The seven amino acids of human RAMP2 (86) and RAMP3 (59) are critical for agonist binding to human adrenomedullin receptors

A narrative review of the calcitonin peptide family and associated receptors as migraine targets: Calcitonin gene-related peptide and beyond

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the pharmacology of the calcitonin peptide family of receptors and explore their relationship to migraine and current migraine therapies.

BACKGROUND

Therapeutics that dampen calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are now in clinical use to prevent or treat migraine. However, CGRP belongs to a broader peptide family, including the peptides amylin and adrenomedullin. Receptors for this family are complex, displaying overlapping pharmacologic profiles. Despite the focus on CGRP and the CGRP receptor in migraine research, recent evidence implicates related peptides and receptors in migraine.

METHODS

This narrative review summarizes literature encompassing the current pharmacologic understanding of the calcitonin peptide family, and the evidence that links specific members of this family to migraine and migraine-like behaviors.

RESULTS

Recent work links amylin and adrenomedullin to migraine-like behavior in rodent models and migraine-like attacks in individuals with migraine. We collate novel information that suggests females may be more sensitive to amylin and CGRP in the context of migraine-like behaviors. We report that drugs designed to antagonize the canonical CGRP receptor also antagonize a second CGRP-responsive receptor and speculate as to whether this influences therapeutic efficacy. We also discuss the specificity of current drugs with regards to CGRP isoforms and how this may influence therapeutic profiles. Lastly, we emphasize that receptors related to, but distinct from, the canonical CGRP receptor may represent underappreciated and novel drug targets.

CONCLUSION

Multiple peptides within the calcitonin family have been linked to migraine. The current focus on CGRP and its canonical receptor may be obscuring pathways to further therapeutics. Drug discovery schemes that take a wider view of the receptor family may lead to the development of new anti-migraine drugs with favorable clinical profiles. We also propose that understanding these related peptides and receptors may improve our interpretation regarding the mechanism of action of current drugs.

Proteomic and metabolomic profiling of urine uncovers immune responses in patients with COVID-19

The utility of the urinary proteome in infectious diseases remains unclear. Here, we analyzed the proteome and metabolome of urine and serum samples from patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls. Our data show that urinary proteins effectively classify COVID-19 by severity. We detect 197 cytokines and their receptors in urine, but only 124 in serum using TMT-based proteomics. The decrease in urinary ESCRT complex proteins correlates with active SARS-CoV-2 replication. The downregulation of urinary CXCL14 in severe COVID-19 cases positively correlates with blood lymphocyte counts. Integrative multiomics analysis suggests that innate immune activation and inflammation triggered renal injuries in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19-associated modulation of the urinary proteome offers unique insights into the pathogenesis of this disease. This study demonstrates the added value of including the urinary proteome in a suite of multiomics analytes in evaluating the immune pathobiology and clinical course of COVID-19 and, potentially, other infectious diseases.

SPECT imaging of pulmonary vascular disease in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis using a vascular endothelium tracer

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) complicating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated to worse outcome. There is a great need for a non-invasive diagnostic modality to detect and evaluate the severity of pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). ^99mTc-PulmoBind is a novel imaging agent that binds to the adrenomedullin (AM) receptor on the pulmonary microvascular endothelium. SPECT imaging employing the endothelial cell tracer ^99mTc-PulmoBind was used to assess PVD associated with lung fibrosis.

Methods

Rats with selective right lung bleomycin-induced fibrosis were compared to control rats. SPECT imaging was performed after three weeks with ^99mTc-PulmoBind and ^99mTc-macroaggregates of albumin (MAA). PH and right ventricular (RV) function were assessed by echocardiography. Lung perfusion was evaluated by fluorescent microangiography. Lung AM receptor expression was measured by qPCR and by immunohistology. Relevance to human IPF was explored by measuring AM receptor expression in lung biopsies from IPF patients and healthy controls.

Results

The bleomycin group developed preferential right lung fibrosis with remodeling and reduced perfusion as assessed with fluorescent microangiography. These rats developed PH with RV hypertrophy and dysfunction. ^99mTc-PulmoBind uptake was selectively reduced by 50% in the right lung and associated with reduced AM receptor expression, PH and RV hypertrophy. AM receptor was co-expressed with the endothelial cell protein CD31 in alveolar capillaries, and markedly reduced after bleomycin. Quantitative dynamic analysis of ^99mTc-PulmoBind uptake in comparison to ^99mTc-MAA revealed that the latter distributed only according to flow, with about 60% increased left lung uptake while left lung uptake of ^99mTc-PulmoBind was not affected. Lung from human IPF patients showed important reduction in AM receptor expression closely associated with CD31.

Conclusions

SPECT imaging with ^99mTc-PulmoBind detects PVD and its severity in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Reduced AM receptor expression in human IPF supports further clinical development of this imaging approach.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01836-3.

Bacterial expression and purification of a heterodimeric adrenomedullin receptor extracellular domain complex using DsbC-assisted disulfide shuffling

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a peptide hormone that is a potent vasodilator and is essential for vascular development. The AM receptor is a heterodimeric cell surface receptor composed of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR), a class B G protein-coupled receptor, in association with either of two receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) coreceptors, RAMP2 or -3. The extracellular domains (ECDs) of CLR and the RAMPs form the primary AM binding site. Here, we present novel methodology for expression and purification of a heterodimeric AM receptor ECD complex as an MBP-CLR ECD fusion protein in association with the RAMP2 ECD. Co-expression of the RAMP2 ECD with the disulfide bond isomerase DsbC in the oxidizing cytoplasm of E. coli trxB gor enabled proper disulfide formation in vivo. The isolated RAMP2 ECD was purified to homogeneity. Co-expression of a soluble MBP-CLR ECD fusion protein with DsbC in E. coli trxB gor yielded a heterogeneous mixture of species with misfolded ECD. Incubation of affinity-purified MBP-CLR ECD in vitro with purified RAMP2 ECD, DsbC, and glutathione redox buffer promoted proper folding of the CLR ECD and formation of a stable MBP-CLR ECD:RAMP2 ECD complex that was purified by size-exclusion chromatography and which exhibited specific AM binding. Approximately 40mg of highly purified complex was obtained starting with 6L bacterial cultures for each protein. The methodology reported here will facilitate structure/function studies of the AM receptor.

Characterization of the single transmembrane domain of human receptor activity-modifying protein 3 in adrenomedullin receptor internalization

Two receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP2 and RAMP3) enable calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) to function as two heterodimeric receptors (CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3) for adrenomedullin (AM), a potent cardiovascular protective peptide. Following AM stimulation, both receptors undergo rapid internalization through a clathrin-dependent pathway, after which CLR/RAMP3, but not CLR/RAMP2, can be recycled to the cell surface for resensitization. However, human (h)RAMP3 mediates CLR internalization much less efficiently than does hRAMP2. Therefore, the molecular basis of the single transmembrane domain (TMD) and the intracellular domain of hRAMP3 during AM receptor internalization was investigated by transiently transfecting various RAMP chimeras and mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hCLR. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that substituting the RAMP3 TMD with that of RAMP2 markedly enhanced AM-induced internalization of CLR. However, this replacement did not enhance the cell surface expression of CLR, [(125)I]AM binding affinity or AM-induced cAMP response. More detailed analyses showed that substituting the Thr(130)-Val(131) sequence in the RAMP3 TMD with the corresponding sequence (Ile(157)-Pro(158)) from RAMP2 significantly enhanced AM-mediated CLR internalization. In contrast, substituting the RAMP3 target sequence with Ala(130)-Ala(131) did not significantly affect CLR internalization. Thus, the RAMP3 TMD participates in the negative regulation of CLR/RAMP3 internalization, and the aforementioned introduction of the Ile-Pro sequence into the RAMP3 TMD may be a strategy for promoting receptor internalization/resensitization.

Structural basis for extracellular interactions between calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein 2 for adrenomedullin-specific binding

The calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR), a class B GPCR, forms a heterodimer with receptor activity-modifying protein 2 (RAMP2), and serves as the adrenomedullin (AM) receptor to control neovascularization, while CRLR and RAMP1 form the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Here, we report the crystal structures of the RAMP2 extracellular domain alone and in the complex with the CRLR extracellular domain. The CRLR-RAMP2 complex exhibits several intermolecular interactions that were not observed in the previously reported CRLR-RAMP1 complex, and thus the shape of the putative ligand-binding pocket of CRLR-RAMP2 is distinct from that of CRLR-RAMP1. The CRLR-RAMP2 interactions were confirmed for the full-length proteins on the cell surface by site-specific photo-crosslinking. Mutagenesis revealed that AM binding requires RAMP2 residues that are not conserved in RAMP1. Therefore, the differences in both the shapes and the key residues of the binding pocket are essential for the ligand specificity.

Shared and separate functions of the RAMP-based adrenomedullin receptors

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a novel hypotensive peptide that exerts a variety of strongly protective effects against multiorgan damage. AM-specific receptors were first identified as heterodimers composed of calcitonin-receptor-like receptor (CLR), a G protein coupled receptor, and one of two receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP2 or RAMP3), which are accessory proteins containing a single transmembrane domain. RAMPs are required for the surface delivery of CLR and the determination of its phenotype. CLR/RAMP2 (AM₁ receptor) is more highly AM-specific than CLR/RAMP3 (AM₂ receptor). Although there have been no reports showing differences in intracellular signaling via the two AM receptors, in vitro studies have shed light on their distinct trafficking and functionality. In addition, the tissue distributions of RAMP2 and RAMP3 differ, and their gene expression is differentially altered under pathophysiological conditions, which is suggestive of the separate roles played by AM₁ and AM₂ receptors in vivo. Both AM and the AM₁ receptor, but not the AM₂ receptor, are crucial for the development of the fetal cardiovascular system and are able to effectively protect against various vascular diseases. However, AM₂ receptors reportedly play an important role in maintaining a normal body weight in old age and may be involved in immune function. In this review article, we focus on the shared and separate functions of the AM receptor subtypes and also discuss the potential for related drug discovery. In addition, we mention their possible function as receptors for AM2 (or intermedin), an AM-related peptide whose biological functions are similar to those of AM.

Protein kinase A-dependent neuronal nitric oxide synthase activation mediates the enhancement of baroreflex response by adrenomedullin in the nucleus tractus solitarii of rats

Background

Adrenomedullin (ADM) exerts its biological functions through the receptor-mediated enzymatic mechanisms that involve protein kinase A (PKA), or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS). We previously demonstrated that the receptor-mediated cAMP/PKA pathway involves in ADM-enhanced baroreceptor reflex (BRR) response. It remains unclear whether ADM may enhance BRR response via activation of nNOS-dependent mechanism in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS).

Methods

Intravenous injection of phenylephrine was administered to evoke the BRR before and at 10, 30, and 60 min after microinjection of the test agents into NTS of Sprague-Dawley rats. Western blotting analysis was used to measure the level and phosphorylation of proteins that involved in BRR-enhancing effects of ADM (0.2 pmol) in NTS. The colocalization of PKA and nNOS was examined by immunohistochemical staining and observed with a laser confocal microscope.

Results

We found that ADM-induced enhancement of BRR response was blunted by microinjection of NPLA or Rp-8-Br-cGMP, a selective inhibitor of nNOS or protein kinase G (PKG) respectively, into NTS. Western blot analysis further revealed that ADM induced an increase in the protein level of PKG-I which could be attenuated by co-microinjection with the ADM receptor antagonist ADM_22-52 or NPLA. Moreover, we observed an increase in phosphorylation at Ser1416 of nNOS at 10, 30, and 60 min after intra-NTS administration of ADM. As such, nNOS/PKG signaling may also account for the enhancing effect of ADM on BRR response. Interestingly, biochemical evidence further showed that ADM-induced increase of nNOS phosphorylation was prevented by co-microinjection with Rp-8-Br-cAMP, a PKA inhibitor. The possibility of PKA-dependent nNOS activation was substantiated by immunohistochemical demonstration of co-localization of PKA and nNOS in putative NTS neurons.

Conclusions

The novel finding of this study is that the signal transduction cascade that underlies the enhancement of BRR response by ADM in NTS is composed sequentially of cAMP/PKA and nNOS/PKG pathways.

Structure-function analysis of amino acid 74 of human RAMP1 and RAMP3 and its role in peptide interactions with adrenomedullin and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors

The receptors for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM) are complexes of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMP). The CGRP receptor is a CLR/RAMP1 pairing whereas CLR/RAMP2 and CLR/RAMP3 constitute two subtypes of AM receptor: AM(1) and AM(2), respectively. Previous studies identified Glu74 in RAMP3 to be important for AM binding and potency. To further understand the importance of this residue and its equivalent in RAMP1 (Trp74) we substituted the native amino acids with several others. In RAMP3, these were Trp, Phe, Tyr, Ala, Ser, Thr, Arg and Asn; in RAMP1, Glu, Phe, Tyr, Ala and Asn substitutions were made. The mutant RAMPs were co-expressed with CLR in Cos7 cells; receptor function in response to AM, AM(2)/intermedin and CGRP was measured in a cAMP assay and cell surface expression was determined by ELISA. Phe reduced AM potency in RAMP3 but had no effect in RAMP1. In contrast, Tyr had no effect in RAMP3 but enhanced AM potency in RAMP1. Most other substitutions had a small effect on AM potency in both receptors whereas there was little impact on CGRP or AM(2) potency. Overall, these data suggest that the geometry and charge of the residue at position 74 contribute to how AM interacts with the AM(2) and CGRP receptors and confirms the role of this position in dictating differential AM pharmacology at the AM(2) and CGRP receptors.

Function of the cytoplasmic tail of human calcitonin receptor-like receptor in complex with receptor activity-modifying protein 2

Receptor activity-modifying protein 2 (RAMP2) enables calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) to form an adrenomedullin (AM)-specific receptor. Here we investigated the function of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tail (C-tail) of human (h)CRLR by co-transfecting its C-terminal mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hRAMP2. Deleting the C-tail from CRLR disrupted AM-evoked cAMP production or receptor internalization, but did not affect [(125)I]AM binding. We found that CRLR residues 428-439 are required for AM-evoked cAMP production, though deleting this region had little effect on receptor internalization. Moreover, pretreatment with pertussis toxin (100ng/mL) led to significant increases in AM-induced cAMP production via wild-type CRLR/RAMP2 complexes. This effect was canceled by deleting CRLR residues 454-457, suggesting Gi couples to this region. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that CRLR truncation mutants lacking residues in the Ser/Thr-rich region extending from Ser(449) to Ser(467) were unable to undergo AM-induced receptor internalization and, in contrast to the effect on wild-type CRLR, overexpression of GPCR kinases-2, -3 and -4 failed to promote internalization of CRLR mutants lacking residues 449-467. Thus, the hCRLR C-tail is crucial for AM-evoked cAMP production and internalization of the CRLR/RAMP2, while the receptor internalization is dependent on the aforementioned GPCR kinases, but not Gs coupling.

Receptor activity modifying proteins and their potential as drug targets

The receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) are a family of membrane proteins that interact with some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate their function. RAMPs can alter GPCR pharmacology and can regulate their signaling as well as trafficking to and from the cell surface. GPCRs have been successfully exploited as drug targets for many years. RAMPs therefore provide a new avenue for drug development, offering opportunities for regulating the function of therapeutically relevant RAMP-interacting GPCRs. RAMPs could be directly targeted themselves or advantage could be taken of the unique RAMP/GPCR interfaces for generating more selective drugs.

Structure-function relationships of the N-terminus of receptor activity-modifying proteins

The receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) are a family of three single transmembrane proteins that have been identified as accessory proteins to some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They can regulate their pharmacology, forward trafficking and recycling, depending on the GPCR. The best characterized receptor complexes formed by RAMPs and GPCRs are the calcitonin peptide family receptors. The association of RAMP1 with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) constitutes the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, whereas RAMP2 or 3 with CL generates adrenomedullin receptors. In this case, the RAMPs substantially alter the pharmacology and trafficking properties of this GPCR. Amylin receptor subtypes are formed from calcitonin receptor (CTR) interactions with RAMPs. Although the RAMPs themselves are not responsive to calcitonin peptide family ligands, there is clear evidence that they participate in ligand binding, although it is still unclear whether this is by directly participating in binding or through allosteric modulation of CL or CTR. A considerable amount of mutagenesis data have now been generated on RAMPs to try and identify the residues that play a role in ligand interactions, and to also identify which residues in RAMPs interact with CL and CTR. This review will focus on RAMP mutagenesis studies with CL, summarizing and discussing the available data in association with current RAMP models and structures. The data reveal key regions in RAMPs that are important for ligand binding and receptor interactions.

Calcitonin receptor-stimulating peptide: Its evolutionary and functional relationship with calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide based on gene structure

This review focuses on the evolutionary and functional relationship of calcitonin receptor-stimulating peptide (CRSP) with calcitonin (CT)/calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in mammals. CRSP shows high sequence identity with CGRP, but distinct biological properties. CRSP genes (CRSPs) have been identified in mammals such as pigs and dogs of the Laurasiatheria, but not in primates and rodents of the Euarchontoglires or in non-placental mammals. CRSPs have genomic organizations highly similar to those of CT/CGRP genes (CT/CGRPs), which are located along with CGRPs in a locus between CYP2R1 and INSC, while the other members of the CGRP superfamily, adrenomedullin and amylin, show genomic organizations and locations distinct from CT, CGRP, and CRSP. Thus, we categorized these three peptides into the CT/CGRP/CRSP family. Non-placental mammals having one and placental mammals having multiple CT/CGRP/CRSP family genes suggests that multiplicity of CT/CGRP started at an early stage of mammalian evolution. In the placental mammals, Laurasiatheria generally possesses multiple CRSPs and only one CT/CGRP, while Euarchontoglires possesses CT/CGRP and CGRPbeta but no CRSP, indicating an increase in the diversity and multiplicity of this family of genes in mammalian evolution. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that some CRSPs have been generated very recently in mammalian evolution. Taken together, the increase in the number and complexity of the CT/CGRP/CRSP family genes may have due to evolutionary pressure to facilitate adaptation during mammalian evolution. In this regard, it is important to elucidate the physiological roles of CT, CGRP and CRSP from the viewpoint of the CT/CGRP/CRSP family even in Euarchontoglires.

Functions of the extracellular histidine residues of receptor activity-modifying proteins vary within adrenomedullin receptors

Receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)-2 and -3 chaperone calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) to the plasma membrane, where together they form heterodimeric adrenomedullin (AM) receptors. We investigated the contributions made by His residues situated in the RAMP extracellular domain to AM receptor trafficking and receptor signaling by co-expressing hCRLR and V5-tagged-hRAMP2 or -3 mutants in which a His residue was substituted with Ala in HEK-293 cells. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that hRAMP2-H71A mediated normal hCRLR surface delivery, but the resultant heterodimers showed significantly diminished [(125)I]AM binding and AM-evoked cAMP production. Expression of hRAMP2-H124A and -H127A impaired surface delivery of hCRLR, which impaired or abolishing AM binding and receptor signaling. Although hRAMP3-H97A mediated full surface delivery of hCRLR, the resultant heterodimers showed impaired AM binding and signaling. Other His residues appeared uninvolved in hCRLR-related functions. Thus, the His residues of hRAMP2 and -3 differentially govern AM receptor function.

Crystal structure of the human receptor activity-modifying protein 1 extracellular domain

Receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1 forms a heterodimer with calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and regulates its transport to the cell surface. The CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer functions as a specific receptor for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Here, we report the crystal structure of the human RAMP1 extracellular domain. The RAMP1 structure is a three-helix bundle that is stabilized by three disulfide bonds. The RAMP1 residues important for cell-surface expression of the CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer are clustered to form a hydrophobic patch on the molecular surface. The hydrophobic patch is located near the tryptophan residue essential for binding of the CGRP antagonist, BIBN4096BS. These results suggest that the hydrophobic patch participates in the interaction with CRLR and the formation of the ligand-binding pocket when it forms the CRLR.RAMP1 heterodimer.

Identification of N-terminal receptor activity-modifying protein residues important for calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin, and amylin receptor function

Calcitonin-family receptors comprise calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) or calcitonin receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) pairings. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors are CL/RAMP1, whereas adrenomedullin (AM) receptors are CL/RAMP2 (AM1 receptor) or CL/RAMP3 (AM2 receptor). Amylin (Amy) receptors are RAMP hetero-oligomers with the calcitonin receptor (AMY1, AMY2, and AMY3, respectively). How RAMPs change G protein-coupled receptor pharmacology is not fully understood. We exploited sequence differences between RAMP1 and RAMP3 to identify individual residues capable of altering receptor pharmacology. Alignment of human RAMPs revealed eight residues that are conserved in RAMP2 and RAMP3 but are different in RAMP1. We hypothesized that residues in RAMP2 and RAMP3, but not RAMP1, are responsible for making CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we introduced individual RAMP3 residues into RAMP1 and vice versa in these eight positions. Mutant or wild-type RAMPs were transfected into Cos7 cells with CL or the insert-negative form of the calcitonin receptor [CT(a)]. Agonist-stimulated cAMP production and cell-surface expression of constructs were measured. Position 74 in RAMP1 and RAMP3 was critical for determining AM potency and affinity, and Phe93 in RAMP1 was an important contributor to alphaCGRP potency at CGRP receptors. Mutant RAMP/CT(a) receptor complexes displayed different phenotypes. It is noteworthy that RAMP1 S103N and W74E mutations led to enhanced rAmy potency, probably related to increased cell-surface expression of these complexes. This differs from the effect on CL-based receptors where expression was unchanged. Targeted substitution has emphasized the importance of position 74 in RAMP1/RAMP3 as a key determinant of AM pharmacology.

Adrenomedullin enhances baroreceptor reflex response via cAMP/PKA signaling in nucleus tractus solitarii of rats

Adrenomedullin (ADM), a 52-amino acid peptide, elicits differential cardiovascular responses when it is administered systemically or directly to the brain. We evaluated in the present study the hypothesis that ADM may modulate baroreceptor reflex (BRR) response through an ADM receptor-mediated cAMP/ protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent mechanism in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS), the terminal site for primary baroreceptor afferents, using Sprague-Dawley rats. Our immunoblot and immunohistochemical results showed that the two component proteins of the ADM(1) receptor complex, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP)-2, were uniformly distributed and highly co-localized in the NTS. Site-specific microinjection of ADM (0.02-0.2pmol) unilaterally into the NTS significantly increased BRR response and sensitivity in a time- and dose-related manner, without affecting arterial pressure and heart rate. The BRR enhancing effect of ADM was also temporally correlated with an up-regulation of PKA(beta), the active form of PKA and an increase in PKA activity. In addition, the ADM-evoked BRR enhancement or PKA activation was abolished by co-microinjection with a selective ADM(1) receptor antagonist, ADM(22-52), an adenylyl cyclase inhibitor, SQ22536, or a PKA inhibitor, Rp-8-bromo-cAMP. These results suggest that ADM enhances BRR via activation of a cAMP/PKA-dependent mechanism by acting site-specifically on ADM(1) receptors in NTS.

Blood pressure is regulated by an alpha1D-adrenergic receptor/dystrophin signalosome

Hypertension is a cardiovascular disease associated with increased plasma catecholamines, overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system, and increased vascular tone and total peripheral resistance. A key regulator of sympathetic nervous system function is the alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptor (AR), which belongs to the adrenergic family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Endogenous catecholamines norepinephrine and epinephrine activate alpha(1D)-ARs on vascular smooth muscle to stimulate vasoconstriction, which increases total peripheral resistance and mean arterial pressure. Indeed, alpha(1D)-AR KO mice display a hypotensive phenotype and are resistant to salt-induced hypertension. Unfortunately, little information exists about how this important GPCR functions because of an inability to obtain functional expression in vitro. Here, we identified the dystrophin proteins, syntrophin, dystrobrevin, and utrophin as essential GPCR-interacting proteins for alpha(1D)-ARs. We found that dystrophins complex with alpha(1D)-AR both in vitro and in vivo to ensure proper functional expression. More importantly, we demonstrate that knock-out of multiple syntrophin isoforms results in the complete loss of alpha(1D)-AR function in mouse aortic smooth muscle cells and abrogation of alpha(1D)-AR-mediated increases in blood pressure. Our findings demonstrate that syntrophin and utrophin associate with alpha(1D)-ARs to create a functional signalosome, which is essential for alpha(1D)-AR regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure.

Dissection of functional residues in receptor activity-modifying proteins through phylogenetic and statistical analyses

Type I and type-II functional divergences have been stated to highlight specific residues carrying out differential functions in evolutionary-divergent protein clusters from a single common ancestor. Briefly, type I analysis is based on residue constraints reflecting a gain of function just in one cluster of an entire family of proteins; while the type-II approach is based on residue constraints showing a different chemical nature in every cluster of a protein family. This last evidence is understood as differential functionality among clusters. The Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins constitute a family characterized by its paralogous distribution in vertebrates. They are known as G-Protein Coupled Receptor modulators. Although several studies have determined their involvement in ligand binding, specificity, and enhancement of signal transduction, the responsible residues supporting those functions are unclear. Using different bioinformatic approaches, we predicted residues involved in different RAMP functional tasks. Many residues localized in an extracellular coil of RAMP proteins were predicted to be under functional divergence suggesting a gain of function in their respective proteins. Interestingly, the transmembrane region also showed important results for residues playing relevant roles where most of them showed a biased distribution on the structure. A relevant role was conferred by the enrichment of type-II residues observed in their sequences. We show a collection of residues explaining possible gain of function and differential functionality in RAMP proteins. These residues are still experimentally unexplored with regards to functionality. Finally, an evolutionary history could be discerned. Mainly, the RAMP2 cluster has evolved in a higher manner than other RAMP clusters. However, a deacceleration in the aminoacid substitution rate of RAMP2 was observed in mammals. Such effect could be caused by the co-evolution of ligands and receptors interacting with RAMP2 through evolution and/or the specialization of this cluster in GPCR modulation.

RAMPs: the past, present and future

The discovery of receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) as accessory proteins required for the appropriate localization and function of certain G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) produced a paradigm shift in our understanding of GPCR regulation. Three RAMPs have now been demonstrated to be crucial for various aspects of the life cycle of calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) including endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi translocation, internalization and recycling. Although the RAMP-CLR interaction was the first to be identified, other GPCRs belonging to both the class B and C families of GPCRs also seem to be regulated by RAMPs. The recent advances in our knowledge of the cellular and biochemical regulation of RAMPs and how they in turn regulate the life cycle of GPCRs could lead to therapeutic advances in several diseases.

A critical role for the short intracellular C terminus in receptor activity-modifying protein function

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) interact with and modify the behavior of the calcitonin receptor (CTR) and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). We have examined the contribution of the short intracellular C terminus, using constructs that delete the last eight amino acids of each RAMP. C-Terminal deletion of individual RAMPs had little effect on the signaling profile induced when complexed with CLR in COS-7 or human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells. Likewise, confocal microscopy revealed each of the mutant RAMPs translocated hemagglutinin-tagged CLR to the cell surface. In contrast, a pronounced effect of RAMP C-terminal truncation was seen for RAMP/CTRa complexes, studied in COS-7 cells, with significant attenuation of amylin receptor phenotype induction that was stronger for RAMP1 and -2 than RAMP3. The loss of amylin binding upon C-terminal deletion could be partially recovered with overexpression of Galpha(s), suggesting an impact of the RAMP C terminus on coupling of G proteins to the receptor complex. In HEK293 cells the c-Myc-RAMP1 C-terminal deletion mutant showed high receptor-independent cell surface expression; however, this construct showed low cell surface expression when expressed alone in COS-7 cells, indicating interaction of RAMPs with other cellular components via the C terminus. This mutant also had reduced cell surface expression when coexpressed with CTR. Thus, this study reveals important functionality of the RAMP C-terminal domain and identifies key differences in the role of the RAMP C terminus for CTR versus CLR-based receptors.

Characterization of the structure of RAMP1 by mutagenesis and molecular modeling

Receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) are a family of single-pass transmembrane proteins that dimerize with G-protein-coupled receptors. They may alter the ligand recognition properties of the receptors (particularly for the calcitonin receptor-like receptor, CLR). Very little structural information is available about RAMPs. Here, an ab initio model has been generated for the extracellular domain of RAMP1. The disulfide bond arrangement (Cys27-Cys82, Cys40-Cys72, and Cys57-Cys104) was determined by site-directed mutagenesis. The secondary structure (alpha-helices from residues 29-51, 60-80, and 87-100) was established from a consensus of predictive routines. Using these constraints, an assemblage of 25,000 structures was constructed and these were ranked using an all-atom statistical potential. The best 1000 conformations were energy minimized. The lowest scoring model was refined by molecular dynamics simulation. To validate our strategy, the same methods were applied to three proteins of known structure; PDB:1HP8, PDB:1V54 chain H (residues 21-85), and PDB:1T0P. When compared to the crystal structures, the models had root mean-square deviations of 3.8 A, 4.1 A, and 4.0 A, respectively. The model of RAMP1 suggested that Phe93, Tyr100, and Phe101 form a binding interface for CLR, whereas Trp74 and Phe92 may interact with ligands that bind to the CLR/RAMP1 heterodimer.

Distinct receptor activity-modifying protein domains differentially modulate interaction with calcitonin receptors

Calcitonin receptors (CTRs) dimerize with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) to generate high-affinity amylin (AMY) receptors; however, the relative contribution of individual RAMP domains to the formation of AMY receptors is poorly understood. We have used chimeras between RAMP1 and RAMP2 that specifically exchanged the N-terminal, transmembrane, or C-terminal domain and examined these in assays of [(125)I]amylin binding or peptide-induced cAMP signaling in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with wild-type or chimeric RAMPs and human CTRa. The specificity of peptides in competition for [(125)I]amylin binding was principally dictated by the N-terminal domain present in the chimeras; however, the maximal level of binding induced was dictated by the transmembrane domain present. This extended previous data (Zumpe et al., 2000) to provide a distinction between the transmembrane domain and the C terminus in this function. In contrast to the effects on binding, each of the RAMP domains played a role in the signaling phenotype of the receptors. In particular, the potency of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was most influenced by the C-terminal domain present, in which the presence of the RAMP1 C-terminal domain led to increased potency over CTRa alone, whereas chimeras with the RAMP2 C-terminal domain did not induce increased CGRP potency. The data provide additional support for the importance of the N terminus in determining binding affinity but reveal a prominent role of the transmembrane domain in the strength of amylin binding and a unique role for the C terminus in signaling by peptides to stimulate cAMP production.

Functions of the cytoplasmic tails of the human receptor activity-modifying protein components of calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) enable calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) to function as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CRLR/RAMP1) or an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor (CRLR/RAMP2 or -3). Here we investigated the functions of the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails (C-tails) of human RAMP1, -2, and -3 (hRAMP1, -2, and -3) by cotransfecting their C-terminal deletion or progressive truncation mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hCRLR. Deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP1 had little effect on the surface expression, function, or intracellular trafficking of the mutant heterodimers. By contrast, deletion of the C-tail from hRAMP2 disrupted transport of hCRLR to the cell surface, resulting in significant reductions in (125)I-hAM binding and evoked cAMP accumulation. The transfection efficiency for the hRAMP2 mutant was comparable with that for wild-type hRAMP2; moreover, immunocytochemical analysis showed that the mutant hRAMP2 remained within the endoplasmic reticulum. FACS analysis revealed that deleting the C-tail from hRAMP3 markedly enhances AM-evoked internalization of the mutant heterodimers, although there was no change in agonist affinity. Truncating the C-tails by removing the six C-terminal amino acids of hRAMP2 and -3 or exchanging their C-tails with one another had no effect on surface expression, agonist affinity, or internalization of hCRLR, which suggests that the highly conserved Ser-Lys sequence within hRAMP C-tails is involved in cellular trafficking of the two AM receptors. Notably, deleting the respective C-tails from hRAMPs had no effect on lysosomal sorting of hCRLR. Thus, the respective C-tails of hRAMP2 and -3 differentially affect hCRLR surface delivery and internalization.

GPCR modulation by RAMPs

Our conceptual understanding of the molecular architecture of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) has transformed over the last decade. Once considered as largely independent functional units (aside from their interaction with the G-protein itself), it is now clear that a single GPCR is but part of a multifaceted signaling complex, each component providing an additional layer of sophistication. Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) provide a notable example of proteins that interact with GPCRs to modify their function. They act as pharmacological switches, modifying GPCR pharmacology for a particular subset of receptors. However, there is accumulating evidence that these ubiquitous proteins have a broader role, regulating signaling and receptor trafficking. This article aims to provide the reader with a comprehensive appraisal of RAMP literature and perhaps some insight into the impact that their discovery has had on those who study GPCRs.

Parathyroid hormone induces receptor activity modifying protein-3 (RAMP3) expression primarily via 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling in osteoblasts

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) has significant anabolic and catabolic effects on bone. We hypothesize that PTH-induced primary response genes are important determinants of osteoblast function. PTH induces osteoblastic gene expression through PTHR1, a heptahelical receptor that triggers cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-protein kinase A (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and calcium signaling. By using representational difference analysis we found that receptor activity modifying protein-3 (RAMP3) is a PTH-induced primary response gene in osteoblastic cells. RAMP3 is a coactivator that directs calcitonin receptor (CTR) and CTR-like receptor (CRLR) glycosylation, trafficking, and ligand-binding specificity. Our purpose was to characterize PTH-induced RAMP3 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels in primary mouse osteoblasts (MOBs) and to determine which signaling pathway mediates this effect. 10 nM PTH maximally induced RAMP3 mRNA levels in MOBs at 4 hours. Protein synthesis inhibition with 3 microg/mL cycloheximide did not affect PTH-induced RAMP3 mRNA levels. Selective activation of cAMP-PKA signaling with, 10 microM forskolin (FSK) and PKC signaling with 1 microM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) significantly increased RAMP3 mRNA levels, whereas 1 microM ionomycin (a calcium ionophore) had no effect. Pretreatment with 30 microM H89, a PKA inhibitor, significantly blocked PTH- and FSK-induced RAMP3 mRNA levels. Pretreatment with 1 microM PMA, which depletes PKC, had no effect on PTH- and FSK-induced RAMP3 mRNA levels but blocked PMA-induced RAMP3 mRNA levels. 100 nM PTH (3-34), which activates PKC and calcium but not PKA, had no effect on RAMP3 mRNA levels. These findings indicate that RAMP3 is a PTH-induced primary response gene in primary MOBs and that PTH regulates RAMP3 gene expression primarily through the cAMP-PKA pathway.

Biodistribution, plasma kinetics and quantification of single-pass pulmonary clearance of adrenomedullin

The biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and multi-organ clearance of the vasodilator peptide AM (adrenomedullin) were evaluated in rats and its single-pass pulmonary clearance was measured in dogs by the indicator-dilution technique. Intravenously administered 125I-rAM(1–50) [rat AM(1–50)] was rapidly cleared following a two-compartment model with a very rapid distribution half-life of 2.0 min [95% CI (confidence interval), 1.98–2.01] and an elimination half-life of 15.9 min (95% CI, 15.0–16.9). The lungs retained most of the injected activity with evidence of single-pass clearance, since retention was lower after intra-arterial (13.5±0.6%) compared with intravenous (30.4±1.5%; P<0.001) injection. Lung tissue levels of total endogenous AM were 20-fold higher than in other organs with no difference in plasma levels across the pulmonary circulation. In dogs, there was 36.4±2.1% first-pass unidirectional extraction of 125I-rAM(1–50) by the lungs that was reduced to 21.9±2.4% after the administration of unlabelled rAM(1–50) (P<0.01). Extraction was not affected by calcitonin-gene-related peptide administration (40.6±2.9%), but was slightly reduced by the C-terminal fragment of human AM(22–52) (31.4±3.3%; P<0.01). These data demonstrate that the lungs are a primary site for AM clearance in vivo with approx. 36% first-pass extraction through specific receptors. This suggests that the lungs not only modulate circulating levels of this peptide, but also represent its primary target.

The clinical relevance of adrenomedullin: a promising profile?

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a peptide that possesses potentially beneficial properties. Since the initial discovery of the peptide by Kitamura et al. in 1993, the literature has been awash with reports describing its novel mechanisms of action and huge potential as a therapeutic target. Strong evidence now exists that AM is able to act as an autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine mediator in a number of biologically significant functions, including the endothelial regulation of blood pressure, protection against organ damage in sepsis or hypoxia, and the control of blood volume through the regulation of thirst. Its early promise as a potential mediator/modulator of disease was not, however, entirely as a result of the discovery of physiological functions but due more to the observation of increasing levels measured in plasma in direct correlation with disease progression. In health, AM circulates at low picomolar concentrations in plasma in 2 forms, a mature 52-amino acid peptide and an immature 53-amino acid peptide. Plasma levels of AM have now been shown to be increased in a number of pathological states, including congestive heart failure, sepsis, essential hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, and renal impairment. These earliest associations have been further supplemented with evidence of a role for AM in other pathologies including, most intriguingly, cancer. In this review, we offer a timely review of our current knowledge on AM and give a detailed account of the putative role of AM in those clinical areas in which the best therapeutic opportunities might exist.

Adrenomedullin receptors: pharmacological features and possible pathophysiological roles

Three receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) chaperone calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) to the cell surface. RAMP2 enables CLR to form an adrenomedullin (AM)-specific receptor that is sensitive to AM-(22-52) (AM(1) receptor). RAMP3 enables CLR to form an AM receptor sensitive to both calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(8-37) and AM-(22-52) (AM(2) receptor), though rat and mouse AM(2) receptors show a clear preference for CGRP alpha-(8-37) over AM-(22-52). RAMP1 enables CRL to form the CGRP-(8-37)-sensitive CGRP(1) receptor, which can also be activated by higher concentrations of AM. Here we review the available information on the pharmacological features and possible pathophysiological roles of the aforementioned AM receptors.

Heterodimers and family-B GPCRs: RAMPs, CGRP and adrenomedullin

RAMPs (receptor activity-modifying proteins) are single-pass transmembrane proteins that associate with certain family-B GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors). Specifically for the CT (calcitonin) receptor-like receptor and the CT receptor, this results in profound changes in ligand binding and receptor pharmacology, allowing the generation of six distinct receptors with preferences for CGRP (CT gene-related peptide), adrenomedullin, amylin and CT. There are three RAMPs: RAMP1–RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be the main determinant of receptor pharmacology, whereas the transmembrane domain contributes to association of the RAMP with the GPCR. The N-terminus of all members of the RAMP family probably contains two disulphide bonds; a potential third disulphide is found in RAMP1 and RAMP3. The N-terminus appears to be in close proximity to the ligand and plays a key role in its binding, either directly or indirectly. BIBN4096BS, a CGRP antagonist, targets RAMP1 and this gives the compound very high selectivity for the human CGRP1 receptor.

RAMP et récepteurs couplés aux protéines G

RAMPs (receptor activity-modifying proteins) were discovered in 1998 as accessory proteins needed to the functionnal activity of CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) receptors. Three RAMPs generated by three different genes are known in human, rat and mice. The coding sequences of such genes are described, but as yet, regulation sequences are unknown. RAMPs interact with GPCR (G protein-coupled receptors) of class II. In the case of the calcitonin/CGRP peptide family, RAMPs determine the functionnal specificity of the receptor, glycosylate and translocate the receptor to the cell surface. CGRP receptors are observed in presence of the RAMP1/calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR), but the association of RAMP2 or RAMP3 with CRLR generates an adrenomedullin receptor. The calcitonin receptor (CTR) is translocated alone to the cell surface, but interactions of RAMPs with CTR forms amylin receptors. If RAMPs can interact with glucagon, parathyroid hormone and VIP/PACAP (vasoactive intestinal peptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (VPACR1)) receptors, the functionnal specificity of these receptors remains unaltered. However, the complex VPACR1/RAMP2 enhances specifically the phosphoinoside signaling pathway.

RAMPs: 5 years on, where to now?

It is now approximately 5 years since the identification of the family of receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs). This finding revolutionized concepts of the pharmacology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and revealed that GPCR accessory proteins not only assist trafficking and folding but also define receptor type. Since the identification of RAMPs as modulators of the trafficking and properties of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor, much work has focused on improving our understanding of the nature of RAMP-GPCR dimers, the extent to which they occur, and the consequence of this association. In this article, we review recent developments, including the identification of new receptor partners and novel roles for RAMPs.

The receptor activity modifying protein family of G protein coupled receptor accessory proteins

Receptor diversity for the calcitonin peptide family is created by the interaction of two 7-transmembrane proteins--the calcitonin receptor (CTR) or the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL-R)--with the receptor activity modifying protein (RAMP) family. The discovery of heterodimeric complexes of these proteins heralded a new era in the study of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), whereby receptor phenotype is no longer governed by just the GPCR. In this article, recent advances in the study of RAMPs are discussed--from our current understanding of the molecular basis of RAMP-receptor interaction to a broader role for RAMPs outside the calcitonin receptor family.

The function of conserved cysteine residues in the extracellular domain of human receptor-activity-modifying protein

The receptor-activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1 is a single-transmembrane-domain protein associated with the calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) to reveal a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. The extracellular region of RAMP1 contains six conserved cysteines. Here, Cys(27) in myc-tagged human (h) RAMP1 was deleted (hRAMP1Delta1), and Cys(40), Cys(57), Cys(72), Cys(82) and Cys(104) were each replaced by Ala. In COS-7 cells expressing hCLR/myc-hRAMP1Delta1 or -C82A, cell surface expression, [(125)I]halphaCGRP binding and cAMP formation in response to halphaCGRP were similar to those of hCLR/myc-hRAMP1. Cell surface expression of myc-hRAMP1-C72A was reduced to 24+/-7% of myc-hRAMP1, and that of -C40A, -C57A and -C104A was below 10%. [(125)I]halphaCGRP binding of hCLR/myc-hRAMP1-C72A was 13+/-3% of hCLR/myc-hRAMP1 and it was undetectable in hCLR/myc-hRAMP1-C40A-, -C57A- and -C104A-expressing cells. Maximal cAMP stimulation by halphaCGRP in hCLR/myc-hRAMP1-C40A- and -C72A-expressing cells was 14+/-1% and 33+/-2% of that of the hCLR/myc-hRAMP1 with comparable EC(50). But cAMP stimulation was abolished in cells expressing hCLR/myc-hRAMP1-C57A and -C104A. In conclusion, CGRP receptor function was not affected by the deletion of Cys(27) or the substitution of Cys(82) by Ala in hRAMP1, but it was impaired by the substitution of Cys(40), Cys(57), Cys(72) and Cys(104) by Ala. These four cysteines are required for the transport of hRAMP1 together with the CLR to the cell surface.

Characterization of the Human Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Subtypes Associated with Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins

Coexpression of receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) with calcitonin receptor 2 (CTR2) or calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) leads to the formation of four functional heterodimeric receptors for human calcitonin gene-related peptide (hCGRP). In this study, we transfected hCGRP receptors into human embryonic kidney 293 cells and examined their pharmacological profiles using three dominant-negative (DN) RAMP mutants and various hCGRPalpha analogs. Fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis revealed that their cotransfection with CTR2 induced cell surface expression of all three RAMPs, and the three CTR2/RAMP heterodimers mediated equivalent levels of cAMP production in response to hCGRPalpha that were approximately 50-fold greater than were seen with CTR2 alone. By contrast, [Tyr0]hCGRPalpha binding and signaling were markedly weaker with CTR2/RAMP2 or -3 than with CTR2/RAMP1 or CRLR/RAMP1; likewise, 125I-[His10]hCGRPalpha bound most potently to CTR2/RAMP1. When CTR2 was coexpressed with DN RAMP1 or -2, hCGRPalpha-evoked responses were similar to those seen with CTR2 alone, despite the expression of both CTR2 and DN RAMP at the cell surface. But coexpression of DN RAMP3 with CTR2 significantly diminished hCGRPalpha signaling compared with that seen with CTR2 alone, indicating that DN RAMP3 is able to function as a negative regulator of CTR2 function. Competition experiments showed the relative agonist sensitivity of the four receptors to be hCGRPalpha > [Tyr0]hCGRPalpha > [Cys(Et)2,7]hCGRPalpha > [Cys(ACM)2,7]hCGRPalpha. Of the linear analogs, [Cys(ACM)2,7]hCGRPalpha (ACM, acetylmethoxy) enhanced cAMP formation only via CTR2/RAMP1, whereas [Cys(Et2,7)]hCGRPalpha acted via CRLR/RAMP1 and somewhat less potently via CTR2/RAMP1. Thus, among the three CGRP8-37-insensitive receptors, CTR2/RAMP1 is most sensitive to the two linear analogs, suggesting that it could be classified as a CGRP2 receptor. Moreover, the combined use of iodinated CGRPalpha analogs may be useful for defining the CGRP1 receptor.

CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 produce pharmacologically distinct adrenomedullin receptors: a comparison of effects of adrenomedullin22-52, CGRP8-37 and BIBN4096BS

Adrenomedullin (AM) has two known receptors formed by the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CL) and receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 2 or 3: we report the effects of the antagonist fragments of human AM and CGRP (AM22-52 and CGRP8-37) in inhibiting AM at human (h), rat (r) and mixed species CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 receptors transiently expressed in Cos 7 cells or endogenously expressed as rCL/rRAMP2 complexes by Rat 2 and L6 cells. AM22-52 (10 microM) antagonised AM at all CL/RAMP2 complexes (apparent pA2 values: 7.34+/-0.14 (hCL/hRAMP2), 7.28+/-0.06 (Rat 2), 7.00+/-0.05 (L6), 6.25+/-0.17 (rCL/hRAMP2)). CGRP8-37 (10 microM) resembled AM22-52 except on the rCL/hRAMP2 complex, where it did not antagonise AM (apparent pA2 values: 7.04+/-0.13 (hCL/hRAMP2), 6.72+/-0.06 (Rat2), 7.03+/-0.12 (L6)). On CL/RAMP3 receptors, 10 microM CGRP8-37 was an effective antagonist at all combinations (apparent pA2 values: 6.96+/-0.08 (hCL/hRAMP3), 6.18+/-0.18 (rCL/rRAMP3), 6.48+/-0.20 (rCL/hRAMP3)). However, 10 microM AM22-52 only antagonised AM at the hCL/hRAMP3 receptor (apparent pA2 6.73+/-0.14). BIBN4096BS (10 microM) did not antagonise AM at any of the receptors. Where investigated (all-rat and rat/human combinations), the agonist potency order on the CL/RAMP3 receptor was AM approximately betaCGRP>alphaCGRP. rRAMP3 showed three apparent polymorphisms, none of which altered its coding sequence. This study shows that on CL/RAMP complexes, AM22-52 has significant selectivity for the CL/RAMP2 combination over the CL/RAMP3 combination. On the mixed species receptor, CGRP8-37 showed the opposite selectivity. Thus, depending on the species, it is possible to discriminate pharmacologically between CL/RAMP2 and CL/RAMP3 AM receptors.

Secretory and vascular effects of adrenomedullin in gastric ulcer: role of CGRP- and adrenomedullin-receptors

Adrenomedullin prevents damage of gastric mucosa in either reserpine-treated or pylorus-ligated rats. Pre-treatment with CGRP(8-37) resulted in a decrease of the gastro-protective effect of adrenomedullin in both models and reversed the inhibitory effect of adrenomedullin on gastric acid output in the pylorus-ligated rats. These adrenomedullin actions were less effectively modified by pre-treatment with adrenomedullin(22-52). These data suggest that the anti-ulcer effect of adrenomedullin is mainly related to its anti-secretory action, presumably mediated through CGRP-receptors.

Identification of the human receptor activity-modifying protein 1 domains responsible for agonist binding specificity

When co-expressed with receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) can function as a receptor for both calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and adrenomedullin (AM). To investigate the structural determinants of ligand binding specificity, we examined the extracellular domain of human (h) RAMP1 using various deletion mutants. Co-expression of the hRAMP1 mutants with hCRLR in HEK-293 cells revealed that deletion of residues 91-94, 96-100, or 101-103 blocked [125I]CGRP binding and completely abolished intracellular cAMP accumulation normally elicited by CGRP or AM. On the other hand, the deletion of residues 78-80 or 88-90 significantly attenuated only AM-evoked responses. In all of these cases, the receptor heterodimers were fully expressed at the cell surface. Substituting alanine for residues 91-103 one at a time had little effect on CGRP-induced responses, indicating that although this segment is essential for high affinity agonist binding to the receptors, none of the residues directly interacts with either CGRP or AM. This finding suggests that RAMPs probably determine ligand specificity by contributing to the structure of the ligand-binding pocket or by allosteric modulation of the conformation of the receptor. Interestingly, the L94A mutant up-regulated surface expression of the receptor heterodimer to a greater degree than wild-type hRAMP1, thereby increasing CGRP binding and signaling. L94A also significantly increased cell surface expression of the hRAMP1 deletion mutant D101-103 when co-transfected with hCRLR, and expression of a L94A/D101-103 double mutant markedly attenuated the activity of endogenous RAMP1 in HEK-293T cells.

Expression of adrenomedullin and its receptor by chondrocyte phenotype cells

For clarifying a process of de-differentiation in culturing chondrocytes, the present study was undertaken to investigate the secretion of adrenomedullin (AM) by chondrocyte phenotype cells and whether or not AM effects this proliferation in a cAMP-dependent fashion. Chondrocyte phenotype cells expressed AM and the AM receptor, and secreted high concentration of AM into the culture medium. When added to cultures, AM increased the intracellular cAMP level and decreased the number of these cells in a similar concentration-dependent fashion. Addition of forskolin and dibutyryl-cAMP caused a significant decrease in the number of these cells. Furthermore, the effect of AM was inhibited by a cAMP-dependent protein kinase A inhibitor (H89). The present findings indicate that AM has an autocrine/paracrine type of anti-proliferative effect on these cells mediated via a cAMP-dependent pathway and raise the possibility that AM plays a role in the local modulation of a process of de-differentiation by culturing chondrocyte phenotype cells.

Specificity of porcine calcitonin receptor and calcitonin receptor-like receptor in the presence of receptor-activity-modifying proteins

Adrenomedullin (AM), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), amylin (AMY) and calcitonin (CT) are members of the CGRP/CT superfamily of peptides. Among them, AM and CGRP are reported to share a core receptor, the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR), and the specificity of the CRLR is determined by the expression levels of receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). In the case of AMY, co-expression of the calcitonin receptor (CTR) and RAMPs was recently reported to form its specific receptor. However, detailed analysis of the receptor specificity of the CRLR and CTR in the presence of RAMPs has so far been performed mainly in the human system. Thus, we cloned cDNAs encoding porcine CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 precursors from a porcine lung and hypothalamus cDNA library, and determined their sequences. Then, porcine RAMPs, CRLR and CTR were expressed in COS-7 or porcine vascular smooth muscle cells, and the resulting receptor complexes were analyzed by the cyclic adenosine 3,5-monophosphate (cAMP) production assay. The specificity of CRLR was clearly determined by the expression of RAMPs; RAMP1 converted CRLR to CGRP receptor, while RAMP2 and RAMP3 converted it to AM receptor, but the affinity of CTR for AMY was not increased by the expression of any known RAMPs. In contrast to previous findings, porcine CTR and RAMP did not appear to form an AMY receptor having sufficient affinity and specificity for the physiological interaction.

Adrenomedullin selectivity of calcitonin-like receptor/receptor activity modifying proteins

Co-expression of an initially orphan calcitonin receptor-like (CL)1 receptor with individual receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMP)1, -2 and -3 results in CL receptor/RAMP1, -2 and -3 proteins at the cell surface. The RAMP define the selectivity of the CL receptor for the vasodilatory peptides adrenomedullin (AM) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The selectivity for AM and CGRP agonists and antagonists of human, rat, porcine and bovine CL receptors, co-expressed with RAMP2 and -3, has been studied in different cell types. This revealed CL receptor/RAMP2 and CL receptor/RAMP3 as AM1 and AM2 receptor subtypes, respectively. The AM1 receptor crossreacts with CGRP at high and the AM2 receptor at lower concentrations. Here the pharmacological properties of the cloned AM receptors are compared to those revealed in tissues and cell lines. According to nomenclature recommendation of the IUPHAR (International Union of Pharmacology) subcommittee XXXII, the former CRLR is now the CL receptor (1).

The function of extracellular cysteines in the human adrenomedullin receptor

When co-expressed with receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 2, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) functions as an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor (CRLR/RAMP2). In the present study, we examined the function of the cysteine (C) residues in the extracellular loops of human (h)CRLR (C212, C225 and C282) and in the extracellular domain of hRAMP2 (C68, C84, C99 and C131). Using site-directed mutagenesis, the cysteine residues were substituted, one at a time, with alanine (A). Co-expression in HEK293 cells of hRAMP2 with the hCRLR C212A or C282A mutant significantly reduced the 50% of effective concentration (EC50) for AM-evoked cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production, despite full cell surface expression of the receptor heterodimer. Co-expression of the C225A mutant had no effect on [125I]AM binding or receptor signaling. These results suggest that the cysteine residues in the first (C212) and the second (C282) extracellular loops form a disulfide bond that is important for stabilizing the receptor in the correct conformation for ligand binding and activation. Cells expressing hCRLR with an hRAMP2 mutant (C68A, C84A, C99A or C131A) showed no specific AM binding or AM-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Though abundant in the intracellular compartment, these receptors were not detected at the cell surface, suggesting that all four cysteine residues are essential for efficient transport to the plasma membrane. Cysteine residues in the extracellular loops of hCRLR and in the extracellular domain of hRAMP2 thus appear to play distinct roles in the cell surface expression and function of the receptor heterodimer.

The transmembrane domain of receptor-activity-modifying protein 1 is essential for the functional expression of a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor

Three receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMP) define specific interactions between calcitonin (CT) gene-related peptide (CGRP), adrenomedullin (AM) and amylin, and a CT receptor or a CT receptor-like receptor (CRLR). Both form heterodimeric RAMP/receptor complexes at the cell surface. This association represents a novel principle of G protein-coupled receptor function. RAMP1 is transported to the cell surface together with the CRLR or the CT receptor. Here, we have investigated the functional relevance of the short C-terminal intracellular tail QSKRTEGIV and of the single transmembrane domain of human (h) RAMP1 for their interactions with the hCRLR to constitute a CGRP receptor. To this end, hRAMP1 has been sequentially truncated from the C-terminus, and [(125)I]h alpha CGRP/hRAMP1/hCRLR association at the cell surface and cAMP accumulation in response to h alpha CGRP have been examined. With the C-terminal truncation of hRAMP1 by four amino acids wild-type hRAMP1 function was maintained, and the hCRLR was required for the transport of hRAMP1 to the cell surface. Further truncation of hRAMP1 through removal of the remaining five intracellular amino acids revealed CRLR-independent cell surface delivery but otherwise normal hRAMP1 activity. Sequential shortening of the hRAMP1 transmembrane domain resulted in progressively impaired association with the hCRLR and, as a consequence, abolished CGRP receptor function. In conclusion, the intracellular QSKRT sequence adjacent to the transmembrane domain of hRAMP1 provides a signal for intracellular retention. The sequence is unrelated to consensus endoplasmic reticulum retention/retrieval motives and overridden by the presence of the hCRLR. The entire single transmembrane domain of hRAMP1 together with one hydrophilic amino acid residue at its C-terminus is required for the formation of a fully functional CGRP/hRAMP1/hCRLR receptor complex.

The calcitonin receptor-like receptor/receptor activity-modifying protein 1 heterodimer can function as a calcitonin gene-related peptide-(8-37)-sensitive adrenomedullin receptor

The receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)/calcitonin receptor-like (CRL) receptor heterodimer is thought to function as a receptor for either a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (CRL receptor/RAMP1) or adrenomedullin (CRL receptor/RAMP2 or -3), depending on the RAMP isoform present. We examined the receptor specificity of adrenomedullin-induced increases in cAMP in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells coexpressing human CRL receptor and human RAMP1 or RAMP2. In cells expressing CRL receptor/RAMP1, adrenomedulin-induced increases in cAMP were comparable to those induced by alpha-CGRP, and the CGRP receptor antagonist alpha-CGRP-(8-37), but not the adrenomedullin receptor antagonist adrenomedullin-(22-52), blocked the adrenomedullin-evoked responses. Cells expressing CRL receptor/RAMP2 responded more selectively to adrenomedullin; in this case, the effect was blocked by adrenomedullin-(22-52) but not by alpha-CGRP-(8-37). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed that cotransfection of CRL receptor and RAMP1 had no effect on the endogenous expression of RAMP2. Thus, CRL receptor/RAMP1 likely functions as an adrenomedullin receptor as well as a CGRP receptor, which may explain why many of the actions of adrenomedullin are potently antagonized by alpha-CGRP-(8-37).

Rat RAMP domains involved in adrenomedullin binding specificity

When coexpressed with receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)2 or -3, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) functions as an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor (CRLR/RAMP2 or -3). Coexpression of rat (r)CRLR with rRAMP deletion mutants in HEK293T cells revealed that deletion of residues 93-99 from rRAMP2 or residues 58-64 from rRAMP3 significantly inhibits high-affinity [125I]AM binding and AM-evoked cAMP production, despite full cell surface expression of the receptor heterodimer. Apparently, these two seven-residue segments are key determinants of high-affinity agonist binding to rAM receptors and of receptor functionality. Consequently, their deletion yields peptides that are able to serve as negative regulators of AM receptor function.