Undertreatment of hyperlipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure

Analysis of the survival time of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a Bayesian approach via a competing risk parametric model

PURPOSE

Heart failure (HF) is a widespread ailment and is a primary contributor to hospital admissions. The focus of this study was to identify factors affecting the extended-term survival of patients with HF, anticipate patient outcomes through cause-of-death analysis, and identify risk elements for preventive measures.

METHODS

A total of 435 HF patients were enrolled from the medical records of the Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, covering data collected between March and August 2018. After a five-year follow-up (July 2023), patient outcomes were assessed based on the cause of death. The survival analysis was performed with the AFT method with the Bayesian approach in the presence of competing risks.

RESULTS

Based on the results of the best model for HF-related mortality, age [time ratio = 0.98, confidence interval 95%: 0.96-0.99] and ADHF [TR = 0.11, 95% (CI): 0.01-0.44] were associated with a lower survival time. Chest pain in HF-related mortality [TR = 0.41, 95% (CI): 0.10-0.96] and in non-HF-related mortality [TR = 0.38, 95% (CI): 0.12-0.86] was associated with a lower survival time. The next significant variable in HF-related mortality was hyperlipidemia (yes): [TR = 0.34, 95% (CI): 0.13-0.64], and in non-HF-related mortality hyperlipidemia (yes): [TR = 0.60, 95% (CI): 0.37-0.90]. CAD [TR = 0.65, 95% (CI): 0.38-0.98], CKD [TR = 0.52, 95% (CI): 0.28-0.87], and AF [TR = 0.53, 95% (CI): 0.32-0.81] were other variables that were directly related to the reduction in survival time of patients with non-HF-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

The study identified distinct predictive factors for overall survival among patients with HF-related mortality or non-HF-related mortality. This differentiated approach based on the cause of death contributes to the estimation of patient survival time and provides valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Anti-atherogenic effect of Nepitrin-7-O-glucoside: A flavonoid isolated from Nepeta hindostana via acting on PPAR - α receptor

Atherogenic dyslipidemia is a condition and responsible for the induction of major cardiovascular diseases. Traditionally, Nepeta hindostana a medicinal plant commonly used as cardioprotective in Indo-Pak regions has gained importance because of its therapeutic active flavonoid Nepitrin-7-O-glucoside. Flavonoid-glycosides are steroids having the ability to exert specific, decisive action on the cardiac muscle. In the present research work flavonoid, Nepitrin-7-O-glucoside was isolated from methanolic extract via chromatographic techniques. The structure was elucidated and confirmed by different spectral techniques like Mass and 1H NMR spectrometry. Various preclinical atherosclerosis parameters such as lipid levels, SGOT/SGPT, body weight, histology of aorta and heart were estimated and beneficial effect of Nepitrin in high-fat diet (HFD) induced atherosclerosis for six weeks were observed. Outcomes of the preclinical results showed and proved that Nepitrin significantly improved dyslipidemia at an effective dose of 50 mg/kg as compared with HFD control and Simvastatin. Molecular docking showed significant binding affinity towards the target PPAR-α receptor (PDB: 2P54). Further the docked ligands with PDB: 2P54 were exposed to molecular dynamics studies to confirm the dynamic behaviour of PPAR-α receptor. Outcomes of the results of the in-vivo study and molecular dynamics study were in correlation with each-others. Further, it can be concluded that Nepitrin has a potent antiatherogenic agent and act by reducing the lipid levels via acting on PPAR-α receptor and regenerating the damaged cells.

Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) is a longitudinal study supported by the National Institutes of Health to determine the disparities in stroke-related mortality across USA. REGARDS has published a body of work designed to understand the disparities in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of coronary heart disease (CHD) and its risk factors in a biracial national cohort. REGARDS has focused on racial and geographical disparities in the quality and access to health care, the influence of lack of medical insurance, and has attempted to contrast current guidelines in lipid lowering for secondary prevention in a nationwide cohort. It has described CHD risk from nontraditional risk factors such as chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and inflammation (i.e., high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and has also assessed the role of depression, psychosocial, environmental, and lifestyle factors in CHD risk with emphasis on risk factor modification and ideal lifestyle factors. REGARDS has examined the utility of various methodologies, e.g., the process of medical record adjudication, proxy-based cause of death, and use of claim-based algorithms to determine CHD risk. Some valuable insight into less well-studied concepts such as the reliability of current troponin assays to identify "microsize infarcts," caregiving stress, and CHD, heart failure, and cognitive decline have also emerged. In this review, we discuss some of the most important findings from REGARDS in the context of the existing literature in an effort to identify gaps and directions for further research.

Examining risk factor goal attainment and adherence to treatment among US heart failure patients: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010

PURPOSE

Data are limited regarding the adequacy of risk factor control and adherence to recommended therapies among adults with heart failure (HF). We evaluated the adequacy of risk factor control and adherence to recommended pharmacologic therapies among non-institutionalized US adults with HF.

METHODS

We examined data from US adults aged 18 years and older with a self-reported history of HF from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008 and 2009-2010. We estimated the proportions of subjects who reported recommended lifestyle modification and medications and were at target levels of blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and hemoglobin A1c.

RESULTS

Among 371 subjects with HF in our study, 73.7 % were non-smokers, while only 69.1, 51.9, and 56.2 % were at goal for blood pressure, LDL-C, and hemoglobin A1c (if diabetic), respectively; only 9.0 % were at goal for all measures. The proportions of non-smokers were lower in males (p < 0.01) and lowest in non-Hispanic blacks (p < 0.01). Subjects with less than a high school education (p < 0.05) were least likely to be at recommended blood pressure levels. The proportions exercising moderately, with recommended alcohol and sodium intakes, and with a normal body mass index were 8.3, 41.4, 28.9, and 17.5 %, respectively. 83.3 % of HF patients were taking only one of the recommended four classes of drugs [β-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs), diuretics, and digoxin]; only 50.1 % were additionally on a lipid-lowering agent.

CONCLUSION

We observed a significant gap between adherence and control of HF risk factors and treatment among non-institutionalized US adults.

Improving treatment intensification to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a cluster randomized trial

Background

Blood pressure, lipid, and glycemic control are essential for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Many health care systems have successfully shifted aspects of chronic disease management, including population-based outreach programs designed to address CVD risk factor control, to non-physicians. The purpose of this study is to evaluate provision of new information to non-physician outreach teams on need for treatment intensification in patients with increased CVD risk.

Methods

Cluster randomized trial (July 1-December 31, 2008) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California registry of members with diabetes mellitus, prior CVD diagnoses and/or chronic kidney disease who were high-priority for treatment intensification: blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg systolic, LDL-cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dl, or hemoglobin A1c ≥ 9%; adherent to current medications; no recent treatment intensification). Randomization units were medical center-based outreach teams (4 intervention; 4 control). For intervention teams, priority flags for intensification were added monthly to the registry database with recommended next pharmacotherapeutic steps for each eligible patient. Control teams used the same database without this information. Outcomes included 3-month rates of treatment intensification and risk factor levels during follow-up.

Results

Baseline risk factor control rates were high (82-90%). In eligible patients, the intervention was associated with significantly greater 3-month intensification rates for blood pressure (34.1 vs. 30.6%) and LDL-cholesterol (28.0 vs 22.7%), but not A1c. No effects on risk factors were observed at 3 months or 12 months follow-up. Intervention teams initiated outreach for only 45-47% of high-priority patients, but also for 27-30% of lower-priority patients. Teams reported difficulties adapting prior outreach strategies to incorporate the new information.

Conclusions

Information enhancement did not improve risk factor control compared to existing outreach strategies at control centers. Familiarity with prior, relatively successful strategies likely reduced uptake of the innovation and its potential for success at intervention centers.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00517686

Patient-reported racial/ethnic healthcare provider discrimination and medication intensification in the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic minority patients are more likely to report experiences with discrimination in the healthcare setting, potentially leading to reduced access to appropriate care; however, few studies evaluate reports of discrimination with objectively measured quality of care indicators.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether patient-reported racial/ethnic discrimination by healthcare providers was associated with evidence of poorer quality care measured by medication intensification.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Baseline data from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE), a random, race-stratified sample from the Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry from 2005-2006, including both survey and medical record data.

MAIN MEASURES

Self-reported healthcare provider discrimination (from survey data) and medication intensification (from electronic prescription records) for poorly controlled diabetes patients (A1c ≥9.0%; systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥130 mg/dl).

KEY RESULTS

Of 10,409 eligible patients, 21% had hyperglycemia, 14% had hyperlipidemia, and 32% had hypertension. Of those with hyperglycemia, 59% had their medications intensified, along with 40% with hyperlipidemia, 33% with hypertension, and 47% in poor control of any risk factor. In adjusted log-binomial GEE models, discrimination was not associated with medication intensification [RR = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.24) for hyperglycemia, RR = 1.23 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.63) for hyperlipidemia, RR = 1.06 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.61) for hypertension, and RR = 1.08 (95% CI: 0.88, 1.33) for the composite cohort].

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that patient-reported healthcare discrimination was associated with less medication intensification. While not associated with this technical aspect of care, discrimination could still be associated with other aspects of care (e.g., patient-centeredness, communication).

Elevated risk profile of women in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a 6-year survey of 117,913 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognosis of female patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been shown to be inferior to that of male patients. Little is known about gender differences during the secondary prevention phase.

METHODS

After ACS, 117,913 patients (30.7% female) were enrolled in two large-scale German registries from 2000 to 2005 during phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Demographic parameters, reperfusion strategies, cardiovascular risk factors, exercise capacity, and medication use at admission and discharge were assessed. Temporary changes (trends) and gender-specific differences were determined.

RESULTS

Compared to 2000, patients in 2005 were significantly older (females: 66.4 vs. 68.0 years; males: 62.3 vs. 63.3 years; p = 0.001) and had a higher body mass index (BMI) (females: 27.7 vs. 28.6 kg/m(2); males: 27.6 vs. 28.1 kg/m(2), in 2000 and 2005, respectively, p < 0.001). Target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg at discharge was obtained in a smaller proportion of women than men (81.0 vs. 83.0%, p < 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at discharge were significantly higher in female patients (95.0 vs. 93.2 mg/dL, p < 0.001); 80.9% of female vs. 83.8% of male patients achieved a target fasting glucose <126 mg/dL during the CR (p < 0.001). Large between-center variability was noted for age, total cholesterol at entry, and exercise capacity at entry and discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Although control of cardiovascular risk factors has improved in both genders, over a recent 6-year period, female patients compared with males were less likely to achieve target values for blood pressure, fasting glucose, and lipid values in the early period after acute coronary events.

Congestive heart failure is associated with lipoprotein components in statin-treated patients with coronary heart disease Insights from the Incremental Decrease in End points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Trial (IDEAL)

BACKGROUND

Very few, if any, studies have assessed the ability of apolipoproteins to predict new-onset of congestive heart failure (HF) in statin-treated patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

AIMS

To employ the Incremental Decrease in End points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Trial (IDEAL) study database to assess the association of on-treatment lipoprotein components with prediction of HF events and to compare their predictive value with that of established risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes.

METHODS

We used Cox regression models to study the relationships between on-treatment levels of apolipoproteins A1 and B to subsequent HF. Chi square information value from the log likelihood was used to compare the predictive value of lipoprotein components with established risk factors of HF.

FINDINGS

In the IDEAL study, on-treatment apolipoproteins proved to be associated with the occurrence of new-onset HF. Variables related to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) carried less predictive information than those related to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apoA-1 was the single variable most strongly associated with HF. LDL-C was less predictive than both non-HDL-C (total cholesterol minus HDL-C) and apoB. The ratio of apoB to apoA-1 was most strongly related to HF after adjustment for potential confounders, among which diabetes had a stronger correlation with HF than did hypertension. ApoB/apoA-1 carried approximately 2.2 times more of the statistical information value than that of diabetes. Calculation of the net reclassification improvement index revealed that about 3.7% of the patients had to be reclassified into more correct categories of risk once apoB/apoA-1 was added to the adjustment factors. The reduction in risk by intensive lipid-lowering treatment as compared to usual-dose simvastatin was well predicted by the difference in apoB/apoA-1 on-treatment levels.

INTERPRETATION

The on-treatment ratio of apoB/apoA-1 was the strongest predictor of HF in CHD patients of both IDEAL treatment arms combined, mostly driven by the strong association with apoA-1, whereas LDL-C and non-HDL-C were less able to predict HF outcome. The predictive information value contained within apoB/apoA-1 was about 2.2 times more than that of diabetes. Between-treatment group differences in HF were to a significant extent explained by on-treatment differences in apoB/apoA-1, mostly through the changes in apoB. We argue therefore, on-treatment lipoprotein components contribute to the overall future risk of HF in statin-treated patients with CHD.

Emerging antidyslipidemic drugs

BACKGROUND

Many patients at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) fail to reach target lipid levels with currently available medications, and a small but clinically relevant proportion of patients experience adverse effects. Thus, additional pharmaceutical strategies are required to fill these gaps in efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of both current and emerging antidyslipidemic drugs.

METHODS

For the current antidyslipidemic drugs, we focus primarily on statins, bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, and niacin. Emerging antidyslipidemic drugs herein discussed were identified by searching the Pharmaprojects database for 'hypercholesterolemia drugs' (Phase II or Phase III), 'HDL-based therapies', and 'PCSK9 inhibition'.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of currently existing medications are most easily applicable. Meanwhile, strategies to raise HDL-C rely on a deep understanding of the complexity of HDL metabolism. Furthermore, novel approaches to further reduce LDL-C warrant careful evaluation of benefit-risk ratio. Finally, the medical community will have to rely on late-phase CHD outcome studies as the final arbiter of clinical application for any new antidyslipidemia treatment.

Suboptimal use of statin therapy in elderly patients with atherosclerosis: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that statin use plays an important role in improving adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis. However, limited population-based data are available on use of statin therapy in these patients in Canada. We sought to study trends in statin use to treat these patients in Ontario during a 10-year period.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cross-sectional time series analysis between April 1, 1995, and March 31, 2004, using health care data from Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS

During the study period, 343,154 elderly patients with atherosclerosis were identified. Of these, 235,615 (68.7%) had coronary artery diseases (CAD), 115,012 (33.5%) had cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and 23,886 (7.0%) had peripheral arterial disease (PAD). About 46% were women, and mean patient age was 77.1 (SD, 7.5) years. During the study period, the percentage of patients treated with a statin in each group increased considerably, from 9.8% to 55.3% in all atherosclerotic patients (P < .01), from 11.8% to 61.2% in CAD patients (P < .01), from 5.3% to 41.2% in CVD patients (P < .01), and from 6.8% to 43.3% in PAD patients (P < .01). During the entire study period, the percentage of statin users was lowest among PAD and CVD patients, followed by patients with both a history of PAD and CVD.

CONCLUSION

The use of statin therapy in elderly patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis has increased substantially during the past decade, but many patients remain untreated. The suboptimal use is greatest among patients with PAD or CVD, or both, and lowest in patients with CAD. Given the heightened risk of cardiovascular adverse outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis, these data have important and immediate implications.

Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of effective hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia therapies, target levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), and hemoglobin A1c control are often not achieved.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relative importance of patient medication nonadherence versus clinician lack of therapy intensification in explaining above target cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor levels.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional assessment.

PARTICIPANTS

In 2005, 161,697 Kaiser Permanente Northern California adult diabetes patients were included in the study.

MEASUREMENT

"Above target" was defined as most recent A1c >/=7.0% for hyperglycemia, LDL-c >/=100 mg/dL for hyperlipidemia, and SBP >/=130 mmHg for hypertension. Poor adherence was defined as medication gaps for >/=20% of days covered for all medications for each condition separately. Treatment intensification was defined as an increase in the number of drug classes, increased dosage of a class, or a switch to a different class within the 3 months before or after notation of above target levels.

RESULTS

Poor adherence was found in 20-23% of patients across the 3 conditions. No evidence of poor adherence with no treatment intensification was found in 30% of hyperglycemia patients, 47% of hyperlipidemia patients, and 36% of hypertension patients. Poor adherence or lack of therapy intensification was evident in 53-68% of patients above target levels across conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Both nonadherence and lack of treatment intensification occur frequently in patients above target for CVD risk factor levels; however, lack of therapy intensification was somewhat more common. Quality improvement efforts should focus on these modifiable barriers to CVD risk factor control.

Evidence-based use of medications in patients with coronary artery disease in a rural Australian community

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evidence-based use of major drug groups for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chronic heart failure and to identify potential interactions.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A major non-metropolitan teaching hospital in rural New South Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Includes 24 men and 25 women, with an age average of 77.2 +/- 7.5 years, range 60-96 years. All patients were over 18 years old with CAD and heart failure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The evidence-based use of medications and potential drug interactions.

RESULTS

On admission, 71% were treated with aspirin/clopidogrel, 71% with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker, 39% with beta-blockers, 29% with short-acting nitrates and 59% with statins. The use of these medications remained unchanged at time of discharge (P > 0.05). Of the 23 patients with hypertension at admission, blood pressure was controlled in seven (30%) before discharge. Potential drug interactions were identified in 37% of the patients. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used in seven (14%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blockers, short-acting nitrate and statins in patients with CAD compares favourably with international literatures. However, there is room for improvement in the use of beta-blockers and statins. A greater effort needs to be made to prevent clinically significant drug interactions.

Who cares for the patient with heart failure?

Heart failure is a progressive and often fatal clinical syndrome caused by cardiac dysfunction. Therapeutic advances in both acute and chronic heart failure care have resulted in the ability to partially or completely reverse cardiac dysfunction, with accompanying reductions in attributable morbidity, mortality, and cost. In order to examine who is best suited to provide care for the patient with heart failure, we must recognize that treatment options vary in relationship to the stage of the disorder. Use of a contemporary heart failure classification scheme facilitates stratification of primary and secondary prevention and tertiary care options.

Dyslipidemia in Older Adults

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown in many large, randomized clinical trials to be safe and highly effective for decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, thus preventing cardiovascular events and decreasing mortality in patients both with and without prior cardiovascular disease. Statins are also appropriate agents for older adults, although they remain underutilized in this population. This article uses three typical case history presentations to review the most recent clinical trial data and guidelines on statin therapy to provide practical guidance on clinical decision making for lipid-lowering therapy in the geriatric population.

Antisense oligonucleotides as therapeutics for hyperlipidaemias

Hyperlipidaemia, due to elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or triglycerides (TGs), is recognised as a significant risk factor contributing to the development of coronary heart disease (CHD), the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Even though a variety of established antihyperlipidaemic agents are available, the majority of high-risk patients do not reach their lipid goals, indicating the need for new and more effective therapeutics to be used alone or as combination agents with existing drugs. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), designed to specifically and selectively inhibit novel targets involved in cholesterol/TG homeostasis, represent a new class of agents that may prove beneficial for the treatment of hyperlipidaemias resulting from various genetic, metabolic or behavioural factors. This article describes the antisense technology platform, highlights the advantages of these novel drugs for the treatment of hyperlipidaemia and reviews the current research in this area.

Statins and Mortality Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Small studies suggest that statins may improve mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Whether these results are generalizable to a broader group of patients with HF remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association between statin use and survival among a national sample of elderly patients hospitalized with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A nationwide sample of 61 939 eligible Medicare beneficiaries > or =65 years of age who were hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between April 1998 and March 1999 or July 2000 and June 2001 was evaluated. The analysis was restricted to patients with no contraindications to statins (n=54,960). Of these patients, only 16.7% received statins on discharge. Older patients were less likely to receive a statin at discharge. Patients with hyperlipidemia and those cared for by a cardiologist or cared for in a teaching hospital were more likely to receive a statin at discharge. In a Cox proportional hazards model that took into account demographic, clinical characteristics, treatments, physician specialty, and hospital characteristics, discharge statin therapy was associated with significant improvements in 1- and 3-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84; and hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.85, respectively). Regardless of total cholesterol level or coronary artery disease status, statin therapy was associated with significant differences in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that statin therapy is associated with better long-term mortality in older patients with HF. This study suggests a potential role for statins as an adjunct to current HF therapy. Randomized clinical trials are required to determine the role of these agents in improving outcomes in the large and growing group of patients with HF.

Statin use after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide study in Denmark

AIMS

To study outpatient statin use after first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Denmark between 1995 and 2002 and to determine the predictors of statin use.

METHODS

This is a nationwide population-based study using administrative registries. Patients with first AMI between 1995 and 2002 older than 30 years of age and alive 6 months after discharge (n = 45 219) were identified through the National Patient Registry. The statins purchased by these patients within 6 months after discharge were determined using the Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics, a nationwide prescription database.

RESULTS

Statin use following AMI increased from 13% in 1995 to 61% in 2002. In 2002, 81% of patients aged 30-64 years used statins. Older patients used fewer statins, but use increased more among patients aged 75-84 years: from 1.3% to 43%. Use in elderly patients did not differ according to gender in 2000-02, but young men used more than younger women. In 2000-02, patients with diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.95) and with heart failure (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64-0.76) were undertreated; this trend was present throughout the period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study, younger patients after AMI had high statin use in 2002, but high-risk patients such as those with diabetes and heart failure were still being undertreated.

Regional variation in medication following coronary events in Germany

BACKGROUND

Mortality rates from ischaemic heart disease have consistently been higher in East compared to West Germany both prior to and since reunification. Coronary care is inversely related to mortality from ischaemic heart disease. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to compare cardiovascular medication in East and West German patients following cardiac rehabilitation.

METHODS

East German (n = 530) and West German (n = 1638) patients were included at admission to one of 18 rehabilitation centres. Inclusion criteria were myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The follow-up period was 12 months.

RESULTS

At admission, East and West German patients differed with regard to sociodemographic variables, risk factors and medical conditions. At 12 months, a higher percentage of West compared to East German patients were prescribed beta-blockers (71% vs. 65%, P = 0.04) and lipid-lowering agents (64% vs. 55%, P = 0.002). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, on the other hand, were prescribed more frequently in the East compared to the West (60% vs. 48%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, region of residence remained a significant predictor for the prescription of lipid-lowering agents (East vs. West: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81) and ACE inhibitors (East vs. West: OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.33-2.39).

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable variation in the prescription of cardiovascular medication in secondary prevention within Germany. Some, but not all, of this variation can be explained by differences in patient characteristics.

An apolipoprotein B antisense oligonucleotide lowers LDL cholesterol in hyperlipidemic mice without causing hepatic steatosis

High levels of plasma apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100), the principal apolipoprotein of LDL, are associated with cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that suppression of apoB-100 mRNA by an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) would reduce LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). Because most of the plasma apoB is made in the liver, and antisense drugs distribute to that organ, we tested the effects of a mouse-specific apoB-100 ASO in several mouse models of hyperlipidemia, including C57BL/6 mice fed a high-fat diet, Apoe-deficient mice, and Ldlr-deficient mice. The lead apoB-100 antisense compound, ISIS 147764, reduced apoB-100 mRNA levels in the liver and serum apoB-100 levels in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Consistent with those findings, total cholesterol and LDL-C decreased by 25-55% and 40-88%, respectively. Unlike small-molecule inhibitors of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, ISIS 147764 did not produce hepatic or intestinal steatosis and did not affect dietary fat absorption or elevate plasma transaminase levels. These findings, as well as those derived from interim phase I data with a human apoB-100 antisense drug, suggest that antisense inhibition of this target may be a safe and effective approach for the treatment of humans with hyperlipidemia.

Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Diabetes is a chronic progressive endocrinopathy associated with significant macrovascular and microvascular complications as well as cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF). Diabetes and chronic systolic HF result in similar activation of pathologic neurohormonal pathways. When diabetes and HF coexist, morbidity and mortality significantly increase. This article reviews important clinical issues in the care of patients with diabetes and HF. A review of pertinent pathophysiologic principles is provided, followed by a discussion of the treatment issues related to this population. Treatment issues include vascular disease risk factor modification, HF pharmacotherapy, glycemic management, and control of other common comorbid conditions.

Disparities in lipid management for African Americans and Caucasians with coronary artery disease: a national cross-sectional study

Background

Individuals with coronary artery disease are at high risk for adverse health outcomes. This risk can be diminished by aggressive lipid management, but adherence to lipid management guidelines is far from ideal and substantial racial disparities in care have been reported. Lipid treatment and goal attainment information is not readily available for large patient populations seen in the fee-for-service setting. As a result, national programs to improve lipid management in this setting may focus on lipid testing as an indicator of lipid management. We describe the detection, treatment, and control of dyslipdemia for African Americans and Caucasians with coronary artery disease to evaluate whether public health programs focusing on lipid testing can eliminate racial disparities in lipid management.

Methods

Physicians and medical practices with high numbers of prescriptions for coronary artery disease medications were invited to participate in the Quality Assurance Program. Medical records were reviewed from a random sample of patients with coronary artery disease seen from 1995 through 1998. Data related to the detection, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia were abstracted from the medical record and evaluated in cross-sectional stratified and logistic regression analyses using generalized estimation equations.

Results

Data from the medical records of 1,046 African Americans and 22,077 Caucasians seen in outpatient medical practices in 23 states were analyzed. African-American patients were younger, more likely to be women and to have diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension. The low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) testing rate for Caucasian men was over 1.4 times higher than that for African-American women and about 1.3 times higher than that for African-American men. Almost 60% of tested Caucasian men and less than half of tested African Americans were prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. Tested and treated Caucasian men had the highest LDL-C goal attainment (35%) and African-American men the lowest (21%).

Conclusions

Although increased lipid testing is clearly needed for African Americans, improvements in treatment and control are also necessary to eliminate racial disparities in lipid management. Disparities in treatment and goal attainment must be better understood and reflected in policy to improve the health of underserved populations.

Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the impact of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy in patients with advanced heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Although statins are known to reduce mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD), the impact of statin therapy in patients with HF has not been well studied. Both the potential risks and benefits of statins in HF have been described.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of 551 patients with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] <or=40%) referred to a single university center for clinical management and/or transplant evaluation. Survival without the necessity of urgent heart transplantation was determined.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 52 +/- 13 years; mean EF was 25 +/- 7%. Forty-five percent of the cohort had CAD, and 45% were receiving statin therapy, including 73% and 22% of CAD and non-CAD patients with HF, respectively. Patients receiving statins were significantly older and more likely to be male, with higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. The EF and cholesterol levels were similar between treated and non-treated patients. Statin use was associated with improved survival without the necessity of urgent transplantation in both non-ischemic and ischemic HF patients (91% vs. 72%, p < 0.001 and 81% vs. 63%, p < 0.001 at one-year follow-up, respectively). After risk adjustment for age, gender, CAD, cholesterol, diabetes, medications, hemoglobin, creatinine, and New York Heart Association functional class, statin therapy remained an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio 0.41 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic HF. Randomized trials are needed for confirmation of a therapeutic benefit.