Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Melagatran, a Novel Synthetic LMW Thrombin Inhibitor, in Patients with Acute DVT

Anticoagulant drugs: an update

Thromboembolic disorders continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in an increased need for anticoagulant therapy. In recent years, new anticoagulant drugs have been developed at a rapid pace, prompted by the recognition of many undesirable properties of currently used agents, and by a greater knowledge of the active enzymatic sites of clotting factors. Furthermore, the structure of a thrombus is better understood, so that newer drugs can inhibit thrombin or Factor Xa not only on the surface of a thrombus, as in the case of heparin, but also the fibrin-bound thrombin or Factor Xa within the thrombus. These agents are usually small molecules synthesized on the basis of their inhibition of specific active sites in the respective coagulation factors. They possess many improved characteristics, such as greater efficacy and safety, oral administration, reliable pharmacokinetics, less need for laboratory monitoring and minimal interactions with other drugs and diet. Prominent among these are lepuridin (Refludan, Pfizer), fondaparinux (Arixtra, Sanofi-Synthelabo) and ximelagatran (Exanta, Astra Zeneca). However, these new drugs are still far from fulfilling the desired objectives. Most of them possess some but not all of the needed properties. Furthermore, many do not have specific antidotes for immediate reversal of their pharmacologic actions, and all are much more costly than conventional agents. Development of newer agents with properties closer to that of the ideal drug remains a challenge.

Ximelagatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and the most frequently encountered cause of embolic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) have represented the cornerstone of anticoagulation practice for the last 60 years. Although highly effective in preventing thromboembolic events among patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin therapy is limited by a multitude of potential problems. Hence, warfarin is significantly underused in clinical practice, with only half of warfarin-treated patients actually achieving therapeutic anticoagulation in routine clinical practice. Consequently, there is an overwhelming need for an alternative oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation that is safer, more practical and effective. Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor that is rapidly converted to the active compound melagatran after oral absorption. It has a low potential for drug interactions, anticoagulation monitoring is not required, and it is administered at a fixed twice-daily dose. The Stroke Prevention using the ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in patients with nonvalvular atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V trials have together demonstrated the noninferiority of ximelagatran relative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and embolic events in atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, initial optimism has been tempered by serious concerns over its safety data in view of its propensity to cause elevation in liver enzymes.

Ximelagatran for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Recurrent Events in Deep Vein Thrombosis

The treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis of recurrent events with heparin/low molecular weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists is limited by several factors. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (ODTIs) showed a better pharmacological activity and might be an alternative in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. The Thrombin Inhibition in Venous Thromboembolism (THRIVE) program performed some studies developing the ODTI ximelagatran for this indication, and it is presented in the overview. The aim of the THRIVE I study was the dose finding, and that of the THRIVE IV study the applicability in hemodynamic stabile pulmonary embolism. A prospective, randomized, double blind trial was performed to compare oral ximelagatran with enoxaparin/warfarin for a 6-month treatment of acute venous thrombosis (THRIVE II and V). A second double blind study compared ximelagatran with placebo over 18 months after a 6-month anticoagulant therapy of acute deep vein thrombosis. The efficacy and safety of treatment of patients with acute deep venous thrombosis who received 2 ∞ 36 mg ximelagatran was not inferior to that of patients who received a conventional anticoagulant for prophylaxis of recurrent events over 6 months. Ximelagatran 2 ∞ 24 mg significantly reduced recurrent thromboembolic events compared to placebo without increasing the risk for hemorrhage. A reversible symptomless increase of alanine aminotransferase occurs in 6% to 9.6% of patients between months 2 and 4. The results of the follow-up studies suggest that thromboembolic events may recur in patients with acute venous thromboembolism after termination of treatment with both vitamin K antagonists and ximelagatran.

Ximelagatran: direct thrombin inhibitor

Warfarin sodium is an effective oral anticoagulant drug. However, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window with significant risks of hemorrhage at therapeutic concentrations. Dosing is difficult and requires frequent monitoring. New oral anticoagulant agents are required to improve current anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, while warfarin is effective in venous disease, it does not provide more than 60% risk reduction compared with placebo in venous thrombosis prophylaxis and considerably lower risk reduction in terms of arterial thrombosis. Ximelagatran is an oral pro-drug of melagatran, a synthetic small peptidomimetic with direct thrombin inhibitory actions and anticoagulant activity. As an oral agent, ximelagatran has a number of desirable properties including a rapid onset of action, fixed dosing, stable absorption, apparent low potential for medication interactions, and no requirement for monitoring of drug levels or dose adjustment. It has a short plasma elimination half-life of about 4 hours in cases of unexpected hemorrhage or need for reversal. Its main toxicity relates to the development of abnormal liver biochemistry and/or liver dysfunction with “long-term” use of the drug. This usually occurs within the first 6 months of commencing therapy, with a small percentage of patients developing jaundice. The biochemical abnormality usually resolves despite continuation of the drug. The cause of this toxicity remains unknown. Clinical studies to date have shown that ximelagatran is noninferior to warfarin in stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, noninferior to standard therapy as acute and extended therapy of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and superior to warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism post-major orthopedic surgery. It has also been shown to be more effective than aspirin alone for prevention of recurrent major cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly

Atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for stroke, particularly among elderly patients. Multiple trials have established that antithrombotic therapy decreases stroke risk. Aspirin is associated with a relative risk reduction of about 21% and adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0) is associated with a relative risk reduction of about 68%. Warfarin is more effective than aspirin but is used less often than indicated because of hemorrhagic risk and the inconvenience of coagulation monitoring. The oral direct thrombin ximelagatran has been investigated for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in two large clinical trials. The results suggest efficacy in a fixed dose compared with well controlled warfarin. Although anticoagulation intensity was not monitored or regulated during treatment with ximelagatran, it was associated with less bleeding than warfarin. Other antithrombotic agents are under development as alternatives to warfarin, but sufficient data are not yet available to justify their clinical use in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Review of the rebound phenomenon in new anticoagulant treatments

BACKGROUND

The launch of new anticoagulant treatments has sparked debate as to the optimal drug to use for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in major orthopaedic surgery, for the treatment of VTE, and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, taking into account both efficacy and tolerability. Newer drugs such as fondaparinux and ximelagatran have shown improvements in short-term efficacy or convenience, but such effects may be offset by reduced tolerability. They also raise the question of a possible delayed increase in thromboembolic events after these drugs are stopped, the so-called 'rebound effect'.

OBJECTIVE

To review pharmacological and clinical data describing the rebound effect associated with new and standard anticoagulant drugs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Computerized searches, covering the period 1960-2005 for the historical background and physiopathology review, and from 1999 to 2005 for the clinical trial analysis, were performed on BIOSIS, PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases. The terms 'rebound', 'anticoagulant', and 'heparin' were used. Only articles written in English were reviewed. Articles with drug interactions from other therapeutic classes or types of vascular surgery and commentary articles were excluded.

RESULTS

Available data in relation to a possible rebound phenomenon following cessation of active treatment are very limited. Results coming mainly from orthopaedic surgery trials suggest an increased rate of venous or arterial thromboembolic events with newer anticoagulants, compared with standard anticoagulant therapy. An increase in the rate of serious arterial adverse events has, for example, been observed in VTE patients treated with ximelagatran relative to those receiving warfarin/placebo (short-term exposure: 0.75% vs 0.26%, p < 0.05; long-term exposure: 1.70% vs 0.70%, p <or= 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Further clinical trials or meta-analyses are needed before we can determine whether the unexpected thromboembolic events found with newer anticoagulants can be linked to a rebound effect on treatment cessation.

A review of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran: not yet the end of the warfarin era

Ximelagatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor that offers numerous potential advantages compared with traditional anticoagulants. It is given orally, has a rapid onset of action, does not require laboratory monitoring, and is not associated with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Numerous phase III trials with ximelagatran focusing on deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis and treatment, stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, and secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction have been conducted. Results of these trials indicate that ximelagatran has similar efficacy and risk of bleeding compared with currently used anticoagulants. Accordingly, the potential of this agent to replace warfarin therapy for a variety of indications has been widely touted. Ximelagatran has already been approved in Europe for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery. However, an adverse effect of ximelagatran is liver enzyme elevation, which has been observed in 5% to 10% of patients with chronic administration of the drug. Although initially felt to be transient in nature, subsequent data presented to the Federal Drug Administration suggest a small but real risk of significant hepatotoxicity. These data led the advisory committee to the Federal Drug Administration to recommend against immediate approval of ximelagatran pending further information. The consistent results of completed trials with ximelagatran suggest that it has the potential to be used in many conditions that currently require treatment with warfarin and heparin products. The potential benefit that may be achieved by the replacement of these historically problematic narrow therapeutic index agents must be weighed against as yet undetermined long-term risks of hepatotoxicity.

Anticoagulant action of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, in umbilical cord and adult plasma: an in vitro examination

INTRODUCTION

This study was performed to compare the anticoagulant activity of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, in umbilical cord plasma with that in adult plasma. In contrast with the most frequently administered anticoagulants, the heparins, melagatran acts independently of antithrombin (AT). As a consequence, administration of melagatran is of special interest in neonates, who have physiologically low levels of AT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma samples were activated under high (as used in standard clotting assays) and low (more comparable with the physiological milieu) coagulant challenge. In the absence of melagatran, adult plasma clotted significantly faster than umbilical cord plasma under high coagulant challenge. Conversely, under low coagulant challenge, clotting of adult plasma was significantly delayed compared with umbilical cord plasma. For both high and low coagulant challenges, clotting times increased and prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) formation decreased with melagatran in a concentration-dependent fashion in umbilical cord and adult plasma. With increasing melagatran concentrations, the quotient between prothrombin fragment 1.2 and TAT formation increased in adult and umbilical cord plasma under both high and low coagulant challenges.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro results cannot be directly extrapolated to clinical efficacy, but assessing the degree of inhibition of thrombin generation may be a useful surrogate for selecting effective doses of ximelagatran for in vivo studies in neonates with thromboembolic complications.

Anticoagulant use in patients with chronic renal impairment

Patients with renal failure have an increased risk of both thrombotic and bleeding complications. A number of antithrombotic drugs undergo renal clearance. Therefore, estimation of renal function is necessary when prescribing these drugs to patients with renal dysfunction. Pharmacokinetic and clinical data in patients with chronic renal impairment are limited for several anticoagulants, and adequate administration information is often absent. Dose adjustment of anticoagulants may be indicated when the creatinine clearance falls below 30 mL/min. Unfractionated heparin, argatroban, and vitamin K antagonists generally do not require dose adjustment with renal dysfunction. However, smaller doses of warfarin may be required to achieve a particular target international normalized ratio. Close monitoring of anticoagulation is recommended when argatroban or high doses of unfractionated heparin are administered in patients with severe chronic renal impairment. Low-molecular weight heparins, danaparoid sodium, hirudins, and bivalirudin all undergo renal clearance. Lower doses and closer anticoagulation monitoring may be advisable when these agents are used in patients with chronic renal failure. We recommend that fondaparinux sodium and ximelagatran (not yet licensed) be avoided in the presence of severe renal impairment and be used with caution in patients with moderate renal dysfunction. While acknowledging the lack of pharmacokinetic data, this review provides specific recommendations for the use of anticoagulants in patients with chronic renal impairment.

Treatment of venous thromboembolism and long-term prevention of recurrence: present treatment options and ximelagatran

Despite the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, existing antithrombotic therapies are suboptimal. Unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin have practical limitations and carry the risk of treatment-related adverse events that restrict their clinical benefits and reduce cost-effectiveness. Efforts to achieve optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis by modifying the intensity of oral warfarin treatment have produced equivocal results, and there is a need for new, efficacious antithrombotic drugs providing predictable, well-tolerated oral dosing without the need for coagulation monitoring. Such agents would ideally have no significant food or drug interactions, and be suitable for both short- and long-term treatment. Ximelagatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has the potential to fulfill many of the unmet needs in the management of venous thromboembolism.

Administration of a small molecule tissue factor/factor VIIa inhibitor in a non-human primate thrombosis model of venous thrombosis: effects on thrombus formation and bleeding time

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the future may target inhibitors of specific procoagulant proteins. This study used a non-human primate model to test the effect of PHA-798, a specific inhibitor of the tissue factor/Factor VIIa complex (TF/VIIa), on venous thrombus formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PHA inhibits the TF/VIIa complex with an IC(50) of 13.5 nM (K(i) 9 nM) and is more than 2000-fold selective for the TF/VIIa complex with respect to IC(50)s for factor Xa and thrombin. In the model, a thrombogenic surface was introduced into the vena cava of a primate, and the amount of thrombus accumulated after 30 min was determined.

RESULTS

PHA-798 reduced thrombus formation on the thrombogenic surface in a dose-dependent manner (56+/-1.9% and 85+/-0.3% inhibition with 100 and 200 microg/kg/min PHA-798, respectively) indicating that the model is sensitive to TF/VIIa inhibition. Treatment with 1 mg/kg intravenous (IV) acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) resulted in only a slight (4-12%), non-significant inhibition of thrombus formation. However, the combination of 100 microg/kg/min PHA-798 and 1 mg/kg ASA resulted in an 89% inhibition of thrombus formation. Additionally, while ASA alone increased bleeding time (BT) from 3.3 min at baseline to 4.6 min following treatment, addition of PHA-798 (100 microg/kg/min) to ASA did not significantly increase the BT further (4.7 min).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that inhibition of TF/VIIa may be safe and effective for the prevention of the proprogation of venous thrombosis and that the combination of ASA and PHA may provide increased efficacy with little change in safety.

Effects of vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon on activated partial thromboplastin time measurement of direct thrombin inhibitors

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is currently the most common test used to measure the anticoagulation intensity of heparins and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). Vitamin K antagonists variably affect aPTT reagents. Interactions between heparin and DTIs occur during concurrent therapy. Three DTIs (lepirudin, argatroban, melagatran) and one unfractionated heparin (liquemin) were added to normal plasma (NP) samples (n = 23) and to vitamin K antagonist plasma (VKAP) samples (n = 23) of patients treated with phenprocoumon. Lepirudin and argatroban were added at concentrations from 300 to 3000 ng/ml, melagatran from 30 to 1000 ng/ml, and unfractionated heparin from 0.016 to 0.48 IU/ml. Wave parameters of clotting time and aPTT ratio curves were evaluated by multivariate analysis for inhibitors, aPTT reagents and NP and VKAP samples. Normal ranges resulting from NP samples were 34.5 +/- 1.0 s with Pathromtin SL and 33.9 +/- 0.8 s with Platelin LS. Normal ranges using VKAP were 52.8 +/- 2.6 s (Pathromtin SL) and 44.2 +/- 1.1 s (Platelin LS) (P < 0.0001). Variance analysis showed that inhibitors, plasmas (NP versus VKAP) and reagents influenced the wave characteristics of aPTT (s) (P < 0.0001) and aPTT ratios (P < 0.0001). Distinct statistical differences between aPTT reagents on one hand and normal versus vitamin K antagonist plasma on the other hand make a comparison of reported aPTT results difficult, especially during overlapping therapy with vitamin K antagonists.

Ximelagatran: Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics

Thromboembolism is the largest cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world, yet oral anticoagulation is currently available only with vitamin K antagonists--most often, warfarin. Warfarin has been used for treatment of thrombotic disease for about 50 years. However, despite its widespread use, it is associated with several limitations, such as varied patient response, a narrow therapeutic window, numerous drug and food interactions, and need for frequent therapeutic monitoring. In addition, its full anticoagulant effect usually takes at least 4-5 days after the start of therapy or any dosage change, and it has a slow offset of therapy. A new oral anticoagulant, ximelagatran, has considerable advantages compared with warfarin. The agent requires no therapeutic monitoring, has a wide therapeutic window, and is not known to interact with food or drugs. The advantages ximelagatran brings to clinical practice should be a welcome addition to the options for management of thrombotic disease.

Ximelagatran: a new antithrombotic option in atrial fibrillation

Treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation typically involve pharmacologic or interventional invasive therapies to suppress the rhythm, control ventricular contraction rates, or prevent thromboembolic complications. Current therapies used for rhythm conversion in atrial fibrillation may have undesirable risks or side effects that limit this approach. Lifelong anticoagulation may be necessary to prevent the formation of thrombus in the left atrial chamber that can travel into the cerebral circulation to cause a stroke. Currently, warfarin is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for this purpose. Unfortunately, many patients with atrial fibrillation may not receive warfarin because of the difficulties in dosing and maintaining desirable target goals. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran has several pharmacologic properties that provide a unique and potentially desirable treatment option. Clinical studies have demonstrated that ximelagatran, administered in twice-daily doses of 36 mg, is non-inferior to warfarin for thromboprophylaxis against stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. The pharmacology of ximelagatran and clinical trials with its use in atrial fibrillation is reviewed.

Ximelagatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), and to review available comparative clinical trial data evaluating its efficacy and safety relative to other antithrombotic agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases (1995-August 2004), supplemented by a manual search of article bibliographies, conference abstracts, and data on file from the manufacturer, was conducted. Key search terms were ximelagatran, melagatran, H376/95, and direct thrombin inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from available clinical trials, including study design, patient demographics, dosing regimens, anticoagulant comparators, methods for evaluating effectiveness, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ximelagatran is an orally administered DTI under development for use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), long-term prevention of a second VTE event, stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation, prevention of VTE after orthopedic procedures, and recurrent ischemic events after acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ximelagatran, in twice-daily doses of 24 or 36 mg, is an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins or warfarin in thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic knee replacement, atrial fibrillation, or initial treatment of VTE. Improved outcomes versus placebo were seen in the long-term prevention of VTE in patients who completed an initial 6 months of treatment. Liver-related effects need further clarification.

Thrombin inhibitor reduces myocardial infarction in apoE−/−× LDLR−/−mice

We have previously shown that atherosclerotic apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) x LDL receptor-deficient (LDLR(-/-)) mice develop myocardial infarction when exposed to hypoxic stress. This study was performed to assess the role of thrombin and thrombosis in this process. ApoE(-/-) x LDLR(-/-) mice were fed a cholesterol-rich diet for 8 mo and were then subjected to hypoxic stress while receiving isoflurane anesthesia. One group received a bolus dose (5.6 micromol/kg) of the thrombin inhibitor melagatran, and control animals received PBS 10 min before the hypoxic stress. The mice were exposed to 10 min of hypoxia followed by normoxia. Ten minutes after the stress, Alzet pumps delivering melagatran (20 nmol x kg x (-1)min(-1)) or PBS were implanted, and the mice were allowed to recover for 48 h. The cardiac response was analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and serum troponin T assay. All animals showed reversible ECG changes as a sign of ischemia during hypoxic stress, and 50% developed infarctions afterward as judged by troponin T levels. The group that received thrombin inhibitor had significantly lower troponin T and smaller myocardial infarctions than the PBS-treated group. These data show that thrombin generation is an important pathogenetic factor and suggest that coronary thrombosis is involved in myocardial infarction in atherosclerotic mice. Exposure of atherosclerotic mice to hypoxia leads to myocardial infarction through a two-phase pathway in which acute transient ischemia is followed by thrombin-dependent, irreversible, myocardial ischemia and myocardial cell death.

Design of Novel and Selective Inhibitors of Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator with Improved Pharmacokinetic Properties for Use as Antimetastatic Agents

The serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) interacts with a specific receptor (uPAR) on the surface of various cell types, including tumor cells, and plays a crucial role in pericellular proteolysis. High levels of uPA and uPAR often correlate with poor prognosis of cancer patients. Therefore, the specific inhibition of uPA with small molecule active-site inhibitors is one strategy to decrease the invasive and metastatic activity of tumor cells. We have developed a series of highly potent and selective uPA inhibitors with a C-terminal 4-amidinobenzylamide residue. Optimization was directed toward reducing the fast elimination from circulation that was observed with initial analogues. The x-ray structures of three inhibitor/uPA complexes have been solved and were used to improve the inhibition efficacy. One of the most potent and selective derivatives, benzylsulfonyl-D-Ser-Ser-4-amidinobenzylamide (inhibitor 26), inhibits uPA with a Ki of 20 nm. This inhibitor was used in a fibrosarcoma model in nude mice using lacZ-tagged human HT1080 cells, to prevent experimental lung metastasis formation. Compared with control (100%), an inhibitor dose of 2 x 1.5 mg/kg/day reduced the number of experimental metastases to 4.6 +/- 1%. Under these conditions inhibitor 26 also significantly prolonged survival. All mice from the control group died within 43 days after tumor cell inoculation, whereas 50% of mice from the inhibitor-treated group survived more than 117 days. This study demonstrates that the specific inhibition of uPA by these inhibitors may be a useful strategy for the treatment of cancer to prevent metastasis.

Combined effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition but not thrombin generation inhibition

The aim of our study was to investigate the combined in vitro effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation and thrombin generation under low and high coagulant challenge in tissue-factor-activated, platelet-rich plasma. Increasing amounts of melagatran dose-dependently decreased prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values, and dose-dependently prolonged the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation. Eptifibatide exerted a dose-dependent anti-aggregating effect under both high and low coagulant challenge. The combination of melagatran and eptifibatide resulted in significant additive prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation, which was more pronounced under low coagulant challenge. Under low, but not under high, coagulant challenge, the combination of melagatran and eptifibatide had a significant additive inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation. No additive effects on decreasing prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values were observed with combined administration of the drugs. The present study demonstrates the additive effect of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition and on prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation.

Ximelagatran: a new oral anticoagulant

Vitamin K antagonists are effective oral anticoagulants, but they have limitations related to a narrow therapeutic range, food and drug interactions, slow onset of action and the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Ximelagatran is a promising new oral anticoagulant under investigation in advanced clinical trials. It is a prodrug that is converted after oral administration to melagatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, with a peak effect after 2 hours and a half-life of approximately 3 hours with primarily renal excretion. Administration results in prolongation of coagulation tests, but routine monitoring is not required because of reliable absorption and predictable effects. A large clinical trials program has demonstrated effectiveness in prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following major orthopedic surgery, treatment of symptomatic DVT, prevention of embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, and prophylaxis of recurrent events after acute myocardial infarction. Bleeding complications have been similar to those with standard therapy, with no unexpected adverse effects except for elevation of serum transaminase levels in over 6% of patients beginning after 1 month of therapy. Ximelagatran may be an alternative oral anticoagulant for patients currently taking vitamin K antagonists.

No influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is a new class of anticoagulant currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form melagatran.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ximelagatran.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonblinded, nonrandomised study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve volunteers with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or B) and 12 age-, weight-, and sex-matched control volunteers with normal hepatic function.

METHODS

Volunteers received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Plasma and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses.

RESULTS

The absorption and bioconversion of ximelagatran to melagatran were rapid in both groups. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran (Cmax) was achieved 2-3 hours after administration; the mean elimination half-life (t1/2z) was 3.6 hours for hepatically impaired volunteers and 3.1 hours for the control volunteers. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax of melagatran in volunteers with hepatic impairment were 11 and 25% lower than in control volunteers, respectively. However, after correcting for the higher renal function (i.e. higher calculated creatinine clearance) in the hepatically impaired volunteers, the ratio of melagatran AUC for hepatically impaired/control volunteers was 0.98 (90% CI 0.80, 1.22), suggesting that mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran. Melagatran was the predominant compound in urine, accounting for 13-14% of the ximelagatran dose. Renal clearance of melagatran was 13% higher in hepatically impaired than in control volunteers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the concentration-response relationship between plasma melagatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Baseline prothrombin time (PT) was slightly longer in the hepatically impaired patients than in the control volunteers, probably reflecting a slight decrease in the activity of coagulation factors. However, when concentrations of melagatran were at their peak, the increase in PT from baseline values was the same in both groups. Capillary bleeding time was measured in the hepatically impaired patients only, and was not increased by ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran between the hepatically impaired and control volunteers. These findings suggest that dose adjustment for patients with mild-to-moderate impairment of hepatic function is not necessary.

Influence of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral ximelagatran and subcutaneous melagatran

BACKGROUND

Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development as an anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form, melagatran.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran following administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a nonblinded randomised crossover study with 2 study days, separated by a washout period of 1-3 weeks. Twelve volunteers with severe renal impairment and 12 controls with normal renal function were included, with median (range) glomerular filtration rates (GFR) of 13 (5-24) and 86 (70-105) mL/min, respectively. All volunteers received, in a randomised sequence, a 3mg subcutaneous injection of melagatran and a 24mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran. Blood samples were collected up to 12 and 14 hours after administration of the subcutaneous and oral doses, respectively, for determination of melagatran plasma concentrations and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measurement of coagulation time. Urine was collected for 24 hours after each dose for determination of melagatran concentration.

RESULTS

For the volunteers with severe renal impairment, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life of melagatran were significantly higher than in the control group with normal renal function. Least-squares mean estimates of the ratios of the mean AUC for volunteers with severe renal impairment and controls (95% confidence intervals) were 4.03 (3.29-4.93) after subcutaneous melagatran and 5.33 (3.76-7.56) after oral ximelagatran. This result was related to the decreased renal clearance (CL(R)) of melagatran, which was linearly correlated with GFR. In the severe renal impairment and control groups, respectively, the mean CL(R) of melagatran was 12.5 and 81.3 mL/min after subcutaneous administration of melagatran and 14.3 and 107 mL/min after oral administration of ximelagatran. There was a nonlinear relationship between the APTT ratio (postdose/predose APTT value) and melagatran plasma concentration. A statistically significant higher slope of the concentration-effect relationship, described by linear regression of the APTT ratio versus the square root of melagatran plasma concentrations, was estimated for the group with severe renal impairment compared to the control group; however, the increase in slope was minor and the estimated differences in APTT ratio between the groups in the studied concentration range was less than 10% and not considered clincially relevant. Ximelagatran and melagatran were well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran, subjects with severe renal impairment had significantly higher melagatran exposure and longer half-life because of lower CL(R) of melagatran compared with the control group with normal renal function, suggesting that a decrease in dose and/or an increase in the administration interval in patients with severe renal impairment would be appropriate.

Ximelagatran/Melagatran

Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time. The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

Pharmacokinetics of melagatran and the effect on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran: a population model analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran, its active form. The objective of this population analysis was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of melagatran and its effect on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measure of coagulation time, in orthopaedic surgery patients sequentially receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran as prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. To support the design of a pivotal dose-finding study, the impact of individualised dosage based on bodyweight and calculated creatinine clearance was examined.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Pooled data obtained in three small dose-guiding studies were analysed. The patients received twice-daily administration, with either subcutaneous melagatran alone or a sequential regimen of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran, for 8-11 days starting just before initiation of surgery. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to evaluate rich data of melagatran pharmacokinetics (3326 observations) and the pharmacodynamic effect on APTT (2319 observations) in samples from 216 patients collected in the three dose-guiding trials. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models were validated using sparse data collected in a subgroup of 319 patients enrolled in the pivotal dose-finding trial. The impact of individualised dosage on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability was evaluated by simulations of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of melagatran were well described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption after both subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran. Melagatran clearance was correlated with renal function, assessed as calculated creatinine clearance. The median population clearance (creatinine clearance 70 mL/min) was 5.3 and 22.9 L/h for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The bioavailability of melagatran after oral ximelagatran relative to subcutaneous melagatran was 23%. The volume of distribution was influenced by bodyweight. For a patient with a bodyweight of 75kg, the median population estimates were 15.5 and 159L for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The relationship between APTT and melagatran plasma concentration was well described by a power function, with a steeper slope during and early after surgery but no influence by any covariates. Simulations demonstrated that individualised dosage based on creatinine clearance or bodyweight had no clinically relevant impact on the variability in melagatran pharmacokinetics or on the effect on APTT.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively low impact of individualised dosage on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of melagatran supported the use of a fixed-dose regimen in the studied population of orthopaedic surgery patients, including those with mild to moderate renal impairment.

Ximelagatran

Although there have been many significant advances over the last 50 years with regards to anticoagulant therapy, warfarin remains the definitive standard for the long-term prevention of thromboembolic events in many patients at risk for these complications. Although effective, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating frequent laboratory monitoring for anticoagulant effect. Ximelagatran is an investigational anticoagulant that directly inhibits thrombin, unlike heparin or warfarin, which are indirect inhibitors. Although indirect thrombin inhibitors are mainly only effective at inhibiting circulating thrombin, direct thrombin inhibitors are able to inhibit both free and clot-bound thrombin, thereby producing more effective anticoagulation. Ximelagatran is the first orally available direct thrombin inhibitor to reach phase 3 clinical trials. Ximelagatran is a prodrug for the active metabolite melagatran, and has been demonstrated to have a relatively wide therapeutic window in terms of bleeding and antithrombotic effect compared with warfarin. Clinical studies have demonstrated ximelagatran to be comparable in efficacy to warfarin and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, comparable to warfarin for stroke prevention in the setting of atrial fibrillation, and, when combined with aspirin, possible more effective than aspirin alone at preventing major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction. Adverse effects with ximelagatran primarily involve bleeding complications, which are more frequent than with placebo, but appear comparable to those occurring with standard anticoagulant treatment (ie, warfarin and LMWH). Ximelagatran has also been demonstrated to cause transient increases in liver enzymes, the significance of which will need to be addressed in ongoing phase 3 studies. Should ongoing trials prove ximelagatran to have at least similar therapeutic efficacy and safety as warfarin, ximelagatran may become a first-line anticoagulant due to its ease of administration and lack of a need for drug monitoring. The results of these trials are eagerly awaited in helping to defining the place in therapy for this promising new agent.

Les nouveaux anticoagulants dans la maladie thromboembolique veineuse

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis is founded on the association of low molecular heparins and oral anticoagulants for 3-6 months. In spite of their uncontested efficacy, these therapeutics bring an hemorrhagic risk and the need of regular laboratory controls for the whole duration of the treatment. The clinical need to extend the indications of anticoagulants have made necessary the development of new antithrombotic treatments.

NEW FEATURES

Two new molecules, fondaparinux and ximelagatran, have been recently developed and are, at present, in very advanced phase of clinical research. Already published phase III studies on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis show the efficacy of these new molecules towards this indication. The results of phase III study in patients with acute VTE have not been published yet.

PROJECTS AND PERSPECTIVES

The new anticoagulant molecules fondaparinux and ximelagatran could open the way to new therapeutic possibilities that could simplify the managing of patients under anticoagulant treatment.

Pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant effect of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran following subcutaneous administration to healthy young men

The pharmacokinetic dose linearity and reproducibility, the effects on ex-vivo coagulation time assays and bleeding time, and tolerability of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran following subcutaneous (s.c.) dosing were investigated in two open-label studies in healthy males: (i). a dose-escalation study in which subjects received single s.c. doses of melagatran (0.1-5 mg); and (ii). a repeated-dosing study in which 3 mg s.c. melagatran was administered at 12-h intervals for 4 days. In both studies, melagatran was rapidly absorbed with maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) observed about 0.5 h post dosing. The half-life of melagatran was about 2 h. The area under the melagatran plasma concentration versus time curve increased linearly with dose. No time dependency in the area under the curve or Cmax was observed over 4 days of twice-daily dosing. The variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was low and the bioavailability of melagatran appeared to be complete. There was a steep and linear prolongation of thrombin time, a non-linear prolongation of both activated partial thromboplastin time and activated coagulation time, and a decrease in prothrombin complex activity with increasing melagatran plasma concentration. Only moderate increases in capillary bleeding time were observed with s.c. doses up to 5 mg melagatran. Melagatran was well tolerated after s.c. injection, with good local tolerability at the injection site.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors in clinical development

Thrombin has long been a target for development of oral anticoagulants but it has been difficult to find synthetic inhibitors with a desirable combination of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. However, there are now two oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in clinical development, ximelagatran (ExantaTM) and BIBR 1048. Both are prodrugs with two protecting groups that are eliminated after absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Their main active substances, melagatran and BIBR 953, are both potent and selective DTIs. In experimental models of thrombosis, melagatran has been shown to have a shallower dose-response curve than warfarin and, therefore, a better separation between efficacy and bleeding. Oral bioavailability, measured as the plasma concentration of the active metabolite, seems to be higher for ximelagatran (20%) than for BIBR 1048 (estimated to 5%). BIBR 953 has a longer half-life (about 12 h) than does melagatran (3-5 h) after oral administration of BIBR 1048 and ximelagatran, respectively. Both melagatran and BIBR 953 are mainly eliminated via the renal route. The variability of the plasma concentration of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran is low. There are no clinically relevant interactions with food or cytochrome P450 metabolized drugs and ximelagatran. In clinical studies, ximelagatran has been administered in a twice-daily fixed-dose regimen without coagulation monitoring. Results of published clinical studies are encouraging, both with regard to efficacy and bleeding. Major indications in Phase III studies with ximelagatran are the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hip and knee replacement surgery, treatment and long-term secondary prevention of VTE and prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is anticipated that with a favourable outcome of the Phase III clinical studies new oral DTIs, with the oral fixed-dose regimen without routine coagulation monitoring, will ease the use of today's anticoagulant therapy.

Three vehicle formulations for melagatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, evaluated in a vena cava thrombosis model in the rat

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of a depot formulation would enhance the antithrombotic effect of the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a rat venous thrombosis model, animals were openly randomized to receive subcutaneously (s.c.) either vehicle (saline, cyclodextrin or poloxamer) or melagatran (0.5 microM/kg) dissolved in vehicle. An additional injection of cyclodextrin or poloxamer was given at another site to investigate whether the vehicle itself had any additional effect. All injections were given 30 min before induction of thrombus formation. Thrombus formation was induced by ferric chloride, together with stenosis of the caval vein, during a short period of inhalation anaesthesia. Five hours later the thrombi were harvested and their wet weight determined. Thrombus size was comparable across the vehicle-only groups. The antithrombotic effects of melagatran in saline or poloxamer were comparable while melagatran in cyclodextrin was less effective. The effects of melagatran in saline, cyclodextrin or poloxamer were not enhanced by additional cyclodextrin or poloxamer. Thrombin time (TT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at the end of the experiment were prolonged to a greater extent in the groups receiving melagatran in cyclodextrin or poloxamer compared with those receiving melagatran in saline.

CONCLUSION

In this vena cava thrombosis model, no enhanced antithrombotic effect was observed with melagatran given as a s.c. depot formulation in cyclodextrin or poloxamer compared with that in saline.

Current anticoagulant therapy--unmet clinical needs

Heparin and the vitamin K antagonist warfarin have been in clinical use for more than 50 years. However, both are associated with several well-documented drawbacks that limit their use. Warfarin can be administered orally, making it the agent of choice for long-term management of thromboembolic conditions, but frequent coagulation monitoring is necessary because of its unpredictable anticoagulant effect--the result, in part, of food and drug interactions-and its narrow therapeutic window. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be administered parenterally only. Coagulation monitoring is also required with heparin although not with LMWH, due to reduced levels of plasma protein binding. In the last 10 years, in the quest to develop new agents that are at least as effective as those currently available, with improved safety and greater ease of use, anticoagulants that target almost every step in the coagulation pathway have been developed. These include inhibitors of the factor VIIa (FVIIa)/tissue factor complex, FIXa inhibitors, direct and antithrombin-dependent FXa inhibitors, agents that enhance the protein C anticoagulant pathway, and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that inhibit the activity of thrombin. Of the new agents, three DTIs-hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban-and the synthetic pentasaccharide (Arixtra) are approved for clinical use. Three other new agents-activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and the oral DTI ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca)-have been evaluated in Phase III studies. The mechanism of action and properties of these new anticoagulants and their potential to replace those in current use will be reviewed here.

Medical indications and considerations for future clinical decision making

There are many well-known drawbacks associated with the currently used antithrombotic agents, warfarin, heparin, and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Because heparins can be administered only parenterally, their application is limited. Though warfarin can be administered orally, its unpredictable anticoagulant effect means that it must be regularly monitored. Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) that is rapidly converted to its active form, melagatran, upon administration. The antithrombotic effects of melagatran have been demonstrated. Following the oral administration of ximelagatran, melagatran has stable and reproducible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that enable ximelagatran to be administered orally, twice daily, according to a fixed-dose regimen, with no need for routine coagulation monitoring. In view of its favourable profile, a clinical trial programme has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ximelagatran compared with standard therapies, for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with previous acute coronary syndromes. These studies show that oral ximelagatran is well tolerated at doses of up to 60 mg, twice daily (bid), and that it is as effective as standard therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, for the treatment of clinically verified acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a moderate to high risk of stroke. The protocols and results of some of these studies--and a study that investigates the use of ximelagatran in combination with aspirin for the management of acute coronary artery disease--are described in this paper.

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran and its active metabolite melagatran: a mini-review

Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) that is rapidly converted to melagatran, its active form, following absorption. Melagatran has been shown to be a potent, rapidly binding, competitive inhibitor of human alpha-thrombin that inhibits both thrombin activity and generation. Melagatran also effectively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin. Melagatran has a wide therapeutic interval that enables it to be administered safely across a wide range of doses with no increased risk of bleeding, in contrast with warfarin whose narrow therapeutic window necessitates monitoring of its pharmacodynamic effect. Although melagatran has all the pharmacodynamic properties required of a new antithrombotic agent, low oral bioavailability that is even further reduced by the concomitant intake of food precludes its development as an oral agent. It was this that propelled the development of its prodrug, ximelagatran, which is 170 times more lipophilic than melagatran and uncharged at intestinal pH. Ximelagatran is therefore much better than melagatran at penetrating the gastrointestinal barrier and, as a consequence, has sufficient bioavailability (20%) for oral administration. Moreover, its pharmacokinetic properties following oral administration are stable and reproducible, with no food interactions and a low potential for drug-drug interactions. These properties allow ximelagatran to be administered twice daily according to a fixed dose regimen without coagulation monitoring. As a consequence of its favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, ximelagatran is currently undergoing full-scale clinical development for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an open-label, randomised, 3 x 3 crossover study with 4 study days, separated by washout periods of 7 days.

SUBJECTS

Subjects comprised 6 healthy young men (aged 20-27 years) and 12 healthy older men and women (aged 56-70 years).

METHODS

All subjects received a 2mg intravenous infusion of melagatran over 10 minutes followed, in randomised sequence, by a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran with breakfast, a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran while fasting, and a 7.5 mg subcutaneous injection of ximelagatran. The primary variables were the plasma concentration of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin.

RESULTS

After oral and subcutaneous administration, ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and biotransformed to melagatran, its active form and the dominant compound in plasma. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in young and older subjects after both oral and subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran clearance of melagatran was correlated with renal function, resulting in about 40% (after intravenous melagatran) to 60% (after oral and subcutaneous ximelagatran) higher melagatran exposure in the older than in the young subjects. Renal clearance of melagatran, was 7.7 L/h and 4.9 L/h in the younger and older subjects, respectively. The interindividual variability inn the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve was low following all regimens (coefficient variation 12-25%). The mean bioavailability of melagatran in young and older subjects was approximately 18 and 12% , respectively, following oral administration of ximalagratan, and 38 and 45%, respectively, following subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was unaffected by whether subjects were fed or fasting, although the plasma concentration of melagatran peaked about 1 hour later under fed than fasting conditions, due to gastric emptying of the immediate-release tablet formulation used. The APTT as prolonged with increasing melagatran plasma concentration-effect relationship was independent of age.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no age-dependent differences in the absorption and biotransformation of ximelagatran, and the observed differences in exposure to melagatran can be explained by differences in renal function between the young and older subjects.

Characterization of in vitro biotransformation of new, orally active, direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, an amidoxime and ester prodrug

N-Hydroxylated amidines (amidoximes) can be used as prodrugs of amidines. The prodrug principle was developed in our laboratory for pentamidine and had been applied to several other drug candidates. One of these compounds is melagatran, a novel, synthetic, low molecular weight, direct thrombin inhibitor. To increase the poor oral bioavailability due to its strong basic amidine functionality selected to fit the arginine side pocket of thrombin, the less basic N-hydroxylated amidine was used in addition to an ethyl ester-protecting residue. The objective of this investigation was to study the reduction and the hydrolytic metabolism of ximelagatran via two mono-prodrugs (N-hydroxy-melagatran and ethyl-melagatran) to melagatran by in vitro experiments. New high-performance liquid chromatography methods were developed to analyze all four compounds. The biotransformation of ximelagatran to melagatran involving the reduction of the amidoxime function and the ester cleavage could be demonstrated in vitro by microsomes and mitochondria from liver and kidney of pig and human, and the kinetic parameters were determined. So far, one enzyme system capable of reducing N-hydroxylated structures has been identified in pig liver microsomes, consisting of cytochrome b(5), NADH-cytochrome b(5) reductase, and a P450 isoenzyme of the subfamily 2D. This enzyme system also reduces ximelagatran and N-hydroxy-melagatran. The participation of recombinant human CYP1A2, 2A6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 with cytochrome b(5) and b(5) reductase in the reduction can be excluded. In summary, ximelagatran and N-hydroxy-melagatran are easily reduced by several enzyme systems located in microsomes and mitochondria of different organs.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

This review deals with a newly-developed category of antithrombotic drugs - the direct thrombin inhibitors. These agents interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on fibrinogen, platelets and other substrates. Heparin and its derivatives (low molecular weight heparins and the active pentasaccharide) inhibit thrombin and/or other coagulation serine proteases indirectly via antithrombin, and the warfarin-type drugs interfere with the synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. The direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in the advanced clinical testing stage (melagatran/ximelagatran), are the subject of this review. The chemical structure; kinetics of thrombin inhibition; pharmacokinetics and clinical use of each of these is discussed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in young healthy male subjects

OBJECTIVES

Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor designed to overcome the low and variable oral absorption of melagatran, its active form. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran following single and repeated oral administration were investigated. The primary objectives were to determine the dose linearity and reproducibility of melagatran exposure and the influence of food intake.

METHODS

Two open-label studies were performed in healthy male subjects. Study I was a dose-escalation study, in which subjects received single oral doses of ximelagatran (1-98 mg). Study II was a randomised, two-way crossover study consisting of two 5-day treatment periods, in which subjects received a 20-mg oral dose of ximelagatran twice daily, either before breakfast and with dinner, or with breakfast and after dinner.

RESULTS

Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and converted to melagatran, which was the predominant compound in plasma. The mean (+/- standard deviation) bioavailability of melagatran was 22.2+/-4.3% and 17.4+/-2.8% after single and repeated dosings, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran and the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased linearly with dose. Inter- and intra-subject variability in melagatran AUC was 8% and 12%, respectively, with no relevant food- or time dependence. Anticoagulation, assessed as activated partial thromboplastin time, was correlated with melagatran plasma concentration. There was virtually no increase in capillary bleeding time over the dose range studied, and ximelagatran was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

After oral administration of ximelagatran to healthy male subjects, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of melagatran is predictable and reproducible.

Melagatran attenuates fibrin and platelet deposition in a porcine coronary artery over-stretch injury model

Melagatran is the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different doses of melagatran with heparin or placebo on platelet deposition and relative fibrin content after coronary angioplasty in pigs. After 125I-labelled fibrinogen and autologous 111Indium-labelled platelets had been infused a balloon injury was performed in the left anterior descending and the right coronary arteries. Pigs were randomized to receive either heparin 200 IU/kg bolus plus 20 IU/kg per h infusion (n = 7); melagatran 1 mg/kg bolus plus 0.33 mg/kg per h infusion (n = 7); melagatran bolus 0.5 mg/kg plus 0.17 mg/kg per h infusion (n = 7); melagatran 0.15 mg/kg bolus plus 0.05 mg/kg per h infusion (n = 6) or saline (n = 4). Seventy-five minutes after the angioplasty, the pigs were euthanized and the injured vessel segments were measured in a gamma counter. Compared with placebo, platelet deposition and relative fibrin content were reduced after both heparin and melagatran, in the latter case with a dose-response relationship. Melagatran reduced platelet deposition and relative thrombus size in a dose-dependent manner when compared with placebo after coronary angioplasty in pigs. No statistically significant difference between melagatran and heparin was found.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in rats, dogs, and humans

The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, and its active form, melagatran, were separately investigated in rats, dogs, and healthy male human subjects after administration of oral and intravenous (i.v.) single doses. Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and metabolized following oral administration, with melagatran as the predominant compound in plasma. Two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and OH-melagatran) that were subsequently metabolized to melagatran were also identified in plasma and were rapidly eliminated. Melagatran given i.v. had relatively low plasma clearance, small volume of distribution, and short elimination half-life. The oral absorption of melagatran was low and highly variable. It was primarily renally cleared, and the renal clearance agreed well with the glomerular filtration rate. Ximelagatran was extensively metabolized, and only trace amounts were renally excreted. Melagatran was the major compound in urine and feces after administration of ximelagatran. Appreciable quantities of ethyl-melagatran were also recovered in rat, dog, and human feces after oral administration, suggesting reduction of the hydroxyamidine group of ximelagatran in the gastrointestinal tract, as demonstrated when ximelagatran was incubated with feces homogenate. Polar metabolites in urine and feces (all species) accounted for a relatively small fraction of the dose. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was 5 to 10% in rats, 10 to 50% in dogs, and about 20% in humans, with low between-subject variation. The fraction of ximelagatran absorbed was at least 40 to 70% in all species. First-pass metabolism of ximelagatran with subsequent biliary excretion of the formed metabolites account for the lower bioavailability of melagatran.

A randomized, controlled, dose-guiding study of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with standard therapy for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis: THRIVE I

This randomized, controlled, multicentre study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, compared with a low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) followed by warfarin, in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity. Patients with acute DVT received oral ximelagatran (24, 36, 48 or 60 mg twice daily) or dalteparin and warfarin for 2 weeks. Evaluation of paired venograms from 295 of 350 patients showed regression of the thrombus in 69% of patients treated with ximelagatran and 69% of patients treated with dalteparin and warfarin. Progression was observed in 8% and 3% of patients, respectively. Changes in thrombus size according to the Marder score were similar in all groups. Treatment discontinuation due to bleeding occurred in two patients receiving ximelagatran (24- and 36-mg groups) and in two patients receiving dalteparin and warfarin. Reduction in pain, edema and circumference of the affected leg was similar in all groups. Oral ximelagatran appears to be a promising alternative to current anticoagulant therapy to limit the progression of acute DVT, and it seems to possess a wide therapeutic window.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical effects of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in acute treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor that is currently being investigated for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, in patients with both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open-label study, 12 patients received a fixed dose of 48 mg oral ximelagatran twice daily for 6-9 days. Plasma samples were collected for determination of melagatran concentrations and scintigraphic changes and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Peak plasma concentrations of melagatran were attained approximately 2 h after administration of ximelagatran. Melagatran plasma concentration profiles were similar on Days 1, 2, and 6-9. Plasma activated partial thromboplastin time increased following administration of ximelagatran and reached a peak that was approximately twofold higher than the predose activated partial thromboplastin time and correlated with melagatran plasma concentrations (R(2) = 0.69). All but one patient (with malignancy) showed regressed or unchanged lung scintigraphic findings, and six of these demonstrated no, or only minor, perfusion defects at central evaluation after 6-9 days of ximelagatran treatment. Clinical symptoms, including chest pain, dyspnoea, cough, and oedema, and pain in the affected leg, were improved. Ximelagatran was well tolerated with no deaths or severe bleeding events reported during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a fixed dose of oral ximelagatran, used without routine coagulation monitoring, showed reproducible pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with a rapid onset of action and promising clinical results in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Effects of ximelagatran, the oral form of melagatran, in the treatment of caval vein thrombosis in conscious rats

The antithrombotic effects of direct (ximelagatran and hirudin) and indirect (dalteparin) anticoagulants were compared using a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treatment model in conscious rats. Thrombus formation was induced in the inferior caval vein by total stasis plus topically applied ferric chloride. After 1-h thrombus maturation, one group of 10 rats were sacrificed and the mean thrombus weight in this group was 27.3 +/- 2.7 mg. This thrombus weight was handled as a reference to which all other results were compared. In all other groups, the total occlusion was removed after 1 h but a partial stasis was retained, permitting some blood flow around the thrombus. Groups of animals received subcutaneous (s.c.) dalteparin (200 IU/kg), s.c. hirudin (0.75 micromol/kg), one of four oral doses of ximelagatran (2.5, 5, 10 or 20 micromol/kg) or s.c. saline (control). After the 3-h treatment, mean thrombus weight in the saline group (26.5 +/- 3.3 mg) did not differ significantly from that of the reference group (27.3 +/- 2.7 mg, see above). Ximelagatran decreased thrombus weight in a dose-dependent manner, with an estimated ID(50) of 15 micromol/kg. Mean thrombus weight with the highest ximelagatran dose (11.1 +/- 1.3 mg) was similar to that with hirudin (13.0 +/- 1.5 mg). The effect of dalteparin on thrombus regression was much less pronounced (20.2 +/- 1.2 mg), compared with ximelagatran and hirudin, even though it was administered at a dose that yielded a similar activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) prolongation. In conclusion, the results from this DVT treatment model showed that direct thrombin inhibitors ximelagatran and hirudin exhibited superior antithrombotic properties to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).

New Oral Anticoagulants

The risk of bleeding, narrow therapeutic index, and need for routine monitoring make oral anticoagulation with warfarin a less than ideal oral anticoagulant. Intravenous therapies such as heparin are not orally bioavailable and have a narrow therapeutic index and high risk of bleeding. New oral antico agulants currently under investigation may have more ideal characteristics for long-term administration. The mechanism of thrombogenesis, limitations of current therapy, and new investigational oral anticoagulants are discussed.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on a wide range of substrates. Their action is in contrast to heparin and its derivatives, which inhibit thrombin and other coagulation serine proteases via antithrombin, and to the warfarin-type drugs that interfere with synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. There are three direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in advanced clinical testing (melagatran/ximelagatran). The chemical structure, kinetics of thrombin inhibition, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of each of these agents are discussed.