Pharmacokinetics of a new immediate-release compound omeprazole capsule and its comparison with the enteric-coated formulation under fasting and fed conditions

Establishing Virtual Bioequivalence and Clinically Relevant Specifications for Omeprazole Enteric-Coated Capsules by Incorporating Dissolution Data in PBPK Modeling

Currently, Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes I and III are the only biological exemptions of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms eligible for regulatory approval. However, through virtual bioequivalence (VBE) studies, BCS class II drugs may qualify for biological exemptions if reliable and validated modeling is used. Here, we sought to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR), and VBE models for enteric-coated omeprazole capsules, to establish a clinically-relevant dissolution specification (CRDS) for screening BE and non-BE batches, and to ultimately develop evaluation criteria for generic omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. To establish omeprazole's IVIVR based on the PBPK model, we explored its in vitro dissolution conditions and then combined in vitro dissolution profile studies with in vivo clinical trials. The predicted omeprazole pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and parameters closely matched the observed PK data. Based on the VBE results, the bioequivalence study of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules required at least 48 healthy Chinese subjects. Based on the CRDS, the capsules' in vitro dissolution should not be < 28%-54%, < 52%, or < 80% after two, three, and six hours, respectively. Failure to meet these dissolution criteria may result in non-bioequivalence. Here, PBPK modeling and IVIVR methods were used to bridge the in vitro dissolution of the drug with in vivo PK to establish the BE safety space of omeprazole enteric-coated capsules. The strategy used in this study can be applied in BE studies of other BCS II generics to obtain biological exemptions and accelerate drug development.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lansoprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Single-, and Multiple-dose Trial

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) differ in onset of action and bioavailability. This trial was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing lansoprazole 30 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (T preparation) in healthy Chinese subjects. This was an open, single-center, randomized, single and multiple oral doses, and two-period crossover study in 30 healthy subjects. After single- and multiple-dose oral administration, blood samples were obtained and lansoprazole concentration in serum was measured for pharmacokinetic analysis. Meanwhile, the intragastric pH was monitored continuously to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of the investigational drugs. The Tmax of the T preparation was 0.5 hours, while the Tmax of the R preparation was 1.5 hours after multiple doses, which indicated that the absorption speed of the T preparation was significantly faster than that of the R preparation. The same characteristics also existed after single-dose administration. The area under the curve (AUC)ss of the T preparation was bio-equivalent to that of the R preparation under steady state. The time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 for the T preparation was higher than that of the R preparation after 1 hour for both single- and multiple-dose. It suggested compared with R preparation, the time percentage of intragastric pH > 4.0 met the criteria for superiority after 1 hour administration for the T preparation. In addition, no serious adverse events occurred in this study. Across this study, the T preparation was better than the R preparation at improving drug absorption and increasing intragastric pH, and had a favorable safety profile.

Effect of Food and Dosing Regimen on Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy-A Literature Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-choice drugs used to prevent and treat acid-related diseases. However, a lack of satisfactory response to the standard PPI dose ("PPI failure") is often reported, especially in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Poor compliance seems to be one of the main causes of PPI failure; hence, it is crucial to gain knowledge on how to properly administer PPIs. In this review, we aimed to evaluate the effect of food, beverages, and dosing regimen on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PPIs and to frame recommendations for healthcare professionals to improve both patient's counseling and compliance to treatment with PPIs. A total of 201 papers were identified following a literature search. After full-text evaluation, 64 studies were included in the review. Co-administration of PPIs with a meal may affect both their bioavailability and effectiveness; however, the influence of food depends on the type of drug and its formulation. Except for pantoprazole, PPIs can be administered in the morning or evening; however, morning intake generally provides better daytime control of gastric acidity. In most cases, the choice of the proper schedule of administration should be based on the patient's symptoms and individual dosing preferences.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole

Background

The pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be affected by food intake. We aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole.

Setting

The study population comprised 186 healthy volunteers participating in 6 bioequivalence clinical trials.

Method

Subjects were evaluated to determine the effect of a high-fat breakfast on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (n = 36), rabeprazole (n = 69), and pantoprazole (n = 81).

Main outcome measure

Drug plasma concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

Results

Food affected the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (increased T_max and decreased AUC and C_max), pantoprazole (increased T_max and decreased AUC), and rabeprazole (increased T_max, C_max and half-life). Food increased variability in T_max for all 3 drugs, delaying absorption around 3 to 4 h and until 20 h in some subjects.

Conclusion

As food delays the absorption of PPIs and increases their variability, it would be better to administer these drugs under fasting conditions.

Trial registration

European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT: 2004–003863-59 (registration date 05/MAR/2004), EudraCT 2006–001162-17 (registration date 17-MAR-2006), EudraCT: 2007–002489-37 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2007–002490-31 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2010–024029-19 (registration date 23-NOV-2010).

Simulated, biorelevant, clinically relevant or physiologically relevant dissolution media: The hidden role of bicarbonate buffer

In-vitro dissolution testing of pharmaceutical formulations has been used as a quality control test for many years. At early drug product development, in vivo predictive dissolution testing can be used for guidance in the rational selection of candidate formulations that best fit the desired in vivo dissolution characteristics. At present, the most widely applied dissolution media are phosphate-based buffers and, in some cases, the result of dissolution tests performed in such media have demonstrated reasonable/acceptable IVIVCs. However, the presence of phosphates in human GI luminal fluids is insignificant, which makes the use of such media poorly representative of the in vivo environment. The gastrointestinal lumen has long been shown to be buffered by bicarbonate. Hence, much interest in the development of suitable biorelevant in vitro dissolution media based on bicarbonate buffer systems has evolved. However, there are inherent difficulties associated with these buffers, such as maintaining the pH throughout the dissolution test, as CO₂ tends to leave the system. Various mathematical models have been proposed to analyze bicarbonate buffers and they are discussed in this review. Approaches such as using simpler buffer systems instead of bicarbonate have been proposed as surrogate buffers to produce an equivalent buffer effect on drug dissolution on a case-by-case basis. There are many drawbacks related to simpler buffers systems including their poor in vivo predictability. Considerable discrepancies between phosphate and bicarbonate buffer dissolution results have been reported for certain dosage forms, e.g. enteric coated formulations. The role and need of bicarbonate-based buffers in quality control testing requires scientific analysis. This review also encompasses on the use of bicarbonate-based buffers as a potentially in vivo predictive dissolution medium for enteric coated dosage forms.

Patient-centered Outcomes with Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Other Drugs

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review of patient-centered outcomes after the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and other drugs.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases in July 2016 to find studies that reported mortality and morbidity after the concomitant use of PPIs and other drugs. We conducted direct meta-analyses using a random-effects model and graded the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group approach.

FINDINGS

We included data from 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 16 randomized controlled trials, and 16 observational studies that examined the concomitant use of PPIs with medications from 10 drug classes. Low-quality evidence suggests that the use of PPIs is associated with greater morbidity when administered with antiplatelet drugs, bisphosphonates, antibiotics, anticoagulants, metformin, mycophenolate mofetil, or nelfinavir. Concomitant PPIs reduce drug-induced gastrointestinal bleeding and are associated with greater docetaxel and cisplatin response rates in patients with metastatic breast cancer. For demonstrated statistically significant relative risks and benefits from concomitant PPIs, the magnitudes of the effects are small, with <100 attributable events per 1000 patients treated, and the effects are inconsistent among specific drugs. Among individual PPIs, the concomitant use of pantoprazole or esomeprazole, but not omeprazole or lansoprazole, is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. Clopidogrel is associated with a greater risk for myocardial infarction compared with prasugrel. Conflicting results between randomized controlled trials and observational studies and high risk for bias in the body of evidence lessened our confidence in the results.

IMPLICATIONS

Available evidence suggests a greater risk for adverse patient outcomes after the concomitant use of PPIs and medications from 9 drug classes and warns against inappropriate drug combinations.