Ozanimod as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

Mirikizumab: A New Therapeutic Option for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of mirikizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed from inception to December 2023 using keywords mirikizumab, interleukin-23 inhibitor, and UC. Information was also obtained from package inserts as well as published abstracts.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Phase 3 studies plus relevant literature on mirikizumab pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Mirikizumab approval was based on LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2. In the phase 3 studies involving patients with moderate to severe UC, mirikizumab, when compared to placebo, resulted in clinical remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients in both the induction and maintenance phase. In addition, mirikizumab met the secondary endpoints of alternate definition of clinical remission, endoscopic remission, glucocorticoid-free clinical remission, histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission, and improvement in bowel urgency status, bowel-urgency remission, and maintenance of clinical remission. Common adverse events noted include infection (15.1%), injection-site reaction (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (7.2%), and headache (3.3%).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

Mirikizumab is the first selective interleukin 23 (IL-23) inhibitor approved for UC. Additional studies are required to determine how to position mirikizumab in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate to severe UC.

CONCLUSION

Mirikizumab provides a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of moderate to severe UC and is another welcomed treatment advance in the treatment arsenal, providing a more selective mechanism of action while maintaining a comparable safety profile.

Interpreting modern randomized controlled trials of medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment options for the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded substantially over the past decade. Multiple classes of advanced therapies, including both monoclonal antibodies and novel oral small molecules, are now available for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, highlighted by the approvals of the first IL23p19 antagonists, selective Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. These advances have been accompanied by the identification of novel targets and the rapid growth in both the number and size of IBD clinical trials. Over a dozen landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been completed in the past 5 years, including the first head-to-head biologic trials, the first combination biologic studies, and multiple phase III registrational trials of novel compounds with new co-primary and composite end points that will change the treatment landscape for years to come. Importantly, the methodology of RCTs in IBD has evolved substantially, with new trial designs, evaluation of unique patient populations, and different types of efficacy and safety end points being key innovations. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of how modern RCTs of IBD medical therapies have evolved and the implications for their appraisal that will help guide the application of these data to clinical practice.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624).

FINDINGS

Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains.

INTERPRETATION

In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD.

FUNDING

None.

Network Meta-Analysis: Histologic and Histo-Endoscopic Improvement and Remission With Advanced Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Histology has prognostic value in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, direct comparisons of histological endpoints are lacking.

AIM

To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare histological endpoints with biologics and small molecules.

METHODS

We searched four databases up until July 2024 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC reporting histological endpoints. Outcomes included histological improvement or remission, and histo-endoscopic improvement after induction or during maintenance. We used a random-effects frequentist model and have reported outcomes as relative risk and 95% confidence interval. We estimated relative drug efficacy with the P-score. We conducted subgroup analysis by trial phase and evaluated risk of bias and evidence certainty.

RESULTS

We included 24 RCTs (15 therapies, 8874 patients). Nineteen provided data on induction and 10 on maintenance; outcome definitions were similar. Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked highest in achieving histologic improvement (P-score 0.98) and remission (P-score 0.90) following induction. Globally, guselkumab 200-400 mg ranked first for histo-endoscopic improvement, while etrasimod 2 mg/day and upadacitinib 45 mg/day were superior in the subgroup analysis. During maintenance, upadacitinib 30 mg/day was superior in achieving histologic improvement and remission (P-score 0.88 for both) and histo-endoscopic improvement (P-score 0.94). Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked second for histologic remission (P-score 0.70) and histo-endoscopic improvement (P-score 0.73), while mirikizumab 200 mg/month ranked second for histologic improvement.

CONCLUSION

These results support the ability of small molecules to achieve stringent endpoints in moderate-to-severe UC. Histological outcome data for biologics was sparser, particularly during maintenance. Head-to-head RCTs are imperative to better inform clinical practice.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341).

FINDINGS

The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered.

FUNDING

None.

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: 2024 American Gastroenterological Association Evidence Synthesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Guidelines on the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases through November 21, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe UC, comparing different advanced therapies (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, interleukin 12/23 or selective interleukin 23 antagonists, and Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) against placebo or another active comparator. Our primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of clinical remission, and our secondary outcome was endoscopic improvement. We performed a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to appraise certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

After excluding JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatment (in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration), low-certainty evidence supports clinically important benefit with infliximab, ozanimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab over adalimumab and mirikizumab for achieving remission with induction therapy in biologically naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC, with risankizumab and ozanimod being ranked the highest for induction of clinical remission. With the inclusion of JAK inhibitors as first-line therapy, upadacitinib was more efficacious compared with all other medications except ozanimod and risankizumab, with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In patients with prior biologic exposure, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab were ranked highest for achieving remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to appraise quality of evidence, this updated network meta-analysis will be used to inform comparative efficacy and positioning of advanced therapies for the treatment of biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Interrupting inflammatory bowel disease therapy: why, who, when and how to consider medication holidays

INTRODUCTION

Medication holidays in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) offer a potential means to balance disease management, costs, and quality of life. This concept is increasingly relevant in light of the chronic nature of IBD, the cumulative side effects associated with long-term pharmacotherapy, and the evolving treatment landscape that now includes a large armamentarium of effective induction, maintenance, and rescue therapies paired with disease monitoring tools that enable early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

This review critically examines the rationale, implementation, and risks of medication holidays in IBD. Recent evidence is reviewed to help guide the risks of relapse involved with cessation of therapy. The selection criteria for patients, the necessary monitoring protocols, and strategies for managing potential relapses are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the potential benefits, medication holidays in IBD involve significant risks and require careful patient selection and active management. Current research highlights a need for improved predictive models and a deeper understanding of patient-specific outcomes and consequences. The future of medication holidays will depend heavily on advancements in noninvasive monitoring technologies and more personalized approaches to therapy. Ultimately, establishing clearer guidelines for safely conducting medication holidays will be crucial in integrating this strategy into routine clinical practice.

Corticosteroid Use in Randomized Clinical Trials of Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research.

METHODS

We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20 mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30 mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P = .023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P = .038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.

Etrasimod for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Analysis of Infection Events from the ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Infections are a safety concern in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. Etrasimod is an oral, once daily [QD], selective sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P]1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. It leads to selective and reversible lymphocyte sequestration and partial peripheral lymphocyte count decrease. We report infection events from the phase 3 ELEVATE programme.

METHODS

Proportions, incidence rates [IRs; per 100 patient-years], and descriptive analyses of all serious, severe, herpes zoster and opportunistic infections are reported in the Pivotal UC cohort [ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12]. Cox regression models evaluated potential baseline risk factors.

RESULTS

In this analysis [n = 787], proportions [IRs] of all infection events were similar for patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD (18.8% [41.1]) or placebo (17.7% [49.0]). Serious infections occurred in three [0.6%] and five [1.9%] patients receiving etrasimod and placebo, respectively. Two herpes zoster events were reported in each group [etrasimod: 0.4%; placebo: 0.8%], all localised and non-serious. One opportunistic infection event was reported in each group. No patient with an absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] < 0.2 × 109/L reported serious/severe or opportunistic infections; no baseline risk factors were identified for such events. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving etrasimod demonstrated no increased risk of infection. The incidence of serious infections and herpes zoster was similar in each group. Among patients receiving etrasimod, no association between ALC < 0.5 × 109/L and infection events was observed. Longer-term follow-up will further characterise the etrasimod safety profile. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

From Hit to Lead: Discovery of First-In-Class Furanone Glycoside D228 Derived from Chimonanthus salicifolius for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TNFα and related inflammatory factor antibody drugs have been orchestrated for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, antibody drugs elicited inevitable disadvantages and small molecule drugs are in an urgent need. Herein, we described the discovery, design, synthesis, and SAR studies from furanone glycoside compound Phoenicein (hit) isolated from Chimonanthus salicifolius to D228 (lead). Remarkably, D228 exhibited good inhibitory activity on B and T lymphocyte and excellent anti-IBD efficacy in vivo. Mechanistically, D228 alleviated the inflammation response by downregulating the MyD88/TRAF6/p38 signaling. Importantly, the relationship of D228, Phoenicein, and their aglycone 7a was deduced: D228 could be considered as a prodrug and metabolized to intermediate Phoenicein. In turn, Phoenicein released their shared active aglycone 7a. Additionally, D228 demonstrated good and balanced profiles of safety and efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. These results suggested that D228 could be used as an ideal lead and potentially utilized for IBD chemotherapy.

Consensus Statements on Assessments and Vaccinations Prior to Commencement of Advanced Therapies for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

Given the introduction of new advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), expanded risk mitigation strategies are essential.

AIMS

To create a comprehensive set of statements on assessment procedures and vaccinations before starting monoclonal antibodies, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators for IBD.

METHODS

We examined literature, guidelines and drug product information regarding vaccination and assessment recommendations for initiating advanced IBD therapies. Using a modified Delphi approach, delegates voted anonymously on the acceptability of these statements prior to and following consensus discussion.

RESULTS

We developed eight statements on the domains of infectious diseases screening, vaccinations and assessments prior to commencing JAK inhibitors and S1P modulators. Six statements received agreement. Pre-advanced therapy screening for infectious diseases was established, and the vaccination protocol was revised. Malignancy, cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk assessments are necessary before initiating JAK inhibitors. Those starting S1P modulators need cardiac and ophthalmic assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus statements combine vaccination and assessments on the currently available advanced therapies for IBD as a single comprehensive document that may reduce IBD complications associated with use of advanced therapies. Knowledge gaps identified during the consensus process will provide further research opportunities.

Defining mucosal healing in randomized controlled trials of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and future perspective

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing (MH) is an established treatment goal in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, various definitions of MH exist. We aimed to identify how MH is defined in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library from inception to December 2023 for phase 2 and 3 RCTs of advanced therapies in IBD.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four studies were included, 72 in UC and 72 in CD, published between 1997 and 2023. In UC, 64% (46/72) RCTs reported MH as an endpoint. 12 definitions of MH were found, from endoscopic assessment alone (35/46; 76%) to the more recent combination of histology and endoscopy (10/46; 22%). 96% (44/46) of studies used the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore. In CD, reporting of MH lagged behind UC, with only 12% (9/72) of trials specifically defining MH as an endpoint, 7 as "absence of ulceration," 2 as Simplified Endoscopic Score for CD score ≤2 or 0. Histological assessment was performed in 3 RCTs of CD. Centralized reading of endoscopy was used in 48% (35/72) of RCTs of UC and 22% (16/72) of CD. Only 1 RCT included transmural healing as an endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

A standard definition of MH in IBD is lacking. Definitions have evolved particularly in UC, which now includes the addition of histological evaluation. Transmural healing holds promise as a future target in CD. We support a greater standardization of definitions as we expect endpoints to become increasingly stringent and multimodal with computers automating the assessment.

New treatments in inflammatory bowel disease - A thrilling time ahead

Except for some surgical techniques, up to 1940 the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease was determined by its own natural history: most medical interventions even worsened prognosis. The empyrical introduction of salazopyrine early in the 1940s, pioneered by Nanna Svartz in Sweden, was followed relatively soon by the incorporation of corticosteroids during the 1950s. However, it took both a long time to reach patients, and quality scientific evidence to better establish their indications built up very slowly.

Ozanimod in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Naive to Advanced Therapies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The pivotal phase 3 True North (TN) study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This analysis assessed ozanimod during TN and the ongoing open-label extension (OLE) in patients with active disease who were naive to advanced therapies (ATs).

METHODS

TN was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of 10-week induction period and 42-week maintenance period. Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated from induction through the OLE. Clinical, endoscopic, and mucosal outcomes were evaluated at the end of induction (Week [W] 10) and maintenance (W52) and at predefined OLE timepoints (OLE W46 and W94). Safety during TN was reported.

RESULTS

This analysis included 616 AT-naive patients. Numerically greater proportions of patients receiving ozanimod than placebo achieved symptomatic response (39% vs 29%, 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 18.8) by W2, with significant differences (56% vs 39%, 95% confidence interval, 6.3-26.3) achieved by W4. Patients receiving ozanimod showed significant improvements across efficacy outcomes versus placebo at W10 and W52 (P < .05, all endpoints). In patients on continuous ozanimod who entered the OLE in clinical response at W52, 91% maintained clinical response through OLE W94, and 74% achieved endoscopic improvement and 57% achieved mucosal healing at OLE W94. In ozanimod-treated patients without clinical response by W10 who received extended induction in the OLE, 62% achieved symptomatic response by OLE W10. Safety outcomes in AT-naive patients were consistent with the total TN population.

CONCLUSIONS

Ozanimod is an effective, durable, and well-tolerated oral therapy for AT-naive ulcerative colitis patients.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Etrasimod: A Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of etrasimod in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was conducted from inception to November 2023 using the keywords etrasimod, ulcerative colitis, and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator. Information was also obtained from published abstracts and package insert.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Phase 2 and 3 studies plus relevant literature on etrasimod pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Per ELEVATE, 2 phase 3 studies, a higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active UC achieved clinical remission in the induction and maintenance phase with etrasimod compared with placebo. In addition, a higher proportion of patients achieved secondary endpoints of clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission, corticosteroid-free remission, and endoscopic improvement with etrasimod vs placebo. Common adverse events include anemia and headache.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

Etrasimod is now the second orally administered sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator approved for UC, providing patients with additional treatment options. Efficacy rates of this treatment are in line with other UC medication options. Similar to other sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, various assessments are required at baseline and during treatment to ensure safe and appropriate use.

CONCLUSION

Etrasimod is another possibility in the armamentarium of UC treatment, providing patients with more oral medication options. Prior to treatment initiation, several assessments relating to safety, drug interactions, and pharmacogenomics factors are advised.

Targeting the Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Pathway: New Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic immune-mediated diseases which primarily target the intestines. In recent years, the development and regulatory approval of various immunotherapies, both biological agents and small molecules, that target specific pathways of the IBD-associated inflammatory cascade have revolutionized the treatment of IBD. Small molecules offer the advantages of oral administration and short wash-out times. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive metabolite of ceramide, which exerts its functions after binding to five G-protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1-S1PR5). Concerning IBD, S1P participates in the egress of lymphocytes from the secondary lymphoid tissue and their re-circulation to sites of inflammation, mainly through S1PR1 binding. In addition, this system facilitates the differentiation of T-helper cells towards proinflammatory immunophenotypes. Recently, S1P modulators have offered a valuable addition to the IBD treatment armamentarium. They exert their anti-inflammatory function via sequestration of T cell subsets in the lymphoid tissues and prevention of gut homing. In this review, we revisit the role of the S1P/S1PR axis in the pathogenesis of IBD and discuss efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and real-world reports on the two S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod, that are currently approved for IBD treatment, and comment on their potential positioning in the IBD day-to-day management. We also present recent data on emerging S1P modulators. Finally, based on the successes and failures of S1PR modulators in IBD, we discuss future avenues of IBD treatments targeting the S1P/S1PR axis.

Ulcerative colitis: clinical biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and emerging treatments

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the two forms of inflammatory bowel disease. It affects 5 million people globally, and is a chronic and recurring inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with clinical presentation of abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The cause and the etiology of UC remain poorly understood. There is no cure and no 'gold standard diagnostic' for UC. The existing treatments are ineffective, and UC patients have a lower life expectancy with a risk of colorectal cancer. Recent studies in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and biomarkers have significantly improved our understanding of UC. In this review we summarize recent advances in identifying novel clinical biomarkers, diagnostics, treatment targets, and emerging therapeutics. These insights are expected to assist in developing effective treatments for UC.

Treatment trajectories and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: a tertiary single-centre experience

Background

There is an increasing diversification in the treatment landscape for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) leading to therapeutic challenges that can only incompletely be covered by prospective randomized double-blind trials. Real-world observations are therefore an important tool to provide insights into therapeutic strategies.

Objectives

To describe the real-world treatment algorithms in an IBD referral centre.

Design

Single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed prospectively collected data on treatment sequences and outcomes from 502 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab at a large German tertiary referral centre.

Results

Treatment decisions correlated to baseline patient characteristics. Over time, infliximab continued to be the preferred first-line option in CD and UC, although ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively, became increasingly important choices. Remission rates decreased with the advancement of therapy lines.

Conclusion

We provide insights into the evolution of tertiary centre real-world treatment sequences that might - together with other observations - help to guide the selection of therapies in IBD. Our data also strongly underscore the unmet need for biomarkers supporting treatment decisions.

Trial registration

None.

Translational characterization of immune pathways in inflammatory bowel disease: insights for targeted treatments

INTRODUCTION

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves the dysregulation of multiple inflammatory pathways. The understanding of these mechanisms allows their selective targeting for therapeutic purposes. The discovery of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha's (TNF-α) role in mucosal inflammation ushered an exciting new era of drug development which now comprises agents targeting multiple pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, integrins, and leukocyte trafficking regulators.

AREA COVERED

This review provides an overview of the main molecular players of IBD, their translation into therapeutic targets and the successful development of the advanced agents modulating them. We combine basic science with clinical trials data to present a critical review of both the successful and failed drug development programs. A PubMed literature search was conducted to delve into the available literature and clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment landscape for IBD has rapidly expanded, particularly with the development of biologics targeting TNF-α, integrins, and S1P modulators, as well as newer agents such as IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, offering robust efficacy and safety profiles. However, challenges persist in understanding and effectively treating difficult-to-treat IBD, highlighting the need for continued research to uncover novel therapeutic targets and optimize patient outcomes.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Treatment options for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are increasing rapidly, but the lack of comparative efficacy trials makes treatment choices a clinical challenge. This network-meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative efficacy of biologics and small molecules in achieving remission in patients with moderate to severe UC.

METHODS

The literature was searched up to May 2024. Phase 3 placebo or active comparator randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was induction and maintenance of endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES] ≤1). Secondary outcomes were the induction and maintenance of clinical remission, endoscopic (MES = 0) and histological remission. A sub-analysis was performed based on the randomized controlled trial design and previous exposure to biologic therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 36 studies that met our inclusion criteria, with 14,270 patients with UC. Upadacitinib ranked highest in inducing clinical remission (99.6%), and endoscopic improvement (99.2%), followed by risankizumab (91.4%) and (82.3%), respectively. In maintenance of endoscopic improvement, upadacitinib ranked first (98.6%) followed by filgotinib 200 mg (79.2%). Risankizumab ranked first in the induction of histological remission (89.4%), followed by guselkumab (88.3%). Upadacitinib ranked first (93.1%) in maintaining histological remission, followed by guselkumab (89.5%).

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib appears to be superior to other therapies in achieving clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and remission, and histological remission. Furthermore, novel biologics such as risankizumab and guselkumab ranked high in achieving these outcomes. This study highlights the efficacy of small molecule drugs and novel selective interleukin-23s as alternatives to other biologics.

Pharmacokinetics of S1P receptor modulators in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, affecting the colorectal mucosae, with a relapsing-remitting course, characterized by the trafficking and gathering of lymphocytes in the inflammatory intestinal mucosa. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators preventing lymphocytes egress from lymphoid tissues to the active inflammation site is an alternative therapeutic option in this condition.

AREA COVERED

We carried out a comprehensive review of the literature available on Medline, Scopus and Embase regarding the pharmacokinetics of S1P receptor modulators. For each compound, we reviewed the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic data and efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies and real-life studies when available.

EXPERT OPINION

S1P receptor modulators, including ozanimod and etrasimod (both currently on the market) as well as VTX002 (under development), are a new class of drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, inducing and maintaining the remission. Due to its pharmacokinetic features, this class of drugs has certain advantages such as an oral administration, a short half-life, a high volume of distribution, and no immunogenicity. On the other hand, there are risks of cardiological and ophthalmological side-effects, as well as drug-drug interactions risk, that require special attention from the healthcare providers.

Nanotechnology for Targeted Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex and recurring inflammatory disorder that affects the gastrointestinal tract and is influenced by genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, the gut microbiota, and environmental factors. Advanced therapies, such as biologics and small molecules, target diverse immune pathways to manage IBD. Nanoparticle (NP)-based drugs have emerged as effective tools, offering controlled drug release and targeted delivery. This review highlights NP modifications for anti-inflammatory purposes, utilizing changes such as those in size, charge, redox reactions, and ligand-receptor interactions in drug delivery systems. By using pathological and microenvironmental cues to guide NP design, precise targeting can be achieved. In IBD, a crucial aspect of NP intervention is targeting specific types of cells, such as immune and epithelial cells, to address compromised intestinal barrier function and reduce overactive immune responses. This review also addresses current challenges and future prospects, with the goal of advancing the development of NP-mediated strategies for IBD treatment.

Immunity in digestive diseases: new drugs for inflammatory bowel disease treatment-insights from Phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), continues to challenge treatment paradigms. Advancements in therapeutic options have been have been driven by Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of new drug classes, particularly sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors.

METHODS

This review synthesizes findings from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted up to early 2024, focusing on the impact of S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors on IBD management. Drugs such as ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab, and brasikumab were evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles.

RESULTS

S1P modulators, such as ozanimod and etrasimod, effectively regulate immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation and several trials highlight their clinical effectiveness in both inducing and maintaining remission in IBD, highlighting its long-term safety and sustained therapeutic effects. Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab, which disrupt key inflammatory cytokine pathways, have already shown significant effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in both CD and UC, with favorable safety profiles across multiple studies, suggesting their potential as critical components in managing IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trials indicate that both S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors offer promising therapeutic benefits and maintain strong safety profiles, positioning them as potential cornerstone treatments for IBD. Despite these advancements, further exploration into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies is essential for maximizing clinical outcomes.

To STRIDE or not to STRIDE: a critique of "treat to target" in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

The STRIDE consensus intends to complement the clinical endpoint with an endoscopic endpoint of mucosal healing and others as treatment targets in ulcerative colitis. If these targets are not reached, STRIDE requires dose or timing adjustments or switching the medication. This narrative review provides a critique of this concept.

AREAS COVERED

We analyze and discuss the limitations of current endpoints as targets, their currently limited achievability, and the lacking evidence from controlled trials relating to 'treat to target.' The relevant publications in PubMed were identified in a literature review with the key word 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

In ulcerative colitis, the standard clinical target is measured traditionally by the MAYO-score, but in variable combinations of patient and physician reported outcomes as well as also different definitions of the endoscopic part. Only a score of 0 is more stringent than clinical remission but is only achieved by a minority of patients in first and even less in second line therapy. The concept is not based on clear evidence that patients indeed benefit from appropriate escalation of treatment. Until the STRIDE approach is proven to be superior to standard treatment focusing on clinical well-being, the field should remain reluctant.

Current Treatments, Emerging Therapeutics, and Natural Remedies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, lifelong disorder characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The exact etiology of IBD remains incompletely understood due to its multifaceted nature, which includes genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and host immune response dysfunction. Currently, there is no cure for IBD. This review discusses the available treatment options and the challenges they present. Importantly, we examine emerging therapeutics, such as biologics and immunomodulators, that offer targeted treatment strategies for IBD. While many IBD patients do not respond adequately to most biologics, recent clinical trials combining biologics with small-molecule drugs (SMDs) have provided new insights into improving the IBD treatment landscape. Furthermore, numerous novel and specific therapeutic targets have been identified. The high cost of IBD drugs poses a significant barrier to treatment, but this challenge may be alleviated with the development of more affordable biosimilars. Additionally, emerging point-of-care protein biomarkers from serum and plasma are showing potential for enhancing the precision of IBD diagnosis and prognosis. Several natural products (NPs), including crude extracts, small molecules, and peptides, have demonstrated promising anti-inflammatory activity in high-throughput screening (HTS) systems and advanced artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted platforms, such as molecular docking and ADMET prediction. These platforms are advancing the search for alternative IBD therapies derived from natural sources, potentially leading to more affordable and safer treatment options with fewer side effects.

T cell trafficking in human chronic inflammatory diseases

Circulating T cells, which migrate from the periphery to sites of tissue inflammation, play a crucial role in the development of various chronic inflammatory conditions. Recent research has highlighted subsets of tissue-resident T cells that acquire migratory capabilities and re-enter circulation, referred to here as "recirculating T cells." In this review, we examine recent advancements in understanding the biology of T cell trafficking in diseases where T cell infiltration is pivotal, such as multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases, as well as in metabolic disorders where the role of T cell migration is less understood. Additionally, we discuss current insights into therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating T cell circulation across tissues and the application of state-of-the-art technologies for studying recirculation in humans. This review underscores the significance of investigating T trafficking as a novel potential target for therapeutic interventions across a spectrum of human chronic inflammatory diseases.

Modern Advanced Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Practical Considerations and Positioning

The therapeutic armamentarium for management of inflammatory bowel diseases has expanded dramatically in the last 5 years, with the introduction of several medications with different mechanisms of action. These include the oral small molecule drugs Janus kinase inhibitors (including upadacitinib, approved for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [UC], and tofacitinib, approved for UC) and sphingosphine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (ozanimod and etrasimod, both approved for UC), and biologic agents, such as selective interleukin-23 antagonists (risankizumab approved for Crohn's disease, and mirikizumab approved for UC). The efficacy and safety of these therapies vary. In this review, we discuss practical use of these newer advanced therapies focusing on real-world effectiveness and safety data, dosing and monitoring considerations, and special situations for their use, such as pregnancy, comorbid immune-mediated disease, use in hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, and in the perioperative setting. We also propose our approach to positioning these therapies in clinical practice, relying on careful integration of the medication's comparative effectiveness and safety in the context of an individual patient's risk of disease- and treatment-related complications and preferences.

Safety and Effectiveness of Thiopurines and Small Molecules in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires weighing an individual patient's therapeutic benefits and therapy-related complication risks. The immunomodulators that have been commonly used so far in IBD therapy are thiopurines, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine. As our understanding of the IBD pathomechanisms is widening, new therapeutic approaches are being introduced, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators' development. Non-selective JAK inhibitors are represented by tofacitinib, while selective JAK inhibitors comprise filgotinib and upadacitinib. As for the S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for UC therapy. The number of elderly patients with IBD is growing; therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the oral immunomodulators among the subjects aged ≥60. Possible complications limit the use of thiopurines in senior patients. Likewise, the promising effectiveness of new drugs in IBD therapy in those with additional risk factors might be confined by the risk of serious adverse events. However, the data regarding this issue are limited.

Blocking GPR15 Counteracts Integrin-dependent T Cell Gut Homing in Vivo

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The G protein coupled receptor GPR15 is expressed on and functionally important for T cells homing to the large intestine. However, the precise mechanisms by which GPR15 controls gut homing have been unclear. Thus, we aimed to elucidate these mechanisms as well as to explore the potential of targeting GPR15 for interfering with T cell recruitment to the colon in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD].

METHODS

We used dynamic adhesion and transmigration assays, as well as a humanised in vivo model of intestinal cell trafficking, to study GPR15-dependent effects on gut homing. Moreover, we analysed GPR15 and integrin expression in patients with and without IBD, cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

RESULTS

GPR15 controlled T cell adhesion to MAdCAM-1 and VCAM-1 upstream of α4β7 and α4β1 integrin, respectively. Consistently, high co-expression of these integrins with GPR15 was found on T cells from patients with IBD, and GPR15 also promoted T cell recruitment to the colon in humanised mice. Anti-GPR15 antibodies effectively blocked T cell gut homing in vitro and in vivo. In vitro data, as well as observations in a cohort of patients treated with vedolizumab, suggest that this might be more effective than inhibiting α4β7.

CONCLUSIONS

GPR15 seems to have a broad, but organ-selective, impact on T cell trafficking and is therefore a promising target for future therapy of IBD. Further studies are needed.

Personalised therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

Preventing and managing cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases treated with small-molecule drugs, an international Delphi consensus

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are small molecule drugs (SMDs) approved for IBD treatment. Their use in clinical practice might be limited due to cardiovascular concerns. We aimed to provide guidance on risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies, aiming to minimize potential cardiovascular risks of SMDs and to facilitate an adequate shared decision-making. A systematic literature search was conducted, and proposed statements were prepared. A virtual consensus meeting was held, in which eleven IBD physicians and two cardiovascular specialists from ten countries attended. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75 % of participants voting as 'agree' with each statement. Consensus was reached for eighteen statements. Available evidence does not show a higher risk of cardiovascular events with JAK inhibitors in the overall IBD population, although it might be increased in patients with an unfavorable cardiovascular profile. S1P receptor modulators may be associated with a risk of bradycardia, atrioventricular blocks, and hypertension. Cardiovascular risk stratification should be done before initiation of SMDs. Although the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with IBD on SMDs appears to be low overall, caution should still be taken in certain scenarios.

Small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of infection and malignancy: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain whether small molecule drugs increase the risk of infection or malignancy in adult IBD patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted from their inception to November 2023. The risk of infections or malignancies in adult IBD patients treated with JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators was compared. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were performed, and relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

27 RCTs from 14 studies were included (n = 10,623). The evidence indicates that small molecule drugs increase the risk of any infections (RR: 1.23, 95 %CI: 1.05-1.44) and herpes zoster (RR: 2.23, 95 %CI: 1.39-3.57). Specifically, UC patients on Filgotinib and Tofacitinib, and CD patients on Upadacitinib, showed elevated risks of any infections (RR: 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.56; RR: 1.42, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.75; RR: 1.57, 95 % CI: 1.11-2.22). CD patients on Upadacitinib also had a significantly higher risk of herpes zoster (RR: 2.64, 95 %CI: 1.16-5.99). No infections were associated with S1P receptor modulators, and similarly, no malignancies were linked to small molecule drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

JAK inhibitors increase the risk of any infections and herpes zoster Over a one-year follow-up period in IBD patients. Continuous monitoring of their long-term safety is necessary.

Pseudoirreversible inhibition elicits persistent efficacy of a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 antagonist

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), a G protein-coupled receptor, is required for lymphocyte trafficking, and is a promising therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Here, we synthesize a competitive S1PR1 antagonist, KSI-6666, that effectively suppresses pathogenic inflammation. Metadynamics simulations suggest that the interaction of KSI-6666 with a methionine residue Met124 in the ligand-binding pocket of S1PR1 may inhibit the dissociation of KSI-6666 from S1PR1. Consistently, in vitro functional and mutational analyses reveal that KSI-6666 causes pseudoirreversible inhibition of S1PR1, dependent on the Met124 of the protein and substituents on the distal benzene ring of KSI-6666. Moreover, in vivo study suggests that this pseudoirreversible inhibition is responsible for the persistent activity of KSI-6666.

Concomitant Administration of Ozanimod and Serotonergic Antidepressants in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis or Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Ozanimod, approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), is a weak in vitro monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor. MAO-B inhibitors can cause serotonin accumulation with concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). We evaluated the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) potentially associated with serotonin accumulation during ozanimod and concomitant SSRI/SNRI use in this post hoc analysis of pooled UC studies and the open-label extension RMS DAYBREAK.

METHODS

Data for ozanimod 0.92 mg from pooled UC studies (n = 1158; cutoff: January 10, 2022) and RMS DAYBREAK (n = 2257; cutoff: February 1, 2022) were analyzed. Concomitant SSRI/SNRI use was allowed in the UC (n = 67) and RMS (n = 274) studies. A narrow Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities search ("serotonin syndrome," "neuroleptic malignant syndrome," and "malignant hyperthermia") and a broad search including terms potentially associated with serotonin accumulation were conducted. The percentages of patients with TEAEs in both searches were analyzed by concomitant SSRI/SNRI use when the TEAE occurred.

RESULTS

No patients had TEAEs matching the narrow search criteria. No differences were observed in the percentages of patients with ≥1 TEAE matching the broad search regardless of SSRI/SNRI use in UC (with: 25.4% [n = 17 of 67]; without: 15.0% [n = 164 of 1091]) and RMS (with: 12.4% [n = 34 of 274]; without: 15.6% [n = 310 of 1982]) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence of increased TEAEs potentially associated with serotonin accumulation was observed with concurrent use of ozanimod and SSRIs/SNRIs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01647516, NCT02531126, NCT02435992, NCT02576717.

Cellular immunotherapies and immune cell depleting therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases: the next magic bullet?

Despite significant advances in biologic and small molecule treatments and the emergence of combination therapies to treat inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) a large unmet need remains to control intestinal inflammation. New approaches targeting several pathways simultaneously with a favorable safety profile and agents that trigger anti-inflammatory pathways to drive durable resolution of inflammation are needed. This article discusses novel cellular immunotherapies and immune cell depleting therapies in IBD, including CAR-T cell approaches, Tr1 and T regulatory (Treg) cells and cell depleting antibodies such as rosnilimab. These novel approaches have the potential to overcome current therapeutic limitations in the treatment of IBD.

The diverse roles of sphingolipids in inflammatory bowel disease

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased over the last 20 years. A variety of causes, both physiological and environmental, contribute to the initiation and progression of IBD, making disease management challenging. Current treatment options target various aspects of the immune response to dampen intestinal inflammation; however, their effectiveness at retaining remission, their side effects, and loss of response from patients over time warrant further investigation. Finding a common thread within the multitude causes of IBD is critical in developing robust treatment options. Sphingolipids are evolutionary conserved bioactive lipids universally generated in all cell types. This diverse lipid family is involved in a variety of fundamental, yet sometimes opposing, processes such as proliferation and apoptosis. Implicated as regulators in intestinal diseases, sphingolipids are a potential cornerstone in understanding IBD. Herein we will describe the role of host- and microbial-derived sphingolipids as they relate to the many factors of intestinal health and IBD.

Discovery of Potent, Orally Bioavailable Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Transporter (Spns2) Inhibitors

Targeting the S1P pathway has resulted in the development of S1P1 receptor modulators for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and ulcerative colitis. We hypothesize that targeting an upstream node of the S1P pathway may provide an improved adverse event profile. In this report, we performed a structure-activity relationship study focusing on the benzoxazole scaffold in SLB1122168, which lead to the discovery of 11i (SLF80821178) as a potent inhibitor of S1P release from HeLa cells (IC50: 51 ± 3 nM). Administration of SLF80821178 to mice induced ∼50% reduction in circulating lymphocyte counts, recapitulating the lymphopenia characteristic of Spns2 null animals. Molecular modeling studies suggest that SLF80821178 binds Spns2 in its occluded inward-facing state and forms hydrogen bonds with Asn112 and Ser211 and π stacking with Phe234. Taken together, SLF80821178 can serve as a scaffold for future inhibitor development and represents a chemical tool to study the therapeutic implication of inhibiting Spns2.

Protective effects of Amauroderma rugosum on dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis through the regulation of macrophage polarization and suppression of oxidative stress

BACKGROUND

Amauroderma rugosum (AR) is a medicinal mushroom commonly used to treat inflammation, gastric disorders, epilepsy, and cancers due to its remarkable anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacological effects of AR and its underlying mechanism of action against ulcerative colitis (UC) in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

A UC mouse model was established by administration of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). AR extract was administered intragastrically to mice for 7 days. At the end of the experiment, histopathology, macrophage phenotype, oxidative stress, and inflammatory status were examined in vivo. Furthermore, RAW 264.7, THP-1, and Caco-2 cells were used to elucidate the mechanism of action of AR in vitro.

RESULTS

AR extract (0.5-2 mg/mL) significantly suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-induced M1 macrophage (pro-inflammatory) polarization in both RAW 264.7 and THP-1 cells. LPS-induced pro-inflammatory mediators (nitric oxide, TNF-α, IL-1β, MCP-1, and IL-6) were reduced by AR extract in a concentration-dependent manner. Similarly, AR extract downregulated MAPK signaling activity in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. AR extract elicited a concentration-dependent increase in the mRNA expression of M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotype markers (CD206, Arg-1, Fizz-1, and Ym-1) in RAW 264.7 cells. Moreover, AR extract suppressed DSS-induced ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunction in Caco-2 cells. The in vivo experiment revealed that AR extract (200 mg/kg) increased colon length compared to the DSS-treated group. In addition, disease activity index, spleen ratio, body weight, oxidative stress, and colonic inflammation were markedly improved by AR treatment in DSS-induced UC mice. Finally, AR suppressed M1 and promoted M2 macrophage polarization in UC mice.

CONCLUSION

The AR extract protected against DSS-induced UC by regulating macrophage polarization and suppressing oxidative stress. These valuable findings suggest that adequate intake of AR can prevent and/or treat UC.

Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by alternating periods of inflammation and remission. Although UC incidence is lower in Taiwan than in Western countries, its impact remains considerable, demanding updated guidelines for addressing local healthcare challenges and patient needs. The revised guidelines employ international standards and recent research, emphasizing practical implementation within the Taiwanese healthcare system. Since the inception of the guidelines in 2017, the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease has acknowledged the need for ongoing revisions to incorporate emerging therapeutic options and evolving disease management practices. This updated guideline aims to align UC management with local contexts, ensuring comprehensive and context-specific recommendations, thereby raising the standard of care for UC patients in Taiwan. By adapting and optimizing international protocols for local relevance, these efforts seek to enhance health outcomes for patients with UC.

Dopamine β-hydroxylase shapes intestinal inflammation through modulating T cell activation

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and relapsing disease characterized by immune-mediated dysfunction of intestinal homeostasis. Alteration of the enteric nervous system and the subsequent neuro-immune interaction are thought to contribute to the initiation and progression of IBD. However, the role of dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH), an enzyme converting dopamine into norepinephrine, in modulating intestinal inflammation is not well defined.

METHODS

CD4+CD45RBhighT cell adoptive transfer, and 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS) or dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis were collectively conducted to uncover the effects of DBH inhibition by nepicastat, a DBH inhibitor, in mucosal ulceration, disease severity, and T cell function.

RESULTS

Inhibition of DBH by nepicastat triggered therapeutic effects on T cell adoptive transfer induced chronic mouse colitis model, which was consistent with the gene expression of DBH in multiple cell populations including T cells. Furthermore, DBH inhibition dramatically ameliorated the disease activity and colon shortening in chemically induced acute and chronic IBD models, as evidenced by morphological and histological examinations. The reshaped systemic inflammatory status was largely associated with decreased pro-inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ in plasma and re-balanced Th1, Th17 and Tregs in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) upon colitis progression. Additionally, the conversion from dopamine (DA) to norepinephrine (NE) was inhibited resulting in increase in DA level and decrease in NE level and DA/NE showed immune-modulatory effects on the activation of immune cells.

CONCLUSION

Modulation of neurotransmitter levels via inhibition of DBH exerted protective effects on progression of murine colitis by modulating the neuro-immune axis. These findings suggested a promising new therapeutic strategy for attenuating intestinal inflammation.

Comparison of early versus late addition of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption for incomplete remission induction in ulcerative colitis

Background and aim

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by repeated relapse and remission. Because no fundamental therapeutic strategy has been established, the treatment goal is generally to maintain the remission phase for a long period after rapid remission induction. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption (GMA) for UC is reportedly quite safe because it does not affect immunosuppression. Moreover, it is useful in combination with other remission induction therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in efficacy by the timing of the addition of GMA with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and anti-cytokine therapy for active UC.

Methods

The study included 59 patients. Patients who started GMA of 5-11 days were in the early GMA combination group. Patients who started GMA 12 days or more were in the late GMA combination group. The primary endpoint was difference in the effect of additional GMA according to the timing of the intervention. The secondary endpoint was difference in the time to remission induction between the two groups.

Results

Of the 32 early GMA group patients, 24 achieved remission induction. Of the 27 late group patients, 18 achieved remission induction. No significant difference in induction rates was found (P = 0.481). The early group had shorter mean time to remission induction (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In conclusion, results suggest that early addition of GMA might lead to earlier remission in patients who have had an inadequate response to remission induction therapy with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and anti-cytokine therapy.

A practical guide to selecting and using new ulcerative colitis therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several new biologics (mirizikizumab) and small molecules (upadacitinib, ozanimod, etrasimod) are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to guide positioning and use of these newer agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

From phase III clinical trials, in the biologic experienced patient, induction with ozanimod, etrasimod, and mirizikizumab had lower clinical remission rates, whereas upadacitinib's clinical remission rates remained similar. Indirect evidence using network meta-analysis suggests upadacitinib may be more efficacious than other advanced therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in both the bio-naive and experienced patient. Upadacitinib was found to have the highest risk for adverse events.

SUMMARY

These newer agents add novel mechanisms of action to the expanding therapeutic armamentarium of advanced therapies to treat ulcerative colitis. Based on expert opinion and available data to date, we propose a practical guide on positioning of these new agents for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. In mild-to-moderate disease, one should consider using ozanimod or etrasimod as first-line agents. In moderate-to-severe disease, we favor using mirizikizumab as first-line agent. In patients who have failed an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, upadacitinib or mirizikizumab should be considered using patient factors and safety to guide one's decision between these two agents.

Navigating the complexities of drug development for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - consisting of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - is a complex, heterogeneous, immune-mediated inflammatory condition with a multifactorial aetiopathogenesis. Despite therapeutic advances in this arena, a ceiling effect has been reached with both single-agent monoclonal antibodies and advanced small molecules. Therefore, there is a need to identify novel targets, and the development of companion biomarkers to select responders is vital. In this Perspective, we examine how advances in machine learning and tissue engineering could be used at the preclinical stage where attrition rates are high. For novel agents reaching clinical trials, we explore factors decelerating progression, particularly the decline in IBD trial recruitment, and assess how innovative approaches such as reconfiguring trial designs, harmonizing end points and incorporating digital technologies into clinical trials can address this. Harnessing opportunities at each stage of the drug development process may allow for incremental gains towards more effective therapies.

Clinical Course of Bio Naive Ulcerative Colitis Patients Five Years After Initiation of Adalimumab in a Nationwide Cohort

Background

There is limited data on the long-term clinical outcomes of bio-naïve ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are initiated on adalimumab (ADA). Our study aims to evaluate the clinical course of a nationwide cohort of bio naïve UC patients who were started on ADA, and then followed for 5 years after initiation of the drug.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the US Veteran Affairs Healthcare System (VAHS). Bio naïve UC patients were followed for 5 years after initiation of ADA. The primary outcome was to determine the time to discontinuation of ADA and if patients achieved endoscopic remission by the end of follow-up.

Results

A total of 387 patients were included among whom 193 (49.87%) had pancolitis. The highest rate of ADA discontinuation was within the first year, with the elderly having a higher rate of discontinuation (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14-2.45) and those on concomitant immunomodulators having a lower rate of discontinuation (HR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.03). In total, 125 (32.30%) patients remained on ADA at the end of their maximum follow-up. 54 (43.90%) achieved endoscopic remission.

Conclusion

Among bio-naive UC patients who were started on ADA, a third were still on the drug at the end of 5 years and half had endoscopic remission. The rate of discontinuation was highest within the first year of initiation, but patients continued to stop the drug over the course of follow-up.

[Risks of Cancer Associated with Therapeutic Drugs for Inflammatory Bowel Disease]

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong chronic inflammatory conditions, with many patients requiring ongoing immunomodulatory drug therapy for maintenance treatment. Recent therapeutic goals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not only aimed at symptomatic remission but also at achieving mucosal healing to improve the natural course of the disease. In this context, therapeutic approaches are being applied in clinical settings that involve early and appropriate use of drugs, such as immunomodulators or biologics, that have the potential to induce healing of the inflamed intestine before irreversible intestinal damage occurs. All drugs that continuously control intestinal inflammation in IBD can heal the mucosa and potentially reduce the incidence of colitis-associated bowel cancer; however, the continuous use of immunosuppressants can potentially increase the risk of malignancies. The safety issues of the drugs used in clinical practice are partly confirmed during their development processes or shortly after initial marketing, but in other cases, they are estimated through post-marketing case reports or epidemiological studies, sometimes decades after drug approval. This review explores the risks associated with malignancies related to the treatment of IBD, focusing on drugs currently approved in Republic of Korea.

The Effect of Etrasimod on Fecal Calprotectin and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein: Results From the ELEVATE UC Clinical Program

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers offer potential alternatives to endoscopies in monitoring ulcerative colitis (UC) progression and therapeutic response. This post hoc analysis of the ELEVATE UC clinical program assessed potential predictive values of fecal calprotectin (fCAL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as biomarkers and associated responses to etrasimod, an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC, in 2 phase 3 clinical trials.

METHODS

In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, patients were randomized 2:1 to 2 mg of etrasimod once daily or placebo for 52 or 12 weeks, respectively. Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP differences between responders and nonresponders for efficacy end points (clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission [EIHR]) were assessed by Wilcoxon P-values. Sensitivity and specificity were presented as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 289 and 238 patients received etrasimod and 144 and 116 received placebo, respectively. Baseline fCAL/hsCRP concentrations were generally balanced. Both trials had lower week-12 median fCAL levels in week-12 responders vs nonresponders receiving etrasimod for clinical remission, clinical response, and EIHR (all P < .001), with similar trends for hsCRP levels (all P < .01). For etrasimod, AUCs for fCAL/hsCRP and EIHR were 0.85/0.74 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 52), 0.83/0.69 (week 52; ELEVATE UC 52), and 0.80/0.65 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 12).

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP levels decreased with etrasimod treatment; ROC analyses indicated a prognostic correlation between fCAL changes during induction and short-/long-term treatment response.

Impact of Prior Biologic or Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy on Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Etrasimod is an oral, once daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P]1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC]. This subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily vs placebo by prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor [bio/JAKi] exposure in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12.

METHODS

Pre-defined efficacy endpoints were assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52 and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12 in bio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients, and at Week 12 [pooled] based on prior advanced therapy exposure mechanism.

RESULTS

In the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 analysis populations, 80/274 [29.2%] and 74/222 [33.3%] patients receiving etrasimod and 42/135 [31.1%] and 38/112 [33.9%] patients receiving placebo, respectively, were bio/JAKi-experienced. In both bio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients, a significantly greater proportion receiving etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (p<0.05) in ELEVATE UC 52 at Weeks 12 [naïve: 30.9% vs 9.7%; experienced: 17.5% vs 2.4%] and 52 [naïve: 36.6% vs 7.5%; experienced: 21.3% vs 4.8%]; in ELEVATE UC 12, this was observed only for bio/JAKi-naïve patients [naïve: 27.7% vs 16.2%, p=0.033; experienced: 18.9% vs 13.2%, p=0.349]. Similar patterns were observed for most efficacy endpoints. Among patients with prior anti-integrin exposure [N=90], a significantly greater proportion achieved clinical response [54.1% vs 27.6%, p=0.030], but not clinical remission [9.8% vs 3.4%, p=0.248], with etrasimod vs placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Bio/JAKi-naïve and -experienced patients had clinically meaningful induction and maintenance treatment benefits with etrasimod vs placebo.

Approach to loss of response to advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Remarkable progress over the last decade has equipped clinicians with many options in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinicians now have the unique opportunity to provide individualized treatment that can achieve and sustain remission in many patients. However, issues of primary non-response (PNR) and secondary loss of response (SLOR) to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies remains a common problem. Specific issues include the choice of optimization of therapy, identifying when dose optimization will recapture response, establishing optimal dose for escalation and when to switch therapy.

AIM

To explores the issues of PNR and SLOR to non-TNFi therapies.

METHODS

This review explores the current evidence and literature to elucidate management options in cases of PNR/SLOR. It will also explore potential predictors for response following SLOR/PNR to therapies including the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

RESULTS

In the setting of PNR and loss of response to alpha-beta7-integrin inhibitors and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibitors dose optimization is a reasonable option to capture response. For Janus kinase inhibitors dose optimization can be utilized to recapture response with loss of response.

CONCLUSION

The role of TDM in the setting of advanced non-TNFi therapies to identify patients who require dose optimization and as a predictor for clinical remission is not yet established and this remains an area that should be addressed in the future.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapies and Acute Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver disease (DILI) represents one of the main problems in the therapeutic field. There are several non-modifiable risk factors, such as age and sex, and all drugs can cause hepatotoxicity of varying degrees, including those for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The aim of this review is to illustrate the adverse effects on the liver of the various drugs used in the treatment of IBD, highlighting which drugs are safest to use based on current knowledge. The mechanism by which drugs cause hepatotoxicity is not fully understood. A possible cause is represented by the formation of toxic metabolites, which in some patients may be increased due to alterations in the enzymatic apparatus involved in drug metabolism. Various studies have shown that the drugs that can most frequently cause hepatotoxicity are immunosuppressants, while mesalazine and biological drugs are, for the most part, less associated with such complications. Therefore, it is possible to assume that in the future, biological therapies could become the first line for the treatment of IBD.