated OVA-induced bronchospasm in animal model of allergic asthma. These results suggest that SKI3301 may have therapeutic potential for allergic asthma.

Study on small airway function in asthmatics with fractional exhaled nitric oxide and impulse oscillometry

OBJECTIVES

The invasive techniques can be direct and objective to assess small airway function, but they have significant risks and inconveniences for patients and cannot be repeated often. Some sophisticated techniques such as fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and impulse oscillometry (IOS) may surmount such restrictions. Therefore, we investigated the relation among FeNO, IOS, and small airway function in asthmatic patients.

METHODS

We recruited 140 asthmatic patients including 69 patients with small airway normal function and 71 patients with small airway dysfunction. FeNO, eosinophil（EOS）count and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) in peripheral blood, pulmonary function, as well as IOS were measured.

RESULTS

The levels of FeNO, the reactance area (AX), the resonant frequency Fres and EOS were significantly increased in small airway dysfunction group compared with small airway normal function group (P < 0.01 respectively). A multiple regression model showed that FeNO, AX and Fres were correlative factors of mid forced expiratory flow of percentages of predicted values [FEF25-75 (%pred)] (P < 0.01, respectively). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the combination of FeNO, AX and Fres had a greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) than each of them (AUC: 0.881, P < .001, 95％CI: 0.815-0.929).

CONCLUSION

FeNO and IOS are helpful in diagnosis of small airway dysfunction with high sensitivity and specificity, and FeNO combined with IOS can better evaluate the small airway function in asthmatic patients.

Inflammation and infections in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is driven by an inflammatory response against normally harmless environmental inorganic and organic compounds in the respiratory tract. Immune responses to airborne pathogens such as viruses and bacteria may reduce the allergic responses but are also known to trigger asthma attacks and eventually lead to severe disease condition.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of respiratory pathogens concerning the induction or protection against acute or chronic asthma manifestations.

METHODS

We included 131 articles for the final review according to their relevance with the subject.

RESULTS

There is apparently contradictory interaction of respiratory germs in the airways of asthmatics which may be protective on one angle but deleterious on the other.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between inflammation and remodeling and the pathogenic role of viral and bacterial infection in the airways of asthmatic patients is still highly debatable and incompletely understood.

Effect of Nasal Allergy Over Spirometric Parameters: A Prospective Study

Nasal allergy is characterized by an IgE mediated inflammatory response of nasal mucosa to allergens and it has a close association with Asthma. Nasal allergy has been demonstrated to be a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma in adults. Spirometric parameters like Forced expiratory volume at timed interval of 1 s (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75 %) are impaired in patients with nasal allergy or allergic rhinitis. The FEF25-75 % has been evidenced to be a reliable marker of early bronchial impairment in nasal allergy. Nasal allergy may be considered as the first step of the progression of respiratory allergy towards asthma. It has been demonstrated that FEF25-75 % is useful in predicting the presence of airway hyper responsiveness.It may be a more sensitive indicator of chronic airway obstruction than FEV1 and is considered as a risk factor for the persistence of respiratory symptoms in asthmatic patients. The impact of allergic rhinitis or nasal allergy on asthma (ARIA) guidelines, clearly underlined the role of allergic rhinitis as risk factor for asthma development. The possible presence of spirometric abnormalities in patient with allergic rhinitis has been well documented. So keeping this in mind, present study is undertaken to evaluate the impairment of spirometric parameters, like FEV1, FEF25-75 %, and forced vital capacity, in patients with nasal allergy and to predict the presence of airway hyper responsiveness.

Subjective and objective assessments of seasonal effect in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological and clinical studies suggest a relationship between rhinitis and asthma. Upper and lower airways may be influenced by a common inflammatory process.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the relationships between rhinitis symptom scores, and both nasal and bronchial airflow among children with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) by means of spirometric and rhinomanometric measurement during and outside the pollen season.

METHODS

Twenty-nine children with both seasonal allergic rhinitis and asthma (AR+A), 30 children with SAR and no asthma (AR) and 36 non-allergic healthy children were evaluated prospectively during and outside the pollen season. Symptom severity was evaluated using both total symptom score and visual analog score (VAS). All participants also received rhinomanometric evaluation and pulmonary function testing.

RESULTS

In children with SAR the median total nasal flow, FEV1, FEF25-75 values were lower than control group during pollen season (p=0.01, p<0.001 and p<0.001 respectively). They had also higher total nasal resistance compared with control groups (p=0.01). Nasal symptom scores were higher among patients with concurrent asthma than patients who had only SAR out of pollen season (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between SAR participants with or without asthma and control group in terms of total nasal flow and total nasal resistance measured out of season (p=0.105 and p=0.19). FEF25-75 values of patients with and without asthma were significantly lower than those of controls out of season (p=0.022, p<0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that as the presence of AR worsens asthma control, the presence of asthma may worsen symptoms of AR out of pollen season. We found that total nasal flow, FEV1, FEF25-75 values of patients with SAR were lower than those of controls out of season. FEF25-75 values of patients with asthma and without asthma were significantly lower than those of controls out of season. Thus, a careful evaluation of lower airways should be performed in even patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis alone.

The role of small airway disease in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an update on the importance of the peripheral 'small' airways in asthma. As the small airways account for less than 10% of total airway resistance, thus having little impact on standard lung function measures such as forced expiratory volume and peak flow, they have been referred to as the 'silent zone'.

RECENT FINDINGS

The study has revealed that small airway involvement is present in all stages of asthmatic disease, being related to important clinical phenotypes such as nocturnal asthma, exercise-induced asthma, and difficult-to-control asthma, including those with the risk of repeated asthma exacerbations. Uncontrolled small airway inflammation is related to airway remodeling and progression of the disease, with a more rapid decline in the lung function. Moreover, studies on both children and adults have shown that the involvement of the small airways represents a crucial step in asthma development. New tools have been developed and old tools have been refined, providing an opportunity to better understand small airway inflammation and dysfunction.

SUMMARY

Small airway inflammation is present in all stages of asthmatic disease and plays an important role in many key clinical conditions/phenotypes. In order to control the disease, we need to target small airway inflammation, which is not only difficult to reach by standard inhaled medications but also to some extent different. A better understanding of the important role small airways are playing in asthma will show that the 'silent zone' is by far not silent at all.

Alveolar and exhaled NO in relation to asthma characteristics--effects of correction for axial diffusion

BACKGROUND

Inflammation in the small airways might contribute to incomplete asthma disease control despite intensive treatment in some subgroups of patients. Exhaled NO (FeNO) is a marker of inflammation in asthma and the estimated NO contribution from small airways (CalvNO ) is believed to reflect distal inflammation. Recent studies recommend adjustments of CalvNO for trumpet model and axial diffusion (TMAD-adj). This study aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of CalvNO , both TMAD-adjusted and unadjusted.

METHODS

Asthma symptoms, asthma control, lung function, bronchial responsiveness, blood eosinophils, atopy and treatment level were assessed in 410 subjects, aged 10-35 years. Exhaled NO was measured at different flow-rates and CalvNO calculated, with TMAD-adjustment according to Condorelli.

RESULTS

Trumpet model and axial diffusion-adjusted CalvNO was not related to daytime wheeze (P = 0.27), FEF50 (P = 0.23) or bronchial responsiveness (P = 0.52). On the other hand, unadjusted CalvNO was increased in subjects with daytime wheeze (P < 0.001), decreased FEF50 (P = 0.02) and with moderate-to-severe compared to normal bronchial responsiveness (P < 0.001). All these characteristics correlated with increased FeNO (all P < 0.05). Unadjusted CalvNO was positively related to bronchial NO flux (J'awNO ) (r = 0.22, P < 0.001) while TMAD-adjCalvNO was negatively related to J'awNO (r = -0.38, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted CalvNO was not associated with any asthma characteristics studied in this large asthma cohort. However, both FeNO and unadjusted CalvNO related to asthma symptoms, lung function and bronchial responsiveness. We suggest a potential overadjustment by current TMAD-corrections, validated in healthy or unobstructed asthmatics. Further studies assessing axial diffusion in asthmatics with different degrees of airway obstruction and the validity of proposed TMAD-corrections are warranted.

NEXThaler, an innovative dry powder inhaler delivering an extrafine fixed combination of beclometasone and formoterol to treat large and small airways in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Airway inflammation and remodelling in asthma occur in the large airways and also in the small airways. The small airways are those < 2 mm in diameter and are significant sites of chronic asthmatic inflammation. It is important, therefore, to target the small as well as the large airways in any strategy for effective treatment of this disease.

AREAS COVERED

The present review deals with the recently developed fixed dose drug combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate that emits extrafine particles when delivered from an innovative dry powder inhaler (DPI), NEXThaler®. The aim is to present the technical and clinical aspects of aerosolized drug delivery to the lungs.

EXPERT OPINION

The data show that the NEXThaler DPI is an efficient device for the management of persistent asthma. The evaluation of the inhalation profiles through the NEXThaler DPI demonstrates that device activation and consistent dose delivery occurs at patient achievable inhalation flow rates, and supports the broad utility of the NEXThaler DPI in patients with asthma. Overall, all the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction outcomes demonstrate the NEXThaler DPI is easy to use.

Small airway impairment and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma onset

Purpose

Our study tried to find a relationship between baseline FEF_25-75% and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and whether a greater FEF_25-75% impairment may be a marker of a more severe hyperresponsiveness in subjects with normal FEV1 and FEV1/FVC and suggestive asthma symptoms. Besides, we tried to asses a FEF_25-75% cut-off value to identify hyper-reactive subjects.

Methods

4,172 subjects (2,042 M; mean age: 38.3±14.9; mean FEV1 % predicted: 100.5±12.7 and FEV1/FVC: 85.4±6.8) were examined after performing a methacholine (Mch) test. All subjects reported a symptom onset within 3 years before the test. Subjects with PD20<400 or >400 µg were arbitrarily considered affected by moderate/severe and borderline AHR, respectively.

Results

PD20 values were 213 (IQR:86-557), 340 (IQR:157-872) and 433 (IQR:196-1032) µg in subjects with baseline FEF_25-75≤50%, FEF_25-75 between 50 and 70% and FEF_25-75>70% respectively (P<0.0001). Only in moderate/severe hyper-reactive subjects (excluded borderlines), PD20 was lower in the FEF_25-75≤50% subgroup than in the 1 with FEF_25-75>70%. The hyperreactive subjects percentage, was higher in those with FEF_25-75≤50% and lower in those with FEF_25-75>70% (P<0.0001). FEF_25-75<50% (compared to FEF_25-75>70%) was a higher AHR risk factor, especially in subjects with moderate/severe AHR (OR: 2.18 [IQR:1.41-3.37]; P<0.0001). Thresholds yielding the highest combined sensitivity/specificity for FEF_25-75% were 75.19 (area under curve [AUC]: 0.653) and 74.95 (AUC:0.688) in subjects with PD20<2,400 and <400 µg respectively. FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC measured in subjects with different FEF_25-75≤50%, FEF_25-75>50 and ≤70% or FEF_25-75>70% levels were similar both in normoreactive and hyperreactive subjects.

Conclusions

At asthma onset, reduced baseline FEF_25-75 values with normal FEV1 and FEV1/FVC may predict AHR. Detectable predictive cut-off values do not exist because even normoreactive subjects can show lower FEF_25-75 values. Furthermore, a greater FEF_25-75 reduction may be associated to a more severe AHR, suggesting a possible FEF_25-75 role in the management of asthma when FEV1 and FEV1/FVC are normal.

Antileukotriene reverts the early effects of inflammatory response of distal parenchyma in experimental chronic allergic inflammation

Aims. Compare the effects of montelukast or dexamethasone in distal lung parenchyma and airway walls of guinea pigs (GP) with chronic allergic inflammation. Methods. GP have inhaled ovalbumin (OVA group-2x/week/4weeks). After the 4th inhalation, GP were treated with montelukast or dexamethasone. After 72 hours of the 7th inhalation, GP were anesthetised, and lungs were removed and submitted to histopathological evaluation. Results. Montelukast and dexamethasone treatments reduced the number of eosinophils in airway wall and distal lung parenchyma compared to OVA group (P < 0.05). On distal parenchyma, both treatments were effective in reducing RANTES, NF-κB, and fibronectin positive cells compared to OVA group (P < 0.001). Montelukast was more effective in reducing eotaxin positive cells on distal parenchyma compared to dexamethasone treatment (P < 0.001), while there was a more expressive reduction of IGF-I positive cells in OVA-D group (P < 0.001). On airway walls, montelukast and dexamethasone were effective in reducing IGF-I, RANTES, and fibronectin positive cells compared to OVA group (P < 0.05). Dexamethasone was more effective in reducing the number of eotaxin and NF-κB positive cells than Montelukast (P < 0.05). Conclusions. In this animal model, both treatments were effective in modulating allergic inflammation and remodeling distal lung parenchyma and airway wall, contributing to a better control of the inflammatory response.

Real life clinical study design supporting the effectiveness of extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone/formoterol at the level of small airways of asthmatics

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to establish how treatment with inhaled extra-fine beclomethasone/formoterol (I-EF-BDP/F) formulation differs from other combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA), we studied lung function and markers of airway inflammation upon switching to the extra-fine formulation and after 8 weeks of treatment with it.

METHODS

We carried out a real-life clinical observation of undercontrolled asthmatic patients switched over from dry powder inhalers of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol to I-EF-BDP/F (Foster(®), Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Italy). The effects of 8-weeks of treatment were documented by means of visual analog scale (VAS), quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), spirometry and markers of airway or systemic inflammation: exhaled breath temperature (EBT), blood eosinophils (Eos), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP). Before/after treatment differences between forced vital capacity percent of predicted (%FVC), a simple indicator of small airways involvement, were calculated and subjects were ranked accordingly to reflect the magnitude of the therapeutic response. Subjects above the 75th percentile (n = 15), "top responders", were then compared with those below the 25th percentile (n = 15) "poor responders".

RESULTS

On average, the 59 patients completing the study (mean age ± SD 51 ± 12 years, 38 women) had significant improvement in VAS and QLQ scores at the end of the treatment period (49.1 ± 2.4 vs. 73.1 ± 2.05 and 146.1 ± 2.7 vs. 176.7.1 ± 3.4 respectively, P < 0.001), but not in the inflammatory indicators (EBT, CRP and Eos). However, when comparing the "top responders" with the "poor responders", significant improvement in these inflammatory indicators was observed: EBT significantly decreased from 34.04/mean/± 0.30/s.e.m./[°C] to 33.57 ± 0.33, P = 0.003, Eos in blood fell from 381.7 ± 91.2 [cells/μL] to 244.2 ± 43.2, P = 0.02. Before/after treatment differences in hsCRP decreased significantly in the top responders compared with the poor responders (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Asthmatic subjects who had the most improvement in FVC after transition to I-EF-BDP/F from other combined ICS/LABA preparations also demonstrated a significant decrease in some indicators of airway/systemic inflammation. These results support the notion that I-EF-BDP/F exerts an effect also at the level of the small airways through a reduction of the level of air trapping. Patients in whom inflammation of the small airways plays an important clinical role are the ones to derive most benefit from this small airways tailored treatment. However, improved compliance due to the "promise of a new drug" effect should also be considered as contributing to the treatment results.

Histomorphometric study of the periodontal ligament in the initial period of orthodontic movement in Wistar rats with induced allergic asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common systemic disease occurring in infancy and adolescence, time periods that could encompass orthodontic treatment. Asthma is an inflammatory disease; therefore, it might interfere with orthodontic tooth movement. The purpose of the study was to analyze the histomorphologic aspects of the periodontal ligament of asthmatic Wistar rats in the initial period of orthodontic movement.

METHODS

Thirty-two Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: 2 control groups consisting of rats without induced allergic asthma, and 2 experimental groups consisting of rats with induced allergic asthma. The animals of the first control and experimental groups did not receive orthodontic forces, whereas those in the second control and experimental groups were subjected to mesial movement of the maxillary left first molar for 3 days. The samples were prepared for histomorphometric analysis of the periodontal ligament. The area of the periodontal ligament was calculated as a function of root length in the cervical and apical regions of the distal face of the maxillary first molar mesial root. The Student t test and the Welch correlation test were applied to the data obtained.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference (P <0.05) between the control and experimental groups. An enhanced response to orthodontic force was observed in the asthmatic animals: the periodontal ligament was more compressed at the pressure area and more stretched in the traction area.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that experimental allergic asthma seems to exacerbate orthodontic movement in rats.

The fraction of NO in exhaled air and estimates of alveolar NO in adolescents with asthma: methodological aspects

RATIONALE

This study investigated the oral contribution to exhaled NO in young people with asthma and its potential effects on estimated alveolar NO (Calv(NO) ), a proposed marker of inflammation in peripheral airways. Secondary aims were to investigate the effects of various exhalation flow-rates and the feasibility of different proposed adjustments of (Calv(NO) ) for trumpet model and axial diffusion (TMAD).

METHODS

Exhaled NO at flow rates of 50-300 ml/sec, and salivary nitrite was measured before and after antibacterial mouthwash in 29 healthy young people (10-20 years) and 29 with asthma (10-19 years). Calv(NO) was calculated using the slope-intercept model with and without TMAD adjustment.

RESULTS

Exhaled NO at 50 ml/sec decreased significantly after mouthwash, to a similar degree in asthmatic and healthy subjects (8.8% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.49). The two groups had similar salivary nitrite levels (56.4 vs. 78.4 µM, P = 0.25). Calv(NO) was not significantly decreased by mouthwash. Calv(NO) levels were similar when flow-rates between 50-200 or 100-300 ml/sec were used (P = 0.34 in asthmatics and P = 0.90 in healthy subjects). A positive association was found between bronchial and alveolar NO in asthmatic subjects and this disappeared after the TMAD-adjustment. Negative TMAD-adjusted Calv(NO) values were found in a minority of the subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people with and without asthma have similar salivary nitrite levels and oral contributions to exhaled NO and therefore no antibacterial mouthwash is necessary in routine use. TMAD corrections of alveolar NO could be successfully applied in young people with asthma and yielded negative results only in a minority of subjects.

Spirometric parameters and levels of interferon gamma and IL-5 in induced sputum from patients with allergic rhinitis or asthma

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to analyze spirometric parameters and cytokine (interferon [IFN] gamma and IL-5) levels in induced sputum from patients with asthma or allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonatopic subjects.

METHODS

Thirty-three subjects aged 18-60 years were enrolled in the present study. Eight patients had asthma without AR symptoms, 16 had AR without asthma symptoms or history, and both groups had positive skin-prick test (SPT) to aeroallergens. The nine remaining subjects were healthy nonatopic subjects with negative SPT to aeroallergens. Spirometry was performed by evaluating the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV(1)), and forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% (FEF(25-75)) of FVC before and after bronchodilator use. Induced sputum samples were also collected for measuring cytokine (IFN-gamma and IL-5) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Significant pre- and postbronchodilator change was observed only for FEV(1) with higher variation values in asthmatic subjects compared with patients with AR (p < 0.05) and nonatopic subjects (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in pre- and postbronchodilator spirometric parameters among the three groups, although asthmatic patients showed lower prebronchodilator FEF(25-75) values (p = 0.065). IL-5 levels were higher in induced sputum from patients with asthma and AR compared with nonatopic subjects (p = 0.020 and p = 0.032, respectively), but IFN-gamma levels showed no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Spirometric measurements were not able to show any occurrence of bronchial constriction in patients with AR, but predominant IL-5 levels in induced sputum from these patients reinforce the role of Th2-type immune response in lower respiratory airways that could contribute to the concept of "one airway, one disease."

Spirometric abnormalities in patients with allergic rhinitis: Indicator of an "asthma march"?

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may precede and promote the onset of asthma. However, few studies addressed this issue mainly concerning bronchial physiological parameters. The aim of this study was to assess forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF(25-75)), forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV(1)), and response to bronchodilation test in a large group of AR patients.

METHODS

Sixteen hundred five adult AR patients were evaluated. Clinical examination, assessment of nasal obstruction perception by visual analog scale, spirometry, and bronchodilation test were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

There were 8.4% of patients with abnormal FEV(1) values, 24.7% had impaired FEF(25-75), and 66.1% had reversibility with bronchodilation. A trend of spirometric impairment seems to exist in these patients. Age, gender, and duration of rhinitis may be risk factors for these findings. Different grades of bronchial impairment seem to exist.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and suggests the possible existence of a progression from AR toward asthma, such as an "asthma march." Therefore, asthma should be suspected and carefully investigated in AR patients.

Early bronchial involvement in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may be frequently associated with asthma or precede it. Bronchial involvement in AR is usually detected by spirometry. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) is considered a reliable parameter for asthma diagnosis. However, forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF(25-75)) could be considered a possible marker of early bronchial involvement in AR; indeed, it has been proposed that FEF(25-75) values <70% of predicted may predict this evolution. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large cohort of children with AR to define an FEV(1) value corresponding to impaired FEF(25-75) values.

METHODS

Eight hundred fifty AR children (555 boys; median age, 10 years) were studied. Spirometry and skin-prick test were performed in all of them. Descriptive statistic and multivariate analysis were considered.

RESULTS

Three-hundred (35.3%) patients had FEF(25-75) values <70% of predicted. Still, normal FEV(1) values were associated with overt impaired FEF(25-75) values and the cutoff value was 83%.

CONCLUSION

Spirometry should be adequately interpreted in AR patients; indeed, an FEV(1) cutoff value of 83% detects with good efficiency AR children with early bronchial impairment.

Impact of allergic rhinitis on bronchi: an 8-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is considered a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma. However, few studies addressed this issue from a functional point of view. The aim of this study was to follow up a group of patients with allergic rhinitis to investigate the onset of possible spirometric abnormalities and/or bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR).

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis were prospectively and consecutively evaluated; 940 controls were also included in the study. Clinical examination, skin-prick test, spirometry, and methacholine challenge were performed in all patients every 2 years for 8 years.

RESULTS

The number of patients with forced expiratory flow at 25 and 75% of pulmonary volume of <70% of predicted significantly increased during the observation time. At baseline, no subjects had BHR; whereas 34 patients had BHR after 8 years. Sensitization to mites, birch, and Parietaria as well as rhinitis duration are risk factors for these changes.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and suggests that spirometry should be performed in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Exercise challenge test: is a 15% fall in FEV(1) sufficient for diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION

In the exercise challenge test (ECT), a drop in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) of between 10 and 15% is the determinant variable for a diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchospasm.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of FEV(1) plus mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the forced vital capacity (FEF(25-75%)) may increase the sensitivity of the ECT in asthmatic children.

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE

To compare FEV(1) and FEF(25-75%) changes in a group of asthmatic and healthy children.

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study. Asthmatics were categorized by their severity (GINA) and after 1 month without controller therapy, an ECT was done under standard protocol. As well, a questionnaire about rhinitis and asthma was conducted with the entire population. ROC curves were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 147 children (34 healthy and 113 asthmatics, 18 and 58 males, respectively) were evaluated. Divided into healthy children and intermittent, mild and moderate persistent asthmatics, they had similar average ages (9.4, 9.48, 8.97, and 11.2 years, respectively). Using a 15% fall in FEV(1), we obtained 29% sensitivity and 100% specificity. However, when we used a 10% fall in FEV(1), sensitivity was 47% and specificity was 97%. Adding a 28% fall in FEF(25-75%), sensitivity was 52% and specificity was 94%.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that test sensitivity can increase by using a lower FEV(1) cut-off (10%) and adding a 28% fall in FEF(25-75%).

Targeting small airways, a step further in asthma management

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, small airway (SA) involvement in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) have reached increasing attention. Originally referred to as the 'silent zone', SA may not be that silent after all. Important clinical correlates are asthma exacerbations and airways remodelling, exercise asthma and nocturnal asthma. Thus, to control pathology in the SA has become a desirable goal in asthma management.

OBJECTIVES

The scope of this review is to give a brief overview of the current status on SA in asthma, how to monitor and to diagnose SA inflammation and finally highlight some important treatment strategies.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

New tools have been developed to monitor SA function; these implies the use of imaging techniques and respiratory physiology, targeting SA function. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide and the combined use of hyperresponsiveness testing with impulsoscillometry is another option. The introduction of ultrafine aerosols has provided new tools for to treat SA inflammation. The challenge for the future will be to define the optimal particle size and device for maximal deposition in entire lung, including the small airways. Moreover, we also need strategies for increasing the therapeutic ratio, i.e. increasing lung deposition without increasing systemic side effects. Another challenge is to design and to perform clinical trials, targeting effects in SA, proving the clinical importance of SA treatment in a large number of patients. The latter also imply education of our medical authorities, communicating that asthma is more than a beta-2 agonist responsive central airway disorder of the lungs.

Bronchodilation test in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may be considered a risk factor for the onset of asthma. Recently, it has been reported that forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF₂₅₋₇₅) may predict a positive response to bronchodilation test in asthmatic children. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large group of adult AR patients to investigate the frequency of response to bronchodilation test and FEF₂₅₋₇₅ values.

METHODS

One thousand four hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients suffering from persistent AR were evaluated. Clinical examination, spirometry, and bronchodilation test were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

In this study, 62.9% of patients had reversibility to bronchodilation test and 17.8% had impaired FEF₂₅₋₇₅ values (≤ 65% of predicted). Impaired FEF₂₅₋₇₅ values associated with longer rhinitis duration may predict reversibility to bronchodilation test (OR = 11.3; P < 0.001). In addition, a FEF₂₅₋₇₅ cutoff value ≤ 71% of predicted may already discriminate patients with reversibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that about two-thirds of patients with persistent AR may be considered at risk of becoming asthmatic. This finding should be adequately considered as a precocious spirometry may allow the early detection of patients prone to develop asthma and consequently to treat them.

Relationship between bronchial hyperreactivity and bronchodilation in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may be considered a risk factor for the onset of asthma. Recently, it has been reported that forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF(25%-75%)) may predict a positive response to bronchodilation test in asthmatic children. Moreover, bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is frequently detected in AR patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible relationship between the response to bronchodilation test and methacholine challenge, also considering the FEF(25%-75%) values in a large group of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-five consecutive AR patients were evaluated. Clinical examination, spirometry, methacholine bronchial challenge, and bronchodilation test were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-one patients (66%) had "positive" results for bronchodilation test; FEF(25%-75%) was abnormal in 78 patients (21.4%), and 76 patients (20.8%) had severe BHR. An FEF(25%-75%) cutoff value of less than 58.5% of predicted may optimally (AUC 0.97) discriminate patients with both severe BHR and reversibility.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms previous studies and increases the strength of the role of FEF(25%-75%) as a marker of early bronchial involvement in patients suffering from persistent allergic rhinitis. Moreover, an FEF(25%-75%) value less than 58.5% of predicted may suggest the co-existence of severe BHR and reversibility.

Lower airways may also be affected in asymptomatic patients with recent onset of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

It is well known that there is a close association between allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma, and AR is a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma. AR duration is significantly associated with a possible bronchial involvement. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of possible spirometric abnormalities and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in a large group of patients with recent onset of AR.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A total of 1,539 AR patients were consecutively evaluated. Clinical examination, skin prick test, spirometry, and methacholine challenge were performed on all patients.

RESULTS

: There were 362 (23%) patients with FEF(25-75) values <70% of predicted. The methacholine challenge was positive in 74.43% of patients, and 72.22% of the population presented a polysensitization. At multivariable analysis, an FEV(1) value lower than 92% of predicted, as well as increasing severity of BHR and polysensitization appeared to be independent predictors of a reduced FEF(25-75) value.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that reduced FEF(25-75) values may be present in some patients with recent onset of AR. FEV(1) <92%, severity of BHR, and polysensitization may be considered risk factor for this phenomenon.

Extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol hydrofluoroalkane-propelled inhaler in asthma

The fixed combination of beclomethasone and formoterol (BDP/F) is an extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-propelled formulation characterized by a small particle size and high particle deposition in the lower airways. The product is manufactured using a specific technology known as Modulite((R)), the advantages of which include a stable and uniform dose delivery and flexibility to tailor particle size. The high fraction of drug available for lung deposition and the resulting low fraction remaining in the upper airways account for a high efficacy coupled with a low systemic bioavailability, therefore making this combination competitive compared with other inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) fixed combinations currently available. A 6-month study comparing BDP/F fixed combination with BDP and formoterol administered via separate inhalers showed a comparable efficacy on lung function and a greater efficacy in favor of the BDP/F fixed combination in terms of improvements in symptom scores and asthma control. Comparative studies in moderate-to-severe asthmatics have shown that the BDP/F combination displays a comparable efficacy to that of ICS/LABA combinations across the different asthma outcomes measured. The smaller particle size of this BDP/F combination in comparison with other ICS/LABA combinations makes it potentially more effective on small airways, a specific target for asthma treatment. This should be confirmed by specifically designed studies. Future development of this combination will include the evaluation of efficacy in maintaining asthma control using a step-down approach and the assessment of its use as maintenance and reliever therapy, since formoterol has already been shown to be an effective reliever medication in asthma in another inhaler containing budesonide/formoterol.

Effects of extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone/formoterol on both large and small airways in asthma

BACKGROUND

Airway inflammation in asthma involves both large and small airways, and the combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) is the mainstay of therapy. Available inhaled combinations differ in terms of drug delivery to the lung and the ability to reach small airways.

AIM

To evaluate whether treatment with an extra-fine inhaled combination provides additional effects vs a nonextra-fine combination on airway function.

METHODS

After a 1- to 4-week run-in period, patients with asthma were randomized to a double blind, double dummy, 12-week treatment with either extra-fine beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) 400/24 microg daily or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) 500/100 microg daily. Methacholine (Mch) bronchoprovocation challenge and single breath nitrogen (sbN2) test were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with asthma (15 men), mean age 43, mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) 71.4% of predicted, were included. A significant increase (P < 0.01) versus baseline was observed in predose FEV(1) in both BDP/F and FP/S groups (0.37 +/- 0.13 l and 0.36 +/- 0.12 l, respectively). PD(20)FEV(1) Mch improved significantly from 90.42 (+/-30.08) microg to 432.41 (+/-122.71) microg in the BDP/F group (P = 0.01) but not in the FP/S group. A trend toward improvement vs baseline was observed for BDP/F in closing capacity (CC), whereas no differences were recorded in other sbN(2) test parameters.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this pilot study suggest that an extra-fine inhaled combination for the treatment of asthma has beneficial effects on both large and small airways function as expressed by Mch and sbN(2) tests.

Montelukast in the treatment of asthma and beyond

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting over 300 million people worldwide. The common association with allergic rhinitis and the presence of proinflammatory cells and mediators in the circulation of patients qualify asthma as a systemic disease. This characteristic and the fact that the gold-standard therapy for persistent asthma, inhaled corticosteroids, cannot suppress all components of airway inflammation and fail to adequately penetrate into the small airways, warrant the quest for effective systemic anti-asthma therapies. This review describes the most important controlled studies of montelukast, a once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, in asthma and allergic rhinitis in both adults and children. Montelukast is a systemically active drug with a targeted, dual mechanism of action, acting both as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory. In patients of all ages, montelukast has shown a favorable safety profile and was well-tolerated. Both as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, montelukast produced clinically relevant improvements in asthma-related parameters, including symptoms, lung function parameters, quality of life and the number of asthma exacerbations. Furthermore, bronchoprotective effects have been reported both against specific and nonspecific bronchoactive stimuli. Similarly, in patients with allergic rhinitis, montelukast produced substantial improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Long-term studies aimed to determine its effects on airway remodeling are still lacking.

Montelukast in the treatment of asthma as a systemic disease

Asthma affects 300 million people worldwide. The common association of asthma with allergic rhinitis and the presence of proinflammatory mediators in the circulation of patients provide strong evidence for the need to treat asthma as a systemic disease. The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast is a disease-specific oral medication that has dual effects on airway smooth muscle cells and inflammatory processes. This review describes recent randomized, controlled studies of montelukast in asthma and allergic rhinitis in adults and children as young as 3 months old. Montelukast treatment consistently produced significant reductions in asthma exacerbations. While many patients may benefit from montelukast as monotheray, combination treatment for chronic asthma with inhaled corticosteroids is advocated as being rational. Significant improvements in symptoms and quality of life were observed in allergic rhinitis patients. Montelukast is well tolerated in patients of all ages. Long-term studies are underway to determine its effects on airway remodeling.

Comparison of effectiveness in ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on small airway function in mild asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of asthma treatment, but conventional ICS may have limited effectiveness in inflammation and patency of small airways. Ciclesonide is delivered and deposited in the peripheral region of the lung as a small particle corticosteroid. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of ciclesonide with fluticasone propionate on small airway function in asthma.

METHODS

Thirty mild persistent asthma patients treated with 200 microg of fluticasone propionate were randomized to receive either ciclesonide 200 microg once daily or fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily for 8 weeks. Small airway function was assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and percentage of eosinophil induced sputum.

RESULTS

We observed that ciclesonide significantly improved IOS measured resistance of small airways (R5-R20; p<0.05), distal reactance (X5; p<0.01), reactance area (AX; p<0.01), and decreased late-phase sputum eosinophil level (p<0.01) compared with fluticasone propionate. There were no significant changes in spirometry indices in either group during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ciclesonide improves small airway function and inflammation compared with fluticasone propionate in mild asthma. This study provides evidence that IOS and late-phase induced sputum allows detection of changes in the small airways that can not be detected by spirometry.

Feasibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements at various flow rates in children with asthma

Measurement of bronchial and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide (NO) levels could be of clinical importance for the treatment of asthma. To discriminate between alveolar and bronchial NO, measurements need to be assessed at various flow rates. To study the feasibility, linearity, and long-term repeatability of NO measurements at four different exhalation flow rates in children with asthma. Twenty-one children with moderate persistent asthma, aged 6-12 yrs, were included in the study. NO was measured according to the ATS/ERS guidelines, using the NIOX analyzer with flow restrictors of 30, 50, 100, and 200 ml/s. Duration of the measurements ranged from 6-10 s, depending on the flow rate. The tests were repeated 3 and 6 months after the first NO measurement. Feasibility of NO measurements at these four flow rates increased from 67% to 91% and 95% at the first, second and third visit, respectively. A significant learning effect was present. Age and lung function indices did not influence success or failure of the tests. At the first measurements occasions, no problems occurred during the NO analysis at a 100 ml/s flow rate. There was a 75-90% success rate when performing the test using flow rates of 30, 50, and 200 ml/s. However, repeating the tests resulted in a 100% success rate. Measurements were not successful if: (i) children ran out of air; (ii) NO concentration exceeded 200 ppb; (iii) the measured NO flow was unstable; and (iv) the NO plateau was not formed. This study showed good feasibility and linearity of NO measurements in asthmatic children of 6 yrs and over at flow rates between 50-200 ml/s. A significant learning effect was present. The long-term reproducibility of alveolar and bronchial NO values during 6 months was moderate.

Predictive value of sGaw, FEF(25-75), and FEV1 for development of asthma after a negative methacholine challenge test

BACKGROUND

A 20% change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) during methacholine challenge testing (MCT) is a reliable marker of asthma. When the FEV(1) decrease is < 20%, there is controversy whether other changes in flows and conductance may be useful. We conducted this study to determine whether changes in sGaw, FEF(25 - 75), and FEV(1) in a negative MCT could predict future occurrence of asthma over a 3-year period.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of asthma but who had a negative MCT per ATS FEV(1) criteria (< 20% FEV(1) decline at 16 mg/mL of methacholine) performed by the 5-breath dosimeter method were analyzed. Two pulmonary fellows, blinded to MCT results, reviewed the patients' medical records. Patients were classified into one of three categories: asthmatic, unclear, and not asthmatic. Decreases in sGaw, FEF(25 - 75), and FEV(1) in the five groups were then retrieved. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 23 were excluded owing to lack of a 3-year follow-up. After complete data review, the number of patients (n) in each group was as follows: asthmatic (n = 15), unclear (n = 7), and not asthmatic (n = 55). sGaw and FEF(25 - 75) decreases from the negative MCT could not predict asthma; however, decreases in FEV(1) were associated with future asthma occurrence (sGaw p = 0.21, FEF25-75 p = 0.07, FEV(1) p = 0.0009). Forty-three percent of the patients who had a 10% to 20% decline in FEV(1) eventually developed asthma.

CONCLUSION

Up to 20% of patients who have symptoms suggestive of asthma but a negative MCT can still develop asthma. Declines in sGaw and FEF(25 - 75) in a negative MCT appear to have no clinical significance. A decrease in FEV(1), especially 10% to 20%, is associated with the diagnosis of future asthma.

Impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma: effects on bronchial hyperreactivity

BACKGROUND

Remarkable relationship exists between upper and lower airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a paramount feature of asthma and may be considered a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma in patients with allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at evaluating the presence of BHR in a large group of patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone, and at investigating possible risk factors related to severe BHR.

METHODS

Three hundred and forty-two patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. Clinical examination, skin prick test, spirometry and bronchial methacholine (MCH) test were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (6.4%) patients had severe BHR, 74 (21.6%) patients had mild BHR and 192 (56.2%) had borderline BHR; 54 (15.8%) patients had a negative MCH test. The logistic regression analysis evidenced that trees and house dust mites sensitization (ORAdj: 8.1), rhinitis duration > 5 years (ORAdj: 5.4) and FEV1 < or = 86% of predicted (ORAdj: 4.0) were significantly associated with severe BHR. The discriminative ability of this model is appreciably satisfactory, being the AUC = 0.90.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and the role of some risk factors, such as tree and mite sensitization, > 5-year duration, and < or = 86% FEV1 values, as risk factors for severe BHR in patients with moderate-severe persistent allergic rhinitis alone. Therefore, BHR is frequently present in patients with chronic rhinitis and should be suspected in the presence of defined risk factors.

Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler on exhaled inflammatory markers in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

Extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone differs from other inhaled corticosteroids by its fine aerosol characteristics. Therefore, extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone may be particularly useful for treating peripheral airway inflammation in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the anti-inflammatory effects of extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) in asthmatic children by measuring bronchial and alveolar nitric oxide (NO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

In a 6-month crossover study, 33 children aged 6 to 12 years with moderate persistent asthma were randomly treated with extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (200 microg daily via an Autohaler) and fluticasone DPI (200 microg daily via a Diskus). The primary outcome variables were alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux. The secondary outcome variables were levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, symptoms, exacerbations, and adverse effects. All the variables were recorded at baseline and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SE alveolar NO concentration and bronchial NO flux were comparable after treatment with hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone vs fluticasone DPI (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.3 +/- 0.5 ppb, P = .55, and 1,124.3 +/- 253.6 vs 1,029.1 +/- 195.5 pL/s, P = .70, respectively). In addition, levels of inflammatory markers in EBC, lung function indices, and symptoms did not differ between treatments. Patients used fewer beta2-agonists during the last 2 weeks of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone treatment.

CONCLUSION

The anti-inflammatory effects of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone are similar to those of fluticasone DPI in children with moderate persistent asthma.

When should a reversibility test be performed on patients with early stages of asthma and normal spirometry?

Subjects with bronchial asthmatic symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and FEV(1)/forced vital capacity [FVC] > 80% could show a positive reversibility test with salbutamol in about 25% of the cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a limit functional value for spirometry exists where a reversibility test using salbutamol, over this limit, is not necessary to confirm the diagnosis of asthma. Four hundred patients (mean age 31.12 +/- 10.99) with asthmatic symptoms and normal spirometry (mean FEV(1) 96.06 +/- 11.82%, mean FEV(1)/FVC 98.89 +/- 6.03%) were recruited. The number of subjects with reversible airflow obstruction (RAO) was evaluated using the following different criteria of reversibility: FEV(1) and FVC >or= slant 12%, peak expiratory flow (PEF) >or= slant 15%, FEF(25 -75) >or= slant 35%, and at least one of these (ANY). In subjects with baseline FEV(1) > 100% (150 patients), 26 (17.3%) patients showed a FEV(1) increase > 12% and, among the criteria used, 45 patients (30%) showed ANY. In subjects with baseline FEV(1)/FVC > 100% (204 patients), 36 patients (17.6%) showed a FEV(1) increase > 12% and 53 patients (26.8%) showed ANY. In subjects with baseline FEF(25 -75) > 70% (209 patients), 26 (12.44%) and 49 (23.44%) patients, respectively, showed an increase in FEV(1) > 12%, and ANY. In 56 patients with baseline cut-offs (evaluated together) FEV(1) > 100%, FEV(1)/FVC > 100% and FEF(25-75) > 70%, 10 patients (17.85%) showed a RAO with ANY. FEV(1) > 121% or FEV(1)/FVC > 110.8% or FEF(25 -75) > 110% were cut-off values identified in this study where no RAO subjects were found over these limits. In conclusion, baseline FEV(1) > 100%, FEV(1)/FVC > 100% and FEF(25 -75) > 70% cannot be considered cut-offs where it is not necessary to perform a reversibility test with a bronchodilator over these limits. It is improbable to find a positive reversibility test using salbutamol in patients with asthmatic symptoms and FEV(1) > 121% or FEV(1)/FVC > 110.8% or FEF(25 -75) > 110% to confirm the diagnosis of asthma.

Impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma: effects on spirometric parameters

BACKGROUND

Close association exists between allergic rhinitis and asthma. Moreover, allergic rhinitis is a strong risk factor for the onset of asthma in adults. This study was aimed at evaluating a large group of patients with moderate-to-severe and persistent allergic rhinitis alone for investigating the presence of spirometric abnormalities and possible risk factors related to it.

METHODS

A total of 392 patients with persistent allergic rhinitis were prospectively and consecutively evaluated. Clinical examination, skin prick test and spirometry were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

There were 24 (6.1%) patients with forced vital capacity (FVC < 80%) of predicted, 50 (12.8%) with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1) < 80%) of predicted and 341 (87.0%) with forced expiratory flow at 25% and 75% of the pulmonary volume (FEF(25-75)) < 80% of predicted. The logistic regression analysis evidenced that rhinitis duration (OR(Adj): 1.9/year) and sensitization to house dust mites (OR(Adj): 8.2) were significantly associated with impaired values of 2 or 3 spirometric parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the close link between upper and lower airways and the role of some risk factors, such as duration and mites sensitization, as early prognostic markers of bronchial involvement in patients with moderate-to-severe and persistent allergic rhinitis alone.

Abnormal spirometry in children with persistent allergic rhinitis due to mite sensitization: the benefit of nasal corticosteroids

Inflammatory processes affecting nasal and bronchial mucosa are similar in nature. The purpose of this study was to examine whether children with perennial allergic rhinitis, without underlying asthma, have impaired pulmonary function. We also investigated whether nasal corticosteroids and loratidine would improve the pulmonary function tests of those children with impaired lung function. Fifty subjects with moderate/severe persistent allergic rhinitis due to exclusively dust mite sensitization and no past medical history suggestive of asthma were assessed. The control group consisted of 26 matched healthy subjects. Subjects with airway obstruction, as detected by forced expiratory volume/1 s (FEV1) or forced expiratory flow from 25/% to 75% (FEF(25-75)) values <80% of those predicted, were treated with loratidine, once a day for 10 days, and daily nasal budesonide for 3 months. We found that 11 of 50 patients (22%) with perennial allergic rhinitis had impaired pulmonary function (FEF(25-75) values <80%), compared to 1/26 (3.8%) of the control group (p < or = 0.05). Reversibility was observed in 9/11 (81.8%), mean 24.7% +/- 10.3%. Within 3 months of treatment, 7/10 had FEF(25-75) > 80% of their predicted values as well as significant improvements in their FEV1 (p = 0.04), and FEV1/FVC (p = 0.04). We conclude that a substantial proportion of children with perennial allergic rhinitis have diminished FEF (25-75) values and reversible airway obstruction. Nasal corticosteroids improve the pulmonary function tests of these children with impaired lung function.

Time for a paradigm shift in asthma treatment: from relieving bronchospasm to controlling systemic inflammation

Inflammation is a key pathology in asthma. In the central airways local inflammation leads to irreversible remodeling and airway dysfunction. Complex inflammatory changes also occur in the nose, sinuses, and small airways. In particular, rhinitis and asthma are linked by a common pathogenic process with common inflammatory cells, mediators, and cytokines. Cross-communication between the airways and bone marrow through inflammatory mediators in the circulation leads to systemic propagation of airway inflammation. Treatment of asthma has traditionally focused on relieving bronchospasm with beta(2)-agonists, which do not affect inflammation. Treatment of eosinophilic inflammation in the central airways with inhaled corticosteroids reduces local inflammation and improves pulmonary function but does not improve the systemic manifestations of asthma. If asthma is a systemic disease, the underlying systemic pathology should be targeted by identifying common disease mediators, mechanisms, or both that are triggered only during active disease. Of currently available therapies, leukotriene receptor antagonists block the action of cysteinyl leukotrienes and thus improve both asthma and rhinitis and other conditions systemically linked with asthma. Other potential treatments include receptor-blocking molecules and synthesis inhibitors related to eicosanoid inflammation. Treatment of asthma as a systemic disease requires clinical trials that evaluate the effects of new treatments on both lung function and the wider systemic pathology.

Methods used in clinical development of novel anti-asthma therapies

In recent years, it has become increasingly important to get as much as possible information on clinical efficacy already in the early phases of drug development. For proof of concept (POC) studies testing novel anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma, there are several validated exacerbation models, inducing various aspects of the airway inflammation and airway responsiveness. The choice of the appropriate asthma model depends on the drug's targets within the inflammatory process. For adequate assessment of the drug's anti-inflammatory potential, it is crucial to choose adequate (surrogate) biomarkers. Ideally, these should include measures of airway response, central and peripheral airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Overall, there are validated non-invasive sampling techniques for the measurement of inflammatory markers in asthma that can be applied as outcome parameters in early clinical trials. If adequately implemented, these measurements can provide early indication of proof of pharmacological and potential therapeutic efficacy-even in first administration to humans.

Allergic rhinitis with hyper-responsiveness differ from asthma in degree of peripheral obstruction during metacholine challenge test

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a risk factor for developing clinical asthma. Moreover, AR is often associated with bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR). The aim of this study was to compare the degree of involvement of the peripheral airways during metacholine (MCh) challenge test in asthmatics and patients with AR with or without BHR by using the impulse oscillometry (IOS) technique. Fifty-three patients with seasonal AR were investigated with MCh challenge test and IOS. Thirteen healthy non-reactive subjects served as controls. MCh challenge test was performed, cut-off value FEV1PD20 2000 microg. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate a MCh/FEV1 slope (Slope-FEV1MCh), which was used as an index of BHR. IOS was performed, measuring respiratory resistance and reactance during the MCh challenge test. Twenty-six subjects had both AR and asthma symptoms, 27 patients reported AR only, without asthma symptoms, 17 (63%) manifested BHR by spirometric criteria. Patients with AR and symptoms of asthma manifested greater peripheral airway obstruction compared to those with AR only with BHR. Increased peripheral obstruction in the asthmatic group compared to patients with AR and BHR may explain previous findings that asthmatics perceive greater airway obstruction during MCh challenge tests.

Lower respiratory tract complications during nasal provocation: nonspecific stimulant or specific allergen?

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an allergic inflammatory disease in which allergen exposure leads to the appearance of symptoms in sensitized individuals because of histamine liberation from nasal mucosal mast cells. Comorbidity of this disease with allergic asthma is common. Therefore, the one airway one disease theory has been put forward. Lower respiratory tract provocation tests with both nonspecific (methacholine) and specific stimulants (allergen) have yielded positive results in nonasthmatic patients with AR. However, not enough research is available to demonstrate whether there is a response in the lower respiratory tract during nasal provocation tests (NPTs) performed to evaluate only nasal airway in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the lower respiratory tract was affected as a result of NPTs with nonspecific and specific stimulants in nonasthmatic patients with AR and to determine the frequency of lower respiratory tract obstruction due to NPT with nonspecific and specific stimulants.

METHODS

Thirty-six participants were enrolled in the study between November 2005 and January 2006 (18 AR patients and 18 healthy control subjects). Patients underwent 2 sessions of NPT. The first session was performed with nasal methacholine as a nonspecific stimulant, and the second session was performed with nasal Olea europaea extract as a specific stimulant. The control group underwent only nonspecific nasal provocation with methacholine. Basal nasal opening and nasal pressures were evaluated spirometrically by rhinomanometric measurements and basal respiratory function tests in both groups before methacholine nasal provocation. Whether or not nasal provocation was achieved, spirometric measurements were performed in all patients and controls after NPTs.

RESULTS

NPTs with methacholine resulted in a similar frequency of nasal provocation in the patient and control groups (P = .63). However, the mean methacholine dose was lower in patients with AR (P = .049). There was a decrease in parameters of asthma, including the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (P = .04), peak expiratory flow (P = .01), and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (P = .004), as a result of NPTs with methacholine in the patient group. However, NPTs with allergen did not cause a change in lower respiratory tract obstruction criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower respiratory tract obstruction can occur after NPTs with nonspecific stimulants; therefore, tests performed with specific allergens can be regarded as safer.

Peripheral nitric oxide is increased in rhinitic patients with asthma compared to bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Allergic rhinitis is a predisposing factor for developing clinical asthma. Moreover, allergic rhinitis is often associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). We hypothesise that patients with asthma have more small airway involvement than those with allergic rhinitis and BHR alone. The aim of this study was to assess peripheral and proximal NO concentration in rhinitic subjects, and to correlate the peripheral NO concentration to the peripheral obstruction in response to methacholine. Patients with allergic rhinitis with or without BHR, or clinical asthma were investigated in and out of the allergy season. Healthy subjects served as controls. Fractional exhaled NO was performed, and peripheral NO concentration and proximal flux of NO was calculated. Methacholine test was performed including impulse oscillometry. Rhinitic patients with asthma demonstrate an increase in both proximal and peripheral NO compared to those with rhinitis alone or those with BHR. There is a trend of increased peripheral NO from patients with rhinitis only, rhinitis and BHR, to rhinitis with asthma. The increase in peripheral NO correlated with an increased peripheral obstruction in response to methacholine. Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis demonstrated a decrease in both proximal and peripheral NO in the off-season. The results support our hypothesis that rhinitic patients with asthma have more peripheral lung inflammation and small airway involvement compared to rhinitic patients with BHR alone.

A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of anti-asthma treatment on lung function in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and especially spirometry measures are useful tools in evaluating early response to treatment of asthma in children mainly due to their worldwide availability. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of anti-asthma treatment in children, equally on FEV(1), FEF25-75%, R(int) and SR(aw) values.

METHODS

Children 6-18 years of age with moderate atopic asthma were randomized to 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 200 microg budesonide (B) (n=29), 5 or 10 mg (according to age) montelukast (M) (n=29), 200 microg B + 5 or 10 mg M (n=29), 200 microg B + 9 microg formoterol (F) (n=29) or placebo (n=27). FEV(1,) FEF25-75%, R(int), SR(aw) were measured before and after treatment.

RESULTS

R(int), SR(aw), FEV(1) improved significantly in all active treatment groups while FEF25-75% improved significantly only in BM group and M group. Combination therapy, showed significantly greater effects on R(int) than monotherapy: BM group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.03) and BF group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that using single parameter for monitoring asthma can be misleading. Using combination of lung function techniques provides better assessment of treatment. Results of our study confirm this hypothesis. The best effect on large and small airways was achieved with combined anti-inflammatory therapy.

Eosinophilic inflammation, remodeling of lower airway, bronchial responsiveness and cough reflex sensitivity in non-asthmatic subjects with nasal allergy

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that nasal allergy influences the lower airway inflammation and functions. We elucidated whether nasal allergy would contribute to lower airway inflammation and functions.

METHODS

266 subjects aged 21-39 years were interviewed with special emphasis on history of asthma and nasal allergies (perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and seasonal allergic rhinitis (Japanese cedar pollinosis; PO)). Symptomatic subject was defined when nasal symptoms were present during a 3-week study period. Pulmonary function, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20), capsaicin cough threshold defined as capsaicin concentration eliciting 5 or more coughs (C5) and eosinophil percentage in hypertonic saline-induced sputum were measured.

RESULTS

Based on the interview, 232 subjects without asthma were divided into symptomatic (n = 25) and asymptomatic (n = 22) PAR, PO on-season (n = 15) and off-season (n = 36), and non-nasal allergy subjects (control) (n = 134). Sputum eosinophils were significantly greater in symptomatic PAR than another four groups (p < 0.01). FEV1/FVC ratio was significantly lower in PAR than control (p < 0.05). Maximum mean expiratory flow was lower in PAR than control (asymptomatic: p < 0.05, symptomatic: p = 0.06). C5 was not different among groups. PAR tended to have a lower PC20 compared to control (symptomatic: p = 0.078; asymptomatic: p = 0.086).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that eosinophilic inflammation occurred in symptomatic period of PAR may contribute to development of lower airway remodeling and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Reversely, PO may not be associated with lower airway eosinophilic inflammation or abnormal bronchial functions. Nasal allergy dose not influence the cough reflex sensitivity.

Role of FEF25%–75% as a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic patients

BACKGROUND

The small airways may play an important role in the clinical manifestations of asthma. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF25%-75%) has been proposed as an approximate measure of the caliber of distal airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a feature of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of BHR in allergic patients with asthma and rhinitis.

METHODS

A total of 726 patients (mean +/- SD age, 24.7 +/- 6.3 years) were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were evaluated in all the participants.

RESULTS

A difference between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FEF25%-75% greater than 20 or a ratio between these variables greater than 1.24 discriminates between patients with no response to a mild response to methacholine vs patients with a moderate-to-severe response with high sensitivity (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the possible role of FEF25%-75% in predicting BHR in allergic individuals with airway disorders.

Allergic rhinitis with or without concomitant asthma: difference in perception of dyspnoea and levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide

BACKGROUND/AIM

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a risk factor for developing clinical asthma. Moreover, AR is often associated with bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients with AR and asthma differed from AR with or without BHR in degree of perception of dyspnoea and airway inflammation, measured as fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (NO).

MATERIALS

Twenty-nine patients with seasonal AR (timothy) were investigated with metacholine challenge test. Fourteen healthy non-reactive subjects served as controls.

METHODS

(1) Metacholine challenge test, cut-off value forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) PD20 2,000 microg. Slope value for metacholine was calculated as %fall in FEV(1)/mol metacholine. Dyspnoea during challenge was measured with a 10-graded modified Borg score. (2) Measurement of fractional-exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) at flow rate 50 mL/s.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients reported AR only, without asthma symptoms, and 12 (67%) were BHR. Eleven subjects had both rhinitis and asthma symptoms. Patients with rhinitis and asthma reported significantly more dyspnoea per percent fall in FEV(1) compared with those with rhinitis and BHR. Moreover, those with rhinitis and asthma had significantly higher NO values compared with those with rhinitis and BHR.

CONCLUSION

The difference between rhinitis patients with or without asthma symptoms seems to be mainly a question of perception of dyspnoea. However, FENO measurement indicates that dyspnoea may also be associated with increased inflammatory activity in the peripheral airways.