5-Ethynyluracil (776C85): a potent modulator of the pharmacokinetics and antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Mediated Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanistic Investigation and Solution

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutics for the treatment of cancers associated with the aerodigestive tract, breast, and colorectal system. The efficacy of 5-FU is majorly affected by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) as it degrades more than 80% of administered 5-FU into an inactive metabolite, dihydrofluorouracil. Herein we discuss the molecular mechanism of this inactivation by analyzing the interaction pattern and electrostatic complementarity of the DPD-5-FU complex. The basis of DPD overexpression in cancer cell lines due to significantly distinct levels of the miRNAs (miR-134, miR-27b, and miR-27a) compared to normal cells has also been outlined. Additionally, some kinases including sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) have been reported to correlate with DPD expression. Currently, to address this problem various strategies are reported in the literature, including 5-FU analogues (bypass the DPD-mediated inactivation), DPD downregulators (regulate the DPD expression levels in tumors), inhibitors (as promising adjuvants), and formulation development loaded with 5-FU (liposomes, nanoparticles, nanogels, etc.), which are briefly discussed in this Review.

A 5-FU Precursor Designed to Evade Anabolic and Catabolic Drug Pathways and Activated by Pd Chemistry In Vitro and In Vivo

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an antineoplastic antimetabolite that is widely administered to cancer patients by bolus injection, especially to those suffering from colorectal and pancreatic cancer. Because of its suboptimal route of administration and dose-limiting toxicities, diverse 5-FU prodrugs have been developed to confer oral bioavailability and increase the safety profile of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens. Our contribution to this goal is presented herein with the development of a novel palladium-activated prodrug designed to evade the metabolic machinery responsible for 5-FU anabolic activation and catabolic processing. The new prodrug is completely innocuous to cells and highly resistant to metabolization by primary hepatocytes and liver S9 fractions (the main metabolic route for 5-FU degradation), whereas it is rapidly converted into 5-FU in the presence of a palladium (Pd) source. In vivo pharmokinetic analysis shows the prodrug is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration and exhibits a longer half-life than 5-FU. In vivo efficacy studies in a xenograft colon cancer model served to prove, for the first time, that orally administered prodrugs can be locally converted to active drugs by intratumorally inserted Pd implants.

Perturbing the Movement of Hydrogens to Delineate and Assign Events in the Reductive Activation and Turnover of Porcine Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase

The native function of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is to reduce the 5,6-vinylic bond of pyrimidines uracil and thymine with electrons obtained from NADPH. NADPH and pyrimidines bind at separate active sites separated by ∼60 Å that are bridged by four Fe₄S₄ centers. We have shown that DPD undergoes reductive activation, taking up two electrons from NADPH [Beaupre, B. A., et al. (2020) Biochemistry 59, 2419-2431]. pH studies indicate that the rate of turnover is not controlled by the protonation state of the general acid, cysteine 671. The activation of the C671 variants is delineated into two phases particularly at low pH values. Spectral deconvolution of the delineated reductive activation reaction reveals that the initial phase results in the accumulation of charge transfer absorption added to the binding difference spectrum for NADPH. The second phase results in reduction of one of the two flavins. X-ray crystal structure analysis of the C671S variant soaked with NADPH and the slow substrate, thymine, in a low-oxygen atmosphere resolved the presumed activated form of the enzyme that has the FMN cofactor reduced. These data reveal that charge transfer arises from the proximity of the NADPH and FAD bases and that the ensuing flavin is a result of rapid transfer of electrons to the FMN without accumulation of reduced forms of the FAD or Fe₄S₄ centers. These data suggest that the slow rate of turnover of DPD is governed by the movement of a mobile structural feature that carries the C671 residue.

The Interaction of Porcine Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase with the Chemotherapy Sensitizer: 5-Ethynyluracil

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a complex enzyme that reduces the 5,6-vinylic bond of pyrimidines, uracil, and thymine. 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is also a substrate for DPD and a common chemotherapeutic agent used to treat numerous cancers. The reduction of 5FU to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil negates its toxicity and efficacy. Patients with high DPD activity levels typically have poor outcomes when treated with 5FU. DPD is thus a central mitigating factor in the treatment of a variety of cancers. 5-Ethynyluracil (5EU) covalently inactivates DPD by cross-linking with the active-site general acid cysteine in the pyrimidine binding site. This reaction is dependent on the simultaneous binding of 5EU and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). This ternary complex induces DPD to become activated by taking up two electrons from the NADPH. The covalent inactivation of DPD by 5EU occurs concomitantly with this reductive activation with a rate constant of ∼0.2 s-1. This kinact value is correlated with the rate of reduction of one of the two flavin cofactors and the localization of a mobile loop in the pyrimidine active site that places the cysteine that serves as the general acid in catalysis proximal to the 5EU ethynyl group. Efficient cross-linking is reliant on enzyme activation, but this process appears to also have a conformational aspect in that nonreductive NADPH analogues can also induce a partial inactivation. Cross-linking then renders DPD inactive by severing the proton-coupled electron transfer mechanism that transmits electrons 56 Å across the protein.

Molecular modeling approaches to address drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) mediated chemoresistance: a review

Resistance against clinically approved anticancer drugs is the main roadblock in cancer treatment. Drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) that are capable of metabolizing a variety of xenobiotic get overexpressed in malignant cells, therefore, catalyzing drug inactivation. As evident from the literature reports, the levels of DMEs increase in cancer cells that ultimately lead to drug inactivation followed by drug resistance. To puzzle out this issue, several strategies inclusive of analog designing, prodrug designing, and inhibitor designing have been forged. On that front, the implementation of computational tools can be considered a fascinating approach to address the problem of chemoresistance. Various research groups have adopted different molecular modeling tools for the investigation of DMEs mediated toxicity problems. However, the utilization of these in-silico tools in maneuvering the DME mediated chemoresistance is least considered and yet to be explored. These tools can be employed in the designing of such chemotherapeutic agents that are devoid of the resistance problem. The current review canvasses various molecular modeling approaches that can be implemented to address this issue. Special focus was laid on the development of specific inhibitors of DMEs. Additionally, the strategies to bypass the DMEs mediated drug metabolism were also contemplated in this report that includes analogs and pro-drugs designing. Different strategies discussed in the review will be beneficial in designing novel chemotherapeutic agents that depreciate the resistance problem.

Transient-State Analysis of Porcine Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Reveals Reductive Activation by NADPH

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catalyzes the initial step in the catabolism of the pyrimidines uracil and thymine. Crystal structures have revealed an elaborate subunit architecture consisting of two flavin cofactors, apparently linked by four Fe₄S₄ centers. Analysis of the DPD reaction(s) equilibrium position under anaerobic conditions revealed a reaction that favors dihydropyrimidine formation. Single-turnover analysis shows biphasic kinetics. The serine variant of the candidate general acid, cysteine 671, provided enhanced kinetic resolution for these phases. In the first event, one subunit of the DPD dimer takes up two electrons from NADPH in a reductive activation. Spectrophotometric deconvolution suggests that these electrons reside on one of the two flavins. The fact that oxidation of the enzyme by dioxygen can be suppressed by the addition of pyrimidine is consistent with these electrons residing on the FMN. The second phase involves further oxidation of NADPH and concomitant reduction of the pyrimidine substrate. During this phase no net reduction of DPD cofactors is observed, indicating that the entire cofactor set acts as a wire, transmitting electrons from NADPH to the pyrimidine rapidly. This indicates that the availability of the proton from the C671 general acid controls the transmittance of electrons from NADPH to the pyrimidine. Acid quench and high-performance liquid chromatography product analysis of single-turnover reactions with limiting NADPH confirmed a 2:1 NADPH:pyrimidine stoichiometry for the enzyme, accounting for successive activation and pyrimidine reduction. These data support an alternating subunit model in which one protomer is activated and turns over before the other subunit can be activated and enter catalysis.

Prompt treatment with uridine triacetate improves survival and reduces toxicity due to fluorouracil and capecitabine overdose or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency

Uridine triacetate has been shown to be an effective antidote against mortality and toxicity caused by either overdoses or exaggerated susceptibility to the widely used anticancer agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine. However, a direct assessment of efficacy based on when emergency treatment was initiated was not clinically feasible. In this study we used mouse models of 5-FU overdose and of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency to compare the efficacy of uridine triacetate in reducing toxicity and mortality when treatment was initiated at time points from 4 to 144 h after administration of 5-FU. We found that uridine triacetate was effective both in the 5-FU overdose and DPD deficiency models. Starting treatment within 24 h was most effective at reducing toxicity and mortality in both models, while treatment starting more than 96 to 120 h after 5-FU was far less effective. Uridine triacetate also reduced mortality in the DPD deficiency model when mice were treated with the 5-FU prodrug capecitabine. The results of this study are supportive of clinical observations and practice, indicating that efficacy declined progressively with later and later treatment initiation. Prompt treatment with uridine triacetate, within 24 h, conferred the greatest protection against 5-FU overexposure.

Drug metabolizing enzymes and their inhibitors' role in cancer resistance

Despite continuous research on chemotherapeutic agents, different mechanisms of resistance have become a major pitfall in cancer chemotherapy. Although, exhaustive efforts are being made by several researchers to target resistance against chemotherapeutic agents, there is another class of resistance mechanism which is almost carrying on unattended. This class of resistance includes pharmacokinetics resistance such as efflux by ABC transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes. ABC transporters are the membrane bound proteins which are responsible for the movement of substrates through the cell membrane. Drug metabolizing enzymes are an integral part of phase-II metabolism that helps in the detoxification of exogenous, endogenous and xenobiotics substrates. These include uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenases (DPDs) and thiopurine methyltransferases (TPMTs). These enzymes may affect the role of drugs in both positive as well negative manner, depending upon the type of tissue and cells present and when present in tumors, can result in drug resistance. However, the underlying mechanism of resistance by drug metabolizing enzymes is still not clear. Here, we have tried to cover various aspects of these enzymes in relation to anticancer drugs.

Radiotherapy and Oral Capecitabine in the Preoperative Treatment of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Rationale, Preliminary Results and Perspectives

Preoperative radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy increases the chances of tumor downstaging and down-sizing and facilitates sphincter-sparing surgical procedures, thereby improving survival and quality of life. Though several innovative agents are being investigated in combination with radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion remains the common schedule used in the preoperative chemoradiation setting. However, the protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil requires specialized pumps and long-term venous access, which makes patients susceptible to infections or thrombosis. To overcome the 5-fluorouracil infusion-related problems, oral 5-fluorouracil precursors and inhibitors of 5-fluorouracil degradation have been developed and explored. These include oral fluoropyrimidines such as tegafur (ftora-fur), uracil plus tegafur (UFT), S-1, eniluracil and the oral carbamate capecitabine. Phase I trials have demonstrated the feasibility of the capecitabine-radiotherapy combination with respect to the bolus or infusion 5-fluorouracil-radiation approach and have defined the optimal dose of capecitabine during radiotherapy (825 mg/m2/day through a bid administration). Severe hand-foot syndrome occurred in 7-15% of patients, representing the most commonly observed toxicity. It is noteworthy that severe diarrhea with capecitabine during radiotherapy was not common. Leukopenia frequently occurred but was mild and reversible. Phase II trials, although limited in number, have evidenced a high probability of pathological complete response (up to 31%) with capecitabine and radiation, with an increased probability of sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. Although it is too early to assess whether oral capecitabine will be able to replace iv 5-fluorouracil in combination with preoperative radiotherapy, the NSABP will address this question in a large randomized trial. Finally, phase I-II trials evaluating escalating doses of capecitabine associated with oxaliplatin or irinotecan with radiotherapy are being carried out to assess the maximum-dose tolerance and efficacy in the preoperative setting. It is likely that these new chemoradiation associations might increase rectal cancer clearance, hopefully without increasing toxicity.

Drug delivery of oral anti-cancer fluoropyrimidine agents

INTRODUCTION

Sixty years since its introduction, 5-FU still forms the core of chemotherapy regimens for many types of malignancies. 5-FU is a time-dependent drug but is rapidly degraded in plasma by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Although originally developed in an intravenous form, 5-FU oral prodrugs were developed with the goal of improving efficacy and minimizing toxicity as well as to capitalize on the advantages of oral drug administration. The inactive 5-FU prodrug is gradually converted into the active form in the systemic circulation. UFT, S-1, and capecitabine are oral 5-FU prodrugs currently in clinical use. However, the efficacy of 5-FU can be further improved by its combination with DPD inhibitors and biochemical modulators, such as uracil and leucovorin, in addition to modifying administration schedules. Areas covered: We focused on the drug delivery of oral 5-FU prodrugs, their pharmacokinetics, and the development of DPD inhibitors. Since oral 5-FU prodrugs have been formulated into combination drugs, we also discussed the regulatory approval of combination drugs. Expert opinion: Many regimens that include intravenously administered 5-FU can be replaced by oral 5-FU prodrugs. Patients would benefit from development of combination 5-FU oral prodrug formulations and its associated path through the combination drug regulatory approval process.

Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement

The use of oral anticancer drugs has increased during the last decade, because of patient preference, lower costs, proven efficacy, lack of infusion-related inconveniences, and the opportunity to develop chronic treatment regimens. Oral administration of anticancer drugs is, however, often hampered by limited bioavailability of the drug, which is associated with a wide variability. Since most anticancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic window and are dosed at or close to the maximum tolerated dose, a wide variability in the bioavailability can have a negative impact on treatment outcome. This review discusses mechanisms of low bioavailability of oral anticancer drugs and strategies for improvement. The extent of oral bioavailability depends on many factors, including release of the drug from the pharmaceutical dosage form, a drug's stability in the gastrointestinal tract, factors affecting dissolution, the rate of passage through the gut wall, and the pre-systemic metabolism in the gut wall and liver. These factors are divided into pharmaceutical limitations, physiological endogenous limitations, and patient-specific limitations. There are several strategies to reduce or overcome these limitations. First, pharmaceutical adjustment of the formulation or the physicochemical characteristics of the drug can improve the dissolution rate and absorption. Second, pharmacological interventions by combining the drug with inhibitors of transporter proteins and/or pre-systemic metabolizing enzymes can overcome the physiological endogenous limitations. Third, chemical modification of a drug by synthesis of a derivative, salt form, or prodrug could enhance the bioavailability by improving the absorption and bypassing physiological endogenous limitations. Although the bioavailability can be enhanced by various strategies, the development of novel oral products with low solubility or cell membrane permeability remains cumbersome and is often unsuccessful. The main reasons are unacceptable variation in the bioavailability and high investment costs. Furthermore, novel oral anticancer drugs are frequently associated with toxic effects including unacceptable gastrointestinal adverse effects. Therefore, compliance is often suboptimal, which may negatively influence treatment outcome.

Specific targeting of prostate cancer cells in vitro by the suicide gene/prodrug system, uracil phosphoribosyltransferase/5-fluorouracil, under the control of prostate-specific membrane antigen promoter/enhancer

This study was designed to investigate the prostate cancer-specific tumoricidal effect of the suicide gene, Escherichia coli uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT), driven by the human prostate-specific membrane antigen promoter/enhancer (PSMA(E/P)) in vitro. When transfected with PSMA(E/P)-EGFP (enhanced green fluorescence protein) (a plasmid construct with the green fluorescence protein gene driven by the PSMA(E/P)), only the androgen-responsive and PSMA-positive prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, expressed GFP, indicating the specificity of the PSMA(E/P) activity in androgen-sensitive and PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells. Taking advantage of this prostate cancer-specific property of PSMA(E/P), we successfully introduced bacterial UPRT into LNCaP cells where the tumoricidal effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was significantly increased when compared with the cells without the exogenous UPRT. We conclude that the efficacy of 5-FU-based chemotherapy in prostate cancers can be significantly improved by targeted expression of the suicide gene UPRT under the control of PSMA(E/P).

High intratumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA levels in pancreatic cancer associated with a high rate of response to S-1

PURPOSE

Although the prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer has been poor, we recently reported unusually high response rate and survival benefit of S-1 treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to reveal genetic background of this unique activity of S-1 against pancreatic cancer. S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative consisting of Tegafur (FT) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor (5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine; CDHP). Accordingly, intratumoral DPD mRNA expression level was measured to reveal whether the level in pancreatic cancer was different from other GI cancer and whether it was relevant to chemosensitivity.

METHODS

Thirty-three recurrent pancreatic cancer patients treated with S-1 were studied. We obtained 15 responders and 13 non-responders according to the change of serum CA19-9. The mRNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded surgical specimens using laser captured microdissection, and relative expression levels of each DPD/beta-actin were measured using a quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Taqman) system. Forty-four colorectal cancer patients and 20 gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 were enrolled as control groups. Thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA expression levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Intratumoral DPD mRNA expression level was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer than that in colorectal cancer (P = 0.0003; median level, 1.38 vs. 0.44) and gastric cancer (P = 0.0061; 1.38 vs. 0.82). No difference in TS mRNA expression levels was observed among cancer types. DPD expression among responded pancreatic cancer was significantly lower than non-responded. (P = 0.012, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral DPD mRNA expression level in pancreatic cancer was significantly higher than the other malignancies. This result may elucidate possible reasons for the high effectiveness of S-1 in pancreatic cancer.

Chemotherapy Dosing Part I: Scientific Basis for Current Practice and Use of Body Surface Area

Cytotoxic chemotherapy is characterised by a low therapeutic index and significant variability in therapeutic and toxic effects. In an attempt to reduce this variability, most chemotherapy doses are individualised according to patient body surface area (BSA). This practice, which was introduced almost 50 years ago, clearly has practical and economic implications for the healthcare system. Furthermore, the clinical value of this approach has, in recent years, been questioned. Despite established practice, chemotherapy dose selection remains complicated, partly because treatment effects are difficult to measure, partly because drugs are used in combination with other treatment modalities, and also because the patient's condition may change with disease progression. Various patient-related factors can affect drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), for example organ function, expression and activity of metabolising enzymes, drug resistance, body size, gender, age, concomitant disease and co-administration of other drugs. These factors may be of clinical significance in chemotherapy dose determination and measures of PK, PD or both feature in attempts to devise more rigorous methods for chemotherapy dosing. Part I of this series of two reviews describes the history and clinical impact of BSA-based chemotherapy, and examines the scientific evidence to support BSA dosing. It evaluates the factors affecting PK and PD for specific drugs that could inform and refine dose determination.

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer remains a public-health issue on a global scale. With development of a new generation of cytotoxic agents, survival has improved for patients with metastatic disease. How to maximize the benefit of chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity remains incompletely answered. Hepatic resection can provide a significant hope for long term survival, and a subset of patients might benefit from perioperative approaches. More recently, specific molecular processes have been targeted for therapeutic interventions, and encouraging results have been achieved using inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

A phase I study of eniluracil/5-FU in combination with radiation therapy for potentially resectable and/or unresectable cancer of the pancreas and distal biliary tract

PURPOSE

Eniluracil is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). It allows for oral dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which may potentially improve the antitumor activity of 5-FU when delivered concurrently with radiotherapy while avoiding the inconvenience and morbidity of continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU. We addressed the safety of oral eniluracil/5-FU combined with radiation therapy and determined the profile of dose-limiting toxicities and recommended Phase II dose (RPTD) in patients with pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with resectable or locally advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer received eniluracil (starting at 6.0 mg/m(2) q12h)/5-FU (starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) q12h). Eniluracil/5-FU were given concurrently with preoperative radiation to 4500 cGy followed by 540 cGy by reduced fields. Surgery was considered 4 weeks after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled. Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all patients. The MTD was not reached and, thus, the RPTD of eniluracil/5-FU was determined to be 10 mg/m(2) q12h/1 mg/m(2) q12h. Two patients with locally advanced disease had a 30-45 percent cross-sectional tumor reduction, one of which underwent margin-negative resection. Two of 5 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 1 of 3 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, with underwent exploratory surgery had margin-negative resections. One patient had a pathologic complete response (pCR). Patient 5-FU plasma exposure increased slightly from Day 8 to Day 31.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral eniluracil/5-FU is feasible, well tolerated, and potentially effective in the neoadjuvant setting. Further investigation of oral fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers for pancreaticobiliary malignancies is warranted.

A phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic breast cancer — A Japanese trial by the S-1 cooperative study group, breast cancer working group

BACKGROUND

S-1 is a newly developed novel oral dihydrouracil dehydrogenase inhibiting fluoropyrimidine drug consisting of 1 M tegafur (FT), 0.4 M 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyrimidine (gimeracil), and 1 M potassium oxonate (oteracil), with efficient antitumor activity and low gastrointestinal toxicity which is widely used in Japan against advanced gastric, head and neck cancers. We investigated its clinical efficacy against metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

A non-blind phase II study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with measurable metastasis foci (n=111) were enrolled, and 108 patients were regarded as eligible. S-1 was administered orally at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2/day b.i.d. One course consisted of 28 consecutive days of administration followed by a 14-day rest, and courses were repeated up to six times.

RESULTS

Among the eligible patients, 10 had a complete response and 35 had a partial response, with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 41.7% (95% confidence interval: CI, 32.3-51.5%). The incidences of toxicity (> or =grade 3) were neutropenia 9.1%, anemia 0.9%, anorexia 3.6%, stomatitis 1.8%, nausea/vomiting 1.8%, diarrhea 0.9%, and fatigue 2.7%, however no treatment-related deaths were observed. The median survival time was 872 days (95% CI, 572-1,110 days). There was no difference in response rate or toxicity between the under 65-year-old group and the older group.

CONCLUSION

S-1 was demonstrated to have high efficacy with low gastrointestinal toxicity even in older patients and will be a promising new chemotherapy drug for metastatic breast cancer.

A Phase I trial of preoperative eniluracil plus 5-fluorouracil and radiation for locally advanced or unresectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum and colon

PURPOSE

Eniluracil, an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows for oral dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which avoids the morbidity of continuous infusion 5-FU. We addressed the safety of oral eniluracil and 5-FU combined with preoperative radiotherapy and determined the recommended Phase II dose and dose-limiting toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal and colon cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with TNM Stage II or III rectal cancer and residual or recurrent colon cancer received eniluracil (starting at 6.0 mg/m(2) every 12 h) and 5-FU (starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) every 12 h). Eniluracil and 5-FU were given with a 5-week course of preoperative radiotherapy of 4500 cGy, with a possible 540-cGy boost. Surgery was performed approximately 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 1 patient was withdrawn owing to noncompliance. Chemotherapy was completed in all patients; radiotherapy was completed in 20 patients. The recommended Phase II dose of eniluracil and 5-FU was 8 mg/m(2) every 12 h and 0.8 mg/m(2) every 12 h, respectively. Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity. Eleven of the 17 patients with primary rectal cancer underwent a sphincter-sparing procedure. One patient had a pathologic complete response.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral eniluracil and 5-FU is feasible and well tolerated. Additional investigation is warranted.

Augmentation of the antitumor activity of capecitabine by a tumor selective dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor, RO0094889

Capecitabine is an orally available fluoropyrimidine and is finally converted to 5-FU selectively in tumor tissues. In our study, we examined whether the antitumor activity of capecitabine is directly affected by a modulation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The modulations were carried out by the overexpression of DPD in tumor cells and by tumor selective DPD inhibition. The DPD-overexpressing cells were obtained by transfection of human DPD cDNA into HCT116 human colorectal cancer cells. The HCT116 cells bearing DPD cDNA expressed about 13 times higher DPD activities than the parental HCT116 cells, and they became significantly less susceptible to capecitabine than the parental cells when transplanted into nude mice. Administration of RO0094889 that is converted to a DPD inhibitor 5-vinyluracil selectively in tumor tissues restored the antitumor activity of capecitabine against the tumor of the HCT116 cells carrying DPD cDNA and various tumors expressing DPD. As compared to 5-ethynyluracil or 5-vinyluracil, which inhibited DPD not only in tumor tissues but also in other non-cancerous tissues, the effective dose range of RO0094889 in augmenting the efficacy of capecitabine was much broader. These results indicate that the antitumor activity of capecitabine is directly affected by DPD activities in tumor tissues and therefore, the combination of capecitabine and a tumor selective DPD inhibitor, RO0094889, will be beneficial to patients who have tumors with high levels of DPD.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity in gastric cancer tissue and effect of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is an enzyme that catabolizes 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The effect of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines (DIF) is presumably related to DPD activity. We studied the efficacy of DIF (tegafur + uracil UFT], tegafur + gimeracil + osteracil [S-1 (TS-1)]) relative to DPD activity, with other fluoropyrimidines as controls.

METHODS

The efficacy of DIF relative to DPD activity was evaluated in 58 gastric cancer patients who received postoperative administration of fluoropyrimidines, consisting of DIF in 42 patients (UFT in 23; S-1 in 19) and non-DIF in 16 patients.

RESULTS

In patients with low DPD activity (under 40 U/mg protein), curative potential tended to be lower for DIF than for non-DIF, but the survival rate was the same for both. In patients with high DPD activity (40 U/mg protein or more), such a tendency was not detected. In a comparison between those treated with UFT and those treated with S-1, prognosis was better in the latter group, in spite of their predominance of lower curative potentials of B or C. In 27 patients with measurable lesions, a partial response (PR) or higher response occurred in 33% (5/15) of those with low DPD activity, and in 17% (2/12) of those with high DPD activity. In the patients with low DPD activity, non-DIF induced no change (NC) in 17% (16), and progressive disease (PD) in the rest. UFF induced PD in all 5 patients, while S-1 induced a response rate of 44% (7/16), with NC in 25% (4/16). In the patients with high DPD activity, on the other hand, non-DIF (n = 3) and UFT (n = 3) induced PD in all the patients, while S-1 induced PR in 33% (2/6) and NC or a higher response in 67% (4/6).

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to use S-1 rather than UFF in patients with high DPD activity. Measurement of DPD was useful in drug selection.

Design and synthesis of the tumor-activated prodrug of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor, RO0094889 for combination therapy with capecitabine

A series of tumor-activated prodrugs of the inhibitors of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme catabolizing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU: 4g), has been designed and synthesized. RO0094889 (11c) is a prodrug of 5-vinyluracil (4c), a known DPD inhibitor, and was designed to generate 4c selectively in tumor tissues by sequential conversion of 11c by three enzymes: esterase, cytidine deaminase and thymidine phosphorylase, the latter two of which are known to be highly expressed in various tumor tissues. When capecitabine (1), a tumor-activated prodrug of 5-FU, was co-administered orally with 11c, 5-FU in tumor tissues was significantly increased with only a slight increase of 5-FU in plasma as compared with oral capecitabine alone.

A phase I trial of weekly paclitaxel plus prolonged oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with refractory malignancies

PURPOSE

This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated doses, and recommended phase II doses of the combination of weekly intravenous paclitaxel and oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received paclitaxel i.v. over 1 hour weekly for four consecutive weeks of each cycle. Oral eniluracil/5-FU was administered orally twice daily for 28 consecutive days starting on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles were repeated every 35 days. Patients were accrued at six different dosing combinations. Weekly paclitaxel doses ranged from 60 mg/m(2) to 80 mg/m(2), and oral eniluracil/5-FU doses ranged from 8.0/0.8 mg/m(2) to 11.5/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received 126 cycles of therapy. Myelosuppression was minimal at all dose levels, with no grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia reported. DLT was reported in three out of six patients enrolled at the highest dose level and consisted of grade 3 diarrhea (two patients) and grade 3 mucositis (one patient). No DLTs were reported in patients enrolled at lower dose levels. One complete response and three partial responses were reported in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and eniluracil/5-FU was generally well tolerated. The recommended doses for further phase II testing are paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 4 weeks plus eniluracil/ 5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-28 with cycles repeated every 35 days.

The effect of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency on outcomes with fluorouracil

The use of fluorouracil has been complicated by unpredictable pharmacokinetics, low response rates and seemingly random toxicity. The variable pharmacology is largely due to inherited differences in expression of the metabolising enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This converts fluorouracil to inactive metabolites (catabolic pathway) and ultimately dictates the amount of fluorouracil that is available to be metabolised to cytotoxic nucleotides (anabolic pathway). Absolute and partial DPD deficiency affect around 0.1 and 3% of the Caucasian population, respectively. Administration of conventional doses of fluorouracil to these individuals has resulted in profound bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity, especially in those with absolute DPD deficiency. Other forms of toxicity such as myocardial ischaemia have been difficult to attribute directly to DPD deficiency. Efforts to improve outcomes with fluorouracil have included monitoring of fluorouracil concentrations and modifying fluorouracil administration techniques (e.g. from bolus injections to protracted intravenous infusions). In general, these moves have met with limited therapeutic advancement. The recognition that DPD deficiency increases toxicity has lead to the suggestion that genotypic or phenotypic assessment of DPD status prior to initiating fluorouracil may help predict outcomes. The gene that encodes for DPD expression is called DPYD. Approximately 1% of Caucasians are heterozygotes for the DPYD*2A mutation which is the variant allele that is most frequently implicated in DPD deficiency. Screening for this mutation may identify around 60% of individuals with absolute DPD deficiency who are at the greatest risk of toxicity. Another approach is to determine DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with low activity suggesting an increased risk of toxicity. Intratumoral DPD activity may also be assessed with high activity suggesting a poorer response to fluorouracil. Recently, drugs that inhibit DPD (e.g. eniluracil) have become available. These remove much of the variability in fluorouracil pharmacokinetics and may make assessment of DPD activity redundant. Despite the considerable inroads that have been made, further study is needed before the best means of optimising fluorouracil treatment is determined.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Eniluracil is a potent, irreversible inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the major catabolic enzyme for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Pretreatment with eniluracil significantly increases plasma half-life, plasma concentration and oral bioavailability of 5-FU. This multicenter phase II trial was designed to estimate the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with 5-FU and eniluracil.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixteen patients (61 with no prior chemotherapy and 55 with prior chemotherapy) were registered for treatment with eniluracil 50 mg (total dose) p.o. on days 1-7 and 5-FU 20 mg/m(2)/day p.o. on days 2-6 of a 28-day treatment cycle.

RESULTS

In 106 patients evaluable for survival, the 6-month survival rate was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 47%, median survival 3.6 months] for patients who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy and 29% (95% CI 16% to 42%, median survival 3.4 months) for those who had received prior chemotherapy. For those patients with measurable disease, the confirmed response rates were 8% and 2%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (29% of patients) and diarrhea (12% of patients). Overall, 69% of patients experienced a grade 3 or worse adverse event during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the combination of a 7-day course of eniluracil and a 5-day course of oral 5-FU has limited activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and is associated with a high frequency of clinically significant adverse events.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

With effective chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment, the survival benefit is clearly achieved for certain (stage III) colorectal cancer patients, though there still exist many unsettled issues including the controversies in the treatment of stage II disease. Advances in the development of a new generation of cytotoxic agents in the past several years have allowed us to move forward from the "fluorouracil-only era" in the treatment of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer. It is still not very clear how best to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy of the combination therapy with newer agents, or how to maximize the benefit of chemotherapy (concurrent versus sequential). There are many current ongoing clinical trials designed to address these issues. With better understanding of the signal transduction and molecular biology characteristics of colorectal cancer, and the development of biologic and molecular target agents, the outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer will be improved further. Future clinical trials should be focused on optimizing and individualizing therapy for patients based on their molecular profiles to achieve maximal clinical benefit.

Pharmacobiologically based scheduling of capecitabine and docetaxel results in antitumor activity in resistant human malignancies

PURPOSE

Capecitabine and docetaxel have demonstrated preclinical antitumor synergy. This synergy is thought to occur from docetaxel-mediated upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (dThdPase), an enzyme responsible for the relative tumor selectivity of capecitabine. On the basis of the time-dependency and transiency for this upregulation, we performed a phase I study of capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel. We hypothesized that weekly docetaxel would result in sustained dThdPase expression and that capecitabine administration at times of maximum dThdPase upregulation would increase the therapeutic index for this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies received docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, and capecitabine bid on days 5 to 18, every 4 weeks. Docetaxel was fixed at 36 mg/m(2)/wk, whereas capecitabine was escalated in successive patients cohorts.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients received 77 courses at capecitabine doses from 950 to 1,500 mg/m(2)/d. The most common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and asthenia. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were infrequent and no treatment-related hospitalizations occurred. Three of three patients treated at 1,500/36 mg/m(2) capecitabine/docetaxel developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea during either their first or second course, whereas only two of 13 patients at 1,250/36 mg/m(2) doses developed significant toxicity. Antitumor responses (n = 7) occurred in patients with hepatocellular, non-small-cell lung, and chemotherapy-refractory breast, bladder, and colorectal carcinomas. Prolonged stabilizations occurred in patients with metastatic mesothelioma (n = 2), chemorefractory non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel is well tolerated. Recommended doses are capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/d (625 mg/m(2) bid) with docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)/wk. The acceptable toxicity profile in this dose schedule, and the antitumor activity observed, warrant further evaluation of this regimen.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II trial (E4296) of oral 5-fluorouracil and eniluracil as a 28-day regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer

Coadministration of eniluracil with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) allows the oral absorption of small doses of 5-FU, resulting in therapeutic plasma levels. A phase II clinical trial of this combination using a continuous dosing schedule was carried out in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Fifty-three previously untreated patients and 46 patients who had received one prior regimen for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received 10 mg/m2 of eniluracil and 1 mg/m2 of 5-FU twice daily for 28 days, with cycles repeated after a 7-day rest until progression of disease or prohibitive toxicity. Seven of 53 previously untreated patients had an objective tumor response (13.2%): 1 complete response and 6 partial responses. The mean duration of response was 6.3 months. Only 1 of the 45 evaluable patients in the previously treated group had a partial response, with no complete responses. The duration of response was 3 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for the previously untreated group and 2.5 months for the previously treated group. Median overall survival was 11.1 months for the previously untreated group and 9.0 months for the previously treated group. Hematologic toxicity was infrequent, with 3 patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity. Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity included 11 patients with diarrhea, 5 with nausea, and 4 with vomiting. Other common toxicities included anemia and stomatitis, but they were generally mild. This regimen is well tolerated and shows activity in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is similar to that observed with other 5-FU-based regimens. This regimen has not shown to be effective in patients who have had prior chemotherapy.

Phase I study of eniluracil and oral 5-fluorouracil in combination with docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

The authors conducted a single-institution Phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses and to define the toxic effects of oral eniluracil and oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible if they had disease progression after anthracycline-based therapy and had never been exposed to taxanes. The starting doses of oral eniluracil and oral 5-FU were 11.5 mg/m(2) and 1.15 mg/m(2), respectively, twice daily on Days 1-14. Docetaxel was given intravenously at a starting dose of 50 mg/m(2) on Day 1 only. The dose of docetaxel was escalated among cohorts until a maximum tolerated dose was reached. Courses were repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

The authors treated 19 patients with Stage IV breast carcinoma, of whom 5 had received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Fifty-three percent had a performance status of 1, and 53% had bone or soft tissue involvement as the dominant site of disease. All patients had received prior therapy with doxorubicin. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. No episodes of sepsis were observed. Significant antitumor activity was observed with a total of two complete and nine partial responses. The recommended doses for Phase II studies are 72 mg/m(2) docetaxel on Day 1 and 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for a total of 14 days, with courses being repeated every 21 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral eniluracil/5-FU and intravenous docetaxel is a safe and well tolerated regimen. Significant antitumor activity is associated with this combination.

Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point.

RESULTS

A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients.

CONCLUSION

Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.

Multicenter phase II study of a 28-day regimen of orally administered eniluracil and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

Eniluracil (776C85), a potent inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows fluorouracil (5-FU) to be administered orally on a schedule that simulates continuous-infusion 5-FU. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the objective tumor response rate of orally administered eniluracil and 5-FU in the treatment of anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer were enrolled onto this open-label, phase II, multicenter study. Patients received orally administered 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil given in a 10:1 ratio (eniluracil:5-FU) twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled. Eight partial responses were observed in 84 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 17.9%), and 20 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median duration of partial response was 20.1 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 26.7 weeks). The median duration of progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients was 9.9 weeks and 40.4 weeks, respectively. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Diarrhea, nausea, malaise/fatigue, vomiting, and mucositis were the most common treatment-related nonhematologic adverse events. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were malaise/fatigue and diarrhea, occurring in 17% and 7% of patients, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was low. Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 17% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Eniluracil-5-FU has modest antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-resistant breast cancer. Treatment was convenient, and patient compliance was high.

The oral fluorinated pyrimidines

The fluorinated pyrimidines have played a major role in the treatment of many common tumors since 5-fluorouracil (5FU) was first introduced. Studies of the cellular and clinical pharmacology of 5FU have led to an improved understanding of the mechanisms of action of this agent. This knowledge has allowed the optimal and rational development of fluoropyrimidine therapy, with significant therapeutic advances in recent years. Efforts to improve the therapeutic index of 5FU have included alteration of schedule, and the addition of biochemical modulators such as folinic acid. Although protracted continuous infusion of 5FU has led to better response rates and decreased toxicity, the administration of 5FU by protracted infusion is not only costly, but also inconvenient to the patient. Furthermore it is often associated with infectious and thrombotic complications related to the required indwelling intravenous catheter. Protracted oral administration is a rational route for administering 5FU, being preferred by the patient and the pharmaco-economist. The unpredictable and low oral bioavailability of 5FU initially discouraged this form of treatment. This problem has now been overcome by the new generation of oral fluoropyrimidines. Two main strategies have been pursued: 1) The administration of an inactive prodrug of 5FU, which is absorbed intact, and subsequently converted to 5FU. Capecitabine is converted to 5FU by a 3 step enzymatic process. 2) The administration of 5FU with an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to minimise the erratic absorption and variable clearance of 5FU: the preparations UFT, S1, and ethinyluracil/5FU contain an oral fluoropyrimidine co-administered orally with inhibitors of this enzyme. The development and characteristics of these agents are discussed.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly oral fluorouracil given with eniluracil and low-dose leucovorin to patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

Fluorouracil (5-FU) given as a weekly, high-dose 24-hour infusion is active and tolerable. We evaluated an oral regimen of eniluracil (which inactivates dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase [DPD]), 5-FU, and leucovorin to simulate this schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received a single 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (2,300 mg/m(2) on day 2) with leucovorin (15 mg orally [PO] bid on days 1 through 3) to provide reference pharmacokinetic data. Two weeks later, patients began treatment with eniluracil (20 mg) and leucovorin (15 mg) (PO bid on days 1 through 3) and 5-FU (10 to 15 mg/m(2) PO bid on day 2).

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue) was seen with 5-FU 15 mg/m(2) PO bid on day 2 given weekly for either 6 of 8 weeks or 3 of 4 weeks, whereas five of seven patients tolerated 5-FU 10 mg/m(2) PO bid given weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Eniluracil led to a 35-fold reduction in 5-FU clearance. Fluoro-beta-alanine, a 5-FU catabolite, was not detected in plasma during oral 5-FU-eniluracil therapy. DPD activity was markedly suppressed in all patients during eniluracil therapy; the inactivation persisted after the last eniluracil dose; percentages of baseline values were 1.8% on day 5, 4.5% on day 12, and 23.6% on day 19.

CONCLUSION

The recommended oral dosage of 5-FU (10 mg/m(2) PO bid) given with eniluracil and leucovorin is approximately 115-fold lower than the reference dosage for 24-hour infusional 5-FU. This difference is greater than expected given the reduction in 5-FU clearance. DPD inactivation persisted for several weeks after completion of eniluracil therapy.

Pharmacology of fluorinated pyrimidines: eniluracil

The pharmacological inactivation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) represents one strategy to improve 5-FU therapy, which historically has been associated with unpredictable pharmacological behavior and toxicity. This is principally due to high interpatient differences in the activity of DPD, the enzyme that mediates the initial and rate-limiting step in 5-FU catabolism. By inactivating DPD and suppressing the catabolism of 5-FU, eniluracil has dramatically altered the pharmacological profile of 5-FU. The maximum tolerated dose of oral 5-FU given with oral eniluracil (1.0 to 25 mg/m2) is substantially lower than conventional 5-FU doses. In the presence of eniluracil, bioavailability of 5-FU has increased to approximately 100%, the half-life is prolonged to 4 to 6 hours, and systemic clearance is reduced > 20-fold to values comparable the glomerular filtration rate (46 to 58 mL/min/m2). Renal excretion (approximately 45% to 75%), instead of DPD-related catabolism, is the principal route of elimination of oral 5-FU given with eniluracil. Chronic daily administration of oral 5-FU 1.0 mg/m2 twice daily with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily produces 5-FU steady-state concentrations (8-38 ng/mL) similar to those achieved with protracted intravenous administration on clinically relevant dose-schedules. On a daily x 5 regimen, higher 5-FU AUC values are related to neutropenia, whereas elevated 5-FU AUC and steady-state concentrations are related to diarrhea when oral 5-FU is given daily with eniluracil on a chronic schedule. The pharmacokinetic behavior of oral eniluracil is similar to that for oral 5-FU. Administration of eniluracil 10 to 20 mg twice daily completely inactivates DPD activity both in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in colorectal tumor tissue, and prolonged inhibition of DPD after discontinuation of eniluracil treatment has been noted. In the presence of eniluracil, oral administration of 5-FU is feasible and variation in 5-FU exposure is reduced, with the anticipation of further reduction in variation as dosing guidelines based on renal function are formulated.

Clinical development of eniluracil/fluorouracil: an oral treatment for patients with solid tumors

Eniluracil (776C85, GW776) inactivates dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the principal enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolism. Inactivation of DPD eliminates a potential mechanism for tumor 5-FU resistance and permits achievement of reliable and predictable pharmacokinetics following oral 5-FU administration. Eniluracil/5-FU has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy in patients with a variety of solid tumors when given on a 5 or 28-day dosing schedule. The primary and dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression with the 5-day schedule and diarrhea with the 28-day schedule. The frequency of hand-foot syndrome is minimal with either schedule. Phase III pivotal registration-directed studies with eniluracil/5-FU given by the 28-day schedule are ongoing or planned for the near future in patients with advanced colorectal, breast and pancreatic cancer.

Preclinical development of eniluracil: enhancing the therapeutic index and dosing convenience of 5-fluorouracil

Eniluracil (5-ethynyluracil, GW 776, 776C85) is being developed as a novel modulator of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of cancer. Eniluracil is an effective mechanism-based inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the first enzyme in the catabolic pathway of 5-FU. By temporarily eliminating this prevalent enzyme, eniluracil provides predictable dosing of 5-FU and enables oral administration of 5-FU to replace intravenous bolus and continuously infused dosing. New DPD is synthesized with a half-life of 2.6 days. It also eliminates the formation of problematic 5-FU catabolites. Most importantly, in laboratory animals, eniluracil increases the therapeutic index and absolute efficacy of 5-FU. Accompanying reports in this journal indicate that eniluracil has promising clinical potential.

Phase I assessment of the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and safety of emitefur in patients with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicities, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic profile of emitefur (BOF-A2) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This was a phase I dose-escalating trial in which cohorts of patients received BOF-A2 (cohort 1, 300 mg/m(2) orally [PO] tid; cohort 2, 200 mg/m(2) PO tid; cohort 3, 200 mg/m(2) bid; and cohort 4, 250 mg/m(2) bid) for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest (cycle 1). Pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and tumor response were monitored.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received 110 cycles (three patients in cohort 1, three patients in cohort 2, 10 patients in cohort 3, and three patients in cohort 4). DLT (grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia) was observed in cohorts 1, 2, and 4. Pharmacokinetics indicated that prolonged systemic expression of fluorouracil (5-FU) is maintained after administration of BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg bid for 14 days. The mean steady-state concentration of plasma 5-FU was > or = 24 ng/mL, which was 184-fold greater than the minimum effective cytotoxic concentration in vitro. Lack of variation of 5-FU trough levels within a day at steady-state indicates suppression of circadian variation. One patient in cohort 3 achieved a partial response and five patients maintained stable disease in excess of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg PO bid for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest is well tolerated. Prolonged exposure to 5-FU above the predicted preclinical minimum effective concentration is maintained, without evidence of circadian variation. Furthermore, evidence of antitumor activity is suggested.