Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection

In silico testing to identify compounds that inhibit ClfA and ClfB binding to the host for the formulation of future drugs against Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a highly resistant pathogen. It has multiple virulence factors, which makes it one of the most pathogenic bacteria for humankind. The vast increase in antibiotic resistance in these bacteria is a warning of existing healthcare policies. Most of the available antibiotics are ineffective due to resistance; this situation requires the development of drugs that target specific proteins and are not susceptible to resistance.

Methods

In this study, we identified a compound that acts as an antagonist of ClfA and ClfB by inhibiting their binding to host cells.

Results

The shortlisted compound's binding activity was tested by docking and molecular dynamics during its interaction with proteins. The identified compound has excellent binding energy with both ClfA (-10.11 kcal/mol) and ClfB (-11.11 kcal/mol).

Discussion

The molecular dynamics of the protein and compound were stable and promising for further in vitro and in vivo tests. The performance of our compound was tested and compared with that of the control molecule allantodapsone, which was reported in a previous study as a pan inhibitor of the clumping factor. An ADMET study of our selected compound revealed its reliable drug likeliness. This compound is an ideal candidate for in vitro studies.

Epidemiology and clinical features of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence, demography and clinical characteristics of patients who were colonized or infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 1998 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Results of MRSA-positive cultures of clinical specimens obtained as part of investigations for suspected infections were retrieved from the King Abdulaziz University Hospital Infection Control Department's records. Charts of patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 292 S aureus isolates identified, 111 (38%) were MRSA, or 6.0 MRSA isolates/1000 admissions, which represented a marked increase over MRSA prevalence in 1988 (less than 2%). Nosocomial acquisition occurred in 74.8% of isolates. All age groups were affected, but 45.9% of patients were in the 'extremes of age' group (younger than one or older than 60 years of age). The prevalence was highest in the medical ward (27%), followed by the paediatrics combined medical and surgical ward (20.7%), the outpatient department (18%), the adult surgical ward (17.1%) and the intensive care units (17.1%). Two-thirds (66.7%) of cases represented infection and the remainder represented colonization. Surgical wounds (31.1%), the chest (27%) and endovascular catheters (20.3%) were the most common sites of infection. Bacteremia occurred in 27% of patients. Local signs (68.9%) and fever (60.8%) were the most common clinical manifestations. Respiratory distress and septic shock occurred in 28.4% and 6.8% of cases, respectively. Of 74 patients with MRSA infection and 37 patients with MRSA colonization, 91.9% and 56.8% received antibiotics in the preceding six weeks, respectively (P<0.0001). The total mortality of patients with MRSA infection was 60.8%; 37.8% of deaths were the result of MRSA infection and 23% were the result of other diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MRSA is high and rapidly increasing at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, as it is worldwide. Control measures to prevent the spread of MRSA in hospitals should continue with reinforcement of hygienic precautions and development of policies to restrict the use of antibiotics.

Expression of virulence factors by Staphylococcus aureus grown in serum

Staphylococcus aureus produces many virulence factors, including toxins, immune-modulatory factors, and exoenzymes. Previous studies involving the analysis of virulence expression were mainly performed by in vitro experiments using bacterial medium. However, when S. aureus infects a host, the bacterial growth conditions are quite different from those in a medium, which may be related to the different expression of virulence factors in the host. In this study, we investigated the expression of virulence factors in S. aureus grown in calf serum. The expression of many virulence factors, including hemolysins, enterotoxins, proteases, and iron acquisition factors, was significantly increased compared with that in bacterial medium. In addition, the expression of RNA III, a global regulon for virulence expression, was significantly increased. This effect was partially restored by the addition of 300 μM FeCl₃ into serum, suggesting that iron depletion is associated with the increased expression of virulence factors in serum. In chemically defined medium without iron, a similar effect was observed. In a mutant with agr inactivated grown in serum, the expression of RNA III, psm, and sec4 was not increased, while other factors were still induced in the mutant, suggesting that another regulatory factor(s) is involved. In addition, we found that serum albumin is a major factor for the capture of free iron to prevent the supply of iron to bacteria grown in serum. These results indicate that S. aureus expresses virulence factors in adaptation to the host environment.

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic

Staphylococcus aureus is an important cause of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), endovascular infections, pneumonia, septic arthritis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, foreign-body infections, and sepsis. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates were once confined largely to hospitals, other health care environments, and patients frequenting these facilities. Since the mid-1990s, however, there has been an explosion in the number of MRSA infections reported in populations lacking risk factors for exposure to the health care system. This increase in the incidence of MRSA infection has been associated with the recognition of new MRSA clones known as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). CA-MRSA strains differ from the older, health care-associated MRSA strains; they infect a different group of patients, they cause different clinical syndromes, they differ in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, they spread rapidly among healthy people in the community, and they frequently cause infections in health care environments as well. This review details what is known about the epidemiology of CA-MRSA strains and the clinical spectrum of infectious syndromes associated with them that ranges from a commensal state to severe, overwhelming infection. It also addresses the therapy of these infections and strategies for their prevention.

Immunological mechanisms underlying the genetic predisposition to severe Staphylococcus aureus infection in the mouse model

Host genetic variations play a significant role in conferring predisposition to infection. In this study, we examined the immune mechanisms underlying the host genetic predisposition to severe Staphylococcus aureus infection in different mouse strains. Whereas C57BL/6 mice were the most resistant in terms of control of bacterial growth and survival, A/J, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice were highly susceptible and succumbed to infection shortly after bacterial inoculation. Other strains (C3H/HeN, CBA, and C57BL/10) exhibited intermediate susceptibility levels. Susceptibility of mice to S. aureus was associated with an inability to limit bacterial growth in the kidneys and development of pathology. Resistance to S. aureus in C57BL/6 mice was dependent on innate immune mechanisms because Rag2-IL2Rgamma(-/-) C57BL/6 mice, which are deficient in B, T, and NK cells, were also resistant to infection. Indeed, neutrophil depletion or inhibition of neutrophil recruitment rendered C57BL/6 mice completely susceptible to S. aureus, indicating that neutrophils are essential for the observed resistance. Although neutrophil function is not inhibited in A/J mice, expression of neutrophil chemoattractants KC and MIP-2 peaked earlier in the kidneys of C57BL/6 mice than in A/J mice, indicating that a delay in neutrophil recruitment to the site of infection may underlie the increased susceptibility of A/J mice to S. aureus.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in dogs and cats: an emerging problem?

There is concern over transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) between animals and humans. The spread of hospital-acquired and community-acquired MRSA is a major challenge in human medicine. MRSA is rarely isolated from animals but methicillin resistance occurs in staphylococci that are more prevalent in animals. MRSA infections in animals are uncommon and most are associated with exposure to medical hospitals, extensive wounds, prolonged hospitalisation and immunosuppression. The risk to human health appears to be small but a survey of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in animals is required. Thorough investigation of possible zoonotic infections to establish linkage is encouraged. Medical and veterinary staff should appreciate that animals can carry MRSA, cooperate in eliminating infections and monitor animals in medical environments. Veterinary clinics should implement guidelines for dealing with MRSA. Responsible antibiotic use should minimise the spread of antibiotic resistance but a UK monitoring scheme is desirable.

Origins of community strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

To characterize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains circulating in the community, we identified predictors of isolating community MRSA and genotyped a sample of MRSA collected from a community-based, high-risk population. Computerized databases of the Community Health Network of San Francisco and the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory were searched electronically for the years 1992-1999 to identify community-onset infections caused by MRSA. Sequential analyses were performed to identify predictors of MRSA strains. The majority (58%) of infections were caused by strains traceable to the hospital or to long-term care facilities. Injection drug use was associated with infections that were not associated with health care settings. Genotypes for 20 of 35 MRSA isolates recovered from injection drug users did not match any of >600 genotypes of clinical isolates. In a nonoutbreak setting, the hospital was the main source of community MRSA; however, the presence of genetically distinct and diverse MRSA strains indicates MRSA strains now also originate from the community.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on dermatology practice

Methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged in the 1960s and is now commonly seen in hospitals, clinics and, since the mid-1990s, the community. Risk factors for the acquisition of MRSA include chronic dermatoses, underlying medical illnesses, attending healthcare facilities, use of prescription antibacterials, surgery, intravenous lines, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, and proximity to patients colonized with MRSA. Recent community-associated strains often occur in patients without these risk factors. Staphylococci are readily spread from person to person and readily contaminate the environment. Infection control measures thus involve identifying the infected patients, separating them from other non-infected patients, cleaning of the environment and, most important of all, scrupulous attention to hand hygiene. Alcoholic antiseptic hand rubs offer an alternative to antiseptic hand washes and increase compliance. Treatment of MRSA skin infections is challenging. Topical agents such as mupirocin or fusidic acid can be used, but the organisms often become resistant. Systemic therapy involves non-beta-lactams. Parenteral treatment is generally with glycopeptides such as vancomycin; oral therapy is more complex. Monotherapy with quinolones, rifampin (rifampicin), and fusidic acid often results in the development of resistance and so, if any of these agents are chosen it should be in combination. There are no data on combination therapy, although rifampin-containing combinations are often chosen. Fourth-generation quinolones and linezolid are expensive but promising alternatives.

Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Epidemiology and Potential Virulence Factors

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been isolated from patients in the community. Some of these strains may have origins in the hospital, but others appear to be novel and unrelated to known hospital strains. Community MRSA strains have several distinguishing characteristics that may enable them to more readily colonize and infect otherwise healthy individuals. This article reviews recent publications addressing the epidemiology of MRSA in the community, risk factors associated with carriage, potentially associated virulence factors, and concepts of strain fitness as they pertain to MRSA. MRSA likely will be an increasingly important pathogen in the community.

Prevalence of and risk factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the time of hospital admission

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization among patients presenting for hospital admission and to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.

DESIGN

Surveillance cultures were performed at the time of hospital admission to identify patients colonized with S. aureus. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.

SETTING

A tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Adults presenting for hospital admission (N = 974).

RESULTS

S. aureus was isolated from 205 (21%) of the patients for whom cultures were performed. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was isolated from 179 (18.4%) of the patients, and MRSA was isolated from 26 (2.7%) of the patients. All 26 MRSA-colonized patients had been admitted to a healthcare facility in the preceding year, had at least one chronic illness, or both. In multivariate analyses comparing MRSA-colonized patients with control-patients, admission to a nursing home (odds ratio [OR], 16.5; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.4 to 192.1; P = .025) or a hospitalization of 5 days or longer during the preceding year (OR, 3.91; CI95, 1.1 to 13.9; P = .035) were independent predictors of MRSA colonization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients colonized with MRSA admitted to this hospital likely acquired the organism during previous encounters with healthcare facilities. There was no evidence that MRSA colonization occurs commonly among low-risk individuals in this community. These data suggest that evaluation of recent healthcare exposures is essential if true community acquisition of MRSA is to be confirmed.

Changing epidemiology of community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

OBJECTIVES

To review cases of community-onset Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and to evaluate whether the risk factors and epidemiology of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia have changed from early reports.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-comparison study of community-onset MRSA (n = 26) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (n = 26) bacteremias at our institution.

SETTING

A 600-bed urban academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients with community-onset MRSA bacteremia were compared with 26 patients with community-onset MSSA bacteremia. Molecular analysis was performed on S. aureus isolates from the 26 MRSA cases as well as from 13 cases of community-onset S. aureus bacteremia from 1980 and 9 cases of nosocomial S. aureus bacteremia from 2001.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar except that patients with MRSA bacteremia were more likely to have presented from a long-term-care facility (26.9% vs 4%; P = .05) and to have had multiple admissions within the preceding year (46% vs 15%; P = .03). Clamped homogeneous electric fields analysis of MRSA isolates from 1982 revealed predominantly that one clone was the epidemic strain, whereas there were 14 unique strains among current community-onset isolates. Among current nosocomial isolates, 3 patterns were identified, all of which were present in the community-onset cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously described risk factors for MRSA acquisition may not be helpful in predicting disease due to the polyclonal spread of MRSA in the community. Unlike early outbreaks of MRSA in patients presenting from the community, current acquisition appears to be polyclonal and is usually related to contact with the healthcare system.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging pathogen

The prevalence of MRSA in the nosocomial setting has been well studied, and its control remains a challenge for infection control professionals. Complicating this problem is the increasing number of reports on the spread of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA). CA-MRSA strains differ from hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains in that they are generally susceptible to most antibiotics. These strains share the presence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV in their genomes, are frequently virulent, and predominantly cause skin and soft tissue infections. The genome sequence of the prototypic CA-MRSA strain, MW2, revealed the presence of additional virulence factors not commonly present in other S. aureus strains. We determined the genetic relatedness of 30 geographically diverse CA-MRSA isolates clustered based on SCCmec type IV by sequence analysis of the polymorphic repeat region of the protein A gene (spa typing). These results indicated that most strains shared a common spa type (131), identical to MW2. Because this group tends to infect healthy individuals with no known risk factors for nosocomial acquisition of MRSA, we refer to it as CA-MRSA without risk factors. A second group, CA-MRSA with risk factors, consists of two related genotypes, spa types 1 and 7, which differ by one nucleotide change. These strains have caused severe infections in HIV-positive patients in Los Angeles and New York. Although CA-MRSA strains share genetic determinants, they are not clonal but rather are derived from different genetic backgrounds. The genetic characteristics and the epidemiology of CA-MRSA with and without risk factors are discussed.

Antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus at the University of Chicago Hospitals: a 15-year longitudinal assessment in a large university-based hospital

OBJECTIVES

To describe a longitudinal profile of resistance to beta-lactam antimicrobials among isolates of Staphylococcus aureus at a large university teaching hospital and to evaluate the impact of the methicillin resistance phenotype on resistance trends for non-beta-lactam antimicrobials.

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility data for all 17,287 S. aureus isolates obtained from January 1986 through December 2000.

SETTING

The University of Chicago Hospitals, a family of tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, consisting of 547 adult and pediatric beds.

RESULTS

The annual rate of resistance to methicillin increased from 13% in 1986 to 28% in 2000 (P < .001) and has not plateaued. For each non-beta-lactam antimicrobial tested, the annual rates of resistance were far higher among methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates than among methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. The annual rates of resistance to the macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antimicrobials erythromycin and clindamycin increased among MSSA isolates (P < .01), but remained lower than 20%. Resistance to the MLS antimicrobials was higher among MRSA isolates (higher than 60%), but the annual rate decreased significantly during the study (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of methicillin resistance among S. aureus isolates has continued to increase; resistance to non-beta-lactam antimicrobials is far more common among MRSA isolates. Recent decreases in the proportion of MRSA isolates resistant to non-beta-lactam antimicrobials suggest important changes in the epidemiology of this pathogen.

Prevalence of and risk factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an outpatient clinic population

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in an outpatient population and to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.

DESIGN

Surveillance cultures were performed during outpatient visits to identify S. aureus colonization. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization.

SETTING

Primary care internal medicine clinic.

PATIENTS

Adults presenting for non-acute primary care (N = 494).

RESULTS

S. aureus was isolated from 122 (24.7%) of the patients for whom cultures were performed. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was isolated from 107 (21.7%) of the patients, whereas MRSA was isolated from 15 (3.0%) of the patients. All MRSA isolates were resistant to multiple non-beta-lactam antimicrobial agents. In multivariate analyses, MRSA colonization was independently associated with admission to a nursing home (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 103; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 7 to 999) or hospital in the previous year, although the association with hospital admission was observed only among those without chronic illness (adjusted OR, 7.1; CI95, 1.3 to 38.1). In addition, MRSA colonization was associated with the presence of at least one underlying chronic illness, although this association was observed only among those who had not been hospitalized in the previous year (adjusted OR, 5.1; CI95, 1.2 to 21.9).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a low prevalence of MRSA colonization in an adult outpatient population. MRSA carriers most likely acquired the organism through contact with healthcare facilities rather than in the community. These data show that care must be taken when attributing MRSA colonization to the community if detected in outpatients or during the first 24 to 48 hours of hospitalization.

Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among household contacts of individuals with nosocomially acquired MRSA

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency with which methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is spread from colonized or infected patients to their household and community contacts.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Household and community contacts of MRSA-colonized or -infected patients for whom MRSA screening cultures were performed.

RESULTS

MRSA was isolated from 25 (14.5%) of 172 individuals. Among the contacts of index patients who had at least one MRSA-colonized contact, those with close contact to the index patient were 7.5 times more likely to be colonized (53% vs 7%; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 50.3; P = .002). An analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility and DNA fingerprint patterns suggested person-to-person spread.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA colonization occurs frequently among household and community contacts of patients with nosocomially acquired MRSA, suggesting that transmission of nosocomially acquired MRSA outside of the healthcare setting may be a substantial source of MRSA colonization and infection in the community.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors

Reports suggest that carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among persons without health care-associated risks has increased. A meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) among MRSA isolates from hospitalized patients or the prevalence of MRSA colonization among community members was conducted. The CA-MRSA prevalence among hospital MRSA was 30.2% in 27 retrospective studies and 37.3% in 5 prospective studies; 85% of all patients with CA-MRSA had > or =1 health care-associated risk. The pooled MRSA colonization rate among community members was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04%-1.53%), but there was significant heterogeneity among study populations. Community members from whom samples were obtained in health care facilities were more likely to be carrying MRSA than were community members from whom samples were obtained outside of the health care setting (relative risk, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56-3.53). Among studies that excluded persons with health care contacts, the MRSA prevalence was 0.2%. Moreover, most persons with CA-MRSA had > or =1 health care-associated risk, which suggests that the prevalence of MRSA among persons without risks remains low (< or =0.24%). Effective control of dissemination of MRSA throughout the community likely will require effective control of nosocomial MRSA transmission.

Evolving antimicrobial chemotherapy for Staphylococcus aureus infections: Our backs to the wall

Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for many nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Its evolving resistance to traditional antimicrobial chemotherapy and emerging prevalence outside of the healthcare environment are serious concerns. This review of the changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, the emergence of vancomycin (glycopeptide)-resistant isolates, and the mechanisms of resistance to beta-lactams and glycopeptides provides an update for clinicians regarding effective strategies for treatment.

MRSA carriage: the relationship between community and healthcare setting. A study in an Italian hospital

From May 1997 to June 1998, all patients admitted to the study institution were screened at entry for MRSA carriage (both colonization and infection). Eighty-six MRSA carriers were identified; of these, 85 were nasal carriers. Risk factors were compared to those of 86 controls. Although the vast majority of both carriers and controls had at least one previous hospital stay, carriers were less likely than controls to be referred from a community setting, and had resided within the community for a shorter time before the current admission. The number of underlying conditions was comparable in the two groups, but those infected were more likely to have cancer than the controls. While community-acquired MRSA carriage is rare, exposure to a health care setting (particularly if repeated) within six months from the current admission, is a risk factor for MRSA carriage and introduction of the organism into an institution.

Community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hand infections: case reports and clinical implications

We report a series of 4 cases of community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hand infections in patients without risk factors. Methicillin-resistant S aureus infections commonly involve the skin and soft tissue; therefore, hand infections may become more common as the prevalence of this pathogen increases. Hand surgeons must be aware of this emerging pathogen and obtain appropriate tissue cultures to diagnose and effectively treat this infection.

Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus an emerging community pathogen? A review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the historical epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and review the literature suggesting that MRSA has become a community pathogen.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the MEDLINE database was performed, encompassing all English or French language citations from 1966 to 1999 and containing the subjects and/or text words: 'Staphylococcus aureus', 'methicillin resistance', 'endocarditis', 'cellulites', 'pneumonia' and 'community-acquired'. Articles published in other languages that provided English or French abstracts were included. All relevant references cited in articles obtained from the MEDLINE database and book chapters were also included.

DATA EXTRACTION

All articles obtained from the above sources were examined and were included in the review if a laboratory or epidemiological study of community-acquired MRSA was presented.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

MRSA has emerged over the past 30 years to become a worldwide nosocomial pathogen and has recently been reported as a cause of community-acquired infections. The changing epidemiology of MRSA is likely because of two mechanisms: the movement of nosocomial MRSA strains into the community and the de novo appearance of community strains resulting from the transfer of genetic material from methicillin-resistant Gram-positive organisms to sensitive S aureus strains. The emergence of MRSA as a community pathogen has occurred at a slower rate than it did for penicillin-resistant S aureus (PRSA) in the 1950s and 1960s, possibly because the mechanism of methicillin resistance does not exhibit the same ease of transferability as that of penicillin resistance. Four case reports, seven case series, 10 case-control studies and two cohort studies on community-acquired MRSA were analyzed. Determining whether these reports involve new community-acquired strains rather than previously acquired nosocomial strains can be problematic. It appears, however, that MRSA strains of both nosocomial and community origin are now endemic in certain communities in different parts of the world. Few surveillance studies of nonhospitalized patient populations have been performed to date; thus, the true prevalence of MRSA in the community at large is essentially unknown, although it appears to be low. At present, the empirical treatment of community-acquired S aureus infections with a beta-lactamase-stable beta-lactam antibiotic is appropriate for most populations. However, empirical vancomycin therapy for serious S aureus infections should be strongly considered for patients with significant risk factors for previously-acquired nosocomial MRSA or for patients belonging to outpatient populations with a proven high prevalence of MRSA. Increasing vancomycin use will likely have a significant impact on the development of resistance in Gram-positive organisms.

Community-acquired and clindamycin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children

BACKGROUND

Recognition of children with community-acquired (CA) infections caused by clindamycin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prompted a retrospective study in two Chicago hospitals conducted from 1987 through 1997.

METHODS

Laboratory records of MRSA isolates, antibiotic susceptibilities and information from patient medical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven MRSA isolates from 103 children were studied with 51 isolates CA and 77 susceptible to clindamycin. The CA infections were less frequently associated with prior surgery (P = 0.0039) or a foreign body (P = 0.0001), and clindamycin-susceptible MRSA infections were less frequently associated with a foreign body (P = 0.001) compared with nosocomially acquired or clindamycin-resistant MRSA infections. Clindamycin-susceptible MRSA sources were mostly skin, wound or abscess (69%). Soft tissue diagnoses predominated (70%), but 16% were serious invasive infections. Ninety percent of clindamycin-susceptible MRSA were susceptible to erythromycin and/or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Antibiotic undertreatment (45%) or overtreatment (17%) of children with the clindamycin-susceptible MRSA occurred, but clindamycin appeared to be effective when used.

CONCLUSION

The impact of these organisms could be substantial if they become more frequent or widespread. S. aureus is a potential pathogen in large numbers of pediatric patients; microbiologic evaluation and both presumptive and definitive treatment of all these children may need to be changed.

Clinical experience and outcomes of community-acquired and nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a northern Australian hospital

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a well-recognized cause of hospital-acquired sepsis. We reviewed the clinical features of a new variant of community-acquired MRSA originally described from the Kimberley region of northern Western Australia (WA MRSA). This strain has become an increasing cause of community- and hospital-acquired sepsis at Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) in the Northern Territory, especially in Aboriginal Australians from remote communities. Fifty percent of WA MRSA was community-acquired, with 76% in Aboriginals. Like the MRSA from eastern Australia (EA MRSA), WA MRSA commonly caused skin sepsis but was less likely to cause respiratory or urinary infections compared with EA MRSA. Twelve out of 125 (9.6%) WA MRSA and 7/93 (7.5%) EA MRSA infections were septicaemias. Septicaemia due to WA MRSA occurred in adult medical patients, especially those with temporary haemodialysis catheters, while EA MRSA septicaemia occurred throughout the hospital. Aboriginal people were more likely to develop both community- and hospital-acquired WA MRSA septicaemia [overall relative risk (RR) 12.3 (95% CI 3.7-40.7)]. Control of WA MRSA requires policies to reduce transmission in both hospitals and communities. Community-based control programmes need support for individual patient management, improved housing and hygiene, control of skin sepsis and appropriate use of antibiotics, especially in rural Aboriginal communities in northern Australia.