Promoter region of the rat m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene contains a cell type-specific silencer element

M(4) muscarinic receptors and locomotor activity regulation

M(4) muscarinic receptors (M(4) MR) represent a subfamily of G-protein coupled receptors serving a substantial role in spontaneous locomotor activity regulation, cognition and modulation of cholinergic system. With increasing body of literature discussing the role of M(4) MR some controversies arose. Thus, we try here to summarize the current evidence regarding the M(4) MR, with the special focus on their role in Locomotor activity control. We review the molecular function of M(4) MR in specific brain areas implicated in locomotor regulation, and shortly in other CNS processes that could be connected to locomotor activity. We also focus on brain areas implicated in locomotor activity biorhythm changes like suprachiasmatic nucleus, subparaventricular zone posterior hypothalamic area, striatum and thalamus. Gender-related aspects and differences in locomotor activity in males and females are discussed further.

Molecular properties of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which comprise five subtypes (M1-M5 receptors), are expressed in both the CNS and PNS (particularly the target organs of parasympathetic neurons). M1-M5 receptors are integral membrane proteins with seven transmembrane segments, bind with acetylcholine (ACh) in the extracellular phase, and thereafter interact with and activate GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) in the intracellular phase: M1, M3, and M5 receptors interact with Gq-type G proteins, and M2 and M4 receptors with Gi/Go-type G proteins. Activated G proteins initiate a number of intracellular signal transduction systems. Agonist-bound muscarinic receptors are phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which initiate their desensitization through uncoupling from G proteins, receptor internalization, and receptor breakdown (down regulation). Recently the crystal structures of M2 and M3 receptors were determined and are expected to contribute to the development of drugs targeted to muscarinic receptors. This paper summarizes the molecular properties of muscarinic receptors with reference to the historical background and bias to studies performed in our laboratories.

Physiological role of G-protein coupled receptor phosphorylation

It is now well established that G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are hyper-phosphorylated following agonist occupation usually at serine and threonine residues contained on the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail. After some 2 decades of intensive research, the nature of protein kinases involved in this process together with the signalling consequences of receptor phosphorylation has been firmly established. The major challenge that the field currently faces is placing all this information within a physiological context and determining to what extent does phosphoregulation of GPCRs impact on whole animal responses. In this chapter, we address this issue by describing how GPCR phosphorylation might vary depending on the cell type in which the receptor is expressed and how this might be employed to drive selective regulation of physiological responses.

Cloning and analysis of rat osteoclast inhibitory lectin gene promoter

Osteoclast inhibitory lectin (OCIL) is a novel regulator of bone remodeling, however, little is known concerning how OCIL is regulated to date. In this study, approximately 4.4 kb of the 5'-flanking sequence of rat OCIL gene was cloned into the promoter-less reporter vector pGL3-basic and transiently transfected into three different cell lines. The differences in the levels of luciferase activity paralleled well with the levels of OCIL mRNA expression in these cells, suggesting that the regulation of rat OCIL gene expression occurs mainly at the transcriptional level. Additional luciferase assays using a series of constructs containing unidirectionally deleted fragments showed that the construct-1819/pGL3 (-1819 to +118) exhibited the highest luciferase activity, suggesting the presence of functional promoter in this region. The region from -4370 to -2805 might contain negative regulatory elements, while the region from -1819 to -1336 might have important positive regulatory elements that enhance OCIL transcription. Sequence analysis of the promoter revealed the absence of both TATA and CAAT boxes. However, in the proximal promoter region (-81 to +118), several potential transcription factor binding sites that may be responsible for the basal transcriptional activity of rat OCIL promoter were observed. The promoter contains several potential Sp1 binding sites, and cotransfection of a shRNA expression plasmid that knockdowns Sp1 significantly reduced OCIL promoter activity and endogenous gene expression and moreover, overexpressing Sp7, a Sp1 family member that also binds to Sp1 binding sequence, increased OCIL promoter activity and gene expression, suggesting a role of Sp1 family proteins in regulation of OCIL transcription.

Alternative splicing of RGS8 gene changes the binding property to the M1 muscarinic receptor to confer receptor type-specific Gq regulation

RGS proteins constitute a large family that modulates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling. We previously showed that RGS8 suppressed Gq signaling in a receptor type-specific manner. To elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying receptor-specific attenuation by RGS8, we examined whether RGS8 can interact with certain G-protein-coupled receptors. By pull-down assay, we showed that RGS8 directly binds to the third intracellular (i3) loop of M1 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). The binding of RGS8S, a splice variant with a different N-terminus, was weaker. RGS8 could bind specifically to the C-terminal part of M1i3 (containing amino acids of 304-353 of i3 of human M1-mAChR), but RGS8S could not. Moreover, deletion of the N-terminal 9 amino acids and substitution of both Arg-8 and Arg-9 of RGS8 with Ala resulted in reduced binding to M1i3. BRET experiments revealed that RGS8 actually interacts with M1-mAChR, but RGS8S does not interact in the living cells. The RGS8 mutant, which had less binding ability to M1i3, showed a reduced inhibitory function of Gq signaling through M1-mAChR. These results demonstrated that RGS8 can directly interact with M1-mAChR via its N-terminus and the i3 loop of the receptor, and this binding must play an essential role in receptor-specific suppression by RGS8.

Integrating Synapse Proteomics with Transcriptional Regulation

The mammalian postsynaptic proteome (PSP) comprises a highly interconnected set of approximately 1,000 proteins. The PSP is organized into macromolecular complexes that have a modular architecture defined by protein interactions and function. Signals initiated by neurotransmitter receptors are integrated by these complexes and their constituent enzymes to orchestrate multiple downstream cellular changes, including transcriptional regulation of genes at the nucleus. Genome wide transcriptome studies are beginning to map the sets of genes regulated by the synapse proteome. Conversely, understanding the transcriptional regulation of genes encoding the synapse proteome will shed light on synapse formation. Mutations that disrupt synapse signalling complexes result in cognitive impairments in mice and humans, and recent evidence indicates that these mutation change gene expression profiles. We discuss the need for global approaches combining genetics, transcriptomics and proteomics in order to understand cognitive function and disruption in diseases.

Regulatory elements of the melanocortin 1 receptor

Among more than 120 genes that are now known to regulate mammalian pigmentation, one of the key genes is MC1R, which encodes the melanocortin 1 receptor, a seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor expressed on the surface of melanocytes. Since the monoexonic sequence of the gene was cloned and characterized more than a decade ago, tremendous efforts have been dedicated to the extensive genotyping of mostly red-haired populations all around the world, thus providing allelic variants that may or may not account for melanoma susceptibility in the presence or absence of ultraviolet (UV) exposure. Soluble factors, such as proopiomelanocortin (POMC) derivatives, agouti signal protein (ASP) and others, regulate MC1R expression, leading to improved photoprotection via increased eumelanin synthesis or in contrast, inducing the switch to pheomelanin. However, there is an obvious lack of knowledge regarding the numerous and complex regulatory mechanisms that govern the expression of MC1R at the intra-cellular level, from gene transcription in response to an external stimulus to the expression of the mature receptor on the melanocyte surface.

A point mutation in a silencer module reduces the promoter activity for the human mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase

A promoter region of human mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MST) [EC 2.8.1.2] is G+C-rich and TATA-less, showing features of a house-keeping gene. In the core promoter, a GC box (-284:GGGGCGTGGC:-275) and an initiator (-219:TTATATG:-225) are found. A cap site hunting analysis for human liver cDNA revealed four possible transcriptional start sites, nucleotides -223, -159, -35 and -25. Point mutagenesis and deletion studies suggest that a module of the silencer element is -394:GCTG:-391. A replacement of -391G to C lost the silencer function; on the other hand, a replacement of -394G to T or C, -393C to T or -392T to G markedly reduced the promoter activity.

Multiple promoters drive tissue-specific expression of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene

Despite the wealth of information on the functional and pharmacological properties of the M2 muscarinic receptor, we know relatively little of structure and regulation of the M2 receptor gene. Here, we describe the organisation of the human M2 gene and its promoters. Four exons are present in the 5' untranslated region of the human M2 mRNA distributed over 146 kb on chromosome 7 which produce eight different splice variants in the IMR-32 neuroblastoma cell line. The unexpectedly large size of this gene indicates that transcription initiates much further upstream of the coding region than earlier studies had indicated. We present evidence that there are three distinct human M2 promoters. Analysis of endogenous transcripts revealed that promoter 2 is preferentially used in neuroblastoma cells, whereas promoter 1 in cardiac cells. All promoters are highly conserved across human, mouse, rat and pig. They contain multiple start sites and none possess a TATA-box. In addition, we describe another M2 promoter that is specific for rat. We show that GATA-4 transcription factor binds to two sites within the regulatory regions of the M2 gene using reporter gene assays, electromobility shift assays and mutational analysis.

GABAA receptors: building the bridge between subunit mRNAs, their promoters, and cognate transcription factors

The type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptors mediate the majority of fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the CNS, and alterations in GABA(A) receptor function is believed to be involved in the pathology of several neurological and psychiatric illnesses, such as epilepsy, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, and schizophrenia. GABA(A) receptors can be assembled from eight distinct subunit families defined by sequence similarity: alpha(1-6), beta(1-3), gamma(1-3), delta, pi, theta, and rho(1-3). The regulation of GABA(A) receptor function in the brain is a highly compensating system, influencing both the number and the composition of receptors at the cell surface. While transcriptional and translational points of control operate in parallel, it is becoming increasingly evident that many functional changes in GABA(A) receptors reflect the differential gene regulation of its subunits. The fact that certain GABA(A) receptor subunit genes are transcribed in distinct cell types during specific periods of development strongly suggests that genetic control plays a major role in the choice of subunit variants available for receptor assembly. This review focuses on the physiological conditions that alter subunit mRNA levels, the promoters that may control such levels, and the use of a conceptual framework created by bioinformatics to study coordinate and independent GABA(A) receptor subunit gene regulation. As this exciting field moves closer to identifying the language hidden inside the chromatin of GABA(A) receptor subunit gene clusters, future experiments will be aimed at testing models generated by computational analysis with biologically relevant in vivo and in vitro assays. It is hoped that through this functional genomic approach there will be the identification of new targets for therapeutic intervention.

Interaction of the repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) with target genes

The repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) has been proposed to restrict expression of repressor element 1 (RE1) bearing genes to differentiated neurons by silencing their expression in non-neural tissue. Here, we have examined the interaction of REST with the M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene. We show that REST binds to the RE1 of the M(4) gene in those cell lines and brain regions where the M(4) gene is expressed but not in those where the M(4) is not expressed. Furthermore, in cells that express M(4), the presence of REST represses but is insufficient to silence transcription of M(4). In non-neural cells REST is absent from the RE1 of the silent M(4) gene and perturbation of REST function fails to induce M(4) expression. We propose that REST acts to regulate expression levels of some RE1-bearing genes in neural cells, thereby playing an important role in defining neuronal activity.

Transcription of the M1 muscarinic receptor gene in neurons and neuronal progenitors of the embryonic rat forebrain

Development of the nervous system is accompanied by expansion and differentiation of the neuronal progenitors within the embryonic neuroepithelium. Although the role of growth factors in this process is well documented, there is increasing evidence for a role of neurotransmitters. Acetylcholine is known to exert many actions on developing neural cells, but its potential role in neurogenesis is unclear. Here, we show that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is expressed in the neuroepithelium of the rat forebrain, where it is found on both nestin+ progenitor cells and TuJ1+ newly differentiated neurons. Furthermore, transcription is governed, at least in part, by regulatory cis elements that are also responsible for driving transcription in neuroblastoma cells. This represents the first demonstration of M1 receptors on neuronal progenitor cells and supports the notion that M1 muscarinic receptors may play a role in development of the nervous system prior to the onset of synaptogenesis and their subsequent role in neurotransmission.

Promoter characterization and genomic organization of the gene encoding integrin-linked kinase 1

Integrin-linked kinase (ILK)-1 is a 59-kDa serine-threonine protein kinase, which associates with the cytoplasmic domain of beta 1, beta 2 and beta 3 integrins and acts as a receptor proximal kinase regulating integrin-mediated signal transduction. We have recently identified an isoform of ILK (ILK-2), which is expressed, in a TGF-beta 1-dependent manner, in a highly invasive tumor cell line but not in normal adult tissues. In contrast, ILK-1 is ubiquitously expressed in normal tissues and is up-regulated in various tumors independent of TGF-beta 1. Here, we report the structural organization and the promoter activity of the human ILK-1 gene, contained within a 8.8-kb genomic fragment cloned from a human BAC library. The mature protein is encoded by 13 exons. The last coding exon contains the entire 3' UTR of the ILK-1 gene, which overlaps with the complementary 3' UTR sequence of the TAF2H gene, a TATA box binding protein-associated factor. A major transcriptional initiation start site was found 138 bp upstream of exon 1 in close proximity to a consensus initiator element (Inr). The ILK gene is transcribed by a TATA-less and CAAT-less promoter with typical features of housekeeping genes. The promoter activity was characterized by a luciferase reporter assay and the minimal sequence conferring promoter activity was 349 bp in size and located immediately upstream of exon 1.

Structure and transcription of the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene

We have isolated and characterized the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene and its promoter. Using 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), internal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and homology searching to identify EST clones, we determined that the cDNA encoding the m3 receptor comprises 4,559 bp in 8 exons, which are alternatively spliced to exclude exons 2, 4, 6, and/or 7; the receptor coding sequence occurs within exon 8. Analysis of P1 artificial chromosome (PAC) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones and of PCR- amplified genomic DNA, and homology searching of human chromosome 1 sequence provided from the Sanger Centre (Hinxton, Cambridge, UK) revealed that the m3 muscarinic receptor gene spans at least 285 kb. A promoter fragment containing bp -1240 to +101 (relative to the most 5' transcription start site) exhibited considerable transcriptional activity during transient transfection in cultured subconfluent, serum-fed canine tracheal myocytes, and 5' deletion analysis of promoter function revealed the presence of positive transcriptional regulatory elements between bp -526 and -269. Sequence analysis disclosed three potential AP-2 binding sites in this region; five more AP-2 consensus binding motifs occur between bp -269 and +101. Cotransfection with a plasmid expressing human AP-2alpha substantially increased transcription from m3 receptor promoter constructs containing 526 or 269 bp of 5' flanking DNA. Furthermore, m3 receptor promoter activity was enhanced by long-term serum deprivation of canine tracheal myocytes, a treatment that is known to increase AP-2 transcription-promoting activity in these cells. Together, these data suggest that expression of the human m3 muscarinic receptor gene is regulated in part by AP-2 in airway smooth muscle.

The basic helix-loop-helix protein, sharp-1, represses transcription by a histone deacetylase-dependent and histone deacetylase-independent mechanism

Many aspects of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation are controlled by basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. One such factor is SHARP-1, initially identified on the basis of its sequence similarity to hairy. Unlike hairy, and atypically for bHLHs, SHARP-1 is expressed late in development, suggestive of a role in terminal aspects of differentiation. Nevertheless, the role of SHARP-1 and the identity of its target genes remain unknown. During the course of a one-hybrid screen for transcription factors that bind to regulatory domains of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene, we isolated the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1. In this study, we investigated the functional role of SHARP-1 in regulating transcription. Fusion proteins of SHARP-1 tethered to the gal4 DNA binding domain repress both basal and activated transcription when recruited to either a TATA-containing or a TATAless promoter. Furthermore, we identified two independent repression domains that operate via distinct mechanisms. Repression by a domain in the C terminus is sensitive to the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, whereas repression by the bHLH domain is insensitive to TSA. Furthermore, overexpression of SHARP-1 represses transcription from the M(1) promoter. This study represents the first report to assign a function to, and to identify a target gene for, the bHLH transcription factor SHARP-1.

Glucocorticoid control of glial gene expression

The glucocorticoid signaling pathway is responsive to a considerable number of internal and external signals and can therefore establish diverse patterns of gene expression. A glial-specific pattern, for example, is shown by the glucocorticoid-inducible gene glutamine synthetase. The enzyme is expressed at a particularly high level in glial cells, where it catalyzes the recycling of the neurotransmitter glutamate, and at a low level in most other cells, for housekeeping duties. Glial specificity of glutamine synthetase induction is achieved by the use of positive and negative regulatory elements, a glucocorticoid response element and a neural restrictive silencer element. Though not glial specific by themselves, these elements may establish a glial-specific pattern of expression through their mutual activity and their combined effect. The inductive activity of glucocorticoids is markedly repressed by the c-Jun protein, which is expressed at relatively high levels in proliferating glial cells. The signaling pathway of c-Jun is activated by the disruption of glia-neuron cell contacts, by transformation with v-src, and in proliferating retinal cells of early embryonic ages. The c-Jun protein inhibits the transcriptional activity of the glucocorticoid receptor and thus represses glutamine synthetase expression. This repressive mechanism might also affect the ability of glial cells to cope with glutamate neurotoxicity in injured tissues.

Characterization of the promoter region of the human melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene

We sequenced 3201 bp upstream from the ATG translation start codon of the human melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R). A number of transcriptional initiation sites were detected over a region of approximately 600 base pairs upstream of the receptor coding region. These consist of GC-rich regions, each including SP-1 consensus binding motifs. Neither a TATA nor a CAAT box was found in this region. The 5'-flanking region also contains the consensus regulatory elements for AP-1, AP-2, and several E-boxes. Gel shift assays targeting the three GC boxes confirmed binding of SP-1. A promoter assay revealed that the minimal region exhibiting promoter activity was located between nucleotides -517 and -282 in human melanoma SK-Mel-2 cells. Further deletion from -517 to -447, which removed an SP-1 site, completely abolished luciferase activity. In conclusion, the MC1R promoter shares the characteristics of many other GPCR promoters. These characteristics include GC-rich sequence, lack of a TATA box, and binding of SP-1.

The mouse neurotrophin receptor trkB gene is transcribed from two different promoters

We have analysed a 7-kb region upstream of the mouse trkB coding sequence. The region showed promoter activity in transient transfection experiments and conferred tissue-specific expression to a reporter gene. Deletion analysis of this region demonstrated the presence of two alternative promoters named P1 and P2 that have been mapped by RNase protection. P1 has been located to 1.8 kb and P2 to 0.5 kb upstream of the trkB translation start site. From the P1 promoter, alternative splicing generates various transcripts. Interestingly, P2 is located in an intron of the transcripts produced from the P1 promoter. This peculiar arrangement results in different mRNA species that encode the same protein(s) but differ in their 5'-untranslated regions. In addition, transcription of the trkB locus results in two different trkB isoforms (kinase and truncated receptors) originated by alternative splicing of the mRNA, that possess differential spatial and temporal expression patterns. Using RT-PCR, we demonstrated that there was no linkage between promoter usage and alternative splicing, since transcripts initiated from each promoter encoded both kinase and truncated receptor proteins.

A silencer element in the regulatory region of glutamine synthetase controls cell type-specific repression of gene induction by glucocorticoids

Glutamine synthetase is a key enzyme in the recycling of the neurotransmitter glutamate. Expression of this enzyme is regulated by glucocorticoids, which induce a high level of glutamine synthetase in neural but not in various non-neural tissues. This is despite the fact that non-neural cells express functional glucocorticoid receptor molecules capable of inducing other target genes. Sequencing and functional analysis of the upstream region of the glutamine synthetase gene identified, 5' to the glucocorticoid response element (GRE), a 21-base pair glutamine synthetase silencer element (GSSE), which showed considerable homology with the neural restrictive silencer element NRSE. The GSSE was able to markedly repress the induction of gene transcription by glucocorticoids in non-neural cells and in embryonic neural retina. The repressive activity of the GSSE could be conferred on a heterologous GRE promoter and was orientation- and position-independent with respect to the transcriptional start site, but appeared to depend on a location proximal to the GRE. Gel-shift assays revealed that non-neural cells and cells of early embryonic retina contain a high level of GSSE binding activity and that this level declines progressively with age. Our results suggest that the GSSE might be involved in the restriction of glutamine synthetase induction by glucocorticoids to differentiated neural tissues.

Control elements of muscarinic receptor gene expression

Studies describing the structures of the M1, M2 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) genes and the genetic elements that control their expression are reviewed. In particular, we focus on the role of the neuron-restrictive silencer element/restriction element-1 (NRSE/RE-1) in the regulation of the M4 mAChR gene. The NRSE/RE-1 was first identified as a genetic control element that prevents the expression of the SCG-10 and type II sodium channel (NaII) genes in non-neuronal cells in culture. The NRSE/RE-1 inhibits gene expression by binding the repressor/silencer protein NRSF/REST, which is present in many non-neuronal cell lines and tissues. Our studies show that although the expression of the M4 mAChR gene is inhibited by NRSF/REST, this inhibition is not always complete. Rather, the efficiency of silencing by NRSF/REST is different in different cells. A plausible explanation for this differential silencing is that the NRSF/RE-1 interacts with distinct sets of promoter binding proteins in different types of cells. We hypothesize that modulation of NRSF/REST silencing activity by these proteins contributes to the cell-specific pattern of expression of the M4 mAChR in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Recent studies that suggest a more complex role for the NRSE/RE-1 in regulating gene expression are also discussed.

Repression and activation of muscarinic receptor genes

The specific cellular response to muscarinic receptor activation is dependent upon appropriate expression of each of the five muscarinic receptor genes by individual cells. Here we summarise recent work describing some of the genomic regulatory elements and transcriptional mechanisms that control expression of the M1 and M4 genes.

Identification and characterization of the rat M1 muscarinic receptor promoter

Five subtypes of the muscarinic receptor have been cloned from both the rat and human genomes. Although all five genes have the coding sequences in a single exon, their structures 5' of the initiation codon are largely uncharacterized, except for the M4 receptor. In the brain, muscarinic receptors mediate motor and memory function by interaction with their ligand acetylcholine. In addition, the M1 muscarinic subtype has been implicated in behavior, stress-adaptive cardiovascular reflexes, and blood pressure regulation. In the current study the M1 muscarinic receptor noncoding 5'-flanking region has been identified and characterized, including the promoter and two 5' noncoding exons located approximately 13-14 kb from the coding exon. Similar to the M4 muscarinic receptor gene the M1 promoter is GC-rich, contains no TATA box, but has two potential CAAT boxes and several putative binding sites for transcription factors such as SP1 and AP-1-3. The transcription initiation site was identified by RNase protection and primer extension. Promoter activity was confirmed in transient expression assays, using luciferase reporter constructs. A 0.89-kb fragment consisting of 480 bp of the promoter, exon 1, and part of intron 1 expressed luciferase activity in two M1 receptor-expressing cell lines (CCL-107 and CCL-147), whereas a longer fragment (1.5 kb) that extends into intron 2 demonstrated significantly increased luciferase activity. The constructs exhibited responses indicating the presence of functional glucocorticoid-, acute-phase-, and heat shock-responsive elements.

Biological activity and modular structure of RE-1-silencing transcription factor (REST), a repressor of neuronal genes

The zinc finger protein RE-1-silencing transcription factor (REST)1 is a transcriptional repressor that represses neuronal genes in nonneuronal tissues. Transfection experiments of neuroblastoma cells using a REST expression vector revealed that synapsin I promoter activity is controlled by REST. The biological activity of REST was further investigated using a battery of model promoters containing strong promoters/enhancers and REST binding sites. REST functioned as a transcriptional repressor when REST binding motifs derived from the genes encoding synapsin I, SCG10, alpha1-glycine receptor, the beta2-subunit of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and the m4-subunit of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor were present in the promoter region. No differences in the biological activity of these REST binding motifs tested were detected. Moreover, we found that REST functioned very effectively as a transcriptional repressor at a distance. Thus, REST represents a general transcriptional repressor that blocks transcription regardless of the location or orientation of its binding site relative to the enhancer and promoter. This biological activity could also be attributed to isolated domains of REST. Both repressor domains identified at the N and C termini of REST were transferable to a heterologous DNA binding domain and functioned from proximal and distal positions, similar to the REST protein.

G protein-coupled receptor kinases

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) constitute a family of six mammalian serine/threonine protein kinases that phosphorylate agonist-bound, or activated, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as their primary substrates. GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation rapidly initiates profound impairment of receptor signaling, or desensitization. This review focuses on the regulation of GRK activity by a variety of allosteric and other factors: agonist-stimulated GPCRs, beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins, phospholipid cofactors, the calcium-binding proteins calmodulin and recoverin, posttranslational isoprenylation and palmitoylation, autophosphorylation, and protein kinase C-mediated GRK phosphorylation. Studies employing recombinant, purified proteins, cell culture, and transgenic animal models attest to the general importance of GRKs in regulating a vast array of GPCRs both in vitro and in vivo.

Nerve growth factor regulation of m4 muscarinic receptor mRNA stability but not gene transcription requires mitogen-activated protein kinase activity

Nerve growth factor (NGF) up-regulated steady-state levels of m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) mRNA in PC12 cells. Up-regulation of mRNA levels was associated with a corresponding increase in mAChR binding sites. Two other growth factors, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), up-regulated m4 mRNA and mAChR binding sites. Treatment of PC12 cells with NGF and bFGF, but not EGF, has previously been demonstrated to result in sustained activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). Analogously, NGF and bFGF, but not EGF, increased the stability of m4 mRNA in PC12 cells. In HER-PC12 cells, a clonal PC12 cell transfectant overexpressing EGF receptors and displaying sustained MAPK activation upon receptor stimulation, EGF treatment stabilized the m4 transcript. A synthetic inhibitor of MAPK kinase, PD98059, inhibited growth factor-induced stabilization of the m4 transcript in both PC12 and HER-PC12 cells. These findings demonstrate that the MAPK pathway is involved in transcript stabilization. Cycloheximide pretreatment abolished the post-transcriptional effect of NGF, indicating that de novo protein synthesis was required for the observed increase in m4 mRNA stability. By contrast, cycloheximide had no discernible post-transcriptional effect if added after NGF treatment, suggesting that an inducible yet stable protein factor was involved in m4 mRNA decay. An unusually well conserved 137 nucleotides of m4 3'-untranslated region has been identified by sequence comparison with other mRNAs that are post-transcriptionally regulated by NGF. In PC12 cells that heterologously overexpress this region, we demonstrate that NGF no longer stabilizes endogenous m4 mRNA. This conserved region probably represents an NGF-responsive element involved in mRNA stability regulation. Finally, transcription of the m4 gene can be induced by all three growth factors but is not dependent on MAPK activity, unlike growth factor-induced m4 mRNA stabilization.

Regulation of the expression and function of the M2 muscarinic receptor

Since the cloning and expression of many of the G protein-coupled receptors during the 1980s, there has been a massive increase in our understanding of many aspects of their function. The use of molecular biology to engineer and express mutant receptors has made it possible to determine key amino acids involved in receptor function. Although advances in molecular biology have contributed greatly to our understanding of the pharmacology and structure of the five subtypes of muscarinic receptor, much remains to be learned about the factors that regulate their expression and function. This review by El-Bdaoui Haddad and Jonathan Rousell describes the current state of awareness and highlights recent advances made in the elucidation of the mechanisms involved in muscarinic receptor regulation. Because most is known about the regulation of expression of the M2 receptor subtype, particular attention will be paid to it. Furthermore, this receptor subtype plays an important role in regulating acetylcholine output from airway cholinergic nerves, and there is substantial evidence from studies both in vivo and in vitro in human and animal models that these receptors are dysfunctional in asthma.

Promoter analysis of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 gene: methylation and expression of the transgene

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit genes compose a family of genes. The major isoform of nAChR in the brain is made up of the alpha4 and beta2 subunits and possesses a high affinity for nicotine. To investigate the mechanisms of the regulation of the nAChR alpha4 gene expression in mouse, its genomic DNA was cloned and characterized. The transcription initiation site was mapped by primer extension and RNase protection experiments and localized at about 254 bp upstream of the translation initiation site. The 5' flanking region of this gene did not have typical TATA box but GC-rich sequences were found around the initiation site. Methylation analysis of this region revealed that genomic DNAs from liver and muscle are partially methylated, whereas little methylation was observed in genomic DNA from brain. To characterize the cis-acting elements driving cell-specific expression of the alpha4 subunit gene, we produced lines of transgenic mice which carry a series of fragments of the alpha4 gene fused with bacterial lacZ as a reporter gene. An 11.5-kb DNA fragment containing 9 kb of the region upstream of the transcription initiation site and the first intron was found to confer an expression pattern which coincides rather well with the endogenous gene expression pattern at early embryonic stages, suggesting that the elements necessary for the onset of alpha4 gene expression are located in this region. A DNA fragment containing the 1.8-kb upstream sequence and the first intron drove expression of lacZ in a limited subset of alpha4 expressing cells, whereas the 1.8-kb upstream sequence alone did not elicit any significant expression. These results show that both upstream and intronic sequences are important for cell-specific expression of the nAChR alpha4 gene.

The role of receptor kinases and arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor regulation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs) play a key role in controlling hormonal regulation of numerous second-messenger pathways. However, following agonist activation, most GPRs rapidly lose their ability to respond to hormone. For many GPRs, this process, commonly referred to as desensitization, appears to be primarily mediated by two protein families: G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and arrestins. GRKs specifically bind to the agonist-occupied receptor, thereby promoting receptor phosphorylation, which in turn leads to arrestin binding. Arrestin binding precludes receptor/G protein interaction leading to functional desensitization. Many GPRs are then removed from the plasma membrane via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Recent studies have implicated endocytosis in the resensitization of GPRs and have linked both GRKs and arrestins to this process. In this review, we discuss the role of GRKs and arrestins in regulating agonist-specific signaling and trafficking of GPRs.

GATA factor-dependent regulation of cardiac m2 muscarinic acetylcholine gene transcription

The m2 subtype is the predominant muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype expressed in heart and regulates the rate and force of cardiac contraction. We have previously reported the isolation of the promoter region for the chick m2 receptor gene and defined a region of the chick m2 promoter sufficient for high level expression in cardiac primary cultures. In this manuscript we demonstrate transactivation of cm2 promoter by the GATA family of transcription factors. In addition, we define the GATA-responsive element in the chick m2 promoter and demonstrate that this element is required for expression in cardiac primary cultures. Finally, we demonstrate specific binding of both a chick heart nuclear protein and of cloned chick GATA-4, -5, and -6 to the GATA-responsive element.

Transcriptional control and the role of silencers in transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes

Mechanisms controlling transcription and its regulation are fundamental to our understanding of molecular biology and, ultimately, cellular biology. Our knowledge of transcription initiation and integral factors such as RNA polymerase is considerable, and more recently our understanding of the involvement of enhancers and complexes such as holoenzyme and mediator has increased dramatically. However, an understanding of transcriptional repression is also essential for a complete understanding of promoter structure and the regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes is achieved through 'silencers', of which there are two types, namely 'silencer elements' and 'negative regulatory elements' (NREs). Silencer elements are classical, position-independent elements that direct an active repression mechanism, and NREs are position-dependent elements that direct a passive repression mechanism. In addition, 'repressors' are DNA-binding trasncription factors that interact directly with silencers. A review of the recent literature reveals that it is the silencer itself and its context within a given promoter, rather than the interacting repressor, that determines the mechanism of repression. Silencers form an intrinsic part of many eukaryotic promoters and, consequently, knowledge of their interactive role with enchancers and other transcriptional elements is essential for our understanding of gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Neuronal expression of zinc finger transcription factor REST/NRSF/XBR gene

The identification of a common cis-acting silencer element, a neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE), in multiple neuron-specific genes, together with the finding that zinc finger transcription factor REST/NRSF/XBR could confer NRSE-mediated silencing in non-neuronal cells, suggested that REST/NRSF/XBR is a master negative regulator of neurogenesis. Here we show that, although REST/NRSF/XBR expression decreases during neuronal development, it proceeds in the adult nervous system. In situ hybridization analysis revealed neuronal expression of rat REST/NRSF/XBR mRNA in adult brain, with the highest levels in the neurons of hippocampus, pons/medulla, and midbrain. The glutamate analog kainic acid increased REST/NRSF/XBR mRNA levels in various hippocampal and cortical neurons in vivo, suggesting that REST/NRSF/XBR has a role in neuronal activity-implied processes. Several alternatively spliced REST/NRSF/XBR mRNAs encoding proteins with nine, five, or four zinc finger motifs are transcribed from REST/NRSF/XBR gene. Two of these transcripts are generated by neuron-specific splicing of a 28-bp-long exon. Rat REST/NRSF/XBR protein isoforms differ in their DNA binding specificities; however, all mediate repression in transient expression assays. Our data suggest that REST/NRSF/XBR is a negative regulator rather than a transcriptional silencer of neuronal gene expression and counteracts with positive regulators to modulate target gene expression quantitatively in different cell types, including neurons.

A calcium responsive element that regulates expression of two calcium binding proteins in Purkinje cells

Calbindin D28 encodes a calcium binding protein that is expressed in the cerebellum exclusively in Purkinje cells. We have used biolistic transfection of organotypic slices of P12 cerebellum to identify a 40-bp element from the calbindin promoter that is necessary and sufficient for Purkinje cell specific expression in this transient in situ assay. This element (PCE1) is also present in the calmodulin II promoter, which regulates expression of a second Purkinje cell Ca2+ binding protein. Expression of high levels of exogenous calbindin or calretinin decreased transcription mediated by PCE1 in Purkinje cells 2.5- to 3-fold, whereas the presence of 1 microM ionomycin in the extracellular medium increased expression. These results demonstrate that PCE1 is a component of a cell-specific and Ca2+-sensitive transcriptional regulatory mechanism that may play a key role in setting the Ca2+ buffering capacity of Purkinje cells.

Endocytosis and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors

Agonist stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors causes a dramatic reorganization of their intracellular distribution. Activation of receptors triggers receptor endocytosis and, since receptors recycle back to the surface continuously, a new steady state is reached where a significant proportion of receptors is located internally. Although this movement of receptors is remarkable, its role has been enigmatic. Recent developments have provided insight into the compartments through which the receptors move, the nature of the signals that trigger receptor translocation, and the significance of receptor cycling for cell function. In this article, Jennifer Koenig and Michael Edwardson review recent progress in this field and place receptor cycling into a mathematical framework that reveals the extent and rate of intracellular receptor movement.

Structure of the m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene and its promoter

The m1 receptor is one of five muscarinic receptors that mediate the metabotropic actions of acetylcholine in the nervous system where it is expressed predominantly in the telencephalon and autonomic ganglia. RNase protection, primer extension, and 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends analysis of a rat cosmid clone containing the entire m1 gene demonstrated that the rat m1 gene consists of a single 657-base pairs (bp) non-coding exon separated by a 13. 5-kilobase (kb) intron from a 2.54-kb coding exon that contains the entire open reading frame. The splice acceptor for the coding exon starting at -71 bp relative to the adenine of the initiating methionine. This genomic structure is similar to that of the m4 gene (Wood, I. C., Roopra, A., Harrington, C. A., and Buckley, N. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30933-30940 and Wood, I. C., Roopra, A., and Buckley, N. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14221-14225). Like the m4 gene, the m1 promoter lacks TATA and CAAT consensus motifs, and the first exon and 5'-flanking region are not gc-rich. The 5'-flanking region also contains the consensus regulatory elements Sp-1, NZF-1, AP-1, AP-2, E-box, NFkappaB, and Oct-1. Unike the m4 promoter, there is no evidence of a RE1/NRSE silencer element in the m1 promoter. Deletional analysis and transient transfection assays demonstrates that reporter constructs containing 0.9 kb of 5'-flanking sequence and the first exon are sufficient to drive cell-specific expression of reporter gene in IMR32 neuroblastoma cells while remaining silent in 3T3 fibrobasts.

The neuron-restrictive silencer element: a dual enhancer/silencer crucial for patterned expression of a nicotinic receptor gene in the brain

The neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) has been identified in several neuronal genes and confers neuron specificity by silencing transcription in nonneuronal cells. NRSE is present in the promoter of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta2-subunit gene that determines its neuron-specific expression in the nervous system. Using transgenic mice, we show that NRSE may either silence or enhance transcription depending on the cellular context within the nervous system. In vitro in neuronal cells, NRSE activates transcription of synthetic promoters when located downstream in the 5' untranslated region, or at less than 50 bp upstream from the TATA box, but switches to a silencer when located further upstream. In contrast, in nonneuronal cells NRSE always functions as a silencer. Antisense RNA inhibition shows that the NRSE-binding protein REST contributes to the activation of transcription in neuronal cells.

Expression of the rat m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene is regulated by the neuron-restrictive silencer element/repressor element 1

Neuronal cell-specific expression of the rat m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is regulated by a silencer element. A likely mediator of this silencing is the neuron-restrictive silencer element/repressor element 1 (NRSE/RE1), which is present 837 base pairs (bp) upstream from the transcription initiation site of the m4 mAChR gene (Wood, I. C., Roopra, A., Harrington, C., and Buckley, N. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30933-30940; Mieda, M., Haga, T., and Saffen, D. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5177-5182). In the present study, we examined whether this putative NRSE/RE1 functions as a silencer. Transient expression assays using m4 mAChR promoter/luciferase expression vectors showed that the m4 NRSE/RE1 is necessary and sufficient to repress m4 promoter activity in non-neuronal L6 cells. m4 promoter activity was only partially repressed, however, in neuronal NG108-15 cells exogenously expressing the neuronal-restrictive silencer factor/RE1-silencing transcription factor (NRSF/REST). By contrast, the promoter activity of the type II sodium channel (NaII) gene was nearly completely repressed in NRSF/REST-expressing NG108-15 cells. Experiments with expression vectors containing chimeric promoters revealed that the NRSE/RE1 elements derived from both the m4 and NaII genes are independently sufficient to silence NaII gene promoter activity, but only partially repress m4 mAChR gene promoter activity in NRSF/REST-expressing NG108-15 cells. Thus, the repression activity of NRSF/REST depends upon the species of promoter to which it is linked. Gel-shift assays showed that the NRSF/REST is the only protein that binds to a 92-bp segment from the m4 mAChR promoter containing NRSE/RE1. This and the fact that m4 promoter activity was completely repressed in L6 cells suggest that the proteins that bind to the m4 constitutive promoter may be different from those in NG108-15 cells. Deletion analysis of the m4 constitutive promoter revealed that a 90-bp segment immediately upstream from the transcription initiation site contains significant promoter activity. Gel-shift assays revealed that several proteins in nuclear extracts prepared from L6 and NG108-15 cells bind to this 90-bp segment and that some of these proteins are L6 or NG108-15 cell-specific. These data support the idea that the repression activity of NRSF/REST depends upon the species of promoter to which it is linked and upon the proteins that bind to those promoters.

A single zinc finger motif in the silencing factor REST represses the neural-specific type II sodium channel promoter

The type II voltage-dependent sodium channel is present in neuronal cells, where it mediates the propagation of nerve impulses. Restricted expression of the type II sodium channel gene to neurons is due, at least in part, to binding of the repressor protein REST (also termed NRSF or XBR) to the RE1 (also called NRSE) sequence in the type II sodium channel gene. Previous studies have shown that a domain in REST containing eight GL1-Krüppel zinc finger motifs mediates DNA binding. Deletional and GAL4-fusion gene analyses now reveal repressor domains that lie outside of the DNA-binding domain in both the amino and carboxyl termini of REST. Mutational analysis further identifies a single zinc finger motif in the carboxyl-terminal domain as being essential for repressing type II sodium channel reporter genes. These studies reveal two domains in REST that may mediate interactions with other proteins involved in restricting expression of a large set of genes to the vertebrate nervous system.

Isolation and characterization of the chicken m2 acetylcholine receptor promoter region: induction of gene transcription by leukemia inhibitory factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor

We have isolated the promoter region and determined the start sites of transcription for the gene encoding the chicken m2 (cm2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Transfection experiments, using cm2-luciferase reporter gene constructs, demonstrated that a 789-bp genomic fragment was sufficient to drive high level expression in chicken heart primary cultures, while an additional 1.2-kb region was required for maximal expression in mouse septal/ neuroblastoma (SN56) cells. Treatment of SN56 cells with the cytokines ciliary neurotrophic factor and leukemia inhibitory factor increases expression of endogenous muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and results in a 4- to 6-fold induction of cm2 promoter driven luciferase expression. We have mapped a region of the cm2 promoter that is necessary for induction by cytokines.

Neural specific expression of the m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor gene is mediated by a RE1/NRSE-type silencing element

Muscarinic receptor genes are members of the G-protein receptor superfamily that, with the inclusion of the odorant receptors, is believed to contain over a thousand members. Each member of this superfamily, which has been studied to date, appears to have a distinct pattern of expression, but little work has been done on the regulation of these complex expression patterns. We have recently isolated the rat m4 muscarinic receptor gene and identified a genomic 1520-nucleotide sequence that appeared capable of directing cell-specific expression (Wood, I. C., Roopra. A., Harrington, C., and Buckley, N. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30933-30940). In the present study we have constructed a set of deletion promoter constructs to more closely define the DNA elements that are responsible for m4 gene expression. We have found that deletion of a RE1/NRSE silencer element between nucleotides -574 and -550, similar to that found in other neural specific genes, results in activation of reporter expression in non-m4-expressing cells. Gel mobility shift analysis has shown that a protein present in nonexpressing cells is capable of binding to this element and is probably the recently identified neural silencer, REST/NRSF. Of the constitutively active proximal promoter only a tandem Sp-1 site appears to recruit DNA binding proteins that are present in all cells tested. This represents the first report documenting the role of this silencer in regulating expression of a member of the G-protein receptor family.