Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

Head-to-head comparison of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment of HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with real-world data from the OPAL registry

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDKIs) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard-of-care in the first-line treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. In the absence of direct head-to-head trials comparing the efficacy and safety of the different CDKIs, the individual choice of treatment in everyday practice is complex. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to emulate a head-to-head comparison of palbociclib +ET (PALBO) and ribociclib +ET (RIBO) in patients recruited into the prospective, observational, multicenter registry platform OPAL (NCT03417115). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life surveys were analyzed, also for subgroups stratified by treatment-free interval (TFI). A total of 623 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer received PALBO (n = 388) or RIBO (n = 235) in their first line of treatment. No difference between PALBO and RIBO was found for PFS (median 26.7 months [23.6, 30.7] vs. 27.0 months [21.1, 30.4], HR 1.01 [0.80, 1.27]) and OS (median 42.4 months [38.8, 50.3] vs. 49.3 months [36.9, NA], HR 0.96 [0.71, 1.28]). There was a trend for longer PFS and OS in patients with TFI <12 months receiving RIBO. Patients reported comparable side effects for both CDKIs. This head-to-head comparison revealed no difference in PFS and OS between PALBO and RIBO, however, a trend to longer PFS and OS with RIBO was observed in the subgroup of patients with TFI <12 months. Side effects experienced with PALBO and RIBO highlight the important toxicities to be addressed during treatment decision.

Discovery of 2,4-quinazolinedione derivatives as LC3B recruiters in the facilitation of protein complex degradations

Targeted protein degradation through autophagosome-tethering compounds (ATTECs) that bypasses the ubiquitination process has garnered increasing attention. LC3B, a key protein in autophagosome formation, recruits substrates into the autophagy-lysosome system for degradation. In this study, we systematically optimized 2,4-quinazolinedione derivatives as LC3B-recruiting fragments, utilizing the CDK9 indicator. By attaching the designed LC3B-recruiting fragment to CDK9 inhibitor SNS-032 through a linker, the resulting bifunctional ATTEC molecule simultaneously degraded CDK9 and its associated Cyclin T1. Two-dimensional NMR experiments confirmed the direct interaction between the novel LC3B-recruiting fragments and LC3B. Mechanistic studies elucidated that degradation occurred via an LC3B-dependent autophagy-lysosomal pathway. Additionally, the general applicability of leveraging LC3B-recruiting fragments linked to inhibitors for the targeted degradation of protein complexes was validated with PRC2 and CDK2/4/6 along with their respective Cyclins. This work provides a series of novel LC3B-recruiting fragments that enrich the ATTEC toolbox and can be applied to the degradation of diverse intracellular disease-causing proteins.

Pseudo acute kidney injury in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. However, all CDK4/6i may increase creatinine levels, which can indicate kidney injury. In vitro research has shown that CDK4/6i can also inhibit tubular secretion of creatinine, thereby causing the phenomenon 'pseudo-acute kidney injury (pseudo-AKI)'. The incidence of pseudo-AKI is, however, unknown. We aimed to determine this incidence by assessing cystatin C, a protein filtered in the glomerulus without being subject to tubular secretion, in patients with creatinine increase during CDK4/6i treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre cohort study patients with breast cancer who received CDK4/6 inhibitors between January 1st 2017 and December 29th 2023 were screened for the incidence of creatinine increases suggesting potential kidney injury in the first six months of treatment. A significant creatinine increase was defined as 1) a creatinine plasma level of >90 µmol/L in women or >115 µmol/L in men and >10% increase from baseline creatinine plasma level or 2) a creatinine plasma level >1.5 times baseline creatinine or 3) an increase in creatinine plasma level from baseline with >26 µmol/L. Pseudo-AKI was diagnosed if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using cystatin C at the moment of creatinine increase was 1) equal or higher than eGFR using creatinine at baseline and/or 2) at least 25% higher than eGFR using creatinine at the moment of creatinine increase. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with pseudo-AKI analysed by means of the binomial probability test.

RESULTS

Of the 234 patients treated with a CDK4/6i, 41 (17.5%) had creatinine levels indicating an AKI. From 22 of these 41 patients, cystatin C could be determined in retrospectively available serum. Pseudo-AKI was found in 16 out of 22 patients (73%, 95% CI 50-89%). In 5 out of 41 patients (12%) the CDK4/6i dose was unjustly adjusted or the drug was stopped due to creatinine increase.

CONCLUSION

Pseudo-AKI has a high incidence in patients treated with CDK4/6i. Determining an eGFR based on the cystatin C value should therefore be considered as the first step when creatinine increases during CDK4/6i treatment.

Impact of adding palbociclib on treatment adherence to ongoing adjuvant endocrine treatment in the global randomized PALLAS randomized trial in patients with early breast cancer

PURPOSE

Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and more objective measures, we evaluated adherence to adjuvant palbociclib and ET in the PALLAS trial, and the impact of palbociclib on ET adherence.

METHODS

The open-label, global, phase 3 PALLAS trial randomized patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative stage II-III breast cancer (1:1) to either 26 cycles of palbociclib (125 mg/day for 21 days and then 7 days off) plus adjuvant ET, versus ET alone. After 23.7 months median follow-up, palbociclib was stopped due to futility of the intervention and patients were moved to follow-up. For each cycle, daily adherence to ET was measured with study diaries; for palbociclib, study diaries and pill counts. At cycles 2, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, patients completed the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 plus an additional item and the McHorney Adherence Questionnaire. Mean persistence was defined in months from treatment initiation to cessation.

RESULTS

Four thousand six hundred eighty-eight of 5796 total PALLAS participants were included. Across all cycles, mean daily ET adherence values measured by study diary were > 98.0% and did not differ between treatment arms. Mean persistence to ET was similar between arms (19.2 months for palbociclib + ET vs. 19.6 months for ET alone). However, patient-reported maximal ET adherence was higher across time for palbociclib + ET compared to ET alone (p ≤ 0.0001, modified MMAS-4; p = 0.05, McHorney).

CONCLUSION

In the PALLAS trial, addition of palbociclib did not decrease adherence to adjuvant ET. Though numbers declined over time, daily adherence for palbociclib and ET remained relatively high at each cycle.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02513394; 07-31-2015) and EudraCT (2014-005181-30).

Final Survival Results from the Penelope-B trial investigating palbociclib vs placebo for patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy - PENELOPE-B

BACKGROUND

The addition of 1-year of palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo in the PENELOPE-B trial. Here we report the final survival results for the PENELOPE-B trial.

METHODS

The PENELOPE-B trial investigated whether adding 1 year of palbociclib to ET in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) patients with residual disease and high relapse risk (CPS-EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) after taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy would improve patient survival. Patients (n=1250) were randomly assigned to receive either palbociclib 125 mg or placebo d1-21 q4w for 13 cycles in addition to ET.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 77.8 months, we recorded 225 deaths (108 palbociclib; 117 placebo) with 6-year overall survival (OS) rate of 82.4% in the palbociclib arm vs. 80.3% in the placebo arm [hazard rationHR0.87, 95% CI 0.67-1.14, p=0.31]. No significant improvement was noted for palbociclib vs placebo for iDFS, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) or locoregional relapse rate (LRR), even with longer follow-up. Upon stratified analysis, we found no benefits across major subgroups. However, exploratory post-hoc analyses of the lobular BC (LBC) subgroup indicated a trend towards better survival outcomes in favour of palbociclib HR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.19-1.07, p=0.062) for OS and 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.97, p=0.035) for iDFS.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that palbociclib did not significantly improve survival outcomes in the overall population. Exploratory post-hoc analyses suggested a trend towards better iDFS outcome in patients with lobular breast cancer receiving palbociclib.

Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

RESULTS

This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal P = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal P < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% v 7%; nominal P = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.

CONCLUSION

Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.

Novel technetium-99m-labelled ribociclib isocyanide derivatives for imaging cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) expression in cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) plays a crucial role in cell cycle regulation, is overexpressed in various cancers and is an important target in the development of radiotracers for tumour imaging. Despite the increasing recognition of CDK4/6 inhibitors in cancer therapy, their application is limited by the lack of suitable biomarkers. Herein, we developed a series of technetium-99m-labelled CDK4/6 radiotracers and utilized a linker optimization strategy to reduce their abdominal uptake and enhance their imaging properties. By introducing polyethylene glycol chains (PEGn, n = 2, 3, or 4) of different lengths, we successfully prepared the first technetium-99m-labelled ribociclib isocyanide derivatives via a one-step method. After rapid screening, we selected [99mTc]Tc-RIB-PEG4-CN (LogD7.4 = 0.01 ± 0.01) because of its superior uptake in the cell lines and suitable nontarget uptake in vivo. Additionally, it displayed nanomolar affinity (5.887 ± 0.3579 nM). In HCT116 xenograft models, the probe exhibited significant tumour uptake (2.44 ± 0.29 % ID/g at 4 h p.i.) while maintaining reduced abdominal uptake. Moreover, the probe showed specificity in HCT116 xenograft models, as evidenced by a 49.2 % decrease in the tumour-to-muscle ratio in the presence of excess ribociclib for blocking. Micro-SPECT/CT images of HCT116 and MCF-7 xenografts revealed the liver metabolism of [99mTc]Tc-RIB-PEG4-CN, with robust tumour retention and comparatively low abdominal uptake at 4 h p.i. This novel radiotracer enables the noninvasive evaluation of CDK4/6 expression, providing valuable insights for clinical treatment strategies and further mechanistic studies.

Models of Early Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors Unveil Potential Therapeutic Treatment Sequencing

BACKGROUND

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with hormone therapies have demonstrated clinical benefit in HR+, HER2- breast cancer patients. However, the onset of resistance remains a concern and highlights a need for therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to develop an in vitro model to better understand the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i + hormone therapies and identify therapeutic strategies with potential to overcome this resistance.

METHODS

The HR+, HER2- T47D breast cancer cell line genetically modified with a Geminin-Venus reporter construct was treated with CDK4/6i (abemaciclib or palbociclib) in combination with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (tamoxifen). Resistant cells were identified by cell sorting for Geminin (%GEM+), a marker of the S/G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and confirmed by treatment with tamoxifen plus the CDK4/6i used to drive resistance. In resistant cells, following treatment with CDK4/6i + ET (tamoxifen or fulvestrant), the effects on cell proliferation (%GEM+) and viability, gene expression, and protein analysis to evaluate CDK4/6-cyclin D complex composition were examined.

RESULTS

Palbociclib + tamoxifen-resistant (PTxR) cells treated with abemaciclib + ET showed decreased %GEM+, %Ki67, and colony formation ability, compared to abemaciclib + tamoxifen-resistant (ATxR) cells treated with palbociclib + ET. Additionally, PTxR cells showed increased CDK4-p21 interaction, compared to ATxR. The CDK6 levels were greater in ATxR cells compared to PTxR cells, associated with CDK4/6i resistance. Additionally, abemaciclib + fulvestrant continued to robustly decrease pRb levels in PTxR models compared to palbociclib + fulvestrant in ATxR models. Transcriptome analysis revealed a depression of the cell cycle and E2F- and Rb-related genes in PTxR cells following treatment with abemaciclib + ET, not present in ATxR cells treated with palbociclib + ET. Both resistant models showed increased EGFR-related gene expression.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, we describe CDK4/6i-dependent mechanisms resulting in early-onset resistance to CDK4/6i + ET, using clinically relevant drug concentrations, in preclinical breast cancer cell models. The characterization of these preclinical models post progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor + ET treatment highlights the potential that the specific sequencing of CDK4/6 inhibitors could offer to overcome acquired resistance to CDK4/6i + ET. Abemaciclib + fulvestrant is currently under clinical investigation in patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer and progression on prior CDK4/6i + ET (NCT05169567, postMONARCH).

A meta-analysis and systematic review of different cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer by using meta-analysis.

Methods

To gather comprehensive and reliable data for our analysis, we systematically searched multiple databases for relevant studies. We utilized RevMan5.3 software to perform the meta-analysis.

Results

Following a rigorous screening and evaluation process, we ultimately included a total of 13 studies in our analysis. Our findings showed that compared to endocrine therapy alone, the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy significantly increased both PFS [HR 0.54 (95%CI: 0.50, 0.58), P<0.00001], OS [HR 0.77 (95%CI: 0.50, 0.58), P<0.00001] and ORR [RR 1.39 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.60), P<0.00001). However, it was also found that CDK4/6 inhibitors caused adverse drug reactions related to the blood system and digestive system (P<0.0001).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy can result in improved PFS and OS for HR+ breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, we recommend close monitoring and management of these potential side effects when utilizing these inhibitors in breast cancer treatment.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023490499.

How are we allocating physicians to deal with breast cancer in men and women in Brazil?

BACKGROUND

Female breast cancer (FBC) is a well-known public health issue worldwide. However, male breast cancer (MBC), though rare, may be overlooked by both public health authorities and clinicians. Both diseases exhibit similarities, and understanding their behavior over time is crucial to grasping their annual impact on many citizens. Furthermore, analyzing if medical personnel are well allocated and influence disease outcomes in a limited setting such as the Public Health System (PHS) is of utmost importance.

METHODS

This ecological study utilized secondary data from 2008 to 2020 to explore the relationship between the number of doctors per 100,000 inhabitants and mortality from FBC and MBC in Brazil. All data were sourced from Brazil's PHS. Mortality rates were analyzed by age and standardized according to the World Health Organization's population figures. The number of physicians was calculated per 100,000 inhabitants. A linear regression analysis was performed using a stepwise selection/backward elimination approach.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2020, Brazil recorded 195,969 breast cancer-related deaths among adults, including 2,220 male victims. The majority of these deaths occurred in the Southeast region among patients older than 50 years. Although both MBC and FBC demonstrated increasing trends over the study period, no correlation was found between the number of physicians and mortality rates for MBC. Conversely, an increase in primary care physicians over the years was positively correlated with mortality rates for FBC (p < 0.05). In addition, the number of physicians in the PHS (β = -0.163; 95% CI: -0.240 to -0.085; p = 0.002), oncologists (β = -0.507; 95% CI: -0.881 to -0.134; p = 0.015), and radiotherapists (β = -6.402; 95% CI: -12.357 to -0.446; p = 0.039) all showed an inverse association with FBC mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing trends in FBC and MBC underscore the need for urgent monitoring. Lower FBC mortality correlates with higher numbers of physicians and specialized care, highlighting the critical role of healthcare workforce capacity and the strategic allocation of specialized personnel in enhancing patient outcomes.

Kinase Plasticity in Response to Vandetanib Enhances Sensitivity to Tamoxifen in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) is common in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Multiple studies have demonstrated that upregulation of MAPK signaling pathways contributes to ET resistance. Herein we show that vandetanib treatment enhances sensitivity to ET in ET-sensitive and -resistant ER+ breast cancer models. Vandetanib treatment alters the gene expression program of ER+ breast cancer cells resulting in a less proliferative and more estrogen responsive Luminal-A like character. Tyrosine kinase network reprogramming was assessed using multiplexed kinase inhibitor beads-mass spectrometry (MIB/MS) assay to identify adaptive resistance mechanisms to vandetanib treatment, including upregulation of HER2 activity. Co-treatment to inhibit HER2 with lapatinib enhanced sensitivity to vandetanib, demonstrating biologic activity of HER2 upregulation. Using a CRISPR knockout model, we demonstrate that vandetanib effects are partially mediated by RET receptor tyrosine kinase. Finally, we use our operating room-to-laboratory assay that measures drug response in individual primary tumor cells in short term cultures to demonstrate conserved gene expression changes, including increased HER2 activity signatures, in vandetanib treated cells, and identify features associated with vandetanib response. These results support future investigation of RET targeting strategies considering reprogrammed networks, such as activated HER2, in patients with ET resistant ER+ breast cancer.

Phase I study of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) with spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) with and without fulvestrant in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer or advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence suggests that cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors enhance antitumor immunity. We conducted a phase I trial of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) plus spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). The combination was also evaluated with fulvestrant in MBC.

METHODS

In Cohort A, ribociclib was administered on Days 1-21 (28-day cycle) starting at 400 mg, and spartalizumab at 400 mg on Day 1. Dose escalation was followed by expansion in AOC. Fulvestrant was added (Cohort B) with a safety run-in followed by expansion in MBC. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and safety and tolerability of the combinations.

RESULTS

33 patients enrolled (n=18, Cohort A; n=15, Cohort B). The RP2D of ribociclib in both cohorts was 600 mg. Treatment-related adverse events in >20% of patients in either cohort were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertransaminasemia, maculopapular rash, fatigue, and nausea. Hypertransaminasemia occurred in 66.7% (AST) and 46.7% (ALT) of patients in Cohort B, including 46.7% and 40.0%, respectively, of grade 3 or 4 events. Two confirmed partial responses were observed (13.3%) in Cohort B, in patients with low baseline serum thymidine kinase activity, coupled with an increase on-treatment. Peripheral blood flow cytometry across patients demonstrated on-target drug binding with increases in PD-1 occupancy and activated CD8+ T cells during treatment, irrespective of response. PD-L1-positivity, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, or tumor mutational burden did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). Several copy-number variations detected with next-generation sequencing correlated with PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribociclib with spartalizumab and fulvestrant showed limited efficacy and elevated hepatotoxicity, precluding further development. Correlative analyses revealed treatment-induced immunological effects, and genomic alterations associated with PFS.

Advances in CDK4 and 6 Inhibitors: Transforming Breast Cancer Treatment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm worldwide and the most prevalent one among women. It represents the leading cause of cancer-related death among females. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors disrupt the cell cycle, inducing cellular senescence and, ultimately, apoptosis. Consequently, they have become a novel type of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer characterised by positive hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, analysing the available literature on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors published over the last five years. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding these drugs to the standard endocrine therapy for this pathology.

RESULTS

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy was shown to improve progression-free survival, overall survival, and chemotherapy-free intervals in patients who received this combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer with positive hormone receptors and HER-2 negative significantly improved PFS, median survival, and chemotherapy-free intervals compared with the use of hormonal treatments alone or in combination with a placebo. Currently, CDK4/6 inhibitors are becoming established as a new standard treatment for this pathology, offering lower toxicity than chemotherapy. However, it is necessary to deeply investigate the mechanisms of treatment resistance and develop effective therapies to overcome them.

Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies molecular biomarkers predicting late progression to CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy are the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Despite the efficacy of CDK4/6is, intrinsic resistance occurs in approximately one-third of patients, highlighting the need for reliable predictive biomarkers.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing analyzed metastatic tumors from HR+/HER2- mBC patients pre-CDK4/6i treatment at baseline (BL) and/or at disease progression. BL samples were from CDK4/6i responders (median progression-free survival [mPFS] = 25.5 months), while progressors were categorized as early-progressors (EP, mPFS = 3 months) and late-progressors (LP, mPFS = 11 months). Metastatic sites included liver, pleural effusions, ascites, and bone. InferCNV distinguished tumor cells, and functional analysis utilized the Molecular Signatures Database.

RESULTS

LP tumors displayed enhanced Myc, EMT, TNF-α, and inflammatory pathways compared to those EP tumors. Samples from BL and LP responders showed increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells compared to EP non-responders. Notably, despite a high frequency of CD8+ T cells in responding tumors, a functional analysis revealed significant upregulation of genes associated with stress and apoptosis in proliferative CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in BL tumors compared to in EP and LP tumors. These genes, including HSP90 and HSPA8, are linked to resistance to PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. A ligand-receptor analysis showed enhanced interactions associated with inhibitory T-cell proliferation (SPP1-CD44) and suppression of immune activity (MDK-NCL) in LP tumors. Longitudinal biopsies consistently revealed dynamic NK cell expansion and enhanced cytotoxic T cell activity, alongside upregulation of immune activity inhibition, in LP tumors compared to in BL tumors. Notably, the predictive biomarker panel from BL tumor cells was validated in 2 independent cohorts, where it consistently predicted a significant improvement in mPFS duration in signature-high versus -low groups.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the significance of molecular biomarkers in predicting clinical outcomes to CDK4/6i. Tumor-infiltration CD8+ T and NK cells may also serve as baseline predictors. These insights pave the way for optimizing therapeutic strategies based on microenvironment-specific changes, providing a personalized and effective approach for managing HR+/HER2- mBC and improving patient outcomes.

The PRC2.1 subcomplex opposes G1 progression through regulation of CCND1 and CCND2

Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

Hematological toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis and pharmacovigilance study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of hematological adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs related to abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the risks of hematological AEs, and a disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals of hematological AEs.

RESULTS

16 RCTs comprising 16,350 breast cancer patients were included. Palbociclib and ribociclib had similar risks for hematological AEs, except a higher risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia observed with palbociclib (risk ratio [RR]: 7.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-41.28). Abemaciclib had a higher risk of anemia than both ribociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.25 - 3.96; grade 3-4: RR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.59 - 8.11) and palbociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.03 - 2.59), but a lower risk of grade 3-4 of both leukopenia (RR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.49) and neutropenia (RR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04 - 0.52) compared with palbociclib. Signals indicating occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were identified for three CDK4/6 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib showed significant but inconsistent hematological toxicity risks.

Efficacy of first-line CDK 4-6 inhibitors in premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to treatment-related neutropenia on efficacy: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia.

Evaluating generalizability of oncology trial results to real-world patients using machine learning-based trial emulations

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating anti-cancer agents often lack generalizability to real-world oncology patients. Although restrictive eligibility criteria contribute to this issue, the role of selection bias related to prognostic risk remains unclear. In this study, we developed TrialTranslator, a framework designed to systematically evaluate the generalizability of RCTs for oncology therapies. Using a nationwide database of electronic health records from Flatiron Health, this framework emulates RCTs across three prognostic phenotypes identified through machine learning models. We applied this approach to 11 landmark RCTs that investigated anti-cancer regimens considered standard of care for the four most prevalent advanced solid malignancies. Our analyses reveal that patients in low-risk and medium-risk phenotypes exhibit survival times and treatment-associated survival benefits similar to those observed in RCTs. In contrast, high-risk phenotypes show significantly lower survival times and treatment-associated survival benefits compared to RCTs. Our results were corroborated by a comprehensive robustness assessment, including examinations of specific patient subgroups, holdout validation and semi-synthetic data simulation. These findings suggest that the prognostic heterogeneity among real-world oncology patients plays a substantial role in the limited generalizability of RCT results. Machine learning frameworks may facilitate individual patient-level decision support and estimation of real-world treatment benefits to guide trial design.

CXCR4 promotes tumor stemness maintenance and CDK4/6 inhibitors resistance in ER-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

CDK4/6 inhibitors have significantly improved the survival of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, becoming a first-line treatment option. However, the development of resistance to these inhibitors is inevitable. To address this challenge, novel strategies are required to overcome resistance, necessitating a deeper understanding of its mechanisms. Recent research has identified several dysregulated genes in CDK4/6 inhibitors-resistant breast cancer, but the underlying mechanism is complex due to tumor heterogeneity and warrants further investigation.

METHODS

RNA sequencing and KEGG pathway analysis was carried out to identify the mainly dysregulated genes in CDK4/6 inhibitors-resistant breast cancer cells. The effects of CXCR4 knockdown and overexpression via siRNAs and plasmids transfection were examined by mammosphere formation, RT-qPCR, flow cytometry, MTT and colony formation assays. The regulation mechanisms were analyzed by RT-qPCR, western blotting and immunofluorescence experiments. Mouse xenografts were used to analyze the role of CXCR4 in regulation palbociclib sensitivity in vivo. Additionally, we collected the clinical samples and performed immunohistochemistry to analyze the clinical significance of CXCR4.

RESULTS

In our study, we focused on cancer stem cells, a critical contributor to cancer metastasis and therapy resistance, and detected an upregulation of stemness in our established palbociclib-resistant ER-positive breast cancer cells. Additionally, our research pinpointed CXCR4 as a pivotal gene responsible for maintaining cancer stemness and promoting palbociclib resistance. Mechanistically, CXCR4 activates the WNT5A/β-catenin signaling pathway by enhancing the expression of WNT5A and β-catenin, facilitating the nuclear translocation of β-catenin protein. Targeting CXCR4 using siRNAs or small molecular inhibitors effectively reduces cancer stemness and reverses palbociclib resistance both in vitro and in vivo. Clinical sample analysis further underscores the overactivation of the CXCR4/WNT5A/β-catenin axis in palbociclib-resistant breast cancer, suggesting CXCR4 as a potential biomarker for predicting resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our study demonstrates that CXCR4 overexpression plays a vital role in maintaining breast cancer stemness and promoting resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors through the activation of the WNT5A/β-catenin pathway. Targeting CXCR4 may offer a promising therapeutic approach for advanced CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER-positive breast cancer.

Palliative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients on CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Safety Analysis

PURPOSE

CDK4/6 inhibitors require meticulous monitoring due to their potential to cause hematological toxicities and hepatotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety of combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 188 patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors between January 2021 and June 2024. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment interventions were extracted from medical records. The primary focus was on the incidence of grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities and hepatotoxicity, assessed according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria, in those receiving concurrent palliative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the 18-month PFS and OS rates were 67% and 85%, respectively. The median age was 57.5 years, and 79% of patients were post-menopausal. Bone and liver metastases were present in 66% and 23% of patients, respectively. Concurrent palliative radiotherapy was administered in 25% of the cohort. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity was comparable between those who received radiotherapy and those who did not. Ribociclib use was associated with lower rates of grade 3 hematologic toxicity (OR: 0.37), neutropenia (OR: 0.41), dose interruptions (OR: 0.30), and dose reductions (OR: 0.37). Pre-menopausal status was linked to fewer dose reductions (OR: 0.17). Rates of treatment interruption, dose reduction, and withdrawal were 55%, 24%, and 2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and palliative radiotherapy does not increase the incidence of hematological adverse events in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Optimizing therapeutic approaches for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: clinical perspectives on biomarkers and treatment strategies post-CDK4/6 inhibitor progression

This review offers an expert perspective on biomarkers, CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy, and therapeutic approaches for managing hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), particularly after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. Key trials have demonstrated that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS), with median durations ranging from 14.8 to 26.7 months, and overall survival (OS), with median durations reaching up to 53.7 months. Actionable biomarkers, such as PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations, have emerged as pivotal tools to guide second-line treatment decisions, enabling the use of targeted therapies like alpelisib and elacestrant and emphasizing the important role of biomarkers in guiding the selection of therapy. This overview aims to provide clinicians with a practical and up-to-date framework to inform treatment decisions and improve patient care in the context of this challenging disease. Additionally, we review emerging biomarkers and novel treatment strategies to address this difficult clinical landscape.

Real-World Experience with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Palliative Setting for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. Landmark trials have demonstrated a comparable progression-free survival (PFS) across CDK4/6 inhibitors, but the overall survival (OS) outcomes have varied. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world PFS and OS for palbociclib and ribociclib when combined with AIs in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated at a single academic center between 1 January 2015 and 1 December 2022. The baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment details were extracted. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the PFS and OS, and differences between the treatment groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included in the final analysis. The cohort was predominantly female (98.7%) and postmenopausal (77.3%), with 52.0% having de novo stage IV disease. Palbociclib was prescribed to 74.7% of the patients, and ribociclib to 25.3%. The patients receiving ribociclib were significantly younger (57.6 vs. 67.5 years, p = 0.013) and more likely to be premenopausal (42.1% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001). The real-world median PFS and OS for palbociclib were 20.3 months (95% CI: 14.8-46) and 37.2 months (95% CI: 20.3-not reached [NR]), respectively. For ribociclib, the median PFS and OS were not reached. The Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age and menopausal status found no significant differences between ribociclib and palbociclib for the PFS (HR = 0.92, p = 0.86) or OS (HR = 0.95, p = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world analysis, palbociclib demonstrated a median PFS consistent with the results from landmark trials, although the observed OS was shorter. The ribociclib-treated patients had a numerically longer PFS and OS compared with those treated with palbociclib, but the differences were not statistically significant. The discontinuation rates were similar between the two groups.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis on Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer After CDK4/6 Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase-II/-III randomized trials of ER + MBC post CDK4/6i + ET progression. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using generic inverse variance and odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method for adverse events (AEs) with Review-Manager version-5.4. NMA was executed using WINBUGS (Microsoft Excel). Three molecular subgroups were analyzed: HER2-low, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and the ESR1 mutation subgroup for selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD).

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. In the HER2-low group, Sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan had a similar efficacy (HR, 95% CI): PFS (0.98; 0.63-1.43) and OS (1.08; 0.76-1.55). In PI3K/AKT/mTOR-altered cases, capivasertib was superior to alpelisib PFS (0.77; 0.53-1.12), and OS (0.80; 0.48-1.35). SERDs had worse PFS and OS versus ongoing CDK 4/6i (ribociclib).

CONCLUSION

No therapy emerged as the unequivocal choice in the post-CDK 4/6i domain in unselected subgroups. In the HER2-low population, a similar efficacy and different toxicity spectrum was seen. In AKT-altered tumors, capivasertib was less toxic than alpelisib.

PROSPERO ID

CRD4202236412.

Lerociclib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy: LEONARDA-1 a phase III randomized trial

Lerociclib (GB491), a highly selective oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, has displayed anti-tumor activity and differentiated safety and tolerability profile in previous ph1/2 clinical trials. The LEONARDA-1, a randomized, double-blind, phase III study, was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lerociclib in HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients, who had relapsed or progressed on prior endocrine therapy. A total of 275 patients were randomized at 1:1 ratio to receive lerociclib (137 patients, 150 mg twice daily) or placebo (138 patients) plus fulvestrant. Progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by investigators was significantly improved in lerociclib arm versus placebo arm (11.07 vs 5.49 months; hazard ratio, 0.451, 95% CI: 0.311-0.656, P = 0.000016), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included PFS assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile. DOR is not reported, and OS data was immature at the data cut-off but unplanned ad hoc analysis is reported. These findings support lerociclib plus fulvestrant as a treatment option for patients with HR+/HER2- endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (ABC). (Funded by Genor Biopharma; LEONARDA-1 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05054751.).

Co-targeting of metabolism using dietary and pharmacologic approaches reduces breast cancer metastatic burden

Patients with metastatic breast cancer face reduced quality of life and increased mortality rates, necessitating more effective anti-cancer strategies. Building on previous research that identified metastatic-niche-specific metabolic vulnerabilities, we investigated how a ketogenic diet enhances estrogen receptor (ER)-positive liver metastatic breast cancer's response to Fulvestrant (Fulv) treatment. Using in vitro cell lines and in vivo xenograft metastasis mouse models, we examined the molecular mechanisms of combining ER targeting with a ketogenic diet. We found that Fulv treatment downregulates the ketogenesis pathway enzyme OXCT1, leading to β-hydroxybutyrate accumulation and decreased tumor cell viability. We also explored interactions between glucose, palmitic acid, and β-hydroxybutyric acid. These findings establish the molecular basis and clinical potential of a ketogenic diet to enhance Fulv efficacy in patients with ER+ liver metastatic breast cancer, potentially improving survival outcomes and quality of life in this population.

Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) use has revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. The choice of a specific CDK4/6i may be influenced by adverse events (AEs). Recently, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the possibility of switching between CDK4/6i for unacceptable toxicity. This study explores oncologists' experiences and future perspectives on CDK4/6 inhibitor switching following this new approval.

METHODS

With the support of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), we conducted a survey among 92 oncologists to assess the impact of AIFA's approval on patient management.

RESULTS

The survey showed that 48 % of participants were not surprised regarding AIFA's decision, with 76 % of respondents believing that this opportunity would significantly influence their treatment choices, enhancing AEs management for patients. Yet, 49 % of respondents emphasized the need for more real world evidence on CDK4/6i switch safety and efficacy. 96 % of respondents reported discontinuation rates between 0% and 25 % of patients, with constipation and hematological toxicity being the most frequent treatment discontinuation reasons. The oncologists prescribing CDK4/6i switch reported that most of these patients were in first line treatment (85 %) and the most common second CDK4/6i most frequently initiated was palbociclib (69 %), then abemaciclib (17 %) and ribociclib (14 %). Among those who started the second CDK4/6i at full dosage, 66 % of patients didn't require a dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

Our survey highlights the importance of allowing CDK4/6i switching, thus likely prompting oncologists to adapt their treatment choices, leading to better AEs management for improving patients' outcome.

Endocrine treatment mechanisms in triple-positive breast cancer: from targeted therapies to advances in precision medicine

Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), defined by the co-expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), poses unique therapeutic challenges due to complex signaling interactions and resulting treatment resistance. This review summarizes key findings on the molecular mechanisms and cross-talk among ER, PR, and HER2 pathways, which drive tumor proliferation and resistance to conventional therapies. Current strategies in TPBC treatment, including endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies, are explored alongside emerging approaches such as immunotherapy and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Additionally, we discuss the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its role in treatment resistance, highlighting promising avenues for intervention through combination therapies and predictive biomarkers. By addressing these interdependent pathways and optimizing therapeutic strategies, precision medicine holds significant potential for improving TPBC patient outcomes and advancing individualized cancer care.

Drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors in early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of PALLAS (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-13/PrE0109)

BACKGROUND

Concomitant intake of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may create drug-drug interactions, potentially impacting efficacy of anticancer agents. In the phase III PALLAS trial, the addition of palbociclib capsules to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). We explored whether concomitant use of PPIs affected survival outcomes in patients treated with palbociclib in PALLAS.

METHODS

This is an exploratory analysis of PALLAS including patients who received at least one dose of palbociclib capsules. We aimed to determine the association of concomitant PPI use with iDFS, distant relapse-free survival and overall survival. Uni- and multivariable Cox models with time-dependent PPI were used. The association between PPI use and neutropenia was also investigated.

RESULTS

Of 2840 patients treated with palbociclib + endocrine therapy, 525 (18.5%) had concomitant PPI and palbociclib intake. PPI intake was significantly associated with older age, post-menopausal status, use of aromatase inhibitors, higher body mass index, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (all P < 0.001). Concomitant PPI intake was not significantly associated with survival outcomes (iDFS, distant relapse-free survival, overall survival). All-grade neutropenia rates were numerically lower in patients who initiated a PPI before study start compared with patients never initiating PPIs (adjusted odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Our exploratory analysis did not demonstrate worse survival outcomes in patients receiving concomitant palbociclib and PPIs in PALLAS. Nonetheless, careful consideration of possible drug-drug interactions is important, especially when studying novel agents in the early breast cancer setting.

Real-world study of patients with HR+/ HER2- metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and fulvestrant

AIMS

To investigate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who initiated first-line palbociclib-fulvestrant.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Retrospective observational study of iKnowMed electronic health records among patients who initiated first-line palbociclib-fulvestrant between 1 February 2016 and 31 December 2019 and were followed through 30 June 2020. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were evaluated descriptively. Endpoints including real-world progression-free survival, overall survival, time to chemotherapy, real-world duration of therapy, and time to next treatment were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods from first-line treatment initiation.

RESULTS

317 patients were included (median age 67.3 years, 90.5% post-menopausal, 36.9% bone-only disease, 15.9 months median follow-up). Among those with prior adjuvant treatment (n = 269), 66.2% (n = 178) had disease-free intervals less than 12 months. Median real-world progression-free survival was 19.6 months (95% CI 15.2-23.6).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest favorable real-world clinical outcomes associated with first-line palbociclib-fulvestrant among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC. (clinical trial registration: NCT04498481).

ACK1/TNK2 kinase: molecular mechanisms and emerging cancer therapeutics

Activated CDC42-associated kinase 1 (ACK1), encoded by the TNK2 gene, is a cytoplasmic non-receptor tyrosine kinase whose aberrant activation correlates positively with cancer severity. Recent research has revealed the functional relevance of this oncokinase - it is an epigenetic regulator that drives cancer progression in multiple malignancies. Although ACK1 is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention, incomplete knowledge of its diverse signaling mechanisms and the lack of specific inhibitors have challenged its clinical success. We summarize recent breakthroughs in understanding ACK1 regulation and cellular signaling, and shed light on its immunomodulatory role in balancing T cell activation. We provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical, proof-of-concept studies of potent ACK1-targeting small-molecule inhibitors that are expected to enter clinical trials for cancer patients.

Who still needs surgical staging of the axilla for invasive breast cancer?

Sentinel lymphadenectomy may be safely omitted for postmenopausal patients with low-risk estrogen-receptor-positive cancers who have a negative pretreatment axillary ultrasound. Surgical staging should still be done for patients who are premenopausal or postmenopausal with high-risk estrogen receptor-positive cancers, for those having neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or those with estrogen-receptor-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive cancers.

Efficacy of radiotherapy for bone metastasis in breast cancer patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

In patients diagnosed withestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer, bone metastasesemerge as theprimary siteofsignificant tumor burden. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6i) inhibitorsare thegold standard in this clinical scenario, while radiotherapy (RT) represents a valuable addition. However, data on the efficacy of this combination remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of RT in bone metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

398 patients (pts) with ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer with bone metastases treated with CDK4/6i between 2018-2024 were analyzed. A total of 114 pts received 177 bone RT concurrently with CDK4/6i or within 6 months before CDK4/6i initiation, including 34 courses of stereotactic-body RT and 143 courses of conventional RT.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) in pts who received bone RT was 31.0 months, compared to 26.3 months in pts without bone RT. The 2-y PFS for pts with bone RT was 57.1 % [95 % CI: 46.3-66.6 %] vs. 53.2 % [95 % CI: 46.3-59.6 %] for patients without bone RT (p = 0.51). The median overall survival (OS) for pts who received bone RT was 49.1 months, compared to 40.5 months for pts without bone RT. The 3-y OS for pts with bone RT was 63.7 % [95 % CI: 51.5-73.5 %] vs. 55.0 % [95 % CI 46.6-62.6 %] for pts without bone RT (p = 0.50). The 3-y local control for irradiated patients was 86.9 % [95 % CI 72.2-94.1 %].

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we present the largest cohort published to date of breast cancer patients who received CDK4/6i alongside bone-directed RT. Although the observed differences in survival were not statistically significant, RT remains a viable treatment modality in metastatic breast cancer in some patients.

CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance in ER+ Breast Cancer

The cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. The ability of these drugs to improve the outcome of patients both in the metastatic and the early setting has been largely demonstrated. However, resistance, either de novo or acquired, represents a major clinical challenge. In the past years, efforts have been made to identify biomarkers that might help in a better selection of patients or to unravel the mechanisms leading to resistance in order to develop new therapeutic strategies to overcome it. Alterations of cell cycle-related genes and proteins are among the best characterized markers of resistance, and pathways impacting the cell cycle, including nuclear and growth factor receptors signaling, have been thoroughly investigated. Despite this, to date, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are administered based only on the hormone receptor and HER2 status of the tumor, and patients progressing on therapy are managed with currently available treatments. Here we summarize present knowledge on the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors' mechanisms of action, efficacy data, and mechanisms of resistance.

Real-world comparison of palbociclib, abemaciclib, and dalpiciclib as first-line treatments for Chinese HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer patients: a multicenter study (YOUNGBC-28)

Background

In recent years, the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) has emerged as the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, the comparison between the efficacy of CDK4/6i has been poorly explored before. Moreover, it remains unclear about the optimal choice of CDK4/6i in the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2- MBC patients in Asian, especially Chinese populations.

Objectives

Our study aims to compare the efficacy of three CDK4/6i widely used in the Chinese population (palbociclib, abemaciclib, and dalpiciclib) in the real world.

Design

From 2020 to 2023, the medical records of patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- MBC were retrospectively assessed in seven institutions in China. Patients who received first-line palbociclib, abemaciclib, or dalpiciclib plus ET were included.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate were used to analyze the clinical outcome.

Results

In total, 209 HR+/HER2- MBC patients were eligible for this study. Eighty-eight (42.1%), 79 (37.8%), and 42 (20.1%) patients were administered first-line palbociclib, abemaciclib, or dalpiciclib plus ET. The overall median rwPFS was 19 months, with no significant difference between these three CDK4/6i (p = 0.84). The results were similar even after propensity score matching. The median OS was not reached. Cox univariate and multivariate regression analysis identified that higher KI67 index, liver metastasis, and primary endocrine resistance were independent risk factors for rwPFS in patients with initial CDK4/6i plus ET.

Conclusion

This study presents a comparison of the real-world efficacy between three CDK4/6i widely used in the Chinese population. Palbociclib, abemaciclib, and dalpiciclib demonstrated comparable efficacy in Chinese patients with advanced HR+/HER2- MBC.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06344780.

Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and in Combination With Targeted Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase Ia/Ib EMBER Study

PURPOSE

Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1-mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC experience is reported here.

METHODS

An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label.

RESULTS

Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2- ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status.

CONCLUSION

Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2- ABC.

Local treatment for oligoprogressive metastatic sites of breast cancer: efficacy, toxicities and future perspectives

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still an incurable disease, which eventually develops resistance mechanisms against systemic therapies. While most patients experience widespread disease progression during systemic treatment (ST), in some cases, progression may occur at a limited number of metastatic sites. Evidence from other malignancies suggests that local treatment with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) may allow effective disease control without the need to modify ST. Available evidence regarding local treatment of oligoprogressive breast cancer is limited, mostly consisting of retrospective studies. The only randomized data come from the randomized CURB trial, which enrolled patients with oligoprogressive disease, including both small cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients, and did not show a survival benefit from local treatment in the latter group. However, local treatment of oligoprogressive MBC is still considered in clinical practice, especially to delay the switch to more toxic STs. This review aims to identify patients who may benefit from this approach based on the current available knowledge, focusing also on the potential risks associated with the combination of radiotherapy (RT) and ST, as well as on possible future scenarios.

Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and can be used early as first-line treatment or deferred to second-line treatment1-7. Randomized data comparing the use of CDK4/6i in the first- and second-line setting are lacking. The phase 3 SONIA trial (NCT03425838) randomized 1,050 patients who had not received previous therapy for advanced breast cancer to receive CDK4/6i in the first- or second-line setting8. All of the patients received the same endocrine therapy, consisting of an aromatase inhibitor for first-line treatment and fulvestrant for second-line treatment. The primary end point was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)). We observed no statistically significant benefit for the use of CDK4/6i as a first-line compared with second-line treatment (median, 31.0 versus 26.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The health-related quality of life was similar in both groups. First-line CDK4/6i use was associated with a longer CDK4/6i treatment duration compared with second-line use (median CDK4/6i treatment duration of 24.6 versus 8.1 months, respectively) and more grade ≥3 adverse events (2,763 versus 1,591, respectively). These data challenge the need for first-line use of a CDK4/6i in all patients.

Beyond the median: Estimating survival times for patients starting endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, metastatic breast cancer from recent randomized trials

AIM

To estimate scenarios for survival for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and to help communicate prognosis to patients starting endocrine therapy (ET) METHODS: We searched for randomized trials of ET for ER-positive MBC and extracted the following percentiles (representative survival scenarios) from each overall survival (OS) curve: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 50th (median), 25th (upper-typical), and 10th (best-case). We then assessed the accuracy of estimating these percentiles for each OS curve by multiplying the median OS by four simple multiples: 0.25 (to estimate the 90th percentile), 0.5 (75th), 2 (25th), and 3 (10th). Estimates were deemed accurate if it fell within 0.75-1.33 times the actual value.

RESULTS

We identified 25 trials with 10,566 patients. The median OS (interquartile range) was: 61.3 months (53.4-64.8) for first-line ET with cyclin-dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitors (four treatment groups); 42.6 months (40.9-50.4) for first-line ET alone (21 treatment groups) and 29.2 months (24.8-33.4) for subsequent line ET (19 treatment groups). Simple multiples of the median OS accurately estimated the 90th percentile in 80%; 75th percentile in 93%; and 25th percentile in 76% of curves. The 10th percentile was only available for four OS curves and could not be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Simple multiples of the median OS are a helpful and accurate method to assist in estimating and discussing scenarios for survival for MBC patients starting ET. Longer follow-up of trials is required to help clinicians estimate the best-case scenario.

Thrombosis in breast cancer patients on cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors: Survival impact and predictive factors - A study by the cancer and thrombosis group of the spanish society of medical oncology (SEOM)

Thrombosis may be included in the profile of side effects associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Its significance might be greater than reported in randomized clinical trials. To investigate this, a retrospective, multicenter study was conducted. The primary objective was to calculate the incidence of thrombosis associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Secondary objectives included examining the impact of thrombosis on survival and identifying predictor variables for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis (AT). A total of 986 patients were recruited. The incidence of VTE/AT associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment during the follow-up period was 5.48 %. Survival analysis did not indicate that the development of VTE/AT during CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment significantly impacted patient survival (p = 0.133). In our analysis, two variables were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) as predictors of VTE/AT in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. These variables were the presence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.68 (95 % CI 1.18 - 11.49) and the use of abemaciclib with an OR of 2.3 (95 % CI 1.16 - 4.57).

The journey of patients affected by metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer from CDK 4/6 inhibitors to second-line treatment: A real-world analysis of 701 patients enrolled in the GIM14/BIOMETA study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4-6i) according to HER2 status (low/zero), and endocrine resistance/sensitivity, as well as the efficacy of second-line treatments, in a large real-world cohort.

METHODS

The GIM14/BIOMETA study (NCT02284581) is a retrospective/prospective study of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella evaluating treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We retrieved data on patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative MBC receiving first-line CDK 4/6i.

RESULTS

Among 3832 patients enrolled in the GIM14-BIOMETA study, 701 were eligible. At a median follow-up of 24.80 months, no significant differences were found between HER2-zero and HER2-low subgroups in terms of first-line time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) (26.16 months [IQR 12.84-NR] vs. 27.60 months [IQR 12.12-64.44], p = 0.972) or overall survival (OS) (mOS>60 months for both groups, p = 0.398). Median TTD was 33.24 months (IQR 16.32-NR) for the endocrine sensitive subgroup, 19.92 months (IQR 8.88-51.24) for the secondary endocrine resistant subgroup and 17.40 months (IQR 7.44-24.72) for the primary endocrine resistant subset, respectively (p < 0.001). Among 239 patients receiving second-line treatment, no significant difference (p = 0.188) was found in terms of second-line TTD between those treated with capecitabine (6.11 months, IQR 2.96-11.47), taxane-based chemotherapy (5.06 months, IQR 2.99-9.99), everolimus plus exemestane (5.39 months, IQR 2.53-9.03) or fulvestrant (6.44 months, IQR 3.38-NR).

CONCLUSIONS

Endocrine therapy plus CDK 4/6i represents an effective treatment, regardless of HER2 status (low/zero). Second-line agents did not differ significantly in terms of TTD. Endocrine resistant cancers exhibit poor response to CDK 4/6i.

Unveiling the Potential of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Inhibitors Beyond Progression in Hormone Receptor Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Negative Advanced Breast Cancer - A Clinical Review

OPINION STATEMENT

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the management of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. However, resistance to CDK4/6i remains an unavoidable challenge, with limited evidence to guide the choice of subsequent treatments. Continuation of CDK4/6 inhibition raises as a compelling treatment option and is currently an active area of research. This approach encompasses multifaceted strategies regarding CDK4/6i sequence (same or switched agent), endocrine therapy (ET) partner and potential combination with a third drug. Continuing CDK4/6 inhibition while targeting ET resistance in tumours still dependent on ER activity (i.e., ESR1 mutation) through a ctDNA-guided approach has the potential of becoming practice-changing, pending the results of ongoing phase III studies. Conversely, the efficacy of this strategy in cases of radiological progression in a biomarker-unselected population appears to be rather unsatisfactory. While some benefit, albeit modest, has been observed from switching to a different CDK4/6i after progression (e.g. ribociclib after palbociclib in the MAINTAIN trial and abemaciclib after both palbociclib and ribociclib in the postMONARCH trial), the current evidence (mainly with palbociclib) clearly argues against maintaining the same CDK4/6i. Biomarker analyses to optimally identify patients suitable for this approach yielded inconsistent findings that do not apply to daily clinical decision making. Attractive preliminary efficacy has recently emerged from combining a third agent (immunotherapy, AKT/ PIK3CA/mTOR inhibitor, new ET agents, CDK2 inhibitors) to CDK4/6i and ET, but further validation in larger ongoing trials is required to also determine the optimal timing for incorporating these agents into the therapeutic timeline. To date, CDK4/6i after CDK4/6i progression is far from being a standard of care. However, selected patients with indolent disease, prolonged exposure to previous CDK4/6i treatment (especially palbociclib) and without actionable molecular alterations, may be suitable for suchmaintenance strategy beyond progression. In this challenging and rapidly evolving treatment landscape, ongoing studies can refine the optimal approach and identify clinical and molecular factors to select the best treatment for the right patient.

The efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk invasive HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: A comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) into ET for the adjuvant treatment of HR + HER2-resected early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients, employing meta-analysis.

METHODS

In this paper, we compiled randomized clinical trials focusing on CDK4/6i used in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk invasive HR-positive and HER2-ESBC patients. A meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

We identified four clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria and were published between 2020 and 2024. These trials involved a combined sample size of 17,749 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The data obtained from the pooled analysis revealed a remarkable beneficial trend in terms of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for the use of ET in combination with CDK4/6i compared to the group receiving ET alone (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03). Of note, CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrated a notably beneficial effect in both grade 2 (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.59-0.81, p < 0.001) and grade 3 (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65-0.89, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were noted in terms of distant relapse-free survival (dRFS) in the groups treated with abemaciclib and ribociclib (HR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.56-0.76, p < 0.001; HR = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.58-0.89, p = 0.003, respectively). CDK4/6i didn't yield a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.77-1.19, p = 0.69). The use of CDK4/6i with ET was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly anemia and neutropenia, compared with ET alone (OR = 9.12, 95 % CI = 5.04-16.48, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this paper demonstrate a significant improvement in iDFS when ET is combined with CDK4/6i, compared to ET alone. Specifically, treatments with abemaciclib and ribociclib showed notable enhancements in dRFS.

Influence of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition on Risk of Relapse and Outcome to Eribulin or Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The presence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in breast cancer (BC) cells has been linked to worse prognosis and may influence response to systemic treatment. We explored the effect of EMT in tumor samples of patients with metastatic BC on disease-free interval and overall survival in those patients receiving eribulin or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Key inclusion criteria included available archived primary BC tissue and, where available, matched metastatic biopsy. Patients received eribulin and/or a CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting. Specimens were assessed for biomarkers by immunohistochemistry (CDH1, AE1/3, VIM, CDH2, ZEB1, pSMAD2, and SMAD4) and gene expression by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (CDH1, CDH2, SNAI1 & 2, TWIST1, VIM, PTEN, and ZEB1 & 2).

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2020, 127 patients were included (95 early-stage disease at diagnosis with metastatic relapse, 32 de novo metastatic disease). In metastatic samples, presence of ZEB1 overexpression was associated with shorter time to recurrence (48.1 months shorter; P = .003), with pSMAD2 overexpression suggesting clinical significance of 52.0 months shorter; P = .01. High gene expression levels for SNAIL1, TWIST1, and PTEN in the primary BC were associated with significantly longer survival in patients who received eribulin (P < .05); high VIM was associated with a clinically relevant trend toward shorter survival after a CDK4/6i (P = .013).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate in our exploratory study that biomarkers involved in the process of EMT could have a prognostic impact in a cohort of patients with BC uniformly treated and with long-term follow-up. Genes known to be involved in EMT were associated with improved eribulin efficacy, while suggesting a poorer outcome with CDK4/6i.

Assessing the real-world effectiveness of 8 major metastatic breast cancer drugs using target trial emulation

BACKGROUND

Demonstration of trial emulation ability to benchmark randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from real-world data (RWD) is required to increase confidence in the use of routinely collected data for decision making in oncology.

METHODS

To assess the frequency with which emulation findings align with RCTs regarding effect size on overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), 8 of 13 pre-selected pivotal RCTs in MBC were emulated using data from 32,598 patients enrolled in the French ESME-MBC cohort between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2021. Adjustment methods and confounders were selected a priori for each emulation; stabilized weight was the reference method to mitigate confounding. Concordance in OS hazard ratios with associated 95 % confidence intervals between RCTs and emulations were assessed used predefined metrics based on statistical significance, estimates, and standardized differences.

RESULTS

The effect sizes were consistent with RCT results in 7 out of the 8 emulations; 4 emulations achieved full statistical significance agreement; 5 emulations had a point estimate included in the RCT CI (estimate agreement); 6 emulations reported no significant differences between RCT and emulation (standardized difference agreement). Discrepancies related to residual confounders and significant shifts in prescription practices post-drug approval may arise in some cases.

CONCLUSION

Target trial emulation from RWD combined with appropriate adjustment can provide conclusions similar to RCTs in MBC. In oncology, this methodology offers opportunities for confirming the impact on long-term survival, for expanding indications in patients excluded from RCTs and for comparative effectiveness in single-arm trials using external control arms.

Timing of Dose Reductions and Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Dose reductions in CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as ribociclib and palbociclib, are often necessary due to treatment-related toxicities in patients with advanced breast cancer. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the timing of dose reductions on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a real-world cohort.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included patients treated with ribociclib or palbociclib between 2019 and 2023 at a cancer center in Turkey. Dose reductions due to drug-related toxicities were recorded, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patients were categorized based on the timing of dose reductions: within the first 3 months (early) and after 3 months (late).

RESULTS

Among 392 patients (mean age 57.13 years), 16.8% had dose reductions within 3 months, 21.7% had late dose reductions, and 61.5% had no dose reductions. The mPFS was 14.26 months for early dose reductions, 33.12 months for late dose reductions, and 20.6 months for no dose reductions (p < 0.001). The mOS was 37.12 months for early dose reductions, not reached for late dose reductions, and 57.76 months for no dose reductions (p < 0.001). Hematological toxicity, primarily neutropenia, was the most common cause of dose reductions. The ECOG performance status, line of therapy, and CDK4/6 inhibitor type were also significant predictors of PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Early dose reductions in CDK4/6 inhibitors negatively affect PFS and OS, highlighting the importance of maintaining treatment intensity in the first 3 months. However, late dose reductions do not negatively affect progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), with late dose reductions associated with better outcomes. Prospective studies in larger patient populations will further clarify our knowledge on this subject.

Therapeutic benefits of maintaining CDK4/6 inhibitors and incorporating CDK2 inhibitors beyond progression in breast cancer

The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy has revolutionized treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer. However, the emergence of resistance in most patients often leads to treatment discontinuation with no consensus on effective second-line therapies. The therapeutic benefits of maintaining CDK4/6i or incorporating CDK2 inhibitors (CDK2i) after disease progression remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that sustained CDK4/6i therapy, either alone or combined with CDK2i, significantly suppresses the growth of drug-resistant HR+ breast cancer. Continued CDK4/6i treatment induces a non-canonical pathway for retinoblastoma protein (Rb) inactivation via post-translational degradation, resulting in diminished E2F activity and delayed G1 progression. Importantly, our data highlight that CDK2i should be combined with CDK4/6i to effectively suppress CDK2 activity and overcome resistance. We also identify cyclin E overexpression as a key driver of resistance to CDK4/6 and CDK2 inhibition. These findings provide crucial insights into overcoming resistance in HR+ breast cancer, supporting the continued use of CDK4/6i and the strategic incorporation of CDK2i to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Inhibition of GPX4 enhances CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy activity in breast cancer

CDK4/6 inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy is the standard of care for estrogen receptor (ER+) breast cancer, and although cytostasis is frequently observed, new treatment strategies that enhance efficacy are required. Here, we perform two independent genome-wide CRISPR screens to identify genetic determinants of CDK4/6 and endocrine therapy sensitivity. Genes involved in oxidative stress and ferroptosis modulate sensitivity, with GPX4 as the top sensitiser in both screens. Depletion or inhibition of GPX4 increases sensitivity to palbociclib and giredestrant, and their combination, in ER+ breast cancer models, with GPX4 null xenografts being highly sensitive to palbociclib. GPX4 perturbation additionally sensitises triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) models to palbociclib. Palbociclib and giredestrant induced oxidative stress and disordered lipid metabolism, leading to a ferroptosis-sensitive state. Lipid peroxidation is promoted by a peroxisome AGPAT3-dependent pathway in ER+ breast cancer models, rather than the classical ACSL4 pathway. Our data demonstrate that CDK4/6 and ER inhibition creates vulnerability to ferroptosis induction, that could be exploited through combination with GPX4 inhibitors, to enhance sensitivity to the current therapies in breast cancer.

Influence of ethnicity on cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor efficacy and toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). While the efficacy and safety profiles of CDK4/6i and ET have been extensively evaluated in phase II and III trials worldwide, it remains unclear whether the response to CDK4/6i and toxicity profile vary among Asian and non-Asian patients. Therefore, we aimed to assess the treatment efficacy of ET with and without CDK4/6i by comparing outcomes in Asian and non-Asian subgroups included in these clinical trials. In addition, we evaluated the toxicity profiles of the treatments by estimating the risk of treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis including the most recent randomized trial data systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL (from inception to May 31st, 2024) or presented in abstracts or oral presentations at the ESMO, ASCO, and SABCS international congresses. We included studies comparing CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, dalpiciclib) + ET versus placebo + ET. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), hazard ratios (HR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for the two subgroups of interest. To evaluate the treatment-related toxicity profiles, we extracted the number of side effects to estimate the risk of treatment-emergent AEs.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (n = 5129) were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of CDK4/6i to ET consistently improved PFS in both Asian (HR = 0.52, 95 % CI 0.47-0.60; p < 0.001) and non-Asian (HR = 0.58, 95 % CI 0.52-0.64; p < 0.001) groups. Similarly, the combination of CDK4/6i + ET led to an OS improvement in both Asian (HR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.62-0.91; p = 0.003) and non-Asian (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) patients. The risk of treatment related toxicity was higher in the CDK4/6i + ET arm in both Asian and non-Asian groups. Interestingly, a numerically higher rate of treatment-related hematological toxicity was observed in Asian patients, although no significant interethnic difference was found in the relative risk of these events.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CDK4/6i and ET significantly improves PFS and OS compared to ET alone in both Asian and non-Asian patients with HR+/HER2-aBC. Although the magnitude of benefit appears to be independent of ethnicity, future clinical trials should devise a standardized method for stratifying patients by ethnicity to more effectively assess potential differences in treatment benefits.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024543217.

Functional activation of the AKT-mTOR signalling axis in a real-world metastatic breast cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Mutations of the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR axis are common events in metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). This study was designed to evaluate the extent to which genetic alterations of the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR can predict protein activation of this signalling axis in MBCs.

METHODS

Molecular profiles were generated by CLIA-certified laboratories from a real-world evidence cohort of 171 MBC patients. Genetic alterations of the PIK3CA pathway were measured using next-generation sequencing. Activation levels of AKT and downstream signalling molecules were quantified using two orthogonal proteomic methods. Protein activity was correlated with underlying genomic profiles and response to CDK4/6 inhibition in combination with endocrine treatment (ET).

RESULTS

Oncogenic alterations of the PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN pathway were identified in 49.7% of cases. Genomic profiles emerged as poor predictors of protein activity (AUC:0.69), and AKT phosphorylation levels mimicked those of mutant lesions in 76.9% of wild-type tumours. High phosphorylation levels of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR downstream target p70S6 Kinase (T389) were associated with shorter PFS in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with ET (HR:4.18 95%CI:1.19-14.63); this association was not seen when patients were classified by mutational status.

CONCLUSIONS

Phosphoprotein-based measurements of drug targets and downstream substrates should be captured along with genomic information to identify MBCs driven by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling.

The Role of Pharmacogenetic-Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Precise Breast Cancer Treatment

Given the high prevalence of breast cancer and the diverse genetic backgrounds of patients, a growing body of research emphasizes the importance of pharmacogenetic-based pharmacokinetic analysis in optimizing treatment outcomes. The treatment of breast cancer involves multiple drugs whose metabolism and efficacy are influenced by individual genetic variations. Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transport proteins are crucial in the regulation of pharmacokinetics. Our review aims to investigate the opportunities and challenges of pharmacogenomic-based pharmacokinetic analysis as a precision medicine tool in breast cancer management.