Intracellular retention of recombinant GABAB receptors

Control of CCR5 Cell-Surface Targeting by the PRAF2 Gatekeeper

The cell-surface targeting of neo-synthesized G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves the recruitment of receptors into COPII vesicles budding at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites (ERESs). This process is regulated for some GPCRs by escort proteins, which facilitate their export, or by gatekeepers that retain the receptors in the ER. PRAF2, an ER-resident four trans- membrane domain protein with cytoplasmic extremities, operates as a gatekeeper for the GB1 protomer of the heterodimeric GABAB receptor, interacting with a tandem di-leucine/RXR retention motif in the carboxyterminal tail of GB1. PRAF2 was also reported to interact in a two-hybrid screen with a peptide corresponding to the carboxyterminal tail of the chemokine receptor CCR5 despite the absence of RXR motifs in its sequence. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based subcellular localization system, we found that PRAF2 inhibits, in a concentration-dependent manner, the plasma membrane export of CCR5. BRET-based proximity assays and Co-IP experiments demonstrated that PRAF2/CCR5 interaction does not require the presence of a receptor carboxyterminal tail and involves instead the transmembrane domains of both proteins. The mutation of the potential di-leucine/RXR motif contained in the third intracellular loop of CCR5 does not affect PRAF2-mediated retention. It instead impairs the cell-surface export of CCR5 by inhibiting CCR5's interaction with its private escort protein, CD4. PRAF2 and CD4 thus display opposite roles on the cell-surface export of CCR5, with PRAF2 inhibiting and CD4 promoting this process, likely operating at the level of CCR5 recruitment into COPII vesicles, which leave the ER.

Kinetic fingerprinting of metabotropic glutamate receptors

Dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are abundantly expressed in neurons. In mammals, eight subunit isoforms, mGluR1-8, have been identified, forming the groups I, II, and III. We investigated receptor dimerization and kinetics of these mGluR isoforms in excised membrane patches by FRET and confocal patch-clamp fluorometry. We show that 5 out of 8 homodimeric receptors develop characteristic glutamate-induced on- and off-kinetics, as do 11 out of 28 heterodimers. Glutamate-responsive heterodimers were identified within each group, between groups I and II as well as between groups II and III, but not between groups I and III. The glutamate-responsive heterodimers showed heterogeneous activation and deactivation kinetics. Interestingly, mGluR7, not generating a kinetic response in homodimers, showed fast on-kinetics in mGluR2/7 and mGluR3/7 while off-kinetics retained the speed of mGluR2 or mGluR3 respectively. In conclusion, glutamate-induced conformational changes in heterodimers appear within each group and between groups if one group II subunit is present.

Class A and C GPCR Dimers in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases affect over 30 million people worldwide with an ascending trend. Most individuals suffering from these irreversible brain damages belong to the elderly population, with onset between 50 and 60 years. Although the pathophysiology of such diseases is partially known, it remains unclear upon which point a disease turns degenerative. Moreover, current therapeutics can treat some of the symptoms but often have severe side effects and become less effective in long-term treatment. For many neurodegenerative diseases, the involvement of G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs), which are key players of neuronal transmission and plasticity, has become clearer and holds great promise in elucidating their biological mechanism. With this review, we introduce and summarize class A and class C GPCRs, known to form heterodimers or oligomers to increase their signalling repertoire. Additionally, the examples discussed here were shown to display relevant alterations in brain signalling and had already been associated with the pathophysiology of certain neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, we classified the heterodimers into two categories of crosstalk, positive or negative, for which there is known evidence.

Structural Basis of GABAB Receptor Regulation and Signaling

GABA_B receptors (GBRs), the G protein-coupled receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), activate Go/i-type G proteins that regulate adenylyl cyclase, Ca²⁺ channels, and K⁺ channels. GBR signaling to enzymes and ion channels influences neuronal activity, plasticity processes, and network activity throughout the brain. GBRs are obligatory heterodimers composed of GB1a or GB1b subunits with a GB2 subunit. Heterodimeric GB1a/2 and GB1b/2 receptors represent functional units that associate in a modular fashion with regulatory, trafficking, and effector proteins to generate receptors with distinct physiological functions. This review summarizes current knowledge on the structure, organization, and functions of multi-protein GBR complexes.

G-protein coupled receptors and synaptic plasticity in sleep deprivation

Insufficient sleep has been correlated to many physiological and psychoneurological disorders. Over the years, our understanding of the state of sleep has transcended from an inactive period of rest to a more active state involving important cellular and molecular processes. In addition, during sleep, electrophysiological changes also occur in pathways in specific regions of the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Activity mediated synaptic plasticity in the CNS can lead to long-term and sometimes permanent strengthening and/or weakening synaptic strength affecting neuronal network behaviour. Memory consolidation and learning that take place during sleep cycles, can be affected by changes in synaptic plasticity during sleep disturbances. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), with their versatile structural and functional attributes, can regulate synaptic plasticity in CNS and hence, may be potentially affected in sleep deprived conditions. In this review, we aim to discuss important functional changes that can take place in the CNS during sleep and sleep deprivation and how changes in GPCRs can lead to potential problems with therapeutics with pharmacological interventions.

GABAB Receptor Chemistry and Pharmacology: Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators

The GABA_B receptors are metabotropic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate the actions of the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). In the CNS, GABA plays an important role in behavior, learning and memory, cognition, and stress. GABA is also located throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and is involved in the autonomic control of the intestine and esophageal reflex. Consequently, dysregulated GABA_B receptor signaling is associated with neurological, mental health, and gastrointestinal disorders; hence, these receptors have been identified as key therapeutic targets and are the focus of multiple drug discovery efforts for indications such as muscle spasticity disorders, schizophrenia, pain, addiction, and gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD). Numerous agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators of the GABA_B receptor have been described; however, Lioresal^® (Baclofen; β-(4-chlorophenyl)-γ-aminobutyric acid) is the only FDA-approved drug that selectively targets GABA_B receptors in clinical use; undesirable side effects, such as sedation, muscle weakness, fatigue, cognitive deficits, seizures, tolerance and potential for abuse, limit their therapeutic use. Here, we review GABA_B receptor chemistry and pharmacology, presenting orthosteric agonists, antagonists, and positive and negative allosteric modulators, and highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting GABA_B receptor modulation for the treatment of various CNS and peripheral disorders.

Structural basis for distinct quality control mechanisms of GABAB receptor during evolution

Cell surface trafficking of many G protein-coupled receptors is tightly regulated. Among them, the mandatory heterodimer GABA_B receptor for the main inhibitory neurotransmitter, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), is a model. In mammals, its cell surface trafficking is highly controlled by an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal in the C-terminal intracellular region of the GB1 subunit that is masked through a coiled-coil interaction with the GB2 subunit. Here, we investigate the molecular basis for the export of its homolog in Drosophila melanogaster that regulates the circadian rhythm and sleep. In contrast to mammals, the endoplasmic retention signal is carried by GB2, while GB1 reaches the cell surface alone. NMR analysis showed that the coiled-coil domain that controls GABA_B heterodimer formation is structurally conserved between flies and mammals, despite specific features. These findings show the adaptation of a similar quality control system during evolution for maintaining the subunit composition of a functional heterodimeric receptor.

Mechanisms and Regulation of Neuronal GABAB Receptor-Dependent Signaling

γ-Aminobutyric acid B receptors (GABA_BRs) are broadly expressed throughout the central nervous system where they play an important role in regulating neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission. GABA_BRs are G protein-coupled receptors that mediate slow and sustained inhibitory actions via modulation of several downstream effector enzymes and ion channels. GABA_BRs are obligate heterodimers that associate with diverse arrays of proteins to form modular complexes that carry out distinct physiological functions. GABA_BR-dependent signaling is fine-tuned and regulated through a multitude of mechanisms that are relevant to physiological and pathophysiological states. This review summarizes the current knowledge on GABA_BR signal transduction and discusses key factors that influence the strength and sensitivity of GABA_BR-dependent signaling in neurons.

Direct Interaction of PP2A Phosphatase with GABAB Receptors Alters Functional Signaling

Addictive drugs usurp the brain's intrinsic mechanism for reward, leading to compulsive and destructive behaviors. In the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the center of the brain's reward circuit, GABAergic neurons control the excitability of dopamine (DA) projection neurons and are the site of initial psychostimulant-dependent changes in signaling. Previous work established that cocaine/methamphetamine exposure increases protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activity, which dephosphorylates the GABA_BR2 subunit, promotes internalization of the GABA_B receptor (GABA_BR) and leads to smaller GABA_BR-activated G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) currents in VTA GABA neurons. How the actions of PP2A become selective for a particular signaling pathway is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that PP2A can associate directly with a short peptide sequence in the C terminal domain of the GABA_BR1 subunit, and that GABA_BRs and PP2A are in close proximity in rodent neurons (mouse/rat; mixed sexes). We show that this PP2A-GABA_BR interaction can be regulated by intracellular Ca²⁺ Finally, a peptide that potentially reduces recruitment of PP2A to GABA_BRs and thereby limits receptor dephosphorylation increases the magnitude of baclofen-induced GIRK currents. Thus, limiting PP2A-dependent dephosphorylation of GABA_BRs may be a useful strategy to increase receptor signaling for treating diseases.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Dysregulation of GABA_B receptors (GABA_BRs) underlies altered neurotransmission in many neurological disorders. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is involved in dephosphorylating and subsequent internalization of GABA_BRs in models of addiction and depression. Here, we provide new evidence that PP2A B55 regulatory subunit interacts directly with a small region of the C-terminal domain of the GABA_BR1 subunit, and that this interaction is sensitive to intracellular Ca²⁺ We demonstrate that a short peptide corresponding to the PP2A interaction site on GABA_BR1 competes for PP2A binding, enhances phosphorylation GABA_BR2 S783, and affects functional signaling through GIRK channels. Our study highlights how targeting PP2A dependent dephosphorylation of GABA_BRs may provide a specific strategy to modulate GABA_BR signaling in disease conditions.

Structural biology of GABAB receptor

Metabotropic GABAB receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that mediates slow and prolonged inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. It functions as a constitutive heterodimer composed of the GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits. Each subunit contains three domains; the extracellular Venus flytrap module, seven-helix transmembrane region and cytoplasmic tail. In recent years, the three-dimensional structures of GABAB receptor extracellular and intracellular domains have been elucidated. These structures reveal the molecular basis of ligand recognition, receptor heterodimerization and receptor activation. Here we provide a brief review of the GABAB receptor structures, with an emphasis on describing the different ligand-bound states of the receptor. We will also compare these with the known structures of related GPCRs to shed light on the molecular mechanisms of activation and regulation in the GABAB system, as well as GPCR dimers in general. This article is part of the "Special Issue Dedicated to Norman G. Bowery".

The Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid B Receptor in Depression and Reward

The metabotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid B (GABA_B) receptor was the first described obligate G protein-coupled receptor heterodimer and continues to set the stage for discoveries in G protein-coupled receptor signaling complexity. In this review, dedicated to the life and work of Athina Markou, we explore the role of GABA_B receptors in depression, reward, and the convergence of these domains in anhedonia, a shared symptom of major depressive disorder and withdrawal from drugs of abuse. GABA_B receptor expression and function are enhanced by antidepressants and reduced in animal models of depression. Generally, GABA_B receptor antagonists are antidepressant-like and agonists are pro-depressive. Exceptions to this rule likely reflect the differential influence of GABA_B1 isoforms in depression-related behavior and neurobiology, including the anhedonic effects of social stress. A wealth of data implicate GABA_B receptors in the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse. We focus on nicotine as an example. GABA_B receptor activation attenuates, and deactivation enhances, nicotine reward and associated neurobiological changes. In nicotine withdrawal, however, GABA_B receptor agonists, antagonists, and positive allosteric modulators enhance anhedonia, perhaps owing to differential effects of GABA_B1 isoforms on the dopaminergic system. Nicotine cue-induced reinstatement is more reliably attenuated by GABA_B receptor activation. Separation of desirable and undesirable side effects of agonists is achievable with positive allosteric modulators, which are poised to enter clinical studies for drug abuse. GABA_B1 isoforms are key to understanding the neurobiology of anhedonia, whereas allosteric modulators may offer a mechanism for targeting specific brain regions and processes associated with reward and depression.

Class C G protein-coupled receptors: reviving old couples with new partners

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication and are encoded by the largest family in our genome. As such, GPCRs represent the main targets in drug development programs. Sequence analysis revealed several classes of GPCRs: the class A rhodopsin-like receptors represent the majority, the class B includes the secretin-like and adhesion GPCRs, the class F includes the frizzled receptors, and the class C includes receptors for the main neurotransmitters, glutamate and GABA, and those for sweet and umami taste and calcium receptors. Class C receptors are far more complex than other GPCRs, being mandatory dimers, with each subunit being composed of several domains. In this review, we summarize our actual knowledge regarding the activation mechanism and subunit organization of class C GPCRs, and how this brings information for many other GPCRs.

The GABAB positive allosteric modulators CGP7930 and GS39783 stimulate ERK1/2 signalling in cells lacking functional GABAB receptors

The present study shows that the GABA_B positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) CGP7930 and GS39783 stimulate extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) signalling in cells that do not express functional GABA_B receptors. In human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, CGP7930 and GS39783 induced a time- and concentration-dependent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation with potencies similar to those displayed as GABA_B PAMs. Conversely, γ-aminobutyric acid and the GABA_B receptor agonists (-)baclofen and SKF97541 were completely inactive. CGP7930 and GS39783 enhanced the nuclear localization of phospho-ERK1/2 and CGP7930 promoted the phosphorylation of the transcription factors Elk-1 and CREB. CGP7930-induced ERK1/2 stimulation was insensitive to pertussis toxin, the G_q/11 antagonist YM254890 and the phospholipase C-β inhibitor U-73122, but was completely blocked by the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD98059. Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-1, platelet--derived growth factor, phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Akt activities potentiated CGP7930-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. CGP7930 enhanced the phosphorylation of myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C (PKC) substrate and inhibition of PKC attenuated the ERK1/2 stimulation. Over-expression of N17Ras, a dominant negative mutant of c-Ras, or inhibition of c-Raf by GW5074 partially antagonized CGP7930-induced ERK1/2 activation. CGP7930 enhanced the phosphorylation of transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK-1) and TAK-1 inhibition by 5Z-7-oxozeaenol reduced CGP7930-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. CGP7930 activated ERK1/2 in CHO-K1 fibroblasts, which lack endogenous GABA_B receptors, but not in HEK-293 cells, indicating that the response displayed cell type specificity. These data demonstrate that CGP7930 and GS39783 can trigger ERK1/2 signalling, a critical modulator of mood and drug addiction, independently of an action on GABA_B receptors.

Gatekeepers Controlling GPCR Export and Function

Regulated export of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from intracellular stores involves chaperones and escort proteins, which promote their progression to the cell surface, and gatekeepers, which retain them in intracellular compartments. Functional γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptors, the paradigm of this phenomenon, comprise GB1 and GB2 subunits forming a heterodimer. GB1 is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in the absence of GB2. A specific ER-resident gatekeeper, prenylated Rab acceptor family 2 (PRAF2), is involved in GB1 retention and prevents its progression into the biosynthetic pathway. GB1 can be released from PRAF2 only on competitive interaction with GB2. PRAF2 is ubiquitous and belongs to a subgroup of the mammalian Ypt-interacting protein (Yip) family. Several other GPCRs are likely to be regulated by Yip proteins, which might be involved in the pathophysiology of human diseases that are associated with impaired receptor targeting to the cell surface.

GABAB receptor cell-surface export is controlled by an endoplasmic reticulum gatekeeper

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) release and cell-surface export of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are tightly regulated. For gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptors of GABA, the major mammalian inhibitory neurotransmitter, the ligand-binding GB1 subunit is maintained in the ER by unknown mechanisms in the absence of hetero-dimerization with the GB2 subunit. We report that GB1 retention is regulated by a specific gatekeeper, PRAF2. This ER resident transmembrane protein binds to GB1, preventing its progression in the biosynthetic pathway. GB1 release occurs upon competitive displacement from PRAF2 by GB2. PRAF2 concentration, relative to that of GB1 and GB2, tightly controls cell-surface receptor density and controls GABAB function in neurons. Experimental perturbation of PRAF2 levels in vivo caused marked hyperactivity disorders in mice. These data reveal an unanticipated major impact of specific ER gatekeepers on GPCR function and identify PRAF2 as a new molecular target with therapeutic potential for psychiatric and neurological diseases involving GABAB function.

Chaperoning G protein-coupled receptors: from cell biology to therapeutics

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that traverse the plasma membrane seven times (hence, are also called 7TM receptors). The polytopic structure of GPCRs makes the folding of GPCRs difficult and complex. Indeed, many wild-type GPCRs are not folded optimally, and defects in folding are the most common cause of genetic diseases due to GPCR mutations. Both general and receptor-specific molecular chaperones aid the folding of GPCRs. Chemical chaperones have been shown to be able to correct the misfolding in mutant GPCRs, proving to be important tools for studying the structure-function relationship of GPCRs. However, their potential therapeutic value is very limited. Pharmacological chaperones (pharmacoperones) are potentially important novel therapeutics for treating genetic diseases caused by mutations in GPCR genes that resulted in misfolded mutant proteins. Pharmacoperones also increase cell surface expression of wild-type GPCRs; therefore, they could be used to treat diseases that do not harbor mutations in GPCRs. Recent studies have shown that indeed pharmacoperones work in both experimental animals and patients. High-throughput assays have been developed to identify new pharmacoperones that could be used as therapeutics for a number of endocrine and other genetic diseases.

Transport along the dendritic endoplasmic reticulum mediates the trafficking of GABAB receptors

In neurons, secretory organelles within the cell body are complemented by the dendritic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi outposts (GOPs), whose role in neurotransmitter receptor trafficking is poorly understood. γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B metabotropic receptors (GABABRs) regulate the efficacy of synaptic transmission throughout the brain. Their plasma membrane availability is controlled by mechanisms involving an ER retention motif and assembly-dependent ER export. Thus, they constitute an ideal molecular model to study ER trafficking, but the extent to which the dendritic ER participates in GABABR biosynthesis has not been thoroughly explored. Here, we show that GABAB1 localizes preferentially to the ER in dendrites and moves long distances within this compartment. Not only diffusion but also microtubule and dynein-dependent mechanisms control dendritic ER transport. GABABRs insert throughout the somatodendritic plasma membrane but dendritic post-ER carriers containing GABABRs do not fuse selectively with GOPs. This study furthers our understanding of the spatial selectivity of neurotransmitter receptors for dendritic organelles.

Heterodimeric coiled-coil interactions of human GABAB receptor

Metabotropic GABAB receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor that mediates inhibitory neurotransmission in the CNS. It functions as an obligatory heterodimer of GABAB receptor 1 (GBR1) and GABAB receptor 2 (GBR2) subunits. The association between GBR1 and GBR2 masks an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal in the cytoplasmic region of GBR1 and facilitates cell surface expression of both subunits. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first crystal structure of an intracellular coiled-coil heterodimer of human GABAB receptor. We found that polar interactions buried within the hydrophobic core determine the specificity of heterodimer pairing. Disruption of the hydrophobic coiled-coil interface with single mutations in either subunit impairs surface expression of GBR1, confirming that the coiled-coil interaction is required to inactivate the adjacent ER retention signal of GBR1. The coiled-coil assembly buries an internalization motif of GBR1 at the heterodimer interface. The ER retention signal of GBR1 is not part of the core coiled-coil structure, suggesting that it is sterically shielded by GBR2 upon heterodimer formation.

Complex GABAB receptor complexes: how to generate multiple functionally distinct units from a single receptor

The main inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA, acts on both ligand-gated and G protein-coupled receptors, the GABA_A/C and GABA_B receptors, respectively. The later play important roles in modulating many synapses, both at the pre- and post-synaptic levels, and are then still considered as interesting targets to treat a number of brain diseases, including addiction. For many years, several subtypes of GABA_B receptors were expected, but cloning revealed only two genes that work in concert to generate a single type of GABA_B receptor composed of two subunits. Here we will show that the signaling complexity of this unit receptor type can be largely increased through various ways, including receptor stoichiometry, subunit isoforms, cell-surface expression and localization, crosstalk with other receptors, or interacting proteins. These recent data revealed how complexity of a receptor unit can be increased, observation that certainly are not unique to the GABA_B receptor.

Plasma membrane density of GABA(B)-R1a, GABA(B)-R1b, GABA-R2 and trimeric G-proteins in the course of postnatal development of rat brain cortex

With the aim to understand the onset of expression and developmental profile of plasma membrane (PM) content /density of crucial components of GABA(B)-R signaling cascade, GABA(B)-R1a, GABA(B)-R1b, GABA(B)-R2, G(i)1/G(i)2alpha, G(i)3alpha, G(o)alpha, G(z)alpha and Gbeta subunit proteins were determined by quantitative immunoblotting and compared in PM isolated from brain cortex of rats of different ages: between postnatal-day-1 (PD1) and 90 (PD90). PM density of GABA(B)-R1a, GABA(B)-R2, G(i)1/G(i)2alpha, G(i)3alpha, G(o)alpha, G(z)alpha and Gbeta was high already at birth and further development was reflected in parallel decrease of both GABA(B)-R1a and GABA(B)-R2 subunits. The major decrease of GABA(B)-R1a and GABA(B)-R2 occurred between the birth and PD15: to 55 % (R1a, **) and 51 % (R2, **), respectively. Contrarily, PM level of the cognate G-proteins G(i)1/G(i)2alpha, G(i)3alpha, G(o)alpha, G(z)alpha and Gbeta was unchanged in the course of the whole postnatal period of brain cortex development. Maturation of GABA(B)-R cascade was substantially different from ontogenetic profile of prototypical plasma membrane marker, Na, K-ATPase, which was low at birth and further development was reflected in continuous increase of PM density of this enzyme. Major change occurred between the birth and PD25. In adult rats, membrane content of Na, K-ATPase was 3-times higher than around the birth.

Regional mRNA expression of GABAergic receptor subunits in brains of C57BL/6J and 129P3/J mice: strain and heroin effects

C57BL/6J and 129 substrains of mice are known to differ in their basal levels of anxiety and behavioral response to drugs of abuse. We have previously shown strain differences in heroin-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) between C57BL/6J (C57) and 129P3/J (129) mice, and in the regional expression of several receptor and peptide mRNAs. In this study, we examined the contribution of the GABAergic system in the cortex, nucleus accumbens (NAc), caudate putamen (CPu) and the region containing the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) to heroin reward by measuring mRNA levels of 7 of the most commonly expressed GABA-A receptor subunits, and both GABA-B receptor subunits, in these same mice following saline (control) or heroin administration in a CPP design. Using real-time PCR, we studied the effects of strain and heroin administration on GABA-A α1, α2, α3, β2, and γ2 subunits, which typically constitute synaptic GABA-A receptors, GABA-A α4 and δ subunits, which typically constitute extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors, and GABA-B R1 and R2 subunits. In saline-treated animals, we found an experiment-wise significant strain difference in GABA-Aα2 mRNA expression in the SN/VTA. Point-wise significant strain differences were also observed in GABA-Aα2, GABA-Aα3, and GABA-Aα4 mRNA expression in the NAc, as well as GABA-BR2 mRNA expression in the NAc and CPu, and GABA-BR1 mRNA expression in the cortex. For all differences, 129 mice had higher mRNA expression compared to C57 animals, with the exception of GABA-BR1 mRNA in the cortex where we observed lower levels in 129 mice. Therefore, it may be possible that known behavioral differences between these two strains are, in part, due to differences in their GABAergic systems. While we did not find heroin dose-related changes in mRNA expression levels in C57 mice, we did observe dose-related differences in 129 mice. These results may relate to our earlier behavioral finding that 129 mice are hyporesponsive to the rewarding effects of heroin.

Endoplasmic reticulum sorting and kinesin-1 command the targeting of axonal GABAB receptors

In neuronal cells the intracellular trafficking machinery controls the availability of neurotransmitter receptors at the plasma membrane, which is a critical determinant of synaptic strength. Metabotropic γ amino-butyric acid (GABA) type B receptors (GABA_BRs) are neurotransmitter receptors that modulate synaptic transmission by mediating the slow and prolonged responses to GABA. GABA_BRs are obligatory heteromers constituted by two subunits, GABA_BR1 and GABA_BR2. GABA_BR1a and GABA_BR1b are the most abundant subunit variants. GABA_BR1b is located in the somatodendritic domain whereas GABA_BR1a is additionally targeted to the axon. Sushi domains located at the N-terminus of GABA_BR1a constitute the only difference between both variants and are necessary and sufficient for axonal targeting. The precise targeting machinery and the organelles involved in sorting and transport have not been described. Here we demonstrate that GABA_BRs require the Golgi apparatus for plasma membrane delivery but that axonal sorting and targeting of GABA_BR1a operate in a pre-Golgi compartment. In the axon GABA_BR1a subunits are enriched in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and their dynamic behavior and colocalization with other secretory organelles like the ER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) suggest that they employ a local secretory route. The transport of axonal GABA_BR1a is microtubule-dependent and kinesin-1, a molecular motor of the kinesin family, determines axonal localization. Considering that progression of GABA_BRs through the secretory pathway is regulated by an ER retention motif our data contribute to understand the role of the axonal ER in non-canonical sorting and targeting of neurotransmitter receptors.

Modulation of cell surface GABA(B) receptors by desensitization, trafficking and regulated degradation

Inhibitory neurotransmission ensures normal brain function by counteracting and integrating excitatory activity. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system, and mediates its effects via two classes of receptors: the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. GABA(A) receptors are heteropentameric GABA-gated chloride channels and responsible for fast inhibitory neurotransmission. GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) that mediate slow and prolonged inhibitory transmission. The extent of inhibitory neurotransmission is determined by a variety of factors, such as the degree of transmitter release and changes in receptor activity by posttranslational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation), as well as by the number of receptors present in the plasma membrane available for signal transduction. The level of GABA(B) receptors at the cell surface critically depends on the residence time at the cell surface and finally the rates of endocytosis and degradation. In this review we focus primarily on recent advances in the understanding of trafficking mechanisms that determine the expression level of GABA(B) receptors in the plasma membrane, and thereby signaling strength.

Regulated GPCR trafficking to the plasma membrane: general issues and the CCR5 chemokine receptor example

The regulated export of nascent G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) from intracellular stores is an emerging concept with important implications in cell biology and pharmacology. This phenomenon requires a complex network of interactions between GPCRs with either chaperones and escort proteins or gatekeepers, which are respectively involved in the progression of GPCRs along the biosynthetic pathway to the plasma membrane or in their retention in intracellular compartments. The regulated export of GPCRs is also controlled by external stimuli and might represent an adaptive mechanism to specific physiological constraints, such as the sustained activation of the CCR5 chemokine receptor in the context of chemotaxis.

On the origin of the triplet puzzle of homologies in receptor heteromers: Toll-like receptor triplets in different types of receptors

Based on our theory, we have discovered main triplets of amino acid residues in the GABAB1 receptor and several other neural receptors, which seem to originate from toll-like receptors and appear also as homologies in receptor heteromers. The obtained results strengthen our hypothesis that these triplets may 'guide-and-clasp' receptor-receptor interactions.

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor internalization is regulated by the R2 subunit

γ-Aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors are important for slow synaptic inhibition in the CNS. The efficacy of inhibition is directly related to the stability of cell surface receptors. For GABA(B) receptors, heterodimerization between R1 and R2 subunits is critical for cell surface expression and signaling, but how this determines the rate and extent of receptor internalization is unknown. Here, we insert a high affinity α-bungarotoxin binding site into the N terminus of the R2 subunit and reveal its dominant role in regulating the internalization of GABA(B) receptors in live cells. To simultaneously study R1a and R2 trafficking, a new α-bungarotoxin binding site-labeling technique was used, allowing α-bungarotoxin conjugated to different fluorophores to selectively label R1a and R2 subunits. This approach demonstrated that R1a and R2 are internalized as dimers. In heterologous expression systems and neurons, the rates and extents of internalization for R1aR2 heteromers and R2 homomers are similar, suggesting a regulatory role for R2 in determining cell surface receptor stability. The fast internalization rate of R1a, which has been engineered to exit the endoplasmic reticulum, was slowed to that of R2 by truncating the R1a C-terminal tail or by removing a dileucine motif in its coiled-coil domain. Slowing the rate of internalization by co-assembly with R2 represents a novel role for GPCR heterodimerization whereby R2 subunits, via their C terminus coiled-coil domain, mask a dileucine motif on R1a subunits to determine the surface stability of the GABA(B) receptor.

Phosphorylation-dependent C-terminal binding of 14-3-3 proteins promotes cell surface expression of HIV co-receptor GPR15

Membrane trafficking is dictated by dynamic molecular interactions involving discrete determinants in the cargo proteins and the intracellular transport machineries. We have previously reported that cell surface expression of GPR15, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that serves as a co-receptor for HIV, is correlated with the mode III binding of 14-3-3 proteins to the receptor C terminus. Here we provide a mechanistic basis for the role of 14-3-3 in promoting the cell surface expression of GPR15. The Ala mutation of penultimate phospho-Ser (S359A) that abolishes 14-3-3 binding resulted in substantially reduced O-glycosylation and the cell surface expression of GPR15. The surface membrane protein CD8 fused with the C-terminal tail of GPR15(S359A) mutant was re-localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In the context of S359A mutation, the additional mutations in the upstream stretch of basic residues (RXR motif) restored O-glycosylation and the cell surface expression. The RXR motif was responsible for the interaction with coatomer protein I (COPI), which was inversely correlated with the 14-3-3 binding and cell surface expression. These results suggest that 14-3-3 binding promotes cell surface expression of GPR15 by releasing the receptor from ER retrieval/retention pathway that is mediated by the interaction of RXR motif and COPI. Moreover, 14-3-3 binding substantially increased the stability of GPR15 protein. Thus 14-3-3 proteins play multiple roles in biogenesis and trafficking of an HIV co-receptor GPR15 to control its cell surface density in response to the phosphorylation signal.

Confined displacement algorithm determines true and random colocalization in fluorescence microscopy

The quantification of colocalizing signals in multichannel fluorescence microscopy images depends on the reliable segmentation of corresponding regions of interest, on the selection of appropriate colocalization coefficients, and on a robust statistical criterion to discriminate true from random colocalization. Here, we introduce a confined displacement algorithm based on image correlation spectroscopy in combination with Manders colocalization coefficients M1(ROI) and M2(ROI) to quantify true and random colocalization of a given florescence pattern. We show that existing algorithms based on block scrambling exaggerate the randomization of fluorescent patterns with resulting inappropriately narrow probability density functions and false significance of true colocalization in terms of p values. We further confine our approach to subcellular compartments and show that true and random colocalization can be analysed for model dendrites and for GABA(B) receptor subunits GABA(B)R1/2 in cultured hippocampal neurons. Together, we demonstrate that the confined displacement algorithm detects true colocalization of specific fluorescence patterns down to subcellular levels.

GABAB receptor coupling to G-proteins and ion channels

GABA(B) receptors have been found to play a key role in regulating membrane excitability and synaptic transmission in the brain. The GABA(B) receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that associates with a subset of G-proteins (pertussis toxin sensitive Gi/o family), that in turn regulate specific ion channels and trigger cAMP cascades. In this review, we describe the relationships between the GABA(B) receptor, its effectors and associated proteins that mediate GABA(B) receptor function within the brain. We discuss a unique feature of the GABA(B) receptor, the requirement for heterodimerization to produce functional receptors, as well as an increasing body of evidence that suggests GABA(B) receptors comprise a macromolecular signaling heterocomplex, critical for efficient targeting and function of the receptors. Within this complex, GABA(B) receptors associate specifically with Gi/o G-proteins that regulate voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)) channels, G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, and adenylyl cyclase. Numerous studies have revealed that lipid rafts, scaffold proteins, targeting motifs in the receptor, and regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins also contribute to the function of GABA(B) receptors and affect cellular processes such as receptor trafficking and activity-dependent desensitization. This complex regulation of GABA(B) receptors in the brain may provide opportunities for new ways to regulate GABA-dependent inhibition in normal and diseased states of the nervous system.

Allosteric modulators of GABA(B) receptors: mechanism of action and therapeutic perspective

γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays important roles in the central nervous system, acting as a neurotransmitter on both ionotropic ligand-gated Cl^--channels, and metabotropic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). These two types of receptors called GABA_A (and C) and GABA_B are the targets of major therapeutic drugs such as the anxiolytic benzodiazepines, and antispastic drug baclofen (lioresal®), respectively. Although the multiplicity of GABA_A receptors offer a number of possibilities to discover new and more selective drugs, the molecular characterization of the GABA_B receptor revealed a unique, though complex, heterodimeric GPCR. High throughput screening strategies carried out in pharmaceutical industries, helped identifying new compounds positively modulating the activity of the GABA_B receptor. These molecules, almost devoid of apparent activity when applied alone, greatly enhance both the potency and efficacy of GABA_B agonists. As such, in contrast to baclofen that constantly activates the receptor everywhere in the brain, these positive allosteric modulators induce a large increase in GABA_B-mediated responses only WHERE and WHEN physiologically needed. Such compounds are then well adapted to help GABA to activate its GABA_B receptors, like benzodiazepines favor GABA_A receptor activation. In this review, the way of action of these molecules will be presented in light of our actual knowledge of the activation mechanism of the GABA_B receptor. We will then show that, as expected, these molecules have more pronounced in vivo responses and less side effects than pure agonists, offering new potential therapeutic applications for this new class of GABA_B ligands.

GABAB receptors: physiological functions and mechanisms of diversity

GABA(B) receptors are the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. GABA(B) receptors are implicated in the etiology of a variety of psychiatric disorders and are considered attractive drug targets. With the cloning of GABA(B) receptor subunits 13 years ago, substantial progress was made in the understanding of the molecular structure, physiology, and pharmacology of these receptors. However, it remained puzzling that native studies demonstrated a heterogeneity of GABA(B) responses that contrasted with a very limited diversity of cloned GABA(B) receptor subunits. Until recently, the only firmly established molecular diversity consisted of two GABA(B1) subunit isoforms, GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b), which assemble with GABA(B2) subunits to generate heterodimeric GABA(B(1a,2)) and GABA(B(1b,2)) receptors. Using genetic, ultrastructural, biochemical, and electrophysiological approaches, it has been possible to identify functional properties that segregate with these two receptors. Moreover, receptor modifications and factors that can alter the receptor response have been identified. Most importantly, recent data reveal the existence of a family of auxiliary GABA(B) receptor subunits that assemble as tetramers with the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2) subunits and drastically alter pharmacology and kinetics of the receptor response. The data are most consistent with native GABA(B) receptors minimally forming dimeric assemblies of units composed of GABA(B1), GABA(B2), and a tetramer of auxiliary subunits. This represents a substantial departure from current structural concepts for GPCRs.

Heterodimerization of the GABAB receptor-implications for GPCR signaling and drug discovery

The identification of the molecular nature of the GABA(B) receptor and the demonstration of its heterodimeric structure has led to extensive studies investigating the mechanism of activation and signaling. Phylogenetic studies suggest that the formation of the heterodimer is a relatively recent event arising in conjunction with the evolution of the central nervous system. Heterodimerization has now been demonstrated for many other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and plays a role in signaling and trafficking. This presents both challenges and opportunities for GPCR drug discovery. In the case of the GABA(B) receptor the best hope for the development of new drugs directed at this receptor is from allosteric modulators. This chapter summarizes our current understanding of the molecular function of the GABA(B) receptor and recent developments in the identification of allosteric modulators. The broader implication of heterodimerization on GPCR function and drug discovery is also discussed.

Escorts take the lead molecular chaperones as therapeutic targets

The functional and physiological diversity of transmembrane receptors results from factors that influence the pharmacology, signaling, and trafficking of these receptors. Receptor mutations and other modifications may lead to misfolding, intracellular retention, and ineffective signaling of transmembrane receptors. The importance of such mutations is highlighted by the fact that various diseases have been linked to mutations that lead to ineffective signaling of these receptors, resulting from the retention of receptors in intracellular compartments. Studies focused on understanding the regulation of trafficking and cell surface expression of newly synthesized receptors have highlighted molecular chaperones as key regulators of receptor maturation and sorting. In this chapter, we discuss the functions of molecular chaperones in the regulation of seven-transmembrane-containing G-protein-coupled receptor function and trafficking and explore ways in which chaperones can serve as novel therapeutic targets.

Genetic factors and epigenetic factors for autism: endoplasmic reticulum stress and impaired synaptic function

The molecular pathogenesis of ASD (autism spectrum disorder), one of the heritable neurodevelopmental disorders, is not well understood, although over 15 autistic-susceptible gene loci have been extensively studied. A major issue is whether the proteins that these candidate genes encode are involved in general function and signal transduction. Several mutations in genes encoding synaptic adhesion molecules such as neuroligin, neurexin, CNTNAP (contactin-associated protein) and CADM1 (cell-adhesion molecule 1) found in ASD suggest that impaired synaptic function is the underlying pathogenesis. However, knockout mouse models of these mutations do not show all of the autism-related symptoms, suggesting that gain-of-function in addition to loss-of-function arising from these mutations may be associated with ASD pathogenesis. Another finding is that family members with a given mutation frequently do not manifest autistic symptoms, which possibly may be because of gender effects, dominance theory and environmental factors, including hormones and stress. Thus epigenetic factors complicate our understanding of the relationship between these mutated genes and ASD pathogenesis. We focus in the present review on findings that ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress arising from these mutations causes a trafficking disorder of synaptic receptors, such as GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) B-receptors, and leads to their impaired synaptic function and signal transduction. In the present review we propose a hypothesis that ASD pathogenesis is linked not only to loss-of-function but also to gain-of-function, with an ER stress response to unfolded proteins under the influence of epigenetic factors.

GPR37 surface expression enhancement via N-terminal truncation or protein-protein interactions

GPR37, also known as the parkin-associated endothelin-like receptor (Pael-R), is an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that exhibits poor plasma membrane expression when expressed in most cell types. We sought to find ways to enhance GPR37 trafficking to the cell surface to facilitate studies of GPR37 functional activity in heterologous cells. In truncation studies, we found that removing the GPR37 N-terminus (NT) dramatically enhanced the receptor's plasma membrane insertion. Further studies on sequential NT truncations revealed that removal of the first 210 amino acids increased the level of surface expression nearly as much as removal of the entire NT. In studies examining the effects of coexpression of GPR37 with a variety of other GPCRs, we observed significant increases in the level of GPR37 surface expression when the receptor was coexpressed with adenosine receptor A(2A)R or dopamine receptor D(2)R. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that full-length GPR37 and, to a greater extent, the truncated GPR37 were capable of robustly associating with D(2)R, resulting in modestly altered D(2)R affinity for both agonists and antagonists. In studies examining potential interactions of GPR37 with PDZ scaffolds, we observed a specific interaction between GPR37 and syntenin-1, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the level of GPR37 surface expression in HEK-293 cells. These findings reveal three independent approaches (N-terminal truncation, coexpression with other receptors, and coexpression with syntenin-1) by which GPR37 surface trafficking in heterologous cells can be greatly enhanced to facilitate functional studies with this orphan receptor.

Enhancement of the surface expression of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate physiological responses to a diverse array of stimuli and are the molecular targets for numerous therapeutic drugs. GPCRs primarily signal from the plasma membrane, but when expressed in heterologous cells many GPCRs exhibit poor trafficking to the cell surface. Multiple approaches have been taken to enhance GPCR surface expression in heterologous cells, including addition/deletion of receptor sequences, co-expression with interacting proteins, and treatment with pharmacological chaperones. In addition to providing enhanced surface expression of certain GPCRs in heterologous cells, these approaches have also shed light on the control of GPCR trafficking in vivo and in some cases have led to new therapeutic approaches for treating human diseases that result from defects in GPCR trafficking.

Aberrant trafficking of human melanocortin 1 receptor variants associated with red hair and skin cancer: Steady-state retention of mutant forms in the proximal golgi

The melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), a Gs protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) expressed in melanocytes, is a major determinant of skin pigmentation and phototype. MC1R activation stimulates melanogenesis and increases the ratio of black, strongly photoprotective eumelanins to reddish, poorly photoprotective pheomelanins. Several MC1R alleles are associated with red hair, fair skin, increased sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation (the RHC phenotype) and increased skin cancer risk. Three highly penetrant RHC variants, R151C, R160W, and D294H are loss-of-function MC1R mutants with altered cell surface expression. In this study, we show that forward trafficking was normal for D294H. Conversely, export traffic was impaired for R151C, which accumulated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and for R160W, which was enriched in the cis-Golgi. This is the first report of steady-state retention in a post-ER secretory compartment of a GPCR mutant found in the human population. Residues R151 and R160 are located in the MC1R second intracellular loop (il2). Two other mutations in il2, T157A preventing T157 phosphorylation and R162P disrupting a (160)RARR(163) motif, also caused intracellular retention. Moreover, T157 was phosphorylated in wild-type MC1R and a T157D mutation mimicking constitutive phosphorylation allowed normal traffic, and rescued the retention phenotype of R160W and R162P. Therefore, MC1R export is likely regulated by T157 phosphorylation and the (160)RARR(163) arginine-based motif functions as an ER retrieval signal. These elements are conserved in mammalian MC1Rs and in all five types of human melanocortin receptors. Thus, members of this GPCR subfamily might share common mechanisms for regulation of plasma membrane expression.

Dendritic assembly of heteromeric gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor subunits in hippocampal neurons

Understanding the mechanisms that control synaptic efficacy through the availability of neurotransmitter receptors depends on uncovering their specific intracellular trafficking routes. gamma-Aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptors (GABA(B)Rs) are obligatory heteromers present at dendritic excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic sites. It is unknown whether synthesis and assembly of GABA(B)Rs occur in the somatic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) followed by vesicular transport to dendrites or whether somatic synthesis is followed by independent transport of the subunits for assembly and ER export throughout the somatodendritic compartment. To discriminate between these possibilities we studied the association of GABA(B)R subunits in dendrites of hippocampal neurons combining live fluorescence microscopy, biochemistry, quantitative colocalization, and bimolecular fluorescent complementation. We demonstrate that GABA(B)R subunits are segregated and differentially mobile in dendritic intracellular compartments and that a high proportion of non-associated intracellular subunits exist in the brain. Assembled heteromers are preferentially located at the plasma membrane, but blockade of ER exit results in their intracellular accumulation in the cell body and dendrites. We propose that GABA(B)R subunits assemble in the ER and are exported from the ER throughout the neuron prior to insertion at the plasma membrane. Our results are consistent with a bulk flow of segregated subunits through the ER and rule out a post-Golgi vesicular transport of preassembled GABA(B)Rs.

Cellular and subcellular localization of Marlin-1 in the brain

Background

Marlin-1 is a microtubule binding protein that associates specifically with the GABA_B1 subunit in neurons and with members of the Janus kinase family in lymphoid cells. In addition, it binds the molecular motor kinesin-I and nucleic acids, preferentially single stranded RNA. Marlin-1 is expressed mainly in the central nervous system but little is known regarding its cellular and subcellular distribution in the brain.

Results

Here we have studied the localization of Marlin-1 in the rodent brain and cultured neurons combining immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and pre-embedding electron microscopy. We demonstrate that Marlin-1 is enriched in restricted areas of the brain including olfactory bulb, cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum. Marlin-1 is abundant in dendrites and axons of GABAergic and non-GABAergic hippocampal neurons. At the ultrastructural level, Marlin-1 is present in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of CA1 neurons in the hippocampus. In the cytoplasm it associates to microtubules in the dendritic shaft and occasionally with the Golgi apparatus, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and dendritic spines. In the nucleus, clusters of Marlin-1 associate to euchromatin.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that Marlin-1 is expressed in discrete areas of the brain. They also confirm the microtubule association at the ultrastructural level in neurons. Together with the abundance of the protein in dendrites and axons they are consistent with the emerging role of Marlin-1 as an intracellular protein linking the cytoskeleton and transport. Our study constitutes the first detailed description of the cellular and subcellular distribution of Marlin-1 in the brain. As such, it will set the basis for future studies on the functional implications of Marlin-1 in protein trafficking.

The localization of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors on dopaminergic neurons of the human substantia nigra

The substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) is comprised mainly of dopaminergic pigmented neurons arranged in groups, with a small population of nonpigmented neurons scattered among these groups. These different types of neurons possess GABAA, GABAB, and glycine receptors. The SNc-pigmented dopaminergic neurons have postsynaptic GABAA receptors (GABAAR) with a subunit configuration containing alpha3 and gamma2 subunits, with a small population of pigmented neurons containing alpha1 beta2,3 gamma2 subunits. GABAB receptors comprised of R1 and R2 subunits and glycine receptors are also localized on pigmented neurons. In contrast, nonpigmented (mainly parvalbumin positive neurons) located in the SNc are morphologically and neurochemically similar to substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) neurons by showing immunoreactivity for parvalbumin and GABAARs containing immunoreactivity for alpha1, alpha3, beta2,3, and gamma2 subunits as well as GABAB R1 and R2 subunits and glycine receptors. Thus, these two neuronal types of the SNc, either pigmented dopaminergic neurons or nonpigmented parvalbumin positive neurons, have similar GABAB and glycine receptor combinations, but differ mainly in the subunit composition of the GABAARs located on their membranes. The different types of GABAARs suggest that GABAergic inputs to these neuronal types operate through GABAARs with different pharmacological and physiological profiles, whereas GABABR and glycine receptors of these cell types are likely to have similar properties.

GABA-B(1) receptors are coupled to the ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway in the absence of GABA-B(2) subunits

In the current model of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor function, there is a requirement for GABA-B(1/2) heterodimerisation for targetting to the cell surface. However, different lines of evidence suggest that the GABA-B(1) subunit can form a functional receptor in the absence of GABA-B(2). We observed coupling of endogenous GABA-B(1) receptors in the DI-TNC1 glial cell line to the ERK pathway in response to baclofen even though these cells do not express GABA-B(2). GABA-B(1A) receptors were also able to mediate a rapid, transient, and dose-dependent activation of the ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway when transfected alone into HEK 293 cells. The response was abolished by G(i/o) and MEK inhibition, potentiated by inhibitors of phospholipase C and protein kinase C and did not involve PI-3-kinase activity. Finally, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation, we show the existence of homodimeric GABA-B(1A) receptors in transfected HEK293 cells. Altogether, our observations show that GABA-B(1A) receptors are able to activate the ERK1/2 pathway despite the absence of surface targetting partner GABA-B(2) in both HEK 293 cells and the DI-TNC1 cell line.

GISP binding to TSG101 increases GABA receptor stability by down-regulating ESCRT-mediated lysosomal degradation

The neuron-specific G protein-coupled receptor interacting scaffold protein (GISP) is a multidomain, brain-specific protein derived from the A-kinase anchoring protein-9 gene. We originally isolated GISP as an interacting partner for the GABA(B) receptor subunit GABA(B1). Here, we show that the protein tumour susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101), an integral component of the endosomal sorting machinery that targets membrane proteins for lysosomal degradation, also interacts with GISP. TSG101 co-immunoprecipitates with GISP from adult rat brain, and using GST pull-downs, we identified that the eighth coiled-coiled region of GISP is critical for TSG101 association. Intriguingly, although there is no direct interaction between GISP and the GABA(B2) subunit, their co-expression in HEK293 cells increases levels of GABA(B2). GISP also inhibits TSG101-dependent GABA(B2) down-regulation in human embryonic kidney 293 cells whereas over-expression of a mutant GISP lacking the TSG101 binding domain has no effect on GABA(B2) degradation. These data suggest that GISP can function as a negative regulator of TSG101-dependent lysosomal degradation of transmembrane proteins in neurons to promote receptor stability.

Tracking cell surface GABAB receptors using an alpha-bungarotoxin tag

GABA(B) receptors mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system and are important for synaptic plasticity as well as being implicated in disease. Located at pre- and postsynaptic sites, GABA(B) receptors will influence cell excitability, but their effectiveness in doing so will be dependent, in part, on their trafficking to, and stability on, the cell surface membrane. To examine the dynamic behavior of GABA(B) receptors in GIRK cells and neurons, we have devised a method that is based on tagging the receptor with the binding site components for the neurotoxin, alpha-bungarotoxin. By using the alpha-bungarotoxin binding site-tagged GABA(B) R1a subunit (R1a(BBS)), co-expressed with the R2 subunit, we can track receptor mobility using the small reporter, alpha-bungarotoxin-conjugated rhodamine. In this way, the rates of internalization and membrane insertion for these receptors could be measured with fixed and live cells. The results indicate that GABA(B) receptors rapidly turnover in the cell membrane, with the rate of internalization affected by the state of receptor activation. The bungarotoxin-based method of receptor-tagging seems ideally suited to follow the dynamic regulation of other G-protein-coupled receptors.