Selective role of G protein gamma subunits in receptor interaction

Beyond the G protein α subunit: investigating the functional impact of other components of the Gαi3 heterotrimers

BACKGROUND

Specific interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins play a key role in mediating signaling events. While there is little doubt regarding receptor preference for Gα subunits, the preferences for specific Gβ and Gγ subunits and the effects of different Gβγ dimer compositions on GPCR signaling are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the subcellular localization and functional response of Gαi3-based heterotrimers with different combinations of Gβ and Gγ subunits.

METHODS

Live-cell imaging microscopy and colocalization analysis were used to investigate the subcellular localization of Gαi3 in combination with Gβ1 or Gβ2 heterotrimers, along with representative Gγ subunits. Furthermore, fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM-FRET) was used to investigate the nanoscale distribution of Gαi3-based heterotrimers in the plasma membrane, specifically with the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R). In addition, the functional response of the system was assessed by monitoring intracellular cAMP levels and conducting bioinformatics analysis to further characterize the heterotrimer complexes.

RESULTS

Our results show that Gαi3 heterotrimers mainly localize to the plasma membrane, although the degree of colocalization is influenced by the accompanying Gβ and Gγ subunits. Heterotrimers containing Gβ2 showed slightly lower membrane localization compared to those containing Gβ1, but certain combinations, such as Gαi3β2γ8 and Gαi3β2γ10, deviated from this trend. Examination of the spatial arrangement of Gαi3 in relation to D2R and of changes in intracellular cAMP level showed that the strongest functional response is observed for those trimers for which the distance between the receptor and the Gα subunit is smallest, i.e. complexes containing Gβ1 and Gγ8 or Gγ10 subunit. Deprivation of Gαi3 lipid modifications resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of protein present in the cell membrane, but did not always affect intracellular cAMP levels.

CONCLUSION

Our studies show that the composition of G protein heterotrimers has a significant impact on the strength and specificity of GPCR-mediated signaling. Different heterotrimers may exhibit different conformations, which further affects the interactions of heterotrimers and GPCRs, as well as their interactions with membrane lipids. This study contributes to the understanding of the complex signaling mechanisms underlying GPCR-G-protein interactions and highlights the importance of the diversity of Gβ and Gγ subunits in G-protein signaling pathways. Video Abstract.

G protein gamma subunit, a hidden master regulator of GPCR signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins (αβγ subunits) that are activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the biological responses of eukaryotic cells to extracellular signals. The α subunits and the tightly bound βγ subunit complex of G proteins have been extensively studied and shown to control the activity of effector molecules. In contrast, the potential roles of the large family of γ subunits have been less studied. In this review, we focus on present knowledge about these proteins. Induced loss of individual γ subunit types in animal and plant models result in strikingly distinct phenotypes indicating that γ subtypes play important and specific roles. Consistent with these findings, downregulation or upregulation of particular γ subunit types result in various types of cancers. Clues about the mechanistic basis of γ subunit function have emerged from imaging the dynamic behavior of G protein subunits in living cells. This shows that in the basal state, G proteins are not constrained to the plasma membrane but shuttle between membranes and on receptor activation βγ complexes translocate reversibly to internal membranes. The translocation kinetics of βγ complexes varies widely and is determined by the membrane affinity of the associated γ subtype. On translocating, some βγ complexes act on effectors in internal membranes. The variation in translocation kinetics determines differential sensitivity and adaptation of cells to external signals. Membrane affinity of γ subunits is thus a parsimonious and elegant mechanism that controls information flow to internal cell membranes while modulating signaling responses.

Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit information to the cell interior by transducing external signals to heterotrimeric G protein subunits, Gα and Gβγ subunits, localized on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. Though the initial focus was mainly on Gα-mediated events, Gβγ subunits were later identified as major contributors to GPCR-G protein signalling. A broad functional array of Gβγ signalling has recently been attributed to Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity, comprising 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subtypes, respectively. In addition to displaying selectivity towards each other to form the Gβγ dimer, numerous studies have identified preferences of distinct Gβγ combinations for specific GPCRs, Gα subtypes and effector molecules. Importantly, Gβ and Gγ subtype-dependent regulation of downstream effectors, representing a diverse range of signalling pathways and physiological functions have been found. Here, we review the literature on the repercussions of Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity on direct and indirect regulation of GPCR/G protein signalling events and their physiological outcomes. Our discussion additionally provides perspective in understanding the intricacies underlying molecular regulation of subtype-specific roles of Gβγ signalling and associated diseases.

Gγ and Gα Identity Dictate a G-Protein Heterotrimer Plasma Membrane Targeting

Heterotrimeric G-proteins along with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate many biochemical functions by relaying the information from the plasma membrane to the inside of the cell. The lipid modifications of Gα and Gγ subunits, together with the charged regions on the membrane interaction surface, provide a peculiar pattern for various heterotrimeric complexes. In a previous study, we found that Gαs and Gαi3 prefer different types of membrane-anchor and subclass-specific lipid domains. In the present report, we examine the role of distinct Gγ subunits in the membrane localization and spatiotemporal dynamics of Gαs and Gαi3 heterotrimers. We characterized lateral diffusion and G-protein subunit interactions in living cells using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) detected by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), respectively. The interaction of Gγ subunits with specific lipids was confirmed, and thus the modulation of heterotrimeric G-protein localization. However, the Gα subunit also modulates trimer localization, and so the membrane distribution of heterotrimeric G-proteins is not dependent on Gγ only.

The in vivo specificity of synaptic Gβ and Gγ subunits to the α2a adrenergic receptor at CNS synapses

G proteins are major transducers of signals from G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are made up of α, β, and γ subunits, with 16 Gα, 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits. Though much is known about the specificity of Gα subunits, the specificity of Gβγs activated by a given GPCR and that activate each effector in vivo is not known. Here, we examined the in vivo Gβγ specificity of presynaptic α_2a-adrenergic receptors (α_2aARs) in both adrenergic (auto-α_2aARs) and non-adrenergic neurons (hetero-α_2aARs) for the first time. With a quantitative MRM proteomic analysis of neuronal Gβ and Gγ subunits, and co-immunoprecipitation of tagged α_2aARs from mouse models including transgenic FLAG-α_2aARs and knock-in HA-α_2aARs, we investigated the in vivo specificity of Gβ and Gγ subunits to auto-α_2aARs and hetero-α_2aARs activated with epinephrine to understand the role of Gβγ specificity in diverse physiological functions such as anesthetic sparing, and working memory enhancement. We detected Gβ₂, Gγ₂, Gγ₃, and Gγ₄ with activated auto α_2aARs, whereas we found Gβ₄ and Gγ₁₂ preferentially interacted with activated hetero-α_2aARs. Further understanding of in vivo Gβγ specificity to various GPCRs offers new insights into the multiplicity of genes for Gβ and Gγ, and the mechanisms underlying GPCR signaling through Gβγ subunits.

GPCR regulation of secretion

Modulation of neurotransmitter exocytosis by activated Gi/o coupled G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a universal regulatory mechanism used both to avoid overstimulation and to influence circuitry. One of the known modulation mechanisms is the interaction between Gβγ and the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNAREs). There are 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits, but specific Gβγs activated by a given GPCR and the specificity to effectors, such as SNARE, in vivo are not known. Although less studied, Gβγ binding to the exocytic fusion machinery (i.e. SNARE) provides a more direct regulatory mechanism for neurotransmitter release. Here, we review some recent insights in the architecture of the synaptic terminal, modulation of synaptic transmission, and implications of G protein modulation of synaptic transmission in diseases. Numerous presynaptic proteins are involved in the architecture of synaptic terminals, particularly the active zone, and their importance in the regulation of exocytosis is still not completely understood. Further understanding of the Gβγ-SNARE interaction and the architecture and mechanisms of exocytosis may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets to help patients with various disorders such as hypertension, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and acute/chronic pain.

Impaired thromboxane receptor dimerization reduces signaling efficiency: A potential mechanism for reduced platelet function in vivo

Thromboxane A₂ is a potent mediator of inflammation and platelet aggregation exerting its effects through the activation of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), termed TP. Although the existence of dimers/oligomers in Class A GPCRs is widely accepted, their functional significance still remains controversial. Recently, we have shown that TPα and TPβ homo-/hetero-dimers interact through an interface of residues in transmembrane domain 1 (TM1) whose disruption impairs dimer formation. Here, biochemical and pharmacological characterization of this dimer deficient mutant (DDM) in living cells indicates a significant impairment in its response to agonists. Interestingly, two single loss-of-function TPα variants, namely W29C and N42S recently identified in two heterozygous patients affected by bleeding disorders, match some of the residues mutated in our DDM. These two naturally occurring variants display a reduced potency to TP agonists and are characterized by impaired dimer formation in transfected HEK-293T cells. These findings provide proofs that lack of homo-dimer formation is a crucial process for reduced TPα function in vivo, and might represent one molecular mechanism through which platelet TPα receptor dysfunction affects the patient(s) carrying these mutations.

Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions

BACKGROUND

The details of the functional interaction between G proteins and the G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been subjected to extensive investigations with structural and functional assays and a large number of computational studies.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The nature and sites of interaction in the G-protein/GPCR complexes, and the specificities of these interactions selecting coupling partners among the large number of families of GPCRs and G protein forms, are still poorly defined.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Many of the contact sites between the two proteins in specific complexes have been identified, but the three dimensional molecular architecture of a receptor-Gα interface is only known for one pair. Consequently, many fundamental questions regarding this macromolecular assembly and its mechanism remain unanswered.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

In the context of current structural data we review the structural details of the interfaces and recognition sites in complexes of sub-family A GPCRs with cognate G-proteins, with special emphasis on the consequences of activation on GPCR structure, the prevalence of preassembled GPCR/G-protein complexes, the key structural determinants for selective coupling and the possible involvement of GPCR oligomerization in this process.

Central and C-terminal domains of heterotrimeric G protein gamma subunits differentially influence the signaling necessary for primordial germ cell migration

Heterotrimeric G protein signaling is involved in many pathways essential to development including those controlling cell migration, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. One key developmental event known to rely on proper heterotrimeric G protein signaling is primordial germ cell (PGC) migration. We previously developed an in vivo PGC migration assay that identified differences in the signaling capacity of G protein gamma subunits. In this study we developed Gγ subunit chimeras to determine the regions of Gγ isoforms that are responsible for these differences. The central section of the Gγ subunit was found to be necessary for the ability of a Gγ subunit to mediate signaling involved in PGC migration. Residues found in the carboxy-terminal segment of Gγ transducin (gngt1) were found to be responsible for the ability of this subunit to disrupt PGC migration. The type of prenylation did not affect the ability of a Gγ subunit to reverse prenylation-deficient-Gγ-induced PGC migration defects. However, a version of gng2, engineered to be farnesylated instead of geranylgeranylated, still lacks the ability to reverse PGC migration defects known to result from treatment of zebrafish with geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitors (GGTI), supporting the notion that Gγ subunits are one of several protein targets that need to be geranylgeranylated to orchestrate the proper long-range migration of PGCs.

G protein subunit dissociation and translocation regulate cellular response to receptor stimulation

We examined the role of G proteins in modulating the response of living cells to receptor activation. The response of an effector, phospholipase C-β to M3 muscarinic receptor activation was measured using sensors that detect the generation of inositol triphosphate or diacylglycerol. The recently discovered translocation of Gβγ from plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation attenuated this response. A FRET based G protein sensor suggested that in contrast to translocating Gβγ, non-translocating Gβγ subunits do not dissociate from the αq subunit on receptor activation leading to prolonged retention of the heterotrimer state and an accentuated response. M3 receptors with tethered αq induced differential responses to receptor activation in cells with or without an endogenous translocation capable γ subunit. G protein heterotrimer dissociation and βγ translocation are thus unanticipated modulators of the intensity of a cell's response to an extracellular signal.

Prenylation-deficient G protein gamma subunits disrupt GPCR signaling in the zebrafish

Prenylation of G protein gamma (gamma) subunits is necessary for the membrane localization of heterotrimeric G proteins and for functional heterotrimeric G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. To evaluate GPCR signaling pathways during development, we injected zebrafish embryos with mRNAs encoding Ggamma subunits mutated so that they can no longer be prenylated. Low-level expression of these prenylation-deficient Ggamma subunits driven either ubiquitously or specifically in the primordial germ cells (PGCs) disrupts GPCR signaling and manifests as a PGC migration defect. This disruption results in a reduction of calcium accumulation in the protrusions of migrating PGCs and a failure of PGCs to directionally migrate. When co-expressed with a prenylation-deficient Ggamma, 8 of the 17 wildtype Ggamma isoforms individually confer the ability to restore calcium accumulation and directional migration. These results suggest that while the Ggamma subunits possess the ability to interact with G Beta (beta) proteins, only a subset of wildtype Ggamma proteins are stable within PGCs and can interact with key signaling components necessary for PGC migration. This in vivo study highlights the functional redundancy of these signaling components and demonstrates that prenylation-deficient Ggamma subunits are an effective tool to investigate the roles of GPCR signaling events during vertebrate development.

Shuttling and translocation of heterotrimeric G proteins and Ras

Heterotrimeric G proteins (alphabetagamma) and Ras proteins are activated by cell-surface receptors that sense extracellular signals. Both sets of proteins were traditionally thought to be constrained to the plasma membrane and some intracellular membranes. Live-cell-imaging experiments have now shown that these proteins are mobile inside a cell, shuttling continually between the plasma membrane and intracellular membranes in the basal state, maintaining these proteins in dynamic equilibrium in different membrane compartments. Furthermore, on receptor activation, a family of G protein betagamma subunits translocates rapidly and reversibly to the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum enabling direct communication between the extracellular signal and intracellular membranes. A member of the Ras family has similarly been shown to translocate on activation. Although the impact of this unexpected intracellular movement of signaling proteins on cell physiology is likely to be distinct, there are striking similarities in the properties of these two families of signal-transducing proteins.

Structural determinants involved in the formation and activation of G protein betagamma dimers

Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of an alpha, beta and gamma subunit, represent one of the most important and dynamic families of signaling proteins. As a testament to the significance of G protein signaling, the hundreds of seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors that interact with G proteins are estimated to occupy 1-2% of the human genome. This broad diversity of receptors is echoed in the number of potential heterotrimer combinations that can arise from the 23 alpha subunit, 7 beta subunit and 12 gamma subunit isoforms that have been identified. The potential for such vast complexity implies that the receptor G protein interface is the site of much regulation. The historical model for the activation of a G protein holds that activated receptor catalyzes the exchange of GDP for GTP on the alpha subunit, inducing a conformational change that substantially lowers the affinity of alpha for betagamma. This decreased affinity enables dissociation of betagamma from alpha and receptor. The free form of betagamma is thought to activate effectors, until the hydrolysis of GTP by G alpha (aided by RGS proteins) allows the subunits to re-associate, effectively deactivating the G protein until another interaction with activated receptor.

Structure of the parathyroid hormone receptor C terminus bound to the G-protein dimer Gbeta1gamma2

A critical role of the Gbetagamma dimer in heterotrimeric G-protein signaling is to facilitate the engagement and activation of the Galpha subunit by cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors. However, high-resolution structural information of the connectivity between receptor and the Gbetagamma dimer has not previously been available. Here, we describe the structural determinants of Gbeta1gamma2 in complex with a C-terminal region of the parathyroid hormone receptor-1 (PTH1R) as obtained by X-ray crystallography. The structure reveals that several critical residues within PTH1R contact only Gbeta residues located within the outer edge of WD1- and WD7-repeat segments of the Gbeta toroid structure. These regions encompass a predicted membrane-facing region of Gbeta thought to be oriented in a fashion that is accessible to the membrane-spanning receptor. Mutation of key receptor contact residues on Gbeta1 leads to a selective loss of function in receptor/heterotrimer coupling while preserving Gbeta1gamma2 activation of the effector phospholipase-C beta.

Membrane signalling complexes: implications for development of functionally selective ligands modulating heptahelical receptor signalling

Technological development has considerably changed the way in which we evaluate drug efficacy and has led to a conceptual revolution in pharmacological theory. In particular, molecular resolution assays have revealed that heptahelical receptors may adopt multiple active conformations with unique signalling properties. It is therefore becoming widely accepted that ligand ability to stabilize receptor conformations with distinct signalling profiles may allow to direct the stimulus generated by an activated receptor towards a specific signalling pathway. This capacity to induce only a subset of the ensemble of responses regulated by a given receptor has been termed "functional selectivity" (or "stimulus trafficking"), and provides the bases for a highly specific regulation of receptor signalling. Concomitant with these observations, heptahelical receptors have been shown to associate with G proteins and effectors to form multimeric arrays. These complexes are constitutively formed during protein synthesis and are targeted to the cell surface as integral signalling units. Herein we summarize evidence supporting the existence of such constitutive signalling arrays and analyze the possibility that they may constitute viable targets for developing ligands with "functional selectivity".

How do receptors activate G proteins?

Heterotrimeric G proteins couple the activation of heptahelical receptors at the cell surface to the intracellular signaling cascades that mediate the physiological responses to extracellular stimuli. G proteins are molecular switches that are activated by receptor-catalyzed GTP for GDP exchange on the G protein alpha subunit, which is the rate-limiting step in the activation of all downstream signaling. Despite the important biological role of the receptor-G protein interaction, relatively little is known about the structure of the complex and how it leads to nucleotide exchange. This chapter will describe what is known about receptor and G protein structure and outline a strategy for assembling the current data into improved models for the receptor-G protein complex that will hopefully answer the question as to how receptors flip the G protein switch.

Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric G proteins have a crucial role as molecular switches in signal transduction pathways mediated by G-protein-coupled receptors. Extracellular stimuli activate these receptors, which then catalyse GTP-GDP exchange on the G protein alpha-subunit. The complex series of interactions and conformational changes that connect agonist binding to G protein activation raise various interesting questions about the structure, biomechanics, kinetics and specificity of signal transduction across the plasma membrane.

A family of G protein βγ subunits translocate reversibly from the plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation

The present model of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors exclusively localizes their activation and function to the plasma membrane (PM). Observation of the spatiotemporal response of G protein subunits in a living cell to receptor activation showed that 6 of the 12 members of the G protein gamma subunit family translocate specifically from the PM to endomembranes. The gamma subunits translocate as betagamma complexes, whereas the alpha subunit is retained on the PM. Depending on the gamma subunit, translocation occurs predominantly to the Golgi complex or the endoplasmic reticulum. The rate of translocation also varies with the gamma subunit type. Different gamma subunits, thus, confer distinct spatiotemporal properties to translocation. A striking relationship exists between the amino acid sequences of various gamma subunits and their translocation properties. gamma subunits with similar translocation properties are more closely related to each other. Consistent with this relationship, introducing residues conserved in translocating subunits into a non-translocating subunit results in a gain of function. Inhibitors of vesicle-mediated trafficking and palmitoylation suggest that translocation is diffusion-mediated and controlled by acylation similar to the shuttling of G protein subunits (Chisari, M., Saini, D. K., Kalyanaraman, V., and Gautam, N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24092-24098). These results suggest that the continual testing of cytosolic surfaces of cell membranes by G protein subunits facilitates an activated cell surface receptor to direct potentially active G protein betagamma subunits to intracellular membranes.

Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins: current structural insights

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) serve as catalytic activators of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Galphabetagamma) by exchanging GTP for the bound GDP on the Galpha subunit. This guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity of GPCRs is the initial step in the G-protein cycle and determines the onset of various intracellular signaling pathways that govern critical physiological responses to extracellular cues. Although the structural basis for many steps in the G-protein nucleotide cycle have been made clear over the past decade, the precise mechanism for receptor-mediated G-protein activation remains incompletely defined. Given that these receptors have historically represented a set of rich drug targets, a more complete understanding of their mechanism of action should provide further avenues for drug discovery. Several models have been proposed to explain the communication between activated GPCRs and Galphabetagamma leading to the structural changes required for guanine nucleotide exchange. This review is focused on the structural biology of G-protein signal transduction with an emphasis on the current hypotheses regarding Galphabetagamma activation. We highlight several recent results shedding new light on the structural changes in Galpha that may underlie GDP release.

Runx-dependent regulation of G-protein gamma3 expression in T-cells

Heterotrimeric G-proteins control diverse biological processes by conveying signals from seven-transmembrane receptors to intracellular effectors. Although their signaling roles were originally ascribed to their GTP-bound alpha-subunits, more recent evidence points to the equally active roles played by their betagamma-dimers. To elucidate the individual contributions of their gamma-subtypes, we used a gene targeting approach to show that mice lacking the gamma3-subtype display a defective T-cell dependent immune response. To identify the cellular basis for this defect, we demonstrated that gamma3-mRNA is strongly induced in activated CD4+ T-cells. To determine the mechanism for this regulated expression, we used several strategies to identify the importance of a Runx consensus sequence element in the first intron of the gamma3 gene and the Runx1 protein. Overall, these data provide the first genetic evidence for the tight regulation and involvement of the G protein gamma3-subtype in mounting an effective immune response in mice.

Analysis of G protein betagamma dimer formation in live cells using multicolor bimolecular fluorescence complementation demonstrates preferences of beta1 for particular gamma subunits

The specificity of G protein betagamma signaling demonstrated by in vivo knockouts is greater than expected based on in vitro assays of betagamma function. In this study, we investigated the basis for this discrepancy by comparing the abilities of seven beta1gamma complexes containing gamma1, gamma2, gamma5, gamma7, gamma10, gamma11, or gamma12 to interact with alphas and of these gamma subunits to compete for interaction with beta1 in live human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. betagamma complexes were imaged using bimolecular fluorescence complementation, in which fluorescence is produced by two nonfluorescent fragments (N and C) of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) when brought together by proteins fused to each fragment. Plasma membrane targeting of alphas-CFP varied inversely with its expression level, and the abilities of YFP-N-beta1YFP-C-gamma complexes to increase this targeting varied by 2-fold or less. However, there were larger differences in the abilities of the CFP-N-gamma subunits to compete for association with CFP-C-beta1. When the intensities of coexpressed CFP-C-beta1CFP-N-gamma (cyan) and CFP-C-beta1YFP-N-gamma2 (yellow) complexes were compared under conditions in which CFP-C-beta1 was limiting, the CFP-N-gamma subunits exhibited a 4.5-fold range in their abilities to compete with YFP-N-gamma2 for association with CFP-C-beta1. CFP-N-gamma12 and CFP-N-gamma1 were the strongest and weakest competitors, respectively. Taken together with previous demonstrations of a role for betagamma in the specificity of receptor signaling, these results suggest that differences in the association preferences of coexpressed beta and gamma subunits for each other can determine which complexes predominate and participate in signaling pathways in intact cells.

A G protein gamma subunit peptide stabilizes a novel muscarinic receptor state

A prenylated peptide specific to the C terminal tail of a G protein gamma subunit type, gamma5, inhibits activation of a G protein by the M2 muscarinic receptor. The gamma5 peptide was tested for direct effects on the M2 receptor's properties. The wild type gamma5 peptide reduced the affinity of M2 for the agonist, carbachol, more than 5-fold in an antagonist displacement assay. The peptide was inactive when its amino acid sequence was scrambled or when it was unprenylated. Although the wild type peptide reduced the affinity of M2 for the antagonist QNB, it had no effect on the antagonists NMS or atropine. These results suggest that in the presence of the peptide the M2 receptor adopts a novel conformational state that affects the ligand binding surface. The results also suggest that the G protein gamma5 subunit tail interacts with a receptor.

Gialpha and Gbeta subunits both define selectivity of G protein activation by alpha2-adrenergic receptors

Previous studies of the specificity of receptor interactions with G protein subunits in living cells have relied on measurements of second messengers or other downstream responses. We have examined the selectivity of interactions between alpha2-adrenergic receptors (alpha2R) and various combinations of Gialpha and Gbeta subunit isoforms by measuring changes in FRET between Gialpha-yellow fluorescent protein and cyan fluorescent protein-Gbeta chimeras in HeLa cells. All combinations of Gialpha1, -2, or -3 with Gbeta1, -2, or -4 were activated to some degree by endogenous alpha2Rs as judged by agonist-dependent decreases in FRET. The degree of G protein activation is determined by the combination of Gialpha and Gbeta subunits rather than by the identity of an individual subunit. RT-PCR analysis and small interfering RNA knockdown of alpha2R subtypes, followed by quantification of radiolabeled antagonist binding, demonstrated that HeLa cells express alpha2a- and alpha2b-adrenergic receptor isoforms in a 2:1 ratio. Increasing receptor number by overexpression of the alpha2aR subtype minimized the differences among coupling preferences for Gialpha and Gbeta isoforms. The molecular properties of each Gialpha, Gbeta, and alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype influence signaling efficiency for the alpha2-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling pathway.

Regions in the G Protein γ Subunit Important for Interaction with Receptors and Effectors

G betagamma dimers containing the gamma11 or gamma1 subunits are often less potent and effective in their ability to regulate effectors compared with dimers containing the gamma2 subunit. To explore the regions of the gamma subunit that affect the activity of the betagamma dimer, we constructed eight chimeric gamma subunits from the gamma1 and gamma2 subunits. Two chimeras were made in which the N-terminal regions of gamma1 and gamma2 were exchanged and two in which the C-terminal regions were transposed. Another set of chimeras was made in which the CAAX motifs of the chimeras were altered to direct modification with different prenyl groups. All eight gamma chimeras were expressed in Sf9 cells with the beta1 subunit, G betagamma dimers were purified, and then they were assayed in vitro for their ability to bind to the G alpha(i1) subunit, to couple G alpha(i1) to the A1 adenosine receptor, to stimulate phospholipase C-beta, and to regulate type I or type II adenyl cyclases. Dimers containing the C-terminal sequence of the gamma2 subunit modified with the geranylgeranyl lipid had the highest affinity for G(i1)alpha (range, 0.5-1.2 nM) and were most effective at coupling the G(i1)alpha subunit to receptor. These dimers were most effective at stimulating the phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-beta isoform and inhibiting type I adenyl cyclase. In contrast, betagamma dimers containing the N-terminal sequence of the gamma2 subunit and a geranylgeranyl group are most effective at activating type II adenyl cyclase. The results indicate that both the N- and C-terminal regions of the gamma subunit impart specificity to receptor and effector interactions.

Differential Sensitivity of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase p110γ to Isoforms of G Protein βγ Dimers

The ability of G protein alpha and betagamma subunits to activate the p110gamma isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PtdIns 3-kinase) was examined using pure, recombinant G proteins and the p101/p110gamma form of PtdIns 3-kinase reconstituted into synthetic lipid vesicles. GTP-activated Gs, Gi, Gq, or Go alpha subunits were unable to activate PtdIns 3-kinase. Dimers containing Gbeta(1-4) complexed with gamma2-stimulated PtdIns 3-kinase activity about 26-fold with EC50 values ranging from 4 to 7 nm. Gbeta5gamma2 was not able to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase despite producing a 10-fold activation of avian phospholipase Cbeta. A series of dimers with beta subunits containing point mutations in the amino acids that undergo a conformational change upon interaction of betagamma with phosducin (beta1H311Agamma2, beta1R314Agamma2, and beta1W332Agamma2) was tested, and only beta1W332Agamma2 inhibited the ability of the dimer to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase. Dimers containing the beta1 subunit complexed with a panel of different Ggamma subunits displayed variation in their ability to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase. The beta1gamma2, beta1gamma10, beta1gamma12, and beta1gamma13 dimers all activated PtdIns 3-kinase about 26-fold with 4-25 nm EC50 values. The beta1gamma11 dimer, which contains the farnesyl isoprenoid group and is highly expressed in tissues containing the p101/p110gamma form of PtdIns 3-kinase, was ineffective. The role of the prenyl group on the gamma subunit in determining the activation of PtdIns 3-kinase was examined using gamma subunits with altered CAAX boxes directing the addition of farnesyl to the gamma2 subunit and geranylgeranyl to the gamma1 and gamma11 subunits. Replacement of the geranylgeranyl group of the gamma2 subunit with farnesyl inhibited the activity of beta1gamma2 on PtdIns 3-kinase. Conversely, replacement of the farnesyl group on the gamma1 and gamma11 subunit with geranylgeranyl restored almost full activity. These findings suggest that all beta subunits, with the exception of beta5, interact equally well with PtdIns 3-kinase. In contrast, the composition of the gamma subunit and its prenyl group markedly affects the ability of the betagamma dimer to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase.

Live cell imaging of Gs and the beta2-adrenergic receptor demonstrates that both alphas and beta1gamma7 internalize upon stimulation and exhibit similar trafficking patterns that differ from that of the beta2-adrenergic receptor

To visualize and investigate the regulation of the localization patterns of Gs and an associated receptor during cell signaling, we produced functional fluorescent fusion proteins and imaged them in HEK-293 cells. alphas-CFP, with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) inserted into an internal loop of alphas, localized to the plasma membrane and exhibited similar receptor-mediated activity to that of alphas. Functional fluorescent beta1gamma7 dimers were produced by fusing an amino-terminal yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fragment to beta1 (YFP-N-beta1) and a carboxyl-terminal YFP fragment to gamma7 (YFP-C-gamma7). When expressed together, YFP-N-beta1 and YFP-C-gamma7 produced fluorescent signals in the plasma membrane that were not seen when the subunits were expressed separately. Isoproterenol stimulation of cells co-expressing alphas-CFP, YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7, and the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) resulted in internalization of both fluorescent signals from the plasma membrane. Initially, alphas-CFP and YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7 stained the cytoplasm diffusely, and subsequently they co-localized on vesicles that exhibited minimal overlap with beta2AR-labeled vesicles. Moreover, internalization of beta2AR-GFP, but not alphas-CFP or YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7, was inhibited by a fluorescent dominant negative dynamin 1 mutant, Dyn1(K44A)-mRFP, indicating that the Gs subunits and beta2AR utilize different internalization mechanisms. Subsequent trafficking of the Gs subunits and beta2AR also differed in that vesicles labeled with the Gs subunits exhibited less overlap with RhoB-labeled endosomes and greater overlap with Rab11-labeled endosomes. Because Rab11 regulates traffic through recycling endosomes, co-localization of alphas and beta1gamma7 on these endosomes may indicate a means of recycling specific alphasbetagamma combinations to the plasma membrane.

Functional genomic dissection of multimeric protein families in zebrafish

The study of multimeric protein function in the postgenomicera has become complicated by the discovery of multiple isoforms for each subunit of those proteins. A correspondingly large number of potential isoform combinations offer the multicellular organism a constellation of protein assemblies from which to generate a variety of functions across different cells, tissues, and organs. At the same time, the multiplicity of potential subunit isoform combinations presents a significant challenge when attempting to dissect the functions of particular isoform combinations. Biochemical and cell culture methods have brought us to a significant state of understanding of multimeric proteins but are unable to answer questions of function within the context of the many tissues and developmental stages of the multicellular organism. Answering those questions can be greatly facilitated in model systems in which expression can be determined over time, in the context of the whole organism, and in which hypomorphic function of each subunit can be studied individually and in combination. Fortunately, the potential for high-throughput in situ hybridization studies and antisense-based reverse genetic knockdowns in zebrafish offers exciting opportunities to meet this challenge. Some of these opportunities, along with cautions of interpretation and gaps in the existing technologies, are discussed in the context of ongoing investigations of the dimeric Na,K-ATPases and heterotrimeric G proteins.

Visualization of G protein betagamma dimers using bimolecular fluorescence complementation demonstrates roles for both beta and gamma in subcellular targeting

To investigate the role of subcellular localization in regulating the specificity of G protein betagamma signaling, we have applied the strategy of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize betagamma dimers in vivo. We fused an amino-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to beta and a carboxyl-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to gamma. When expressed together, these two proteins produced a fluorescent signal in human embryonic kidney 293 cells that was not obtained with either subunit alone. Fluorescence was dependent on betagamma assembly in that it was not obtained using beta2 and gamma1, which do not form a functional dimer. In addition to assembly, BiFC betagamma complexes were functional as demonstrated by more specific plasma membrane labeling than was obtained with individually tagged fluorescent beta and gamma subunits and by their abilities to potentiate activation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha(s) in COS-7 cells. To investigate isoform-dependent targeting specificity, the localization patterns of dimers formed by pair-wise combinations of three different beta subunits with three different gamma subunits were compared. BiFC betagamma complexes containing either beta1 or beta2 localized to the plasma membrane, whereas those containing beta5 accumulated in the cytosol or on intracellular membranes. These results indicate that the beta subunit can direct trafficking of the gamma subunit. Taken together with previous observations, these results show that the G protein alpha, beta, and gamma subunits all play roles in targeting each other. This method of specifically visualizing betagamma dimers will have many applications in sorting out roles for particular betagamma complexes in a wide variety of cell types.

The C-terminal tail preceding the CAAX box of a yeast G protein gamma subunit is dispensable for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo

The gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are required for receptor-G protein coupling. The C-terminal domains of Ggamma subunits can contact receptors and influence the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling in vitro. However, it is unknown whether receptor interaction with the C terminus of Ggamma is required for signaling in vivo. To address this question, we cloned Ggamma homologs with diverged C-terminal sequences from five species of budding yeast. Each Ggamma homolog functionally replaced the Ggamma subunit of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (STE18 gene product). Mutagenesis of S. cerevisiae Ste18 likewise indicated that specific C-terminal sequence motifs are not required for signaling. Strikingly, an internal in-frame deletion removing sequences preceding the C-terminal CAAX box of Ste18 did not impair signaling by either of its cognate G protein-coupled pheromone receptors. Therefore, receptor interaction with the C-terminal domain of yeast Ggamma is not required for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo. Because the mechanism of G protein activation by receptors is conserved from yeast to humans, mammalian receptors may not require interaction with the tail of Ggamma for G protein activation in vivo. However, receptor-Ggamma interaction may modulate the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling or promote activation of Gbetagamma effectors that co-cluster with receptors.

Loss of G protein gamma 7 alters behavior and reduces striatal alpha(olf) level and cAMP production

The G protein beta gamma-dimer is required for receptor interaction and effector regulation. However, previous approaches have not identified the physiologic roles of individual subtypes in these processes. We used a gene knockout approach to demonstrate a unique role for the G protein gamma(7)-subunit in mice. Notably, deletion of Gng7 caused behavioral changes that were associated with reductions in the alpha(olf)-subunit content and adenylyl cyclase activity of the striatum. These data demonstrate that an individual gamma-subunit contributes to the specificity of a given signaling pathway and controls the formation or stability of a particular G protein heterotrimer.

Activation of G-protein Galpha subunits by receptors through Galpha-Gbeta and Galpha-Ggamma interactions

Activation of the Galpha subunit of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins by transmembrane receptors requires the propagation of structural signals from the receptor-binding site to the nucleotide-binding site at the opposite side of the protein. In a previous model, it was suggested that the Gbeta-Ggamma dimer is tilted away from Galpha by a lever-arm motion of the Galpha N-terminal helix. Here, we propose that the motion occurs in the opposite direction, close-packing the Galpha-Gbeta interface and creating a novel interface between the helical domain of Galpha and the N terminus of Ggamma, which determines the specificity of activation.

Cross signaling, cell specificity, and physiology

The literature on intracellular signal transduction presents a confusing picture: every regulatory factor appears to be regulated by all signal transduction cascades and to regulate all cell processes. This contrasts with the known exquisite specificity of action of extracellular signals in different cell types in vivo. The confusion of the in vitro literature is shown to arise from several causes: the inevitable artifacts inherent in reductionism, the arguments used to establish causal effect relationships, the use of less than adequate models (cell lines, transfections, acellular systems, etc.), and the implicit assumption that networks of regulations are universal whereas they are in fact cell and stage specific. Cell specificity results from the existence in any cell type of a unique set of proteins and their isoforms at each level of signal transduction cascades, from the space structure of their components, from their combinatorial logic at each level, from the presence of modulators of signal transduction proteins and of modulators of modulators, from the time structure of extracellular signals and of their transduction, and from quantitative differences of expression of similar sets of factors.

G protein specificity: traffic direction required

This review focuses on the coupling specificity of the Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G(i/o) proteins that mediate diverse signaling pathways, including regulation of ion channels and other effectors. Several lines of evidence indicate that specific combinations of G protein alpha, beta and gamma subunits are required for different receptors or receptor-effector networks, and that a higher degree of specificity for Galpha and Gbetagamma is observed in intact systems than reported in vitro. The structural determinants of receptor-G protein specificity remain incompletely understood, and involve receptor-G protein interaction domains, and perhaps other scaffolding processes. By identifying G protein specificity for individual receptor signaling pathways, ligands targeted to disrupt individual pathways of a given receptor could be developed.

Gbetagamma affinity for bovine rhodopsin is determined by the carboxyl-terminal sequences of the gamma subunit

Two native betagamma dimers, beta(1)gamma(1) and beta(1)gamma(2), display very different affinities for receptors. Since these gamma subunits differ in both primary structure and isoprenoid modification, we examined the relative contributions of each to Gbetagamma interaction with receptors. We constructed baculoviruses encoding gamma(1) and gamma(2) subunits with altered CAAX (where A is an aliphatic amino acid) motifs to direct alternate or no prenylation of the gamma chains and a set of gamma(1) and gamma(2) chimeras with the gamma(2) CAAX motif at the carboxyl terminus. All the gamma constructs coexpressed with beta(1) in Sf9 cells yielded beta(1)gamma dimers, which were purified to near homogeneity, and their affinities for receptors and Galpha were quantitatively determined. Whereas alteration of the isoprenoid of gamma(1) from farnesyl to geranylgeranyl and of gamma(2) from geranylgeranyl to farnesyl had no impact on the affinities of beta(1)gamma dimers for Galpha(t), the non-prenylated beta(1)gamma(2) dimer had significantly diminished affinity. Altered prenylation resulted in a <2-fold decrease in affinity of the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer for rhodopsin and a <3-fold change for the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. In each case with identical isoprenylation, the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer displayed significantly greater affinity for rhodopsin compared with the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. Furthermore, dimers containing chimeric Ggamma chains with identical geranylgeranyl modification displayed rhodopsin affinities largely determined by the carboxyl-terminal one-third of the protein. These results indicate that isoprenoid modification of the Ggamma subunit is essential for binding to both Galpha and receptors. The isoprenoid type influences the binding affinity for receptors, but not for Galpha. Finally, the primary structure of the Ggamma subunit provides a major contribution to receptor binding of Gbetagamma, with the carboxyl-terminal sequence conferring receptor selectivity.

G protein gamma subunit interaction with a receptor regulates receptor-stimulated nucleotide exchange

The surfaces of heterotrimeric G proteins (alphabetagamma) in contact with receptors and the molecular events at these sites, which lead to G protein activation, are largely unknown. We show here that a peptide from the C terminus of a G protein gamma subunit blocks muscarinic receptor-stimulated G protein activation in a sequence-dependent fashion. A G protein mutated at the same site on the gamma subunit shows enhanced receptor stimulated nucleotide exchange without affecting G protein heterotrimerization. Ineffective contact between the gamma subunit and receptor increases the rate of receptor-stimulated nucleotide exchange. Specific interaction of the G protein gamma subunit with the receptor thus helps the betagamma complex to act at a distance and control guanine nucleotide exchange in the alpha subunit.

Receptor-G protein gamma specificity: gamma11 shows unique potency for A(1) adenosine and 5-HT(1A) receptors

G protein coupled receptors activate signal transducing guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which consist of an alpha subunit and a betagamma dimer. Whole cell studies have reported that receptors signal through specific betagamma subtypes. Membrane reconstitution studies with the adenosine A(1) and alpha(2A) adrenergic receptors have reached a similar conclusion. We aimed to test the generality of this finding by comparing the gamma subtype specificity for four G(i)-coupled receptors: alpha(2A) adrenergic; A1 adenosine (A(1)-R); 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)-R); mu opioid. Membranes were reconstituted with Galpha(i)(1) and five gamma subtypes (dimerized to beta1). Using a sensitive alpha-betagamma binding assay, we show that all recombinant betagamma (except beta1gamma1) had comparable affinity for alpha(i)(1). Using high affinity agonist binding as a measure of receptor-G protein coupling, betagamma-containing gamma11 was the most potent for A(1)-R and 5-HT(1A)-R (p < 0.05, one way ANOVA) while gamma7 was most potent for the other two receptors. gamma11 was 3-8-fold more potent for the A(1)-R than were the other gamma subtypes. Also, gamma11 was 2-8-fold more potent for A(1)-R than at the other receptors, suggesting a unique coupling specificity of the A(1)-R for gamma11. In contrast, the discrimination by receptors for the other betagamma subtypes (beta1 and gamma1, gamma2, gamma7, and gamma10) was limited (2-3-fold). Thus the exquisite betagamma specificity of individual receptors reported in whole cell studies may depend on in vivo mechanisms beyond direct receptor recognition of betagamma subtypes.

Gbeta gamma isoforms selectively rescue plasma membrane localization and palmitoylation of mutant Galphas and Galphaq

Mutation of Galpha(q) or Galpha(s) N-terminal contact sites for Gbetagamma resulted in alpha subunits that failed to localize at the plasma membrane or undergo palmitoylation when expressed in HEK293 cells. We now show that overexpression of specific betagamma subunits can recover plasma membrane localization and palmitoylation of the betagamma-binding-deficient mutants of alpha(s) or alpha(q). Thus, the betagamma-binding-defective alpha is completely dependent on co-expression of exogenous betagamma for proper membrane localization. In this report, we examined the ability of beta(1-5) in combination with gamma(2) or gamma(3) to promote proper localization and palmitoylation of mutant alpha(s) or alpha(q). Immunofluorescence localization, cellular fractionation, and palmitate labeling revealed distinct subtype-specific differences in betagamma interactions with alpha subunits. These studies demonstrate that 1) alpha and betagamma reciprocally promote the plasma membrane targeting of the other subunit; 2) beta(5), when co-expressed with gamma(2) or gamma(3), fails to localize to the plasma membrane or promote plasma membrane localization of mutant alpha(s) or alpha(q); 3) beta(3) is deficient in promoting plasma membrane localization of mutant alpha(s) and alpha(q), whereas beta(4) is deficient in promoting plasma membrane localization of mutant alpha(q); 4) both palmitoylation and interactions with betagamma are required for plasma membrane localization of alpha.

G Protein beta subunit types differentially interact with a muscarinic receptor but not adenylyl cyclase type II or phospholipase C-beta 2/3

In comparison with the alpha subunit of G proteins, the role of the beta subunit in signaling is less well understood. During the regulation of effectors by the betagamma complex, it is known that the beta subunit contacts effectors directly, whereas the role of the beta subunit is undefined in receptor-G protein interaction. Among the five G protein beta subunits known, the beta(4) subunit type is the least studied. We compared the ability of betagamma complexes containing beta(4) and the well characterized beta(1) to stimulate three different effectors: phospholipase C-beta2, phospholipase C-beta3, and adenylyl cyclase type II. beta(4)gamma(2) and beta(1)gamma(2) activated all three of these effectors with equal efficacy. However, nucleotide exchange in a G protein constituting alpha(o)beta(4)gamma(2) was stimulated significantly more by the M2 muscarinic receptor compared with alpha(o)beta(1)gamma(2). Because alpha(o) forms heterotrimers with beta(4)gamma(2) and beta(1)gamma(2) equally well, these results show that the beta subunit type plays a direct role in the receptor activation of a G protein.