Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

Treatment Adherence to Adjuvant Chemotherapy According to the New Standard 3-month CAPOX Regimen in High-risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Evaluation in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

A 3-month adjuvant treatment regimen with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for high-risk stage II (T4N0) and stage III (node-positive) colon cancer was implemented in the Netherlands in 2017. The IDEA trial showed a clinically irrelevant difference in long-term outcomes in combination with a substantial decrease in toxicity in comparison with a 6-month regimen. A significantly increased dose intensity was observed in the 3-month arm, which might be essential to achieve optimal long-term outcomes. Hence, the aim of the present study was to evaluate if a similar dose intensity could be achieved in patients treated with adjuvant CAPOX for 3 months in daily practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients scheduled for 3 months of adjuvant CAPOX for high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The number of administered cycles and the daily cumulative dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were extracted from the medical files. Relative dose intensity (RDI) was determined by comparing the administered dose intensity with the standard dose intensity.

RESULTS

In total, 802 (80.0%) of the 1002 patients completed 4 cycles of CAPOX. The overall mean RDI of adjuvant treatment was 82.9% for capecitabine, and 83.8% for oxaliplatin, based on the combination of dose reductions and omitting cycles.

CONCLUSION

One out of 5 patients did not complete 4 cycles of CAPOX. The administered dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the first year after the update of the guideline was lower than the advised dose for the 3-month CAPOX regimen, and the administered dose in the IDEA study. The impact on long-term oncological outcomes should be awaited.

Number of Lymph Nodes Examined as a Prognosis Factor in Patients With Stage II or III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) examination is important for staging colorectal cancer. Examining < 12 LN has been associated with a poor prognosis. However, surgical and pathological advances have led to increase examined LN, necessitating the reassessment of the best cutoff for prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed patients with stage II-III colon cancer from the Yonsei Cancer Center Registry (YCC) database and the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). The optimal LN cutoff was determined by comparison with hazard ratio (HR) in 12 LN. We compared higher vs. lower LN cutoff effects on a 6-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2015, the proportion with < 12 LN decreased significantly (P < .001). There was no significant association between 6-year OS and LN yield in all stages II-III patients (HR = 1.21, P = .116), stage II (HR = 1.39, P = .068), and stage III (HR = 1.18, P = .297) colon cancer based on the standard 12 LN examined, whereas the 20 LN cutoff examined was associated with a significant increase in 6-year OS in all patients (HR = 1.51, P < .001). Multivariate regression revealed a significant decrease in 6-year OS in stage II (HR = 1.39, P = .026) and stage III (HR = 1.47, P < .001) with < 20 LN yield. In the NCR, < 20 LN was associated with poorer 6-year OS in stage II-III patients (HR = 1.25, P < .001), stage II (HR = 1.43, P < .001), and stage III (HR = 1.13, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Over the past decade, inadequate LN examinations have significantly decreased. Compared to < 12 LN, < 20 LN examined is more associated with a worse prognosis in patients who underwent surgery.

Simultaneous double primary malignant tumors of MSS/pMMR ascending colon cancer and MSI-H/dMMR duodenal cancer with nearly 2 years of recurrence-free survival after MDT-guided comprehensive treatment: a case report

The exceedingly rare clinical presentation of synchronous ascending colon carcinoma with duodenal adenocarcinoma demonstrating discordant mismatch repair protein expression patterns forms the cornerstone of this investigation. Through detailed analysis of a unique case featuring co-occurring MSS/pMMR ascending colon adenocarcinoma and MSI-H/dMMR duodenal adenocarcinoma, this study demonstrates the successful implementation of multidisciplinary therapeutic protocols achieving 22-month progression-free survival post-radical resection. These clinical findings offer empirical evidence for optimizing clinical management while systematically addressing diagnostic complexities and treatment dilemmas inherent to synchronous dual primary intestinal carcinomas. Particular emphasis is placed on reconciling therapeutic conflicts arising from differential tumor biology and developing precision strategies for molecularly heterogeneous synchronous malignancies.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating the preventive effect of diclofenac cream on capecitabine-related hand-foot syndrome: study protocol of J-SUPPORT2401/JORTC-SUP06 (J-DIRECT)

BACKGROUND

Clinical evidence on preventive therapy for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is limited, and moisturizing and avoiding local pressure are recommended in guidelines. Although the precise pathogenesis and mechanisms of HFS remain unclear, inflammatory reactions are thought to be involved. The preventive effects of topical diclofenac gel have been reported from India. However, the trial did not evaluate its preventive effect for the sole, and the HFS incidence in the control group was lower than that in previous reports. Therefore, this study aims to confirm the preventive effects of diclofenac sodium 0.1% cream for capecitabine-induced HFS.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Patients scheduled to receive capecitabine-containing chemotherapy are enrolled, and participants are prophylactically treated with topical diclofenac sodium 0.1% cream or placebo alongside standard preventive therapy. The primary endpoint is an incidence of grade 2 HFS within 3 months. The secondary endpoints include time to onset of HFS, incidences of dose reduction, schedule delay, discontinuation caused by capecitabine-induced HFS, dose intensity of capecitabine, an incidence of grade ≥ 2 peripheral sensory neuropathy, incidences of other capecitabine-related adverse events (nausea, vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea, oral mucositis, pigmentation, abnormality of liver and renal functions, and neutropenia).

DISCUSSION

If this study meets the primary endpoint, a new standard preventive therapy for HFS will be established. Moreover, the use of topical diclofenac cream alongside high-dose capecitabine may enhance chemotherapy efficacy.

Combined Analyses of Circulating Tumor DNA and Immunoscore in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PRODIGE-GERCOR IDEA-France/HORG-IDEA-Greece Trials

PURPOSE

Immunoscore (IS) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are two emerging technologies in improving prognostication and tailoring adjuvant treatments in patients resected from a stage III colon cancer (CC). Here, we analyzed the prognostic value of the two biomarkers in patients who participated in the randomized phase III IDEA-France and HORG trials.

METHODS

Plasma samples were collected after surgery and before adjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA analysis was performed using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex protein chain reaction assay. Multivariable analyses for time to recurrence (TTR; patients without recurrence or death due to CC) and overall survival (OS) were performed using ctDNA and IS results, along with other parameters including treatment duration and disease risk group.

RESULTS

Of the 554 patients with available ctDNA results, 445 were ctDNA-negative (80.3%) and 109 were ctDNA-positive (19.7%); baseline characteristics showed more T4/N2 and venous embolism/lymphatic invasion/perineural invasion+ in ctDNA-positive patients. With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, the 2-year TTR rate was 43.5% (95% CI, 34.1 to 52.6) for ctDNA-positive patients and 88.1% (95% CI, 84.7 to 90.8) for ctDNA-negative patients (P < .0001). ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker for both TTR (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR], 5.21 [95% CI, 3.59 to 7.58]; P < .001) and OS (adjHR, 4.84 [95% CI, 3.40 to 6.89]; P < .001). ctDNA remained the most significant prognostic factor irrespective of disease stage, treatment duration, and IS results. IS was not prognostic in ctDNA-positive patients but remained a significant prognostic tool for ctDNA-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

In this combined analysis of two adjuvant trials dedicated to patients with stage III CC after surgery, ctDNA was detectable in 19.7% of the patients and was confirmed as a major independent prognostic biomarker. IS seems to bring additional prognostic information in the 80.3% of patients who are ctDNA-negative.

Utility of circulating tumor DNA to detect minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) and guiding treatment decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to examine the study designs and settings of ongoing clinical trials that use ctDNA to guide treatment decisions and to determine the best timing for detecting MRD in non-metastatic CRC. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for English language records. The ctDNA settings from the clinical trials were categorized by randomization to ctDNA testing, treatment options based on ctDNA results, and the timing of ctDNA testing relative to adjuvant therapy. For prospective studies, a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach was conducted to examine the pairwise associations between different ctDNA timing strategies and MRD, defined as recurrence, relapse, and progression. The main approaches in ctDNA-based interventional trial designs were categorized as ctDNA-guided treatment, ctDNA-by-treatment, ctDNA-guided surveillance, and ctDNA-enriched adjuvant therapy for guiding treatment decisions, including both escalation and de-escalation strategies, and surveillance. Overall, both preoperative and postoperative ctDNA detection were linked to higher risks of progression, with pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 5.23 (2.10-13.00) and 7.95 (5.30-11.91), respectively. Among the timing strategies, ctDNA testing after adjuvant therapy was the most effective for identifying high-risk patients, strongly suggesting the presence of residual disease. This study comprehensively reviewed the clinical settings of ctDNA testing in ongoing trials and provided evidence supporting the selection of post-adjuvant therapy as the optimal timing for ctDNA testing.

Foundation Model for Predicting Prognosis and Adjuvant Therapy Benefit From Digital Pathology in GI Cancers

PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for improving cancer diagnosis and treatment. Here, we present a foundation AI model for prognosis prediction on the basis of standard hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology slides.

METHODS

In this multinational cohort study, we developed AI models to predict prognosis from histopathology images of patients with GI cancers. First, we trained a foundation model using over 130 million patches from 104,876 whole-slide images on the basis of self-supervised learning. Second, we fine-tuned deep learning models for predicting survival outcomes and validated them across seven cohorts, including 1,619 patients with gastric and esophageal cancers and 2,594 patients with colorectal cancer. We further assessed the model for predicting survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The AI models predicted disease-free survival and disease-specific survival with a concordance index of 0.726-0.797 for gastric cancer and 0.714-0.757 for colorectal cancer in the validation cohorts. The models stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, with 5-year survival rates of 49%-52% versus 76%-92% in gastric cancer and 43%-72% versus 81%-98% in colorectal cancer. In multivariable analysis, the AI risk scores remained an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for clinicopathologic variables. Compared with stage alone, an integrated model consisting of stage and image information improved prognosis prediction across all validation cohorts. Finally, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in the high-risk group but not in the low-risk group (treatment-model interaction P = .01 and .006) for stage II/III gastric and colorectal cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pathology foundation model can accurately predict survival outcomes and complement clinicopathologic factors in GI cancers. Pending prospective validation, it may be used to improve risk stratification and inform personalized adjuvant therapy.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (WJOG5810G)

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains unknown. This phase 2 study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) after lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included colorectal adenocarcinoma, first curative resection of ≤4 lung metastases, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, with the expectation of 50% (threshold, 35%) and a planned sample size of 100 (90% power; alpha error, 5%).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014; patient enrollment was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. Excluding four ineligible patients, the characteristics of the 48 patients in the efficacy analysis set were a median age of 62 years (range, 43-75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 in 45 patients, prior resection of extrathoracic metastasis in four patients, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen within normal range in 43 patients; the status of lung metastasis was single in 34 patients, unilateral in 40 patients, and metachronous in 41 patients; and a disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of lung metastasis of <2 years in 33 patients. The 5-year OS rate was 85.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4%-92.6%), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 44.9%-72.4%). Forty-one of the 52 patients (78.8%) in the safety analysis set completed 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (50.0%), fatigue (7.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (7.7%), and other (<5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 is feasible, and may be effective after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Beyond chemotherapy: Exploring 5-FU resistance and stemness in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, demanding continuous advancements in treatment strategies. This review explores the complexities of targeting colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs) and the mechanisms contributing to resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The efficacy of 5-FU is enhanced by combination therapies such as FOLFOXIRI and targeted treatments like bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, particularly in KRAS wild-type tumors, despite associated toxicity. Biomarkers like thymidylate synthase (TYMS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are crucial for predicting 5-FU efficacy and resistance. Targeting CRC-CSCs remains challenging due to their inherent resistance to conventional therapies, marker variability, and the protective influence of the tumor microenvironment which promotes stemness and survival. Personalized treatment strategies are increasingly essential to address CRC's genetic and phenotypic diversity. Advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines, along with nanomedicine-based therapies, offer promising targeted drug delivery systems that enhance specificity, reduce toxicity, and provide novel approaches for overcoming resistance mechanisms. Integrating these innovative strategies with traditional therapies may enhance the effectiveness of CRC therapy by addressing the underlying causes of 5-FU resistance in CSCs.

The Long Noncoding RNA DUXAP8 Facilitates the Malignant Progression of Colon Cancer via the microRNA-378a-3p/FOXQ1 Axis

Background/Aims

The long noncoding RNA DUXAP8 is a pivotal regulator in cancer pathogenesis, but the molecular mechanism underlying the role of DUXAP8 in colon cancer progression is underexplored.

Methods

In addition to bioinformatic analyses, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to assess DUXAP8, microRNA-378a-3p, FOXQ1 expression in colon cancer tissues, and clinical data were analyzed to determine the correlation between DUXAP8 expression and colon cancer patient outcomes. Nuclear/cytoplasmic RNA fractionation was utilized to analyze the subcellular distribution of DUXAP8. Dual-luciferase and RNA immunoprecipitation assays were performed to confirm the binding of DUXAP8/FOXQ1 and microRNA-378a-3p. After cell transfection, qRT-PCR was performed to evaluate the modulatory relationship of DUXAP8/microRNA-378a-3p/FOXQ1. Cell Counting Kit-8, MTT, scratch healing, and Transwell assays were performed to evaluate the impact of DUXAP8/microRNA-378a-3p/FOXQ1 expression on colon cancer cell functions.

Results

The results revealed that the expression of DUXAP8 and FOXQ1 was upregulated in colon cancer tissues, while the expression of microRNA-378a-3p was down-regulated. The increased DUXAP8 expression was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Dual-luciferase and RNA immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that DUXAP8 was a sponge for microRNA-378a-3p and targeted the ability of microRNA-378a-3p to regulate FOXQ1. In addition, functional experiment results revealed that overexpressed DUXAP8 facilitated the growth and migratory ability of colon cancer cells. DUXAP8 also reversed the tumor-suppressive effect of microRNA-378a-3p. However, silencing FOXQ1 could reverse the cancer-promoting effects of high DUXAP8 expression.

Conclusions

DUXAP8 expression was significantly increased in colon cancer, which was associated with lymph node metastasis and unfavorable outcomes in colon cancer patients. DUXAP8 may hasten malignant progression of colon cancer cells through its effects on microRNA-378a-3p/FOXQ1.

Real-World Tolerability of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients in the United States With Localized Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Curative-Intent Treatment

PURPOSE

The combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is commonly used in patients with localized colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving curative-intent treatment. Our study aimed to assess the real-world tolerability of CAPOX in a single-institution cohort of patients with localized CRC.

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective study that included patients with localized CRC receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant CAPOX. The primary end point was completion rate of intended number (obtained by chart review) of CAPOX cycles irrespective of dose levels. Secondary outcome measures included the rate of grade ≥3 adverse events, hospital admission rate, and dose reductions.

RESULTS

The study included 153 patients with a median age of 61 years; 49% were female and 78.4% had stage III CRC. The proportion of patients (95% CI) who completed all planned CAPOX cycles was 44.4% (36 to 52) in the entire cohort and 34.6% (23 to 45) among female patients. Independent variables associated with treatment completion in multivariable analysis were race, sex, and intended number of cycles. Notably, the therapy completion rates (95% CI) were 55% (43 to 66) and 33% (20 to 45) in patients intended to receive four and eight cycles of CAPOX, respectively. The rate of grade ≥3 adverse events and hospitalization because of CAPOX-related toxicity were 30.7% (95% CI, 23 to 38) and 17.6% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that a substantial number of patients with localized CRC undergoing curative-intent treatment with CAPOX do not complete the planned cycles of chemotherapy because of toxicity. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and appropriate supportive care to optimize the therapeutic benefit of CAPOX in this setting.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colon cancer: A systematic review with proportional meta-analysis

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is suggested in locally advanced colon cancer. Data on improved long-term oncological outcomes are lacking, which hampers the implementation in clinical practice. This systematic review provides an overview of the benefits and drawbacks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. A systematic literature search was performed using Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (OvidSP), and the Cochrane Library. Studies reporting on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable, locally advanced colon cancer without metastases at the time of diagnosis were considered eligible for inclusion. An overview of short- and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is provided based on available literature. Additionally, proportional meta-analyses were performed using MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.2.6. A total of 17 unique studies were included in this review, 3 randomised controlled trials and 14 prospective single-arm or retrospective studies. The maximum reported dropout before surgery was 7.8 % in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A histopathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in 0-4.8 % of the patients. The occurrence of anastomotic leaks was less than 8 % for both patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients treated with upfront surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a safe alternative for adjuvant chemotherapy based on the dropout rate before surgery and the peri-operative morbidity and peri-operative mortality. Robust long-term survival outcomes are lacking and serious concerns regarding the risk of overtreatment have been expressed. Hence, neoadjuvant chemotherapy might be considered in a select group of patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, 2024 update

The 2024 updates of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer emphasize standardizing cancer treatment in China, highlighting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource access, and precision medicine in oncology. These updates address disparities in epidemiological trends, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor biology, treatment approaches, and drug selection for colorectal cancer patients across diverse regions and backgrounds. Key revisions include adjustments to evidence levels for intensive treatment strategies, updates to regimens for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite stability (MSS) patients who have failed standard therapies, and rectal cancer patients with low recurrence risk. Additionally, recommendations for digital rectal examination and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)/ DNA polymerase delta 1 (POLD1) gene mutation testing have been strengthened. The 2024 CSCO Guidelines are based on both Chinese and international clinical research, as well as expert consensus, ensuring their relevance and applicability in clinical practice, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely updates.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer: A nationwide cohort study from the Netherlands

AIM

Treatment of rectal cancer has improved significantly over the past decades. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival of patients with rectal cancer.

METHOD

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used to evaluate all nonmetastatic pathological node-positive patients who underwent treatment for rectal cancer during the time period 2009-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were grouped according to whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were further divided into three groups according to the type of preoperative treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied based on patient-related variables, tumour-related variables and treatment-related variables. The matching procedure for PSM was done with nearest neighbour and without replacement employing a 1:1 ratio. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed after PSM to compare overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 7479 patients were included, of whom 865 (11.6%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM the no neoadjuvant treatment group included 240 patients per study arm, the neoadjuvant radiotherapy group 317 and the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group 182 patients. A significant difference in 5-year survival was found comparing adjuvant versus no adjuvant chemotherapy in all subgroups: no neoadjuvant treatment 54.6% vs. 40.8% (p = 0.003), neoadjuvant radiotherapy 77.0% vs. 53.9% (p < 0.001) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation 68.1% vs. 45.6% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an improved 5-year survival in all subgroups. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer should be reconsidered in node-positive patients.

Intestinal Autotransplantation for Locally Advanced or Locally Recurrent Colon Cancer Invading Superior Mesenteric Artery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the outcomes of intestinal autotransplantation (IATx) in patients with locally advanced (LACC) or locally recurrent (LRCC) colon cancer invading the superior mesenteric artery (SMA).

BACKGROUND

SMA involvement in LACC or LRCC is deemed unresectable and is associated with a poor prognosis. Combined extended resections of multiple organs together with SMA, followed by IATx may offer favorable clinical outcomes. However, data on its safety and efficacy are scarce.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing IATx between May 2018 and December 2022 in intestinal transplant programs at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in China. Patients with LACC or LRCC concomitantly with SMA contact of more than 180 degrees were included. Patients with a locoregional peritoneal, pelvic, or distal metastasis were excluded.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent either IATx combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 8) or IATx alone (n = 2). Eight patients (80%) were males, and the median age was 55 years (range, 32-71 years). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free survival and overall survival at 3 years after IATx were 68% and 80%, respectively. No perioperative deaths occurred. All 10 patients experienced postoperative complications, including Clavien-Dindo grade I (n = 1), grade II (n = 4), grade IIIa (n = 1), grade IIIb (n = 3), and grade IVa (n = 1), which comprised acute venous thromboses, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, anastomotic leak, gastropareses, and significant pleural effusions. With an average follow-up of 23.9 months, 8 patients (80%) were currently alive without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

Extended resection for LACC or LRCC invading SMA can be performed safely and is associated with prolonged survival.

Impact of tumor and node stages on the efficacy of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients: an ACCENT pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Standard adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer (CC) is fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin. Recently, stage III was subdivided into low-risk (T1-3, N1) and high-risk (T4 and/or N2), with the benefit of adding oxaliplatin varying across these substages. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of oxaliplatin on survival outcomes in subdividing stage III CC patients based on T and N staging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 4942 stage III CC patients were pooled from the three randomized pivotal trials of oxaliplatin. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox models stratified by study, and interaction tests were used to assess the oxaliplatin effect across subgroups based on T and N stages. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The prevalence of tumor stages was T1-2 12.4%, T3 74.4%, and T4 13.1%; nodal stages were N1 64.7% and N2 35.3%. A significant OS benefit from oxaliplatin was seen only in T3 (5-year OS = 77.2% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001): T3N1 (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001) and T3N2 (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95, P = 0.010). No benefit was observed for T1-2 (5-year OS = 87.8% versus 88.7%, P = 0.644) or T4 patients (5-year OS = 62.6% versus 60.2%, P = 0.648). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between T stage and the effect of oxaliplatin treatment on OS, whereas no such interaction was observed for N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed that oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy offers a significant survival benefit in stage III CC patients with T3 tumors. In contrast, no survival benefit was observed for T1-2 or T4 patients. These results suggested that T stage plays a more crucial role than N stage in predicting treatment benefit, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics.

Three Versus Six Months of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Contemporary Real-World Analysis

PURPOSE

Based on the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy analysis, 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is an option for stage III colorectal cancer (colorectal cancer [CRC]), with cost and toxicity benefits. We examined the patterns of uptake of CAPOX versus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and chemotherapy duration in a contemporary real-world cohort of patients in Canada.

METHODS

The provincial pharmacy database was used to identify patients with resected stage III CRC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2021 and December 2022. Demographic, tumor, and treatment information was collected and compared.

RESULTS

Of 452 patients, 234 (52%) and 218 (48%) were planned to receive 3 and 6 months of chemotherapy, respectively. Within the 3-month group, 226 (97%) received CAPOX. Within the 6-month group, there was a 51%-49% split between CAPOX and FOLFOX. Age >70 years (P = .039), well/moderately differentiated (P = .005), and low-risk disease (P < .0001) were significantly associated with 3 months. Performance status, ileostomy, or preexisting neuropathy did not affect treatment choice. Of patients planned for 6 months, 29% had low-risk disease, with 52% of these receiving CAPOX. Patients receiving 6 months were more likely to report neuropathy (68 v 36%, P < .0001) and to stop oxaliplatin early (54 v 31%, P < .0001). The most likely reason for early adjuvant discontinuation was neuropathy in the 6-month group and gastrointestinal toxicity in the 3-month group (P < .0001). Irrespective of duration, mean time from consult to starting chemotherapy was longer for FOLFOX versus CAPOX (24 v 19 days, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary cohort, 6 months chemotherapy is still being offered to patients with low-risk disease and is associated with more neuropathy. Exploration of patient preferences and resource costs may improve adoption of reduced duration adjuvant CAPOX in stage III CRC.

Combining Circulating Tumour DNA with Clinical Pathological Risk Factors for Developing Peritoneal Metastasis Prediction Model in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Aims/Background Peritoneal metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) indicates a poor prognosis for patients. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) effectively predicts recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, this study aims to construct a predictive model for peritoneal metastasis by integrating ctDNA with clinicopathological factors in stage I-III CRC patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 299 CRC patients who underwent ctDNA detection at The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 209) and validation (n = 90) sets in a 7:3 ratio using a random number table method. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model optimized feature selection, and multivariable logistic regression constructed the predictive model. Results Among the study cohort, 59 patients were ctDNA-positive. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with an 8.522-fold increased risk of peritoneal metastasis (p < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 8.522, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.371-16.615). The model included preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125), pathological lymph node staging, perineural invasion, and ctDNA levels, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.808 (95% CI 0.727-0.888) in the training set and 0.784 (95% CI 0.658-0.910) in the validation set. Conclusion This model can accurately identify high-risk patients for peritoneal metastasis in postoperative CRC, facilitating early detection and timely intervention.

Re-examining the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer using the lymphadenectomy index

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in colon cancer surgery is specified in guidelines based on the results of past analyses. However, with advances in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatments, the clinical significance of dissecting each lymph node may change. In this study, we re-examined the optimal dissection range in each colon cancer localization. We retrospectively analyzed 788 cases of T1-T4 colon cancer who underwent radical resection between 2008 and 2018 at our hospital, and evaluated the Lymphadenectomy Index. No metastases to the main lymph node were found in T1 cases. In T2 cases, dissection effect to the main lymph node were observed in cases with tumors localized in the ascending colon and left side of the transverse colon. For tumors localized in the cecum, dissection was effective for lymph nodes in nodal station 213, in the right side of the transverse colon in station 211, in the descending colon in station 221, and in the sigmoid colon in station 231. These lymph nodes could have been considered out of scope for dissection if the Japanese guidelines were followed. In these cases, the extent of lymph node dissection should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

The Current Status of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in Japan: A Paradigm Shift from Oral Fluoropyridine Single Therapy to the Oxaliplatin Regimen

The effectiveness of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) has been reported overseas; however, in Japan, the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is reported to be good, and there has been a long debate about the applicability of L-OHP combination therapy in Japan. In recent years, the results of the ACHIEVE trial have become clear, and the standard consensus in Japan establishes L-OHP combination therapy for a duration of 3 months as the adjuvant treatment for CRC.

Impact of Small Tumor Size on Prognosis in T3N1 Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, large tumor size is associated with poor survival in colon cancer, but its impact remains limited and controversial. Recently, the impact of small tumor size on prognosis has gained attention. This study aimed to investigate whether small tumor size can be an additional parameter for T3N1 colon cancer prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with pT3N1 colon cancer between 2010 and 2021. The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was calculated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We evaluated survival through the Kaplan-Meier method, and the risk of prognosis through multivariate Cox models.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value of tumor size was 45 mm. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in tumor size < 45 mm than in ≥ 45 mm (25.7% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.037). Tumor size < 45 mm also had lower overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) than its counterpart (p = 0.03 for all). In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 70 years, undifferentiated histological type, and tumor size < 45 mm were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.025, p = 0.001, p < 0.04, respectively), whereas tumor size < 45 mm was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS (p = 0.043). Meanwhile, the independent prognostic factors for CSS were undifferentiated histological type and tumor size < 45 mm (p = 0.008 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Small tumor size is associated with poor prognosis in pT3N1 colon cancer cases. Thus, small tumors potentially have biologically aggressive features.

Narrative review of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with more than 1.9 million new cases reported in 2020, and is associated with major survival challenges, particularly in patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). LACC often involves T4 invasion or extensive nodal involvement and requires a multidisciplinary approach for management. Radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the primary treatment strategy for LACC. However, achieving complete tumor resection (R0) is challenging because locally advanced colon tumors typically infiltrate adjacent organs or nodes. Advancements in LACC treatment have involved neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), and neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAIT). Studies such as FOxTROT and PRODIGE 22 have demonstrated that NACT, particularly with FOLFOX or CAPOX, can lead to major tumor downstaging, improved survival rates, and increased R0 resection rates. Predictive biomarkers, such as mismatch repair (MMR) status and T stage, are crucial in identifying candidates who may benefit from NACT. NACRT has demonstrated promise in enhancing tumor regression, particularly in patients with rectal cancer, underscoring its potential for use with LACC. NAIT, particularly for deficient MMR tumors, has emerged as a novel approach, with studies such as NICHE-2 and NICHE-3 reporting excellent pathologic responses and pathologic complete responses. Integrating these therapies can enhance the surgical and survival outcomes of patients with LACC, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics and response to neoadjuvant interventions. This review discusses the evolving landscape of LACC management, focusing on optimizing treatment approaches for improved patient outcomes.

Poorly controlled type II diabetes mellitus significantly enhances postoperative chemoresistance in patients with stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been associated with increased risk of colon cancer (CC) and worse prognosis in patients with metastases. The effects of T2DM on postoperative chemoresistance rate (CRR) and long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage III CC who receive curative resection remain controversial.

AIM

To investigate whether T2DM or glycemic control is associated with worse postoperative survival outcomes in stage III CC.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 278 patients aged 40-75 years who underwent surgery for stage III CC from 2018 to 2021. Based on preoperative T2DM history, the patients were categorized into non-DM (n = 160) and DM groups (n = 118). The latter was further divided into well-controlled (n = 73) and poorly controlled (n = 45) groups depending on the status of glycemic control. DFS, OS, and CRR were compared between the groups and Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Patients in the DM and non-DM groups demonstrated similar DFS, OS, and CRR (DFS: 72.03% vs 78.75%, P = 0.178; OS: 81.36% vs 83.12%, P = 0.638; CRR: 14.41% vs 7.5%, P = 0.063). Poorly controlled DM was associated with a significantly worse prognosis and higher CRR than well-controlled DM (DFS: 62.22% vs 78.07%, P = 0.021; OS: 71.11% vs 87.67%, P = 0.011; CRR: 24.40% vs 8.22%, P = 0.015). High preoperative fasting plasma glucose [DFS: Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.684, P < 0.001; OS: HR = 2.105, P = 0.019; CRR: HR = 2.214, P = 0.005] and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (DFS: HR = 2.344, P = 0.006; OS: HR = 2.119, P = 0.021; CRR: HR = 2.449, P = 0.009) indicated significantly poor prognosis and high CRR, while T2DM history did not (DFS: HR = 1.178, P = 0.327; OS: HR = 0.933, P = 0.739; CRR: HR = 0.997, P = 0.581).

CONCLUSION

Increased preoperative fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels, but not T2DM history, were identified as risk factors associated with poor postoperative outcomes and high CRR in patients with stage III CC.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival per consensus molecular subtype in stage III colon cancer

The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification divides colon tumors into four subtypes holding promise as a predictive biomarker. However, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence free survival (RFS) per CMS in stage III patients remains inadequately explored. With this intention, we selected stage III colon cancer (CC) patients from the MATCH cohort (n = 575) and RadboudUMC (n = 276) diagnosed between 2005 and 2018. Patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were matched based on tumor location, T- and N-stage (n = 522). Tumor material was available for 464 patients, with successful RNA extraction and CMS subtyping achieved in 390 patients (surgery alone group: 192, adjuvant chemotherapy group: 198). In the overall cohort, CMS4 was associated with poorest prognosis (HR 1.55; p = .03). Multivariate analysis revealed favorable RFS for the adjuvant chemotherapy group in CMS1, CMS2, and CMS4 tumors (HR 0.19; p = .01, HR 0.27; p < .01, HR 0.19; p < .01, respectively), while no significant difference between treatment groups was observed within CMS3 (HR 0.68; p = .51). CMS subtyping in this non-randomized cohort identified patients with poor prognosis and patients who may not benefit significantly from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Value of ctDNA in surveillance of adjuvant chemosensitivity and regimen adjustment in stage III colon cancer: a protocol for phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (REVISE trial)

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for stage III colon cancer is 3 or 6 months of double-drug regimen chemotherapy following radical surgery. However, patients with positive circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) exhibit a high risk of recurrence risk even if they receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential benefit of intensified adjuvant chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOXIRI), for ctDNA-positive patients remains to be elucidated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the utility of ctDNA in monitoring chemosensitivity and to preliminarily assess whether intensified chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI can increase ctDNA clearance and improve survival outcomes. A total of 60 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer exhibiting postoperatively positive ctDNA before and after two cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) will be randomly assigned to continue five additional cycles of XELOX (control arm) or switch to eight cycles of FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm). This sequential approach is designed to escalate treatment for patients with persistent ctDNA positivity while avoiding overtreatment in those who may respond well to standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the change in ctDNA concentration, defined as the difference between the ctDNA concentration measured after two cycles of XELOX and after the completion or termination of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the ctDNA clearance rate, 2-year disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, chemotherapy-related side effects and quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 20231998). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06242418, registered on 27 January 2024).

Patients with T4N0 and T1‑3N1 colon cancer and a high preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin for 6 months

A shorter duration of oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy has recently emerged as a potential option for patients with high-risk stage II and low-risk stage III (T1-3N1) colon cancer (CC). The present study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for recurrence in these patient populations and to identify the appropriate indications for shortened treatment durations. The present study retrospectively analyzed 396 patients who underwent curative surgery for pathological T4N0 or stage III CC, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, at two institutes. Overall, 234 patients with T4N0 and low-risk stage III CC were categorized into the low-risk group and 162 patients with high-risk stage III CC into the high-risk group. The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group. Multivariate Cox model analysis of the low-risk group revealed that high preoperative serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and incomplete 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin were independent poor prognostic factors. The prognosis of patients in the low-risk group who had abnormal CEA levels and did not complete the 6-month adjuvant treatment with oxaliplatin was similar to that of patients in the high-risk group. However, the prognosis of patients in the low-risk group with high CEA levels improved with a 6-month adjuvant treatment with oxaliplatin to a similar level to that of all patients with low CEA levels in the low-risk group. In conclusion, the present study suggested that the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin should not be shortened in patients with high preoperative CEA levels, even in the low-risk group.

Liquid biopsy for breast cancer and other solid tumors: a review of recent advances

Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported to be less invasive and effective for comprehensive genetic analysis of heterogeneous solid tumors, including decision-making for therapeutic strategies, predicting recurrence, and detecting genetic factors related to treatment resistance in various types of cancers. Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer are among the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, and clinical studies of liquid biopsy for these cancers are ongoing. Liquid biopsy has been used as a companion diagnostic tool in clinical settings, and research findings have accumulated, especially in cases of colorectal cancer after curative resection and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after curative chemoradiotherapy, in which ctDNA detection helps predict eligibility for adjuvant chemotherapy. Liquid biopsy using ctDNA shows promise across a wide range of cancer types, including breast cancer, and its clinical applications are expected to expand further through ongoing research. In this article, studies on liquid biopsy in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and NSCLC are compared focusing on ctDNA.

Dietary quality and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and dose-limiting chemotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin. This study investigated the relationship between dietary quality and the development of moderate and/or severe CIPN in colon cancer survivors using data from the Focus on Reducing Dose-Limiting Toxicities in Colon Cancer with Resistance Exercise trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03291951).

METHODS

Diet quality was collected using a 127-item food-frequency questionnaire and was scored using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010). CIPN was assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at each chemotherapy cycle. The association of dietary quality with time to the first moderate-to-severe (moderate-severe) or severe event of CIPN was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Only participants who received oxaliplatin were included in this analysis (n = 132).

RESULTS

Seventy-four participants (56.1%) reported moderate-severe CIPN. Higher dietary quality was associated with a significantly decreased risk of moderate-severe CIPN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99) and severe CIPN (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Consumption of red and processed meat (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07-2.83) and sugar-sweetened beverages (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59) was associated with an increased risk of moderate-severe CIPN. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages also was associated with an increased risk of severe CIPN (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), whereas vegetable consumption was associated with a reduced risk of severe CIPN (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with colon cancer who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, higher baseline dietary quality was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-severe CIPN.

Assessing the clinical utility of tumor invasion proportion of lymph nodes for enhanced risk stratification in N1 colorectal cancer

N staging systems are paramount clinical features for colorectal cancer (CRC). In N1 stage (N1) CRC, patients present with a limited number of metastatic lymph nodes, yet their prognoses vary widely. The tumor invasion proportion of lymph nodes (TIPLN) has gained attention, but its prognostic value in N1 CRC remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 416 N1 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery from January 2014 to December 2018, reviewing 713 hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to assess TIPLN. Overall survival was the primary outcome in our study. Using restricted cubic splines, we explored the relationship between TIPLN and prognosis, with Cox regression and subgroup analyses adjusting for potential confounders. We found that increased TIPLN was associated with an unfavorable prognosis. At a cut-off value of 50%, patients with high-TIPLN exhibiting poorer outcomes than their low-TIPLN counterparts (hazard ratio: 3.77, P < 0.001). Furthermore, high-TIPLN was confirmed as an independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 3.12, P < 0.001) after adjusting for clinical confounders. Notably, TIPLN could also enhance risk stratification within the T and N stages, where patients with low-risk (T1-3 stage) and high-TIPLN demonstrated poorer overall survival compared to those with high-risk (T4 stage) and low-TIPLN (hazard ratio: 2.54, P = 0.021). In conclusion, TIPLN is a promising prognostic indicator for N1 CRC patients that complements traditional N staging system for a more comprehensive evaluation. Integrating TIPLN into the TNM staging system could enhance risk stratification and guide treatment decisions.

Assessment of the Addition of Oxaliplatin to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis

PURPOSE

The adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer (CC) is chemotherapy combining fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX). FP regimen plus OX (FPOX) may benefit in high-risk stage II CC. We performed a pooled analysis of pivotal MOSAIC and C-07 studies evaluating FPOX for the treatment of high-risk stage II CC according to prognostic factors, number of high-risk factors, and current clinicopathologic risk classification on the basis of T stage, tumor perforation, and number of lymph nodes examined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One thousand five hundred and ninety-five patients with stage II CC receiving FP or FPOX were pooled. The overall survival (OS) benefit of OX was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted Cox models stratified by study. Three thousand and fifty-nine patients with stage III CC were used only for interaction tests between the allocated chemotherapy and stage.

RESULTS

In the pooled analysis of stage II patients, independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were sex, age, perforation/obstruction, and tumor sidedness. There was a significant interaction in OS between stage and allocated chemotherapy with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.03 for stage II (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P = .813) and 0.82 for stage III (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92; P = .001; Pint = .073). There was no benefit from the addition of OX to FP for any of the prognostic factors. The number of high-risk factors tested was not predictive of OX benefit. According to the currently agreed clinicopathologic risk classification, no OS benefit of OX was observed, as HR was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.18; P = .349).

CONCLUSION

No OS benefit of adjuvant OX was found in high-risk stage II CC, regardless of the definition used to characterize tumors as having a high risk for recurrence. Hence, our analysis suggests that OX should not be the standard of care for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CC, even in high-risk patients.

Nanoparticle delivery of si-Notch1 modulates metabolic reprogramming to affect 5-FU resistance and cell pyroptosis in colorectal cancer

Background

Nanocarrier delivery of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to silence cancer-associated genes is a promising method for cancer treatment. Here, we explored the role and mechanisms of PLAG NPs-delivered si-Notch1 in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Results

High Notch1 expression was observed in both sensitive and resistant CRC tissues and cells. Notch1 silencing repressed proliferation and facilitates apoptosis of resistant CRC cells, and suppressed glycolysis and promoted pyroptosis in resistant CRC cells. Notch1 directly interacts with PCAF. Notch1 knockdown’s suppressive effect on glycolysis was reversed by overexpression of PCAF. Moreover, a nanocarrier called PLAG NPs was built with a higher delivery efficiency compared with lipo2000. Si-Notch1 delivered by PLAG NPs efficiently overcame the CRC cells’ 5-FU resistance and facilitated pyroptosis in a CRC mouse model.

Conclusions

PLAG NPs carrying si-Notch1 had a great advantage in the extension of half-life circulation and targeting ability, providing a theoretical foundation for precise clinical treatment of CRC.

Survival analysis in pT1-3 and paracolic lymph-node invasion colorectal cancer: the prognostic role of positive paracolic lymph-node ratio for adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Several studies have observed that some stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients cannot benefit from standard adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no unified screening standard to date.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma treated in 3 centers between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Patients were divided into four groups according to different stages and positive paracolic lymph-node ratio (P-LNR) [Cohort 1: pT1-3N0M0, Cohort 2: pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0, Cohort 3: pT4N0M0, Cohort 4: stage III patients except for pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0], and further overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier method. The univariate and multivariate analyses were employed for cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 5581 consecutive CRC patients with, and 2861 eligible patients were enrolled for further analysis. The optimal cut-off value of P-LNR in our study was 0.15. There was no significant difference in OS (91.36 vs. 93.74%) and DFS (87.65 vs. 90.96%) between stage III patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 and those with pT1-3N0M0. Further analysis demonstrated that CRC patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 were less likely to benefit from 8 cycles of CAPOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy and suffered fewer adverse events from declining chemotherapy. Comparing with 0-4 cycles versus 8 cycles, the overall survival rates were 91.35 versus 90.19% (P = 0.79), and with a DFS of 87.50 versus 88.24% (P = 0.49), the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent risk factor for patients with pT1-3N + (P-LNR ≤ 0.15)M0 (HR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.90-1.30, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The concept of P-LNR we proposed might have a high clinical application value and accurately enable clinicians to screen out specific CRC patients who decline or prefer limited chemotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRY

The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300076883.

Inflammation, physical activity, and disease-free survival in stage III colon cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B-Southwest Oncology Group 80702 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Inflammation and insufficient physical inactivity contribute to individual-level risk of disease recurrence and death in stage III colon cancer. The extent to which increased inflammatory risk can be offset by sufficient physical activity remains unknown.

METHODS

This cohort study was nested within the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology) and Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial. Inflammatory burden was quantified by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptor 2 after recovery from tumor resection. Physical activity was measured during and after postoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 88.4% among patients with low inflammation and sufficient physical activity (referent group for all comparisons), 84.9% with low inflammation and insufficient physical activity (absolute risk difference = -3.5 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -11.3 to 4.3; P = .38), 78.0% with intermediate inflammation and insufficient physical activity (absolute risk difference = -10.4 percentage points, 95% CI = -17.4 to -3.3; P = .007), and 79.7% with high inflammation and insufficient physical activity (absolute risk difference = -8.7 percentage points, 95% CI = -15.7 to -1.6; P = .022). In contrast, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 87.3% among patients with intermediate inflammation and sufficient physical activity (absolute risk difference = -1.1 percentage points, 95% CI = -7.5 to 5.3; P = .74) and 84.4% with high inflammation and sufficient physical activity (absolute risk difference = -4.0 percentage points, 95% CI = -12.3 to 4.3; P = .34).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study of stage III colon cancer patients, physical activity was associated with improved disease-free survival despite high inflammation. Patients with intermediate or high inflammation who were physically active had disease-free survival rates that were not statistically significantly different from those with low inflammation.

Localized Rectal Cancer: Indian Consensus and Guidelines

The rising incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in India, particularly the prevalence of rectal cancer over colon cancer (0.7:1), has been a growing concern in recent decades; especially notable is the trend of increasing cases among young CRC patients. Given the diverse treatment approaches for rectal cancer globally and the varying economic capacities of patients in low to middle-income countries (LMICs) like India, it is essential to establish consensus guidelines that are specifically tailored to meet the needs of these patients. To achieve this, a panel comprising 30 eminent rectal cancer experts convened to conduct a comprehensive and impartial evaluation of existing practices and recent advancements in the field. Through meticulous scrutiny of published literature and a consensus-building process that involved voting on pertinent questions, the panel formulated management strategies. These recommendations are the result of a rigorous, evidence-based process and encapsulate the collective wisdom and judgment of leading authorities in the field.

Can we identify patients carrying targeted deleterious DPYD variants with plasma uracil and dihydrouracil? A GPCO-RNPGx retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is the main cause of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicities. The best strategy for identifying DPD-deficient patients is still not defined. The EMA recommends targeted DPYD genotyping or uracilemia (U) testing. We analyzed the concordance between both approaches.

METHODS

This study included 19,376 consecutive French patients with pre-treatment plasma U, UH2 and targeted DPYD genotyping (*2A, *13, D949V, *7) analyzed at Eurofins Biomnis (2015-2022).

RESULTS

Mean U was 9.9 ± 10.1 ng/mL (median 8.7, range 1.6-856). According to French recommendations, 7.3 % of patients were partially deficient (U 16-150 ng/mL) and 0.02 % completely deficient (U≥150 ng/mL). DPYD variant frequencies were *2A: 0.83 %, *13: 0.17 %, D949V: 1.16 %, *7: 0.05 % (2 homozygous patients with U at 22 and 856 ng/mL). Variant carriers exhibited higher U (median 13.8 vs. 8.6 ng/mL), and lower UH2/U (median 7.2 vs. 11.8) and UH2/U2 (median 0.54 vs. 1.37) relative to wild-type patients (p<0.00001). Sixty-six% of variant carriers exhibited uracilemia <16 ng/mL, challenging correct identification of DPD deficiency based on U. The sensitivity (% patients with a deficient phenotype among variant carriers) of U threshold at 16 ng/mL was 34 %. The best discriminant marker for identifying variant carriers was UH2/U2. UH2/U2<0.942 (29.7 % of patients) showed enhanced sensitivity (81 %) in identifying deleterious genotypes across different variants compared to 16 ng/mL U.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reaffirm the poor concordance between DPD phenotyping and genotyping, suggesting that both approaches may be complementary and that targeted DPYD genotyping is not sufficiently reliable to identify all patients with complete deficiency.

Stool and blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer management: an update on screening and disease monitoring

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers have revolutionized the management of colorectal cancer (CRC), facilitating early detection, prevention, personalized treatment, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This review explores current CRC screening strategies and emerging biomarker applications.

MAIN BODY

We summarize the landscape of non-invasive CRC screening and MRD detection strategies, discuss the limitations of the current approaches, and highlight the promising potential of novel biomarker solutions. The fecal immunochemical test remained the cornerstone of CRC screening, but its sensitivity has been improved by assays that combined its performance with other stool analytes. However, their sensitivity for advanced adenomas and the patient compliance both remain suboptimal. Blood-based tests promise to increase compliance but require further refinement to compete with stool-based biomarker tests. The ideal scenario involves leveraging blood tests to increase screening participation, and simultaneously promote stool- and endoscopy-based screening among those who are compliant. Once solely reliant on upfront surgery followed by stage and pathology-driven adjuvant chemotherapy, the treatment of stage II and III colon cancer has undergone a revolutionary transformation with the advent of MRD testing after surgery. A decade ago, the concept of using a post-surgical test instead of stage and pathology to determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy was disruptive. Today, a blood test may be more informative of the need for chemotherapy than the stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker research is not just improving, but bringing a transformative change to CRC clinical management. Early detection is not just getting better, but improving thanks to a multi-modality approach, and personalized treatment plans are not just becoming a reality, but a promising future with MRD testing.

Exploring the molecular profile of localized colon cancer: insights from the AIO Colopredict Plus registry

Introduction

Understanding the mutational landscape of colon cancer (CC) is crucial for targeted therapy development. Microsatellite instability (MSI-H), rat sarcoma (RAS), and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutations (MT) are pivotal markers. Further investigation into clinicopathological features of RAS and BRAF MT in microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI-H tumors is warranted.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 4883 localized CC patients (pts.) was conducted. Molecular profiling assessed MSI, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF MT. Correlation with clinicopathological data employed ANOVA and Chi-square tests. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed adjusting for age, gender, sidedness, UICC stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). A Cox model incorporated all variables as covariates.

Results

This analysis included 4883 pts. (2302 female/2572 male, 3865 (79.2%) MSS, 1018 (20.8%) MSI-H). MSS pts. had more All-Wild Type (WT), KRAS MT, and NRAS MT tumors vs. MSI-H pts. (42.1% vs. 21.1%; 39.8% vs. 15.4%; 3.6% vs. 0.7%; p<0.001 for each). BRAF MT tumors (95.5% BRAF V600E MT) were more prevalent in MSI-H individuals (62.8% vs. 8.1%, p<0.001). KRAS and BRAF MT tumors were more frequently right-sided, while BRAF MT tumors were associated with female gender, advanced disease stage, lymph node positivity, and poorer differentiation in the MSS subset (p<0.001). Common KRAS mutations included p.G12D (30.44%) and p.G12V (21.3%) in MSS and p.G13D (28.9%) and p.G12D (22.37%) in MSI-H. NRAS MT tumors were dominated by codon 61 mutations (51.7%). Survival analysis revealed worst prognosis in BRAF MT MSS tumors (DFS: HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.15-2.62, p=0.009; OS: HR 1.61 (95% CI 0.99-2.6), p=0.055). The 3-years DFS and 5-years OS rates were lowest in this subset (61.6% and 57.7% respectively).

Discussion

These findings highlight the complex interplay between molecular subtypes, clinicopathological features, and survival outcomes in early CC. Further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms and develop personalized treatment strategies.

The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage III disease is recognized as a standard treatment and is routinely performed in patients with colon cancer (CC). However, the recommendation for AC is mainly based on studies performed in past environments, where D3 lymphadenectomy was not routinely performed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CC patients who underwent curative resection with D3 lymphadenectomy in Keio Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (K-SEER) database. After patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 84 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the AC and non-AC groups in the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; 88.01% vs. 81.46%, p = 0.295) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS; 69.57 vs. 70.08%, p = 0.820), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, AC improved both the CSS [hazard ratio (HR)0.273; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.094-0.797, p = 0.017] and RFS (HR 0.376; 95% CI 0.174-0.806, p = 0.012) only for tumors with N2 disease compared to non-AC.

CONCLUSION

The current indications for AC in patients with CC after D3 lymphadenectomy should be reconsidered. It is possible that AC is appropriate only for stage III CC patients with N2 disease.

A novel risk classification model integrating CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage for stage 3 colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the IDEA-France trial

BACKGROUND

We assessed the added value of incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and pathological TN (pTN) stage for risk classification in stage 3 colon cancer (CC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed postoperative CEA values in patients with CC from the IDEA-France phase 3 trial. The relation between disease-free survival (DFS) and CEA was modeled through restricted cubic splines. Prognostic value of CEA, ctDNA, and pTN was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic and predictive factors for DFS.

RESULTS

Among 696 patients (35%), CEA values were retrievable, and for 405 (20%) both CEA and ctDNA were available. An optimized CEA threshold of 2 ng/mL was identified, the 3-year DFS was 66.4% for patients above the threshold and 80.9% for those below (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.33-2.28, P < .001). In multivariate analysis, CEA ≥ 2 ng/mL contributed significantly to model variability, becoming an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 1.82; 95% CI,1.27-2.59), alongside ctDNA (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.16-3.03) and pTN (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.54). A novel integrated risk classification combining CEA, ctDNA, and pTN stage reclassified 19.8% of pT4/N2 patients as low risk and 2.5% of pT3/N1 patients as high risk. This new classification demonstrated the 3-year DFS of 80.8% for low-risk patients and 55.4% for high-risk patients (HR, 2.66, 95% CI, 1.84-3.86, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative CEA value is a prognostic factor for DFS in stage 3 CC, independently of ctDNA and pTN. It advocates for systematic reporting in future adjuvant trials. Integrating both biomarkers with pTN could refine risk classification in stage 3 CC.

Essential updates 2022-2023: Surgical and adjuvant therapies for locally advanced colorectal cancer

Pivotal articles that had been published between 2022 and 2023 on surgical and perioperative adjuvant treatments for locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) were reviewed. This review focuses on new evidence in the following areas: optimization of surgical procedures for colon cancer, including the optimal length of bowel resection and use of the no-touch isolation technique; minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, such as laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic surgery; neoadjuvant treatments for rectal cancer, including total neoadjuvant therapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer; and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II and III colon cancer. Although the current understanding may not enable perfect decision-making for patients and medical professionals, ongoing advancements are expected to result in more effective personalized treatment plans, ultimately improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Predicting long-term survival among patients with HCC

BACKGROUND

Prognosticating survival among patients with HCC and cirrhosis must account for both the tumor burden/stage, as well as the severity of the underlying liver disease. Although there are many staging systems used to guide therapy, they have not been widely adopted to predict patient-level survival after the diagnosis of HCC. We sought to develop a score to predict long-term survival among patients with early- to intermediate-stage HCC using purely objective criteria.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study among patients with HCC confined to the liver, without major medical comorbidities within the Veterans Health Administration from 2014 to 2023. Tumor data were manually abstracted and combined with clinical and laboratory data to predict 5-year survival from HCC diagnosis using accelerated failure time models. The data were randomly split using a 75:25 ratio for training and validation. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed and compared to other HCC staging systems.

RESULTS

The cohort included 1325 patients with confirmed HCC. A risk score using baseline clinical, laboratory, and HCC-related survival had excellent discrimination (integrated AUC: 0.71 in the validation set) and calibration (based on calibration plots and Brier scores). Models had superior performance to the BCLC and ALBI scores and similar performance to the combined BCLC-ALBI score.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a risk score using purely objective data to accurately predict long-term survival for patients with HCC. This score, if validated, can be used to prognosticate survival for patients with HCC, and, in the setting of liver transplantation, can be incorporated to consider the net survival benefit of liver transplantation versus other curative options.

A standing platform for cancer drug development using ctDNA-based evidence of recurrence

The time required to conduct clinical trials limits the rate at which we can evaluate and deliver new treatment options to patients with cancer. New approaches to increase trial efficiency while maintaining rigor would benefit patients, especially in oncology, in which adjuvant trials hold promise for intercepting metastatic disease, but typically require large numbers of patients and many years to complete. We envision a standing platform - an infrastructure to support ongoing identification and trial enrolment of patients with cancer with early molecular evidence of disease (MED) after curative-intent therapy for early-stage cancer, based on the presence of circulating tumour DNA. MED strongly predicts subsequent recurrence, with the vast majority of patients showing radiographic evidence of disease within 18 months. Such a platform would allow efficient testing of many treatments, from small exploratory studies to larger pivotal trials. Trials enrolling patients with MED but without radiographic evidence of disease have the potential to advance drug evaluation because they can be smaller (given high probability of recurrence) and faster (given short time to recurrence) than conventional adjuvant trials. Circulating tumour DNA may also provide a valuable early biomarker of treatment effect, which would allow small signal-finding trials. In this Perspective, we discuss how such a platform could be established.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration and Disease-Free Survival in Low-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer with N1a-b and N1c Disease: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) are known to have a poor prognosis independent of lymph node (LN) involvement and are considered equivalent to LN metastases in the latest staging system. In stage III colon cancer (CC), high-risk patients (pT4 or pN2) receive 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, while low-risk patients (pT1-3 and N1) are recommended either 3 or 6 months of CAPOX or 6 months of FOLFOX therapy. However, the optimal chemotherapy duration for low-risk patients classified as pN1c remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy duration (3 months vs. 6 months) on survival in patients with low-risk stage III CC either in pN1a-b and pN1c patient groups.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage III CC who underwent surgery at a tertiary center between January 2014 and May 2024. Demographic and pathological data of patients were retrospectively collected. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included. Among the patients, 116 were pT1-3N1a-b and 26 were pT1-3N1c. Local (23.1% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) and overall (38.5% vs 14.6%, P = 0.011) recurrences were significantly higher in the pN1c group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no significant impact of adjuvant chemotherapy duration on DFS in the pN1a-b group (P = 0.359), whereas in the pN1c group, 3-month chemotherapy resulted in significantly shorter DFS (P = 0.044) in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that shorter duration of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with worse survival and 6-month chemotherapy is recommended for patients with pT1-3 and N1c disease.

Sex differences in recovery from postoperative sarcopenia during adjuvant CAPOX therapy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Women are predisposed to develop intolerance to cancer chemotherapy. Sarcopenia and chemotherapy are mutually related. Women are generally intolerable to chemotherapeutics such as 5-fluorouracil. Although adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, e.g. CAPOX is commonly used to treat colorectal cancer, its effects on patients in terms of sarcopenia and sex remain unknown. We investigated sex disparities in the impacts of CAPOX on body composition in this study.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study on diagnostic metrics used for sarcopenia in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant CAPOX. Evaluations of the nutritional status by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), gait speed, grip strength, skeletal muscle mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content using a body composition analyzer were performed in the first, fourth, and eighth cycles of CAPOX (first, second, and third measurements, respectively).

RESULTS

Among 80 eligible patients, 61 completed four CAPOX cycles. The median differences in MNA, gait, grip strength, muscle mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content between the first and second measurements for men (n = 35) and women (n = 26) were + 10.5% and + 2.9% (p = 0.067), + 4.5% and - 2.6% (p = 0.16), + 1.8% and + 2.8% (p = 0.66), + 2.7% and + 1.3% (p = 0.021), + 4.5% and + 3.5% (p = 0.59), and + 3.3% and + 0.0% (p = 0.006), There were no sex differences in comparisons of the above metrics between the first and third measurements in 34 patients who completed eight CAPOX cycles (19 wen and 15 women).

CONCLUSIONS

Early cycles of adjuvant CAPOX may have a negative impact on the postoperative recovery of several metrics for diagnosing sarcopenia in women.