1
|
Peled Y, Ducharme A, Kittleson M, Bansal N, Stehlik J, Amdani S, Saeed D, Cheng R, Clarke B, Dobbels F, Farr M, Lindenfeld J, Nikolaidis L, Patel J, Acharya D, Albert D, Aslam S, Bertolotti A, Chan M, Chih S, Colvin M, Crespo-Leiro M, D'Alessandro D, Daly K, Diez-Lopez C, Dipchand A, Ensminger S, Everitt M, Fardman A, Farrero M, Feldman D, Gjelaj C, Goodwin M, Harrison K, Hsich E, Joyce E, Kato T, Kim D, Luong ML, Lyster H, Masetti M, Matos LN, Nilsson J, Noly PE, Rao V, Rolid K, Schlendorf K, Schweiger M, Spinner J, Townsend M, Tremblay-Gravel M, Urschel S, Vachiery JL, Velleca A, Waldman G, Walsh J. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024:S1053-2498(24)01679-6. [PMID: 39115488 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Peled
- Leviev Heart & Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Anique Ducharme
- Deparment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Michelle Kittleson
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Neha Bansal
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Josef Stehlik
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shahnawaz Amdani
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Diyar Saeed
- Heart Center Niederrhein, Helios Hospital Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Richard Cheng
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian Clarke
- Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maryjane Farr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Parkland Health System, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - JoAnn Lindenfeld
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Deepak Acharya
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Dimpna Albert
- Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Paediatric Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant, Heart Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saima Aslam
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alejandro Bertolotti
- Heart and Lung Transplant Service, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Michael Chan
- University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sharon Chih
- Heart Failure and Transplantation, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monica Colvin
- Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Maria Crespo-Leiro
- Cardiology Department Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna (CHUAC), CIBERCV, INIBIC, UDC, La Coruna, Spain
| | - David D'Alessandro
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Daly
- Boston Children's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carles Diez-Lopez
- Advanced Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anne Dipchand
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Melanie Everitt
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alexander Fardman
- Leviev Heart & Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marta Farrero
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Feldman
- Newark Beth Israel Hospital & Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Christiana Gjelaj
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Goodwin
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kimberly Harrison
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Eileen Hsich
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emer Joyce
- Department of Cardiology, Mater University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tomoko Kato
- Department of Cardiology, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Narita, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel Kim
- University of Alberta & Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Me-Linh Luong
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Haifa Lyster
- Department of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex, UK
| | - Marco Masetti
- Heart Failure and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Johan Nilsson
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Vivek Rao
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katrine Rolid
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kelly Schlendorf
- Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Joseph Spinner
- Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madeleine Townsend
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maxime Tremblay-Gravel
- Deparment of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université?de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Urschel
- Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Luc Vachiery
- Department of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Académique Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Angela Velleca
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Georgina Waldman
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James Walsh
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane; Heart Lung Institute, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. New Therapies for Highly Sensitized Patients on the Waiting List. KIDNEY360 2024; 5:1207-1225. [PMID: 38995690 PMCID: PMC11371354 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Exposure to HLA alloantigens through pregnancy, blood products, and previous transplantations induce powerful immunologic responses that create an immunologic barrier to successful transplantation. This is commonly detected through screening for HLA antibodies using Luminex beads coated with HLA antigens at transplant evaluation. Currently accepted approaches to desensitization include plasmapheresis/low-dose or high-dose intravenous Ig plus anti-CD20. However, these approaches are often unsuccessful because of the inability to remove high titer circulating HLA antibodies and limit rebound responses by long-lived anti-HLA antibody secreting plasma cells (PCs) and memory B cells (B MEM ). This is especially significant for patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody of 99%-100%. Newer desensitization approaches, such as imlifidase (IgG endopeptidase), rapidly inactivate IgG molecules and create an antibody-free zone by cleaving IgG into F(ab'2) and Fc fragments, thus eliminating complement and cell-mediated injury to the graft. This represents an important advancement in desensitization. However, the efficacy of imlifidase is limited by pathogenic antibody rebound, increasing the potential for antibody-mediated rejection. Controlling antibody rebound requires new strategies that address the issues of antibody depletion and inhibition of B MEM and PC responses. This will likely require a combination of agents that effectively and rapidly deplete pathogenic antibodies and prevent immune cell activation pathways responsible for antibody rebound. Here, using anti-IL-6 receptor (tocilizumab) or anti-IL-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B MEM and PC donor-specific HLA antibody responses. Agents aimed at eliminating long-lived PCs (anti-CD38 and anti-B-cell maturation antigen×CD3) are likely to benefit highly HLA sensitized patients. Complement inhibitors and novel agents aimed at inhibiting Fc neonatal receptor IgG recycling will be important in desensitization. Administering these agents alone or in combination will advance our ability to effectively desensitize patients and maintain durable suppression post-transplant. After many years of limited options, advanced therapeutics will likely improve efficacy of desensitization and improve access to kidney transplantation for highly HLA sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Comins-Boo A, Irure-Ventura J, Valentin MO, Belmar-Vega L, López Del Moral Cuesta C, Valero San Cecilio R, Rodrigo Calabia E, Renuncio-García M, Castro Hernández C, Mikhalkovich D, Mota Pérez N, Ruiz San Millán JC, López-Hoyos M, San Segundo D. Low-risk delisting strategy in highly sensitized patients without donor offers included in exchange donation programs. One single-center experience. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110806. [PMID: 38664156 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Comins-Boo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Maria O Valentin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Lara Belmar-Vega
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Covadonga López Del Moral Cuesta
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo Calabia
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Mónica Renuncio-García
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Carolina Castro Hernández
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Dzmitry Mikhalkovich
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Nerea Mota Pérez
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz San Millán
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Molecular Biology Department, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - David San Segundo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Furian L, Bestard O, Budde K, Cozzi E, Diekmann F, Mamode N, Naesens M, Pengel LHM, Schwartz Sorensen S, Vistoli F, Thaunat O. European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12475. [PMID: 38665475 PMCID: PMC11043529 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Experimental Nephrology and Transplant Laboratory, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Liset H. M. Pengel
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Soren Schwartz Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Biothecnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rindi LV, Zaçe D, Braccialarghe N, Massa B, Barchi V, Iannazzo R, Fato I, De Maria F, Kontogiannis D, Malagnino V, Sarmati L, Iannetta M. Drug-Induced Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drug Saf 2024; 47:333-354. [PMID: 38321317 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01383-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) was first described among patients affected by hematological or solid tumors. Following the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, people living with HIV have represented most cases for more than a decade. With the diffusion of highly active antiretroviral therapy, this group progressively decreased in favor of patients undergoing treatment with targeted therapy/immunomodulators. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the objective was to assess which drugs are most frequently related to PML development, and report the incidence of drug-induced PML through a meta-analytic approach. METHODS The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Database (CADTH) were searched up to May 10, 2022. Articles that reported the risk of PML development after treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, including patients of both sexes under the age of 80 years, affected by any pathology except HIV, primary immunodeficiencies or malignancies, were included in the review. The incidence of drug-induced PML was calculated based on PML cases and total number of patients observed per 100 persons and the observation time. Random-effect metanalyses were conducted for each drug reporting pooled incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) of the observation time. Heterogeneity was measured by I2 statistics. Publication bias was examined through funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS A total of 103 studies were included in the systematic review. In our analysis, we found no includible study reporting cases of PML during the course of treatment with ocrelizumab, vedolizumab, abrilumab, ontamalimab, teriflunomide, daclizumab, inebilizumab, basiliximab, tacrolimus, belimumab, infliximab, firategrast, disulone, azathioprine or danazole. Dalfampridine, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod show a relatively safe profile, although some cases of PML have been reported. The meta-analysis showed an incidence of PML cases among patients undergoing rituximab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) of 0.01 cases/100 persons (95% CI - 0.08 to 0.09; I2 = 20.4%; p = 0.25) for a median observation period of 23.5 months (IQR 22.1-42.1). Treatment of MS with natalizumab carried a PML risk of 0.33 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.29-0.37; I2 = 50%; p = 0.003) for a median observation period of 44.1 months (IQR 28.4-60) and a mean number of doses of 36.3 (standard deviation [SD] ± 20.7). When comparing data about patients treated with standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID), the latter appears to carry a smaller risk of PML, that is, 0.08 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.0-0.15) for EID versus 0.3 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.25-0.34) for SID. CONCLUSIONS A higher risk of drug-related PML in patients whose immune system is not additionally depressed by means of neoplasms, HIV or concomitant medications is found in the neurological field. This risk is higher in MS treatment, and specifically during long-term natalizumab therapy. While this drug is still routinely prescribed in this field, considering the efficacy in reducing MS relapses, in other areas it could play a smaller role, and be gradually replaced by other safer and more recently approved agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Vittorio Rindi
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Drieda Zaçe
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Neva Braccialarghe
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Massa
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Virginia Barchi
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Iannazzo
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilenia Fato
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco De Maria
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Dimitra Kontogiannis
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Malagnino
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
- Infectious Disease Clinic, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Loredana Sarmati
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy
- Infectious Disease Clinic, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Iannetta
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
- Infectious Disease Clinic, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee JH, Lee HR, Lee SW, Song JH, Hwang SD. Effect of Induction Therapy Dose on Survival in Abo-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis Using Recent Data. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:511-514. [PMID: 38378338 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rituximab is an essential induction immunosuppressant for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (KT) (ABOi-KT). However, studies on the optimal dose of rituximab are insufficient, and there are dosage differences between transplant centers and countries. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine the survival outcomes of patients receiving the most effective and safe dose of rituximab during ABOi-KT. METHODS Studies on rituximab dose were divided into four groups: ABO compatible, 1) placebo, 2) rituximab 200 mg, 3) rituximab 200-500 mg, and 4) rituximab 500 mg. We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded databases from 1970 to February 2022.9 . The inclusion criteria were adult patients (>18 years old). Reviews, observational studies, and clinical trials that did not clearly define outcomes or that did not have graft failure as an outcome were excluded. We performed direct and indirect network meta-analyses using Bayesian models and ranked different rituximab doses using a generation mixed treatment comparison (GeMTC) and Stata version 13. The NMA approach was evaluated using the GRADE framework, which specifies four levels of certainty for a given result: high, moderate, low, and very low. The outcomes included patient survival, graft failure, and bacterial and viral infections. RESULTS Twenty-five trials, including 5,378 subjects, were divided into the following four groups: 1) placebo, 2) rituximab 200 mg, 3) rituximab 200-500 mg, and 4) rituximab 500 mg. We focused on survival outcomes according to the dose of rituximab when patients received induction therapy for ABOi-KT. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the ABO-compatible and rituximab 200 mg groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CrI: 0.071-0.91 and OR 0.14, 95% CrI 0.036-0.47), compared with that in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS We found that low-dose rituximab in ABO-i KT was effective compared to the high-dose and placebo in maintaining the survival rate. However, large-scale and long-term data are necessary for further validation of our findings. Additionally, the use of smaller doses of rituximab will require further discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ho Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leesin Hemodialysis and Intervention Clinic, Busan, Korea
| | - Hee Ryong Lee
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leesin Hemodialysis and Intervention Clinic, Busan, Korea
| | - Seoung Woo Lee
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Joon Ho Song
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Seun Deuk Hwang
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:104-120. [PMID: 38088373 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%. RECENT FINDINGS Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization. SUMMARY Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heeger PS, Haro MC, Jordan S. Translating B cell immunology to the treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection. Nat Rev Nephrol 2024; 20:218-232. [PMID: 38168662 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-023-00791-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), including chronic AMR (cAMR), causes ~50% of kidney allograft losses each year. Despite attempts to develop well-tolerated and effective therapeutics for the management of AMR, to date, none has obtained FDA approval, thereby highlighting an urgent unmet medical need. Discoveries over the past decade from basic, translational and clinical studies of transplant recipients have provided a foundation for developing novel therapeutic approaches to preventing and treating AMR and cAMR. These interventions are aimed at reducing donor-specific antibody levels, decreasing graft injury and fibrosis, and preserving kidney function. Innovative approaches emerging from basic science findings include targeting interactions between alloreactive T cells and B cells, and depleting alloreactive memory B cells, as well as donor-specific antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells. Therapies aimed at reducing the cytotoxic antibody effector functions mediated by natural killer cells and the complement system, and their associated pro-inflammatory cytokines, are also undergoing evaluation. The complexity of the pathogenesis of AMR and cAMR suggest that multiple approaches will probably be required to treat these disease processes effectively. Definitive answers await results from large, double-blind, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Heeger
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maria Carrera Haro
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Stanley Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Banno T, Hirai T, Oki R, Yagisawa T, Unagami K, Kanzawa T, Omoto K, Shimizu T, Ishida H, Takagi T. Higher Donor Age and Severe Microvascular Inflammation Are Risk Factors for Chronic Rejection After Treatment of Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Transpl Int 2024; 37:11960. [PMID: 38371907 PMCID: PMC10869508 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Recent developments in intensive desensitization protocols have enabled kidney transplantation in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized recipients. However, cases of active antibody-mediated rejection (AABMR), when they occur, are difficult to manage, graft failure being the worst-case scenario. We aimed to assess the impact of our desensitization and AABMR treatment regimen and identify risk factors for disease progression. Among 849 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2021 at our institution, 59 were diagnosed with AABMR within 1 year after transplantation. All patients received combination therapy consisting of steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and plasmapheresis. Multivariable analysis revealed unrelated donors and preformed donor-specific antibodies as independent risk factors for AABMR. Five-year death-censored graft survival rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AABMR although 27 of 59 patients with AABMR developed chronic AABMR (CABMR) during the study period. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a donor age greater than 59 years and microvascular inflammation (MVI) score (g + ptc) ≥4 at AABMR diagnosis were independent risk factors for CABMR. Our combination therapy ameliorated AABMR; however, further treatment options should be considered to prevent CABMR, especially in patients with old donors and severe MVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taro Banno
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihito Hirai
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rikako Oki
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yagisawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Unagami
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Kanzawa
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Omoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Shimizu
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Organ Transplant Medicine, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chowdhry M, Yadav A, Sharma V, Agrawal S. Role of therapeutic plasma exchange as a desensitization therapy in human leukocyte antigen incompatible renal transplant patients: A single-center experience. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2024; 46:42-48. [PMID: 36621348 PMCID: PMC10935460 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite an increase in the rate of successful live donor renal transplantation done annually, the number of potential recipients with acceptable donors is relegated to the ever-expanding cadaver-donor waiting list due to sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. If not sufficiently suppressed, these preformed HLA antibodies can trigger antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and early graft loss. To ameliorate this situation, various desensitization treatments are administered to provide a survival benefit to highly sensitized patients. METHOD One hundred and six patients in the time frame of January 2017 to March 2019 were included in the study group. The desensitization protocol included therapeutic plasma exchange and administration of low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (100 mg/kg per therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) session) to highly sensitized patients (treatment group) who subsequently underwent renal transplantation after negative pre-transplant Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Luminex crossmatch (CDC/LumXM). We compared graft survival rates between the group undergoing desensitization (treatment group) and matched control group of patients that underwent HLA-compatible transplantation. RESULTS In the treatment group, Kaplan-Meier analysis estimates an average rate of patient graft survival of 95.2% at 3 years post-transplant, as compared with the rate of 86.9% in the same time frame for the control-matched group (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION Desensitization treatment with TPE before live donor renal transplantation in the case of patients with HLA sensitization provides better survival benefits along with monitoring for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and other infections, rather than waiting for a compatible organ donor. The data lays out evidence that desensitization treatments can assist overcome HLA incompatibility barriers in live donor renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Chowdhry
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110076, India.
| | - Ayushi Yadav
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Vandana Sharma
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - Soma Agrawal
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, New Delhi 110076, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Srivastava PK, Kittleson MM. Modern advances in heart transplantation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 82:147-156. [PMID: 38244826 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the only definitive therapy for patients with end stage heart disease. With the increasing global prevalence of heart failure, the demand for HTx has continued to grow and outpace supply. In this paper, we will review advances in the field of HTx along the clinical journey of a HTx recipient. Starting with the sensitized patient, we discuss current methods to define sensitization, and assays to help identify clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies. Desensitization strategies targeting all levels of the adaptive immune system are discussed with emphasis on novel techniques such as anti-CD 38 blockade and use of the Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus Pyogenes. We next discuss donor procurement and the resurgence of donation after circulatory death as a viable strategy to significantly and safely increase the donor pool. Post-transplant, we evaluate non-invasive surveillance techniques including gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA. Last, we discuss the ground-breaking developments in the field of xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyaksh K Srivastava
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Inoue K, Hori S, Tomizawa M, Yoneda T, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Detailed Cause of Donor Ineligibility in Living Donor Kidney Transplants: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:10-15. [PMID: 38177044 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living kidney donors are evaluated to determine their physical and psychological suitability for transplantation and ensure their safety. During this process, we frequently encounter cases where a donor is found to be ineligible. In this study, we surveyed donors who are ineligible for transplantation at our hospital to educate patients, their families, and medical staff regarding transplantation in the future. METHODS We examined the proportion of ineligible donors among 237 potential donors who visited our hospital between January 2002 and March 2022. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and evaluated from various aspects such as age, body mass index, medical history, medications, and renal function. RESULTS The mean age at presentation was 55.5 years, the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.6, and no significant difference was found between the ineligible and eligible donor groups. The transplant ineligibility rate was 23.6%, and the categories were for medical, backout, immunologic, and recipient-related reasons, in descending order. Furthermore, a low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was the most common cause of medical cases. CONCLUSIONS Many patients were judged ineligible because of lifestyle-related diseases such as low GFR, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Therefore, thorough patient education should be conducted using these data as a reference to reduce the number of donors ineligible because of lifestyle-related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuniaki Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Tomizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan; Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu L, Ji X, Zhu P, Yang L, Shi J, Zhao Y, Lai X, Yu J, Fu H, Ye Y, Wu Y, Ying J, Huang H, Luo Y. Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2023; 203:829-839. [PMID: 37621146 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizhen Liu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinyu Ji
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Panpan Zhu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luxin Yang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jimin Shi
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanmin Zhao
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Lai
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian Yu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huarui Fu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yishan Ye
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yibo Wu
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinping Ying
- Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - He Huang
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Luo
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Province Engineering Laboratory for Stem Cell and Immunity Therapy, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kittleson MM. Management of the sensitized heart transplant candidate. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:362-369. [PMID: 37678171 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For sensitized heart transplant candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. RECENT FINDINGS Advances in the assessment of HLA antibodies allow for identification of heart transplant candidates who may benefit from desensitization strategies to widen the donor pool and mitigate the risk of adverse posttransplant outcomes. SUMMARY Antibody sensitization is a barrier to successful heart transplantation and strategies to identify sensitized patients, stratify their risk, and mitigate this risk through desensitization is crucial to optimize the quality of life and survival of HT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Kittleson
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Betriu S, Rovira J, Arana C, García-Busquets A, Matilla-Martinez M, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Bañon-Maneus E, Lazo-Rodriguez M, Bartoló-Ibars A, Claas FHJ, Mulder A, Heidt S, Juan M, Bayés-Genís B, Campistol JM, Palou E, Diekmann F. Chimeric HLA antibody receptor T cells for targeted therapy of antibody-mediated rejection in transplantation. HLA 2023; 102:449-463. [PMID: 37503860 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), mainly against HLA, increases the risk of allograft rejection. Moreover, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains an important barrier to optimal long-term outcomes after solid organ transplantation. The development of chimeric autoantibody receptor T lymphocytes has been postulated for targeted therapy of autoimmune diseases. We aimed to develop a targeted therapy for DSA desensitization and ABMR, generating T cells with a chimeric HLA antibody receptor (CHAR) that specifically eliminates DSA-producing B cells. We have genetically engineered an HLA-A2-specific CHAR (A2-CHAR) and transduced it into human T cells. Then, we have performed in vitro experiments such as cytokine measurement, effector cell activation, and cytotoxicity against anti-HLA-A2 antibody-expressing target cells. In addition, we have performed A2-CHAR-Tc cytotoxic assays in an immunodeficient mouse model. A2-CHAR expressing T cells could selectively eliminate HLA-A2 antibody-producing B cells in vitro. The cytotoxic capacity of A2-CHAR expressing T cells mainly depended on Granzyme B release. In the NSG mouse model, A2-CHAR-T cells could identify and eradicate HLA-A2 antibody-producing B cells even when those cells are localized in the bone marrow. This ability is effector:target ratio dependent. CHAR technology generates potent and functional human cytotoxic T cells to target alloreactive HLA class I antibody-producing B cells. Thus, we consider that CHAR technology may be used as a selective desensitization protocol or an ABMR therapy in transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergi Betriu
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Rovira
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carolt Arana
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ainhoa García-Busquets
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina Matilla-Martinez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Ramirez-Bajo
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisenda Bañon-Maneus
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Lazo-Rodriguez
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arend Mulder
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Manel Juan
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriu Bayés-Genís
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Campistol
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Laboratori Experimental de Nefrologia i Trasplantament (LENIT), Fundació de Recerca Clinic Barcelona-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación Renal (REDINREN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Institut Clínic de Nefrologia i Urologia (ICNU), Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hiramitsu T, Hasegawa Y, Futamura K, Okada M, Matsuoka Y, Goto N, Ichimori T, Narumi S, Takeda A, Kobayashi T, Uchida K, Watarai Y. Prediction models for the recipients' ideal perioperative estimated glomerular filtration rates for predicting graft survival after adult living-donor kidney transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1187777. [PMID: 37720509 PMCID: PMC10501755 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1187777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The impact of the perioperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on graft survival in kidney transplant recipients is yet to be evaluated. In this study, we developed prediction models for the ideal perioperative eGFRs in recipients. Methods We evaluated the impact of perioperative predicted ideal and actual eGFRs on graft survival by including 1,174 consecutive adult patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) between January 2008 and December 2020. Prediction models for the ideal perioperative eGFR were developed for 676 recipients who were randomly assigned to the training and validation sets (ratio: 7:3). The prediction models for the ideal best eGFR within 3 weeks and those at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after LDKT in 474 recipients were developed using 10-fold validation and stepwise multiple regression model analyzes. The developed prediction models were validated in 202 recipients. Finally, the impact of perioperative predicted ideal eGFRs/actual eGFRs on graft survival was investigated using Fine-Gray regression analysis. Results The correlation coefficients of the predicted ideal best eGFR within 3 weeks and the predicted ideal eGFRs at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after LDKT were 0.651, 0.600, 0.598, and 0.617, respectively. Multivariate analyzes for graft loss demonstrated significant differences in the predicted ideal best eGFR/actual best eGFR within 3 weeks and the predicted ideal eGFRs/actual eGFRs at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after LDKT. Discussion The predicted ideal best eGFR/actual best eGFR within 3 weeks and the predicted ideal eGFRs/actual eGFRs at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after LDKT were independent prognostic factors for graft loss. Therefore, the perioperative predicted ideal eGFR/actual eGFR may be useful for predicting graft survival after adult LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahisa Hiramitsu
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuki Hasegawa
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kenta Futamura
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Manabu Okada
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yutaka Matsuoka
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Masuko Memorial Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Norihiko Goto
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Ichimori
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunji Narumi
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Asami Takeda
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takaaki Kobayashi
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kazuharu Uchida
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Masuko Memorial Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Watarai
- Department of Transplant and Endocrine Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao D, Guo Z, Zhao G, Sa R, Zhu L, Chen G. A Novel Daratumumab-Based Regimen for Desensitization in Highly HLA-Presensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11771. [PMID: 37675269 PMCID: PMC10477353 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daqiang Zhao
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiliang Guo
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhao
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Rula Sa
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Institution of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guo Z, Zhao D, Sa R, Wang L, Li S, Zhao G, Zhu L, Chen G. A modified perioperative regimen for deceased donor kidney transplantation in presensitized recipients without prior desensitization therapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1223567. [PMID: 37475867 PMCID: PMC10355838 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Renal transplantation in HLA-presensitized recipients entails an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss. There is currently no accepted standard treatment protocol that can help transplant surgeons safely perform deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation in presensitized patients without pretransplant desensitization. Methods Fifty-one panel-reactive antibody (PRA)-positive recipients and 62 PRA-negative retransplant recipients (control) who received DD renal transplantation were included. Patients in the presensitized group (donor-specific antibody [DSA]-positive, n=25; DSA-negative, n=26) without desensitization received a modified perioperative treatment starting on day 0 or -1 with rituximab, thymoglobulin, and low daily doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG, 10-20 g/d, for 14 days). Plasmapheresis was performed once before surgery in DSA-positive recipients. Results The median follow-up time was 51 months in the presensitized group and 41 months in the control group. The incidence of early acute rejection (AR) and AMR (including mixed rejection) was 35.3% and 13.7% in the presensitized group, respectively, significantly higher than in the control group (14.5% and 1.6%, respectively). Within the presensitized group, the DSA-positive subgroup had more AMR than the DSA-negative subgroup (24.0% vs. 3.8%), but the incidence of T cell-mediated rejection was comparable (20.0% vs. 23.4%). In the presensitized group, all rejections were successfully reversed, and graft function remained stable during follow-up. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates of the grafts and recipients in this group were 98.0%. Conclusion With a modified IVIG-based perioperative regimen, excellent intermediate-term graft and recipient survival outcomes can be achieved in presensitized patients who received DD kidney transplantation without prior desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiliang Guo
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Daqiang Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Rula Sa
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Songxia Li
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Zhu
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Couzi L, Malvezzi P, Amrouche L, Anglicheau D, Blancho G, Caillard S, Freist M, Guidicelli GL, Kamar N, Lefaucheur C, Mariat C, Koenig A, Noble J, Thaunat O, Thierry A, Taupin JL, Bertrand D. Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11244. [PMID: 37448448 PMCID: PMC10336835 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Couzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS-UMR 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Marine Freist
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux, Le Puy-en-Velay, France
| | | | - Nassim Kamar
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Christophe Mariat
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Johan Noble
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | - Antoine Thierry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim HW, Lee J, Heo SJ, Kim BS, Huh KH, Yang J. Comparison of high-dose IVIG and rituximab versus rituximab as a preemptive therapy for de novo donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7682. [PMID: 37169835 PMCID: PMC10175554 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34804-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) is associated with a higher risk of kidney graft failure. However, it is unknown whether preemptive treatment of subclinical dnDSA is beneficial. Here, we assessed the efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab combination therapy for subclinical dnDSA. An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at two Korean institutions. Adult (aged ≥ 19 years) kidney transplant patients with subclinical class II dnDSA (mean fluorescence intensity ≥ 1000) were enrolled. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive rituximab or rituximab with IVIG at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the change in dnDSA titer at 3 and 12 months after treatment. A total of 46 patients (24 for rituximab and 22 for rituximab with IVIG) were included in the analysis. The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 66.7 ± 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m2. The titer decline of immune-dominant dnDSA at 12 months in both the preemptive groups was significant. However, there was no difference between the two groups at 12 months. Either kidney allograft function or proteinuria did not differ between the two groups. No antibody-mediated rejection occurred in either group. Preemptive treatment with high-dose IVIG combined with rituximab did not show a better dnDSA reduction compared with rituximab alone.Trial registration: IVIG/Rituximab versus Rituximab in Kidney Transplant With de Novo Donor-specific Antibodies (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033276, first trial registration (26/07/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Woo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Jae Heo
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
DeFilippis EM, Kransdorf EP, Jaiswal A, Zhang X, Patel J, Kobashigawa JA, Baran DA, Kittleson MM. Detection and management of HLA sensitization in candidates for adult heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:409-422. [PMID: 36631340 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HT) remains the preferred therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, for sensitized HT candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens , finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting HT has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. This State-of-the-Art review discusses the assessment of human leukocyte antigens antibodies, potential desensitization strategies including mechanisms of action and specific protocols, the approach to a potential donor including the use of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, and virtual crossmatches, and peritransplant induction management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan P Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abhishek Jaiswal
- Hartford HealthCare Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - David A Baran
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rao RA, Kransdorf EP, Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA, Kittleson MM. How to Approach HLA Sensitization in Heart Transplant Candidates. JACC: HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:469-475. [PMID: 37019560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
|
23
|
Abstract
Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
|
24
|
Okada M, Narumi S, Hasegawa Y, Futamura K, Hiramitsu T, Ichimori T, Goto N, Kobayashi T, Uchida K, Takeda A, Watarai Y. Optimal dose of rituximab in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14915. [PMID: 36634703 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation have improved with the introduction of desensitization therapy with rituximab. However, rituximab prevents not only antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but also increases the risk of adverse events, such as infection. For ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, we previously used a rituximab-free desensitization protocol and then initiated a single dose of 100 mg rituximab in 2016. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers before and after the introduction of rituximab. METHODS ABOi kidney transplantations (n = 142) in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers between 2007 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without rituximab) for desensitization. The primary outcomes were the incidence of acute AMR and infection. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were desensitized without rituximab (rituximab-free group), and 76 were pretreated with 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) before transplantation. The incidence of acute AMR was significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group (.0% [0/76] vs. 7.6% [5/66], respectively; p = .047). Post-transplantation anti-A/B antibody titers were also lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infections, between the two groups. CONCLUSION In ABOi kidney transplantation patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, the desensitization protocol with a single dose of 100 mg rituximab was effective in preventing acute AMR without increasing the risk of other adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manabu Okada
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunji Narumi
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuki Hasegawa
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kenta Futamura
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahisa Hiramitsu
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Ichimori
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Norihiko Goto
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takaaki Kobayashi
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Kazuharu Uchida
- Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Masuko Memorial Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Asami Takeda
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Watarai
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Transplant Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grimaldi V, Pagano M, Moccia G, Maiello C, De Rosa P, Napoli C. Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation. CURRENT RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY 2023; 4:100056. [PMID: 36714552 PMCID: PMC9876744 DOI: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Grimaldi
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy,Corresponding author.
| | - Martina Pagano
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Giusi Moccia
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Maiello
- Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation, Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Paride De Rosa
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona," University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, Salerno, Italy
| | - Claudio Napoli
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy,Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Farshbafnadi M, Razi S, Rezaei N. Transplantation. Clin Immunol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818006-8.00008-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
27
|
Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 2023; 107:231-253. [PMID: 35915547 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes. METHODS We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility. RESULTS Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
28
|
Roux A, Hachem RR. Point-Counterpoint: Desensitization to improve the likelihood of lung transplantation. Hum Immunol 2023; 84:43-45. [PMID: 36328804 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Roux
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blincoe A, Labrosse R, Abraham RS. Acquired B-cell deficiency secondary to B-cell-depleting therapies. J Immunol Methods 2022; 511:113385. [PMID: 36372267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2022.113385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The advantage of the newer biological therapies is that the immunosuppressive effect is targeted, in contrast, to the standard, traditional immunomodulatory agents, which have a more global effect. However, there are unintended targets and consequences, even to these "precise" therapeutics, leading to acquired or secondary immunodeficiencies. Besides depleting specific cellular immune subsets, these biological agents, which include monoclonal antibodies against biologically relevant molecules, often have broader functional immune consequences, which become apparent over time. This review focuses on acquired B-cell immunodeficiency, secondary to the use of B-cell depleting therapeutic agents. Among the many adverse consequences of B-cell depletion is the risk of hypogammaglobulinemia, failure of B-cell recovery, impaired B-cell differentiation, and risk of infections. Factors, which modulate the outcomes of B-cell depleting therapies, include the intrinsic nature of the underlying disease, the concomitant use of other immunomodulatory agents, and the clinical status of the patient and other co-existing morbidities. This article seeks to explore the mechanism of action of B-cell depleting agents, the clinical utility and adverse effects of these therapies, and the relevance of systematic and serial laboratory immune monitoring in identifying patients at risk for developing immunological complications, and who may benefit from early intervention to mitigate the secondary consequences. Though these biological drugs are gaining widespread use, a harmonized approach to immune evaluation pre-and post-treatment has not yet gained traction across multiple clinical specialties, because of which, the true prevalence of these adverse events cannot be determined in the treated population, and a systematic and evidence-based dosing schedule cannot be developed. The aim of this review is to bring these issues into focus, and initiate a multi-specialty, data-driven approach to immune monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaliesse Blincoe
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Allergy, Starship Child Health, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
| | - Roxane Labrosse
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roshini S Abraham
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Galeev SR, Gautier SV. Risks and ways of preventing kidney dysfunction in drug-induced immunosuppression in solid organ recipients. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS 2022. [DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2022-4-24-38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) is the cornerstone of treatment after transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term graft function. However, the expected effects of IMT must be balanced against the major adverse effects of these drugs and their toxicity. The purpose of this review is to summarize world experience on current immunosuppressive strategies and to assess their effects on renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sh. R. Galeev
- Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
| | - S. V. Gautier
- Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Sechenov University
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Leal R, Pardinhas C, Martinho A, Sá HO, Figueiredo A, Alves R. Strategies to Overcome HLA Sensitization and Improve Access to Retransplantation after Kidney Graft Loss. J Clin Med 2022; 11:5753. [PMID: 36233621 PMCID: PMC9572793 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation have a previously failed graft. Retransplantation provides a significant improvement in morbidity, mortality, and quality of life when compared to dialysis. However, HLA sensitization is a major barrier to kidney retransplantation and the majority of the highly sensitized patients are waiting for a subsequent kidney transplant. A multidisciplinary team that includes immunogeneticists, transplant nephrologists and surgeons, and adequate allocation policies is fundamental to increase access to a kidney retransplant. A review of Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was performed on the challenges of kidney retransplantation after graft loss, focusing on the HLA barrier and new strategies to overcome sensitization. Conclusion: Technical advances in immunogenetics, new desensitization protocols, and complex allocation programs have emerged in recent years to provide a new hope to kidney recipients with a previously failed graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Leal
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Clara Pardinhas
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - António Martinho
- Coimbra Histocompatibility Center, Portuguese Institute of Blood and Transplantation, 3041-861 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Helena Oliveira Sá
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Arnaldo Figueiredo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
- Urology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Alves
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yilmaz VT, Dandin O, Kisaoglu A, Avanaz A, Kamaci D, Toru HS, Demiryilmaz I, Koksoy S, Aydinli B, Kocak H. Prognosis and Treatment for Active and Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients; Single Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1809-1815. [PMID: 35907695 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment alternatives of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal transplant patients. METHODS Three thousand renal transplant patients were included in the study. The patients were first divided into 2 groups. Group 1: ABMR [-] recipients (n = 2871), Group 2: ABMR (+) recipients (n = 129). ABMR patients were compared among themselves by dividing them into 3 subgroups (early-active, late-active, chronic-active). The study was performed retrospectively. Different combinations of methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, plasmapheresis (PP), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) were used in the treatment and the results were compared. RESULTS Graft survival and functions were worse and the rates of CAD, delayed graft function, BK virus, and cytomegalovirus higher in patients with ABMR. Also, graft survival was lower in patients with serum creatinine ≥3 (P = 0.001), GFR <30 (P <0.001), and spot urine protein to creatinine ratio ≥1 (P = 0.042) at the time of diagnosis. High interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores in chronic ABMR cases and high intimal arteritis scores in active ABMR cases were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that ABMR has a poor prognosis in terms of clinical parameters, and treatment should be individualized according to pathologic findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. Pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG should be used in the treatment of all ABMR patients, but PP, rituximab, and ATG should be used in selected cases. ABMR has a poor prognosis and treatment should be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vural Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey.
| | - Ozgur Dandin
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Kisaoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ali Avanaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Davut Kamaci
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Havva Serap Toru
- Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ismail Demiryilmaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Sadi Koksoy
- Department of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Bulent Aydinli
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Kocak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cooper DKC, Yamamoto T, Hara H, Pierson RN. The first clinical pig heart transplant: Was IVIg or pig cytomegalovirus detrimental to the outcome? Xenotransplantation 2022; 29:e12771. [PMID: 35942912 PMCID: PMC10124764 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The clinical course of the first patient to receive a gene-edited pig heart transplant was recently reported by the University of Maryland team. Although the pig heart functioned well for >40 days, serum anti-pig antibodies then increased, and the patient sadly died after 60 days. Because of his debilitated pre-transplant state, the patient never thrived despite excellent graft function for several weeks, and the cause of his demise continues to be uncertain. A few days before an increase in anti-pig antibodies was observed, the patient had received intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIg), and whether this played a role in his cardiac deterioration has been discussed. Furthermore, mcfDNA testing indicated an increase in pig cytomegalovirus (CMV), and its possible role in the development of cardiac dysfunction has also been considered. On the basis of the limited data provided in the publication and on our previous investigations into whether IVIg contains anti-TKO pig antibodies and therefore might be deleterious to TKO pig organ xenografts, we suggest that the steady rise in anti-pig antibody titer was more consistent with the failure of the immunosuppressive regimen to prevent elicited anti-TKO pig antibody production, rather than from the passive transfusion of IVIg or the presence of pig CMV in the graft. Although the outcome of the Maryland experience was disappointing, valuable lessons were learned. Our attention was drawn to the potential risks of heart transplantation in a "deconditioned" patient, the administration of IVIg, the transmission of pig CMV, and of the difficulties in interpreting myocardial biopsy findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K. C. Cooper
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Takayuki Yamamoto
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hidetaka Hara
- Yunnan Xenotransplantation Engineering Research Center, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Richard N. Pierson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ge S, Chu M, Tang J, Kahwaji J, Karasyov A, Lovato D, Vo A, Choi J, Jordan SC, Zhang R, Toyoda M. Viral-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant patients maintained on everolimus and low dose tacrolimus. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13805. [PMID: 35213773 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintenance with "everolimus + reduced dose tacrolimus" (Ev + Taclow ) was reported to reduce the risk of viral infections compared to (Tac + MMF). Here we examined viremia and viral-specific T-cell (viral-Tc) responses in patients treated with Ev + Taclow v. Tac + MMF in highly-HLA sensitized patients. METHODS HLA sensitized (HS) kidney transplant patients were monitored pre- and post-transplant for viremia (CMV, BK and EBV) by PCR in 19 Ev + Taclow and 48 Tac + MMF patients. For CMV PCR analysis, we compared infection rates in 19 Ev + Taclow patients to 48 CMV D+/R- (#28) or CMV D-/R- (#20) Tac + MMF patients. CMV-Tc and EBV-Tc were evaluated by cytokine flow cytometry, and DSA levels by Luminex for selected patients in both groups. RESULTS CMV, EBV viremia rates were similar in Ev + Taclow v. Tac + MMF patients, but BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Taclow patients. No patient in either group developed BKAN or PTLD. CMV- & EBV-Tc decreased significantly after alemtuzumab induction but returned to pre-treatment levels 1-2 months post-transplant in most patients. de novo DSA was similar in both groups as were patient and graft survival and graft rejection. CONCLUSIONS CMV-Tc, EBV-Tc were similar in Ev + Taclow and Tac + MMF patients. EBV and CMV viremia rates were similar over 1 year. BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Taclow patients suggesting no benefit for Ev + Taclow in enhancing viral specific Tc effector functions or limiting viral infections. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shili Ge
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maggie Chu
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jacqueline Tang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 90048, USA
| | - Joseph Kahwaji
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 90048, USA
| | - Artur Karasyov
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Darly Lovato
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 90048, USA
| | - Jua Choi
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 90048, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 90048, USA
| | - Ruan Zhang
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mieko Toyoda
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kälble F, Süsal C, Pego da Silva L, Speer C, Benning L, Nusshag C, Pham L, Tran H, Schaier M, Sommerer C, Beimler J, Mehrabi A, Zeier M, Morath C. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Desensitization With Immunoadsorption. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:781491. [PMID: 34977083 PMCID: PMC8719417 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.781491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the current organ shortage, living donor kidney transplantation is increasingly performed across HLA (human leukocyte antigen) or ABO antibody barriers. There is still uncertainty about the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes, which may limit long-term graft survival. From March 2007 to December 2016, 58 sensitized living donor kidney transplant candidates were identified and 38 patients eventually included in the study: 36 patients (95%) had pre-transplant and pre-desensitization Luminex-detected donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), and 17/36 patients (47%) in addition had a positive crossmatch result. Two patients had no detectable DSA but a positive CDC B-cell crossmatch result. Patients were treated with pre- and post-transplant apheresis and powerful immunosuppression including the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (N = 36) in combination with thymoglobulin (N = 20) or anti-IL2 receptor antibody (N = 18). The results of the 38 successfully desensitized and transplanted patients were retrospectively compared to the results of 76 matched standard-risk recipients. Desensitized patients showed patient and graft survival rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients (P = 0.55 and P = 0.16, respectively). There was a trend toward reduced death-censored graft survival in desensitized patients (P = 0.053) which, however, disappeared when the 34 patients who were transplanted after introduction of sensitive Luminex testing were analyzed (P = 0.43). The incidence of rejection episodes without borderline changes were in desensitized patients with 21% similar to the 18% in standard-risk patients (P = 0.74). Thirty-six patients had pre-transplant HLA class I and/or II DSA that were reduced by 85 and 81%, respectively, during pre-transplant desensitization (P < 0.001 for both). On day 360 after transplantation, 20 of 36 (56%) patients had lost their DSA. The overall AMR rate was 6% in these patients, but as high as 60% in 5 (14%) patients with persistent and de novo DSA during year 1; 2 (40%) of whom lost their graft due to AMR. Eleven (31%) patients with persistent DSA but without de novo DSA had an AMR rate of 18% without graft loss while one patient lost her graft without signs of AMR. Our desensitization protocol for pre-sensitized living donor kidney transplant recipients with DSA resulted in good graft outcomes with side effects and rejection rates similar to that of standard-risk recipients. Adequate patient selection prior to transplantation and frequent immunological monitoring thereafter is critical to minimize rejection episodes and subsequent graft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Kälble
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.,Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Luiza Pego da Silva
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lien Pham
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hien Tran
- Transplantation-Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schaier
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Beimler
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nikolova A, Patel JK. Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 272:85-116. [PMID: 35474024 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.
Collapse
|
40
|
Truffot A, Jouve T, Noble J, Bardy B, Malvezzi P, Rostaing L, Stanke-Labesque F, Gautier-Veyret E. Tocilizumab Trough Levels Variability in Kidney-Transplant Candidates Undergoing Desensitization. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010091. [PMID: 35011830 PMCID: PMC8745611 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of anti-HLA antibodies is an increasing challenge in kidney transplantation. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), has been proposed to complement conventional desensitization therapy. We aimed to describe TCZ plasma trough concentrations and their variability and to investigate the link between TCZ concentration and the evolution of anti-HLA antibodies. Sensitized kidney-transplant candidates treated monthly with TCZ (8 mg/kg) for desensitization were retrospectively included. TCZ concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Seventy-four TCZ concentrations from 10 patients were analyzed. The TCZ trough concentration ranged from <1.0 to 52.5 mg·L−1, with a median of 25.6 mg·L−1 [25th–75th percentiles: 13.2–35.3 mg·L−1). The inter- and intra-individual coefficients of variation were 55.0% and 33.0%, respectively. The TCZ trough concentration was not related to IL-6 (rho = −0.46, p = 0.792), soluble IL-6R (rho = −0.81, p = 0.65) concentrations or reduction of anti-HLA antibodies (mixed-effects model adjusting, effect of TCZ trough concentration: rho = −0.004, p = 0.26). The individual median TCZ concentration tended to be associated with the number of antibodies, with an initial MFI > 3000 that dropped to <3000 after TCZ treatment (rho = 0.397, p = 0.083). TCZ trough concentrations in kidney-transplant candidates treated for desensitization were highly variable. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to study the possible link between TCZ concentrations and the reduction of anti-HLA antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Truffot
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Pharmacogénétique et Toxicologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (A.T.); (F.S.-L.); (E.G.-V.)
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (T.J.); (J.N.); (P.M.)
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences, UMR CNRS 5309/INSERM U1209, Université Grenoble-Alpes, 38400 Grenoble, France
| | - Johan Noble
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (T.J.); (J.N.); (P.M.)
| | - Béatrice Bardy
- Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS Rhône-Alpes), Seteur HLA, 38043 Grenoble, France;
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (T.J.); (J.N.); (P.M.)
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (T.J.); (J.N.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-476768945
| | - Françoise Stanke-Labesque
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Pharmacogénétique et Toxicologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (A.T.); (F.S.-L.); (E.G.-V.)
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Elodie Gautier-Veyret
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Pharmacogénétique et Toxicologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France; (A.T.); (F.S.-L.); (E.G.-V.)
- Université Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2, 38000 Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bastos J, Machado DJDB, David-Neto E. Increasing transplantability in Brazil: time to discuss Kidney Paired Donation. J Bras Nefrol 2021; 44:417-422. [PMID: 35107119 PMCID: PMC9518625 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2021-0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for chronic kidney disease. In Brazil, there are currently more than 26 thousand patients on the waitlist. Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) offers an incompatible donor-recipient pair the possibility to exchange with another pair in the same situation, it is a strategy to raise the number of KT. Discussion: KPD ceased being merely an idea over 20 years ago. It currently accounts for 16.2% of living donors KT (LDKT) in the USA and 8% in Europe. The results are similar to other LDKT. It is a promising alternative especially for highly sensitized recipients, who tend to accumulate on the waitlist. KPD is not limited to developed countries, as excellent results were already published in India in 2014. In Guatemala, the first LDKT through KPD was performed in 2011. However, the practice remains limited to isolated cases in Latin America. Conclusion: KPD programs with different dimensions, acceptance rules and allocation criteria are being developed and expanded worldwide to meet the demands of patients. The rise in transplantability brought about by KPD mostly meets the needs of highly sensitized patients. The Brazilian transplant program is mature enough to accept the challenge of starting its KPD program, intended primarily to benefit patients who have a low probability of receiving a transplant from a deceased donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Bastos
- Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Juiz de Fora, Departamento de Transplante, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Elias David-Neto
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Transplante, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Puliyanda DP, Jordan SC, Kim IK, Patel M, Murthy A, Huang E, Zhang X, Reinsmoen N, Kamil ES, Toyoda M. Use of Rituximab for persistent EBV DNAemia, and Its effect on donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients: A case series. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e14113. [PMID: 34418254 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent EBV DNAemia (PEBV) is associated with late-onset PTLD. The efficacy of rituximab in PEBV is not conclusive. We monitored PEBV and DSA in pediatric kidney transplant patients with or without rituximab. METHODS 13 PEBV patients received standard treatment with immunosuppression reduction and valganciclovir, with or without IVIG; 5/13 were further treated with rituximab. RESULTS All Rituximab-treated and 6/7 No-Rituximab patients were EBV seronegative at transplant and seroconverted post-transplant. Peak EBV PCR levels were lower in No-Rituximab than Rituximab patients and all No-Rituximab patients cleared PEBV after standard treatment. Additional 1-2 doses of rituximab reduced EBV PCR levels in all 5 Rituximab patients, 3 cleared PEBV. One No-Rituximab patient developed localized PLTD. None of Rituximab patients developed de novo DSA, while 4/8 No-Rituximab patients did: 2/4 had ABMR. 1/5 Rituximab and 5/8 No-Rituximab patients had acute rejection. There was no change in eGFR between pre-EBV DNAemia and follow-up in Rituximab patients, while reduction in No-Rituximab patients was found. There was no difference in graft and patient survival. CONCLUSIONS While early intervention with rituximab in pediatric patients with PEBV may reduce viral load and PTLD, we observed a slower development of de novo DSA, and rejection and maintenance of eGFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechu P Puliyanda
- Pediatric Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Irene K Kim
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mitasha Patel
- Pediatric Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anand Murthy
- Pediatric Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Edmund Huang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Reinsmoen
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine S Kamil
- Pediatric Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mieko Toyoda
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sethi S, Ammerman N, Vo A, Jordan SC. Approach to Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates and a Positive Crossmatch. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:587-595. [PMID: 35367027 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation offers survival benefit compared with ongoing dialysis. There have been considerable advances in the last decade to allow for increased access to transplant for the HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. These include increased priority in the kidney allocation system, kidney paired donation, and novel desensitization strategies. A better understanding of the role of B cells, plasma cells, and complement and inflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of HLA antibody-mediated allograft injury has led to the use of novel therapeutics for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. Here we discuss current approaches to kidney transplantation in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.
Collapse
|
44
|
Mujtahedi SS, Yigitbilek F, Ozdogan E, Schinstock CA, Stegall MD. Antibody-Mediated Rejection: the Role of Plasma Cells and Memory B Cells. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00342-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
45
|
C3 complement inhibition prevents antibody-mediated rejection and prolongs renal allograft survival in sensitized non-human primates. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5456. [PMID: 34526511 PMCID: PMC8443599 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25745-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensitized kidney transplant recipients experience high rates of antibody-mediated rejection due to the presence of donor-specific antibodies and immunologic memory. Here we show that transient peri-transplant treatment with the central complement component C3 inhibitor Cp40 significantly prolongs median allograft survival in a sensitized nonhuman primate model. Despite donor-specific antibody levels remaining high, fifty percent of Cp40-treated primates maintain normal kidney function beyond the last day of treatment. Interestingly, presence of antibodies of the IgM class associates with reduced median graft survival (8 vs. 40 days; p = 0.02). Cp40 does not alter lymphocyte depletion by rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin, but inhibits lymphocyte activation and proliferation, resulting in reduced antibody-mediated injury and complement deposition. In summary, Cp40 prevents acute antibody-mediated rejection and prolongs graft survival in primates, and inhibits T and B cell activation and proliferation, suggesting an immunomodulatory effect beyond its direct impact on antibody-mediated injury. Donor-specific antibodies in sensitized recipients may cause kidney transplant rejection. Here the authors show that complement component C3 inhibition prolongs graft survival by inhibiting T and B cell proliferation/activation and hence tissue injury, despite antibody levels remaining unaffected.
Collapse
|
46
|
Tanaka A, Ide K, Tanaka Y, Ohira M, Tahara H, Ohdan H. B cell depletion with anti-CD20 mAb exacerbates anti-donor CD4 + T cell responses in highly sensitized transplant recipients. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18180. [PMID: 34518640 PMCID: PMC8437972 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Pretransplant desensitization with rituximab has been applied to preformed donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (DSA)-positive recipients for elimination of preformed DSA. We investigated the impact of pretransplant desensitization with rituximab on anti-donor T cell responses in DSA-positive transplant recipients. To monitor the patients' immune status, mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays were performed before and after desensitization with rituximab. Two weeks after rituximab administration, the stimulation index (SI) of anti-donor CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in the DSA-positive recipients than in the DSA-negative recipients. To investigate the mechanisms of anti-donor hyper responses of CD4+ T cells after B cell depletion, highly sensitized mice models were injected with anti-CD20 mAb to eliminate B cells. Consistent with clinical observations, the SI values of anti-donor CD4+ T cells were significantly increased after anti-CD20 mAb injection in the sensitized mice models. Adding B cells isolated from untreated sensitized mice to MLR significantly inhibited the enhancement of anti-donor CD4+ T cell response. The depletion of the CD5+ B cell subset, which exclusively included IL-10-positive cells, from the additive B cells abrogated such inhibitory effects. These findings demonstrate that IL-10+ CD5+ B cells suppress the excessive response of anti-donor CD4+ T cells responses in sensitized recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asuka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ide
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Yuka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tahara
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Habal MV. Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation. Front Immunol 2021; 12:702186. [PMID: 34504489 PMCID: PMC8423343 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.702186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Heart transplant candidates sensitized to HLA antigens wait longer for transplant, are at increased risk of dying while waiting, and may not be listed at all. The increasing prevalence of HLA sensitization and limitations of current desensitization strategies underscore the urgent need for a more effective approach. In addition to pregnancy, prior transplant, and transfusions, patients with end-stage heart failure are burdened with unique factors placing them at risk for HLA sensitization. These include homograft material used for congenital heart disease repair and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Moreover, these risks are often stacked, forming a seemingly insurmountable barrier in some cases. While desensitization protocols are typically implemented uniformly, irrespective of the mode of sensitization, the heterogeneity in success and post-transplant outcomes argues for a more tailored approach. Achieving this will require progress in our understanding of the immunobiology underlying the innate and adaptive immune response to these varied allosensitizing exposures. Further attention to B cell activation, memory, and plasma cell differentiation is required to establish methods that durably abrogate the anti-HLA antibody response before and after transplant. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies to the net state of sensitization and the potential implications for graft longevity also remain to be comprehensively defined. The aim of this review is to first bring forth select issues unique to the sensitized heart transplant candidate. The current literature on desensitization in heart transplantation will then be summarized providing context within the immune response. Building on this, newer approaches with therapeutic potential will be discussed emphasizing the importance of not only addressing the short-term pathogenic consequences of circulating HLA antibodies, but also the need to modulate alloimmune memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlena V. Habal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Olaso D, Manook M, Moris D, Knechtle S, Kwun J. Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3656. [PMID: 34441950 PMCID: PMC8396983 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (D.O.); (M.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (D.O.); (M.M.); (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rituximab Desensitization in Liver Transplant Recipients With Preformed Donor-specific HLA Antibodies: A Japanese Nationwide Survey. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e729. [PMID: 34291151 PMCID: PMC8288898 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The significance of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplant recipients is controversial. Moreover, there has been no established desensitization protocol for DSA-positive recipients. Methods. A Japanese nationwide survey was performed to investigate the clinical practice among preformed DSA-positive patients with special reference to rituximab desensitization. Results. There was a total of 47 cases, including 2 pediatric cases, in which rituximab (287 ± 159 mg [319 (50–916)/m2]) was administered to desensitize preformed DSA. The decision for the indication of rituximab desensitization was based on a single-antigen assay in the majority of cases (83%, 39/47), and the most frequent protocol was rituximab monotherapy (n = 12) followed by quadruple treatment with rituximab tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and plasmapheresis (n = 11). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft and patient survival rates among adult patients were 85%, 83%, 83%, and 81%, 77%, 74%, respectively, while neither graft loss nor death was observed in the 2 pediatric cases. The 1-, 3-, and 12-mo cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was 11%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. The incidence of AMR was significantly higher in the lower rituximab dose group than in the higher rituximab dose group (cutoff 300 mg/m2, 4% versus 24%, P = 0.041). The rate of infusion-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.4%, and all ADRs were mild and self-limiting. A total of 99 ADRs among 27 patients were reported, none of which were severe adverse events associated with rituximab. Conclusions. The rituximab induction was well tolerated among DSA-positive liver transplant recipients with a satisfactory outcome. A rituximab dose >300 mg/m2 was observed to achieve less incidence of the development of AMR.
Collapse
|
50
|
Rossi AP, Alloway RR, Hildeman D, Woodle ES. Plasma cell biology: Foundations for targeted therapeutic development in transplantation. Immunol Rev 2021; 303:168-186. [PMID: 34254320 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage organ disease. Over the past 70 years, tremendous progress has been made in solid organ transplantation, particularly in T-cell-targeted immunosuppression and organ allocation systems. However, humoral alloimmune responses remain a major challenge to progress. Patients with preexisting antibodies to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) are at significant disadvantages in regard to receiving a well-matched organ, moreover, those who develop anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation face a significant foreshortening of renal allograft survival. Historical therapies to desensitize patients prior to transplantation or to treat posttransplant AMR have had limited effectiveness, likely because they do not significantly reduce antibody levels, as plasma cells, the source of antibody production, remain largely unaffected. Herein, we will discuss the significance of plasma cells in transplantation, aspects of their biology as potential therapeutic targets, clinical challenges in developing strategies to target plasma cells in transplantation, and lastly, novel approaches that have potential to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Rossi
- Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Immunology Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - David Hildeman
- Division of Immunobiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Immunology Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|