Phosphorylation of four amino acid residues in the carboxyl terminus of the rat somatostatin receptor subtype 3 is crucial for its desensitization and internalization

The Role of Receptor-Ligand Interaction in Somatostatin Signaling Pathways: Implications for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from neuroendocrine cells and manifest in diverse organs. Key players in their regulation are somatostatin and its receptors (SSTR1-SSTR5). Understanding receptor-ligand interactions and signaling pathways is vital for elucidating their role in tumor development and therapeutic potential. This review highlights SSTR characteristics, localization, and expression in tissues, impacting physiological functions. Mechanisms of somatostatin and synthetic analogue binding to SSTRs, their selectivity, and their affinity were analyzed. Upon activation, somatostatin initiates intricate intracellular signaling, involving cAMP, PLC, and MAP kinases and influencing growth, differentiation, survival, and hormone secretion in NETs. This review explores SSTR expression in different tumor types, examining receptor activation effects on cancer cells. SSTRs' significance as therapeutic targets is discussed. Additionally, somatostatin and analogues' role in hormone secretion regulation, tumor growth, and survival is emphasized, presenting relevant therapeutic examples. In conclusion, this review advances the knowledge of receptor-ligand interactions and signaling pathways in somatostatin receptors, with potential for improved neuroendocrine tumor treatments.

Understanding the influence of lipid bilayers and ligand molecules in determining the conformational dynamics of somatostatin receptor 2

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that controls numerous cellular processes including cell-to-cell signaling. In this study, we report how the lipid and ligand molecules influence the conformational dynamics of the membrane-bound SSTR2. Molecular simulations of different holo and apoenzyme complexes of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of a lipid bilayer were performed, observed, and correlated with previously reported studies. We identified the important SSTR2 residues that take part in the formation of the SSTR2-ligand complex. On analyzing the molecular simulation trajectories, we identified that the residue D3.32 is crucial in determining the bioactive conformation of SSTR2 ligands in the binding site. Based on the results, we suggest that designing a novel SSTR2 ligand with an H-bond donor group at the R1 position, and hydrophobic groups at R2 and R3 might have higher activity and SSTR2-selectivity. We analyzed the simulated systems to identify other important structural features involved in SSTR2-ligand binding and to observe the different conformational changes that occur in the protein after the ligand binding. Additionally, we studied the conformational dynamics of N- and C-terminal regions of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of the lipid bilayer. Both the systems were compared to understand the influence of lipid molecules in the formation of secondary structural domains by these extracellular regions. The comparative study revealed that the secondary structural elements formed by C-terminal residues in presence of lipid molecules is crucial for the functioning of SSTR2. Our study results highlight the structural complexities involved in the functioning of SSTR upon binding with the ligands in the presence and absence of lipid bilayer, which is essential for designing novel drug targets.

Understanding the influence of lipid bilayers and ligand molecules in determining the conformational dynamics of somatostatin receptor 2

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that controls numerous cellular processes including cell-to-cell signaling. In this study, we report how the lipid and ligand molecules influence the conformational dynamics of the membrane-bound SSTR2. Molecular simulations of different holo and apoenzyme complexes of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of a lipid bilayer were performed, observed, and correlated with previously reported studies. We identified the important SSTR2 residues that take part in the formation of the SSTR2-ligand complex. On analyzing the molecular simulation trajectories, we identified that the residue D3.32 is crucial in determining the bioactive conformation of SSTR2 ligands in the binding site. Based on the results, we suggest that designing a novel SSTR2 ligand with an H-bond donor group at the R1 position, and hydrophobic groups at R2 and R3 might have higher activity and SSTR2-selectivity. We analyzed the simulated systems to identify other important structural features involved in SSTR2-ligand binding and to observe the different conformational changes that occur in the protein after the ligand binding. Additionally, we studied the conformational dynamics of N- and C-terminal regions of SSTR2 in the presence and absence of the lipid bilayer. Both the systems were compared to understand the influence of lipid molecules in the formation of secondary structural domains by these extracellular regions. The comparative study revealed that the secondary structural elements formed by C-terminal residues in presence of lipid molecules is crucial for the functioning of SSTR2. Our study results highlight the structural complexities involved in the functioning of SSTR upon binding with the ligands in the presence and absence of lipid bilayer, which is essential for designing novel drug targets.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

BBSome trains remove activated GPCRs from cilia by enabling passage through the transition zone

A diffusion barrier at the transition zone enables the compartmentalization of signaling molecules by cilia. The BBSome and the small guanosine triphosphatase Arl6, which triggers BBSome coat polymerization, are required for the exit of activated signaling receptors from cilia, but how diffusion barriers are crossed when membrane proteins exit cilia remains to be determined. In this study, we found that activation of the ciliary G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) Smoothened and SSTR3 drove the Arl6-dependent assembly of large, highly processive, and cargo-laden retrograde BBSome trains. Single-molecule imaging revealed that the assembly of BBSome trains enables the lateral transport of ciliary GPCRs across the transition zone. However, the removal of activated GPCRs from cilia was inefficient because a second periciliary diffusion barrier was infrequently crossed. We conclude that exit from cilia is a two-step process in which BBSome/Arl6 trains first move activated GPCRs through the transition zone before a periciliary barrier can be crossed.

An Actin Network Dispatches Ciliary GPCRs into Extracellular Vesicles to Modulate Signaling

Signaling receptors dynamically exit cilia upon activation of signaling pathways such as Hedgehog. Here, we find that when activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) fail to undergo BBSome-mediated retrieval from cilia back into the cell, these GPCRs concentrate into membranous buds at the tips of cilia before release into extracellular vesicles named ectosomes. Unexpectedly, actin and the actin regulators drebrin and myosin 6 mediate ectosome release from the tip of cilia. Mirroring signal-dependent retrieval, signal-dependent ectocytosis is a selective and effective process that removes activated signaling molecules from cilia. Congruently, ectocytosis compensates for BBSome defects as ectocytic removal of GPR161, a negative regulator of Hedgehog signaling, permits the appropriate transduction of Hedgehog signals in Bbs mutants. Finally, ciliary receptors that lack retrieval determinants such as the anorexigenic GPCR NPY2R undergo signal-dependent ectocytosis in wild-type cells. Our data show that signal-dependent ectocytosis regulates ciliary signaling in physiological and pathological contexts.

Endocytosis and Signal Transduction: Basic Science Update

Endocytosis can be separated into the categories of phagocytosis and pinocytosis. Phagocytosis can be distinguished from pinocytosis primarily by the size of particle ingested and by its dependence on actin polymerization as a key step in particle ingestion. Several specific forms of pinocytosis have been identified that can be distinguished based on their dependence on clathrin or caveolin. Both clathrin and caveolin-dependent pinocytosis appear to require the participation of dynamin to internalize the plasma membrane. Other, less well-characterized forms of pinocytosis have also been described. Although endocytosis has long been known to affect receptor density, recent studies have demonstrated that endocytosis through clathrin- and caveolin-dependent processes plays a key role in receptor-mediated signal transduction. In some cases, blockade of these processes attenuates, or even prevents, signal transduction from taking place. This information, coupled with a better understanding of endocytosis mechanisms, will help advance the field of cell biology as well as present new targets for drug development and disease treatment.

Identification of Phosphorylation Sites Regulating sst3 Somatostatin Receptor Trafficking

The human somatostatin receptor 3 (sst3) is expressed in about 50% of all neuroendocrine tumors and hence a promising target for multireceptor somatostatin analogs. The sst3 receptor is unique among ssts in that it exhibits a very long intracellular C-terminal tail containing a huge number of potential phosphate acceptor sites. Consequently, our knowledge about the functional role of the C-terminal tail in sst3 receptor regulation is very limited. Here, we have generated a series of phosphorylation-deficient mutants that enabled us to determine crucial sites for its agonist-induced β-arrestin mobilization, internalization, and down-regulation. Based on this information, we generated phosphosite-specific antibodies for C-terminal Ser(337)/Thr(341), Thr(348), and Ser(361) that enabled us to investigate the temporal patterns of sst3 phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. We found that the endogenous ligand somatostatin induced a rapid and robust phosphorylation that was completely blocked by the sst3 antagonist NVP-ACQ090. The stable somatostatin analogs pasireotide and octreotide promoted clearly less phosphorylation compared with somatostatin. We also show that sst3 phosphorylation occurred within seconds to minutes, whereas dephosphorylation of the sst3 receptor occurred at a considerable slower rate. In addition, we also identified G protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 and 3 and protein phosphatase 1α and 1β as key regulators of sst3 phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, respectively. Thus, we here define the C-terminal phosphorylation motif of the human sst3 receptor that regulates its agonist-promoted phosphorylation, β-arrestin recruitment, and internalization of this clinically relevant receptor.

Recruitment of β-Arrestin into Neuronal Cilia Modulates Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 3 Ciliary Localization

Primary cilia are essential sensory and signaling organelles present on nearly every mammalian cell type. Defects in primary cilia underlie a class of human diseases collectively termed ciliopathies. Primary cilia are restricted subcellular compartments, and specialized mechanisms coordinate the localization of proteins to cilia. Moreover, trafficking of proteins into and out of cilia is required for proper ciliary function, and this process is disrupted in ciliopathies. The somatostatin receptor subtype 3 (Sstr3) is selectively targeted to primary cilia on neurons in the mammalian brain and is implicated in learning and memory. Here, we show that Sstr3 localization to cilia is dynamic and decreases in response to somatostatin treatment. We further show that somatostatin treatment stimulates β-arrestin recruitment into Sstr3-positive cilia and this recruitment can be blocked by mutations in Sstr3 that impact agonist binding or phosphorylation. Importantly, somatostatin treatment fails to decrease Sstr3 ciliary localization in neurons lacking β-arrestin 2. Together, our results implicate β-arrestin in the modulation of Sstr3 ciliary localization and further suggest a role for β-arrestin in the mediation of Sstr3 ciliary signaling.

Protein phosphatase modulation of somatostatin receptor signaling in the mouse hippocampus

Many inhibitory interneurones in the hippocampus release the neuropeptide somatostatin (SST) which inhibits neuronal excitability through Gi/Go-coupled receptors. To investigate the signaling pathways underlying the SST inhibition of neuronal excitability in the hippocampus, we performed perforated patch-clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal neurones in acute brain slices from P14-P18 mice. Bath application of 1 μM SST reversibly reduces the frequency of action potential firing in response to depolarising current steps, and is associated with neuronal hyperpolarisation and a reduction in membrane resistance. This effect is mediated by potassium channels with KCNK-like pharmacology. In addition, in slices that have been cultured in vitro for seven days or more, SST also produces a hyperpolarisation independent reduction in action potential firing, which can be also observed in acute slices when the Ser/Thr protein phosphatases PP2A and PP4 are inhibited selectively with fostriecin. This hyperpolarisation independent effect of SST appears to be mediated by G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels. Knockdown of protein phosphatase 5, by Cre recombinase mediated deletion of the floxed Ppp5c gene, blocks the hyperpolarisation independent effect of SST, and reduces the hyperpolarisation dependent effect in a manner consistent with increased SST receptor desensitisation. Thus, reversible protein phosphorylation provides a mechanism to enhance or diminish the inhibitory effect of SST, which could allow system level regulation of circuit excitability in the hippocampus.

Fine-tuning somatostatin receptor signalling by agonist-selective phosphorylation and dephosphorylation: IUPHAR Review 5

The biological actions of somatostatin are mediated by a family of five GPCRs, named sst1 to sst5 . Somatostatin receptors exhibit equally high-binding affinities to their natural ligand somatostatin-14 and largely overlapping distributions. The overexpression of somatostatin receptors in human tumours is the molecular basis for diagnostic and therapeutic application of the stable somatostatin analogues octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide. The efficiency of somatostatin receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of intracellular carboxyl-terminal serine and threonine residues. Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite-specific antibodies for human sst2 and sst5 receptors. These phosphosite-specific antibodies are unique tools to monitor the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptors phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Using a combined approach of phosphosite-specific antibodies and siRNA knock-down screening, relevant kinases and phosphatases were identified. Emerging evidence suggests distinct mechanisms of agonist-selective fine-tuning for individual somatostatin receptors. The recently uncovered differences in phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of these receptors may hence be of physiological significance in mediating responses to acute, persistent or repeated stimuli in a variety of target tissues.

G protein-coupled receptor accessory proteins and signaling: pharmacogenomic insights

The identification and characterization of the genes encoding G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and the proteins necessary for the processes of ligand binding, GPCR activation, inactivation, and receptor trafficking to the membrane are discussed in the context of human genetic disease. In addition to functional GPCR variants, the identification of genetic disruptions affecting proteins necessary to GPCR functions have provided insights into the function of these pathways. Gsα and Gβ subunit polymorphisms have been found to result in complex phenotypes. Disruptions in accessory proteins that normally modify or organize heterotrimeric G-protein coupling may also result in disease states. These include the contribution of variants of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein to hypertension; the role variants of the activator of G protein signaling (AGS) proteins to phenotypes (such as the type III AGS8 variant to hypoxia); the contribution of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) proteins, such as GRK4, in disorders such as hypertension. The role of accessory proteins in GPCR structure and function is discussed in the context of genetic disorders associated with disruption of the genes that encode them. An understanding of the pharmacogenomics of GPCR and accessory protein signaling provides the basis for examining both GPCR pharmacogenetics and the genetics of monogenic disorders that result from disruption of given receptor systems.

Pharmacogenetics of the G protein-coupled receptors

Pharmacogenetics investigates the influence of genetic variants on physiological phenotypes related to drug response and disease, while pharmacogenomics takes a genome-wide approach to advancing this knowledge. Both play an important role in identifying responders and nonresponders to medication, avoiding adverse drug reactions, and optimizing drug dose for the individual. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the primary target of therapeutic drugs and have been the focus of these studies. With the advance of genomic technologies, there has been a substantial increase in the inventory of naturally occurring rare and common GPCR variants. These variants include single-nucleotide polymorphisms and insertion or deletions that have potential to alter GPCR expression of function. In vivo and in vitro studies have determined functional roles for many GPCR variants, but genetic association studies that define the physiological impact of the majority of these common variants are still limited. Despite the breadth of pharmacogenetic data available, GPCR variants have not been included in drug labeling and are only occasionally considered in optimizing clinical use of GPCR-targeted agents. In this chapter, pharmacogenetic and genomic studies on GPCR variants are reviewed with respect to a subset of GPCR systems, including the adrenergic, calcium sensing, cysteinyl leukotriene, cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors, and the de-orphanized receptors such as GPR55. The nature of the disruption to receptor function is discussed with respect to regulation of gene expression, expression on the cell surface (affected by receptor trafficking, dimerization, desensitization/downregulation), or perturbation of receptor function (altered ligand binding, G protein coupling, constitutive activity). The large body of experimental data generated on structure and function relationships and receptor-ligand interactions are being harnessed for the in silico functional prediction of naturally occurring GPCR variants. We provide information on online resources dedicated to GPCRs and present applications of publically available computational tools for pharmacogenetic studies of GPCRs. As the breadth of GPCR pharmacogenomic data becomes clearer, the opportunity for routine assessment of GPCR variants to predict disease risk, drug response, and potential adverse drug effects will become possible.

Illuminating somatostatin analog action at neuroendocrine tumor receptors

Somatostatin analogs for the diagnosis and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been used in clinical applications for more than two decades. Five somatostatin receptor subtypes have been identified and molecular mechanisms of somatostatin receptor signaling and regulation have been elucidated. These advances increased understanding of the biological role of each somatostatin receptor subtype, their distribution in NETs, as well as agonist-specific regulation of receptor signaling, internalization, and phosphorylation, particularly for the sst2 receptor subtype, which is the primary target of current somatostatin analog therapy for NETs. Various hypotheses exist to explain differences in patient responsiveness to somatostatin analog inhibition of tumor secretion and growth as well as differences in the development of tumor resistance to therapy. In addition, we now have a better understanding of the action of both first generation (octreotide, lanreotide, Octreoscan) and second generation (pasireotide) FDA-approved somatostatin analogs, including the biased agonistic character of some agonists. The increased understanding of somatostatin receptor pharmacology provides new opportunities to design more sophisticated assays to aid the future development of somatostatin analogs with increased efficacy.

Coexpression of human somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2) and SSTR3 modulates antiproliferative signaling and apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin (SST) via five Gi coupled receptors namely SSTR1-5 is known to inhibit cell proliferation by cytostatic and cytotoxic mechanisms. Heterodimerization plays a crucial role in modulating the signal transduction pathways of SSTR subtypes. In the present study, we investigated human SSTR2/SSTR3 heterodimerization, internalization, MAPK signaling, cell proliferation and apoptosis in HEK-293 cells in response to SST and specific agonists for SSTR2 and SSTR3.

RESULTS

Although in basal conditions, SSTR2 and SSTR3 colocalize at the plasma membrane and exhibit heterodimerization, the cell surface distribution of both receptors decreased upon agonist activation and was accompanied by a parallel increase in intracellular colocalization. Receptors activation by SST and specific agonists significantly decreased cAMP levels in cotransfected cells in comparison to control. Agonist-mediated modulation of pERK1/2 was time and concentration-dependent, and pronounced in serum-deprived conditions. pERK1/2 was inhibited in response to SST; conversely receptor-specific agonist treatment caused inhibition at lower concentration and activation at higher concentration. Strikingly, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was sustained upon prolonged treatment with SST but not with receptor-specific agonists. On the other hand, SST and receptor-specific agonists modulated p38 phosphorylation time-dependently. The receptor activation in cotransfected cells exhibits Gi-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation attributed to increased PARP-1 expression and TUNEL staining, whereas induction of p21 and p27Kip1 suggests a cytostatic effect.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides new insights in SSTR2/SSTR3 mediated signaling which might help in better understanding of the molecular interactions involving SSTRs in tumor biology.

Molecular mechanisms of somatostatin receptor trafficking

The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) is an important modulator of neurotransmission in the central nervous system and acts as a potent inhibitor of hormone and exocrine secretion. In addition, SRIF regulates cell proliferation in normal and tumorous tissues. The six somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, and sst5), which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, share a common molecular topology: a hydrophobic core of seven transmembrane-spanning α-helices, three intracellular loops, three extracellular loops, an amino-terminus outside the cell, and a carboxyl-terminus inside the cell. For most of the GPCRs, intracytosolic sequences, and more particularly the C-terminus, are believed to interact with proteins that are mandatory for either exporting neosynthesized receptor, anchoring receptor at the plasma membrane, internalization, recycling, or degradation after ligand binding. Accordingly, most of the SRIF receptors can traffic not only in vitro within different cell types but also in vivo. A picture of the pathways and proteins involved in these processes is beginning to emerge.

Somatostatin receptor biology in neuroendocrine and pituitary tumours: part 1--molecular pathways

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) may occur at many sites in the body although the majority occur within the gastroenteropancreatic axis. Non-gastroenteropancreatic NETs encompass phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas, medullary thyroid carcinoma, anterior pituitary tumour, broncho-pulmonary NETs and parathyroid tumours. Like most endocrine tumours, NETs also express somatostatin (SST) receptors (subtypes 1–5) whose ligand SST is known to inhibit endocrine and exocrine secretions and have anti-tumour effects. In the light of this knowledge, the idea of using SST analogues in the treatment of NETs has become increasingly popular and new studies have centred upon the development of new SST analogues. We attempt to review SST receptor (SSTR) biology primarily in neuroendocrine tissues, focusing on pituitary tumours. A full data search was performed through PubMed over the years 2000–2009 with keywords ‘somatostatin, molecular biology, somatostatin receptors, somatostatin signalling, NET, pituitary’ and all relevant publications have been included, together with selected publications prior to that date. SSTR signalling in non-neuroendocrine solid tumours is beyond the scope of this review. SST is a potent anti-proliferative and anti-secretory agent for some NETs. The successful therapeutic use of SST analogues in the treatment of these tumours depends on a thorough understanding of the diverse effects of SSTR subtypes in different tissues and cell types. Further studies will focus on critical points of SSTR biology such as homo- and heterodimerization of SSTRs and the differences between post-receptor signalling pathways of SSTR subtypes.

Somatostatin receptor-3 mediated intracellular signaling and apoptosis is regulated by its cytoplasmic terminal

In the present study, we describe the role of cytoplasmic terminal (C-tail) domain in regulating coupling to adenylyl cyclase, signaling, and apoptosis in human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells transfected with wild type (wt)-hSSTR3 and C-tail deleted mutants. Cells transfected with wt-hSSTR3 and C-tail mutants show comparable membrane expression; however, display decreased expression in presence of agonist. wt-hSSTR3 exists as preformed homodimer at cell surface in basal conditions and decreases in response to agonist. Cells expressing C-tail mutants also show evidence of homodimerization with the same intensity as wt-hSSTR3. The agonist-dependent inhibition of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was lost in cells expressing C-tail mutants. Agonist treatment in cells expressing wt-hSSTR3 resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation, increased expression of PARP-1, and TUNEL positivity in proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive cells. The agonist mediated increase in membrane expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) seen with wt-hSSTR3 was diminished in C-tail mutants, which was accompanied with the loss of receptor's ability to induce apoptosis. Taken together, our data provide new insights into C-tail-dependent regulation of cell signaling and apoptosis by hSSTR3.

C-tail mediated modulation of somatostatin receptor type-4 homo- and heterodimerizations and signaling

Somatostatin receptors show great diversity in response to agonist mediated receptor-specific homo- and heterodimerizations. Here, using photobleaching-fluorescence resonance energy transfer, immunocytochemistry, western blot and co-immunoprecipitation, we investigated dimerization, trafficking, coupling to adenylyl cyclase and signaling of human somatostatin receptor-4 (hSSTR4) in HEK-293 cells. We also determined the role of the C-tail of hSSTR4 on physiological responses of the cells. wt-hSSTR4 exogenously expressed in HEK-293 cells exhibits constitutive dimerization, inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP, and displays agonist dependent changes in pERK1/2 and pERK5 expressions. Upon C-tail deletion, the receptor loses membrane expression and ability to dimerize and inhibition of cAMP and pERK5 however, displays several-fold increases in the expression of pERK1/2. Chimeric hSSTR4 with the C-tail of hSSTR5 functions like wt-hSSTR4, in contrast, with the C-tail of hSSTR1 functions like C-tail deleted hSSTR4. hSSTR4 dimerization and signaling are associated with increased cyclin-dependent-kinase p27(kip1) expression and inhibition of the cell proliferation. We also report heterodimerization between hSSTR4/hSSTR5, but not between hSSTR4/hSSTR1, with significant changes in receptor functions. Taken together, these data define a novel mechanism for the role of hSSTR4 in cell proliferation and modulation of signaling pathways.

Interaction of the human somatostatin receptor 3 with the multiple PDZ domain protein MUPP1 enables somatostatin to control permeability of epithelial tight junctions

The presence of heterotrimeric G-proteins at epithelial tight junctions suggests that these cellular junctions are regulated by so far unknown G-protein coupled receptors. We identify here an interaction between the human somatostatin receptor 3 (hSSTR3) and the multiple PDZ protein MUPP1. MUPP1 is a tight junction scaffold protein in epithelial cells, and as a result of the interaction with MUPP1 the hSSTR3 is targeted to tight junctions. Interaction with MUPP1 enables the receptor to regulate transepithelial permeability in a pertussis toxin sensitive manner, suggesting that hSSTR3 can activate G-proteins locally at tight junctions.

Intracellular degradation of somatostatin-14 following somatostatin-receptor3-mediated endocytosis in rat insulinoma cells

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) endocytosis influences cellular responsiveness to agonist stimulation and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, a common diagnostic imaging technique. Recently, we have shown that SSTR1 is differentially regulated in the endocytic and recycling pathway of pancreatic cells after agonist stimulation. Additionally, SSTR1 accumulates and releases internalized somatostatin-14 (SST-14) as an intact and biologically active ligand. We also demonstrated that SSTR2A was sequestered into early endosomes, whereas internalized SST-14 was degraded by endosomal peptidases and not routed into lysosomal degradation. Here, we examined the fate of peptide agonists in rat insulinoma cells expressing SSTR3 by biochemical methods and confocal laser scanning microscopy. We found that [(125)I]Tyr11-SST-14 rapidly accumulated in intracellular vesicles, where it was degraded in an ammonium chloride-sensitive manner. In contrast, [(125)I]Tyr1-octreotide accumulated and was released as an intact peptide. Rhodamine-B-labeled SST-14, however, was rapidly internalized into endosome-like vesicles, and fluorescence signals colocalized with the lysosomal marker protein cathepsinD. Our data show that SST-14 was cointernalized with SSTR3, was uncoupled from the receptor, and was sorted into an endocytic degradation pathway, whereas octreotide was recycled as an intact peptide. Chronic stimulation of SSTR3 also induced time-dependent downregulation of the receptor. Thus, the intracellular processing of internalized SST-14 and the regulation of SSTR3 markedly differ from the events mediated by the other SSTR subtypes.

Morphine-induced mu-opioid receptor rapid desensitization is independent of receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestins

Receptor desensitization involving receptor phosphorylation and subsequent betaArrestin (betaArr) recruitment has been implicated in the tolerance development mediated by mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1). However, the roles of receptor phosphorylation and betaArr on morphine-induced OPRM1 desensitization remain to be demonstrated. Using OPRM1-induced intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i))release to monitor receptor activation, as predicted, [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), induced OPRM1 desensitization in a receptor phosphorylation- and betaArr-dependent manner. The DAMGO-induced OPRM1 desensitization was attenuated significantly when phosphorylation deficient OPRM1 mutants or Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast (MEF) cells from betaArr1 and 2 knockout mice were used in the studies. Specifically, DAMGO-induced desensitization was blunted in HEK293 cells expressing the OPRM1S375A mutant and was eliminated in MEF cells isolated from betaArr2 knockout mice expressing the wild type OPRM1. However, although morphine also could induce a rapid desensitization on [Ca(2+)](i) release to a greater extent than that of DAMGO and could induce the phosphorylation of Ser(375) residue, morphine-induced desensitization was not influenced by mutating the phosphorylation sites or in MEF cells lacking betaArr1 and 2. Hence, morphine could induce OPRM1 desensitization via pathway independent of betaArr, thus suggesting the in vivo tolerance development to morphine can occur in the absence of betaArr.

Intracellular trafficking of somatostatin receptors

The somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5 (sst(1)-sst(5)) exhibit different intracellular trafficking and endosomal sorting after agonist exposure. The internalization of the somatostatin receptor subtypes sst(2), sst(3) and sst(5) occurs to a much higher extent after somatostatin exposure than of sst(1) or sst(4). After endocytosis, sst(2) and sst(5) recycle to the plasma membrane, whereas sst(3) is predominantly down-regulated. This review will focus on the molecular mechanisms of the differential intracellular trafficking of sst(2), sst(3) and sst(5), and discusses our current knowledge on somatostatin receptor interacting proteins.

Selective agonism in somatostatin receptor signaling and regulation

The five somatostatin receptor subtypes, named sst1-sst5, activate both distinct and common signaling pathways and exhibit different patterns of receptor regulation. Until recently it was believed that once a particular somatostatin receptor was activated by an agonist, all the down-stream signaling and regulatory effects characteristic of that receptor subtype in that cellular environment would be triggered. Thus, differences in the actions of somatostatin analogs between tissues were attributed to variability in the nature and concentration of the sst receptor subtypes and effectors expressed in different targets. However, agonists have recently been shown to exhibit functional selectivity at individual sst receptors such that they can elicit a subset of that receptor's potential effects, a property known as biased agonism. This review will summarize the evidence for functionally selective somatostatin receptor agonists and discuss the implications and promise of these new findings.

G protein-coupled receptor pharmacogenetics

Common G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) gene variants that encode receptor proteins with a distinct sequence may alter drug efficacy without always resulting in a disease phenotype. GPCR genetic loci harbor numerous variants, such as DNA insertions or deletions and single-nucleotide polymorphisms that alter GPCR expression and function, thereby contributing to interindividual differences in disease susceptibility/progression and drug responses. In this chapter, these pharmacogenetic phenomena are reviewed with respect to a limited sampling of GPCR systems, including the beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors, and the calcium-sensing receptor. In each example, the nature of the disruption to receptor function that results from each variant is discussed with respect to the regulation of gene expression, expression on cell surface (affected by receptor trafficking, dimerization, desensitization/downregulation), or perturbation of receptor function (by altering ligand binding, G protein coupling, and receptor constitutive activity). Despite the breadth of pharmacogenetic knowledge available, assessment for genetic variants is only occasionally applied to drug development projects involving pharmacogenomics or to optimizing the clinical use of GPCR drugs. The continued effort by the basic science of pharmacogenetics may draw the attention of drug discovery projects and clinicians alike to the utility of personalized pharmacogenomics as a means to optimize novel GPCR drug targets.

Pharmacogenomics of G protein-coupled receptor signaling: insights from health and disease

The identification and characterization of the processes of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation and inactivation have refined not only the study of the GPCRs but also the genomics of many accessory proteins necessary for these processes. This has accelerated progress in understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in GPCR structure and function, including receptor transport to the membrane, ligand binding, activation and inactivation by GRK-mediated (and other) phosphorylation. The catalog of G(s)alpha and Gbeta subunit polymorphisms that result in complex phenotypes has complemented the effort to catalog the GPCRs and their variants. The study of the genomics of GPCR accessory proteins has also provided insight into pathways of disease, such as the contributions of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein to hypertension and activator of G protein signaling (AGS) proteins to the response to hypoxia. In the case of the G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), identified originally in the retinal tissues that converge on rhodopsin, proteins such as GRK4 have been identified that have been subsequently associated with hypertension. Here, we review the structure and function of GPCR and associated proteins in the context of the gene families that encode them and the genetic disorders associated with their altered function. An understanding of the pharmacogenomics of GPCR signaling provides the basis for examining the GPCRs disrupted in monogenic disease and the pharmacogenetics of a given receptor system.

Novel insights in somatostatin receptor physiology

The experimental data reviewed in the present paper deal with the molecular events underlying the agonist-dependent regulation of the distinct somatostatin receptor subtypes and may suggest important clues about the clinical use of somatostatin analogs with different pattern of receptor specificity for the in vivo targeting of tumoral somatostatin receptors. Somatostatin receptor subtypes are characterized by differential beta-arrestin trafficking and endosomal sorting upon agonist binding due, at least in part, to the differences in their C-terminal tails. Moreover, the subcellular expression pattern of somatostatin receptor subtypes and their activity in response to agonist treatment are affected by intracellular complements, such as proteins involved in intracellular vesicle trafficking. Different somatostatin analogs may induce distinct conformations of the receptor/ligand complex, preferentially coupled to either receptor signaling or receptor endocytosis.

Differential modulation of type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors along the neuroimmune axis

Endocannabinoid-signaling chains have been implicated in a variety of pathophysiological functions, including memory, coordination, vasoregulation, reproduction, neurodegeneration, and inflammation. These activities were thought to be mediated by the activation of two G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors (CB(1)R and CB(2)R). These two CBR subtypes share common agonists and trigger similar signaling pathways, yet they present several important differences in structure and cell distribution. In particular, recent research has shown that the CB(1)R and CB(2)R are differentially linked to lipid rafts, specialized microdomains of the plasma membrane involved in the signaling of many other GPCRs. We present an overview of the current literature on the effects that lipid raft perturbation have on CBRs activities, and provide a mechanistic model to interpret these data in terms of structural and functional aspects. These findings may also have important implications for the development of new therapeutic approaches, including lipid raft perturbing drugs, aimed to selectively modulate CB(1)R signaling in a variety of pathological conditions.

The chemokine receptor homologue encoded by US27 of human cytomegalovirus is heavily glycosylated and is present in infected human foreskin fibroblasts and enveloped virus particles

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a member of the beta-herpesvirus family, encodes four homologues of cellular G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). One of these, the protein product of HCMV open reading frame (ORF) UL33, has been identified in HCMV-infected cells and virus particles and shown to be heat-aggregatable and N-glycosylated. Another, the product of ORF US28, has been functionally characterized as a beta-chemokine receptor. Here we report the use of RT-PCR, coupled in vitro transcription-translation, immunoprecipitation, and Western immunoassays to (i) show that RNA from the open reading frame US27 appears predominantly during the late phase of replication; (ii) identify the protein encoded by HCMV US27 in infected cells and enveloped virus particles; (iii) demonstrate that the US27-encoded protein is heterogeneously N-glycosylated and resolves as two species following treatment with peptide N-glycosidase F; and (iv) show that both the recombinant and deglycoylated infected cell US27 protein aggregate when heated in the presence of SDS prior to electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels, a property which is abrogated with the addition of urea to sample buffer.

Colocalization of somatostatin receptors and epidermal growth factor receptors in breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is positively correlated with tumor size and inversely correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB) levels and tumor differentiation. In the present study, we compared SSTR1-5 and ErbB1-4 mRNA and protein expression in two breast cancer cell lines: MCF-7 (ER+) and MDA-MB-231 (ERalpha-).

RESULTS

All five SSTRs and four ErbBs were variably expressed as both cell surface and cytoplasmic proteins. In both cell lines, SSTR4 and SSTR1 were highly expressed, followed by SSTR2 and SSTR5 with SSTR3 being the least expressed subtype, at the protein level. ErbBs were variably expressed with ErbB1 as the predominant subtype in both cell lines. ErbB1 is followed by ErbB3, ErbB2 and ErbB4 in MCF-7 at both the protein and mRNA levels. In MDA-MB-231 cells, ErbB1 is followed by ErbB2, ErbB4 and ErbB3. Our results indicate significant correlations at the level of mRNA and protein expression in a cell and receptor-specific manner. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we found that, in MCF-7 cells, SSTR5 was the most prominent subtype coexpressed with ErbBs followed by SSTR3, SSTR4, SSTR1 and SSTR2, respectively. In MDA-MB-231 cells, SSTR1 colocalized strongly with ErbBs followed by SSTR5, SSTR4, SSTR3 and SSTR2. ErbBs displayed higher levels of colocalization amongst themselves in MCF-7 cells than in MDA-MB-231 cells.

CONCLUSION

These findings may explain the poor response to endocrine therapy in ER-cancer. Differential distribution of SSTR subtypes with ErbBs in breast cancer cells in a receptor-specific manner may be considered as a novel diagnosis for breast tumors.

The G protein-coupled receptors: pharmacogenetics and disease

Genetic variation in G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is associated with a wide spectrum of disease phenotypes and predispositions that are of special significance because they are the targets of therapeutic agents. Each variant provides an opportunity to understand receptor function that complements a plethora of available in vitro data elucidating the pharmacology of the GPCRs. For example, discrete portions of the proximal tail of the dopamine D1 receptor have been discovered, in vitro, that may be involved in desensitization, recycling and trafficking. Similar in vitro strategies have been used to elucidate naturally occurring GPCR mutations. Inactive, over-active or constitutively active receptors have been identified by changes in ligand binding, G-protein coupling, receptor desensitization and receptor recycling. Selected examples reviewed include those disorders resulting from mutations in rhodopsin, thyrotropin, luteinizing hormone, vasopressin and angiotensin receptors. By comparison, the recurrent pharmacogenetic variants are more likely to result in an altered predisposition to complex disease in the population. These common variants may affect receptor sequence without intrinsic phenotype change or spontaneous induction of disease and yet result in significant alteration in drug efficacy. These pharmacogenetic phenomena will be reviewed with respect to a limited sampling of GPCR systems including the orexin/hypocretin system, the beta2 adrenergic receptors, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors and the calcium-sensing receptor. These developments will be discussed with respect to strategies for drug discovery that take into account the potential for the development of drugs targeted at mutated and wild-type proteins.

Plasma membrane and lysosomal localization of CB1 cannabinoid receptor are dependent on lipid rafts and regulated by anandamide in human breast cancer cells

In this report we show, by confocal analysis of indirect immunofluorescence, that the type-1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R), which belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors, is expressed on the plasma membrane in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. However, a substantial proportion of the receptor is present in lysosomes. We found that CB1R is associated with cholesterol- and sphyngolipid-enriched membrane domains (rafts). Cholesterol depletion by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MCD) treatment strongly reduces the flotation of the protein on the raft-fractions (DRM) of sucrose density gradients suggesting that CB1 raft-association is cholesterol dependent. Interestingly binding of the agonist, anandamide (AEA) also impairs DRM-association of the receptor suggesting that the membrane distribution of the receptor is dependent on rafts and is possibly regulated by the agonist binding. Indeed MCD completely blocked the clustering of CB1R at the plasma membrane. On the contrary the lysosomal localization of CB1R was impaired by this treatment only after AEA binding.

Interactions with PDZ Domain Proteins PIST/GOPC and PDZK1 Regulate Intracellular Sorting of the Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5

By yeast two-hybrid screening we have identified interaction partners for the intracellular C-terminal tail of the human and rodent somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (SSTR5). Interactions with the PDZ domain-containing proteins PIST and PDZK1 are mediated by the PDZ ligand motif at the C terminus of the receptor; in case of the human and mouse (but not the rat) receptors, a slight sequence variation of this motif also allows for binding of the peroxisomal receptor PEX5. PIST is Golgi-associated and retains SSTR5 in the Golgi apparatus when coexpressed with the receptor; PDZK1 on the other hand associates with the SSTR5 at the plasma membrane. Endogenous SSTR5 in the neuroendocrine AtT-20 tumor cell line is colocalized with PIST in the Golgi apparatus. On a functional level, removal of the PDZ ligand motif of the receptor does not interfere with agonist-dependent internalization of the receptor or its targeting to a Golgi-associated compartment; however, recycling of the receptor to the plasma membrane after washout of the agonist is inhibited, suggesting that the PDZ-mediated interaction of SSTR5 is required for postendocytic sorting.

Postsynaptic shank antagonizes dendrite branching induced by the leucine-rich repeat protein Densin-180

Leucine-rich repeat and PDZ [postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95)/Discs large/zona occludens-1] domain proteins such as scribble and Densin-180 have been implicated in the establishment of cell-cell contacts. Here, we show that Densin-180, which has been identified as a constituent of the postsynaptic density in excitatory synapses interacts with the postsynaptic scaffold protein shank (shank1-3). The interaction involves a two-point attachment of the C-terminal region of Densin-180 with the Src homology 3 domain and the N-terminal part of the proline-rich region of shank proteins. The N-terminal leucine-rich repeat region, which is not involved in binding shank, targets Densin-180 to the plasma membrane in transfected cells and to the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells. Nevertheless, coexpression of shank leads to a redirection of Densin-180 into intracellular clusters. In cultured hippocampal neurons, Densin-180 overexpression induces excessive branching of neuronal dendrites, which occurs at the expense of clusters for the postsynaptic marker PSD-95. Coexpression of shank3 abrogates branch formation and targets Densin-180 into postsynaptic clusters instead. Shank blocks binding of delta-catenin but not alphaCaM kinase II to Densin-180; because delta-catenin has been shown to induce branching and neurite formation, our data suggest a mechanism where shank could block the activation of a Densin-180-dependent signaling pathway by delta-catenin.

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor differentially regulates low density lipoprotein and transferrin receptors

Endocytosis mediated by both LDL receptors (LDLRs) and transferrin receptors (TfRs) occurs in clathrin-coated pits and requires specific tyrosine-based internalization sequences located in the cytoplasmic domain of these receptors. Internalization of these receptors is mediated by endocytic proteins that interact with the internalization domains. We previously showed that macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) rapidly increases LDLR-dependent uptake and metabolism of LDL. To study the mechanism by which M-CSF regulates LDL uptake, we compared the effect of M-CSF on the internalization of LDL and transferrin (Tf). Our results show that M-CSF substantially increased the rate of LDLR internalization without increasing LDLR localization on the cell surface. In contrast, M-CSF treatment of macrophages rapidly increased the localization of TfR to the cell surface but did not alter the relative rate of Tf internalization. Moreover, M-CSF regulated TfR and LDLR via the activation of distinct signaling pathways. Recruitment of TfR to the cell surface was attenuated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, whereas stimulated LDL uptake was inhibited by the serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid. Taken together, our results indicate that M-CSF differentially regulates receptors that undergo endocytosis and that increased LDL uptake results from a selective increase in the rate of LDLR internalization.

Differential β-Arrestin Trafficking and Endosomal Sorting of Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes

The physiological responses of somatostatin are mediated by five different G protein-coupled receptors. Although agonist-induced endocytosis of the various somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)) has been studied in detail, little is known about their postendocytic trafficking. Here we show that somatostatin receptors profoundly differ in patterns of beta-arrestin mobilization and endosomal sorting. The beta-arrestin-dependent trafficking of the sst(2A) somatostatin receptor resembled that of a class B receptor in that upon receptor activation, beta-arrestin and the receptor formed stable complexes and internalized together into the same endocytic vesicles. This pattern was dependent on GRK2 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2)-mediated phosphorylation of a cluster of phosphate acceptor sites within the cytoplasmic tail of the sst(2A) receptor. Unlike other class B receptors, however, the sst(2A) receptor was rapidly resensitized and recycled to the plasma membrane. The beta-arrestin mobilization of the sst(3) and the sst(5) somatostatin receptors resembled that of a class A receptor in that upon receptor activation, beta-arrestin and the receptor formed relatively unstable complexes that dissociated at or near the plasma membrane. Consequently, beta-arrestin was excluded from sst(3)-containing vesicles. Unlike other class A receptors, a large proportion of sst(3) receptors was subject to ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal degradation and did not rapidly recycle to the plasma membrane. The sst(4) somatostatin receptor is unique in that it did not exhibit agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. Together, these findings may provide important clues about the regulation of receptor responsiveness during long-term administration of somatostatin analogs.

Somatostatin receptors

In 1972, Brazeau et al. isolated somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF), a cyclic polypeptide with two biologically active isoforms (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28). This event prompted the successful quest for SRIF receptors. Then, nearly a quarter of a century later, it was announced that a neuropeptide, to be named cortistatin (CST), had been cloned, bearing strong resemblance to SRIF. Evidence of special CST receptors never emerged, however. CST rather competed with both SRIF isoforms for specific receptor binding. And binding to the known subtypes with affinities in the nanomolar range, it has therefore been acknowledged to be a third endogenous ligand at SRIF receptors. This review goes through mechanisms of signal transduction, pharmacology, and anatomical distribution of SRIF receptors. Structurally, SRIF receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled (GPC) receptors, sharing the characteristic seven-transmembrane-segment (STMS) topography. Years of intensive research have resulted in cloning of five receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)), one of which is represented by two splice variants (sst(2A) and sst(2B)). The individual subtypes, functionally coupled to the effectors of signal transduction, are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian organism, with corresponding differences in physiological impact. It is evident that receptor function, from a physiological point of view, cannot simply be reduced to the accumulated operations of individual receptors. Far from being isolated functional units, receptors co-operate. The total receptor apparatus of individual cell types is composed of different-ligand receptors (e.g. SRIF and non-SRIF receptors) and co-expressed receptor subtypes (e.g. sst(2) and sst(5) receptors) in characteristic proportions. In other words, levels of individual receptor subtypes are highly cell-specific and vary with the co-expression of different-ligand receptors. However, the question is how to quantify the relative contributions of individual receptor subtypes to the integration of transduced signals, ultimately the result of collective receptor activity. The generation of knock-out (KO) mice, intended as a means to define the contributions made by individual receptor subtypes, necessarily marks but an approximation. Furthermore, we must now take into account the stunning complexity of receptor co-operation indicated by the observation of receptor homo- and heterodimerisation, let alone oligomerisation. Theoretically, this phenomenon adds a novel series of functional megareceptors/super-receptors, with varied pharmacological profiles, to the catalogue of monomeric receptor subtypes isolated and cloned in the past. SRIF analogues include both peptides and non-peptides, receptor agonists and antagonists. Relatively long half lives, as compared to those of the endogenous ligands, have been paramount from the outset. Motivated by theoretical puzzles or the shortcomings of present-day diagnostics and therapy, investigators have also aimed to produce subtype-selective analogues. Several have become available.

Cell-cell fusion and internalization of the CNS-based, HIV-1 co-receptor, APJ

APJ, a member of the human G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor family, has been shown to serve as a coreceptor for the entry of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), and it is dramatically expressed in central nervous system (CNS)-based cells. In this study, expression of APJ tagged with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and a fluorescent peptide, 5-carboxyfluorescein (5-CF) conjugated Apelin-13, were utilized for studying receptor internalization and recycling, in stably expressing indicator cells, human neurons, primary CNS microvascular endothelial cells (MVECs), and astrocytes. Fusion of the C-terminus of APJ to the N-terminus of GFP did not alter receptor ligand binding and functions, including signaling and internalization. Using 293 cells stably expressing APJ-GFP, we demonstrated that rapid internalization of the APJ receptor was induced by stimulation with Apelin-36 and Apelin-13, in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, investigations showed that the internalized APJ was colocalized with transferrin receptors, suggesting that the internalization of APJ induced by Apelin is likely to be via clathrin-coated pits. Interestingly, we found that the internalized APJ molecules were recycled to the cell surface within 60 min after removal of Apelin-13, but most of the internalized APJ still remained in the cytoplasm, even 2 h after washout of Apelin-36. The intact cytoplasmic C-terminal domain was found to be required for ligand-induced APJ internalization. Human neurons were dramatically stained by the APJ-binding fluorescent peptides. Primary human fetal astrocytes were less strongly labeled with 5-CF-Apelin-13, and in primary human CNS MVECs only weak distribution of green fluorescence specific for APJ in the cytoplasm was observed. Apelin-36 blocked cell membrane fusion mostly due to steric interference, with only a very modest effect on receptor internalization. The CNS represents a unique reservoir site for HIV-1. As such, molecular therapeutics and small molecular inhibitors of HIV-1 entry via this unique CNS receptor are now able to be rationally designed.

The pathophysiological consequences of somatostatin receptor internalization and resistance

Somatostatin receptors expressed on tumor cells form the rationale for somatostatin analog treatment of patients with somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors. Nevertheless, although somatostatin analogs effectively control hormonal hypersecretion by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, islet cell tumors, and carcinoid tumors, significant differences are observed among patients with respect to the efficacy of treatment. This may be related to a differential expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes among tumors. In addition, the property of somatostatin receptor subtypes to undergo agonist-induced internalization has important consequences for visualizing, as well as for therapy, of receptor-positive tumors using radioisotope- or chemotherapeutic-compound-coupled somatostatin analogs. This review covers the pathophysiological role of somatostatin receptor subtypes in determining the efficacy of treatment of patients with somatostatin receptor-positive tumors using somatostatin analogs, as well as the preclinical and clinical consequences of agonist-induced receptor internalization for somatostatin receptor-targeted radio- and chemotherapy. Herein, the development and potential role of novel somatostatin analogs is discussed.

Expression of somatostatin receptors 3, 4, and 5 in mouse kidney proximal tubules

BACKGROUND

Systemic infusion of somatostatin (SRIF) induces many physiological changes in human and rodent kidneys, including alterations in glomerular filtration, solute transport, and water clearance. Although somatostatin can bind to five different G-protein coupled receptors (SSTRs), only SSTR1 and SSTR2A proteins have been described convincingly in rat and/or human kidneys. Both are expressed primarily in collecting ducts, despite clear evidence that somatostatin also can bind to proximal tubules. Our aim was to characterize the expression of somatostatin receptors three to five in adult mouse kidneys.

METHODS

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed followed by Southern blotting on mouse kidney RNA for SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5. Immunohistochemistry and dual-labeling immunofluorescence also were performed to localize the receptors in the kidney.

RESULTS

Messenger RNA was detected for somatostatin receptors 3 to 5 in the mouse kidney by RT-PCR, with confirmation by Southern blotting. By immunohistochemistry and dual-labeling immunofluorescence, the proteins for all three receptors were abundantly expressed, but exclusively localized to the proximal tubules. SSTR3 was present in intracellular granules, while SSTR4 and SSTR5 were expressed on the lumenal membranes of the tubules.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of SSTR3, SSTR4, and SSTR5 in mouse proximal tubules complements the expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in collecting ducts as seen in other species. Taken together, the kidney is one of few organs expressing all five somatostatin receptors outside of the nervous system and pancreas.

Homologous and heterologous regulation of somatostatin receptor 2

We previously demonstrated that phosphorylation of somatostatin receptor 2A (sst2A) is rapidly increased in transfected cells both by agonist and by the protein kinase C (PKC) activator phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). Here, we investigate whether PKC-mediated receptor phosphorylation is involved in the homologous or heterologous regulation of endogenous sst2 receptors in AR42J pancreatic acinar cells upon stimulation by agonist or by cholecystokinin (CCK) or bombesin (BBS). Somatostatin, PMA, CCK, and BBS all increased sst2A receptor phosphorylation 5- to 10-fold within minutes. Somatostatin binding also caused rapid internalization of the ligand-receptor complex, and PMA, CCK, and BBS all stimulated this internalization further. Additionally, sst2 receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was desensitized by all treatments. Somatostatin, as well as peptidic (SMS201-995) and nonpeptidic (L-779,976) sst2 receptor agonists increased the EC(50) for somatostatin inhibition 20-fold. In contrast, pretreatment with BBS, CCK, or PMA caused a modest 2-fold increase in the EC(50) for cyclase inhibition. Whereas the PKC inhibitor GF109203X abolished sst2A receptor phosphorylation by CCK, BBS, and PMA, it did not alter the effect of somatostatin, demonstrating that these reactions were catalyzed by different kinases. Consistent with a functional role for PKC-mediated receptor phosphorylation, GF109203X prevented PMA stimulation of sst2 receptor internalization. Surprisingly, however, GF109203X did not inhibit BBS and CCK stimulation of sst2A receptor endocytosis. These results demonstrate that homologous and heterologous hormones induce sst2A receptor phosphorylation by PKC-independent and -dependent mechanisms, respectively, and produce distinct effects on receptor signaling and internalization. In addition, the heterologous hormones also modulate sst2 receptor internalization by a novel mechanism that is independent of receptor phosphorylation.

MIZIP, a highly conserved, vertebrate specific melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 interacting zinc-finger protein

Using the yeast-two-hybrid system a novel protein was identified from human brain that interacts with the C-terminus of melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCH-R1). This protein, characterized by a Myeloid translocation protein 8, Nervy, DEAF1 proteins (MYND) zinc-finger domain, is termed MCH-R1-interacting zinc-finger protein, MIZIP. It is fully conserved in man, rat, mouse and highly conserved in Xenopus and zebrafish, but not detectable in invertebrates. MIZIP gene organization in human (six exons on chromosome 9q34.3) and mouse is highly conserved, yet in rodents an additional exon is generated giving rise to alternatively spliced mRNAs. MIZIP is expressed in brain, testis and stomach, where expression of MCH and MCH-R1 was previously reported. MIZIP interaction with MCH-R1 was verified by overlay and pull-down assays as well as by co-transfection experiments in human embryonic kidney-293 cells. MIZIP is cytoplasmically localized but gets recruited to the plasma membrane when cells are co-transfected with MCH-R1 supporting the notion that MIZIP is involved in the function of MCH-R1.

Distinct residues in the carboxyl tail mediate agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D1 receptor

We have shown in a previous study that desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D(1) receptor following short-term agonist exposure are mediated by temporally and biochemically distinct mechanisms. In the present study, we have used site-directed mutagenesis to remove potential phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail of the dopamine D(1) receptor to study these processes. Mutant D(1) receptors were stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells, and kinetic parameters were measured. Mutations of Ser/Thr residues to alanine in the carboxyl tail demonstrated that the single substitution of Thr-360 abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. Isolated mutation of the adjacent glutamic acid Glu-359 also abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. These data suggest that Thr-360 in conjunction with Glu-359 may comprise a motif necessary for GRK2-mediated phosphorylation and desensitization. Agonist-induced internalization was not affected with mutation of either the Thr-360 or the Glu-359 residues. However, receptors with Ser/Thr residues mutated in the distal carboxyl tail (Thr-446, Thr-439, and Ser-431) failed to internalize in response to agonist activation, but were able to desensitize normally. These results indicate that agonist-induced desensitization and internalization are regulated by separate and distinct serine and threonine residues within the carboxyl tail of the human dopamine D(1) receptor.

Phosphorylation of the receptor for PTH and PTHrP is required for internalization and regulates receptor signaling

We have previously shown that agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor occurs on its carboxyl-terminal tail. Using site-directed mutagenesis, phosphopeptide mapping, and direct sequencing of cyanogen bromide-cleaved fragments of phosphoreceptors, we report here that PTH-dependent phosphorylation occurs on the serine residues at positions 491, 492, 493, 495, 501, and 504, and that the serine residue at position 489 is required for phosphorylation. When these seven sites were mutated to alanine residues, the mutant receptor was no longer phosphorylated after PTH stimulation. The phosphorylation-deficient receptor, stably expressed in LLCPK-1 cells, was impaired in PTH-dependent internalization and showed an increased sensitivity to PTH stimulation; the EC(50) for PTH-stimulated cAMP accumulation was decreased by 7-fold. Furthermore, PTH stimulation of the phosphorylation-deficient PTH/PTHrP receptor caused a sustained elevation in intracellular cAMP levels. These data indicate that agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor plays an important role in receptor function.

Internalization-defective mutants of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 exert normal signaling functions in hematopoietic cells

The regulatory peptide somatostatin (SST) acts via a family of G-protein-coupled receptors comprising five subtypes (SSTR1-5). G-protein-coupled receptors activate multiple signaling mechanisms, which variably depend on internalization and intracellular routing of activated receptors. We have recently demonstrated that hematopoietic precursors express SSTR2 and that SST is a chemoattractant for these cells. Herein, we characterize critical regions in SSTR2 involved in endocytosis and describe how ligand-induced internalization impacts on two major signaling functions of SSTR2 in hematopoietic cells, the activation of the Erk pathway and the induction of promigratory responses.

Agonist-induced internalization and trafficking of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in hippocampal neurons

Agonist-induced internalization of G-protein-coupled receptors is an important mechanism for regulating receptor abundance and availability at the plasma membrane. In this study we have used immunolabeling techniques and confocal microscopy to investigate agonist-induced internalization and trafficking of CB(1) receptors in rat cultured hippocampal neurons. The levels of cell surface CB(1) receptor immunoreactivity associated with presynaptic GABAergic terminals decreased markedly (by up to 84%) after exposure to the cannabinoid agonist (+)-WIN55212, in a concentration-dependent (0.1-1 microm) and stereoselective manner. Inhibition was maximal at 16 hr and abolished in the presence of SR141716A, a selective CB(1) receptor antagonist. Methanandamide (an analog of an endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide) also reduced cell surface labeling (by 43% at 1 microm). Differential labeling of cell surface and intracellular pools of receptor demonstrated that the reduction in cell surface immunoreactivity reflects agonist-induced internalization and suggests that the internalized CB(1) receptors are translocated toward the soma. The internalization process did not require activated G-protein alpha(i) or alpha(o) subunits. A different pattern of cell surface CB(1) receptor expression was observed using an undifferentiated F-11 cell line, which had pronounced somatic labeling. In these cells substantial CB(1) receptor internalization was also observed after exposure to (+)-WIN55212 (1 microm) for relatively short periods (30 min) of agonist exposure. In summary, this dynamic modulation of CB(1) receptor expression may play an important role in the development of cannabinoid tolerance in the CNS. Agonist-induced internalization at presynaptic terminals has important implications for the modulatory effects of G-protein-coupled receptors on neurotransmitter release.

Agonist-mediated endocytosis of rat somatostatin receptor subtype 3 involves beta-arrestin and clathrin coated vesicles

Agonist-induced endocytosis of somatostatin receptors determines subsequent cellular responsiveness to peptide agonist and influences somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, a technique to image various tumours. We examined the internalization of sst3HSV, an epitope-tagged type 3 somatostatin receptor, in transfected rat neuroendocrine insulinoma cells. Stimulation of these cells with somatostatin induced trafficking of coexpressed enhanced green fluorescence protein/beta-arrestin1 fusion protein and sst3HSV to colocalize in the same endocytic vesicles. Coexpression of a dominant negative mutant of the arrestin fusion protein with the receptor blocked the internalization of sst3HSV. Stimulation with somatostatin also induced the transient translocation of alpha-adaptin, a component of the adaptor protein complex 2, to the plasma membrane. alpha-adaptin and clathrin colocalized with the receptor. By electron microscopy, we observed internalized sst3 in clathrin coated pits, endosomes and at the limiting membrane of multivesicular bodies, a location typical for receptors being recycled. Concordantly, we observed sst3HSV colocalized with Rab11 in a perinuclear compartment which is likely to correspond to the pericentriolar recycling endosome. Thus, agonist-induced endocytosis of sst3 depends on its interaction with beta-arrestin, involves the adaptor protein complex 2 and proceeds via clathrin coated vesicles to the recycling compartment.

Agonist-induced phosphorylation of somatostatin receptor subtype 1 (sst1). Relationship to desensitization and internalization

The sst1 somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtype is widely expressed in the endocrine, gastrointestinal, and neuronal systems as well as in hormone-sensitive tumors, yet little is known about its regulation. Here we investigated the desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation of sst1 expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Treatment of cells with 100 nm SRIF for 30 min reduced maximal SRIF inhibition of adenylyl cyclase from 40 to 10%. This desensitization was rapid (t(12) < 2 min) and dependent on agonist concentration (EC(50) = 2 nm). However, internalization of receptor-bound ligand occurred slowly (t(12) > 180 min). Incubation of cells with SRIF also caused a rapid (t(12) < 2 min) increase in sst1 receptor phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner (EC(50) = 1.3 nm), as determined in a mobility shift phosphorylation assay. Receptor phosphorylation was not affected by pertussis toxin, indicating a requirement for receptor occupancy rather than signaling. The protein kinase C activator, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate also stimulated sst1 receptor phosphorylation whereas forskolin did not. Both agonist- and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-stimulated receptor phosphorylation occurred mainly on serine. These studies are the first to demonstrate phosphorylation of the sst1 receptor and suggest that phosphorylation mediated uncoupling, rather than sequestration, leads to its desensitization.