Ropeginterferon versus Standard Therapy for Low-Risk Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Pegylated interferon: the who, why, and how

Interferon alpha (IFN-α) is a fascinating molecule with many biological properties yet to be fully understood. Among these properties, several have demonstrated usefulness for targeting malignant cells, including hematopoietic cells from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Indeed, IFN-α has been used for decades across all myeloproliferative neoplasms, but only recently a new form, ropegIFN-α2b, was approved to treat patients with polycythemia vera. Many phase 2 and more recently phase 3 studies have demonstrated IFN-α's promise in treating patients with essential thrombocythemia and early-stage myelofibrosis. In addition, although not approved in that situation, IFN-α is the only cytoreductive therapy that can be used during pregnancy. Today, IFN-α is a key medicine for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia, while its place in the management of myelofibrosis must be better defined. The advantages of IFN therapy include a well-known safety profile, high rates of clinical and molecular responses, and a unique ability to deeply reduce the mutant allele burden of most of the driver mutations causing myeloproliferative neoplasms. Recent preliminary data from prospective studies suggest that molecular responses may be correlated with prolonged event-free survival, raising the hope that IFN therapy may ultimately alter the natural history of many diseases.

Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio identifies low-risk polycythaemia vera patients for early Ropeginterferon alfa-2b therapy

We investigated the effect of Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) versus phlebotomy-only (Phl-O) on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in 126 patients randomized in the low-polycythaemia vera (PV) phase II trial. Patients with a baseline NLR ≥3.5 vs. <3.5 had a longer history of PV, were more likely to have splenomegaly, higher JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) (56% vs. 20% p = 0.001) and more proliferative disease. Ropeg was superior to Phl-O in reducing NLR (p = 0.008), and the reduction was strongly influenced by the reduction in neutrophils and less by a change in lymphocytes (-59% and -14% respectively). This effect was associated with the achievement of the low-PV primary end-point (p = 0.021), symptom reduction and reduction in JAK2 VAF. Interestingly, the reduction in JAK2 VAF from baseline was linearly associated with the reduction in NLR. Patients who failed Phl-O at 12 months had characteristics that distinguished them from responders, including very high NLR and resistance to cross-over to 100 μg Ropeg every 2 weeks suggesting higher escalated doses of Ropeg. In conclusion, the study provides evidence that NLR can serve as a valuable biomarker to assess and guide treatment with Ropeg in the early stage of low-risk PV patients.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera: A Review

Importance

Polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased red blood cell mass and increased risk of thrombosis, affects approximately 65 000 people in the US, with an annual incidence of 0.5 to 4.0 cases per 100 000 persons.

Observations

Erythrocytosis (hemoglobin >16.5 mg/dL in men or >16.0 mg/dL in women) is a required diagnostic criterion, although thrombocytosis (53%) and leukocytosis (49%) are common. Patients may have pruritus (33%), erythromelalgia (5.3%), transient visual changes (14%), and splenomegaly (36%) with abdominal discomfort. More than 95% of patients have a JAK2 gene variant, which helps distinguish PV from secondary causes of erythrocytosis, such as tobacco smoking or sleep apnea. Among 7 cohorts (1545 individuals), the median survival from diagnosis was 14.1 to 27.6 years. Prior to or at the time of PV diagnosis, arterial thrombosis occurred in 16% of patients and 7% had venous thrombotic events, which could involve unusual sites, such as splanchnic veins. PV is also associated with an increased bleeding risk, especially in patients with acquired von Willebrand disease, which can occur with extreme thrombocytosis (platelet count, ≥1000 × 109/L). All patients with PV should receive therapeutic phlebotomy (goal hematocrit, <45%) and low-dose aspirin (if no contraindications). Patients who are at higher risk of thrombosis include those aged 60 years or older or with a prior thrombosis. These patients and those with persistent PV symptoms may benefit from cytoreductive therapy with hydroxyurea or interferon to lower thrombosis risk and decrease symptoms. Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor that can alleviate pruritus and decrease splenomegaly in patients who are intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea. About 12.7% of patients with PV develop myelofibrosis and 6.8% develop acute myeloid leukemia.

Conclusions and Relevance

PV is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis and is almost universally associated with a JAK2 gene variant. PV is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, hemorrhage, myelofibrosis, and acute myeloid leukemia. To decrease the risk of thrombosis, all patients with PV should be treated with aspirin and therapeutic phlebotomy to maintain a hematocrit of less than 45%. Cytoreductive therapies, such as hydroxyurea or interferon, are recommended for patients at high risk of thrombosis.

Hepatoid thymic carcinoma in a polycythemia vera patient treated with ropeginterferon Alfa-2b: Clinical, histopathological and molecular correlates

Hepatoid thymic carcinoma (HTC) is an extremely rare variant of primary epithelial tumor of the thymus morphologically resembling hepatocellular carcinoma Herein, we report an additional case of HTC diagnosed in a 40-years-old man affected by polycythemia vera and treated with ropeginterferon alfa 2-b, for the first time deeply analyzing the molecular profile of this distinctive thymic malignancy. By immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7-19, GLUT1, and Hep-Par-1, whereas AFP tested negative. Whole exome sequencing revealed loss of function mutations in TP53, STK11, PBRM1, SMAD3, FN1, NTRK1, and FANCD2, as well as gain of function mutations in MTOR, BCL11A and COL1A1, along with amplification of CCND3 and MDM2. This mutational landscape halfway between thymic carcinoma (TP53, PBRM1) and hepatoid variant carcinoma of other sites (STK11) suggests that, at some point during carcinogenesis, a switch occurred from an epithelial thymic phenotype to a hepatoid-like one.

Polycythemia vera: past, present and future

There has been remarkable progress in the development of novel therapeutic approaches for patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Historically, therapy goals in PV were to mitigate thrombotic risks and control blood counts and symptoms. There is now increased focus on disease modification through progressive attrition of JAK2-mutant stem/progenitor cells. The approval of ropeginterferon, a novel monoPEGylated interferon, coupled with findings from LOW-PV and longer-term data from CONTINUATION-PV that strongly support a disease-modifying effect for interferon therapy, have transformed the treatment paradigm for this disorder. Results from MAJIC-PV demonstrate that disease modification can also be induced with JAK inhibitors, suggesting an urgent need to incorporate prospective molecular monitoring into PV trials. Novel agents, such as hepcidin mimetics, aim to help patients with PV restore normal hematocrit levels and become phlebotomy-free. In this review, we will summarize past, current and future approaches to PV management and highlight findings from key clinical studies.

Ethnic sensitivity analyses of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in polycythemia vera treatment with ropeginterferon alfa-2b

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) is approved for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera (PV). This report aims to analyze the ethnic sensitivity of Ropeg for the treatment of PV, comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety profiles across diverse ethnic groups. We conducted a relevant review of PV and analysis of data obtained from clinical studies involving Ropeg. The PK behavior of ropeg showed no significant differences between Chinese and overseas populations. Their efficacy and safety profiles were similar across the ethnic groups. The analyses indicated that the dose-exposure-response profile of Ropeg was consistent irrespective of ethnic variations. The results suggest that Ropeg exhibits a consistent PK and pharmacodynamics profile and a similar therapeutic effect across different ethnic groups, confirming its efficacy and safety in the global treatment of PV. More generally, these findings support the broader application of Ropeg in diverse patient populations and emphasize the need for an inclusive clinical practice.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to assess efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with early/lower-risk primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive of the myeloproliferative neoplasms and patients require greater attention and likely require earlier therapeutic intervention. Currently approved treatment options are limited in their selective suppression of clonal proliferation resulting from driver- and coexisting gene mutations. Janus kinase inhibitors are approved for symptomatic patients with higher-risk PMF. Additionally, most ongoing clinical studies focus on patients with higher-risk disease and/or high rates of transfusion dependency. Optimal treatment of early/lower-risk PMF remains to be identified and needs randomized clinical trial evaluations. Pegylated interferon alfa is recommended for symptomatic lower-risk PMF patients based on phase 2 non-randomized studies and expert opinion. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg) is a new-generation pegylated interferon-based therapy with favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profiles, requiring less frequent injections than prior formulations. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial will assess its efficacy and safety in patients with "early/lower-risk PMF", defined as pre-fibrotic PMF or PMF at low or intermediate-1 risk according to Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus. Co-primary endpoints include clinically relevant complete hematologic response and symptom endpoint. Secondary endpoints include progression- or event-free survival, molecular response in driver or relevant coexisting gene mutations, bone marrow response, and safety. Disease progression and events are defined based on the International Working Group criteria and well-published reports. 150 eligible patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ropeg or placebo. Blinded sample size re-estimation is designed. Ropeg will be administered subcutaneously with a tolerable, higher starting-dose regimen. The study will provide important data for the treatment of early/lower-risk PMF for which an anti-clonal, disease-modifying agent is highly needed.

Efficacy and safety outcomes in Japanese patients with low-risk polycythemia vera treated with ropeginterferon alfa-2b

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal erythrocytosis. A phase 2 study reported that ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for PV in Japanese patients. This post hoc analysis of the phase 2 data further evaluated outcomes in patients at low risk of thrombosis (low-risk PV). Among 20 patients with low-risk PV, 60.0% (12/20) and 85.0% (17/20) achieved < 45% hematocrit by weeks 24 and 52, respectively. The proportion of responders with complete hematologic response (CHR) was 60.0% (12/20) at week 52, and the median time to response was 11.9 months. The mean JAK2 V617F allele burden decreased from 75.8% at baseline to 53.7% at week 52. No patient experienced thrombosis or bleeding episodes. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to ropeginterferon alfa-2b, but no grade ≥ 3 TEAEs or deaths related to ropeginterferon alfa-2b occurred, and no new safety concerns arose. This analysis indicated that ropeginterferon alfa-2b may be an effective treatment option for Japanese patients with low-risk PV.

Contemporary Challenges in Polycythemia Vera Management From the Perspective of Patients and Physicians

Although polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic and incurable disease, effective management can allow most patients to maintain functional lives with near-normal life expectancy. However, there remain several inter-related factors that contribute to many ongoing challenges associated with the management of PV, which this review aims to explore. First, as a disease hallmarked by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, PV is often accompanied by inflammatory symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Next, patients often require recurrent therapeutic phlebotomies to maintain their hematocrit below the 45% threshold that has been associated with a decreased risk of thrombotic events. The need to closely monitor hematocrit and perform conditional therapeutic phlebotomies ties patients to the healthcare system, thereby limiting their autonomy. Furthermore, many patients describe therapeutic phlebotomies as burdensome and the procedure is often poorly tolerated, further contributing to quality-of-life decline. Phlebotomy needs can be reduced by utilizing cytoreductive therapy; however, standard first-line cytoreductive options (i.e., hydroxyurea and interferon) have not been shown to significantly improve symptom burden. Collectively, current PV management, while reducing thrombotic risk, often has a negative impact on patient quality of life. As researchers continue to advance towards the goal of developing a disease-modifying therapy for patients with PV, pursuit of nearer-term opportunities to shift the current treatment paradigm towards improving symptoms without compromising quality of life is also warranted, for example, by reducing or eliminating the frequent use of phlebotomy.

The evolving landscape of polycythemia vera therapies

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape of polycythemia vera (PV) has seen major advancements within the last decade including approval of ruxolitinib in the second line setting after hydroxyurea, ropegylated interferon-α2b, and advanced clinical development of a novel class of agents called hepcidin mimetics.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive review of the evidence discussing the risk stratification, treatment indications, role and limitations of phlebotomy only approach and pivotal trials covering nuances related to the use of interferon-α (IFN-α), ruxolitinib, hepcidin mimetics, and upcoming investigational agents including HDAC and LSD1 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

The research paradigm in PV is slowly shifting from the sole focus on hematocrit control and moving toward disease modification. The discovery of hepcidin mimetics has come as a breakthrough in restoring iron homeostasis, achieving phlebotomy-independence and may lead to improved thrombosis-free survival with stricter hematocrit control. On the other hand, emerging data with IFN- α and ruxolitinib as well as combination of the two agents suggests the potential for achieving molecular remission in a subset of PV patients and long-term follow-up is awaited to validate the correlation of molecular responses with clinically relevant outcomes of progression-free and thrombosis-free survival.

ROP-ET: a prospective phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in essential thrombocythemia patients with limited treatment options

Interferon-based therapies, such as ropeginterferon alfa-2b have emerged as promising disease-modifying agents for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocythemia (ET). Current ET treatments aim to normalize hematological parameters and reduce the thrombotic risk, but they do not modify the natural history of the disease and hence, have no impact on disease progression. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (trade name BESREMi®), a novel, monopegylated interferon alfa-2b with an extended administration interval, has demonstrated a robust and sustained efficacy in polycythemia vera (PV) patients. Given the similarities in disease pathophysiology and treatment goals, ropeginterferon alfa-2b holds promise as a treatment option for ET. The ROP-ET trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase III study that includes patients with ET who are intolerant or resistant to, and/or are ineligible for current therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU), anagrelide (ANA), busulfan (BUS) and pipobroman, leaving these patients with limited treatment options. The primary endpoint is a composite response of hematologic parameters and disease-related symptoms, according to modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. Secondary endpoints include improvements in symptoms and quality of life, molecular response and the safety profile of ropeginterferon alfa-2b. Over a 3-year period the trial assesses longer term outcomes, particularly the effects on allele burden and clinical outcomes, such as disease-related symptoms, vascular events and disease progression. No prospective clinical trial data exist for ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the planned ET study population and this study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for ET patients with limited alternatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT, 2023-505160-12-00; Registered on October 30, 2023.

Treatment outcome and germline predictive factors of ropeginterferon alpha-2b in myeloproliferative neoplasm patients

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could serve as excellent markers in foretelling the treatment outcome of interferon (IFN) in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). However, most work originated from western countries, and data from different ethnic populations have been lacking.

METHODS

To gain insights, targeted sequencing was performed to detect myeloid-associated mutations and SNPs in eight loci across three genes (IFNL4, IFN-γ, and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase [ITPA]) to explore their predictive roles in our cohort of 21 ropeginterferon alpha-2b (ROPEG)-treated MPN patients, among whom real-time quantitative PCR was also performed periodically to monitor the JAK2V617F allele burden in 19 JAK2V617F-mutated cases.

RESULTS

ELN response criteria were adopted to designate patients as good responders if they achieved complete hematological responses (CHR) within 1 year (CHR1) or attained major molecular responses (MMR), which occurred in 70% and 45% of the patients, respectively. IFNL4 and IFN-γ gene SNPs were infrequent in our population and were thus excluded from further analysis. Two ITPA SNPs rs6051702 A>C and rs1127354 C>A were associated with an inferior CHR1 rate and MMR rate, respectively. The former seemed to be linked to grade 2 or worse hepatotoxicity as well, although the comparison was of borderline significance only (50%, vs. 6.7% in those with common haplotype, p = 0.053). Twelve patients harbored 19 additional somatic mutations in 12 genes, but the trajectory of these mutations varied considerably and was not predictive of any response.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study provided valuable information on the ethnics- and genetics-based algorithm in the treatment of MPN.

Essential thrombocythemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

OVERVIEW

Essential thrombocythemia is a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) mutation-prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal thrombocytosis; clinical course is often indolent but might be interrupted by thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications, microcirculatory symptoms (e.g., headaches, lightheadedness, and acral paresthesias), and, less frequently, by disease transformation into myelofibrosis (MF) or acute myeloid leukemia.

DIAGNOSIS

In addition to thrombocytosis (platelets ≥450 × 109 /L), formal diagnosis requires the exclusion of other myeloid neoplasms, including prefibrotic MF, polycythemia vera, chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis. Bone marrow morphology typically shows increased number of mature-appearing megakaryocytes distributed in loose clusters.

GENETICS

Approximately 80% of patients express myeloproliferative neoplasm driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, MPL), in a mutually exclusive manner; in addition, about 50% harbor other mutations, the most frequent being TET2 (9%-11%), ASXL1 (7%-20%), DNMT3A (7%), and SF3B1 (5%). Abnormal karyotype is seen in <10% of patients and includes +9/20q-/13q-.

SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSIS

Life expectancy is less than that of the control population. Median survival is approximately 18 years but exceeds >35 years in younger patients. The triple A survival risk model, based on Age, Absolute neutrophil count, and Absolute lymphocyte count, effectively delineates high-, intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and low-risk disease with corresponding median survivals of 8, 14, 21, and 47 years.

RISK FACTORS FOR THROMBOSIS

Four risk categories are considered: very low (age ≤60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type), low (same as very low but JAK2 mutation present), intermediate (same as low but age >60 years), and high (thrombosis history or age >60 years with JAK2 mutation).

MUTATIONS AND PROGNOSIS

MPL and CALR-1 mutations have been associated with increased risk of MF transformation; spliceosome with inferior overall and MF-free survival; TP53 with leukemic transformation, and JAK2V617F with thrombosis. Leukemic transformation rate at 10 years is <1% but might be higher in JAK2-mutated patients with extreme thrombocytosis and those with abnormal karyotype.

TREATMENT

The main goal of therapy is to prevent thrombosis. In this regard, once-daily low-dose aspirin is advised for all patients and twice daily for low-risk disease. Cytoreductive therapy is advised for high-risk and optional for intermediate-risk disease. First-line cytoreductive drugs of choice are hydroxyurea and pegylated interferon-α and second-line busulfan.

ADDITIONAL CONTENT

The current review includes specific treatment strategies in the context of extreme thrombocytosis, pregnancy, splanchnic vein thrombosis, perioperative care, and post-essential thrombocythemia MF, as well as new investigational drugs.

SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Novel Therapies for Polycythemia Vera

In the recent years, landmark advancements in the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV) have been achieved. We witnessed the regulatory approval of ropeginterferon and the advanced clinical development of other novel agents that may affect the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. Agents with the potential of disease modification may soon overtake preceding treatment options that were based on the patient's age and history of thrombosis. Recent studies using ropeginterferon in low-risk PV patients earlier in the disease course challenge the current treatment paradigm and shift the focus on modifying the course of the disease. Hepcidin mimetics offer an excellent alternative to phlebotomy, providing better quality of life, and may lead to improved outcomes in PV by tight hematocrit control. Novel agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, hold promise to complement the therapeutic landscape of PV and might be particularly promising in rationale combinations. Ruxolitinib is well established as an approved second-line treatment for PV. In the frontline setting, the precise role of ruxolitinib, which also represents an appealing agent in combination regimens, will be determined in ongoing research studies. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess whether novel agents/regimens elicit fewer thromboembolic/ hemorrhagic events and halt disease progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia. We aspire that disease-modifying approaches in PV are on the horizon, and that we will be empowered to ultimately change the natural course of the disease and profoundly impact the lives of PV patients in the near future.

Interferons in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Interferons are cytokines with immunomodulatory properties and disease-modifying effects that have been used to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) for more than 35 years. The initial use of interferons was limited due to difficulties with administration and a significant toxicity profile. Many of these shortcomings were addressed by covalently binding polyethylene glycol to the interferon structure, which increases the stability, prolongs activity, and reduces immunogenicity of the molecule. In the current therapeutic landscape, pegylated interferons are recommended for use in the treatment of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. We review recent efficacy, molecular response, and safety data for the two available pegylated interferons, peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi). The practical management of interferon-based therapies is discussed, along with our opinions on whether to and how to switch from hydroxyurea to one of these therapies. Key topics and questions related to use of interferons, such as their safety and tolerability, the significance of variant allele frequency, advantages of early treatment, and what the future of interferon therapy may look like, will be examined. Pegylated interferons represent an important therapeutic option for patients with MPNs; however, more research is still required to further refine interferon therapy.

Ropeginterferon phase 2 randomized study in low-risk polycythemia vera: 5-year drug survival and efficacy outcomes

In patients with low-risk polycythemia vera, exposure to low-dose Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) 100 µg every 2 weeks for 2 years was more effective than the standard treatment of therapeutic phlebotomy in maintaining target hematocrit (HCT) (< 45%) with a reduction in the need for phlebotomy without disease progression. In the present paper, we analyzed drug survival, defined as a surrogate measure of the efficacy, safety, adherence, and tolerability of Ropeg in patients followed up to 5 years. During the first 2 years, Ropeg and phlebotomy-only (Phl-O) were discontinued in 33% and 70% of patients, respectively, for lack of response (12 in the Ropeg arm vs. 34 in the Phl-O arm) or adverse events (6 vs. 0) and withdrawal of consent in (3 vs. 10). Thirty-six Ropeg responders continued the drug for up to 3 years, and the probability of drug survival after a median of 3.15 years was 59%. Notably, the primary composite endpoint was maintained in 97%, 94%, and 94% of patients still on drug at 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, and 60% of cases were phlebotomy-free. Twenty-three of 63 Phl-O patients (37%) failed the primary endpoint and were crossed over to Ropeg; among the risk factors for this failure, the need for more than three bloodletting procedures in the first 6 months emerged as the most important determinant. In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness of Ropeg, we suggest increasing the dose and using it earlier driven by high phlebotomy need in the first 6 months post-diagnosis.

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b treatment in a young patient with multi-refractory polycythemia vera and double JAK2 gene mutation: a case report

This case report presents a 3-year-old female patient initially diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV) in 2001. The patient exhibited elevated red blood cell (RBC) counts, high hemoglobin (Hb) levels, hyperleukocytosis, and moderate thrombocytosis, with sporadic abdominal pain and significant splenomegaly. Despite various treatments, including phlebotomies, hydroxyurea, and alpha-interferon, the patient struggled to maintain optimal hematocrit levels and experienced persistent symptoms. Subsequent genomic analysis revealed a rare JAK2 G301R mutation alongside the canonical JAK2 V617F mutation, potentially contributing to disease severity. In 2023, the patient started Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, leading to improved hematological parameters and symptom relief. The case underscores the challenges in managing PV, particularly in young patients, and highlights the potential clinical significance of additional JAK2 mutations/variants and the potential benefits of Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in achieving better disease control.

Change in Polycythemia Vera Treatment: Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Light of Current Trials

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (RopegIFN) enables effective cytoreduction in polycythemia vera (PV). Recent analyses suggest that long-term RopegIFN therapy fulfills treatment goals important to patients with PV including good quality of life, the slowing of disease progression, and long event-free survival. Data support the use of RopegIFN in both early PV therapy and second-line and beyond.

Moving toward disease modification in polycythemia vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) belongs to the BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is characterized by activating mutations in JAK2 and clinically presents with erythrocytosis, variable degrees of systemic and vasomotor symptoms, and an increased risk of both thromboembolic events and progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment selection is based on a patient's age and a history of thrombosis in patients with low-risk PV treated with therapeutic phlebotomy and aspirin alone, whereas cytoreductive therapy with either hydroxyurea or interferon alfa (IFN-α) is added for high-risk disease. However, other disease features such as significant disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly, concurrent thrombocytosis and leukocytosis, or intolerance of phlebotomy can constitute an indication for cytoreductive therapy in patients with otherwise low-risk disease. Additionally, recent studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy (ie, reduction in phlebotomy requirements and molecular responses) of ropegylated IFN-α2b support its use for patients with low-risk PV. Additionally, emerging data suggest that early treatment is associated with higher rates of molecular responses, which might eventually enable time-limited therapy. Nonetheless, longer follow-up is needed to assess whether molecular responses associate with clinically meaningful outcome measures such as thrombosis and progression to myelofibrosis or AML. In this article, we provide an overview of the current and evolving treatment landscape of PV and outline our vision for a patient-centered, phlebotomy-free, treatment approach using time-limited, disease-modifying treatment modalities early in the disease course, which could ultimately affect the natural history of the disease.

Cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera

Aim: Patients with polycythemia vera (PV), a rare and chronic blood cancer, are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events, progression to myelofibrosis, and leukemic transformation. In 2021, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi®) was approved in the US to treat adults with PV. The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, used as a first- or second-line treatment, for the treatment of patients with PV in the US. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model was developed from the healthcare system perspective in the United States. Model inputs were informed by the PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV studies and published literature. The model population included both low-risk and high-risk patients with PV. The model compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft used either as first- or second-line versus an alternative treatment pathway of first-line hydroxyurea followed by ruxolitinib. Results: Over the modeled lifetime, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft provided an additional 0.4 higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.4 life-years with an added cost of USD60,175, resulting in a cost per QALY of USD141,783. The model was sensitive to treatment costs, the percentage of patients who discontinue hydroxyurea, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users who switch to monthly dosing, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users as 2nd line treatment, and the treatment response rates. A younger patient age at baseline and a higher percentage of patients with low-risk disease improved the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft. Conclusion: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft is a cost-effective treatment option for a broad range of patients with PV, including both low- and high-risk patients and patients with and without prior cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea.

Polycythemia vera: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a JAK2-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal erythrocytosis; other features include leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, splenomegaly, pruritus, constitutional symptoms, microcirculatory disturbances, and increased risk of thrombosis and progression into myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

DIAGNOSIS

A working diagnosis is considered in the presence of a JAK2 mutation associated with hemoglobin/hematocrit levels of >16.5 g/dL/49% in men or 16 g/dL/48% in women; morphologic confirmation by bone marrow examination is advised but not mandated.

CYTOGENETICS

Abnormal karyotype is seen in 15%-20% of patients with the most frequent sole abnormalities being +9 (5%), loss of chromosome Y (4%), +8 (3%), and 20q- (3%).

MUTATIONS

Over 50% of patients harbor DNA sequence variants/mutations other than JAK2, with the most frequent being TET2 (18%) and ASXL1 (15%). Prognostically adverse mutations include SRSF2, IDH2, RUNX1, and U2AF1, with a combined incidence of 5%-10%.

SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSIS

Median survival is ⁓15 years but exceeds 35 years for patients aged ≤40 years. Risk factors for survival include older age, leukocytosis, abnormal karyotype, and the presence of adverse mutations. Twenty-year risk for thrombosis, post-PV MF, or AML are ⁓26%, 16% and 4%, respectively.

RISK FACTORS FOR THROMBOSIS

Two risk categories are considered: high (age >60 years or thrombosis history) and low (absence of both risk factors). Additional predictors for arterial thrombosis include cardiovascular risk factors and for venous thrombosis higher absolute neutrophil count and JAK2V617F allele burden.

TREATMENT

Current goal of therapy is to prevent thrombosis. Periodic phlebotomy, with a hematocrit target of <45%, combined with once- or twice-daily aspirin (81 mg) therapy, absent contraindications, is the backbone of treatment in all patients, regardless of risk category. Cytoreductive therapy is reserved for high-risk disease with first-line drugs of choice being hydroxyurea and pegylated interferon-α and second-line busulfan and ruxolitinib. In addition, systemic anticoagulation is advised in patients with venous thrombosis history.

ADDITIONAL TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

At the present time, we do not consider a drug-induced reduction in JAK2V617F allele burden, which is often incomplete and seen not only with peg-IFN but also with ruxolitinib and busulfan, as an indicator of disease-modifying activity, unless accompanied by cytogenetic and independently-verified morphologic remission. Accordingly, we do not use the specific parameter to influence treatment choices. The current review also includes specific treatment strategies in the context of pregnancy, splanchnic vein thrombosis, pruritus, perioperative care, and post-PV MF.