Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

Histamine induced high mobility group box-1 release from vascular endothelial cells through H1 receptor

Background

Systemic allergic reaction is characterized by vasodilation and vascular leakage, which causes a rapid, precipitous and sustained decrease in arterial blood pressure with a concomitant decrease of cardiac output. Histamine is a major mediator released by mast cells in allergic inflammation and response. It causes a cascade of inflammation and strongly increases vascular permeability within minutes through its four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) on endothelial cells. High mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), a nonhistone chromatin-binding nuclear protein, can be actively secreted into the extracellular space by endothelial cells. HMGB1 has been reported to exert pro-inflammatory effects on endothelial cells and to increase vascular endothelial permeability. However, the relationship between histamine and HMGB1-mediated signaling in vascular endothelial cells and the role of HMGB1 in anaphylactic-induced hypotension have never been studied.

Methods and results

EA.hy 926 cells were treated with different concentrations of histamine for the indicated periods. The results showed that histamine induced HMGB1 translocation and release from the endothelial cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. These effects of histamine were concentration-dependently inhibited by d-chlorpheniramine, a specific H₁ receptor antagonist, but not by H₂ or H_3/4 receptor antagonists. Moreover, an H₁-specific agonist, 2-pyridylethylamine, mimicked the effects of histamine, whereas an H₂-receptor agonist, 4-methylhistamine, did not. Adrenaline and noradrenaline, which are commonly used in the clinical treatment of anaphylactic shock, also inhibited the histamine-induced HMGB1 translocation in endothelial cells. We therefore established a rat model of allergic shock by i.v. injection of compound 48/80, a potent histamine-releasing agent. The plasma HMGB1 levels in compound 48/80-injected rats were higher than those in controls. Moreover, the treatment with anti-HMGB1 antibody successfully facilitated the recovery from compound 48/80-induced hypotension.

Conclusion

Histamine induces HMGB1 release from vascular endothelial cells solely through H₁ receptor stimulation. Anti-HMGB1 therapy may provide a novel treatment for life-threatening systemic anaphylaxis.

Histamine enhances ATP-induced itching and responsiveness to ATP in keratinocytes

Mechanical stimulation of cultured keratinocytes and a living epidermis increases intracellular calcium ion concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in stimulated cells. This action propagates a Ca2+ wave to neighboring keratinocytes via ATP/P2Y2 receptors. Recent behavioral, pharmacological studies revealed that exogenous ATP induces itching via P2X3 receptors in mice. We previously showed that alloknesis occurs when an external stimulus is applied to the skin with increased epidermal histamine in the absence of spontaneous pruritus. Based on these results, we investigated the effects of histamine at a concentration that does not cause itching on ATP-induced itching. The mean number of scratching events induced by the mixture of ATP and histamine increased by 28% over the sum of that induced by histamine alone or ATP alone. A317491, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, suppressed the mixture-induced scratching more often than the ATP-induced scratching. Next, we examined the ATP-induced [Ca2+]i change before and after histamine stimulation using normal human epidermal keratinocytes. Some cells did not respond to ATP before histamine stimulation but responded to ATP afterward, the phenomenon suppressed by chlorpheniramine maleate. These findings suggest that histamine enhances ATP-induced itching and that a potential mechanism could involve increased responsiveness to ATP in keratinocytes.

Deacetylation as a receptor-regulated direct activation switch for pannexin channels

Activation of Pannexin 1 (PANX1) ion channels causes release of intercellular signaling molecules in a variety of (patho)physiological contexts. PANX1 can be activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including α1-adrenergic receptors (α1-ARs), but how receptor engagement leads to channel opening remains unclear. Here, we show that GPCR-mediated PANX1 activation can occur via channel deacetylation. We find that α1-AR-mediated activation of PANX1 channels requires Gαq but is independent of phospholipase C or intracellular calcium. Instead, α1-AR-mediated PANX1 activation involves RhoA, mammalian diaphanous (mDia)-related formin, and a cytosolic lysine deacetylase activated by mDia - histone deacetylase 6. HDAC6 associates with PANX1 and activates PANX1 channels, even in excised membrane patches, suggesting direct deacetylation of PANX1. Substitution of basally-acetylated intracellular lysine residues identified on PANX1 by mass spectrometry either prevents HDAC6-mediated activation (K140/409Q) or renders the channels constitutively active (K140R). These data define a non-canonical RhoA-mDia-HDAC6 signaling pathway for GαqPCR activation of PANX1 channels and uncover lysine acetylation-deacetylation as an ion channel silencing-activation mechanism.

Multiple GPCR Functional Assays Based on Resonance Energy Transfer Sensors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the largest membrane protein families that participate in various physiological and pathological activities. Accumulating structural evidences have revealed how GPCR activation induces conformational changes to accommodate the downstream G protein or β-arrestin. Multiple GPCR functional assays have been developed based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) sensors to monitor the conformational changes in GPCRs, GPCR/G proteins, or GPCR/β-arrestin, especially over the past two decades. Here, we will summarize how these sensors have been optimized to increase the sensitivity and compatibility for application in different GPCR classes using various labeling strategies, meanwhile provide multiple solutions in functional assays for high-throughput drug screening.

Allosteric Modulators of G Protein-Coupled Dopamine and Serotonin Receptors: A New Class of Atypical Antipsychotics

Schizophrenia was first described by Emil Krapelin in the 19th century as one of the major mental illnesses causing disability worldwide. Since the introduction of chlorpromazine in 1952, strategies aimed at modifying the activity of dopamine receptors have played a major role for the treatment of schizophrenia. The introduction of atypical antipsychotics with clozapine broadened the range of potential targets for the treatment of this psychiatric disease, as they also modify the activity of the serotoninergic receptors. Interestingly, all marketed drugs for schizophrenia bind to the orthosteric binding pocket of the receptor as competitive antagonists or partial agonists. In recent years, a strong effort to develop allosteric modulators as potential therapeutic agents for schizophrenia was made, mainly for the several advantages in their use. In particular, the allosteric binding sites are topographically distinct from the orthosteric pockets, and thus drugs targeting these sites have a higher degree of receptor subunit specificity. Moreover, “pure” allosteric modulators maintain the temporal and spatial fidelity of native orthosteric ligand. Furthermore, allosteric modulators have a “ceiling effect”, and their modulatory effect is saturated above certain concentrations. In this review, we summarize the progresses made in the identification of allosteric drugs for dopamine and serotonin receptors, which could lead to a new generation of atypical antipsychotics with a better profile, especially in terms of reduced side effects.

Can distinctly different rapid estrogen actions share a common mechanistic step?

Contribution to Special Issue on Fast effects of steroids. This paper reviews early evidence for the existence of rapid, non-genomic effects of estrogens on neurons, and, further, proposes that these rapid effects are often synergistic with later, genomic effects. Finally, suggestions about potential molecular mechanisms underlying the rapid effects of estrogens are offered. A mechanistic step we propose to be common among rapid estrogenic actions includes membrane ER's binding to histamine, and NMDA receptors and subsequent dimerization, and clustering (respectively) in a manner that enhances histamine and NMDA actions.

The First Negative Allosteric Modulator for Dopamine D2 and D3 Receptors, SB269652 May Lead to a New Generation of Antipsychotic Drugs

D₂ and D₃ dopamine receptors belong to the largest family of cell surface proteins in eukaryotes, the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Considering their crucial physiologic functions and their relatively accessible cellular locations, GPCRs represent one of the most important classes of therapeutic targets. Until recently, the only strategy to develop drugs regulating GPCR activity was through the identification of compounds that directly acted on the orthosteric sites for endogenous ligands. However, many efforts have recently been made to identify small molecules that are able to interact with allosteric sites. These sites are less well-conserved, therefore allosteric ligands have greater selectivity on the specific receptor. Strikingly, the use of allosteric modulators can provide specific advantages, such as an increased selectivity for GPCR subunits and the ability to introduce specific beneficial therapeutic effects without disrupting the integrity of complex physiologically regulated networks. In 2010, our group unexpectedly found that N-[(1r,4r)-4-[2-(7-cyano-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolin-2-yl)ethyl]cyclohexyl]-1H-indole-2-carboxamide (SB269652), a compound supposed to interact with the orthosteric binding site of dopamine receptors, was actually a negative allosteric modulator of D₂- and D₃-receptor dimers, thus identifying the first allosteric small molecule acting on these important therapeutic targets. This review addresses the progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of interaction between the negative modulator SB269652 and D₂ and D₃ dopamine receptor monomers and dimers, and surveys the prospects for developing new dopamine receptor allosteric drugs with SB269652 as the leading compound.

Biosensor cell assay for measuring real-time aldosterone-induced release of histamine from mesenteric arteries

AIMS

The aims were to develop a method for real-time detection of histamine release and to test whether incubation with aldosterone induces histamine release from isolated, perfused mice mesenteric arteries.

METHODS

Fura-2-loaded HEK-293 cells transfected with the histamine H1 receptor was used as a sensitive biosensor assay for histamine release from isolated mouse mesenteric arteries. Activation of the H1 receptor by histamine was measured as an increased number of intracellular Ca²⁺ transient peaks using fluorescence imaging.

RESULTS

The developed biosensor was sensitive to histamine in physiological relevant concentrations and responded to substances released by the artery preparation. Aldosterone treatment of mesenteric arteries from wild-type mice for 50 min resulted in an increased number of intracellular Ca²⁺ transient peaks in the biosensor cells, which was significantly inhibited by the histamine H1 blocker pyrilamine. Mesenteric arteries from mast cell-deficient SASH mice induced similar pyrilamine-sensitive Ca²⁺ transient response in the biosensor cells. Mesenteric arteries from wild-type and SASH mice expressed histamine decarboxylase mRNA, indicating that mast cells are not the only source of histamine release.

CONCLUSION

The developed biosensor assay can measure release of substances from vascular preparations. Histamine is released from the vessel preparation in response to aldosterone treatment independently of mast cells. The assay enables us to study a new signaling mechanism for vascular responses induced by aldosterone.

G Protein-coupled Receptor Biased Agonism

G protein-coupled receptors are the largest family of targets for current therapeutics. The classic model of their activation was binary, where agonist binding induced an active conformation and subsequent downstream signaling. Subsequently, the revised concept of biased agonism emerged, where different ligands at the same G protein-coupled receptor selectively activate one downstream pathway versus another. Advances in understanding the mechanism of biased agonism have led to the development of novel ligands, which have the potential for improved therapeutic and safety profiles. In this review, we summarize the theory and most recent breakthroughs in understanding biased signaling, examine recent laboratory investigations concerning biased ligands across different organ systems, and discuss the promising clinical applications of biased agonism.

TASK Channels on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons Modulate Electrocortical Signatures of Arousal by Histamine

Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons are the main source of cortical acetylcholine, and their activation by histamine elicits cortical arousal. TWIK-like acid-sensitive K(+) (TASK) channels modulate neuronal excitability and are expressed on basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, but the role of TASK channels in the histamine-basal forebrain cholinergic arousal circuit is unknown. We first expressed TASK channel subunits and histamine Type 1 receptors in HEK cells. Application of histamine in vitro inhibited the acid-sensitive K(+) current, indicating a functionally coupled signaling mechanism. We then studied the role of TASK channels in modulating electrocortical activity in vivo using freely behaving wild-type (n = 12) and ChAT-Cre:TASK(f/f) mice (n = 12), the latter lacking TASK-1/3 channels on cholinergic neurons. TASK channel deletion on cholinergic neurons significantly altered endogenous electroencephalogram oscillations in multiple frequency bands. We then identified the effect of TASK channel deletion during microperfusion of histamine into the basal forebrain. In non-rapid eye movement sleep, TASK channel deletion on cholinergic neurons significantly attenuated the histamine-induced increase in 30-50 Hz activity, consistent with TASK channels contributing to histamine action on basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. In contrast, during active wakefulness, histamine significantly increased 30-50 Hz activity in ChAT-Cre:TASK(f/f) mice but not wild-type mice, showing that the histamine response depended upon the prevailing cortical arousal state. In summary, we identify TASK channel modulation in response to histamine receptor activation in vitro, as well as a role of TASK channels on cholinergic neurons in modulating endogenous oscillations in the electroencephalogram and the electrocortical response to histamine at the basal forebrain in vivo.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Attentive states and cognitive function are associated with the generation of γ EEG activity. Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons are important modulators of cortical arousal and γ activity, and in this study we investigated the mechanism by which these neurons are activated by the wake-active neurotransmitter histamine. We found that histamine inhibited a class of K(+) leak channels called TASK channels and that deletion of TASK channels selectively on cholinergic neurons modulated baseline EEG activity as well as histamine-induced changes in γ activity. By identifying a discrete brain circuit where TASK channels can influence γ activity, these results represent new knowledge that enhances our understanding of how subcortical arousal systems may contribute to the generation of attentive states.

Allosteric signaling through an mGlu2 and 5-HT2A heteromeric receptor complex and its potential contribution to schizophrenia

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form multiprotein complexes (heteromers), which can alter the pharmacology and functions of the constituent receptors. Previous findings demonstrated that the Gq/11-coupled serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and the Gi/o-coupled metabotropic glutamate 2 (mGlu2) receptor-GPCRs that are involved in signaling alterations associated with psychosis-assemble into a heteromeric complex in the mammalian brain. In single-cell experiments with various mutant versions of the mGlu2 receptor, we showed that stimulation of cells expressing mGlu2-5-HT2A heteromers with an mGlu2 agonist led to activation of Gq/11 proteins by the 5-HT2A receptors. For this crosstalk to occur, one of the mGlu2 subunits had to couple to Gi/o proteins, and we determined the relative location of the Gi/o-contacting subunit within the mGlu2 homodimer of the heteromeric complex. Additionally, mGlu2-dependent activation of Gq/11, but not Gi/o, was reduced in the frontal cortex of 5-HT2A knockout mice and was reduced in the frontal cortex of postmortem brains from schizophrenic patients. These findings offer structural insights into this important target in molecular psychiatry.

Novel dimensions of D3 receptor function: Focus on heterodimerisation, transactivation and allosteric modulation

The brain׳s complexity derives not only from the way the intricate network of neurons is wired, but also by protein complexes that recognize and decode chemical information. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the most abundant family of proteins mediating neurotransmission in the brain, and their ability to form homo- and heteromers which amplifies the scope for synaptic communication and fine-tuning. Dopamine receptors are important drug targets and members of both the D1/D5 and D2/D3/D4 receptor families form homo- and heteromers. The present article focuses on D3 receptor homo- and heteromers, in particular, those formed in association with their D2 counterparts. We highlight the binding profiles and mechanisms of interaction with D3-D3 homomers and D3-D2 heteromers of: first, the PET ligand and potent agonist [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO; second, the novel, bitopic/allosteric dopamine D3 receptor antagonist, SB269,652; and third, diverse partial agonists like antipsychotic and aripiprazole. Molecular mechanisms of interplay between the two protomers of heteromeric D3-D2 complexes are likewise discussed: for example, "transactivation", whereby recruitment of one member of a heteromer harnesses signalling pathways is normally coupled to the other protomer. Finally, D1 receptor heteromers are also taken into consideration in deciphering the nature of interfaces required to stabilize dimeric assemblies and permit their interaction with G proteins. Improved understanding of D3 as well as D2 and D1 receptor complexes should yield important insights into their physiological roles and pathological significance, and permit the development of novel drug classes with potentially distinctive functional profiles and improved therapeutic windows.

Transmembrane domains of attraction on the TSH receptor

The TSH receptor (TSHR) has the propensity to form dimers and oligomers. Our data using ectodomain-truncated TSHRs indicated that the predominant interfaces for oligomerization reside in the transmembrane (TM) domain. To map the potentially interacting residues, we first performed in silico studies of the TSHR transmembrane domain using a homology model and using Brownian dynamics (BD). The cluster of dimer conformations obtained from BD analysis indicated that TM1 made contact with TM4 and two residues in TM2 made contact with TM5. To confirm the proximity of these contact residues, we then generated cysteine mutants at all six contact residues predicted by the BD analysis and performed cysteine cross-linking studies. These results showed that the predicted helices in the protomer were indeed involved in proximity interactions. Furthermore, an alternative experimental approach, receptor truncation experiments and LH receptor sequence substitution experiments, identified TM1 harboring a major region involved in TSHR oligomerization, in agreement with the conclusion from the cross-linking studies. Point mutations of the predicted interacting residues did not yield a substantial decrease in oligomerization, unlike the truncation of the TM1, so we concluded that constitutive oligomerization must involve interfaces forming domains of attraction in a cooperative manner that is not dominated by interactions between specific residues.

Heterodimerization of mouse orexin type 2 receptor variants and the effects on signal transduction

Orexin-A and Orexin-B play important roles in many physiological processes in which Orexins orchestrate diverse downstream effects via two G-protein coupled receptors: Orexin1R and Orexin2R. Two alternative C-terminus splice variants of the mouse Orexin receptors mOX2alphaR and mOX2betaR have recently been identified. This study explored the possibility of heterodimerization between mOX2alphaR and mOX2betaR, and investigated novel signal transduction characteristics after stimulation. The dimerization of mOX2alphaR and mOX2betaR was confirmed by BRET and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Meanwhile, in HEK293 cells, co-expression of mOX2alphaR and mOX2betaR resulted in a strengthened increase in activation of ERK1/2, with maximal activation at 5 min and 100 nM. Furthermore, heterodimerization also elicits stronger intracellular Ca2+ elevation after Orexin(s) stimulation, followed by a slower decline in intracellular Ca2+ to a steady endpoint Protein Kinase C Inhibitor significantly inhibited these downstream effects. In addition, the cAMP response element reporter activities were significantly reduced, whereas the serum response element luciferase and the T-lymphocyte activation of nuclear factor-responsive element reporter activity were significantly up-regulated after Orexin(s) stimulation. Besides, Orexin-A/-B induced a significantly higher rate of HEK293 cell proliferation in cells co-expressing mOX2alphaR/mOX2betaR compared to the control group. Taken together, we provide conclusive evidence that mOX2alphaR can form a functional heterodimer with mOX2betaR and this leads to increased PKC and decreased protein kinase A activity by ERK signal pathway leading to a significant increase in cell proliferation. The nature of this signaling pathway has significant implications for the role of Orexin in the regulation of physiological processes including the homeostasis of feeding.

Emerging opportunities for allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors

Their ubiquitous nature, wide cellular distribution and versatile molecular recognition and signalling help make G-protein binding receptors (GPCRs) the most important class of membrane proteins in clinical medicine, accounting for ∼40% of all current therapeutics. A large percentage of current drugs target the endogenous ligand binding (orthosteric) site, which are structurally and evolutionarily conserved, particularly among members of the same GPCR subfamily. With the recent advances in GPCR X-ray crystallography, new opportunities for developing novel subtype selective drugs have emerged. Given the increasing recognition that the extracellular surface conformation changes in response to ligand binding, it is likely that all GPCRs possess an allosteric site(s) capable of regulating GPCR signalling. Allosteric sites are less structurally conserved than their corresponding orthosteric site and thus provide new opportunities for the development of more selective drugs. Constitutive oligomerisation (dimerisation) identified in many of the GPCRs investigated, adds another dimension to the structural and functional complexity of GPCRs. In this review, we compare 60 crystal structures of nine GPCR subtypes (rhodopsin, ß₂-AR, ß₁-AR, A(2a)-AR, CXCR4, D₃R, H₁R, M₂R, M₃R) across four subfamilies of Class A GPCRs, and discuss mechanisms involved in receptor activation and potential allosteric binding sites across the highly variable extracellular surface of these GPCRs. This analysis has identified a new extracellular salt bridge (ESB-2) that might be exploited in the design of allosteric modulators.

Pathophysiology of GPCR Homo- and Heterodimerization: Special Emphasis on Somatostatin Receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface proteins responsible for translating >80% of extracellular reception to intracellular signals. The extracellular information in the form of neurotransmitters, peptides, ions, odorants etc is converted to intracellular signals via a wide variety of effector molecules activating distinct downstream signaling pathways. All GPCRs share common structural features including an extracellular N-terminal, seven-transmembrane domains (TMs) linked by extracellular/intracellular loops and the C-terminal tail. Recent studies have shown that most GPCRs function as dimers (homo- and/or heterodimers) or even higher order of oligomers. Protein-protein interaction among GPCRs and other receptor proteins play a critical role in the modulation of receptor pharmacology and functions. Although ~50% of the current drugs available in the market target GPCRs, still many GPCRs remain unexplored as potential therapeutic targets, opening immense possibility to discover the role of GPCRs in pathophysiological conditions. This review explores the existing information and future possibilities of GPCRs as tools in clinical pharmacology and is specifically focused for the role of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in pathophysiology of diseases and as the potential candidate for drug discovery.

Functional homomers and heteromers of dopamine D2L and D3 receptors co-exist at the cell surface

Human dopamine D(2long) and D(3) receptors were modified by N-terminal addition of SNAP or CLIP forms of O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase plus a peptide epitope tag. Cells able to express each of these four constructs only upon addition of an antibiotic were established and used to confirm regulated and inducible control of expression, the specificity of SNAP and CLIP tag covalent labeling reagents, and based on homogenous time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, the presence of cell surface D(2long) and D(3) receptor homomers. Following constitutive expression of reciprocal constructs, potentially capable of forming and reporting the presence of cell surface D(2long)-D(3) heteromers, individual clones were assessed for levels of expression of the constitutively expressed protomer. This was unaffected by induction of the partner protomer and the level of expression of the partner required to generate detectable cell surface D(2long)-D(3) heteromers was defined. Such homomers and heteromers were found to co-exist and using a reconstitution of function approach both homomers and heteromers of D(2long) and D(3) receptors were shown to be functional, potentially via trans-activation of associated G protein. These studies demonstrate the ability of dopamine D(2long) and D(3) receptors to form both homomers and heteromers, and show that in cells expressing each subtype a complex mixture of homomers and heteromers co-exists at steady state. These data are of potential importance both to disorders in which D(2long) and D(3) receptors are implicated, like schizophrenia and Parkinson disease, and also to drugs exerting their actions via these sites.

Cleavage-resistant fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and Gα(i1). Homotropic and heterotropic effects in the binding of ligands

BACKGROUND

G protein-coupled receptors fused to a Gα-subunit are functionally similar to their unfused counterparts. They offer an intriguing view into the nature of the receptor-G protein complex, but their usefulness depends upon the stability of the fusion.

METHODS

Fusion proteins of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and the α-subunit of G(i1) were expressed in CHO and Sf9 cells, extracted in digitonin-cholate, and examined for their binding properties and their electrophoretic mobility on western blots.

RESULTS

Receptor fused to native α(i1) underwent proteolysis near the point of fusion to release a fragment with the mobility of α(i1). The cleavage was prevented by truncation of the α-subunit at position 18. Binding of the agonist oxotremorine-M to the stable fusion protein from Sf9 cells was biphasic, and guanylylimidodiphosphate promoted an apparent interconversion of sites from higher to lower affinity. With receptor from CHO cells, the apparent capacity for N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine was 60% of that for [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate; binding at saturating concentrations of the latter was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner at low concentrations of unlabeled N-methylscopolamine.

CONCLUSIONS

A stable fusion protein of the M(2) receptor and truncated α(i1) resembles the native receptor-G protein complex with respect to the guanyl nucleotide-sensitive binding of agonists and the noncompetitive binding of antagonists.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Release of the α-subunit is likely to occur with other such fusion proteins, rendering the data ambiguous or misleading. The properties of a chemically stable fusion protein support the notion that signaling proceeds via a stable multimeric complex of receptor and G protein.

Allostery at G protein-coupled receptor homo- and heteromers: uncharted pharmacological landscapes

For many years seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were thought to exist and function exclusively as monomeric units. However, evidence both from native cells and heterologous expression systems has demonstrated that GPCRs can both traffic and signal within higher-order complexes. As for other protein-protein interactions, conformational changes in one polypeptide, including those resulting from binding of pharmacological ligands, have the capacity to alter the conformation and therefore the response of the interacting protein(s), a process known as allosterism. For GPCRs, allosterism across homo- or heteromers, whether dimers or higher-order oligomers, represents an additional topographical landscape that must now be considered pharmacologically. Such effects may offer the opportunity for novel therapeutic approaches. Allosterism at GPCR heteromers is particularly exciting in that it offers additional scope to provide receptor subtype selectivity and tissue specificity as well as fine-tuning of receptor signal strength. Herein, we introduce the concept of allosterism at both GPCR homomers and heteromers and discuss the various questions that must be addressed before significant advances can be made in drug discovery at these GPCR complexes.

Trans-activation between 7TM domains: implication in heterodimeric GABAB receptor activation

Seven-transmembrane domain (7TM) receptors have important functions in cell-cell communication and can assemble into dimers or oligomers. Such complexes may allow specific functional cross-talk through trans-activation of interacting 7TMs, but this hypothesis requires further validation. Herein, we used the GABAB receptor, which is composed of two distinct subunits, GABAB1, which binds the agonist, and GABAB2, which activates G proteins, as a model system. By using a novel orthogonal-labelling approach compatible with time-resolved FRET and based on ACP- and SNAP-tag technologies to verify the heterodimerization of wild-type and mutated GABAB subunits, we demonstrate the existence of a direct allosteric coupling between the 7TMs of GABAB heterodimers. Indeed, a GABAB receptor, in which the GABAB2 extracellular domain was deleted, was still capable of activating G proteins. Furthermore, synthetic ligands for the GABAB2 7TM could increase agonist affinity at the GABAB1 subunit in this mutated receptor. In addition to bringing new information on GABAB receptor activation, these data clearly demonstrate the existence of direct trans-activation between the 7TM of two interacting proteins.

Hetero-dimerization of serotonin 5-HT(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors

In the present study, detailed information is presented on the hetero-dimerization of the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor and the dopamine D(2) receptor. Biophysical approaches (fluorescence spectroscopy as well as fluorescence lifetime microscopy) were used to determine the degree of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between cyan and yellow fluorescent protein labeled receptor variants co-expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK293). Recorded data demonstrate the existence of energy transfer between the wild-type forms of 5-HT(2A)R and D(2)R, pointing toward the formation of hetero-5-HT(2A)R/D(2)R dimers and homo-5-HT(2A)R/5-HT(2A)R dimers. Moreover, the present study investigates the role of specific motifs (one containing adjacent arginine residues (217RRRRKR222) in the third intracellular loop (ic3) of D(2)R, and the other consisting of acidic glutamate residues (454EE455) in the C-tail of (5-HT(2A)R) in the formation of noncovalent complexes between these receptors. Our results suggest that these regions of 5-HT(2A)R and D(2)R may be involved in the interaction between these two proteins. On the other hand, the above-mentioned motifs do not play an important role in the homo-dimerization of these receptors. Furthermore, we estimated the influence of specific receptor ligands on the dimerization processes. Agonists (DOI and quinpirole) and antagonists (ketanserin and butaclamol) cause different effects on FRET efficiency depending on whether homo- or hetero-complexes are present. These data may have therapeutic implications, since (using the immunofluorescence double labeling protocols) the co-localization of these two receptors was demonstrated in the medial prefrontal cortex and pars reticulate of the substantia nigra of the rat brain.

Heterodimerisation of G protein-coupled receptors: implications for drug design and ligand screening

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

In recent times many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to dimerise/oligomerise and, in some cases, such structural organization has been found to be essential for receptor function or to play a modulatory role in living cells. The fact that these complexes may display differential pharmacology through, for example, the formation of a new binding pocket or signalling properties, as well as different functions or regulation in physiological tissues, offers novel opportunities for drug discovery. As a consequence, it seems necessary to develop new approaches suitable for GPCR heterodimer identification and selective ligand screening.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review gives an overview of new strategies that have been developed in an effort to incorporate the possibilities added by GPCR hetero-oligomerisation on the screening of compounds as drug candidates.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a wider knowledge about how the current understanding of GPCR oligomeric structure and function has mandated that hetero-oligomeric receptors must be considered as novel targets in the identification of future lead compounds.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

For the improvement of novel drug discovery, more structural and functional information on the process of receptor oligomerisation is needed, and the realisation that the function of GPCRs can be greatly influenced by other interacting receptors or proteins also demands consideration in the lead-compound developing process in order to achieve better therapeutic agents.

Allosteric communication between protomers of dopamine class A GPCR dimers modulates activation

A major obstacle to understanding the functional importance of dimerization between Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been the methodological limitation in achieving control of the identity of the components comprising the signaling unit. We have developed a functional complementation assay that enables such control and illustrate it for the human dopamine D2 receptor. The minimal signaling unit, two receptors and a single G protein, is maximally activated by agonist binding to a single protomer, which suggests an asymmetrical activated dimer. Inverse agonist binding to the second protomer enhances signaling, whereas agonist binding to the second protomer blunts signaling. Ligand-independent constitutive activation of the second protomer also inhibits signaling. Thus, GPCR dimer function can be modulated by the activity state of the second protomer, which for a heterodimer may be altered in pathological states. Our novel methodology also makes possible the characterization of signaling from a defined heterodimer unit.

Functional importance of a structurally distinct homodimeric complex of the family B G protein-coupled secretin receptor

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors has been described, but its structural basis and functional importance have been inconsistent. Here, we demonstrate that the agonist occupied wild-type secretin receptor is predominantly in a guanine nucleotide-sensitive high-affinity state and exhibits negative cooperativity, whereas the monomeric receptor is primarily in a guanine nucleotide-insensitive lower affinity state. We previously demonstrated constitutive homodimerization of this receptor through the lipid-exposed face of transmembrane (TM) IV. We now use cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of 14 TM IV residues, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), and functional analysis to map spatial approximations and functional importance of specific residues in this complex. All, except for three helix-facing mutants, trafficked to the cell surface, where secretin was shown to bind and elicit cAMP production. Cells expressing complementary-tagged receptors were treated with cuprous phenanthroline to establish disulfide bonds between spatially approximated cysteines. BRET was measured as an indication of receptor oligomerization and was repeated after competitive disruption of oligomers with TM IV peptide to distinguish covalent from noncovalent associations. Although all constructs generated a significant BRET signal, this was disrupted by peptide in all except for single-site mutants replacing five residues with cysteine. Of these, covalent stabilization of receptor homodimers through positions of Gly(243), Ile(247), and Ala(250) resulted in a GTP-sensitive high-affinity state of the receptor, whereas the same procedure with Ala(246) and Phe(240) mutants resulted in a GTP-insensitive lower affinity state. We propose the existence of a functionally important, structurally specific high-affinity dimeric state of the secretin receptor, which may be typical of family B G protein-coupled receptors.

Brain receptor mosaics and their intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions: molecular integration in transmission and novel targets for drug development

The concept of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions and evidence for their existence was introduced by Agnati and Fuxe in 1980/81 suggesting the existence of heteromerization of receptors. In 1982, they proposed the existence of aggregates of multiple receptors in the plasma membrane and coined the term receptor mosaics (RM). In this way, cell signaling becomes a branched process beginning at the level of receptor recognition at the plasma membrane where receptors can directly modify the ligand recognition and signaling capacity of the receptors within a RM. Receptor-receptor interactions in RM are classified as operating either with classical cooperativity, when consisting of homomers or heteromers of similar receptor subtypes having the same transmitter, or non-classical cooperativity, when consisting of heteromers. It has been shown that information processing within a RM depends not only on its receptor composition, but also on the topology and the order of receptor activation determined by the concentrations of the ligands and the receptor properties. The general function of RM has also been demonstrated to depend on allosteric regulators (e.g., homocysteine) of the receptor subtypes present. RM as integrative nodes for receptor-receptor interactions in conjunction with membrane associated proteins may form horizontal molecular networks in the plasma membrane coordinating the activity of multiple effector systems modulating the excitability and gene expression of the cells. The key role of electrostatic epitope-epitope interactions will be discussed for the formation of the RM. These interactions probably represent a general molecular mechanism for receptor-receptor interactions and, without a doubt, indicate a role for phosphorylation-dephosphorylation events in these interactions. The novel therapeutic aspects given by the RMs will be discussed in the frame of molecular neurology and psychiatry and combined drug therapy appears as the future way to go.

Studies on the role of the receptor protein motifs possibly involved in electrostatic interactions on the dopamine D1 and D2 receptor oligomerization

We investigated the influence of an epitope from the third intracellular loop (ic3) of the dopamine D(2) receptor, which contains adjacent arginine residues (217RRRRKR222), and an acidic epitope from the C-terminus of the dopamine D(1) receptor (404EE405) on the receptors' localization and their interaction. We studied receptor dimer formation using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Receptor proteins were tagged with fluorescence proteins and expressed in HEK293 cells. The degree of D(1)-D(2) receptor heterodimerization strongly depended on the number of Arg residues replaced by Ala in the ic3 of D(2)R, which may suggest that the indicated region of ic3 in D(2)R might be involved in interactions between two dopamine receptors. In addition, the subcellular localization of these receptors in cells expressing both receptors D(1)-cyan fluorescent protein, D(2)-yellow fluorescent protein, and various mutants was examined by confocal microscopy. Genetic manipulations of the Arg-rich epitope induced alterations in the localization of the resulting receptor proteins, leading to the conclusion that this epitope is responsible for the cellular localization of the receptor. The lack of energy transfer between the genetic variants of yellow fluorescent protein-tagged D(2)R and cyan fluorescent protein-tagged D(1)R may result from differing localization of these proteins in the cell rather than from the possible role of the D(2)R basic domain in the mechanism of D(1)-D(2) receptor heterodimerization. However, we find that the acidic epitope from the C-terminus of the dopamine D(1) receptor is engaged in the heterodimerization process.

Selectivity and functional consequences of interactions of family A G protein-coupled receptors with neurochondrin and periplakin

A wide range of intracellular proteins have been demonstrated to interact with individual G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and, in certain cases, to modulate their function or trafficking. However, in only a few cases have the GPCR selectivity of such interactions been investigated. Interactions between the intracellular C-terminal tails of 44 GPCRs and both neurochondrin and periplakin were assessed in pull-down studies. 23 of these interacted with neurochondrin and periplakin, 10 interacted with neither whilst nine interacted with only neurochondrin and two with only periplakin. When appropriate GIP-interacting G(q)/G(11)-coupled GPCRs were expressed in cells inducibly expressing neurochondrin or periplakin this resulted in a reduction in the increase in intracellular [Ca(2+)] in response to agonist. However, induction of neurochondrin or periplakin was without functional consequences for GPCRs with which they did not interact. Unlike intracellular [Ca(2+)] signals, induction of expression of either interacting protein did not inhibit agonist-mediated ERK1/2 MAPK phosphorylation. These data indicate that both periplakin and neurochondrin can interact with a wide range of GPCRs and modulate function selectively. Details of the structure of the intracellular C-terminal tail of individual receptors will be required to fully understand the basis of such selectivity.

Facilitatory interplay in alpha 1a and beta 2 adrenoceptor function reveals a non-Gq signaling mode: implications for diversification of intracellular signal transduction

Agonist occupied alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (alpha(1)-ARs) engage several signaling pathways, including phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, calcium mobilization, arachidonic acid release, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation, and cAMP accumulation. The natural agonist norepinephrine (NE) activates with variable affinity and intrinsic efficacy all adrenoceptors, and in cells that coexpress alpha(1)- and beta-AR subtypes, such as cardiomyocytes, this leads to coactivation of multiple downstream pathways. This may result in pathway cross-talk with significant consequences to heart physiology and pathologic state. To dissect signaling components involved specifically in alpha(1A)- and beta(2)-AR signal interplay, we have developed a recombinant model system that mimics the levels of receptor expression observed in native cells. We followed intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization to monitor in real time the activation of both G(q) and G(s) pathways. We found that coactivation of alpha(1A)- and beta(2)-AR by the nonselective agonist NE or via a combination of the highly selective alpha(1A)-AR agonist A61603 and the beta-selective agonist isoproterenol led to increases in Ca(2+) influx from the extracellular compartment relative to stimulation with A61603 alone, with no effect on the associated transient release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores. This effect became more evident upon examination of an alpha(1A)-AR variant exhibiting a partial defect in coupling to G(q), and we attribute it to potentiation of a non G(q)-pathway, uncovered by application of a combination of xestospongin C, an endoplasmic reticulum inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor blocker, and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, a nonselective storeoperated Ca(2+) entry channel blocker. We also found that stimulation with A61603 of a second alpha(1A)-AR variant entirely unable to signal induced no Ca(2+) unless beta(2)-AR was concomitantly activated. These results may be accounted for by the presence of alpha(1A)/beta(2)-AR heterodimers or alternatively by specific adrenoceptor signal cross-talk resulting in distinct pharmacological behavior. Finally, our findings provide a new conceptual framework to rationalize outcomes from clinical studies targeting alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors.

CXCR2 chemokine receptor antagonism enhances DOP opioid receptor function via allosteric regulation of the CXCR2-DOP receptor heterodimer

Opioid agonists have a broad range of effects on cells of the immune system, including modulation of the inflammatory response, and opioid and chemokine receptors are co-expressed by many white cells. Hetero-oligomerization of the human DOP opioid and chemokine CXCR2 receptors could be detected following their co-expression by each of co-immunoprecipitation, three different resonance energy transfer techniques and the construction of pairs of individually inactive but potentially complementary receptor G-protein α subunit fusion proteins. Although DOP receptor agonists and a CXCR2 antagonist had no inherent affinity for the alternative receptor when either receptor was expressed individually, use of cells that expressed a DOP opioid receptor construct constitutively, and in which expression of a CXCR2 receptor construct could be regulated, demonstrated that the CXCR2 antagonist enhanced the function of DOP receptor agonists only in the presence of CXCR2. This effect was observed for both enkephalin- and alkaloid-based opioid agonists, and the effective concentrations of the CXCR2 antagonist reflected CXCR2 receptor occupancy. Entirely equivalent results were obtained in cells in which the native DOP opioid receptor was expressed constitutively and in which expression of the isolated CXCR2 receptor could be induced. These results indicate that a CXCR2 receptor antagonist can enhance the function of agonists at a receptor for which it has no inherent direct affinity by acting as an allosteric regulator of a receptor that is a heterodimer partner for the CXCR2 receptor. These results have novel and important implications for the development and use of small-molecule therapeutics.

G protein activation by the leukotriene B4 receptor dimer. Evidence for an absence of trans-activation

There is compelling evidence that G protein-coupled receptors exist as homo- and heterodimers, but the way these assemblies function at the molecular level remains unclear. We used here the purified leukotriene B(4) receptor BLT1 stabilized in its dimeric state to analyze how a receptor dimer activates G proteins. For this, we produced heterodimers between the wild-type BLT1 and a BLT1/ALXR chimera. The latter is no longer activated by leukotriene B(4) but is still activated by ALXR agonists. In this heterodimer, agonist binding to either one of the two protomers induced asymmetric conformational changes within the receptor dimer. Of importance, no G protein activation was observed when using a dimer where the ligand-loaded protomer was not able to trigger GDP/GTP exchange due to specific mutations in its third intracellular loop, establishing that the conformation of the agonist-free protomer is not competent for G protein activation. Taken together, these data indicate that although ligand binding to one protomer in the heterodimer is associated with cross-conformational changes, a trans-activation mechanism where the ligand-free subunit would trigger GDP/GTP exchange cannot be considered in this case for G protein activation. This observation sheds light into the way GPCR dimers, in particular heterodimers, could activate their cognate G proteins.

Hetero-oligomerization of the P2Y11 receptor with the P2Y1 receptor controls the internalization and ligand selectivity of the P2Y11 receptor

Nucleotides signal through purinergic receptors such as the P2 receptors, which are subdivided into the ionotropic P2X receptors and the metabotropic P2Y receptors. The diversity of functions within the purinergic receptor family is required for the tissue-specificity of nucleotide signalling. In the present study, hetero-oligomerization between two metabotropic P2Y receptor subtypes is established. These receptors, P2Y1 and P2Y11, were found to associate together when co-expressed in HEK293 cells. This association was detected by co-pull-down, immunoprecipitation and FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) experiments. We found a striking functional consequence of the interaction between the P2Y11 receptor and the P2Y1 receptor where this interaction promotes agonist-induced internalization of the P2Y11 receptor. This is remarkable because the P2Y11 receptor by itself is not able to undergo endocytosis. Co-internalization of these receptors was also seen in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells co-expressing both P2Y11 and P2Y1 receptors, upon stimulation with ATP or the P2Y1 receptor-specific agonist 2-MeS-ADP. 1321N1 astrocytoma cells do not express endogenous P2Y receptors. Moreover, in HEK293 cells, the P2Y11 receptor was found to functionally associate with endogenous P2Y1 receptors. Treatment of HEK293 cells with siRNA (small interfering RNA) directed against the P2Y1 receptor diminished the agonist-induced endocytosis of the heterologously expressed GFP-P2Y11 receptor. Pharmacological characteristics of the P2Y11 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells were determined by recording Ca2+ responses after nucleotide stimulation. This analysis revealed a ligand specificity which was different from the agonist profile established in cells expressing the P2Y11 receptor as the only metabotropic nucleotide receptor. Thus the hetero-oligomerization of the P2Y1 and P2Y11 receptors allows novel functions of the P2Y11 receptor in response to extracellular nucleotides.

Co-expression of mu and delta opioid receptors as receptor-G protein fusions enhances both mu and delta signalling via distinct mechanisms

Mu and delta opioid receptors (MORs and DORs) were co-expressed as fusion proteins between a receptor and a pertussis insensitive mutant Galpha(i/o) protein in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Signalling efficiency was then monitored following inactivation of endogenous Galpha(i/o) proteins by pertussis toxin. Co-expression resulted in increased delta opioid signalling which was insensitive to the mu specific antagonist d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2. Under these conditions, mu opioid signalling was also increased and insensitive to the delta specific antagonist Tic-deltorphin. In this latter case, however, no G protein activation was observed in the presence of the delta specific inverse agonist N,N(CH3)2-Dmt-Tic-NH2. When a MOR fused to a non-functional Galpha subunit was co-expressed with the DOR-Galpha protein fusion, delta opioid signalling was not affected whereas mu opioid signalling was restored. Altogether our results suggest that increased delta opioid signalling is due to enhanced DOR coupling to its tethered Galpha subunit. On the other hand, our data indicate that increased mu opioid signalling requires an active conformation of the DOR and also results in activation of the Galpha subunit fused the DOR.

Requirements and ontology for a G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization knowledge base

BACKGROUND

G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are a large and diverse family of membrane proteins whose members participate in the regulation of most cellular and physiological processes and therefore represent key pharmacological targets. Although several bioinformatics resources support research on GPCRs, most of these have been designed based on the traditional assumption that monomeric GPCRs constitute the functional receptor unit. The increase in the frequency and number of reports about GPCR dimerization/oligomerization and the implication of oligomerization in receptor function makes necessary the ability to store and access information about GPCR dimers/oligomers electronically.

RESULTS

We present here the requirements and ontology (the information scheme to describe oligomers and associated concepts and their relationships) for an information system that can manage the elements of information needed to describe comprehensively the phenomena of both homo- and hetero-oligomerization of GPCRs. The comprehensive information management scheme that we plan to use for the development of an intuitive and user-friendly GPCR-Oligomerization Knowledge Base (GPCR-OKB) is the result of a community dialog involving experimental and computational colleagues working on GPCRs.

CONCLUSION

Our long term goal is to disseminate to the scientific community organized, curated, and detailed information about GPCR dimerization/oligomerization and its related structural context. This information will be reported as close to the data as possible so the user can make his own judgment on the conclusions drawn for a particular study. The requirements and ontology described here will facilitate the development of future information systems for GPCR oligomers that contain both computational and experimental information about GPCR oligomerization. This information is freely accessible at http://www.gpcr-okb.org.

G protein-coupled receptor dimerisation: Molecular basis and relevance to function

The belief that G protein-coupled receptors exist and function as monomeric, non-interacting species has been largely supplanted in recent years by evidence, derived from a range of approaches, that indicate they can form dimers and/or higher-order oligomeric complexes. Key roles for receptor homo-dimerisation include effective quality control of protein folding prior to plasma membrane delivery and interactions with hetero-trimeric G proteins. Growing evidence has also indicated the potential for many co-expressed G protein-coupled receptors to form hetero-dimers/oligomers. The relevance of this to physiology and function is only beginning to be unravelled but may offer great potential for more selective therapeutic intervention.

Opsin oligomerization in a heterologous cell system

Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) we studied opsin oligomerization in heterologous expression systems and quantitatively assessed its oligomerization state. BRET2 saturation and competition experiments were performed with live COS-7 cells expressing Rluc-and GFP2-tagged receptor constructs. BRET2 saturation curves obtained were hyperbolic, and the calculated oligomerization state (N = 1 for dimers) suggested that opsin (N = 1.34 +/- 0.25) forms higher oligomers. Very high BRET2 values obtained for the opsin homo-dimer pair indicated a large energy transfer efficiency (E) and for cases where E >> 0.1 a modified saturation curve was proposed. The existence of homo-dimer complexes was additionally supported by competition assay results and was also observed in HEK-293 cells. Furthermore, evidence was provided for homo-and hetero-dimerization of family A (beta2-adrenergic) and B (gastric inhibitory polypeptide, GIP) receptors. In summary, these experiments demonstrate homo-and hetero-dimerization for opsin, beta 2-adrenergic, and GIP receptors.

Visual rhodopsin sees the light: structure and mechanism of G protein signaling

The availability of crystal structures for the dark, inactive, and several light-activated photointermediate states of vertebrate visual rhodopsin has provided important mechanistic and energetic insights into the transformations underlying agonist-dependent activation of this and other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The high natural abundance of rhodopsin in the vertebrate retina, together with its specific localization to the disk membranes of the rod cell, has also enabled direct imaging of rhodopsin in its native environment. These advances have provided compelling evidence that rhodopsin, like many other GPCRs, forms highly organized oligomeric structures that, in all likelihood, are important for receptor biosynthesis, optimal activation, and signaling.

G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin

The rhodopsin crystal structure provides a structural basis for understanding the function of this and other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The major structural motifs observed for rhodopsin are expected to carry over to other GPCRs, and the mechanism of transformation of the receptor from inactive to active forms is thus likely conserved. Moreover, the high expression level of rhodopsin in the retina, its specific localization in the internal disks of the photoreceptor structures [termed rod outer segments (ROS)], and the lack of other highly abundant membrane proteins allow rhodopsin to be examined in the native disk membranes by a number of methods. The results of these investigations provide evidence of the propensity of rhodopsin and, most likely, other GPCRs to dimerize, a property that may be pertinent to their function.

The role of GPCR dimerisation/oligomerisation in receptor signalling

A wide range of techniques have been employed to examine the quaternary structure of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although it is well established that homo-dimerisation is common, recent studies have sought to explore the physical basis of these interactions and the role of dimerisation in signal transduction. Growing evidence hints at the existence of higher-order organisation of individual GPCRs and the potential for hetero-dimerisation between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs. Here we consider how both homo-dimerisation/oligomerisation and hetero-dimerisation can regulate signal transduction through GPCRs and the potential consequences of this for function of therapeutic medicines that target GPCRs. Hetero-dimerisation is not the sole means by which co-expressed GPCRs may regulate the function of one another. Heterologous desensitisation may be at least as important and we also consider if this can be the basis for physiological antagonism between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs. Although there may be exceptions (Meyer et al. 2006), a great deal of recent evidence has indicated that most G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) do not exist as monomers but rather as dimers or, potentially, within higher-order oligomers (Milligan 2004b; Park et al. 2004). Support for such models has been provided by a range of studies employing different approaches, including co-immunoprecipitation of differentially epitope-tagged but co-expressed forms of the same GPCR, co-operativity in ligand binding and a variety of resonance energy transfer techniques (Milligan and Bouvier 2005). Only for the photon receptor rhodopsin has the organisational structure of a GPCR been studied in situ. The application of atomic force microscopy to murine rod outer segment discs indicated that rhodopsin is organised in a series of parallel arrays of dimers (Liang et al. 2003) and based on this, molecular models were constructed to try to define and interpret regions of contact between the monomers (Fotiadis et al. 2004). Only for relatively few other GPCRs are details of the molecular basis of dimerisation available but within this limited data set, recent studies on the dopamine D2 receptor suggest a means by which information on the binding of an agonist can be transmitted between the two elements of the dimer via the dimer interface (Guo et al. 2005). Although the availability of cDNAs encoding molecularly defined GPCRs has allowed high-throughput screening for ligands that modulate GPCR function, this is performed almost exclusively in heterologous cell lines transfected to express only the specific GPCR of interest. Given that the human genome contains some 400-450 genes encoding non-chemosensory GPCRs, it is clear that any individual cell of the body may express a considerable number of GPCRs. Interactions between these, either via hetero-dimerisation, via heterologous desensitisation or via the integration of downstream signals can potentially alter the pharmacology, sensitivity and function of receptor agonists and hence produce varied responses. In this article, we will use specific examples to consider the role of homo-dimerisation/oligomerisation in GPCR function and whether either direct hetero-dimerisation or heterologous desensitisation between pairs of co-expressed GPCRs affects the function of the receptor pairs.

Asymmetric conformational changes in a GPCR dimer controlled by G-proteins

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication. Although long considered as monomeric, it now appears that these heptahelical proteins can form homo- or heterodimers. Here, we analyzed the conformational changes in each subunit of a receptor dimer resulting from agonist binding to either one or both subunits by measuring the fluorescent properties of a leukotriene B(4) receptor dimer with a single 5-hydroxytryptophan-labeled protomer. We show that a receptor dimer with only a single agonist-occupied subunit can trigger G-protein activation. We also show that the two subunits of the receptor dimer in the G-protein-coupled state differ in their conformation, even when both are liganded by the agonist. No such asymmetric conformational changes are observed in the absence of G-protein, indicating that the interaction of the G-protein with the receptor dimer brings specific constraints that prevent a symmetric functioning of this dimer. These data open new options for the differential signaling properties of GPCR dimers.

Oligomeric structure of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor: comparisons with rhodopsin

The structural basis of the quaternary organization of rhodopsin has recently been explored and modeled. Because information obtained from studying rhodopsin has frequently been directly applicable to other G protein-coupled receptors we wished to ascertain if dimeric and/or oligomeric forms of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor could be observed and if so whether rhodopsin might provide insights into the quaternary structure of this receptor. Co-immunoprecipitation and both conventional and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrated quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and, in concert with the reconstitution of fragments of this receptor, provided information on the molecular basis of these interactions. Development of three color fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) allowed the imaging of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor oligomers in single living cells. Mutation of hydrophobic residues in transmembrane domains I and IV of the receptor resulted in marked reduction in three color FRET suggesting an alteration in oligomeric organization and potential similarities with rhodopsin. The mutated alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor was unable to reach the cell surface, did not become terminally N-glycosylated and was unable to signal.