Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis

Current therapeutic overview and future perspectives regarding the treatment of psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting millions of people worldwide, characterized by rapid proliferation of keratinocytes, immune cell infiltration, and systemic inflammation. Over time, treatment strategies have evolved significantly from traditional topical therapies and phototherapy to advanced systemic options such as biologics and, more recently, oral small molecule drugs. This review aims to provide an in-depth examination of current psoriasis therapies, with a focus on biologics, oral small molecules, and new and emerging treatments. Several classes of biologic therapies have received regulatory approval for psoriasis, including inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-12/23, IL-17, and IL-23. Biologics have transformed psoriasis care, offering improved disease management and quality of life for patients, with generally favorable safety profiles. However, challenges such as high cost, potential immunogenicity and complexity of administration have sparked interest in alternative treatment options. Oral small molecules, particularly Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have gained attention for their efficacy and ease of use, being orally administered drugs. These drugs mark a shift in therapeutic paradigms by providing an oral option that precisely targets specific signaling pathways. In addition to existing therapies, this review also highlights emerging treatments that could shape the future of psoriasis care, including new small-molecule inhibitors. Early clinical trials suggest that these agents could improve treatment outcomes for psoriasis patients. Current research is increasingly focused on understanding disease recurrence, particularly the influence of tissue-resident memory T cells (TRMs). Avoiding the proliferation of these cells may be crucial in attenuating recurrence. In particular, interleukin-23 (IL-23), produced by CD301b+ cells, has been linked to stimulation of TRM cell proliferation in the skin. This finding highlights that IL-23 inhibitors and treatments targeting CD301b+ cells are promising strategies for maintaining remission and preventing relapse. In summary, the landscape of psoriasis treatments is advancing rapidly, with an increasing focus on personalized, patient-specific therapies. Research is expected to continue to refine and improve therapeutic approaches for this complex disease.

Treatment controversies in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: focus on biologics and targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

There are several treatment controversies that have emerged in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. These are related to the nature of the conditions as well as to the use of medications.

AREAS COVERED

This review, which included a search of PubMed database as well as the references within the articles provides an overview of the nature of spondyloarthritis, controversy over the inclusion of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a peripheral spondyloarthritis, and a summary of current treatments for both PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), with special emphasis on targeted therapy. The review highlights the differences in response to certain medications, particularly biologic therapy and summarizes the randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis providing data about the responses in table format.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for better outcome measures in axSpA. Currently, the measures are subjective. Imaging may be more appropriate but there is a need for research into the reliability and responsiveness of imaging techniques. In PsA, there may also be better response measures and research into the reliability and responsiveness of available measures is underway. There is also a need for novel therapies as well as biomarkers for response in both diseases.

Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in Korean patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study

Bimekizumab treatment has demonstrated significant improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis; however, studies so far have focused on predominantly White patient populations from North America and Europe, with one smaller study in a Japanese population. Here, clinical responses, safety, and tolerability of bimekizumab treatment in Korean patients are reported. Korean patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q4W to week 16. Co-primary efficacy end points were achievement of ≥90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear) at week 16. Secondary efficacy end points included achievement of PASI 75 at week 4 and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1 at week 16. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Statistical analysis of the co-primary efficacy end points was performed using a type I error rate, at a two-sided α level of 0.05. Overall, 47 Korean patients were randomized to treatment (bimekizumab: 32, placebo: 15). At week 16, bimekizumab-treated patients had significantly higher clinical responses versus placebo-treated patients (PASI 90: 81.3% vs. 0%; IGA 0/1: 87.5% vs. 0%, p < 0.001 for both). Bimekizumab showed a rapid onset of clinical response, with 75.0% of patients achieving PASI 75 by week 4 (0% in placebo patients [nominal p < 0.001]). A higher proportion of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved DLQI 0/1 at week 16 (46.9% vs. 6.7% in placebo patients, nominal p = 0.007), indicating greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following bimekizumab treatment. Bimekizumab was well-tolerated in Korean patients, with no new safety signals identified. Treatment with bimekizumab led to rapid improvements in clinical responses and HRQoL versus placebo in Korean patients, consistent with responses in global populations. These findings suggest that bimekizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in Korean patients with psoriasis.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Other Biologics in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Updated Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Biologic treatments have made complete skin clearance in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis a real possibility. Although clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of bimekizumab over secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, direct comparisons with other biologics are not available. This systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of bimekizumab versus other biologic systemic therapies for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

We conducted an SLR to retrieve published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsycINFO on 13 January 2022. Two NMA types were used to analyse the long-term achievement of 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100): (1) NMA of cumulative clinical benefits, based on the area under the curve, from week 0 to 52; (2) multinomial NMA at weeks 44‒60. Binomial NMA was used to evaluate long-term serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

The SLR identified 38 RCTs, of which 19 were included in the NMA. Bimekizumab 320 mg administered every 4 weeks to week 16 then every 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) showed a greater cumulative average number of days of PASI 100 response compared with all other biologics. These differences were statistically significant versus all biologics, except risankizumab 150 mg. The multinomial NMA demonstrated that interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were the most efficacious treatments. No significant differences were found in long-term occurrence of SAEs.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W was superior to most other treatments in maintaining complete skin clearance during the first year of treatment. It demonstrated a greater cumulative average number of days with completely clear skin while displaying a comparable safety profile compared with all other biologics.

Advances in psoriasis research: From pathogenesis to therapeutics

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting approximately 2 % to 3 % of the global population. The pathogenesis of psoriasis is complex, involving immune dysregulation, hyperproliferation and angiogenesis. It is a multifactorial disease which is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. The development of various therapeutic agents, such as JAK inhibitors, small molecules, and biologics with potential anti-psoriatic properties was possible with the vast understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Various signalling pathways, including NF-κB, JAK-STAT, S1P, PDE-4, and A3AR that are involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis as well as the preclinical models utilised in the research of psoriasis have been highlighted in this review. The review also focuses on technological advancements that have contributed to a better understanding of psoriasis. Then, the molecules targeting the respective signalling pathways that are still under clinical trials or recently approved as well as the latest breakthroughs in therapeutic and drug delivery approaches that can contribute to the improvement in the management of psoriasis are highlighted in this review. This review provides an extensive understanding of the current state of research in psoriasis, giving rise to opportunities for researchers to discover future therapeutic breakthroughs and personalised interventions. Efficient treatment options for individuals with psoriasis can be achieved by an extensive understanding of pathogenesis, therapeutic agents, and novel drug delivery strategies.

Evolving understanding of autoimmune mechanisms and new therapeutic strategies of autoimmune disorders

Autoimmune disorders are characterized by aberrant T cell and B cell reactivity to the body's own components, resulting in tissue destruction and organ dysfunction. Autoimmune diseases affect a wide range of people in many parts of the world and have become one of the major concerns in public health. In recent years, there have been substantial progress in our understanding of the epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis and mechanisms of autoimmune diseases. Current approved therapeutic interventions for autoimmune diseases are mainly non-specific immunomodulators and may cause broad immunosuppression that leads to serious adverse effects. To overcome the limitations of immunosuppressive drugs in treating autoimmune diseases, precise and target-specific strategies are urgently needed. To date, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the mechanisms of immune tolerance, offering a new avenue for developing antigen-specific immunotherapies for autoimmune diseases. These antigen-specific approaches have shown great potential in various preclinical animal models and recently been evaluated in clinical trials. This review describes the common epidemiology, clinical manifestation and mechanisms of autoimmune diseases, with a focus on typical autoimmune diseases including multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and sjögren's syndrome. We discuss the current therapeutics developed in this field, highlight the recent advances in the use of nanomaterials and mRNA vaccine techniques to induce antigen-specific immune tolerance.

[Monoclonal antibodies for inflammatory, autoimmune and oncological skin diseases]

In 1997 rituximab, a genetically engineered chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD20 expressed on B cells was approved for treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Since then, pharmacological improvements combined with increased knowledge on the immunopathogenesis of diseases led to the development of specific mAb targeting different antigens (e.g., interleukins or transmembrane receptors). This approach reshaped the therapeutic methodology in many fields, including dermatology. Nowadays, the treatment of frequent and possibly impairing inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis or hidradenitis suppurativa have different mAbs approved for both adult and pediatric patients. This class of drugs often shows a more favorable outcome and a better safety profile than routine immunosuppressants, such as steroids and steroid-sparing substances. For many years mAbs also represented a pillar of oncological treatment for severe diseases such as malignant melanoma or Merkel cell carcinoma. This review summarizes the current knowledge on already approved and promising new mAbs for the treatment of inflammatory and oncological skin diseases.

Complete Skin Clearance is Associated with the Greatest Benefits to Health-Related Quality of Life and Perceived Symptoms for Patients with Psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

With newer biologics, the achievement of complete skin clearance has become an attainable treatment goal for patients with plaque psoriasis. We evaluate how improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses, particularly at incremental improvements approaching complete skin clearance (PASI 100), translate into improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-perceived symptoms.

METHODS

Data from the BE RADIANT phase 3b trial (NCT03536884) and its open-label extension (OLE), pooled across all study visits and treatments over 16 weeks (randomised patients) and 2 years (patients entering the OLE), were analysed using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Proportions of patients achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1, DLQI item scores of 0, and Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM) item scores of 0 for itching, scaling, and skin pain at specific PASI improvement levels were estimated.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and forty-three patients were randomised to treatment; 654 entered the OLE. Using 16-week pooled data, there were incremental improvements in the proportions of patients estimated by our model to achieve DLQI 0/1 with PASI 100 compared with 95% (PASI = 95%) and 90% (PASI = 90%) improvements in PASI (93.0%, 89.3%, and 83.8% achieving DLQI 0/1, respectively). Estimated proportions achieving DLQI item scores of 0 had the greatest increases at higher PASI improvement levels for Items 1 (itchy, sore, painful, or stinging skin), 2 (embarrassment), and 4 (choice of clothing). Estimated proportions of patients achieving P-SIM = 0 were also higher for PASI 100 (itching: 61.7%; scaling: 82.2%; skin pain: 96.9%) than for PASI = 95% (50.8%; 72.3%; 95.7%) and PASI = 90% (39.8%; 59.5%; 94.0%). Similar benefits of incremental PASI improvements were estimated using 2-year data.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete skin clearance translated into the greatest benefits to HRQoL and patient-perceived symptoms, over and above skin clearance between 90% and 100%, highlighting the importance of targeting PASI 100 as a treatment outcome for patients with psoriasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03536884. Complete skin clearance is associated with the greatest benefits to health-related quality of life and perceived symptoms for patients with psoriasis: KeyResults and Conclusions (MP4 72828 kb).

Treatment strategies for Spondyloarthritis: Implementation of precision medicine - Or "one size fits all" concept?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a term to describe a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have common pathophysiological, genetic, and clinical features. Under the umbrella term SpA, two main groups are subsumed: axial SpA (radiographic axSpA and non-radiographic axSpA) and peripheral SpA (with the leading representative being psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but also arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated pSpA). The key clinical symptom in axSpA is chronic back pain, typically with inflammatory characteristics, which starts in early adulthood, while the leading clinical manifestations of peripheral SpA (pSpA) are arthritis, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis. Furthermore, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD) can accompany axial or peripheral symptoms. All these factors need to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in SpA patients. Despite the major advances in the treatment landscape over the past two decades with the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and most recently targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), a relevant proportion of patients still does not achieve the desired state of remission (=absence of disease activity). With this implementation of new treatment modalities, clinicians now have more choices to make in the treatment algorithms. However, despite generalized treatment recommendations, all factors need to be carefully considered when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice, aiming at an important first step towards personalized treatment strategies in SpA. In this narrative review, we focus on the efficacy of approved and emerging treatment options in axSpA and PsA as the main representative of pSpA and discuss their selective effect on the different manifestations associated with SpA to provide guidance on drivers of treatment decisions in specific situations.

Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies

OBJECTIVES

To assess impact of bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using 16-week data from two phase 3 studies.

METHODS

BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; tumour necrosis factor inhibitor inadequate response/intolerance (TNFi-IR)) are phase 3 studies of subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W; both were double-blind and placebo-controlled to 16 weeks. Patients were randomised 3:2:1 to bimekizumab, placebo or reference (subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg Q2W) in BE OPTIMAL; 2:1 to bimekizumab or placebo in BE COMPLETE. Patient-reported outcomes for pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL are reported to week 16 using pooled and individual study data for bimekizumab and placebo patients.

RESULTS

1073/1112 (96.5%) patients completed week 16 (bimekizumab:‍ 677/698 [97.0%]; placebo: 396/414 [95.7%]). Bimekizumab-treated patients achieved rapid improvements vs placebo in pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL by week 4, after a single dose. Improvements continued to week 16 for all patient-reported outcomes, including Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; mean (95% CI) change from baseline: bimekizumab: -‍25.2 [-27.2, -23.1]; placebo:‍ -‍5.7 [-8.2, -3.3]) and FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 4.5 [3.9, 5.1]; placebo: 1.1 [0.3, 2.0]); both nominal p<0.001. Greater proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported symptoms vs placebo, including FACIT-Fatigue (bimekizumab: 53.1%; placebo: 36.3%) and HAQ-DI (bimekizumab:‍ 53.0%; placebo: 28.7%); both nominal p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab treatment demonstrated rapid and greater improvements in patient-reported pain, fatigue, physical function and HRQoL to week 16 vs placebo in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03895203; NCT03896581.

Bimekizumab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, inflammatory dermatosis involving recurrent abscesses, nodules and tunnels in intertriginous regions. Biologics and other immunomodulators have significantly expanded the treatment options available for HS. Bimekizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting both interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F, key mediators of inflammation, that is already approved for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylarthritis. It is currently pending FDA review for HS treatment but has already received marketing authorization for this indication in Europe. This review aims to explore drug-specific characteristics of bimekizumab including its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the current state of the literature regarding its use in HS such as safety, efficacy and dosing, while highlighting its implications in clinical practice. Recent Phase II and III trial data demonstrating positive efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of HS will also be detailed.

Therapeutic Advances in Psoriasis: From Biologics to Emerging Oral Small Molecules

Psoriasis is a persistent, inflammatory condition affecting millions globally, marked by excessive keratinocyte proliferation, immune cell infiltration, and widespread inflammation. Over the years, therapeutic approaches have developed significantly, shifting from conventional topical treatments and phototherapy to more sophisticated systemic interventions such as biologics and, recently, oral small-molecule drugs. This review seeks to present a comprehensive investigation of the existing psoriasis treatment options, focusing on biologic agents, oral small molecules, and emerging treatments. Several categories of biologic treatments have received regulatory approval for psoriasis, including TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. These targeted therapies offer significant improvement in disease control and quality of life, with acceptable safety profiles. However, limitations such as cost, potential immunogenicity, and administration challenges have driven the exploration of alternative treatment modalities. Oral small molecules, particularly inhibitors of Janus kinase (JAK), have emerged as options due to their convenience and efficacy. These agents represent a paradigm shift in the management of the condition, offering oral administration and targeted action on specific signaling pathways. In addition to existing therapies, the review explores emerging treatments that hold promise for the future of psoriasis care. These include innovative small-molecule inhibitors. Early-stage clinical trials suggest these agents may enhance outcomes for psoriasis patients. In conclusion, the therapeutic landscape of psoriasis is rapidly evolving, emphasizing targeted, patient-centered treatments. Ongoing research and development are expected to lead to more personalized and effective management strategies for this complex condition.

Guselkumab Reduces Disease- and Mechanism-Related Biomarkers More Than Adalimumab in Patients with Psoriasis: A VOYAGE 1 Substudy

Background

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by activation of IL-23-driven IL-17-producing T cell and other IL-23 receptor-positive IL-17-producing cell responses. Selective blockade of IL-23p19 with guselkumab was superior to blockade of TNF-α with adalimumab (ADA) in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Objective: Pharmacodynamic responses of guselkumab versus ADA were compared in patients with psoriasis in VOYAGE 1.

Design

Inflammatory cytokine serum levels were assessed (n = 118), and lesional and nonlesional skin biopsies were collected (n = 38) in patient subsets at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 weeks after treatment to evaluate pharmacodynamic responses of guselkumab versus those of ADA.

Results

Guselkumab provided rapid reductions in serum IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 levels by week 4 versus at baseline, which were maintained through weeks 24 and 48 (P < .001). The magnitude of reduction of IL-17A and IL-22 at week 48 and IL-17F at weeks 4, 24, and 48 were greater with guselkumab than with ADA (all P < .05). In the skin, guselkumab reduced the expression of IL-23/IL-17 pathway-associated and psoriasis-associated genes.

Conclusion

These data provide extensive characterization of pharmacodynamic anti-inflammatory responses to IL-23p19 and TNF-α inhibition in human blood and tissue over time with FDA-approved doses of guselkumab and ADA. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02207231).

Quality of reporting and concordance between sources of adverse events in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cross-sectional study of RCTs from a Cochrane systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Incomplete reporting of safety outcomes in quality and availability of safety reporting in published articles of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were described in different medical areas. The number of RCTs assessing systemic treatments for psoriasis has increased considerably. Complete and precise reporting of safety is mandatory for the efficacy/harms balance evaluation. We aimed to assess the quality and availability of safety reporting in published RCTs assessing systemic treatments for psoriasis, as well as the concordance of data between published trials and ClinicalTrials.gov (CT).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We included all RCTs in adults initiated after September 2009, assessing systemic psoriasis treatments compared with placebo or with an active comparator. All trials were selected in duplicate by 2 independent authors from the latest search of the dedicated Cochrane review. We described quality of safety reporting for all published RCTs, using a modified Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials harms scale by using descriptive analysis, and a composite score of 3 key items of safety report. For each RCT, data on adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs) were extracted from the publication and CT: total number of AEs/SAEs, patients with AEs/SAEs, SAEs by system organ class classification and deaths. These data were compared between sources for each RCT.

RESULTS

In total, 128 trials were included in the analysis of reporting quality, and 76 in the analysis of data concordance between sources. The median number of reported Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials harms items per article was 9 out of 18 (IQR 7-10), and mean number was 8.39 (SD = 3.02). Items in the methods section were the least frequently reported. The proportion of RCTs reporting the number of SAEs and death were significantly higher on CT than in the published article ((100% (76/76) vs 88.2%, McNemar test, P < .0016). At least 1 discrepancy between sources for SAE safety data was found in 30/76 (39.5%) RCTs.

CONCLUSION

Shortcomings and gaps in the quality of safety reporting in publications of RCTs of systemic psoriasis treatments have been identified. A lack of data in published articles and discrepancies between published articles and CT data complete this finding.

IL-17A/F double producing T cells, unstable Tregs and quiescent TRMs in clinically healed lesions are potential cellular candidates for recurrence of psoriasis

Biological antibodies targeting key cytokines such as IL-17 and IL-23 have revolutionized psoriasis outcome. However, the recurrence remains an urgent challenge to be addressed. Currently, most of the descriptions of skin T-cell characteristics in psoriasis are derived from lesional and non-lesional skin, and their characteristics in resolved lesions (clinically healed lesions) remain vague. In order to further elucidate the cellular mechanism of recurrence, we performed single-cell sequencing and multiplexed immunohistochemical staining of T-cell subsets in autologous resolved lesion (RL), on-site recurrent psoriatic lesion (PL), and adjacent normal-appearing skin (NS) of psoriasis. By comparing with PL and NS tissues, we identified three potential cellular candidates for recurrence in clinically healed lesions: IL-17A/F double producing T cells, unstable Tregs and quiescent TRMs. Our results provide research clues for elucidating the immunological recurrence mechanism of psoriasis, and further work is needed to deepen our findings.

IL-17 inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis. An overview

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for spondyloarthritis has expanded considerably in recent years, and there is growing evidence to support the increasing use of IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

AREAS COVERED

This literature review provides an update on the role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of axSpA, efficacy and safety from clinical trials and real-life studies on the use of IL17i in axSpA. We also review the impact of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations on the decision to treat with IL17i and the efficacy of IL17i on structural progression.

EXPERT OPINION

There are still some unanswered questions concerning the use of IL-17i in axSpA in clinical practice such as their respective place in the management of axSpA compared to TNFα inhibitors (TNFi). Their main differences rely on their specific efficacy in extra-articular manifestations such as psoriasis, uveitis, and inflammatory bowel diseases leading to the choice of the best treatment in a given patient. Regarding their real impact on structural progression, the rate of progression under IL-17i appears to be low and presumably similar to TNFi. One final question is the advantage of blocking the two IL-17 isoforms A and F compared to the single inhibition of IL-17A.

IL23R mutations associated with decreased risk of psoriasis lead to the differential expression of genes implicated in the disease

Psoriasis is an incurable immune-mediated skin disease, affecting around 1%-3% of the population. Various lines of evidence implicate IL23 as being pivotal in disease. Genetic variants within the IL23 receptor (IL23R) increase the risk of developing psoriasis, and biologic therapies specifically targeting IL23 demonstrated high efficacy in treating disease. IL23 acts via the IL23R, signalling through the STAT3 pathway, mediating the cascade of events that ultimately results in the clinical presentation of psoriasis. Given the essential role of IL23R in disease, it is important to understand the impact of genetic variants on receptor function with respect to downstream gene regulation. Here we developed model systems in CD4+ (Jurkat) and CD8+ (MyLa) T cells to express either the wild type risk or mutant (R381Q) protective form of IL23R. After confirmation that the model system expressed the genes/proteins and had a differential effect on the phosphorylation of STAT3, we used RNAseq to explore differential gene regulation, in particular for genes implicated with risk to psoriasis, at a single time point for both cell types, and in a time course experiment for Jurkat CD4+ T cells. These experiments discovered differentially regulated genes in the cells expressing wild type and mutant IL23R, including HLA-B, SOCS1, RUNX3, CCR5, CXCR3, CCR9, KLF3, CD28, IRF, SOCS6, TNFAIP and ICAM5, that have been implicated in both the IL23 pathway and psoriasis. These genes have the potential to define a IL23/psoriasis pathway in disease, advancing our understanding of the biology behind the disease.

Differential Pharmacodynamic Effects on Psoriatic Biomarkers by Guselkumab Versus Secukinumab Correlate with Long-Term Efficacy: An ECLIPSE Substudy

IL-23 is a cytokine produced by myeloid cells that drives the T helper 17 pathway and plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of plaque psoriasis. IL-23 activation initiates a cascade of cytokines subsequently inducing the expression of many psoriasis-related proteins. This study aimed to better understand the underlying mechanisms driving the differences between IL-23 and IL-17A blockade in patients with psoriasis and their implications for durability of clinical responses. Serum and/or skin biopsies were isolated from patients treated with guselkumab or secukinumab for evaluation of potential biomarkers of pharmacodynamic response to treatment. Guselkumab treatment led to significantly greater reductions of IL-17F and IL-22 serum levels than treatment with secukinumab at weeks 24 and 48, demonstrating sustained regulation of the IL-23/T helper 17 pathway. Analyses of proteomic and transcriptomic profiles of patient sera and skin biopsies demonstrated differential regulation of proteins involved in chemokine, TNF, and relevant immune signaling pathways to a greater degree with guselkumab than with secukinumab treatment. These data provide insights into the differences between the mechanisms and impact of IL-23 and IL-17A blockade in psoriasis, with implications for efficacy observations and treatment paradigms. Trial Registration: The original study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03090100).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Phase I Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of CMAB015, a Candidate Secukinumab Biosimilar, with Its Reference Product Cosentyx® in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

Purpose

Secukinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-17A, is approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of CMAB015, a candidate secukinumab biosimilar, with the reference product secukinumab (Cosentyx®) in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Patients and methods

This double-blind, parallel-group study randomized healthy Chinese male subjects (N=130) to receive either a single dose of 150 mg CMAB015 or secukinumab subcutaneously. Primary study endpoints were PK parameters such as the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), while safety and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints.

Results

The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC0-inf for CMAB015 to secukinumab were all within the bioequivalence limits (80.00-125.00%). Other PK parameters were comparable between the groups. The safety profile of CMAB015 was similar to that of secukinumab, with no serious adverse events related to treatment. The incidence of TEAEs was slightly higher in the CMAB015 group, but these events were mild to moderate in severity and did not lead to any withdrawals from the study. Immunogenicity analysis revealed low rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity, with similar rates between CMAB015 and secukinumab.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated equivalent PK, comparable safety, and immunogenicity of CMAB015 to secukinumab in healthy Chinese male subjects. These findings support further clinical evaluation of CMAB015 as a secukinumab biosimilar.

Trial Registration

The trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier No. NCT05734482) and Chinadrugtrials.org.cn (Identifier No. CTR20230105).

IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors Have the Fastest Time to Meaningful Clinical Response for Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Several treatment options with differing mechanisms exist for plaque psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to compare the time to onset of action among the available systemic therapies for plaque psoriasis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials that investigated two or more therapeutics for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were included. A weighted average time for 50% of patients to reach PASI75 and PAI90 with each of the therapeutics was calculated. A network meta-analysis was performed to determine which therapeutics were significantly faster in time to meaningful clinical response than others. Results: IL-17 inhibitors had the shortest time to achieve PASI75 and PASI90 followed by risankizumab in the weighted mean analysis. In the meta-analysis, the fastest time to PASI75 was seen with bimekizumab, brodalumab and ixekizumab. No significant (p < 0.05) difference was seen in the time to meaningful clinical response between these drugs; however, bimekizumab was significantly faster in time to PASI75 among the remaining therapeutics. In the meta-analysis for PASI90, the fastest time was seen with ixekizumab, bimekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab and guselkumab with no significant differences in between these therapeutics. However, bimekizumab was significantly faster than the remaining therapeutics for PASI90. Conclusions: IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may be considered as requiring the shortest time for meaningful clinical response in plaque psoriasis. In addition to the time to onset, the safety profile of each drug needs to be considered when deciding on a therapeutic to initiate.

IL-17 family cytokines in inflammatory or autoimmune skin diseases

As potent pro-inflammatory mediators, IL-17 family cytokines play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory and autoimmune skin disorders. Although substantial progress has been achieved in understanding the pivotal role of IL-17A signaling in psoriasis, leading to the development of highly effective biologics, the functions of other IL-17 family members in inflammatory or autoimmune skin diseases remain less explored. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of IL-17 family cytokines and their receptors, with a particular focus on the recent advancements in identifying cellular sources, receptors and signaling pathways regulated by these cytokines. At the end, we discuss how the aberrant functions of IL-17 family cytokines contribute to the pathogenesis of diverse inflammatory or autoimmune skin diseases.

Dermatologische unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen bei Behandlung mit Biologika – Pathogenese und Management

Biologika sind für verschiedene Entzündungskrankheiten aus Dermatologie, Allergologie, Rheumatologie und Gastroenterologie sowie für zahlreiche maligne Erkrankungen zugelassen. Dermatologische unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen durch Biologika können primären entzündlichen Dermatosen ähneln, unterscheiden sich von ihnen jedoch in ihrer Pathogenese. In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir die fünf verschiedenen Pathomechanismen dermatologischer, unerwünschter Arzneimittelwirkungen durch Biologika. Durch besseres Verständnis dieser Mechanismen erhoffen wir uns wertvolle Einblicke in die Pathogenese primärer Entzündungskrankheiten zu gewinnen. Außerdem geben wir in diesem Artikel Empfehlungen für die Behandlung und das Management der durch Biologika ausgelösten dermatologischen unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen.

The management of axial spondyloarthritis with cutting-edge therapies: advancements and innovations

INTRODUCTION

Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement.

EXPERT OPINION

AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.

Bimekizumab safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Rates of hepatic events and changes in liver parameters over 2 years in randomized phase 3/3b trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with psoriasis are at increased risk of liver function abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

Explore rates of hepatic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in liver parameters in bimekizumab-treated patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Data are reported from 5 phase 3/3b trials over 2 years. Hepatic TEAEs, laboratory elevations in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and changes in clinical markers of liver fibrosis (Fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] Index and AST to Platelet Ratio Index [APRI]) are reported. TEAEs are presented using exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years (PY).

RESULTS

2186 patients received ≥1 bimekizumab dose. Over 2 years, the EAIR of hepatic TEAEs was 3.5/100 PY and did not increase from first to second year. 2-year EAIRs of ALT/AST elevations >3x and >5x the upper limit of normal were 2.3 and 0.6/100 PY; rates were similar to placebo, adalimumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab during controlled study periods. FIB-4 and APRI scores did not increase through 2 years, regardless of fibrosis risk at baseline.

LIMITATIONS

Obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, chronic alcohol consumption, and medication changes are confounding factors for hepatic dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Rates of hepatic adverse events (AEs) with bimekizumab were consistent through 2 years; incidences of transaminase elevations were similar to comparators during phase 3/3b controlled study periods.

Dermatologic adverse events caused by biologic treatments - Pathogenesis and management

Biologics are approved for various dermatologic, allergic, rheumatic, and gastroenterologic inflammatory diseases, as well as for numerous malignancies. The dermatologic adverse events from treatment with biologics may resemble primary inflammatory diseases but differ in pathogenesis. In this article, we describe five different pathogenic mechanisms of dermatologic adverse events. By studying these mechanisms, we hope to gain valuable insights into the pathogenesis of primary inflammatory diseases. In addition, in this article, we provide recommendations for the treatment and management of the dermatological adverse events induced by biologics.

[IL-17A and IL-17F: from discovery to target of biologics - an illustrative example of translational research]

Interleukin (IL)-17A and then IL-17F have been discovered through their roles in chronic inflammatory diseases. These cytokines share 50% of sequence homology and bind to the same receptor made of the IL-17RA et IL-17RC chains. While they have rather similar pro-inflammatory effects, slight differences exist depending on the cell type considered or whether there is TNF or not. Indeed, there is a synergistic effect of TNF and IL-17A or IL-17F on many cell types. In addition, the interactions between immune and stromal cells also modulate their effects which vary according to stromal cell subtype. The identification of IL-17A and IL-17F roles in inflammatory diseases, as psoriasis, has led to the development of inhibitors of those cytokines. Anti-IL-17A, then anti-IL-17A/F and now anti-IL-17RA have been approved for different diseases and are particularly efficient in psoriasis. Their use is expending to other diseases like psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Last, the recent understanding of the importance of stromal cells during chronic inflammation explains the relative inefficacy of such inhibitors in some other diseases.

Mental health outcomes in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with bimekizumab: Analysis of phase 2/3 randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with psoriasis have increased risk of suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) and depression. Bimekizumab, a biologic that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2023 for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, following 2021 European Medicines Agency approval.

OBJECTIVE

To report SIB and depression in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated in bimekizumab clinical trials.

METHODS

Mental health changes, including neuropsychiatric events, were actively monitored across 9 bimekizumab clinical trials in psoriasis phase 2/3 trials. The patient-reported electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (measuring SIB) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (measuring depression) were administered, monitored by an independent Neuropsychiatric Adjudication Committee.

RESULTS

Throughout 7166 patient-years (PY) of bimekizumab exposure, the adjudicated SIB rate was 0.13/100PY; SIB ranges for the general psoriasis population and patients receiving anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 therapies are 0.09 to 0.54/100PY and 0.09 to 0.19/100PY, respectively. At week 16, 92.9% vs 81.1% of bimekizumab- vs placebo-treated patients had no/minimal depression. Newonset positive electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale responses and mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were low for bimekizumab-treated patients.

LIMITATIONS

Patient exclusion for significant/severe prespecified SIB/depression history.

CONCLUSION

The long-term adjudicated SIB rate with bimekizumab was low and within ranges reported in the general psoriasis patient population and psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 biologics. Screening/monitoring questionnaires reported low SIB and depression levels.

Biologics for Psoriasis

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept), the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), the p19 subunit of IL-23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17-RA (brodalumab) and both IL-17A and IL-17F (bimekizumab) have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. In both the short and long term, risankizumab had highest Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 scores compared to other oral and injectable biologics. IL-23 inhibitors had lowest rates of short-term and long-term adverse events and most favorable long-term risk-benefit profile compared to IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors.

Interleukin-17A in diabetic retinopathy: The crosstalk of inflammation and angiogenesis

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a severe ocular complication of diabetes which can leads to irreversible vision loss in its late-stage. Chronic inflammation results from long-term hyperglycemia contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of DR. In recent years, the interleukin-17 (IL-17) family have attracted the interest of researchers. IL-17A is the most widely explored cytokine in IL-17 family, involved in various acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Growing body of evidence indicate the role of IL-17A in the pathogenesis of DR. However, the pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effect of IL-17A in DR have not hitherto been reviewed. Gaining an understanding of the pro-inflammatory role of IL-17A, and how IL-17A control/impact angiogenesis pathways in the eye will deepen our understanding of how IL-17A contributes to DR pathogenesis. Herein, we aimed to thoroughly review the pro-inflammatory role of IL-17A in DR, with focus in how IL-17A impact inflammation and angiogenesis crosstalk.

Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To understand the relative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, vs other biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) for PsA using network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (most recent update conducted on 1 January 2023) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of b/tsDMARDs in PsA. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for efficacy outcomes at Weeks 12-24 for b/tsDMARD-naïve and TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-experienced patients. Safety at Weeks 12-24 was analysed in a mixed population. Odds ratios (ORs) and differences of mean change with the associated 95% credible interval (CrI) were calculated for the best-fitting models, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated to determine relative rank.

RESULTS

The NMA included 41 RCTs for 22 b/tsDMARDs. For minimal disease activity (MDA), bimekizumab ranked 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients. In b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, bimekizumab ranked 6th, 5th and 3rd for ACR response ACR20/50/70, respectively. In TNFi-experienced patients, bimekizumab ranked 1st, 2nd and 1st for ACR20/50/70, respectively. For Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, bimekizumab ranked 2nd and 1st in b/tsDMARD-naïve patients, respectively, and 1st and 2nd in TNFi-experienced patients, respectively. Bimekizumab was comparable to b/tsDMARDs for serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab ranked favourably among b/tsDMARDs for efficacy on joint, skin and MDA outcomes, and showed comparable safety, suggesting it may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with PsA.

Targeting STING in dendritic cells alleviates psoriatic inflammation by suppressing IL-17A production

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease driven by the aberrant activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells, ultimately leading to increased production of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17A. It is established that the cGAS-STING pathway is essential for psoriatic inflammation, however, the specific role of cGAS-STING signaling in DCs within this context remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrated the upregulation of cGAS-STING signaling in psoriatic lesions by analyzing samples from both clinical patients and imiquimod (IMQ)-treated mice. Using a conditional Sting-knockout transgenic mouse model, we elucidated the impact of cGAS-STING signaling in DCs on the activation of IL-17- and IFN-γ-producing T cells in psoriatic inflammation. Ablation of the Sting hampers DC activation leads to decreased numbers of IL-17-producing T cells and Th1 cells, and thus subsequently attenuates psoriatic inflammation in the IMQ-induced mouse model. Furthermore, we explored the therapeutic potential of the STING inhibitor C-176, which reduces psoriatic inflammation and enhances the anti-IL-17A therapeutic response. Our results underscore the critical role of cGAS-STING signaling in DCs in driving psoriatic inflammation and highlight a promising psoriasis treatment.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa: An ambispective observational study

In this original research, we present the results in terms of effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa in real clinical practice. Results indicated significant improvement in all activity scores and patient-reported outcomes at week 16, including a notable decrease in mean IHS4 from 27.1 to 15.6 (p < 0.001), HS-PGA from 5.1 to 3.2 (p < 0.001), VAS pain from 8.3 to 4.7 (p < 0.001) and DLQI from 21.6 to 12.6 (p < 0.001). Bimekizumab, administered every 2 or 4 weeks, was well-tolerated with no discontinuations and no new safety concerns identified. These findings corroborate the drug's effectiveness and favourable safety profile observed in phase 3 clinical trials, supporting its use in real-world clinical practice for treating HS.

Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (BE HEARD I and BE HEARD II): two 48-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa have substantial unmet clinical needs and scarce therapeutic options. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F and IL-17A, in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

METHODS

BE HEARD I and II were two identically designed, 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trials. Patients aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa were randomly assigned 2:2:2:1 using interactive response technology (stratified by worst Hurley Stage at baseline and baseline systemic antibiotic use) to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks; bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks to week 16, then every 4 weeks to week 48; bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; or placebo to week 16, then bimekizumab 320 mg every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was an hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response of at least 50%, defined as a reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule count of at least 50% from baseline with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count (HiSCR50) at week 16. Efficacy analyses included all randomly assigned study patients (intention-to-treat population). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one full or partial dose of study treatment in the safety set, and of bimekizumab in the active-medication set. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04242446 and NCT04242498, and both are completed.

FINDINGS

Patients for BE HEARD I were recruited from Feb 19, 2020, to Oct 27, 2021, and 505 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. Patients for BE HEARD II were recruited from March 2, 2020, to July 28, 2021, and 509 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. The primary outcome at week 16 was met in the group who received bimekizumab every 2 weeks using modified non-responder imputation; higher responder rates were observed with bimekizumab versus placebo in both trials: 138 (48%) of 289 patients versus 21 (29%) of 72 patients in BE HEARD I (odds ratio [OR] 2·23 [97·5% CI 1·16-4·31]; p=0·0060) and 151 (52%) of 291 patients versus 24 (32%) of 74 patients in BE HEARD II (2·29 [1·22-4·29]; p=0·0032). In BE HEARD II, HiSCR50 was also met in the group who were administered bimekizumab every 4 weeks (77 [54%] of 144 vs 24 [32%] of 74 with placebo; 2·42 [1·22-4·80]; p=0·0038). Responses were maintained or increased to week 48. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 40 (8%) patients in BE HEARD I and in 24 (5%) patients in BE HEARD II treated with bimekizumab over 48 weeks. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events to week 48 were hidradenitis in both trials, in addition to coronavirus infection and diarrhoea in BE HEARD I, and oral candidiasis and headache in BE HEARD II. One death was reported across the two trials, and was due to congestive heart failure in a patient with substantial cardiovascular history treated with bimekizumab every 2 weeks in BE HEARD I (considered unrelated to bimekizumab treatment by the investigator). No new safety signals were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Bimekizumab was well tolerated by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and produced rapid and deep clinically meaningful responses that were maintained up to 48 weeks. Data from these two trials support the use of bimekizumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

FUNDING

UCB Pharma.

Disease Clearance as a New Outcome in Ulcerative Colitis: a Systematic Review and Expert Consensus

The concept of disease clearance has been proposed as a potential target in ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a systematic review to investigate the role of disease clearance, defined as a composite outcome including simultaneous clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission of disease in the management of patients with UC. Based on the literature data, statements regarding disease clearance were developed and voted on by the members of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) according to a Delphi methodology. A definition of disease clearance was proposed to standardize its use in clinical practice and clinical trials and to provide practical recommendations for its implementation as a therapeutic target in UC.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

INTRODUCTION

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were used to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab and secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg at 52 weeks for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve (bDMARD-naïve) or with previous inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).

METHODS

Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from bimekizumab randomized controlled trials, BE OPTIMAL (N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (N = 267), were matched to aggregate data from bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patient subgroups from FUTURE 2 using secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg doses (bDMARD-naïve: N = 63/37; TNFi-IR: N = 67/33). To adjust for cross-trial differences, patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of patients in the secukinumab trials. Unanchored comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and secukinumab 52-week non-responder imputation outcomes for 20/50/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20/50/70) and minimal disease activity (MDA) index were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients who were bDMARD-naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of ACR70 response than secukinumab 150 mg (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.39 [1.26, 4.53]; p = 0.008) and secukinumab 300 mg (2.03 [1.11, 3.72]; p = 0.021) at 52 weeks. In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response compared to secukinumab 150 mg for ACR20 (3.50 [1.64-7.49]; p = 0.001), ACR50 (3.32 [1.41, 7.80]; p = 0.006), ACR70 (2.95 [1.08, 8.07]; p = 0.035) and MDA (3.52 [1.38, 8.99]; p = 0.009), and a greater likelihood of response compared to secukinumab 300 mg for ACR50 (2.44 [1.06, 5.65]; p = 0.037) and MDA (2.92 [1.20, 7.09]; p = 0.018) at 52 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In this MAIC analysis, the efficacy of bimekizumab, as demonstrated by the likelihood of ACR20/50/70 and MDA response at 52 weeks, was greater or comparable to secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg for patients with PsA who were bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT04009499, NCT01752634, NCT01989468, NCT02294227, NCT02404350.

Unveiling the role of IL-17: Therapeutic insights and cardiovascular implications

Interleukin-17 (IL-17), a pivotal cytokine in immune regulation, has attracted significant attention in recent years due to its roles in various physiological and pathological processes. This review explores IL-17 in immunological context, emphasizing its structure, production, and signaling pathways. Specifically, we explore its involvement in inflammatory diseases and autoimmune diseases, with a notable focus on its emerging implications in cardiovascular system. Through an array of research insights, IL-17 displays multifaceted functions yet awaiting comprehensive discovery. Highlighting therapeutic avenues, we scrutinize the efficacy and clinical application of four marketed IL-17 mAbs along other targeted therapies, emphasizing their potential in immune-mediated disease management. Additionally, we discussed the novel IL-17D-CD93 axis, elucidating recent breakthroughs in their biological function and clinical implications, inviting prospects for transformative advancements in immunology and beyond.

From bench to bedside - is there a role of IL-17 drugs in rheumatoid arthritis?

INTRODUCTION

IL-17 has been described as a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is relevant in the seronegative spondylarthritides with IL-17 targeted therapies being licensed for their treatment.There is evidence to demonstrate that IL-17 is found in RA joints and contributes to the pro-inflammatory cascade. This results in synovial hyperplasia and osteoclastogenesis thus causing joint destruction and bony erosions.

AREAS COVERED

This review article summarizes trials that have studied the use of IL-17 targeted therapies in RA patients who have failed conventional synthetic disease-modifying therapy (C-DMARDS) and biologic DMARDS.

EXPERT OPINION

The trials that have studied IL-17 inhibitors in RA patients have only shown a modest improvement in disease activity. In several trials, the primary endpoint was not achieved whilst in others, when comparing with existing licensed biologics for RA, did not demonstrate any superiority.Tissue Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) likely plays more of a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of RA with IL-17 having a synergistic effect. Therefore, in our opinion, IL-17 inhibitors as an independent therapy for RA are less likely to provide a cost-effective benefit. There may be scope to potentially combine it with TNF-α-inhibitors (TNF-i), but this requires further research especially with the potential concerns related to increased immunosuppression.

A pilot study on the efficacy of a seaweed mud application in the treatment of cellulite

BACKGROUND

Cellulite represents a common multi-factorial condition that affects nearly all women and is now recognized as a clinical condition associated with systemic factors and negative psychological effects. Several noninvasive and minimally invasive treatments were developed during the last few years, but limited evidence supports many of them due to lack of evidence, insufficient participants, and potential adverse effects.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a seaweed mud application in improving both the structure and function of tissues affected by cellulite. Sixty women with cellulite underwent 4-week applications of seaweed mud on the buttocks and thighs. The following assessments were performed at baseline and after the last treatment: photographic, clinical, and anthropometric evaluation; tests for elasticity and hydration; ultrasonography of cellulite nodules; and cellulite biopsies in the trochanteric region. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire.

RESULTS

The treatment resulted in a significant improvement in the severity of cellulite severity between the initial assessment and the 4-week follow-up, with enhanced structure, elasticity, and hydration of the affected tissues. Microscopic analysis of the cellulite biopsies revealed a significant restoration of dermal organization with induced collagen synthesis and reduced inflammation, edema, and lipid deposition following the 4-week seaweed mud applications. Additionally, the treatment led to a remarkable improvement in comfort and satisfaction as well as a reduction in body circumferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The cosmetic application of seaweed mud has proven to be a safe, non-invasive treatment for improving the tissue alterations characteristic of cellulite.

Clinical efficacy observation of calcipotriol combined with AYJ sodium alginate repair dressing in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris and its effect on patients' neurological function

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical efficacy of calcipotriol combined with AYJ(An Yi Jia) sodium alginate repair dressing in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris (PV) and its effect on patients' neurological function.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 103 patients with PV admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024. All patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the treatment interventions received by the patients, they were divided into control group (n = 51, receiving calcipotriol monotherapy) and observation group (n = 52, receiving calcipotriol combined with AYJ sodium alginate repair dressing). The clinical treatment effects, severity of the disease (PSSI score), levels of T lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+), serum nerve growth factor (NGF), inflammatory factors [interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)], and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

① Clinical treatment effects: The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). ② Severity of the disease: The PASI scores of both groups gradually decreased with prolonged treatment time, and the observation group showed a greater magnitude of change (p < 0.05). ③ T lymphocyte subset cells and serum nerve growth factor: The levels of CD4+ were increased after treatment in both groups, while CD8+ and NGF levels were decreased compared to before treatment, with a greater magnitude of change in the observation group (p < 0.05). ④ Inflammatory factors: The levels of IFN-γ, IL-8, and TNF-α were decreased after treatment in both groups, with a greater magnitude of change in the observation group (p < 0.05). ⑤ Adverse reactions: There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Calcipotriol combined with AYJ sodium alginate repair dressing has ideal therapeutic effects in the treatment of PV. Compared with calcipotriol alone, the combined application of AYJ sodium alginate repair dressing can further improve patient efficacy, improve immune and neurological function, alleviate patient inflammatory responses, and does not increase the risk of adverse reactions in patients.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria

A model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of bimekizumab with other psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treatment regimens using ≥  20%/50%/70% improvements in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (ACR20/50/70) for patients with PsA. Forty-nine trials of 16 drugs were identified in the literature, comprising 21,340 patients. Trial-level covariates, including prior biologic use, concomitant methotrexate use, time since diagnosis, trial completion year, and active comparator were considered for exploratory models. The final model was selected using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO CV) to assess predictive performance based on prespecified criteria. LOO CV was conducted for 15 trials; the final model demonstrated that 91.5% (952/1,040) of the observed treatment differences, and 96.1% of the observed ACR20/50/70 response rates were within the 95% prediction interval (PI). Median ACR50 response rates (95% PI) at week 16 in biologic-naïve patients were predicted to be 44% (40-49%) for bimekizumab 160 mg, among the highest of all treatments analyzed. Response rates for secukinumab 150 mg and risankizumab 150 mg were 28% (25-32%) and 27% (24-31%), respectively. The MBMA was also used to predict the probability of success (PoS) of potential head-to-head trials using ACR50 response as the end point with varying sample sizes: vs. secukinumab 150 mg, the PoS for bimekizumab 160 mg was 62% (N = 200) and 90% (N = 400). Versus risankizumab 150 mg, the PoS for bimekizumab 160 mg was 68% (N = 200) and 94% (N = 400). In summary, a predictive MBMA described ACR20/50/70 outcomes in PsA, allowing accurate and precise treatment comparisons and robust PoS calculations.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab in Japanese patients with psoriasis: A single-center retrospective study

Bimekizumab, which suppresses both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, has recently been approved as a biologic for psoriasis. We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for psoriasis and to identify predictive factors for its treatment responsiveness. We analyzed 36 Japanese patients with psoriasis (19 with psoriasis vulgaris and 17 with psoriatic arthritis) from May 2022 to September 2023. All patients received bimekizumab (320 mg every 4 weeks) until week 16. Seventeen patients (43.2%) had experienced bio-switch. The median (interquartile range) baseline total psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) was 6 (3.2-20.0). Total PASI rapidly and significantly decreased at week 4 by a median 79.8% from baseline, and gradually decreased thereafter. The PASI on the trunk, and upper and lower limbs rapidly and significantly decreased at week 4 compared to baseline and plateaued thereafter. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil number significantly decreased at week 16 compared to baseline. At weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16, the achievement rate of absolute PASI ≤2 was 72.2%, 80.6%, 92.9%, and 96.4%, respectively; that of absolute PASI ≤1 was 41.7%, 61.3%, 85.7%, and 82.1%; that of PASI 75 was 55.5%, 52.9%, 69.7%, and 75.8%; that of PASI 90 was 36.1%, 50.0%, 57.6%, and 62.9%; and that of PASI 100 was 19.4%, 38.2%, 51.5%, or 57.6%, respectively. Linear multivariate regression analysis revealed that younger age was associated with a higher percentage reduction of total PASI at weeks 4 and 8. There were no serious or fatal adverse events during treatment. In conclusion, bimekizumab rapidly and remarkably reduced the total PASI together with high achievement rates of absolute PASI ≤1 and ≤2, and with favorable safety in real-world clinical practice. Younger age may be a predictive factor for a good treatment response to bimekizumab.

Bimekizumab: A Review in Psoriatic Arthritis

Although several biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), including interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors, are approved for psoriatic arthritis, the treatment of this disease remains suboptimal. Bimekizumab (Bimzelx®), a dual IL-17A and IL-17F inhibitor, is approved in the EU, Great Britain and Japan for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. In pivotal phase 3 clinical trials in patients who were bDMARD-naïve or previously had an inadequate response or intolerance to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) α inhibitors, bimekizumab improved the signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis across a range of joint, skin, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo, including the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% response in the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Phase 2 clinical trial data have shown that responses are maintained up to 3 years. Bimekizumab was generally well tolerated in patients with psoriatic arthritis, with a safety profile consistent with that in other approved indications. The most common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, oral candidiasis, headache and diarrhoea. In conclusion, bimekizumab extends the treatment options available to patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bimekizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, could be effective for treating Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in the management of PsA.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search by August 2023 was performed through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. investigating the efficacy or safety data of bimekizumab in the treatment of PsA. Data was pooled using the random-effects models. Egger tests were used to evaluate potential publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs, involving 892 PsA patients and 467 placebo controls, were included in this analysis. Bimekizumab significantly increased the rates of PASI75 and PASI100 compared with placebos [RR = 7.22, 95% CI (5.24, 9.94), p < 0.001; RR = 10.12, 95% CI (6.00, 17.09), p < 0.001]. The rate of overall adverse events was slightly higher in the bimekizumab group [RR = 1.42, 95% CI (1.05, 1.93) p = 0.023). However, there were fewer adverse severe drug reactions in the bimekizumab group compared to the placebo.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab had a significant clinical benefit in managing PsA and an acceptable safety profile.

The Role of Interleukin 23/17 Axis in Psoriasis Management: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials

Psoriasis pathogenesis is influenced by genetic factors and characterized by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and various environmental triggers. These triggers set off metabolic processes involving inflammation, cell signaling, immune response dysregulation, and antigen presentation. Several types of innate and adaptive immune cells are involved in psoriasis. Among the cytokine cascade which leads to psoriasis development, the interleukin (IL)-23/Th17 axis, especially IL-17 production, emerges as crucial. Recognizing the pivotal role of this axis has facilitated the development of selective and effective biological drugs, such as anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 monoclonal antibodies. These drugs aim to achieve the complete or near-complete disappearance of psoriatic lesions, as indicated by PASI100 and PASI90 responses, respectively. In this context, the aim of our review was to delve into the functioning of the IL-23/Th17 axis, its dysregulation in psoriasis pathogenesis, and the therapeutic potential of its inhibition. Currently, 4 anti-IL17 (secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab and brodalumab) and 3 anti-IL23 (guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab) have been approved. All these drugs showed high levels of effectiveness in both clinical trials and real-life experiences, with an excellent profile in terms of safety. Certainly, furthers studies will allow for better characterization of biologics' profile, in order to administer the right drug for the right patients at the right moment.