Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer

Positive Margin Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery by Histologic Subtype: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Evaluating the Impact of Oncoplastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common histologic subtype of breast cancer, has a higher risk of positive surgical margins than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Whether this risk persists for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with oncoplastic approaches remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess positive margins following oncoplastic BCS by histologic subtype and evaluate the impact of oncoplastic surgery on positive margins in ILC.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for articles reporting positive margin rates after oncoplastic BCS in ILC patients. Relative risks (RR) were log transformed and displayed with forest plots.

RESULTS

Eight studies, encompassing 754 ILC patients undergoing BCS (338 with oncoplastic surgery), were included. The pooled positive margin rate for ILC patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21-40%). Patients with ILC had a significantly higher RR for positive margins after oncoplastic BCS compared with IDC (RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.4). However, for ILC patients with larger tumors, oncoplastic BCS was associated with a significantly lower RR for positive margins compared with standard BCS (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Invasive lobular carcinoma patients undergoing oncoplastic BCS have higher positive margin risks than IDC patients, underscoring the need for improved preoperative imaging and systemic therapies. However, the addition of oncoplastic surgery to BCS reduces positive margin rates compared with standard BCS in ILC patients, particularly for larger tumors. These findings highlight the role of oncoplastic surgery as an important technique to optimize outcomes for those at high risk of positive margins.

Dissemination and Implementation-A Primer for Accelerating "Time to Translation" in Radiation Oncology

The field of radiation oncology has achieved significant technological and scientific advancements in the 21st century. Yet uptake of new evidence-based practices has been heterogeneous, even in the presence of national and international guidelines. Addressing barriers to practice change requires a deliberate focus on developing and testing strategies tailored to improving care delivery and quality, especially for vulnerable patient populations. Implementation science provides a systematic approach to developing and testing strategies, though applications in radiation oncology remain limited. In this critical review, we aim to (1) assess the time from first evidence to widespread adoption, or "time to translation," across multiple evidence-based practices involving radiation therapy, and (2) provide a primer on the application of implementation science to radiation oncology. Specifically, we discuss potential targets for implementation research in radiation oncology, including both evidence-based practices and quality metrics, and highlight examples of studies evaluating implementation strategies. We also define key concepts and frameworks in the field of implementation science, review common study designs, including hybrid trials and cluster randomization, and discuss the interaction with related disciplines such as quality improvement and behavioral economics. Ultimately, this review aims to illustrate how a comprehensive understanding of implementation science could be used to promote equity and quality in cancer care through the development of effective, scalable, and sustainable care delivery solutions.

Breast Conservation Surgery for Breast Cancer in Men

BACKGROUND

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, accounting for 1% of all breast cancer diagnosed in the US. The rarity of MBC has limited the development of treatment algorithms specific to men. Therefore, the standard of care has been mastectomy. The safety and feasibility of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in MBC are unclear. This study assessed whether overall survival (OS) outcomes, local recurrence (LR), and postoperative complications differed between patients with MBC who underwent conservative surgery or mastectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective search for men aged 18 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer was conducted using the TriNetX network. Cohort 1 included patients who underwent BCS. Cohort 2 included patients who underwent mastectomy. Propensity score matching was conducted using age, BMI, tobacco use, cancer stage and tumor size (T1 to T4), radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, genetics, and comorbidities. Outcomes of interest were 5-year OS, LR, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients underwent BCS, and 1,101 patients underwent mastectomy. After matching, 401 patients per cohort were identified. No difference was observed in 5-year OS with the Kaplan-Meier analysis (Cohort 1: 84% vs Cohort 2: 86%, log-rank test p = 0.412) or with LR (11% vs 13%, p = 0.384). The mastectomy cohort was more likely to have postoperative complications, with a risk of 24% compared with 17% in the BCS cohort (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was observed in the 5-year OS and LR rate between patients with MBC who undergo BCS or mastectomy. The postoperative complication rate was higher with mastectomies. We conclude that BCS for unicentric MBC is feasible and preferred for T1 and T2 cancers.

Promoting Oncological Safety: Extreme Oncoplasty as an Alternative to Mastectomy-Insights From a Single-Center Experience in Low and Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

Extreme oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (eOBCS), euphemism for radical conservation, expands the indications of breast conservation for tumor that typically requires a mastectomy. Existing data show no discernible survival differences between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery; however, limited evidence exists regarding local recurrences between these groups. We report the oncological outcomes of eOBCS in terms of margin safety and disease recurrence at our institute. Median surgical margin was 0.68 (0.2-2) cm away. Two patients (4.3%) required re-excision of positive margins. One locoregional and four distant disease recurrences were encountered with 5-year local recurrence free, distant recurrence free, and overall survivals estimated to be 91%, 73%, and 78%, respectively. Satisfactory cosmesis was attained in all patients without significant perioperative complications.

METHODOLOGY

47 patients underwent eOBCS between July'17 and June'22. Mean follow-up was 54 (24-84) months. Primary endpoints were the resection margin status and need for reoperation. Secondary endpoints were 5-year local and distant recurrence free and overall survivals. Median surgical margin was 0.68 (0.2-2) cm away. Two patients (4.3%) required re-excision of positive margins. One locoregional and four distant disease recurrences were encountered with 5-year local recurrence free, distant recurrence free, and overall survivals estimated to be 91%, 73%, and 78%, respectively. Satisfactory cosmesis was attained in all patients without significant perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 46.8 (±13.2) years. IDC (70.2%) was the commonest histological type. 32% of cancers were >5 cm in size, 30% were multifocal, and 40.4% were node positive. 25% were triple negative whereas, 7% were Her2Neu positive. Therapeutic mammoplasty (44.4%) was the frequently performed surgical procedure followed by local rotational flaps (27.6%). Mean pretreatment mammographic tumor size was 50 mm (±7.5) mm. 40.4% of the patients qualified for neoadjuvant therapies and 91.5% received radiation. Median surgical margin was 0.68 (0.2-2) cm away. Two patients (4.3%) required re-excision of positive margins. One locoregional and four distant disease recurrences were encountered with 5-year local recurrence free, distant recurrence free, and overall survivals estimated to be 91%, 73%, and 78%, respectively. Satisfactory cosmesis was attained in all patients without significant perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

eOBCS is an innovative and aesthetically promising surgical technique enabling successful breast conservation in patients necessitating mastectomy. Our data substantiate the oncological safety of eOBCS; however, it requires appropriate patient selection and multidisciplinary planning.

Survival after standard or oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests a survival advantage after breast-conserving surgery compared with mastectomy. Previous studies have compared survival outcomes after standard breast-conserving surgery, but no studies have compared survival outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes after breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy (and an oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy subgroup) with those after mastectomy ± radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained National Cancer Registry. Overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival outcomes were analysed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis adjusting for patient demographics, tumour characteristics, and treatment adjuncts.

RESULTS

A total of 14 182 patients were eligible (8537 patients underwent standard breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy, 360 patients underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy, 2953 patients underwent mastectomy + radiotherapy, and 2332 patients underwent mastectomy - radiotherapy). The median follow-up was 7.27 (range 0.2-13.6) years. Superior 10-year survival was observed after breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy (overall survival: 81.2%; breast cancer-specific survival: 93.3%) compared with mastectomy + radiotherapy (overall survival: 63.4%; breast cancer-specific survival: 75.9%) and mastectomy - radiotherapy (overall survival: 63.1%; breast cancer-specific survival: 87.5%). Ten-year overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy were 86.1% and 90.2% respectively. After adjusted analysis, breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy was associated with superior survival outcomes compared with mastectomy + radiotherapy (overall survival: HR 1.34 (95% c.i. 1.20 to 1.51); breast cancer-specific survival: HR 1.62 (95% c.i. 1.38 to 1.90)) and mastectomy - radiotherapy (overall survival: HR 1.57 (95% c.i. 1.41 to 1.75); breast cancer-specific survival: HR 1.70 (95% c.i. 1.41 to 2.05)). Similar survival outcomes were observed amongst patients treated with oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy compared with mastectomy + radiotherapy (overall survival: HR 1.72 (95% c.i. 1.62 to 2.55); breast cancer-specific survival: HR 1.74 (95% c.i. 1.06 to 2.86)) and mastectomy - radiotherapy (overall survival: HR 2.21 (95% c.i. 1.49 to 3.27); breast cancer-specific survival: HR 1.89 (95% c.i. 1.13 to 3.14)).

CONCLUSION

Breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery + radiotherapy are associated with superior overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival compared with mastectomy ± radiotherapy. The findings should inform discussion of surgical treatment options for patients with breast cancer.

The Role of Molecular Profiling in De-Escalation of Toxic Therapy in Breast Cancer

The prevalence and mortality associated with breast cancer have forced healthcare providers to leverage surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy to achieve a cure. Whereas mortality has significantly dropped over the decades, long-term toxicities and healthcare costs are prohibitive. Therefore, a better understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling is being utilized for de-escalation of treatment where appropriate. As research evolves, there is growing evidence that less aggressive treatment regimens, when appropriately tailored, can be equally effective for certain patient populations. This approach not only enhances the quality of life for patients by reducing the financial, physical, and emotional burdens associated with more invasive therapies but also promotes a more personalized treatment strategy. By focusing on precision medicine and understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, healthcare providers and patients can make informed decisions that balance safety with efficacy. The field of molecular profiling is a promising avenue for precision-targeted de-escalation and escalation of therapy to minimize the risk-benefit ratio.

Oncoplastic Surgery: Where Are We Now?

In the 1970s, we learned breast conservation therapy (BCT) was not inferior to mastectomy. Early BCT methods could result in deformities that were unacceptable to patients and to their surgeons. By the 1990s, surgeons began to apply the principles of plastic surgery to improve outcomes. The term oncoplastic surgery was first described in the 1990s by Werner Audretsch. We offer a review of principles, techniques, current controversies, and challenges in broadening the utilization of OPS.

Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review update synthesized recent evidence on the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in women aged ≥ 40 years and aims to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's (CTFPHC) guideline update.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE® ALL, Embase Classic + Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to update our searches to July 8, 2023. Search results for observational studies were limited to publication dates from 2014 to capture more relevant studies. Screening was performed independently and in duplicate by the review team. To expedite the screening process, machine learning was used to prioritize relevant references. Critical health outcomes, as outlined by the CTFPHC, included breast cancer and all-cause mortality, treatment-related morbidity and overdiagnosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non/quasi RCTs and observational studies were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by one reviewer and verified by another. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for RCTs and the Joanna Brigg's Institute (JBI) checklists for non-randomized and observational studies. When deemed appropriate, studies were pooled via random-effects models. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed following GRADE guidance.

RESULTS

Three new papers reporting on existing RCT trial data and 26 observational studies were included. No new RCTs were identified in this update. No study reported results by ethnicity, race, proportion of study population with dense breasts, or socioeconomic status. For breast cancer mortality, RCT data from the prior review reported a significant relative reduction in the risk of breast cancer mortality with screening mammography for a general population of 15% (RR 0.85 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93). In this review update, the breast cancer mortality relative risk reduction based on RCT data remained the same, and absolute effects by age decade over 10 years were 0.27 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 40 to 49; 0.50 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 50 to 59; 0.65 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 60 to 69; and 0.92 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 70 to 74. For observational data, the relative mortality risk reduction ranged from 29 to 62%. Absolute effects from breast cancer mortality over 10 years ranged from 0.79 to 0.94 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 40 to 49; 1.45 to 1.72 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 50 to 59; 1.89 to 2.24 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 60 to 69; and 2.68 to 3.17 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 70 to 74. For all-cause mortality, RCT data from the prior review reported a non-significant relative reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality of screening mammography for a general population of 1% (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00). In this review update, the absolute effects for all-cause mortality over 10 years by age decade were 0.13 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 40 to 49; 0.31 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 50 to 59; 0.71 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 60 to 69; and 1.41 fewer deaths per 1000 in those aged 70 to 74. No observational data were found for all-cause mortality. For overdiagnosis, this review update found the absolute effects for RCT data (range of follow-up between 9 and 15 years) to be 1.95 more invasive and in situ cancers per 1000, or 1 more invasive cancer per 1000, for those aged 40 to 49 and 1.93 more invasive and in situ cancers per 1000, or 1.18 more invasive cancers per 1000, for those aged 50 to 59. A sensitivity analysis removing high risk of bias studies found 1.57 more invasive and in situ cancers, or 0.49 more invasive cancers, per 1000 for those aged 40 to 49 and 3.95 more invasive and in situ cancers per 1000, or 2.81 more invasive cancers per 1000, in those aged 50 to 59. For observational data, one report (follow-up for 13 years) found 0.34 more invasive and in situ cancers per 1000 in those aged 50 to 69. Overall, the GRADE certainty of evidence was assessed as low or very low, suggesting that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of screening for breast cancer on the outcomes evaluated in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review update did not identify any new trials comparing breast cancer screening to no screening. Although 26 new observational studies were identified, the overall quality of evidence remains generally low or very low. Future research initiatives should prioritize studying screening in higher risk populations such as those from different ages, racial or ethnic groups, with dense breasts or family history.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Protocol available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/xngsu/.

Quality of life and its predictors among breast cancer patients treated with surgery-a retrospective minimum 3-year follow-up study

AIM

Quality of life (QoL) has been identified as an important indicator of positive outcomes among breast cancer (BC) survivors. However, the status and predictors of QoL in China remain unclear. This retrospective follow-up study aimed to examine the QoL levels among BC patients following surgery and to assess the influence of sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors on QoL.

METHODS

An institution-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 714 BC patients who received surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 2016 and December 2019. Our primary outcome measure was QoL, assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Anxiety and depression were evaluated by the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), respectively. Data on the patient demographics and clinical were derived from medical records. Results are presented as means (SD), medians [Q1, Q3], or percentage (%). We used R 4.2.2 software to identify factors associated with QoL after BC surgery. AMOS 28.0 was used to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to predict QoL outcomes.

RESULTS

The overall QoL score was 43.30 ± 4.77 (mean ± SD). Predictive factors were: surgery type, radiotherapy, anxiety, and depression (p<0.05). The results of the SEM indicated that anxiety and depression had a direct negative effect on QoL (effect value was -0.46, -0.84, respectively, p<0.05), radiotherapy had a direct positive effect on QoL (effect value was 0.71, p<0.05). The type of surgery (mastectomy) impacted QoL both directly and indirectly through its association with depression, with direct and indirect effect values of -0.96 and -0.66, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The QoL of BC patients after surgery is generally moderate to low. Medical staff should prioritize early identification and rehabilitation management for patients experiencing anxiety, depression, radiotherapy, and mastectomy to enhance their QoL. Our findings provide a strong foundation for developing nursing intervention plans and assessment guidelines for practitioners caring for BC patients.

Oncoplastic Reconstruction in the Setting of Prior Cosmetic Augmentation

BACKGROUND

This study explored the surgical management and reconstruction options for augmented breasts in the context of breast conservation therapy (BCT) for breast cancer. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in the rates of complications, revisions, or patient satisfaction in patients who maintained their breast augmentation versus those who had their implants removed in the context of BCT.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 142 patients who underwent BCT at a single center from March of 2016 to March of 2022. The study included patients who had a preexistent cosmetic augmentation at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and BCT. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, breast implant details, reconstructive technique, complications, and revisions were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q BCT module.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (65.5%) chose to maintain their implants, whereas 49 (34.5%) elected to have them removed during BCT. Patients with submuscular implants were more likely to maintain their implants. Oncoplastic mastopexy was associated with higher complication rates, particularly in patients opting for implant downsizing. However, multivariate logistic regression did not identify implant management strategy as an independent predictor for complications or revisions. Surgical-site infection was the only predictor of implant explantation. Patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the different implant management cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that maintaining breast implants during BCT does not increase the risk of complications or revisions. Overall, BCT in augmented women was found to be a safe approach, with high patient satisfaction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Should Palpable Nodes Be Exclusionary in Patients Who Are Otherwise Candidates for ACOSOG Z0011-Type Trials?

BACKGROUND

Palpable nodes were exclusionary in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, while SINODAR-ONE excluded those with positive axillary nodes by palpation and ultrasound. To determine whether clinical nodal status should be exclusionary in those fulfilling pathologic criteria for ACOSOG Z0011 and similar trials, this study analyzed the accuracy and implications of clinical nodal positivity.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years old with cT1-T2, cN0-cN1, M0 breast cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2019. Subset characteristics of cN1 and cN0 were compared with respect to final pathologic nodal status and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 57,823 patients identified, 77.0% were cT1 and 23.0% were cT2. Of the 93.9% of patients who were staged as cN0, 16.7% were pN1; of the remaining 6.1% staged as cN1, 9.6% were found to be pN0. Among cN1/pN0 patients, 14.9% underwent axillary dissection without sentinel node biopsy. There was no difference in adjusted OS for patients staged as cN0 versus cN1 who were found to be pN1 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37, p = 0.22), a finding that persisted on subset analysis in those with two positive nodes (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33, p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical nodal stage does not affect OS in pN1 patients. Clinical nodal assessment can both overstage patients and result in unnecessary axillary surgery. These data suggest that cN1 patients who are otherwise candidates for a Z0011-like paradigm should still be considered eligible. Their final candidacy should be determined by surgical lymph node pathology and not preoperative clinical status.

Higher 10-Year Survival with Breast-Conserving Therapy over Mastectomy for Women with Early-Stage (I-II) Breast Cancer: Analysis of the CDC Patterns of Care Data Base

Background

Studies in the United States are scarce that assess the survival differences between breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (Breast-Conserving Therapy; BCT) and mastectomy groups using population-based data while accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors that affect the survival of women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

Objective

To assess whether BCT provides superior long-term overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) compared with mastectomy in women with ESBC, while considering key factors that impact survival.

Design

Cohort study.

Methods

We analyzed data on women aged 20 years and older diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer (BC) in 2004 who received either BCT or mastectomy. The data were collected by 5 state cancer registries through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Patterns of Care study. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis involved optimal caliper propensity score (PS) matching to address residual confounding.

Results

Of the 3495 women, 41.5% underwent mastectomy. The 10-year OS and BCSS were 82.7% and 91.1% for BCT and 72.3% and 85.7% for mastectomy, respectively. Adjusted models showed that mastectomy recipients had a 22% higher risk of all-cause deaths (ACD) (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = [1.06, 1.41]) and a 26% higher risk of breast cancer-specific deaths (BCD) (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = [1.02, 1.55]) than BCT recipients. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that mastectomy was associated with a higher risk of ACD (P < .05) but did not exhibit a statistically significant risk for BCD. Women with HR+/HER2+ (luminal B) or invasive ductal carcinoma BC who underwent mastectomy had higher risks of ACD and BCD compared with BCT recipients, while the hazards for ACD in triple-negative BC did not remain significant after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusion

ESBC BCT recipients demonstrate superior OS and BCSS compared with mastectomy recipients.

Breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy in T1-2N3M0 stage breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy and mastectomy exhibit highly comparable prognoses for early-stage breast cancer; however, the safety of BCS for T1-2N3M0 breast cancer remains unclear. This study compared long-term survival for BCS versus (vs.) modified radical mastectomy (MRM) among patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer.

METHODS

Data of patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups, BCS and MRM; Pearson's chi-squared test was used to estimate differences in clinicopathological features. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of surgical methods and other factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 2124 patients were included; after PSM, 596 patients were allocated to each group. BCS exhibited the same 5-year BCSS (77.9% vs. 77.7%; P = 0.814) and OS (76.1% vs. 74.6%; P = 0.862) as MRM in the matched cohorts. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that BCS had the same BCSS and OS as MRM (hazard ratios [HR] 0.899 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.697-1.160], P = 0.413 and HR 0.858 [95% CI 0.675-1.089], P = 0.208, respectively); this was also seen in most subgroups. BCS demonstrated better BCSS (HR 0.558 [95% CI 0.335-0.929]; P = 0.025) and OS (HR 0.605 [95% CI 0.377-0.972]; P = 0.038) than MRM in those with the triple-negative subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

BCS has the same long-term survival as MRM in T1-2N3M0 breast cancer and may be a better choice for triple-negative breast cancer.

Use of Advanced Energy Devices and Fiberoptic Retractors in Single-Incision Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, p=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, p=0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, p=0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, p=0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, p=0.523).

CONCLUSION

Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.

Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast: The State of the Art of a Rare and Aggressive Disease

INTRODUCTION

Considering the increasing number of conservative surgeries (quadrantectomies) for primary breast carcinoma, especially in the early stages, often followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, the incidence of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAS) is expected to rise in the coming decades, and it will represent a clinical and therapeutic challenge, as limited data are available due to the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease. Though the prognosis of these patients is poor, a number of clinical and pathological factors can be evaluated to better understand the course of RAS. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the available clinical-pathological, therapeutic, and prognostic data regarding RAS to evaluate its occurrence, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

METHOD

RAS clinical data were identified by a systematic review conducted in five different databases (Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane). Only RAS works published in English, with access to the full manuscript text, and with clear results, were considered as eligible.

RESULTS

We considered 52 papers comprising 319 RAS cases. The patient age at diagnosis ranged from 37 to 93 years, with most cases occurring from 5 to 10 years after breast irradiation. The most common clinical presentation was an aggressive development of macules, papules, or erythematous-violaceous skin discoloration at the site of previous radiation treatment for primary breast carcinoma. Complete surgical excision appeared to be the first-line treatment of the disease, in some cases followed by adjuvant local and/or systemic therapies. Despite different treatments, local recurrence rates ranged from 40% to 90%, leading to negative outcomes and poor prognosis for patients.

CONCLUSION

Although the literature is limited and the data are heterogeneous and contentious, our review aims to highlight the importance of early diagnosis, multimodal treatment, and long-term follow-up of RAS in order to limit and prevent the aggressiveness of this neoplasm.

"Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Many women eligible for breast conservation therapy (BCT) elect unilateral mastectomy (UM) with or without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) and cite a desire for "peace of mind." This study aimed to characterize how peace of mind is defined and measured and how it relates to surgical choice.

METHODS

Nine databases were searched for relevant articles through 8 October 2023, and data were extracted from articles meeting the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 20 studies. Most were prospective cohort studies (65%, 13/20). In the majority of the studies (72%, 13/18), Non-Hispanic white/Caucasian women comprised 80 % or more of the study's sample. Almost half of the studies used the phrase "peace of mind" in their publication (45%, 9/20), and few directly defined the construct (15%, 3/20). Instead, words representing an absence of peace of mind were common, specifically, "anxiety" (85%, 17/20), "fear" (75%, 15/20), and "concern" (75%, 15/20). Most of the studies (90%, 18/20) measured peace of mind indirectly using questionnaires validated for anxiety, fear, worry, distress, or concern, which were administered at multiple postoperative time points (55%, 11/20). Most of the studies (95%, 18/19) reported at least one statistically significant result showing no difference in peace of mind between BCT, UM, and/or CPM at their latest time of assessment.

CONCLUSION

Peace of mind is largely framed around concepts that suggest its absence, namely, anxiety, fear, and concern. Existing literature suggests that peace of mind does not differ among average-risk women undergoing BCT, UM, or CPM. Shared surgical decisions should emphasize at least comparable emotional and/or psychosocial well-being between CPM and breast conservation.

Is Immediate Breast Reconstruction With a Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Safe for Starting Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer?

INTRODUCTION

Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy reduces perceptions of mutilation and femininity issues in oncological patients, but surgical complications should not delay chemotherapy. This study evaluated postsurgical complications in patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and silicone implants, along with resulting impacts in delaying chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study utilized a prospectively maintained database. Clinical, surgical, and oncological data from 196 women were collected according to the operated side. Patients were grouped according to the time elapsed between surgery and the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy: ≤ 60 days (group 1), 61 to 90 days (group 2), or > 90 days (group 3).

RESULTS

A total of 198 immediate reconstructions were performed on 196 patients between August 1, 2010 and March 31, 2020; after surgery, 47.4% had minor complications and 7.1% had major complications. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The mean time elapsed between surgery and the first chemotherapy cycle was 65.4 days (median: 59), with 52.7% of the patients assigned to group 1, 37.4% to group 2, and 9.9% to group 3. The occurrence of major postoperative complications significantly affected the start of chemotherapy (64.0 vs. 94.5 days; P = .044). Additionally, patients with 2 or more comorbidities were more likely to experience major complications (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.03-10.95; P = .045) than those with 1 or 0.

CONCLUSION

Major postoperative complications significantly delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in oncological patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and silicone implants.

Axillary Management: How Much Is Too Much?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current management of the axilla in breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Axillary dissection is no longer indicated in patients with clinically node-negative axilla with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes following upfront surgery or in patients with clinically node-negative axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast cancer has evolved away from routine axillary clearance to the less invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy to now complete omission of axillary sampling in select patients. We will review the most salient evidence that has shaped these practice changes over the last three decades. Current practice controversies are especially relevant for elderly populations and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Ongoing clinical trials will provide data to further guide breast cancer surgical management.

Urine Biopsy as Dynamic Biomarker to Enhance Clinical Staging of Bladder Cancer in Radical Cystectomy Candidates

PURPOSE

There is significant interest in identifying complete responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) to potentially avoid removal of a pathologically benign bladder. However, clinical restaging after NAC is highly inaccurate. The objective of this study was to develop a next-generation sequencing-based molecular assay using urine to enhance clinical staging of patients with bladder cancer.

METHODS

Urine samples from 20 and 44 patients with bladder cancer undergoing RC were prospectively collected for retrospective analysis for molecular correlate analysis from two clinical trials, respectively. The first cohort was used to benchmark the assay, and the second was used to determine the performance characteristics of the test as it correlates to responder status as measured by pathologic examination.

RESULTS

First, to benchmark the assay, known mutations identified in the tissue (MT) of patients from the Accelerated Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Cisplatin trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01611662, n = 16) and a cohort from University of California-San Francisco (n = 4) were cross referenced against mutation profiles from urine (MU). We then determined the correlation between MU persistence and residual disease in pre-RC urine samples from a second prospective clinical trial (The pT0 trial; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02968732). Residual MU status correlated strongly with residual disease status (pT0 trial; n = 44; P = .0092) when MU from urine supernatant and urine pellet were assessed separately and analyzed in tandem. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 91%, 50%, 86%, and 63% respectively, with an overall accuracy of 82% for this second cohort.

CONCLUSION

MU are representative of MT and thus can be used to enhance clinical staging of urothelial carcinoma. Urine biopsy may be used as a reliable tool that can be further developed to identify complete response to NAC in anticipation of safe RC avoidance.

A Prospective Study of Sentinel Node Biopsy Omission in Women Age ≥ 65 Years with ER+ Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

National guidelines recommend omitting SNB in older patients with favorable invasive breast cancer. However, there is a lack of prospective data specifically addressing this issue. This study evaluates recurrence and survival in estrogen receptor-positive/Her2- (ER+) breast cancer patients, aged ≥ 65 years who have breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without SNB.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study at a single institution where 125 patients aged ≥ 65 years with clinical T1-2N0 ER+ invasive breast cancer undergoing BCS were enrolled. Patients were treated with BCS without SNB. Primary outcome measure was axillary recurrence. Secondary outcome measures include recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From January 2016 to July 2022, 125 patients were enrolled with median follow-up of 36.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.0-38.0]. Median age was 77.0 years (range 65-93). Median tumor size was 1 cm (range 0.1-5.0). Most tumors were ductal (95/124, 77.0%), intermediate grade (60/116, 51.7%), and PR-positive (117/123, 91.7%). Radiation therapy was performed in 37 of 125 (29.6%). Only 60 of 125 (48.0%) who were recommended hormonal therapy were compliant at 2 years. Chemotherapy was administered to six of 125 (4.8%) patients. There were two of 125 (1.6%) axillary recurrences. Estimated 3-years rates of regional RFS, DFS, and OS were 98.2%, 91.2%, and 94.8%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression identified hormonal therapy noncompliance to be significantly associated with recurrence (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary recurrence rates were extremely low in this cohort. These results provide prospective data to support omission of SNB in this patient population TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02564848.

To study the survival analysis and recurrence pattern in women treated for breast cancer: Retrospective study, a tertiary cancer center experience from Sub-Himalayan Region of India

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a leading health concern in India, comprising 25% of female cancers with significant mortality. This study was conducted at the Cancer Research Institute in the Northern Sub-Himalayan region of India from 2016 to 2021, evaluated 674 breast cancer cases to analyze factors that influence recurrence.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective clinical audit assessing patients' survival outcomes using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression. Factors including age, molecular subtype, TNM staging, and treatment modalities were evaluated.

RESULTS

Notable findings include a high occurrence of breast cancer in young patients (24.48% ≤ 40 years) and varying recurrence rates among molecular subtypes with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 neu-enriched (25.24%) and triple‑negative breast cancer (22.58%) being the most common. Advanced T and N stages, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the number of nodes dissected showed significant associations with higher recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

This study sheds light on survival and recurrence patterns in Northern Sub-Himalayan breast cancer patients, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies, comprehensive follow-up care, with improved understanding of regional outcomes. These findings contribute valuable insights for optimizing patient care and improving survival rates in this region.

A Prospective Trial of Single-Fraction Radiation to the Tumor Bed with a Novel Breast-Specific Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Device: The GammaPod

Purpose

Radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer is typically delivered in a hypofractionated regimen to the whole breast followed by a tumor bed boost. This results in a treatment course of approximately 4 weeks. In this study, the tumor bed boost was delivered in a single fraction as part of a safety and feasibility study for FDA clearance of the device.

Methods and Materials

Eligible women with early-stage breast cancer underwent lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy. Patients underwent breast immobilization using a system specific to the GammaPod followed by CT simulation, boost treatment planning, and boost treatment delivery all in a single treatment day. Patients then started whole-breast radiation therapy within 1 week of the boost treatment. Patients and treatments were assessed for safety and feasibility. Acute toxicities were recorded.

Results

A single-fraction boost of 8 Gy was delivered to the tumor bed before a course of whole-breast radiation. The GammaPod treatment was successfully delivered to 14 of 17 enrolled patients. Acute toxicities from all radiation therapy, inclusive of the boost and whole-breast radiation, were limited to grade 1 events.

Conclusions

The GammaPod device successfully delivered a single-fraction boost treatment to the tumor bed with no change in expected acute toxicities. The results of this study led to FDA clearance of the device through the Investigational Device Exemption process at the FDA. The GammaPod is in clinical use at 4e institutions nationally and internationally, with additional sites pending in 2023.

Feasibility and early cosmetic outcome of modified lateral intercostal artery perforator flap after breast conservative surgery

BACKGROUND

The lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap aims at replacing the excised breast lump with axillary tissue rich blood supply. The purpose of this study is to report the initial results of a modification LICAP flap technique in terms of intraoperative technical feasibility and short-term cosmetic outcomes in the early postoperative period.

METHODS

Modified LICAP flap technique was performed on 36 female patients with pathologically proven BC located in the outer half of the breast in the period from June 1, 2021, to April 30, 2022.

RESULTS

The LICAP flap modification enabled performing the procedure with the patient in supine position without repositioning. The majority of the patients (90%) had satisfactory early cosmetic results as reported by the patients and oncoplastic independent surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Modified LICAP flap reconstruction is feasible to be performed with the patient in supine position without repositioning and it has satisfactory early cosmetic outcomes.

Breast-conserving surgery is associated with a lower incidence of suicide among females with breast cancer in the United States: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

With comparable overall survival and local recurrence rates with mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has become the cornerstone of therapy for breast cancer; however, the difference in the incidence of suicide between BCS and mastectomy among breast cancer survivors remains unclear. This study evaluated the mortality risk from suicide among breast cancer survivors and compared suicide risk between BCS and mastectomy using a population-based cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female patients newly diagnosed with first primary breast cancer, recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, were included. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and cumulative mortality rate from suicide among those who underwent BCS and mastectomy were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1 190 991 patients with newly diagnosed first primary breast cancer were included in the study, of whom 56.5% underwent BCS and 36.1% underwent mastectomy. During the follow-up period, 667 suicides were recorded. Patients who underwent mastectomy exhibited significantly higher suicide mortality than the general population [mortality rate, 8.16 per 100 000 person-years; SMR 1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.33)], while there was no significant difference in suicide rate between patients who underwent BCS and the general population [SMR 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.02)]. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that BCS, compared with mastectomy, was associated with a significantly decreased risk of suicide among females with breast cancer [hazard ratio 0.80 (95% CI 0.68-0.95); P = 0.009].

CONCLUSION

BCS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of suicide among females with breast cancer. BCS offers a compelling option for improving the quality of life and self-esteem of patients with cancer and provides a novel perspective on cancer management.

Outcomes and complications of intraoperative radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an alternative for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for early stage breast cancer (BC). Herein, we compared outcomes, postoperative and post-radiation complications of IORT and EBRT.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study to compare complications of IORT and EBRT in patients. A checklist of the complications of IORT and EBRT, was used to assess and post-radiation complications and outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 264 women (121 in IORT and 143 in EBRT group) with a mean (SD) age of 55 ± 8.6 years analyzed in this study. The IORT group (quadrantectomy + SLNB + IORT) had more severe post-operative pain compared to the EBRT group (quadrantectomy + SLNB) (OR = 1.929, 95% CI: 1.116-3.332). Other postoperative complications, including edema, erythema, seroma, hematoma, and wound complications were not significantly different between the IORT and EBRT groups. EBRT was associated with higher rates post-radiation complications, including erythema (95.8% vs. 21.5%), skin dryness (30.8% vs. 12.4%), pruritus (26.6% vs. 17.4%), hyperpigmentation (48.3% vs. 9.9%), and telangiectasia (1.4% vs. 0.8%). Multivariate analysis showed that erythema, skin dryness and pruritus, and hyperpigmentation were more severe in the EBRT group, while breast induration was higher in the IORT group (OR = 4.109, 95% CI: 2.242-7.531). Excellent, good, and fair cosmetic outcome was seen in 11.2%, 72%, and 16.8% of the patients in the EBRT group and 29.8%, 63.6%, and 6.6% in the IORT group, respectively, suggesting that the cosmetic outcome was significantly better in the IORT group (P < .001). There wasn't statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates between two groups of patients who received either IORT or EBRT (P = .953, P = .56).

CONCLUSION

IORT is considered to have lower post-radiation complications and better cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients. Therefore, IORT might be used as the treatment of choice in eligible patients.

REPEATED BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERIES AS REFLECTION OF THE EVOLUTION IN BREAST CANCER TREATMENT (CASE REPORT WITH LITERATURE REVIEW)

The clinical case of a patient with multicentric breast cancer who underwent organ-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy is presented. An ipsilateral cancer recurrence was diagnosed 8 years after the first operation. The repeated organ-sparing surgery (lumpectomy) was done with a good cosmetic result and without disease progression during 1-year follow-up. The literature review shows that neoadjuvant systemic therapy accounting for molecular subtypes of cancer has radically changed breast cancer surgeries. The evolution of surgical approaches in stage I-II breast cancer patients consists in the de-escalation of surgery from mastectomy to organsparing or oncoplastic surgery, minimally directed surgery, and repeated breast-conserving surgery. De-escalation of surgical interventions in the area of the regional lymphatic collector consists in the transition from total axillary lymphatic dissection to sentinel lymph node biopsy or targeted removal of metastatic lymph nodes. The repeated breast-conserving surgery can be safely performed for ipsilateral recurrence in patients with all molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

The percentage of unnecessary mastectomy due to false size prediction using preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Imaging-estimated tumour extent after neoadjuvant chemotherapy tends to be discordant with the pathological extent. The authors aimed to prospectively determine the proportion of decisions regarding total mastectomy for potential breast-conserving surgery candidates owing to false size prediction with imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy and non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors prospectively enroled clinical stage II or III breast cancer patients who are scheduled for total mastectomy between 2018 and 2021. This study was conducted at Seoul National University Hospital at South Korea. Before surgery, each surgeon recorded the hypothetical maximum tumour size at which the surgeon would have been able to attempt breast-conserving surgery if the patient had actually less than the size of the tumour at that location in the breast. After surgery, the hypothetical maximum tumour size was compared with the final pathologic total extent of the tumour, including invasive and in situ cancers.

RESULTS

Among the 360 enroled patients, 130 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 230 did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the total of each group, 47.7% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 21.3% in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a smaller pathologic tumour extent than the pre-recorded hypothetical maximum tumour size (P<0.001). Further analyses were conducted for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The proportions of total mastectomy with false size prediction were higher in HER2-positive (63.3%) and triple-negative (57.6%) patients compared with ER-positive/HER2-negative (25.0%) patients (P<0.001). Both magnetic resonance imaging-pathology and ultrasonography-pathology size discrepancies were significantly associated with false decisions for total mastectomy (both P<0.001). Without magnetic resonance imaging, the false decision may be reduced by 21.5%.

CONCLUSION

A total of 47.7% of patients who received total mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were breast-conserving surgery eligible, which was significantly higher than that of non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. Magnetic resonance imaging contributed the most to false size predictions.

High wavenumber Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative assessment of breast tumour margins

Optimal oncological results and patient outcomes are achieved in surgery for early breast cancer with breast conserving surgery (BCS) where this is appropriate. A limitation of BCS occurs when cancer is present at, or close, to the resection margin - termed a 'positive' margin - and re-excision is recommended to reduce recurrence rate. This is occurs in 17% of BCS in the UK and there is therefore a critical need for a way to assess margin status intraoperatively to ensure complete excision with adequate margins at the first operation. This study presents the potential of high wavenumber (HWN) Raman spectroscopy to address this. Freshly excised specimens from thirty patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were measured using a surface Raman probe, and a multivariate classification model to predict normal versus tumour was developed from the data. This model achieved 77.1% sensitivity and 90.8% specificity following leave one patient out cross validation, with the defining features being differences in water content and lipid versus protein content. This demonstrates the feasibility of HWN Raman spectroscopy to facilitate future intraoperative margin assessment at specific locations. Clinical utility of the approach will require further research.

Prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on machine learning

BACKGROUND

Develop the best machine learning (ML) model to predict nonsentinel lymph node metastases (NSLNM) in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

From June 2016 to August 2022, 1005 breast cancer patients were included in this retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. Six ML models were introduced, and their performance was compared.

RESULTS

NSLNM occurred in 338 (33.6%) of 1005 patients. The best ML model was XGBoost, whose average area under the curve (AUC) based on 10-fold cross-verification was 0.722. It performed better than the nomogram, which was based on logistic regression (AUC: 0.764 vs. 0.706).

CONCLUSIONS

The ML model XGBoost can well predict NSLNM in breast cancer patients.

Radiotherapy refusal in breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

Although radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery has been the standard treatment for breast cancer, some people still refuse to undergo radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for refusal of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS

To investigate the trend of refusing radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into radiotherapy group and radiotherapy refusal group. Survival results were compared using a multivariate Cox risk model adjusted for clinicopathological variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of patients refusing radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery and a nomogram model was established.

RESULTS

The study included 87,100 women who underwent breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. There were 84,948 patients (97.5%) in the radiotherapy group and 2152 patients (2.5%) in the radiotherapy refusal group. The proportion of patients who refused radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery increased from 2.1% in 2010 to 3.1% in 2015. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that radiotherapy can improve overall survival (p < 0.001) and breast cancer specific survival (p < 0.001) in the patients with breast-conserving surgery. The results of multivariate logistic regression showed that age, income, marital status, race, grade, stage, subtype and chemotherapy were independent factors associated with the refusal of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative radiotherapy can improve the benefits of breast-conserving surgery. Patients with old age, low income, divorce, white race, advanced stage, and no chemotherapy were more likely to refuse radiotherapy.

Robotic-Assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Minimally invasive approaches to breast surgery have evolved from endoscopic techniques to recent developments in robotic-assisted mastectomies. Initial studies on robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) have shown improved patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes with similar complication rates and oncological outcomes in selected patients. This chapter reviews techniques used and available data on complications and clinical outcomes for RNSM. Currently, RNSM is an investigational technique in the United States and should be performed in clinical trials with U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval to rigorously evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this approach.

How breast cancer therapies impact body image - real-world data from a prospective cohort study collecting patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer patients body image (BI) is a crucial aspect of quality of life (QoL). This study examined the postoperative impact of different surgical approaches on long-term BI analyzing real-world data to guide pre- and postoperative patient care and preserve QoL.

METHODS

EORTC QLQ-BR23 BI scores were collected electronically in 325 breast cancer patients within routine clinical care for a duration of 41.5 months (11/17/2016 - 4/30/2020) at predefined time points preoperatively and repeatedly up to two years after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) (n = 212), mastectomy alone (M) (n = 27) or mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (MIBR) (n = 86). Higher scores indicated better BI. A linear mixed regression model was used to analyze the impact of BCS, M and MIBR, as well as non-surgical therapies on BI at treatment initiation and over time.

RESULTS

BI scores deteriorated by 5 points (95%-confidence interval (CI) -8.94 to -1.57, p≈0.005) immediately after BCS, by 7 points (95%-CI -12.13 to -1.80, p≈0.008) after MIBR and by 19 points (95%-CI -27.34 to -10.34, p < 0.001) after M. The change over time after BCS (+ 0.10 points per week, 95%-CI -0.17 to 0.38), MIBR (-0.07 points per week, 95%-CI -0.35 to 0.20) and M (+ 0.14 points per week, 95%-CI -0.19 to 0.48) were not statistically significant (each p > 0.05). At treatment initiation chemotherapy was associated with a 22-point decline (95%-CI -25.39 to -17.87, p < 0.001) in BI score, while radiotherapy was associated with a 5-point increase (95%-CI 1.74 to 9.02, p≈0.004). However, over time chemotherapy was associated with a score recovery (+ 0.28 points per week, 95%-CI 0.19 to 0.37, p < 0.001), whereas for radiotherapy a trend towards BI deterioration was observed (-0.11 points per week, 95%-CI -0.23 to 0.02, p≈0.101).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer surgery negatively affects BI. BCS and MIBR presumably harm BI less than M in the early postoperative period. Our data suggests BI to be deteriorating in the long term after MIBR while improving after BCS or M. Radiotherapy seems to have an additional negative long-term impact on BI. These findings should be confirmed in further studies to enable evidence-based patient information as part of preoperative shared decision-making and postoperative patient care.

The Efficacy of Low-Kilovoltage X-Rays Intraoperative Radiation as Boost for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a novel promising technology that may replace external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) as boost for patients receiving breast-conserving surgery. To better evaluate the efficacy of IORT using low-kilovoltage (low-kV) X-rays as boost, we presented this meta-analysis according to the PRISMA checklist.

Methods

Studies reported survival outcomes of intraoperative radiation using low-kilovoltage X-rays system (Intrabeam®, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) as boost were identified through electronic bibliographic database: PUBMED. The meta-analysis module in Stata (16.0) is used to pool the studies. A Poisson regression model is used to predict a 5-year local recurrence rate.

Results

Twelve studies including 3006 cases were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 55 months weighted by sample size. The pooled local recurrence rate is 0.39% per person-year (95% CI: 0.15%-0.71%), with a low degree of heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The predicted 5-year local recurrence rate was 3.45%. No difference in pooled local recurrence rate was found between non-neoadjuvant patients studies and neoadjuvant patients studies (0.41% per person-year vs. 0.58% per person-year, P = 0.580).

Conclusions

This study shows that low-kV IORT is an effective method as boost in breast cancer patients, with a low pooled local recurrence rate and low predicted 5-year local recurrence rate. Besides, no difference in the local recurrence rate was found between non-neoadjuvant patients studies and neoadjuvant patients studies. Low-kV IORT boost may be a promising alternative to EBRT boost in the future, which is being tested in the ongoing TARGIT-B trial.

How well are Brazilian mastologists (breast surgeons) trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery? A study of the impact of a breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery improvement course

Introduction

The breasts are a female symbol, impacts self-image and self-esteem. Breast reconstructive and oncoplastic surgeries have an important role in minimizing injuries. In Brazil less than a third of public health system (SUS) users have access to immediate reconstructive surgery. The low rate of breast reconstructions has multiple causes and the deficiency in availability and surgeons' technical qualification play a role. In 2010, the Breast Reconstruction and Oncoplastic Surgery Improvement Course was created by professors of the Mastology Department of Santa Casa de São Paulo and State University of Campinas (UNICAMP). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of the techniques learned on patients' management by the surgeons enrolled in the Course, as well as to characterize their profile.

Methods

All students enrolled in the Improvement Course between 2010 and 2018 were invited to answer an online questionnaire. Students who did not agree to answer the questionnaire or answered them incompletely were excluded.

Results

Total students included: 59. The mean age: 48.9 years, male (72%) with more than 5 years of Mastology practice (82.2%), from all regions of Brazil, 1.7% from the North, 33.9% from the Northeast, 44.1% from the Southeast, and 12% from the South. Most of the students considered they had little or no knowledge of breast reconstruction (74.6%) and 91,5% did not consider they had enough aptitude to perform breast reconstructions after finishing residency. After the Course, 96.6% considered themselves apt to perform such surgeries. Over 90% of the students considered the Course had impacted their practice and changed their surgical strategy view. Before the Course, 84.8% of the students stated that less than half of their patients who were operated on for breast cancer had breast reconstruction, compared to 30.5% after the Course.

Conclusion

The Breast Reconstruction and Oncoplastic Surgery Improvement Course studied here positively impacted the mastologists' management of patients. New training centers worldwide can help a lot of women with breast cancer.

Young age is associated with inferior outcomes in early-stage luminal B breast cancer patients who undergo mastectomy

Background: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of age on cancer relapse and survival in breast cancer patients undergoing different treatments. Methods: The propensity score method was used to correct for disparities between two groups; 2049 young patients were matched to 4053 older patients. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess disease-free survival. Results: In the original cohort, young patients showed higher lymph node metastasis, hormone-receptor positivity and high Ki-67 levels. After propensity score matching, the disease-free survival of young patients with the luminal B-like subtype who received mastectomy with early stage disease exhibited inferior survival. Conclusion: Decisions about biology-driven systemic treatment strategies for young patients are worthy of discussion with a multidisciplinary tumor board.

Pre-operative and early postoperative health-related quality of life of breast cancer woman: a Lebanese prospective study

Breast cancer (BC) is a major health concern in Lebanon, with an increasing incidence rate due to advancements in treatment modalities. Evaluating the impact of the BC and its treatment on a woman's Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and comparing these patterns before and after breast conserving surgery is important to identify areas where interventions may be needed to improve the overall well-being of women with BC. This study aimed to evaluate the HRQoL pre and post-operative breast conserving surgery and just prior to initiation of adjuvant therapy in newly diagnosed patients with BC in Lebanon, specifically focusing on changes in body image. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 120 patients in two health care facilities in Lebanon, collecting sociodemographic and clinical data, and using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires to evaluate HRQoL. The outcomes were measured at baseline and then one-day post-operative breast surgery. Results revealed a statistically and clinically significant decrease in body image (mean difference of 8.1 points (95% 4.3;11.1)), physical functioning (mean difference of 6.1 points (95% 3.3;8.5)), and emotional functioning (mean difference of -8.4 points (95%-12.4; -4.9) after surgery. Positive change of physical functioning score was observed among married women. Positive change of emotional functioning score was observed among patients with poor body image score and high future perspective score. Our findings provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers on the impact of breast conserving surgery on HRQoL in Lebanese women.

Radiotherapy of early-stage breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent disease for women. With advances in breast cancer screening, most breast cancers are now diagnosed in the early stages. With knowledge of different subtypes and their behavior, breast cancer treatment has become more individualized. Radiation therapy as one of the mainstays of breast cancer treatment has also been evolving. This review attempts to provide a summary of the most influential clinical studies that have driven the technological advances in radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Partial breast reconstruction of 30 cases with peri-mammary artery perforator flaps

BACKGROUND

Volume replacement is one of the vital techniques of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) when applying breast-conserving surgery. The clinical application of peri-mammary artery perforator flaps for this indication is uneven in China. Here, we describe the results of our clinical experience with peri-mammary artery flaps for partial breast reconstruction.

METHODS

In this study, 30 patients underwent partial breast resection for quadrant breast cancer followed by partial breast reconstruction with peri-mammary artery perforator flaps, which included the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap (TDAP), anterior intercostal artery perforator flap (AICAP), lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (LICAP), and lateral thoracic artery perforator flap (LTAP). All the patients' operation plans were discussed comprehensively and were performed by sticking to every step. The satisfaction outcome was assessed with the extracted version of the BREAST-Q version 2.0, Breast Conserving Therapy Module Preoperative and Postoperative Scales both preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

According to the study outcomes, the mean flap size was 5.3*4.2*2.8 cm (3.0-7.0*3.0-5.0*1.0-3.5 cm). The mean surgical time was 142 min (100-250 min). No partial flap failure was detected, and no severe complications were observed. Most patients were satisfied with the outcomes regarding the dressing, sexual life, and breast shape postoperation. Furthermore, the sensation of the surgical area, scar satisfaction, and recovery state gradually improved. Overall, LICAP and AICAP had higher scores when different flaps were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, we found that peri-mammary artery flaps had significant value in breast-conserving surgery, especially in patients with small or medium-sized breasts. Perforators could be detected by vascular ultrasound before the operation. More than one perforator could be found most of the time. No severe complications occurred when performing a suitable plan, including discussing and recording the operation procedure; the focus of care, the choice for precise and proper perforators, and the mechanism for hiding the scars were all considered and recorded in a specific chart. Patients were satisfied with the reconstruction technique of peri-mammary artery perforator flaps after breast-conserving, and the satisfaction of AICAP and LICAP was higher. In general, this technique is suitable for partial breast reconstruction and has no negative impact on patient satisfaction.

Annual cost-savings with the implementation of estrogen-receptor-only testing on Ductal Carcinoma in Situ specimens

BACKGROUND

In DCIS, ER status is an important marker. The utility of concomitant PR testing remains unclear.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study was performed with a comparative analysis of the NCDB to assess annual cost-savings with omission of routine PR testing. National Medicare payment standards determined PR staining costs to be $124.92.

RESULTS

150 institutional DCIS cases with receptor data were identified. 104 (69%) were ER+/PR+, 16 (11%) were ER+/PR-, and none were ER-/PR+. Omission of routine PR testing would have resulted in $18,738 saved annually. Within the NCDB, 34,100 DCIS cases had receptor data: 29,277 (85.9%) patients were ER+, and 26,008 (76%) were both ER/PR+. 211 (0.6%) patients were ER-/PR+. Annual national cost-savings with omission of routine PR-testing would have been $4.3 million.

CONCLUSION

PR testing for DCIS should be reserved only for patients with ER- DCIS undergoing breast conservation to determine the utility of adjuvant endocrine therapy.

A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4-192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our "5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin" method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.

Dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap for conservative treatment of breast cancer - description of technique, objective and subjective assessments

Objective

to describe and evaluate the dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap with no contralateral surgery as a technique for the conservative treatment of breast cancer when skin or a large proportion of gland requires resection.

Patients/Methods

14 patients with breast tumors with a mean size of 4.2 cm and need for skin resection. The resection area is included within an isosceles triangle, with its apex located on the areola, which is the pivot for rotation of a dermoglandular flap released through a lateral extension along that triangle base. Symmetry before and after radiotherapy was objectively assessed by authors using the BCCT.core software, as well as subjectively by three experts and patients themselves using the Harvard scale.

Results

Experts considered the breast symmetry results to be excellent/good for 85.7% of patients in the early post-operative period and 78.6% in the late post-operative period. Excellent/good ratings provided by BCCT.core software amounted to 78.6% of cases in the early post-operative period and 92.9% in the late post-operative period. Symmetry was rated as excellent/good by 100% of patients.

Conclusion

Dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap technique with no contralateral surgery provides good symmetry when a large proportion of skin or gland requires resection on breast conservative cancer treatment.

Distance to radiation therapy facility influences surgery type among older women with early‐stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (BCT) yields equivalent or better survival than mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) women. However, nationwide mastectomy trends increased in recent decades, attracting studies on underlying causes. Prior research identified that long distance to the radiation treatment facility (RTF) was associated with mastectomy. Still, it is unclear whether such association applies to young and old ESBC women comparably. We sought to delineate such impacts by age.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer in 2013-2017 receiving either BCT or mastectomy were identified from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. We assessed the association of surgery (mastectomy vs. BCT) with the distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTFs using multivariable logistic regression adjusting the socio-demographic and tumor characteristics. The nearest accessible RTF was determined based on patients' health insurance. For Medicaid, uninsured, and unknown insurance patients, the nearest accessible RTF is the nearest RTF owned by the government. The interaction effect of age and distance was evaluated as well.

RESULTS

Of 11,604 patients, 46.7% received mastectomy. Compared with distance ≤5 miles to the nearest RTF, those with distance ≥40 miles or 15-40 miles had higher odds of mastectomy (adjusted (adj) OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.82; adj OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02-1.34). To the nearest accessible RTF, the adj ORs were 1.25 (95% CI = 1.03-1.51) and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.04-1.35), respectively. Age-stratified analysis showed the significant association (p < 0.05) only presented among women aged ≥65, but not those aged <65 years.

CONCLUSION

Distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTF influences the surgery choice, especially among women in Louisiana ≥65 years with ESBC. Further understanding of factors leading to the decision for mastectomy in this age group is needed.

Emerging Roles of Ceramides in Breast Cancer Biology and Therapy

One of the classic hallmarks of cancer is the imbalance between elevated cell proliferation and reduced cell death. Ceramide, a bioactive sphingolipid that can regulate this balance, has long been implicated in cancer. While the effects of ceramide on cell death and therapeutic efficacy are well established, emerging evidence indicates that ceramide turnover to downstream sphingolipids, such as sphingomyelin, hexosylceramides, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and ceramide-1-phosphate, is equally important in driving pro-tumorigenic phenotypes, such as proliferation, survival, migration, stemness, and therapy resistance. The complex and dynamic sphingolipid network has been extensively studied in several cancers, including breast cancer, to find key sphingolipidomic alterations that can be exploited to develop new therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes. Here, we review how the current literature shapes our understanding of how ceramide synthesis and turnover are altered in breast cancer and how these changes offer potential strategies to improve breast cancer therapy.

De-Escalating the Management of In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

De-escalation of breast cancer treatment reduces morbidity and toxicity for patients. De-escalation is safe if cancer outcomes, such as recurrence and survival, remain unaffected compared to more radical regimens. This review provides an overview on treatment de-escalation for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), local treatment of breast cancer, and surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Improvements in understanding the natural history and biology of breast cancer, imaging modalities, and adjuvant treatments have facilitated de-escalation of treatment over time.

Abstract

It is necessary to identify appropriate areas of de-escalation in breast cancer treatment to minimize morbidity and maximize patients’ quality of life. Less radical treatment modalities, or even no treatment, have been reconsidered if they offer the same oncologic outcomes as standard therapies. Identifying which patients benefit from de-escalation requires particular care, as standard therapies will continue to offer adequate cancer outcomes. We provide an overview of the literature on the de-escalation of treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), local treatment of breast cancer, and surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. De-escalation of breast cancer treatment is a key area of investigation that will continue to remain a priority. Improvements in understanding the natural history and biology of breast cancer, imaging modalities, and adjuvant treatments will expand this even further. Future efforts will continue to challenge us to consider the true role of various treatment modalities.

Innovation in Breast Surgery: Practical and Ethical Considerations

The adoption of innovation is essential to the evolution of patient care. Breast surgical oncology advances through incorporating new techniques, devices, and procedures. Historical changes in practice standards from radical to modified radical mastectomy or axillary node dissection to sentinel node biopsy reduced morbidity without sacrifice in oncologic outcome. Contemporary oncoplastic techniques afford broader consideration for breast conservation and the potential for improved cosmetic outcomes. At present, many breast surgeons face the decision of which wireless device to use for localization of nonpalpable lesions. Consideration for future changes, such as robotic mastectomy, are on the horizon. No guideline exists to assist breast surgeons in the adoption of innovation into practice. The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons acknowledges that breast surgeons confront many questions associated with onboarding innovation. This paper aims to provide a framework for asking relevant questions along with the ethical principles to consider when integrating an innovation into practice.

Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BACKGROUND

Male breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking.

METHOD

The retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1-2 N0-1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844).

CONCLUSION

The results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.