1
|
Januszek R, Bryniarski L, Mashayekhi K, DI Mario C, Siłka W, Malinowski KP, Wańha W, Chyrchel M, Siudak Z. Annual operator volume and procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusions treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: analysis based on 14,899 patients. Minerva Cardiol Angiol 2024; 72:336-345. [PMID: 38482633 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.23.06447-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low operator and institutional volume is associated with poorer procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This study was aimed at evaluating the relationship between operator volume and procedural outcomes of patients treated with PCI for chronic total occlusion (CTO). METHODS Data were obtained from the national registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (ORPKI) collected from January 2014 to December 2020. The primary endpoint was a procedural success, defined as restoration of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) II/III flow without in-hospital cardiac death and myocardial infarction, whereas secondary endpoints included periprocedural complications. RESULTS Data of 14,899 CTO-PCIs were analyzed. The global procedural success was 66.1%. There was a direct relationship between the annual volume of CTO-PCIs per operator and the procedural success (OR: 1.006 [95% CI: 1.003-1.009]; P<0.001). The nonlinear relationships of annualized CTO-PCI volume per operator and adjusted outcome rates revealed that operators performing 40 CTO cases per year had the best procedural outcomes in terms of technical success (TIMI flow II/III after PCI), coronary artery perforation rate and any periprocedural complications rate (P<0.0001). Among the other factors associated with procedural success, the following can be noted: multi-vessel, left main coronary artery disease (as compared to single-vessel disease), the usage of rotablation as well as PCI within bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS High-volume CTO operators achieve greater procedural success with a lower frequency of periprocedural complications. Higher annual caseload might increase the overall quality of CTO-PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Januszek
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland -
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Cracow University, Kraków, Poland -
| | - Leszek Bryniarski
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
- Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Kambis Mashayekhi
- Division of Cardiology and Angiology II, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | - Carlo DI Mario
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Wojciech Siłka
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
- Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Krzysztof P Malinowski
- Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Wojciech Wańha
- Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Michał Chyrchel
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
- Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Siudak
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poletti E, Agostoni P, Ungi I. Learning curve, awareness, confidence and audacity: the perfect cocktail to tackle CTO-PCI. Minerva Cardiol Angiol 2024; 72:332-335. [PMID: 38804628 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.24.06558-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Poletti
- HartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Imre Ungi
- Division of Invasive Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center of Cardiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keller K, Göbel S, Gori T, Münzel T, Wenzel P, Hobohm L. A nationwide trend analysis on the usage of endomyocardial biopsy. Clin Cardiol 2024; 47:e24198. [PMID: 38085136 PMCID: PMC10823453 DOI: 10.1002/clc.24198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a safe procedure performed in diagnostic work-up of cardiac disease. HYPOTHESIS Data regarding temporal trends of total numbers, characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and complications of patients undergoing EMB are sparse. METHODS The nationwide German inpatient sample (2005-2019) was used for this analysis. Patient cases of EBM during the 5-year cycles from 2005 to 2009, 2010 to 2014, and 2015 to 2019 were compared, and temporal trends regarding total numbers and presumable major and minor EMB-associated complications were investigated. RESULTS Overall, 67 745 EMB were performed in Germany 2005-2019. Total number of EMB increased from 3083 in 2005 to 5646 in 2019 (β 0.40 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.43], p < .001). Among these EMB, 19 083 (28.2%) were performed during the period 2005-2009, 22 867 (33.7%) 2010-2014, and 25 795 (38.1%) between 2015 and 2019. The proportion of patients aged ≥70 years was highest 2015-2019 (2005-2009: 9.3%; 2010-2014: 13.8%; 2015-2019: 16.1%, p < .001) and the most aggravated comorbidity profile (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.25 ± 1.93; 2.67 ± 2.14; 3.01 ± 2.29, p < .001) was also detected 2015-2019. Major complications occurred less often in the period 2015-2019 compared to 2005-2009 (odds ratio [OR] 0.921 [95% CI 0.893-0.950], p < .001), whereas minor complications were more frequently observed between 2015 and 2019 (OR 1.067 [95% CI 1.042-1.093], p < .001). While a decrease in major complications was detected irrespective of age, an increase in minor complications was identified only in patients between 30-59 years. CONCLUSIONS Annual numbers of EMB increased significantly in Germany 2005-2019. Patients who underwent EMB in recent years were older and showed an aggravated comorbidity profile accompanied by fewer major complications, underscoring safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karsten Keller
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH)University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Clinic VIIUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
| | - Sebastian Göbel
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
| | - Tommaso Gori
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH)University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)Partner Site Rhine MainMainzGermany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)Partner Site Rhine MainMainzGermany
| | - Philip Wenzel
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH)University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)Partner Site Rhine MainMainzGermany
| | - Lukas Hobohm
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiology IUniversity Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH)University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz)MainzGermany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shen YC, Krumholz HM, Hsia RY. Do PCI Facility Openings and Closures Affect AMI Outcomes Differently in High- vs Average-Capacity Markets? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1129-1140. [PMID: 37225284 PMCID: PMC10229059 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute myocardial infarction may result from openings and closures of PCI-providing hospitals, potentially leading to low hospital PCI volume, which is associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to determine whether openings and closures of PCI hospitals have differentially impacted patient health outcomes in high- vs average-capacity PCI markets. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, the authors identified PCI hospital availability within a 15-minute driving time of zip code communities. The authors categorized communities by baseline PCI capacity and identified changes in outcomes associated with PCI-providing hospital openings and closures using community fixed-effects regression models. RESULTS From 2006 to 2017, 20% and 16% of patients in average- and high-capacity markets, respectively, experienced a PCI hospital opening within a 15-minute drive. In average-capacity markets, openings were associated with a 2.6 percentage point decrease in admission to a high-volume PCI facility; high-capacity markets saw an 11.6 percentage point decrease. After an opening, patients in average-capacity markets experienced a 5.5% and 7.6% relative increase in likelihood of same-day and in-hospital revascularization, respectively, as well as a 2.5% decrease in mortality. PCI hospital closures were associated with a 10.4% relative increase in admission to high-volume PCI hospitals and a 1.4 percentage point decrease in receipt of same-day PCI. There was no change observed in high-capacity PCI markets. CONCLUSIONS After openings, patients in average-capacity markets derived significant benefits, whereas those in high-capacity markets did not. This suggests that past a certain threshold, facility opening does not improve access and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chu Shen
- Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, USA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bailey SR. PCI Facility Openings and Closures: If You Build It, Will They Benefit? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1141-1143. [PMID: 37140501 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven R Bailey
- Department of Medicine, LSU Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Udell JA, Brickman AR, Chu A, Ferreira-Legere LE, Sheth MS, Ko DT, Austin PC, Abdel-Qadir H, Ivers NM, Bhatia RS, Farkouh ME, Stukel TA, Tu JV. Primary Care Clinical Volumes, Cholesterol Testing, and Cardiovascular Outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2023; 39:340-349. [PMID: 36574928 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether the annual number of primary care physician (PCP) unique outpatient assessments, which we refer to as clinical volume, translates into better cardiovascular preventive care. We examined the relationship between PCP outpatient clinical volumes and cholesterol testing and major adverse cardiovascular event rates among guideline-recommended eligible patients. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study conducted as part of the Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART) cohort, a population-based cohort of almost all adult residents of Ontario, Canada, followed from 2008 to 2012. For each clinical volume quintile, we compared cholesterol testing and major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as time to first event of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS The 10,037 PCPs evaluated had an annualized median volume of 2303 clinical encounters (IQR 1292-3680). Among 4,740,380 patients, 84% underwent guideline-concordant cholesterol testing at least once over 5 years, ranging from 73% with the lowest clinical volume quintile physicians to 86% with the highest. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 10.5% relative increase in the probability of cholesterol testing for every doubling of clinical volumes (95% CI 9.7-11.4; P < 0.001). Patients treated by the lowest volume quintile physicians had the highest rate of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (compared with the highest volume quintile physicians: adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.21; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients of physicians with the lowest clinical volumes received less frequent cholesterol testing and had the highest rate of incident cardiovascular events. Further research investigating the drivers of this relationship is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob A Udell
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Arielle R Brickman
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Maya S Sheth
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dennis T Ko
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Schulich Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Husam Abdel-Qadir
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noah M Ivers
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Sacha Bhatia
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E Farkouh
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thérèse A Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jack V Tu
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Schulich Heart Centre, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krishnamurthy A, Keeble CM, Anderson M, Burton-Wood N, Somers K, Harland C, Baxter PD, McLenachan JM, Blaxill JM, Blackman DJ, Malkin CJ, Wheatcroft SB, Greenwood JP. Association between operator volume and mortality in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Open Heart 2022; 9:openhrt-2022-002072. [PMID: 36192035 PMCID: PMC9535214 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a paucity of real-world data assessing the association of operator volumes and mortality specific to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods Demographic, clinical and outcome data for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds General Infirmary, UK, between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013, were obtained prospectively. Operator volumes were analysed according to annual operator PPCI volume (low volume: 1–54 PPCI per year; intermediate volume: 55–109 PPCI per year; high volume: ≥110 PPCI per year). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were undertaken to investigate 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, adjusting for confounding factors. Results During this period, 4056 patients underwent PPCI, 3703 (91.3%) of whom were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. PPCI by low-volume operators was associated with significantly higher adjusted 30-day mortality (HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.08); p=0.02) compared with PPCI performed by high-volume operators, with no significant difference in adjusted 12-month mortality (HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.65); p=0.09). Comparisons between low-volume and intermediate-volume operators, and between intermediate and high-volume operators, showed no significant differences in 30-day and 12-month mortality. Conclusions Low operator volume is independently associated with higher probability of 30-day mortality compared with high operator volume, suggesting a volume–outcome relationship in PPCI at a threshold higher than current recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvindra Krishnamurthy
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK,Leeds Instutute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire M Keeble
- Leeds Instutute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn Somers
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Paul D Baxter
- Leeds Instutute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK,Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephen B Wheatcroft
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK,Leeds Instutute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John P Greenwood
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK,Leeds Instutute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim JY, Kang J, Kim BJ, Kim SE, Kim DY, Lee KJ, Park HK, Cho YJ, Park JM, Lee KB, Cha JK, Lee JS, Lee J, Yang KH, Hong OR, Shin JH, Park JH, Gorelick PB, Bae HJ. Annual Case Volume and One-Year Mortality for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Korean Med Sci 2022; 37:e270. [PMID: 36123959 PMCID: PMC9485065 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between endovascular treatment (EVT) case volume per hospital and clinical outcomes has been reported, but the exact volume threshold has not been determined. This study aimed to examine the case volume threshold in this context. METHODS National audit data on the quality of acute stroke care in patients admitted via emergency department, within 7 days of onset, in hospitals that treated ≥ 10 stroke cases during the audit period were analyzed. Ischemic stroke cases treated with EVT during the last three audits (2013, 2014, and 2016) were selected for the analysis. Annual EVT case volume per hospital was estimated and analyzed as a continuous and a categorical variable (in quartiles). The primary outcome measure was 1-year mortality as a surrogate of 3-month functional outcome. As post-hoc sensitivity analysis, replication of the study results was examined using the 2018 audit data. RESULTS We analyzed 1,746 ischemic stroke cases treated with EVT in 120 acute care hospitals. The median annual EVT case volume was 12.0 cases per hospital, and mortality rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year were 12.7%, 16.6%, and 23.3%, respectively. Q3 and Q4 had 33% lower odds of 1-year mortality than Q1. Adjustments were made for predetermined confounders. Annual EVT case volume cut-off value for 1-year mortality was 15 cases per year (P < 0.02). The same cut-off value was replicated in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION Annual EVT case volume was associated with 1-year mortality. The volume threshold per hospital was 15 cases per year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Yup Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jihoon Kang
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Beom Joon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Do Yeon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Keon-Joo Lee
- Department of Neurology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Kyun Park
- Department of Neurology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Jin Cho
- Department of Neurology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jong-Moo Park
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Kyung Bok Lee
- Department of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Kwan Cha
- Department of Neurology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juneyoung Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Hwa Yang
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea
| | - Ock Ran Hong
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea
| | - Ji Hyeon Shin
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Park
- Department of Neurology, Gyeonggi Provincial Medical Center Icheon Hospital, Icheon, Korea
| | - Philip B Gorelick
- Davee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hee-Joon Bae
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
PCI volumes: Have volumes and experience become irrelevant? CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 40:69-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Broome DT, Naples R, Bailey R, Tekin Z, Hamidi M, Bena JF, Morrison SL, Berber E, Siperstein AE, Scharpf J, Skugor M. Use of Preoperative Imaging in Primary Hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:e328-e337. [PMID: 33119066 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Preoperative imaging is performed routinely to guide surgical management in primary hyperparathyroidism, but the optimal imaging modalities are debated. OBJECTIVE Our objectives were to evaluate which imaging modalities are associated with improved cure rate and higher concordance rates with intraoperative findings. A secondary aim was to determine whether additive imaging is associated with higher cure rate. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS This is a retrospective cohort review of 1485 adult patients during a 14-year period (2004-2017) at an academic tertiary referral center that presented for initial parathyroidectomy for de novo primary hyperparathyroidism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Surgical cure rate, concordance of imaging with operative findings, and imaging performance. RESULTS The overall cure rate was 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.95). Cure rate was significantly improved if sestamibi/single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was concordant with operative findings (95.9% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.010). Adding a third imaging modality did not improve cure rate (1 imaging type 91.8% vs. 2 imaging types 94.4% vs. 3 imaging types 87.2%, P = 0.59). Despite having a low number of cases (n = 28), 4-dimensional (4D) CT scan outperformed (higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) all imaging modalities in multiglandular disease and double adenomas, and sestamibi/SPECT in single adenomas. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative ultrasound combined with sestamibi/SPECT were associated with the highest cure and concordance rates. If pathology was not found on ultrasound and sestamibi/SPECT, additional imaging did not improve the cure rate or concordance. 4D CT scan outperformed all imaging modalities in multiglandular disease and double adenomas, and sestamibi/SPECT in single adenomas, but these findings were underpowered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Broome
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Naples
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Richard Bailey
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zehra Tekin
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Moska Hamidi
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - James F Bena
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shannon L Morrison
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eren Berber
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Allan E Siperstein
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Joseph Scharpf
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mario Skugor
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vemulapalli S. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement volume-outcome relationships: a Pandora's box. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:493-495. [PMID: 33312908 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-av-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sreekanth Vemulapalli
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Association between Hospital volume of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival to Hospital discharge. Resuscitation 2020; 148:25-31. [PMID: 31945429 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown that hospital case volume is not associated with survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, how case volume impact on survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is unknown. METHODS We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in the U.S. 2005-2011 to identify cases in which in-hospital CPR was performed for IHCA. Restricted cubic spine was used to evaluate the association between hospital annual CPR volume and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS Across more than 1000 hospitals in NIS, we identified 125,082 cases (mean age 67, 45% female) of IHCA for which CPR was performed over the study period. Median [Q1, Q3] case volume was 60 [34, 99]. Compared to those in the 1 st quartile of case volume, hospitals in the 4th quartile tends to have younger patients (mean = 66 vs 68 yrs), higher comorbidities (median Elixhauser score = 4 vs 3), and in low income areas (37 vs 30%). Overall, 23% of the patients survived to hospital discharge. There was a non-linear association between CPR volume and survival: a non-significant trend towards better survival was observed with increasing annual CPR volume that reached a plateau at 51-55 cases per year, after which survival began to drop and became significantly lower after 75 cases per year (p for non-linearity<0.001). Compared to those in first quartile of case volume, hospitals in 4th quartile had higher length of stay (median = 8 vs 10 days, respectively) and higher rate of non-routine home discharge (64% vs 67%) among those who survived. CONCLUSION Unlike OHCA, low CPR volume is an indicator of good performing hospitals and increasing CPR case volume does not translate to improve survival for IHCA.
Collapse
|
13
|
Samsky M, Krucoff M, Althouse AD, Abraham WT, Adamson P, Aguel F, Bilazarian S, Dangas GD, Gilchrist IC, Henry TD, Hochman JS, Kapur NK, Laschinger J, Masters RG, Michelson E, Morrow DA, Morrow V, Ohman EM, Pina I, Proudfoot AG, Rogers J, Sapirstein J, Senatore F, Stockbridge N, Thiele H, Truesdell AG, Waksman R, Rao S. Clinical and regulatory landscape for cardiogenic shock: A report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium ThinkTank on cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 2020; 219:1-8. [PMID: 31707323 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
14
|
Vemulapalli S, Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Li Z, Dai D, Kosinski AS, Kumbhani DJ, Ruiz CE, Thourani VH, Hanzel G, Gleason TG, Herrmann HC, Brindis RG, Bavaria JE. Procedural Volume and Outcomes for Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:2541-2550. [PMID: 30946551 DOI: 10.1056/nejmsa1901109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 249] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the introduction of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States, requirements regarding procedural volume were mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a condition of reimbursement. A better understanding of the relationship between hospital volume of TAVR procedures and patient outcomes could inform policy decisions. METHODS We analyzed data from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry regarding procedural volumes and outcomes from 2015 through 2017. The primary analyses examined the association between hospital procedural volume as a continuous variable and risk-adjusted mortality at 30 days after transfemoral TAVR. Secondary analysis included risk-adjusted mortality according to quartile of hospital procedural volume. A sensitivity analysis was performed after exclusion of the first 12 months of transfemoral TAVR procedures at each hospital. RESULTS Of 113,662 TAVR procedures performed at 555 hospitals by 2960 operators, 96,256 (84.7%) involved a transfemoral approach. There was a significant inverse association between annualized volume of transfemoral TAVR procedures and mortality. Adjusted 30-day mortality was higher and more variable at hospitals in the lowest-volume quartile (3.19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.78 to 3.67) than at hospitals in the highest-volume quartile (2.66%; 95% CI, 2.48 to 2.85) (odds ratio, 1.21; P = 0.02). The difference in adjusted mortality between a mean annualized volume of 27 procedures in the lowest-volume quartile and 143 procedures in the highest-volume quartile was a relative reduction of 19.45% (95% CI, 8.63 to 30.26). After the exclusion of the first 12 months of TAVR procedures at each hospital, 30-day mortality remained higher in the lowest-volume quartile than in the highest-volume quartile (3.10% vs. 2.61%; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.40). CONCLUSIONS An inverse volume-mortality association was observed for transfemoral TAVR procedures from 2015 through 2017. Mortality at 30 days was higher and more variable at hospitals with a low procedural volume than at hospitals with a high procedural volume. (Funded by the American College of Cardiology Foundation National Cardiovascular Data Registry and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreekanth Vemulapalli
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - John D Carroll
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Michael J Mack
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Zhuokai Li
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - David Dai
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Andrzej S Kosinski
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Dharam J Kumbhani
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Carlos E Ruiz
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Vinod H Thourani
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - George Hanzel
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Howard C Herrmann
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Ralph G Brindis
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- From the Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center (S.V.), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (S.V., Z.L., D.D., A.S.K.), and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University (A.S.K.) - all in Durham, NC; the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (J.D.C.); Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital, Plano (M.J.M.), and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.K.) - both in Texas; the Division of Cardiology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Hackensack, NJ (C.E.R.); the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC (V.H.T.); the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI (G.H.); the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (T.G.G.); the Divisions of Cardiology (H.C.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.E.B.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.G.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Movahedi S, Eliyas S, Fisher N. Early years postgraduate learning and training in prosthodontic dentistry: 2019 and beyond. Br Dent J 2019; 226:801-806. [DOI: 10.1038/s41415-019-0317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
16
|
Kumbhani DJ, Nallamothu BK. PCI Volume Benchmarks: Still Adequate for Quality Assessment in 2017? J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 69:2925-2928. [PMID: 28619192 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dharam J Kumbhani
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Valle JA, Glorioso TJ, Maddox TM, Armstrong EJ, Waldo SW, Bradley SM, Ho PM. Impact of Patient Distance From Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Centers on Longitudinal Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2018; 11:e004623. [DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.004623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Javier A. Valle
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (J.A.V., E.J.A., S.W.W., P.M.H.)
| | - Thomas J. Glorioso
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (T.J.G.)
| | - Thomas M. Maddox
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Current address for Dr Maddox: Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ehrin J. Armstrong
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (J.A.V., E.J.A., S.W.W., P.M.H.)
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (J.A.V., E.J.A., S.W.W., P.M.H.)
| | - Steven M. Bradley
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Current address for Dr Bradley: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN
| | - P. Michael Ho
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Rocky Mountain Regional Medical Center, Aurora (J.A.V., T.J.G., T.M.M., E.J.A., S.W.W., S.M.B., P.M.H.)
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (J.A.V., E.J.A., S.W.W., P.M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 136:e232-e268. [PMID: 28923988 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1015] [Impact Index Per Article: 145.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion that is frequently associated with multisystem organ failure. Despite improving survival in recent years, patient morbidity and mortality remain high, and there are few evidence-based therapeutic interventions known to clearly improve patient outcomes. This scientific statement on cardiogenic shock summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock; reviews contemporary best medical, surgical, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care practices; advocates for the development of regionalized systems of care; and outlines future research priorities.
Collapse
|
19
|
Fanaroff AC, Zakroysky P, Dai D, Wojdyla D, Sherwood MW, Roe MT, Wang TY, Peterson ED, Gurm HS, Cohen MG, Messenger JC, Rao SV. Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:2913-2924. [PMID: 28619191 PMCID: PMC5784411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional guidelines have reduced the recommended minimum number to an average of 50 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures performed annually by each operator. Operator volume patterns and associated outcomes since this change are unknown. OBJECTIVES The authors describe herein PCI operator procedure volumes; characteristics of low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators; and the relationship between operator volume and clinical outcomes in a large, contemporary, nationwide sample. METHODS Using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry collected between July 1, 2009, and March 31, 2015, we examined operator annual PCI volume. We divided operators into low- (<50 PCIs per year), intermediate- (50 to 100 PCIs per year), and high- (>100 PCIs per year) volume groups, and determined the adjusted association between annual PCI volume and in-hospital outcomes, including mortality. RESULTS The median annual number of procedures performed per operator was 59; 44% of operators performed <50 PCI procedures per year. Low-volume operators more frequently performed emergency and primary PCI procedures and practiced at hospitals with lower annual PCI volumes. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 1.86% for low-volume operators, 1.73% for intermediate-volume operators, and 1.48% for high-volume operators. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality was higher for PCI procedures performed by low- and intermediate-volume operators compared with those performed by high-volume operators (adjusted odds ratio: 1.16 for low versus high; adjusted odds ratio: 1.05 for intermediate vs. high volume) as was the risk for new dialysis post PCI. No volume relationship was observed for post-PCI bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Many PCI operators in the United States are performing fewer than the recommended number of PCI procedures annually. Although absolute risk differences are small and may be partially explained by unmeasured differences in case mix between operators, there remains an inverse relationship between PCI operator volume and in-hospital mortality that persisted in risk-adjusted analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Fanaroff
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Pearl Zakroysky
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David Dai
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew W Sherwood
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Matthew T Roe
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tracy Y Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hitinder S Gurm
- Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mauricio G Cohen
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - John C Messenger
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sunil V Rao
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kamal A, Sinha A, Hutfless SM, Afghani E, Faghih M, Khashab MA, Lennon AM, Yadav D, Makary MA, Andersen DK, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Hospital admission volume does not impact the in-hospital mortality of acute pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:21-28. [PMID: 27887788 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Revised: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple factors influence mortality in Acute Pancreatitis (AP). METHODS To evaluate the association of demographic, clinical, and hospital factors with the in-hospital mortality of AP using a population-based administrative database. The Maryland HSCRC database was queried for adult (≥18 years) admissions with primary diagnosis of AP between 1/94-12/10. Organ failure (OF), interventions, hospital characteristics and referral status were evaluated. RESULTS There were 72,601 AP admissions across 48 hospitals in Maryland with 885 (1.2%) deaths. A total of 1657 (2.3%) were transfer patients, of whom 101 (6.1%) died. Multisystem OF was present in 1078 (1.5%), of whom 306 (28.4%) died. On univariable analysis, age, male gender, transfer status, comorbidity, OF, all interventions, and all hospital characteristics were significantly associated with mortality; however, only age, transfer status, OF, interventions, and large hospital size were significant in the adjusted analysis. Patients with commercial health insurance had significantly less mortality than those with other forms of insurance (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.82, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION OF is the strongest predictor of mortality in AP after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. Admission to HV or teaching hospital has no survival benefit in AP after adjusting for OF and transfer status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amitasha Sinha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan M Hutfless
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elham Afghani
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mahya Faghih
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dhiraj Yadav
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Martin A Makary
- Pancreatitis Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dana K Andersen
- National Institutes of Digestive and Kidney Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anthony N Kalloo
- Pancreatitis Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Pancreatitis Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an integral treatment modality for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as well as chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) not responsive to optimal medical therapy. This coupled with studies on the feasibility and safety of performing PCI in centers without on-site surgical backup led to widespread growth of PCI centers. However, this has been accompanied by a recent steep decline in the volume of PCIs at both the operator and hospital level, which raises concerns regarding minimal procedural volumes required to maintain necessary skills and favorable clinical outcomes. The 2011 ACC/AHA/SCAI competency statement required PCI be performed by operators with a minimal procedural volume of >75 PCIs annually at high-volume centers with >400 PCIs per year, a number which was relaxed in the 2013 ACC/AHA/SCAI update to >50 PCIs/operator/year in hospitals with >200 PCIs annually to coincide with reduction in national PCI volume. Recent data suggests that many hospitals do not meet these thresholds. We review data on the importance of volume as a vital quality metric at both an operator and hospital level in determining procedural outcomes following PCI.
Collapse
|
22
|
Choi JW, Jeon SW, Kwon JG, Lee DW, Ha CY, Cho KB, Jang BI, Park JB, Park YS. Volume of hospital is important for the prognosis of high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Surg Endosc 2016; 31:3339-3346. [PMID: 27928663 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5369-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a potentially life-threatening hospital emergency requiring hemodynamic stabilization and resuscitation. This study is carried out to determine whether hospital volume can influence outcome in patients with NVUGIB. METHOD This is a retrospective study with a prospective cohort database (KCT 0000514. cris.nih.go.kr). Eight teaching hospitals were divided into two different groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥60 NVUGIB patients/year, four clinics) and low-volume centers (LVC, <60 NVUGIB patients/year, four clinics). Baseline characteristics of patients, risk stratification, and outcomes between hospitals of different volumes were compared. From February 2011 to December 2013, a total of 1584 NVUGIB patients enrolled in eight clinics were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measurements consisted of continuous bleeding after treatment, re-bleeding, necessity for surgical/other retreatments, and death within 30 days. RESULTS Similar baseline characters for patients were observed in both groups. There was a significant difference in the incidence of poor outcome between the HVC and LVC groups (9.06 vs. 13.69%, P = 0.014). The incidence rate of poor outcome in high-risk patients (Rockall score ≥8) in HVC was lower than that in high-risk patients in LVC (16.07 vs. 26.92%, P = 0.048); however, there was no significant difference in poor outcome in the lower-risk patients in either group (8.72 vs. 10.42%, P = 0.370). CONCLUSIONS Significant correlation between hospital volume and outcome in NVUGIB patients was observed. Referral to HVC for the management of high-risk NVUGIB patients should be considered in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Woo Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.,Kyungpook National University Hospital/School of Medicine, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, Korea
| | - Seong Woo Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea. .,Kyungpook National University Hospital/School of Medicine, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41404, Korea.
| | - Jung Gu Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Dong Wook Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chang Yoon Ha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Kwang Bum Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Byung Ik Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jung Bae Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea
| | - Youn Sun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Gumi, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Impact of Operator Experience and Volume on Outcomes After Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9:2086-2093. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
24
|
Harrison RW, Simon D, Miller AL, de Lemos JA, Peterson ED, Wang TY. Association of hospital myocardial infarction volume with adherence to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association performance measures: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Am Heart J 2016; 178:95-101. [PMID: 27502856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to guideline-based therapy improves patient outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and hospital AMI volume is associated with reperfusion care, but the extent hospital AMI volume is associated with overall guideline adherence is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied 486 hospitals treating 249,877 AMI patients in ACTION Registry-GWTG from January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2011. Hospital adherence to each American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association performance measure was compared between tertiles defined by hospital AMI volume: low (≤108 cases/y), middle (≥109 and ≤227 cases/y), and high (≥228 cases/y). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, was used to examine the association between annual AMI volume and adherence to each measure. Similar modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between AMI volume and in-hospital mortality. Compared with high-volume hospitals, lower-volume hospitals were less likely to be academically affiliated, or to have cardiac surgery capabilities, electronic health records, or dedicated tobacco treatment services. Higher-volume hospitals had greater adherence to each performance measure, except aspirin use at arrival and reperfusion therapy. The greatest difference was in the rates of referral to cardiac rehabilitation (59%, 76%, and 83% in low-, middle-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, higher AMI volume (up to 400 AMI patients/y) remained associated with higher-performance measure adherence. There was no association between AMI volume and in-hospital mortality after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Higher hospital AMI volume was correlated with better adherence to process of care measures, but not in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rashid M, Sperrin M, Ludman PF, O'Neill D, Nicholas O, de Belder MA, Mamas MA. Impact of operator volume for percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcomes: what do the numbers say?: Table 1. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2016; 2:16-22. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
26
|
|
27
|
Kao SH, Lu DK, Lin YL, Hsieh HM, Lin TH, Chiu HC. Association of Physician Certification Policy and Quality of Care: Evidence of percutaneous coronary intervention certification program in Taiwan. Health Policy 2015; 119:1031-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Revised: 08/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Arora S, Panaich SS, Patel NJ, Patel N, Solanki S, Deshmukh A, Singh V, Lahewala S, Savani C, Thakkar B, Dave A, Patel A, Bhatt P, Sonani R, Patel A, Cleman M, Forrest JK, Schreiber T, Badheka AO, Grines C. Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the United States. Angiology 2015; 67:326-35. [DOI: 10.1177/0003319715593853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Multivessel coronary artery disease carries significant mortality risk. Comprehensive data on inhospital outcomes following multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MVPCI) are sparse. Methods: We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) between 2006 and 2011 using different International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. The primary outcome was inhospital all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was a composite of inhospital mortality and periprocedural complications. Results: The overall mortality was low at 0.73% following MVPCI. Multivariate analysis revealed that (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, P value) age (1.63, 1.48-1.79; <.001), female sex (1.19, 1.00-1.42; P = .05), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; 2.97, 2.35-3.74; <.001), shock (17.24, 13.61-21.85; <.001), a higher burden of comorbidities (2.09, 1.32-3.29; .002), and emergent/urgent procedure status (1.67, 1.30-2.16; <.001) are important predictors of primary and secondary outcomes. MVPCI was associated with higher mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of care as compared to single vessel single stent PCI. Conclusion: MVPCI is associated with higher inhospital mortality, LOS, and hospitalization costs compared to single vessel, single stent PCI. Higher volume hospitals had lower overall postprocedural mortality rate along with shorter LOS and lower hospitalization costs following MVPCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpkumar Arora
- Internal Medicine Department, Mount Sinai St Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Nileshkumar J. Patel
- Internal Medicine Department, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Nilay Patel
- Internal Medicine Department, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Shantanu Solanki
- Internal Medicine Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Vikas Singh
- Cardiology Department, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sopan Lahewala
- Internal Medicine Department, Mount Sinai Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chirag Savani
- Internal Medicine Department, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Badal Thakkar
- Internal Medicine Department, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Abhishek Dave
- Internal Medicine Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Achint Patel
- Internal Medicine Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parth Bhatt
- Internal Medicine Department, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Rajesh Sonani
- Internal Medicine Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aashay Patel
- Internal Medicine Department, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | - Michael Cleman
- Cardiology Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - John K. Forrest
- Cardiology Department, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Cindy Grines
- Cardiovascular Department, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Choi YJ, Kim JB, Cho SJ, Cho J, Sohn J, Cho SK, Ha KH, Kim C. Changes in the Practice of Coronary Revascularization between 2006 and 2010 in the Republic of Korea. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56:895-903. [PMID: 26069109 PMCID: PMC4479855 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence suggests that technological innovations and reimbursement schemes of the National Health Insurance Service may have impacted the management of coronary artery disease. Thus, we investigated changes in the practice patterns of coronary revascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS Revascularization and in-hospital mortality among Koreans ≥20 years old were identified from medical claims filed between 2006 and 2010. The age- and sex-standardized procedure rate per 100,000 person-years was calculated directly from the distribution of the 2008 Korean population. RESULTS The coronary revascularization rate increased from 116.1 (95% confidence interval, 114.9-117.2) in 2006 to 131.0 (129.9-132.1) in 2010. Compared to the rate ratios in 2006, the rate ratios for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in 2010 were 1.16 (1.15-1.17) and 0.80 (0.76-0.84), respectively. Among patients who received PCI, the percentage with drug-eluting stents increased from 89.1% in 2006 to 93.0% in 2010. In-hospital mortality rates from PCI significantly increased during the study period (p=0.03), whereas those from CABG significantly decreased (p=0.01). The in-hospital mortality rates for PCI and CABG were higher in elderly and female patients and at the lowest-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION The annual volume of coronary revascularization continuously increased between 2006 and 2010 in Korea, although this trend differed according to procedure type. A high percentage of drug-eluting stent procedures and a high rate of in-hospital mortality at low-volume hospitals were noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Jung Choi
- Health Technology Assessment Team, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Bae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su-Jin Cho
- Health Technology Assessment Team, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaelim Cho
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungwoo Sohn
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Kyoung Hwa Ha
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changsoo Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Endo A, Kawamura A, Miyata H, Noma S, Suzuki M, Koyama T, Ishikawa S, Nakagawa S, Takagi S, Numasawa Y, Fukuda K, Kohsaka S. Angiographic Lesion Complexity Score and In-Hospital Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127217. [PMID: 26121583 PMCID: PMC4487684 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We devised a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) scoring system based on angiographic lesion complexity and assessed its association with in-hospital complications. BACKGROUND Although PCI is finding increasing application in patients with coronary artery disease, lesion complexity can lead to in-hospital complications. METHODS Data from 3692 PCI patients were scored based on lesion complexity, defined by bifurcation, chronic total occlusion, type C, and left main lesion, along with acute thrombus in the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1 point assigned for each variable). RESULTS The patients' mean age was 67.5 +/- 10.8 years; 79.8% were male. About half of the patients (50.3%) presented with an acute coronary syndrome, and 2218 (60.1%) underwent PCI for at least one complex lesion. The patients in the higher-risk score groups were older (p < 0.001) and had present or previous heart failure (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Higher-risk score groups had significantly higher in-hospital event rates for death, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock (from 0 to 4 risk score; 1.7%, 4.5%, 6.3%, 7.1%, 40%, p < 0.001); bleeding with a hemoglobin decrease of >3.0 g/dL (3.1%, 11.0%, 13.1%, 10.3%, 28.6%, p < 0.001); and postoperative myocardial infarction (1.5%, 3.1%, 3.8%, 3.8%, 10%, p = 0.004), respectively. The association with adverse outcomes persisted after adjustment for known clinical predictors (odds ratio 1.72, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The complexity score was cumulatively associated with in-hospital mortality and complication rate and could be used for event prediction in PCI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaka Endo
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Kawamura
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- University of Tokyo, Healthcare Quality Assessment, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigetaka Noma
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masahiro Suzuki
- Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization, Saitama National Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takashi Koyama
- Department of Cardiology, Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Ishikawa
- Department of Cardiology, Saitama City Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Susumu Nakagawa
- Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Takagi
- Department of Cardiology, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yohei Numasawa
- Department of Cardiology, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fukuda
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Kohsaka
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a lack of evidence in the literature, several assumptions exist about the safety of thoracentesis in clinical guidelines and practice patterns. We aimed to evaluate specific demographic and clinical factors that have been commonly associated with complications such as iatrogenic pneumothorax, re-expansion pulmonary oedema (REPE) and bleeding. METHODS We performed a cohort study of inpatients who underwent thoracenteses at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) from August 2001 to October 2013. Data were collected prospectively including information on volume of fluid removed, procedure side, whether the patient was on positive pressure ventilation, number of needle passes and supine positioning. Iatrogenic pneumothorax, REPE and bleeding were tracked for 24 h after the procedure or until a clinical question was reconciled. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained through query of electronic medical records. RESULTS CSMC performed 9320 inpatient thoracenteses on 4618 patients during the study period. There were 57 (0.61%) iatrogenic pneumothoraces, 10 (0.01%) incidents of REPE and 17 (0.18%) bleeding episodes. Iatrogenic pneumothorax was significantly associated with removal of >1500 mL fluid (p<0.0001), unilateral procedures (p=0.001) and more than one needle pass through the skin (p=0.001). For every 1 mL of fluid removed there was a 0.18% increased risk of REPE (95% CI 0.09% to 0.26%). There were no significant associations between bleeding and demographic or clinical variables including International Normalised Ratio, partial thromboplastin time and platelet counts. CONCLUSIONS Our series of thoracenteses had a very low complication rate. Current clinical guidelines and practice patterns may not reflect evidence-based best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Ault
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Bradley T Rosen
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jordan Scher
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joe Feinglass
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Barsuk
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rossano JW, Naim MY. The nebulous relationship between volume and outcome. Resuscitation 2014; 85:1642-3. [PMID: 25220926 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph W Rossano
- The Cardiac Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Maryam Y Naim
- The Cardiac Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Grover P, Singh V, Patel N, Arora S, Chothani A, Mehta K, Deshmukh A, Savani GT, Patel A, Panaich SS, Shah N, Rathod A, Brown M, Mohamad T, Tamburrino FV, Kar S, Makkar R, O'Neill WW, De Marchena E, Schreiber T, Grines CL, Rihal CS, Cohen MG. Impact of annual operator and institutional volume on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a 5-year United States experience (2005-2009). Circulation 2014; 130:1392-406. [PMID: 25189214 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.114.009281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457,498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2,243,209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4(th) [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3(rd) [45-100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2(nd) quartile [16-44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1(st) quartile [≤15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apurva O Badheka
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.).
| | - Nileshkumar J Patel
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Peeyush Grover
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Vikas Singh
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Nilay Patel
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Shilpkumar Arora
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Ankit Chothani
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Kathan Mehta
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Abhishek Deshmukh
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Ghanshyambhai T Savani
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Achint Patel
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Sidakpal S Panaich
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Neeraj Shah
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Ankit Rathod
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Michael Brown
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Tamam Mohamad
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Frank V Tamburrino
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Saibal Kar
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Raj Makkar
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - William W O'Neill
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Eduardo De Marchena
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Theodore Schreiber
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Cindy L Grines
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Charanjit S Rihal
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| | - Mauricio G Cohen
- From Yale New Haven Medical Center, New Haven, CT (A.O.B.); Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY (N.J.P., N.S., F.V.T.); UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA (P.G.); University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (V.S., G.T.S., E.D.M., M.G.C.); Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ (N.P.); Mount Sinai's St Luke Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (S.A.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (A.C.); UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (K.M.); University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR (A.D.); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (A.P.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI (S.S.P., M.B., T.M., T.S., C.L.G.); Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.R., S.K., R.M.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (W.W.O.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Anwar F, Shah K, McLean I. Volume-outcome relationship in revision hip replacement - Results from a low volume hospital. J Orthop 2014; 10:139-43. [PMID: 24396230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Accepted: 06/01/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mortality and morbidity are both increased during revision hip surgery. Higher hospital procedure volumes have been associated with lower rates of mortality and/or complications according to some reports - the "practice makes perfect" hypothesis. AIM The aim of the study was to test "practice makes perfect; hypothesis with regards to revision hip surgery at our low volume hospital. METHODS This is a retrospective study of all the patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty under the care of the senior author between February 2002 and January 2006. Data was collected about the 30-day and one-year mortality, post-operative complications like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), superficial or deep wound infections, dislocations, and the Oxford hip score. RESULTS The rate of revision hip surgery carried out in our hospital was 6.25 per year. There was no 30-day mortality, stroke within 3 months, dislocations within one year, re-admission within one month, one-year mortality and deep infections within one year. The final outcome after revision hip surgery, based on Oxford questionnaire, showed that 72% had an excellent outcome and 8% had poor outcome. CONCLUSION Volume and outcome relationship may not contribute towards the final outcome when individual surgeons and hospitals are considered. Good general hospital care can greatly affect the health outcome for a particular procedure. Strategies aimed at improving the general hospital care may benefit the patients as much as volume based regionalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahim Anwar
- Spinal Injuries Unit, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom
| | - Kalpesh Shah
- Trauma & Orthopaedics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom
| | - Ian McLean
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries DG1 4AP, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bosson N, Kaji AH, Niemann JT, Eckstein M, Rashi P, Tadeo R, Gorospe D, Sung G, French WJ, Shavelle D, Thomas JL, Koenig W. Survival and Neurologic Outcome after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Results One Year after Regionalization of Post-Cardiac Arrest Care in a Large Metropolitan Area. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2014; 18:217-23. [DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2013.856507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
36
|
The impact of surgical volume on patient outcomes following thyroid surgery. Surgery 2013; 154:1346-52; discussion 1352-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
37
|
Miller BJ, Lu X, Cram P. The trends in treatment of femoral neck fractures in the Medicare population from 1991 to 2008. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95:e132. [PMID: 24048563 PMCID: PMC3763808 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.l.01163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined trends in the treatment of femoral neck fractures over the last two decades. METHODS We used Medicare Part A administrative data to identify patients hospitalized for closed femoral neck fracture from 1991 to 2008. We used codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, to categorize treatment as nonoperative, internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. We examined differences in treatment according to hospital hip fracture volume, hospital location (rural or urban), and teaching status. RESULTS Our sample consisted of 1,119,423 patients with intracapsular hip fractures occurring from 1991 to 2008. We found a generally stable trend over time in the percentage of patients managed with nonoperative treatment, internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. We found little difference in surgical treatment across different groups of hospitals (high volume compared with low volume, urban compared with rural, and teaching compared with nonteaching). The percentage of acute care hospitals treating hip fractures remained fairly constant (74.8% in 1991 to 1993 and 69.0% in 2006 to 2008). The median number of hip fractures treated per hospital did not change (thirty-three in 1991 to 1993 and thirty-three in 2006 to 2008). There was no increase in the percentage of fractures treated in high-volume hospitals over time (57.7% in 1991 to 1993 and 57.1% in 2006 to 2008) and little reduction in the percentage of fractures treated in low-volume hospitals (5.8% in 1991 to 1993 and 5.5% in 2006 to 2008). CONCLUSIONS There has been little change in the trends of operative and nonoperative treatment for proximal femoral fractures over the last two decades, and there was little evidence of regionalization of hip fracture treatment to higher-volume hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J. Miller
- Departments of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation (B.J.M.) and Internal Medicine (X.L, P.C.), 200 Hawkins Drive, 01025 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address for B.J. Miller:
| | - Xin Lu
- Departments of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation (B.J.M.) and Internal Medicine (X.L, P.C.), 200 Hawkins Drive, 01025 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address for B.J. Miller:
| | - Peter Cram
- Departments of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation (B.J.M.) and Internal Medicine (X.L, P.C.), 200 Hawkins Drive, 01025 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address for B.J. Miller:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindiss RG, Brush JE, Burke JA, Dehmers GJ, Deychak YA, Jneids H, Jolliss JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messengers JC, Moussas ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, Whites CJ, Williamss ES, Halperin JL, Beckman JA, Bolger A, Byrne JG, Lester SJ, Merli GJ, Muhlestein JB, Pina IL, Wang A, Weitz HH. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Coronary Artery Interventional Procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 82:E69-111. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - John G. Harold
- American College of Cardiology Foundation representative
| | - Theodore A. Bass
- Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Issam D. Moussas
- Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joshua A. Beckman
- Former Task Force member during the writing effort; Authors with no symbol by their name were included to provide additional content expertise
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ileana L. Pina
- Former Task Force member during the writing effort; Authors with no symbol by their name were included to provide additional content expertise
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Coronary Artery Interventional Procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:357-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
40
|
Akin I, Hochadel M, Schneider S, Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Senges J, Richardt G, Kuck KH, Nienaber CA. Volume-outcomes relationship in the Era of modern coronary intervention-results from the prospective multicenter German DES.DE Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 82:E788-97. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Akin
- Heart Center Rostock; Divisions of Cardiology, Pulmology and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine I; University Hospital Rostock; Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ralf Zahn
- Department of Cardiology; Heart Center Ludwigshafen; Germany
| | | | - Gert Richardt
- Department of Cardiology; Heart Center Bad Segeberg; Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Kuck
- Department of Cardiology; Asklepios Hospital Hamburg; Germany
| | - Christoph A. Nienaber
- Heart Center Rostock; Divisions of Cardiology, Pulmology and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine I; University Hospital Rostock; Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindis RG, Brush JE, Burke JA, Dehmer GJ, Deychak YA, Jneid H, Jollis JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messenger JC, Moussa ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, White CJ, Williams ES. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (writing committee to revise the 2007 clinical competence statement on cardiac interventional procedures). Circulation 2013; 128:436-72. [PMID: 23658439 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0b013e318299cd8a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
42
|
|
43
|
Abstract
Past literature suggests that Certificate of Need (CON) regulations for cardiac care were ineffective in improving quality, but less is known about the effect of CON on patient costs. We analyzed Medicare data for 1991-2002 to test whether states that dropped CON experienced changes in costs or reimbursements for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary interventions. We found that states that dropped CON experienced lower costs per patient for CABG but not for percutaneous coronary intervention. Average Medicare reimbursement was lower for both procedures in states that dropped CON. The cost savings from removing CON regulations slightly exceed the total fixed costs of new CABG facilities that entered after deregulation. Assuming continued cost savings past 2002, the savings from deregulating CABG surgery outweigh the fixed costs of new entry. Thus, CON regulations for CABG may not be justified in terms of either improving quality or controlling cost growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Ho
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hsia RY, Kanzaria HK, Srebotnjak T, Maselli J, McCulloch C, Auerbach AD. Is emergency department closure resulting in increased distance to the nearest emergency department associated with increased inpatient mortality? Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:707-715.e4. [PMID: 23026784 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2012] [Revised: 08/11/2012] [Accepted: 08/21/2012] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We seek to determine whether patients living in areas affected by emergency department (ED) closure, with subsequent increased distance to the nearest ED, have a higher risk of inpatient death from time-sensitive conditions. METHODS Using the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development database, we performed a nonconcurrent cohort study of hospital admissions in California between 1999 and 2009 for patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models comparing adjusted inpatient mortality for patients experiencing increased distance to the nearest ED versus no change in distance. RESULTS Of 785,385 patient admissions, 67,577 (8.6%) experienced an increase in distance to ED care because of an ED closure. The median change for patients experiencing an increase in distance to the nearest ED was only 0.8 miles, with a range of 0.1 to 33.4 miles. Patients with an increase did not have a significantly higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.09). In subgroups, we also observed no statistically significant differences in adjusted mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction, stroke, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sepsis. We did not observe any significant variations in mortality for time-sensitive conditions in sensitivity analyses that incorporated a lag effect of time after change in distance, allowance for a larger affected population, or removal of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from the acute myocardial infarction subgroup. CONCLUSION In this large population-based sample, less than 10% of the patients experienced an increase in distance to the nearest ED, and of that group, the majority had less than a 1-mile increase. These small increased distances to the nearest ED were not associated with higher inpatient mortality among time-sensitive conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Matsuda Y, Kubo T, Fujino Y, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H. Association between hospital volume and outcomes of elderly and non-elderly patients with acute biliary diseases: a national administrative database analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 13:731-40. [PMID: 22985177 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00938.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hospital volume and clinical outcomes of elderly and non-elderly patients with acute biliary diseases using data from a national administrative database. METHODS Overall, 26720 elderly and 33774 non-elderly patients with acute biliary diseases were referred to 820 hospitals in Japan. Hospital volume was categorized into three groups based on the case numbers during the study period: low-volume, medium-volume and high-volume. We compared the risk-adjusted length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality in relation to hospital volume. These analyses were stratified according to the presence of invasive treatments for acute biliary diseases. RESULTS Multiple linear regression analyses showed that increased hospital volume was significantly associated with shorter LOS in both elderly and non-elderly patients with and without invasive treatments. Increased hospital volume was significantly associated with decreased relative risk of in-hospital mortality in elderly patients. The odds ratio for high-volume hospitals was 0.672 in elderly patients without invasive treatments (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.533-0.847, P=0.001) and 0.715 in those with invasive treatments (95% C, 0.566-0.904, P=0.005). However, no significant differences for in-hospital mortality were seen in non-elderly patients with and without invasive treatments. CONCLUSION This study has highlighted that higher volume hospitals significantly reduced LOS and in-hospital mortality for elderly patients with acute biliary diseases, but not non-elderly patients. The current results are of value for elderly healthcare policy decision-making, and highlight the need for further studies into the quality of care for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuhiko Murata
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A, Byrne JG, Cavendish JJ, Chambers CE, Hermiller JB, Kinlay S, Landzberg JS, Laskey WK, McKay CR, Miller JM, Moliterno DJ, Moore JWM, Oliver-McNeil SM, Popma JJ, Tommaso CL. 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:2221-305. [PMID: 22575325 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
47
|
Zarebczan B, Chen H. Influence of surgical volume on operative failures for hyperparathyroidism. Adv Surg 2011; 45:237-48. [PMID: 21954691 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2011.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Hyperparathyroidism is a disease that is often seen in the United States. Patients may present with a wide variety of symptoms affecting multiple organs, but frequently, they are found to be hyperparathyroid on a routine blood examination. Although these patients may be asymptomatic, new consensus guidelines exist for when they should undergo surgery, and several studies have shown multiple benefits from operative intervention. Surgical cure rates can be greater than 95%, but if the initial surgery is unsuccessful, the cure rate becomes 80%. In the hands of experienced surgeons, both initial cure rates and those for reoperations are much higher, illustrating that the surgical volume does affect failure in parathyroid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Zarebczan
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, H4-722, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 2011; 40:1018-23. [PMID: 21926541 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31821bd233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the relationship between hospital volume and clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, using a Japanese national administrative database. METHODS A total of 7007 patients with acute pancreatitis were referred to776 hospitals in Japan. Patient data were corrected according to the severity of acute pancreatitis to allow the comparison of risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality and length of stay in relation to hospital volume. Hospital volume was categorized based on the number of cases during the study period into low-volume (<10 cases), medium-volume (10-16 cases), and high-volume hospitals (HVHs, >16 cases). RESULTS Increased hospital volume was significantly associated with decreased relative risk of in-hospital mortality in both patients with mild and those with severe acute pancreatitis. The odds ratios for HVHs were 0.424 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.228-0.787; P = 0.007) and 0.338 (95% CI, 0.138-0.826; P = 0.017), respectively. Hospital volume was also significantly associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild acute pancreatitis. The unstandardized coefficient for HVHs was -0.978 days (95% CI, -1.909 to -0.048; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that hospital volume influences the clinical outcome in both patients with mild and those with severe acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
|
49
|
Contreras JM, Kim B, Tristao IM. Does doctors' experience matter in LASIK surgeries? HEALTH ECONOMICS 2011; 20:699-722. [PMID: 20568101 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we use a longitudinal census of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eye surgeries collected directly from patient charts to examine the learning-by-doing hypothesis in medicine. LASIK surgery has precise measures of presurgical condition and postsurgical outcomes. Unlike other types of surgery, the impact of unobservable underlying patient conditions on outcomes is minimal. Individual learning by doing is identified through observations of surgical outcomes over time, based on the cumulative number of surgeries performed. Collective learning is identified separately, through changes in a group adjustment rule determined jointly by all the surgeons in a structured internal review process. Our unique data set overcomes some of the measurement problems in patient outcomes encountered in other studies and improves the possibility of identifying and separating the impact of learning by doing from other effects. We cannot conclude that the outcome of LASIK surgery improves as an individual surgeon's experience increases, but we find strong evidence that experience accumulated by surgeons as a group in a clinic significantly improves outcomes.
Collapse
|
50
|
Kocher KE, Sklar DP, Mehrotra A, Tayal VS, Gausche-Hill M, Myles Riner R. Categorization, designation, and regionalization of emergency care: definitions, a conceptual framework, and future challenges. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17:1306-11. [PMID: 21122012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00932.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This article reflects the proceedings of a breakout session, "Beyond ED Categorization-Matching Networks to Patient Needs," at the 2010 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference, "Beyond Regionalization: Integrated Networks of Emergency Care." It is based on concepts and areas of priority identified and developed by the authors and participants at the conference. The paper first describes definitions fundamental to understanding the categorization, designation, and regionalization of emergency care and then considers a conceptual framework for this process. It also provides a justification for a categorization system being integrated into a regionalized emergency care system. Finally, it discusses potential challenges and barriers to the adoption of a categorization and designation system for emergency care and the opportunities for researchers to study the many issues associated with the implementation of such a system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith E Kocher
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|