G Protein beta subunit types differentially interact with a muscarinic receptor but not adenylyl cyclase type II or phospholipase C-beta 2/3

The in vivo specificity of synaptic Gβ and Gγ subunits to the α2a adrenergic receptor at CNS synapses

G proteins are major transducers of signals from G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are made up of α, β, and γ subunits, with 16 Gα, 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits. Though much is known about the specificity of Gα subunits, the specificity of Gβγs activated by a given GPCR and that activate each effector in vivo is not known. Here, we examined the in vivo Gβγ specificity of presynaptic α_2a-adrenergic receptors (α_2aARs) in both adrenergic (auto-α_2aARs) and non-adrenergic neurons (hetero-α_2aARs) for the first time. With a quantitative MRM proteomic analysis of neuronal Gβ and Gγ subunits, and co-immunoprecipitation of tagged α_2aARs from mouse models including transgenic FLAG-α_2aARs and knock-in HA-α_2aARs, we investigated the in vivo specificity of Gβ and Gγ subunits to auto-α_2aARs and hetero-α_2aARs activated with epinephrine to understand the role of Gβγ specificity in diverse physiological functions such as anesthetic sparing, and working memory enhancement. We detected Gβ₂, Gγ₂, Gγ₃, and Gγ₄ with activated auto α_2aARs, whereas we found Gβ₄ and Gγ₁₂ preferentially interacted with activated hetero-α_2aARs. Further understanding of in vivo Gβγ specificity to various GPCRs offers new insights into the multiplicity of genes for Gβ and Gγ, and the mechanisms underlying GPCR signaling through Gβγ subunits.

GPCR regulation of secretion

Modulation of neurotransmitter exocytosis by activated Gi/o coupled G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a universal regulatory mechanism used both to avoid overstimulation and to influence circuitry. One of the known modulation mechanisms is the interaction between Gβγ and the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNAREs). There are 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits, but specific Gβγs activated by a given GPCR and the specificity to effectors, such as SNARE, in vivo are not known. Although less studied, Gβγ binding to the exocytic fusion machinery (i.e. SNARE) provides a more direct regulatory mechanism for neurotransmitter release. Here, we review some recent insights in the architecture of the synaptic terminal, modulation of synaptic transmission, and implications of G protein modulation of synaptic transmission in diseases. Numerous presynaptic proteins are involved in the architecture of synaptic terminals, particularly the active zone, and their importance in the regulation of exocytosis is still not completely understood. Further understanding of the Gβγ-SNARE interaction and the architecture and mechanisms of exocytosis may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets to help patients with various disorders such as hypertension, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and acute/chronic pain.

The inhibitory effect of Gβγ and Gβ isoform specificity on ENaC activity

Epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC) activity, which determines the rate of renal Na(+) reabsorption, can be regulated by G protein-coupled receptors. Regulation of ENaC by Gα-mediated downstream effectors has been studied extensively, but the effect of Gβγ dimers on ENaC is unclear. A6 cells endogenously contain high levels of Gβ1 but low levels of Gβ3, Gβ4, and Gβ5 were detected by Q-PCR. We tested Gγ2 combined individually with Gβ1 through Gβ5 expressed in A6 cells, after which we recorded single-channel ENaC activity. Among the five β and γ2 combinations, β1γ2 strongly inhibits ENaC activity by reducing both ENaC channel number (N) and open probability (Po) compared with control cells. In contrast, the other four β-isoforms combined with γ2 have no significant effect on ENaC activity. By using various inhibitors to probe Gβ1γ2 effects on ENaC regulation, we found that Gβ1γ2-mediated ENaC inhibition involved activation of phospholipase C-β and its enzymatic products that induce protein kinase C and ERK1/2 signaling pathways.

Diverse β subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are present in thyroid plasma membranes

The functioning of heterotrimeric G protein α subunits in the transduction of hormonal signals to appropriate intracellular responses is well recognized. Much less is known about the distribution of isoforms and functions of G protein β subunits. Here, using specific antibodies, we documented that in plasma membranes of the thyroid cell line Nthy-ori 3-1 all Gβ isoforms-Gβ(1), Gβ(2), Gβ(3), Gβ(4) and Gβ(5) are present, while the Gβ(3) occurs in minute amount. In plasma membrane fraction isolated from pooled postoperative thyroids of patients with nodular goiter and Graves' disease, the Gβ(1), Gβ(2), Gβ(4) and Gβ(5) subunits were found, whereas Gβ(3) could not be detected. Competition studies revealed that the Gβ(2) is the principal Gβ subunit in membranes from cultured thyroid cells, originated from normal thyroid, as well as in membranes from patients' thyroids. This suggests that Gβ(2) subunit cooperates with Gα(s) subunit, the most active of the Gα variants, during stimulation of adenylate cyclase which constitutes the main route of physiological thyroid stimulation.

The rapid activation of N-Ras by alpha-thrombin in fibroblasts is mediated by the specific G-protein Galphai2-Gbeta1-Ggamma5 and occurs in lipid rafts

alpha-thrombin is a potent mitogen for fibroblasts and initiates a rapid signal transduction pathway leading to the activation of Ras and the stimulation of cell cycle progression. While the signaling events downstream of Ras have been studied in significant detail and appear well conserved across many species and cell types, the precise molecular events beginning with thrombin receptor activation and leading to the activation of Ras are not as well understood. In this study, we examined the immediate events in the rapid response to alpha-thrombin, in a single cell type, and found that an unexpected degree of specificity exists in the pathway linking alpha-thrombin to Ras activation. Specifically, although IIC9 cells express all three Ras isoforms, only N-Ras is rapidly activated by alpha-thrombin. Further, although several Galpha subunits associate with PAR1 and are released following stimulation, only Galpha(i2) couples to the rapid activation of Ras. Similarly, although IIC9 cells express many Gbeta and Ggamma subunits, only a subset associates with Galpha(i2), and of those, only a single Gbetagamma dimer, Gbeta(1)gamma(5), participates in the rapid activation of N-Ras. We then hypothesized that co-localization into membrane microdomains called lipid rafts, or caveolae, is at least partially responsible for this degree of specificity. Accordingly, we found that all components localize to lipid rafts and that disruption of caveolae abolishes the rapid activation of N-Ras by alpha-thrombin. We thus report the molecular elucidation of an extremely specific and rapid signal transduction pathway linking alpha-thrombin stimulation to the activation of Ras.

Structural determinants involved in the formation and activation of G protein betagamma dimers

Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of an alpha, beta and gamma subunit, represent one of the most important and dynamic families of signaling proteins. As a testament to the significance of G protein signaling, the hundreds of seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors that interact with G proteins are estimated to occupy 1-2% of the human genome. This broad diversity of receptors is echoed in the number of potential heterotrimer combinations that can arise from the 23 alpha subunit, 7 beta subunit and 12 gamma subunit isoforms that have been identified. The potential for such vast complexity implies that the receptor G protein interface is the site of much regulation. The historical model for the activation of a G protein holds that activated receptor catalyzes the exchange of GDP for GTP on the alpha subunit, inducing a conformational change that substantially lowers the affinity of alpha for betagamma. This decreased affinity enables dissociation of betagamma from alpha and receptor. The free form of betagamma is thought to activate effectors, until the hydrolysis of GTP by G alpha (aided by RGS proteins) allows the subunits to re-associate, effectively deactivating the G protein until another interaction with activated receptor.

Coordinating speed and amplitude in G-protein signaling

G-protein-mediated signaling is intrinsically kinetic. Signal output at steady state is a balance of the rates of GTP binding, which causes activation, and of GTP hydrolysis, which terminates activation. This GTPase catalytic cycle is regulated by receptors, which accelerate GTP binding, and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which accelerate hydrolysis. Receptors and GAPs similarly control the rates of signal initiation and termination. To allow independent control of signal amplitude and of the rates of turning the signal on and off, the activities of receptors and GAPs must be coordinated. Here, the principles of such coordination and the mechanisms by which it is achieved are discussed.

Structure of the parathyroid hormone receptor C terminus bound to the G-protein dimer Gbeta1gamma2

A critical role of the Gbetagamma dimer in heterotrimeric G-protein signaling is to facilitate the engagement and activation of the Galpha subunit by cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors. However, high-resolution structural information of the connectivity between receptor and the Gbetagamma dimer has not previously been available. Here, we describe the structural determinants of Gbeta1gamma2 in complex with a C-terminal region of the parathyroid hormone receptor-1 (PTH1R) as obtained by X-ray crystallography. The structure reveals that several critical residues within PTH1R contact only Gbeta residues located within the outer edge of WD1- and WD7-repeat segments of the Gbeta toroid structure. These regions encompass a predicted membrane-facing region of Gbeta thought to be oriented in a fashion that is accessible to the membrane-spanning receptor. Mutation of key receptor contact residues on Gbeta1 leads to a selective loss of function in receptor/heterotrimer coupling while preserving Gbeta1gamma2 activation of the effector phospholipase-C beta.

How do receptors activate G proteins?

Heterotrimeric G proteins couple the activation of heptahelical receptors at the cell surface to the intracellular signaling cascades that mediate the physiological responses to extracellular stimuli. G proteins are molecular switches that are activated by receptor-catalyzed GTP for GDP exchange on the G protein alpha subunit, which is the rate-limiting step in the activation of all downstream signaling. Despite the important biological role of the receptor-G protein interaction, relatively little is known about the structure of the complex and how it leads to nucleotide exchange. This chapter will describe what is known about receptor and G protein structure and outline a strategy for assembling the current data into improved models for the receptor-G protein complex that will hopefully answer the question as to how receptors flip the G protein switch.

A family of G protein βγ subunits translocate reversibly from the plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation

The present model of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors exclusively localizes their activation and function to the plasma membrane (PM). Observation of the spatiotemporal response of G protein subunits in a living cell to receptor activation showed that 6 of the 12 members of the G protein gamma subunit family translocate specifically from the PM to endomembranes. The gamma subunits translocate as betagamma complexes, whereas the alpha subunit is retained on the PM. Depending on the gamma subunit, translocation occurs predominantly to the Golgi complex or the endoplasmic reticulum. The rate of translocation also varies with the gamma subunit type. Different gamma subunits, thus, confer distinct spatiotemporal properties to translocation. A striking relationship exists between the amino acid sequences of various gamma subunits and their translocation properties. gamma subunits with similar translocation properties are more closely related to each other. Consistent with this relationship, introducing residues conserved in translocating subunits into a non-translocating subunit results in a gain of function. Inhibitors of vesicle-mediated trafficking and palmitoylation suggest that translocation is diffusion-mediated and controlled by acylation similar to the shuttling of G protein subunits (Chisari, M., Saini, D. K., Kalyanaraman, V., and Gautam, N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24092-24098). These results suggest that the continual testing of cytosolic surfaces of cell membranes by G protein subunits facilitates an activated cell surface receptor to direct potentially active G protein betagamma subunits to intracellular membranes.

Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins: current structural insights

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) serve as catalytic activators of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Galphabetagamma) by exchanging GTP for the bound GDP on the Galpha subunit. This guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity of GPCRs is the initial step in the G-protein cycle and determines the onset of various intracellular signaling pathways that govern critical physiological responses to extracellular cues. Although the structural basis for many steps in the G-protein nucleotide cycle have been made clear over the past decade, the precise mechanism for receptor-mediated G-protein activation remains incompletely defined. Given that these receptors have historically represented a set of rich drug targets, a more complete understanding of their mechanism of action should provide further avenues for drug discovery. Several models have been proposed to explain the communication between activated GPCRs and Galphabetagamma leading to the structural changes required for guanine nucleotide exchange. This review is focused on the structural biology of G-protein signal transduction with an emphasis on the current hypotheses regarding Galphabetagamma activation. We highlight several recent results shedding new light on the structural changes in Galpha that may underlie GDP release.

Candidate genes and their regulatory elements: alcohol preference and tolerance

QTL analysis of behavioral traits and mouse brain gene expression studies were combined to identify candidate genes involved in the traits of alcohol preference and acute functional alcohol tolerance. The systematic application of normalization and statistical analysis of differential gene expression, behavioral and expression QTL location, and informatics methodologies resulted in identification of 8 candidate genes for the trait of alcohol preference and 22 candidate genes for acute functional tolerance. Pathway analysis, combined with clustering by ontology, indicated the importance of transcriptional regulation and DNA and protein binding elements in the acute functional tolerance trait, and protein kinases and intracellular signal transduction elements in the alcohol preference trait. A rudimentary search for transcription control elements that could indicate coregulation of the panels of candidate genes produced modest results, implicating SMAD-3 in the regulation of four of the eight candidate genes for alcohol preference. However, the realization of the many caveats related to transcription factor binding site analysis, and attempts to correlate between transcription factor binding and function, forestalled any definitive global analysis of transcriptional control of differentially expressed candidate genes.

G protein betagamma complex translocation from plasma membrane to Golgi complex is influenced by receptor gamma subunit interaction

On activation of a receptor the G protein betagamma complex translocates away from the receptor on the plasma membrane to the Golgi complex. The rate of translocation is influenced by the type of gamma subunit associated with the G protein. Complementary approaches--imaging living cells expressing fluorescent protein tagged G proteins and assaying reconstituted receptors and G proteins in vitro--were used to identify mechanisms at the basis of the translocation process. Translocation of Gbetagamma containing mutant gamma subunits with altered prenyl moieties showed that the differences in the prenyl moieties were not sufficient to explain the differential effects of geranylgeranylated gamma5 and farnesylated gamma11 on the translocation process. The translocation properties of Gbetagamma were altered dramatically by mutating the C terminal tail region of the gamma subunit. The translocation characteristics of these mutants suggest that after receptor activation, Gbetagamma retains contact with a receptor through the gamma subunit C terminal domain and that differential interaction of the activated receptor with this domain controls Gbetagamma translocation from the plasma membrane.

Gialpha and Gbeta subunits both define selectivity of G protein activation by alpha2-adrenergic receptors

Previous studies of the specificity of receptor interactions with G protein subunits in living cells have relied on measurements of second messengers or other downstream responses. We have examined the selectivity of interactions between alpha2-adrenergic receptors (alpha2R) and various combinations of Gialpha and Gbeta subunit isoforms by measuring changes in FRET between Gialpha-yellow fluorescent protein and cyan fluorescent protein-Gbeta chimeras in HeLa cells. All combinations of Gialpha1, -2, or -3 with Gbeta1, -2, or -4 were activated to some degree by endogenous alpha2Rs as judged by agonist-dependent decreases in FRET. The degree of G protein activation is determined by the combination of Gialpha and Gbeta subunits rather than by the identity of an individual subunit. RT-PCR analysis and small interfering RNA knockdown of alpha2R subtypes, followed by quantification of radiolabeled antagonist binding, demonstrated that HeLa cells express alpha2a- and alpha2b-adrenergic receptor isoforms in a 2:1 ratio. Increasing receptor number by overexpression of the alpha2aR subtype minimized the differences among coupling preferences for Gialpha and Gbeta isoforms. The molecular properties of each Gialpha, Gbeta, and alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype influence signaling efficiency for the alpha2-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling pathway.

Regions in the G Protein γ Subunit Important for Interaction with Receptors and Effectors

G betagamma dimers containing the gamma11 or gamma1 subunits are often less potent and effective in their ability to regulate effectors compared with dimers containing the gamma2 subunit. To explore the regions of the gamma subunit that affect the activity of the betagamma dimer, we constructed eight chimeric gamma subunits from the gamma1 and gamma2 subunits. Two chimeras were made in which the N-terminal regions of gamma1 and gamma2 were exchanged and two in which the C-terminal regions were transposed. Another set of chimeras was made in which the CAAX motifs of the chimeras were altered to direct modification with different prenyl groups. All eight gamma chimeras were expressed in Sf9 cells with the beta1 subunit, G betagamma dimers were purified, and then they were assayed in vitro for their ability to bind to the G alpha(i1) subunit, to couple G alpha(i1) to the A1 adenosine receptor, to stimulate phospholipase C-beta, and to regulate type I or type II adenyl cyclases. Dimers containing the C-terminal sequence of the gamma2 subunit modified with the geranylgeranyl lipid had the highest affinity for G(i1)alpha (range, 0.5-1.2 nM) and were most effective at coupling the G(i1)alpha subunit to receptor. These dimers were most effective at stimulating the phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-beta isoform and inhibiting type I adenyl cyclase. In contrast, betagamma dimers containing the N-terminal sequence of the gamma2 subunit and a geranylgeranyl group are most effective at activating type II adenyl cyclase. The results indicate that both the N- and C-terminal regions of the gamma subunit impart specificity to receptor and effector interactions.

Differential sensitivity of P-Rex1 to isoforms of G protein betagamma dimers

P-Rex1 is a specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac, which is present in high abundance in brain and hematopoietic cells. P-Rex1 is dually regulated by phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate and the Gbetagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. We examined which of the multiple G protein alpha and betagamma subunits activate P-Rex1-mediated Rac guanine nucleotide exchange using pure, recombinant proteins reconstituted into synthetic lipid vesicles. AlF(-)(4) activated G(s),G(i),G(q),G(12), or G(13) alpha subunits were unable to activate P-Rex1. Gbetagamma dimers containing Gbeta(1-4) complexed with gamma(2) stimulated P-Rex1 activity with EC(50) values ranging from 10 to 20 nm. Gbeta(5)gamma(2) was not able to stimulate P-Rex1 GEF activity. Dimers containing the beta(1) subunit complexed with a panel of different Ggamma subunits varied in their ability to stimulate P-Rex1. The beta(1)gamma(3), beta(1)gamma(7), beta(1)gamma(10), and beta(1)gamma(13HA) dimers all activated P-Rex1 with EC(50) values ranging from 20 to 38 nm. Dimers composed of beta(1)gamma(12) had lower EC(50) values (approximately 112 nm). The farnesylated gamma(11) subunit is highly expressed in hematopoietic cells; surprisingly, dimers containing this subunit (beta(1)gamma(11)) were also less effective at activating P-Rex1. These findings suggest that the composition of the Gbetagamma dimer released by receptor activation may differentially activate P-Rex1.

Galpha subunit Gpa2 recruits kelch repeat subunits that inhibit receptor-G protein coupling during cAMP-induced dimorphic transitions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

All eukaryotic cells sense extracellular stimuli and activate intracellular signaling cascades via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and associated heterotrimeric G proteins. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPCR Gpr1 and associated Galpha subunit Gpa2 sense extracellular carbon sources (including glucose) to govern filamentous growth. In contrast to conventional Galpha subunits, Gpa2 forms an atypical G protein complex with the kelch repeat Gbeta mimic proteins Gpb1 and Gpb2. Gpb1/2 negatively regulate cAMP signaling by inhibiting Gpa2 and an as yet unidentified target. Here we show that Gpa2 requires lipid modifications of its N-terminus for membrane localization but association with the Gpr1 receptor or Gpb1/2 subunits is dispensable for membrane targeting. Instead, Gpa2 promotes membrane localization of its associated Gbeta mimic subunit Gpb2. We also show that the Gpa2 N-terminus binds both to Gpb2 and to the C-terminal tail of the Gpr1 receptor and that Gpb1/2 binding interferes with Gpr1 receptor coupling to Gpa2. Our studies invoke novel mechanisms involving GPCR-G protein modules that may be conserved in multicellular eukaryotes.

Differential Sensitivity of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase p110γ to Isoforms of G Protein βγ Dimers

The ability of G protein alpha and betagamma subunits to activate the p110gamma isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PtdIns 3-kinase) was examined using pure, recombinant G proteins and the p101/p110gamma form of PtdIns 3-kinase reconstituted into synthetic lipid vesicles. GTP-activated Gs, Gi, Gq, or Go alpha subunits were unable to activate PtdIns 3-kinase. Dimers containing Gbeta(1-4) complexed with gamma2-stimulated PtdIns 3-kinase activity about 26-fold with EC50 values ranging from 4 to 7 nm. Gbeta5gamma2 was not able to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase despite producing a 10-fold activation of avian phospholipase Cbeta. A series of dimers with beta subunits containing point mutations in the amino acids that undergo a conformational change upon interaction of betagamma with phosducin (beta1H311Agamma2, beta1R314Agamma2, and beta1W332Agamma2) was tested, and only beta1W332Agamma2 inhibited the ability of the dimer to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase. Dimers containing the beta1 subunit complexed with a panel of different Ggamma subunits displayed variation in their ability to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase. The beta1gamma2, beta1gamma10, beta1gamma12, and beta1gamma13 dimers all activated PtdIns 3-kinase about 26-fold with 4-25 nm EC50 values. The beta1gamma11 dimer, which contains the farnesyl isoprenoid group and is highly expressed in tissues containing the p101/p110gamma form of PtdIns 3-kinase, was ineffective. The role of the prenyl group on the gamma subunit in determining the activation of PtdIns 3-kinase was examined using gamma subunits with altered CAAX boxes directing the addition of farnesyl to the gamma2 subunit and geranylgeranyl to the gamma1 and gamma11 subunits. Replacement of the geranylgeranyl group of the gamma2 subunit with farnesyl inhibited the activity of beta1gamma2 on PtdIns 3-kinase. Conversely, replacement of the farnesyl group on the gamma1 and gamma11 subunit with geranylgeranyl restored almost full activity. These findings suggest that all beta subunits, with the exception of beta5, interact equally well with PtdIns 3-kinase. In contrast, the composition of the gamma subunit and its prenyl group markedly affects the ability of the betagamma dimer to stimulate PtdIns 3-kinase.

Live cell imaging of Gs and the beta2-adrenergic receptor demonstrates that both alphas and beta1gamma7 internalize upon stimulation and exhibit similar trafficking patterns that differ from that of the beta2-adrenergic receptor

To visualize and investigate the regulation of the localization patterns of Gs and an associated receptor during cell signaling, we produced functional fluorescent fusion proteins and imaged them in HEK-293 cells. alphas-CFP, with cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) inserted into an internal loop of alphas, localized to the plasma membrane and exhibited similar receptor-mediated activity to that of alphas. Functional fluorescent beta1gamma7 dimers were produced by fusing an amino-terminal yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fragment to beta1 (YFP-N-beta1) and a carboxyl-terminal YFP fragment to gamma7 (YFP-C-gamma7). When expressed together, YFP-N-beta1 and YFP-C-gamma7 produced fluorescent signals in the plasma membrane that were not seen when the subunits were expressed separately. Isoproterenol stimulation of cells co-expressing alphas-CFP, YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7, and the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) resulted in internalization of both fluorescent signals from the plasma membrane. Initially, alphas-CFP and YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7 stained the cytoplasm diffusely, and subsequently they co-localized on vesicles that exhibited minimal overlap with beta2AR-labeled vesicles. Moreover, internalization of beta2AR-GFP, but not alphas-CFP or YFP-N-beta1/YFP-C-gamma7, was inhibited by a fluorescent dominant negative dynamin 1 mutant, Dyn1(K44A)-mRFP, indicating that the Gs subunits and beta2AR utilize different internalization mechanisms. Subsequent trafficking of the Gs subunits and beta2AR also differed in that vesicles labeled with the Gs subunits exhibited less overlap with RhoB-labeled endosomes and greater overlap with Rab11-labeled endosomes. Because Rab11 regulates traffic through recycling endosomes, co-localization of alphas and beta1gamma7 on these endosomes may indicate a means of recycling specific alphasbetagamma combinations to the plasma membrane.

Simultaneous stimulation of GABA and beta adrenergic receptors stabilizes isotypes of activated adenylyl cyclase heterocomplex

Background

We investigated how the synthesis of cAMP, stimulated by isoproterenol acting through β-adrenoreceptors and Gs, is strongly amplified by simultaneous incubation with baclofen. Baclofen is an agonist of δ-aminobutyric acid type B receptors [GABA_B], known to inhibit adenylyl cyclase via Gi. Because these agents have opposite effects on cAMP levels, the unexpected increase in cAMP synthesis when they are applied simultaneously has been intensively investigated. From previous reports, it appears that cyclase type II contributes most significantly to this phenomenon.

Results

We found that simultaneous application of isoproterenol and baclofen specifically influences the association/dissociation of molecules involved in the induction and termination of cyclase activity. Beta/gamma from [GABA]B receptor-coupled Gi has a higher affinity for adenylyl cyclase isoform(s) when these isoforms are co-associated with Gs. Our data also suggest that, when beta/gamma and Gαs are associated with adenylyl cyclase isoform(s), beta/gamma from [GABA]B receptor-coupled Gi retards the GTPase activity of Gαs from adrenergic receptor. These reciprocal regulations of subunits of the adenylyl cyclase complex might be responsible for the drastic increase of cAMP synthesis in response to the simultaneous signals.

Conclusions

Simultaneous signals arriving at a particular synapse converge on molecular detectors of coincidence and trigger specific biochemical events. We hypothesize that this phenomenon comes from the complex molecular architectures involved, including scaffolding proteins that make reciprocal interactions between associated molecules possible. The biochemistry of simultaneous signaling is addressed as a key to synaptic function.

Visualization of G protein betagamma dimers using bimolecular fluorescence complementation demonstrates roles for both beta and gamma in subcellular targeting

To investigate the role of subcellular localization in regulating the specificity of G protein betagamma signaling, we have applied the strategy of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize betagamma dimers in vivo. We fused an amino-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to beta and a carboxyl-terminal yellow fluorescent protein fragment to gamma. When expressed together, these two proteins produced a fluorescent signal in human embryonic kidney 293 cells that was not obtained with either subunit alone. Fluorescence was dependent on betagamma assembly in that it was not obtained using beta2 and gamma1, which do not form a functional dimer. In addition to assembly, BiFC betagamma complexes were functional as demonstrated by more specific plasma membrane labeling than was obtained with individually tagged fluorescent beta and gamma subunits and by their abilities to potentiate activation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha(s) in COS-7 cells. To investigate isoform-dependent targeting specificity, the localization patterns of dimers formed by pair-wise combinations of three different beta subunits with three different gamma subunits were compared. BiFC betagamma complexes containing either beta1 or beta2 localized to the plasma membrane, whereas those containing beta5 accumulated in the cytosol or on intracellular membranes. These results indicate that the beta subunit can direct trafficking of the gamma subunit. Taken together with previous observations, these results show that the G protein alpha, beta, and gamma subunits all play roles in targeting each other. This method of specifically visualizing betagamma dimers will have many applications in sorting out roles for particular betagamma complexes in a wide variety of cell types.

Analysis of C5a-mediated chemotaxis by lentiviral delivery of small interfering RNA

Immune cells respond to chemotactic signals by means of G protein-coupled receptors. Attempts to elucidate the function of specific G protein family members in these responses is complicated by redundancy among the different G protein isoforms. We have used lentiviral-based RNA interference to eliminate expression of specific G protein subunits selectively in J774A.1 mouse macrophages. The chemotactic response to the complement factors C5a and C3a is ablated in cells lacking G beta(2) but is unaffected in cells lacking G beta(1), G alpha i(2), or G alpha i(3). Similarly, the C5a-mediated calcium response of single cells is either absent or significantly delayed and weakened by G beta(2) knockdown. Assessment of Akt1 phosphorylation levels in response to C5a shows rapid and sustained phosphorylation in both wild-type cells and cells lacking G beta(1). Cells lacking G beta(2) retain the rapid response but cannot sustain phospho-Akt1 levels. The phenotype of cells lacking G beta(2) can be reversed by overexpression of either human G beta(2) or mouse G beta(1). These data demonstrate the usefulness of lentiviral-based RNA interference in the systematic analysis of a signaling pathway, and they suggest that in J774A.1 cells, G beta(2)-derived G beta gamma is the most effective mediator of chemotaxis to C5a.

Gi protein activation in intact cells involves subunit rearrangement rather than dissociation

G protein-coupled receptors transduce diverse extracellular signals, such as neurotransmitters, hormones, chemokines, and sensory stimuli, into intracellular responses through activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. G proteins play critical roles in determining specificity and kinetics of subsequent biological responses by modulation of effector proteins. We have developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay to directly measure mammalian G protein activation in intact cells and found that Gi proteins activate within 1-2 s, which is considerably slower than activation kinetics of the receptors themselves. More importantly, FRET measurements demonstrated that Galphai- and Gbetagamma-subunits do not dissociate during activation, as has been previously postulated. Based on FRET measurements between Galphai-yellow fluorescent protein and Gbetagamma-subunits that were fused to cyan fluorescent protein at various positions, we conclude that, instead, G protein subunits undergo a molecular rearrangement during activation. The detection of a persistent heterotrimeric composition during G protein activation will impact the understanding of how G proteins achieve subtype-selective coupling to effectors. This finding will be of particular interest for unraveling Gbetagamma-induced signaling pathways.

G Protein βγ Subunits Stimulate p114RhoGEF, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for RhoA and Rac1

Rho GTPases integrate the intracellular signaling in a wide range of cellular processes. Activation of these G proteins is tightly controlled by a number of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). In this study, we addressed the functional role of the recently identified p114RhoGEF in in vivo experiments. Activation of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors with lysophosphatidic acid resulted in activation of a transcription factor, serum response element (SRE), that was enhanced by p114RhoGEF. This stimulation was inhibited by the functional scavenger of Gβγ subunits, transducin. We have determined that Gβγ subunits but not Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins stimulated p114RhoGEF-dependent SRE activity. Using coimmunoprecipitation assay, we have determined that Gβγ subunits interacted with full-length and DH/PH domain of p114RhoGEF. Similarly, Gβγ subunits stimulated SRE activity induced by full-length and DH/PH domain of p114RhoGEF. Using in vivo pull-down assays and dominant-negative mutants of Rho GTPases, we have determined that p114RhoGEF activated RhoA and Rac1 but not Cdc42 proteins. Functional significance of RhoA activation was established by the ability of p114RhoGEF to induce actin stress fibers and cell rounding. Functional significance of Rac1 activation was established by the ability of p114RhoGEF to induce production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) followed by activation of NADPH oxidase enzyme complex. In summary, our data showed that the novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor p114RhoGEF regulates the activity of RhoA and Rac1, and that Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are activators of p114RhoGEF under physiological conditions. The findings help to explain the integrated effects of LPA and other G-protein receptor-coupled agonists on actin stress fiber formation, cell shape change, and ROS production.

The C-terminal tail preceding the CAAX box of a yeast G protein gamma subunit is dispensable for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo

The gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins are required for receptor-G protein coupling. The C-terminal domains of Ggamma subunits can contact receptors and influence the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling in vitro. However, it is unknown whether receptor interaction with the C terminus of Ggamma is required for signaling in vivo. To address this question, we cloned Ggamma homologs with diverged C-terminal sequences from five species of budding yeast. Each Ggamma homolog functionally replaced the Ggamma subunit of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (STE18 gene product). Mutagenesis of S. cerevisiae Ste18 likewise indicated that specific C-terminal sequence motifs are not required for signaling. Strikingly, an internal in-frame deletion removing sequences preceding the C-terminal CAAX box of Ste18 did not impair signaling by either of its cognate G protein-coupled pheromone receptors. Therefore, receptor interaction with the C-terminal domain of yeast Ggamma is not required for receptor-mediated G protein activation in vivo. Because the mechanism of G protein activation by receptors is conserved from yeast to humans, mammalian receptors may not require interaction with the tail of Ggamma for G protein activation in vivo. However, receptor-Ggamma interaction may modulate the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling or promote activation of Gbetagamma effectors that co-cluster with receptors.

Cloning, tissue distribution, and functional expression of the human G protein beta 4-subunit

Heterotrimeric G proteins (Galphabetagamma) play an essential role in coupling membrane receptors to effector proteins such as ion channels and enzymes. Among the five mammalian Gbeta-subunits cloned, the human G protein beta4 has not been described. The purpose of the present study was to functionally characterize the newly identified human Gbeta4 subunit. The Gbeta4 open reading frame (ORF) was amplified utilizing PCR from brain cDNA. Amplification primers were generated following 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5'-RACE) from an expressed sequence tag (EST) containing the predicted 3' end of the protein. Multiple tissue cDNA panel analysis showed that Gbeta4 mRNA was strongly expressed in lung and placenta, whereas it is weakly expressed in brain and heart. Heterologous overexpression of Gbeta4gamma2 or Gbeta4gamma4 in rat sympathetic neurons resulted in tonic modulation of N-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) and G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) currents. Furthermore, coexpression of Gbeta4gamma2 and Galpha(oA) resulted in heterotrimer formation. These results show that the newly cloned Gbeta subunit shares several properties with other human Gbeta family members.

Human A(2A) adenosine receptors: high-affinity agonist binding to receptor-G protein complexes containing Gbeta(4)

Agonists bind with higher affinity to G protein-coupled heptahelical receptors than to uncoupled receptors. Recombinant A(1) and A(3) adenosine receptors couple well to G(i/o), but recombinant human A(2A) adenosine receptors (hA(2A)AR) couple poorly to G(s) and bind agonists with K(i) values in binding assays that are much higher than ED(50) values for functional responses such as coronary dilation and inhibition of neutrophil oxidative burst. In this study, we produced hA(2A)AR-G protein complexes in membranes derived from Sf9 cells quadruply infected with receptors and heterotrimeric G protein subunits. The composition of G(beta) markedly influences coupling such that A(2A)AR-alpha(s)beta(1)gamma(2) are 8 +/- 2% coupled whereas equivalently expressed A(2A)AR-alpha(s)beta(4)gamma(2) are 40 +/- 2% coupled. Hence, we were able for the first time to accurately measure high-affinity agonist binding to hA(2A)AR. The agonist 2-[2-(4-amino-3-[(125)I]iodophenyl)ethylamino]adenosine binds to coupled and uncoupled hA(2A)AR with K(D) values of 0.46 nM and 26 nM, respectively, a difference in affinity of 57-fold. The addition of GTPgammaS converts all receptors to the low-affinity state. A(2A)AR coupling does not influence binding of antagonists including, (125)I-4-(2-[7-amino-2-[2-furyl][1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol ((125)I-ZM241385), K(D) = 0.5 nM. Based on a comparison of high-affinity binding sites, N(6)-3-iodo-2-chlorobenzyladenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide is only 8-fold A(3) selective (A(2A Ki, H) = 18.3 +/- 3.2 nM; A(3 Ki, H) = 2.4 +/- 0.3 nM) and 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine is only 33-fold A(1) selective (A(2A Ki, H) = 11.0 +/- 1.9; A(1 Ki, H) = 0.3 +/- 0.1). We conclude that recombinant hA(2A)AR can form a high-affinity receptor-G protein complex with alpha(s)beta(4)gamma(2) that is useful for determining receptor selectivity.

Gbetagamma affinity for bovine rhodopsin is determined by the carboxyl-terminal sequences of the gamma subunit

Two native betagamma dimers, beta(1)gamma(1) and beta(1)gamma(2), display very different affinities for receptors. Since these gamma subunits differ in both primary structure and isoprenoid modification, we examined the relative contributions of each to Gbetagamma interaction with receptors. We constructed baculoviruses encoding gamma(1) and gamma(2) subunits with altered CAAX (where A is an aliphatic amino acid) motifs to direct alternate or no prenylation of the gamma chains and a set of gamma(1) and gamma(2) chimeras with the gamma(2) CAAX motif at the carboxyl terminus. All the gamma constructs coexpressed with beta(1) in Sf9 cells yielded beta(1)gamma dimers, which were purified to near homogeneity, and their affinities for receptors and Galpha were quantitatively determined. Whereas alteration of the isoprenoid of gamma(1) from farnesyl to geranylgeranyl and of gamma(2) from geranylgeranyl to farnesyl had no impact on the affinities of beta(1)gamma dimers for Galpha(t), the non-prenylated beta(1)gamma(2) dimer had significantly diminished affinity. Altered prenylation resulted in a <2-fold decrease in affinity of the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer for rhodopsin and a <3-fold change for the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. In each case with identical isoprenylation, the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer displayed significantly greater affinity for rhodopsin compared with the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. Furthermore, dimers containing chimeric Ggamma chains with identical geranylgeranyl modification displayed rhodopsin affinities largely determined by the carboxyl-terminal one-third of the protein. These results indicate that isoprenoid modification of the Ggamma subunit is essential for binding to both Galpha and receptors. The isoprenoid type influences the binding affinity for receptors, but not for Galpha. Finally, the primary structure of the Ggamma subunit provides a major contribution to receptor binding of Gbetagamma, with the carboxyl-terminal sequence conferring receptor selectivity.

Role of the gamma subunit prenyl moiety in G protein beta gamma complex interaction with phospholipase Cbeta

The G protein betagamma complex regulates a wide range of effectors, including the phospholipase Cbeta isozymes (PLCbetas). Prenyl modification of the gamma subunit is necessary for this activity. Evidence presented here supports a direct interaction between the G protein gamma subunit prenyl group and PLCbeta isozymes. A geranylgeranylated peptide corresponding to the C-terminal region of the gamma subunit type, gamma2, strongly inhibits stimulation of PLCbeta2 and PLCbeta3 activity by the betagamma complex. This effect is specific because the same peptide has no effect on stimulation of PLCbeta by an alpha subunit type, alphaq. Prenylation of the gamma peptide is required for its inhibitory effect. When interaction of prenylated gamma subunit peptide to fluorophore-tagged PLCbeta2 was examined by fluorescence spectroscopy, prenylated but not unprenylated peptide increased PLCbeta2 fluorescence emission energy, indicating direct binding of the prenyl moiety to PLCbeta. In addition, fluorescence resonance energy transfer was detected between fluorophore tagged PLCbeta and wild type betagamma complex but not an unprenylated mutant betagamma complex. We conclude that a major function of the gamma subunit prenyl group is to facilitate direct protein-protein interaction between the betagamma complex and an effector, phospholipase Cbeta.