Evidence that the nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis cycle of G proteins causes acute desensitization of G-protein gated inward rectifier K+ channels

Direct modulation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels

Ion channels play a pivotal role in regulating cellular excitability and signal transduction processes. Among the various ion channels, G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels serve as key mediators of neurotransmission and cellular responses to extracellular signals. GIRK channels are members of the larger family of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Typically, GIRK channels are activated via the direct binding of G-protein βγ subunits upon the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GIRK channel activation requires the presence of the lipid signaling molecule, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). GIRK channels are also modulated by endogenous proteins and other molecules, including RGS proteins, cholesterol, and SNX27 as well as exogenous compounds, such as alcohol. In the last decade or so, several groups have developed novel drugs and small molecules, such as ML297, GAT1508 and GiGA1, that activate GIRK channels in a G-protein independent manner. Here, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview focusing on the direct modulation of GIRK channels by G-proteins, PIP2, cholesterol, and novel modulatory compounds. These studies offer valuable insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of channel function, and have potential implications for both basic research and therapeutic development.

Autophagy in Plants: Both a Puppet and a Puppet Master of Sugars

Autophagy is a major pathway that recycles cellular components in eukaryotic cells both under stressed and non-stressed conditions. Sugars participate both metabolically and as signaling molecules in development and response to various environmental and nutritional conditions. It is therefore essential to maintain metabolic homeostasis of sugars during non-stressed conditions in cells, not only to provide energy, but also to ensure effective signaling when exposed to stress. In both plants and animals, autophagy is activated by the energy sensor SnRK1/AMPK and inhibited by TOR kinase. SnRK1/AMPK and TOR kinases are both important regulators of cellular metabolism and are controlled to a large extent by the availability of sugars and sugar-phosphates in plants whereas in animals AMP/ATP indirectly translate sugar status. In plants, during nutrient and sugar deficiency, SnRK1 is activated, and TOR is inhibited to allow activation of autophagy which in turn recycles cellular components in an attempt to provide stress relief. Autophagy is thus indirectly regulated by the nutrient/sugar status of cells, but also regulates the level of nutrients/sugars by recycling cellular components. In both plants and animals sugars such as trehalose induce autophagy and in animals this is independent of the TOR pathway. The glucose-activated G-protein signaling pathway has also been demonstrated to activate autophagy, although the exact mechanism is not completely clear. This mini-review will focus on the interplay between sugar signaling and autophagy.

Dose-Duration Reciprocity for G protein activation: Modulation of kinase to substrate ratio alters cell signaling

In animal cells, activation of heterotrimeric G protein signaling generally occurs when the system's cognate signal exceeds a threshold, whereas in plant cells, both the amount and the exposure time of at least one signal, D-glucose, are used toward activation. This unusual signaling property called Dose-Duration Reciprocity, first elucidated in the genetic model Arabidopsis thaliana, is achieved by a complex that is comprised of a 7-transmembrane REGULATOR OF G SIGNALING (RGS) protein (AtRGS1), a Gα subunit that binds and hydrolyzes nucleotide, a Gβγ dimer, and three WITH NO LYSINE (WNK) kinases. D-glucose is one of several signals such as salt and pathogen-derived molecular patterns that operates through this protein complex to activate G protein signaling by WNK kinase transphosphorylation of AtRGS1. Because WNK kinases compete for the same substrate, AtRGS1, we hypothesize that activation is sensitive to the AtRGS1 amount and that modulation of the AtRGS1 pool affects the response to the stimulant. Mathematical simulation revealed that the ratio of AtRGS1 to the kinase affects system sensitivity to D-glucose, and therefore illustrates how modulation of the cellular AtRGS1 level is a means to change signal-induced activation. AtRGS1 levels change under tested conditions that mimic physiological conditions therefore, we propose a previously-unknown mechanism by which plants react to changes in their environment.

KCTD Hetero-oligomers Confer Unique Kinetic Properties on Hippocampal GABAB Receptor-Induced K+ Currents

GABA_B receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors for the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, GABA. GABA_B receptors were shown to associate with homo-oligomers of auxiliary KCTD8, KCTD12, KCTD12b, and KCTD16 subunits (named after their T1 K⁺-channel tetramerization domain) that regulate G-protein signaling of the receptor. Here we provide evidence that GABA_B receptors also associate with hetero-oligomers of KCTD subunits. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that two-thirds of the KCTD16 proteins in the hippocampus of adult mice associate with KCTD12. We show that the KCTD proteins hetero-oligomerize through self-interacting T1 and H1 homology domains. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer measurements in live cells reveal that KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers associate with both the receptor and the G-protein. Electrophysiological experiments demonstrate that KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers impart unique kinetic properties on G-protein-activated Kir3 currents. During prolonged receptor activation (one min) KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers produce moderately desensitizing fast deactivating K⁺ currents, whereas KCTD12 and KCTD16 homo-oligomers produce strongly desensitizing fast deactivating currents and nondesensitizing slowly deactivating currents, respectively. During short activation (2 s) KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers produce nondesensitizing slowly deactivating currents. Electrophysiological recordings from hippocampal neurons of KCTD knock-out mice are consistent with these findings and indicate that KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers increase the duration of slow IPSCs. In summary, our data demonstrate that simultaneous assembly of distinct KCTDs at the receptor increases the molecular and functional repertoire of native GABA_B receptors and modulates physiologically induced K⁺ current responses in the hippocampus.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The KCTD proteins 8, 12, and 16 are auxiliary subunits of GABA_B receptors that differentially regulate G-protein signaling of the receptor. The KCTD proteins are generally assumed to function as homo-oligomers. Here we show that the KCTD proteins also assemble hetero-oligomers in all possible dual combinations. Experiments in live cells demonstrate that KCTD hetero-oligomers form at least tetramers and that these tetramers directly interact with the receptor and the G-protein. KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers impart unique kinetic properties to GABA_B receptor-induced Kir3 currents in heterologous cells. KCTD12/KCTD16 hetero-oligomers are abundant in the hippocampus, where they prolong the duration of slow IPSCs in pyramidal cells. Our data therefore support that KCTD hetero-oligomers modulate physiologically induced K⁺ current responses in the brain.

Regulator of G-protein signalling and GoLoco proteins suppress TRPC4 channel function via acting at Gαi/o

Transient receptor potential canonical 4 (TRPC4) forms non-selective cation channels implicated in the regulation of diverse physiological functions. Previously, TRPC4 was shown to be activated by the Gi/o subgroup of heterotrimeric G-proteins involving Gαi/o, rather than Gβγ, subunits. Because the lifetime and availability of Gα-GTP are regulated by regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) and Gαi/o-Loco (GoLoco) domain-containing proteins via their GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and guanine-nucleotide-dissociation inhibitor (GDI) functions respectively, we tested how RGS and GoLoco domain proteins affect TRPC4 currents activated via Gi/o-coupled receptors. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we show that both RGS and GoLoco proteins [RGS4, RGS6, RGS12, RGS14, LGN or activator of G-protein signalling 3 (AGS3)] suppress receptor-mediated TRPC4 activation without causing detectable basal current or altering surface expression of the channel protein. The inhibitory effects are dependent on the GAP and GoLoco domains and facilitated by enhancing membrane targeting of the GoLoco protein AGS3. In addition, RGS, but not GoLoco, proteins accelerate desensitization of receptor-activation evoked TRPC4 currents. The inhibitory effects of RGS and GoLoco domains are additive and are most prominent with RGS12 and RGS14, which contain both RGS and GoLoco domains. Our data support the notion that the Gα, but not Gβγ, arm of the Gi/o signalling is involved in TRPC4 activation and unveil new roles for RGS and GoLoco domain proteins in fine-tuning TRPC4 activities. The versatile and diverse functions of RGS and GoLoco proteins in regulating G-protein signalling may underlie the complexity of receptor-operated TRPC4 activation in various cell types under different conditions.

RGS Redundancy and Implications in GPCR-GIRK Signaling

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are key components of GPCR complexes, interacting directly with G protein α-subunits to enhance their intrinsic GTPase activity. The functional consequence is an accelerated termination of G protein effectors including certain ion channels. RGS proteins have a profound impact on the membrane-delimited gating behavior of G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels as demonstrated in reconstitution assays and recent RGS knockout mice studies. Akin to GPCRs and G protein αβγ subunits, multiple RGS isoforms are expressed within single GIRK-expressing neurons, suggesting functional redundancy and/or specificity in GPCR-GIRK channel signaling. The extent and impact of RGS redundancy in neuronal GPCR-GIRK channel signaling is currently not fully appreciated; however, recent studies from RGS knockout mice are providing important new clues on the impact of individual endogenous RGS proteins and the extent of RGS functional redundancy. Incorporating "tools" such as engineered RGS-resistant Gαi/o subunits provide an important assessment method for determining the impact of all endogenous RGS proteins on a given GPCR response and an accounting benchmark to assess the impact of individual RGS knockouts on overall RGS redundancy within a given neuron. Elucidating the degree of regulation attributable to specific RGS proteins in GIRK channel function will aid in the assessment of individual RGS proteins as viable therapeutic targets in epilepsy, ataxia's, memory disorders, and a growing list of neurological disorders.

Restoring the ON Switch in Blind Retinas: Opto-mGluR6, a Next-Generation, Cell-Tailored Optogenetic Tool

Photoreceptor degeneration is one of the most prevalent causes of blindness. Despite photoreceptor loss, the inner retina and central visual pathways remain intact over an extended time period, which has led to creative optogenetic approaches to restore light sensitivity in the surviving inner retina. The major drawbacks of all optogenetic tools recently developed and tested in mouse models are their low light sensitivity and lack of physiological compatibility. Here we introduce a next-generation optogenetic tool, Opto-mGluR6, designed for retinal ON-bipolar cells, which overcomes these limitations. We show that Opto-mGluR6, a chimeric protein consisting of the intracellular domains of the ON-bipolar cell-specific metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR6 and the light-sensing domains of melanopsin, reliably recovers vision at the retinal, cortical, and behavioral levels under moderate daylight illumination.

Mechanisms of fast desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-gated currents

GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)Rs) regulate the excitability of most neurons in the central nervous system by modulating the activity of enzymes and ion channels. In the sustained presence of the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid, GABA(B)Rs exhibit a time-dependent decrease in the receptor response-a phenomenon referred to as homologous desensitization. Desensitization prevents excessive receptor influences on neuronal activity. Much work focused on the mechanisms of GABA(B)R desensitization that operate at the receptor and control receptor expression at the plasma membrane. Over the past few years, it became apparent that GABA(B)Rs additionally evolved mechanisms for faster desensitization. These mechanisms operate at the G protein rather than at the receptor and inhibit G protein signaling within seconds of agonist exposure. The mechanisms for fast desensitization are ideally suited to regulate receptor-activated ion channel responses, which influence neuronal activity on a faster timescale than effector enzymes. Here, we provide an update on the mechanisms for fast desensitization of GABA(B)R responses and discuss physiological and pathophysiological implications.

Short-term desensitization of muscarinic K+ current in the heart

Acetylcholine (ACh) rapidly increases cardiac K(+) currents (IKACh) by activating muscarinic K(+) (KACh) channels followed by a gradual amplitude decrease within seconds. This phenomenon is called short-term desensitization and its precise mechanism and physiological role are still unclear. We constructed a mathematical model for IKACh to examine the conditions required to reconstitute short-term desensitization. Two conditions were crucial: two distinct muscarinic receptors (m2Rs) with different affinities for ACh, which conferred an IKACh response over a wide range of ACh concentrations, and two distinct KACh channels with different affinities for the G-protein βγ subunits, which contributed to reconstitution of the temporal behavior of IKACh. Under these conditions, the model quantitatively reproduced several unique properties of short-term desensitization observed in myocytes: 1), the peak and quasi-steady states with 0.01-100 μM [ACh]; 2), effects of ACh preperfusion; and 3), recovery from short-term desensitization. In the presence of 10 μM ACh, the IKACh model conferred recurring spontaneous firing after asystole of 8.9 s and 10.7 s for the Demir and Kurata sinoatrial node models, respectively. Therefore, two different populations of KACh channels and m2Rs may participate in short-term desensitization of IKACh in native myocytes, and may be responsible for vagal escape at nodal cells.

Increased agonist affinity at the μ-opioid receptor induced by prolonged agonist exposure

Prolonged exposure to high-efficacy agonists results in desensitization of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR). Desensitized receptors are thought to be unable to couple to G-proteins, preventing downstream signaling; however, the changes to the receptor itself are not well characterized. In the current study, confocal imaging was used to determine whether desensitizing conditions cause a change in agonist-receptor interactions. Using rapid solution exchange, the binding kinetics of fluorescently labeled opioid agonist, dermorphin Alexa594 (derm A594), to MORs was measured in live cells. The affinity of derm A594 binding increased after prolonged treatment of cells with multiple agonists that are known to cause receptor desensitization. In contrast, binding of a fluorescent antagonist, naltrexamine Alexa594, was unaffected by similar agonist pretreatment. The increased affinity of derm A594 for the receptor was long-lived and partially reversed after a 45 min wash. Treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin did not alter the increase in affinity of the derm A594 for MOR. Likewise, the affinity of derm A594 for MORs expressed in mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from arrestin 1 and 2 knock-out animals increased after treatment of the cells with the desensitization protocol. Thus, opioid receptors were "imprinted" with a memory of prior agonist exposure that was independent of G-protein activation or arrestin binding that altered subsequent agonist-receptor interactions. The increased affinity suggests that acute desensitization results in a long-lasting but reversible conformational change in the receptor.

Neuropeptide transmission in brain circuits

Neuropeptides are found in many mammalian CNS neurons where they play key roles in modulating neuronal activity. In contrast to amino acid transmitter release at the synapse, neuropeptide release is not restricted to the synaptic specialization, and after release, a neuropeptide may diffuse some distance to exert its action through a G protein-coupled receptor. Some neuropeptides such as hypocretin/orexin are synthesized only in single regions of the brain, and the neurons releasing these peptides probably have similar functional roles. Other peptides such as neuropeptide Y (NPY) are synthesized throughout the brain, and neurons that synthesize the peptide in one region have no anatomical or functional connection with NPY neurons in other brain regions. Here, I review converging data revealing a complex interaction between slow-acting neuromodulator peptides and fast-acting amino acid transmitters in the control of energy homeostasis, drug addiction, mood and motivation, sleep-wake states, and neuroendocrine regulation.

GIRK channel modulation by assembly with allosterically regulated RGS proteins

G-protein-activated inward-rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels hyperpolarize neurons to inhibit synaptic transmission throughout the nervous system. By accelerating G-protein deactivation kinetics, the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein family modulates the timing of GIRK activity. Despite many investigations, whether RGS proteins modulate GIRK activity in neurons by mechanisms involving kinetic coupling, collision coupling, or macromolecular complex formation has remained unknown. Here we show that GIRK modulation occurs by channel assembly with R7-RGS/Gβ5 complexes under allosteric control of R7 RGS-binding protein (R7BP). Elimination of R7BP occludes the Gβ5 subunit that interacts with GIRK channels. R7BP-bound R7-RGS/Gβ5 complexes and Gβγ dimers interact noncompetitively with the intracellular domain of GIRK channels to facilitate rapid activation and deactivation of GIRK currents. By disrupting this allosterically regulated assembly mechanism, R7BP ablation augments GIRK activity. This enhanced GIRK activity increases the drug effects of agonists acting at G-protein-coupled receptors that signal via GIRK channels, as indicated by greater antinociceptive effects of GABA(B) or μ-opioid receptor agonists. These findings show that GIRK current modulation in vivo requires channel assembly with allosterically regulated RGS protein complexes, which provide a target for modulating GIRK activity in neurological disorders in which these channels have crucial roles, including pain, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease and Down syndrome.

RGS proteins maintain robustness of GPCR-GIRK coupling by selective stimulation of the G protein subunit Gαo

Termination of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) signaling downstream of activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is accelerated by regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which act as guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins (GAPs). Using a Xenopus oocyte expression system, we found that although RGS proteins had a negative effect of accelerating the kinetics of GPCR-coupled potassium ion (K+) channel (GIRK) deactivation, they also had positive effects of increasing the amplitudes and activation kinetics of neurotransmitter-evoked GIRK currents. The RGS box domain alone was sufficient to stimulate neurotransmitter-dependent activation of GIRK currents. Moreover, RGS4 mutants with compromised GAP activity augmented GPCR-GIRK coupling (as assessed by measurement of the GIRK current elicited by neurotransmitter). By accelerating G protein activation kinetics, RGS4 specifically stimulated Gα₀, which stimulated GPCR-GIRK coupling despite its GAP activity. Opposing actions of RGS proteins thus both stimulate and inhibit G proteins to modulate the amplitude and kinetics of neurotransmitter-induced GIRK currents, thereby distinguishing the responses to activation of different G protein isoforms.

GABAB receptor coupling to G-proteins and ion channels

GABA(B) receptors have been found to play a key role in regulating membrane excitability and synaptic transmission in the brain. The GABA(B) receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that associates with a subset of G-proteins (pertussis toxin sensitive Gi/o family), that in turn regulate specific ion channels and trigger cAMP cascades. In this review, we describe the relationships between the GABA(B) receptor, its effectors and associated proteins that mediate GABA(B) receptor function within the brain. We discuss a unique feature of the GABA(B) receptor, the requirement for heterodimerization to produce functional receptors, as well as an increasing body of evidence that suggests GABA(B) receptors comprise a macromolecular signaling heterocomplex, critical for efficient targeting and function of the receptors. Within this complex, GABA(B) receptors associate specifically with Gi/o G-proteins that regulate voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)) channels, G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, and adenylyl cyclase. Numerous studies have revealed that lipid rafts, scaffold proteins, targeting motifs in the receptor, and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins also contribute to the function of GABA(B) receptors and affect cellular processes such as receptor trafficking and activity-dependent desensitization. This complex regulation of GABA(B) receptors in the brain may provide opportunities for new ways to regulate GABA-dependent inhibition in normal and diseased states of the nervous system.

Membrane anchor R9AP potentiates GTPase-accelerating protein activity of RGS11 x Gbeta5 complex and accelerates inactivation of the mGluR6-G(o) signaling

The R7 subfamily of RGS proteins critically regulates neuronal G protein-signaling pathways that are essential for vision, nociception, motor coordination, and reward processing. A member of the R7 RGS family, RGS11, is a GTPase-accelerating protein specifically expressed in retinal ON-bipolar cells where it forms complexes with the atypical G protein beta subunit, Gbeta(5), and transmembrane protein R9AP. Association with R9AP has been shown to be critical for the proteolytic stability of the complex in the retina. In this study we report that R9AP can in addition stimulate the GTPase-accelerating protein activity of the RGS11 x Gbeta(5) complex at Galpha(o). Single turnover GTPase assays reveal that R9AP co-localizes RGS11 x Gbeta(5) and Galpha(o) on the membrane and allosterically potentiates the GTPase-accelerating function of RGS11 x Gbeta(5). Reconstitution of mGluR6-Galpha(o) signaling in Xenopus oocytes indicates that RGS11 x Gbeta(5)-mediated GTPase acceleration in this system requires co-expression of R9AP. The results provide new insight into the regulation of mGluR6-Galpha(o) signaling by the RGS11 x Gbeta(5) x R9AP complex and establish R9AP as a general GTPase-accelerating protein activity regulator of R7 RGS complexes.

CCR5 ligands modulate CXCL12-induced chemotaxis, adhesion, and Akt phosphorylation of human cord blood CD34+ cells

CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 play an important role in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) migration from and retention within the bone marrow. HSPCs are very selective in their chemotactic response and undergo chemotaxis only in response to CXCL12. In addition to CXCR4, HSPCs express receptors for various other chemokines; however, the role of these receptors is not well understood. Freshly isolated CD34(+) cells (highly enriched for HSPCs) from cord blood (CB) express low levels of CCR5; however, if the cells were washed with acidic buffer before Ab staining to remove any ligand bound to CCR5, then nearly 80% of CD34(+) CB cells were found to express CCR5 on the cell surface. Although none of the CCR5 ligands investigated in this study (CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5) induced chemotaxis, at relatively high concentrations they transiently enhanced CXCL12-mediated chemotaxis of CD34(+) CB cells. In contrast, CXCL12-mediated adhesion of cells to VCAM-1-coated surfaces was reduced if CD34(+) CB cells were pretreated with these CCR5 ligands for 15 min. The effect of these chemokines on CXCL12-mediated responses was not at the level of CXCR4 expression, but on downstream signaling pathways elicited by CXCL12. Pretreatment with CCR5 chemokines enhanced CXCL12-mediated Akt phosphorylation, but down-modulated calcium flux in CD34(+) CB cells. Modulation of CXCL12-mediated responses of CD34(+) cells by CCR5 chemokines provides a possible mechanism that underlies movement of HSPCs during inflammation.

Coordinating speed and amplitude in G-protein signaling

G-protein-mediated signaling is intrinsically kinetic. Signal output at steady state is a balance of the rates of GTP binding, which causes activation, and of GTP hydrolysis, which terminates activation. This GTPase catalytic cycle is regulated by receptors, which accelerate GTP binding, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which accelerate hydrolysis. Receptors and GAPs similarly control the rates of signal initiation and termination. To allow independent control of signal amplitude and of the rates of turning the signal on and off, the activities of receptors and GAPs must be coordinated. Here, the principles of such coordination and the mechanisms by which it is achieved are discussed.

Addictive drugs modulate GIRK-channel signaling by regulating RGS proteins

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are strong modulators of G-protein-mediated pathways in the nervous system. One function of RGS proteins is to accelerate the activation-deactivation kinetics of G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. The opening of GIRK channels reduces the firing rates of neurons. Recent studies indicate that RGS proteins also modulate the coupling efficiency between gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors and GIRK channels in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the initial target for addictive drugs in the brain reward pathway. Chronic drug exposure can dynamically regulate the expression levels of RGS. Functional and behavioral studies now reveal that levels of RGS2 protein, through selective association with GIRK3, critically determine whether GABA(B) agonists are excitatory or inhibitory in the VTA. The regulation of RGS protein in the reward pathway might underlie adaptation to different types of addictive drugs.

RGS4 regulates parasympathetic signaling and heart rate control in the sinoatrial node

Heart rate is controlled by the opposing activities of sympathetic and parasympathetic inputs to pacemaker myocytes in the sinoatrial node (SAN). Parasympathetic activity on nodal myocytes is mediated by acetylcholine-dependent stimulation of M(2) muscarinic receptors and activation of Galpha(i/o) signaling. Although regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are potent inhibitors of Galpha(i/o) signaling in many tissues, the RGS protein(s) that regulate parasympathetic tone in the SAN are unknown. Our results demonstrate that RGS4 mRNA levels are higher in the SAN compared to right atrium. Conscious freely moving RGS4-null mice showed increased bradycardic responses to parasympathetic agonists compared to wild-type animals. Moreover, anesthetized RGS4-null mice had lower baseline heart rates and greater heart rate increases following atropine administration. Retrograde-perfused hearts from RGS4-null mice showed enhanced negative chronotropic responses to carbachol, whereas SAN myocytes showed greater sensitivity to carbachol-mediated reduction in the action potential firing rate. Finally, RGS4-null SAN cells showed decreased levels of G protein-coupled inward rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel desensitization and altered modulation of acetylcholine-sensitive potassium current (I(KACh)) kinetics following carbachol stimulation. Taken together, our studies establish that RGS4 plays an important role in regulating sinus rhythm by inhibiting parasympathetic signaling and I(KACh) activity.

A novel assay of Gi/o-linked G protein-coupled receptor coupling to potassium channels provides new insights into the pharmacology of the group III metabotropic glutamate receptors

The group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) represent a family of presynaptically expressed G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with enormous therapeutic potential; however, robust cellular assays to study their function have been difficult to develop. We present here a new assay, compatible with traditional high-throughput screening platforms, to detect activity of pharmacological ligands interacting with G(i/o)-coupled GPCRs, including the group III mGluRs 4, 7, and 8. The assay takes advantage of the ability of the Gbetagamma subunits of G(i) and G(o) heterotrimers to interact with G-protein regulated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs), and we show here that we are able to detect the activity of multiple types of pharmacophores including agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators of several distinct GPCRs. Using GIRK-mediated thallium flux, we perform a side-by-side comparison of the activity of a number of commercially available compounds, some of which have not been extensively evaluated because of the previous lack of robust assays at each of the three major group III mGluRs. It is noteworthy that several compounds previously considered to be general group III mGluR antagonists have very weak activity using this assay, suggesting the possibility that these compounds may not effectively inhibit these receptors in native systems. We anticipate that the GIRK-mediated thallium flux strategy will provide a novel tool to advance the study of G(i/o)-coupled GPCR biology and promote ligand discovery and characterization.

Motor coordination deficits in mice lacking RGS9

RGS9-2 is a striatum-enriched protein that negatively modulates dopamine and opioid receptor signaling. We examined the role of RGS9-2 in modulating complex behavior. Genetic deletion of RGS9-2 does not lead to global impairments, but results in selective abnormalities in certain behavioral domains. RGS9 knockout (KO) mice have decreased motor coordination on the accelerating rotarod and deficits in working memory as measured in the delayed-match-to-place version of the water maze. In contrast, RGS9 KO mice exhibit normal locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, cue and contextual fear conditioning, startle threshold, and pre-pulse inhibition. These studies are the first to describe a role for RGS9-2 in motor coordination and working memory and implicate RGS9-2 as a potential therapeutic target for motor and cognitive dysfunction.

RGS2 modulates coupling between GABAB receptors and GIRK channels in dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area

Agonists of GABA(B) receptors exert a bi-directional effect on the activity of dopamine (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area, which can be explained by the fact that coupling between GABA(B) receptors and G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels is significantly weaker in DA neurons than in GABA neurons. Thus, low concentrations of agonists preferentially inhibit GABA neurons and thereby disinhibit DA neurons. This disinhibition might confer reinforcing properties on addictive GABA(B) receptor agonists such as gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and its derivatives. Here we show that, in DA neurons of mice, the low coupling efficiency reflects the selective expression of heteromeric GIRK2/3 channels and is dynamically modulated by a member of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein family. Moreover, repetitive exposure to GHB increases the GABA(B) receptor-GIRK channel coupling efficiency through downregulation of RGS2. Finally, oral self-administration of GHB at a concentration that is normally rewarding becomes aversive after chronic exposure. On the basis of these results, we propose a mechanism that might underlie tolerance to GHB.

A unique sorting nexin regulates trafficking of potassium channels via a PDZ domain interaction

G protein-gated potassium (Kir3) channels are important for controlling neuronal excitability in the brain. Using a proteomics approach, we have identified a unique rodent intracellular protein, sorting nexin 27 (SNX27), which regulates the trafficking of Kir3 channels. Like most sorting nexins, SNX27 possesses a functional PX domain that selectively binds the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) and is important for trafficking to the early endosome. SNX27, however, is the only sorting nexin to contain a PDZ domain. This PDZ domain discriminates between channels with similar class I PDZ-binding motifs, associating with the C-terminal end of Kir3.3 and Kir3.2c (-ESKV), but not with that of Kir2.1 (-ESEI) or Kv1.4 (-ETDV). SNX27 promotes the endosomal movement of Kir3 channels, leading to reduced surface expression, increased degradation and smaller Kir3 potassium currents. The regulation of endosomal trafficking via sorting nexins reveals a previously unknown mechanism for controlling potassium channel surface expression.

Coregulation of natively expressed pertussis toxin-sensitive muscarinic receptors with G-protein-activated potassium channels

Many inhibitory neurotransmitters in the brain activate Kir3 channels by stimulating pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G-protein-coupled receptors. Here, we investigated the regulation of native muscarinic receptors and Kir3 channels expressed in NGF-differentiated PC12 cells, which are similar to sympathetic neurons. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and immunocytochemistry revealed that NGF treatment significantly upregulated mRNA and protein for m2 muscarinic receptors, PTX-sensitive G alpha(o) G-proteins, and Kir3.2c channels. Surprisingly, these upregulated muscarinic receptor/Kir3 signaling complexes were functionally silent. Ectopic expression of m2 muscarinic receptors or Kir3.2c channels was unable to produce muscarinic receptor-activated Kir3 currents with oxotremorine. Remarkably, pretreatment with muscarinic (m2/m4) receptor antagonists resulted in robust oxotremorine-activated Kir3 currents. Thus, sustained cholinergic stimulation of natively expressed m2/m4 muscarinic receptors controlled cell surface expression and functional coupling of both receptors and Kir3 channels. This new pathway for controlling Kir3 signaling could help limit the potential harmful effects of excessive Kir3 activity in the brain.

Gene-trapped mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes and human genetics implicate AKAP10 in heart rhythm regulation

Sudden cardiac death due to abnormal heart rhythm kills 400,000-460,000 Americans each year. To identify genes that regulate heart rhythm, we are developing a screen that uses mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) with gene disruptions that can be differentiated into cardiac cells for phenotyping. Here, we show that the heterozygous disruption of the Akap10 (D-AKAP2) gene that disrupts the final 51 aa increases the contractile response of cultured cardiac cells to cholinergic signals. In both heterozygous and homozygous mutant mice derived from these mESCs, the same Akap10 disruption increases the cardiac response to cholinergic signals, suggesting a dominant interfering effect of the Akap10 mutant allele. The mutant mice have cardiac arrhythmias and die prematurely. We also found that a common variant of AKAP10 in humans (646V, 40% of alleles) was associated with increased basal heart rate and decreased heart rate variability (markers of low cholinergic/vagus nerve sensitivity). These markers predict an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Although the molecular mechanism remains unknown, our findings in mutant mESCs, mice, and a common human AKAP10 SNP all suggest a role for AKAP10 in heart rhythm control. Our stem cell-based screen may provide a means of identifying other genes that control heart rhythm.

Pleiotropic phenotype of a genomic knock-in of an RGS-insensitive G184S Gnai2 allele

Signal transduction via guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) is involved in cardiovascular, neural, endocrine, and immune cell function. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) speed the turn-off of G protein signals and inhibit signal transduction, but the in vivo roles of RGS proteins remain poorly defined. To overcome the redundancy of RGS functions and reveal the total contribution of RGS regulation at the Galpha(i2) subunit, we prepared a genomic knock-in of the RGS-insensitive G184S Gnai2 allele. The Galpha(i2)(G184S) knock-in mice show a dramatic and complex phenotype affecting multiple organ systems (heart, myeloid, skeletal, and central nervous system). Both homozygotes and heterozygotes demonstrate reduced viability and decreased body weight. Other phenotypes include shortened long bones, a markedly enlarged spleen, elevated neutrophil counts, an enlarged heart, and behavioral hyperactivity. Heterozygous Galpha(i2)(+/G184S) mice show some but not all of these abnormalities. Thus, loss of RGS actions at Galpha(i2) produces a dramatic and pleiotropic phenotype which is more evident than the phenotype seen for individual RGS protein knockouts.

R7BP augments the function of RGS7*Gbeta5 complexes by a plasma membrane-targeting mechanism

The RGS7 (R7) family of G protein regulators, Gbeta5, and R7BP form heterotrimeric complexes that potently regulate the kinetics of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. Reversible palmitoylation of R7BP regulates plasma membrane/nuclear shuttling of R7*Gbeta5*R7BP heterotrimers. Here we have investigated mechanisms whereby R7BP controls the function of the R7 family. We show that unpalmitoylated R7BP undergoes nuclear/cytoplasmic shuttling and that a C-terminal polybasic motif proximal to the palmitoylation acceptor sites of R7BP mediates nuclear localization, palmitoylation, and plasma membrane targeting. These results suggest a novel mechanism whereby palmitoyltransferases and nuclear import receptors both utilize the C-terminal domain of R7BP to determine the trafficking fate of R7*Gbeta5*R7BP heterotrimers. Analogous mechanisms may regulate other signaling proteins whose distribution between the plasma membrane and nucleus is controlled by palmitoylation. Lastly, we show that cytoplasmic RGS7*Gbeta5*R7BP heterotrimers and RGS7*Gbeta5 heterodimers are equivalently inefficient regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling relative to plasma membrane-bound heterotrimers bearing palmitoylated R7BP. Therefore, R7BP augments the function of the complex by a palmitoylation-regulated plasma membrane-targeting mechanism.

New roles for Galpha and RGS proteins: communication continues despite pulling sisters apart

Large G protein alpha subunits and their attendant regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins control both intercellular signaling and asymmetric cell divisions by distinct pathways. The classical pathway, found throughout higher eukaryotic organisms, mediates intercellular communication via hormone binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Recent studies have led to the discovery of GPCR-independent activation of Galpha subunits by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor RIC-8 in both asymmetric cell division and synaptic vesicle priming in metazoan organisms. Protein-protein interactions and protein function in each pathway are driven through the cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis by the Galpha subunit. This review builds a conceptual framework for understanding RIC-8-mediated pathways by comparison with the mechanism of classical G-protein activation and inhibition in GPCR signaling.

The selective interactions and functions of regulators of G-protein signalling

There is accumulating evidence that regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) can have roles in signal transduction that are not related to GAP activity. Furthermore, RGSs have much more selective effects in vivo than might be anticipated from their behaviour in in vitro assays. I discuss the molecular mechanisms by which these phenomena might be explained including specific interactions between the RGS and G-protein coupled receptor, G-protein and effector.

Differential effects of melatonin and its downstream effector PKCalpha on subcellular localization of RGS proteins

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are proteins that bind specifically to activated Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins to terminate signaling by both Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. Signal-induced RGS redistribution may affect their activity in G protein-mediated signaling. We have previously shown that melatonin and the cell permeable cGMP analog 8-bromo cGMP, which lead to protein kinase C (PKC) activation, enhanced cytoplasmic distribution of RGS10 and RGS2 in prostate carcinoma PC3-AR cells. In the present study, we transfected PC3-AR cells with myc-tagged Galphai/Galphaq specific RGS proteins RGS2, RGS4 and RGS10 and examined the effects of melatonin, 8-bromo cGMP and PKC inhibitors on their nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning. RGS10 and RGS2 were predominantly localized in the nucleus and perinuclear regions whereas RGS4 was mostly cytoplasmic in the PC3-AR cells. Melatonin and the cell permeable cGMP analog 8-bromo cGMP, previously found to activate PKCalpha in the PC3-AR cells, enhanced cytoplasmic localization of RGS10 and RGS2 but induced nuclear accumulation of RGS4. The isozyme specific PKC inhibitor GO6976 (PKCalpha and PKCbeta1) but not hispidin (PKCbeta) negated the effects of melatonin on RGS10, RGS2 and RGS4 localization. These findings indicate that PKCalpha, a downstream effector of the melatonin receptor, differentially affects nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of both Galphai and Galphaq specific RGS proteins. These observations provide further insight into melatonin's ability to fine-tune multiple membrane G-proteins signaling in cells.

Differential expression of the regulator of G protein signaling RGS9 protein in nociceptive pathways of different age rats

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins which act as modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors. RGS9 has two alternative splicing variants. RGS9-1 is expressed in the retina. RGS9-2 is expressed in the brain, especially abundant in the striatum. It is believed to be an essential regulatory component of dopamine and opioid signaling. In this study, we compared the expression of RGS9 proteins in the nervous system of different age groups of rats employing immunocytochemistry. In both 3-week- and 1-year-old rats, RGS9 is expressed abundantly in caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle. It is also expressed abundantly in the ventral horn of the spinal cord and the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells. Quantitative analysis showed that the intensities of RGS9 expression in 1-year-old rats are higher than those in the 3-week-old rats in caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, periaqueductal gray, and gray matter of the spinal cord. In contrast, in thalamic nuclei and locus coeruleus, the intensities of RGS9 immunostaining in 3-week-old rats are higher than in 1-year-old rats. In DRG cells, there is no significant difference between the two age groups. These data suggest that RGS9 is differentially expressed with age. Such differential expression may play an important role in neuronal differentiation and development as well as in neuronal function, such as dopamine and opioid signaling.

Regulation of the muscarinic K+ channel by extracellular ATP through membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in guinea-pig atrial myocytes

1 The present study was designed to examine the functional role of membrane phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P(2)) in the regulation of the muscarinic K(+) channel (I(K,ACh)) by extracellular ATP and adenosine in guinea-pig atrial myocytes, using the whole-cell patch-clamp method. 2 Bath application of ATP in micromolar concentrations typically evoked a transient activation of I(K,ACh); a rapid activation phase was consistently followed by a progressive decline even to the baseline level despite the continued presence of ATP. This progressive decline of I(K,ACh) was significantly attenuated either by blockade of phospholipase C (PLC) with compound 48/80 (100 microM) or by addition of PtdIns(4,5)P(2) (50 microM) to the cell inside, suggesting that depletion of membrane PtdIns(4,5)P(2) via PLC activation is mainly, if not totally, responsible for the progressive decline of I(K,ACh) during the presence of ATP. 3 When atrial myocytes were exposed to wortmannin (50 microM) following ATP (50 microM) application to impair the resynthesis of PtdIns(4,5)P(2), the activation of I(K,ACh) evoked by subsequently applied ATP (50 microM) was greatly reduced. Activation of I(K,ACh) by adenosine (100 microM) was partially reduced by pretreatment of atrial myocytes with ATP (100 microM) and was largely abolished by a further addition of wortmannin (50 microM) in the presence of ATP (100 microM). These results support the view that the activation of I(K,ACh) by ATP and adenosine depends on membrane PtdIns(4,5)P(2) that is subject to reduction by extracellular ATP. 4 The present study thus provides functional evidence to suggest that extracellular ATP activates PLC and thereby depletes membrane PtdIns(4,5)P(2) that is critically involved in the activation process of I(K,ACh) by its agonists ATP and adenosine in guinea-pig atrial myocytes.

Palmitoylation regulates plasma membrane-nuclear shuttling of R7BP, a novel membrane anchor for the RGS7 family

The RGS7 (R7) family of RGS proteins bound to the divergent Gβ subunit Gβ5 is a crucial regulator of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling in the visual and nervous systems. Here, we identify R7BP, a novel neuronally expressed protein that binds R7–Gβ5 complexes and shuttles them between the plasma membrane and nucleus. Regional expression of R7BP, Gβ5, and R7 isoforms in brain is highly coincident. R7BP is palmitoylated near its COOH terminus, which targets the protein to the plasma membrane. Depalmitoylation of R7BP translocates R7BP–R7–Gβ5 complexes from the plasma membrane to the nucleus. Compared with nonpalmitoylated R7BP, palmitoylated R7BP greatly augments the ability of RGS7 to attenuate GPCR-mediated G protein–regulated inward rectifying potassium channel activation. Thus, by controlling plasma membrane nuclear–shuttling of R7BP–R7–Gβ5 complexes, reversible palmitoylation of R7BP provides a novel mechanism that regulates GPCR signaling and potentially transduces signals directly from the plasma membrane to the nucleus.

HEK293 cell line: A vehicle for the expression of recombinant proteins

The HEK cell line has been extensively used as an expression tool for recombinant proteins since it was generated over 25 years ago. Although of epithelial origin, its biochemical machinery is capable of carrying out most of the post-translational folding and processing required to generate functional, mature protein from a wide spectrum of both mammalian and non-mammalian nucleic acids. Though popular as a transient expression system, this cell type has also seen wide use in stably transfected forms (i.e. transformed cells) to study a variety of cell-biological questions in neurobiology. The principal attributes which have made the HEK cell a popular choice among electrophysiologists to study isolated receptor channels include; its quick and easy reproduction and maintenance; amenability to transfection using a wide variety of methods; high efficiency of transfection and protein production; faithful translation and processing of proteins; and small cell size with minimal processes appropriate for voltage-clamp experimentation. These, and other attributes, also mean that complementary biochemical/cell biological evaluations of expressed proteins can be performed in concert with functional analyses to establish detailed pharmacological and biophysical profiles for the action of new drugs and their targets. The increased amount of sequence information available from the human genome has placed greater emphasis upon heterologous cell expression systems as targets for high throughput structure-function evaluation of novel drug targets and disease markers. Here we have highlighted some of the innate characteristics of the HEK cell in order that its suitability as a vehicle for the expression of a gene product can be assessed for particular needs. We have also detailed some of the standard methods used for transfection and obtaining functional data from electrophysiological recording techniques.

Receptor-induced depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate inhibits inwardly rectifying K+ channels in a receptor-specific manner

Phosphatidylionsitol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)), a substrate of phospholipase C, has recently been recognized to regulate membrane-associated proteins and act as a signal molecule in phospholipase C-linked Gq-coupled receptor (GqPCR) pathways. However, it is not known whether PIP(2) depletion induced by GqPCRs can act as receptor-specific signals in native cells. We investigated this issue in cardiomyocytes where PIP(2)-dependent ion channels, G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) and inwardly rectifying background K(+) (IRK) channels, and various GqPCRs are present. The GIRK current was recorded by using the patch-clamp technique during the application of 10 microM acetylcholine. The extent of receptor-mediated inhibition was estimated as the current decrease over 4 min while taking the GIRK current (I(GIRK)) value during a previous stimulation as the control. Each GqPCR agonist inhibited I(GIRK) with different potencies and kinetics. The extents of inhibition induced by phenylephrine, angiotensin II, endothelin-1, prostaglandin F2alpha, and bradykinin at supramaximal concentrations were (mean +/- SE) 32.1 +/- 0.6%, 21.9 +/- 1.4%, 86.4 +/- 1.6%, 63.7 +/- 4.9%, and 5.7 +/- 1.9%, respectively. GqPCR-induced inhibitions of I(GIRK) were not affected by protein kinase C inhibitor (calphostin C) but potentiated and became irreversible when the replenishment of PIP(2) was blocked by wortmannin (phosphatidylinositol kinase inhibitor). Loading the cells with PIP(2) significantly reduced endothelin-1 and prostaglandin F2alpha-induced inhibition of I(GIRK). On the contrary, GqPCR-mediated inhibitions of inwardly rectifying background K(+) currents were observed only when GqPCR agonists were applied with wortmannin, and the effects were not parallel with those on I(GIRK). These results indicate that GqPCR-induced inhibition of ion channels by means of PIP(2) depletion occurs in a receptor-specific manner.

G-protein signaling: back to the future

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are intracellular partners of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs act on inactive Galpha.GDP/Gbetagamma heterotrimers to promote GDP release and GTP binding, resulting in liberation of Galpha from Gbetagamma. Galpha.GTP and Gbetagamma target effectors including adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases and ion channels. Signaling is terminated by intrinsic GTPase activity of Galpha and heterotrimer reformation - a cycle accelerated by 'regulators of G-protein signaling' (RGS proteins). Recent studies have identified several unconventional G-protein signaling pathways that diverge from this standard model. Whereas phospholipase C (PLC) beta is activated by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma, novel PLC isoforms are regulated by both heterotrimeric and Ras-superfamily G-proteins. An Arabidopsis protein has been discovered containing both GPCR and RGS domains within the same protein. Most surprisingly, a receptor-independent Galpha nucleotide cycle that regulates cell division has been delineated in both Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we revisit classical heterotrimeric G-protein signaling and explore these new, non-canonical G-protein signaling pathways.

The heart rate decrease caused by acute FTY720 administration is mediated by the G protein-gated potassium channel I

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is an endogenous agonist for a family of five G protein-coupled receptors (S1P(1-5)) involved in cell proliferation, cardiovascular development and lymphocyte trafficking. The sphingolipid drug FTY720 displays structural similarity to S1P and efficacy as an immunosuppressant in models of autoimmune disease and in solid organ transplantation. While FTY720 is well-tolerated in humans, it produces a transient reduction of heart rate (HR). As S1P activates the cardiac G protein-gated potassium channel I(KACh), we speculated that the FTY720-induced HR reduction reflects I(KACh) activation. We examined FTY720 effects on atrial myocytes from wild-type and I(KACh)-deficient mice. In wild-type myocytes, the active phosphate metabolite of FTY720 (FTY720-P) induced single channel activity with conductance, open time, GTP sensitivity and rectification identical to that of I(KACh). In whole-cell recordings, FTY720-P evoked an inwardly rectifying potassium current in approximately 90% of myocytes responding to acetylcholine. Comparable channel activity was never observed in myocytes from I(KACh)-deficient mice. In wild-type mice, acute FTY720 administration produced a dose-dependent, robust HR reduction. In contrast, the HR reduction induced by FTY720 in I(KACh)-deficient mice was blunted. We conclude that the effect of acute FTY720 administration on HR is mediated primarily by I(KACh) activation.

Endogenous RGS proteins enhance acute desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-activated GIRK currents in HEK-293T cells

The coupling of GABA(B) receptors to G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels constitutes an important inhibitory pathway in the brain. Here, we examined the mechanism underlying desensitization of agonist-evoked currents carried by homomeric GIRK2 channels expressed in HEK-293T cells. The canonical GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen produced GIRK2 currents that decayed by 57.3+/-1.4% after 60 s of stimulation, and then deactivated rapidly (time constant of 3.90+/-0.21 s) upon removal of agonist. Surface labeling studies revealed that GABA(B) receptors, in contrast to micro opioid receptors (MOR), did not internalize with a sustained stimulation for 10 min, excluding receptor redistribution as the primary mechanism for desensitization. Furthermore, heterologous desensitization was observed between GABA(B) receptors and MOR, implicating downstream proteins, such G-proteins or the GIRK channel. To investigate the G-protein turnover cycle, the non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue (GTPgammaS) was included in the intracellular solution and found to attenuate desensitization to 38.3+/-2.0%. The extent of desensitization was also reduced (45.3+/-1.3%) by coexpressing a mutant form of the Galphaq G-protein subunit that has been designed to sequester endogenous RGS proteins. Finally, reconstitution of GABA(B) receptors with Galphao G-proteins rendered insensitive to RGS resulted in significantly less desensitization (28.5+/-3.2%). Taken together, our results demonstrate that endogenous levels of RGS proteins effectively enhance GABA(B) receptor-dependent desensitization of GIRK currents.

Computational modeling reveals how interplay between components of a GTPase-cycle module regulates signal transduction

Heterotrimeric G protein signaling is regulated by signaling modules composed of heterotrimeric G proteins, active G protein-coupled receptors (Rs), which activate G proteins, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which deactivate G proteins. We term these modules GTPase-cycle modules. The local concentrations of these proteins are spatially regulated between plasma membrane microdomains and between the plasma membrane and cytosol, but no data or models are available that quantitatively explain the effect of such regulation on signaling. We present a computational model of the GTPase-cycle module that predicts that the interplay of local G protein, R, and GAP concentrations gives rise to 16 distinct signaling regimes and numerous intermediate signaling phenomena. The regimes suggest alternative modes of the GTPase-cycle module that occur based on defined local concentrations of the component proteins. In one mode, signaling occurs while G protein and receptor are unclustered and GAP eliminates signaling; in another, G protein and receptor are clustered and GAP can rapidly modulate signaling but does not eliminate it. Experimental data from multiple GTPase-cycle modules is interpreted in light of these predictions. The latter mode explains previously paradoxical data in which GAP does not alter maximal current amplitude of G protein-activated ion channels, but hastens signaling. The predictions indicate how variations in local concentrations of the component proteins create GTPase-cycle modules with distinctive phenotypes. They provide a quantitative framework for investigating how regulation of local concentrations of components of the GTPase-cycle module affects signaling.

Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: is morphine different?

Opioid tolerance and dependence are important phenomena. The contribution of acute mu-opioid receptor regulatory mechanisms to the development of analgesic tolerance or physical dependence are unknown, and even the mechanisms underlying relatively rapid receptor desensitization in single cells are unresolved. To a large degree, the uncertainty surrounding the mechanisms and consequences of short-term regulation of tau-opioid receptors in single cells arises from the limitations in the experimental design in many of the studies that have investigated these events. Receptor overexpression and use of assays in which regulatory mechanisms are likely to blunt control determinations have led to measurements of opioid receptor activity that are likely to be insensitive to receptor uncoupling. Together with uncertainties concerning molecular details of tau-opioid receptor interactions with potential regulatory molecules such as G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins, we are left with an incomplete picture crudely copied from the well-worked-out regulatory schema for beta(2)-adrenoceptors. As a consequence, suggestions that clinically relevant tau-opioid receptor agonists may have different propensities to produce tolerance and dependence that arise from their differential recruitment of regulatory mechanisms are premature, and have not yet been appropriately assessed, nor explained in the context of a thoroughly established regulatory scheme. In this commentary, we outline the experimental limitations that have given rise to conflicting ideas about how mu-opioid receptors are regulated, and identify the issues we feel still need to be addressed before we can understand why morphine promotes receptor trafficking differently to other opioids.

Acute desensitization of GIRK current in rat atrial myocytes is related to K+ current flow

We have investigated the acute desensitization of acetylcholine-activated GIRK current (I(K(ACh))) in cultured adult rat atrial myocytes. Acute desensitization of I(K(ACh)) is observed as a partial relaxation of current with a half-time of < 5 s when muscarinic M2 receptors are stimulated by a high concentration (> 2 micromol l(-1)) of ACh. Under this condition experimental manoeuvres that cause a decrease in the amplitude of I(K(ACh)), such as partial block of M2 receptors by atropine, intracellular loading with GDP-beta-S, or exposure to Ba2+, caused a reduction in desensitization. Acute desensitization was also identified as a decrease in current amplitude and a blunting of the response to saturating [ACh] (20 micromol l(-1)) when the current had been partially activated by a low concentration of ACh or by stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors. A reduction in current analogous to acute desensitization was observed when ATP-dependent K+ current (I(K(ATP))) was activated either by mitochondrial uncoupling using 2,4-dinitrophenole (DNP) or by the channel opener rilmakalim. Adenovirus-driven overexpression of Kir2.1, a subunit of constitutively active inwardly rectifying K+ channels, resulted in a large Ba2+-sensitive background K+ current and a dramatic reduction of ACh-activated current. Adenovirus-driven overexpression of GIRK4 (Kir3.4) subunits resulted in an increased agonist-independent GIRK current paralleled by a reduction in I(K(ACh)) and removal of the desensitizing component. These data indicate that acute desensitization depends on K+ current flow, independent of the K+ channel species, suggesting that it reflects a reduction in electrochemical driving force rather than a bona fide signalling mechanism. This is supported by the observation that desensitization is paralleled by a significant negative shift in reversal potential of I(K(ACh)). Since the ACh-induced hyperpolarization shows comparable desensitization properties as I(K(ACh)), this novel current-dependent desensitization is a physiologically relevant process, shaping the time course of parasympathetic bradycardia.

Endogenous regulator of g protein signaling proteins reduce {mu}-opioid receptor desensitization and down-regulation and adenylyl cyclase tolerance in C6 cells

Chronic exposure of cells to mu-opioid agonists leads to tolerance which can be measured by a reduced ability to activate signaling pathways in the cell. Cell signaling through inhibitory G proteins is negatively regulated by RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins. Here we examine the hypothesis that the GTPase accelerating activity of RGS proteins, by altering the lifetime of Galpha and Gbetagamma, plays a role in the development of cellular tolerance to mu-opioids. C6 glioma cells were stably transfected with mu-opioid receptor and pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive Galpha(o) that was either sensitive or insensitive to endogenous RGS proteins. Cells were treated with PTX to uncouple endogenous Galpha proteins followed by exposure to the mu-opioid agonists [d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) or morphine. Receptor desensitization as measured by agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and receptor down-regulation as measured by [(3)H]diprenorphine binding were increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o). Exposure to high concentrations of morphine or the peptidic mu-opioid agonist DAMGO led to a tolerance to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity in both cell types with a rapid (30 min) and a slower component. Using a submaximal concentration of DAMGO to induce a reduced level of tolerance, a shift in the concentration-effect curve for DAMGO to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity was seen in the cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o), but not in the cells expressing RGS-sensitive Galpha(o), which can be partly explained by an increased supersensitization of the adenylyl cyclase response. The results show that RGS proteins endogenously expressed in C6 cells reduce agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor desensitization, down-regulation, and sensitivity to tolerance to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity.

Uncoupling conformational change from GTP hydrolysis in a heterotrimeric G protein alpha-subunit

Heterotrimeric G protein alpha (G alpha) subunits possess intrinsic GTPase activity that leads to functional deactivation with a rate constant of approximately 2 min(-1) at 30 degrees C. GTP hydrolysis causes conformational changes in three regions of G alpha, including Switch I and Switch II. Mutation of G202-->A in Switch II of G alpha(i1) accelerates the rates of both GTP hydrolysis and conformational change, which is measured by the loss of fluorescence from Trp-211 in Switch II. Mutation of K180-->P in Switch I increases the rate of conformational change but decreases the GTPase rate, which causes transient but substantial accumulation of a low-fluorescence G alpha(i1).GTP species. Isothermal titration calorimetric analysis of the binding of (G202A)G alpha(i1) and (K180P)G alpha(i1) to the GTPase-activating protein RGS4 indicates that the G202A mutation stabilizes the pretransition state-like conformation of G alpha(i1) that is mimicked by the complex of G alpha(i1) with GDP and magnesium fluoroaluminate, whereas the K180P mutation destabilizes this state. The crystal structures of (K180P)G alpha(i1) bound to a slowly hydrolyzable GTP analog, and the GDP.magnesium fluoroaluminate complex provide evidence that the Mg(2+) binding site is destabilized and that Switch I is torsionally restrained by the K180P mutation. The data are consistent with a catalytic mechanism for G alpha in which major conformational transitions in Switch I and Switch II are obligate events that precede the bond-breaking step in GTP hydrolysis. In (K180P)G alpha(i1), the two events are decoupled kinetically, whereas in the native protein they are concerted.

Gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channel activation kinetics via Galphai and Galphao-coupled receptors are determined by Galpha-specific interdomain interactions that affect GDP release rates

Gbetagamma-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels have distinct gating properties when activated by receptors coupled specifically to Galpha(o) versus Galpha(i) subunit isoforms, with Galpha(o)-coupled currents having approximately 3-fold faster agonist-evoked activation kinetics. To identify the molecular determinants in Galpha subunits mediating these kinetic differences, chimeras were constructed using pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive Galpha(oA) and Galpha(i2) mutant subunits (Galpha(oA(C351G)) and Galpha(i2(C352G))) and examined in PTX-treated Xenopus oocytes expressing muscarinic m2 receptors and Kir3.1/3.2a channels. These experiments revealed that the alpha-helical N-terminal region (amino acids 1-161) and the switch regions of Galpha(i2) (amino acids 162-262) both partially contribute to slowing the GIRK activation time course when compared with the Galpha(oA(C351G))-coupled response. When present together, they fully reproduce Galpha(i2(C352G))-coupled GIRK kinetics. The Galpha(i2) C-terminal region (amino acids 263-355) had no significant effect on GIRK kinetics. Complementary responses were observed with chimeras substituting the Galpha(o) switch regions into the Galpha(i2(C352G)) subunit, which partially accelerated the GIRK activation rate. The Galpha(oA)/Galpha(i2) chimera results led us to examine an interaction between the alpha-helical domain and the Ras-like domain previously implicated in mediating a 4-fold slower in vitro basal GDP release rate in Galpha(i1) compared with Galpha(o). Mutations disrupting the interdomain contact in Galpha(i2(C352G)) at either the alphaD-alphaE loop (R145A) or the switch III loop (L233Q/A236H/E240T/M241T), significantly accelerated the GIRK activation kinetics consistent with the Galpha(i2) interdomain interface regulating receptor-catalyzed GDP release rates in vivo. We propose that differences in Galpha(i) versus Galpha(o)-coupled GIRK activation kinetics are due to intrinsic differences in receptor-catalyzed GDP release that rate-limit Gbetagamma production and is attributed to heterogeneity in Galpha(i) and Galpha(o) interdomain contacts.

Rapid desensitization of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) currents is determined by G protein cycle

Activation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, found in the brain, heart, and endocrine tissue, leads to membrane hyperpolarization that generates neuronal inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, slows the heart rate, and inhibits hormone release. During stimulation of G(i/o)-coupled receptors and subsequent channel activation, it has been observed that the current desensitizes. In this study we examined mechanisms underlying fast desensitization of cloned heteromeric neuronal Kir3.1+3.2A and atrial Kir3.1+3.4 channels and also homomeric Kir3.0 currents in response to stimulation of several G(i/o) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed in HEK-293 cells (adenosine A(1), adrenergic alpha(2A), dopamine D(2S), M(4) muscarinic, and GABA(B1b/2) receptors). We found that all agonist-induced currents displayed a similar degree of desensitization except the adenosine A(1) receptor, which exhibits an additional desensitizing component. Using the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS), we found that this is due to a receptor-dependent, G protein-independent process. Using Ca(2+) imaging we showed that desensitization is unlikely to be accounted for solely by phospholipase C activation and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) hydrolysis. We examined the contribution of the G protein cycle and found the following. First, agonist concentration is strongly correlated with degree of desensitization. Second, competitive inhibition of GDP/GTP exchange by using nonhydrolyzable guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDPbetaS) has two effects, a slowing of channel activation and an attenuation of the fast desensitization phenomenon. Finally, using specific Galpha subunits we showed that ternary complexes with fast activation rates display more prominent desensitization than those with slower activation kinetics. Together our data suggest that fast desensitization of GIRK currents is accounted for by the fundamental properties of the G protein cycle.