Growing Ranks of Advanced Practice Clinicians - Implications for the Physician Workforce

Clinical Outcomes of Orthopedic Surgery Co-Management by Internal Medicine Advanced Practice Clinicians: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Comanagement of orthopedic surgery patients by internal medicine hospitalists is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes including complications, length of stay, and cost. Clinical outcomes of orthopedic comanagement performed solely by internal medicine advanced practice clinicians have not been reported. Our objecyive was to compare clinical outcomes between advanced practice clinician-based comanagement and usual orthopedic care.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in patients 18 years or older, hospitalized for orthopedic joint or spine surgery between May 1, 2014 and January 1, 2022. Outcomes assessed were length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, return to operating room, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and total direct cost, excluding surgical implants. Generalized boosted regression and propensity score weighting was used to compare clinical outcomes and health care cost between usual care and advanced practice clinician comanagement.

RESULTS

Advanced practice clinician comanagement was associated with a 5% reduction in mean length of stay (rate ratio = 0.95, P = .009), decreased odds of returning to the operating room (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, P = .002), and a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (OR 0.32, P = .037) compared with usual orthopedic care in a weighted analysis. Need for ICU transfer was higher with advanced practice clinician comanagement (OR 1.54, P = .009), without significant differences in 30-day readmission or in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed reductions in length of stay, health care costs, return to the operating room, and 30-day mortality with advanced practice clinician comanagement compared with usual orthopedic care. Our findings suggest that advanced practice clinician-based comanagement may represent a safe and cost-effective model for orthopedic comanagement.

US Primary Care Workforce Growth: A Decade of Limited Progress, and Projected Needs Through 2040

BACKGROUND

Despite efforts to mitigate a projected primary care physician (PCP) shortage required to meet an aging, growing, and increasingly insured population, shortages remain, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, growing inequity, and persistent underinvestment.

OBJECTIVE

We examined primary care workforce trends over the past decade and revisited projected primary care clinician workforce needs through the year 2040.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Using data from the AMA Masterfile and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we analyzed trends in the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and in outpatient PCP visits by age and gender over the past decade. We then used the Medicare PECOS and Physician & Other Practitioners datasets to identify nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in primary care.

MEASURES

Using these baseline clinician enumerations and projected population growth estimates from the US Census Bureau for the years 2020-2040, we calculated estimated primary care workforce needs by 2040.

KEY RESULTS

The effects of aging and population growth and baseline shortages in the primary care workforce call for significant increases in the primary care workforce to accommodate rising demands. Office visits to primary care clinicians are projected to increase from 773,606 in 2020 to 893,098 in 2040. We project a need for an additional 57,559 primary care clinicians by 2040.

CONCLUSIONS

Workforce shortages in primary care continue to expand due to population aging, growth, and heightened rates of clinician burnout & egress.

Trauma advanced practice provider education: the current state of trauma advanced practice provider postgraduate education in the United States

Background

Postgraduate education for advanced practice providers (APPs) is a rapidly evolving field and includes residencies and fellowships designed to help narrow the gap between physicians and APPs. The current state of trauma APP postgraduate programs in the U.S. is unknown. The aim of this study is to identify the APP postgraduate programs in the U.S. dedicated to trauma training and to understand the baseline characteristics of these programs and their curriculums, including which technical skills and bedside procedures a trauma APP should be expected to perform.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of all identifiable APP postgraduate programs in trauma surgery in the U.S. through June 2022. A survey tool designed to better understand training programs and curriculums was created. A web-based survey using Qualtrics was sent to the program directors of the identifiable trauma programs. Descriptive statistics were calculated as appropriate.

Results

Eight programs were identified as primarily trauma training programs. Six programs completed the entire survey, and one program completed 50% of the survey. Programs vary in the number of graduates, clinical rotations, and educational curriculums, though all programs offer didactics and simulation curriculums for procedure skill development. Most programs are not accredited.

Conclusion

This is the first study developed to understand the content and curriculums of postgraduate trauma programs for APPs. There are only a handful of programs dedicated to trauma training, and their educational offerings are diverse, with similarities across programs in expected procedural competency. There is a need for trauma programs to invest in and further standardize APP training.

Level of evidence

IV.

Awareness and Application of United States Food Allergy Prevention Guidelines Among Pediatricians and Other Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the awareness of, adherence to, and barriers to the 2017 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) peanut allergy prevention guidelines among the pediatrics health care workforce.

STUDY DESIGN

Pediatricians, family physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and dermatologists who provide care for infants were solicited for a population-based online survey, administered from June 6, 2022, through July 3, 2022. The survey collected information about NIAID guideline awareness, implementation, and barriers as well as concerns related to the guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 250 pediatricians, 250 family physicians, 504 APPs, and 253 dermatologists met inclusion criteria. Self-reported guideline awareness was significantly higher for pediatricians (76%) compared with dermatologists (58%), family physicians (52%), and APPs (45%) (P < .05). Among participants who were aware of the guidelines, most reported using part or all of the guidelines in their clinical practices. Reported practice patterns for peanut introduction in 6-month-old infants were variable and did not always align with guidelines, particularly for infants with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pediatricians have the highest self-reported level of NIAID guideline awareness, awareness was suboptimal irrespective of provider type. Education for all pediatric clinicians is urgently needed to promote evidence-based peanut allergy prevention practices.

Utilization trends for MR arthrography of the hip and shoulder: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 20-year data from a tertiary care academic medical center

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to analyze changes in the utilization of MRA of the hip and shoulder at a large tertiary care academic medical center during a period of significant technological advancements over the last 20 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional analysis identified MRA of the hip and shoulder performed at our institution over a 20-year period (2/2003-2/2023) in relation to the total number of MR hip and shoulder examinations during the same period. Patient characteristics and referring provider demographic information were extracted. Descriptive statistics and trend analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The total number of MRIs of the hip and shoulder increased overall, with small dips in 2020 and 2022. MRA of the hip increased significantly over the first 10 years of the study period (p = 0.0005), while MRA of the shoulder did not change significantly (p = 0.33). The proportion of both MRA of the hip and shoulder declined over the last 10 years (hip, p = 0.0056; shoulder, p = 0.0017). Over the same period, there was significant increase in the proportion of examinations performed at 3 Tesla versus 1.5 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, there was a downward trend in MR shoulder and hip arthrogram utilization in the second half of this 20-year study period. However, utilization varied somewhat by referring specialties and credentials. These changes are likely reflective of both improvements in image quality and evolving practice recommendations. Awareness of such trends may be valuable in ensuring appropriate patient care, as well as for anticipating the needs of a musculoskeletal radiology practice.

Projecting the Future Registered Nurse Workforce After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Importance

Health care delivery systems rely on a well-prepared and adequately sized registered nurse (RN) workforce. The US RN workforce decreased by more than 100 000 in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic-a far greater single-year drop than observed over the past 4 decades. The implication for the longer-term growth of the RN workforce is unknown.

Objective

To describe recent trends in RN employment through 2023 and forecast the growth of the RN workforce through 2035.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Descriptive analysis of recent trends since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in RN employment using data from the US Bureau of the Census Current Population Survey and including employed RNs aged 23 to 69 years from 1982 through 2023, and retrospective cohort analysis of employment trends by birth year and age to project the age distribution and employment of RNs through 2035.

Main Outcome and Measures

Annual full-time equivalent (FTE) employment of RNs by age, demographics, and sector of employment; forecast of RN workforce by age through 2035.

Results

The final sample included 455 085 RN respondents aged 23 to 69 years. After a sharp decline in 2021, RN employment recovered, and the total number of FTE RNs in 2022 and 2023 was 6% higher than in 2019 (3.35 million vs 3.16 million, respectively). Using data on employment, education, and population through 2022, the size of the RN workforce was projected to increase by roughly 1.2 million FTEs to 4.56 million by 2035, close to prepandemic forecasts. Growth will be driven primarily by RNs aged 35 to 49 years, who are projected to compose nearly half (47%) of the RN workforce in 2035, up from 38% in 2022.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, the rebound in the total size of the US RN workforce during 2022 and 2023 indicates that the earlier drop in RN employment during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic was likely transitory. Updated forecasts of the future RN workforce are very close to those made before the pandemic.

Leveraging nursing strengths, listening to nursing needs: A keynote paper from the 2022 Emory University Business Case for Nursing Summit

This keynote paper is the first installment in the six-part Nursing Outlook special edition based on the 2022 Emory University Business Case for Nursing Summit. The summit, which took place in March 2022, was led by Emory School of Nursing in partnership with Emory School of Business. It convened national nursing, health care, and business leaders to explore possible solutions to nursing workforce crises. Each of the summit's panels authored a paper in this special edition on their respective topic(s). Those topics included the growth, distribution, resilience, and value of the nursing workforce. As on the day of the event, the keynote frames the panelists' discussions by sharing nursing workforce trends, expert workforce insights, and data-informed questions to help promote dialogue in this series and beyond.

Characterizing malpractice cases involving emergency department advanced practice providers, physicians in training, and attending physicians

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate available characteristics and financial costs of malpractice cases among advanced practice providers (APPs; nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]), trainees (medical students, residents, fellows), and attending physicians.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of claims occurring in the emergency department (ED) from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, contained in the Candello database. Cases were classified according to the provider type(s) involved: NP, PA, trainee, or cases that did not identify an extender as being substantially involved in the adverse event that resulted in the case ("no extender").

RESULTS

There were 5854 cases identified with a total gross indemnity paid of $1,007,879,346. Of these cases, 193 (3.3%) involved an NP, 513 (8.8%) involved a PA, 535 (9.1%) involved a trainee, and 4568 (78.0%) were no extender. Cases where a trainee was involved account for the highest average gross indemnity paid whereas no-extender cases are the lowest. NP and PA cases differed by contributing factors compared to no-extender cases: clinical judgment (NP 89.1% vs. no extender 76.8%, p < 0.0001; PA 84.6% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001), documentation (NP 23.3% vs. no extender 17.8%, p = 0.0489; PA 25.9% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001), and supervision (NP 22.3% vs. no extender 1.8%, p < 0.0001; PA 25.7% vs. no extender p < 0.0001). Cases involving NPs and PAs had a lower percentage of high-severity cases such as loss of limb or death (NP 45.6% vs. no extender 50.2%, p = 0.0004; PA 48.3% vs. no extender, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

APPs and trainees comprise approximately 21% of malpractice cases and 33% of total gross indemnity paid in this large national ED data set. Understanding differences in characteristics of malpractice claims that occur in emergency care settings can be used to help to mitigate provider risk.

Industry Payments to Urologists and Urologic Advanced Practice Providers in 2021

OBJECTIVE

To compare industry payments from drug and medical device companies to urologists and urologic advanced practice providers (APPs) in 2021.

METHODS

We used the 2020 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty file to identify single-specialty urology practices, defined as those where the majority of physicians were urologists. We then used the Open Payments Program Year 2021 data to summarize the value and number of industry payments to urologists and APPs, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, in these practices. We calculated the total value and number of payments and median total value and number of payments per provider for urologists and urologic APPs.

RESULTS

We identified 4418 urologists and 1099 APPs working in single-specialty urology practices in 2021 (Table 1). Of these, 3646 (87%) urologists received at least one industry payment, totaling $14,755,003 from 116,039 payments, and 954 urologic APPs (87%) received at least one industry payment, including 463 nurse practitioners (85%), totaling $401,283 from 13,035 payments, and 491 physician assistants (89%), totaling $543,429 from 14,626 payments. We observed significantly greater median total value and number of payments per provider for urologists ($620 and 24 payments) compared to urologic APPs ($473 and 21 payments; P < .001 and P = .017, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A similar percentage of urologists and urologic APPs received industry payments in 2021. While urologists received a higher total number and total value of payments in 2021, urologic APPs were a common target of industry marketing payments.

Structural capabilities in primary care practices where nurse practitioners care for persons living with dementia

BACKGROUND

Primary care structural capabilities (i.e., electronic health records, care coordination, community integration, and reminder systems) can address the multiple needs of persons living with dementia (PLWD).

OBJECTIVES

This study describes structural capabilities in primary care practices where nurse practitioners (NPs) provide care to PLWD and compares the presence of structural capabilities in practices with a high and low volume of PLWD.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 293 NPs in 259 practices in California. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association between the volume of PLWD and the presence of structural capabilities.

RESULTS

NPs reported that 96% of practices had electronic health records, 61% had community integration, 55% had reminder systems and 35% had care coordination capabilities. Practices with a high volume of PLWD were less likely to have community integration compared to practices with a low volume of PLWD.

CONCLUSION

Many PLWD-serving practices do not have the essential infrastructure for providing optimal dementia care. Practice managers should focus on implementing the essential structural capabilities to address the complex needs of PLWD.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians and practice administrations can use the findings of this study to improve the delivery of care in practices that provide care to PLWD.

Nurse Practitioner Students' Knowledge Assessment and Perceived Preparedness to Triage Ophthalmology Complaints in a Primary Care Setting: An Educational Intervention

Purpose  In this proof-of-concept pilot study, we aimed to increase nurse practitioner (NP) student knowledge of ophthalmology to prepare NPs for encounters in primary care settings. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) endorse core knowledge that medical students should achieve. We assess the effectiveness of an innovative ophthalmologist-led curriculum based on these competencies tailored to issues NPs encounter in primary care. Methods  Johns Hopkins University NP students enrolled in a pre-post-cohort study and educational intervention. The didactic program was developed according to AUPO and AAO core ophthalmology content for medical students and was taught in-person by an ophthalmologist. Pre-post-assessments evaluated students' perceived readiness to encounter ophthalmic issues in the clinic and baseline knowledge of core competencies of ophthalmology. Results  A total of 42 NP students were included in the analysis. NP students improved in core knowledge and readiness to encounter ophthalmology issues. After the educational event, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' ratings of preparedness to obtain a focused history, exam, perform initial management and decide the urgency of a referral for acute painless vision loss ( p  < 0.001), chronic vision loss ( p  < 0.001), or a patient with a red/painful eye ( p  < 0.001). Students showed a statistically significant improvement in postdidactic event core ophthalmology knowledge assessment scores ( p  = 0.002). Conclusion  Primary care NPs are increasingly the initial point of contact for patients with ophthalmic complaints, and thus, high-quality and thorough education regarding ophthalmology triage and referral for NPs is necessary. NP student comfort with and knowledge of ophthalmic complaints and triage may be improved by a brief educational intervention taught by an ophthalmologist early in the NP curriculum.

The Association between Primary Care Practices' Structural Capabilities and Hospitalizations among Persons Living with Dementia

Background: Persons living with dementia (PLWD) are more likely to be hospitalized than individuals without dementia. Little is known about key features (i.e., structural capabilities) in primary care practices where PLWD receive care. This study assessed the relationship between structural capabilities (i.e., care coordination, community integration, and reminder systems) and hospitalizations among PLWD. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 5001 PLWD in 192 practices and used three datasets: nurse practitioner surveys, Medicare claims, and Minimum Data Set. Using generalized estimating equations, we evaluated the association between structural capabilities and hospitalizations. Results: PLWD who received care from practices with care coordination were less likely to have hospitalizations (OR = 0.62, p < .05). No statistically significant associations were observed between community integration and reminder systems and hospitalizations. Conclusion: Primary care practices need to tailor structural capabilities to address the needs of PLWD to reduce hospitalizations.

Advanced Practice Provider Onboarding: An Academic Teaching Institution's Experience

With the robust growth in demand for advanced practice providers (APPs), employers must focus on strategies to promote recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction. The authors describe the creation, development, and sustainability of an APP onboarding program to support the initial transition for providers into their new roles within an academic healthcare organization. Advanced practice provider leaders coordinate with multidisciplinary stakeholders to ensure new-hire APPs are equipped with the necessary tools for a successful start.

State Variation in the Utilization of Nurse Practitioner-Provided Home-Based Primary Care: A Medicare Claims Analysis

Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide an increasing proportion of home-based primary care, despite restrictive scope of practice laws in approximately one half of states. We examined the relationship between scope of practice laws and state volume of NP-provided home-based primary care by performing an analysis of 2018 to 2019 Medicare claims. For each state we calculated the proportion of total home-based primary care visits by NPs and the proportion of all NPs providing home-based primary care. We used the 2018 American Association of Nurse Practitioners classification of state practice environment. We performed chi-square tests to assess the significance between volume and practice environment. We found that 42% of home-based primary care is delivered by NPs nationally, but substantial variation exists across states. We did not find a discernible or statistically significant pattern of uptake of NP-provided home-based primary care across full, reduced, or restricted states. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(5), 11-17.].

The impact of a structured onboarding program for newly hired nurse practitioners and physician assistants

BACKGROUND

The return on investment for onboarding programs and their effect on attrition and engagement within health systems across the United States are unclear.

LOCAL PROBLEM

The existing onboarding program for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) at a hospital on the west coast was varied and lacked a clinician focus. A structured onboarding program was created to standardize their entry to our workforce.

METHODS

A needs assessment was completed with a stakeholder focus group, for which an onboarding curriculum was then created. Participants completed presurveys/postsurveys during the data collection period as the primary outcome. A Plan-Do-Study-Act approach was used to revise session content and improve participant experience. Onboarding costs and attrition were tracked as secondary outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

From July 2017 through June 2019, newly hired NPs and PAs were invited to participate in the program. Six quarterly cohorts attended five in-person 2-hour onboarding sessions over 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine eligible NPs and PAs completed an anonymous pre/post Qualtrics survey. The aggregate responses were significantly improved using Fisher exact test. Measured onboarding value was not significantly changed. Mean pre-onboarding attrition was 10.3% compared with 4.5% for onboarding participants. The annual cost for onboarding participants was $63,470 versus $256,826 as the estimated mean cost of one separation within their first year.

CONCLUSIONS

Workforce engagement, standardized knowledge, and participant attrition revealed an improving trend with this structured onboarding program. The investment to formalize onboarding newly hired NPs and PAs was modest, and the findings suggest that an onboarding program has financial and engagement merit.

The current state of transplant advanced practice providers: results of the advanced practice provider practice survey

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are trained, licensed health care providers. The American Society of Transplant APP community of practice developed an electronic survey to investigate transplant APP demographics, scope of practice, and academic activities. We defined the top of scope of practice as delivering health care to the fullest extent of APP education and training as allowed by state laws and regulations. From July 11, 2020, to August 31, 2020, 307 invitations were e-mailed and survey links were distributed electronically on the community of practice hub and social media. Two hundred fifty-three APPs responded. APPs practice in inpatient and outpatient settings. Among the respondent APPs, 11.5% assist in the operating room (OR), 46.3% of inpatient and 46.6% of outpatient APPs perform procedures, and 17.8% run specialized APP clinics. 26.2% feel they do not function at the top of their scope of practice and 29.7% were expected to function as a coordinator some or all of the time. Forty-three percent gave invited lectures, 41.5% have published, and 69.2% teach physician trainees. 74.7% and 35.1%, respectively, would like to participate in research and teach but are limited by time, opportunity, and experience. APPs should practice at the top of their scope of practice. Clinical workloads and lack of time limit the ability of APP to teach and contribute to evidence-based practice.

A confirmatory factor analysis of the novice nurse practitioner role transition scale

As interest in supporting new nurse practitioners' (NPs) transition to practice increases, those interested in measuring the concept will need an instrument with evidence of reliability and validity. The Novice NP Role Transition (NNPRT) Scale is the first instrument to measure the concept. The preliminary exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure: organizational alignment, mentorship, sense of purpose, perceived competence and self-confidence, and compensation. Using a cross-sectional design and data from 210 novice NPs, the purpose of this study was to confirm the NNPRT Scale's internal factor structure via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The sample was primarily female (97.5%), White (75.9%), and certified in primary care (53.5%). The CFA confirmed the five-factor structure, and model fit was improved by moving and omitting items (χ² [619] = 1277.799, p < 0.001; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.071 [0.066-0.077]). The final NNPRT Scale includes 37-items, and internal consistency reliability was calculated at 0.95. Convergent validity evidence was supported by a positive, significant correlation with receiving a formal orientation in the first NP position; a negative, significant correlation with turnover intention; and a lack of a relationship with years of prior registered nurse experience. The NNPRT Scale is an instrument with sound evidence of reliability and validity. The NNPRT Scale will be useful for researchers, administrators, and clinicians looking to explore factors that affect NNPRT, as well as by clinicians and administrators implementing programs to support novice NPs' transition to practice.

Utilization of Medicare's chronic care management services by primary care providers

BACKGROUND

Medicare billing codes introduced in 2015 reimburses primary care providers for non-face-to-face, chronic care management (CCM) services rendered by clinical staff.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this manuscript was to describe provider trends in billed CCM services and identify factors associated with CCM utilization.

METHODS

Observational study using Medicare Public Use Files, 2015 to 2018. General, family, geriatric, and internal medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) with billed primary care services were included. Multivariable analyses modeled associations between the CCM services and type of provider, adjusting for year, primary care services, practice, and patient characteristics.

FINDINGS

Among 140,465 physicians and 141,118 NPs/PAs, CCM services increased each year, yet remained underutilized: 2% to 7% of physicians and 0.3% to 1.3% of NPs/PAs billed CCM in 2018. Increases in beneficiaries (p < .0001), percentage of dually enrolled (p = .0134), and primary care services (p < .0001) predicted higher CCM utilization.

DISCUSSION

CCM utilization reflects practice-based efforts to improve patient access to care by enhancing care delivery.

Referring Provider Opinions of Pediatric Cardiology Evaluations Performed by Nurse Practitioners

In the setting of physician shortages, nurse practitioner (NP) roles have evolved, with increasing independence across most healthcare settings. We sought to characterize referring clinician perceptions of NP-performed outpatient pediatric cardiology consultations. We electronically distributed to pediatric and family medicine physicians and NPs in Arkansas our 11-item survey assessing the acceptability of pediatric cardiology consultations being completed by an NP under varying circumstances. Circumstances included seven common referral indications, and the scale offered five answer choices ranging from "definitely unacceptable" to "definitely acceptable". A total of 292 of 1756 (16.6% response rate) referring clinicians responded to the survey. Overall, 57% of responses indicated that NP-completed pediatric cardiology evaluations were either definitely or probably unacceptable. Acceptability was varied by referral indication and referring clinician characteristics. Unacceptability of NP-completed pediatric cardiology evaluations was greatest among family medicine physicians (81%), pediatricians (66%), and clinicians working in solo or two-physician practices (77%) or community hospitals/clinics (71%). If NP evaluation of a murmur included required review with a cardiologist, the unacceptability rate dropped from 50 to 24% (p < 0.0001). Unacceptability was higher in physicians who do not work with NPs (69%) compared to those who do (60%) (pp < 0.0001). Many referring physicians were willing to send patients ≥ 100 miles to ensure evaluation by a pediatric cardiologist. Most referring physicians find pediatric cardiology evaluations performed by NPs to be unacceptable. Requisite review with a cardiologist improved acceptability of NP evaluations. Many referring physicians would send patients much farther to guarantee evaluation by a cardiologist.

The Impact of Nurse Practitioner-Led Primary Care on Quality and Cost for Medicaid-Enrolled Patients in States With Pay Parity

Studies have established that nurse practitioners (NPs) deliver primary care comparable to physicians in quality and cost, but most focus on Medicare, a program that reimburses NPs less than physicians. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the quality and cost implications of receiving primary care from NPs compared to physicians in 14 states that reimburse NPs at the Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) physician rate (i.e., pay parity). We linked national provider and practice data with Medicaid data for adults with diabetes and children with asthma (2012-2013). We attributed patients to primary care NPs and physicians based on 2012 evaluation & management claims. Using 2013 data, we constructed claims-based primary care quality measures and condition-specific costs of care for FFS enrollees. We estimated the effect of NP-led care on quality and costs using: (1) weighting to balance observable confounders and (2) an instrumental variable (IV) analysis using differential distance from patients' residences to primary care practices. Adults with diabetes received comparable quality of care from NPs and physicians at similar cost. Weighted results showed no differences between NP- and physician-attributed patients in receipt of recommended care or diabetes-related hospitalizations. For children with asthma, costs of NP-led care were lower but quality findings were mixed: NP-led care was associated with lower use of appropriate medications and higher rates of asthma-related emergency department visits but similar rates of asthma-related hospitalization. IV analyses revealed no evidence of differences in quality between NP- and physician-led care. Our findings suggest that in states with Medicaid pay parity, NP-led care is comparable to physician-led care for adults with diabetes, while associations between NP-led care and quality were mixed for children with asthma. Increased use of NP-led primary care may be cost-neutral or cost-saving, even under pay parity.

Evaluation of Industry Payments to US Advanced Practice Clinicians in 2021

IMPORTANCE

Advanced practice clinicians (APCs) are a growing part of the US health care system, and their financial relationships with pharmaceutical and medical device companies have not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the value, frequency, and types of payments made to APCs and the association of state scope-of-practice laws with these payments.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study used 2021 Open Payments Program data to analyze payments from pharmaceutical or medical device companies to physicians or APCs between January 1 and December 31, 2021. Doctors of medicine and osteopathy were categorized as physicians, and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, certified nurse midwives, and anesthesiologist assistants as APCs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The total value and total number of payments were calculated in aggregate and per clinician for each type of APC, all APCs, and physicians. These calculations were repeated by submitting manufacturer, form of payment, nature of payment, and state scope-of-practice law for nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 412 000 physicians and 232 000 APCs collectively received $1.99 billion in payments from industry in 2021, of which APCs received $121 million (6.1%). The median total value of payments per clinician for physicians was $167 (IQR, $45-$712) and for APCs was $117 (IQR, $33-$357). The median total number of payments per clinician was equal for physicians and APCs (n = 4). The most common payments to APCs included food and beverage ($69 million [57.6%]), compensation for services other than consulting ($32 million [26.4%]), and consulting fees ($8 million [6.6%]). Advanced practice clinicians in states with the most restrictive scope-of-practice laws received 15.9% lower total value of payments than those in the least restrictive states (P = .002). Physician assistants received 7.6% (P = .005) higher value and 18.1% (P < .001) greater number of payments than nurse practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, 232 000 APCs collectively received $121 million in industry payments in 2021. The frequency of industry interactions with APCs was similar to that for physicians, but the average value was lower. The greater value of payments to APCs who practice in states with the least restrictive scope-of-practice laws suggests that industry payments may be related to clinician autonomy.

Practice Environment and Workforce Outcomes of Nurse Practitioners in Community Health Centers

The nurse practitioner (NP) workforce in community health centers (CHCs) increases access to primary care for underserved populations. Working with medically complex patients, high workloads, and low resources in the CHC setting, CHC NPs may be susceptible to poor workforce outcomes. This study uses NP survey data collected from 6 US states to describe and assess the relationship between CHC NP practice environment and burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention. CHC NPs rated their practice environments favorably, and more than 89% of CHC NPs reported satisfaction with their job. Better rating of NPs' relationship with CHC administration was associated with improved job satisfaction and decreased turnover intention.

Didactic Physician Assistant Students' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Medicine Resources: A Preliminary Investigation

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician Assistant (PA) students. This pilot study surveyed didactic PA students at three geographically diverse PA programs at the end of their didactic EBM course to understand which attributes of EBM resources they find most and least useful, and their self-efficacy in searching and appraising medical literature. Thematic analysis identified the most important student-reported attributes of a resource. PA students in this sample preferred UpToDate and PubMed as their top EBM tools based on attribute ratings. However, each database included in this pilot study received positive feedback, despite a low usage rate across institutions. The most important attributes were ease of use/search, information presentation, and conclusion/critical appraisal skill. After one EBM course, on average, students rated their self-efficacy searching the literature and appraising the literature as "moderately confident." This suggests that instructors and librarians have an opportunity to expose students to more tools as well as encourage "the right tool for the right job."

A cross-sectional study of the practice types of US adult primary care physician specialists

BACKGROUND

Many physicians listed as primary care in databases such as the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile do not provide traditional ambulatory primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To compare physicians listed in the AMA Masterfile as primary care physician (PCPs) specialists for adult patients with their actual practice type.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of the AMA Masterfile report for PCPs who care for adults (listed as family medicine, internal medicine, medicine-paediatrics, and geriatrics) in the summer and fall of 2018 (spring of 2019 for Hartford, CT) in the primary counties of 8 metropolitan areas across the United States. We searched multiple websites to determine the actual practice type of each physician in the study counties. We correlated the 2 datasets: the AMA Masterfile list vs the results of our searches.

RESULTS

Family physicians were more likely to function as traditional ambulatory PCPs than internists [1,738/2,101 (82.7%) vs 1,241/2,025 (60.9%), P < 0.001], and less likely to be hospitalists [83/2,101 (4.0%) vs 631/2,025 (31.0%), P < 0.001]. Other practice types included urgent care [105 (5.0%) family physicians, 16 (0.8%) internists] and emergency medicine [49 (2.3%) family physicians, 20 (1.0%) internists]. The AMA Masterfile identified 4,892 practicing PCPs for adult patients in the study counties, of which 3,084 (63.0%) matched by location and ambulatory PCP practice type [3,695 (75.5%) for ambulatory PCP practice type only].

CONCLUSIONS

We provide an updated estimate using a unique methodology to estimate how to correct the AMA Masterfile for PCPs who actually provide traditional ambulatory primary care to adult patients.

Meeting the need for nurse practitioner clinicals: A survey of practitioners

BACKGROUND

The increase in the number of nurse practitioner (NP) students requires increased clinical practice sites and prepared preceptors.

PURPOSE

This study describes NPs' clinical experiences as a student and their current practices as an NP preceptor.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive study design used a 38-item web-based survey conducted in June and July 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 334 NPs practicing in Texas responded; most had been NPs for 10 or fewer years (58.2%) and in their positions less than 5 years (50.3%). A plurality of respondents was required to find their own clinical placements (46%). The most common challenge in obtaining clinical placements was finding preceptors (33%). Nurse practitioners reported excellent clinical experiences (39.3%) as a student and believed that they were generally well prepared for the NP role (38.9%) and to care for their specialty patient population (46.1%) upon graduation. Sixty percent of respondents reported not currently precepting, 37.6% had never been asked to precept, whereas 32.8% reported that employers restricted precepting. Family NPs were the least likely to precept.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse practitioners report positive clinical experiences that prepare them for NP careers. Multiple opportunities exist to enlist additional NPs as preceptors for NP students.

IMPLICATIONS

There is capacity within the current NP workforce to meet the clinical educational needs of NP students. Future work should examine best practices to engage NPs who are not currently preceptors. As policies change NP education, research should examine the implications of the preparation for NP roles at the time of graduation, organizational outcomes, and quality of care.

The development of a visual dashboard report to assess physician assistant and nurse practitioner financial and clinical productivity

The evolving COVID-19 pandemic has unevenly affected academic medical centers (AMCs), which are experiencing resource-constraints and liquidity challenges while at the same time facing high pressures to improve patient access and clinical outcomes. Technological advancements in the field of data analytics can enable AMCs to achieve operational efficiencies and improve bottom-line expectations. While there are vetted analytical tools available to track physician productivity, there is a significant paucity of analytical instruments described in the literature to adequately track clinical and financial productivity of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) employed at AMCs. Moreover, there is no general guidance on the development of a dashboard to track PA/NP clinical and financial productivity at the individual, department, or enterprise level. At our institution, there was insufficient tracking of PA/NP productivity across many clinical areas within the enterprise. Thus, the aim of the project is to leverage our institution's existing visualization tools coupled with the right analytics to track PA/NP productivity trends using a dashboard report.MethodsWe created an intuitive and customizable highly visual clinical/financial analytical dashboard to track productivity of PAs/NPs employed at our AMC.ResultsThe APP financial and clinical dashboard is organized into two main components. The volume-based key performance indicators (KPIs) included work relative value units (wRVUs), gross charges, collections (payments), and payer-mix. The session utilization (KPIs) included (e.g., new versus return patient ratios, encounter type, visit volume, and visits per session by provider). After successful piloting, the dashboard was deployed across multiple specialty areas and results showed improved data transparency and reliable tracking of PAs/NPs productivity across the enterprise. The dashboard analytics were also helpful in assessing PA/NP recruitment requests, independent practice sessions, and performance expectations.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first paper to highlight steps AMCs can take in developing, validating, and deploying a financial/clinical dashboard specific to PAs/NPs. However, empirical research is needed to assess the impact of qualitative and quantitative dashboards on provider engagement, revenue, and quality of care.

Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs Associated with More Aggressive Diagnostic Testing

BACKGROUND

Variation in clinicians' diagnostic test utilization is incompletely explained by demographics and likely relates to cognitive characteristics. We explored clinician factors associated with diagnostic test utilization.

METHODS

We used a self-administered survey of attitudes, cognitive characteristics, and reported likelihood of test ordering in common scenarios; frequency of lipid and liver testing in patients on statin therapy. Participants were 552 primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants from practices in 8 US states across 3 regions, from June 1, 2018 to November 26, 2019. We measured Testing Likelihood Score: the mean of 4 responses to testing frequency and self-reported testing frequency in patients on statins.

RESULTS

Respondents were 52.4% residents, 36.6% attendings, and 11.0% nurse practitioners/physician assistants; most were white (53.6%) or Asian (25.5%). Median age was 32 years; 53.1% were female. Participants reported ordering tests for a median of 20% (stress tests) to 90% (mammograms) of patients; Testing Likelihood Scores varied widely (median 54%, interquartile range 43%-69%). Higher scores were associated with geography, training type, low numeracy, high malpractice fear, high medical maximizer score, high stress from uncertainty, high concern about bad outcomes, and low acknowledgment of medical uncertainty. More frequent testing of lipids and liver tests was associated with low numeracy, high medical maximizer score, high malpractice fear, and low acknowledgment of uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician variation in testing was common, with more aggressive testing consistently associated with low numeracy, being a medical maximizer, and low acknowledgment of uncertainty. Efforts to reduce undue variations in testing should consider clinician cognitive drivers.

Supporting Advanced Practice Providers Through the Development and Implementation of an Advanced Practice Provider Professional Advancement Program

As the number of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) has increased across health care settings, institutions have identified the need to provide opportunities for the advancement, growth, and development of APPs. An APP Professional Advancement Program was developed and implemented at our freestanding, pediatric academic medical center that employs over 700 APPs. This program was designed to support all APPs regardless of their role and practice setting by recognizing their accomplishments and providing the tools and resources needed to pursue opportunities to further their professional development and leadership. This article describes the development, implementation, and sustainment of an APP Professional Advancement Program.

Recruitment and retention of primary care nurse practitioners in underserved areas: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The growing nurse practitioner (NP) workforce plays a critical role in primary care delivery in the United States. However, better recruitment and retention of the robust NP workforce in underserved areas are needed; evidence to inform such effort is limited.

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to examine the findings, scope, and knowledge gaps of available literature on factors associated with NP recruitment and retention in underserved areas.

METHODS

This review was guided by Joanna Briggs' Scoping Review Methodology and PRISMA-SCR reporting standards. Literature search for peer-reviewed and gray literature was conducted in six databases.

FINDINGS

A total of 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Factors associated with NP recruitment and retention in underserved areas were mapped into five themes, including factors related to: the individual NP, NP education programs/financial aid, organizations employing NPs, the communities NPs work in, and autonomous practice. Majority of the included studies were published before 2010; few used rigorous study designs and analysis methods; and few exclusively studied NPs and unique challenges facing the NP workforce.

DISCUSSION

Available studies demonstrate that NP recruitment and retention can be addressed by various stakeholders (e.g., educators, policy makers); however, up-to-date, methodologically rigorous, and NP-focused studies are needed.

The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery

Nurse practitioners (NPs) are an increasingly integral part of the primary care workforce. NPs' authority to practice without physician oversight is regulated by state-level scope of practice (SOP) restrictions. To the extent that SOP restrictions prevent NPs from practicing to their full abilities and capacity, they could create inefficiencies and restrict access to health care. In this paper, I study what happens at primary care practices when states relax their SOP laws. Using a novel dataset of claims and electronic health records paired with a difference-in-differences research design, I quantify the effects of relaxing SOP laws on: (1) NPs' autonomy in their day-to-day jobs; (2) total workload and patient allocation between NPs and physicians; and (3) the provision of low-value services at primary care practices. I find some evidence that NPs practice more autonomously following SOP changes, but I find no evidence that relaxing SOP laws changes the volume nor allocation of patients to NPs, nor the provision of low-value services. Given the lower reimbursement that NPs typically receive, these findings suggest that allowing NPs to practice without physician oversight could reduce health care spending, without harming patients.

Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Transition to Practice in the Long-Term Care Setting: An Ethnography

Advanced practice registered nurses are successful in improving quality outcomes and filling provider care gaps in long-term care. However, little is known about the nurse’s transition to practice in this setting. A 12-month ethnography was conducted via participant-observation with nine advanced practice registered nurses in five long-term care facilities to understand practice environment influence on the nurses’ transition and on the reciprocal influence of the nurse on the practice environment. Transition was fraught with uncertainty as documented by five themes: where’s my authority, institutional acceptance, personal role fulfillment, provider relationships, and individual versus organizational care. These findings suggest that transition in this setting is complex, characterized by insecurity whether the individual is new to advanced practice or experienced. Transition in long-term care could be strengthened by formal programs that include clinical practice, reconceived mentorship for advanced practice registered nurses, and education designed to improve comfort and expertise with indirect care.

A competency roadmap for advanced practice nursing education using PRIME-NP

BACKGROUND

Clinical competency validation is essential for nurse practitioner (NP) education and public accountability. While there has been robust discussion around what constitutes clinical competency and assessment, clear and consistent definitions and measurements remain elusive.

PURPOSE

This article describes the PRIME-NP clinical competency model that is scalable, reproducible and accurately documents NP student competency across clinical courses.

METHODS

To develop the model, work in 5 discrete domains was necessary: (a) model development, (b) assessment tool to be used in Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCE), (c) rubrics to accompany the OSCE exam, (d) faculty education, and (e) evaluating the model use.

FINDINGS

Faculty and student outcomes reveal that the model and assessment tool acceptability and effectiveness of the model, especially for early identification for at risk students.

CONCLUSION

The PRIME-NP offered faculty the opportunity to identify at-risk students, identify a more nuanced remediation plan, and assess student competency in simulated environments.

Psychometric properties of two instruments measuring self-efficacy and outcome expectations of providing inhaler technique education to patients

INTRODUCTION

Both the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) asthma practice guidelines recommend that providers routinely check inhaler technique and correct any mistakes that patients may make when using these devices. Providers, however, rarely check inhaler technique during asthma visits. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the development of an instrument to measure self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding inhaler technique patient education, (2) evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the new scales, and (3) provide preliminary evidence of construct validity. Methods: First- and second-year physician assistant (PA) students at two institutions completed an anonymous and voluntary survey evaluating two new instruments, the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Self-efficacy (TIP-SE) and the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Outcome Expectations (TIP-OE) scales and sociodemographic characteristics. The data were analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Cronbach's α, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: We had usable responses from 146 PA students (71.9% participation rate). The PCA identified one factor for the TIP-SE and TIP-OE, respectively. The internal consistency of the TIP-SE and TIP-OE was α = 0.96 and α = 0.92, respectively. The logistic regression found that second-year PA students who had higher mean TIP-SE scores were significantly more likely to report teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.9). There was not a statistically significant relationship between reporting teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations and mean TIP-OE scores. Conclusion: The TIP-SE and TIP-OE show preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.2008428 .

Optimal Staffing Models To Care For Frail Older Adults In Primary Care And Geriatrics Practices In The US

Different staffing configurations in primary and geriatric care practices could have implications for how best to deliver services that are essential for a growing population of older adults. Using data from a 2018 survey of physicians (MDs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) working in primary and geriatric care, we assessed whether different configurations were associated with better or worse performance on a number of standard process measures indicative of comprehensive, high-quality primary care. Practices with a large concentration of MDs had the highest estimated labor costs. Practices high in NPs and physician assistants (PAs) were most common in states that grant full scope of practice to NPs. The high-NP/PA configuration was associated with a 17-percentage-point greater probability of facilitating patient visits and a 26-percentage-point greater probability of providing the full bundle of primary care services compared with the high-MD model. Team-based configurations had a 27.7-percentage-point greater probability of providing the full bundle of primary care services. The complex needs of older adults may be best served by team-based practices with a broad provider mix that can provide a range of services in the office and the community.

Investigating practice-level and individual factors of advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants and their relationship to resilience

BACKGROUND

Gaps in research persist related to practitioners' resilience, although much has been written about the need for strategies to strengthen personal resilience.

PURPOSE

The study's purpose was to examine practice-level (quality of physician relationship, physician presence, and autonomy) and individual factors and how they affect resilience.

METHODOLOGY

An online survey invited advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs) from four states to participate in a cross-sectional study. Hierarchical ordinary least squares regression was used to test the impact of main effect variables in the context of identified control variables.

SAMPLE

A sample of 1,138 APRNs and PAs completed the survey questions.

RESULTS

Findings from the covariate model (model 1) and the main effect model (model 2) show that both models were significant at the p < .01 level, with the adjusted R2 differing from 0.02 to 0.13, respectively. Regression results show a significant positive association between quality of the physician relationship and APRN/PA resilience (b = 0.09, p < .01). A negative association between the lack of autonomy and higher levels of resilience (b = -0.14, p < .01) was also demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced practice registered nurse/PA resilience is affected by both practice-level and personal factors, suggesting that workplace interventions could increase resilience.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Work environments allowing APRNs and PAs to function autonomously and with professional support from physician colleagues are favorable contributors to their resilience. Future studies need to investigate the meaning of physician presence/availability and organizational interventions that extend beyond individual resilience.

Nurse practitioner-owned practices and value-based payment

BACKGROUND

The United States is steadily shifting away from volume-based payments toward value-based payment for health care. The nursing model's emphasis on high-value care, such as disease prevention and health maintenance, ideally positions nurse practitioner (NP) practice owners to contribute to the goals of value-based care. However, little is known about NP participation in value-based care.

PURPOSE

To better understand NP-owned practice participation in value-based care.

METHODOLOGY

Using convenience sampling, we developed a registry of NP owned practices, which we used to conduct a web-based survey from November 2019 to February 2020.

RESULTS

Of the 47 NP-owner respondents, 40 practice in primary or specialty care. Practices are relatively small with a mean clinical staff of 4 full-time equivalent (FTE; range: 1-17), mean total staff of 7 FTE (1-28.5), and with a mean of 325 patient visits annually. A third participate in value-based payment arrangements, whereas a half are considering and three quarters are knowledgeable about value-based payment arrangements. Over 70% of practice owners report lack of knowledge, lack of financial protections, and lack of payer partnership as barriers to participation in value-based payment models.

CONCLUSIONS

NP practice owners face many challenges to taking on risk, including insufficient patient volume.

IMPLICATIONS

Joining together may allow small NP practices to participate in and thrive under value-based payment. Reducing the barriers and regulation of all NPs will enable the health care system to capitalize on the nursing model to meet the goals of value-based care.

Comparing physicians and PAs as solo providers in a rural ED: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of physician assistants (PAs) as solo providers in rural EDs.

METHODS

This study compared ED metrics and patient characteristics between physicians and PAs at a critical access hospital in Arizona.

RESULTS

Nearly 26,000 patient encounters from the ED of the host institution were analyzed. Although minor variances in metrics were appreciated, transfers, 72-hour returns, and death rates were all similar among provider types. Results from this work do not demonstrate a clinically meaningful difference among ED metrics between physicians and PAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggest that an appropriately trained and experienced PA can meet commonly used metrics in the care of patients presenting to this rural ED.

Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Laws and Opioid Prescribing

Policy Points The increased use of nurse practitioners represents a viable policy option to address continuing access-to-care deficiencies across the United States, but state scope-of-practice laws limit the ability of nurse practitioners to deliver health care. Groups in favor of restrictive scope-of-practice laws have argued that relaxing these laws will lead to increases in opioid prescriptions during an already severe opioid crisis, implicating patient safety concerns. An examination of a data set of 1.5 billion opioid prescriptions demonstrates that relaxing nurse practitioner scope-of-practice laws generally reduces opioid prescriptions. This evidence supports eliminating restrictive scope-of-practice laws that currently govern nurse practitioners in many states.

CONTEXT

As many parts of the United States continue to face physician shortages, the increased use of nurse practitioners (NPs) can improve access to care. However, state scope-of-practice (SOP) laws limit the ability of NPs to provide care by restricting the services they can provide and often requiring physician supervision of their practices. One important justification for the continuation of these restrictive SOP laws is preventing the overprescription of certain medications, particularly opioids.

METHODS

This study examined a data set of approximately 1.5 billion individual opioid prescriptions between 2011 and 2018, which were aggregated to the individual provider-year level. A series of difference-in-differences regression models was estimated to examine the association between laws allowing NPs to practice independently and opioid prescribing patterns among physicians and NPs. Opioid prescriptions were measured in total annual morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed by individual providers.

FINDINGS

Across all NPs and physicians, independent NP practice was associated with a statistically significant decline of 6%, 2%, 3%, 7%, and 5% in total annual MMEs prescribed to commercially insured, cash-paying, Medicare, government-assistance, and all patients, respectively. Medicaid patients saw no statistically significant change in annual MMEs. Across all payers, NPs generally increase and physicians generally decrease the number of opioids they prescribe following a grant of NP independence. These counterbalancing changes result in an overall net decline in MMEs.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence supports the contention that allowing NPs to practice independently increases opioid prescriptions. The results support policy changes that allow NPs to practice independently.

Retention and change in PAs' first years of employment

OBJECTIVE

Employment analyses demonstrate that physician assistants (PAs) exhibit role flexibility in US medicine. The next step in understanding this labor-shifting observation is to know at what career stage it first occurs.

METHODS

Using matriculate data linked to the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) census survey data, a longitudinal analysis of seven graduate cohorts revealed that one-third of PAs changed specialty roles at least once during their first decade of employment.

RESULTS

From this series, it appears that new PAs spend about 3.4 years in their first job, on average, before they decide to move to another medical or surgical field. In examining PAs who changed their clinical role during this time period, 28% shifted from primary care to another medical or specialty role. Overall, the PA career movement to nonprimary care specialties increased substantially.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support observations that PAs provide an adaptive role in a dynamic and changing medical workforce.

Hospital Medicine Providers' Transfusion Knowledge: A Survey Study

Blood transfusion is one of the most common procedures performed in the inpatient setting. Although ordering a transfusion is a component of routine practice for most hospitalists, prior literature has shown that non-transfusion medicine physicians have poor to intermediate transfusion medicine knowledge (TMK). No recent study has evaluated TMK among hospitalists, including both attending hospitalists and advanced practice providers (APPs). Using a validated exam and a truncated version of a validated survey, we obtained an initial impression of attitudes, perceived and actual TMK. A total of 183 hospital medicine providers nation-wide completed the 12-question online survey and 20 question exam, including 155 attending hospitalists and 28 APPs. The overall mean score was 52% (range 20%-85%). Forty-one percent of participants reported less than 1 hour of training in transfusion medicine. Five of the seven questions with the worst performance (<25% correct) were on transfusion reactions. Almost all respondents reported consenting a patient for blood transfusion and 60% believed that TMK was very or extremely important in order to provide appropriate care for patients. More than 80% believed that having additional transfusion medicine education would be at least moderately helpful. Although routinely consenting patients for transfusion, hospital medicine providers may have insufficient TMK particularly as it pertains to transfusion reactions. The majority of hospitalists rated TMK important to clinical practice and had an interest in additional training, thus continuing medical education has the potential to improve TMK and patient care.

Impact of state scope-of-practice laws on nurse practitioner-provided home visits

Millions of older Americans receive nurse practitioner (NP)-provided home based primary care (HBPC). Little is known about how state scope-of- practice (SOP) laws may impact use of NP-home visits. Using 2017 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use File (PUF), we examined the impact of state SOP laws on the use of NP-home visits. The PUF file was merged with the 2017 American Community Survey to assess area-level median income. Over 4.4 million home visits were provided to 1.6 million Medicare beneficiaries. NPs represented the largest share of providers (47.5%). In states with restricted SOP laws, compared to NPs, physicians and physician assistants had higher odds of providing HBPC. In states with reduced SOP laws, compared to NPs, physicians and PAs had decreased odds of providing HBPC. Our study provides evidence that SOP restrictions are associated with decreased utilization of NP-provided HBPC.