Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex

DHHC21 deficiency attenuates renal dysfunction during septic injury

Renal dysfunction is one of the most common complications of septic injury. One critical contributor to septic injury-induced renal dysfunction is renal vascular dysfunction. Protein palmitoylation serves as a novel regulator of vascular function. Here, we examined whether palmitoyl acyltransferase (PAT)-DHHC21 contributes to septic injury-induced renal dysfunction through regulating renal hemodynamics. Multispectral optoacoustic imaging showed that cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced septic injury caused impaired renal excretion, which was improved in DHHC21 functional deficient (Zdhhc21^dep/dep) mice. DHHC21 deficiency attenuated CLP-induced renal pathology, characterized by tissue structural damage and circulating injury markers. Importantly, DHHC21 loss-of-function led to better-preserved renal perfusion and oxygen saturation after CLP. The CLP-caused reduction in renal blood flow was also ameliorated in Zdhhc21^dep/dep mice. Next, CLP promoted the palmitoylation of vascular α1-adrenergic receptor (α1AR) and the activation of its downstream effector ERK, which were blunted in Zdhhc21^dep/dep mice. Vasoreactivity analysis revealed that renal arteries from Zdhhc21^dep/dep mice displayed reduced constriction response to α1AR agonist phenylephrine compared to those from wild-type mice. Consistently, inhibiting PATs with 2-bromopalmitate caused a blunted vasoconstriction response to phenylephrine in small arteries isolated from human kidneys. Therefore, DHHC21 contributes to impaired renal perfusion and function during septic injury via promoting α1AR palmitoylation-associated vasoconstriction.

The Protein Acyl Transferase ZDHHC21 Modulates α1 Adrenergic Receptor Function and Regulates Hemodynamics

OBJECTIVE

Palmitoylation, the reversible addition of the lipid palmitate to a cysteine, can alter protein localization, stability, and function. The ZDHHC family of protein acyl transferases catalyzes palmitoylation of numerous proteins. The role of ZDHHC enzymes in intact tissue and in vivo is largely unknown. Herein, we characterize vascular functions in a mouse that expresses a nonfunctional ZDHHC21 (F233Δ).

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Physiological studies of isolated aortae and mesenteric arteries from F233Δ mice revealed an unexpected defect in responsiveness to phenylephrine, an α1 adrenergic receptor agonist. In vivo, F233Δ mice displayed a blunted response to infusion of phenylephrine, and they were found to have elevated catecholamine levels and elevated vascular α1 adrenergic receptor gene expression. Telemetry studies showed that the F233Δ mice were tachycardic and hypotensive at baseline, consistent with diminished vascular tone. In biochemical studies, ZDHHC21 was shown to palmitoylate the α1D adrenoceptor and to interact with it in a molecular complex, thus suggesting a possible molecular mechanism by which the receptor can be regulated by ZDHHC21.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, the data support a model in which ZDHHC21 F233Δ diminishes the function of vascular α1 adrenergic receptors, leading to reduced vascular tone, which manifests in vivo as hypotension and tachycardia. This is to our knowledge the first demonstration of a ZDHHC isoform affecting vascular function in vivo and identifies a novel molecular mode of regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure.

Structure, Function, Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential of the G Protein, Gα/q,11

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the major classes of cell surface receptors and are associated with a group of G proteins consisting of three subunits termed alpha, beta, and gamma. G proteins are classified into four families according to their α subunit; Gα_i, Gα_s, Gα_12/13, and Gα_q. There are several downstream pathways of Gα_q of which the best known is upon activation via guanosine triphosphate (GTP), Gα_q activates phospholipase Cβ, hydrolyzing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate into diacylglycerol and inositol triphosphate and activating protein kinase C and increasing calcium efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum. Although G proteins, in particular, the Gα_q/11 are central elements in GPCR signaling, their actual roles have not yet been thoroughly investigated. The lack of research of the role on Gα_q/11 in cell biology is partially due to the obscure nature of the available pharmacological agents. YM-254890 is the most useful Gα_q-selective inhibitor with antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and thrombolytic effects. YM-254890 inhibits Gα_q signaling pathways by preventing the exchange of guanosine diphosphate for GTP. UBO-QIC is a structurally similar compound to YM-254890, which can inhibit platelet aggregation and cause vasorelaxation in rats. Many agents are available for the study of signaling downstream of Gα_q/11. The role of G proteins could potentially represent a novel therapeutic target. This review will explore the range of pharmacological and molecular tools available for the study of the role of Gα_q/11 in GPCR signaling.

G protein trafficking

The classical view of heterotrimeric G protein signaling places G -proteins at the cytoplasmic surface of the cell's plasma membrane where they are activated by an appropriate G protein-coupled receptor. Once activated, the GTP-bound Gα and the free Gβγ are able to regulate plasma membrane-localized effectors, such as adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase C-β, RhoGEFs and ion channels. Hydrolysis of GTP by the Gα subunit returns the G protein to the inactive Gαβγ heterotrimer. Although all of these events in the G protein cycle can be restricted to the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane, G protein localization is dynamic. Thus, it has become increasingly clear that G proteins are able to move to diverse subcellular locations where they perform non-canonical signaling functions. This chapter will highlight our current understanding of trafficking pathways that target newly synthesized G proteins to the plasma membrane, activation-induced and reversible translocation of G proteins from the plasma membrane to intracellular locations, and constitutive trafficking of G proteins.

Cleavage-resistant fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and Gα(i1). Homotropic and heterotropic effects in the binding of ligands

BACKGROUND

G protein-coupled receptors fused to a Gα-subunit are functionally similar to their unfused counterparts. They offer an intriguing view into the nature of the receptor-G protein complex, but their usefulness depends upon the stability of the fusion.

METHODS

Fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and the α-subunit of G(i1) were expressed in CHO and Sf9 cells, extracted in digitonin-cholate, and examined for their binding properties and their electrophoretic mobility on western blots.

RESULTS

Receptor fused to native α(i1) underwent proteolysis near the point of fusion to release a fragment with the mobility of α(i1). The cleavage was prevented by truncation of the α-subunit at position 18. Binding of the agonist oxotremorine-M to the stable fusion protein from Sf9 cells was biphasic, and guanylylimidodiphosphate promoted an apparent interconversion of sites from higher to lower affinity. With receptor from CHO cells, the apparent capacity for N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine was 60% of that for [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate; binding at saturating concentrations of the latter was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner at low concentrations of unlabeled N-methylscopolamine.

CONCLUSIONS

A stable fusion protein of the M(2) receptor and truncated α(i1) resembles the native receptor-G protein complex with respect to the guanyl nucleotide-sensitive binding of agonists and the noncompetitive binding of antagonists.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Release of the α-subunit is likely to occur with other such fusion proteins, rendering the data ambiguous or misleading. The properties of a chemically stable fusion protein support the notion that signaling proceeds via a stable multimeric complex of receptor and G protein.

A crucial role for Galphaq/11, but not Galphai/o or Galphas, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated cell growth inhibition

GnRH acts on its cognate receptor in pituitary gonadotropes to regulate the biosynthesis and secretion of gonadotropins. It may also have direct extrapituitary actions, including inhibition of cell growth in reproductive malignancies, in which GnRH activation of the MAPK cascades is thought to play a pivotal role. In extrapituitary tissues, GnRH receptor signaling has been postulated to involve coupling of the receptor to different G proteins. We examined the ability of the GnRH receptor to couple directly to Galpha(q/11), Galpha(i/o), and Galpha(s), their roles in the activation of the MAPK cascades, and the subsequent cellular effects. We show that in Galpha(q/11)-negative cells stably expressing the GnRH receptor, GnRH did not induce activation of ERK, jun-N-terminal kinase, or P38 MAPK. In contrast to Galpha(i) or chimeric Galpha(qi5), transfection of Galpha(q) cDNA enabled GnRH to induce phosphorylation of ERK, jun-N-terminal kinase, and P38. Furthermore, no GnRH-mediated cAMP response or inhibition of isoproterenol-induced cAMP accumulation was observed. In another cellular background, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays confirmed that the GnRH receptor was unable to directly couple to Galpha(i) but could directly interact with Galpha(q/11). Interestingly, GnRH stimulated a marked reduction in cell growth only in cells expressing Galpha(q), and this inhibition could be significantly rescued by blocking ERK activation. We therefore provide direct evidence, in multiple cellular backgrounds, that coupling of the GnRH receptor to Galpha(q/11), but not to Galpha(i/o) or Galpha(s), and consequent activation of ERK plays a crucial role in GnRH-mediated cell death.

The Importance of N-terminal Polycysteine and Polybasic Sequences for G14α and G16α Palmitoylation, Plasma Membrane Localization, and Signaling Function

Plasma membrane targeting of G protein alpha (Galpha) subunits is essential for competent receptor-to-G protein signaling. Many Galpha are tethered to the plasma membrane by covalent lipid modifications at their N terminus. Additionally, it is hypothesized that Gq family members (Gqalpha,G11alpha,G14alpha, and G16alpha) in particular utilize a polybasic sequence of amino acids in their N terminus to promote membrane attachment and protein palmitoylation. However, this hypothesis has not been tested, and nothing is known about other mechanisms that control subcellular localization and signaling properties of G14alpha and G16alpha. Here we report critical biochemical factors that mediate membrane attachment and signaling function of G14alpha and G16alpha. We find that G14alpha and G16alpha are palmitoylated at distinct polycysteine sequences in their N termini and that the polycysteine sequence along with the adjacent polybasic region are both important for G16alpha-mediated signaling at the plasma membrane. Surprisingly, the isolated N termini of G14alpha and G16alpha expressed as peptides fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein each exhibit differential requirements for palmitoylation and membrane targeting; individual cysteine residues, but not the polybasic regions, determine lipid modification and subcellular localization. However, full-length G16alpha, more so than G14alpha, displays a functional dependence on single cysteines for membrane localization and activity, and its full signaling potential depends on the integrity of the polybasic sequence. Together, these findings indicate that G14alpha and G16alpha are palmitoylated at distinct polycysteine sequences, and that the adjacent polybasic domain is not required for Galpha palmitoylation but is important for localization and functional activity of heterotrimeric G proteins.

Action of Pasteurella multocida toxin on Galpha(q) is persistent and independent of interaction with G-protein-coupled receptors

Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) activates Galpha(q) and facilitates stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation induced by agonists via G(q)-coupled membrane receptors. Here, we studied the effects of PMT on agonist-induced GTPgammaS binding to G(q) in cell membranes and a role of G-protein-coupled receptors in the action of PMT. Pre-treatment of Swiss 3T3 cells with PMT increased bombesin or vasopressin-induced GTPgammaS-binding in cell membranes by about 50 to 150%. Increase in agonist-stimulated GTPgammaS-binding caused by PMT pretreatment was specific for Galpha(q) and not observed with Galpha(11). PMT-induced effects on GTPgammaS-binding were persistent after removing the toxin or in the presence of anti-PMT antibody. Stimulation of agonist-induced GTPgammaS-binding by PMT was independent of phosphorylation of the C-terminal tyrosine356 of Galpha(q). Activation of phospholipase C by PMT occurred via Galpha(q) which was fused to the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and also with a C-terminally deleted Galpha(q), which is not able to interact with G protein-coupled membrane receptors. The data indicate that activation of Galpha(q) by PMT is persistent and independent of a functional interaction of G(q) with G-protein-coupled receptors.

Ligand screening system using fusion proteins of G protein-coupled receptors with G protein alpha subunits

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest families of genes in the human genome, and are the largest targets for drug development. Although a large number of GPCR genes have recently been identified, ligands have not yet been identified for many of them. Various assay systems have been employed to identify ligands for orphan GPCRs, but there is still no simple and general method to screen for ligands of such GPCRs, particularly of G(i)-coupled receptors. We have examined whether fusion proteins of GPCRs with G protein alpha subunit (Galpha) could be utilized for ligand screening and showed that the fusion proteins provide an effective method for the purpose. This article focuses on the followings: (1) characterization of GPCR genes and GPCRs, (2) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs, (3) characterization of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins, and (4) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs using GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins.

G-protein-coupled receptors: past, present and future

The G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family represents the largest and most versatile group of cell surface receptors. Drugs active at these receptors have therapeutic actions across a wide range of human diseases ranging from allergic rhinitis to pain, hypertension and schizophrenia. This review provides a brief historical overview of the properties and signalling characteristics of this important family of receptors.

Up-regulation of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor by the MAS Proto-oncogene Is Due to Constitutive Activation of Gq/G11 by MAS

Coexpression of the MAS proto-oncogene with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor in CHO-K1 cells has been reported to increase the number of [(3)H]angiotensin II-binding sites, although MAS does not bind [(3)H]angiotensin II. In HEK293 cells stably expressing AT(1) receptor-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), MAS-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) expression from an inducible locus caused strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts and [(3)H]angiotensin II binding levels. The time course of AT(1) receptor-CFP up-regulation was also markedly slower than that of induction of MAS expression. These effects were not mimicked by induced expression of I138D MAS-YFP, a mutant unable to cause constitutive loading of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) onto the phospholipase Cbeta-linked G protein Galpha(11). Protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors and the selective Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) inhibitor YM-254890 fully blocked MAS-induced up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts, whereas the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate produced strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP without induction of MAS-YFP expression and in the presence of I138D MAS-YFP. The C-terminal tail of the AT(1) receptor is a known target for PKC-mediated phosphorylation. In cells stably expressing a C-terminally truncated version of the AT receptor, induction of MAS expression did not up-regulate the truncated construct levels. These data demonstrate that the ability of MAS to up-regulate AT(1) receptor levels reflects the constitutive capacity of MAS to activate Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) and hence stimulate PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the AT(1) receptor.

Muscarinic receptor-mediated GTP-Eu binding in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex is correlated with spatial memory impairment in aged rats

The present study examined muscarinic receptor/G-protein coupling in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex of young and aged Long-Evans rats characterized for spatial learning ability in the Morris water maze. In a highly sensitive time-resolved fluorometry GTP-Eu binding assay, muscarinic-mediated GTP-Eu binding was severely blunted in hippocampus (-32%) and prefrontal cortex (-34%) as a consequence of aging. Furthermore, the magnitude of decreased muscarinic-mediated GTP-Eu binding was significantly correlated with the severity of spatial learning impairment in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of aged rats and was specifically decreased in the subset of aged rats that were spatial learning impaired when compared to the aged unimpaired and the young rats. Western blot data indicated a preservation of the membrane-bound M1 receptor and the Galphaq/11 protein in both brain regions. These data demonstrate that muscarinic signaling is severely impaired as a consequence of normal aging in a manner that is closely associated with age-related cognitive decline.

Bring your own G protein

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-Galpha fusion proteins were first characterized more than 10 years ago as a strategy for studying receptor-G protein signaling. A large number of studies have used this approach to characterize receptor coupling to members of the Gs, Gi, and Gq families of Galpha subunits, but this strategy has not been widely used to study Galpha12 and Galpha13. As described in the article by Zhang et al. in this issue of Molecular Pharmacology (p. 1433) characterization of the signaling properties of thromboxane A2 receptor (TPalpha) -Galpha12 and -Galpha13 fusion constructs demonstrates the applicability of this strategy to members of this unique family of Galpha subunits, and how this strategy can be used to resolve otherwise difficult problems of receptor pharmacology associated with these proteins. The general strategy of making receptor-Galpha fusion constructs has wide applicability to a number of research problems, but there are perhaps also "hidden messages" in how different receptor-Galpha subunit fusion pairs behave.

Functional interactions between the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are compromised by de-palmitoylation of the G protein but not of the receptor

Both the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are targets for post-translational thio-acylation that is regulated by agonist occupancy of the receptor [P.A. Stevens, J. Pediani, J.J. Carrillo, G. Milligan, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 35883]. In co-expression studies mutation of the sites of thio-acylation in the G protein or treatment of cell membranes with hydroxylamine greatly reduced agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. In alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins mutation of thio-acylation sites in receptor or G protein did not alter the binding affinity of the antagonist [3H]prazosin or the agonist phenylephrine. Although the potency of phenylephrine to stimulate binding of [35S]GTPgammaS to alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins was unaffected by the thio-acylation potential of either element, the maximal effect was reduced by some 50% when the G protein but not the receptor was mutated to prevent thio-acylation. This reflected lack of thio-acylation of the G protein rather than mutation of Cys9 and Cys10 to Ser because treatment with hydroxylamine mimicked this in fusions containing the wild type G protein but was without effect in those mutated to prevent thio-acylation. Mutation to reduce binding of beta/gamma to Galpha11 markedly reduced phenylephrine stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Combination of mutations to prevent thio-acylation and beta/gamma binding did not, however, have an additive effect on [35S]GTPgammaS binding. These results indicate that the thio-acylation status of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor does not regulate G protein activation whereas thio-acylation of Galpha11 plays a key role in activation by the receptor beyond providing membrane association and proximity.

Activation of an alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galphao1 fusion protein dynamically regulates the palmitoylation status of the G protein but not of the receptor

Post-translational thio-acylation of a fusion protein between the alpha2A-adrenoceptor and the alpha subunit of the G protein G(o1) is both dynamic and regulated by agonist binding. Incorporation of [3H]palmitate into the fusion protein was reduced substantially in the presence of the agonist adrenaline. This was dependent on the concentration of adrenaline and correlated with occupancy of the ligand binding site. Both the receptor and G-protein elements of the fusion construct incorporated [3H]palmitate but this occurred more rapidly for the G-protein element and regulation of acylation by the agonist occurred only for the G protein. The kinetics of de-palmitoylation of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor-Galpha(o1) fusion were accelerated markedly by agonist. Again, this reflected modulation of the G protein but not of the receptor. Agonist-induced regulation of the kinetics of thio-acylation of the G protein was abolished, however, in a mutant unable to bind guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTP[S]) in response to adrenaline. Despite the dynamic nature of the post-translational acylation and its regulation by agonist, the ability of adrenaline to activate the G protein, monitored by stimulation of the binding of [35S]GTP[S] to such fusion constructs, was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either the receptor or G-protein element.

Functional complementation and the analysis of opioid receptor homodimerization

Complementation of function after coexpression of pairs of nonfunctional G protein-coupled receptors that contain distinct inactivating mutations supports the hypothesis that such receptors exist as dimers. Chimeras between members of the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family have been particularly useful because the N-terminal ligand binding and heptahelical transmembrane elements can be considered distinct domains. To examine the utility of a related approach for opioid receptors, fusion proteins were generated in which a pertussis toxin-resistant (Cys351Ile) variant of the G protein Gi1alpha was linked to the C-terminal tails of the delta opioid peptide (DOP), kappa opioid peptide, and mu opioid peptide receptors. Each was functional as measured by agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-([gamma-35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in Gialpha immunoprecipitates from membranes of pertussis toxin-treated HEK293 cells. Agonist function was eliminated either by fusion of the receptors to Gi1alphaGly202Ala,Cys351Ile or mutation of a pair of conserved Val residues in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor. Coexpression, but not simple mixing, of the two inactive fusion proteins reconstituted agonist-loading of [35S]GTPgammaS for each receptor. At equimolar amounts, reconstitution of DOP receptor function was more extensive than kappa or mu opioid receptor. Reconstitution of DOP function required two intact receptors and was not achieved by provision of extra Gi1alphaCys351Ile membrane anchored by linkage to DOP transmembrane domain 1. Inactive forms of all G protein alpha subunits can be produced by mutations equivalent to Gi1alphaGly202Ala. Because the amino acids modified in the opioid receptors are highly conserved in most rhodopsin-like receptors, this approach should be widely applicable to study the existence and molecular basis of receptor dimerization.

Molecular mechanism underlying partial and full agonism mediated by the human cholecystokinin-1 receptor

The cholecystokinin-1 receptor (CCK1R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that regulates important physiological functions. As for other GPCRs, the molecular basis of full and partial agonism is still far from clearly understood. In the present report, using both laboratory experiments and molecular modeling approaches, we have investigated the partial agonism mechanism of JMV 180, on the human CCK1R. We first showed that efficacy of the CCK1R to activate phospholipase C is dependent on the correct orientation of the C-terminal end of peptidic ligands toward residue Phe(330) of helix VI. We have previously reported that a single mutation of Met(121) (helix III) markedly reduced the receptor-mediated inositol phosphate production upon stimulation by CCK. Computational simulations predicted that residue 121 affected orientation of the C-terminal end of CCK, thus suggesting that the molecular complex with a reduced inositol phosphate production observed with the mutated CCK1R resembles that resulting from binding of JMV 180 to the WT-CCK1R. Pharmacological, biochemical, and functional characterizations of the two receptor.ligand complexes with decreased abilities to signal were carried out in different cell types. We found that they presented the same features, such as total dependence of inositol phosphate production to Galpha(q) expression, single affinity of binding sites, insensitivity of binding to non-hydrolyzable GTP, absence of GTPgamma[S(35)] binding following agonist stimulation, similarity of dose-response curves for amylase secretion, and incapacity to induce acute pancreatitis in pancreatic acini. We concluded that helices VI and III of the CCK1R are functionally linked through the CCK1R agonist binding site and that positioning of the C-terminal ends of peptidic agonists toward Phe(330) of helix VI is responsible for extent of phospholipase C activation through Galpha(q) coupling. Given the potential therapeutic interest of partial agonists such as JMV 180, our structural data will serve for target structure-based design of new CCK1R ligands.

A single amino acid determines preference between phospholipids and reveals length restriction for activation of the S1P4 receptor

Background

Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are ligands for two related families of G protein-coupled receptors, the S1P and LPA receptors, respectively. The lysophospholipid ligands of these receptors are structurally similar, however recognition of these lipids by these receptors is highly selective. A single residue present within the third transmembrane domain (TM) of S1P receptors is thought to determine ligand selectivity; replacement of the naturally occurring glutamic acid with glutamine (present at this position in the LPA receptors) has previously been shown to be sufficient to change the specificity of S1P₁ from S1P to 18:1 LPA.

Results

We tested whether mutation of this "ligand selectivity" residue to glutamine could confer LPA-responsiveness to the related S1P receptor, S1P₄. This mutation severely affected the response of S1P₄ to S1P in a [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay, and imparted sensitivity to LPA species in the order 14:0 LPA > 16:0 LPA > 18:1 LPA. These results indicate a length restriction for activation of this receptor and demonstrate the utility of using LPA-responsive S1P receptor mutants to probe binding pocket length using readily available LPA species. Computational modelling of the interactions between these ligands and both wild type and mutant S1P₄ receptors showed excellent agreement with experimental data, therefore confirming the fundamental role of this residue in ligand recognition by S1P receptors.

Conclusions

Glutamic acid in the third transmembrane domain of the S1P receptors is a general selectivity switch regulating response to S1P over the closely related phospholipids, LPA. Mutation of this residue to glutamine confers LPA responsiveness with preference for short-chain species. The preference for short-chain LPA species indicates a length restriction different from the closely related S1P₁ receptor.

Regulation of alpha-1B adrenergic receptor localization, trafficking, function, and stability

The alpha-1 adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)ARs) play important roles in normal physiology and in many disease states, and understanding their signaling pathways and regulatory mechanisms is thus of considerable relevance, in particular for identifying pharmacological targets for therapeutic modulation. The expression, function, localization, trafficking, and stability of these receptors are all subject to complex regulation by diverse molecular mechanisms. This article highlights recent studies from our laboratory and others focused on the localization and trafficking of the alpha-1B adrenergic receptor (alpha(1B)AR) subtype and on changes in its stability that are likely to be involved in regulating receptor expression. The role(s) of protein kinase C in alpha(1B)AR sequestration, endocytosis, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation are summarized, and evidence for alpha(1B)AR localization in caveolae/rafts is presented. Receptor structural domains involved in the multiple steps and mechanisms of agonist-induced desensitization are described. Finally, aspects of alpha(1B)AR structural stability that appear to control its drug-induced up- and down-regulation are discussed. Our understanding of regulation for the alpha(1B)AR subtype provides a model for studies of the differential regulation of the other alpha(1)AR subtypes and may lead to identification of new molecular targets for therapeutic intervention in a variety of disease states.

The 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) receptor is stably palmitoylated, and acylation is critical for communication of receptor with Gi protein

In the present study, we verified that the mouse 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptor is modified by palmitic acid, which is covalently attached to the protein through a thioester-type bond. Palmitoylation efficiency was not modulated by receptor stimulation with agonists. Block of protein synthesis by cycloheximide resulted in a significant reduction of receptor acylation, suggesting that palmitoylation occurs early after synthesis of the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Furthermore, pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that fatty acids are stably attached to the receptor. Two conserved cysteine residues 417 and 420 located in the proximal C-terminal domain were identified as acylation sites by site-directed mutagenesis. To address the functional role of 5-HT(1A) receptor acylation, we have analyzed the ability of acylation-deficient mutants to interact with heterotrimeric G(i) protein and to modulate downstream effectors. Replacement of individual cysteine residues (417 or 420) resulted in a significantly reduced coupling of receptor with G(i) protein and impaired inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. When both palmitoylated cysteines were replaced, the communication of receptors with G alpha(i) subunits was completely abolished. Moreover, non-palmitoylated mutants were no longer able to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation, indicating that palmitoylation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor is critical for the enabling of G(i) protein coupling/effector signaling. The receptor-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase was also affected by acylation-deficient mutants, suggesting the importance of receptor palmitoylation for the signaling through the G beta gamma-mediated pathway, in addition to the G alpha(i)-mediated signaling.

Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.

Control of signalling efficacy by palmitoylation of the rat Y1 receptor

(1) We have investigated the properties of native and haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y(1) receptors after mutation of the palmitoylation site Cys(337) to Ser or Ala. (2) In Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing similar receptor levels, the C337A mutation abolished incorporation of [(3)H]palmitic acid into the HA-Y(1) receptor. (3) Cys(337) substitution did not alter the affinities of Y(1) receptor agonists or antagonists, but it eliminated the ability of guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) to displace [(125)I]PYY-specific binding (compared to approximately 50% inhibition in Y(1) or HA-Y(1) clones). (4) Stimulation of GTPgamma[(35)S] binding by native and HA-Y(1) receptors in standard incubation buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 micro M GDP) was prevented by Cys(337) mutation. In this assay, the function of Y(1)(C337S) receptors could be partially rescued by reducing the Na(+) concentration, and when overexpressed (B(max): approximately 10 pmol mg(-1)), both HA-Y(1) and HA-Y(1)(C337A) receptors displayed similar responses to NPY and peptide YY (PYY). (5) In stably transfected adenocarcinoma cells expressing Y(1) or Y(1)(C337S) receptors, PYY inhibited anion secretion stimulated by vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP; measured as short-circuit current, I(SC)) with similar potency (EC(50): 26-53 nM). In contrast to the transient Y(1) receptor-mediated responses observed at maximal PYY concentrations, I(SC) reductions in both Y(1)(C337S) clones were sustained. (6) We conclude that nonpalmitoylation of the Y(1) receptor reduces its coupling efficiency to G proteins, and may also indirectly influence desensitisation processes that depend on the formation of an active agonist-receptor conformation.

Concerted stimulation and deactivation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins by chimeric G protein-coupled receptor-regulator of G protein signaling 4 fusion proteins: analysis of the contribution of palmitoylated cysteine residues to the GAP activity of RGS4

Agonists stimulated high-affinity GTPase activity in membranes of HEK293 cells following coexpression of the alpha 2A-adrenoceptor and a pertussis toxin-resistant mutant of Go1 alpha. Enzyme kinetic analysis of Vmax and Km failed to detect regulation of the effect of agonist by a GTPase activating protein. This did occur, however, when cells were also transfected to express RGS4. Both elements of a fusion protein in which the N-terminus of RGS4 was linked to the C-terminal tail of the alpha 2A-adrenoceptor were functional, as it was able to provide concerted stimulation and deactivation of the G protein. By contrast, the alpha 2A-adrenoceptor-RGS4 fusion protein stimulated but did not enhance deactivation of a form of Go1 alpha that is resistant to the effects of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. Employing this model system, mutation of Asn128 but not Asn88 eliminated detectable GTPase activating protein activity of RGS4 against Go1 alpha. Mutation of all three cysteine residues that are sites of post-translational acylation in RGS4 also eliminated GTPase activating protein activity but this was not achieved by less concerted mutation of these sites. These studies demonstrate that a fusion protein between a G protein-coupled receptor and an RGS protein is fully functional in providing both enhanced guanine nucleotide exchange and GTP hydrolysis of a coexpressed G protein. They also provide a direct means to assess, in mammalian cells, the effects of mutation of the RGS protein on function in circumstances in which the spatial relationship and orientation of the RGS to its target G protein is defined and maintained.

Partial rescue of functional interactions of a nonpalmitoylated mutant of the G-protein G alpha s by fusion to the beta-adrenergic receptor

Most heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunits are posttranslationally modified by palmitoylation, a reversible process that is dynamically regulated. We analyzed the effects of Galpha(s) palmitoylation for its intracellular distribution and ability to couple to the beta-adrenergic receptor (betaAR) and stimulate adenylyl cyclase. Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy of stably transfected cyc(-) cells, which lack endogenous Galpha(s), showed that wild-type Galpha(s) was predominantly localized at the plasma membrane, but the mutant C3A-Galpha(s), which does not incorporate [(3)H]palmitate, was mostly associated with intracellular membranes. In agreement with this mislocalization, C3A-Galpha(s) showed neither isoproterenol- or GTPgammaS-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activation nor GTPgammaS-sensitive high-affinity agonist binding, all of which were present in the wild-type Galpha(s) expressing cells. Fusion of C3A-Galpha(s) with the betaAR [betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s)] partially rescued its ability to induce high-affinity agonist binding and to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity after isoproterenol or GTPgammaS treatment. In comparison to results with the WT-Galpha(s) and betaAR (betaAR-Galpha(s)) fusion protein, the betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s) fusion protein was about half as efficient at coupling to the receptor and effector. Chemical depalmitoylation by hydroxylamine of membranes expressing betaAR-Galpha(s) reduced the high-affinity agonist binding and adenylyl cyclase activation to a similar degree as that observed in betaAR-(C3A)Galpha(s) expressing membranes. Altogether, these findings indicate that palmitoylation ensured proper localization of Galpha(s) and facilitated bimolecular interactions of Galpha(s) with the betaAR and adenylyl cyclase.

G protein-coupled receptor overexpression with the baculovirus-insect cell system: a tool for structural and functional studies

G protein-coupled receptors, whose topology shows seven transmembrane domains, form the largest known family of receptors involved in higher organism signal transduction. These receptors are generally of low natural abundance and overexpression is usually a prerequisite to their structural or functional characterisation. The baculovirus-insect cell system constitutes a versatile tool for the maximal production of receptors. This heterologous expression system also provides interesting alternatives for receptor functional studies in a well-controlled cellular context.

Principles: extending the utility of [35S]GTP gamma S binding assays

Ligand regulation of the binding of [35S]GTPgammaS is one of the most widely used methods to measure receptor activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. However, until recently this method was largely restricted to receptors that interact with members of the family of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G proteins. Here, the reasons for this restriction are discussed and recent approaches that have extended the utility of this method such that it is now suitable for analysis of the activation of any heterotrimeric G protein are reviewed.

Regulation of the avidity of ternary complexes containing the human 5-HT(1A) receptor by mutation of a receptor contact site on the interacting G protein alpha subunit

1 Fusion proteins were constructed between the human 5-HT(1A) receptor and pertussis toxin-resistant forms of both G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha mutated at residue(351) from cysteine to either glycine or isoleucine. Each of these was expressed stably in HEK293 cells. 2 Increasing concentrations of GDP inhibited binding of the agonist [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT but not the antagonist [(3)H]-MPPF to each construct. 3 The IC(50) for GDP was greater for constructs containing isoleucine at residue(351) of the G proteins compared to those with glycine at this position. 4 The G protein antagonist suramin had similar effects to GDP on the binding of [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT. 5 The proportion of 5-HT(1A) receptor binding sites detected by [(3)H]-MPPF that displayed high affinity for 8-OH-DPAT was significantly greater when the interacting G protein contained isoleucine rather than glycine at residue(351). 6 The 5-HT(1A) receptor displayed similar avidity of interaction with G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha. 7 These results indicate that a higher avidity ternary complex is formed between 8-OH-DPAT, the 5-HT(1A) receptor and G proteins when isoleucine rather than glycine is located at residue(351) of the interacting G protein.

Measurement of agonist-dependent and -independent signal initiation of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor mutants by direct analysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on the G protein galpha(11)

Immunoprecipitation of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) following a [(35)S]GTPgammaS [guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate] binding assay resulted in incorporation of low levels of nucleotide. The agonist phenylephrine increased incorporation some 30-fold. Agonist-induced binding represented 1.0 mol of [(35)S]GTPgammaS/mol of fusion protein. This was to the G protein linked to the receptor rather than endogenous Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) as a fusion protein containing the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and a form of Galpha(11) (G(208)A) unable to exchange guanine nucleotides effectively, bound [(35)S]GTPgammaS very poorly. Fusion proteins between A(293)E, D(142)A, and 3CAM mutants of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) bound substantially greater levels of [(35)S]GTPgammaS in the absence of agonist than the fusion incorporating the wild-type receptor. Constitutive binding of the nucleotide induced by these mutants was only 20% of the level achieved by phenylephrine. These mutant receptors thus do not provide an accurate mimic of the agonist-occupied state. Phentolamine reduced the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS and acted as a partial inverse agonist for each of the constitutively active mutants. [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(11) was elevated by phenylephrine in both wild-type and constitutively active mutant forms of the fusion proteins, but agonist potency and binding affinity were 50 times higher for the fusions containing the mutated receptors. These studies provide the first direct demonstration of the capacity of constitutively active mutants of a receptor to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on the alpha subunit of a G(q) family G protein and defines a strategy potentially suitable for any receptor that couples to these G proteins.

Generation and analysis of constitutively active and physically destabilized mutants of the human beta(1)-adrenoceptor

Constitutive activity of wild-type and mutant forms of human beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors was measured by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assays using fusion proteins between these receptors and G(s)alpha. Constitutive activity of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor is enhanced by mutation of Leu(322). The ability of ligands to suppress receptor instability and produce up-regulation is often associated with constitutively active mutants. Leu(322)Lysbeta(1)-adrenoceptor, but not wild type, was up-regulated by exposure to the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective blocker betaxolol. More extensive sequence alterations of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor were generated to mimic the initially described constitutively active mutant (CAM) of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor that is up-regulated strongly by betaxolol. Substitution of amino acids 316 to 324 of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor with the equivalent alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor sequence did not result in up-regulation by betaxolol. However, these forms of both beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors displayed substantial and equivalent constitutive activity. The addition of the Leu(322)Lys mutation into the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor substituted beta(1)-adrenoceptor to produce the CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor allowed substantially greater levels of up-regulation by betaxolol without enhancement of constitutive [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Arg(156)Alabeta(1)-adrenoceptor was up-regulated strongly by betaxolol but displayed lower constitutive activity than did other mutants. Binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to all the fusion proteins was increased substantially by isoprenaline. Despite the ability of betaxolol to cause up-regulation of many mutants, only for the CAMbeta(2)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha and CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha fusion proteins was the basal binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS decreased by betaxolol. Clear resolution between receptor constitutive activity and ligand suppression of receptor instability can be obtained for mutant beta-adrenoceptors, and potential inverse agonists do not function equally at phenotypically apparently equivalent CAM receptors.

Effective information transfer from the alpha 1b-adrenoceptor to Galpha 11 requires both beta/gamma interactions and an aromatic group four amino acids from the C terminus of the G protein

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order Tyr > Phe > Trp > Ile > Ala = Gln = Arg > Ser > Asp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.

Agonists activate Gi1 alpha or Gi2 alpha fused to the human mu opioid receptor differently

As preferential coupling of opioid receptor to various inhibitory Galpha subunits is still under debate, we have investigated the selectivity of the human mu opioid receptor fused to a pertussis toxin insensitive C351I Gi1 alpha or C352I Gi2 alpha in stably transfected HEK 293 cells. Overall agonist binding affinities were increased for both fusion constructs when compared to the wild type receptor. [35 S]GTPgammaS binding was performed on pertussis toxin treated cells to monitor coupling efficiency of the fusion constructs. Upon agonist addition hMOR-C351I Gi1 a exhibited an activation profile similar to the non-fused receptor while hMOR-C352I Gi2 alpha was poorly activated. Interestingly no correlation could be drawn between agonist binding affinity and efficacy. Upon agonist addition, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, as measured using a reporter gene assay, was inhibited by signals transduced via the fused Gi1 alpha and Gi2 alpha mainly. In contrast both fusion constructs were able to initiate ERK-MAPK phosphorylation via coupling to endogenous G proteins only. In conclusion our data indicate that hMOR couples more efficiently to Gi1 alpha than Gi2 alpha and that the coupling efficacy is clearly agonist-dependent.

Enhanced detection of receptor constitutive activity in the presence of regulators of G protein signaling: applications to the detection and analysis of inverse agonists and low-efficacy partial agonists

Fusion proteins between the human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor and either wild type or certain pertussis toxin-resistant forms of G(o1)alpha and G(i1)alpha display constitutive GTPase activity that can be inhibited by the inverse agonist spiperone. Addition of recombinant regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 1 or RGS16 to membranes expressing these fusion proteins resulted in elevation of this constitutive GTPase activity without significantly altering the binding affinity of antagonist/inverse agonist ligands. For a 5-HT(1A) receptor-(Cys(351)Ile)G(o1)alpha fusion protein the increase in basal GTPase activity was greater than 4-fold. Enzyme kinetic analysis demonstrated that the effect of RGS1 was as a GTPase-activating protein for the fusion construct. In the presence of the RGS proteins, both agonists and inverse agonists produced much more robust regulation of high-affinity GTPase activity than in their absence. This allowed detection of the partial agonist nature of WAY100635, which has been described previously as a neutral antagonist at the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Of a range of ligands studied, only haloperidol functioned as a neutral ligand in the presence of RGS1. These studies show that addition of a recombinant RGS protein provides a simple and novel means to elevate the fraction of basal membrane GTPase activity contributed by the constitutive activity of a receptor. By so doing, it also greatly enhances the ability to detect and analyze the effects of inverse agonists and to discriminate between neutral ligands and those with low levels of positive intrinsic efficacy.

Co- and posttranslational modification of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor: effects on receptor expression and function

We have characterized the maturation, co- and posttranslational modifications, and functional properties of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (AR) expressed in different mammalian cells transfected using conventional approaches or the Semliki Forest virus system. We found that the alpha(1B)-AR undergoes N-linked glycosylation as demonstrated by its sensitivity to endoglycosidases and by the effect of tunicamycin on receptor maturation. Pulse-chase labeling experiments in BHK-21 cells demonstrate that the alpha(1B)-AR is synthesized as a 70 kDa core glycosylated precursor that is converted to the 90 kDa mature form of the receptor with a half-time of approximately 2 h. N-Linked glycosylation of the alpha(1B)-AR occurs at four asparagines on the N-terminus of the receptor. Mutations of the N-linked glycosylation sites did not have a significant effect on receptor function or expression. Surprisingly, receptor mutants lacking N-linked glycosylation migrated as heterogeneous bands in SDS-PAGE. Our findings demonstrate that N-linked glycosylation and phosphorylation, but not palmitoylation or O-linked glycosylation, contribute to the structural heterogeneity of the alpha(1B)-AR as it is observed in SDS-PAGE. The modifications found are similar in the different mammalian expression systems explored. Our findings indicate that the Semliki Forest virus system can provide large amounts of functional and fully glycosylated alpha(1B)-AR protein suitable for biochemical and structural studies. The results of this study contribute to elucidate the basic steps involved in the processing of G protein-coupled receptors as well as to optimize strategies for their overexpression.

The alpha1b-adrenergic receptor subtype: molecular properties and physiological implications

The aim of this review is to summarize some of the main findings from our laboratory as well as from others concerning the biochemical, molecular, and functional properties of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor. Experimental and computational mutagenesis of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor have been instrumental in elucidating some of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor activation and receptor coupling to Gq. The knockout mouse model lacking the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor has highlighted the potential implication of this receptor subtype in variety of functions including the regulation of blood pressure, glucose homeostasis, and the rewarding response to drugs of abuse.