A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears

Brain functional connectivity alterations in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

Recent advancements in neuroimaging have illustrated that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries could impact the central nervous system (CNS), causing neuroplastic changes in the brain beyond the traditionally understood biomechanical consequences. While most of previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have focused on localized cortical activity changes post-injury, emerging research has suggested disruptions in functional connectivity across the brain. However, these prior investigations, albeit pioneering, have been constrained by two limitations: a reliance on small-sample participant cohorts, often limited to two to three patients, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings, and an adherence to region of interest based analysis, which may overlook broader network interactions. To address these limitations, our study employed resting-state fMRI to assess whole-brain functional connectivity in 15 ACL-injured patients, comparing them to matched controls using two distinct network analysis methods. Using Network-Based Statistics, we identified widespread reductions in connectivity that spanned across multiple brain regions. Further modular connectivity analysis showed significant decreases in inter-modular connectivity between the sensorimotor and cerebellar modules, and intra-modular connectivity within the default-mode network in ACL-injured patients. Our results thus highlight a shift from localized disruptions to network-wide dysfunctions, suggesting that ACL injuries induce widespread CNS changes. This enhanced understanding has the potential to stimulate the development of strategies aiming to restore functional connectivity and improve recovery outcomes.

Predictors of lower knee function improvement two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The extent to which knee functions improve after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) varies. This study aimed to determine the factors that affect lower knee function improvement after two years of ACLR.

METHODS

The study included 159 patients who underwent ACLR in the Indonesian ACL community between August 2018 and April 2020. The concomitant injury and graft types of ACLR were determined using patients' pre-surgical MRI and medical records. The five subscales of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) were used to evaluate the patient at baseline, first year, and second year following ACLR. A linear mixed-effect model (LMEM) was used to predict the longitudinal improvement models for the five-subscales KOOS score after ACLR.

RESULTS

The LMEM predicted lower KOOS subscales scores improvements by 0.5 for QOL, 0.1 for symptom, ADL, and QOL, and 0.2 for sports/recreation, respectively, for a one score increase of age and time from injury to surgery. Male patients had higher KOOS subscale scores with the improvement of pain, symptom, and ADL by 5.7, 5.9, and 6.3 compared to female patients, respectively, while patients with patellar tendon grafts had lower improvement of KOOS score pain by 6.5 compared to hamstring tendon grafts.

CONCLUSION

As the age and time from injury to surgery increased, the KOOS subscales scores of QOL and symptoms, ADL, sports/recreation, and QOL decreased. Male patients reported higher KOOS subscales scores for pain, symptoms, and ADL, while patients with patella tendon grafts had a lower improvement in pain score.

Externally validated treatment algorithm acceptably predicts nonoperative treatment success in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop and externally validate a treatment algorithm to predict nonoperative treatment success or failure in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.

METHODS

Data were used from two completed studies of adult patients with ACL ruptures: the Conservative versus Operative Methods for Patients with ACL Rupture Evaluation study (development cohort) and the KNee osteoArthritis anterior cruciate Ligament Lesion study (validation cohort). The primary outcome variable is nonoperative treatment success or failure. Potential predictor variables were collected, entered into the univariable logistic regression model and then incorporated into the multivariable logistic regression model for constructing the treatment algorithm. Finally, predictive performance and goodness-of-fit were assessed and externally validated by discrimination and calibration measures.

RESULTS

In the univariable logistic regression model, a stable knee measured with the pivot shift test and a posttrauma International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score <50 were predictive of needing an ACL reconstruction. Age >30 years and a body mass index > 30 kg/m2 were predictive for not needing an ACL reconstruction. Age, pretrauma Tegner score, the outcome of the pivot shift test and the posttrauma IKDC score are entered into the treatment algorithm. The predictability of needing an ACL reconstruction after nonoperative treatment (discrimination) is acceptable in both the development and the validation cohort: area under the curve = resp. 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.81) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the treatment algorithm can acceptably predict whether an ACL injury patient will have a(n) (un)successful nonoperative treatment (discrimination). Calibration of the treatment algorithm suggests a systematical underestimation of the need for ACL reconstruction. Given the limitations regarding the sample size of this study, larger data sets must be constructed to improve the treatment algorithm further.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Implementing a shared decision-making intervention to support treatment decisions for patients following an anterior cruciate ligament rupture - a protocol for the POP-ACLR feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture may follow a surgical or nonsurgical pathway. At present, there is uncertainty around treatment choice. Two shared decision-making tools have been codesigned to support patients to make a decision about treatment following an ACL rupture. The shared decision-making tools include a patient information leaflet and an option grid. We report the protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study, with nested qualitative interviews, to understand feasibility, acceptability, indicators of effectiveness and implementation factors of these shared decision-making tools (combined to form one shared decision-making intervention).

METHODS

A single-centre non-randomised feasibility study will be conducted with 20 patients. Patients diagnosed with an ACL rupture following magnetic resonance imaging will be identified from an orthopaedic clinic. The shared decision-making intervention will be delivered during a clinical consultation with a physiotherapist. The primary feasibility outcomes include the following: recruitment rate, fidelity, acceptability and follow-up questionnaire completion. The secondary outcome is the satisfaction with decision scale. The nested qualitative interview will explore experience of using the shared decision-making intervention to understand acceptability, implementation factors and areas for further refinement.

DISCUSSION

This study will determine the feasibility of using a newly developed shared decision-making intervention designed to support patients to make a decision about treatment of their ACL rupture. The acceptability and indicators of effectiveness will also be explored. In the long term, the shared decision-making intervention may improve service and patient outcomes and ensure cost-effectiveness for the NHS; ensuring those most likely to benefit from surgical treatment proceed along this pathway.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Pending registration on ISRCTN.

Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been considered a promising treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. The effects of PRP on clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are controversial.

Objective

To compare subjective outcomes and graft maturity in patients undergoing ACLR with and without postoperative intra-articular PRP injection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This surgeon- and investigator-masked randomized clinical trial included patients treated at a national medical center in China who were aged 16 to 45 years and scheduled to undergo ACLR. Participants were enrolled between March 21, 2021, and August 18, 2022, and followed up for 12 months, with the last participant completing follow-up on August 28, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 to the PRP group (n = 60), which received 3 doses of postoperative intra-articular PRP injection at monthly intervals, or to the control group (n = 60), which did not receive postoperative PRP injection. Both groups had the same follow-up schedule.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the mean score for 4 subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) (range, 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function and fewer symptoms) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes, graft maturity (on magnetic resonance imaging), and physical examinations at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

Among the 120 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 29.0 [8.0] years; 84 males [70%]), 114 (95%) were available for the primary outcome analysis. The mean KOOS4 scores at 12 months were 78.3 (SD, 12.0; 95% CI, 75.2-81.4) in the PRP group and 76.8 (SD, 11.9; 95% CI, 73.7-79.9) in the control group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 2.0; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.3; P = .36). Secondary outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups except for sports and recreation level and graft maturity at 6 months. Intervention-related adverse events included pain at the injection site and knee swelling after injection.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial among patients undergoing ACLR, the addition of postoperative intra-articular PRP injection did not result in superior improvement of knee symptoms and function at 12 months compared with no postoperative injection. Further studies are required to determine appropriate indications for PRP in musculoskeletal disorders.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000040262.

Rates of Subjective Failure After Both Isolated and Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry 2004-2021

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCLR) have been reported to be inferior to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Furthermore, combined ligament injuries have been reported to have inferior outcomes compared with isolated PCLR.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to report on PCLR outcomes and failure rates and compare these outcomes between isolated PCLR and multiligament knee surgery involving the PCL. The hypothesis was that combined PCL injury reconstruction would have higher rates of subjective failure and revision relative to isolated PCLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients with primary PCLR with or without concomitant ligament injuries registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry between 2004 and 2021 were included. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) totals were collected preoperatively and at 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure, defined as either a revision surgery or a KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) subscale score <44.

RESULTS

The sample included 631 primary PCLR procedures, with 185 (29%) isolated PCLR procedures and 446 (71%) combined reconstructions, with a median follow-up time of 7.3 and 7.9 years, respectively. The majority of patients had poor preoperative knee function as defined by a KOOS QoL score <44 (90.1% isolated PCLR, 85.7% combined PCL injuries; P = .24). Subjective outcomes improved significantly at 2- and 5-year follow-up compared with preoperative assessments in both groups (P < .001); however, at 2 years, 49.5% and 46.5% had subjective failure (KOOS QoL <44) for isolated PCLR and combined PCLR, respectively (P = .61). At 5 years, the subjective failure rates of isolated and combined PCLR were 46.7% and 34.2%, respectively (P = .04). No significant difference was found in revision rates between the groups at 5 years (1.9% and 4.6%, respectively; P = .07).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent PCLR had improved KOOS QoL scores relative to their preoperative state. However, the subjective failure rate was high for both isolated and multiligament PCLR. Within the first 2 years after surgery, patients who undergo isolated PCLR can be expected to have similar failure rates to patients who undergo combined ligament reconstructions.

Early Surgery Versus Exercise Therapy and Patient Education for Traumatic and Nontraumatic Meniscal Tears in Young Adults-An Exploratory Analysis From the DREAM Trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of early meniscal surgery versus exercise and education with the option of later surgery on pain, function, and quality of life in young patients with a meniscal tear, taking symptom onset into account. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial (the "Danish RCT on Exercise versus Arthroscopic Meniscal surgery for young adults" [DREAM] trial), 121 patients aged 18-40 years with a magnetic resonance imaging-verified meniscal tear were randomized to surgery or 12 weeks of supervised exercise and patient education. For this exploratory study, the analyses were stratified by symptom onset (traumatic/nontraumatic). The main outcome was the difference in change after 12 months in the mean score of 4 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (KOOS4) covering pain, symptoms, function in sport and recreation, and quality of life. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (69%) in the exercise therapy group and 47 (78%) in the surgery group were categorized as having a traumatic tear. We observed no difference in change in the KOOS4 after 12 months between the 2 treatment groups for either traumatic tears (18.8 versus 16.0 in the surgery versus exercise therapy groups; adjusted mean difference, 4.8 [95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 11.2]) or nontraumatic tears (20.6 versus 17.3 in the surgery versus exercise therapy groups; adjusted mean difference, 7.0 [95% confidence interval, -3.7 to 17.7]). CONCLUSION: In patients with traumatic and nontraumatic meniscus tears, early meniscal surgery did not appear superior to exercise and education in improving pain, function, and quality of life after 12 months. Further research is needed to confirm the clinical applicability of these findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(5):1-10. Epub 22 February 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12245.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach).

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I2 = 94%) compared to pre-ACLR (mean = 44.4 [95% CI 38.2, 50.7], I2 = 98%), remained relatively stable, until they reached the highest point 2 to 5 years after ACLR (mean = 70.7 [95% CI 63.0, 78.5], I2 = 98%). Meta-regression suggests shorter time from injury to surgery, male sex, and older age were associated with higher ACL-RSI scores only 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 47.6%), and this reduced 1-2 years after ACLR (heterogeneity explained R2 = 27.0%).

CONCLUSION

Psychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions.

REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .

Development of a patient decision aid for children and adolescents following anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an international mixed-methods study

AIM

To develop and user test an evidence-based patient decision aid for children and adolescents who are considering anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.

SETTING

A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including various types of health professionals and researchers, and consumers) informed by the best available evidence and existing patient decision aids.

PARTICIPANTS

People who ruptured their ACL when they were under 18 years old (ie, adolescents), their parents, and health professionals who manage these patients. Participants were recruited through social media and the network outreach of the steering group.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Semistructured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid. The feedback was used to refine the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, refining the aid according to feedback and further interviews, was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We conducted 32 interviews; 16 health professionals (12 physiotherapists, 4 orthopaedic surgeons) and 16 people who ruptured their ACL when they were under 18 years old (7 were adolescents and 9 were adults at the time of the interview). Parents participated in 8 interviews. Most health professionals, patients and parents rated the aid's acceptability as good-to-excellent. Health professionals and patients agreed on most aspects of the decision aid, but some health professionals had differing views on non-surgical management, risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms.

CONCLUSION

Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to help children and adolescents choose an appropriate management option following ACL rupture with their parents and health professionals. A clinical trial evaluating the potential benefit of this tool for children and adolescents considering ACL reconstruction is warranted.

No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine hip and lower-leg muscle strength in people after ACL injury compared with an uninjured control group (between people) and the uninjured contralateral limb (between limbs).

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SportDiscus to 28 February 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Primary ACL injury with mean age 18-40 years at time of injury. Studies had to measure hip and/or lower-leg muscle strength quantitatively (eg, dynamometer) and report muscle strength for the ACL-injured limb compared with: (i) an uninjured control group and/or (ii) the uninjured contralateral limb. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Collaboration domains.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included (n=23 measured strength ≤12 months post-ACL reconstruction). Most examined hip abduction (16 studies), hip extension (12 studies) and hip external rotation (7 studies) strength. We found no meaningful difference in muscle strength between people or between limbs for hip abduction, extension, internal rotation, flexion or ankle plantarflexion, dorsiflexion (estimates ranged from -9% to +9% of comparator). The only non-zero differences identified were in hip adduction (24% stronger on ACL limb (95% CI 8% to 42%)) and hip external rotation strength (12% deficit on ACL limb (95% CI 6% to 18%)) compared with uninjured controls at follow-ups >12 months, however both results stemmed from only two studies. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes and comparisons, and drawn primarily from the first year post-ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not show widespread or substantial muscle weakness of the hip and lower-leg muscles after ACL injury, contrasting deficits of 10%-20% commonly reported for knee extensors and flexors. As it is unclear if deficits in hip and lower-leg muscle strength resolve with appropriate rehabilitation or no postinjury or postoperative weakness occurs, individualised assessment should guide training of hip and lower-leg strength following ACL injury.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020216793.

Delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for more than 3 or 6 months results in lower risk of revision surgery

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to investigate the risk of revision surgery when delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) past 3 months or 6 months after injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30,280 patients with isolated ACLR were identified in the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry and divided into four groups; ACLR < 3 months, > 3 months, < 6 months, or > 6 months after injury. Primary outcome was revision surgery and secondary outcome were objective and subjective clinical outcome. The 2 year relative risk, crude, and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Comparing ACLR < 3 months to ACLR > 3 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.81 (95% CI 1.46-2.23; P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.27 (95% CI 1.12-1.44; P < 0.001). Comparing ACLR < 6 months to ACLR > 6 months of injury the 2 year relative risk of revision surgery was found to be 1.61 (95% CI 1.34-1.92; P < 0.001) with an adjusted HR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.15-1.40; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk of revision ACLR surgery was found to be increased when ACLR was performed within 3 months or 6 months of injury compared with later surgery. The 1 year postoperative objective knee laxity and the subjective patient-related outcome was found to be without a clinically significant difference; however, those with early ACLR (< 3 months or < 6 months) were found to have a higher activity level 1 year postoperatively. The information about increased risk of revision when having early surgery should be informed to patients when deciding timing of ACLR treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Interventions to Standard Rehabilitation After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Blood flow restriction training (BFR-t) data are heterogeneous. It is unclear whether rehabilitation with BFR-t after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is more effective in improving muscle strength and muscle size than standard rehabilitation.

PURPOSE

To review outcomes after an ACL injury and subsequent reconstruction in studies comparing rehabilitation with and without BFR-t.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review. Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A search of English-language human clinical studies published in the past 20 years (2002-2022) was carried out in 5 health sciences databases, involving participants aged 18-65 undergoing rehabilitation for an ACL injury. Outcomes associated with muscle strength, muscle size, and knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria and compared.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 279 studies, of which 5 met the selection criteria. Two studies suggested that BFR-t rehabilitation after an ACL injury improved knee or thigh muscle strength and muscle size compared with rehabilitation consisting of comparable and higher load resistance training, with two studies suggesting the opposite. The single study measuring PROMs showed improvement compared to traditional rehabilitation, with no difference in muscle strength or size.

CONCLUSION

BFR-t after an ACL injury seems to benefit muscle strength, muscle size, and PROM scores compared with standard rehabilitation alone. However, only 1 large study included all these outcomes, which has yet to be replicated in other settings. Further studies utilizing similar methods with a common set of outcome measures are required to confirm the effects of BFR-t on ACL rehabilitation.

30 years with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

This narrative review describes the development and use of patient-reported outcomes over 30 years, focusing on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). KOOS is a five-subscale patient-reported instrument intended for use from the time of knee injury to the development of osteoarthritis. Numerous studies have confirmed that the psychometric properties of the KOOS and its short-form KOOS-12 are acceptable. More recent research has focused on the use and interpretation of KOOS scores in clinical trials using thresholds, such as minimal important differences, patient-acceptable symptom states, and treatment failure. As an indication of KOOS's popularity, the total 3854 PubMed results for KOOS have increased exponentially since the first KOOS paper was published 25 years ago and now seem to have plateaued at around 650 annually. The selected articles are not based on a systematic search, but on the author's own publications, reading, and literature search that grew organically from that.

Does an early post traumatic knee brace reduce the incidence of knee rotational instability?

PURPOSE

Several anterolateral stabilization procedures have been developed recently to address rotational instability of the knee. Currently, these procedures tend to be systematically used by some practitioners. However, antero-lateral structures of the knee (including the anterolateral ligament, ALL) have a self-healing potential which can reduce the need to perform an antero-lateral procedure. In this study, it was hypothesized that early post-traumatic immobilization of the knee with a knee brace would allow partial healing of antero-lateral structures and also allow control of the pivot shift, thus avoiding antero-lateral extra-articular stabilization. The objective of this study was to compare the severity of pivot shift between two groups of patients who all experienced anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and respectively underwent post-traumatic immobilization of the knee versus no immobilization.

METHODS

This was a comparative, multicentric (three centers' study) retrospective, consecutive study including 168 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between May and September 2022. The application or not of post-traumatic immobilization and its duration, the severity of pivot shift observed in the operating room under general anesthesia, the presence of anterolateral lesions as revealed by MRI and the patients' pre-injury sport activity were recorded.

RESULTS

A grade 3 pivot shift was found in 44 patients (27%). It was more frequently observed in the group without a brace compared to the group with a knee brace (18 patients out of 36: 50% versus 26 patients out of 132: 19.7%; p = 0.0012). Wearing a brace, whether hinged (OR = 0.221, [0.070-0.652]; p = 0.006) or not (OR = 0.232, [0.076-0.667]; p = 0.0064), was protective from the risk of developing a significant pivot shift.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the presence of pivot-shift was lower in the patients that had an early post-injury knee brace before their ACL reconstruction. Based on this result, systematic brace placement could be advocated for in patients after knee trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prognostic retrospective case-control study.

Engineering a functional ACL reconstruction graft containing a triphasic enthesis-like structure in bone tunnel for the enhancement of graft-to-bone integration

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sports injury, which causes knee instability and abnormal joint kinematics. The current ACL graft was single-phasic, and not convenient for the formation of enthesis-like tissue in the bone tunnel, resulting in poor integration of graft-to-bone.

Methods

A band-shaped acellular tendon (BAT) was prepared as the core component of the ACL reconstruction graft at first, while sleeve-shaped acellular cartilage (SAC) or sleeve-shaped acellular bone (SAB) was fabricated using a vacuum aspiration system (VAS)-based decellularization protocol. The biocompatibility of the three acellular matrixes was evaluated. Furthermore, a collagen-binding peptide (CBP) derived from the A3 domain of von Willebrand factor was respectively fused into the N-terminal of GDF7, TGFβ3, or BMP2 to synthesize three recombinant growth factors capable of binding collagen (named C-GDF7, C-TGFβ3, or C-BMP2), which were respectively tethered to the BAT, SAC or SAB for improving their inducibilities in stem cell differentiation. An in-vitro experiment was performed to evaluate theirs osteogenic, chondrogenic, and tenogenic inducibilities. Then, C-TGFβ3-tethering SAC (C-TGFβ3@SAC) and C-BMP2-tethering SAB (C-BMP2@SAB) were sequentially surrounded at the bone tunnel part of C-GDF7-tethering BAT (C-GDF7@BAT), thus a sleeve-shaped acellular graft with a triphasic enthesis-like structure in bone tunnel part (named tissue-engineered graft, TE graft) was engineered. Lastly, a canine ACL reconstruction model was used to evaluate the in-vivo performance of this TE graft in enhancing graft-to-bone integration.

Results

The BAT, SAC, and SAB well preserved the structure and components of native tendon, cartilage, and bone, showing good biocompatibility. C-GDF7, C-TGFβ3, or C-BMP2 showed a stronger binding ability to BAT, SAC, and SAB. The C-GDF7@BAT, C-TGFβ3@SAC, or C-BMP2@SAB was a controlled delivery system for the scaffold-specific release of GDF7, TGFβ3, and BMP2, thus showing superior tenogenic, chondrogenic, or osteogenic inducibility, respectively. Using a canine ACL reconstruction model, abundant newly-formed bone and connective collagen fibers could be observed at the integration site between TE graft and bone tunnel at postoperative 16 weeks. Meanwhile, the failure load of the reconstructed ACL by TE graft was significantly higher than that of the autograft.

Conclusion

The TE graft could be used to reconstruct ruptured ACL and augment graft-to-bone integration, thus demonstrating high potential for clinical translation in ACL reconstruction.

Translational potential of this article

The findings of the study indicated that the TE graft could be a novel graft for ACL reconstruction with the ability to augment graft-to-bone integration, which may provide a foundation for future clinical application.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Candidate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Knee Osteoarthritis Definitions Versus Radiograph in an Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Cohort

OBJECTIVE

We tested the diagnostic accuracy of previously proposed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) osteoarthritis (OA) definitions in a cohort after acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

We studied participants with posteroanterior and lateral knee radiographs and MRI 5 years after ACL injury, scored using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Osteoarthritis Score. Radiographic OA (ROA) was defined using Osteoarthritis Research Society International scoring of osteophytes and joint space narrowing considering medial/lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments. We tested three candidate MRI OA definitions that performed well in an older adult cohort. "Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) simple" required cartilage score ≥2 (range 0-6) and osteophyte score ≥2 (0-7); "MOST optional" included cartilage score ≥2, osteophyte score ≥2, and either bone marrow lesions (BMLs) ≥1 (0-3) or synovitis ≥2 (0-3). The third, a Delphi panel definition, included nonzero scores for cartilage, osteophyte, BMLs, meniscus, and other structures. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each MRI definition versus ROA.

RESULTS

We included 113 participants (mean age 26 years, 26% female). At 5 years, 29 participants (26%) had ROA. "MOST simple" had a sensitivity of 52% (95% CI 33%-71%), and specificity of 76% (95% CI 66%-85%). Sensitivity and specificities for "MOST optional" were 28% (95% CI 29%-67%) and 83% (95% CI 74%-91%), respectively. The Delphi panel definition had a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 29%-67%) and specificity of 77% (95% CI 67%-86%).

CONCLUSION

Simple MRI-based OA definitions requiring at least cartilage damage and an osteophyte have low sensitivity and high specificity in young persons after knee injury.

Influence of Surgeon Experience and Clinic Volume on Subjective Knee Function and Revision Rates in Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed by high-volume surgeons/clinics has been associated with increased graft individualization and decreased operating times, complication rates, and total costs.

Purpose

To investigate the influence of surgeon/clinic volume on subjective knee function and revision surgery rates at 2 years after primary ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry were used to study patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2008 and 2019. Surgeons/clinics were categorized based on a combination of total caseload volume (cutoff: 50 ACLRs/surgeon, 500 ACLRs/clinic) and annual volume (cutoff: 29 ACLRs/year/surgeon, 56 ACLRs/year/clinic). The thresholds of minimal important change (MIC), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) relative to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and KOOS4 (mean score of the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports/Rec, and QoL subscales) were applied. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess variables influencing the MIC, PASS, or TF of the KOOS and KOOS4. Adjusted Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the hazard ratio of subsequent ACLR.

Results

Of 35,371 patients, 16,317 had 2-year follow-up outcome data and were included. Patients who underwent primary ACLR by high-volume surgeons had significantly higher MIC and PASS rates and lower TF rates when compared with patients who underwent the procedure by low-volume surgeons: MICKOOS4: 70.6% vs 66.3%; PASSKOOS4: 46.0% versus 38.3%; and TFKOOS4: 8.7% versus 11.8% (all P < .02). Significantly decreased odds of achieving MICKOOS4 (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PASSKOOS4 (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84) were found for ACLRs performed by low-volume surgeons. Clinic volume did not influence the odds of reaching MIC, PASS, or TF. Overall, 804 patients (2.3%) underwent subsequent ACLR at <2 years, with significantly higher revision rates among patients operated on at high-volume clinics (2.5% vs 1.7%; P < .001). However, in the adjusted Cox regression, surgeon/clinic volume had no influence on subsequent ACLR rates. High-volume surgeons/clinics had decreased time to surgery, operating time, perioperative complication rates, and use of thromboprophylaxis and nonroutine antibiotics (P < .001).

Conclusion

Patients who underwent primary ACLR by high-volume surgeons experienced increased improvement and satisfaction regarding subjective knee function. Factors other than surgical volume influenced subsequent surgery rates. Patients might benefit from undergoing primary ACLR by high-volume providers.

Conservative vs Surgical Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is very common, especially in young athletic individuals who injure themselves during sports involving pivoting actions. Management options include conservative management, which involves progressive physical therapy, educating the patient on how to prevent instability, and the use of a hinged knee brace. Surgical management involves reconstruction of the torn ligament using an autograft or an allograft and ACL repair where the torn ligament is affixed back to the tibia or femur. The choice of management depends on the severity of the injury, other injuries in associated structures, the level of fitness, and the athletic goals of the patient. Many studies exist on the management choice of ACL injury, but no clear consensus prevails. This study will examine the effectiveness of conservative versus surgical management. A literature review will be performed to identify appropriate papers which compare and evaluate the two approaches. A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the conservative to surgical management of ACL injury was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Patient eligibility criteria included individuals older than 15 with an isolated, recent ACL injury diagnosis via an appropriate clinical test, MRI, or arthroscopy. Studies were eligible if they were using appropriate surgical or conservative methods, as mentioned previously, and measuring results via appropriate scores, tools, and methods that will be presented below. The follow-up timeline would be from presentation time until at least two years. Five papers were found to be eligible. Overall, these papers included 462 patients. Two studies measuring overall knee symptoms, function, and sports activities using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) score found that the operated group had a significantly higher score. The other two studies measured overall knee function and health using the Tegner & Lysholm and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores. In both papers, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Regarding Tegner's activity score, only one paper had significant findings. A significantly longer period to return to sports activities was observed in the operative group. Stability was significantly higher in all papers in the operated group. Osteoarthritis was measured using different tools in each paper. Only one paper found a significantly higher risk in the operated group. Only one paper indicated significantly more complications in the operated group regarding side effects. Overall, very few differences were observed between the two treatment groups. The most significant differences observed were the higher stability and the longer recovery period in patients undergoing surgery. Large RCTs following patients for enough time are needed to prove if surgical treatment offers significant benefits over conservative treatment.

Delayed Meniscus Repair Lowers the Functional Outcome of Primary ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to evaluate whether the time of intervention and the type of meniscus surgery (repair vs. partial meniscectomy) play a role in managing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with concurrent meniscus pathologies.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study which differentiated between early and late ACL reconstructions with a cut-off at 3 months. Patients were re-evaluated after 2 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients received an operation between 2-12 weeks after the injury, and thirty patients received the surgery between 13-28 weeks after trauma. The strongest negative predictive factor of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form in a hierarchical regression model was older age (ß = -0.49 per year; 95% CI [-0.91; -0.07]; p = 0.022; partial R2 = 0.08)). The strongest positive predictive factor was a higher preoperative Tegner score (ß = 3.6; 95% CI [0.13; 7.1]; p = 0.042; partial R2 = 0.07) and an interaction between meniscus repair surgery and the time of intervention (ß = 27; 95% CI [1.6; 52]; p = 0.037; partial R2 = 0.07), revealing a clinical meaningful difference as to whether meniscus repairs were performed within 12 weeks after trauma or were delayed. There was no difference whether partial meniscectomy was performed early or delayed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical timing plays a crucial role when surgeons opt for a meniscus repair rather than for a meniscectomy.

Preferences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey among orthopedic surgeons in China

The purpose of this study was to reveal the current trends and preferences of Chinese orthopedic surgeons regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through a nationwide web-based survey conducted in China. The survey questionnaire was distributed via WeChat to the chairmen of provincial orthopedic and sports medicine organizing committees in China, who then shared it in their respective WeChat workgroups. The questionnaire consisted of 52 multiple-choice questions covering 8 sections. Data collection was implemented by Questionnaire Star. A total of 812 valid questionnaires were returned: 94.21% of the respondents preferred single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, while 61.70% preferred autogenous semitendinosus plus gracilis reconstruction; 76.35% of the respondents preferred establishing the femoral tunnel first, while 47.29% preferred establishing the femoral tunnel through a medial auxiliary approach; and 85.10% of the respondents recommended patients to undergo surgery within 3 months after ligament injury. Besides, the vast majority of respondents chose to retain the ligamentous remnant bundle (92.98%) and recommended routine use of knee braces postoperatively (94.09%). It is recommended to perform arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with the remnant preserving technique using a hamstring autograft within 3 months of ACL rupture, with support of postoperative functional braces.

To achieve the unachievable-Patients' experiences of opting for delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after trying rehabilitation alone as primary treatment: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

About 50% of patients who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are treated without ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). A significant proportion of these patients opt for late ACL-R. Patients' experience of changing treatment has not yet been investigated and presented in the scientific literature.

AIM

To explore patients' experiences before and after changing treatment from ACL rehabilitation alone to ACL-R.

METHOD

Fifteen patients were interviewed in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with qualitative content analysis, based on the method described by Graneheim and Lundman. Patients were between 26 and 58 years old, and had tried rehabilitation for a minimum of 9 months prior to ACL-R.

RESULTS

Two themes, "Expecting what could not be achieved: the struggle to recover and not becoming stable", and "Internal completeness: expectations can be achieved", emerged from the analysis. Each theme was supported by three main categories and 5-6 subcategories. The first theme represents the journey before ACL-R, where patients experienced getting stronger, but perceived the knee as unstable. The second theme represents the journey after ACL-R, where patients expressed that they felt whole after their ACL-R, and where able to achieve their expections. Patients experienced a greater support from the healthcare system, and ultimately expressed a feeling of having achieved the unachievable after ACL-R.

SUMMARY

Patients who cross over from ACL rehabilitation to ACL-R experienced rehabilitation alone as insufficient to achieve the desired outcomes, which resulted in a need to opt for delayed ACL-R. Healthcare providers need to support patients, who primarily choose to undergo rehabilitation alone and later opt for ACL-R, throughout the whole rehabilitation process.

The optimal window for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with respect to quadriceps atrophies lies within 21 to 100 days

PURPOSE

The study's objective was to determine the optimal window for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with respect to quadriceps atrophies and clinical outcome.

METHODS

For this retrospective, comparative study, 115 patients aged under 35 were included, who received an ACL reconstruction between 2011 and 2016. They were divided into four groups, depending on the time to surgery, to determine the optimal window for reconstruction: (group 1: ≤21 d, group 2: <21d-56d≥, group 3: >56d-100d≥, group 4: >100d). Follow-up was performed one month postoperatively, after a mean of 4.9 (±5.3) months, and after a mean of 3.5 (±1.4) years. Primary endpoints included quadriceps muscle status, range of motion (ROM), pain, swelling, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), the Lysholm-Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Tegner-Activity-Scale (TAS).

RESULTS

Significantly more quadriceps atrophies were observed in group 1 and group 4, representing reconstructions earlier than 21 and later than 100 days (29% and 41% vs. 9%; p = 0.032). The measurements of knee extension (p = 0.082) and ROM (p = 0.123) were comparable in all groups. Group 1 showed the least pain (0% vs. 15%; p = 0.285) and swelling (0% vs. 23%; p = 0.077) compared to all other groups one month postoperatively. A comparison of postoperative clinical scores revealed no significant differences, with group 1 exhibiting the lowest TAS levels.

CONCLUSION

In patients who underwent ACL reconstruction within three weeks or after more than 100 days, a significantly higher incidence of quadriceps atrophy was observed, possibly attributable to the initial inflammatory phase or the delayed reconstruction affecting quadriceps function. However, this impairment may not be observable in elite athletes who undergo reconstruction within hours of the injury.

Bilateral neuromuscular control in patients one year after unilateral ACL rupture or reconstruction. A cross-sectional study

Objectives

To compare bilateral neuromuscular control in patients one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) or conservative treatment (ACL-C) to healthy controls (ACL-I).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Electromyography of vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded during stair descent and anterior tibial translation. Each step of stair descent was divided into pre-activity, weight-acceptance and push-off phase. Pre-activation, short, medium (MLR) and long latency responses (LLR) were defined for reflex activity.

Participants

N = 38 patients one year after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), N = 26 participants with conservative treatment one year after ACL rupture (ACL-C), N = 38 healthy controls with an intact ACL (ACL-I).

Main outcome measures

Normalized root mean squares per muscle and phase (α = 0.05).

Results

During stair descent, within-group leg differences were found for the quadriceps in ACL-R during all phases and for the BF in ACL-C during weight-acceptance. Between-group leg differences were found for BF in both patient groups compared to ACL-I during push-off.Between-group differences in pre-activation for VM between ACL-R and ACL-C, and between ACL-C and ACL-I were found, and as LLR between patients and ACL-R versus ACL-I. Pre-activation of BF and MLR of ST differed for each patient group compared to ACL-I.

Conclusions

Bilateral neuromuscular alterations are still present one year after ACL rupture or reconstruction.

Comparison of immediate versus optional delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injury through a parallel, multicentric, pragmatic randomized controlled trial - IODA trial

BACKGROUND

Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomized controlled trials [1, 2] (RCT) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to verify these results and assess whether patient-specific parameters determine if a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, multi-center RCT with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomized to conservative treatment (rehabilitation + optional delayed surgery) or immediate ACL reconstruction (< 12 weeks). The primary outcome is the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 7 months (short term) and 1-year long term) post-injury. These following additional outcomes will be administered at 4 and 7 months (short term) and 1, 2, and 3 years post-injury (long term): patient-reported outcomes concerning knee symptoms, knee function and quality of life, functional knee tests, time to return to pre-injury activity level and return to work, structural knee joint damage and cartilage health (only at 4 months and 3 years post-injury), as well as adverse events such as re-rupture rates. Furthermore, the secondary objective is to identify (through a predictive analysis) individuals who would benefit the most from early reconstruction versus those who should rather be treated conservatively.

DISCUSSION

This large RCT will assess the clinical effectiveness of both surgical and conservative treatment. In addition, it will be the first study that provides insights into which patient-specific factors predict successful outcomes after conservative treatment of ACL injuries. These results will be the first step toward early patient identification regarding treatment decisions. This is urgently needed to avoid (1) delayed surgeries and prolonged rehabilitation and (2) unnecessary surgeries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

this trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05747079) on 10/02/2023.

Only 10% of Patients With a Concomitant MCL Injury Return to Their Preinjury Level of Sport 1 Year After ACL Reconstruction: A Matched Comparison With Isolated ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is a need for an increased understanding of the way a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury may influence outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with a concomitant MCL injury would have inferior clinical outcomes compared with a matched cohort of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction without an MCL injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Matched registry-based cohort study; case-control.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry and a local rehabilitation outcome registry were utilized. Patients who had undergone a primary ACL reconstruction with a concomitant nonsurgically treated MCL injury (ACL + MCL group) were matched with patients who had undergone an ACL reconstruction without an MCL injury (ACL group), in a 1:3 ratio. The primary outcome was return to knee-strenuous sport, defined as a Tegner activity scale ≥6, at the 1-year follow-up. In addition, return to preinjury level of sport, muscle function tests, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The ACL + MCL group comprised 30 patients, matched with 90 patients in the ACL group. At the 1-year follow-up, 14 patients (46.7%) in the ACL + MCL group had return to sport (RTS) compared with 44 patients (48.9%) in the ACL group (P = 0.37). A significantly lower proportion of patients in the ACL + MCL group had returned to their preinjury level of sport compared with the ACL group (10.0% compared with 25.6%, adjusted P = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups across a battery of strength and hop tests or in any of the assessed PROs. The ACL + MCL group reported a mean 1-year ACL-RSI after injury of 59.4 (SD 21.6), whereas the ACL group reported 57.9 (SD 19.4), P = 0.60.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a concomitant nonsurgically treated MCL injury did not return to their preinjury level of sport to the same extent as patients without an MCL injury 1 year after ACL reconstruction. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of return to knee strenuous activity, muscle function, or PROs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with a concomitant nonsurgically treated MCL injury may reach outcomes similar to those of patients without an MCL injury 1 year after an ACL reconstruction. However, few patients return to their preinjury level of sport at 1 year.

[Treatment of acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament : Always only reconstruction?]

The aim of treatment of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the return of the patient to an acceptable level of activity without giving way phenomena as well as adequate treatment of prognostically relevant concomitant lesions. The treatment of acute ACL ruptures can be either early reconstruction or a primary physiotherapy with optional later reconstruction. Which path is taken depends on possible concomitant injuries that require early surgical intervention (e.g., repairable meniscal injury or distal rupture of the medial collateral ligament) and on patient-specific factors (age, level of activity). Isolated ruptures of the ACL can also be primarily treated without surgery. Then the injured knee joint should first be so far conditioned by rehabilitative measures that pain, swelling and posttraumatic restriction of movement are improved and neuromuscular training can be started. A screening test consisting of jumping tests, patient-reported outcome measures and the testing for giving way phenomena can be suitable to differentiate compensators (copers) from noncompensators (non-copers). Surgical reconstruction of the ACL should be recommended to non-compensators in the sense of participatory decision-making. Activity modification (adapter) can also be considered as a treatment strategy. If instability events (giving way) or secondary meniscal lesions occur during nonsurgical therapy, cruciate ligament reconstruction should be considered.

Functional performance tests, clinical measurements, and patient-reported outcome measures do not correlate as outcomes 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are evaluated by laxity measures, functional tests, and patients' perception by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). It is not known, if one of these evaluation instruments is representative or if outcome scores from all must be reported to obtain a full evaluation of the condition. The aim was to study the correlations between these three types of outcomes 1 year after primary ACLR.

METHOD

All adult patients (range 18-45 years) who had an ACLR between 1.1.2019 and 31.12.2021 were offered 1-year follow-up by an independent observer. Preoperative information about knee laxity and peroperative information about the condition of menisci and cartilage were registered. At 1-year follow-up clinical and instrumented knee stability and function assessed by four different hop tests were registered. Patients completed four PROMs (the Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Lysholm score) and Tegner activity scale and answered anchor questions regarding satisfaction and willingness to repeat the operation.

RESULTS

A total of 190 adults attended the 1-year follow-up and 151 had all assessments. There were only a few positive and weak correlations between performance tests and PROMS and between clinical measurements and PROMS (r = 0.00-0.38), and the majority were of negligible strength. Tegner score had in general the highest correlation (low to moderate). The highest correlation was 0.53 (moderate) between the anchor question about patient satisfaction and Lysholm/IKDC scores. There was no difference in the correlations depending on meniscal condition.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACLR patients there was no clinically relevant correlation between scores obtained by PROMs, a battery of functional performance tests and instrumented laxity of the knee at 1-year follow-up. Therefore, one type of outcome cannot represent the others. This is an argument for always to include and report all three types of outcomes, and conclusions based on one type of outcome may not be sufficient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Using 3D MRI Bone Shape to Predict Pre-Osteoarthritis of the Knee 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury increases risks for osteoarthritis (OA), a poorly modifiable and disabling condition. Joint changes of potentially reversible pre-OA have been described just 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) when early bone shape changes have also been reported.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates relationships between interlimb differences in tibiofemoral bone shape derived from statistical shape modeling (SSM) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and participant factors on patient-reported outcomes 2 years after unilateral ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

SSM-derived tibiofemoral bone shape and subchondral bone area were assessed from bilateral knee MRI scans of 72 participants with unilateral ACLR (mean age, 34 ± 11 years; 32 women) and compared with a reference cohort of 398 older individuals without OA (mean age, 50 ± 3 years; 213 women). Multivariable logistic regression models examined relationships between participant and surgical factors with interlimb differences in bone shapes or subchondral bone areas. Relationships between patient-reported outcomes and the interlimb differences in bone shape and subchondral area were examined using similar models.

RESULTS

Bone shape scores and subchondral bone areas were greater (more OA-like) in ACLR knees than uninjured contralateral knees in every bone metric tested (P≤ .001). Interlimb differences in femur shape scores of participants with ACLR were 65% greater (P < .001) than those of the significantly older reference cohort. Taller height, medial meniscal tears, and decreasing age were associated with larger interlimb differences in shape scores and subchondral areas (P < .05). Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft recipients demonstrated greater interlimb subchondral area differences compared with allograft recipients (P < .05). Interlimb differences for hamstring autograft recipients did not differ from those with BPTB or allograft. Greater interlimb differences in medial femur subchondral areas were associated with worse patient-reported Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Symptoms (R = 0.27; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

Even in the absence of radiographic OA, just 2 years after unilateral ACLR patients showed greater bone shape scores and subchondral areas consistent with pre-OA in their ACLR knees. Furthermore, greater medial femur bone areas were weakly associated with worse symptoms. Patients who are younger, are taller, have meniscal tears, or have BPTB grafts may be at increased risk for bony asymmetries 2 years after ACLR.

Meniscal allograft transplantation improves patient-reported outcomes in both minimal and moderate knee osteoarthritis at 1 and 2 years postoperatively

PURPOSE

Severe cartilage damage and advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) might be associated with poor outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to explore MAT survivorship and patient satisfaction among young patients with symptomatic meniscal deficiency and radiological OA of different Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive MAT patients were prospectively followed up for 2 years. The lateral meniscus was replaced in 29 patients and the medial meniscus in 6 patients. Outcomes were assessed using the KOOS4 composite score, KOOS subscales, Lysholm knee score, and OA K-L grade progression from weight-bearing knee radiographs. For the outcome analysis, patients were categorized into two groups: 19 in Group A (K-L classification 0-1) and 16 in Group B (K-L classification 2).

RESULTS

In terms of KOOS4 and Lysholm scores, the patients showed a clinically significant improvement from baseline to the 1-year follow-up (22.2 points, 95% CI 16.6-27.8 for KOOS4 and 16.8 points, 95% CI 8.9-24.6 for Lysholm), and the improvement remained at 2 years (20.6 points, 95% CI 13.2-28.1 for KOOS4 and 21.5, 95% CI 12.5-30.7 for Lysholm). At the 6-month follow-up, this improvement was not yet observed. Minor between-group differences were observed in the KOOS4 and Lysholm scores for the K-L 0-1 and K-L 2 OA groups, but the estimates were imprecise with wide confidence intervals. A clinically relevant difference between these two study groups could not be found at any timepoint. The reoperation rate was higher in the K-L 2 group than in the K-L 0-1 group (31% vs. 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

MAT yielded improved patient-reported outcomes and subjective satisfaction at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The differences from baseline exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at all timepoints. The severity of cartilage damage and knee OA in terms of the K-L grade at the time of surgery did not affect the KOOS and Lysholm scores after the MAT procedure. Knee OA progression in terms of K-L grade worsening was not observed in any patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Analgesic effect of nitrous oxide during manual therapy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many patients during manual therapy after anterior ligament reconstruction will experience severe pain, which has a negative impact on their rehabilitation. However, there is rarely an analgesic method for these patients during rehabilitation. Nitrous oxide with rapid analgesic and sedative effects is often used to relieve pain in minor procedures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not nitrous oxide analgesia decreases pain compared to oxygen during manual therapy after anterior ligament reconstruction.

METHODS/DESIGN

This single-center, randomized, double-blind and controlled trial will recruit 120 patients. Patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing manual therapy after anterior ligament reconstruction (1 month post-operative) with acute pain (VAS ≥ 4) are included. The main exclusion criteria included the following: pulmonary embolism, intestinal obstruction, pneumothorax. Patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (A) and the control group (B) in a ratio of 1:1. Doctors, therapists, patients, and data collectors are all blind to the study. The manual therapy will be performed by therapists. Nurses who implemented the intervention handed the doctors envelopes containing the patients' codes and allocation of A or B. Group A will receive a pre-prepared nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture plus conventional treatment (no analgesic) given as 30-min treatment sessions, once daily, and group B will receive oxygen plus conventional treatment (no analgesic) under the same conditions. Assessments will be taken 2 min before the intervention (T0), 5 min after the beginning of the intervention (T1), and 5 min after the intervention finished (T2). The primary outcome is pain score. Secondary outcomes include vital signs, side effects, joint range of motion, adjuvant analgesia need, therapist and patient satisfaction, and whether willing to receive the same gas again.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

We expect nitrous oxide inhalation to have a beneficial effect on the pain of patients who receive manual therapy after anterior ligament reconstruction.

DISCUSSION

If this treatment appears beneficial, it could improve patients' satisfaction and quality of life potentially and even be implemented widely in hospital and rehabilitation settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, ChiCTR2200061175 (Version 2.0 June 15, 2022), https://www.chictr.org.cn .

Effects of exercise prehabilitation before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on functional outcomes during pre- and postoperative rehabilitation - protocol for a single-blinded randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although a benefit of preoperative training prior to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is likely, there is no consensus on the optimal content (criteria-based programme), supervision (one-on-one guidance or self-administered training) and general setting of preoperative training after ACL injuries. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of an individually adaptive, guided, structured and criteria-based preoperative rehabilitation programme in comparison to a non-guided and self-administered home training programme.

METHODS

The planned single-blinded randomised controlled trial study was approved by the ethics committee of the German Sport University on June 14, 2022 (ethics application no. 093/2022) and prospectively registered (DRKS-ID: DRKS00030312; date of registration: 26.09.2022). N = 114 participants between 16 and 60 years of age with a unilateral ACL rupture and scheduled ACL reconstruction with a hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft will be randomly (block-randomisation, 1:1 allocation) and blinded assigned to one of two groups: intervention group (structured, criteria-based, guided prehabilitation training) and comparator group (non-guided, self-administered home training). After surgical reconstruction, patients of both groups participate in the same standard, functional measurement-guided, postoperative rehabilitation programme. Stepwise increasing the functional requirements of the assessments, all participants participate in testing at the day of anamnesis (t1), 1-7 days before surgical reconstruction (t2), day of surgical reconstruction (t3) and 30 (t4), 60 (t5), 90 (t6) and 180 (t7) days post-reconstruction. The primary outcome is the overall self-reported knee condition, assessed by the sum score of all sub-scales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes include functional outcomes (range of motion, knee flexors and extensors and plantar flexors strength/torque, functional postural control, jumping ability), workability and return to sport (RTS) (psychological readiness, RTS success).

DISCUSSION

The planned study targets to fill a gap in the evidence regarding effective designs of prehabilitation training before surgical ACL reconstruction. Potential difficulties that could affect the conduct of the study are lack of treatment adherence of the patients and high dropout.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Register of Clinical Trials DRKS-ID: DRKS00030312 . Registered on 26 September 2022.

Augmentation of ACL Autograft Reconstruction With an Amnion Collagen Matrix Wrap and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-up

Background

It is theorized that the lack of a synovial lining after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) contributes to slow ligamentization and possible graft failure. Whether graft maturation and incorporation can be improved with the use of a scaffold requires investigation.

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of wrapping an ACL autograft with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), quantify the cellular content of the BMAC samples, and assess 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A total of 40 patients aged 18 to 35 years who were scheduled to undergo ACLR were enrolled in a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 2 arms based on graft type: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB; n = 20) or hamstring (HS; n = 20). Participants in each arm were randomized into a control group who underwent standard ACLR or an intervention group who had their grafts wrapped with an amnion collagen matrix during graft preparation, after which BMAC was injected under the wrap layers after implantation. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping/processing yielded mean T2* relaxation time and graft volume values at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Participants completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and pain visual analog scale. Statistical linear mixed-effects models were used to quantify the effects over time and the differences between the control and intervention groups. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results

No significant differences were found at any time point between the intervention and control groups for BTB T2* (95% CI, -1.89 to 0.63; P = .31), BTB graft volume (95% CI, -606 to 876.1; P = .71), HS T2* (95% CI, -2.17 to 0.39; P = .162), or HS graft volume (95% CI, -11,141.1 to 351.5; P = .28). No significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups of either graft type on any patient-reported outcome measure. No adverse events were reported after a 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, wrapping a graft with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting BMAC appeared safe. MRI T2* values and graft volume of the augmented ACL graft were not significantly different from that of controls, suggesting that the intervention did not result in improved graft maturation.

Registration

NCT03294759 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

An early care void: The injury experience and perceptions of treatment among knee-injured individuals and healthcare professionals - A qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVES

To better comprehend the initial injury experience and care requirements of knee-injured individuals, as well as healthcare professionals' interactions with early care.

DESIGN

Qualitative interviews.

SETTING

Public healthcare in Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten individuals (6 women) with major knee injuries (6 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscal tears, 2 isolated ACL tears, 1 isolated meniscal tear, 1 patella dislocation), aged 16-33 years (median 19 years), 1-26 months post-injury (median 3 months). Thirteen HCPs (5 physiotherapists, 5 orthopedic surgeons, 3 general practitioners).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Semi-structured individual and focus group interviews, transcribed verbatim and with latent thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The three main themes were: 1) Emotional struggles in solitude - knee-injured individuals dealing with emotions alone due to limited HCP resources for emotional support. 2) Blurry beginning - knee-injured individuals finding initial care frustrating, a sentiment shared by HCPs. 3) A journey with no map - knee-injured individuals holding varied outcome expectations, while HCPs hesitate to discuss long-term knee health.

CONCLUSION

Early care for knee-injured individuals is filled with worries and unmet emotional and information support needs. HCPs need more support and training to deliver timely and appropriate care.

Accelerometer-assessed physical activity patterns during the first two years after a non-surgically treated ACL injury

OBJECTIVES

To describe physical activity patterns and analyze changes during the first two years after a non-surgically treated ACL injury, and to assess correlations between accelerometer-assessed physical activity and self-reported knee function and knee-related quality of life.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

128 patients (61 females, 25.2 ± 7.1 years) with acute ACL injury.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical activity patterns were measured with accelerometry. Self-reported knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, and knee-related quality of life was assessed using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Quality of Life questionnaire.

RESULTS

Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and steps per day increased from baseline to 3 months (p < .001), with no further increase from 3 to 24 months (p > .05). Time in MVPA did not correlate to patient-reported outcome measures at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Physical activity increased from acute phase to 3 months after non-surgically treated ACL injury, but almost one in four patients did not reach recommended levels of physical activity. Physical activity did not correlate with knee function or quality of life. Patients may need improved support to return to physical activity after ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02931084.

The challenge of evaluating our surgical procedures

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1133–1134.

High prevalence of associated intra-articular injuries with increasing time period from anterior cruciate ligament injury to reconstruction, even in apparent copers

BACKGROUND

It still unclear whether copers may bear the same time-sensitive risk of intra-articular injury as non-copers. The objectives were to investigate the clinical characteristics of copers and non-copers that have sustained an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, and to examine and compare the intra-articular pathologies in delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in copers and noncopers.

METHODS

Patients who sustained ACL injury while participating in high-performance sports and opted for non-operative treatment were enrolled in this study. Depending on the occurrence of the knee giving way, patients were classified into copers and noncopers. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Additionally, intra-articular injuries were evaluated for those who eventually underwent delayed ACLR.

RESULTS

11 of the 75 patients (14.7%) were classified as copers. No major differences were found in the clinical characteristics between groups. Following the initial non-operative treatment, 67 patients underwent delayed ACLR. When examining intra-articular abrasions at the time of surgery, non-copers who continued sports activities for 3 to 12 months exhibited a significantly higher rate of injury as opposed to their coper counterparts. However, the difference in the prevalence of intra-articular lesions between the two groups in patients who continued to play sports for at least 12 months before surgery was nominal.

CONCLUSION

The rate of copers was relatively low in patients who resumed playing high-level sports after ACL injury. Additionally, even in copers, those who continued sports activities for more than 12 months had comparably high prevalence of intra-articular injuries with noncopers.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Neuromuscular control in males and females 1 year after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture or reconstruction during stair descent and artificial tibial translation

Neuromuscular alterations are reported in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and conservative treatment (copers with ACL deficiency, ACL-C). However, it is unclear whether sex influences neuromuscular control. The objective was to investigate differences in neuromuscular control regarding sex and treatment type one year after ACL rupture in comparison to a group with an intact ACL (ACL-I). Electromyography of vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis, biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded in ACL-R (N = 38), ACL-C (N = 26), and ACL-I (N = 38) during stair descent and reflex activity by anterior tibial translation while standing. The movements of stair descent were divided into pre-activity, weight-acceptance and push-off phases, reflex activity in pre-activation, short, medium (MLR), and long latency responses (LLR). Normalized root mean squares for each muscle of involved and matched control limb per phase were calculated and analyzed with two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). During stair descent, neuromuscular differences of BF were significant during push-off only (p = 0.001). Males of ACL-R and ACL-C had higher BF activity compared to ACL-I (p = 0.009, 0.007 respectively). During reflex activity, VM and BF were significantly different between treatment groups for pre-activation (p = 0.013, 0.035 respectively). VM pre-activation of females was higher in ACL-R compared to ACL-C (p = 0.018), and lower in ACL-C compared to ACL-I (p = 0.034). Males of ACL-R showed higher VM and less BF pre-activation (p = 0.025, p = 0.003 respectively) compared to ACL-I. Males of ACL-C had less BF pre-activation compared to ACL-I (p = 0.019). During MLR, intra-group differences in ST were found for treatment (p = 0.011) and females of ACL-R compared to ACL-I (p = 0.015). During LLR, overall intra-group differences in VM were present for treatment (p = 0.034) and in females (ACL-R versus ACL-C (p = 0.015), ACL-I (p = 0.049), respectively). One year after an ACL rupture, neuromuscular alterations persist regardless of treatment and sex. Standard rehabilitation protocols may not be able to restore neuromuscular control. Future research should include long-term follow up and focus on exercises targeting neuromuscular function.

Knee MRI biomarkers associated with structural, functional and symptomatic changes at least a year from ACL injury - A systematic review

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) results from various aetiologies, including joint morphology, biomechanics, inflammation, and injury. The latter is implicated in post-traumatic OA, which offers a paradigm to identify potential biomarkers enabling early identification and intervention. This review aims to describe imaging features associated with structural changes or symptoms at least one year following injury.

Methodology

A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidance, prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022371838). Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-texts, performed data extraction, and risk of bias assessments (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Inclusion criteria included imaging studies involving human participants aged 18-45 who had sustained a significant knee injury at least a year previously. A narrative synthesis was performed using synthesis without meta-analysis methodology.

Results

Six electronic databases and conference proceedings were searched, identifying 11 studies involving 776 participants. All studies included participants suffering an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and utilised MRI. Different, and not directly comparable, techniques were used. MRI features could be broadly divided into structural, including joint position and morphology, and compositional. Promising biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting osteoarthritis include T1rho and T2 relaxation time techniques, bone morphology changes and radiomic modelling.

Discussion

As early as 12 months after injury, differences in tibia position, bone morphology, presence of effusion and synovitis, and cartilage/subchondral bone composition can be detected, some of which are linked with worse patient-reported or radiological progression. Standardisation, including MR strength, position, sequence, scoring and comparators, is required to utilise clinical and research OA imaging biomarkers fully.

Tourniquet-less arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a technical guide & narrative review of the evidence

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often performed with the use of a thigh tourniquet. Surgeons believe this helps improve visualisation and reduce operative time. However, tourniquet use has been associated with many complications including increased pain, neurovascular injury, venous thromboembolism, haematoma formation, and others. In this article, we describe a method allowing comparable arthroscopic visualisation to be achieved without the aid of a tourniquet for ACLR procedures. The literature evidence relating to this technique as well as tourniquet use for ACLR is also reviewed. Tourniquet-less ACLR can be achieved through the combined application of hypotensive anaesthesia, intravenous tranexamic acid, and use of adrenaline-supplemented irrigation fluid and local anaesthetic. Performing ACLR without a tourniquet avoids the risks associated with its use and reduces the severity of post-operative haemarthrosis which may contribute to the patient's pain and limit their ability to perform their rehabilitation exercises.

Impact of anterior cruciate ligament surgery on the development of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis comparing non-surgical and surgical treatments

Introduction

Context: The development of knee osteoarthritis (OA) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is now widely recognized. The impact of surgical or non-surgical management on the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis is still debated in the medical community.Here, we present a meta-analysis comparing the impact of surgical or non-surgical management of ACL injuries on the development of knee OA.

Method

A systematic literature review was conducted using data from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane libraries from February to May 2019. Only randomized clinical trials published between 2005 and 2019 with a non-surgical group and a surgical group were included to explore the onset or progression of knee OA after ACL injury. Trials had to have at least one radiographic endpoint (Kellgren-Lawrence scoring system). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane's Q and I2 statistical methods.

Results

Only three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were selected for meta-analysis. Of the 343 injured knees included in the studies, 180 underwent ACL reconstruction and 163 underwent non-surgical treatment. The relative risk of knee osteoarthritis was higher after surgery than after non-surgical treatment (RR 1.72, CI 95% [1.18-2.53], I2 ​= ​0%).

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis suggest a predisposition to knee osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction surgery compared with non-surgical management. Due to the small number of good quality studies available, further well-conducted randomised studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Does the one-leg rise test reflect quadriceps strength in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

OBJECTIVE

To explore if one-leg rise test performance is associated with quadriceps strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PARTICIPANTS

100 individuals (50 females, 50 males) aged 18-40 years, 9-36 months post-ACLR with ongoing knee symptoms (KOOS4 <80/100).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of one-leg rise repetitions (using an adjustable-height plinth) and isometric quadriceps strength using isokinetic dynamometry (60° flexion, normalised to body mass). Multivariable fractional polynomial regression models adjusted for sex explored relationships between one-leg rise performance (repetitions) and quadriceps strength (Nm/kg) for each limb.

RESULTS

A non-linear, increasing association between one-leg rise performance and quadriceps strength was observed, with the rate of increase attenuating at higher values of one-leg rise performance. Similar relationships were observed in the ACLR (β = 0.15, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.20; adjusted r2 = 0.51) and contralateral limb (β = 0.14, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.19; r2 = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The one-leg rise test can be an indicator of quadriceps strength in individuals after ACLR, enabling clinicians to easily monitor quadriceps strength recovery without specialised equipment. With the relationship between one-leg rise performance and quadriceps strength attenuating with a larger number of one-leg rises achieved, other factors (e.g., motivation, endurance) likely contribute to one-leg rise performance at higher values.

Smoking and secondary ACL rupture are detrimental to knee health post ACL injury-a Bayesian analysis

PURPOSE

To identify potential prognostic factors for patient-reported outcomes in an Icelandic cohort of ACL injured subjects.

METHODS

All knee MRI reports written in Iceland between the years 2001 to 2011 were read to identify individuals with a possible ACL injury. These individuals were contacted and asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding their injury and current knee related health. The questionnaire collected information on years since surgery, injury circumstance, brace use, physiotherapy, ACL surgery, second ACL injury and current smoking status. In addition, the baseline status of their meniscii were assessed from the original MRI report and medical records were used to identify any subsequent, non-ACL surgery. The patient-reported Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score (KOOS) was used assess current knee related health. A Bayesian proportional odds model was used to assess the effect of all potential prognostic factors above as well as age and sex on KOOS outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 408 subjects completed the questionnaire indicating that they did rupture their ACL. The following variables were associated with worse outcomes across all KOOS subscales: having a subsequent arthroscopy, reinjury to your ACL, and smoking. Having physiotherapy for 9 months was associated with worse KOOS pain scores than having 6 months of physiotherapy. Conversely KOOS pain score tended to be higher if you injured your knee during sports.

CONCLUSION

Reinjuring your ACL, smoking and having subsequent (non-ACLR) surgery predict your knee related health following an ACL injury. Strategies should be implemented to reduce the risk of secondary ACL injury, and patients should be strongly advised not to smoke.

Following the Dropouts - Interpreting an 11-Year Follow-up Study

In this edition of NEJM Evidence, Lohmander et al.1 report on the 11-year follow-up for a randomized clinical trial (KANON [Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Nonsurgical vs. Surgical Treatment]) of early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus optional delayed ACLR in young, active adults. This is the third publication reporting on this trial, which enrolled 121 participants from February 2002 through June 2006. A 2010 article2 reported on the 2-year follow-up, and a 2013 article3 reported on the 5-year follow-up. Both of these analyses concluded that early ACLR did not lead to improved patient-reported outcomes relative to optional delayed ACLR.

Generalised joint hypermobility leads to increased odds of sustaining a second ACL injury within 12 months of return to sport after ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To determine the 12-month risk of a second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in a population of patients with and without generalised joint hypermobility (GJH) who return to sports (RTS) at competition level after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R).

METHODS

Data were extracted from a rehabilitation-specific registry for 16-50-year-old patients treated with ACL-R between 2014 and 2019. Demographics, outcome data and the incidence of a second ACL injury within 12 months of RTS, defined as a new ipsilateral or contralateral ACL, were compared between patients with and without GJH. Univariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to determine the influence of GJH and time of RTS on the odds of a second ACL injury, and ACL-R survival without a second ACL injury after RTS.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients, 50 (22.2%) with GJH and 175 (77.8%) without GJH, were included. Within 12 months of RTS, 7 (14.0%) patients with GJH and 5 (2.9%) without GJH had a second ACL injury (p=0.012). The odds of sustaining a second ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injury were 5.53 (95% CI 1.67 to 18.29) higher in patients with GJH compared with patients without GJH (p=0.014). The lifetime HR of a second ACL injury after RTS was 4.24 (95% CI 2.05 to 8.80; p=0.0001) in patients with GJH. No between-group differences were observed in patient-reported outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GJH undergoing ACL-R have over five times greater odds of sustaining a second ACL injury after RTS. The importance of joint laxity assessment should be emphasised in patients who aim to return to high-intensity sports following ACL-R.

Early Surgical Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common and debilitating knee injury that can significantly impair knee function and stability. The optimal management of ACL injuries remains a topic of ongoing debate, with two primary treatment approaches being surgical reconstruction and adequate rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare the knee function and stability outcomes between these two treatment modalities, shedding light on their respective effectiveness. We utilized Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 20, 2022. We utilized the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment. The following outcomes were assessed: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee score, Lysholm score, the occurrence of the knee giving way, Tegner score, KT1000, Lachman test, pivot shift test, SF-36 score to assess the quality of life, and incidence of reinjury and reoperation. We included a total of six trials with a population sample size of 691 patients, which were divided into surgical versus non-surgical groups, accounting for 348 and 343 patients, respectively. The pooled estimate demonstrated that the surgical reconstruction was associated with a significant increase in the IKDC score (MD = 7.49 [2.04, 12.94], (P = 0.007)), and KOOS score was significant in the reconstruction cohort (MD = 5.87 [1.64, 10.09], (P = 0.007)). The incidences of reoperation (RR = 0.43 [0.20, 0.91], (P = 0.03)), reinjury (RR = 0.49 [0.27, 0.88], (P = 0.02)), and occurrence of the knee giving way (RR = 0.19 [0.08, 0.49], (P = 0.005)) were significantly decreased in the surgical cohort. There is no significant difference between both cohorts regarding the Lysholm score (1.27 [-1.39, 3.93], (P = 0.35)). The findings of this comprehensive analysis indicate that early reconstruction does not demonstrate clear superiority over rehabilitation alone in terms of knee function, Lysholm score, and Tegner score among patients with ACL rupture. However, early reconstruction does exhibit a substantial reduction in the incidence of reinjury, reoperation, and knee giving way, suggesting potential benefits in terms of stability outcomes. These results underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and preferences in treatment decision-making.

Treatment for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Young Active Adults

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury of the knee is common in young active adults and often has severe and sometimes lifelong consequences. The clinical management of this injury remains debated. A prior trial of early versus delayed optional ACL repair showed no differences in outcomes at 2 years. METHODS: We present the 11-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial involving 121 young active adults (mean age 26yo, 74% male) with an acute sports-related ACL tear. We compared patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between those randomized to receive early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) followed by exercise therapy (N=62) and those treated with early exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (N=59). The primary end point at 11 years was change from baseline in the mean of four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) — pain, symptoms, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS4; range of scores, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]; minimal important change=9). RESULTS: In all, 88% of the cohort followed up at 11 years (53/62 in the early vs. 54/59 in the optional late ACL repair groups), and 52% of those assigned to optional delayed ACLR underwent ACLR. Mean improvement in KOOS4 from baseline to 11 years was 46 points for those assigned to early ACLR plus exercise therapy and 45 points for those assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (between-group difference, 1.6 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −8.8 to 5.6; P=0.67 after adjustment for baseline score, full analysis set). About two thirds of the full cohort reported meeting the case definition for a “patient-acceptable symptom state” (KOOS4 patient-acceptable symptom state threshold value=79), whereas 44% had developed radiographic osteoarthritis of their injured knee. Mean summed incident radiographic osteoarthritis feature scores, scores range from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate more severe joint damage, were 2.4 for the group assigned to early ACLR and 1.0 for the group assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (mean difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: At 11-year follow-up, among young active adults with acute ACL tears assigned to early ACLR plus exercise versus initial exercise therapy with the option of delayed ACLR, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN84752559.)

Clinical, patient-reported, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings 11 years after acute posterior cruciate ligament injury treated non-surgically

BACKGROUND

Long-term consequences of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury such as persistent posterior tibial translation and risk of osteoarthritis development are unclear. Additionally, little data is available describing the natural history of structural morphology of the ruptured PCL. The purpose of the study was to determine the long-term outcome after non-operatively treated PCL injury.

METHODS

Over 6-years, all acute knee injuries were documented by subacute MRI (median 8 days [5-15, 25th - 75th percentile] from injury to MRI). Twenty-six patients with acute PCL injury were identified of whom 18 (69%) participated in the long-term follow-up after 11 years. Follow-up included radiographic posterior tibial translation (RPTT) determined using the Puddu axial radiograph. weight-bearing knee radiographs, MRI and KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score).

RESULTS

On subacute MRI, 11 knees displayed total and 7 partial ruptures. At 11 (SD 1.9) years, the median RPTT was 3.7 mm (1.5-6.3, 25th - 75th percentile). Seven knees displayed radiographic osteoarthritis approximating Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 2. All follow-up MRIs displayed continuity of the PCL. Patients with more severe RPTT (> 3.7 mm), had worse scores in the KOOS subscales for symptoms (mean difference 14.5, 95% CI 7-22), sport/recreation (30, 95% CI 0-65) and quality of life (25, 95% CI 13-57) than those with less severe RPTT (≤ 3.7 mm). This was also the case for the KOOS₄ (22, 95% CI 9-34).

CONCLUSION

Acute PCL injuries treated non-surgically display a high degree of PCL continuity on MR images 11 years after injury. However, there is a large variation of posterior tibial translation with higher values being associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes.

Management after acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Part 1: ACL reconstruction has a protective effect on secondary meniscus and cartilage lesions

PURPOSE

The aim of this consensus project was to validate which endogenous and exogenous factors contribute to the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and to what extent ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction can prevent secondary damage to the knee joint. Based on these findings, an algorithm for the management after ACL rupture should be established.

METHODS

The consensus project was initiated by the Ligament Injuries Committee of the German Knee Society (Deutsche Kniegesellschaft, DKG). A modified Delphi process was used to answer scientific questions. This process was based on key topic complexes previously formed during an initial face-to-face meeting of the steering group with the expert group. For each key topic, a comprehensive review of available literature was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Consensus was defined a-priori as eighty percent agreement.

RESULTS

Of the 17 final statements, 15 achieved consensus, and 2 have not reached consensus. Results of the consensus were summarized in an algorithm for the management after ACL rupture (infographic/Fig. 2).

CONCLUSION

This consensus process has shown that the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis is a complex multifactorial process. Exogenous (primary and secondary meniscus lesions) and endogenous factors (varus deformity) play a decisive role. Due to the complex interplay of these factors, an ACL reconstruction cannot always halt post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee. However, there is evidence that ACL reconstruction can prevent secondary joint damage such as meniscus lesions and that the success of meniscus repair is higher with simultaneous ACL reconstruction. Therefore, we recommend ACL reconstruction in case of a combined injury of the ACL and a meniscus lesion which is suitable for repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.